Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/05/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 31st, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Viola los derechos de autor. C.Jonel [contact me] 11:04, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Viola los derechos de autor. C.Jonel [contact me] 11:06, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Viola los derechos de autor. C.Jonel [contact me] 11:06, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Viola los derechos de autor. C.Jonel [contact me] 11:07, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was created by me for use by a games company. Whilst it is now on my deviant art account it is not public domain and you have no right to show it here. Kindly remove it. Peter Johnston http:\\www.deviantart.com\monkey-paw. 81.129.201.24 10:33, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation. Thank you for bringing it to our attention. See archive.org for evidence of this image at Deviant Art in 2009. Note also that the source given here is Wikia, which isn't as stringent copyright as we'd like. Green Giant (talk) 11:51, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of unfree (copyrighted) work. Bidgee (talk) 12:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom and uploader request. Green Giant (talk) 15:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.parisetudiant.com/etudiant/sortie/clement-reisky-des-photographies-architecturales-a-l-atmosphere-futuriste-inspire-de-georges-orwell-nommee-2031.html JeanBono (talk) 14:32, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Reupload of File:Clément_Reisky_Auteur_Photographe.jpg, no evidence of permission. Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:34, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

منبع دهی مشکل دارد آیوش (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 17:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:OgreBot/Uploads by new users/2014 March 25 12:00 علی اللهیاری (talk) 08:44, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

یرذ لپ اتد Hadisemosavi (talk) 17:36, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: nonsense, probably just a simple mistake by a newbie. --4nn1l2 (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس حسین حسین فرجی هروانی Hosfa (talk) 18:12, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 18:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kristof-van-de-vondel-1426782870.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source not matching, modified and copyright violation 109.43.2.28 19:39, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: just text, trivial despite being a trademark rubin16 (talk) 19:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cambiar versión fotografía Noelia Campillo (talk) 19:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cambiar versión fotografía Noelia Campillo (talk) 19:55, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn Krd 04:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yo, JorgeLC, autor de esta fotografía, propongo su eliminación, ya que no está incluida en ningún artículo y carece de calidad. Hay otras fotografías de mucha mayor calidad, donde se observa mejor el monumento, hechas por otros autores. 89.29.146.209 04:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Only image att his angle and this close .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yo, JorgeLC, Jorge López Cantos, autor de esta fotografía, propongo su eliminación, por la poca calidad de mi fotografía. Existen otras fotografías en "wikimedia commons" de esta monumento de mayor calidad. JorgeLópezCantos 14:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)


Kept Speedy keep -- no new information in this request. Please do not nominate this for deletion again. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 22:51, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Didym; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 21:42, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Completely non-notable podcaster, out of scope (see previous deletion discussion for what I assume is a picture of the same person) IagoQnsi (talk) 18:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions (278x181px), missing EXIF, uploaded by 1-upload user Sonicrider (talk · contributions · Statistics). Gunnex (talk) 10:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: Tagged with copyvio via https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=288504294599246&id=168832476503211 (10.2012). Gunnex (talk) 10:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Túrelio; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 21:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright WikiKids Iktorie1 (talk) 13:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Ellin Beltz; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 21:44, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidene of permission; licence of Flickr is "NC". Andy Mabbett (talk) 17:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License on Flickr is "Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial 2.0 Generic". Apologies if this is insufficient for WikiMedia Commons. Is WikiMedia commercial? Thanks, DASonnenfeld (talk) 17:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@DASonnenfeld: Please see Commons talk:Licensing/Explaining why Derivative Work and Commercial Use must be allowed. You can, of course, ask the copyright holder to relax the licence. Andy Mabbett (talk) 20:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the explanation. I've written to the photographer seeking permission... Kind regards, DASonnenfeld (talk) 20:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pigsonthewing: Permission has been granted... The photographer's contact info has been added to the Talk page for this image. Thanks, DASonnenfeld (talk) 20:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Commons:OTRS#If you are not the copyright holder for the correct process. Andy Mabbett (talk) 21:08, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks. I've written the photographer again & requested that he submit his permission directly as required. DASonnenfeld (talk) 00:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After further consideration, the photographer declines to permit unrestricted use of his work. Objection withdrawn to deleting this file. Thanks, DASonnenfeld (talk) 18:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:13, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 22:44, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 22:44, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 22:44, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter bird is copyright. Fry1989 eh? 22:48, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are SVGs of the Facebook F logo. Fry1989 eh? 22:49, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of Bruno Maria Apollonj Ghetti, dead in 1989. Finished in 1955. No FOP in Italy.

José Luiz disc 00:38, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

State cancellando tutte le fotografie di chiese o edifici religiosi presi da esterno. Mi chiedo: ma a che serve commons.wikimedia.org se non si può caricare nessuna foto recente? quali presunte leggi vengono violate? ci sarà mai qualcuno che pretenderà o farà valere una qualche violazione di diritti? A perderci è solo Commons, e mi dispiace.--Croberto68 (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is given as de Hamon JP, with no apparent connection to uploader, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of Gianni Mazzocca in late 50's. No FOP in Italy.

