Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/08/18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 18th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 04:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 13:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 13:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

взят из книги "Оружие народов Кавказа" Э.Г. Аствацатурян, ISBN 5-901555-17-1 Иван Дулин (talk) 06:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann as Copyvio. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I consider the photo out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 15:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Hedwig with reason "Out of project scope. This unstructured mass upload is disruptive and not useful for Commons." Taivo (talk) 20:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright holder in EXIF does not match uploader in any way Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Natuur12: Forgot to remove the speedy tag or is there anything wrong with the OTRS ticket? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing wrong with the ticket I hope :). But yes, forgot to remove it. Natuur12 (talk) 23:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Natuur12 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:05, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

in flicker page Licensed at the source as "Attribution-NoDerivs License", which is not a free license. Motopark (talk) 19:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: usage granted for wikipedia only Denniss (talk) 08:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensed at the source as "Attribution-NoDerivs License", which is not a free license. Motopark (talk) 20:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: copyvio deleted, uploader warned Denniss (talk) 08:04, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is Missing essential source information. Image cannot be "PD-old" (life of the author plus 70 years), if author is unknown.

As author is unknown only {{PD-US}} or {{PD-US-unpublished}} can be used, but information is lacking to decided if these should be used. Source doesn't indicate a publication date, remember creation is NOT publication, (so {{PD-US}} doesn't apply)

Per {{PD-US-unpublished}} - "Works of unknown authors or where the author's death date is unknown are copyrighted until the shorter of 95 years since the first publication or 120 years since their creation"- See 17 USC 302. Johnson died in 1919 so image could have been created in as little as 96 years ago (so {{PD-US-unpublished}} doesn't apply).

If more info is given then image may be savable. --ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept,  I withdraw my nomination - After spending some time I was able to find a 1920 publication date that made this public domain. However, uploader should be more diligent in his licencing.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 12:35, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:43, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is taken directly from this website http://www.agencesss12.gouv.qc.ca/citoyens/ou-consulter/par-municipalite/ Amqui (talk) 20:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:06, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation de droit d'auteur : http://www.saint-georges.ca/vivre-a-saint-georges/taxibus/ Amqui (talk) 20:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:06, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://www.saint-georges.ca/nous-decouvrir/marques-distinctives/embleme-floral/ Amqui (talk) 20:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:06, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrigth violation: http://www.mddelcc.gouv.qc.ca/eau/regions/region12/12-chaudiere.htm Amqui (talk) 20:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:06, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: https://www.chaudiereappalaches.com/fichiersUpload/actualites/afficher-20120918083135-20110418150523-paysages-saint-joseph-crdits-arnaud-roy.jpg Amqui (talk) 20:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:05, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-France}}

List of 150 files in Category:Graffiti in Paris to be deleted

Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These pictures depict buildings, doors, and other architectural stuff "where" something has been painted, these buildings are the main subjects of these pictures.

because not original enough. Jeriby (talk) 15:17, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeriby: S'il te plait, fais une liste avec des *. Merci, Yann (talk) 15:56, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep tout. --Classiccardinal (talk) 19:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Is COM:GRAFFITI not a Commons policy any more? To answer ARTEST4ECHO, French IP law protects all "works of the mind", whether they are deemed to be art or not. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 20:46, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep -- Original deletion rationale does not seem to apply, since these images are not on Commons due to claimed freedom of panorama, but rather due to special graffiti considerations (not relevant to officially-installed architecture, murals etc). AnonMoos (talk) 04:10, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Application of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Graffiti Léna (talk) 07:49, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suspect, that this is not a textlogo. Compare with threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not delete please, this is a own creation. Is legitime, not a copy.


Kept: PD-textlogo anyway. Yann (talk) 11:15, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Currently protected by unexpired British Crown copyright. [2] Urquhartnite (talk) 23:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Igor alexandrov--Hang9417 (talk) 17:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-UKGov. Yann (talk) 20:11, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Currently protected by both unexpired British Crown copyright [3] and by also by extension unexpired British Crown copyright in Gibraltar. Urquhartnite (talk) 23:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Igor alexandrov--Hang9417 (talk) 17:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-UKGov. Yann (talk) 20:10, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free derivative work. Urquhartnite (talk) 16:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 20:31, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and a clear copyright violation. JuTa 17:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and a clear copyright violation. JuTa 17:29, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Coypvio: http://www.marc-p.com/bilder/ diba (talk) 13:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: permission via OTRS Wdwd (talk) 19:56, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value - also questionable copyright status of background image INeverCry 20:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AJEET PRAJAPAT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal drawings

INeverCry 20:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 21:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vlateinn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 21:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eng a.younes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 21:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ardaada (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 21:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value - blurry 18kb thumb INeverCry 21:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo looks to be a copyvio to me - no metadata, surprisingly professional. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF INeverCry 21:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabriel Michelon40 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 21:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: He seems w:en:Elijah Wood as w:en:Frodo Baggins. unlikely not to be own work. screenshot or something. KurodaSho (talk) 21:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandeep8795 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Tabercil (talk) 23:05, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DisneyCarToys (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Langston2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monster Adam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 23:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 23:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 23:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image/spam INeverCry 23:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 23:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mattho69 as Copyvio (copyvio) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ANY NOYON (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivanprdad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bishnu neupane602 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image for self-promotion. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private album must be under userpage Motopark (talk) 06:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 06:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused, uploaded by banned sockpuppet user. Tom-L (talk) 07:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused, uploaded by banned sockpuppet user. Tom-L (talk) 07:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user page image. Tom-L (talk) 07:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of scope, the illustration on the background might be a copyright violation. Tom-L (talk) 08:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other images of that place, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Additional possible copyright issues: small size; no metadata... if uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam. Russian article has been dropped immediately Bilderling (talk) 11:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, out of project scope like before! Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cafer AKTÜRK.jpg Fenerli1978 (talk) 11:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

include:


