Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/08/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 7th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyvio: https://www.google.fr/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivX5OS4bt822RNOFAVAde-wgrGbBWR0-ZuEulNyjg-5LQwhZ_1DOun6sAJ7qU782fEi1XWmsb0RnPRbBXLDjlx6KJAdmL4Cn0kV7Otr4voUg1IONhGrP8Kl2_1QZ3_1eE8YI9KWfjl0sHxRgTQ21mTLFR2Q48WNqJr4Eo_1vc7ZMr9NfvAA8lg0_14S5K426ZUIdNSfY0YB4JNUGk6ZjdXtwEJsycLkrA9PlgLGuKAze5PMcr1r6E5dZIAwNMN4jUXnFvKfQvPG9JOxZs3shPtD0IJIo505sLtU_1X3NPzpYuf11c51x1-Lv3e7yDacpmFlcNQFY0-RGbC2BvdG_17daNOymS4WjH1HvGDo3TiE2jV4t4ymNg23lS4Ukbsm64-5NLh4actkWy2s5MKSa_1nnjkAA6X-fLMvqLq2QsPMpxsqsJ88d8VnZwPVAY5LAjo09kXBT_1vt4LsVMg5l0AvH1h0-Xw-JqaxyFFocQKA6u-9svRGQ5jJ3HSI0ntXV48Lz9haSJhoT3FD3QJZJAkwdARNRuY6o8h-e3slFjBJaZlGV5P2oGqDb6MBuYqoHMhJwF6JBXPH9Iz_1IqqbSoSs1zJV7r1wOw94VJTMxz7Oi8JRvFwjgc2qHYg3eDOVNgVd-h_1aFiEnBzf-RF4uFNR6Yadl8vIULEgu58oeO-STQTP6GoP2ByMM8lG_1oKnRYmUWg84Vnv9J1nMB0Y9UC4o6uMPQRh5dGiVijlbz8Sv7J7aA2C1lIVre7-QWJAO9iwisCWM1O8Mwn1X6DtfpRM6iDkRR8-ghJTXelV5yeeCZghG5MpV9Ziayxj2Q84Ngy9M4knNMMfnzdTZW9TA5nihPGE_1eGUj41e18YTVSRt-544kTlnERtH3K-UOSPXC6GhWuVhlTGuZuns6lSbxjgZNSFdvlHvg-8x7uXh3jlsLcr6QcS7_1RcRQk6zkQYHg33g_1xlTdszL2h4IIvlUR97qXsP7lPo4o4ElqjqgU48yva8r9b-pp0ZneZrzsaZLUdh4IkZF0sMWOC43TD9EbBDXbvXdwJ_1l6ONOoRzZJJSSbWpX7bzqiVz6okoZCgL_1plUhvMroNP00XtvQAQUNMpxbbDkwLOA0ATtf2hdpC2dBRocgPLZxxHe0e4VYam1mVk0UyKnBZTRLTACNUnDXDWbVipYo8lddOus6eXAnDpuI_1N41ywWmsMAf2yhfkWJvWZgzun_17OspzBBXBVEW9ePowoltxwendHv0NAq6sQjHb17n4lITyvyvL3J_1pQazEek57ip_1_1hDhdsfUg9XgYSa5D_1pB1I323G_1-DuYzfPdaMsI4TIu2OhvcM-3QTTwmywwULDDeXhIzOd0dwAgPmI1XGCCYCaAzP3iKr21vaUnCpGuuhBL2IByUfgV0DcyWmyqJMmIob_1zNRWTrD83AqEdpu0o0yxKyNYYCBgO6SMsozWiPhDx0ToDeCW-uNPzkP5i65HcS_1QieiPZcLhQehvfWp2sMsj0440GcEU6QJjDfvdweELpMhVIwQENzfSLlxd8rO_14LgOcCX4QXiZ24J-kUyt9JwilnHm2KjhH2d3ZCGRuZBxrJ9TC5aCJrvgY&gws_rd=cr&ei=4bPEVebNKYKlsAGrloioBw Yann (talk) 13:35, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrefs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:PRP: Quite unlikey that Andrefs (talk · contributions · Statistics) is the creator of all these official symbols (coats of arms = brasão + flag = bandeira) from more then 50 Brazilian municipalities. There may be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided. Uploaded in 2014 and 2013, most of them (if not all) can be found earlier on official sites or elsewhere = grabbed from Internet without caring copyrights. Per COM:EVID the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that these files are in the public domain or that the copyright owners has released them under a suitable licence.

Gunnex (talk) 22:16, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrefs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Claim that all these official symbols (coat of arms / brasão + flag / bandeira) of several Brazilian municipalities were published or commissioned by a Brazilian government prior to 1983 ({{PD-BrazilGov}}) is not supported. There are also unlikely "own" works (especially for the coat of the arms). All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. Generally for most of the Brazilian coats of arms and flags: unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982). Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government.