José Luiz disc 01:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (from http://www.guiadeonibus.com.br/cidades/Urussanga-SC_1174.html ) Scheridon (talk) 01:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a professional studio portrait which has been scanned or re-photographed (note blue aura around the edges at the bottom) Uploader should be required to show proof of copyright ownership or permission to license from the owner Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't trust MiewEN he is an author. This user many times uploaded images of others. Above all he uploaded this one as Vica Kerekes.JPG, it means as different actress. This image depicts actress Michaela Maurerová at the 21st Czech Lions ceremony (2013), see photo by Jan Silvar. How can I take the only snap of unknown person and later uploaded it as concrete different actress? It's not credible.--Kacir (talk) 01:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

reason=its not my own work. --Sophia (talk) 17:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repeat upload of Commons:Deletion requests/File:NRHS campus dusk.jpg ɱ (talk) 02:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfounded and possibly spurious material — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inhakito (talk • contribs) 2015-05-26T00:22:24‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a stolen image.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.251.233.171 (talk • contribs) 2015-05-28T16:53:41‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a stolen image.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.251.233.171 (talk • contribs) 2015-05-28T16:54:33‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:05, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:05, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exact duplicate of File:Image from page 288 of "Introduction to zoology; a guide to the study of animals, for the use of secondary schools;" (1900) (14784722542).jpg Animalparty (talk) 06:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-trivial logo, needs permission A.Savin 07:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-trivial logo, needs permission A.Savin 07:24, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-trivial logo, needs permission A.Savin 07:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-trivial logo, needs permission A.Savin 07:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted front page of a novel from 1992. Sporti (talk) 08:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. This artwork is quite recent. JeanBono (talk) 08:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The picture that I took recently shows the buildings (and surrounding) on which the paintings are made. It is not a photo of the pictures themselves (hard to see). Based on this I don't see any copyright violation. This picture is presently used on the French version of Fresque des Lyonnais. Dingy (talk) 04:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in France... JeanBono (talk) 05:09, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ocesamonterrey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status, multiple copyright issues involved, unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ocesamonterrey and multiple digicams in use. All files uploaded in a row on 07.10.2011 for es:Auditorio Banamex, an indoor amphitheatre, located in Monterrey, Mexico. Living example: File:Bunbury AuditorioBanamex 16Oct10.jpg versus (lower res, but identical exif) https://www.flickr.com/photos/danyrockstar/5115338969/ (2010, © by "Daniela Velez"). Unclear is also File:Auditorio Banamex.jpg, previously published via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?s=bac99755b067691201f4df6bebcecad4&p=82424414&postcount=3315 (07.2011) = (lower res, but identical exif) http://www.ratconcerts.com/gallery/Auditorio%20Banamex.jpg (last modified: 06.2011)

Exif history:

  • NIKON D90 - 17.11.2008
  • Canon EOS 50D - 28.09.2010
  • Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT - 16.10.2010
  • Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT - 12.11.2010
  • Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT - 13.11.2010
  • Canon EOS 40D - 23.02.2011
  • Canon EOS 5D - 15.03.2011
  • NIKON D90 - 13.04.2011

File:ABNMX Exterior 02.jpg is — per official Facebook (03.2011) — credited with "Foto por: Fernando Vega". Previously published on offical Facebook was also File:Auditorio Banamex.jpg = https://www.facebook.com/auditbanamex/photos/a.169971046358525.36173.142112159144414/169971063025190/?type=1&theater (2010).

Same for File:EnriqueIglesias AuditorioBanamex 23Feb11.jpg + File:ABNMX Interior 02.jpeg, previously published in this album from 03.2011 or File:Bosé AuditorioBanamex 12Nov10.jpg = https://www.facebook.com/auditbanamex/photos/a.170891306266499.36452.142112159144414/170900059598957/?type=3&theater (2010).

Multiple permissions from several photographers and/or further details needed.


Gunnex (talk) 09:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

thumbnail. not useful Saqib (talk) 09:58, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful Saqib (talk) 10:06, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

not useful Kha4lid56 (talk) 16:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

not useful Kha4lid56 (talk) 16:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 10:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose . better image File:Darkot in GilgitBaltistan, Pakistan 4.JPG Saqib (talk) 10:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose . better image File:Darkot in GilgitBaltistan, Pakistan 4.JPG Saqib (talk) 10:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose . better image File:Darkot in GilgitBaltistan, Pakistan 4.JPG Saqib (talk) 10:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose . better image File:Darkot in GilgitBaltistan, Pakistan 4.JPG Saqib (talk) 10:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose . better image File:Darkot in GilgitBaltistan, Pakistan 4.JPG Saqib (talk) 10:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 10:32, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 10:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 10:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 10:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:53, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LeonGuanajuato (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:LeonGuanajuato (serial copyrigt violator / Flickr grabber). All files uploaded on 06.12.2013, mostly related to es:León (Guanajuato), a city in Mexico. Living example: File:Templo Expiatorio del Sagrado Corazón.jpg: 1st version grabbed from https://www.flickr.com/photos/juanjoge/6054541827/ (2011, © by "Juan Gutierrez")

Gunnex (talk) 11:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Cuatamuto / logs (last remaining file). Gunnex (talk) 11:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The watermark "IMAGE BANK" gives the impression this is a copyright violation. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:01, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused, promotional Citobun (talk) 12:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused, promotional Citobun (talk) 12:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere, e.g., http://www.theguardian.com/world/gallery/2014/jul/21/aerial-views-of-india-by-drone-in-pictures#img-10 where it's credited to Amos Chapple. --ghouston (talk) 12:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere, e.g., http://www.blog.propchill.com/investing-in-property-in-noida-vs-gurgaon-which-is-better/ --ghouston (talk) 12:24, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere, e.g., http://meinhardtindia.com/projects/state-highway-yamuna-expressway/ --ghouston (talk) 12:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shayanpooya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

files not needed anymore / these were temp uploads for identification of the animal. Same for File:Unbekannter Käfer für Auskunft-1.jpg and File:Unbekannter Käfer für Auskunft-2.jpg Also quick delete is fine with me (the uploader)

Neozoon (talk) 13:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image and disturbing people in front The Photographer (talk) 13:16, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Photographer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these photos are taken in Paris (based on the file name), many I assume to be in or around the en:Centre Georges Pompidou. There is no COM:FOP in France, therefore all of these are infringements on the artists (or architects) copyright. Unless we know them to be free they should be deleted (being in a museum of modern art is a pretty good indicator that the artist wouldn't have died long enough ago for them to be free) per COM:PRP.