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other images of that place, out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom George Chernilevsky talk 05:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope/unused, tiny resolution and there are better photos from the same angle of view A.Savin 12:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 05:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other images of that place, out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom George Chernilevsky talk 05:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flag of a fake country, uploaded by a vandal Bilderling (talk) 14:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Coat of arms of a fake country, uploaded by a vandal Bilderling (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

decoration of a fake country, uploaded by a vandal Bilderling (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

decoration of a fake country, uploaded by a vandal Bilderling (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

out of project scope, fake award and personal artwork George Chernilevsky talk 05:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

decoration of a fake country, uploaded by a vandal Bilderling (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

decoration of a fake country, uploaded by a vandal Bilderling (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

decoration of a fake country, uploaded by a vandal Bilderling (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

symbol of a fake country, uploaded by a vandal Bilderling (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Coat of arms of a fake country, uploaded by a vandal Bilderling (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms of a fake country, uploaded by a vandal Bilderling (talk) 14:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flag of a fake country, uploaded by a vandal Bilderling (talk) 14:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flag of a fake country, uploaded by a vandal Bilderling (talk) 14:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mouradbahloul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 17:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blurred, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since) Didym (talk) 03:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright status unclear Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Фотография несвободной газеты не может быть свободна. Dima st bk (talk) 04:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 04:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted source : http://www.rajnishestates.com/?page_id=193 Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: possible copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 06:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This file is now being used in the article Robert J. Williamson of the Esperanto Wikipedia. (User talk: Kanadano) 02:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC) Please do not delete; when I first added the picture, I couldn't figure out how to integrate it into my article. Today I succeeded in doing this.[reply]


Kept: now in use Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Gbawden: Why is this image out of scope? Jarble (talk) 02:34, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Jarble: see COM:PENIS Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://ericorporation.com/ don't share pics under free license Bilderling (talk) 08:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify, see source and content in general, Roland zh (talk) 20:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Yann. JuTa 20:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Yann. JuTa 20:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, imho not COM:DM. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Yann. JuTa 20:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a watermark reading "moviegalleri", a website which the uploader does not seem to work for. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:05, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Yann. JuTa 20:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sorry, no discrimination for cross-dressers and lovers of cross-dressers but neither there is permission by the person being photographed nor should there be room for photoshop accidents. -- 188.109.10.23 14:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


Deleted: by User:Hedwig in Washington. JuTa 20:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, possible professional shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An email has been sent to COM:OTRS (talk)


Kept: Kept for now, ongoing OTRS ticket 2015081810012171. If ticket isn't successful within 30 days, file will be deleted. Jcb (talk) 20:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since) Didym (talk) 03:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Conversation in OTRS started.--Wdwd (talk) 19:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission and license info via OTRS. Wdwd (talk) 11:27, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, this is a screen capture whithout permission, "courtoisie" is not proven here. Do not follow (talk) 20:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. JuTa 09:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since) Didym (talk) 03:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 18:22, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Amitie 10g (talk) 22:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 18:23, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Amitie 10g (talk) 22:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 18:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 22:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 18:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-France}} Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:50, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 百结眠妃 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 20:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violations Mys_721tx (talk) 11:41, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 21:52, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 21:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ucemma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 23:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since) Didym (talk) 03:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:El Cid (filme).png

Probably false. How can a 1961 film poster be "own work"? Yanguas (talk) 03:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Defense = The image is not a poster, was made with images displayed in the Commons itself, it was done in the Paint Program, containing no notes or names. is easy to see that just have: the name of the actors, the name of the film the image Castile's Castle. anyone could do the assemblies. note that there is no replica of this image.Rodrigo Elias Cardoso (talk) 12:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rodrigo, you need to list the all the original images you used to create this derivative work. Should be simple, if they are all already in Commons. -- Tuválkin 21:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:52, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 04:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:52, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error creating a category with this name Wuyouyuan (talk) 05:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:52, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

взят из книги "Оружие народов Кавказа" Э.Г. Аствацатурян, ISBN 5-901555-17-1 Иван Дулин (talk) 06:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Do wo have any idea who actually created the drawing? Is it a recent creation? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 06:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Its my Real & Recent Photo. I had uploaded it to use as my profile Picture. It should not be Deleted as I think. Achyootamkarn (talk) 11:42, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same or similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tzan.jpg eurodyne (talk) 06:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Footballer Image Files uploaded by Royroydeb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are football player images that are crops or screengrabs based on resolution. None of them have any Exif data (note the user's other "own work" uploads have two unique Exif identifiers) and have poor resolution or non-standard formatting. A lot of images from the user have been deleted earlier, but these are ones for which I can't find the original unmodified sources.

SpacemanSpiff 06:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no metadata, watermarked - probable copyvio, -mattbuck (Talk) 07:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no metadata - possible copyvio? -mattbuck (Talk) 07:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For some reason I can't actually view this image, but the upload log states a source which doesn't explicitly offer free licences. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

взят из книги Oakeshott, Ewart, Records of the Medieval Sword ISBN 0-85115-539-1 Иван Дулин (talk) 08:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Amitie 10g. No detail, only rough outlines. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per comments Alan (talk) 22:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture from Facebook S. Plaine (discuter) 08:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No correcto RAFOL13 (talk) 09:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Alan (talk) 22:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the uploader said it's cropped from File:Japanese_conservative_holds_a_placard_on_free_Liu_Xiaobo_02.jpg, apparently it is from the portrait on the board in that original picture. But the original portrait's copyright is unkown to us and likely to be non-free, so we should not use this file under uploader's "own work" claim. Kegns (talk) 10:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 21:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: Why isn't the banner that this was cropped also tagged for DR? Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden: done. --Wcam (talk) 02:38, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 22:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: It seems official/promotional photo. Similar image is found on the web: [4]. Small size and missing EXIF data. KurodaSho (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other images of that place, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam. Russian article has been dropped immediately Bilderling (talk) 11:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam. Russian article has been dropped immediately Bilderling (talk) 11:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam. Russian article has been dropped immediately Bilderling (talk) 11:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam. Russian article has been dropped immediately Bilderling (talk) 11:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam. Russian article has been dropped immediately Bilderling (talk) 11:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam. Russian article has been dropped immediately Bilderling (talk) 11:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam. Russian article has been dropped immediately Bilderling (talk) 11:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam. Russian article has been dropped immediately Bilderling (talk) 11:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam. Russian article has been dropped immediately Bilderling (talk) 11:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam. Russian article has been dropped immediately Bilderling (talk) 11:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam. Russian article has been dropped immediately Bilderling (talk) 11:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam. Russian article has been dropped immediately Bilderling (talk) 11:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hyagolechar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution, no EXIF. Probably not own work

Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP Alan (talk) 22:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Catun18

[edit]

Text contributions, out of project scope.

