Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/12/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 2nd, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redirect to an empty category, content was deleled as copyvio, may also be deleted. Druschba 4 (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy -- housekeeping .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sanyo3000.JPG 小倉商事 (talk) 02:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

usuario no me gusto Rozzmostek (talk) 03:45, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, user's request on creation day. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar images found on internet link Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Herbythyme as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 07:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 08:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fakebild, eines inzwischen infinit in der de:WP gesperrten Benutzerkontos. Benutzer:HOPflaume (talk) 08:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Denniss. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non conforme alle Vostre regole Hoteltorinojesolo (talk) 09:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non conforme alle Vostre regole Hoteltorinojesolo (talk) 09:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non conforme alle Vostre regole Hoteltorinojesolo (talk) 09:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non conforme alle vostre regole Hoteltorinojesolo (talk) 09:56, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

difamación, ver la descripción Tarawa1943 (talk) 10:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, vandalism, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a creative-commons Gage Skidmore image as per this larger version. I guess this one should therefore be deleted as a redundant, low resolution duplicate? Not entirely sure on the process here! Nikthestunned (talk) 12:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, scaled-down file:Rahul Kohli April 2015.jpg. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:24, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to metadata different author Sonty (talk) 15:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Grabbed from the web. Natuur12 (talk) 17:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 12:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader may not have copyright The Avengers (talk) 13:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Christian Ferrer as copyvio. Taivo (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded from Twitter The Avengers (talk) 13:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Christian Ferrer as copyvio. Taivo (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error title, this category already exists with the correct title: Erskine Hawkins Lionel Decoster (talk) 14:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:ジェノサイド5.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:墓標なき草原のモンゴル語訳版.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied.from http://www.tmg-la.com/adam-breuchaud-portfolio/ 176.83.56.64 21:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 22:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from http://www.telva.com/2015/09/03/moda/1441293474.html 176.83.56.64 21:20, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 22:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandsct

[edit]

Here are last remaining photos of Sandsct (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violations all of them Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:25, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small, distorted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:26, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jayfray12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional - unused text logos of non-notable websites

INeverCry 01:32, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader request; unused Slowking4Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 20:42, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, non-free license. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Do not show your tongue on selfies. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davidgnanasekaran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:45, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I delete also file:DAVID G.JPG due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es un error personal. En un intento de crear una pagina de wikipedia subi el documento. Pero forma parte de otro archivo, y necesito borrarlo para poder hacer uso de él, puesto que la foto fue tomada por mi. CSJAANTROPOLOGIA (talk) 04:56, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Non-spontaneous shot with Tama Drums, with the exact same picture being used at the brand's website: http://www.tamadrum.co.jp/artist/tama_artist.php?artist_id=477&area=2 Victor Lopes (talk) 05:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of commons scope Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:56, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, derivative work of multiple photos with unclear copyright status. Taivo (talk) 13:46, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daddygoal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Daddygoal / logs (serial copyright violator) and (all files uploaded in a row on 27.12.2012):


Gunnex (talk) 08:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also no freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 13:51, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I måde for fun but now its a liability Kejserfreeman (talk) 10:08, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. I delete also file:Cille effekten.jpg. Both are small unused personal photos without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 13:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is just a downscaled version of file:Seiffen DREGENO (01).JPG, uploaded by the photographer itself. --ThomasPusch (talk) 10:15, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded for advertising only. Not usable for educational purposes. - Hoo man (talk) 10:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It has been uploaded for accompanying the profile of a computer scientist, Athanassios I. Hatzis. Now I am trying to find the Wikidata page of this person, that I created and modified today, and it has disappeared without any prior notification. Why did this happen ? I cannot even see the contributions and the history of that page, Athanassios I. Hatzis, that I made under this User name. Healis (talk) 14:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have investigated the matter and I discovered that the user Hoo_man deleted the page without any notification. See more at [[1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Healis (talk • contribs)


 Deleted, scaled-down file:Athanassios kite 1541x1948.jpg. Healis uploaded the same photo 5 times with different resolution. The biggest is kept, others deleted. Taivo (talk) 07:51, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pibwl (talk) 10:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused logo of non-notable website. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pibwl (talk) 10:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, clearly screenshot of website. Taivo (talk) 13:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains 3D elements, and therefore {{PD-art}} doesn't apply. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 11:56, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, thank you, Amitie. Taivo (talk) 13:49, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

modern photo with copyright శ్రీధర్ బబు (talk) 11:59, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. There is even "© Jan Erik Kirkebo" on bottom of picture. Taivo (talk) 13:56, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Angegebene Quell stimmt nicht, Urheber eher nicht die Abgeblidete selbst, Hochladername stimmt nicht mit angeblichem Urheber überein 217.91.88.82 12:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, ich habe das Bild aus dem Artikel genommen, bis die Sache geklärt ist. Ich denke in Zukunft wird es einfacher sein, wenn der Dateiupload nicht mehr über mich und meine Bemühungen geht, sondern direkt über den Dateiupload durch die zuständigen Personen. Gerne stelle ich den E-Mail Verkehr zwischen mir, dem Verlag und Frau Greenhill zur Verfügung. Von daher bitte ich um eine schnelle Entscheidung, damit ich den neuen, alten Weg beschreiten kann, der vorgesehen ist. Von daher schon einmal Danke für die Mühe im Voraus.--Jan Erfurt (talk) 18:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Habe nun die Lizen auf die Stufe umgestellt die mir seitens Frau Greenhill und dem Management des Verlages per E-Mail genannt wurde.