ColonialGrid (talk) 13:16, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above and uploader request. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:38, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is some form of artwork, moved over from Flickr. Nominated to achieve consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO 3D patches without permission of creators. Image passes flickr review; content does not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of teeshirt on model, description looks like promotion. COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Such long-distance shot would require good equipement →‎ absence of metadata is suspect. IMO derivate work from 1:11:19, copyrighted by France Télévisions. Gyrostat (talk) 13:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivate work from 19:59, copyrighted by France Télévisions. Gyrostat (talk) 14:05, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution, multiple hits on google, seems to be originally from here. El Grafo (talk) 20:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted by RTL (radio station) Gyrostat (talk) 21:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivate work from Getty Images, by Daniel Mihailescu. Gyrostat (talk) 21:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: by Stéphane Mahé, Reuters. Gyrostat (talk) 21:51, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: by Boris Horvat (Getty Images). Gyrostat (talk) 21:52, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work" but probably a copy of the image found on the internet. Original is at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nepal_Patan_Mangal.jpg Takeaway (talk) 22:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Downsized duplicate.--Pere prlpz (talk) 19:04, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. This file is licensed based on a credit available (as indicated) at http://www.telegraf.rs/vesti/861275-dva-metka-za-ustasu-ko-je-cetnik-blagoje-jovovic-koji-je-ubio-anta-pavelica-foto (10.2013) = http://www.telegraf.rs/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/24/blagojejovovic.jpg = "Foto: Wikipedia/Свифт". Checking uploads by Свифт (talk · contributions · Statistics) I can't found any related file. Considering the related logs quite a lot of user's uploads got deleted in the meantime by several reasons. Further details (per COM:EVID) and a source linking to a corresponding freely licensed work by "Свифт" needed. Gunnex (talk) 22:26, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See EXIF:

© Copyright Michael Powell www.michaelpowell.com BBC Radio Presenter Marc Riley.

Stefan4 (talk) 22:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded locally at enwiki by en:user:Струјајое (@Струјајое: ) in 2009 (and later transferred to Commons) the photo was previously published via http://kizahood.8m.com/photo.html (wayback to 2004 available) = http://kizahood.8m.com/Portfolio/Kragujevac2.jpg (last modified: 2005, exif available). Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 22:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:01, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE MY ACCOUNT, SIMPLE. HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 07:52, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE MY ACCOUNT, SIMPLE. HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 07:56, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:30, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE MY ACCOUNT, SIMPLE. HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 07:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:30, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE MY ACCOUNT, SIMPLE. HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 07:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:30, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE MY ACCOUNT, SIMPLE. HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 07:58, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:15, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:30, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivate work from 44:55, copyrighted by France Télévisions. Gyrostat (talk) 14:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahdiouahidi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album or file hosting. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sendoh~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for US Federal license; highest resolution version found online is from Canadian source, not copyright-free: http://forestrydev.org/diseases/ctd/Group/Rust/rust1_e.html

MPF (talk) 14:54, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aguilas de Cristo FC 111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for US Federal license; highest resolution version found online is from Canadian source, not copyright-free: http://tidcf.nrcan.gc.ca/en/diseases/factsheet/1000053

MPF (talk) 14:58, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pablitoguz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused symbols of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for US Federal license; highest resolution version found online is from Canadian source, not copyright-free: http://tidcf.nrcan.gc.ca/en/diseases/factsheet/1000053

MPF (talk) 15:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omar2564 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Omar2564 (Panoramio grabber). Living example: File:Iglesia Santiago Apostol.jpg (file not nominated but needs a history edit, as it was overwritten by other user), initially uploaded in 2009 = grabbed from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/16805284 (2008, © All rights reserved by "sugitzu").

Gunnex (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniela Hejátková (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Koreahdhwwe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Encyclopedic value?? Hansmuller (talk) 15:08, 31 May 2015 (UTC) She is a YouTuber from Chile and looks nice, but do we need portraits of all YouTubers? Kind regards, Hansmuller (talk) 15:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MiriCosgrove (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence that file is licensed under CC-BY 4.0 rubin16 (talk) 15:37, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

These images seem to be out of scope. The tables are better done as a wikitable and the logo seems to be a personal logo of no use for people other than the artist.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:16, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2013. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.

Gunnex (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obs.: I found several uncategorized Minecraft related screenshots etc. which I categorized in this category after iniciating this DR. Please evaluate these files too. Gunnex (talk) 18:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2014. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.

Gunnex (talk) 08:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. JurgenNL (talk) 07:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Various screenshots, logos and textures from Minecraft (which isn't freely licensed)

Logos
Screenshots
Derivative works of Minecraft textures

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by INeverCry. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots of a non-free video game, thus making these images non-free deriative works.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't make sense to me. I understand that Minecraft is closed source so a general screenshot of landscape that was generated by the program or programmers would not be my work. But there are a huge number of photos of real buildings in the Wikimedia Commons. The person who took that photo of a building probably didn't build the building, they only took the photo. Isn't that "derivative" work? I made that Bitcoin icon myself with several hours of labor, and then I took the photos/screenshots. Two parts of the creative process were my own and that creative work would not exist without my significant efforts. Can the brick maker sue the architect for his "derivative" work? And then the architect sue the photographer for using their building in the photographic "derivative" work? If what I posted is illegal to post, then it shouldn't be, and we should fight stupid laws like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatljuice (talk • contribs) 00:40, 1 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