Martin H. (talk) 12:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PS Alan (talk) 22:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be copied from http://everydaypeoplestories.com/blog/nyasha-mutsauri-miss-globe-international-pageant/ 4ing (talk) 13:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be copied from http://tirfashionhouse.com/archive4.html 4ing (talk) 13:52, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be copied from http://everydaypeoplestories.com/blog/nyasha-mutsauri-miss-globe-international-pageant/ 4ing (talk) 13:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chunmu55 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:16, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pkadm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other images of that place, out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:16, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used, many other images of that place, out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:18, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:18, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The name of the file suggests the creation date of 1911, which would make the image {{Pd-RusEmpire}}, and the usage of the old alphabet on the map (e.g. Татарскъ) supports this conclusion.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ymblanter Alan (talk) 22:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Children's drawings

[edit]
Category:Children's drawings sent to Aidar battalion
Category:Children's drawings sent to Krivbas battalion

These children's drawing are intellectual property of their respective creators. They have been uploaded from Flickr accounts that belong to adults, would seem to harbour the mistaken idea that they can licence these images. The copyright holders are actually the children themselves, who might be represented by their parents, but not by independant third parties. --Rama (talk) 14:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PS: by contrast, here are examples of children's drawing properly uploaded on Commons: File:Child Art Aged 4.5 Person 2.png, File:Child scribble age 1y10m.jpg. Rama (talk) 14:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FCBG (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mlemlemlo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bettyreategui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Coats of arms. Proper source information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bettyreategui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Bettyreategui (serial copyright violator). All files most likely grabbed from Facebook (or elsewhere). Example: File:Laguna de Caballococha.jpg (10.2015) --> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/311388375614192/photos/a.311398365613193.74088.311388375614192/468080796611615/?type=3&theater (2013) or File:Restaurante en Santa Rosa.jpg (11.2015) --> grabbed from (example) https://goleticiacolombia.wordpress.com/2013/05/28/visit-santa-rosa-peru/ (2013) = https://goleticiacolombia.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/p52201371.jpg (exif available) or File:Bus-Taxi en la carretera que lleva al mar sahauri.jpg (12.2015) --> grabbed from (example) http://marocco.evolutiontravel.it/it_IT/tab/25833_hotel-bab-al-bahar-4-stelle.html (© 2000/2016 All rights reserved) = http://marocco.evolutiontravel.it/schede/25833/it-marocco-hotel-bab-al-bahar-4-stelle-speciale-luglio-1a260.jpg etc. etc. etc.

Gunnex (talk) 16:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bettyreategui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violation. If you follow the rule, the date of the first publication of the image is unknown.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 09:20, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • La Imagen sí cuenta con libre derecho de autor, ya que, fue tomada en 1960, cuando estudiaba en la PUCP. Cuenta con licencia libre: {{PD-Peru-photo}}.

(Rolo Mai (talk) 18:20, 20 July 2020 (UTC))[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 04:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violations the copyright - photo belong to Andrzej Massel 95.40.80.173 15:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 22:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Olympic emblem. Do not agree that it does not meet the threshold of originality Hektor (talk) 15:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Poor argument by Hektor. A bunch of simple shapes doesn't meet the threshold of originality. It would be very useful if Hektor could explain their reason with more depth. --Sfs90 (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Speedy close, the nominator's behaviour regarding the nomination of the PyeongChang 2018 Winter Olympics (see here) show they don't know what they're talking about. Fry1989 eh? 18:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Alan (talk) 22:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paralympic emblem. Do not agree that it does not meet the threshold of originality Hektor (talk) 15:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Poor argument by Hektor. A bunch of simple shapes doesn't meet the threshold of originality. It would be very useful if Hektor could explain their reason with more depth. --Sfs90 (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Speedy close, the nominator's behaviour regarding the nomination of the PyeongChang 2018 Winter Olympics (see here) show they don't know what they're talking about. Fry1989 eh? 18:33, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Tokyo Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games has abolished the 2020 Summer Paralympics Logo--Photoyi (talk) 16:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It's simple Squares with 9 fields. and, only elements Category:45° 90°. --Benzoyl (talk) 05:52, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Alan (talk) 22:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source does not contain this image. It is probably a color painting drawn from the original portrait of Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar, no proof that the painter died before 1955 (for {{PD-India}}) or released under a free license. Arr4 (talk) 16:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP Alan (talk) 22:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 17:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 17:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image. Jonund (talk) 17:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment A mediocre image is better than none, but in my opinion, this is not worth having. Input from others is welcome. --Jonund (talk) 18:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per cmts Alan (talk) 22:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Biturulita (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 17:52, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was uploaded to w:en:File:Maryam Zandi.jpg. However there it was attributed to Zandi herself, unlike here where the uploader claims it as their own. We cannot therefore be sure if this license is valid. Apply COM:PRP. BethNaught (talk) 08:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Parandco: I have permission from Maryam Zandi herself for uploading this photo (which she has given me) and she has asked me to update her page according to the information she has provided me. If you need the email from Maryam Zandi herself which within that email she has mentioned that I can use her photo for uploading in her Wikipedia page. (talk) 08:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See COM:OTRS. Be aware that permission to use the photo on Wikipedia is insufficient. You need permission to upload under a free license which will allow anybody to modify and reuse the photograph for any purpose, including commercial purposes. BethNaught (talk) 10:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No action re OTRS in almost a month Herby talk thyme 10:53, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, not used, many other images of that place, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have transferred a set of images from Flickr to commons via Flickr2Commons tool. Now, all of the images were under Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic and accepted by the norms for uploading a work found on Flickr. Now, this image was taken in the month of November. In the beginning of winter season in India there remains heavy fog in that particular time.Due to the presence of fog, a gloomy effect have been created and the photographer wanted to capture the same. As per my opinion, the image should not be deleted.Schwiki (talk) 12:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: The appears to be fog arround the Taj Mahal (clearly there are three persons, too), that noesn't make this picture bad quality. Maybe still educationally valuable for Fog, and at least, the Taj Majal. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Odd image however I understand the arguments to "keep" Herby talk thyme 10:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. If found to be in-scope, there are additional possible copyright issues: small size; no metadata... If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Of no value as far as I can see Herby talk thyme 10:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,
I am Dustin Cook, I uploaded the file, it was taken by a teammate the night of that race and they have given permission for me to use it. If you still have a problem with it I can very easily upload others. If you have any way for me to verify my identity if you require that sort of proof let me know.
Cheers, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genericskier (talk • contribs) 00:07, 19 August 2015‎ (UTC) Note: moved from my talk page --Storkk (talk) 11:10, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Genericskier: It would be fantastic if we could keep this photo! We just need to do a little more work to verify the license, I hope you can help. Your teammate (the photographer) needs to confirm an exact license (and note that any license that we accept needs to allow for, for example, commercial derivative usage). We have procedures in place to make this as painless as possible. Please read and follow COM:OTRS. Thanks for your help, Dustin! Storkk (talk) 11:11, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Nothing apparently from OTRS since nomination - if by any chance this is an aeeror it can be undeleted. Herby talk thyme 11:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nothing from OTRS is over three weeks so deleted. Herby talk thyme 11:03, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nothing from OTRS is over three weeks so deleted. Herby talk thyme 11:03, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nothing from OTRS is over three weeks so deleted. Herby talk thyme 11:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS confirmation required that the uploader is Борис Дерменджиев, the presumed copyright holder of the sculpture. Storkk (talk) 10:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nothing from OTRS is over three weeks so deleted. Herby talk thyme 11:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nothing from OTRS is over three weeks so deleted. Herby talk thyme 11:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mislabelled image has a section circled in red that does not include any plant that could be called Maleza mora (not Hierba mora, not Morus, not Rubus; it is probably Polygonum. Elsewhere in the image are Rumex and Rubus. The image serves no encyclopedic purpose. It is the only contribution of the uploader and may perhaps have been intended as a joke. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Inmujernl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Willimony (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits an Alexander Murashkin. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

