Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/03/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Copied from the Internet. Yann (talk) 07:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 07:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, but all I can quickly find on the web is [1], which is from the same source image, but wasn't the uploader's source. Storkk (talk) 11:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy copyvio matanya • talk 12:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Polimerek as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: As claimed by spouse of Erazm Ciołek, who published this picture with copyright notice in his publication "Stop Cenzurze" (1980), so the Polish PD exception from 1994 is not eligible. See OTRS ticket: [2] Jarekt (talk) 15:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Same with
Delete I agree that publication "Stop Cenzurze" (1980) seem to be earlier than publication in Solidarnosc newspaper. And I verify that documentation provided in OTRS ticket:2014032410011689 show that there was a Copyright notice on "Stop Cenzurze" (1980) publication. However I believe that the requirement was that the images have to be printed with the (c) notice on the image itself, so this images might be still meeting the requirements of the {{PD-Polish}} license. However, since there is a threat of a legal action we might want to treat it the same way as Commons:Office actions. --Jarekt (talk) 16:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Delete Actually the publication "Stop Cenzurze" was a set of pictures with hand-made cover, with one copyright notice on the back cover. IMHO intention of author was clear as he wanted to copyright all pictures. The Polish copyright law was saying that the copyright notice had to be put on photographic work - not necessarily every single photo on set of them published together. Polimerek (talk) 19:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- It was pointed out to me that there is a different interpretation of the unclear law where (C) just have to be on the work itself not on individual images. In such a case Copyright notice on "Stop Cenzurze" (1980) publication would make it a copyvio as asserted by Polimerek. --Jarekt (talk) 19:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Jarekt (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
George Vernon Hudson seems to be the author, and he died in 1946. PD-old does not apply. Lymantria (talk) 09:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe {{PD-self}} then? TOL says PD, and don't we consider TOL trustable … ? FDMS 4 18:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- {{PD-New Zealand}} applies. I withdraw the DR. Lymantria (talk) 17:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: PD-New Zealand Lymantria (talk) 17:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Permission? — Allrounder (talk) 02:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- @111Alleskönner: Although the video was created by the german public TV station ZDF, it was done with for a cooperation with Wikimedia Deutschland called ZDFcheck. Like the other files in Category:ZDFcheck it is licensed under cc-by-3.0. See the license information in the youtube description and previous deletion. --sitic (talk) 09:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Source clearly states CC license Jcb (talk) 21:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Abkhazia and South Ossetia are independent states with limited recognition. This category is just political agitation, not encyclopedic. I can say the same thing about Crimea category and about Category:Areas occupated by Russia, created by the Ukrainian user. I think it's better to not provoke the other side of conflict with creating of such controversial categories.--Soul Train (talk) 21:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Yes! Occupation is political question. Sorry.--Dim Grits (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- This is also law querstion! :) there is a Law of Georgia, which I have cited on the category. So, everything is correct.--Yuriy Kvach (talk) 14:25, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Category:Georgian areas occupated by Russia, Category:Ukrainian areas occupated by Russia, Category:Areas occupated by Russia as POV pushing --Butko (talk) 21:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Category is OK. Adequate. – Bobek (talk) 21:20, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Strong oppose I have explained the necessity of this category in the top of one. Same is related to similar Ukrainian category. Please donot blame me in provocation and political agitation. The provocation and political agitation were started when the categories related to Ukrainian administrative divisions were copied/moved to Russian categories. here are examples: Category:Post in Yalta and Category:Parks in Crimea. This is an attempt to explain to wikicommons community, that the relation of these categories to Russia is a fact, which donot need to be recognized by anyone except Russia. This is political agitation! The categories created by mine have the explanaited, that they are consist off the subcategories about the areas, considered as occupated according to the laws of related countries. Yours. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 07:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Yes, Abkhazia and South Ossetia are independent. But Abkhazia and Shida Kartli are territory of Georgia. Much of the economy of them is based around the presence of Russian military forces. Russian military forces and territory of Georgia. No Treaty. Occupation or not? --Dim Grits (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- delete. what is "occupated"? lol --81.198.155.62 17:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Ψ (talk) 15:08, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedily; because we have the Neutral point of view here and we don't need shitstorm discussions inspired by single-purpose accounts. A.Savin 18:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, unused personal photo Rybec (talk) 17:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: "Out of project scope: personal image" - not used anywhere --D-Kuru (talk) 00:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
De que forma o editor comprova possuir direitos autorais da foto para divulgá-la nestes termos de licença? Tonelada D C @ 19:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tandrade8371 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Andrade Headshot1.jpg
- File:Ticao QU-01.png
- File:Ticao UC 01.png
- File:Ticao Salv FC 01.jpg
- File:Ticao UC 02.jpg
- File:Ticao IPi 01.jpg
- File:TicaoAndrade07-2.jpg
- File:Andrade.jpg
- File:Netto 21.jpg
- File:Netto 1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: at least one of them has a logo, ergo clear copyrigt violations Ymblanter (talk) 08:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:23, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 02:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 02:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
dies professionell aussehende Porträtfoto wurde in dem angegebenen link als "privat" gekennzeichnet, ist jedoch sicherlich nicht von A(ndreas)lan(ge) 2017. sondern von einem Fotografen, d.h. die Urheberangabe ist wohl falsch. Jbergner (talk) 06:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Es handelt sich eindeutig um ein foto aus der Lippischen Landeszeitung (
[3]) Löschen--Lutheraner (talk) 12:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP - Freigabe nötig -- Steinsplitter (talk) 11:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
I made a mistake in the definition: this immage is a screenshot Malufe (talk) 07:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:10, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, unused, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Personal photo, unused Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Banned in Germany because of its copyrighted music 91.66.63.188 11:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: standard youtube license = copyrighted. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 11:15, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 02:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Missing "+3" overall charge? Small, {{BadGIF}}; replaceable by File:Werner's-supposed-second-hexol-cation-2D-plain.png. Unused. DMacks (talk) 03:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 12:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
out of project scope (article removed as not notable on nl-wiki); copyvio since registered trademark; no permission as well MoiraMoira (talk) 07:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:10, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Proably not own work: portrait, small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 08:26, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
These are copyrighted derivative images. The copyright is owned by Nestle and Momiji. Leoboudv (talk) 06:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:08, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 02:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope and promotional. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
No longer in use, thereby out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF, probably not own work. Yann (talk) 07:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete /St1995 13:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
In view of the upload-history of this account, strong doubt that this image (shot with a professional Canon EOS-1D Mark III model) is own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Proably not own work: portrait, small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 08:26, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
source says CC BY-NC 2.0 Jarekt (talk) 03:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF, probably not own work. Yann (talk) 07:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably cropped image from somewhere else. — Revicomplaint? 10:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 03:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 05:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. — Revicomplaint? 10:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, poorly composed photo of unremarkable architecture Rybec (talk) 06:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:10, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work from box design. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Annie Díaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:21, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fabrizialeopardi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Aldo Nove e Mara Carfagna.jpg
- File:Imagefranz Krauspenhaar Atelier Vidocq 1.jpg
- File:Franz Krauspenhaar Atelier Vidocq.jpg
- File:Franz Krauspenhaar Roma.jpg
- File:Franz Krauspenhaar 1.JPG
- File:Franz Krauspenhaar.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Floobersman2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 03:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Archons Krig (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 02:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:05, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement of clinic with questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexnewport (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pwkorea1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:23, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SkydiveLaguna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:Invexga WingsuitRodeo.jpg
- File:Invexga Wingsuit Base.jpg
- File:Invexga Base Jump.jpg
- File:Invexga ballonJump.jpg
- File:Invexga Tandem.jpg
- File:Invexga Wingsuit Mach 1.jpg
INeverCry 03:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP -- Steinsplitter (talk) 11:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prasadarjun (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyvios - collection of modern book covers
- File:Vyavharik Hindi Vyakaran 257 pages Rs. 4000.jpg
- File:Manak Hindi Vyakaran from Ankit 276 pages.jpg
- File:Mahamav Gautam Buddha From Ankit 268 pages.jpg
- File:Vyavharik Manovigyan 160 Pages.png
- File:Yug Nirmata Dr. Ambedkar from Yadav Ramchandra pages 200 and Rs. 300.jpg
- File:Rajbhasha hindi ka kramik vikas.jpg
- File:Pap ka Ant tatha anya kahaniyan from Ankit 147 pages 152 Rs. 200written book written book 05.jpg
- File:Gumarah tatha anya kahaniyan from Hindi book Centre 181 pages Rs. 200 Hard C 01.jpg
- File:Guardbabu Storiesfrom Janvani 152 pages Rs. 200.jpg
- File:Badalte Sanskar from Ankit pages 152 Rs. 200written book 04.jpg
- File:English-Hindi Prashasnik kosh.png
- File:Gautam Buddha ka Jeevan-Darshan.png
- File:Arjun Prasad 01.jpg
- File:Atankwad Ka Nasur-Pakistan 111pages Rs. 200.jpg
- File:Adhunik Jeevan Aur Paryavaran 184P ages.png
- File:Adhunik MuhavaraKoshFrom Ankit 220 pages.jpg
INeverCry 02:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with all but the first one. Isn´t too simple to be CR? --Ganímedes (talk) 12:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP -- Steinsplitter (talk) 11:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saurabh.krishnagopal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.
