Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/11/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 2nd, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

제 허락 없이 사진을 찍었습니다. 초상권 침해 입니다. 삭제해 주세요 1.232.130.37 08:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This picture not my allowe..pls delet right now. This is infringement the rights to my portrait 1.232.130.37 08:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I am the author of photo. I did take it on a public space - Charles bridge. Photo is taken In Czech republic where :

  • Taking a picture of a person in a public space: Requires consent if the person is identifiable (with exceptions for legal official use, scientific use, artistic use and news reporting). I suppose this is legal official use on Encyclopedia.
  • Its uploaded on Commons server in USA where Consent is NOT required.

Also {{Personality rights}} template is presented from beginning.

I suppose I didn't violate any law. Would be good if someone other put opinion. --Mile (talk) 10:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mile,
hadn't you asked the depicted ladies after shooting the photo, whether you can publish it? Per Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people images of identifiable people in Czech Rep. require their consent. The image on Commons is not covered by any of the mentioned exceptions. It's sad, because it is a very nice image. --Túrelio (talk) 10:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't have intention in forward so didn't ask. So delete it. --Mile (talk) 11:25, 28 October 2015 (UTC) [reply]

I will blurr the faces so problem will be solved till better upload from country where no prohibitions are. --Mile (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I solved the situation. Faces are blurred so cant be identified anymore. --Mile (talk) 11:40, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Túrelio check now. --Mile (talk) 11:41, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While I can understand your intent to rescue this photo, IMO, this isn't an acceptable solution. 1) at least in my jurisdiction (Germany) this would definitely not comply with the personality rights of the depicted, as people, who know her already, can still identify her. 2) Besides, in this case the blurring totally spoils the photo. Sorry. --Túrelio (talk) 14:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You took my picture without my permission. I want to delete my picture on website. 61.254.85.189 11:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will let society proceed on (but not some unknown IP), I blurred faces and legal issue is solved anyway. --Mile (talk) 14:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It will be deleted. --Mile (talk) 15:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Faces blurred, old version deleted. Yann (talk) 09:50, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is me in this photo you uploaded. There is me in this photo you uploaded. Delete this photo on all website and original film (original image ). 1.232.130.37 01:05, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday I asked you to delete the photo. But, It has not been removed. This photo was used to bad news in my country. I have received a malicious comment. I am very uncomfortable. Delete this photo on all website and original film(original image). I do not want to happen again being. Never again should not be used to this photo. when it will be removed in the website? 1.232.130.37 02:48, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @1.232.130.37: ,
sorry for the somewhat unfriendly reaction you received. Could you please send your request to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to make it a bit more official. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 07:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Google Translation (Korean): 안녕하세요 @1.232.130.37: ,
받은 다소 비우호적 인 반응 죄송합니다. 당신은 좀 더 공식 확인 permissions-commons@wikimedia.org에 요청을 보내 주시기 바랍니다 수 없습니다. 감사. Poké95 07:41, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You've processed to blur my face on the photo. Nevertheless, my face still looks at other unspecified sites. This photo has been used carelessly for a year in between I do not know. I do not want anyone to use my photos for any purpose. I have gotten so extreme pain. Please delete my photo immediately. 61.254.85.189 12:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@61.254.85.189: We are sorry for the extreme pain you experienced. Please send your request to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to make it a bit more official. Thanks. Poké95 13:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, we do not have control over other sites where the original was reused and deleting the photo here would not solve the problem. You will have to contact those other sites directly. — Yerpo Eh? 07:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In the last week I found out my picture on the internet.
My friend had asked to delete the picture in there, I regret not having done it yet.
I am not using social network services.
I do not upload and share about my photo, my infromation on the internet.
I do not want to share my photo with people that I do not know.
You was blurred on my face in this photo. But I do not feel really happy.
Please, Delete my photo on the Wikipedia. Takeataxi (talk) 09:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As far I am concerned, It can be deleted. By its not up to me, I cant delete it, just administrator can. --Mile (talk) 09:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The subject asked for removal. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per ticket:2015102910014983 (Confirmed by Steinsplitter). --Alan (talk) 12:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a picture of me on it, and I would appreciate it if you delete this file. Privacy policy svp. 145.131.132.136 10:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept - still available from original source Denniss (talk) 13:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

external source, no license, no permission Large Text (talk) 09:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no file present. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no file Jarekt (talk) 15:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thats me plz delete it Nilloxer (talk) 01:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request on upload day. JuTa 19:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial advertising, SPAM, of project scope. This file was already deleted about 15 times and now uploaded again by another sock puppet. I strongly suggest to block the IP behind all the malevolent suck puppets! Ies (talk) 16:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Selfie Shoes gif.gif Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paul Böhling.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image fails to meet the qualifications. Also, image is not the user's own work. Believed to be from sock-puppet of continuously blocked user on Wikipedia. Livelikemusic (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 10:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gildo 900 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text documents of unclear notability without evidence of permission. See COM:SCOPE.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per EXIF, authors are Ana Starka and Isabela. OTRS-permissions from authors are needed. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gildo 900 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plus File:04Fundacao.pdf, a reuploaded file. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gildo 900 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These do not seem to be own work by the uploader. They also seem to be out of scope.