permission should be confirmed via OTRS. It is the only upload from this user account, with only few few edits on ru.wp.--Wdwd (talk) 21:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Nothing from OTRS is over three weeks so deleted. Herby talk thyme 11:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jenmedia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is my work. I regret that you discount my upload/contrib integrity here and will advise, respectfully, that I take my activity here seriously and I do not operate in the manner which you are accusing or suggesting. My desktop crashed and I lost all my data/files. This image was taken a while back. I tried to access and reactivate an old Flickr account but to no avail. What is the next action, here? Do you need me to take any action hereafter, i.e. send a written statement, send other photos I have taken that relate to the said individual as well as some of the product (designer of fashion handbags), et al? Please note, I do not have another image/shot of this person however I can make arrangements to take one if necessary but this is time on my end Should be a last resort. The subject / person in the image can attest to my upload/ownership here as well however I don't know how you would handle this (whatever the guidelines may be). Anything I can do to help, just let me know what you'd like me to do. Thank you. Jenmedia (talk) 22:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Typo correction (I tried to reactive my old Flickr to access images, typo earlier stated deactivate which was incorrect) Jenmedia (talk) 22:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also to note that meanwhile I will be looking through some old CDs containing images. If I am fortunate to find anything on hand relating to this article/bio / matter I will update accordingly. I understand the copyright issues that many deal with and appreciate your concern. Hopefully I can locate other larger res image files. If I happen to find such or perhaps another image taken by me, owned by me, of the same individual and matter I will upload these as well. Also to note - I am a photographer having professional equipment but such is not my source of income (I wear many other hats). Thank you.


Deleted: Nothing further heard to confirm licensing via OTRS or to upload original images over three weeks now. Herby talk thyme 11:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jenmedia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are highly professional images and yet are small sized and lack any EXIF. I would suggest that if we are to host these images we should seek confirmation via COM:OTRS. Thanks

Herby talk thyme 11:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand the comment above about "nothing further heard" as it has not been three weeks; all of this is quite confusing to me - I am copying my reply below relating to these images; McLaren launch event - please read the following...

File:Jenmedia mclaren launch 2010 img 19.jpg and File:Jenmedia 2010 mclaren launch shot 1b.jpg

[edit]

I am complimented by your remarks of "highly professional" photo. I am an artist, designer, illustrator, photographer, writer, and many other titles. These shots I took on my own personal time as I was a guest at the McLaren launch event. I am trying to locate my larger file size; my computer crashed not too long ago but I have files saved elsewhere via the web, i.e. flickr, and I also have version of one of these shots - the file is hosted at my site https://jenmedia.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/mcclaren-launch.jpg ... I am not sure if you are able to see all the others I have uploaded some of which are the same vehicle ... I appreciate your compliments - you aren't the first one to question my photography and own work here - and again, I am gathering other files to resolve. This is a little time consuming for me (again, my system crashed so I lost some files/data from the past years) ... because of this I will probably refrain from uploading anymore of my shots here as me doing a favor seems to backfire. Respectfully, Jenmedia (talk) 08:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am correcting my comment above to reference that you are attempting to remove two photos of mine now - both of which I have personally taken - one of these images I have on my wordpress server; I am still locating others and will update you accordingly. Jenmedia (talk) 08:04, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also to ask if you are looking at the original file upload dims; what determines very small, please educate me so I know as one file is over 1000 x 1000 but resolution and dim options may differ and I guess you deem this too small.

Also to note my web server has another copy stored here (https://jenmedia.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/jenmedia-pretending-to-be-a-pro-photographer-for-bentley-rolls-mclaren-launch.jpg) that has a credit line / event caption / bottom right corner - I don't know if any of this is helpful; I am not as seasoned as you when it comes to this documentation here when it comes to photos - all I know is that I like to take them and provide some work for use to Wikipedia; so forgive me if I am not noting the proper terms or documenting this talk page properly; just being thorough as it's a bit insulting to me being accused of not uploading my own work (while simultaneously a compliment I suppose). Also to prove the wordpress server is mine; ref url https://jenmedia.wordpress.com/?attachment_id=3900 ... Thank you. Respectfully, Jenmedia (talk) 08:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at my talk page as I have answered you there in a sense.
On size you would be amazed how many people steal images from photographer's websites and upload them here claiming "own work". It is in my experience rare for a photographer to put their work anywhere public and not leave in the EXIF at least as regards copyright - I certainly would do that and I would advise you to consider how you handle this. While it will not prevent abuse it may mean it can be spotted more easily. Certainly it is a combination of these factors that made me wonder about these images.
Strangely (to me) quite a few of your uploads do have EXIF information (though you have not set the copyright filed which is odd to me). Equally you do vary in the size of your uploads from what are full sized images to ones that barely qualify as thumbnails - I find that odd.
You would also be well advised to consider your backup policy. I guess I'd be likely to have at least 3/4 backups of important images. Best --Herby talk thyme 08:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ticket:2015092010013878 in process. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per ticket:2015092010013878 - Jcb (talk) 00:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture was taken from the website of this person and no OTRS release approval has been sent. In this situation, it cannot stay in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 15:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No OTRS permission since nomination Herby talk thyme 11:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 18:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom - copyvio Herby talk thyme 11:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Triangulo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 18:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom and unused Herby talk thyme 11:16, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amit01sirt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 18:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llywelyn2000 (talk • contribs) 2015-08-10T09:08:11‎ (UTC)