Gunnex (talk) 08:44, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bandeiramirassoldoeste.gif municipal law 37/78. Camervan (talk) 15:09, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrefs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probable COM:COPYVIOs: No confidence that these maps are own work of uploader, read the edges.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I do believe that he created the maps himself but he used copyrightable base maps to do so. Natuur12 (talk) 20:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This has nothing to do with NASA so the NASA copyright tag is spurious. This image also has a misleading name. It was used in hoax articles in English Wikipedia and is a copy of a correctly named file. DanielRigal (talk) 19:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are quite a large number of files like this. If you search for the string "Belmaachi" you will find them all. As far as I can tell Belmaachi claims to be some bigwig in Morocco. I have no idea if this is wholly false or exaggerated truth. It doesn't matter. What he does is take other images (and Wikipedia articles) and add his name to them (either to the original or making a copy). Vanity is not the half of it!

I think that all such images can be deleted as vandalism. You should find that they are all duplicates of existing images. Even if they are not they are very unlikely to be validly licensed. All images uploaded by the user who uploaded this one are of this type. Here is another good example uploaded by another of his sockpuppets: File:Rabat, 4 km, Route des Zaiers, Selim Belmaachi.jpeg. The bizarre thing here is that, for some inexplicable reason, he is pretending to be a dead woman![1] As I said, vanity is not the half of it. There is something weird in this guy's mind.

I recommend to delete all of these images (except if they were renamed, in which case they should be returned to their original names) and to block all the sockpuppet uploaders.

Maybe also consider blacklisting the substring "Belmaachi" in image names? --DanielRigal (talk) 19:57, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Vandalism. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete That 'A' is complex. This isn't even used in an article now anyways. Its an orphan. Spartan7W (talk) 23:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:11, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, see: http://www.fansshare.com/gallery/photos/10981269/bull-terrier-and-flowers-picture-wallpaper/ Softlavender (talk) 08:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

again

That is my own photo the photo in that link is my own photo I'm honest don't make dirt to my reputation Weisenstar (talk) 09:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC) User:Softlavender stop cheating me please[reply]

that is my own photo from that website I upload that photo to thaat link then I upload it to Commons so that's my own work OK Weisenstar (talk) 01:13, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

please stop

Please removed deletion request for this photo because its 100% my own photo and my own camera to use OK the photo you see in other website is my photo too because I upload that photo first in that website then here OK understand User:Softlavender Weisenstar (talk) 10:51, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You should confirm your authorship for images allready published elsewhere through the so called Commons:OTRS procedure. regards. --JuTa 10:57, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The same photo is in higher resolution and with full EXIF data available on http://www.animalplanethd.com/bull-terrier-galaxy-wallpaper-11422.html. The website claims that it has been upload on May 23rd, which would be > 1 month before the upload to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 16:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Judging by the photos uploaded by this user, two things are curious. One he claims he has a huge amount of dogs, big dogs too, of many different breeds; which is rather unusual. Those are way many dogs to own generally, and most people who own dogs often breed them, so they are often the same breed. Second, there is a huge variation in the quality of the photos, some mainly a snapshot, while this above, a very good picture. Third; we had and have a long standing problem with vandalism on dog articles from a somebody, several Ips blocked and such. There are certain editing similarities with this user. --Hafspajen 11:50, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
please removed the deletion request

Deleted: Needs valid com:OTRS permission McZusatz (talk) 11:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Buggy SVG, better alternatives available in Category:Propane-1,2-diol. Leyo 21:44, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 04:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW Base (talk) 22:05, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 04:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect date, incorrect source and incorrect license . HombreDHojalata.talk 22:06, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 04:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 22:17, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 22:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 22:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has no use or place on the commons. Its posted by its manufacturer with clear advertising in the image itself. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 23:04, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused, have several PNG and SVG at same style/level of detail in Category:Pyrazine DMacks (talk) 04:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Plenty of higher quality equivalents. Ed (Edgar181) 16:54, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality without EXIF, taken from normally not publicly accessible place, so very likely copyright violation from the web or a printed source. A.Savin 12:59, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Фоткают, вообще-то, не дроном, а находящейся на нем камерой. А она вроде как генерирует метаданные и даже способна снимать RAW файлы. Докажете - окей, бог вам судья что такое страшенное качество сюда льёте. Не докажете - удалят по-любому, тем более вы уже успели зарекомендовать себя как нарушитель авторских прав. Кто вам теперь поверит? --A.Savin 13:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Low resolution. No evidence that it is own work. Anatoliy (talk) 20:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yassin kabouri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 23:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:12, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 23:25, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 23:27, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 23:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:14, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo better suited to Facebook. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:14, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-resolution personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:51, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:15, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:15, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:16, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 02:33, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:16, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanjaypal khod (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 14:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taylor banze (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 16:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 16:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FernandoGomez1998 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 16:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 16:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammad khalid khan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 17:04, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Punketo16 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 17:09, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jario o altinho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 17:17, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:16, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jario o altinho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 02:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafidul.slam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 02:57, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lgsocrates (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scanned from some magazine not own work ?

Motopark (talk) 04:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:34, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Licoricestix (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: What new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:20, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kyojr22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:35, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:36, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:36, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused video of non-educational content. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:36, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 05:36, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image not realistically useful for an educational purpose O.Koslowski (talk) 07:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:02, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image not realistically useful for an educational purpose O.Koslowski (talk) 07:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:02, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image not realistically useful for an educational purpose O.Koslowski (talk) 07:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image not realistically useful for an educational purpose O.Koslowski (talk) 07:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo uploaded for promotion purposes, as implied by the description. Not likely to be used in an educational context. O.Koslowski (talk) 07:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Osvaldo O Faz Acontecer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Josve05a (talk) 12:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Basvb (talk) 13:00, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Osvaldo O Faz Acontecer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. For File:Olha Nós.jpg: unlikely own work, most likely grabbed from social media (see also User talk:Osvaldo O Faz Acontecer: serial copyright violator).