 Deleted, you wanted quick decision and here it is. Now the file has two sources. One of them has no copyright notice at all (that means: all is copyrighted) and the other has "© Cicero 2015" (also unfree license). If the photographer (not you or Kelly Greenhill) will send OTRS-permission, then the file will be restored.
Das Datei hat zwei Quellen. Die erste Quelle hat kein Urheberrechtsschutz und die andere hat "© Cicero 2015". Beide Lizenze sind nicht frei. Es ist Urheberrechtsverletzung. Taivo (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

better quality picture available A1000 (talk) 12:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, redundant to file:Cc crews 2.jpg. Taivo (talk) 14:47, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

刪除Qwe875357 (talk) Qwe875357 (talk) 13:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:49, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no description - test uploads? Same for File:Fout6.jpg, File:Fout5.jpg, possibly File:Fout1.jpg Pibwl (talk) 13:57, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please delete this pictures. I uploaded them accidentally (nearly 4 years ago haha). That's why the titles called "Fout" (= mistake in Dutch).

 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 메인호걸 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, almost-copies of other files uploaded by 메인호걸. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 15:42, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the design is probably copyrighted also. Taivo (talk) 15:59, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation JuTa 19:19, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sebbysam88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused private photos

George Chernilevsky talk 15:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:28, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status as this photo was already circulating at Internet before upload date in 11.2009 via http://riodulce.net/destinations/tijax.htm ("© 2004 www.riodulce.net", wayback to 2006 available) = (smaller res) http://riodulce.net/images/destinations/tijax/tijax-1.jpg (last modified: 07.2009), eventually taken from related photo galleries http://riodulce.net/GALLERY/ (which are today broken). Uploaded by 2-upload user Gxrodriguez (remaining file). Gunnex (talk) 16:56, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete this. The file File:Jarlsberg og Larviks amt nr 43- Kart over Tønsberg, 1883.jpg is the same, but with better resolution.


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work of 1942 picture very unlikely Basvb (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, there is even written "1932" on the photo. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted statues, no FoP in Russia for sculptures.

Stolbovsky (talk) 17:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, modern sculptures (memorial to people who falled in WWII). Taivo (talk) 10:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kheefatt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images.

Basvb (talk) 17:43, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all are unused. That means: no one cares. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Avaleriob (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Own work of Oralia Bringas unlikely do to age of file. The Alianza logos need OTRS permission. Given 5/6 files are copyright violations. COM:PCP for the last file without exif data.

Basvb (talk) 18:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified people ; Generic file name ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Tangopaso (talk) 18:03, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dupe of File:Matka Canyon, 61.JPG Paweł 'pbm' Szubert (talk) 20:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

However, this version has been "cleaned" (the horizontal wire has been removed). Anyway, first we need to find out who is the true photographer, User:Делфина or User:Bijonse. --Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: I think that there might be more copyvios between these accounts. There is also File:Christian religious buildings 176.jpg which I nominated and Commons:Deletion requests/File:105 9487 copy.jpg in which files were already removed. Paweł 'pbm' Szubert (talk) 09:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Matka Canyon has better ciomposition. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny unusable version of the flag of Uruguay. Fry1989 eh? 19:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only 20×20 pixels. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not usable for educational purposes. - Hoo man (talk) 19:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused personal logo, the uploader's only contribution. The user is globally locked as spam-only account. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Enrico Prampolini is dead in 1956. Copyright violation. 82.124.156.116 20:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Italian 1917 films are in public domain. I'll fix licenses. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sailko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Enrico Prampolini is dead in 1956. Copyright violation.

82.124.156.116 20:18, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Italian 1917 films are in public domain. I'll fix the licenses. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sailko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Italy. Permission of the sculptors' heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:19, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick, what you write is vail only if the sculptor died less than 70 year ago. Oberdan monument is anonymous, and if you can find what year Italo Amerigo Passani died I will pay you a beer ;) --Sailko (talk) 20:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The burden of proof is with the uploader so it's up to him/her provide evidence that sculptor died more than 70 years ago. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:44, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nobody know when that author died. His younger brothyer died in 1952, so he is likely to have died before (possibly during the war). And the statue is only attribuited to him ([2]), there is no signature or document. We should not delete an image is there is no evidence of infraction. Please do not propose deletion randomly. --Sailko (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Then if you are confident in you please add a license template on file descriptions such as {{PD-old-70}}. However and according to Aunction he died 1963. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Really, I've been searching for a death date since last August as I made this wikipedia page of this sculptor. Seems I owe you a beer! Anyway now that I know I will not upload more from this author. For admins please remeber to leave the Undelete in 2044 category. Thank you. --Sailko (talk) 16:40, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 15:22, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sailko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader has said of these paintings by Konstantinos Parthenis on their talk page that the author now I see is not in PD and has requested that the images be deleted in a way that would allow them to be listed for restoring in future.

Belbury (talk) 18:31, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 21:15, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image quite identical to File:Le Louvre IMG 20141107 144630 (15762605172).jpg ; no category, no description in both Tangopaso (talk) 20:26, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, almost-copy, light a bit worse. Taivo (talk) 11:52, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Channel 5 logo 2011.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all the uploader's contributions were duplicates. I replaced and deleted them all. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dupe of File:Christian religious buildings 175.JPG Paweł 'pbm' Szubert (talk) 20:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not exact duplicate, but smaller and the other file has more monastery. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dupe of File:Matka Canyon , 128.JPG Paweł 'pbm' Szubert (talk) 20:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, small resolution. Almost identical to File:St Andrew Monastery Macedonia.jpg Paweł 'pbm' Szubert (talk) 20:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, enough similar. Small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Homhbater (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Homhbater / logs and:


Gunnex (talk) 21:18, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, these are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 12:36, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, considering also actual version grabbed from https://www.flickr.com/photos/moi_rivas/2019189383 (2005, © All rights reserved by "MOISES RIVAS") Gunnex (talk) 21:43, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded, very poor image, out of scope ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 23:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, really bad quality. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque existe otro archivo con el mismo contenido Marce946 (talk) 23:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:36, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:03, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 02:26, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pierre19241 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 02:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fusnort (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 02:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value/promotional INeverCry 02:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Descileus69 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF (except for 3 images which are 500 x 750px) - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 02:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Depicted person is unknown to en.wiki and ru.wiki. No educational value here. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Very unlikely to be own works, almost can be found http://www.ekaterinababinski.letsgames.us/archive.html --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value - also possible copyvio for the underlying image INeverCry 02:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No educational value, watermark. Taivo (talk) 11:13, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: previously published, no evidence of permission http://artpicsiwain.blogspot.fr/2015/07/iwain-lizan-cris-y-su-heroes-y-princesas.html --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission - EXIF indicates the author is Berndt Brundert - similar upload from this user File:BBF0112.jpg sources the image to a website and indicates same author - the uploader's only other upload File:Ivanov-besy.jpg gives "Viktor Vasilyev" as the author INeverCry 03:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all three files per COM:PRP. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvios : come from http://www.actor-ivanov.com/photos/ka2aclyz8k9ufqmwb003ut3nxn2f2v --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 03:19, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio https://www.flickr.com/photos/jaredtcampbell/5176308623 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Worldacts (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused images of non-notable musicians

INeverCry 03:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:41, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:43, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unidentified plant ; unidentified location ; generic file name ; so no encyclopedic value ! Tangopaso (talk) 18:19, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopaedic value is not a rationale and other stuff can be fixed. It's a photo of a lawn and illustrative,  Keep. -- (talk) 18:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep In scope of Category:Close-ups of grass Milru (talk) 19:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Taivo (talk) 08:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be taken from the web. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See hear speak no evil drawings of German politicians

[edit]

The photo showing "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" drawings of German politicians was deleted the other discussion because it was copyrightable, regardless of copyright status of the photo itself. Same goes for the above photos showing the same drawings. --George Ho (talk) 00:57, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nichts hören, nichts sehen, nichts sagen. - Stop Watching Us, Berlin, 27.07.2013.jpg. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No description of this artwork; may be a recent (Copyrighted) artwork. Cjp24 (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Siblu singer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 02:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete also file:SIBLU.JPG. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juliándavid2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - collection of artworks by non-notable artist - none in use + a few unused personal images of the artist himself

INeverCry 04:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image/artwork INeverCry 04:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Julian Arias Bello (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 04:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:32, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern church with original design INeverCry 04:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern church with original design INeverCry 04:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern 3d relief marked "1940-2003 Bogdan Yanush" INeverCry 04:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:57, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:59, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images/artworks

INeverCry 05:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josep M Aguadé (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 05:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Santana805 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

INeverCry 05:15, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:22, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anvilassa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused watermarked personal artworks

INeverCry 05:26, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SonaliKaran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible copyvios - 2 look like screencaps - the other is small w/ no EXIF

INeverCry 05:41, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:53, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:03, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - looks like a scan/photo of a photo - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 06:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not a scan, but photo of some stand or public poster. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused tiny 2kb 50 x 50px image - no educational value and possible copyvio INeverCry 06:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jan Spousta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Author's permission needed.

Sealle (talk) 06:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete OTRS-permission from author Eliška Kánová is needed. Taivo (talk) 13:29, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The permission from Eliška Kánova was sent three days ago to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org from her e-mail. The subject of the e-mail was "images listed in wiki". Moreover I feel that you do harm to the project by suspecting that I lied when I wrote (during the download) that the pictures were freed by the author. I think that we should trust one to another unless there are indices of falsehood.--Jan Spousta (talk) 09:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sealle: I do not see why there was "significant doubt" about my truthfulness when I stated here that my colleague Eliška Kánová released the files under free license. COM:PCP demands a "significant doubt" about a license, not just an editor thinking that all othes are liars and thieves of intellectual property. If you can prove that I am a liar or a thief, then OK, you are right to demand written permissions, because you can raise a significant doubt. Otherwise I think that your actions are harmful. (To be clear: I do not assert that you are acting in the bad faith. I assume your good faith. Perhaps you honestly think that all others may be liars and you are trying to prevent their lies by demanding more proofs and being more bureaucratic. But I think that this is exactly the way to hell. Nobody wishes to volunteer where their truthfulness is under doubt.)--Jan Spousta (talk) 12:42, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept OTRS 2015120410009111. Jan Spousta, Taivo acted entirely correctly. Unfortunately, we get a great many uploads from editors who either don't understand licensing or who simply lie. Therefore, policy requires that except in the case of "own work", we require that the actual copyright holder send a free license to OTRS, as was done here. This is not a reflection on you, but on the many of our editors who tell us things that are not correct. Remember, please, that we get more than 10,000 new images every day and more than 2,000 of them are deleted for cause. A significant fraction of those are cases where the uploader has claimed that the image was freely licensed when it was not..     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional, out of project sacope, not used Motopark (talk) 07:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymus photographer ("Die Galerie", a company?) is not creator of the work. It shows obviously a sculpture only in a temporary limited exhibition Artmax (talk) 08:50, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymous photographer ("Die Galerie", a company or what?) is not creator of the work. It shows obviously a sculpture only in a temporary limited exhibition. Artmax (talk) 08:53, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymous photographer ("Die Galerie", a company or what?) is not creator of the work. It shows obviously a sculpture only in a temporary limited exhibition Artmax (talk) 08:53, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paneteworld

[edit]

Paneteworld (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Small photos and mostly without camera data. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smismail1996

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Smismail1996 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, found outside Wikipedia. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of user:AminTavassoli

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of AminTavassoli (talk · contribs):

First group. Small photos and mostly without metadata. I suspect copyright violation.

Second group. Website name on bottom, own work is also suspicious. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as per Taivo. Yann (talk) 22:50, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Gramuniti

[edit]

Gramuniti (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

First group. Small photos without metadata, probably not own work, but copyright violations.

Second group. Historical photos, can be in public domain due to age, because Ethiopia demands 50 years from death, but correct author and death year must be given. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no realistic educational use, unknown location, no useful description (trivial house), low quality Pibwl (talk) 10:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Wikipedista2014

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Wikipedista2014 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. Own work is unlikely, probably copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:43, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Farragon

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Farragon~commonswiki (talk · contribs):

These files have two problems. At first, they are derivative works of art by unknown artist, maybe still copyrighted. The photos are (deciding by language) made in France – there is no freedom of panorama in France. File description is inadequate. At second, small photos without metadata, own work is not sure. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 46.218.9.198 as Copyvio (copyvio) Yann (talk) 10:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Many Web hits. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ghaele

[edit]

Here are last remainng contributins of Ghaele (talk · contribs):

OTRS-permission from author Nestor G. Zavarce is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seregot

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Seregot (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, source "archivo" lets me guess, that the uploader is not the author. Probably copyright violations like his/her all other contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original image (https://www.flickr.com/photos/jameskrismay/2459253143/) is "All rights reserved". So, it's a bit unclear why the Flickr-user, who only restored the image, can license it under a CC license. It's not my intention to have this image deleted, but the copyright status needs to be confirmed. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It's older than either of the Flickr users, so we need more information to keep it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Luis Constant

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Luis Constant (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 11:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Structuralia

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Structuralia (talk · contribs):

Small photos and mostly without metadata. The photos are made in different ends of world, so own work is unlikely. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tafeax

[edit]

Tafeax (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 11:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Rashakhalifa

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Rashakhalifa (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 11:24, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DanieleCampostrini

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of DanieleCampostrini (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 11:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vanessa mora mejias (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images : out of scope

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I liked File:La piedra rojiza caracteriza la Quebrada de Jaspe.JPG, but what's a possible scope?... Pibwl (talk) 13:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of TANDIFEDE

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of TANDIFEDE (talk · contribs):

They are all unused small photos without metadata. In addition, here are a lot of derivative works (marked with asterisk, mostly photos of photos) and a lot of photos about non-notable people (marked with plus, out of project scope). Description is inadequate. Taivo (talk) 12:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused spam photo, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 13:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"I was there" photo, without encyclopedical use - same for its twin File:Appleton Rum Estate..JPG (user's only uploads) Pibwl (talk) 13:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is alleged to be subject - permission seems dubious. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider the same for: File:Koller3.jpg.
According to the uploader, source is "Koller", the pictured person. Should be sufficient.--ProfessorX (talk) 19:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, that is exactly why it isn't sufficient. Uploader is claiming the subject is the source, but the subject clearly played no part in taking this photo, so they aren't the original author and even if they were the copyright holder, we'd need their permission to upload it and we have no proof of that. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Todd Doors (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. Commons:Derivative works from Google Maps. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Eugene?! Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. This is family history and genealogy exclusively for Moral Family of the Philippines written in Tagalog version. With refer to unclear copyrights status, it is now under the jurisdiction of Wikimedia commons. The file is accessible and the author wishes to share it under Wikipedia commons for its perusal. Commons:Derivative works from Google Maps. Kindly show me particular photo/s showing google map that needs to be corrected.

Any clarifications? Please let me know.

Thanks,

Chris

Who is author(s) of text and images?
See first page for Google Maps screenshot. I didn't go through all pages to check problematic images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Eugene?! I have three images/photos including text credited to Google maps. I don't know who is the author but that's what have shown to their website. Is this permissible or I should replace it? Other than that images/photos are verbal consent from contributors shown on last two (2) pages reflecting their names or group names. Do I need to upload all original images and text here for your easy reference?

You could not include copyrighted context like Google Maps screenshots. See Commons:Derivative works. Please ask photographers to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Eugene, I have no connection to any photographers of google maps. Maybe, you know some of them and introduce to me in order to ask permission from them. Regards, P.S. (This is the link regarding my OTRS request: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard&action=edit&section=26. I don't know if this is ok?)

You could replace maps with http://www.openstreetmap.org, which are available under {{CC-BY-SA-2.0}}, but this may affect licensing of your file. See also Commons:Email templates for example of permission. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Email templates for example of permission.] E-mail sent as instructed. Here's my ticket as per e-mail response from the team: [Ticket#: 2015120610000205].OTRS-pending Chriz moral (talk) 00:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The Google map is clearly a copyvio. In addition, family histires of non-notable families are out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book cover, out of scope. Same for remaining uploads File:Innate Alloimmunity.jpg, File:Innate Alloimmunity -2.jpg Pibwl (talk) 17:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Deciding by username, the uploader is author of books. But OTRS-permission from cover artist(s) is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the picture shown on this stamp, de:Günther Rechn is still alive, so his works are not in public domain. Correlatio (talk) 19:57, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the picture shown on this stamp, Erhard Schmidt is very likely alive, so his works are not in public domain. Correlatio (talk) 20:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the picture shown on this stamp, Johanna Starke died in 2011, so her works won't come into public domain before 2082. Correlatio (talk) 20:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Enrico Prampolini is dead in 1956. Copyright violation. 82.124.156.116 20:22, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is utilitarian object, Prampolini did not make itself, but just designed, and many copies were industrially produced since. So as we keep pictures of Ferrari cars by Pininfarina (still alive), we can keep objects designed by Prampolini, there is no copyright violation. --Sailko (talk) 20:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The art work has a copyright without regard to whatever it is painted on. Ferrari cars are them selves utilitarian, so do not themselves have a copyright, but if this were painted on the side of one, it would. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the table top has a marble mosaic on (not a painting), designed by Prampolini, but not made with his hands (it's a piece of industrial design, made and assembled by machines), and I took a photo of it in a museum section dedicated to design, not a painting gallery. Please reevet your deletion, as your motivations are invalid. Thank you --Sailko (talk) 22:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eugène Fidler is dead in 1990. Copyright violation. 82.124.156.116 21:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "GREM" graffiti may meet threshold of originality in the US. The font is oddly shaped and not simple. Therefore, the photo should be deleted to avoid copyright infringements, even when the artist is anonymous. George Ho (talk) 22:59, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 12:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Fonts do not have a copyright in the USA, so this is PD-text logo. See WP:Public_domain#Fonts_and_typefaces .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps especially those which were printed since 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. The pictures shown on these stamps are all works of Silvia Runge, who was alive in 2012. So all these files are copyrighted and can not be hosted here without permission.

Correlatio (talk) 23:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trademark infringement 159.49.254.2 23:25, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment see COM:Trademarks. Bidgee (talk) 23:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Fonts are not copyrightable in USA. Note, that both a's are identical. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Trademarks are not a concern of Commons. Fonts do not have a copyright in the USA. This is PD-text logo .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selbsterstellter Artikel der abgebildeten Person im ANR der de:wp wurde kürzlich per SLA entfernt. Das Bild ist ebenso irrelevant. 109.42.1.62 23:57, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uneducational selfie, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 11:57, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sozanskyy27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uneducational selfie, out of scope

ManniLo (talk) 12:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of عبسلام

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of عبسلام (talk · contribs):

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. (In addition, these are small photos without metadata, own work is not sure, maybe copyright violations.) Taivo (talk) 12:08, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antmango1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image, out of scope, see [[3]]

ManniLo (talk) 12:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission from Alwyn Botha. Taivo (talk) 14:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mrajeshtailor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo, out of scope

ManniLo (talk) 12:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 12:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, promotional Alan (talk) 12:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magentamonkey666 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo, out of scope

ManniLo (talk) 13:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pibwl (talk) 13:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Screenshot of en:Warcraft, almost surely copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 15:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZOMA SAFWAT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images have been copied from http://mejalex.org/ar/. Unclear if the uploader owns the copyright to these images.

Takeaway (talk) 14:25, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alcaldía Municipal de Soacha 1

[edit]

Highly unlikely to be own work: different sizes, no EXIF data, watermarks, and images readily available on the internet.

P 1 9 9   15:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blake.r.warner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aktiveslernen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Enannan anna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 15:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jsahuqui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jhon Goez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guido.volkaerts (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 00:32, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor-quality photo ManniLo (talk) 12:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor-quality personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 15:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:21, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 15:36, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:21, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor-quality personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 15:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified plant ; unidentified location ; generic file name ; so no encyclopedic value ! Tangopaso (talk) 18:15, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:23, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was not PD in Italy on 1996-01-01, so had its copyright extended in the US per the URAA. Please do not upload photos or film frames shot after 1975. Cavarrone (talk) 10:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vicmaelvaldezdelamota (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Vicmaelvaldezdelamota (serial copyright violator). Uploaded in a row on 15./16.01.2013 for es:Concepción de La Vega, municipality of the central Dominican Republic, considering also File:Museo Sacro.JPG (in meantime overwritten): 1st version grabbed from http://www.diariolibre.com/noticias/premios-xi-bienal-de-arquitectura-BNDL360144 (2012) = http://www.diariolibre.com/imagenes/2012/18/255727.jpg

Gunnex (talk) 11:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Alan: I restored the top version of File:Museo Sacro.JPG: it was uploaded by another user, so it should not be deleted basing on this request. Ankry (talk) 11:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Chulosantos1990 / logs (Flickr/Panoramio grabber). Last remaining file. Gunnex (talk) 12:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotion out of scope ManniLo (talk) 13:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

phabricators 72.47.146.208 15:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I do not understand the reason. Taivo (talk) 15:40, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason Alan (talk) 00:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es handelt sich um eine Innenaufnahme eines privaten Gebäudes. Die Panoramafreiheit gilt hier nicht. Bitte prüfen. Bielibob (talk) 15:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete What is copyrighted here? Probably nothing, so freedom of panorama is not violated. But I support deletion exactly because here is no educational value. Taivo (talk) 15:50, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above Alan (talk) 00:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://seabogota.org/wp-content/Cimy_User_Extra_Fields/furlan.miguel@gmail.com/avatar/Alumnos-libres-thumbnail.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture in Italy or US, no freedom of panorama. ~~ FunkMonk (talk) 16:45, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work. http://universalnews.photoshelter.com/image/I0000Bx3w8eN5vec says copyright lies with Universal News & Sport (Scotland) and is not compatible with Commons. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:53, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not likely to be own work, see Tineye search. Einstein2 (talk) 17:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work unlikely see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Koorilad24 Basvb (talk) 17:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work unlikely see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Koorilad24 Basvb (talk) 17:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work unlikely see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Koorilad24 Basvb (talk) 17:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Azeremen12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I suggest that the uploader does not own the copyright to any of these. COmmons:OTRS confirmation of the right to upload them is required. One of them is copyright Barbara Kinney/Hillary Clinton!!!

Timtrent (talk) 20:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I assume it is copyrighted. Ymblanter (talk) 20:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Poster from USA, not older than 1980. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, manipulated background, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 22:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gangpi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 22:41, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dupe of File:Matka Canyon , 123.JPG Paweł 'pbm' Szubert (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The other file is bigger and the monastery is better depicted, so I suggest to delete Matka Canyon instead, but smaller file is used and bigger unused. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not duplicate. P 1 9 9   04:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Available here, source unknown: https://vk.com/album-6309164_94879829 Ytoyoda (talk) 04:03, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from omflag.com Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar image found in Google search link Biplab Anand (Talk) 08:03, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Anhtq9

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Anhtq9 (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 12:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paneco

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Paneco (talk · contribs), not yet nominated for deletion:

All photos have different camera data, probably copyright violations as his/her all other contributions. Taivo (talk) 12:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All those data are provided by the PanEco Foundation, which is the author of those Wiki-Sites and uploader of those pictures. Paneco (talk) 13:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission 31.4.104.11 13:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LA ASOCIACIÓN CULTURAL CAEPIONIS, PIONERA Y PRINCIPAL PROMOTORA EN LA MODIFICACIÓN DE LA LEYENDA DEL ESCUDO DE CHIPIONA.
Esta Asociación que desde su fundación lleva en su anagrama el escudo de Chipiona con la leyenda de Cæpionis Turris, se dirigió al Ayuntamiento solicitando este cambio en diferentes ocasiones desde 1977 hasta 1996.
Su tesis se basa en que no existe documentación alguna tanto geográfica, histórica ni morfológica en la que apoyarse para deducir que el nombre de Chipiona pudiera provenir de algún personaje histórico llamado Scipión y sin embargo ocurre todo lo contrario con el nombre de Cæpión.
Si consultamos la extensa documentación existente, libros o documentos relacionados con la antigüedad de esta zona de la provincia de Cádiz, podemos ver como autores clásicos antiguos como el geógrafo griego Strabón, el romano Pomponio Mela, denominan al referirse a esta parte de costa como "Cæpionis Turris", "La Torre de Cæpión".
Posteriormente en 1634, el Doctor Rodrigo Caro, en su obra "Antigüedades y Principado de la Ilustrísima ciudad de Sevilla" nos dice que Chipiona heredó el nombre de la Torre de Cæpión.
Corroboran esta opinión, Isacio Vosio que en su edición dice: Se leía antes Cæpionis....
Abrahán Gronovio también dice: In ipso mari, monimentum Cæpionis.... Ceán Bermúdez, Madoz y otros, admiten dicho nombre como el más justificado que se conoce.
Más recientemente en la Historia de España de Ramón Menéndez Pidal y en la de D. Claudio Sánchez Albornoz también se menciona a Chipiona como "Cæpionis Turris".
Nuestro historiador chipionero D. Miguel Espinosa Pau, también se preocupó en su libro "Cæpionis Turris", escrito por los años 40 de este siglo, de la procedencia del nombre de Chipiona del cual realizó un excelente trabajo.
Después José Florido Ríos en el año 1977 hizo un interesante estudio sobre el tema de la leyenda de nuestro escudo. Estudio que fue presentado a Pleno el 29/11/1977 (Punto 9) para solicitar en su día el cambio de la leyenda de nuestro escudo. Más tarde en el Pleno de 19/06/1981 (Punto 7) el Ayuntamiento se ratificó en el contenido del acuerdo plenario adoptado en sesión 29/11/1977.
Por último, a través del Concejal Delegado de Cultura, Eduardo Gutiérrez Castro, se volvió a llevar al Pleno del Ayuntamiento, sesión 20/06/1996, siendo aprobado por todos los grupos políticos y posteriormente tras su publicación en el BOJA de 03/12/1996, fue sometido a información pública por espacio de 20 días a efecto de alegaciones en el tablón de edictos del Ayuntamiento. A continuación se elevó a la Consejería de Gobernación para su aprobación definitiva.
Sometido el expediente a la Real Academia de Ciencias, Bellas Letras y Nobles Artes de Córdoba, es informado favorablemente, según acuerdo de 29 de julio de 1997.
Con fecha 20/11/1997, el Consejo de Gobierno de la Consejería de Gobernación y Justicia de la Junta de Andalucía dispuso:
1º Autorizar al Ilmo. Ayuntamiento de Chipiona (Cádiz), para que modifique la leyenda que figura actualmente en la bordura de su escudo municipal: "Scipionis Turris" por la de "Cæpionis Turris".
2º El presente Decreto entrará en vigor el mismo día de su publicación en el Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía.
En cuanto a la pronunciación y derivación de la palabra "Cæpionis" en Chipiona es de tener en cuenta que la "C" latina en un principio tuvo el sonido de la "K" y que empezó a perderlo hacia el siglo III de nuestra era. Después tuvo una alteración en la llamada "pronunciación romana" pasando a ser "G" como ocurre en el italiano, o "CH" como ocurrió en el sur de la península en lo que fue lengua de los mozárabes donde se pronunciaba como "CH". Ejemplos de este tipo lo tenemos en palabras derivadas del latín como Illici que pasó a "Elche" y no Elce, Cícero que pasó a pronunciarse "Chícharo", y en el caso que nos ocupa que pasó de Cæpionis en un primer caso a Chepiona, convirtiendo el diptongo "AE" en E que era la pronunciación latina, como lo pronunciaban también los árabes y posteriormente a la actual Chipiona.
La posibilidad de que se derivase de la palabra "Scipión" hubiere dado el nombre de "Escipiona" o de "Eschipiona" pues el vulgo tendió siempre a abreviar las palabras suprimiendo letras y aún sílabas con mucha más frecuencia al final (apócope) que en el principio (aféresis) o en medio (síncope).
Juan Luis Naval Molero.
Presidente de la Asociación Cultural Caepionis.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Juanmabernal (talk • contribs) LMLM (talk) 19:20, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

: CULTURAL ASSOCIATION Caepionis, pioneer and main promoter ON CHANGING THE LEGEND CHIPIONA SHIELD.
This Association since its founding has in his anagram Chipiona shield with the legend of Caepionis Turris, addressed the City Council requesting this change at different times from 1977-1996. His thesis is based on that there is no geographically, historically or morphological documentation to lean to deduce that the name could come from Chipiona some historical character named Scipio and yet the opposite happens with the name of Caepión. If we consult the extensive existing documentation, books or related to the antiquity of this area of ​​the province of Cadiz documents, we can see how ancient classical authors like Greek geographer Strabo, the Roman Pomponio Mela called referring to this part of coast as "Caepionis Turris", "The Tower of Caepión". Later in 1634, Dr. Rodrigo Caro, in his "Antiquities and the Principality of Seville Grace" tells us that Chipiona inherited the name of the Tower of Caepión. Corroborate this view, Isacio Vosio in its edition says: Caepionis was read before ....
Abraham Gronovio also says: In ipso mari, monimentum Caepionis .... Cean Bermudez, Madoz and others admit that name as the most justified is known. More recently in the History of Spain Ramon Menendez Pidal and that of Mr Claudio Sanchez Albornoz Chipiona also he mentioned as "Turris Caepionis".
Our chipionero historian Miguel Espinosa Pau, also worried in his book "Caepionis Turris" written by the 40s of this century, the origin of the name of Chipiona which did an excellent job. After José Florido River in 1977 made an interesting study on the subject of the legend of our shield. Study which was submitted to plenary on 29/11/1977 (Item 9) to request at the time the change of the legend of our shield. Later in the plenary 19/06/1981 (Item 7) the City Council ratified the content of the resolution adopted in plenary session 29/11/1977.
Finally, through the Councillor of Culture, Eduardo Gutierrez Castro, returned to take the full City Council, meeting 20/06/1996, and was approved by all political groups and subsequently after its publication in the BOJA 03 / 12/1996 was submitted for public consultation for 20 days allegations effect on the bulletin board of City Hall. Then he rose to the Ministry of Interior for final approval.
Submitted dossier to the Royal Academy of Sciences, Beautiful Letters and Noble Arts of Cordoba, it is reported favorably upon agreement of July 29, 1997.
On 20/11/1997, the Governing Council of the Ministry of Interior and Justice of the Junta de Andalucía decided:
1. That the Hon. City of Chipiona (Cádiz), to amend the legend currently contained in its municipal shield bordura "Scipionis Turris" by "Caepionis Turris".
2nd This Decree shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Gazette of the Andalusian.
In terms of pronunciation and derivation of the word "Caepionis" Chipiona is to note that the "C" Latin originally had the sound of "K" and began to lose around the third century AD . Then he had an alteration in the "Roman pronunciation" becoming "G" as in Italian, or "CH" as in the south of the peninsula in what was language Mozarabic where he was pronounced as "CH" . Examples of this type we have it in words derived from Latin and Illici happened to "Elche" and not Elce, Cicero happened to rule "Pea" and in this case we happened to Caepionis in a first case to Chepiona, becoming the diphthong "AE" on E which was the Latin pronunciation, as also pronounced the Arabs and later to the current Chipiona.
The possibility that may arise from the word "Scipio" he has given the name "Escipiona" or "Eschipiona" for the common people always tended to abbreviate words suppressing letters and even syllables much more often at the end (short) that in the beginning (apheresis) or medium (syncope). Juan Luis Naval Molero.

President of the Cultural Association Caepionis


Deleted: Heraldic shield was not own work as claimed. Image needs a source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Main subject of these photos is a box of pastries for take-away consumption, presumely of recent design (although the cafe that sells them is rather old). I suppose COM:PACKAGING applies?

-- Tuválkin 14:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 15:39, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Lisbon holiday (18816466601).jpg, I don't see nothing there that could hold a copyright, only text and common shapes.
As for these other two - File:Lisbon holiday (18813835465).jpg and File:Lisbon holiday (18816445161).jpg, they have a lace that may have some copyright (though I suspect it's merely a copy of some old and common design), but the subject is notable - patisserie from a traditional cafe of Lisbon - so it could be worth blurring the lace or some similar trick to the same effect to keep them.-- Darwin Ahoy! 18:29, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Taivo and per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

w:File:Damphier Rhodes Nashville.jpg lists a different source and author, and there is no evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 16:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated to be copyright of the uploader, but is of the uploader. Commons:OTRS approval is required to sort out the licencing Timtrent (talk) 16:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a picture of me I did not take. I'd like for it to be deleted. 128.62.32.133 16:35, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Part of a gallery of images, all marked (d), various sizes, etc. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by myself. A better version is now available at File:Herri met de Bles - Landscape with Saint Christopher, 1535 - 1545 - Boijmans 2437 (OK).jpg. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 19:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The other file is smaller, but this file has bad colors. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Taivo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:21, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

==

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request --Elídio Hatutale (talk) 20:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonsoir. Photographie d'un photographe professionnel (voir cette conversation sur la PdD d'une utilisatrice de la version française) sans ticket OTRS. Unique contribution de l'utilisateur sur Commons. CptKeyes (talk) 17:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

La conversation est un peu difficile à suivre après coup, d'autant plus qu'il faut chercher certains détails de l'affaire ailleurs que dans la page liée ci-dessus, mais voici comment je crois comprendre les événements qui ont mené à la situation actuelle :
1. Le 19 janvier 2015, l'utilisatrice Pompeienne téléverse un fichier nommé « File:Amandine Marshall par le photographe Michel Vaillant.jpg ». (Voir le journal des opérations pour ce fichier.) À ce moment, il semble que le fichier souffrait de deux problèmes : A) l'utilisatrice n'est pas le photographe ; et B) la page de description du fichier ne comporte pas de bandeau de licence. Ces deux problèmes auraient toutefois pu se corriger par une communication à Commons provenant du photographe pour attribuer une licence libre et par l'ajout du bandeau de licence correspondant sur la page.
2. Peu après, le même jour (19 janvier), l'utilisateur CptKeyes signale à Pompeienne le problème A, sur sa page de discussion de fr.wikipédia, et explique la procédure OTRS. Pompeienne accuse réception de cette information.
3. Le lendemain (20 janvier), l'utilisateur Jarekt signale à Pompeienne le problème B, sur sa page de discussion de Commons. Il s'ensuit une brève discussion sur la page de discussion de l'utilisateur Jarekt, dans laquelle celui-ci mentionne qu'une communication OTRS du photographe ne serait pas nécessaire si le photographe lui-même se crée un compte Wikimedia et téléverse la photo. (Malheureusement, il s'agit d'un mauvais conseil.) Pompeienne mentionne qu'elle demandera au photographe de faire le nécessaire pour donner suite.
4. Le 23 janvier, un compte au nom d'utilisateur MVphotographe est créé et ce compte téléverse le fichier « File:Amandine Marshall.jpg ». (Selon le contexte des conversations, on suppose qu'il s'agit probablement de la même photo que celle du fichier « File:Amandine Marshall par le photographe Michel Vaillant.jpg ». Il serait important de savoir si c'est le cas ou pas.)
5. Le 28 janvier, le fichier « File:Amandine Marshall par le photographe Michel Vaillant.jpg » est supprimé par un sysop, pour la raison technique qu'aucun modèle de licence n'y a encore été ajouté après l'expiration du délai habituel d'une semaine. (Conséquence normale du problème B non corrigé.)
6. Le 31 mai, CptKeyes contacte à nouveau Pompeienne sur fr.wikipédia et lui signale que la photographie (on suppose qu'il s'agit maintenant du fichier « File:Amandine Marshall.jpg ») n'a toujours pas été validée de façon satisfaisante, compte tenu des circonstances. Pompeienne exprime sa surprise, puisqu'elle croyait l'affaire réglée (on suppose qu'elle réfère implicitement au fait que le conseil donné par l'utilisateur Jarekt avait été suivi par elle et par le photographe).
7. Le 2 décembre, la suppression du fichier « File:Amandine Marshall.jpg » est proposée.
Analyse : Comme noté plus haut, le conseil de ne pas faire envoyer de confirmation par le photographe était erroné. Ce conseil aurait été bon s'il s'était agi d'une photo téléversée dès le départ par le photographe. Ou encore, peut-être, si le photographe avait disposé sur Wikimedia d'un compte préexistant bien établi. Mais dans le cas présent, s'il s'agit de la même photo dans les deux fichiers, la photo avait déjà été publiée une première fois par Pompeienne le 19 janvier et, donc, n'importe qui aurait pu faire une copie de cette photographie, créer le compte MVphotographe, puis téléverser la copie de la photographie par ce compte. Ce qui est dommage, c'est que l'utilisatrice inexpérimentée et de bonne volonté a fait des efforts louables pour que cette photo utile puisse arriver sur Commons et sur un article de Wikipédia, mais que malheureusement ces efforts ont été mal orientés par un conseil erroné qui lui a été donné sur Commons plutôt que de suivre le bon conseil qui lui avait été donné précédemment par l'utilisateur CptKeyes sur fr.wikipédia. On pourrait se consoler en se disant que les probabilités sont fortes pour que le compte MVphotographe appartienne effectivement au photographe. Sauf qu'il resterait un doute. Il pourrait être tentant de ne rien faire pour clarifier la situation. Mais ce n'est jamais rendre service à qui que ce soit de laisser un doute. Si jamais le photographe reprochait à Commons une contravention à ses droits d'auteur en disant que le compte n'est pas à lui, Commons n'aurait aucune façon de démontrer le contraire, car Commons aurait fait preuve de négligence en omettant de demander une confirmation.
Conclusion : Delete. -- Asclepias (talk) 08:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence of release from creator, per documentation. James F. (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skysex

[edit]

SkySex (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

First group. There is no freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Second group. This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 11:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Taivo. Эти здания снесли, их не существует, автор неизвестен. Разве они попадают под удаление?

Также, этот рекламный щит разве является скульптурой или зданием?, он даже не памятник.--SkySex (talk) 19:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 11:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: creator will and identifiable people : request accepted --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

不能确定是古代作品,有可能是现代所画 shizhao (talk) 12:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence it's an old painting --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pesell (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. Old photos of polish people and propaganda.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PCP Krd 18:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pesell (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful claims of own work on these images: one is historic and obviously not own work, two are drawings by User_talk:R.Zwierzynieck, and two are photos of seals or emblems, not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]