All real buildings have copyrights, until they expire. In many countries, Commons photographs are permitted by laws which specifically exempt the photographs from being derivative works, see COM:FOP. However, that is a bad analogy. Think, instead, of drawings of real buildings, including both the architectural drawings used to construct them, renderings used to show them before construction, and post construction drawings. All of them have copyrights and you will not see them on Commons without a specific license from the creator.
The brick maker cannot sue because bricks aren't copyrighted, but the architect can sue a photographer in many countries (those with no FOP law) and can sue someone who copies his drawings in every country.
Copyright law is not stupid. If it were not for copyright laws, few people would go to the effort of writing books or creating sculptures, because they could not earn money for doing it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that my analogy isn't perfect, but I think it's closer to accurate than yours James. Copies, or photos of architectural drawings would be more like copies or photos of computer code. A more accurate analogy would be if I went to Disneyland and built a tower out of foam blocks that are supplied by Disney and then took a picture of my creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 1 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, you are wrong. As I noted above, there are explicit exemptions in some countries for photographs of actual buildings. Minecraft is not buildings. Your Disney block creation would be a sculpture. In any event, with limited exceptions which don't apply here, every created work has a copyright. While there are exceptions for actual buildings (and other things) in some countries, any other copy of such a work is a copyvio. Since no exception applies to computer generated works anywhere, this is a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're saying I'm wrong about. I'm trying to come up with an analogy that we can agree on so that arguments can be made from some sort of common ground. I understand that legally there may be a problem. I don't claim to know international IP law (I live in the US). I do believe that if there are laws that restrict what I posted, then those laws should be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 2 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]



Let's start from scratch. There is nothing international about this -- it is all US law and Commons rules. One of two things is true. Either:
  • You drew these completely from your own mind with no reference to anything on Minecraft, or
  • These are derived from or use images or parts of images from Minecraft.
In the first case, they are your personal creations and we do not keep personal art from non-notable artists, see COM:SCOPE.
In the second case, your images are derivative works of the copyrighted work of other people and therefore must be deleted as copyvios.
.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Jim, derivative works from a copyrighted game artworks. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded 2015. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above.

Gunnex (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than "Other stuff doesn't exist", do you have a policy-based reason for deletion? Andy Dingley (talk) 16:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
COM:L. Screenshots of a non-free video game (COM:SS). Gunnex (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. INeverCry 00:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Self-promotional logo uploads and artwork by non-notable individuals. Out of scope, and on top of that many are likely copyvios.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9   14:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots and assets from a copyrighted video game. I wonder how many of these I'll actually have to make.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What part of File:Discobeat Skin.png is Mojang's IP? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch on that one, I would've said the background but it doesn't appear to be Mojang's textures. However, we still can't be sure whether the background is freely licensed. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be the personal player model skin used by the uploader. From the publicly available logs at de.wp it appears that this may have been used for a self-promotional article that was deleted speedily – which raises the additional question of COM:SCOPE. --El Grafo (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment maybe a warning message equivalent to {{NoUploads}} might help to keep new uploads to the category down a little bit? --El Grafo (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyrighted video game screenshots, derivitave content or otherwise out of scope uploads.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment File:Skin de Diamantum576.jpg has a watermark from novaskin.me/wallpapers, a page that seems to provide a functionality where you can place your own player skin into a pre-made wallpaper. They use CC-BY-SA-NC as a license for their stuff, so even if the background image was their own (which I'm tempted to doubt based on the other clearly non-free stuff they use) we can't keep it. --El Grafo (talk) 14:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File:The Feed The Beast Launcher.png seems to show a separate software called Feed The Beast Launcher, which is licensed {{Apache}}. The screenshot shows logos for different Minecraft modpacks which might not be part of that license, however. Don't know if these might qualify for COM:De minimis/{{De minimis}}? --El Grafo (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've updated the page to show the Apache license, rather than the CC-own work claim. Checking the Feed the Beast modpack list the modpacks included in the screenshot are All Rights Reserved, which I would assume includes the logo too. I'm not too sure about de minimis either, especially since one of the logos cover a decent amount of the image, but in the worst case the logos could be edited out in order to keep the image. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I'd like to point out that the three which are struck out and stated to be "in use" are likely all COM:COPYVIOs as they are COM:DW of copyrighted game "Minecraft". A copyvio "in use" does not become ineligible to delete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The last one (File:Tinkers Construct smeltery.png) is fine, I think: It doesn't contain anything from the original game, everything displayed comes from the Tinkers Construct mod which has a free license. --El Grafo (talk) 16:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment (Edit conflict) Not all of these files were nominated as copyright violations, some were also nominated as out of scope.
-Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots of Minecraft, or derivative content using textures owned by Mojang.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The head of the skin appears to me to be a derivative of the Pig that appears in Minecraft, and I'd also imagine there was some issue with the Spider-Man uniform too. Either way, out of scope. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyright violations or out of scope uploads.

Copyright violations
Out of scope

--Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voglio farti notare che la dichiarazione sulla immagine File:Herobrine skin ver. mod.png, non è esatta, non risulta nessuna copyright della Mojang su questo personaggi perché il personaggio è stato creato dalla comunità di Minecraft, inoltre l’immagine non deriva dal videogioco e stata realizzata dall’autore che la pubblicata, soprattutto il personaggio è una creepy-pasta ispirato a Minecraft. Inoltre Notch ha più volte dichiarato che il personaggio non esiste nel videogioco. Per tanto Mojang non ha mai avuto copyright sul questo personaggio immaginario. Qualsiasi riferimento della Mojang su Herobrine e solamente uno scherzò che fa alla comunità. Inoltre dire che l’immagine e derivato della skin del giocatore predefinito di Minecraft, ti poso dire che è deriva solo dalle abilità del autore della immagine che la realizzato in SVG e poi la salvato su http://minecraft.gamepedia.com in formato PNG.--0 Noctis 0 (talk) 08:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It does not matter whether Mojang claim ownership or acknowledge the character, as this representation of it was made by modifying Minecraft textres. The Herobrine skin is clearly a derivative work of the Steve skin. Making minor modifications by colouring the eyes white and adding a smile does not mean that the editor now owns rights to the skin, thus they are not able to release the image under a free license. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Additonally, even if it were the sole authorship of the uploader on Gamepedia, the image is only licensed CC-BY-NC, which is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. The source has no mention of the GDFL license that you claimed when uploading the file. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Su questo ti posso dare una spiegazione, essendo che non esiste il Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) o perché non sono riuscito a trovarlo (probabilmente e stato nominato sotto un altro nome). Ho caricato immagine sotto la licenza che l’autore mia detto che era adeguata. Se mi stai dicendo che l’immagine come il colore della pelle e legata al copyright, l’immagine e composta da geometria semplice e colori che formano l’immagine non possono essere considerati come materiale protetto da copyright perché comuni a tutti, Non supera quindi la soglia di originalità. Inoltre cito il trademark.--0 Noctis 0 (talk) 20:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