Kept: Still readable - might be of use. Herby talk thyme 11:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: It seems screen capture of a Japanese television commercial, "木村文乃、CMで歌声披露 新ノンアルコールソーダのイメキャラに" (around 1:20). She is a Japanese actress, w:en:Fumino Kimura (= 木村文乃). KurodaSho (talk) 19:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llywelyn2000 (talk • contribs) 2015-08-10T10:16:56‎ (UTC)

  •  Keep: Resolution itself is not a valid reason for deletion. Still educationally valuable. If at the source is not found this picture at better resolution, is not Commons problem. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per keep comment Herby talk thyme 11:19, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Littlegoldenstar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 19:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:19, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Innovationsstandort (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 19:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by مصطفى الموصل (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 19:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. format and missing exif, as well imho just a 'selfy' that's not in use within the Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Delportal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 19:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:23, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image, unused --JWBE (talk) 10:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:23, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeank Zapata (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 19:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started as imho uploaded for promotional use, hence imho 'out of scope', Roland zh (talk) 19:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify, see source mentioned by uploader, Roland zh (talk) 19:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:25, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, also missing permission Didym (talk) 19:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:25, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alforninigio4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 19:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:25, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify, see source mentioned (facebook), Roland zh (talk) 19:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haris khan.4hd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 19:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed own work as p.e. format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started as imho commercial-oriented advertisements, Roland zh (talk) 19:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed own work as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, as well imho rather commercial advertisements, Roland zh (talk) 19:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, again, but DR as per File:Indian Wedding Photographer in Bangalore, Warangal, Vijayawada, Visakhapatnam,AndhraPradesh India.jpg by same uploader, Roland zh (talk) 19:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed own work as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed own work as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsharp picture Motopark (talk) 20:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 11:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started as imho just commercial-orientied advertisements, Roland zh (talk) 20:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam Herby talk thyme 11:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raymond Meuwly died in 1981, so OTRS permission is needed until PD in 2052 Didym (talk) 21:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No OTRS since nom Herby talk thyme 12:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Los mao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Loiscapirosi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 21:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom and copyright too maybe Herby talk thyme 12:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Manque des informations visibles sur l'origine et l'utilisation du logo Saranos (talk) 09:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Manque des informations visibles sur l'origine et l'utilisation du logo Saranos (talk) 10:05, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dupicate of File:Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan Flag.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:32, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear why it is in scope. Too little information provided. Jonund (talk) 17:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's more info here. I suppose it may be of use for female dress of 1915, particularly sportswear. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep When did "I don't understand it" become a rationale for deletion? It is not clear to me what educational value there is in any baseball photograph here, yet I recognise others may have valid use for them. We should be hugely reluctant to start seeing images as objectively "no use", from a subjective standpoint. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Maybe female dress of 1915 is a sufficient rationale. I don't propose "I don't understand it" as a rationale for deletion. I'm open for suggestions, but images that seem to lack educational value should not just be assumed to have one. --Jonund (talk) 17:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per dicussion Natuur12 (talk) 23:32, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Impossible to read the sign; overexposed image. Jonund (talk) 17:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was created primarily for Wikisource page s:uk:Сторінка:Етнографічний_збірник_Т.35.djvu/38. It is not needed anymore after substitution with Score notation. DixonD (talk) 18:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Metabaron~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 18:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This is our own work

[edit]

Those two files has been written, arranged (Bobby Boy is a traditionnal song) and performed by the Barons Freaks, released, mixed, mastered by the AMMD, and Metabaron is a nickname for the whole band. We do own this work, as you might see by looking at baronsfreaks.org or baronsfreaks.bandcamp.com, and share and spread them following the terms of free art license. Please remove this deletion request.

Barons Freaks


Deleted: Evidence of permission via OTRS is required. Natuur12 (talk) 23:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On 2015-08-18T17:59:55‎, Paris 16 (talk · contribs) added to this filepage {{duplicate|Pont de lArchevêché, Paris 2010.jpg}}. Since that other photo has been retouched and this one is a duplicated of its unmodified original, {{Duplicate}} doesn’t apply strictly. -- Tuválkin 18:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These were originally the same image. If the retouchings added by Paris 16 were a good addition (and I think they are), then the unretouched original is of no immediate use. If necessary it could be restored as a new file, or the retouchings could be reverted, but so far there’s no support for that. -- Tuválkin 21:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, not per me, as I typed vk instead vd by mistake. -- Tuválkin 21:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion Natuur12 (talk) 23:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is never "Own work". The user would have to be almost 100 years and have the copyright of Pathe France. 92.72.192.25 19:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I renamed due to personal privacy reasons - not wanting to use my username, but search engines are still picking up this (unused) page. Masked Turk (talk) 19:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Sounds fair Natuur12 (talk) 23:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, seems to come from a website Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 20:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify, see source "for college purpose", Roland zh (talk) 20:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify, see source "Nil" or "Nll", Roland zh (talk) 20:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A painting depicting Elvis Presley, claimed to be "own work" of the uploader. But as the uploader is a photographer, not a painter, he most likely isn't the author of the painting. It's apparently hung in Graceland and certainly not pre-1923 or similar, nor do other copyright exceptions come to mind. Rosenzweig τ 20:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, see www.geraniumhomes.com Magnolia677 (talk) 20:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a pretty poor photo of myself and I object to the fact that it is so readily accessible for people to use. The photographer did not get permission to use the photos in writing from the people whom he casually photographed at the meeting where he took them. --Brian Josephson (talk) 15:45, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral - on one hand permission from the depicted person is not required, on the other hand we do have an alternative: File:Brian Josephson, March 2004.jpg, so I don't see an actual need to keep this file. Jcb (talk) 20:06, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and without context, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Description is clear, this is an example how to make UI mockups based on the AskFedora desing, as part of modern Web interfaces, HTML5 and Free Software. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment I do not think this shows "how to make UI mockups" based on anything... how is it different from some random mockup? Is any design mockup automatically notable? I'm still failing to see it, I'm afraid. Storkk (talk) 17:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cubgirl4444 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, likely to be taken by the person who restored the aircraft, who later sold it to the uploader. Unless proof of transfer of copyright can be proven, or the images are released by the photographer (or next of kin if applicable), they should be deleted per COM:PRP.

