Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/12/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Don't want 68.148.226.222 05:07, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. File widely in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:21, 14 December 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
he is ugly 212.178.82.119 08:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 08:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
reason for deletion}} Rayroman07 (talk) 13:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
reason for deletion}} Rayroman07 (talk) 13:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
reason for deletion}} Rayroman07 (talk) 13:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. ★ Poké95 23:50, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyvio; it's the same picture used to identify a video at this channel in YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/giutoniolo/videos Victor Lopes (talk) 04:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. Can be in public domain due to age, but correct author and publishing year must be given. Taivo (talk) 15:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Appears to be from this talpo.it PDF. But, that is a scan or photo of a 1941 Italian military publication. So, would seem to be PD-Art|PD-anon-70-EU. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept, thank you, Carl. Now I have enough information to correctly attribute and license the image. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Mistakenly uploaded. Potential legal issues having file public. Personal upload < 7 days ago. Dman081 (talk) 16:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiu3sqHzVOXJyHqYmI3PNfwLExKAx69W_1_1XTkiSuMGJfnoVOpUPR6SELK9SJA97GnflbEsK-Ppbx8X3DT3t8WOf2BNiMHdncm_1i_1mwjwYGAlinSBsPIYP-kCQnKx2Rl6aJ33lPYjXAHLVCelUPaycFUcHFxs7eQJ4bOY5m72JsevuMaPZVH9tM6uAmKNTKdY3H2kZk5d_1PFIbAYBg-ymRf8tZBvvuNLMCaUKuT7szgvMic99O1Xhn5uYCPzsKZR8-MRg_1ZSInaqVTUnl4v6SzxGZxXHYqQ4OHg34Pk_1BI4U2jIx1_1cq4eBiIOU-Pm1puH3BeZ1KT4kDk9aHkcotXXEfhFgKNQg5UGSSWanTdv8Jqh0F2w3d0fUA4Ib-1g4XX0QNK-kpm9pLIPk7EIkdc2g0CViqf0dJaQrqjYJP1gWVvDgo3lWBFeTf1NtdAeGVUpQ9rH_1vRZ9vANdB_1wlOURvjInEXTwOOlAynoH7ELKA3G9fDPafVTJie4OWXm3BD094lJ2tIIrpxOXtelgLK3zOpvv26xY34LzmUDhEVppXLt30Uk47eO-HpI1M12HwtbNg-hEkT6_1PYH0zoVU4MxUsk8qO2a6QN7qckFxFAiM8vyOSNyfrsxs5umGtR5d-Tr43Vq7e2QQ0FnTeOOHm6NRQE16mAjHqvP_1gdBmiZldXyoLoFGlpikXe32x8NOMHHGcneFQe4yoWMusN7601cXnzlXTK0sWN4t16SZV7-1GdzPQjzkPee0JIg19LjZcoD-DWcUMxo6tHG5Yt9xWQA4eF2Ywx4CUnD_12bFP713AcBP69aKPEFzOfMqZLHvY7E3tIQaCdkJMpmCi49qQlHcHMvpHNrxO6WzDd_12XN14HZFXNKrUSnUCLqfK3q4o1HoaZJffrM5MKusa21z0sHQTxutTUH7_1Y9GICWmAKduYM2C1GDQ3qJz9gS4unX8H3cIuZN0RYwCA-UQPKW9DHHSLeZrXoPer4vBB2IJ6XFpZMcYlJSVltAF8WAOLH_1dJa0O6JRFQ2UG5ONDyvVeGoRknoLt0l8F5CqyNZBs3mQLTD7ALDOMcBQs3rgddU1kPUT96m6Z8bFC8wRo4hOKaR9ISNlAhpx9xTRtBik3SLWCVKpylrysK1deXG0Vq8Ajw0SK_1XPhsJ-O5F1VrEYpE_1DKVQEZsHIfXG02ftCyOiDUr8MfwcnfnBYldn2lBdZ3l8hqi2L_1BHW-q6ZAAg6NJD5uZG4kxL5_1evzH-2L8jferKK44aNj_1gqEjwO60dWfUt_1XCZ3tcObZZF1GFfO4i3oGw5G8L6eF-840sV_1Ecws1DBy5g90PrVGCS3Wn5c1Wb41AE2LcAcD3mhtRiIZOthNnKLn7I605DwLXeEluqRbWSU6HZ-oIVS7xaNZjdb8vSor_1FNaJ3_1yvki3tA-MDRS-UBEc0wbF-dHStmT4u4d_1Wmx3ANkor3_1huo1CV6zsv5IdzgK47hSh2hnh73D1-z6Sucx7oFuAkHhHqzNnoNUaN1oLrZ3xecxGHF77QPAvKlzaQP_1cuPh1obaCy6nLWElAN9F_1wyGtyFKXCg&hl=fr-US Supertoff (talk) 18:20, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Logo of unclear notability. Appears to fail COM:SCOPE and possibly COM:L. Stefan2 (talk) 23:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
See also File:WOOPS LOGO BEYAZ-2 DIGITAL.JPG, another Woops logo. Two accounts uploading the same screenshots: File:Ekrangoruntusu.PNG and another screenshot from the homepage File:Woopscomtr61215.PNG vs. File:Ekran goruntusu.PNG, File:Woops-com-tr.JPG. "Ekran görüntüsü" just means screenshot, see here. Are those 2 accounts Tubacurmen (3 uploads) and Klemadran (3 deleted uploads) the same person advertising with different accounts? They also both had a few deleted edits on tr-Wikipedia, maybe a deleted article about Woops? --Bjarlin (talk) 20:34, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
@Stefan2 and Yann: Please take a look upon the 3 other files and the two accounts uploading all those files. --Bjarlin (talk) 21:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- I have tagged both screenshots as copyvios. There is no indication that the logo is in scope. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
not own work Biplab Anand (Talk) 05:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copright violation JuTa 00:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Definitely not "simple geometric shapes", obvious copyviol. To be reuploaded on individual projects with the appropriate trademark license, if need be. WikiKiwi 14:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
delete No OK .--EEIM (talk) 02:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 22:35, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Too complicated for the licence given. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 11:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:TOYS Сильна (talk) 11:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan. Ras67 (talk) 00:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per above. Darwin Ahoy! 12:41, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan. Ras67 (talk) 00:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per above Darwin Ahoy! 12:41, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Attack photo, used in an attack article. Largoplazo (talk) 04:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted by Hedwig in Washington Darwin Ahoy! 12:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
not own work link Biplab Anand (Talk) 06:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyvio, grabbed from the web Darwin Ahoy! 12:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused, untrimmed, (even) smaller version of File:Alan Thomas Saunders2.jpg. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Delete Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I'm not too fluent with Wikimedia and couldn't figure out how to delete it myself. Doug butler (talk) 12:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per above, consensual deletion, requested by uploader Darwin Ahoy! 12:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
LP copyrigth violation Threecharlie (talk) 12:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per above, obvious copyvio Darwin Ahoy! 12:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A sculpture by an unknown artist, indoors, in France (No Freedom of Panorama). And also a derivative work of a copyrighted character. Themightyquill (talk) 12:48, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per above Darwin Ahoy! 12:48, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. rather (video)thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 00:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Last remaining. Many copyvios. Yann (talk) 13:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Appears to incorporate two copyrighted images: http://dialog.ua.edu/2013/01/campus-always-planned-ever-changing/ and https://www.flickr.com/photos/retrophisch/6329357956 Ytoyoda (talk) 04:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
I could not verify license. Source site is dead. OTRS-permission from author Krzysztof Miłosz is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:55, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Plenty of copies. Yann (talk) 15:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Happimelli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Jace williams model.jpg
- File:Jace williams.jpg
- File:Jace williams sutra.jpg
- File:10251473 843140619095799 1033921784 n-1.jpg
Yann (talk) 15:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- also file:Kaltom.jpg
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Uncertain copyright, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
What is it? Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 16:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Very poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Uncertain copyright, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:11, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
out of date, not valid for use. Seemoramee (talk) 16:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
[[Category:Calendars]]
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Google Mail software is copyrighted and not free, no permission. Bjarlin (talk) 16:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Promotional upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
No clear description; no creation date of the artwork (it maybe recent); no permission. Cjp24 (talk) 18:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
No clear description; no creation date of the artwork (it maybe recent); no permission. Cjp24 (talk) 18:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
No clear description; no creation date of the artwork (it maybe recent); no permission. Cjp24 (talk) 18:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
No clear description; no creation date of the artwork (it maybe recent); no permission. Cjp24 (talk) 18:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
No clear description; no creation date of the artwork (it maybe recent); no permission. Cjp24 (talk) 18:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 18:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 18:20, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 18:21, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Seems to be a publicity photo - see http://est.ua/press/58271/ - not at all clear that the uploader holds the rights to this Whpq (talk) 18:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Private photo, out of scope. Cjp24 (talk) 19:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
File:The beauty of standing up for your rights is others will see you standing and stand up as well! ~ Sou Boyy (Sourendra Kumar Das).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 19:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
it isnt in a page Bart1998smits (talk) 20:43, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Dutch hockey player Maartje Krekelaar. Apparently copyvio from shockabsorber.be. Thuresson (talk) 21:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
it isnt a page Bart1998smits (talk) 18:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Poseidon dz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be his or her own work, no EXIF data. and some of contribution of this user are copyvio
Vikoula5 (talk) 21:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', imho rather commercial advertisements (see initial categorization) and file not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', missing exif and imho 'posing', as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. format and missing exif, missing links to media used from Wikimedia Commons, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 22:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. missing exif, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 22:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
This is a photo of Indira Gandhi (1917-1984). I have asked the uploader to explain the circumstances of him taking this photo of this Indian prime minister but uploader has chosen not to answer despite making contributions after I posted my question. Uploader is notable for a number of problematic uploads of which many have been deleted as copyvios Thuresson (talk) 23:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The copyright holder is "EMPRESA DIARIO EL SUR S.A." according to EXIF. Stefan2 (talk) 23:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
The holder of copyright is not " DAILY SOUTHERN COMPANY SA " Because the information is public Because the rights of actual author of the Republic of Chile through the Ministry of Health , references indicate that pages of pdf noted remove the information , the hospital is public in Chile at that hospital information and material that is publicly available through these pdfs, pray not again remove because it is a job nonprofit and to me college sorry for my english but i try to defense mi work.
if the image is the problem please put the author's reference because I downloaded the image from google Tamara Cornejo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TamaraCornejoUcen (talk • contribs) 2015-12-16T01:32:52 (UTC)
- There is no evidence that the file is freely licensed or in the public domain for any reason. Images which you can find on Google are usually unfree. See COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
There is no need to convert File:Triangle.Isosceles.svg to a PNG file. The original SVG file can be used directly. This PNG file fails COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 23:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Based on uploader's other uploads, montages that include non-free images and a Getty Images photo claimed as own work, there's not enough evidence to verify license for this image. It's a PNG file, rather than an original JPEG photo, and the date given is for October 2014, even though it's for a half-marathon held in March. If this is a freely licensed work, I'd encourage the uploader to present more verifiable information or upload the original photo file. Ytoyoda (talk) 23:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Is it really a selfie? Maybe copyright violation? OTRS-permission from photographer is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
File:Agata Musiał 52167 deficyt budżetowy finanse i rachunkowość niestacjonarne, praca zaliczeniowa z polityki fiskalnej.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- also file:BredaMod.42.PNG
Small photos without metadata, uploader has problems with copyright. Maybe not own works as claimed, but copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 15:39, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Both photos appear here. The image sizes are higher here, but that is just due to expanding the solid color area -- the photographic parts are identical. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:44, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 15:50, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
keine Lizenz von dpa (Zentralbild Berlin) Mehlauge (talk) 15:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 00:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio from https://www.flickr.com/photos/63981454@N06/5824235844 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
screenshot from the source (web screenshot) without permission to use under CC licence Bjarlin (talk) 05:30, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Google search image link Biplab Anand (Talk) 06:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Google search link Biplab Anand (Talk) 06:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
No indication given on the campaign website https://berniesanders.com/media-kit/ that this photo is released into the public domain. Bottom of the website clearly states "Copyright Bernie 2016." William S. Saturn (talk) 06:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- It is false that this photo is copyrighted under that tag. The "Copyright Bernie 2016" tag mentioned is rather for the webpage itself, and appears as an html footer at the bottom of the webpage that the photo is provided on. The photo is clearly listed on its web page under "Media Kit," which implies freedom to re-post the photo for non-commercial uses in the public sphere under CC0 1.0 guidelines. Because of its posting under "Media Kit", the photo is clearly being released by the campaign of Bernie Sanders for use by the public. --7partparadigm talk 07:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Even if it were only the restriction to "non-commercial uses", it violates our licensing policy, which requires any upload to be free also for commercial use. --Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't believe that is true, could you cite the specific code that you are referring to? This photo was clearly released by the campaign website for the media, and I am not sure why it is being considered otherwise. --7partparadigm talk 07:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for assuming bad-faith. Just try to read the page that I had alerady linked in my posting. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- No insult intended, man. Allow me to defend the uploading of the photo. If it is a picture featuring Bernie Sanders which is featured on his campaign website under “Media Kit,” then it should be safe to assume it’s safe use on Wikipedia. There is no copyright logo on the photo or anywhere near where it is presented (please click photo to see source link for uncropped version) nor is there any mention of the desire for any sort of compensation or need to register at the web site to gain full access to the photo. If the photo is presented in the public sphere without any kind of copyright tag or other copyright information (implied or direct) presented about the photo itself (other than it being a part of a “Media Kit”), it is considered part of the Public Domain until the owner of the photo has made clear the desired restrictions for the media to have.
