Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/12/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 31st, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen shot from A Haber TV, news channel from Turkey. Its copyright. Mavrikant (talk) 01:37, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Löscht bitte alle meine Bilder und meinen Account.Mein Arbeitgeber weiss von den Bildern und möchte das ich sie lösche,was ich aber nicht kann,Danke Hardo Brinkmann 08:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)


Request merged to larger DR at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Expert19612005. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ealltech11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:34, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ealltech11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted image, not "own work", see for instance http://i.imgur.com/mOfRES3.jpg and https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/1d/69/3f/1d693fb80d95c2dec9b472d482546537.jpg

Ies (talk) 09:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WapDogg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 08:38, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Chrispberner Gunnex (talk) 09:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a personal photograph. It is not in use at any user page and thus out of scope for Commons. Whpq (talk) 15:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Also from FB. Yann (talk) 15:35, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. Source information given is unclear. The image is widely spread across the internet, and the uploader has a history of copyright issues. Whpq (talk) 15:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/--5strNBqkHQ/UtbCAv0CydI/AAAAAAAAAls/ut0CGttXNmE/s1600/Teja_ji_maharaj.jpg Yann (talk) 15:35, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Michał Kucharski (talk) 10:34, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User request. Yann (talk) 17:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Phuthuong Gunnex (talk) 21:56, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 00:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test file for AjaxQuickDelete.js test MaGa 19:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Test, DR by uploader. --Achim (talk) 09:51, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test MediaWiki:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete.js/hr.js -MaGa 19:37, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty cat, DR by author. --Achim (talk) 09:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Background image is not free of copyright, see here for original image. This is a Derivative work, a mash-up of background plus dinosaur image, and as such cannot be hosted here on Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In this case I'm agree with the deletion. Please do. The uploader, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:54, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this picture is not his own work but taken from the website: http://www.telegraaf.nl/telesport/darts/24583329/__Jelle_Klaasen_troeft_Chisnall_af__.html Ricodol74 (talk) 18:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely from here: http://www.billboard.com/artist/5769898/dove-cameron/biography Ytoyoda (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Achim (talk) 10:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: On multiple websites, some dated to before upload and not credited to the uploader I cant find the source. Yann (talk) 07:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For example, [1] on a celebrity-images filesharing site is marked 26 January 2015, compared to the commons upload and uploader's claimed creation of 27 October 2015. DMacks (talk) 20:37, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is live display from Commons. Yann (talk) 20:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting site! Will have to remember that detail. Here it is on her own facebook page dated August 7, 2015 uploaded by herself. DMacks (talk) 04:48, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: From FB, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader didn't provide a real source of rights from the photo. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 17:06, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Originally from the WWE instagram page per https://www.instagram.com/p/768IRVr6DO/ Tabercil (talk) 15:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems copyrighted by vanderkrogt.net Paulbe (talk) 17:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is published on http://www.vanderkrogt.net/standbeelden/object.php?record=OV24al , with the notice: "© Website en Foto's: René & Peter van der Krogt". --Paulbe (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:14, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Somada (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 07:45, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (c) vios Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Somada (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Unused personal files or files of non-notable people as the subject.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:11, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Somada (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, user blocked for copyvios, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 14:36, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Somada (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:02, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Somada (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Cape Verde.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 18:03, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I took the picture with my own camera on my property of a car I owned. What do I need to do? This is the first time it has been shown anywhere. I ran the photo through a thumb nail program to reduce the file size as I took it on hi res setting. Maybe this changed the exif? (427Freak (talk) 07:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Just to let you know, I did run the photo through a thumb nail program to reduce the size. If that helps you. I took this photo at my building with permission. It is owned by me. I can send you the orig file, it is high res, just so you can inspect it. The orange 69 being used prior was not even a real Yenko car. I just wrote an article on 68 Yenko Camaro's for an upcoming book, I have collected Camaro's for over 30 years and I am a automobile appraiser. Dana — Preceding unsigned comment added by 427Freak (talk • contribs) 07:38, 01 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@427Freak: Hi,
You uploaded File:Yenko68mcacn.jpg and File:Yenkomcacn.jpg copied from the Internet, so that's why your claim is questioned. Could you upload the original picture with EXIF? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Yann, you are right about the first 2 photos and I realized it immediately and took them down. That is why I replaced them with a photo of my own. I apologize. I will upload the orig photo. It is in the camera at work so I will do as soon as I go back. Thank you. (427Freak (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Uploaded picture with EXIF from my own camera. Should be good now. Thanks. Dana (427Freak (talk) 04:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC))[reply]