- File:Anil Trivedi AAP 7.jpg
- File:Anil Trivedi AAP.png
- File:Anil Trivedi AAP 2.png
- File:Anil Trivedi.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicolas Introcaso (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - no educational value
- File:NacionalB1988-89 Reducido vuelta.jpg
- File:NacionalB1988-89 Reducido ida.jpg
- File:ReducidoNacionalB88-89ida.jpg
- File:1978Mundial.Argentina-Brasil.jpg
INeverCry 03:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicolas Introcaso (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Autódromo Juan Oria.jpg
- File:Circuito de la Base Aeronaval Punta Indio.jpg
- File:Autódromo Mar y Valle.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 23:02, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:何新与托夫勒.jpg
- File:何新与卡斯特罗.jpg
- File:何新，一个传奇.jpeg
- File:3801213fb80e7becfa17fa292f2eb9389a504fc2d462b315-1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nika Kashibadze (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. No evidenceof permission(s) for logos.
- File:Archil Khabadze.jpg
- File:Davitusupashvili.jpg
- File:Irakligaribashvili.png
- File:Giorgimargvelashvili.jpg
- File:Colonel Chachibaia.jpg
- File:Generali Vakhtang Kapanadze.jpg
- File:Georgia(country) military personel.jpg
- File:RustaveliStage2.jpg
- File:RustaveliStage.JPG
- File:Studentsnow.jpg
- File:Studentsold.jpg
- File:Tafubuildingold.jpg
- File:Tafubuilding.jpg
- File:Tafulogo.jpg
- File:Building BATU 2.jpg
- File:Students BATU.jpg
- File:Logo BATU.jpg
- File:Building BATU.jpg
- File:Sharabidze irakli.jpg
- File:BSMA logo.jpg
- File:Bechedi.jpg
- File:Kadetebi.jpg
- File:Shenoba.jpg
- File:GAF army lieutenant colonel 90cw.jpg
- File:GAF army major 90cw.jpg
- File:GAF army colonel 90cw.jpg
- File:Shota.jpg
- File:Gia.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP -- Steinsplitter (talk) 11:22, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paarijaatproduction (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
- File:Har Janam main Milenge.JPG
- File:Praveen bhansali (99).JPG
- File:Praveen bhansali (85).JPG
- File:Praveen bhansali (98).JPG
- File:Praveen bhansali (84).JPG
- File:Praveen bhansali (82).JPG
- File:Praveen bhansali (121).JPG
- File:Praveen (364).JPG
- File:Har janam main milenge 1.JPG
INeverCry 03:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Val de Ornia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 03:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stephani890 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 02:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:05, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Krd 17:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
name with error AMY (talk) 16:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted Krd 16:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Logo of the National LIbrary of Tunisia. Uploader unlikely to be copyright holder as stated in Licensing template. Ahecht (talk) 17:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Krd 16:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope; seems to be an advertise Ciaurlec (talk) 12:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 16:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Krd 17:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Screenshot of a Tunisian government web page. Uploader unlikely to be copyright holder as stated in Licensing template. Ahecht (talk) 17:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Krd 16:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted Krd 16:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Unidentified man since 2008, out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 16:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Logo for unidentified band. Out of project scope, or possibly a copyright violation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Krd 17:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Not own work - seems to be a test upload. Available on web without clear free license here among other places. Storkk (talk) 11:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio, see http://www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/royalty-free/42-17167222/chrysanthemum. Jespinos (talk) 15:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment interesting - it's available under a "Royalty Free" license, which initially looks good... However their terms, specifically section 11, seem to be incompatible with commons. Storkk (talk) 17:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Royalty-free license is not a free license and hence incompatible with Commons. Jespinos (talk) 18:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Incompatible license Krd 16:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Unidentified man, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Also bad quality, useless. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Krd 16:48, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope; maybe an advertise Ciaurlec (talk) 12:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 16:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Bad image Davidgutierrezalvarez (talk) 02:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 17:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Artwork of José Pancetti (1902 — 1958), Brazilian painter. Copyrighted till the end of 2028. Gunnex (talk) 14:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission per nomination Krd 16:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope; maybe an advertise Ciaurlec (talk) 12:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 16:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Useless image. The related article has been deleted from it.wiki for lack of notability (see it:Wikipedia:Pagine da cancellare/Luigi Susi). --BohemianRhapsody (talk) 23:26, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Slightly out of project scope, furthermore doubable own work. Krd 16:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Krd 17:05, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
derivative work: shows the cover of a catalogue in a way that may not be de minimis Rybec (talk) 17:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission Krd 17:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Krd 17:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright Violation, Permission not given by owner 176.35.177.83 15:20, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- The painter Jacques de Rousseau died in 1638. Who do you think has any copyright in this painting? --Túrelio (talk) 16:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Whitfa (talk) 17:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Copyright belongs to the person who took the picture of the painting, a professional photographer (the Author). The Author cannot be the painter who indeed died in 1638 he could not own the digital image in question. The photographer has removed permission for the image to be reproduced, on the request of the owner of the painting. This image is now being reproduced without permission, a Copyright violation, it must be removed.
Kept, the author lived circa 1600–1638, so no permission is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
copyvio http://www.sovietznak.ru/badge/8269?sphrase_id=17451 Not own work, photo of 3D-object is copyrighted, even if the object itself is in Public Domain PD Daryona (talk) 08:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nominator Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Capture of a publication made in 2007. Not evidence of free licence or PD. Ganímedes (talk) 12:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Image in use for promotional purposes, [4]. Uploader name is same as page name to which image was uploaded. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Unidentified man since 2010, picture from 2007, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:30, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:40, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AutosyAutos (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
INeverCry 16:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete promotional Motopark (talk) 18:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deyseliza osas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unidentified woman since 2012, not used, poor quality, out of scope.
Yann (talk) 12:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:42, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 17:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:44, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be the uploader's own work, as claimed. See also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Princesse_Lilian.jpg Surtsicna (talk) 22:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- I agree that the source is missing, which should be corrected, but isn't this photo obviously old enough to be without copyright? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 03:22, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think so. It was probably taken in the 1930s, so the author could not have died more than 100 years ago. It cannot be assumed that the author died more than 70 years ago either. Surtsicna (talk) 14:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
DW, looks like one of the images is similar to toys here, no indication of source for any of the images plus small size and missing metadata. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
The menu is not de minimis in this photo. In Hong Kong, freedom of panorama does not apply to two-dimensional works (Commons:FOP#Hong_Kong). Rybec (talk) 16:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
self-promotion, out of Commons:Project scope Anne Bauval (talk) 21:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Seems to be the same as Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Bensimhoun-1.lemma_in_Galois_Theory-2.RxInterQuotR-3.conjugates_of_polynomial.pdf. Proz (talk) 22:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Comparaison des différents monstres liés a Alien dans les films Alien, Predator, Alien vs Predator et Prometheus.png
[edit]DW, looks like one of the images is similar to toys here, no indication of source for any of the images plus small size and missing metadata. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Missing legal information Fixertool (talk) 03:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Kept for now. Please give the OTRS-team some time to deal with this image. Natuur12 (talk) 11:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
File:AIbEiAIAAAAiCKuJjv-f7dWozgEQioSFzLaBmsoWGPXq6-qvpoPqogEwAYAEPLodRDoQEChVCBcqkSBlwF95.jpeg
[edit]ower quality of this image, unused, out of COM:SCOPE.| Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete clearely too small to be useful. Kathisma (talk) 17:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Bensimhoun-On the possibility to define the minimal polynomial of an algebraic element over a U.F.D.pdf
[edit]self-promotion, out of Commons:Project scope Anne Bauval (talk) 21:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Seems to be the same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minimal polynomial of an algebraic element over a UFD - 02.01.2005 - Bensimhoun.pdf. Proz (talk) 22:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: And it's gone Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Text contribution, out of project scope Martin H. (talk) 23:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Linked to blatant hoax WP:ES Fixertool (talk) 04:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Image part of this photoseries: on photobucket marked (c) 2014. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Tiny resolution, no use. Fry1989 eh? 22:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
No source, small size, low resolution and lack of metadata, make this unlikely to be user's own work and suggest that this is a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be the uploader's own work, as claimed. See also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Princesse_Lilian.jpg Surtsicna (talk) 22:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- I agree that the source is missing, which should be corrected, but isn't this photo obviously old enough to be without copyright? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 03:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think so. It was probably taken in the 1930s, so the author could not have died more than 100 years ago. It cannot be assumed that the author died more than 70 years ago either. Surtsicna (talk) 14:53, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Source: "Adobe Photoshop". Possibly altered to avoid copyright violation Yanguas (talk) 20:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Image all over the internet see here, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
I have made a new, better image DanielDemaret (talk) 20:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
This looks like a screenshot from a movie. It should be checked if it is really a picture of the uploader. Christian Bolz (talk) 12:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
File:7-Dehydrocholesterol is present in the tissues of the skin, where it is transformed to vitamin D 3 by a sunlight-induced photochemical reaction..pdf
[edit]Unused, low quality, hand drawn, details not readily discerned. Suitable higher-quality replacements exist such as File:Calcitriol-Biosynthese 1 engl.svg. Ed (Edgar181) 18:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
{{PD-1923}} does not apply here, the image was published in 1923 rather than prior to 1923. Lymantria (talk) 09:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Correct, and Nils Johan Teodor Odhner died 1973. The question is: has this image been published prior to 1923? The expedition was ~20 years earlier. Anyone? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:52, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Surely this was w:Nils Hjalmar Odhner, who died in 1973? Anyway, Delete and Category:Undelete in 2044 if it can be confirmed he was the illustrator as well. A single year too late to be PD :-(. Storkk (talk) 15:57, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Surely this was w:Nils Hjalmar Odhner, who died in 1973? Anyway,
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 15:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Ahoj, jsem autorem fotografie, jaký je důvod pro její smazání? /
Hi there, I took this picture. What is the reason for deleting it? --Vítek 13:15, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Please send evidence of permission to com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 12:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
DW, looks like at least one of the images is similar to toys here, no indication of source for any of the images plus missing metadata. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded among copyvios of same subject matter (including same visual style, background gradient, etc.) - see user talk/deleted contribs; low resolution; no camera EXIF. Эlcobbola talk 20:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
{{Pd-old}}-fail, considering artwork of pt:José Wasth Rodrigues (1891—1957), Brazilian painter. Copyrighted till the end of 2027. Gunnex (talk) 16:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Jim Lovell at the Honourable Company of Air Pilots Trophies & Awards Banquet London with the Duke of York.jpg
[edit]Image part of this photoseries: on photobucket marked (c) 2014. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Response:
The photo series is of an Honourable Company of Air Pilots event. It is an open album on Photobucket.