As the creator of File:Flag of Satigris.svg I do not object to its deletion. I don't even remember why I uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons, to be honest. Bowwow828 (talk) 10:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyright violations (including screenshots and derivative works) and out of scope uploads related to Minecraft. Copyright violations

Out of scope

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Herobrine.png

Previously {{copyvio|1=© Mojang Studios. The fact that they state that they are "quite relaxed about non-commercial things" is not enough per COM:Licensing – commercial reuse MUST be allowed for all files at Commons.}}, see User_talk:Herobrine303. The uploader removed the copyvio tag without starting a regular deletion request, so here we go.

This is a derivative work of the original default Minecraft Steve player skin (the old one, before he got a shave, low-res version of the original image here). Similar or identical files have been deleted repeatedly in the past (CTRL+F Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minecraft for "herobrine.png"), so I don't think {{PD-ineligible}} applies. --El Grafo (talk) 13:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Procedural close: already deleted as noted above. Эlcobbola talk 20:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos are of a Minecraft Papercraft Chess board. The artwork on all the pieces is from the game Minecraft (by Mojang AB) and Pixel Papercraft may also arguably hold some copyright in the chess designs. These photos seem to exceed COM:DM, as the only purpose/value in the photos is to showcase the copyrighted artwork (i.e. blacking out the copyrighted parts would mean blocking out basically the entire photo). COM:DM Sweden would apply since Mojang AB is a Swedish company, and from the few examples listed on that page, it seems Sweden may have even stricter laws than the U.S., making it more likely these are not de minimis.

IagoQnsi (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of scope.

Leonel Sohns 15:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I've tagged a few of these for speedy deletion as clear copyvios, and the rest I agree are out of scope. –IagoQnsi (talk) 02:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Four of these were speedy deleted as copyright violations. The remainder aren't screenshots, so weren't speedy deleted, though I do agree with the deletion nomination. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:EXPLICATIONZONE.png is lacking a bit of an explanation, but it could hypothetically be used in some sort of expert guide on how to select a volume using commands. Not sure on that none.  Delete all of the remaining ones as out of scope. Especially File:MoistMeter.pdf, which as far as I can tell is just made-up nonsense. --El Grafo (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly a scan from a book; no evidence that the uploader took the image him/herself  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a copyrighted panel. AlessioMela (talk) 16:38, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

created in 1928 and not published in the UK prior to 1923 Graemp (talk) 17:55, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 16:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal unsed image. out of scoop Saqib (talk) 17:56, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alugo2014 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Alugo2014 who already grabbed in the past copyrighted material from "Deutsche Welle for illustrating de:DW (Latinoamérica) (and the related eswiki entry). All files uploaded in a row on 20.01.2013.

Living examples:

For the rest, per above + eventually video screenshots, considering also mysteriously available broken text at File:Gonzalo E. Cáceres.png.

Gunnex (talk) 18:06, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

could this be usful for commons? Saqib (talk) 18:11, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Syedkamalalishah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

likely copyvio. no meta data and low res. the user uploaded 1 copyvio

Saqib (talk) 18:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo/not useful for an educational purpose Fleur-de-farine (talk) 18:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful for an educational purpose Fleur-de-farine (talk) 18:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful for an educational purpose Fleur-de-farine (talk) 19:05, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This talk page has been empty for years, and never contained anything useful.
Note: This deletion proposal concerns the talk page only, not the image itself. Jahoe (talk) 19:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

existing permission from DJI? Nattr (talk) 19:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded by 1-upload user Cossvera (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 06.2014 the photo was previously published via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/107093116 (05.2014, all rights reserved by "Carlos Rosales Vera"). Despite of having a similar username, the Panoramio user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established. Gunnex (talk) 20:08, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of a CC licence, especially from a profit-making corporate site SchroCat (talk) 20:37, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from here http://www.airliners.net/photo/Untitled-(Confederate-Air/Grumman-(General-Motors)/1385078/L/&sid=8230269055eb7d94cad27a2e165d54ef Curioushavedape (talk) 20:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Licensed with {{PD-Coa-Mexico}} which may not apply for logos of companies like en:Correos de México, the national postal service of Mexico (even state-owned). Logo is (IMHO) also above COM:TOO. Gunnex (talk) 20:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maquedasahag (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. State anthems of Mexico licensed with {{PD-Coa-Mexico}} which seems not applyable for this kind of works (music). For File:Himno Mexicano-OSN.ogg (grabbed from a blog): unlikely {{PD-old-100}}, appears to be a recent recording.

Gunnex (talk) 21:15, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Струјајое (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status and unlikely own works, considering also User talk:Струјајое. Poster art for several theatre events, considering

Permissions and/or further details needed.

Gunnex (talk) 23:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Струјајое (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per EXIF data photos are copyrighted by Denis Danicic (website: http://fotoreporter.rs/). No permission from copyright holder.