Kept: User has pictures of the same car with EXIF. Looks OK. Yann (talk) 09:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Vio Dr-Taher (talk) 17:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 00:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Olavo, Miguel, Tolentino.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Whpq as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Very unlikely to be uploader's own work. This is a posed professional photo, a crop of which is used in the subkect's linked in profile - https://www.linkedin.com/in/fvsegarra Yann (talk) 16:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note - The article on the english Wikipedia for Fran Villalba Segarra, the subject of the photo has been deleted along withe its talk page. On the talk page, the editor with the same user name as on commons here contested a tagging of "conflict of interest" on the article, and claimed to be unaffiliated with subject and merely thought he was a notable person to include on wikipedia. If true, then how does he manage to be the copyright holder of for an obviously studio shot image of the subject? -- Whpq (talk) 19:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Whqp. File is out of project scope or the source and author information is wrong. Martin H. (talk) 20:10, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used for promotional purposes by multiple sockpuppetsMean as custard (talk) 09:50, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matinkhan789 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Matinkhan789 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Wiki13 talk 08:11, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jr.apolonio

[edit]

Jr.apolonio (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

These files are not the uploader's own works but the non-free television screenshots. --Y.haruo (talk) 20:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaanbayulken (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope : unused personal images. Also unlikely to be own work as all images are about the same subject.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:10, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mejiamejia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A multitude of personal images. Please see the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:03, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mejiamejia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images. Out of project scope.

Wiki13 talk 15:19, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FoP in the US for statues so unfortunately this will need to be deleted :( Валерий Чкалов (talk) 02:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Lymantria (talk) 07:16, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FoP in the US for such signs, so unfortunately this will need to be deleted :( Валерий Чкалов (talk) 02:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Lymantria (talk) 07:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FoP in the US for such signs, so unfortunately this will need to be deleted :( Валерий Чкалов (talk) 02:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Lymantria (talk) 07:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FoP in the US for such signs, so unfortunately this will need to be deleted :( Валерий Чкалов (talk) 02:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominator Lymantria (talk) 07:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Sodomschwaaa (talk) 07:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a personal photo album. Richard Avery (talk) 10:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Lymantria (talk) 07:19, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beastboy2004 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Hystrix (talk) 08:35, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:56, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Hystrix (talk) 08:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Hystrix (talk) 08:38, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Hystrix (talk) 08:40, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, see https://humanrightslawyersfromiran.wordpress.com/2014/11/12/ادامه-تحصن-نسرین-ستوده/ Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Reupload of File:FB IMG 1448196434931 Humanrightslawyer.jpg, grabbed from https://assets.about.me/background/users/m/o/h/mohammadalikhalili_1448297100_46.jpg . --Achim (talk) 20:57, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above Hystrix (talk) 08:41, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TacoArgentino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 21:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios, images taken from different web-source like "www.taringa.net", no permission Wdwd (talk) 08:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TacoArgentino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very different types of images, so professional images of weapons, on the other side professional logos but with small size or professional 3D image. I have doubts that the uploader ist the author like stated.

Avron (talk) 17:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SPAM de uma Olavete racista 200.149.192.22 08:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that this work is banned in several countries does not prevent it from being uploaded, this is how I understand the disclaimer in the description. Re copyright - this is very interesting. If the image was created in one of the countries that it is banned in, I would think that it is not copyrightable in that country. But I would also guess that it would still be considered as copyrighted in the US. Seems like the Berne convention would not apply, from what I understand the Berne convention applies when an author exerts an ownership, not when an a defendant raises an issue of the work not being copyrightable in the country of origin. But I am not sure so it would be great if someone has input. Rybkovich (talk) 19:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The image is all over the web, in many larger sizes, so who knows where it is created. It's an image of 2D art, so the image probably does not have a copyright of its own. The badge is that of Hitler's bodyguard -- eight men -- so it is unlikely that it was published in the United States without notice. Unless and until someone can show that the creator has been dead for 70 years or that it is PD in the USA, I think it must be deleted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - I uploaded this, but I think the wing obscures too much of the view to be educationally useful - I uploaded several other aerial photos of Pearland with this set, so this won't be missed INeverCry 02:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, advertising picture by (presumedly) Neapolitan taylor g (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Author does not match uploader (out of scope too I guess) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused artwork by non-notable uploader, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:02, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused artwork by non-notable uploader, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:02, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

--Blueboyou (talk) 16:40, 31 December 2015 (UTC)How and where to I respond to a request to delete this file from wikepedia?[reply]

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The underlying bikini art has an undetermined copyright status 186.88.108.137 04:08, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal art of unknown artist. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE 186.88.108.137 04:09, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personalart of unknown artist .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope and copyvio George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense image, see nonsense description and nonsense category. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 10:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Hystrix (talk) 09:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Hystrix (talk) 09:05, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is mentioning the Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) as Azad Kashmir (free Kashmir) which is not correct with indian prespective 182.71.251.213 11:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Neither perceived nor actual lack of neutrality is a valid reason for deletion on Commons. We only host the illustrations. It's up to the individual projects if, how and in what context they use them. This file is used on at least 76 pages in 35 different projects, and we're not about to editorialise all those pages on those independent projects by snatching the illustration out from under their feet. If you disagree, get an account, upload an alternative and get consensus to change the illustration on each individual project. LX (talk, contribs) 14:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because the boundaries are disputed should we not add the perspective from which this map is created? It is not clear to me based on the description and the deletion reason. Does the map correspond to the official Indian government perspective or a different perspective? Rybkovich (talk) 19:02, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
See en:Azad Kashmir#cite note-10, and note the name of the article. It and the label used in the map in question seem to reflect the current de facto situation. LX (talk, contribs) 00:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Got it thanks for looking into it. Rybkovich (talk) 01:26, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion Hystrix (talk) 09:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chris.Rass (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 11:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Hystrix (talk) 09:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tadeomedina1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 11:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Hystrix (talk) 09:10, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope 106.68.15.5 06:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of formula: {{Use TeX}}. Lowres, have multiple TeX of the relevant math in en:Gini coefficient DMacks (talk) 06:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Iceland, this might meet COM:TOO in Iceland Sodomschwaaa (talk) 06:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:55, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as no source (No source since) HR, no copy found, let's have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 07:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is from a Flickr account that contains files taken from other sources in violation of copyright. For example, this file (uploaded on Commons as this) is actually copyrighted by the Thai Royal Household Bureau. So the Flickr account is untrustworthy, especially when the account owner (Jom Thai (talk · contribs)) appears to be a sock puppet of another user (Parintar (talk · contribs)), who operated a number of other puppets and has been blocked indefinitely. iudexvivorum (talk) 07:03, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (pt:Deserdados) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos Sodomschwaaa (talk) 07:22, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a personal photo album. Richard Avery (talk) 10:21, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 08:40, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Infringes on Architect's copyright .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 08:40, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Infringes on architect's copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 08:40, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Infringes on architect's copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 08:41, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

gggggggggggggg Goldandroid (talk) 23:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope Krd 18:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Riggwelter as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader has stated that he does not own the copyright to this logotype. It is therefor a copyright infringement.. Unsure enough about COM:TOO in Sweden to comment on a typeface is copyrightable. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, because of confusion about the copyright, I suggest that the picture is deleted. I have previously tried to delete the image on my own but understand that it can only be enforced by an administrator. Thanks for helping, --Fjrommel (talk) 13:41, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality self promotional picture without good META data Motopark (talk) 06:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown low quality self promotional picture see description Motopark (talk) 06:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dharmajit Baral (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jean Claude Nzita (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FernandaBustosFernández (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 14:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:35, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality photo, it seems like a scan from a journal. Harold (talk) 15:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File doesn't seem like own work (no proof for this claim), probably it is a official photo from 70s. "открытка" = postcard in Russian Harold (talk) 15:08, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free software (QQ) screenshot . Stang 15:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free software (QQ) screenshot . Stang 15:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious non-free book cover image, uploaded by WP editor with few edits TAnthony (talk) 15:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free software web screenshot . Maybe copyvio from weibo.com . Stang 15:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free software web screenshot . Maybe copyvio from weibo.com . Stang 15:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free software web screenshot . Maybe copyvio from weibo.com . Stang 15:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free software web screenshot . Maybe copyvio from weibo.com . Stang 15:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free software web screenshot . Maybe copyvio from weibo.com . Stang 15:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Including:

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates. Category:The Address Downtown Dubai should be deleted as well per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Modern Dubai (7992017911).jpg still ongoing until (its image is deleted). George Ho (talk) 19:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete these images as they appear to be non-free in the source country. Every image in the category appears to be non-free, but they should be nominated before the category is deleted. Mamyles (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Narek75 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims. Low-resolution photos with no metadata. The other half of the files uploaded by the user turned out to be copyright violations.

LX (talk, contribs) 16:11, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 16:11, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Narek75 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Taken from a catalogue. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader.

Stefan2 (talk) 20:08, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Historical photos. Unlikely to be own work by the hywiki uploader. Sources are needed in order to determine the copyright status.

Stefan2 (talk) 20:09, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Small size, no EXIF data, PNG so probable screenshots, very unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Narek75 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото сделаны в разные периоды жизни и в разных условиях, скорее всего, взяты из семейного архива, обработаны и загружены на Commons. Исходников нет ни у одного фото.

Dogad75 (talk) 19:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dogad75 my Russian is not that good, so I'm going to respond to you in English. Yes, these photos have been taken during different life periods of this person. I've been donated this photos by his family members also I personally took some of them. This is why I have a complete priority to distribute them under the Creative Commons license. Please remove deletion templates immediately. Thank you for your time. --Narek75 (talk) 09:49, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When you uploaded those files, you claimed that you personally created all of them. Now you acknowledge that some of them were not created by you, which means the information on at least some of the file descriptions is not truthful. The deletion templates should not be removed until this discussion is closed, and the discussion definitely cannot be closed with a decision to keep the files as long as we know that at least some undefined subset of the file descriptions are not truthful. For content created by third parties, verified permission statements will be required. Also, even if you do narrow down the set of files you claim to have created yourself, please understand that simply taking your word for it becomes increasingly difficult given the history above. LX (talk, contribs) 10:25, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LX, OK, first sorry for the belated response. What we have above (deleted pictures in the past), was all because of my unawareness and lack of knowledge on how Commons works. Some of the pictures I've uploaded (mostly about agriculture) were taken from my workplace archives with a full permission of public relations department (I can even send you a written statement with chief PR specialist that I have 100% control of them). The pictures you guys are trying to delete were all given to me by this person's family members and friends (I also happened to be a friend of his). There has been an oral agreement to upload them as a non-copyrighted media. After some time you can see that some of these pictures were heavily featured in Armenian news outlets. All I'm saying is that this pictures in fact belong to me and my friends and we kindly decided to distribute them as free media. Please tell me what the issue here is and what solutions could we come up with. --Narek75 (talk) 06:33, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here, you're saying that at least some of the photos are works by other, unnamed authors, and if I understand you correctly, you're saying that they are not protected by copyright (which would be a new claim). On the file description pages, you still state that the photos are all your own works (meaning works created by you), that you are the author (meaning the photographer), and that you are the copyright holder (meaning you either created them, had them created for you by an employee or similar, or had the copyright transferred to you in writing), and that you've chosen as the copyright holder to publish them under a specific copyright license.
I can't make any promises on behalf of whoever decides the outcome of this discussion, but I think for anything but deletion to be even remotely realistic, the discrepancies between what you've said above and the information on the file description pages would have to be sorted out. LX (talk, contribs) 07:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly enough you've also deleted the ones, the were created by me alone. Can I please at least upload those ? --Narek75 (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Family members rarely have the right to freely license such images -- that right is almost always held by the photographers. In each case, in order to restore the images, we will need a free license from the actual photographer using the procedure at OTRS, or if others have the right to license the images, a free license from the other person together with a copy of the written agreement with the actual photographer which allows the person to license them. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Narek75 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not found at URL. Anyway Copyright © 2010 Encyclopedia. All Rights Reserved.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel Sorry, probably wrong website, Armenian encyclopedias (including Soviet-Armenian) are released to public domain under Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0. Let me change the source real quick, and let me know if it's OK. --Narek75 (talk) 06:29, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just like this one for example. --Narek75 (talk) 06:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Narek75: There's a problem if you don't know where your images come from! Please provide a link to Voskeporik Armenian Encyclopedia, please. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:02, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Patrick Rogel, I can't seem to find anything valuable about Voskeporik, unlike the Armenian Soviet Encyclopedia, Voskeporik was not scanned in Wikiquote. --Narek75 (talk) 07:13, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try searching again. --Narek75 (talk) 07:14, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no source provided by Narek75 to back up claims since April. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Senapa (talk) 22:11, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Senapa (talk) 22:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Senapa (talk) 22:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Senapa (talk) 22:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hoax Peter James (talk) 01:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sale78ml (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scope? Copyright?

Yann (talk) 06:48, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:04, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:04, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. See.http://www.smvacademy.com John from Idegon (talk) 09:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:40, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because my this file confuse me Hussain imam bagh (talk) 09:55, 31 December 2015 (UTC) --Hussain imam bagh (talk) 15:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I rescind my request to delete the image from Wikimedia Commons Kevin Seguin (talk) 18:30, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion Krd 12:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Illustrator nl:Willy Herzig died 1978; see also http://www.imagesmusicales.be/browse/illustrator/Willy-Herzig/5810/8/ Goesseln (talk) 12:50, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional poster, unused, using copyrighted logo of RiR Lisbon Threeohsix (talk) 13:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, Unused text document of questionable notability Threeohsix (talk) 13:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akpa peter Akpa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moresse de moret (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.flickr.com/photos/26897468@N07/2705383133.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild stellt mein eigentum dar. 217.233.143.202 18:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Translation: "This image shows my own property".
keep. No valid reason for deletion. There is no "Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache" in Germany. The image seems to be taken from the street and not from inside the boundaries of private property. There is no man and no sign with names or telephone numbers or something like this to be seen on the photo. Sometimes owners of buildings are afraid of the danger of burglary. So maybe the owner is interested in the fact that I questioned the police whether a photo like this could increase the probability of burglary, and the answer was "no, in no way". --2003:7A:8A72:88A5:65F6:EF9A:C4D:D89 14:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion Krd 12:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Not in use. Uncategorized for over 2 years. Out of scope. DavidIvar (talk) 19:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not educationally useful. Unused. Uncategorized for over 2 years. DavidIvar (talk) 19:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Yoda character is still under a copyright. Sorry I am. Yann (talk) 21:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:24, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 23:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Julius07~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

High quality images down-sampled to small thumbnails, no EXIF data. Mostly copies from http://www.foto-julius.at/. No evidence of a free license there. Uploaded in 2006. Are these acceptable without OTRS permission?