- I mean, the photo is listed under something like “Media Kit” on that same website, I think it is safe to assume that it implied for use, and it is safe for use on all ‘media’ outlets. I appreciate your work in protecting Wikipedia, but this photo upload doesn’t seem to represent copyright violation. --7partparadigm talk 03:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for assuming bad-faith. Just try to read the page that I had alerady linked in my posting. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't believe that is true, could you cite the specific code that you are referring to? This photo was clearly released by the campaign website for the media, and I am not sure why it is being considered otherwise. --7partparadigm talk 07:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Even if it were only the restriction to "non-commercial uses", it violates our licensing policy, which requires any upload to be free also for commercial use. --Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination, there is no evidence the photo is compatible with our license as long as it's not precisely written at the source --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
On the Flickr page it clearly states "All rights reserved." William S. Saturn (talk) 08:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: undefined --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:43, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination, likely derivative too --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The Verizon-IP 72.94.20.122 posted the following statement onto the image page
- "This photo was taken without the permission of the owner of the property. The photographer trespassed to acquire this photo and published it without the owners' permission. He has no authority to release it for reproduction. The behaviour was outrageous and criminal. We, the owners, have had our privacy violated and do not approve the release and distribution of this photo."[1],
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:John_Bailey_Farm.jpg&diff=181810090&oldid=97265145){kind=link}
which might be interpreted as a deletion-request. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Private property? --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Photo was taken from a public street. Nothing illegal about it. Moreover, the property is on the "National Register of Historic Places", so owner is probably receiving tax credits for it. Tcolgan001 (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Then Keep, Freedom of panorama in the US. Unser under that IP address is likely trolling. --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Then
Kept: By searching with google map, the image was clearly taken from the road, FoP is ok for building in USA --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:32, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', imho commercial advertisements and file not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 04:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Ad business started in 2015, looks like a clear case of spam. Removed. Darwin Ahoy! 09:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Incorporates image that is "all rights reserved" on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/chhornglim/3055613710 Other images seem fine. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Cropped to remove non-free elements.
Speedy delete the previous version. --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Old version supressed, kept the current one, per above. Darwin Ahoy! 09:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Duplicated Almondega (talk) 04:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, requested by uploader Darwin Ahoy! 09:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
File:856695-interior-jail-cell-area-fortaleza-ozama-prison-military-complex-santo-domingo-dominican-republic-ove.jpg
[edit]
I uploaded the incorrect one. This was is not mine. Caballero1967 (talk) 06:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Requested by uploader Darwin Ahoy! 09:23, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
File:Irena Komnena.jpg
[edit]
- File:Irena Komnena.jpg
- File:Alexios Palaiologos.jpg
- File:Theodora Angelina Palaiologina.jpg
- File:Margareta Burbonska.jpg
These images were all uploaded by User:Gospodar svemira. They are Out of Scope (not "providing knowledge; instructional or informative""), anachronistic, unreal and made by the user themselves via their imagination. Seeing as these images are being used to illustrate historical figures who have lived historically, it doesn't make any encyclopedic sense to use imaginary drawings of these individuals. I mean there is a clear case for using stylized/romanticized version of a person even if not accurate but only if done by an actual historical artist, but these images were literally drawn by the user themselve. I am guessing the user just drew or color them up because these figures lacked any historical or post-contemporary depictions but that is not a good reason to literally make things up with the potential of confusing everyone who look at these images and believe them to be real. The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 09:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
These files seem to have the same problem as well:
- File:Henry, son of Edward I.jpg
- File:Alfonso, Earl of Chester.jpg
- File:Paumakua tree.jpg
- File:Kuaiwa.jpg
- File:Keeaumoku Nui.jpg
- File:Kalaninuiamamao.jpg
- File:Keaweopala.jpg
- File:Alapainui.jpg
- File:Keawe II.jpg
- File:Tisethor.jpg
These files are mainly being used on the Croatian wiki (I'm guessing this user is Croatian) and the further harm is that people translating those articles are thinking the image are actually real and propagating their usage. --The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 09:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, The Emperor's New Spy! I just saw this page and I admit - it is my imagination that created those images, but I did that in a good faith, not because I wanted to mislead anybody anyhow. These pictures are primarily created for illustrating articles about historical persons who died before their depictions or portraits were created. It is true, however, that we cannot know how EXACTLY they looked like; it is also true, however, that many artists created - and are creating - images that depict deceased people in quite romantic ways. We have, for example, very romantic "portraits" of many English, French and German kings and queens on Wikimedia.
- I understand that people can create image that depict non-contemporary person such as File:Adeliza of Louvain.JPG which we can allow to be used in the event there no contemporary depiction, but neither you nor I can create content/illustration (draw a picture with no basis in fact, based on our imagination) just for the sole purpose of having an illustration.
- Hello, The Emperor's New Spy! I just saw this page and I admit - it is my imagination that created those images, but I did that in a good faith, not because I wanted to mislead anybody anyhow. These pictures are primarily created for illustrating articles about historical persons who died before their depictions or portraits were created. It is true, however, that we cannot know how EXACTLY they looked like; it is also true, however, that many artists created - and are creating - images that depict deceased people in quite romantic ways. We have, for example, very romantic "portraits" of many English, French and German kings and queens on Wikimedia.
But, if it is really necessary, then of course, delete these files. However, I believe four images can be kept:
- Family tree of the kings of Maui, starting with King Paumakua
- A coloured version of depiction of Queen Margaret
- A coloured version of depiction of Henry
- A coloured version of depiction of Alphonso, Henry's brother
These versions are in public domain per se and are simply coloured; I believe they would not mislead anybody by mere colour. Tree of the kings does not depict any person, it is rather some kind of chart with kings' names in circles.
I understand now that there are more parameters on which criteria for images to stay is being held here. I will not repeat the same mistake.--Lycoris (talk) 18:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- I questioned the educational value of any of these images as well. The colors are chosen with no realistic basis in the real world. How exactly do we know if the Queen's dress was blue for example? The family tree should just be created with the existing template on Wikipedia. --The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 19:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hmmm... If you believe these files SHOULD be really deleted, then, of course, there is no other option. But I think that at least the image of the tree can stay. But please - can you give me a day, so that I can save those files on my computers or phones? After tomorrow, feel free to delete them. :)--Lycoris (talk) 18:14, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- User art may be in scope and in this case, in my opinion, it is interesting enough to keep. But there should be added suitable categorization and template tagging warning about the anachronistic style of these fanciful reconstructions, though.
- If there are mistakes on an article of the Croatian Wikipedia, please report them in its talk page and try to fix the problem thereon, not here in Commons. After all, if hr:Kornjaši were illustrated with this image, you’d fix it by editing the page to show this one instead, not by coming to Commons demanding the wholesale deletion of all such “misleading” images…
- -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 03:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: All are in use, so in scope. Yann (talk) 11:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
This is a professionally designed logo. Where is the evidence the uploader owns the copyright? Philafrenzy (talk) 00:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Bellow the Threshold of originality in the UK? --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Well there is quite a lot of design in it - two fonts, use of different colours, overlapping elements. I don't think it can really be called plain text or simple geometric design. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 11:43, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Superseded, unused, inferior image. Last version is after SVG uploaded. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 01:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - This image is the master from which the SVG was generated. -- MaxxL - talk 08:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not really, we not keep raster images if there was uploaded after a SVG. Only the first version is earlier but different but also very similar. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 10:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 11:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Yann That is wrong, this is not the master-version. I generated the SVG from a much higher resolution so the SVG is in both ways superior. I'll quit Commons with this flimsy rules and absolutely arbitrary admin decisions. So it's absolutely idiotic to maintain something here (after this rules). ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 20:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
PD-art is for 2D-works. What is the license for this 3-dimensional photograph? Josve05a (talk) 06:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Comment review via Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/PD-Art review. Josve05a (talk) 06:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Author is Bruce M White, no permission. Yann (talk) 11:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The image was previously published here without proper licence. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:02, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The photo was previously published here without proper licence. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:02, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The image was previously published here without proper licence. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio https://www.eta.co.uk/2015/01/22/no-caravan-love-ray-mears/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The photo was previously published here without proper licence. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
I could not verify the license. Source link is wrong. Even date is wrong (not 2009 work, there is 2014 on image). The image surpasses threshold of originality. OTRS-permission from author Łukasz Wyszyński is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence it's free --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:52, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
I could not verify the license. Source link is wrong. Even date is wrong (not 2009 work, there is 2014 on image). The image surpasses threshold of originality. OTRS-permission from author Łukasz Wyszyński is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence it's free --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:52, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Huge watermark for promotional purpose, can't be used. Out of scope.
- File:SabyaSachi Mukherji at Lakme Fashion Week Grand Finale, by SouBoyy, Sourendra Kumar Das..jpg
- File:In SabyaSachi Couture at Lakme Fashion Week Grand Finale, by SouBoyy, Sourendra Kumar Das..jpg
- File:In SabyaSachi Mukherji at Lakme Fashion Week Grand Finale, by Sou Boyy, Sourendra Kumar Das..jpg
- File:Noyonika Chatterji in SabyaSachi Mukherji at Lakme Fashion Week Grand Finale, by Sou Boyy, Sourendra Kumar Das..jpg
- File:Dazzling Sony Kaur in Ritu Kumar's ensemble at Lakme Fashion Week at Grand Hyatt Mumbai, by SouBoyy, Sourendra Kumar Das..jpg
- File:Dazzling Alesia Raut in Ritu Kumar's ensemble at Lakme Fashion Week at Grand Hyatt Mumbai, by SouBoyy, Sourendra Kumar Das..jpg
- File:Dazzling Nargis Fakhri in Ritu Kumar at Lakme Fashion Week at Grand Hyatt Mumbai, by SouBoyy, Sourendra Kumar Das..jpg
- File:Dazzling Nargis Fakhri in Ritu Kumar's ensemble at Lakme Fashion Week at Grand Hyatt Mumbai, by SouBoyy, Sourendra Kumar Das..jpg
- File:Pria Kataria Puri's show, walks Amit Ranjan at Lakme Fashion Week, by SouBoyy, Sourendra Kumar Das..jpg
- File:Pria Kataria Puri's show at Lakme Fashion Week, by SouBoyy, Sourendra Kumar Das..jpg
- File:Pria Kataria Puri's designs at Lakme Fashion Week, by SouBoyy, Sourendra Kumar Das..jpg
- File:Pria Kataria Puri with showstopper Mahi Gill at Lakme Fashion Week, by SouBoyy, Sourendra Kumar Das..jpg
- File:Shantanu Goenka's KRUHUN at Lakme Fashion Week, Winter Festive - Day 2 by Sou Boyy, Sourendra Kumar Das.jpg
- File:Shantanu Goenka's KRUHUN at Lakme Fashion Week, Winter Festive - Day 2 by Sou Boyy, Sourendra Kumar Das - With Asif Azim at Grand Hyatt Mumbai..jpg
- File:Shantanu Goenka's KRUHUN at Lakme Fashion Week, Winter Festive - Day 2 by Sou Boyy, with Sourendra Kumar Das at Grand Hyatt Mumbai..jpg
- File:Shantanu Goenka's KRUHUN at Lakme Fashion Week, Winter Festive - Day 2 by Sou Boyy, Sourendra Kumar Das - With Asif Azim and Jaanvi Thakur at Grand Hyatt Mumbai..jpg
- File:Shantanu Goenka's KRUHUN at Lakme Fashion Week, Winter Festive - Day 2 by Sou Boyy, Sourendra Kumar Das - Freddy Daruwala at Grand Hyatt Mumbai..jpg
- File:Manish @ LFW.jpg
Yann (talk) 19:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all. I don't expect to see people using these in their entirety, and the chance of one of them being useful in part (i.e. extract a small portion of one of them) is rather tiny. Of course, keep any where such a use has already been demonstrated. Nyttend (talk) 00:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I must emphasise that Sou Boyy has also uploaded duplicate versions of almost all these images where the watermark is in an unobtrusive location along the bottom of the image. These duplicate images can actually be used as they are, and definitely seem well within scope and are very good assets to Commons, so this should not be taken as criticism of all his uploads, simply a note that the files listed above unfortunately cannot be used as they currently are due to the huge watermarks across the middle. Mabalu (talk) 00:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment It of them are duplicated? The ones that are duplicated should be kept, crops, and some edition, could create a image without the text. -- RTA 09:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- There are a couple towards the end where I don't see an equivalent duplicate version without the massive watermark has been uploaded, but given that they aren't usable, I think they are best sacrificed. Mabalu (talk) 10:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused and unusable : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Je l'ai uploadé par mégarde. Et l'entreprise ne désire pas que son logo soit libre de droit. Rayuka (talk) 19:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request accepted --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in France for sculptures. Taivo (talk) 13:55, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative works --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Insufficient evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. The image appears at [2] and on Daren Shiau's Facebook page at [3] where it is labelled "Photo from Melbourne Writers Festival 2010". — SMUconlaw (talk) 14:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:07, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Because there is no camera data in the EXIF I suggest that this may have been scanned or otherwise extracted, and that we require Commons:OTRS assertion of the right to upload this here before to may remain Timtrent (talk) 14:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:06, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded into http://clien.net/cs2/bbs/board.php?bo_table=park&wr_id=40389034 4 days before Commons. On such circumstances, own work is dubious and OTRS-permission from photographer is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no permissions --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:04, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marion-Bourgeat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparent shots taken from a newspaper clip or magazine.