- Comment The image was uploaded as "own work" yet found on photobucket which page is marked (c) 2014. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Please send evidence of permission to com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 13:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 18:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 17:42, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE; inappropriate filename and description; probably meant as an attack image Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
I have made a new, better image DanielDemaret (talk) 19:59, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork of Brazilian painter pt:Juarez Maranhão (1930—), uploaded by Gruchalski123. Permission of Juarez Maranhão needed. Gunnex (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Lower quality of this image, unused, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete clearly too small to be useful. Kathisma (talk) 17:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
DW: The image in background is from an exhibition as shown here, it was married with an image of the artist, but is still DW and probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Not plausibly described why the uploader should hold copyright of a painting by a painter who died in 2000. Narrenmarsch (talk) 10:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Same goes for the rest of Category:Carmelo García Barrena --Narrenmarsch (talk) 17:54, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Please nominate the others seperately Natuur12 (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
AU flag has been deleted several times, can not be on Commons. Fry1989 eh? 00:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Linked to blatant hoax WP:ES Fixertool (talk) 04:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Jim Lovell receives the Award of Honour from Judge Tudor Owen and the Duke of York, Master and Grand Master of the Honourable Company of Air Pilots.jpg
[edit]COM:COPYVIO. Image from here marked "Copyright Krajowe Towarzystwo Lotnicze AOPA Poland, 2002-2010" dated 16 Styczeń, 2014. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
RESPONSE:
Krajowe Towarzystwo Lotnicze AOPA Poland did NOT take this photograph and does NOT own the copyright.
It is a false claim of copyright.
The photograph was taken at a private event in London.
- Comment Thank you for your reply, subsequently I found that the image is part of this photoseries: on photobucket marked (c) 2014. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:11, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Please send evidence htat you are the copyrightholder to com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 13:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Logo is available in SVG as File:ILO logo.svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC) {{speedy|duplicate of .svg file of same name}}
- Delete per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 17:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO. Watermarked image from here three days before user upload to Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
while it may be public domain elsewhere, this image does not appear to be in the public domain in the united states Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Small size, low resolution and camera metadata which says "LAURENT CERINO" is the author, suggests COM:COPYVIO as the uploader's name bears no relation to "LAURENT CERINO". Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded this as tiff file, but color is off. Will redo as jpeg. Spinster (talk) 19:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
The picture is from the professional photo studio Schuster in Vienna. We need an OTRS proof, that the uploader has the right to publish this image under a free licence. Ras67 (talk) 22:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 20:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused in personal pages Ciaurlec (talk) 13:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Logo is available in SVG as File:ILO logo.svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC) {{speedy|duplicate of .svg of same file name}}
- Delete per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 17:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 09:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 09:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 09:42, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO, image is marked copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 09:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 09:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 09:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 09:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Seems fixed Natuur12 (talk) 12:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Ddp9256: fixed. Out of curiosity, since you knew the correct license, why did you not tag them correctly instead of nominating for deletion? Storkk (talk) 09:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep now that license is fixed. Storkk (talk) 09:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 09:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Seems fixed Natuur12 (talk) 12:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Seems fixed Natuur12 (talk) 12:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality image and unused. There is a better alternative: File:Mona Lisa-thumb.jpg Angelus(talk) 15:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Overhatching shows this is a screenshot from television, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Not only simple geometric shapes and/or text but with threshold of originality NNW 11:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Millenniata-Logo cropped.jpg. NNW 11:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
It is from 1927, PD-US is ivalid, Austrian PD/licence is also missing. Ras67 (talk) 22:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
This is a great image - unfortunately, under Italian copyright laws, there is no Freedom of Panorama exclusion. The sculpture is the main subject of the photo, and as such this is a reproduction of a work of art copyrighted until 70 years after the sculptor's death. Storkk (talk) 18:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope; maybe an advertise Ciaurlec (talk) 12:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
A very low resolution version of a map, ]and redundant to File:Outline Map of Crimea (disputed status).svg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO, image is marked copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Fixertool (talk) 21:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Linked to vandalism on Spanish Wikipedia: [5] --Fixertool (talk) 02:13, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO: No source is given, this is listed as user's own work when it is an apparent promotional piece containing a painting by Muhammed Arif, (1937-2009) a well-known Kurdish painter. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Obviously a capture from movie. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Individual poster components may be copyrighted: e.g. "Bullet for my Valentine" photo, kimono girl illustration, "EUROPE" logo. Brainy J (talk) 15:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO: No source is given, this is listed as user's own work when it is an apparent promotional piece containing a painting by Muhammed Arif, (1937-2009) a well-known Kurdish painter. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork of Júlia dos Santos Baptista (1966—), Brazilian painter. Originally uploaded on nlwiki by "Venbap". Permission from Júlia dos Santos Baptista needed. Gunnex (talk) 16:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Not only simple geometric shapes and/or text but with threshold of originality NNW 11:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
picture from websource 194.54.148.8 10:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
{{copyvio|1=Нарушение авторских прав}}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
No source, small size, low resolution and lack of metadata, make this unlikely to be user's own work and suggest that this is a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
wrong license Ddp9256 (talk) 23:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - license fixed. Storkk (talk) 10:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
No source, small size, low resolution and lack of metadata, make this illustration unlikely to be user's own work and suggest that this is a COM:COPYVIO. Image is not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Image from here, marked "© Giresun Günlüğü Haber İnternet Sitesi", probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Low quality, better version already uploaded Liuscomaes (talk) 20:30, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
The photo is a derivative work because it shows a sculpture and a painting. Rybec (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
I am not sure I have solid evidence, but something tells me that the uploader did not take this photograph. Such a high quality photograph of a princess attending a very official function could have hardly been taken by an amateur. Furthermore, the uploader has uploaded other portraits claiming to be her own work, even though the photographs are official portraits taken many decades ago. There is a photograph similar to this one at http://www.tackers.org/about-tackers/tackers-committee/ Surtsicna (talk) 22:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete image is © Mark Earthy/SCANPIX [6] --El Grafo (talk) 13:43, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Freedom_of_Panorama#Japan does not apply to artistic works. We would need evidence that this sculpture is in the public domain. Storkk (talk) 11:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO, image is marked copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Watermarked, appears to be for promotional purposes. User's other uploads were all pictures of this shoe as well. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Petskribo pri landonomoj en la nova retejo de la Universala Esperanto-Asocio (2014).jpg.pdf
[edit]unused link Petrus Adamus (talk) 20:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
This file was mistakenly uploaded in pdf format. A better version of the same file has been uploaded in svg format. I am the uploader and creator of both files. Marchjuly (talk) 06:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO cover of a CD, album or image on iTunes, see here for dozens of sites that use this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation, seems to be copied from http://www.spacefacts.de/mission/english/soyuz-33.htm LukeSurl (talk) 22:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
I've copied the TIFF version to Commons. The Mediawiki software can make a full-size JPEG (last link after "Other resolutions"). Rybec (talk) 02:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Corrected version found here: File:Tree of life hebrew.svg The Haz talk 03:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Name of photographer and name of uploader bear no relationship. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
A show program for an unknown show. This image is unused and out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
really bad colormanagement, upload a big PNG soon -DH93 (talk) 17:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep SVGs can be corrected. Fry1989 eh? 02:05, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 13:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Probably not own work: no EXIF data and watermark BrightRaven (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
The photo shows a low-relief plaque in England commemmorating events of 1968 to 1993. Freedom of panorama in the UK doesn't include two-dimensional works (Commons:FOP#United_Kingdom). Does the low relief make the plaque a kind of sculpture? Rybec (talk) 06:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded the file without realizing that a better version already existed. - Fma12 (talk) 19:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Theater poster, no metadata, really small size, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:12, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork of Brazilian artist pt:Oscar Araripe (1941—), uploaded by Araripe (talk · contribs). Permission from "Oscar Araripe" needed. Obs.: File:Duas igrejas.jpg overwritten in 2011 by Luiz Eduardos = copyvio via (example) http://www.cidadaniadigital.ufv.br/santarita.htm = http://www.cidadaniadigital.ufv.br/imagens/igreja00.jpg (last modified: 2008)
- File:Duas igrejas.jpg
- File:Flores Fundo Preto - com flores azuis e vermelhas - 1.10x1.20m.jpg
- File:Jarro vermelho - ouro preto - convite.jpg
- File:Autoretrato-bp-ceara.jpg
- File:Flowers Rebecca.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 21:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Illuminavissem (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotional images, out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:My Adam Weishaupt biography book coming soon at walterstore- 2014-03-09 13-47.jpg
- File:This is my Esoteric research book called Illuminavissem- (Etymology,Numerology,sacred geometry,pyramidology,symbology,esoteric psychology,esoteric philosophy and esoteric science etc)- 2014-02-19 18-12.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AllTheGoodNames (talk · contribs)
[edit]Probable COM:COPYVIOs. Poster image, Cover of publication image, Libel coupon listed as published, and two photographs of unknown origin, unlikely to be user's own work.
- File:Rally to Save the Honi 8.jpg
- File:Freedom Ride.jpg
- File:Libel coupon.png
- File:The Soin.jpg
- File:Honi Soit Editors Office - University of Sydney.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Giancarlo Zorlini
[edit]Copyrighted artworks of Brazilian painter pt:Giancarlo Zorlini (1931—), uploaded by user Atanai in 2009 and licensed mostly with a mix of {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} + self-{{Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}. Sourced mostly with "Arquivo de família"/archive from family, a written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that these files are indeed freely licensed, is needed.
Concerning the photos...
- File:Giancarlo-Zorlini-foto-2.jpg (1980s, taken by "Amigo da família"/friend of family)
- File:Giancarlo-Zorlini.jpg (1970s, taken by "Amigo do pintor"/friend of painter)
- File:Ottone-Zorlini-e-seus-amigos-em-Paraty-RJ.jpg (1964, taken by "Omar Pellegatta")
... additional permissions via COM:OTRS are needed.
- File:Giancarlo-Zorlini-Casas-do-Jardim-Previdencia-SP.jpg
- File:Giancarlo-Zorlini-Casas-em-Montmatre.jpg
- File:Giancarlo-Zorlini-Catalogo-Exposicao-Renot.jpg
- File:Giancarlo-Zorlini-Flores.jpg
- File:Giancarlo-Zorlini-foto-2.jpg
- File:Giancarlo-Zorlini-Modelo-Sentado.jpg
- File:Giancarlo-Zorlini-Ouro-Preto.jpg
- File:Giancarlo-Zorlini.jpg
- File:Ottone-Zorlini-e-seus-amigos-em-Paraty-RJ.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded this as tiff, but went wrong somewhere; image is not correctly uploaded. Will retry as jpeg. Spinster (talk) 19:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Momi Cafe
[edit]According to the descriptions, these are photographs of objects made by Momi Cafe, a coffee shop in Suzhou, China. Maybe some of them are too simple to be copyrightable.
- File:A series of postercards named little black boys.jpg
- File:A special kind of the postercards put in an iron box.jpg
- File:Bookmarklets.jpg
- File:Ceramic bottles.jpg
- File:Hand-drawn notebooks.jpg
- File:Hand-made pendants 2.jpg
- File:Hand-made pendants 3.jpg
- File:Hand-made pendants.jpg
- File:The cover of a postcard 3.jpg
- File:The cover of a postcard.jpg
- File:The cover of a postercard 2.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeff Turner (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvios or out of project scope images.
- File:Locandina 2012fb1.png
- File:Tabellone Venerdì 13.PNG
- File:Tabellone prima edizione.PNG
- File:Podio2.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 15:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ariadnaabarca (talk · contribs)
[edit]There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
Jespinos (talk) 16:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emmanuelwikimarcel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional documents, out of COM:SCOPE. Promotional head shot (nominated separately) is in use, but with no source, low quality is likely COM:COPYVIO.
- File:Définitions du coaching-objectifs et priorités.pdf
- File:Psychologie du management-acronymes.pdf
- File:Cadre et outils du coaching.pdf
- File:Identifier la problématique des personnes coachées.pdf
- File:Psychologie du management.pdf
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
no permissions 91.66.63.188 12:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JanoXploXion (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious "own works". TinEye has found File:Sitio-en-construccion por mi.jpg on 15 websites
- File:4537052-marco-hecho-de-alambres-de-puas-sobre-fondo-negro.jpg
- File:Sitio-en-construccion por mi.jpg
- File:Bajo construccion.jpg
- File:Proyecto en construccion.jpg
91.66.63.188 12:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- The last image - File:Proyecto en construccion.jpg - I would argue qualifies under COM:L#Simple_design as all it is generic text and simple geomatric shapes, parallelograms top & bottom in this case. So it should be removed from consideration under this DR. Tabercil (talk) 00:39, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Low res imag of minimal size, conveying no useful information. Not used anywhere. 194.95.59.160 11:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIOs. Both images are overprinted with the name of the show they are from.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jarah Design (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIO: No source is given, these are listed as user's own work when they are paintings by Muhammed Arif,COM:COPYVIO: No source is given, this is listed as user's own work when it is an apparent promotional piece containing a painting by Muhammed Arif, (1937-2009) a well-known Kurdish painter. a well-known living Kurdish painter.
- File:Muhammed-arif-tablo6.jpg
- File:Muhammed-arif-tablo4.jpg
- File:Muhammed-arif-tablo3.jpg
- File:Muhammed-arif-tablo1.jpg
- File:Muhammed-arif-tablo2.jpg
- File:Tabloy Hunermand Muhammed-Arif.jpg
- File:Tabloy hunermand Muhammed Arif.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jarah Design (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per 1st nomination (see above). Reproductions of artworks by Muhammed Arif, (1937-2009) a Kurdish painter, needing permission via COM:OTRS. The rest of the are files (related to actors) unlikely to be own works: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.
- File:Jarah-design-muhamed-arif5.jpg
- File:Jarah-design-muhamed-arif4.jpg
- File:Jarah-design-muhammed-arif3.jpg
- File:Jarah-design-Muhammed-Arif.jpg
- File:Wenekeshan-muhammed-arif.jpg
- File:Muhammed Arif.jpg
- File:Kurdish- poet-qani.jpg
- File:Mauham-arif-محەمەد عارف.jpg
- File:لە راستەوە سەفوەت جەراح، دووهەم و سێهەم نەناسراو، چوارەم مصطفی العقاد پێنجەم ئەنتۆنی کویین و خێزانەکەی لە بەغدا لە سالی حەفتاکان.jpg
- File:هونەرمەند سەفوەت جەراح لە فیلمی فارس بن حمدان.jpg
- File:هەنەرمەند سەفوەت جەراح لەگەل هونەرمەندی کورد جەعفەر عەلی فلیمی سینەمایی عیراقی المسألة الکبری.jpg
- File:سەفوەت جەراح لە زنجیرەی ناسکە لەگەڵ دەرهێنەر سەعدون یونس.jpg
- File:Safwat Jarah سەفوەت جەراح.jpg
- File:Safwat-jarah سەفوەت جەراح وێنەی.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:30, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
deleted. INeverCry 03:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kasturi saikia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Do not appear to be uploader's work; uploaded among blantant copyvios (e.g. File:Hum Badal Gaye.jpg and File:Axl Hazarika Poster.jpg) of similar subject matter. Further, appeared on numerous sites before upload to commons (e.g. File:Ryan Hazarika.jpg is here, File:Hum Badal Gaye Poster-First Animation Film From North-East India -2012.jpg is here, here, etc.) Quack?
- File:RyanHazarika.jpg
- File:Ryan Hazarika @ NIT Jalandhar 2012.jpg
- File:Ryan Hazarika.jpg
- File:Hum Badal Gaye Poster-First Animation Film From North-East India -2012.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 20:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Avadhesh64 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional images, all associated with business "Touch me for"... out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Touchmefor-service.png
- File:Touchmefor-diti.png
- File:Touchmefor-cnf.png
- File:Advertisement-touchmefor.png
- File:CEOAndFounder-touchmefor.png
- File:Touchmefor-vcs.png
- File:Touchmefor-avb.png
- File:TouchmeforMailBox.png
- File:Touchmefor-GlobalWiki.png
- File:Developerteam.png
- File:Touchmefor.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 17:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
- File:Radiante.jpg
- File:La Bella y el Peluche.jpg
- File:La Bella Durmiente.jpg
- File:Simplemente hermosa.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 22:30, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted artworks by en:Oscar Oiwa (1965—), Brazilian painter. Permission from Oscar Oiwa needed. Obs.: Previously uploaded by User talk:Thomson13 and locally on enwiki via en:User talk:Thomson13: mostly all deleted (no permission). User Thomson13 created the articles in ptwiki and enwiki.
- File:Flower Garden.jpg
- File:Peace and War (War).jpg
- File:G-8 Meeting.jpg
- File:Black Snow 2.jpg
- File:WWW Com.jpg
- File:Prime-Ministerial Nightmare.jpg
- File:Gardening (Manhattan).jpg
Gunnex (talk) 13:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lookpla Topping (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIO Images of singing group cropped from original photo "GOT7 at M Countdown". Original is marked "Author Kay/ Copyright holder Photo by Kay", no apparent connection to uploader. Nominating original and all DWs of it.
- File:BamBam at M Countdown 20 February 2014.jpg
- File:JR at M Countdown 20 February 2014.jpg
- File:JB at M Countdown 20 February 2014.jpg
- File:Youngjae at M Countdown 20 February 2014.jpg
- File:Jackson at M Countdown 20 February 2014.jpg
- File:Yugyeom at M Countdown 20 February 2014.jpg
- File:Mark at M Countdown 20 February 2014.jpg
- File:GOT7 at M Countdown 20 February 2014.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tahreekeinsaaf (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:ArsalanTajGhummanonKarachiJalsa25Dec2011.jpg
- File:ArsalanTajGhummanonYouthConvention.jpg
- File:ArsalanTajGhummanElectionProfile.jpg
- File:ArsalanTajGhumman1.jpg
- File:ArsalanTajGhumman.jpeg
- File:E230d74bd3f10e93314b25c1fa02b513.jpeg
Gunnex (talk) 23:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks You Donawidyanugroho (talk) 19:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- It's not policy to delete user talk pages, why do you want it deleted? Do you want to inactivate your account? -- Deadstar (msg) 08:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Per above Natuur12 (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Artworks by pt:Eliseu Visconti (1866—1944), Brazilian painter, copyrighted till the end of 2014. Probadly grabbed from http://www.eliseuvisconti.com.br/Catalogo/Principal/1/Catalogo.aspx (archive from 2012 or from the main site which is archived since 2006). Example: File:BAS DE PORTIÈRE - IRIS SELVAGENS-ESTUDO PARA TECIDO-GUACHE SOBRE PAPEL-61x47-c.1901-MUSEU NACIONAL DE BELAS ARTES-RJ.jpg (uploaded 2013) versus http://eliseuvisconti.com.br/Catalogo/Principal/29/Catalogo.aspx = http://eliseuvisconti.com.br/img/1/BAS%20DE%20PORTIEREred.jpg (last modified: 2011, identical exif). All files licensed with self-{{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}
eliseuvisconti.com.br ("Projeto Eliseu Visconti") is licensed with Copyright © 2005 Eliseu Visconti - Todos os direitos reservados and emphasize that: "Os direitos de uso comercial do nome, da marca e da reprodução de obras de Eliseu Visconti são de propriedade exclusiva da família do artista, não podendo ser empregados sem sua autorização. Isto também é válido para a promoção de eventos que versem sobre a obra de Visconti." = (Google Translate) "The rights of commercial use of the name, the brand and the reproduction of works of Eliseu Visconti are the exclusive property of the artist's family, and may not be used without their authorization. This is also valid for the promotion of events that deal with the work Visconti."
The site is maintained by "Tobias Stourdzé Visconti" (grandson of Eliseu Visconti) and - per username - is active in the related ptwiki-entry, as also uploader TOBELO and both users may be related to eliseuvisconti.com.br. Nevertheless one file was already deleted in 2013 via Commons:Deletion requests/File:Retrato do escultor João Zaco Paraná.jpg - without any counter-arguing by uploader TOBELO. Permission needed.
Concerning the photos (obviously not taken by TOBELO)...
- File:Eliseu Visconti.jpg (taken in France, 1913)
- File:Eliseu Visconti pintando o pano de boca do Theatro Municipal do Rio de Janeiro - Paris - 1907.jpg (taken in France, 1907)
...publication and author status is unclear (may be published for the 1st time in 2005 = start date of "Projeto Eliseu Visconti")
Some files (like File:Retrato de João Zaco Paraná, pintado por Eliseu Visconti - c.1925 - Coleção Museu Oscar Niemeyer - Curitiba-PR.jpg + File:O BATISMO DA BONECA-OST-94x87-c.1933-COLEÇÃO PARTICULAR.jpg) are additionally URAA-related.
Some files (like File:Friso sobre o proscênio do Theatro Municipal do Rio de Janeiro - 1936.jpg + File:PANO DE BOCA DO THEATRO MUNICIPAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO - A INFLUÊNCIA DAS ARTES SOBRE A CIVILIZAÇÃO.jpg) may additionally not be covered by COM:FOP#Brazil, concerning indoor-shots.
- File:Retrato de João Zaco Paraná, pintado por Eliseu Visconti - c.1925 - Coleção Museu Oscar Niemeyer - Curitiba-PR.jpg
- File:ESTUDO DE NU - PRÊMIO DE VIAGEM - OST - 110x76 cm - 1892 - MUSEU D. JOÃO VI.jpg
- File:Detalhe GIOVENTU 1.jpg
- File:O Beijo da Glória a Santos Dumont.jpg
- File:Recompensa de São Sebastião - Pintura de Eliseu Visconti - Óleo Sobre Tela - 218x133 cm - 1898 - Museu Nacional de Belas Artes do Rio de Janeiro.jpg
- File:Imagem de Raios X do quadro Gioventù mostra que Eliseu Visconti primeiro usou a tela para um estudo de "Recompensa de São Sebastião".jpg
- File:Gioventù.jpg
- File:Revue du Brésil.jpg
- File:Visconti, Eliseu - Recompensa de São Sebastião - Óleo sobre tela - 2,18 x 1,33 m - 1898.jpg
- File:0991 - MATERNIDADE-OST-166x200-1906-PINACOTECA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO.jpg
- File:Retrato do Maestro Alberto Nepomuceno - Pintado por Eliseu Visconti em 1895.jpg
- File:Autorretrato de Eliseu Visconti - 1902.jpg
- File:Retrato de Gonzaga Duque -1912.jpg
- File:Ex-libris da Biblioteca Nacional.jpg
- File:Retrato da escultora Nicolina Vaz de Assis, pintado por Eliseu Visconti..jpg
- File:Friso sobre o proscênio do Theatro Municipal do Rio de Janeiro - 1936.jpg
- File:Moça no Trigal - c.1916 - Coleção Particular.jpg
- File:Eliseu Visconti pintando o pano de boca do Theatro Municipal do Rio de Janeiro - Paris - 1907.jpg
- File:BAS DE PORTIÈRE - IRIS SELVAGENS-ESTUDO PARA TECIDO-GUACHE SOBRE PAPEL-61x47-c.1901-MUSEU NACIONAL DE BELAS ARTES-RJ.jpg
- File:A MÚSICA-PAINEL CENTRAL DO FOYER DO THEATRO MUNICIPAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO-ÓLEO SOBRE TELA DE LONA-7 m x 16 m-1916.jpg
- File:Eliseu Visconti.jpg
- File:O BATISMO DA BONECA-OST-94x87-c.1933-COLEÇÃO PARTICULAR.jpg
- File:GIOVENTÙ - OST - 65 x 49 cm - 1898 - MNBA-Ibram-Minc, Rio de Janeiro,RJ.jpg
- File:VOLTA ÀS TRINCHEIRAS - OST - 95 x 125 cm - c.1917 - Coleção Particular.jpg
- File:PANO DE BOCA DO THEATRO MUNICIPAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO - A INFLUÊNCIA DAS ARTES SOBRE A CIVILIZAÇÃO.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Restored: 7 files, as per [7]. Yann (talk) 16:34, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
- File:Yorxikar con su primo en el sambil.jpg
- File:Yorxikar portando el estilo en el sambil.jpg
- File:Yorxikar disfrutando de su cumpleaños.jpg
- File:Yorxikar the father.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 15:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Link Osorio (talk · contribs)
[edit]It seems unlikely that the depicted copyrightable objects are the uploader's own work. (The uploader is a confirmed sockpuppet of copyvio-only uploader User:Link Smurf, along with User:Interstate69.)
—LX (talk, contribs) 15:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SAJEEVJINO (talk · contribs)
[edit]I viewed the Web site from which these screenshots were made, and the site has a copyright notice saying "All Rights Reserved". Also, the JPEG format is not well-suited to non-photographic images like these, making it less likely that someone will reuse them (COM:SCOPE).
Rybec (talk) 14:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- The uploader has left some comments on my talk page [8]. Rybec (talk) 13:52, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Sir ..I already given the Authorization message from the Admin of Indian Defence Forum Mr.Singh to use the Screenshots from that Forum
- Comment The image of the screenshot is insufficient, please file an OTRS, after which the file/s can be COM:UNDEL if that is the consensus of the community. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Swedish works from 1947 are copyrighted to at least 2017; also, while we may not be able to read the signature, I'm pretty sure it's not anonymous. Prosfilaes (talk) 05:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you; I uploaded the file and I'd like it deleted. I left a message at the Village Pump but hadn't known how to request a deletion on the file itself; it should be a speedy delete. I'll also update the information on the corresponding file at Wikipedia — incorrectly tagged as public domain in the U.S. — WFinch (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- The poster is United Artist's, and more likely is the same poster that was utilised in America, with only additional words translated into Swedish, and may not have originality required to get a Swedish copyright. Accordingly, I have declined a speedy delete as copyright violation and converted this to a normal deletion request. @Prosfilaes: @WFinch: — billinghurst sDrewth 12:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted design. FunkMonk (talk) 13:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- I think that would come under Cosplay, but I'm not sure this is free anyway. Is it perhaps a screencap? It looks like it was a different size but then stretched. Own work seems dubious IMO. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like a movie prop, commercial costumes would hardly be that detailed on the inside (though you never know with Star Wars). FunkMonk (talk) 14:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 14:59, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
unfree image on Commons Kirilloparma (talk) 20:20, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
The licence PD-US is not valid here. The picture is from Vienna/Austria and so it must be PD in Austria, to host it on Commons. See Com:L. Ras67 (talk) 16:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- I have informed the uploader via email. The uploader seems to be working for the Goldenes Kreuz Privatklinik. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - OTRS can undelete if satisfied. Storkk (talk) 09:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
unfree image on Commons Kirilloparma (talk) 20:20, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Why unfree? I can't find the original photo online.--Ray Garraty (talk) 14:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Looks like a scan Natuur12 (talk) 15:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
There are two issues: First this color image was not taken before 1923. PD-US is invalid. Second we need also a German/Austria related licence too! Ras67 (talk) 16:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- I have informed the uploader via email. The uploader seems to be working for the Goldenes Kreuz Privatklinik. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - OTRS can undelete if uploader can satisfy them that they have the right to release the photo. Storkk (talk) 09:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://laurent.renard6.chez-alice.fr/
Converted by me to DR, as a copyvio is a bit unlikely IMO, because if you click on the portrait image on the external website, it is linked to https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Lrwiki, which suggests that User:Lrwiki is also the owner of the external website. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Okey Natuur12 (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal picture Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 01:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Images of San Camillo (Milan)
[edit]- File:Santuario di San Camillo a Milano.JPG
- File:Milaan lokale kerk.jpg
- File:9630 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9629 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9628 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9627 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9626 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9625 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9622 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9619 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9618 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9617 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9616 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9613 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9640 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9636 - Milano - San Camillo Lapide Idelfonso Schuster (1932) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9634 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9633 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:9632 - Milano - Spirito Maria Chiappetta, San Camillo (1902) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 18-Oct 2007.jpg
- File:Milano, chiesa di San Camillo 03.jpg
- File:Milano, chiesa di San Camillo 02.jpg
- File:Milano, chiesa di San Camillo 01.jpg
My understanding of photographs of Italian architecture, based on Commons:Freedom_of_Panorama#Italy, is that they fall under the copyright of the architect until 70 years after their death. The architect of this church, if I am reading Italian correctly, was a Spirito Maria Chiappetta, who (again, subject to my reading of Italian) seems to have died in 1948. If my reading and interpretation is correct, these should be deleted and undeleted on January 1, 2019. --Storkk (talk) 12:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Is there no cutoff date? The church was built in 1912. In the US everything before 1923 and not registered copyrigth is PD. When where copyrigths granted for architects in Italy?Smiley.toerist (talk) 14:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- My understanding is that since it was build pre-1923, it would be fine under American law. Italian law works differently, and Commons requires the work to be free under both US law and the law of the country of origin. Also, note that if these do get deleted, they will be categorized into Category:Undelete_in_2019, and will be restored then. This has happened, for example, to Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Riccardo_Pitteri_015.jpg. Best regards, Storkk (talk) 10:46, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- I am the author of (most of) the images and I agree with the request. When I uploaded them there was nowhere any information whatsoever about Chiappetta, now, a few years later, I found on the web the dates of his long life: (1868-1948). Therefore these images must go, helas. The only exception being the plaque to Schuster, which as such is ineligible for copyright. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 11:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Please delete these three too: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Istituto_Vittoria_Colonna_%28Milan%29 , by the same architect (shot by me as well). --User:G.dallorto (talk) 12:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
I started a legal discussion in the village pump but I do not expect a lot out of it. (Village_Pump#No descendants of author). I would be interesting to know if he was married before priesthood and had children.Smiley.toerist (talk) 13:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no fop in Italy Natuur12 (talk) 14:58, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a creation of the government of Macau, not of the uploader (as the Licensing block states). Ahecht (talk) 17:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Question Is there anything copyrightable in this "arrival card"? Looks like {{PD-ineligible}} to me … --El Grafo (talk) 13:57, 28 March 2014 (UTC)- Template:Answer Maybe you're not accustomed to, but this was my landing slip that I scanned as soon as I come back home! (P.S.: I don't work for the government of SAR Macau) :)
Kept: Per above Natuur12 (talk) 15:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cyffaleyenda18 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
- File:Wine Glass & Arizona.jpg
- File:The Legend is Born Chill World Album.jpg
- File:C.Y.F.F.A Leyenda the Pharaoh.jpg
- File:C.Y.F.F.A Leyenda founder of Chill World Dynasty Records.jpg
- File:CyffaLeyenda.png
- File:Cyffa Leyenda (Rapper).jpg
- File:Cyffa.jpg
INeverCry 02:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cyffaleyenda18 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of promo images. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Chill World Dynasty presents the Owner C.Y.F.F.A Leyenda.jpg
- File:Chill World Dynasty presents G.Rose.jpg
- File:DeDre & C.Y.F.F.A Leyenda Performing at The Damneck Beach Festival.jpg
- File:Chill World Dynasty Records.jpg
- File:Cyffa Leyenda Chill World Dynasty clothing.jpg
- File:C.Y.F.F.A Leyenda the Entertainer.jpg
- File:Chill World Dynasty Records & Entaertainment ©.jpg
- File:DeDre "Vice Presdint" , C.Y.F.F.A Leyenda "Founder" , G.Rose "Vice President".jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cyffaleyenda18 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional images. User uploader name is similiar to the CYFFA in the file names. Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:C.Y.F.F.A Leyenda & Mr.Mike "Teen Staff Leader & Instructor".JPG
- File:C.Y.F.F.A Leyenda signs T.3.K "The 3rd King" new artist in Chill World Dynasty Records.jpg
- File:C.Y.F.F.A Leyenda signs Brandon Perez (photographor-videoman).jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Out or scope or not the photographer. Natuur12 (talk) 15:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
This photograph contains copyrighted works.(drawing on the wall) - must get deleted because no de minimis 88.64.113.125 15:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- I disagree because of :
|
Reproduction of the subject of the photograph or other type of file is permitted under Malaysian law (section 13(2)(d) the Copyright Act 1987 (Consolidated, 15/08/2000, No. A1082)), which states that the right of control is excluded from:
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![34 File:Jennifer Gillis as Dorothy Gale in "The Wizard of Oz".JPG](#File:Jennifer_Gillis_as_Dorothy_Gale_in_"The_Wizard_of_Oz".JPG){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg.pdf){kind=link}
_in_1982.jpg){kind=link}
_Logo.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![08:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/03/24#c-Túrelio-2014-03-24T08:28:00.000Z-File:Jennifer_Gillis_as_Dorothy_Gale_in_"The_Wizard_of_Oz".JPG){kind=link}
![11:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/03/24#c-Steinsplitter-2014-03-31T11:12:00.000Z-File:Jennifer_Gillis_as_Dorothy_Gale_in_"The_Wizard_of_Oz".JPG){kind=link}
_military_personel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg.png){kind=link}
.svg.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg.pdf&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg.pdf&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
-_2014-02-19_18-12.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_1982.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_1982.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_in_1982.jpg){kind=link}
_in_1982.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto,_18-Oct_2007.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kept: Malaysian FOP applies. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded it MsEndri96 (talk) 19:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: By fastily. Yann (talk) 09:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
_Logo.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Logo.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
False PD rationale. Does not consist of simple geometric shapes. Contains original authorship meeting the threshold of originality in Japan. The uploader, who has a history of abusing the {{PD-textlogo}} blanked out the {{Copyvio}} tag. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
_Logo.svg){kind=link}
- Where reference to the source? --Эрманарих (talk) 23:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- What do you mean? Reference to which source? What's your source for the claim that a drawing of two people and a sun is a simple geometric shape? It doesn't look like any geometric shape I've ever heard of. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Drawing is too simple that it was possible to claim unambiguously that it is people and the sun. By default it is simple geometrical figures. --Эрманарих (talk) 02:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- So you're saying that if you can't be certain what it depicts, it's a simple geometric shape? That's not what those words mean. A "simple geometric shape" is something like "circle", "triangle" or "heptagon." —LX (talk, contribs) 06:42, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Image too simple. With the same probability it is possible to tell that it is circles and letters X. --Эрманарих (talk) 03:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- So you're saying that if you can't be certain what it depicts, it's a simple geometric shape? That's not what those words mean. A "simple geometric shape" is something like "circle", "triangle" or "heptagon." —LX (talk, contribs) 06:42, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Drawing is too simple that it was possible to claim unambiguously that it is people and the sun. By default it is simple geometrical figures. --Эрманарих (talk) 02:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- What do you mean? Reference to which source? What's your source for the claim that a drawing of two people and a sun is a simple geometric shape? It doesn't look like any geometric shape I've ever heard of. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not a simple geometric shape. Permission by author required. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
_Logo.svg){kind=link}
This photograph contains copyrighted works.(flowers) - must get deleted 88.64.113.125 15:26, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- I disagree because of :
|
|
Reproduction of the subject of the photograph or other type of file is permitted under Malaysian law (section 13(2)(d) the Copyright Act 1987 (Consolidated, 15/08/2000, No. A1082)), which states that the right of control is excluded from:
|
Kept: Malaysian FOP applies. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Euro coins are copyrighted. 84.61.188.147 07:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative of copyrighted euro coin. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
This photograph contains copyrighted works.(logo on the left) - must get deleted because no de minimis because of the very high resolution 88.64.113.125 15:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- I disagree because of :
|
|
Reproduction of the subject of the photograph or other type of file is permitted under Malaysian law (section 13(2)(d) the Copyright Act 1987 (Consolidated, 15/08/2000, No. A1082)), which states that the right of control is excluded from:
|
Kept: Malaysian FOP applies. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 09:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Painter Ture Hagelberg died in 1985. Permission missing I99pema (talk) 12:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- According to User talk:Ekr commons the "paintings made by my grandfather and the use of the paintings in these photos is allowed by the estate, i.e. my mother and her siblings". I have asked User:DK538 to raise an OTRS. --I99pema (talk) 20:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Painter Ture Hagelberg died in 1985. Permission missing I99pema (talk) 12:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- According to User talk:Ekr commons the "paintings made by my grandfather and the use of the paintings in these photos is allowed by the estate, i.e. my mother and her siblings". I have asked User:DK538 to raise an OTRS. --I99pema (talk) 20:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Image claims to be by "Virgin EMI Records". I would not beleive EMI released the rights to a commercial image without some explicit communication (which would require an OTRS tag). User:Astrid Bulmer pretended it was uploaded by "User:Virgin_EMI_Records" which seems suspiscious. Also, she's not even signed or connected to EMI. So, this is almost certainly not from EMI. All we know for sure is we don't know anything about ownership and licensing of this image. Rob (talk) 20:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Delete per nom - Pretty much copyvio. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 14:45, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Please wait I'm communicating with the uploader (en:User talk:Virgin EMI), who promises they can prove who they are. If I can confirm things, I will send the email(s) to the appropriate address, so we can add an OTRS tag. I would appreciate any advice on what I should be asking for. As I understand it, I'll need a) proof he's with EMI b) a clear statement EMI holds the copyright and c) a release on a free license. --Rob (talk) 16:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)- Keep - I've gotten an email from the uploader. His confirmed email is part of the "umusic.com" domain (he said he works with Universal Music for Virgin EMI Records). Based on that, and what he said, I'm confident he does work with who he says. I have asked him to send a final confirming email to permissions at Commons, so we can have an OTRS tag for the image (which technically more than needed, since he directly uploaded the image). --Rob (talk) 19:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- I have received the final letter, giving a clear release. The same email was copied to appropriate permissions email to get the OTRS tag added. --Rob (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Cool. Natuur12 (talk) 18:32, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright dispute Flyingstrat (talk) 11:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, @Flyingstrat: . Could you elucidate what the dispute is? At first I thought you were claiming that this file is missing your watermark, and I was going to remind you that Creative commons licenses are irrevocable, and that you uploaded the original it under a CC-BY license. Then I saw that you uploaded the non-watermarked version. I am puzzled. Storkk (talk) 10:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Almost similar to File:Bobby Tench wikipedia copyright.jpg Natuur12 (talk) 18:28, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Painter Ture Hagelberg died in 1985. Permission missing I99pema (talk) 12:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- According to User talk:Ekr commons the "paintings made by my grandfather and the use of the paintings in these photos is allowed by the estate, i.e. my mother and her siblings". I have asked User:DK538 to raise an OTRS. --I99pema (talk) 20:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Still no OTRS-ticket Natuur12 (talk) 18:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I am raising request in good faith on behalf of a claim of copyright by the new account Equatorgator (talk · contribs): "This is copyrighted material. I am the grandson of the subject and our family retains all the rights to these images."
The pages uploaded from USC's digital library to Commons are:
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~1).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~2).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~3).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~4).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~5).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~6).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~7).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~8).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~9).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~10).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~11).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~12).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~13).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~14).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~15).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~16).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~17).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~18).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~19).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~20).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~21).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~22).jpg
- File:Photograph album of V.W. Peters, 1928-2002 (Peters_album~23).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The intention of the (partial) upload from the University of Southern California was to limit the images taken from the album to those before 1946, be under the jurisdiction of the Government of Japan and consequently have expired copyright.
The source USC web page states "The University of Southern California has licensed digital access to this material from Dr. Victor Wellington Peters whose estate retains the rights to the information in the individual items."[9] However for pre-1946 photographs, the copyright is expired if the copyright claim can only be correctly made under the jurisdiction of the Government of Japan.
-- Fæ (talk) 06:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment I fail to see how the government of Japan could be invoked on a Westerner's scrapbook for someone categorized as a "Missionary in Korea." The images are personal, the new user has clearly stated that the family believes the scrapbook pages containing images and words to be copyright, and Dr. Peters died in 2002. I am putting this long-winded explanation here, in case anyone follows the deletion closure.
Deleted: per nomination; see discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Restored: {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}} applies here. Yann (talk) 16:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Unfortunately... I think I need to re-nominate this image (and the related ones) for deletion. While the photographs in this album would almost certainly not have any copyright protection in either Korea or Japan today, that does not necessarily mean it is hostable on Commons. I hate to be a pain about it, but there was an explicit request by the probable copyright owner, and if they issue a DMCA I don't see if we would have a choice, and would like to do the right thing first.
Commons requires that images be free in both the country of origin, and the United States. Therefore each image really needs two tags, though often the U.S. one is omitted under the assumption that a work was not restored by the URAA. We need to demonstrate how this photo is public domain under United States law, and I don't see where that is shown. Additionally to apply PD-Japan-oldphoto for the other part of the Commons requirement, we need to show that either Japan or Korea is the country of origin to begin with. Country of origin is the country of first publication. So while Japan (and therefore Korea) based their terms on date of create, it is the place of publication which determines the country of origin. From the sounds of it, these photos were personal, and not published anywhere until recently, when the author (who died in 2012) wrote the descriptions and had them published in California (or his estate had them published). On the face of it, that actually makes the United States the country of origin. It may be that they were published elsewhere first, but is there evidence of that, or a good reason to believe they were?
Secondly, the public domain interpretation in Japan/Korea, even if that is the country of origin, may not apply in the United States, which trades heavily on the date of publication. If these photos were unpublished through 1989, then their U.S. copyright term is a straight 70pma (expiring in 2083), because they never lost their copyright to begin with, and the URAA is not relevant (as that only restored copyrights which had previously been lost due to publication without notice, or lack of renewal). PD-Japan-oldphoto can only be used if the photos are also public domain in the United States, and I don't see which U.S. copyright tag would apply in this case. If these photos were published long ago somewhere, that could change things greatly. It's just that by the descriptions, it sure sounds like these photos were private, personal photos owned by the family and were not published until the last 10 years, or even more recently than that. If that is the case... there is no way the U.S. copyright has lapsed.
Lastly, the descriptive text appears to have been authored much more recently, probably in the 2000s. If true, that content is undoubtedly under copyright. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:30, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- (My response here is necessarily long, so I may slightly revise it over the next 24 hours)
- This is a long DR nomination. I see several parts to it an so am numbering my responses to each part. I make this the sixth time I have written justifications to retain these photographs for the public benefit. Please consider this my final analysis as I have probably broken the law of diminishing returns with regard to my volunteer time, which I could be using to preserve other educational material.
- We have an on-wiki pseudonymous request from a possible grandson of Peters. We do not know if this person is recognized by the Peters' estate. The digital images are provided not only on USC's database, but on other websites such as Europeana and Facebook. It is clear that as part of the missionary work his documentation of his time in Korea was presented to the public, although it remains unclear to if these specific photographs were parts of the presentations. It is clear that Peters took care to preserve records of his time as a missionary in Korea and was keen to share these with the public during his lifetime, including his personal donations of his complete archives in 2006—"I shared my missionary experiences because many people were contributing to my salary and work in Korea. I wanted them to know what was happening there" (Peters).[10] If the Peter's estate now wishes to attempt to claim commercial rights in the USA, then I suggest they are advised to raise a DMCA notice with WMF legal who can advise the Wikimedia Community as to whether a claim can be valid for photographs that are already public domain under Japanese IP law (and consequently Korean IP law and any other country that respects the status of PD works under Japanese IP law which may or may not include the USA).
- The DR nomination asserts that we have yet to demonstrate whether US IP law recognizes the Japanese IP law for pre-1946 photographs taken in Korea (under Japanese rule). I prefer to see this as we have an outstanding question for our research, and should ask for advice from a paid attorney, to check whether this is the case, and until we know defer any proposed deletions of material that we can currently legitimately class under {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}}. If we started to routinely delete images on this basis, then there are literally millions of historic photographs taken outside of the USA for which the same rationale for deletion can be raised, for example I have no legal evidence that the USA recognizes the Public Domain equivalence of {{OGL}} or expired UK Crown Copyright rules (50 years from date of creation not publication, in fact the first time that 95% of these have been published was in the last 10 years by the Imperial War museum scanning the unpublished originals and putting them on their website on a non-commercial use only licence) and I have personally uploaded more than 50,000 photographs under these rules where a large proportion have unknown dates for the death of the photographer and were taken less than 70 years ago, certainly less than 120 years ago and for some photographs we may be able to demonstrate that the photographers are alive (certainly true for recent OGL works) and for all we know would like to have commercial rights in the USA if there is no parity.
- The text on the album has no certain date and may well have been produced in the USA by Peters retrospectively compared to the dates of the photographs. I suggest this is blanked from the images (see example image). I have previously taken care to have pages of the album that were after 1946 removed and this is an extension of that necessary housekeeping.
- --Fæ (talk) 04:31, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I think that making the USA the contry of origin is quite inadequate if these images are in the public domain where they were taken. Now if the USA law says that any unpublished picture is still in copyright in USA, we have a big problem, not only restricted to this case, i.e. see Indian law. I think that this requires a wider discussion, as many more images would be affected. I don't think we should decide about such an issue in the restricted space of a DR. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:37, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Country of origin is the country of first publication. It is not necessarily where the photos were taken. As for U.S. law, it's not something to "decide", it is beyond question that unpublished works never lost their copyright. And yes, it is not only for this case, but it has come up in many others. The question is if we can reasonably assume the photos were published long ago... if not, then the U.S. copyright is 70pma (for works for individuals), and 120 years from creation for corporate/anonymous works. This has been noted many times, and yes files have been deleted because of it, and is not really controversial -- it's the law. See the Hirtle copyright chart; the main sections are "Never published works", "Works first published in the U.S.", and "Works first published outside the U.S.". In some cases for the third section the foreign law can enter into it, but it must have been published at some point in a foreign country for the U.S. copyright to have ever been lost in the first place. We have to show how the work came into the U.S. public domain by an avenue on that chart; it's pretty thorough. If the author published these photographs in Korea while he was living there, that would change the scenario quite a bit, but is that reasonable to assume? Unfortunately, in most cases, public exhibition is not the same thing as publication (see Article 3 for the Berne definition, and the U.S. definition is similar). Normally, copies must be distributed for publication to occur (even TV broadcast, amazingly, is not publication). If they were put in a book or newspaper in Korea... that would count. As for the second part of Commons policy, we need to identify the country of origin. Here is the definition, per Article 5(4) of the Berne Convention:
- (4) The country of origin shall be considered to be:
- (a) in the case of works first published in a country of the Union, that country; in the case of works published simultaneously in several countries of the Union which grant different terms of protection, the country whose legislation grants the shortest term of protection;
- (b) in the case of works published simultaneously in a country outside the Union and in a country of the Union, the latter country;
- (c) in the case of unpublished works or of works first published in a country outside the Union, without simultaneous publication in a country of the Union, the country of the Union of which the author is a national, provided that:
- (i) when these are cinematographic works the maker of which has his headquarters or his habitual residence in a country of the Union, the country of origin shall be that country, and
- (ii) when these are works of architecture erected in a country of the Union or other artistic works incorporated in a building or other structure located in a country of the Union, the country of origin shall be that country.
- (4) The country of origin shall be considered to be:
- Country of origin is the country of first publication. It is not necessarily where the photos were taken. As for U.S. law, it's not something to "decide", it is beyond question that unpublished works never lost their copyright. And yes, it is not only for this case, but it has come up in many others. The question is if we can reasonably assume the photos were published long ago... if not, then the U.S. copyright is 70pma (for works for individuals), and 120 years from creation for corporate/anonymous works. This has been noted many times, and yes files have been deleted because of it, and is not really controversial -- it's the law. See the Hirtle copyright chart; the main sections are "Never published works", "Works first published in the U.S.", and "Works first published outside the U.S.". In some cases for the third section the foreign law can enter into it, but it must have been published at some point in a foreign country for the U.S. copyright to have ever been lost in the first place. We have to show how the work came into the U.S. public domain by an avenue on that chart; it's pretty thorough. If the author published these photographs in Korea while he was living there, that would change the scenario quite a bit, but is that reasonable to assume? Unfortunately, in most cases, public exhibition is not the same thing as publication (see Article 3 for the Berne definition, and the U.S. definition is similar). Normally, copies must be distributed for publication to occur (even TV broadcast, amazingly, is not publication). If they were put in a book or newspaper in Korea... that would count. As for the second part of Commons policy, we need to identify the country of origin. Here is the definition, per Article 5(4) of the Berne Convention:
- By that, the country (or countries) of first publication matter quite a bit. But if they were never published when the author was in Korea, but rather were published between when he returned to the U.S. in 1941 and when he died in 2012 (or was posthumously published by the estate), it would appear the U.S. is the country of origin. If unpublished, it is the country of which the author is a national, which again is the U.S. If they were published in Korea... that would make a big difference. If they were, that would make Korea/South Korea the country of origin, the works would have lost their copyright there regardless of publication, and if they were published without notice and/or not renewed, the U.S. copyright would have been lost, and would not have qualified for the URAA renewals either due to PD-Japan-oldphoto. That situation happens quite often for old Japanese photos. But what is the most likely scenario here? Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- I will say it's possible some were published -- I can't see the content, but it seems Peters did have articles in this book or magazine, one of which I think was in 1933. There are references to articles he wrote in there. Can't see if there are any photographs though. Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment OK, I overlooked the fact that the author was a US national, which matters for unpublished images in the US law. I still quite uncomfortable with applying US law for images taken in Korea at least 70 years ago. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:37, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- U.S. law only applies within U.S. borders, but being a U.S. institution, it's the one the Foundation is directly subject to -- thus something needs to be in the public domain per U.S. law (or licensed), whether we like that law or not. As for the Berne country of origin being based on publication, that is for a reason -- it does give authors a chance to control the protection somewhat; for example if an author lives in a non-Berne country, they can cause something to be first published in a Berne country and thus get protection for their work. For someone who takes photos on holiday, I would also expect the country of origin to be where they are published (i.e. typically the nation where they live, assuming they are published once back home), not the country they are taken in. There can be some odd corner cases which it may seem like a bad idea to follow the logic, but when an author chooses their place of publication, I would tend to follow that. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- I believe we should have proper advice on whether Article 5(4) of the Berne Convention should be read as over-ruling all previous law of the country of creation which defines the work as Public Domain on the basis of that creation rather than publication. This means examples of expired UK Crown Copyright and the 14,000+ images used PD-Japan-oldphoto can be overturned based on this reading of US law. We would also have to consider deletions of all non-US public domain works where we can find no evidence of first publication on the suspicion that the first publication was a computer scan made available to the public on a US-hosted server, including original scans provided to Commons on the basis that this may create a new copyright for an estate elsewhere. --Fæ (talk) 09:36, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- We have always used the Berne definition -- which other one is there? Part of the reason for choosing that is that for all countries following the "rule of the shorter term", as allowed under the Berne Convention, would follow that definition -- thus works which are PD in that country, following those rules, should also be PD in all countries across the world following that rule. If we use a different definition, then that condition will no longer hold, and we can only show that a work is PD in that country only -- it may be copyrighted most everywhere else in the world. Whether we like it or not, that is the definition, and it is the one which has legal effect across a number of countries. When it comes to the U.S. copyright law when it comes to unpublished works... that is the law, whether we like it or not, and we have to follow it. If we host a work which is still under copyright because of that, is is no less a copyright violation then taking images off the Internet. So yes, that can unfortunately mean that some works which are PD in the country of origin might still be not OK, if their U.S. copyright is still valid. Nothing we can do about it. Keep in mind though that they would not necessarily needed to have been published at the time they were taken -- PD-Japan-oldphoto pictures which were say published without notice only in 1985 would still have lost their U.S. copyright, and the PD-Japan-oldphoto status would still mean the URAA did not restore them, so they could still be OK to host. In a great many cases, that probably occurred, and as long as that seems like the most likely situation, that's good enough for me. It's just in this case, the evidence seemed to more strongly favor only recent publication, thus my concern. As for UK Crown Copyright, that is different -- to my mind, that is a form of PD-author, where the author is disclaiming further rights -- so even if the rights might technically have existed under the URAA, the author is disclaiming them. So the unpublished portion of U.S. really should not affect any UK Crown Copyright works which have expired. (And actually, the UK had the same perpetual copyright on unpublished works until the 1988 UK Copyright Act -- the U.S. mostly inherited that concept -- but the subsequent EU directives rendered most of that effect obsolete.) Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, per Carl. It seems that these files are unfortunately still copyrighted -FASTILY 09:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)