Gunnex (talk) 07:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non educational personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty gallery requested by creator of the Gallery Oursana (talk) 14:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Will withdraw if notability is reasonably asserted. Storkk (talk) 15:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:07, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:20, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, commercial promotion, out of scope. Rsteen (talk) 16:40, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:20, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, undocumented, out of scope Rsteen (talk) 16:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:20, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Maybe in public domain, who's the author? Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC) The author is Bagetti Giuseppe and you can find this picture in the public domain.--Petit-Historien (talk) 18:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 05:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS does not allow the photo into Commons without toymaker's permission. Taivo (talk) 12:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not only is subject matter problematic, the image itself has been found elsewhere on the internet without a free licence. WJBscribe (talk) 18:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, out of project scope Fenerli1978 (talk) 15:07, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

include:


Deleted: Érico Wouters (msg) 01:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This property is copyright protected by law and the user who uploaded have no right to handle this file, Contact http://facebook.com/akhilzid or akhilzid@gmail.com for detailed information Akhilzid (talk) 06:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Dharmadhyaksha Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:27, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Saiful Islam Jitu (serial copyright violator) Gunnex (talk) 06:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:27, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jmahir5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Jmahir5 (serial copyright violator)

Gunnex (talk) 06:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:27, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Cameron256 (serial copyright violator) Gunnex (talk) 08:33, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. LX (talk, contribs) 08:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:28, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not the own work of the uploader, it's a promotional image for a single/music video. See artofthemuses.com, larger version, etc. A bit of background is at en:Tian_mi_mi#Luhan_version. —RP88 (talk) 09:16, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fundacionfadesco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright isues 50.101.247.59 11:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Yann Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is small photo without metadata, own work is not sure. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by WJBscribe Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deepa jayaraj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unelikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 13:32, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:30, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:31, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (done by Guiseppe Pino according to http://www.contrasto.it/webgate/preview.php?UURL=65c5fb9d37a068fe850c50ff209b411c&SECTION=SERIESRESULT&IMGID=00112486 Engelbaet 14:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:31, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Altay2540 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:31, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to speedy delete --LeoDE (talk) 17:26, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Done by Yann Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:31, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Losdelcerroadicto (long term serial copyright violator) Gunnex (talk) 16:51, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:31, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshots of Microsoft products can't be uploaded under a free license according to Commons:Screenshots. --Sanya7901 (talk) 18:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Thibaut120094 Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:32, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio Getty images (http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Kati+Outinen/Le+Havre+64th+Festival+del+Film+di+Locarno/7VdED-nw2cI) All user contributions were copyvios -> block indefinitely! 178.9.81.254 22:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Didym Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:32, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo and text scanned from El Mercurio newspaper, copyrights belongs to the newspaper or their respective authors Sfs90 (talk) 23:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Turelio Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:32, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 23:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Yann Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:33, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BibliotecaSenado (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep All these pictures were the first of an important series, donated by the Library of the Senate of the Province of Buenos Aires, in the framework of the campaign created for this purpose and within an agreement signed between this institution and Wikimedia Argentina. We are working to get express permission through OTRS to avoid these episodes. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 20:16, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: for now, 2015081010018456 gives little hope that the library is the owner or that they even know what they are doing. Jcb (talk) 20:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's just a commercial advertisement. Paulbe (talk) 18:07, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: promotional logo. P 1 9 9   17:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused composite of logos which are certainly not user's own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: promotional logo. P 1 9 9   17:33, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused composite of logos which are certainly not user's own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: promotional logo. P 1 9 9   17:33, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ellivoud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images highly unlikely to be user's own work. They are copied from an "Uncle Sam's Military Catalog" not the US Marine Corps., don't let the identical acronyms fool you.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: promotional logos and derivatives. P 1 9 9   17:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication with Miriam Singer (1).jpg בריאן (talk) 07:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate File:Miriam Singer (1).jpg Wdwd (talk) 21:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source indicates that this file is CC-BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR. Per Commons:Licensing, Commons does not accept files licensed for non-commercial use only. —RP88 (talk) 08:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. license review failed. Wdwd (talk) 21:08, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo does not appear to be the own work of the uploader. Two years before it was uploaded to Commons it was uploaded as 이종설's Facebook profile photo. If the uploader is the actual photographer, then they will need to follow the steps at COM:OTRS (since this is a photo that has been previously published without a free license). —RP88 (talk) 09:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. Wdwd (talk) 21:10, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader indicates that this file is licensed for "research and educational purposes". In addition, source link says "Images and text may not be used for any commercial purposes without prior written permission". These limitations are not compatible with Commons:Licensing, which requires files to be usable by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. —RP88 (talk) 11:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: license review failed (nc) Wdwd (talk) 21:14, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raymond Prévost is dead in 1974. Copyright violation. 90.2.91.233 11:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. No permission for shown artwork. Wdwd (talk) 21:16, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2011 Injam Production. Copyright violation. 90.2.91.233 12:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. Wdwd (talk) 21:19, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Deleted on de:Stephanie Hartung - but this not a rational on commons to delete an image. Could be used in ohters projects. Valid permission via OTRS. Wdwd (talk) 21:27, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kungfuman as Copyvio (copyvio) Yann (talk) 14:12, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:02, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chat of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:03, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:03, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient permissions, image forwarded by subject: Requires permission via COM:OTRS from photographer Thomas Nitz, otherwise COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eahhousing (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 16:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 17:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope Yann (talk) 17:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook size, no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:06, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook size, no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:06, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense, but thumbnail-format and missing exif imho worth to verify by DR process, Roland zh (talk) 19:32, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