- File:PMB sur Katia.jpg
- File:Trophée FFE.jpg
- File:Traversée de rivière.jpg
- File:Remise des prix.jpg
- File:Pascal Marion-Bourgeat CSO Pontarlier.jpg
- File:Pascal Marion-Bourgeat CCE.jpg
- File:Pascal Marion-Bourgeat Aix les Bains.jpg
- File:ImagesCA0QMK1C.jpg
- File:ImagesCA7G3Y5J.jpg
- File:ImagesCAHWYYZS.jpg
ƬheStrikeΣagle 10:20, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:49, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Advertizing? But does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:51, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LeonardoIannelliCOMPUTE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:51, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bayramerdem74 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:51, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio, uploaded from this blog. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psubhashish (talk • contribs)
- Which blog? --Stefan2 (talk) 16:07, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Info: File uploaded in 2010. According to the Google Image search results, pictures found are dated after the date of upload to Commons, even, one of these pages containing this file is linked to this file at Commons. So, Keep. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per above. Steinsplitter (talk) 17:51, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Author is Ermanno Giuca, permission needed. Yann (talk) 14:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:51, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Statues of Sergei Korolyov
[edit]- File:Baik 4871.jpg
- File:Koroljow Denkmal.jpg
- File:Monument to S.P. Korolev in Korolyov city.jpg
- File:Monumentkorolev.JPG
- File:RIAN archive 877562 Spaceport Baikonur.jpg
- File:S.P.Korolev monument in Baykonur city 03.2006.JPG
- File:Калуга. Памятник Циолковский и Королёв..JPG
- File:Памятник С.П. Королёву в г.Королёв.jpg
- File:Korolev Zhytomyr.jpg
- File:Korolev.Zhitomir.JPG
- File:Житомир. Пам'ятник С. П. Корольову — конструктору космічних ракет..JPG
- File:Житомир. Памятник Королёву..JPG
- File:Пам'ятник С. П. Корольову.jpg
- File:RIAN archive 721015 Bas-relief on the building where academician Sergey Korolyov used to work.jpg
- File:Statue of Sergei Korolev (11396794464).jpg
- File:Statue of Sergei Korolev (Kiev, Ukraine) (8162272467).jpg
- File:Могила матери академика Сергея Королёва.JPG
- File:Sergei Korolyov Museum (Moscow) -5.jpg
- File:Arjakovastr2011.jpg
- File:Mozjorin7.jpg
- File:1.Памятник первому ИСЗ.jpg
- File:Monument Sputnik Korolyov.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(8162272467).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan, Ukraine and Russia. Sergei Korolev died in 1966 so that the creators of his sculptures can't be dead for 70 years! --Ras67 (talk) 01:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan, Ukraine and Russia. Sergei Korolev died in 1966 so that the creators of his sculptures can't be dead for 70 years!Qweasdqwe (talk) 08:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP for sculptures in these countries Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michaeltrio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope promotion
- File:Proposal Rings.jpg [4]
- File:Get the best Diamond Eternity Ring.jpg [5]
- File:Diamond Eternity Ring.jpg [6]
- File:Diamond Necklace.jpg
- File:Vintage Engagement Rings.jpg [7]
- File:Engagement Rings.jpg [8]
— Racconish ☎ 12:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- The fact they were uploaded for promotion is irrelevant for this discussion, as the images are not promotional in themselves (no logos, no watermarks(oops, see below), no slogans). They just need to be in scope and properly licensed. Assuming the latter, I’d say that File:Proposal Rings.jpg and File:Diamond Eternity Ring.jpg are great photography fully worth keeping; the others are not so useful, especially due to very low resolution. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 04:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Heh, File:Engagement Rings.jpg does have a watermark. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 04:41, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: promotional or in scope they are copyvio as they can be found previously published in several websites with copyright notices. Very very unlikely to be own works. ( --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:17, 21 December 2015 (UTC) For the record the links provided in this nomination have been added by me just before to delete the files as evidence. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:52, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michaeltrio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Recreation of previously deleted promotional images.
— Racconish ☎ 14:06, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted As recreated content, this could have been a {{Speedy}}. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Josve05a as no license (No license since). However, Per Commons:Requests for comment/Flickr and PD images The Photographer (talk) 02:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep as with similar discussions elsewhere, in particular here and here. Blythwood (talk) 10:58, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- I have written to the photographer and asked her/him the clarify if the photo can be used on Wikimedia. If the photographer agree, then change the licence to a Creative Commons licence CC BY-SA or similar. Uleli (talk) 15:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per Blythwood Ezarateesteban 19:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:42, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Right, but this is de minimis in this instance, in that the inclusion of the video in the background is incidental to the actual subject of the photo. Also, in future, please do one bulk nomination instead of several nominations. russavia (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:11, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:42, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Right, but this is de minimis in this instance, in that the inclusion of the video in the background is incidental to the actual subject of the photo. Also, in future, please do one bulk nomination instead of several nominations. russavia (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Right, but this is de minimis in this instance, in that the inclusion of the video in the background is incidental to the actual subject of the photo. Also, in future, please do one bulk nomination instead of several nominations. russavia (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:10, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Right, but this is de minimis in this instance, in that the inclusion of the video in the background is incidental to the actual subject of the photo. Also, in future, please do one bulk nomination instead of several nominations. russavia (talk) 13:44, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:44, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:22, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Right, but this is de minimis in this instance, in that the inclusion of the video in the background is incidental to the actual subject of the photo. Also, in future, please do one bulk nomination instead of several nominations. russavia (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: Second DR with the same arguments. No reason for deletion. The video in the background is actually the same presentatin from other angle. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Inferior to File:Hyundai Motor Company logo.svg which could be used to create raster images. This tiny thumbnail is pretty useless. De728631 (talk) 19:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright "Wheaton A. B. Mahoney" per the meta data. No evidence that the uploader is said person, nor the subject. If the uploader is a publicist, perhaps OTRS permission can be obtained. Nymf (talk) 20:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Low quality scan. File:DBPB 1969 346 Joseph Karl Stieler Alexander von Humboldt.jpg is a much better alternative. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 23:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:04, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
This seems to be a historic image, unlikely to be own work by the uploader. A source is needed in order to determine the copyright status. Stefan2 (talk) 23:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Image certainly looked old enough, but with no source provided, it falls under COM:EVID and was deleted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:03, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:R2-D2
[edit]R2-D2 is a copyrighted design, so these images are not yet able to be hosted on Commons.
- File:10.17.09R2D2ByLuigiNovi.jpg
- File:FW Star Wars1.jpg
- File:Gen Con Indy 2008 030.JPG
- File:Gen Con Indy 2008 031.JPG
- File:Pitt Car Sci Mus 92.JPG
- File:R2-D2 20090702 Japan Expo 01.jpg
- File:R2-D2 reservoir.jpg
- File:R2builders droids.jpg
- File:R2D2 from Lego.JPG
- File:R2d2crack.jpg
- File:R2d2lala2.jpg
russavia (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:R2-D2
[edit]I believe these two be derivatives of a copyrighted character, and therefore, subject to copyright.
- File:Airparks bus (AE09 DJU) 2009 MAN 14.240 MCV Evolution, Star Wars launch party, Luton Airport, 6 June 2011 (1).jpg
- File:Anaglyph.R2D2.Red.Cyan.color.jpg
- File:Anime Expo 2011 (5917374081).jpg
- File:Anime Expo 2011 - interviewing R2 (5917373029).jpg
- File:Artoo Deetoo - Flickr - map.jpg
- File:C-3PO und R2-D2 (10585302543).jpg
- File:Celebrity news by MushroomBrain.jpg
- File:Course of the Force 2012 - Chris Hardwick and R2-D2 (13971372657).jpg
- File:Course of the Force 2012 - Chris Hardwick and R2-D2 (14158035495).jpg
- File:DragonCon 2010 (R2-D2).jpg
- File:DragonCon 2012 06.jpg
- File:Fan Expo 2014 - R2-D2 (9666461583).jpg
- File:FF19 (6823614231).jpg
- File:Lil anakin and big anakin (4020962927).jpg
- File:Peacock Lane-16.jpg
- File:R2-D2 (10585062134).jpg
- File:R2-D2 (7271128422).jpg
- File:R2-D2.JPG
- File:R2D2 (9027556073).jpg
- File:R2D2 auf der Gamescom (7818144324).jpg
- File:R2d2 crop.png
- File:R2D2 Ice Sculpture.JPG
- File:Southsea Skatepark Graff (110) (3875957234).jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration 2015 - R2-D2 (17400554433).jpg
- File:SWCA - R2D2 and a Landspeer (17015345520).jpg
- File:SWCA - Wonder Woman and Batman Mandalorian with R2D2 and R5D4 (17015338370).jpg
- File:The Force Awakens panel at Celebration Anaheim (16774610853).jpg
- File:WonderCon 2012 - R2-D2 and Princess Leia (6873208644).jpg
- File:WonderCon 2012 - R2-D2 and Princess Leia (6873208686).jpg
- File:Фольгована куля R2D2.jpg
_2009_MAN_14.240_MCV_Evolution,_Star_Wars_launch_party,_Luton_Airport,_6_June_2011_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3875957234).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Themightyquill (talk) 13:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted R2D2 is a copyrighted character. There are additional images in this category which could be checked/nominated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:30, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:R2-D2
[edit]per Commons:Deletion requests/File:R2-D2 (10585062134).jpg (COM:TOYS)
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:017 mNACTEC, exposició Lego.jpg
- File:Celebration - R2-D2 plane (17207118348).jpg
- File:Darth Vader and R2-D2 keychain.JPG
- File:John Stears R2D2 2.jpg
- File:Maker Faire 2007 - S2-D2 (508247085).jpg
- Keep for new blurred version, Delete for original version. --Clusternote (talk) 01:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- File:R2-A6 versus Harley Quinn (5134039209).jpg
- File:R2-D2 hecho en Latacunga.jpg
- File:R2spraytwo.jpg
- File:Smithsonian NASM - Close Encounters of the Third Kind Mother Ship spacecraft model (2445479409).jpg
- File:Smithsonian NASM - Close Encounters of the Third Kind Mother Ship spacecraft model (275670228).jpg
- File:Smithsonian NASM - Close Encounters of the Third Kind Mother Ship spacecraft model (67281435).jpg
- File:SWCA - From Droid Builder's Club Room (17015129648).jpg
- File:SWCA - From Droid Builder's Club Room (17015327900).jpg
- File:SWCA - Nippon Airways Star Wars plane (16580462524).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Josve05a (talk) 23:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted I have included File:Maker Faire 2007 - S2-D2 (508247085).jpg in the deletions because it is not useful with the large areas of pixelation in the middle. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:R2-D2
[edit]R2-D2 is a copyrighted work.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
G I Chandor (talk) 00:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as DRs above. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:49, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:R2-D2
[edit]COM:DW. Copyrighted characters.