ColonialGrid (talk) 14:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:ColonialGrid this picture is from 1991. PLEASE READ. Taken in Columbus in 1991 after restoration. I got my engineering degree from Ohio State. I am 61 years old & took this picture in 1991. I've owned this cub since 1985. This is getting ridiculous. I WANT OUT OF FRIGGING WIKI!!!!!!!!! I HATE IT HERE!

I HATE WIKI! I HATE WIKI! I HATE WIKI! I HATE WIKI! I HATE WIKI! I HATE WIKI! I HATE WIKI! I HATE WIKI! I HATE WIKI! I HATE WIKI!

Cubgirl4444 (talk) 04:09, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:ColonialGrid no, i never said any such thing. i said we've owned this since 1985. we paid big money in ohio in 1991 to have it restored. it took 3 years. pretty tired of being accused of lying here. really leaves a terrible taste...

− Now you're saying I didn't take a picture of my own aircraft after restoration. Earlier the pic of it at osh kosh in 1991 was removed so I guess I didn't go to osh kosh & take a picture of it there either... somebody else must've done that too. i have a picture of it in lock haven winning the sentimental journey award in 1991 but i'll never share it here... guess you all think somebody else took that one too. actually, i must not own any of the photographs i have taken of the cub over the last 30 years. i guess someone else flies it too and pays hangar fees, insurance, annuals. gee thanks guys for setting me straight! love coming here being called a liar.

i'm sending wiki a certified letter about this behavior. users shouldn't be allowed to get online & accuse people of being liars. shame on you guys.

AGAIN< I HATE WIKI... CORRECTION< WIKI USERS WHO ACCUSE ME OF LYING, User talk:ColonialGrid

Cubgirl4444 (talk) 12:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I never called you lair, I just don't think you understand our licencing requirements. Given that pretty much everything you have uploaded hasn't complied with our licencing requirements, often as own work (for example the files below, which are scans of documents from 1941, you clearly cannot have written a document in 1941 as you were not born yet), I do think it is reasonable to assume that these images too were not own work. Also, regarding the emails you have been uploading, you cannot do this, you did not write them and they are not your IP to release. Additionally, for the third time, every file uploaded to Commons must be available for commercial use, not simply non-profit educational use, therefore the Smithsonian releases you have been certifying to not comply with our licencing requirements. Before you upload another file, please familiarise yourself with COM:LICENSE, and only upload files that comply. ColonialGrid (talk) 13:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These are scans from a 1941 document, therefore unlikely to be own work. Unless proof of public domain status, or a free licence can be provided, they should be deleted per COM:PRP.

ColonialGrid (talk) 14:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note, OTRS has received a ticket (2015081910013588), which repeats the above. From what I've seen, I don't think these images in particular are copyvios. --Mdann52talk to me! 17:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
On what basis has the OTRS ticket claimed that these three files are PD or CC? ColonialGrid (talk) 04:36, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No licence claim yet, just a claim of ownership. --Mdann52talk to me! 06:41, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have no doubt the person owns the document, but it simply cannot be own work if made in 1941 as the uploader claims to be in their 60s. ColonialGrid (talk) 07:07, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@ColonialGrid: the file title says it was 1991... and it was published in 2015. If you say there are no issues with this being their own work, I fail to see why there is a DR open. Can you please enlighten me to this 1941 claim you mentioned? --Mdann52talk to me! 17:17, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, this is two DRs that have been merged, the three files you are commenting on are extracted from a PDF that has 1941 in the title. I thought it was this document and the images extracted from it (ie File:Flitfire pilot instructions.pdf, File:Flitfire Brigade Formation 1941.png, and File:Flitfire Brigade Flight 1941.png) that you were commenting about, as it was these files that you are commenting on. ColonialGrid (talk) 08:45, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

violation of copyright; this page does not have copyright release. DELETE IMMEDIATELY

Cubgirl4444 (talk) 07:18, 10 September 2015 (UTC)cubgirl[reply]

flitfire brigade info violates copyright; DELETE IMMEDIATELY.

Cubgirl4444 (talk) 07:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)cubgirl[reply]

Keep: This photo should not be deleted. It is a legitimate photo of a historical subject that was donated to Commons under the licence indicated, by the copyright holder. As indicated here the user has conflicted with many other editors, quit Wikipedia and is now using a false premise to try to "un-donate" her work to Commons. The image is significant and should be retained here. - Ahunt (talk) 13:24, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all three 1991 files. The claims that these images violate copyright do not stand up to scrutiny. The original contributor has given a perfectly reasonable case for their ownership of copyright. They then got upset by editorial challenges both here and on Wikipedia and began attempting to remove material: see not only their later comments above here but also both this parallel deletion request for one image and this attempted removal of contributed material from Wikipedia. The claims of breach do not stand up to scrutiny. These images were, to all appearances, legitimately released by the original owner under a Creative Commons license. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 14:11, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. 1941 documents are PD-US no notice/no renewal. Yann (talk) 18:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[5] Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC) I put a link to the website so that user know about the notability.[reply]


 Deleted, by User:Alan with reason "Commons:Deletion requests/File:Avalancha SurAvsr.png". Taivo (talk) 21:30, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not FoP in Italy, per Italy/FoP - Fma12 (talk) 15:05, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of modern 3D sculpture that is copyrighted by FIFA. The trophy was designed (1971) by Italian artist Silvio Gazzaniga, who is still alive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fma12 (talk • contribs)

Also adding :

LGA talkedits 08:04, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete COM:DW. LGA talkedits 08:04, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Obvious copyvio of a photography and copyvio as COM:DW of the FIFA world cup trophy. I would add that all the FIFA trophy is probably in use in lots of wiki. For exemple the first image is used in the following wiki:

+----------+-----------+
| gil_wiki | count_img |
+----------+-----------+
| arwiki   |         3 |
| bnwiki   |         3 |
| enwiki   |       142 |
| itwiki   |         2 |
| jawiki   |         1 |
| scnwiki  |         1 |
+----------+-----------+