again, no offense, but as per File:Street in kerala.jpg by same uploader, Roland zh (talk) 19:33, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify thumbnail-format upload that's also missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The eagle is far above the TOO. Fma12 (talk) 21:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense, but imho 'selfy' with no 'educational use' within Wikimedia Commons, hence DR started to verify, Roland zh (talk) 19:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:57, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: While the text is generic the eagle illustration is likely to have involved some creative input, unless you can find it is the public domain. Ww2censor (talk) 18:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The eagle figure is far above the TOO. - Fma12 (talk) 21:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', p.e. format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

again, no offense, but as per File:Farook Abdul Rahiman 2013 IFFK.jpg by same uploader, Roland zh (talk) 20:15, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense, but DR started to verify "collect from writer for this work", Roland zh (talk) 20:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed "Benny Behanan MLA", as well thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense, but DR started to verify claimed "own work" as linking to facebook, Roland zh (talk) 20:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Metadata. No high resolution image. No camera information. Clear copyright violation of original photographer. Suggest to delete. Photographs of this person is already available at Category:Ramesh Chennithala. -- Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

again, no offense, but as per File:Ramesh Chennithala.jpg by same uploader, Roland zh (talk) 20:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work', see p.e. format, missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense, but DR started to verify claimed 'own ork', see p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is translator? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: text only, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random_background_texure_edit_coming_soon_full_hd_by_prajwals-d53k45s.jpg Aank Setyawan (talk) 14:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan image. Ozonesn (talk) 15:19, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see how this file can possibly be within Comons' scope. Either it is what the uploader says it is, their own work, in which case it would appear to be a vanity image used as part of a probable hoax at en.wp and zh.wp. Or it is not their own work and is an an image from "Australian Talk Show watched by one billion Chinese" and therefore copyrighted. Either way, it doesn't belong on Commons. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

is also clearly a 'shopped version of File:Chinesemovieactor.jpg which should go for the same reasons. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9   16:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images may not be uploaded to Commons.--William S. Saturn (talk) 19:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9   16:43, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:40, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This file clearly is free use. Threshold of originality is not met. It is only text with rectangles. Spartan7W (talk) 19:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Clearly no copyvio, above the TOO. Fma12 (talk) 21:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: P 1 9 9   16:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:40, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Slightly above the TOO, but above in my opinion. - Fma12 (talk) 20:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: below TOO. P 1 9 9   16:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: P 1 9 9   16:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A name, a slogan, five-pointed stars, bent bars. Not TOO. Spartan7W (talk) 23:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9   16:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks pretty intricate to me.--William S. Saturn (talk) 19:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9   19:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: P 1 9 9   19:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A name, a slogan, five-pointed stars, bent bars. Not TOO. Spartan7W (talk) 23:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9   19:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I strongly doubt this 'arrangement' of simple shapes is not copyrightable. See Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Ted_Cruz for other discussion. Reventtalk 05:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I think, that red and white lines surpass threshold of originality. Uneven width, uneven curvature, white and red line are even not congruent (white line is thicker). Taivo (talk) 07:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The shapes are simple lines, which are below the threshold of originality. If you see this logo of Car Credit City: you'll see logo with far more compound and complex curves and shapes which was denied copyright. The Huckabee lines are simple straight lines that have a contour. Everything else, stars and text, is clearly below threshold. Spartan7W (talk) 14:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Spartan7W: An arrangement of simple shapes can be original and copyrightable. In the case of the Car Credit City logo, the registration was denied because the logo was basically just a slightly stylized version of the letters 'CCC', and a typeface is explicitly not a subject of copyright. If you refer to the actual USCO ruling, the same 'CCC' logo, when combined with other material in a way IMO significantly less complex that the image here, was successfully registered. Reventtalk 14:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly.--Elvey (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom and Taivo. -- Poké95 04:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Spartan. There's really nothing original going into that logo. MB298 (talk) 17:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete COM:PRP is a lousy reason to delete this, but all the others are sound. As Nyttend said, PD-textlogo is just for...text. And PD-shape is just for basic, unoriginal geometric shapes. And fair use certainly isn't a reason to keep anything here; this is commons, and fair use is not considered here (but is fine at, e.g., en.wikipedia.org).--Elvey (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the arrangement is not simple and the result is a beautiful stylized logo, stylization impossible without an artistic and original touch = above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:21, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep Hand fits within the 'Best Western' exception, in my opinion. The siloutte of a human hand, with no other distinguishing features to make it complex or unique, is below TOO. Spartan7W (talk) 23:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Above the TOO, by far. - Fma12 (talk) 20:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9   19:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: P 1 9 9   19:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Weak keep: The US country form may be above the TOO, but many similar US logos has been kept. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Strong keep: Simple text. Outline of the contiguous 48 states is a silhouette of a geographic feature, that can't be copyrighted. Additionally, as it depicts the outline of a sovereign state, whose works are public domain, the nature of the shape could fall within a U.S. Government work, technically. Spartan7W (talk) 23:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9   19:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues in regards to us map shape SecretName101 (talk) 23:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: below TOO. P 1 9 9   15:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This comment was made on a different DR and copied here. The issues are likely similar/identical and this fact is noted in Spartan7W's edit summary, but it's unorthodox enough that it should be documented in the clear IMO. Storkk (talk) 07:51, 13 August 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Kept: P 1 9 9   19:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contiene errores en la secuencia de cuadros DiogenWebBlog (talk) 01:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 21:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free work by S. Batič. Eleassar (t/p) 05:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source; seems to be a copy of a photograph of a statue, made to look like an illustration (?) Zoupan (talk) 06:02, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license - I don't want this image to be used commercially. Only for Wikipedia Per Ingar Nilsen (talk) 06:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Sorry but the license cannot be revoced Natuur12 (talk) 21:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work (professional video) , per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Paulo António zeca (serial copyright violator) Gunnex (talk) 07:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope IMO. Has been used on a page but appears to be added by user in order to justify having the image Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Guatapará regarding official symbols