- File:Artuditu i Magma.JPG
- File:C2E2 2014 - Stormtroopers & R2-D2 (14271716955).jpg
- File:CPBR2015 - 02.jpg
- File:Employee Halloween 2015 (22616639505).jpg
- File:Fallas de Alcira (2010) 06.JPG
- File:Fancon 2015 Prince George (17029791124).jpg
- File:Inaugural flight of the R2-D2 jet to Brussels Airport (11).jpg
- File:Internetdagarna 2015 (23244620945).jpg
- File:London Comic Con Oct 14 - Jawas (15440834338).jpg
- File:R2-D2 (3344297026).jpg
- File:R2-D2 (6134665054).jpg
- File:R2-D2 (6134677406).jpg
- File:R2D2 (6129671750).jpg
- File:R2D2 .jpg
- File:R2D2 CAD drawing.jpg
- File:R2D2-with-IloveFS-at-FSFE-booth.jpg
- File:Star Wars and the Power of Costume July 2018 19 (R2-D2 costume from Episode IV).jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration (the 1st) - R2-D2 (cropped).jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration IV - R2-D2 custom fan made droid races (4878294439).jpg
- File:Star Wars cosplay - 2018 Atlanta Comic Con.jpg
- File:Star Wars Launch Bay (29646651692).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_R2-D2_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- About a decade ago someone nominated a whole whack of pictures of model cars for deletion - you know the ones that are children's toys. The nomination claimed that a picture of a toy Mustang car violated a copyright. I can't remember for sure now, but I think they were claiming the pictures of the model violated Mattel's copyright, not the copyright of the Ford Motor Company. The strange thing is that no one objects to pictures of actual Mustang cars, just to models of them. I find that counter-intuitive.
- I put the three R2D2 costumes I uploaded into a cosplay category. So, when someone takes a picture of someone wearing a Wonder Woman costume, or a Spiderman costume, are they violating a copyright? Is the person who makes themself a Wonder Woman or Spiderman costume violating a copyright? If those pictures violate a copyright, is it the copyright of Marvel, or of the amateur costume maker?
- Is someone going to argue these arguments apply to the images in Category:Cosplay of Bender (Futurama)? Geo Swan (talk) 01:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Yuraily Lic: most of these are costumes made by fans. If I understand your argumentation this picture should be deleted because it is a derivated work, but not this one which is also a derivated work made in lego. The only difference is the building material. --Cody escadron delta (d) 05:50, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- If you want to submit a DR about it, you can do it. I am not obligated to submit DRs for all copyvios files, and I won't stop you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Yuraily Lic: you absolutely not answer to me. --Cody escadron delta (d) 06:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- If you want to submit a DR about it, you can do it. I am not obligated to submit DRs for all copyvios files, and I won't stop you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete These seem like obvious copyright violations here. Some kid in a cardboard box painted blue and white would be a stretch for deletion, but all the ones I looked at above are near exact copies. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussions above. --Wdwd (talk) 15:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:R2-D2
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted character.
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Addition,
- File:Brasil Comic Con 2014 (15798265615).jpg - (Com:Deletion requests/File:Brasil Comic Con 2014 (15798265615).jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
--Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:R2-D2
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted character. See also above DRs.
- File:Star Wars cosplay group at The Aerospace Museum of California.jpg
- File:Star Wars- The Last Jedi Japan Premiere Red Carpet- Mark Hamill (38055465745).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:R2-D2
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted character. See also above DRs.
- File:Clone Wars screening - Anakin, R2, and Obi-Wan costumed fans (5240102759).jpg
- File:Toronto 2015 - Tusken Raiders (16931167305).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:R2-D2
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted character. See also above DRs.
- File:3PO and R2D2 in Nebuta.jpg
- File:AI-agent-and-environment.jpg
- File:Japan- Aomori Inakadate tambo art 2015 6.jpg
- File:Lego R2-D2.jpg
- File:LEGO R2D2 (335626691).jpg
- File:R2-D2 - Genuine Movie Star.jpg
- Keep published under a free licence by the official Star Wars account on Flickr. --Cody escouade delta (d) 09:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- File:R2d2 (9137017881).jpg
- File:R2d2 (9139244468).jpg
- File:Sam Macaroni 2014.jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration (the 1st) - R2-D2 and Anthony Daniels (4878237961).jpg
- File:Star Wars Celebration (the 1st) - R2-D2 and Anthony Daniels (4878843490).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_R2-D2_and_Anthony_Daniels_(4878237961).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_R2-D2_and_Anthony_Daniels_(4878843490).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
DMacks (talk) 03:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- See the previous deletion debate (June 2016). --ContributorQ (talk) 19:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- That appears only relevant to File:Japan- Aomori Inakadate tambo art 2015 6.jpg. I don't understand it either...neither (im)permanence nor public-display nor purpose seem relevant to whether something is a DR. That is, my concern isn't whether the photo here infringes on the artist who created this display, but whether the artist (and by extension our photo) created something that infringes on the Disney original they are reproducing. DMacks (talk) 20:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment A file can hardly violate a copyright solely because of its categorization. Unless an explicit reference to R2-D2 is contained in the image itself, I suggest to keep the respective file and just remove it from Category:R2-D2. This applies at least to File:AI-agent-and-environment.jpg, where the robot may, or may not, resemble R2-D2. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:46, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Indeed, I was careful to only pick files that actually contained (in my view) a substantial and clear image of R2-D2, rather than de minimis, merely relating to it, or something so stylized that it was not a DW of that specific robot. For the file you mention, it appears so clearly to be this subject as a substantive part of this image, even though it's redrawn by hand; see Commons:Fan art#Copyright in fan art. One could replace it with a different generic/free robot, but one could not simply crop it out altogether. DMacks (talk) 13:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: almost all, per nomination, except for the one released by the Star Wars account on Flickr. --Rosenzweig τ 01:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Definitely not "simple geometric shapes", obvious copyviol. To be reuploaded on individual projects with the appropriate trademark license, if need be. WikiKiwi 14:13, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Info: See the previous DR. Bellow the TOO in Japan for me. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:21, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'm a graphic and type designer, and that is definitely a custom font, ESPECIALLY the "Z" which is iconic of the DBZ serie. We can pretend it's all basic shapes but it's not. That's blatant copyright infringement, like with the other DB logos. --WikiKiwi 20:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC) P.S: After reading COM:TO#Japan I'm still positive about my DR. --WikiKiwi 20:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep This image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality. Looks OK.--EEIM (talk) 02:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- The aforelinked COM:TO#Japan makes this procedure necessary, but the logo is obviously NOT made of "simple geometric shapes or text". --WikiKiwi 14:50, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Custom lettering, not TOO. Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:26, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a very poor quality scan. This also makes me doubt the right of the uploader to post it here. It is unused currently, and of insufficient quality. Licencing needs to be confirmed by Commons:OTRS if it is to remain here, too, I think Timtrent (talk) 14:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:25, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The mention of a URL in the source field suggests that this comes from a website. Also note that the original file name suggests that this is a screenshot, possibly of the website listed in the source field. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: (c) at Http://www.yogawhitelotus.com/yoga-white-lotus.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:25, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Official and sport related symbols. May be in public domain, but proper reason should be provided.
- File:Nsw-025-2.png
- File:Nsw-025-1.png
- File:Nsw-024.png
- File:Nsw-023.png
- File:Nsw-022.png
- File:Nsw-021.png
- File:Nsw-020.png
- File:Nsw-019.png
- File:Nsw-018-2.png
- File:Nsw-018-1.png
- File:Nsw-017.png
- File:Nsw-016.png
- File:Nsw-015.png
- File:Nsw-014.png
- File:Nsw-013.png
- File:Nsw-012.png
- File:Nsw-011.png
- File:Nsw-010.png
- File:Nsw-09.png
- File:Nsw-08.png
- File:Nsw-07-3.png
- File:Nsw-07-2.png
- File:Nsw-07-1.png
- File:Nsw-06-3.png
- File:Nsw-06-2.png
- File:Nsw-06-1.png
- File:Nsw-05.png
- File:Nsw-04.png
- File:Nsw-03.png
- File:Nsw-01.png
- File:Nsw-02-2.png
- File:Nsw-02-1.png
- File:NakhonsawanGames2015 Logo.png
- File:Yasothonflag.jpg
- File:Yalaflag.jpg
- File:Uttaraditflag.jpg
- File:UthaiThaniflag.jpg
- File:Udonthaniflag.jpg
- File:UbonRatchathaniflag.jpg
- File:Tratflag.jpg
- File:Trangflag.jpg
- File:Takflag.jpg
- File:SuratThaniflag.jpg
- File:Surinflag.jpg
- File:Suphanburiflag.jpg
- File:Sukhothaiflag.jpg
- File:Songkhlaflag.jpg
- File:Sisaketflag.jpg
- File:Singburiflag.jpg
- File:Satunflag.jpg
- File:Saraburiflag.jpg
- File:SamutSongkhram.jpg
- File:SakonNakhonflag.jpg
- File:SamutPrakan.jpg
- File:SamutSakhon.jpg
- File:SaKaeoflag.png
- File:RoiEtflag.jpg
- File:Rayongflag.jpg
- File:Ranongflag.jpg
- File:Ratchaburiflag.jpg
- File:PrachuapKhiriKhanflag.png
- File:PhangNgaflag.jpg
- File:Phrachinburiflag.jpg
- File:Phichitflag.jpg
- File:Phitsanulokflag.jpg
- File:Phuketflag.jpg
- File:Phraeflag.jpg
- File:Phetchaburiflag.jpg
- File:Phetchabunflag.jpg
- File:Pattaniflag.jpg
- File:Phayeoflag.jpg
- File:Phatthalungflag.jpg
- File:Nonthaburiflag.jpg
- File:PathumThaniflag.jpg
- File:NongBuaLamphuflag.jpg
- File:NongKhaiflag.jpg
- File:NakhonSiThammaratflag.jpg
- File:NakhonRatchasimaflag.jpg
- File:NakhonSawanflag.jpg
- File:NakhonPathomflag.jpg
- File:NakhonPhanomflag.jpg
- File:NakhonNayokflag.jpg
- File:Narathiwatflag.jpg
- File:Mukdahanflag.jpg
- File:Nanflag.jpg
- File:MahaSarakhamflag.jpg
- File:MaeHongSonflag.jpg
- File:Lumphunflag.jpg
- File:Lopburiflag.jpg
- File:Loeiflag.jpg
- File:Lampangflag.jpg
- File:Krabiflag.jpg
- File:Kanchanaburiflag.jpg
- File:KhonKaenflag.jpg
- File:KamphaengPhetflag.jpg
- File:Kalasinflag.jpg
- File:Chumphonflag.jpg
- File:Chonburiflag.jpg
- File:ChiangRaiflag.jpg
- File:ChiangMaiflag.jpg
- File:Chanthaburiflag.jpg
- File:Chaiyaphumflag.jpg
- File:Chachoengsaoflag.jpg
- File:Chainatflag.jpg
- File:Bangkokflag.png
- File:BuengKanflag.jpg
- File:Buriramflag.jpg
- File:AngThongflag.jpg
- File:PhraNakhonSiAyutthayaflag.jpg
- File:AmnatCharoenflag.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination, no indication of user's own work, no sources. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:23, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Claims to be "own work" but is clearly a (poor) scan from a book or magazine SpinningSpark 15:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Appears to be a symbol from w:Stargate SG-1. The uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. Stefan2 (talk) 16:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
If it is from CNBC, it is probably not free. Yann (talk) 18:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 01:42, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 03:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Right, but this is de minimis in this instance, in that the inclusion of the video in the background is incidental to the actual subject of the photo. Also, in future, please do one bulk nomination instead of several nominations. russavia (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- You don't have the right of the shown video. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Best to Crop and revision-delete to reduce the amount of video depicted, so that the claim to de minimis is stronger. My vote applies to all related nominations. -Pete F (talk) 00:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roleček 19:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no indication of who took the video in the background which is not de minimus as it fills more than 70% of the frame. At concerts the film and video rights do not belong to anyone sitting in audience snapping away with a cellphone. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
تصویر زیرنویس دارد و ناقض حق تکثیر است وهمن (talk) 05:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 21:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Star Wars toys
[edit]It seems to me these are all going to be derivative images of copyrighted toys of copyrighted characters, as per COM:TOYS. Maybe I've misunderstood something?