While closing this DR, it would be nice to transfer back images where there are exemption doctrine to do so (such as the en:Wikipedia:Non-free content policy). --PierreSelim (talk) 12:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the first image is used on the Main Page of enwiki so not really a good idea to delete this image yet...lets wait a few days...--Stemoc (talk) 12:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
it can be transferred to en.wp and used under fair use. --rtc (talk) 17:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete standard trophy case of COM:DW, already discussed. Use under fair use in specific wikipedias. --rtc (talk) 17:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment

show also a bottle of coke, that is supposed to be copyrighted, why don't we delete also all pictures including a bottle of Coke then? (that's supposed to be ironic) --Gambo7 (talk) 17:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion Эlcobbola talk 17:25, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous DR. Unlike the image this photo was taken from, the copyrighted trophy is showed as the main subject here. - Fma12 (talk) 14:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by user:Hedwig in Washington with reason "copyright violation". Taivo (talk) 21:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Vauxrenard" war eine falsche Benennung; das Foto zeigt vielmehr Grandris und ist auch schon entsprechend umbenannt worden. Dietrich (talk) 16:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, nobody objected and the redirect is unused. Taivo (talk) 21:42, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Seite ist eine Kopie einer Zeitung und ist damit eine Urheberrechtsverletzung (please translate ist correctly :-( )--K@rl (talk) 12:45, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bitte, das Bild zu löschen, wenn es eine Urheberrechtsverletzung darstellt. Meinen Fehler bitte ich zu entschuldigen. Vielen Dank. --Lillith Green (talk) 10:44, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, newspaper clipping, uploader also agrees with deletion. Taivo (talk) 21:44, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is biased and wrong, without any languistic reference and based on a nationalistic motives Adilswati (talk) 10:42, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 11:19, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map was produced by Maria0333, a confirmed sock of LanguageXpert at the English Wikipedia. See here, Maria0333 has a bad reputation of creating wrong map which has no reference.It should be deleted.

The creator of this map (0333maria)is a sock puppet of worse notoriety of using more than 20 accounts for vandalism and disinformations. Always engaged in anti Pashtun, anti baloch and anti seraiki schemes. As far as this map is concerned, it is totally biased & wrong beacuse majority of the Quetta people are Pashto speaking Pashtuns, but it has concealed a big nation under Punjabi. Similarly, Qilla Abdulla district is majority of Pashtuns but in this map Hazargi has highlighted and remaining Musa Khel District which is a also a dominant Pashto speaking region. but this person has shaded it by Seraiki majority which is absolutely wrong & punishable. So, this unreferenced, biased and wrong map of a sock puppet should be deleted.--Adilswati (talk) 13:31, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide sources and refrences of your claim ? 39.47.219.56

Check the official website of Blochistan Govt and ur often repeating quote of census in a real manner. --Adilswati (talk) 05:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maria0333 or 39.47.219.56 prove it that the map is factual,give reliable reference.But I know you have no such refs and the map is based on your Punjabi mindset--94.99.201.82 05:33, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Already nominated by you and kept, but not longer used (do you removed the link to this file at the article that were used?). Commons is not Wikipedia, and therefore, the files don't need references (only a valid source). You must prove its not-educational valuable with stronger reasons. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the file is used. Taivo (talk) 21:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, really out of scope. Also claim "source is Google" does not sound well. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:47, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hochlader nicht mit genammtem Rechteinhaber identisch — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lutheraner (talk • contribs) 2015-08-15T12:52:25‎ (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader is not author. The photographer must send OTRS-permission and after that file can be restored. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong use — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rickazio (talk • contribs) 2015-08-13T22:43:06‎ (UTC)


 Deleted, OK, small file (376×299) without metadata, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 21:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensed at the source as "Attribution-NoDerivs License", which is not a free license. Motopark (talk) 19:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned in description, I have received specific permission by the author to use this image in this manner. May I provide a screenshot of sorts? @Motopark: Spartan7W (talk) 22:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You should ask them to change the license tag on the image.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:48, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Spartan7W: please read COM:OTRS - this is a classic case for OTRS confirmation. It would be easiest if they would change the flickr license, however that is not necessary if they clearly state that they license the file here under an acceptable license. That's a big "if", though: do they understand that any commons-compatible license allows for commercial derivatives? Note that "Wikipedia use is OK" is most definitely not an acceptable license! Cheers, Storkk (talk) 10:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, second revision deleted, but first kept. The second revision can be also restored, if OTRS-permission arrives. Taivo (talk) 21:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Peinture de Picasso : Arlequin acolado 1901 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siren-Com (talk • contribs) 2015-08-11T12:11:15‎ (UTC)



 Deleted, all other (except Picasso) does not surpass threshold of originality. Picasso died in 1973 and copyright lasts in Spain 80 years. So the file can be restored in 2054. Taivo (talk) 22:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kukunmishra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Krd 16:16, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kukunmishra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 20:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by user:Herbythyme with reason "out of project scope". Taivo (talk) 22:08, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamharishjoshi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, not educationally useful.

Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamharishjoshi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 21:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by user:Herbythyme with reason "out of project scope". Taivo (talk) 22:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old and unneeded screenshot of an error message Didym (talk) 19:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, per Amitie. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anti-Russian propaganda, out of scope. Sealle (talk) 23:13, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Humm... Where is the rules about this? --Esetok (talk) 16:57, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vatnik or Vatniki is very popular 2013-14 term describing Russian patriotic rednecks. Vatnik is a person who is dumb and blindly loves his Motherland. The lack of irony and critical thinking is often attributed to Russian Vatniki. 1