[edit]

Coat of arms (brasão) and flag (bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:Guatapará emancipated in 1989 (in fact established only in 1993, see also http://www.guatapara.sp.gov.br/novo_site/index.php?nivel=1&exibir=secoes&ID=19), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. Generally for most of the Brazilian coats of arms and flags: unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982). Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government (mostly some years after official federal constitution, see also this extreme case, where a Brazilian municipality created his official symbols in 2014: 81 years after emancipation...). The actual Brazilian copyright law from 1998 makes no exception for government works.

Gunnex (talk) 09:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader has licensed this file for use for any purpose, but restricts users to those who "represent 2GO or is an agency of 2Go Group Inc". This limitation is not compatible with Commons:Licensing, which requires files to be usable by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. If this logo is below the threshold of originality in the Philippines, it might be possible to replace the license with {{PD-textlogo}}. Unfortunately the current TOO page lacks any guidelines for the Philippines. —RP88 (talk) 09:58, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-text Natuur12 (talk) 21:32, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Несвободное изображение Sat-Electric (talk) 11:59, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#France. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France. 84.61.189.70 12:51, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality without EXIF, taken from normally not publicly accessible place, so very likely copyright violation from the web or a printed source. A.Savin 12:58, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Henri Grand'Aigle is dead in 1951 and Raoul Serres is dead in 1971. Copyright violations. 90.2.91.233 13:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" is dubious, possible copyright violation. Assayer (talk) 13:05, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Own Work" ist natürlich Unfug. Der "author" meinte wohl, dass er das Bild "selbst kopiert hat". Immerhin benutzt auch der NDR das Bild [2]. Die Quelle müsste also leicht zu ermitteln sein. Bis dahin würde ich mal gelten lassen, dass das Bild PD ist, da Litten bereits 1932 verstorben ist; das Bild also vor mehr als 80 Jahren entstanden ist.--Wvk (talk) 14:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: old enough Natuur12 (talk) 21:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ten plik prawdopodobnie został wysłany powtórnie. Jego identyczna wersja z późniejszymi zmianami znajduje pod tym plikiem: File:Homoseksuality in europe map.PNG Matt Cross'e (talk) 13:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 21:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jest to wczesna wersja mapy Homoseksuality in europe map.PNG. Ta wersja jest nie aktualna i nie będzie kontynuowane jej rozwijanie. Matt Cross'e (talk) 15:17, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: still no reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 16:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mappa errata, sostituita da File:Italia - mappa strada statale 2.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe Arbalete (talk) 13:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 21:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mappa errata, sostituita da File:Italia - mappa strada statale 2.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe Arbalete (talk) 12:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, author's request. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lomita as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.artmajeur.com/fr/art-gallery/gallery/jean-louis-berthod/1589062 Not the same picture, but permission from the sculptor needed. Yann (talk) 14:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


J'ai l'autorisation du sculpteur. I've got the autorization of the artist.

Super ! Merci de l'envoyer à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org. Voyez COM:OTRS/fr pour la procédure. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Le mail a été envoyé ce matin ;-)

Toujours pas de nouvelles? Still no news?


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: ticket:2015080810005303. Yann (talk) 21:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kleuske as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-trivial logo, removed before (as File:Q-musiclogo.jpg), uploaded (again) by the same user Yann (talk) 14:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment See Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2015/07#File:Q-musiclogo.png. Yann (talk) 14:12, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Above TOO in the Netherlands. Natuur12 (talk) 21:35, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the non-free poster. Artem Korzhimanov (talk) 14:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Перефотографирование любого объекта есть свободное творчество. Это не копирование файла, а творческая работа с поиском точки съёмки, ракурса и освещения.. Вы можете мне возразить? Возражайте!-))) --LgeDimitry3 (talk) 21:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader (who may be subject) is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Additional probable scope issues. Storkk (talk) 16:06, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Exterior of Mills Memorial Library from July 19th, 2011. Photo by Tony Hoang of McMaster University, Science Media Lab." uploaded by someone else. OTRS is required to show that this has been licenced correctly. The details given so far make me doubt it Timtrent (talk) 16:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am a staff member of McMaster University and this image was created by one of my employees for the purpose of promoting the library. The name Tony Hoang was given as credit to the employee who was paid to produce the work. Since the Library owns the photo, and I am manager within the library, can this still be used? Also, how does one give credit to someone who took a photo for an organization? I'm new to Wikipedia and I'm not familiar with the best practice for doing this without raising red flags of ownership. --User:Chris McAllister (McMaster)
It is a common misconception that Wikimedia Commons is Wikipedia. It is not. It has very precise rules for the material that may be uploaded and retained, tighter rules than, for example, the English Wikipedia. The circumstances described by Chris McAllister (McMaster) seem to me to mean that it is essential that OTRS processes are followed, and that the editor is given advice. With a satisfactory OTRS submission any deletion may be reversed in due time. The admin here considering this for deletion or retention at closure should, if the advice has not been given before, offer this advice to the editor. I would, but I am not competent to do so. Timtrent (talk) 21:09, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hang9417 as no source (No source since)... but image says own work. Notice the two images uploaded seem to be from the same photoshoot, with different outfits. I did not find a match in google images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 21:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no exif, likely captured from TV, other images of the uploader are copyvios Hang9417 (talk) 17:57, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probably copyvio as all the other uploads. Com:PCP--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goelette.Cardabela (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. --> considering indoor shots, derivated from copyrighted material. All files most likely taken in Colombia, considering related to es:Carnaval de Barranquilla (Colombia's most important folklore celebration). File:La Cueva de Barranquilla (Gabriel García Márquez).JPG is cropped from File:La Cueva de Barranquilla.JPG. File:Affiche 2004 du Carnaval de Barranquilla.JPG is derivated from an event poster. = may not be covered by COM:FOP#Colombia and COM:FOP#Andean Community of Nations (Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru).

I accumulated related DR's in Category:Colombian FOP cases with an inconsistent score of 11:3 (deleted : kept) but the closing was also affected by the the question if located "in permanent form" at the location. Considering File:Affiche 2004 du Carnaval de Barranquilla.JPG I would say "No": appears to be sticked on a wall in a provisionally / temporarily way. For File:La Cueva de Barranquilla.JPG (and the crop) I can't presume anything: Is this photo poster "situated in permanent form in a place open to the public" and does COM:FOP#Colombia / COM:FOP#Andean Community of Nations (Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru) cover also indoor shots?

Gunnex (talk) 18:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Masti as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation. Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 18:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not in Europe. Natuur12 (talk) 21:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is stolen! And the profile is fake! MercedesBusSofia (talk) 19:06, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Claim that this official symbol (coat of arms / brasão) of Brazilian state university pt:Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso was published or commissioned by a Brazilian government prior to 1983 ({{PD-BrazilGov}}) is not supported. Uploaded in 03.2014 the file was (as indicated) taken from http://www.unemat.br/reitoria/design/ which does not specify the creation date. The file itself is dated with the upload date.

Btw, identical file File:Brasão UNEMAT.jpg was uploaded by this user two months earlier as "own work" = quite unlikely. Gunnex (talk) 19:06, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair Use Logo of a presidential campaign that does meet the threshold of originality. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I don't agree. IMO the logo is above the TOO. - Fma12 (talk) 20:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. No indication of its age. Tom-L (talk) 20:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused redundant file by permanently blocked user. File:Coat of arms of Oscar Andres Rodriguez M.svg is a superior alternative. Tom-L (talk) 21:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Natuur12 (talk) 21:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License provided by uploader restricts the use of this file to a single Wikipedia article (namely jp:雲鷹丸). This restriction is not compatible with Commons:Licensing, which requires files to be usable by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. —RP88 (talk) 21:05, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Image is unused and is just a really poor quality version of File:Jacobhamblin.jpg. I see no reason to keep an image of such poor quality when it is obviously been replaced with a much better version of the exact same image. I think this should be deleted under COM:Redundant - "Redundant or low quality files only get deleted on a case by case basis...". In this case it should be deleted.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 21:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samjai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These two files from mediaportal.saabgroup.com both have a non-commercial restriction in the Usage Terms section of their Info pages (i.e. "All digital assets are free to download and use for non-commercial purposes"). Non-commercial restrictions are not compatible with Commons:Licensing.

RP88 (talk) 21:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User Dogboy LeDuc is not the author of the logo Goesseln (talk) 22:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:41, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License at source for this file (ClipArt ETC License) restricts use to non-commercial use and limits to a maximum of 50 items. These restrictions are not compatible with Commons:Licensing, which requires files to be usable by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. —RP88 (talk) 20:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - initially I thought this was obviously an old drawing copyright expired, but using electric-eye I could not find an older source. Although it looks an old drawing, it could be a modern drawing in 19th century style. As there is no evidence it is old, I concur with deletion. Rwendland (talk) 20:33, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:41, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These appear to be missing evidence of permission. See also User talk:-revi#Category:Files from the Seoul Metropolitan Fire and Disaster Headquarters. What is the best way to handle 6,000 files missing permission?

(List of the 6103 Files)

Stefan4 (talk) 13:41, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete If this DR is closed as a Delete, then VFC can actually delete the files. If, on the other hand, there actually is permission, or it can be arranged, then VFC can add the necessary template(s).
I agree that they appear to be missing both a source (if it's on the Web) and any sort of permission. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I want to thank you for your thoughtful suggestion and agree with you. I think these links clearly show that there is permission. [3], [4]. So It would be really nice if VFC add the necessary template to those files. thank you again for your opinion. 최광모 (talk) 02:27, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
actually, we have the copyright of the photos that have watermark of presses since our members of services took the photos. thank you. 최광모 (talk) 02:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • hello. thank you for the request. as for this problem. I am now working for Seoul Metropolitan Fire and Disaster Headquarters and got permission from the department in charge before receiving files. My name is 최광모, the person in charge is '김휘대'. 최광모 (talk) 00:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • this is the official reply to the similar question. [5], [6]. 'eungdapso'(eungdapso.seoul.go.kr) is our civil complaint system. Anyone can contact me about this by number 02-3706-1724(Field Operation Division, Seoul Metropolitan Fire and Disaster Headquarters) or kwangmo@seoul.go.kr. thank you. 최광모 (talk) 00:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I attach the mail I sent to OTRS

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am now working for Seoul Metropolitan Fire and Disaster Headquarters. Part of my job is to promote Seoul Fire Services on SNS chanels and other websites.

There was a similar question Seoul Metropolitan Fire and Disaster Headquarters asking if the photos are being 'officially' uploaded by Seoul Fire Services. The answer was yes and you can see it on below links. 'eungdapso'(eungdapso.seoul.go.kr) is our civil complaint system

https://twitter.com/seoul_eds/statuses/597697994062835712 http://eungdapso.seoul.go.kr/Community/viewLongText.jsp?key=CD852A52B4760F9E09DBF27ABCB137A3AB33F5A7F1FF35C5B135421B870AD652

The question : @wonsoonpark 시장님, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:19950629%EC%82%BC%ED%92%8D%EB%B0%B1%ED%99%94%EC%A0%90_%EB%B6%95%EA%B4%B4_%EC%82%AC%EA%B3%A046.jpg … 이런 사진처럼 서울소방재난본부가 소유한 사진이 '공공누리 1유형'에 호환되는 저작권 유형으로 배포되고 있는데, 정책이 그렇게 결정된 것인가요?

The answer of Seoul Metropolitan Fire and Disaster Headquarters : @jhkaaron6722 서울시정에 관심을 가져주셔셔 감사합니다. 서울특별시 소방재난본부에서는 시민들의 알권리 보호 및 대외 소방활동 홍보를 위해 소장하고 있는 미디어 자료를 크리에이티브 커먼즈 저작자표시-동일조건변경허락 4.0 국제 라이선스로 배포하고 있습니다. 누구나 저작자를 표시하여 자료를 이용할 수 있으며 저작물을 이용하여 만든 2차저작물에는 본 라이선스와 동일하거나 유사한 라이선스를 적용해야 합니다. 단 특정할 수 있는 개인이 미디어 자료에 포함되어 있을 경우 소방재난본부 및 해당 인물의 승인을 받으셔야합니다. 감사합니다 .(2015-05-11 18:41:21)


I hereby affirm that I, Choe Kwangmo, represent Seoul Metropolitan Fire and Disaster Headquarters, who is the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the files listed in the below link. I will take all legal responsibilities associated with uploading the files on a Wikimedia project on behalf of Seoul Metropolitan Fire and Disaster Headquarters.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Files_from_the_Seoul_Metropolitan_Fire_and_Disaster_Headquarters

I agree with the person in charge to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Detailed information of Choe Kwangmo birthday : <PRIVATE INFORMATION REDACTED BY REVI> cell phone : <PRIVATE INFORMATION REDACTED BY REVI> job address : 서울특별시 중구 퇴계로26길 52, 서울특별시 소방재난본부 (예장동) 4층 현장대응단 Field Operation Division, Seoul Metropolitan Fire & Disaster Headquarters, 52, Toegye-ro 26-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul (postal code 04628)

Choe Kwangmo Friday, May 29, 2015

최광모 (talk) 01:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He has no authority to license the file, as it is not his personal works. And, twitter reply is not acceptable method of permissions. Only acceptable way to get permission is to get a permission from your boss or legal department, and send the permission in plaintext to permissions-ko@wikimedia dot org. — regards, Revi 04:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
as I said, that is not just twitter reply. the replys are first resistered in our system 'eungdapso'(eungdapso.seoul.go.kr) by the person in charge. Then it goes to the compliant maker. that is why I give two links, not just twitter reply link. here is our 'official reply' [7]. In the link, Seoul Metropolitan Government clearly says that the files are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0. International. Therefore, I think authority of my permission depends on the authenticity of the site(http://eungdapso.seoul.go.kr). Mr argument is that the site belongs to Seoul Metropolitan Government and only the person in charge make a reply in the site. If you need further information you can contact Marketing team of Seoul Metropolitan Fire and Disaster Headquarters. The person in charge is '김휘대'(+82 2 3706 1547). thank you.

최광모 (talk) 05:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know the system of Seoul Govt, and (in my opinion) our permission log should be hosted in OTRS system, not anywhere else. (No evernote, no seoul govt. site, no twitter, no facebook, etc. They are not permanent, and can be deleted by anyone at any time.) Thus it should be sent to permissions by 'someone with authority to make files CC BY SA 4.0', not you. (ps. Can list of files stripped into separate page as it causes lag on my laptop?) — regards, Revi 13:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
the official oppinion of seoul goverment resistered in eungdapso system is permanant and written by one with authority. I think if someone want to check it, then he or she has no choice but to contact seoul fire headquarters. In the letter I sent to otrs yesterday, I make it clear that I work for seoul fire headquarters and part of my job is to promote our activity on the web. that is why I was able to recieve original photos of seoul fire services that dates back to early nineteenth century. I am scheduled to upload more than 360,000 photos(2TB) untile next year. the photos are no less than our entire history. I think it would benefits many people and enrich their understanding of our services. thank you. 최광모 (talk) 23:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stop. First, if you expect to upload files here you must obey Commons rules. That includes having the proper authorized official of the organization send a free license to OTRS. Second, these 6,000 file as useless without proper categorization. Unless you are willing to spend the time necessary -- at one minute per file, that would be at least 100 hours -- the 6000 should be deleted. If you upload any more files before the 6000 are all categorized properly, I will block you from editing on Commons. The last thing we need is more files that cannot be accessed because they have no categories. Commons is interested in useful images, not quantity. I find it difficult to believe that this organization has even 6,000 images that fall within Commons scope -- I doubt very much that we want 360,000 of them (and note that applying proper categories to that many files will take a skilled person several years). .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the advice. I think you are mostly right. My argument is that we seoul fire services already made it clear that there was no license issue when someone uploaded activities of seoul fire services. It is resistered in our 'official' system. As for categorization matter, I carefully rename files(place, subject, date, etc) as possible as I can so that anyone can understand the photos easily. but you are right on that I upload too many files. so I decided to follow your words. I will upload only usuful(I think, for other wiki projects) photos of seoul fire services from now on. thank you again for your proper suggestion. 최광모 (talk) 09:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The categories are trivial. I did two of them. The file names are a description of the image, where it was taken, 2010 Haiti Earthquake, for example, and something about the subject matter, with the camera file name at the end. It is moot for anyone to !vote on deletion as it is pretty clear that we will be getting the proper permission through OTRS shortly. At that time we can do the categorization with a bot in a day or two. I will add the google translation to the Files list, and anyone who understands Korean and Chinese can improve them (the file names include both languages, but are mostly in Korean). Are we that limited for space that we have to decide whether to keep them? My rule of thumb is you can never take too many pictures - but you can have not enough. My suggestion is after they are uploaded we can look through them and see if any are not worth keeping. My guess is that those are the ones that we are not getting - every photographer takes up to hundreds or even thousands of photographs for each one that is used. But yes, please hold off on uploading more of these until this DR is closed. Delphi234 (talk) 21:51, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for the kind words. I will upload only usuful(I think, for other wiki projects) photos of seoul fire services from now on. I also promise to make a gallery for every photos I will upload so that the bot will easily categorize them. thank you. 최광모 (talk) 09:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
More important than a gallery is to simply include categories for each. Delphi234 (talk) 02:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can somebody please summarize which consensus has been found here, if any? Thank you. --Krd 17:03, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom and Jim. The evidence provided by the uploader was not conclusive enough (a social media conversation and an email to OTRS that was sent from the uploader but not from an official website). Rather than working to solve this problem, the uploader appears to have simply continued uploading more potential copyright violations. Green Giant (talk) 21:57, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Batch 6 Scope Test. Some kind of party / training (?) in a stadium. No description.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:55, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Batch 7 Scope Test. Random(?) officials

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:58, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scope Test. Some kind of a sports event? Official or just for fun? Unknown people, no description.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

360 files. Scope Test. Some kind of a sports event? Unknown people, no description.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:05, 17 July 2015 (UTC) Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/08/07/Sports and family batch[reply]

Copyright and scope test. 29 Comic strips / posters.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:10, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scope test. official and a list.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:12, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown fire officials.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:24, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright and scope test.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:30, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scope test.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:40, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scope test.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:43, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Resolved. Natuur12 (talk) 13:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License provided by uploader restricts the use of this file to "a report or article about A HUMAN RIGHT". This restriction is not compatible with Commons:Licensing, which requires files to be usable by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. —RP88 (talk) 21:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's certainly possible that the logo is below the threshold of originality (I tend to lean towards it being above) but there is an additional complication with keeping this file under a TOO rationale. Since this file was actually originally contributed in a source code format (i.e. SVG) we have to also worry about the copyright to the SVG source code (this SVG is not the product of a conversion by a Commons volunteer, but the original format submitted by the contributor who used an incompatible license). For example, a comparable issue in the U.S. is digital fonts. The U.S. considers typefaces to be ineligible for copyright protection, but the U.S. Copyright Office does permit the copyright registration of digital vector fonts in file formats like Postscript or TrueType under the theory that while the product of the font source code may be ineligible for copyright protection, the source itself is a "computer program" that can be eligible for protection. See w:Intellectual_property_protection_of_typefaces#United_States for a bit of background. —RP88 (talk) 09:53, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yuya_at_Fanimecon,_San_Jose,_CA,_May_2011.png#file 184.23.19.52 21:40, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am the original photographer of this photo and would like this to be taken down since the uploader claims that it was their own work. 184.23.19.52 21:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Doubtfull claim of ownership Natuur12 (talk) 21:40, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]