- File:1980s toyshop display in the Riverside Museum of Transport and Travel in Glasgow, Scotland.jpg
- File:Celebration - Action Figures (17207146478).jpg
- File:Celebration - Disney Parks Merch (16774651513).jpg
- File:Celebration - Rancho Obi-Wan (17187470837).jpg
- File:Celebration - Rancho Obi-Wan (17207337280).jpg
- File:Celebration - Rancho Obi-Wan (17394915575).jpg
- File:Osaka Tin Toy Institute The Tin Age Collection Star Wars Boba Fett Back Side.jpg
- File:Osaka Tin Toy Institute The Tin Age Collection Star Wars Boba Fett Close Up 1.jpg
- File:SWC 6 - Look Sir, Toys! (7860617306).jpg
- File:Toy shop.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Themightyquill (talk) 12:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for the majority but provisionally Keep on these three:
- File:1980s toyshop display in the Riverside Museum of Transport and Travel in Glasgow, Scotland.jpg
- File:SWC 6 - Look Sir, Toys! (7860617306).jpg
- File:Toy shop.jpg
- I think these may count as de minimis (lots of toys in each, and they are the subject, but insufficient detail of any specific toy). - AdamBMorgan (talk) 13:48, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, AdamBMorgan. That seems fair, though I have to wonder if the storm trooper in the first image, the Disney duck in the second, and the Yoda in the third can really be considered de minimis. I'll leave that to others to decide. At any rate, they should be removed from the Category:Star Wars toys. - Themightyquill (talk) 15:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- I agree with AdamBMorgan. The 3 photos, he mentioned, are covered by de minimis. For File:Toy shop.jpg see also the opinion -> at Village pump. It "has a mass of copyrightable detail, some more prominent than others, but they are incidental to the overall photograph." Electron ツ ➧☎ 19:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Generally, if there are many things in an image, all of which are copyrighted, de minimis cannot apply. In order for DM to apply, you must be able to delete the copyrighted objects without the average viewer noticing. Obviously that cannot happen in these cases. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:58, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Star Wars toys
[edit]These Star Wars toys are probably copyrighted. COM:TOYS.
- File:-062 - R2D2 (25331209262).jpg
- File:Chewbac.jpg
- File:Father & Son (2743180610).jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 7.jpg
- File:Obi Wan Kenobi.jpg
- File:Opposites (28438029062).jpg
- File:Star Wars Launch Bay Hot Toys Kylo Ren.jpg
- File:Star Wars Roboter Darth Vader und BB-8 - Gamescom 2017, Köln (35946081083).jpg
- File:SWCA - From Droid Builder's Club Room (17176926866).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 11:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I am not sure about Chewbac.jpg, but the others are clearly not OK. I deleted Father & Son (2743180610).jpg, as obvious copyvio. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:30, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete But don't delete SWCA - From Droid Builder's Club Room (17176926866).jpg. That's mislabelled as a toy (the picture is dated long before the toys were even released), when it's a fan-built droid, which appears to be OK. However, File:Star Wars BB8 (24193040086).jpg seems like it should be deleted.--Quarax (talk) 11:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - SWCA may have been produced by a fan rather than commercially, but it still has a copyright and there is no evidence that the Flickr user had the right to freely license it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Star Wars toys
[edit]COM:TOYS. COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:Chilango Studios Empresa.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 100.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 103.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 3.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 44.jpg
- File:Games Day 2015, Budapest, 45.jpg
- File:Lee McAteer with Invasion Mascot and Stormtrooper in Salford Offices.jpg
- File:Toys 2007-150-112 (15593444642).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:38, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:20, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a photograph of a lego sculpture by an unknown artist, indoors, in France. France has no Freedom of Panorama, so it seems to be this would be copyright. Also, I think it's a derivated work of a copyrighted character (R2D2). Maybe I've misunderstood something though? Themightyquill (talk) 12:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:58, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Blatant copyvio see foot of http://www.theoslotimes.us/ previously deleted by by Hedwig in Washington because: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work Arjayay (talk) 12:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
This is the OsloTimes Logo it and www.theoslotimes.us is the American Edition of the Oslo Times, so there has been no copyright violation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prabalta (talk • contribs) 11:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Deleted: What Prabalta says is true, but so what? The source site has a clear copyright notice. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:03, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
No indication as to the person who made the sculpture. It could be that FOP might apply, depending on where the photograph was taken, but otherwise it's copyright, no? Themightyquill (talk) 12:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep No FoP issues. Germany: dedicated to the public and publicly-accessible. In like 95% of the pictures of sculptures and monuments, it doesn't say who's the author, so that's not a reason for a deletion request either. --Kadellar (talk) 22:13, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand. Are you saying this was taken in Germany? I don't see any indication of that, but maybe I've just missed it? If so, German FoP law specifically excludes photos taken indoors in museums. =( - Themightyquill (talk) 11:11, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- It was taken on the street. --Kadellar (talk) 22:20, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand. Are you saying this was taken in Germany? I don't see any indication of that, but maybe I've just missed it? If so, German FoP law specifically excludes photos taken indoors in museums. =( - Themightyquill (talk) 11:11, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, Kadellar - It seems that might allow the image in some countries, but apparently not in Germany. =( As per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Germany: "The reproduction of a work that otherwise would not be covered by § 59 UrhG [Germany's Freedom of Panorama law] is also not allowed if that work is visible only by accident, e.g. through an open door or window." and "Works displayed in shop windows do not fall under § 59 UrhG due to a lack of permanent display." - Themightyquill (talk) 08:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Scultpure by unidentified artist. It could be subject to freedom of panorama, depending on where it was taken, but otherwise it is copyrighted, no? Themightyquill (talk) 12:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
An indoor sculpture by an unidentified artist. I imagine this is subject to copyright, no? Themightyquill (talk) 12:44, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 12:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
include big poster which copyright are unknown Motopark (talk) 12:48, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image of sculpture by unknown artist in France (No Freedom of Panorama). Themightyquill (talk) 12:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 12:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Did the uploader Prastper actually sculpt this piece, or just take a photo of it? If the latter, where was it taken, and does Freedom of Panorama apply? Themightyquill (talk) 12:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Photograph of a sculpture by unknown artist. Freedom of Panorama may apply, depending on where the photograph was taken. Themightyquill (talk) 12:55, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sculpture by unknown artist in the United States (where Freedom of Panorama does not apply to sculptures). Maybe I've misunderstood, but I think this is subject to copyright. Is a reproduction of the Statue of Liberty (which I assume is PD at this point) subject to its own copyright or not? Themightyquill (talk) 12:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Yes, sculptures of PD objects are copyrighted -- think about a sculpture of a human, or a dog, for example. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
(As above) : Sculpture by unknown artist in the United States (where Freedom of Panorama does not apply to sculptures). Maybe I've misunderstood, but I think this is subject to copyright. Is a reproduction of the Statue of Liberty (which I assume is PD at this point) subject to its own copyright or not? Themightyquill (talk) 13:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:08, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Miniland (Legoland Florida)
[edit]Sculptures are not subject to Freedom of Panorama in the United States. Architecture is, so maybe these could fall under that provision, even though they are scale models? If so, they should be tagged as FoP.
- File:Alice.png
- File:Federal trade commission legoland.JPG
- File:Georgetown canoe club.JPG
- File:Hans Christian Anderson Legoland.JPG
- File:Helmsley Building in Lego.JPG
- File:Indiana Plaza washing dc at legoland.JPG
- File:Legoland FDNY station 8.jpg
- File:Legoland georgetown canal row houses.JPG
- File:Legoland las vegas excalibur hotel casino.JPG
- File:Legoland las vegas luxor hotel casino.JPG
- File:Legoland las vegas MGM Grand hotel casino 2.JPG
- File:Legoland las vegas Mirage hotel casino.JPG
- File:Legoland las vegas New york new york hotel casino.JPG
- File:Legoland las vegas treasure island hotel casino.JPG
- File:Legoland las vegas welcome.JPG
- File:Legoland miniand washington dc lafayette square.JPG
- File:Legoland miniland hampshire essex american standard 780 third sony.JPG
- File:Legoland mwashington dc georgetown canal.JPG
- File:Legoland New York 1 Times Square Allied Chemical Building.JPG
- File:Legoland New York 100 United Nations Plaza.JPG
- File:Legoland New York 6 Times Square Knickerbocker Hotel.JPG
- File:Legoland New York 750 Seventh Ave.JPG
- File:Legoland New York 780 Third Wang Building.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Actors Guild Building Broadway.JPG
- File:Legoland New York American Standard Building.JPG
- File:Legoland New York AT&T Sony Building.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Banco Santander US.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Belvedere Castle.JPG
- File:Legoland New York bergdorf goodman.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Bertelsmann Building.JPG
- File:Legoland new york British Empire Building.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Central Park Carousel.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Central Park Dairy.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Chrysler Building.jpg
- File:Legoland New York Citicorp Center.JPG
- File:Legoland New York City 5 East 57th Street.JPG
- File:Legoland new york city east 57th st.JPG
- File:Legoland new york city flatiron.JPG
- File:Legoland new york Delacorte Clock Entrance central park zoo.JPG
- File:Legoland New York east 57th St Brietling.JPG
- File:Legoland New York east 57th St Burberry.JPG
- File:Legoland New York east 57th St Chanel.JPG
- File:Legoland New York east 57th St Mui Mui.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Empire State building.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Essex House Hotel Central Park South.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Exxon Building 1251 Ave Americas.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Flatiron Fuller Building.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Fred F French Building 555 Fifth Avenue.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Grand Central Terminal.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Hampshire House Central Park South.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Hans Christian Anderson Statue Central Park.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Helmsley Building.JPG
- File:Legoland new york International Building.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Langham Aprtments Central Park West.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Lever House.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Lincoln Building.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Lipstick building.JPG
- File:Legoland New York MetLife Pan Am Building.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Paramount Building 1501 Broadway.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Plaza Hotel Central Park.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Radio City Music Hall.JPG
- File:Legoland New York RCA GE Building 30 Rockefeller Plaza.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Rockefeller Plaza Statue Promethius.JPG
- File:Legoland New York San Remo Central Park West.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Seagram Building.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Sherman Statue.jpg
- File:Legoland New York Solomon R Guggenheim Museum.JPG
- File:Legoland New york St Peters Lutheran Church Citicorp Center.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Statue Liberty.JPG
- File:Legoland New York The Dakota Apartment.JPG
- File:Legoland new york tropic zone central park zoo.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Union Carbide Building 2.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Woolworth Building.JPG
- File:Legoland New York Worldwide Plaza.png
- File:Legoland renwick gallery wash dc.JPG
- File:Legoland washignton dc gerogetown rowhouses.JPG
- File:Legoland washignton dc National Bank of Washington.JPG
- File:Legoland washignton dc washington hotel.JPG
- File:Legoland washingotn dc central national bank.JPG
- File:Legoland washingotn dc jefferson memorial.JPG
- File:Legoland washingotn dc OAS building.JPG
- File:Legoland washingotn dc old psot office.JPG
- File:Legoland Washingotn dc red Cross.JPG
- File:Legoland washington corcoran gallery.JPG
- File:Legoland Washington DC Arlington memorial bridge.JPG
- File:Legoland washington dc capitol.JPG
- File:Legoland washington dc FDNY ghostbuster firehouse.JPG
- File:Legoland Washington DC Freer Gallery.JPG
- File:Legoland Washington DC Healy Hall Georgetown.JPG
- File:Legoland washington dc indiana palza.JPG
- File:Legoland Washington DC Industry Building.JPG
- File:Legoland Washington DC lincoln memorial.JPG
- File:Legoland washington dc marine corp memorial iwo jima.jpg
- File:Legoland Washington DC Metropolitan bank.JPG
- File:Legoland Washington DC National Archive.JPG
- File:Legoland Washington DC National Savings and trust.JPG
- File:Legoland washington dc oblique National Metropolitan Bank Building.JPG
- File:Legoland washington dc Ohio Drive arch bridge.JPG
- File:Legoland Washington DC Smithsonian castle.JPG
- File:Legoland Washington DC St johns Church.JPG
- File:Legoland washington dc suntrust.JPG
- File:Legoland washington dc vietnam vet memorial.jpg
- File:Legoland washington dc Washington monument.jpg
- File:Legoland Washington DC washington office plaza.JPG
- File:Legoland washington dc white house.JPG
- File:Legoland Washington DC WW2 Memorial.JPG
- File:Legoland washington georgetown three story tan.JPG
- File:Legoland Woolworth Building nyc.JPG
- File:Legolandminicites Langham Dakota San Remo.JPG
- File:Legolnad washingotn dc National Metropolitan Bank Building.JPG
- File:Lelgoland washington dc federal trade commission building.JPG
- File:MetLife Pan Am Legoland.JPG
- File:National Museum African Art Legoland.JPG
- File:New york plaza.JPG
- File:Old stone House legoland.jpg
- File:Treasure Island Hotel Constructed Out Of Legos.jpg
- File:Willard hotel legoland.JPG
- File:Worldwide Plaza Fred F French 6times sqaure in lego.JPG
Themightyquill (talk) 13:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- I think it's a stretch to call any of these Lego assemblages either "sculptures" or "architecture" (they certainly don't qualify for the architectural exception to the US copyright laws). The closest thing they are equivalent to is architectural models. I think the controlling authority would be the rules promulgated by the various Legolands they were taken at. If they allow photographs, and also allow distribution of those images under one of our licenses, then all is well.