Yann (talk) 13:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I sent a mail requesting confirmation from Julius Silver. Yann (talk) 14:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above Hystrix (talk) 14:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

complex logo, no permission. Also maybe out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:35, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JenysCZE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:52, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a derivative work of something Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:55, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rahulmarvel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatice works

Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:56, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:55, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyright violation (Exif) Shev123 (talk) 23:04, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, low quality image, replaced by File:Mitsubishi Pajero van.jpg and File:Pajero van in Ho Chi Minh City.jpg. OSX (talkcontributions) 03:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:51, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by %USER% as Speedy Yann (talk) 15:52, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed DR. Reason was "We should get permission in advance from 阿部宏". Yann (talk) 15:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The file page says "許可なく転載を禁ず" - "no redistribution without permission" which is incompatible to COM:L. We need [[compatible permission of 阿部宏 (or whoever else holding the copyright), probably using COM:OTRS. whym (talk) 03:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion, unused image Bazj (talk) 12:02, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:Нагрудний знак «Відзнака Департаменту контррозвідки Служби безпеки України».png. Kwasura (talk) 03:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:22, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Sodomschwaaa (talk) 07:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a personal photo album. Richard Avery (talk) 10:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I like the photo. I added category Running children. Taivo (talk) 17:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not that bad. Perfect example of a stock photograph Natuur12 (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 09:36, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Expert19612005 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per this revision, "Löscht bitte alle meine Bilder und meinen Account.Mein Arbeitgeber weiss von den Bildern und möchte das ich sie lösche,was ich aber nicht kann". This translates as Please delete all my pictures and my Account. My employer knows about the pictures and want the I delete what I can not, however. I'm not certain if this applies to all mages or not. It is worth noting that the uploader attempted to have his files deleted a few months back, but this was declined as the reason given, "no longer current", was not considered a valid reason for deletion.

-mattbuck (Talk) 10:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Difficult case. Normally released pictures can't be retracted.--Kopiersperre (talk) 21:56, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: True but given the statement provided by the uploader and given the nature of the photographs it is highly unfair not to grant the uploader the courtesy. Also, quit a lot of them would also fail com:IDENT and some are just plain out of scope. Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Expert19612005 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

com:IDENT, exhibitionism, enough of this stuff

Pippobuono (talk) 07:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 17:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded on 14.12.2015 by 3-upload user Keila zapeta (talk · contributions · Statistics) = 2x copyvio Gunnex (talk) 10:38, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete source, so compliance with the copyright tag can't be verified. The uploader claims that the photograph was taken on 5 April 2012, but w:Abdullah bin Faisal Al Saud died in 2007, so this is impossible. If the photograph had been taken in 2012, it would not have complied with the copyright tag used. Stefan2 (talk) 12:02, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo, presumably non-free. Stefan2 (talk) 12:18, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 14:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 14:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 14:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is very unlikely to be the work of the uploader, who is the subject of the picture. Commons:OTRS assertions of the right to upload are required Timtrent (talk) 14:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 14:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 00:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by SpiderMum as Fair use (non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo Uploaded in 2013, user not informed. Yann (talk) 07:50, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* I don't understand what the problem is. Please tell me about, so I can fix the problem. Removal of the graphic is not in my opinion necessary and justified. Kamilkasperek (dyskusja) 09:35, 31 gru 2015 (CET)

Deleted: Copyrighted logo Natuur12 (talk) 20:48, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nejde o skladatele Fischera, ale o G.F.Händla Martin wolf (talk) 09:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Bazj (talk) 12:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sem indicação de importância Doctor661 (talk) 12:02, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:48, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo No permission ציון הלוי (talk) 07:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of a painter whic is still alive Shev123 (talk) 12:18, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I rescind my deletion request of this file from Wikimedia Commons Kevin Seguin (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No longer in use Kevin Seguin (talk) 12:39, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 20:50, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ies as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted image, not "own work", see http://static.ladepeche.fr/content/media/image/zoom/2015/05/09/201505091634-full.jpg This is not the source. HR with EXIF data. Yann (talk) 13:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 20:50, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only being used to promote the subject .... and subjects article's currently up as A7, Won't ever be used in any articles so better off deleted, Cheers –Davey2010Talk 15:55, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:50, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG version (File:TP-LINK_logo.svg) is available. All the use has been replaced. Stang 15:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:50, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG version (File:TP-LINK_logo.svg) is available. All the use has been replaced. Stang 15:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:50, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG version (File:TP-LINK_logo.svg) is available. All the use has been replaced. Stang 15:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:50, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally uploaded as thunmbnail did not show! SM1 (talk) 16:08, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of a painter which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 16:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of a painter which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 16:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 16:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Overwritten file: two in one. Uploaders should remember not to violate COM:OVERWRITE.

The image is in use in pl:Tramwaje w Kijowie#Muzeum komunikacji miejskiej w Kijowie oraz pomnik tramwaju. Google Translate suggests that the text means that the sculpture was created in the late 20th century. Per COM:FOP#Ukraine, we need evidence that the sculptor has been dead for at least 70 years. We currently do not have such evidence (and the sculptor is unlikely to have been dead for at least 70 years if the sculpture was created in the late 20th century). Stefan2 (talk) 20:04, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Distinct, copyrighted costume czar 21:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Per COM:COSTUME, Wikimedia's ex-legal-person, Mike Godwin, stated that photographs of people wearing costumes are not copyright infringements. (e.g. in this e-mail). - AdamBMorgan (talk) 21:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Present consensus has adopted the view that in order to be a copyright violation, "[t]he photo would have to be primarily of the mask or other separable element of the costume, e.g. focusing on the expression inherent in the mask distinct from that of the general character."

Photo is primarily of the mask with a specific expression czar 18:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Per COM:COSTUME, it's a Coplay. --Clodion (talk) 07:33, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Photo not of mask costume per se, but of Cosplay participant. Although, Godwin's concerns about the potential tenuousness of this argument should be kept in mind if case law develops further. Avi (talk) 16:54, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Yoda character is still under a copyright. Sorry I am. Yann (talk) 21:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Per, Mask + man = Cosplay. Mask only = Copyright. Image of a man with Nike shoes = Man with shoes. Nike shoes only = Copyright. --Volupnich (talk) 20:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Yann Natuur12 (talk) 20:53, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description say the photomontage come from wiki photos, well what are they? if source are no provided, the file must be deleted Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:34, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Atlasowa as no license. Uploader added a CC license later, but he changed the autor from external souce to own work as well, which is not very believable. JuTa 21:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, the image is used but the use is questionable, as it is a photo for a family/friend album not for an encyclopedia. The fact this is several children in a private space is also maybe an issue. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:18, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ravenleonardo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works + 1 copyvio https://www.flickr.com/photos/44877083@N05/4333826137

Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 18:22, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 22:52, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Being featured for a branded search on Google. This property has been rebranded and is not the proper photo for Stuytown. 108.21.60.172 17:38, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. What Google does is not our problem. And this is clearly titled as Peter Cooper Village, not Stuyvesant Town. Anyway, nothing of the sort is a reason to delete a photo from Commons. - Jmabel ! talk 20:22, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - As the photographer, I know where I was located when I took it, and which of the two projects I was photographing. This is Peter Cooper Village as it was called at the time (I am not aware of any rebranding, but concede it could be possible) as anyone familiar with the area can tell. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:06, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • As far as I can tell from looking around a bit, the "rebranding" of StuyTown and PCV does not involve changing the names of the projects, just an attempt to up-class them. I don't see where that has anything to do with my photo, or any other photo of the projects, for that matter. I honestly don;t understand the point of the nominator, but suggest they withdraw their nomination. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:11, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The property has been renovated and rebranded since this photo has been taken. It does not profile the apartments to their current updared status. 100.33.236.18 23:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep - This is a frivolous request, considering that the previous deletion request has not yet been closed, and that the "rebranding" and renovating does not involve any physical alteration of the exteriors of the buildings -- and even if it did, the photo would still accurately reflect the look of the buildings at the time it was taken. Note that neither of these two IPs have made any edits to Commons except for these two deletion requests. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 20:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 20:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not use this image file 양념파닭 (talk) 16:08, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: so source JuTa 17:37, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vituzzu as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: upload for a self-promo (now deleted) page at it.wiki, no educational purpose Yann (talk) 15:41, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:35, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis la personne figurant sur cette photo. Je souhaite qu'elle soit retirée de wikipedian, merci. Sire Cedric (official) (talk) 13:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thought I figured out the copyright but I do not believe I have. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 14:08, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally uploaded as thumbnail did not show! SM1 (talk) 16:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is very blurry, but also it does not appear to be a nutcracker as titled. This seems to be a bottle and can opener. Fences and windows (talk) 16:55, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Found it - it's a jar opener. If you keep this, please move the file to a better title, e.g. Jar opener. Fences and windows (talk) 13:30, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred photo ; Marks on the stone are blurred and not visible ; unknown object ; identification plaque is not readable ; generic file name (no identification) Tangopaso (talk) 22:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