Smooth O (talk) 14:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Струјајое (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Four different photographers are credited in the metadata of these images, even though the uploader has claimed to own all of them. This also makes me question the copyright status of other photographs uploaded by this user without photographer credit in the EXIF data.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User request. Bhai-istan (talk) 14:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 04:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User request. Bhai-istan (talk) 14:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 04:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User request Bhai-istan (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 03:59, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User request. Bhai-istan (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 03:59, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE MY ACCOUNT, SIMPLE. HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 07:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:30, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE MY ACCOUNT, SIMPLE. HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:04, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:32, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE MY ACCOUNT, SIMPLE. HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:04, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:32, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE MY ACCOUNT, SIMPLE. HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:04, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:31, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:12, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:31, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:13, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:31, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:13, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:31, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:15, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:31, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:15, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:31, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:37, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:23, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:23, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:26, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:26, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 08:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture could harm Kristof Van De Vondel in his current private life and professional activities. His current job is one where he has the lead over a 50 people and this picture could be used against him. Therefore I wish this image to be deleted. AlexanderD1983 (talk) 08:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. INeverCry 01:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject wants the file deleted but more important, it fails Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Belgium. Natuur12 (talk) 12:24, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:25, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour, je me permets de vous contacter pour vous demander la suppression du logo de notre revue qui figure sur votre site à cette page : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Tell_mum_everything_is_ok_logo.jpg En effet, j'ai moi-même ajouté ce logo à une époque ou une page existait à propos du fanzine participatif que nous éditions. Cette page n'existant plus, je souhaiterai voir le logo disparaitre également. Si je vous écris aujourd'hui c'est parce que nous avons constaté l'utilisation à des fins commerciales, (purement mercantiles), de notre logo : http://www.ebay.fr/itm/Tell-MUM-EVERYTHING-is-OKAY-Mug-Design-11oz-Heavy-Ceramic-Novelty-Gift-coffee-/121635581052?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&hash=item1c520bac7c Ce logo est celui d'une revue, et quoi qu'en dise la page wikipédia qui ne lui attribue pas de copyright, le logo existe bien et vous pouvez en juger de vous mêmes en consultant les pages de notre revue : exemple n°3 = http://www.editionsfpcf.com/index.php/tellmumeverythingisok/tell-mum-3/ (l'antériorité du logo remonte à 2009 et est bel et bien associé à notre travail) J'espère que vous comprendrez notre demande. Il ne s'agit pas d'effacer du contenu mais plutôt d'éviter que notre travail soit terni par ce genre de pratiques. Pour info, nous sommes une maison d'édition associative, sans salariés. Notre travail est donc entièrement bénévole et chaque production finance la suivante. Quand on tombe sur ce genre de produit, on se doit de réagir. Merci encore et bonne fin de journée, Maxime Milanesi, Président de l'association Les Éditions FP&CF Victor Hassy (talk) 13:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Victor Hassy: Bonjour,
Supprimer ce logo de Commons aura peu d'incidence sur son utilisation ailleurs. Il ne peut pas être couvert par le droit d'auteur, il est trop simple pour cela. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 07:45, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


ce fichier doit etre supprimé car à l'époque il faisait partie d'une page qui a été supprimée. un modérateur s'était alors proposé de mettre le fichier ici mais aujourdh'uin nous constatons qu'il est utilisé à des fins commerciales, aussi je demande à c qu'il soit retiré définitivement. Merci Victor Hassy (talk) 19:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Ce texte simple ne peut pas être protégé par le droit d'auteur. PD-ineligible. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:06, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Maybe PD. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: changed the license to {{PD-art|PD-old-auto}} JuTa 06:56, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. Commons:Derivative works from manga. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

奕辰已上傳LIN I-CHEN.jpg原始照片

The file has been renewed. Check it again, please.--Jitcji (talk) 07:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: seems to be own work Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

検索結果でいくつか出てしまうため。 藤村 新次郎 (talk) 04:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user page deleton request by user Pitke (talk) 21:16, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I WANT TO DELETE ALL MY CONTENT AND ACCOUNT Erick Duque (EDKH) (talk) 08:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting content by ground of uploader request only is not our policy, and user accounts cannot be deleted. You can mark your userpage for speedy deletion (use Template:Speedy), and if you want to make sure you can't access your account ever again, change your email to a nonexisting one and your password to gibberish, then log out. --Pitke (talk) 21:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: uploader leaving project was only reason given Pitke (talk) 21:25, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier pris sur une propriété privée sans accord des propriétaires 2.9.1.56 08:54, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Permission of the owners is not required for the photograph to belong to the photographer, or for them to be able to license it.. Per http://www.culture.gouv.fr/public/mistral/merimee_fr?ACTION=CHERCHER&FIELD_1=REF&VALUE_1=PA49000061 the building was constructed in the 15-17th centuries, and so the design is obviously in the public domain. Revent (talk) 21:46, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 07:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private child image taken at an unknown location, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

c.f. category:Children of Cambodia. --McZusatz (talk) 18:49, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 07:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Absence de source, donc licence invérifiable 6PO 19:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

J'ai copié la page de discussion du fichier :
  • "Does any one know the source of this image, (specifically from which manuscript it came)? Any reference, especially one including institution and shelf-marks would be greatly appreciated. Dsmdgold 23:00, 1 October 2005 (UTC)"
6PO 19:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)