- So, what that means is that some research needs to be done, but in the meantime, I oppose removing them as sculptures, which they decidedly are not. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your input, Beyond my Ken. Even if we accept that they are architectural models, I don't see any particular reason to believe that architectural models wouldn't be subject to copyright. At best, models of older buildings whose architectural model copyrights have expired would be okay.
- As for the rules of Legoland, lots of museums allow photographs of the artwork inside, but that doesn't give us the right to distribute images of the artwork inside if it's still under copyright. That said, I'm in no particular rush to delete these, if you want to contact Legoland and see what they think, that sounds like a great idea. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: These are clearly created works and have a copyright either as sculpture or as architectural models. (Note that all but the very simplest of toys have copyrights). Architectural models are not covered by US FOP -- that covers only the actual buildings. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:13, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emmanuelogabi (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be his or her own work, Small and no EXIF data. and some of contribution of this user are copyvio
- File:Afrobeat Dancers7f.jpg
- File:Afrobeat Dancers4.jpg
- File:Afrobeat Dancers3.jpg
- File:Afrobeat Dancers5.jpg
- File:Afrobeat Dancers2.jpg
- File:Afrobeat Dancers.jpg
Vikoula5 (talk) 13:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan, the whole facility with the bas relief looks fairly modern so i don't believe that the sculptor is dead for 70 years! Ras67 (talk) 13:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
creator ask. no file Sgsg (talk) 13:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama in Uzbekistan Ymblanter (talk) 15:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama in Uzbekistan Ymblanter (talk) 15:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Photos uploaded under the license
{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}. What kind of skyline or the monument is not understand. In the written description of the Monument to Amir Temur. And where is panorama???? To leave. --94.230.237.234 07:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: see COM:FOP . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
It is stated on the file information pages of these files that the files were published before 1923, but it seems that the painting was created in 1941, so it can impossibly have been published before 1923. The pictures seem to be unfree in the United States.
- File:Bildschirmfoto 2014-11-25 um 09.49.57.png
- File:Bildschirmfoto 2014-11-25 um 09.53.51.png
- File:Porträt Frau Ilse Weichert, Wien 1941.jpg
Stefan2 (talk) 15:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego minifigures
[edit]I could certainly be wrong here, but it seems to me that any photos or artwork of Lego minifigures are derivative works of copyrighted toys. Unless there is any reason to believe these toys are in the public domain? See COM:TOYS.
- File:Andeiviet Groot.jpg
- File:Batman (3100958105).jpg
- File:Brickfilm - Laufanimation.gif
- File:Carnival in Limassol 2014 (12888279615).jpg
- File:Dekonstrukcja (3697448759).jpg
- File:DSCN7472 (5191825192).jpg
- File:DSCN8736 2 (5260340491).jpg
- File:DSCN8738 2 (5260339059).jpg
- File:DSCN8742 2 (5260948612).jpg
- File:DSCN8748 2 (5260949974).jpg
- File:DSCN8752 2 (5260951228).jpg
- File:DSCN8758 2 (5260952716).jpg
- File:Ego Leonard in Brighton 2008.jpg
- File:Figurine géante Skateur Minifigures - Série 1 - 2 - 20150324 17h21 (10024).jpg
- File:Flickr - lejoe - Lego Man.jpg
- File:Foto composición.JPG
- File:It was an ugly night (3497587443).jpg
- File:Jamming Troopers on TT-303 Bass Bot.jpg
- Keep because critical regions have been already blurred, and kept on previous deletion request. For details, see previous discussion. --Clusternote (talk) 22:56, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Absolutely, keep. Sorry - I did try to look through these as I compiled the bulk delete, but obviously not carefully enough. - Themightyquill (talk) 09:31, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- File:Juno lego.jpg
- Keep All NASA supplied images are in the public domain, regardless of the subject matter. -- 14.2.107.109 09:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Why would NASA not be subject to regular copyright laws? I realize that photos produced by the US government are copyright free, but I don't see why the content wouldn't still be copyrighted if it doesn't belong to them. - Themightyquill (talk) 17:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Because the content does belong to them. It's ornamentation on a space probe. -- 14.2.3.245 15:07, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for your reply. If I understand correctly, you're saying that NASA created these figures and that they aren't technically derivative of Lego toys, even though they look like lego toys and are labelled as such. I'm neither familiar enough with the back catalogue of LEGO toys nor knowledgeable enough about copyright law to argue one way or another in this particular case. - Themightyquill (talk) 15:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Why would NASA not be subject to regular copyright laws? I realize that photos produced by the US government are copyright free, but I don't see why the content wouldn't still be copyrighted if it doesn't belong to them. - Themightyquill (talk) 17:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- File:Knowledge sharing (6003136440).jpg
- File:Korg monotron DUO with LEGO people.jpg
- Keep because critical regions have been blurred. --Clusternote (talk) 23:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Absolutely, keep. Sorry - I did try to look through these as I compiled the bulk delete, but obviously not carefully enough. - Themightyquill (talk) 09:31, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- File:Lego - ljudje.JPG
- File:Lego Ambulance Team.JPG
- File:LEGO Assault Van.jpg
- File:Lego Brickfilm - Laufanimation.gif
- File:Lego builder with hammer drill.JPG
- File:Lego Chef.JPG
- File:LEGO Clown Advert 2.jpg
- File:LEGO Clown Advert.jpg
- File:Lego Diver minifigure from the Aqua Raiders series.jpg
- File:Lego Easter Bunny drowning in eggs.jpg
- File:Lego Fabuland.JPG
- File:Lego Fire Fighter.JPG
- File:Lego Head Led.jpg
- File:LEGO Indiana Jones in Grass (2809158854).jpg
- File:LEGO Indiana Jones in Jungle (2808302019).jpg
- File:LEGO Indiana Jones in the Desert (2810749797).jpg
- File:Lego Knight.JPG
- File:Lego Minifigure hats and hair.jpg
- File:Lego Minifigure heads, torsos, hips and legs.jpg
- File:Lego Minifigure Monument.jpg
- File:LEGO Minifigure skating through town.jpg
- File:Lego Modular - Set 10211 Grand Emporium (7115021203).jpg
- File:Lego Neo Classic Spacemen.jpg
- File:Lego play.jpg
- File:Lego Police Officer.JPG
- File:Lego Rob (2934479060).jpg
- File:Lego robber.JPG
- File:Lego Space Classic minifigures.jpg
- File:Lego Space minifigures.jpg
- File:LEGO Star Wars Episode I - A New Hope (2808329673).jpg
- File:Lego Store, Rockefeller Center (7175078374).jpg
- File:Lego X-Men (2933524113).jpg
- File:Lego X-Men - Magneto (2933535649).jpg
- File:Lego X-Men - Professor X (2934388380).jpg
- File:Lego X-Men - Wolverine (2934384750).jpg
- File:Lego-Ausstellung (10562633424).jpg
- File:LEGO-Ferrari 7 - Big Legomen.JPG
- File:LEGO-Ferrari 7.jpg
- File:Lego-Nice.jpg
- File:LegoFigurine.JPG
- File:Legoland Windsor - Indiana Jones (2835946022).jpg
- Keep because is protected by FOP in UK. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 11:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- File:LegolandDiscoveryCentreToronto2.JPG
- File:LegolandDiscoveryCentreToronto3.JPG
- File:LegolandDiscoveryCentreToronto4.JPG
- File:LegolandXmasTree.JPG
- File:LegolandXmasTree2.JPG
- File:Macro photo of a Lego Minifigure taking a macro photo of a flower.jpg
- File:Montreal Zombie Walk 2015 (22031202624).jpg
- File:Montreal Zombie Walk 2015 - Zombie minifig (22033015473).jpg
- File:Mr212nd LOGO.png
- File:Occupy Lego Land OWS 2011 Shankbone.JPG
- File:Pompier en légo - 6.jpg
- File:Ready For Battle (2911580961).jpg
- File:Resistance was futile....jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Lego Ninja (5985864566).jpg
- File:Sandwichposition1.jpg
- File:Storm trooper (9159886753).jpg
- File:Sylvia-earle-and-lego.jpg
- File:Tom the Cafe Owner (2809145552).jpg
- File:U nákladového nádraží 10, označení LEGO.jpg
- File:Unemployment was high in lego land.jpg
- File:USD253711-Toy figure 01.jpg
- File:USD253711-Toy figure 02.jpg
- File:Wall of LEGO minifigures.jpg
- File:Zabawa klockami LEGO 05.JPG
- File:Zabawa klockami LEGO 08.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 01.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 02.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 03.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 05.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 06.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 08.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 09.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 10.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 11.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 12.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 13.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 14.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 22.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 31.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Themightyquill (talk) 12:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment File:U nákladového nádraží 10, označení LEGO.jpg is protected by FOP, anyway. --Mormegil (talk) 13:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I think you're right. It looks like Lego advertising, so they would have the rights to create the sculpture and since they put it in public in the Czech Republic, FOP should apply. - Themightyquill (talk) 13:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- (It’s a sculpture & logo above an entrance to the office building of the LEGO Trading company. --Mormegil (talk) 12:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC))
- Yes, I think you're right. It looks like Lego advertising, so they would have the rights to create the sculpture and since they put it in public in the Czech Republic, FOP should apply. - Themightyquill (talk) 13:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- You are probably right, I do not know the rules here. I will have no objections to a deletion of my pictures here if the Wiki community finds it to be the right thing to do! Ida Tolgensbakk (talk) 08:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- We need more experienced people to comment here. I don't think Lego minifigures count as art, either on a practical level or a legal one. ɱ (talk) 20:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- I think, the real breadth of application of copyright is uneven and illogical, as it results from real tolerance or legal pressure in various domains. Eg. films or photos are often considered as protected even when they are absolutely not "creative", but simply a work of craftsmanship or even automatic. Unfortunately, LEGO characters (I'm not sure about simple construction parts) have a certain extent of artistic originality, and LEGO company is very active and aggressive in their defence. In the Czech Republic, the Pirate Party used characters freely inspired by the LEGO figures in their election shot, and was condemned to a penalty.[9] However, there is some space to seek and defend limits of application of copyright to be not quite absurd. --ŠJů (talk) 21:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Nordic copyright law is less illogical in that aspect: most photos are considered to be below the threshold of originality. Since it is useful to provide copyright protection for photographs, Nordic countries therefore protect photographs through a related right, which is not based on originality.
- Lego bricks are made by a Danish company, so Denmark is probably the source country for many of the figurines. Per COM:L, we therefore need to consider at least the laws of Denmark and the United States.
- In the United States, there is a rule that utilitarian objects are ineligible for copyright, but toys are considered to be non-utilitarian. The only toy example we have is File:Koosh Ball Wall.jpg which is too simple to be copyrighted, but that toy is obviously a lot less simple than these figurines.