irrtümlich falsche Version hochgeladen Ostfriese73 (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This infringes on the sculpture's copyright -- do not upolad another version of this file. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original photo if made around 1905, is not "Own work" of the uploader. Copyrights of the original photographer might still be valid. Paulbe (talk) 17:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In order for this composite image to be hosted on Commons, each base-image source must be provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All this images are extracted from Commons, not only by me, but also by others, until me. Thanks, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 18:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confidence that this cut-out fossil image is own work of uploader, looks more like trimmed from a book or website with words added. If indeed this was described in 1993 by Nel and Balme, it's likely that this image was in their paper. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No confidence ? Presumption of guilt ? You must verify ! This is MY drawing (so, Nel & Balme CAN'T have THIS picture in their paper) of a fossil (the butterfly Lethe corbieri) actually exposed in the Natural History Museum of Toulon (France) where I work. Sorry for my cosmetic work on my pictures before upload ! You CAN'T find this image nowhere, in any site or book, but you can call the Natural History Museum of Toulon 00.33.483.954.421, contact the curator François Dusoulier (he speaks perfectly english), and ask to him if he expose this fossil in this moment, and if he know me, Ion Cepleanu ! --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 19:09, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Please discuss without being upset. This is a process not a judgement. Considering that you work at the museum, I can see how you'd get File:Lethe corbieri, me & my graphic sources.jpg quite easily. Would it be possible for you to provide a larger image of the actual fossil? I can see that the new image of these fossils was not cut from your "me&my" file, because there is no shadowing, and the little plastic holders have vanished. Incidentally, you might with to check your camera, because the timestamp on the metadata on both pictures is identical, so the visual differences between the two images are notable, especially the rearranging, relighting and refocusing in less than a minute. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:13, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Sorry but I'm "upset" in my brain since my young years : I affirm that according with the french laws I can do photographies of a public collection exposed in a public & free access exhibition, and also that I can modify my photographies for obtaining an "esthetic" effect. A fossil is not an artwork, so it's not concerned by the FoP problem. I'm a "scientific mediator" [3], a storyteller with some scientific & artistic universitary diplomas : in my mind, this transformations are a good thing for the vulgarisation articles (I modified around the fossil, not this one itself). But it seems you're not agree with this. Am I right or wrong ? I have not a strong opinion. But see please : here File:Lethe corbieri, me & my graphic sources.jpg you can see the fossil as it's exposed in the exhibition of the Natural History Museum of Toulon (public institution, free entrance). With File:Lethe_corbieri,_Oligocène,_Holotype.jpeg and File:Dactylo+Belemnites.jpg you can see my photographies, modified for an "esthetic" effect (if this word is admissible ? you are scaring me since my confusion between violed & raped - the same word in French : violer). In all cases, even if I'm right, you, do for the better regarding the rules and the Wikipedia's best interest. It's not a personal question for me : I uploaded a lot of images into Commons, and if 5% or 10% are not OK with the rules and must be deleted, this is not a problem. Cheers, as you said  :-) --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 11:16, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I'm keeping this, but, as Ellin said, a larger image of the fossil would be very nice to have. Also please note that Commons does presume guilt. It is up to the uploader to prove beyond a significant doubt that the image is PD or freely licensed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, this doesn't correspond to any historical reality. Other upload is vandalism. Yann (talk) 17:56, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are two copyrights here: the videography (in the public domain, from the White House) and the performance of a prepared rap (no permission from the copyright holder). Unless I'm missing something, this would be a token example at Commons:Video#Videos_and_copyright (so it's odd that this was 2014-01-11 media of the day). It's like if I recorded this myself and put my videography in the public domain/CC0—the performer (Miranda) would still own the copyright to the performed work, unless we secured his permission. czar 22:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The White House copyright notice states that "Except where otherwise noted, third-party content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License" and there is no separate (c) claim at the video's page. De728631 (talk) 06:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So by the same logic, we have public domain recordings of "When Something Is Wrong with My Baby"[4], "Soul Man"[5], "(Sittin' On) The Dock of the Bay"[6], and so on? I'm doubtful that the copyright behind those lyrics has been cc-by licensed because of White House efforts. The alternative would be that those assets were not included as "third-party content" in that license statement, making the video public domain, but not its audio. Eh? (Plenty more in searching https://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/ for "performance".) czar 23:38, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The quote of the Web site's copyright policy is out of context. The site actually says:

"Except where otherwise noted, third-party content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Visitors to this website agree to grant a non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free license to the rest of the world for their submissions to Whitehouse.gov under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License."

Clearly the performer did not visit the site and therefore make this CC-BY. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork by a living artist so under copyright; needs checking to see if original can be photographed in a public location under COM:FOP MPF (talk) 22:45, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The painting is by Marinus Adrianus Koekkoek (1807-1868) so has been PD for 75 years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cosine02 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader request deletion.SVG version is available. Yann (talk) 16:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The two kinds of type on this map show that there is a base image which has been worked on. Unfortunately, there is no source of the base image and that kind of color printing was not around in 1650 so this isn't a historical map either. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A historical map isn't only an OLD, very OLD map ! We can today draw numeric and vectorial maps with our PC even of the Neolithic ! But I could also draw maps when I was young, in the 70ties, before the beginning of the personal computers, and I can today scan my backgounds (and also my old argentic pellicula photographies), re-draw with Photoshop, translate and cosmetically adapt this works. « No confidence » ? Presumption of guilt ? You must verify ! I have Skype. You can search and call me. I can show by Skype my old works ! Would you ? --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 19:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Even if the map is recent and would be copyrighted as an original work, this map is not copyrightable as it is not sufficiently creative (both under french and US standards). It is only a representation of basic facts - borders and simple altitude geography. More creativity is required both in US and France. Mentioning France because of the language, I don't know what country the map was published in. Rybkovich (talk) 19:11, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Spiridon Ion Cepleanu wrote, in the image's description, that it was own work (« travail personnel »), and later gave some explanations about the way he worked, for many years, to build some other maps. Ellin Beltz may believe that this map is a copyvio, but there is no real proof or simply a clue for that. And to ask for a source, when it is an own work, should be difficult. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 15:06, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yanguas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/AMANDALINCEEARTHURLINCE/photos/pb.169472716480983.-2207520000.1451491837./902685019826412/?type=3&theater HR with EXIF. Let's have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 06:39, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Per Christian Ferrer.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copied from http://www.regione.sicilia.it/beniculturali/bibliotecacentrale/mango/oneto.htm, where copying for commercial use is not allowed. The Regione Sicilia may have taken it from Antonino Mango di Casalgerardo (1912). Nobiliario di Sicilia. Notizie e stemmi relativi alle famiglie nobili siciliane. Palermo: A. Reber. (the text is from that source). That book may or may not be out of copyright: VIAF gives a date of birth, 1876, but no date of death. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:34, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader provided no source, we can't assume and provide one for them. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by PsichoPuzo as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: transferred to superseded file Yann (talk) 15:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: They were correct, this file was replaced with a larger version. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by PsichoPuzo as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: duplicate File:Эмблема Сухопутных войск Республики Беларусь.png Yann (talk) 15:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Images are not the same. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A better version in .png was uploaded by myself (the creator) with minor corrections to synchorinze this odd one with all the other maps in the category (ethnographic maps of Transleithanian counties in 1910). This was the first map in the series with some rudimentary mistakes. The newer version made it useless. Zello (talk) 18:50, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has a logo over it that missed! Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 21:08, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:26, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a beer glass displaying a non-free corporate logo. This cannot be justified as de minimis in my opinion as the glass of beer is the main subject. BethNaught (talk) 22:50, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ukrop4ik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, weird names, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 18:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All photos belong to me ! The picture of my coins from my collection ! One photo is a portrait for personal page --Ukrop4ik (talk) 21:09, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you upload the original images with EXIF data? Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • These images were scanned. They don't have EXIF data.

Several other images also scanned, but they removed. These are portraits of my relatives (the actor and poet of our land ). I took them from the family photo album.

--Ukrop4ik (talk) 16:34, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Map from 1961 book is not out of copyright yet, nor own work. Yann (talk) 20:09, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I draw this map (format A3) in the 1970 years since some others, cited in a 1961 book (cited as source) or not, as this one [7]. Some days ago I scan my old work (in some different pieces), actualize it and work in Photoshop (asembled the pieces). I can show my first old work by Skype. Am I (today) rape the copyright of my work of the 70-ties (not published - it was a thesis) ? --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 16:34, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:OTRS required. --Krd 12:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 23:03, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This map is not copyrightable in the US. Per a major US map copyright case - Sparaco v. Lawler 303 f.3d 460 (2nd cir. 2002)].
  • "To the extent that the site plan sets forth the existing physical characteristics of the site, including its shape and dimensions, the grade contours, and the location of existing elements, it sets forth facts;  copyright does not bar the copying of such facts." The map here is only a representation of specific locations.
I am not as sure re France but it does seem that, like in the US creativity is also required. Here is what I found:
  • "A 1996 judgement of the Court of Appeal of Douai decided that a map consisting of the various wine-producing regions of France, annotated to show the year and very superficial remarks concerning the vintage of each wine domain, was not original because it merely reproduced data trivial both in its presentation in the form of a map and in the remarks concerning the vintages." [[8]]
There is practically no creativity here. Only different colors to mark different sectors of the hospital campus. Rybkovich (talk) 20:00, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PCP. Although is could be possible that this is PD, there is no evidence that seconds such assumption. --Krd 12:14, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]