Keep: Orignal source is now in image description (Legenda Aurea (Keble MS 49, fol 162r), c. 1267-76) --GDK (talk) 19:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GDK, I am sorry but I can't find it... --6PO 21:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OK now. Yann (talk) 07:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from herehttp://www.airliners.net/photo/PHi---Petroleum/Bell-407/0921270/L/&sid=d88f75b65d59b103c9afad93373a1931 Curioushavedape (talk) 20:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: If you see the picture closer, this one uploaded to Flickr is not the same as the one found in airliners.net, and metadata says clearly ints file has been taken in 2012. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It was loaded August 20, 2005 on airliners.net clearly before the Flickr fake Curioushavedape (talk) 20:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Amitie 10g: The EXIF information on the Flickr file does not indicate the photo was taken in 2012, it indicates that it was modified in Photoshop in 2012. That in itself in not proof that it is a copyvio, but indicative. However, looking at the Flickr version at a high level of zoom, there appears to my eye to be evidence that the passenger was indeed photoshopped out... that area has a noticeably 'smoother' pattern than the noise present in other parts of the sky. Regardless of that opinion, however, the similarity of aspects such as the rotor positions and shadow angles goes, IMO, beyond any possible coincidence.  Delete per the precautionary principle. Revent (talk) 22:08, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. No doubt it is a photoshopped version of Airliners. Yann (talk) 07:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lomita as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1ère de couverture ; La photo qui illustre la couverture est peut-être dans le domaine public. Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per the precautionary principle, unless provenance can be shown for the photograph. Revent (talk) 21:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not PD Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lomita as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1ère de couverture La photo qui illustre la couverture est peut-être dans le domaine public. Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, again per the precautionary principle, unless provenance can be found for the photograph. Revent (talk) 21:39, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lomita as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1ère de couverture ; La photo qui illustre la couverture est peut-être dans le domaine public. Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete yet again, per the precautionary principle, unless provenance can be shown for the photograph. Revent (talk) 21:40, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:08, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the image was that I created, no one has copyright in the image, not consiguir a high quality image due to the high quality images are protected Fox de Quintal (talk) 13:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

a imagem foi eu que criei, ninguém tem direitos autorais na imagem, não consiguir uma imagem de alta qualidade devido que as imagens de alta qualidade são protegidas Fox de Quintal (talk) 13:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Legitimately in use, and thus in scope until it can be replaced with a higher quality image. Revent (talk) 21:51, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: IMHO borderline. The quality is really bad, making it unuseable for educational use. On the other hand the file is in use = in scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:14, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yo, JorgeLC, el autor de esta foto, he subido otra más actualizada y de mayor calidad, por eso pido el borrado de ésta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JorgeLC~commonswiki (talk • contribs) 18:49, 16 May 2010‎ (UTC)[reply]


Kept, upload a better version over this one if you have one. Kameraad Pjotr 20:29, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Existe otra fotografía (Conventoagustinasalmansaespanacalearagon.jpg) idéntica a ésta pero más actual. Ambas fueron hechas por mí (JorgeLC). Por este motivo, sugiero la eliminación de este archivo, es decir de: File:Iglesiaconventoagustinasalmansaespañacallepmc.jpg. Gracias. 89.29.146.209 05:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yo, JorgeLC, Jorge López Cantos, autor de esta fotografía, subí otra fotografía, de mejor calidad, de este mismo monumento (File:Conventoagustinasalmansaespanacallearagon.jpg), por lo tanto solicito la eliminación de esta fotografía, anterior, de menor calidad, con menos luz, y dejar el nuevo archivo para evitar duplicidades. JorgeLópezCantos 14:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)


Deleted: per request by uploader. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:25, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper license. Fry1989 eh? 19:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Ibrahim.ID Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:28, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nome do arquivo incoerente Oliveirajp (talk) 14:54, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request, recent unused file Revent (talk) 14:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nome incoerente, nomeação errada. Oliveirajp (talk) 15:06, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request, recent unused file. Revent (talk) 14:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Add uncertain images and files — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wliek351 (talk • contribs) 2015-05-26T09:06:05‎ (UTC)


Deleted: unused and uploaders request. JuTa 20:13, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Ayeshahe

[edit]

Little or no metadata. Some images look like screenshots.--Obi2canibe (talk) 12:37, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - All these Photographs have uploaded By an Executive officer working for SIRASA Newsfirst named Ayesha Hettiarachchi (Ayeshahe),Simply because we don't find any Metadata on these Photographs,Can we throw these in the Bin ?
@ Obi2canibe Then Think Similarly about User UmakanthJaffna Uploads as Well, (Working for Uthayan Newspaper)
What do you think about this -> C. V. Vigneswaran with a Well Wisher Thanks.--MediaJet talk 14:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We are only concerned about who owns the copyright to the images, not the employment history of the uploader. In the case of screenshots from TV programmes, the copyright holder is the owner of the TV station (see COM:SS). In this case it is MTV/Capital Maharajah. Hettiarachchi does not own the copyright even though he may be a bigwig in the station. If we are to keep the screenshots we need to receive permission from MTV/Capital Maharajah via OTRS. For the other images, who took the image and in what capacity? If it was in a capacity as an employee of MTV/Capital Maharajah then they, MTV/Capital Maharajah, own the copyright. Even if Hettiarachchi took the photo but did it as a part of his job then MTV/Capital Maharajah own the copyright. We can only keep them if Hettiarachchi took the photos in his personal capacity.--Obi2canibe (talk) 18:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@ Obi2canibe - Sorry, until Now I didn't see the Screenshots she have Uploaded,those files should undoubtedly go to the Bin,But Rethink about the other ones.--MediaJet talk 20:25, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It will be up to the closing admin to decide if the other images should be deleted or not. If the uploader can convince the community that they own the copyright, so be it.--Obi2canibe (talk) 12:50, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I think we should try to get OTRS permission for these files. Some photos look staged, indicating that someone inside the studio took the photograph. Who and if there's a copyright issue attached is not clear. 225x225 pixel fotos seem to be from a website, who took those? Who is the (c)owner? The current status is unclear copyright -> Com:PCP-deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:22, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 21:10, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yo, el autor de esta foto, JorgeLC, subí el 04/04/2010 otra de mayor calidad, pues es más visible el monumento, por eso pido el borrado de ésta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JorgeLC~commonswiki (talk • contribs) 18:45, 16 May 2010‎ (UTC)[reply]


Kept, upload a better version over this one if you have one. Kameraad Pjotr 20:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Existe otro archivo (Iglesiaconventoagustinasalmansaespana.jpg) más actual y donde se observa mejor el monumento. Ambos archivos están hechos por mí (JorgeLC). Por eso sugiero la eliminación de este archivo, es decir de: File:Iglesiaconventoagustinasalmansaespañavistaplaza.jpg. Gracias. 89.29.146.209 06:04, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yo, JorgeLC, Jorge López Cantos, autor de esta fotografía, propongo su eliminación, porque yo mismo, JorgeLC, subí otra fotografía posterior, de mayor calidad y con mayor luz, donde se observa mucho mejor el monumento, y así evitar duplicidades. JorgeLópezCantos 14:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)


Deleted. INeverCry 21:09, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yo, JorgeLC, autor de esta fotografía, propongo su eliminación por la baja calidad de la misma, ya que la hice con un viejo teléfono móvil, sin "zoom". No entro aquí con nombre de usuario porque no sé crear un nuevo usuario en "wikimedia commons", lo siento. I´am JorgeLC, the author of this photography. Please, delete my photo because your quality is nothing (my photo is made with a old mobile phone without zoom). I´ve not nick in wikimedia commons because I don´t knowledge make a nick here, sorry. 89.29.146.209 15:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:20, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yo, JorgeLC, Jorge López Cantos, autor de esta fotografía, propongo su eliminación, por la baja calidad de esta fotografía. Existen otras fotografías en "wikimedia commons" de mayor calidad. JorgeLópezCantos 14:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

  •  Keep La mala calidad por si sola no es una razón de borrado, y yo no encuentro en Category:Castillo de Almansa ninguna otra imagen del castillo desde el mismo punto de vista. Entonces, esta imagen tiene claramente un potencial uso educativo al no haber alternativas.
This image is in scope and has an obvious potential educative use since there aren't better equivalent images of the same castle from the same (nor a similar) point of view.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:00, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. INeverCry 21:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Propongo la eliminación de este archivo, ya que existen otros archivos del escudo de Almansa en "wikimedia commons" de mayor calidad, exactitud, para así evitar duplicidades. JorgeLópezCantos 14:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

 Keep The others are not duplicates, but different renditions of the same COA. Revent (talk) 14:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per Revent.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:02, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 21:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Propongo la eliminación de este archivo, ya que existen otros dos archivos idénticos, los cuales sí son usados en diferentes artículos de "wikipedia". Este archivo, no tiene ningún uso en ningún artículo de "wikipedia". No es necesario tener 3 archivos iguales. JorgeLópezCantos 14:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

 Keep Not a duplicate, File:Albacete Almansa Mapa municipal.png does not have a transparent background like this one does. If anything, delete the other. Revent (talk) 14:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 21:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This new uploader, User:Goofy222 may or may not be the photographer Matthijs van den Berg. He has uploaded a number of images from the web site of the photographer as Own Work. The site is marked "All Rights Reserved", so they have been deleted. This does not appear on the site, but if Goofy222 is van den Berg, then this is not Own Work. van den Berg is probably notable, within our requirements. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am the same person as my nickname Goofy222: Matthijs van den Berg, Dutch photograper, the photo belongs to me, I am the person on the photograph and the copyright belongs to me. Matthijs van den Berg Probably the acount Goofy222 is also deleted, I'm not sure. Matthijs van den Berg (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. Doesn't look like a selfie. INeverCry 21:15, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission for various logos. Fry1989 eh? 22:21, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Each of the logos already had the very same permissions, they are from political parties which are public institutions (they even use public money). Each logo has the same case:
I put them together because they formed a political alliance for an election on june 7th at the mexican state of Nuevo León. You can find about this alliance at CEENL.MX / PARTIDOS POLÍTICOS / Coaliciones 2015 / and read about the "Alianza por tu Seguridad". And obviously, I also created this file for saving space for this article as having four logos together was resizing the cells of some tables.
I really hope this file is not deleted.--Sueño1989 (talk) 23:02, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment This image is formed combining images that are in Commons with {{PD-Coa-Mexico}}. There is no copyright reason to delete the image unless one of its parts was challenged. Therefore I suggest:
  • If you think it's dubious that {{PD-Coa-Mexico}} covers any of the original, then close this DR and open another one nominating the dubious original images and the collage image.
  • If you think none of the parts has a dubious copyright status, close the DR as keep.
--Pere prlpz (talk) 16:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. JuTa 20:24, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A medal of the merchant marine without source, possible COM:COPYVIO as the medal would not be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Did you see the licensing template on the image? Per the text of the template, it does not matter what the source of the image is if the image is, if the object it is a photograph of is in the public domain to begin with. I hope this clears this up. Pesco (talk) 01:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The graphic above is a representation of an award or decoration of an agency of the federal government of the United States. As works of the U.S. federal government, such images are in the public domain; photographs of such images are also considered to be in the public domain per this court ruling.
  •  Comment The source is needed to show that it is a work of the US Government. Without a source it is impossible to tell where the image came from. I totally understand your quote on the court ruling; however, COM:EVID says it's up to the uploader to provide source and licensing information. There is a license, what is missing is the source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:03, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You still need to provide a source, that's all. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:32, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And of course author and source for your other uploads as well. Otherwise you'll be back here in no time and the whole thing starts all over. Thanks! :) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: missing source. JuTa 20:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An award of the US Merchant Marine, but no indication of User's own work on this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Did you see the licensing template on the image? Per the text of the template, it does not matter what the source of the image is if the image is, if the object it is a photograph of is in the public domain to begin with. I hope this clears this up. Pesco (talk) 01:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The graphic above is a representation of an award or decoration of an agency of the federal government of the United States. As works of the U.S. federal government, such images are in the public domain; photographs of such images are also considered to be in the public domain per this court ruling.
  •  CommentThe source is needed to show that it is a work of the US Government. Without a source it is impossible to tell where the image came from. I totally understand your quote on the court ruling; however, COM:EVID says it's up to the uploader to provide source and licensing information. There is a license, what is missing is the source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:03, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: missing source. JuTa 20:21, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]