- In Denmark, utilitarian objects are eligible for copyright, so there are more examples to look at. This knife and this chair are copyrighted in Denmark. Originality in the Nordic countries is largely about the risk for dual creation, so one would have to consider how likely it is that someone else accidentally might create identical toys. I'm guessing that the risk of dual creation is low for most, possibly all, of the figurines, but it is hard to tell. For example, the hand design is a bit unique. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- I think, the real breadth of application of copyright is uneven and illogical, as it results from real tolerance or legal pressure in various domains. Eg. films or photos are often considered as protected even when they are absolutely not "creative", but simply a work of craftsmanship or even automatic. Unfortunately, LEGO characters (I'm not sure about simple construction parts) have a certain extent of artistic originality, and LEGO company is very active and aggressive in their defence. In the Czech Republic, the Pirate Party used characters freely inspired by the LEGO figures in their election shot, and was condemned to a penalty.[9] However, there is some space to seek and defend limits of application of copyright to be not quite absurd. --ŠJů (talk) 21:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: While a single Lego brick may not have a copyright, the more complex parts clearly do and any assembly of bricks or other parts also does. I have kept several that are covered by FOP, but deleted those where there was only an outline as I think even the outline is above the ToO. The NASA figures clearly infringe on the Lego copyright and while Lego may tolerate or even encourage NASA doing that on a space probe, that does not put the result into the PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego minifigures
[edit]Per COM:TOYS
- File:14027233 1086928444718824 432919324 n(1).jpg
- File:2001 Stormtroopers.jpg
- File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (005).jpg
- File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (041).jpg
- File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (042).jpg
- File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (043).jpg
- File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (044).jpg
- File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (059).jpg
- File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (075).jpg
- File:7190 Billund, Denmark - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28143802063).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28143819683).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28143826813).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28654065852).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28654068182).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28681870811).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28727546446).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28758981745).jpg
- File:Bench Lego Store Leicester Square London United Kingdom.jpg
- File:CfA Lesson.jpg
- File:Crazy Scientist - flicker 33469154156 05b34d4fa2 o.jpg
- File:Darth Vader on a Bike and friends I (5180008204).jpg
- File:Darth Vader on a Bike and friends II (5179407607).jpg
- File:Darth Vader on a Bike and friends III (5179408285).jpg
- File:Darth Vader on a Bike and friends IV (5179409029).jpg
- File:Dr Julius Hibbert Lego.jpg
- File:Imperial Judge.jpg
- File:Imperial Plans Stolen.jpg
- File:Imperial Plans Withheld.jpg
- File:Imperial Plans.jpg
- File:Jumping Red Stormtrooper.jpg
- File:Jumping Stormtrooper 01.jpg
- File:LEGO - Winter Village.jpg
- File:Lego Builder.jpg
- File:Lego Deemsters.jpg
- File:Lego Figure Near Big Ben Elizabeth Tower Lego Store Leicester Square London United Kingdom.jpg
- File:Lego Officer Lego Store Leicester Square London United Kingdom.jpg
- File:Lego People.jpg
- File:Lego Store Leicester Square London Lester 2.jpg
- File:Lego Store Leicester Square London Lester 3.jpg
- File:Lego Store Leicester Square London Lester.jpg
- File:Legoland Japan Splash Battle - flickr 32708180834 0084afbe23 o.jpg
- File:Legoland Windsor - Indiana Jones (2835946022).jpg: Keep because is protected by FOP in UK --ŠJů (talk) 19:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:LegolandDiscoveryCentreToronto4.JPG: please check why the file was kept in the previous DR. --ŠJů (talk) 19:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:Legos- Wonder Woman with Chewbacca.jpg
- File:London Underground Lego Figure Leicester Square London 2.jpg
- File:London Underground Lego Figure Leicester Square London.jpg
- File:Many Imperial Plans.jpg
- File:Nature Stormtroopers.jpg
- File:Original Spaceman Legos.jpg
- File:Pirate - flickr 33551604765 8d868aa333 o.jpg
- File:Pirate - flickr 33551619605 304dfac960 o.jpg
- File:Queen Lego Store Leicester Square London United Kingdom.jpg
- File:Red Stormtrooper Plans Withheld.jpg
- File:Royal Guard Lego Store Leicester Square London.jpg
- File:Sad Stormtrooper Builder.jpg
- File:Sad Stormtrooper.jpg
- File:Scraping Lesson.jpg
- File:Scraping Presentation.jpg
- File:Selma Bouviert Lego.jpg
- File:Spider Stormtrooper Shovel.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Batman Builder.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Build 1.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Build 2.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Build 3.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Build 4.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Build 5.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Build 6.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Builder.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Configuration 01.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Configuration Docs.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Configuration Fall.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Future.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Gems.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Hourglass.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Lonely.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Meeting.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Money.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Robot.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Scroll.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Scrolls.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Spiderman Links.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Spiderman Meeting.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Spiderman.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Tinfoil Hat.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper walking on sand (Unsplash).jpg
- File:Stormtroopers Book.jpg
- File:Stormtroopers Keyboard.jpg
- File:Stormtroopers Scrolls.jpg
- File:Temple - panoramio (1).jpg
File:U nákladového nádraží 10, označení LEGO.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep, clearly {{FoP-Czechia}}. --ŠJů (talk) 19:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:Waving Lego.jpg
- File:Waving Red Stormtrooper and Friends.jpg
- File:Waving Red Stormtrooper.jpg
- File:Waving Stormtrooper.jpg
- File:Waving Stormtroopers.jpg
- File:Weighed down... (7357478252).jpg
- File:書籍出版2 2.JPG
- File:書籍出版3 1.jpg
- File:書籍出版3 2.JPG
- File:書籍出版4 1.jpg
- File:書籍出版4 2.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Racconish ☎ 03:48, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, except some which are likely covered by various FOP laws. --Storkk (talk) 09:44, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego minifigures
[edit]- File:American figure boi.jpg
- File:Carpenters with furniture assembly instructions.jpg
- File:CS3 7397 (14128675012).jpg
- File:I Hate My Job.jpg
- File:LEGO Build a Mini Minifigures (29018826388).jpg
- File:LEGO Build a Mini Minifigures (42843072692).jpg
- File:LEGO Build a Mini Minifigures (42843074262).jpg
- File:LEGO Build a Mini Minifigures (42891187291).jpg
- File:LEGO Build a Mini Minifigures (42891188111).jpg
- File:LEGO Build a Mini Minifigures (42891189011).jpg
- File:LEGO Build a Mini Minifigures (42891190151).jpg
- File:Lego minifigures of The Honor Guard of ROC at Flotilla 131 booth 20190324a.jpg
- File:LEGO minifigures.jpg
- File:LyftLegoPanoply.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Control.jpg
- File:To work by bike.jpg
- File:Weird people waiting in a queue.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:11, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fitindia (talk) 06:44, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego minifigures
[edit]
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:03, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego minifigures
[edit]- File:LEGO City 10159 LEGO City Airport (42842780332).jpg
- File:Lego Ghostbusters (2914485906).jpg
- File:Lego one of the Cool Creations.jpg
- File:樂高動畫.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:33, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego minifigures
[edit]Photos of minifigures COM:TOYS: "When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country."
- File:Chained to the desk at work.jpg
- File:Classic Space Renntransporter.jpg
- File:Golf ball and toy.jpg
- File:Lego Neo Classic Space Exploration Rover.jpg
- File:Lego People - Flickr - Joe Shlabotnik.jpg
- File:Lego Space - Set 6822 Space Digger (1981).jpg
- File:Lego Space - Set 6870 Space Probe Launcher (7465209646).jpg
- File:Legolandflag.jpg
- File:Loui Sparks.png
- File:R WP 20160713 18 57 33 Pro (28329251215).jpg
- File:R WP 20160713 18 58 19 Pro (28329252295).jpg
- File:Return to normality - 134- it begins.jpg
- File:This is a submission from Twitter user @ChelseyBallarte (24589110078).jpg
- File:레고 피규어.jpg
- File:Employee chained to his desk.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 11:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego minifigures
[edit]Per past discussions of this category, photos of regular minifigures fall under COM:TOYS.
- File:BrickCon 2021 Unlimited Master Build (51548642246).jpg
- File:Day 143 Cy365 Make Believe (71559571).jpeg
- File:Day 167 Cy365 Motorhome (74216989).jpeg
- File:Day 45 Cy365 Amore (61040950).jpeg
- File:DnD in a Nutshell.jpg
- File:Figura de lego de Bart Simpson, Diecast Convention, Mexico 2017.jpg
- File:Forestiers (lego).jpg
- File:LEGO Collectible Minifigures Series 4 Crazy Scientist vs. Studios (5535301750).jpg
- File:Lego Figuren.jpg
- File:LEGO minifigure C-3PO.jpg
- File:Lego minifigure parts.jpg
- File:Raspberries - Flickr - places lost.jpg
- File:Robert i Józek.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 21:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:53, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart and diagram of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Schéma d'une réaction exothermique.png
- File:Schéma d'un ATD.png
- File:Schéma d'une réaction endothermique.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: in use --Krd 18:39, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Superseded, unused, inferior image. Last version is after SVG uploaded. First version has too low quality, out of scope. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 01:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 11:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Yann: This is a cache issue (bug). There is no PNG version anymore used (compare Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wollmerath.gif) ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 11:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- This bug is a problem. I reported (phab:T122061) it and keep this in my watch list until it is fixed. Yann (talk) 17:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Deleted: Not used any more. Yann (talk) 10:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- This bug is a problem. I reported (phab:T122061) it and keep this in my watch list until it is fixed. Yann (talk) 17:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 02:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused and replaced by superior File:DEU Hessisch Oldendorf COA.svg; inferior vectorisation, but no official source, that this version was in use; no educational purpose. Furthermore the official blazon only says there is a nettle leaf but not these "lines" going to the middle of the nettle leaf. Fränsmer (talk) 03:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', imho commercial advertisements and file not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
How does PD-art-(70/default) apply? Josve05a (talk) 06:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment review via Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/PD-Art review. Josve05a (talk) 06:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:02, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Peru
[edit]Unclear copyright status, no entry for Peru at COM:CUR. Supposed "own works" derived from modern banknotes of Peru, copyrighted by the issuer en:Central Reserve Bank of Peru. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:500intisb.jpg.
- File:1 000 000 Intis.jpg
- File:10 Intis.jpg
- File:10 nuevos soles 2011.jpg
- File:10 nuevos soles.jpg
- File:100 000 Intis.jpg
- File:100 nuevos soles 2011.jpg
- File:100 soles.jpg
- File:1000 Intis.jpg
- File:10000 Intis.jpg
- File:100intis.jpg
- File:20 nuevos soles.jpg
- File:5 000 000 Intis.jpg
- File:50 000 Intis.jpg
- File:50 Intis.jpg
- File:50 nuevos soles 2011.jpg
- File:50 soles.jpg
- File:500 000 Intis.jpg
- File:500 Intis.jpg
- File:5000 Intis.jpg
- File:5solesdeoro.jpg
- File:5solesdeoro1.jpg
- File:Billet de banque Titicaca.jpg
- File:Billete de cincuenta mil intis.jpg
- File:Billete de un millón de Intis.jpg
- File:Billetes Banknotes Peru.PNG
- File:Cincuenta Soles.JPG
- File:Diez Soles.JPG
- File:Money.Peru (Photo by DAVID HOLT, 2011) (1).jpg
- File:Money.Peru (Photo by DAVID HOLT, 2011).jpg
- File:Reverso del billete de cincuenta mil Intis.jpg
- File:Veinte Soles.JPG
_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 08:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Info Btw, same unclear copyright status for (modern) Category:Coins of Peru... Gunnex (talk) 08:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Update: At official site http://www.bcrp.gob.pe/banknotes-and-coins.html images of banknotes and coins are available under certain terms of use which may be somewho ("for informational purposes only") Fair use related, or? Gunnex (talk) 08:48, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Gunnex. La unidad monetaria denominada Inti dejó de ser de "curso legal" desde 1991 y su ley de creación (Ley Nº 24064 [10]) fue derogada mediante la la Ley Nº 25295, que estableció la nueva unidad monetaria del Nuevo Sol.[11] Además, la Ley Nº 24064 en ningún artículo dispone que las imágenes de los billetes o monedas de Intis tengan copyright. Lo mismo se aplica para las imágenes de los billetes o monedas de Soles de Oro (1863-1985) anteriores a los Intis.
- ¿Me puedes explicar de qué manera monedas sin valor legal y cuyas leyes fueron derogadas pueden llegar a tener algún copyright? [12]
- Con respecto a las imágenes de Nuevos Soles, el Código Penal Peruano solo prohíbe lo siguiente:[13] (Confrontar también la Ley N° 26714 [14]).
- Artículo 252.- Fabricación y falsificación de moneda de curso legal.
- Artículo 253.- Alteración de la moneda de curso legal
- Artículo 254.- Tráfico de moneda falsa
- Artículo 255.- Fabricación o introducción en el territorio de la República de instrumentos destinados a la falsificación de billetes o monedas
- Artículo 256.- Alteración de billetes o monedas
- Con respecto a las imágenes de Nuevos Soles, el Código Penal Peruano solo prohíbe lo siguiente:[13] (Confrontar también la Ley N° 26714 [14]).
- Es absolutamente falso que los billetes peruanos tengan copyright, pues no existe ninguna ley que lo especifique. En "Terms of Use" acerca de la información del BCRP dice "is offered to the general public for informational purposes only", y en la versión en español [15] dice: "El contenido del Portal de Internet del BCRP se elabora con fines informativos y su uso es responsabilidad del visitante. Puede reproducirse total o parcialmente, sin autorización expresa, siempre y cuando se cite la fuente.", ¿y qué hay en ese portal? pues imágenes de los billetes y monedas peruanos, los mismos que tú "dices" que tienen copyright basándote únicamente en la legislación de otros países.