Stefan2 (talk) 16:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope selfie Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload for advertisement GY Fan 03:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tajammalarain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 07:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

include

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luigui.silva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 07:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cutiepyegowns (talk · contribs)

[edit]

promotional pictures

Motopark (talk) 08:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused & not very accurate map, replaced by File:Hslbenelux.png Kopiersperre (talk) 10:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom / out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Only 180×226 pixels, the user's last remaining upload. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused document of questionable notability, out of project scope Jianhui68 (talk) 11:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small image, unusable. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 11:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 11:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 08:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 11:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 08:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jidsunsub1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope : unused personal images

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 08:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promocional ver aquí Jcfidy (talk) 12:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fuzzy and small image of unknown place; without context it has no educational value. Unused. P 1 9 9   14:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I figure it is likely Puebla City in Mexico, but there are many better images at Category:Panoramics in Puebla (city). --P 1 9 9   14:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and fuzzy unidentified logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashish bafna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All unused personal photos of non-notable person, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Loxox (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luxe Radio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion, some files are also probably copyvios.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 15:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fuzzy/blurry image without any context to make it educational, unused and unusable. P 1 9 9   17:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:07, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional text-only logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality nonsense image, already used to vandalize in en:Brookwood High School (Snellville, Georgia). Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kuzdramichelle (talk · contribs)

[edit]
English: Out of scope and likely copyvio.
Español: Fuera del alcance del proyecto y probable violación de copyright

Alan (talk) 19:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Better  Delete all. The uploader is blocked for 2 weeks due to copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 20:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional/advertising image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising سامي الرحيلي (talk) 18:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown place, low quality, subject without real educational use, uncategorized Pibwl (talk) 18:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of an (underage, 17) person without any relevance (Commons as hosting of personal pictures) L736E (talk) 20:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex copyrighted logo Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 23:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 23:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 23:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 23:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Without author or date of creation, I have to fail this PD-review. Josve05a (talk) 00:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect structure, see e.g. en:Talk:Tetrachlorodecaoxide#Structure. Leyo 01:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree fresco. Eleassar (t/p) 01:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

LIkely taken from here http://www.footmanager.net/forum/amiens-sc-mein-p-tit-club-d-vindra-gran-t33391-84.html ; photo hosted on imageshack: http://imageshack.com/f/marodelinronnylosc2j Ytoyoda (talk) 01:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Scoopfinder as no license (No license since). The only reason I've converted it to a deletion request is to give time for an explanation of why Lithuanian law applies here. Green Giant (talk) 02:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thelexilove (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of com:scope, self promo Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Lexi Love Photo 2015.jpg if the author is mentioned. It certainly is not own work by the subject.
 Delete File:Lexi Love SAG.jpg SAG membership card is above Com:TOO and not Com:DM.
My 2¢. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WTF? OMG! TMD TLA. ARG! :-) (What Hedwig is likely trying to express is that the SAG membership card is an important part of the second photo, and copyrighted, so gets in the way of making the second photo free. However Hedwig is a busy man, so uses these abbreviations. Abbreviations that I, who have been a Commons contributor for 6 years, had to look up, so if a less experienced contributor - say, for example, Love herself - should happen to get here, they just might be a bit puzzled.) I am still arguing for keep on this second one. The membership card is one, very small, monocolor figure, and a bit of text in standard fonts. The text are the names of SAG-AFTRA, spelled out, and that of Love herself, so clearly not copyrightable. I would argue that the figure is, in fact, de minimis - in other words, small enough relative to the whole photo that it is not important. The important part of the photo is that Love is a member of SAG-AFTRA, which is all in the presence of Love herself holding the card and the card's non-copyrightable text. (If you read that Twitter link, she goes on for quite a while about how this information is important to her to have in her article; I'm guessing that's why she is contributing this image.) However, if the closing administrator's judgment is that the little figure is large enough to matter, I will volunteer to edit the photo to remove the tiny figure; it's only about 1% of the photo, we can cover it with a block or something, while still keeping 99% of the value. --GRuban (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's where you are wrong. The filename already suggests that the photograph is about LL having an SAG membership card. Plain old logic dictates that de minimis non curat lex does not apply. Please read up on what is de minimis and what's not. Regarding TOO and DM. Both are linked to a page where everything is explained. No matter if I write threshold of originality or TOO -> most user have to look it up anyway, doesn't make any difference. GDS (good day, sir) café --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for that! I appreciate your argument, but continue to disagree. Others, or the closer, will have to decide. It's good to work with you. --GRuban (talk) 14:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The first image is obviously not a selfie, so "own work" is not correct. We need a free license from the actual photographer. The second, is, as noted above, about the SAG card, so the card cannot be de minimis and is clearly copyrighted. Also, the second may or not be a selfie -- if not, we need a license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lord DX (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted art by Government of Venezuela (source is 404 or not official) and not too simple to be a text logo

The Photographer (talk) 03:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. --Poké95 09:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Photographer as no permission (No permission since). It is a official political logo not too simple to be text logo The Photographer (talk) 03:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: mid-20th-century architecture; no evidence that the architect died before 1945. Eleassar (t/p) 03:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in Com:Scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This place is on the NRHP. It is possible that this unusual table is one of the reasons for that. See National Register of Historic Places listings in Story County, Iowa .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: 1925 church tower, no evidence that the architect died before 1945. Eleassar (t/p) 03:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: 1925 church tower, no evidence that the architect died before 1945. Eleassar (t/p) 03:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need to know either the artist or the date of creation (or possibly publication) to claim public domain status. (via Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/PD-Art review) Josve05a (talk) 04:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Paterm as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: low quality Amitie 10g (talk) 04:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Paterm as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: low quality Amitie 10g (talk) 04:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this simple enough to be ineligible for copyright. If not, this needs to go. Josve05a (talk) 05:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Ertuğrul Kürkçü (cropped).jpg PanchoS (talk) 06:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person depicted has not given permission. Grueslayer (talk) 08:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, bitte löschen, auf Antrag des Urhebers --Pimpinellus (talk) 08:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the pictures shown on these stamps de:Rudolf Bergander died in 1970, so his works won't come into public domain before 2041.

Correlatio (talk) 08:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the picture shown on this stamp de:Wilhelm Lachnit died in 1962, so his works won't come into public domain before 2033. Correlatio (talk) 08:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the picture shown on this stamp de:Jutta Damme died in 2002, so her works won't come into public domain before 2073. Correlatio (talk) 08:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the pictures shown on these stamps de:Harald Hakenbeck is still alive, so his works are not in public domain.

Correlatio (talk) 08:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the pictures shown on these stamps de:Max Lingner died in 1959, so his works won't come into public domain before 2030.

Correlatio (talk) 08:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the pictures shown on these stamps de:Karl Schmidt-Rottluff died in 1976, so his works won't come into public domain before 2047.

Correlatio (talk) 08:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the picture shown on these stamps de:Franz Radziwill died in 1983, so his works won't come into public domain before 2054.

Correlatio (talk) 09:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source "from website"? Different author as the uploader? Maybe a violation of copright alkab (talk) 09:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quero retirar meus arquivos enviados. Luizsouzarj (talk) 09:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The CC-BY-SA license cannot be taken back. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Desejo eliminar este arquivo do banco de imagens do Wikimedia. A foto é de minha autoria e não a quero mais sendo disponibilizada no site. Luizsouzarj (talk) 09:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: You have asked for dletion of several good photos which you licensed as CC-BY-SA. The license cannot be taken back, so these files will not be deleted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Solicito que este arquivo seja apagado do Wikimedia. Sou o autor da foto e não a quero mais sendo compartilhada no Wikimedia. Luizsouzarj (talk) 09:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Solicito a exclusão deste arquivo de minha autoria. Não o quero mais no Wikimedia. Luizsouzarj (talk) 10:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Solicito a exclusão deste arquivo de minha autoria. Não o quero mais no Wikimedia. Luizsouzarj (talk) 10:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Living artist. Media under copyright. Uploader is not the author Percy creazy (talk) 10:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source country incorrectly identified, the event depicted happened in MEXICO and not ARGENTINA as claimed on the licence. As the image is still in copyright in source until at least 2086 and USA till at least 2057 it should be deleted. 1.136.96.78 10:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Absurd DR. The event happened in Mexico but El Gráfico sent a team of journalists and photographers to cover the 1986 World Cup, therefore the magazine has its own copyright over the material published. You can see the direct link to file here. All the photos depicted on El Gráfico website are their property and were previously published on the magazine with the same name (which has been continuously publishing since 1919).
Although the image is still copyrighted in the USA, this is not a mere reason to be deleted (according to the debate concerning URAA). - Fma12 (talk) 15:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User:Fma12: You should also take a look at COM:SC. If an Argentinian publication published in 1964 or later carried a valid copyright notice, then the file is unfree in the United States per COM:SC (not COM:URAA), and Argentinian photos published with copyright notice are unfree in the United States even if the copyright already had expired in Argentina as of 1996. It is very easy to add a copyright notice to a publication, so if you upload an Argentinian post-1963 picture, then you first need to check that there was no valid copyright notice in the publication containing the picture. It's entirely possible that El Gráfico used a copyright notice in the 1980s.
If the picture was first published in Argentina, then Argentina is the source country. The country of photography is irrelevant. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Photo is under copyright in USA, trophy is not de minimis and is also under copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Solicito a exclusão deste arquivo de minha autoria. Não o quero mais no Wikimedia. Luizsouzarj (talk) 10:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Solicito a exclusão deste arquivo de minha autoria. Não o quero mais no Wikimedia. Luizsouzarj (talk) 11:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image may be in breach of CAA flight rules, I'd rather play it safe and get something better. Could you please remove this image, I'll take a "definitely legal" one later this week. Parrot of Doom (talk) 11:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The factr that the image may have been taken in breach of rules is not the concern of Commons and is not a reason to delete. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrectly-uploaded, I'd like this file to be deleted as it may infringe CAA rules. I have an alternative version which I shall use in the article. Parrot of Doom (talk) 10:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I won't close this a second time, but please note that renominating an image a second time with the same reason is against the rules here. I see no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:59, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: As per Jim. Natuur12 (talk) 17:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, missing EXIF and permission, low resolution Jianhui68 (talk) 11:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Taken from campaign poster -- no evidence of free license .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, missing permission and EXIF Jianhui68 (talk) 11:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, missing permission, found on many websites Jianhui68 (talk) 11:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Demparty (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I find these images unlikely to be own work. Low resolution, a drive-by uploader, no camera metadata.

-mattbuck (Talk) 11:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Solicito a remoção deste arquivo da base de imagens da wikimedia. Não quero mais ele sendo disponibilizado. Luizsouzarj (talk) 11:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Solicito exclusão deste arquivo de minha autoria. Motivo: não o quero mais sendo disponibilizado. Luizsouzarj (talk) 12:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work : small size without EXIF --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : previously published http://archives.deccanchronicle.com/130803/news-current-affairs/article/officials-forget-flag-designer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : previously published http://www.gutenberg-e.org/kam01/kam06aaf.html --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a OGL license. See http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/terms-conditions.page.Permission is not Required "When the use is non-commercial. When the use is commercial but the anticipated revenue is under $10,000. Permission is Required When the material is being revised, adapted, modified, or translated. When the material will be used commercially and the anticipated annual revenue exceeds $10,000."

IMO this is not compliant with Commons licensing. Btw the original source is here http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/about-org-structure/royal-canadian-navy-bio.page

@Stefan2: Stefan2 can you comment- you are an expert in this Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • The permission at http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/terms-conditions.page definitely doesn't make pictures freely licensed. Modification is prohibited, and you can't use the material commercially if you expect to earn more than $10,000 per year. I guess that there are very few who earn $10,000 per year on government material, but it is still a restriction on commercial use. I can't find any evidence that the picture is licensed under OGL. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:05, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : previously published http://www.alalam.ir/news/1183134 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the picture shown on these stamps de:Willi Baumeister died in 1955, so his works won't come into public domain before 2026.

Correlatio (talk) 12:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : previously published http://www.boon.hu/augusztus-20-magyar-szent-istvan-rend-polgar-judit-orul-a-dijnak/2899655 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the pictures shown on these stamps de:George Grosz died in 1959, so his works won't come into public domain before 2030.

Correlatio (talk) 12:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the picture shown on these stamps de:Otto Pankok died in 1966, so his works won't come into public domain before 2037.

Correlatio (talk) 12:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of this picture. No permission. BrightRaven (talk) 12:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The image is a cropped from File:Japanese conservative holds a placard on free Liu Xiaobo 02.jpg. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Liu Xiaobo.png. BrightRaven (talk) 13:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The image on the poster is not de minimis in either of these images. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is not own "El Escudo de Armas del estado Apure fue diseñado por el pintor apureño Francisco Fernández Rodríguez en 1932" The Photographer (talk) 13:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged for no-source (an obviously wrong claim), and it's always possible that this professional drawing was executed by Demorep and later uploaded here. However, that's not likely to be the case, so I'd suggest deletion per the precautionary principle. Nyttend (talk) 13:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

orthographe Skblzz1 (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC) the title only is rewriting...better : you can let this pic with the good name "Ernest Chenard sur Chenard & Walcker (Caravane Paris-Nice de 1902).jpg" ( = other better name)[reply]


Kept: Not a reason to delete .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not the user's own work, and is a believed sock-puppet of longterm banned Wikipedia user. Livelikemusic (talk) 13:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded those photos ou my grandfather, with the agreement of m'y family. We on the rights and none has been ever published

Files uploaded by Jpgine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely claims of authorship

— Racconish ☎ 13:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely "own work": looks like press release or screengrab, no EXIF data, only upload by user. P 1 9 9   14:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio content. Present in too many copyrighted website. Google searched images. Out of commons scope. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 14:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

contains non-free elements, is a logo MichielDMN (talk) 16:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Australianguy2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Australianguy2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/image/0015/160521/StudentLife.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Australianguy2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Many of Australianguy2015's uploads have already been deleted, and these are unlikely to be own work either. Probably taken from other web sites, e.g., [1] vs File:University of Tasmania Cradle Coast Campus.jpg. I've left a few logos that may be ineligible for copyright.

--ghouston (talk) 03:04, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Only 2 photos have camera data (both different). One photo has even "Copyright News Corp Australia" in metadata! Taivo (talk) 08:43, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvios. --lNeverCry 10:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asad Munawar 222 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One is a newspaper scan. Some are historical photos which are unlikely to be own work. Some show evidence that a camera flash was used to take photos of pictures. There's no EXIF and varying resolution. The own work claims look questionable.

Stefan2 (talk) 15:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from none-trivial logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BAHIDAALI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by אלון ארביב (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable

Motopark (talk) 15:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://apps.uc.pt/account/picture/calvao?hr. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably wrong licence. Image is watermarked and simply taken from a private website with no statements regarding copyrights. No rationale why this is supposed to by cc-by-3.0. Please note that uploader has a long history of copyright infringements and has been blocked before for disregarding licence terms. RJFF (talk) 15:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 157.80.67.183 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This image is unauthorized reproduction from GET AWAY TRIKE !blog http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/rboz_05/36519022.html or https://twitter.com/GET_AWAY_TRIKE/status/660411829198262273 and added feather without permission. IJReid (talk) 15:53, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My mistake: the image is actually under copyright (Corbis) alothough the original photo os of ocurse out of copyright. Byronmercury (talk) 16:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. How can these photographs from c. 1900 be copyrighted to Corbis when the original photos are out of copyright? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
well, Corbis claim to have copyright. I presume they mean copyright of the image (image of a photo). I am no expert on copyright law. The original photos date from around 1900. I asked for a deletion as soon as I became aware of corbis' claim (just after I uploaded it). (Byronmercury

Kept: These are PD -- the Corbis claim is not valid. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I tagged these and other images of the exterior of this museum for speedy delete due to copyright violation (the building dates only to 1981, and there is no FoP in Albania) but User:Sailko asked me to remove the speedy from these three: "I think the images of interior are not eligible for NO-FOP violation, they are just plain rooms with museum exhibition inside. Please open a discussion before deleting, thank you." I don't believe the interior nature of these files should make a difference if the architecture is copyrighted, but I'm more than willing to let others discuss and decide.

Themightyquill (talk) 16:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Copyright protects both building interiors and exteriors. Single rooms are sometimes below the threshold of originality, though. This is possibly the case with some of these rooms. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think there's nothing especially original in the single rooms of the museum, which are quite plain. --Sailko (talk) 21:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. --Albinfo (talk) 19:02, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I don't understand why these monuments were in the Albanian lists of WLM if taking pictures of them wasn't allowed... How were we supposed to partecipate with????? --Sailko (talk) 19:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's a very valid point, Sailko. It's a shame to waste nice photos, and to waste people's time. - Themightyquill (talk) 19:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The architecture has a copyright -- these rooms are clearly above any TOO. Also the art works may or not be PD, depending on their age. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the deletion nomination page for Category:SM Hypermarket (Sucat).


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate to File:Daniel Craig, producer Barbara Broccoli, actress Naomie Harris and actor Christoph Waltz - Film Premiere "Spectre" 007 (22547549736).jpg, has been new uploaded because of watermark. Queryzo (talk) 12:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Correct vector image is created. --Kwasura (talk) 11:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Better svg file exists (File:Finnish air force roundel 1934-1945 border.svg). The swastika has also a wrong shade of blue in this one. According to Finnish book about the warpaint of the FAF (Keskinen, Kalevi; Stenman, Kari: Sotamaalaus, Suomen ilmavoimien historia 23. ISBN 951-98751-6-6), the shade of blue should be Federal Standard 595 FS15123 which is used on the Finnish air force roundel 1934-1945 border.svg. --Msaynevirta (talk) 19:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use, cannot be deleted for these reasons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use no more. --Kwasura (talk) 13:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: again. --JuTa 23:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of the File:Finnish air force roundel 1934-1945 border.svg Kwasura (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2018 (UTC) Kwasura (talk) 19:40, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused text document of unclear notability. Contains historical pictures which probably aren't own work and thus potentially are unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 16:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused text document of unclear notability. Stefan2 (talk) 16:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused text document of unclear notability. Stefan2 (talk) 16:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused text document of unclear notability. Stefan2 (talk) 16:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused text document of unclear notability. Stefan2 (talk) 16:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused text document of unclear notability. Stefan2 (talk) 16:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Happyness23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Unused text documents of unclear notability.

Stefan2 (talk) 16:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could not verify source, date of creation, copyright status, year of publication or accuracy of the caption. I suspect this image violates the wikimedia policies. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You need a password in order to look at this file, so its copyright status is unverifiabe. Files which can't be opened are out of scope in my opinion. Stefan2 (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book. No evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The EXIF data for this image claims that the source of this image is "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sohail_Tanvir_for_Rawalpindi_RAMS.jpg". Looking at the file history there, the image was uploaded by the same user as uploaded it here on Commons, as a non-free image, with the following Source: "Sohail Tanvir (a friend of mine) personally gave it to me." This suggests that the photograph is not, in fact, taken by the user in question, and I suspect it is a copyvio, although there is no obvious source online. Harrias (talk) 17:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Editor downloaded image from copyright holder, changed name of picture then re-uploaded it under their name. DD2K (talk) 17:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of some non-free file, I haven't been able to find the original source yet, so bringing it here. —SpacemanSpiff 17:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter and why it's public domain in India? Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:54, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, it's not in public domain in India. Author is unknown, but the uploader likely have some information. I think it's safe to assume that it is copyrighted, so delete. Masum Reza📞 18:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is Eric Behar but EXIF lists the author as CARLOS MORET. Stefan2 (talk) 17:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eric Behar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Several of these have the author's name in EXIF, but there are multiple different authors and all of them have a different name than the uploader.

Stefan2 (talk) 17:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dagher Adel 1

[edit]

Copyvios, not own work: various watermarks, formats, and unattributed derivatives.

P 1 9 9   18:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as a professional photographer, I can only publish under CC BY-NC-ND license Bas Uterwijk (talk) 18:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That may be, but it is irrelevant. You uploaded this image as CC-BY-SA. That license cannot be taken back and the file is in use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by XenonX3 as no license. Uploader added a {{Bild-PD-alt}} later to the author field. Its still unknown who the author was an when he/she died to determine if the license is vali or not. JuTa 19:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Gerne möchte ich Auskunft über dieses Foto geben:

Die Aufnahme stammt etwa aus dem Jahr 1908. Dies ist am Typ der Lokomotive sowie an den Gebäuden schön zu datieren. Das Foto befindet sich in meiner Sammlung über Wörth an der Donau. Es ist eines der ältesten und schönsten Fotos in Wörth über das Walhallabockerl. Der Fotograf ist leider unbekannt und mit Sicherheit bereits verstorben. Das Foto wird auch gerne bei Veranstaltungen über das Bockerl in Wörth verwendet. (Theater und Kultur) Das Bild ist sowohl für unseren Stadtartikel, wie auch für den Walhallabahn-Artikel sehr wichtig. Für weitere Fragen stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung.

--Blechmodelle (talk) 05:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A 1908 image is too recent to assum that that the photographer has been dead for 70 years. Unless you can determine when the photographer died, it cannot be kept here until about 2040. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. Uploader added a CC license later, which is OK. But this looks like a photogaphed information-sign in Morocco, and Morocco has no so called freedom of panorame - see COM:FOP#Morocco. JuTa 19:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

К сожалению, не очень разбираюсь в здешнем интерфейсе - даже сейчас не могу понять, туда ли пишу. Вроде бы перерисовал схему и добавил к ней свободную лицензию - она не добавилась? Потому что это теперь уже практически мой рисунок, а в первоначальном варианте это фотография со схемы, висевшей на входе в Волюбилис. Масштаб и линии границ города и кварталов остались без изменения, сделал перевод и убрал лишнее - правда, не знаю, как быть с сылкой на источник, источник-то это исходная фотография. Но статье очень не помешала бы такая схема. Rigelus 20:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please read COM:DW. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader and author are different. I suspect copyright violation. OTRS-permission from author is needed. Taivo (talk) 19:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license. Uploader added a license later, but this is likely invalid as the image is used under fair use on it:File:Stemma Gendarmeria Vaticana.svg. JuTa 19:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

O arquivo original na Wikimedia Commons em Italiano, não permite que seja aproveitado na Wikipedia nas demais línguas. É necessária a mantenção deste arquivo até que se encontre uma forma de que se possa utilizá-lo nas demais Wikis. Francisco Seixas (talk) 22:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The use on WP:IT is undeer the "fair use" rule. Commons does not allow "fair use". .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful due to inaccuracy. Amateur rendering of aircraft model A300B2-203. Some of the more obvious problems with it: 1. Cockpit windscreen is completely misshapen and unrealistic. 2. Unpainted area around horizontal stabilizer seal is wrong shape. 3. No flap track fairings on wings. 4. Cabin windows should not be square. Commons has actual photographs of this same model, so there is no need to keep a poor drawing of one. SheepNotGoats (talk) 19:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That is all probably correct, but the file is in use on many Wikipedias and therefore cannot be deleted except for copyright violation. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, missing permission {{No permission since}} Voyagerim (talk) 20:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken image, not useful for any purpose. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken image, not useful for any purpose. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. The building was built in 1988 and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means the images are copyrighted and cannot stay on commons. JuTa 20:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. The building was built in 1988 and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means the images are copyrighted and cannot stay on commons. JuTa 20:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 05:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. The building was built in 1988 and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means the images are copyrighted and cannot stay on commons. JuTa 20:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 13:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. The building was built in 1988 and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means the images are copyrighted and cannot stay on commons. JuTa 20:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [5]. Yann (talk) 13:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. The building was built in 1988 and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means the images are copyrighted and cannot stay on commons. JuTa 20:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [6]. Yann (talk) 13:54, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. The building was built in 1988 and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means the images are copyrighted and cannot stay on commons. JuTa 20:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [7]. Yann (talk) 13:56, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. The building was built in 1988 and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means the images are copyrighted and cannot stay on commons. JuTa 20:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is fine with Albanian law as the building is not the main theme of the picture. --Albinfo (talk) 19:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [8]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [9]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:25, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it. no the main theme of the picture. --Albinfo (talk) 18:55, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [10]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax. There is no place called Rubensdijk nor a former municipality The Banner (talk) 20:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [11]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax. There is no place called Rubensdijk nor a former municipality The Banner (talk) 20:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax. There is no place called Rubensdijk nor a former municipality The Banner (talk) 20:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [12]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax. There is no place called Rubensdijk nor a former municipality The Banner (talk) 20:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [13]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [14]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [15]. Yann (talk) 05:32, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [16]. Yann (talk) 17:10, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [17]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [18]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Obi2canibe as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not uploader's own work - see https://plus.google.com/photos/115024238354179480185/albums/posts/6179018423620357906?pid=6179018423620357906&oid=115024238354179480185 Yann (talk) 20:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [19]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Obi2canibe as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not uploader's own work - see https://plus.google.com/photos/115024238354179480185/albums/posts/6179012516829992802?pid=6179012516829992802&oid=115024238354179480185 Yann (talk) 20:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [20]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it. no the main theme of the picture. --Albinfo (talk) 18:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [21]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Obi2canibe as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not uploader's own work - see http://www.airport.lk/beta/rma/gallery/3.jpg Yann (talk) 20:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [22]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [23]. Yann (talk) 17:29, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [24]. Yann (talk) 05:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [25]. Yann (talk) 16:56, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [26]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexmasanov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old pictures / small size, no EXIF data + logo, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 20:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [27]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [28]. Yann (talk) 16:26, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [29]. Yann (talk) 16:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it. no the main theme of the picture. --Albinfo (talk) 18:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [30]. Yann (talk) 16:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Monument was part of the Albanian lists of WLM, so there must have been a kind of authorization to upload pictures of it for this special occasion... Otherwise, how were we supposed to partecipate with????? --Sailko (talk) 19:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [31]. Yann (talk) 17:10, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Monument was part of the Albanian lists of WLM, so there must have been a kind of authorization to upload pictures of it for this special occasion... Otherwise, how were we supposed to partecipate with????? --Sailko (talk) 19:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: WLM has no authority to authorize these images and frequently makes this mistake. Only the architect can license this image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [32]. Yann (talk) 05:01, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Monument was part of the Albanian lists of WLM, so there must have been a kind of authorization to upload pictures of it for this special occasion... Otherwise, how were we supposed to partecipate with????? --Sailko (talk) 19:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it. no the main theme of the picture. --Albinfo (talk) 18:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Frequent WLM mistake -- only the architect of the building that is the central point of this image can authorize its use here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [33]. Yann (talk) 04:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [34]. Yann (talk) 04:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [35]. Yann (talk) 04:58, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [36]. Yann (talk) 04:52, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [37]. Yann (talk) 04:54, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [38]. Yann (talk) 04:55, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [39]. Yann (talk) 04:56, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [40]. Yann (talk) 04:55, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [41]. Yann (talk) 04:58, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Monument was part of the Albanian lists of WLM, so there must have been a kind of authorization to upload pictures of it for this special occasion... Otherwise, how were we supposed to partecipate with????? --Sailko (talk) 19:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [42]. Yann (talk) 17:18, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [43]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 21:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it. no the main theme of the picture. --Albinfo (talk) 18:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Nonsense -- the central point of the image is the copyrighted buidling. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [44]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 21:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [45]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 21:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [46]. Yann (talk) 05:01, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 21:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it. no the main theme of the picture. --Albinfo (talk) 18:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [47]. Yann (talk) 04:59, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CaravanEscapade (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, all other files are copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 21:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tegel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The photographer is not the uploader according to the uploader on it's svwp talk page Wdwd (talk) 21:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's right. The uploader is Kristofer Wåhlander and the photographer is Fredrik Liljegren. The latest information I got is that the uploader has asked the photographer to send in permission through OTRS. -- Tegel (talk) 21:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Permission registered, OTRS #2015110510023248. Riggwelter (talk) 21:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Manzi who? Out of scope? There's a page w:Manzi (Rapper) which redirects to the deleted page w:Manzi (rapper) but I'm not sure if it is the same Manzi. Stefan2 (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: From Facebook, A watermark appears on the picture CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of an album cover. Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es gibt einen Fehler bei den Parteien. Es ist nicht die grüne Partei der Schweiz, sondern die SVP. 2A01:110F:C9C:1500:DAA2:5EFF:FE97:F659 22:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a reason to dlete. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zackknapp2099 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Web resolution, no EXIF, strange watermarks. Probably not own work by the uploader.

Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Target Logistics (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Target Logistics (copyvios/permission from several photographers needed). Uploaded in 01./02.2013 for en:Target Logistics. Considering also (example):

Despite of having a similar username, the targetlogistics.net user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established.

Gunnex (talk) 22:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. pages 318 through 346 contain commentaries by Svetlana Zabrodskaya (Russian:Светлана Забродская) who published her latest book in 2011 hence is possibly still alive. Jarash (talk) 22:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the uploader. This is now an unuseful redirect Tangopaso (talk) 23:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 23:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of copyright works; no evidence uploader is publisher of those works MPF (talk) 23:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ynak vc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two historic photos and one very small picture. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader.

Stefan2 (talk) 23:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:TOYS. Stefan2 (talk) 23:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious manipulation (replacement of original face); also the only link is to an en wiki page due for deletion. Her Pegship (talk) 23:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer needed, redundant Maschen (talk) 23:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use, therefore cannot be deleted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer needed, redundant Maschen (talk) 23:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Widely In use, therefore cannot be deleted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

He does not want to be listed Luoranen (talk) 23:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Although we rarely delete images at the subject's request, this person does not show up at all on Google and therefore probably does not meet Commons requirement for notability. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture was upload also to Hebrew wikipedia with the source from http://kohelet.org.il/ site Hanay (talk) 10:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. Cant be own or free Bilderling (talk) 10:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permissions : http://www.eispi.ru/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could reach COM:TOO, but the threshold is lower in Switzerland, so I am not sure if it's a copyright violation or if it could be treated as PD-textlogo Scoopfinder(d) 11:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: it is not a plain text, it is also a geometric arrangement above the text, this makes it original and unique --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional logo exceeds COM:TOO. P 1 9 9   15:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: undefined --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sahduoo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused duplicates of File:SAHDUOO 橫向.svg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicates George Chernilevsky talk 17:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: There is not so many images of Kowak, Tanzania, the image is useful --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a press image, possible copyvio. ViperSnake151 (talk) 18:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Very unlikely to be an own work [48] --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inconsistent EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Small size, no or inconsistent EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Definitely, promptly, as an obvious application of the PRP. Nearly all of these images, when searched on Google, return the result "The image is no longer available or is not publicly accessible." This is an explicit indication that Google has received a removal request, and honored it. Revent (talk) 17:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination, some images come from http://nadyavasina.com/ , one similar of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BrcyzFNZJ4 at 1mn04 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax. There is no place called Rubensdijk nor a former municipality The Banner (talk) 20:25, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Addition: file taken from here, violating CC-BY-SA. CaAl (talk) 21:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: previously published, not free http://www.drentslandschap.nl/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Fietsroute-Hunzedal-2002-3-DIGI-12-08-03.pdf --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax. There is no place called Rubensdijk nor a former municipality The Banner (talk) 20:25, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In addition: this image has been "stolen" from this one and, since it's not giving the right credits, is violating the terms of CC-BY-SA. CaAl (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It's indeed not an own work and a very very small duplicate of File:Eenvoudig dorpshuis met ingezwenkte lijstgevel op plint met aanbouw onder wolfsdak Markstraat 3 Borne.jpg :) --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination, FOP in Albania don't allow this image can be used for commercial purposes --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [49]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The main theme is undoubtedly the artwork, Albanese law don't allow commercial reuse of this image --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [50]. Yann (talk) 17:00, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be captured from a video. Eeekster (talk) 03:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: possible copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

YA NO EXISTE Wiki-centrodeestudioshamilton (talk) 15:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request, arguably out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request INCORRECT UPLOAD-Plugee (talk) 07:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 19:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF copy of a Chinese Wikipedia article. Mys_721tx (talk) 20:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a blank page Ruthven (msg) 17:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom, deleted by User:Túrelio. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a blank page Ruthven (msg) 17:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom, deleted by User:Túrelio. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a blank page Ruthven (msg) 17:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom, deleted by User:Túrelio. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sadly, I think this building is still copyrighted & we can't host this on Commons. See ro:Fișier:Sediul Institutului de Istorie NI.jpg. Jmabel ! talk 17:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Building designed by Petre Antonescu (d. 1965). No freedom of panorama in Romania. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spamer's. Logo can't be own or free Bilderling (talk) 10:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Sealle (talk) 17:35, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ليس شرعي هذه صورة Marshall jozef (talk) 18:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The only content is a generic welcome message. Thuresson (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Thuresson (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

يرجى مسحه ل Marshall jozef (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The only content is a generic welcome message. Thuresson (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Thuresson (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fernando Stechinna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

screencap

INeverCry 18:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:18, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fernando Stechinna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, most probably TV screenshots.

Yann (talk) 20:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 22:30, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Handwriting is copyrighted The Photographer (talk) 12:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

… says who? --Leyo 14:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Handwriting is not compatible with text logo, because it's a art activity when you write something you are using your own hand and not a free font style. --The Photographer (talk) 17:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In which legislation? --Leyo 17:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"For example, a poem is protected by copyright whether it is handwritten on a napkin, typed on a page, or stored on a computer"[51] --The Photographer (talk) 18:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would say it's rather comparable to COM:SIG. The text, i.e. the 5 words, as such is surely not eligible for copyright. --Leyo 22:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
However, it's not a signature. The text is not the problem, the problem is the art work handwriting --The Photographer (talk) 12:01, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection. Handwriting is not part of logo is the motto, is not necessary the handwriting .--EEIM (talk) 05:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could be nice tell that you uploaded another version (overwrite) without handwriting :). How a good practice you could upload another version like a new file without overwrite this file --The Photographer (talk) 11:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with a version without handwriting. Thuresson (talk) 21:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Thuresson (talk) 21:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Borre el texto de propaganda personal por favor. 181.203.77.43 13:19, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cualquier error que veas en Wikipedia, sientate libre de corregir.--EEIM (talk) 13:36, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 20:39, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated with cat 최광모 (talk) 14:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently replaced with Category:Yoo Myungkyu (firefighter). Thuresson (talk) 21:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 21:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mary Wilkes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep They are not of questionable notability and not out of project scope. Comparisons of gun violence rates between two countries is of academic, political, and social interest. Specifically, a comparison of these rates in the US and in Australia has been the subject of discussion by candidates in the 2016 US Presidential Election. One of these files is currently in use and therefore cannot be deleted anyway. If they should be converted to a different file format, keeping these versions as a source for those future versions is necessary (or at least helpful). Deli nk (talk) 19:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use (enwiki). Alan (talk) 21:50, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Correct vector image is created. --Kwasura (talk) 12:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Better svg file exists (File:Finnish air force roundel m1934 low visibility.svg). The swastika has a wrong shade of blue and the background colour is also wrong. According to Finnish book about the warpaint of the FAF (Keskinen, Kalevi; Stenman, Kari: Sotamaalaus, Suomen ilmavoimien historia 23. ISBN 951-98751-6-6), the shade of blue should be Federal Standard 595 FS15123. Background should be FS15414 according to the book. The file Finnish air force roundel m1934 low visibility.svg is drawn in the right colour shades. --Msaynevirta (talk) 19:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File does absolutely nothing. It just sits there and trashes the category. --Kwasura (talk) 11:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --Msaynevirta (talk) 19:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File does absolutely nothing. It just sits there and trashes the category. --Kwasura (talk) 11:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --Msaynevirta (talk) 19:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Correct vector image created. File just trashes the category. --Kwasura (talk) 11:12, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file. --Kwasura (talk) 14:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is another question, and it is quite relevant: why to upload inferior, tricky and super heavy files, when we already have superior, easy and light? --Kwasura (talk) 19:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The name suggests a photo of an order insignia. I am unable to open this file with Gimp or Okular. Thuresson (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not needed. Both .svg and .png files exist in good quality. --Kwasura (talk) 10:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 21:53, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not needed and is incorrect. Correct .svg file exists in good quality. --Kwasura (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Motkinilyq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NETCOPYVIO

INeverCry 23:35, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Hedwig in W Alan (talk) 21:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a blank page Ruthven (msg) 17:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a blank page Ruthven (msg) 17:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a blank page Ruthven (msg) 17:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a blank page Ruthven (msg) 17:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a press image, possible copyvio. ViperSnake151 (talk) 18:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per com:PRP Alan (talk) 21:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another redundant penis image of no particular special interest. Uploaded by new user, used for vandalism on blocked user talk page on enwiki The Anome (talk) 20:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep as COM:Nudity applies to new images, not old images. This reasonable quality photograph is in use on a Wikimedia project and was uploaded over a year ago, so procedurally should be kept. Retrospectively digging out human penis images and deleting them under apparent COM:Nudity grounds is unhelpful and is not how the guidelines should be applied. As for being used for vandalism on another project, this is an irrelevant part of the nomination. Any photograph could be misused for vandalism. -- (talk) 05:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Kept, Thuresson (talk) 21:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 20:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, uploaded by problematic user. Thuresson (talk) 21:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 21:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer needed, redundant Maschen (talk) 23:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. unused Alan (talk) 21:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer needed, redundant Maschen (talk) 23:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom, unused Alan (talk) 21:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Facucaldo123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Facucaldo123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Set of stuff grabbed from the web, long history of (c)vios

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Amitie 10g (talk) 04:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 07:38, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion requested by uploader see de:Benutzer Diskussion:Sascha jaeger#Problem mit Deinen Dateien auf Commons, copyright problem ° (Gradzeichen) 10:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 07:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion requested by uploader see de:Benutzer Diskussion:Sascha jaeger#Problem mit Deinen Dateien auf Commons, copyright problem 2 ° (Gradzeichen) 10:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 07:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion requested by uploader see de:Benutzer Diskussion:Sascha jaeger#Problem mit Deinen Dateien auf Commons, copyright problem 3 ° (Gradzeichen) 10:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 07:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Peter Isotalo as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: No source info whatsoever. Impossible to verify PD status.. The file has veen in Commons 8 years and it is heavily used. It deserves a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 20:12, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A much larger version is available here with the artist's signature "Ogden". My guess is that this is Henry Alexander Ogden (1856-1936), "an American illustrator particularly of historical and military subjects". It needs to be investigated further when this particular image was published. Thuresson (talk) 22:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Old enough and given the subject and the nature of the file, probably before 1923 Natuur12 (talk) 07:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it. no the main theme of the picture. --Albinfo (talk) 18:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Sorry but not com:DM either Natuur12 (talk) 07:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [52]. Yann (talk) 05:28, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another redundant penis image of no particular special interest. Uploaded by new user, another one of whose images, uploaded at around the same time, was also used vandalism on blocked user talk page on enwiki The Anome (talk) 20:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope Natuur12 (talk) 07:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 07:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [53]. Yann (talk) 05:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: DM Natuur12 (talk) 07:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted building (built in 1981) in a country without Freedom of Panorama. In a previous deletion request, the image was kept as de minimis by Natuur12 but I think that must have been a simple error. The building is clearly the focus of the image, and is in fact the very name of the file. Themightyquill (talk) 14:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [54]. Yann (talk) 04:52, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 07:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [55]. Yann (talk) 16:38, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 07:51, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [56]. Yann (talk) 16:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio from http://www.coloribus.com/adsarchive/prints/levis-paint-the-rose-725855/ or similar
(permission via OTRS pending, no speedy delete) Wdwd (talk) 21:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder. Until now no ticket in OTRS system regarding this file:

 Deleted, no permission.Wdwd (talk) 21:19, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]