--Esetok (talk) 15:04, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. COM:NOTCENSORED: "Commons will not censor or remove media that users find objectionable or offensive". --sasha (krassotkin) 16:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Go on reading, Krassotkin: …unless the image … violates other Commons policy such as our scope. Sealle (talk) 21:30, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Sealle: This image within scope. What we will illustrate articles and news about popular meme "Vatnik"? This unique image needs careful kept. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Sorry, in russian, It's easier for me) Вообще удивлён твоей позицией, а вкупе с другими вынесениями на удаления шокирован и очень расстроен, т.к. отношусь с уважением и ценю твою работу. Но тут, с одной стороны явный "протест" и пушинг, с другой - непонимание что такое Викисклад. Викисклад - крупнейший медиабанк свободных медиаматериалов, предназначенных для использования где угодно. Поэтому в нём могут находиться любые материалы, которые где-то, кем-то, когда-то, даже чисто теоретически могут быть использованы для образовательных целей; причём во многих вариантах. Тут же чистое "скопе" - важная страничка в нашей истории и культуре. Что с того, что кого-то она может оскорбить. Свастика вона тоже многих оскорбляет, как и советская символика, кстати, но всё это нужно для иллюстрации нашей истории, общественного развития, культуры. Поэтому даже если кто-то десятки подобных изображений загрузит в разных комбинациях и сюжетах, все их нужно будет сохранить, как минимум для того, чтобы к разному дизайну конечного материала было что подобрать. Ну и смотри например: Category:Countryballs by country. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. JuTa 21:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is substantially similar to the original non-free work (see here or here). Not only the overall shapes are copied, but even minor details are nearly identical, like patches and stitches. Therefore, it is a derivative work of a non-free image, and as such cannot be hosted on Commons. Grebenkov (talk) 20:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the original author isn't even credited. --Grebenkov (talk) 20:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The author of original meme is Anton Chadskiy: [6]. "It was happened in 2011, a few months before protests against falsified elections to State Duma. I wanted to draw a character that would have embodied all negative qualities of a typical Russian". Dicto dicto dicto dicto dicto (talk) 06:56, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • This image was made by me, and not a derivative work, but inspired by the original. If you wish, you can find a lot of differences between the original image and my image. "Vatnik" - a popular meme, and this character is not the legal owner. Many Russians do not like this "Russophobian" meme, and this can be seen in a previous attempt to delete the image from the Commons. [It is written with the help of Google Translator] --Esetok (talk) 03:22, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, at first, Commons is not censored. Commons can host racist and xenophobic images, including about vatnik. The file is used and so in project scope. But the file is really too similar to original. I'll delete it as derivative work. There have been cases in Commons, where hand drawings of photo are deleted as derivative works, drawing of hand drawing is not so different. Please draw a new picture about vatnik, which is not so similar to original. Let your fantasy fly.

В Викискладе нет цензуры. Здесь могут быть расистские и ксенофобные изображения, в том числе про ватника. Этот файл даже используют, значит, изображения ватника нужны. Но этот файл слишком похожий на оригинал. Я удаляю его как производное произведение. В Викискладе есть случаи, что рисунки фотографии удалили как производные произведения, рисунок рисунка должен быть почти тот же. Пожалуйста, делайте новый рисунок ватника, который не было бы так похожий на оригинал. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erroneously described as PD, but attributed to one "Vasil Lopata", who appears to be born in 1941 and probably still living [7][8] Fut.Perf. 14:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image is a part of ukrainian one hryvnia note, 1992-1994, PD, National Bank of Ukraine. 1 2. a simple photoshop cut is not copyrighted. --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 04:11, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. But it isn't a "simple photoshop cut" from the image on the banknote. It's clearly copied from some other, manual drawing. I don't see how we could conclude that just because some other derivative of Lopata's drawing was incorporated into a PD banknote, Lopata's original must also be PD. Fut.Perf. 10:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
the original drawing is owned by the Government of Ukraine, so why this derivative works are copyrighted? Original notes were created by Canadian Bank Note Company. it was contrasted, lighted, may be printed in a book or newspaper, so what? this is how I understand my country`s law. --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 20:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we don't know whether the original drawing is "owned" by the government. The artist may well have published the original drawing somewhere else first, attaining copyright for it, and then licensed the government to use the derivative for the banknotes. The version we have here is not derived from the banknote but the other way round. Check details such as individual strokes in the moustache or the ornaments in the crown to see that it couldn't have been derived from the banknote picture just by "contrasting, lighting" etc. Fut.Perf. 05:44, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Missing permission. Not a derivative of a banknote. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:42, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-France}}

Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, About my File:Place Concorde en février 2014 07.jpg, the object shown is just a simple diamond shape. It is not sufficiently original to qualify as protectable by french copyright (droit d'auteur) as the work must "reflects the personality of its author". A very common diamond shape is not original enough for that. Regards. Lionel Allorge (talk) 23:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't see why my File:Pieuvre GZ'UP.png would have to be deleted. Could someone explain? I'm no law expert, but I hardly see how it can violate copyrights, as I'm the author of the photography, and as its pictured objet is freely accessible to anyone going to Paris. How could a publicly and permanently visible item be forbidden to photography? Isn't it automatically a part of the public domain, since its author left it in the outside, without even putting it there legally (some people would say it's a kind of vandalism), and since anyone can modify it without any consequence? If I just droped a piece of paper on the road, wouldn't its original content be free of copyright in the exact same way? And what about a public sculpture or building? It has an author, sure (the sculptor or the architect), but since it's permanently visible to anyone and on a public space, it seems to me that it must be free of copyright, at least for photography. --Grelot-de-Bois (talk) 04:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No Freedom of panorama in France, so the copyright on the octopus applies and you thus cannot publish your photograph under a Free licence. Rama (talk) 06:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, don't understand why the image File:Revendication.jpg would to be deleted. Please check your understanding of french copyright laws. Available to help if needed. --Eric Walter (talk) 07:59, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eric Walter, my understanding is that there is no freedon of panorama in France, except when the work is an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Rodrigolopes and thanks for answering. So you consider the street paint as a protected work ? Because freedom of panorama is only for protected work outside. --Eric Walter (talk) 08:10, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please keep File:StreetArt Paris RueHautefeuille.jpeg

Hi Rodrigolopes and thank you for the time you spend improving WP. About the File:StreetArt Paris RueHautefeuille.jpeg, I met the author of the drawing withing the no entry sign. The author told me he wants his street-art drawings be photographed and published on websites. But he wants to stay anonymous.
Oops, I have just read https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Panorama_in_Europe_in_2015. I hope it is not too late... I will contact some Members of European Parliament and request help in free software forums... If we all convince the European Parliament, Freedom of panorama will be OK in Europe :-) Cheers --Oliver H (talk) 07:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Oliver H: , I forgot this discussion, but I think the result will be  Keep. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti in Paris and COM:GRAFFITI. Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep new versions

--Paris 16 (talk) 13:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those are often not really much better than the previous versions. Simply blurring something is not enough to void copyright. It must be sufficiently different to not be a derivative work. Stuff like File:Rue de la Lune, Paris 25 June 2015.jpg is not sufficiently different. So the decision is still the same: Either we assume that these are not copyrighted or the author will not assert their copyright then these can stay in their unblurred form. If we assume that these are copyrighted then the blurred version is still a derivative work and we need the author's permission. Regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:55, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I opened that discussion and think that can be closed by  Keep. See the similar DR Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti in Paris and COM:GRAFFITI. Rodrigolopes (talk) 16:32, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: DR withrawn by nominator. JuTa 00:10, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]