- Un saludo y espero que retires tus plantillas de borrado de todas estas imágenes, y especialmente de las imágenes de Intis. MarcoMogollon (talk) 03:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Please, revisa el Decreto Legislativo 822 de 1996, Ley sobre el derecho de autor, que no menciona ni a las monedas ni a los billetes como objetos de "derechos de autor" o protección por parte del Estado. Bye, MarcoMogollon (talk) 04:15, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hi! Thx for the feedback. As @Jameslwoodward: already indicated at Commons:Deletion requests/File:500intisb.jpg the Peruvian copyright law does NOT have a copyright exception for banknotes (and similar works) via the related copyright law Ley 822 (Art. 9: "No son objeto de protección por el derecho de autor"). So, the question remains: How to treat and license all these supposed "own works" (which they aren't: they were all derived from — see COM:DW — artworks made by Central Reserve Bank of Peru's designer team) in such a way that makes them compatible with COM:L. "(...) tú "dices" que tienen copyright basándote únicamente en la legislación de otros países." No, see Ley 822, Art. 9.
- "¿Me puedes explicar de qué manera monedas sin valor legal y cuyas leyes fueron derogadas pueden llegar a tener algún copyright?" This is irrelevant.
- Per above mentioned link, the terms of use (btw, appears to be quite fresh created [2014?], as historic versions of http://www.bcrp.gob.pe did not mentioned - so far I could verify - any "terms of use", presuming © by bcrp.gob.pe) offers a license which is — IMHO — open to interpretation: and that's why I started this request as "Unclear copyright status". Gunnex (talk) 16:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Please, revisa el Decreto Legislativo 822 de 1996, Ley sobre el derecho de autor, que no menciona ni a las monedas ni a los billetes como objetos de "derechos de autor" o protección por parte del Estado. Bye, MarcoMogollon (talk) 04:15, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
DeleteI don't read Spanish and Google does not do a great job with everything above, so forgive me if I have missed something here. I see
- "Es absolutamente falso que los billetes peruanos tengan copyright, pues no existe ninguna ley que lo especifique."
That is backwards. Every created work has a copyright unless the copyright law specifies otherwise, the copyright has expired, or the owner of the copyright puts the work in the Public Domain. The copyright obviously has not expired and "for informational purposes" is the only quasi-license I see, which is nowhere near enough for Commons. As I said at the other DR, the Copyright Law is tightly drawn and currency and coins do not seem to be included. So, unless I or the Google translation have missed something, I don't see how we can keep these. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Unclear copyrright status Natuur12 (talk) 19:06, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Peru
[edit]COM:CUR Peru The Inti bill is not free image,
- File:10 intis.png
- File:100 intis.jpg
- File:5 millones intis.jpg
- File:Banknota-peru-1000-inti-1988 b.jpg
MiguelAlanCS (talk) 08:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Non-free screenshot? Taivo (talk) 09:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hégésippe Cormier as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: deletion|No real source. The uploader has already uploaded, with other usernames, fake images. There is no proof that the person on this image should be , daughter of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 15:53, 13 December 2015 (UTC) Taivo (talk) 09:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- CommentI've just speedied off the other uploads from this user. No sources, all falsely claimed own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted content? Also note inadequate description, maybe out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 10:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- also file:Site 0002 0001.JPG
Uploader is not author. OTRS-permission from Francesco Bandarin is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Source site says: "© UNESCO World Heritage Centre 1992-2015" and "All photographs and other elements of the UNESCO World Heritage Centre website are protected by international treaties on intellectual property and other applicable laws." Taivo (talk) 11:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- The uploader is UNESCO, this was a test to make sure we could upload using the API, please feel free to delete both the images in the category, higher resolution versions of these images will be uploaded shortly. John Cummings (talk) 10:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Okay Natuur12 (talk) 19:12, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
The image in the background is under copyright. 107.10.236.42 11:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:12, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's a photo of a placard of Soyuz TMA-13M's mission patch. I see no scope furthermore for the project. Ras67 (talk) 12:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:12, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning) (talk) 13:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
-2015-12-14T13:19:00.000Z-File:2003_Hyundai_Grandeur_XG250_BRABUS_Limited.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning) (talk) 13:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
-2015-12-14T13:27:00.000Z-File:2010_Toyota_Camry_XV40_2.0E.jpg){kind=link}
- You uploaded this file on Wikipedia, do you say it's not you who took the photo? because I found no previous publication on the web --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:11, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: DR isn't motivated Natuur12 (talk) 19:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
image opposing to someone else's belongings Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning) (talk) 08:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Please provide a valid reason for courtesy deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
File is seriously misleading, around Deep web (search) ideas Deku-shrub (talk) 14:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Deku-shrub: Could you tell something more? If something is misleading, we can just correct it. And this file it's not intended to illustrate the search process in the Deep web. It just illustrate the general process how the Tor network works. --Rezonansowy (talk) 15:01, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 19:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Image presents a very confused conflation of deep web search index iceberg metaphor with IP address which doesn't add clarity to any article Deku-shrub (talk) 10:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Speedy keep See a problem = Fix it. Rezonansowy (talk) 19:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)- Keep: The file is in use on wikinews:ru:Facebook официально доступен в Tor: facebookcorewwwi.onion, so under COM:INUSE it's not eligible for deletion just for being very confused. That doesn't stop it being renamed, or the description being changed, to remove references to "deep web". --bjh21 (talk) 11:19, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Close as kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Uploader is not author. OTRS-permission from Michelle Metteer is needed. Taivo (talk) 13:44, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Uploader was Michelle Metteer and Michelle Metteer (I) took the photo myself as an employee of the Town of Minturn and the Minturn Market. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.93.232.129 (talk • contribs)
12/17/15-As of today, I have not heard a response, from Taivo. Not sure why such direct information would be needed for deletion. This is all correct information directly from the Town of Minturn source. To confirm, Uploader WAS/IS author and has every right to post such material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.93.232.129 (talk • contribs)
- Please send COM:OTRS-permission. There are quite a lot of impostors in Commons and otherways we cannot be sure, that you and Michelle Metteer are the same person. If the photo is deleted meanwhile – no problem, if OTRS-permission arrives, then the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Couldn't find a related ticket. Natuur12 (talk) 19:25, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- also file:Kazete.JPG
Packaging, but should be compared with threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
The Trophy depicted is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Es una obra derivada de la fotografía adjunta más abajo. El archivo está en formato svg por lo que demuestra que tengo el editable y por consiguiente me hace autor de la imagen. O díganme cual es el error con las licencias o con la publicación de la imagen para aclarar mejor el tema ya que el sustento de "The Trophy depicted is not own work of uploader" es bastante escueto.--Ondando (talk) 21:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- The image "file below" is File:SalónTrofeosColo-Colo.jpg which would also appear to have 3D objects not own work depicted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: com:DW of non free content Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. .... This is actually an advertisement sponsored by the FBI... "“Death in Disguise” AAA ad sponsored by J. Edgar Hoover, FBI. " Found in a circa 1963 "Triptik” Route Map Book from AAA. There is no indication it is a work of the Federal Government other than what is shown above. Converting for consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Fails com:EVIDENCE Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
This is a song by w:Văn Cao, who almost certainly didn't work for the United States government. Stefan2 (talk) 20:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
This is a song by w:Mohammed Abdel Wahab. He almost certainly didn't work for the United States Navy. Stefan2 (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- This should be covered by {{PD-United Arab Emirates}}. Isn't the national anthem an official document? -- Darwin Ahoy! 09:43, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Stefan. Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
There isn't any licence! This isn't own work. Sakhalinio (talk) 21:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Sakhalinio, OTRS was recieved today for this and all photos of the category. Soon the OTRS member will put the ticket number in the photos, I'm not authorized to do that. David Saroyan (talk) 22:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Meanwhile, please add {{OTRS pending}} to the file (see the documentation first). --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:39, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: See ticket:2015121210003361. The uploader was to instructed to add the ticket himself. We all know how well that goes... Natuur12 (talk) 19:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: Встречается в Интернете уже 9 июля 2015 года в более полном формате, возможно, вырезана отсюда http://forbes.kz/process/expertise/pochemu_v_kazahstane_preobladayut_yuristyi-universalyi Dogad75 (talk) 23:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:25, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
This is not a 2D-work. It is a 3D work (a relief). Consequently {{PD-Art}} does not apply, because the photographer's work is protected by copyright. I do not think the original uploader is the photographer: this image can be found in larger size on the web: [16] (note that the picture had originally a border). BrightRaven (talk) 09:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- I found an alternative image to replace this one: https://www.flickr.com/photos/dalbera/2076972086. BrightRaven (talk) 10:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- It is already here: File:La salle dAkhenaton (1356-1340 av J.C.) (Musée du Caire) (2076972086).jpg. BrightRaven (talk) 10:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
_(Mus%C3%A9e_du_Caire)_(2076972086).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Isère-culture (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seemingly copyvios. On the one hand acc. to the description the images are copyrighted by different people and organizations. On the other hand the images are claimed "own work". Both can't be true at the same time.
- File:Maison Ravier.jpg
- File:Maison du Patrimoine de Villard-de-Lans.jpg
- File:Maison du Patrimoine de Saint-Chef.jpg
- File:Maison Départementale des Alpages.jpg
- File:Maison du Patrimoine de Hières-sur-Amby.jpg
- File:Maison de la Pierre et du Ciment.jpg
- File:Maison de la Montagne - Espace d'exposition.jpg
- File:Maison de la faune.jpg
- File:Le Grand Séchoir.jpg
- File:Histobus Dauphinois.jpg
- File:Musée EDF Hydrélec.jpg doit effectivement être supprimé
- File:Forges et Moulins de Pinsot.jpg
- File:Espace Patrimoine de Vaujany.jpg
- File:Espace Giono.jpg
- File:Ecomusée rural.JPG
- File:Couvent des Carmes - vue extérieure.jpg
Ies (talk) 17:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Bonjour, ici Isere-culture,
- Je suis en train de retravailler les fichiers.
- Certains peuvent rester en ligne et d'autres non.
Je vous précise ci-dessous ceux qui doivent être supprimés et actualise la description de ceux pouvant être en ligne.
- Merci
- Hi @Ies: Isere-culture is one of the officials and institutionals accounts created by Isère Department (Conseil départemental de l'Isère in French), see here for details. Isere-culture and Isère Department are collaborating with us in a GLAM partnership. This is our special project in wikipedia in French: GLAM Isère. Probably, there are some problems in those files dues to low experience of user, but officially Isere-culture has some rights to uploads files.
- isere-culture.fr and isere-patrimoine.fr are is own sites. He can dispose of digitals photos in those sites. Originals photos are parts of the collections of severals museums of Isère department. The copyrights of digital collections in isere-patrimoine.fr and in isere-culture.fr sites (© Conseil départemental de l'Isère) are not in contradiction with others copyrights of phisicals and originals photos in museums collections (© specific museum who own photo). Both are available.
- IMHO, specifics problems in files have to be resolved one by one. My best from Grenoble,--Pạtạfisik 12:32, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- The template in description says : "Source", but if you write "own" you have as result "my work". "Own source" is not "my work". It's a problem of UploadWizard and Commons, I think.--Pạtạfisik 13:04, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hi @Patafisik: particularly in cases of collaboration it might be a good idea not to leave an external and inexperienced contributor alone. Better prepare him an appropriate upload form and ask an experienced uploader to check the external contributions at least for a while. The current problem is not caused by that "Own source" template. It rather results from a neglect of the collaboration partner! -- Ies (talk) 13:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Ies: I can't apologyze. Actually, our partnership is an informal collaboration, till now, but a structured one. Without a GLAM official partnership (in progress) I can't create "an appropriate upload form".
- However we are encouraging creation and modification of articles by professionals in Isère.
- Me and others volunteers had a conference directed to GLAM professionals in may 2015. In october 2015, a training day (practical & theorical) has been done for GLAM Isère's professionals, for sharing our knowledge and explain wikipedia's rules.
- Once a month, GLAM professionals has having an edit-a-thon morning without us, in their job time. Individual practice can't be excluded, to evolve just to achieve a good quality level of contribution. Do you remember when you where a newbie ? Obviously mistakes can't be excluded from the learning process.
- Meanwhile, in our free time we - the volonteers - are checking their job a posteriori. And we are always ready to give some help and to tutor.
- So: they are not alones, they try to became indipendents, we are tutoring them, but we cannot edit instead of them, especially we cannot learn and do mistakes to progress. But they are doing a good job, indeed ! :-)
- --Pạtạfisik 15:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hi @Patafisik: particularly in cases of collaboration it might be a good idea not to leave an external and inexperienced contributor alone. Better prepare him an appropriate upload form and ask an experienced uploader to check the external contributions at least for a while. The current problem is not caused by that "Own source" template. It rather results from a neglect of the collaboration partner! -- Ies (talk) 13:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Detailed discussion apprechiated, but sadly the named problems have not been resolved. Krd 10:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Restored: See ticket:2016010610009878. Yann (talk) 18:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC)