Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/01/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 10th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newer duplicate of File:20131217 Antares CRS Orb-1 rocket rollout (201312170010HQ).jpg. Originally tagged as such, but {{Duplicate}} template was removed by uploader. Very minor differences in compression, but exact same image (content, composition, levels, etc). Huntster (t @ c) 15:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree after long deliberations. File:20131217 Antares CRS Orb-1 rocket rollout (201312170010HQ).jpg has better quality than nominated file.  Delete /St1995 17:21, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploaders (co) request. JuTa 21:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lukeno94 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Image uploaded by known hoaxer, and pertains to a totally different person. It is almost certainly a copyvio, but I don't know the exact source. Discussion here JuTa 17:48, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 20:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like his business card Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all, copyright violation and out of scope. JuTa 13:45, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pour l'améliorer. Antoine 13 (talk) 14:14, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request, copyright violation and no license at all. JuTa 13:46, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks remarkably similar to File:Indus River ,D.G.KHAN.jpg which was deleted for copyright violation in February 2012. Green Giant (talk) 12:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 19:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quite identical with File:Notre Dame 111 2012-07-01.jpg and File:Notre Dame 112 2012-07-01.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 20:47, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 03:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quite identical with File:Notre Dame 111 2012-07-01.jpg and File:Notre Dame 110 2012-07-01.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 20:48, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 03:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Duplicate}} of File:Wikimania 2013 04334.JPG Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 19:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As a duplicate. odder (talk) 18:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its copied from the internet, e.g. here. Without OTRS ticket follows PCP. Ras67 (talk) 00:25, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 08:22, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its copied from the internet, e.g. here. Without OTRS ticket follows PCP. Ras67 (talk) 00:35, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 08:22, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image contain 16 logo / trademark. They are not "Own work" of autor "User:Randilg". The images may be used, but not under CC-by-sa-3.0 Andrez1 (talk) 00:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW. See COM:L Alan (talk) 08:23, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a modern installation within a museum and is not be covered by FOP in Great Britain. Oursana (talk) 01:35, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 08:23, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP France. Jules Paressant (1917-2001) Labattblueboy (talk) 01:43, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP France. Jules Paressant (1917-2001) Labattblueboy (talk) 01:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет подтверждения заявленной свободной лицензии Dogad75 (talk) 01:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, possible to be a screenshot of a video, thus copyvio Siyuwj (talk) 02:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:49, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of sculpture; no FoP for sculpture in Argentina per COM:FOP Эlcobbola talk 03:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 08:24, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inadequate source; image dated to 1920 could very well have an author who died less than 70 years ago. Who was the author? When did s/he die? Эlcobbola talk 03:40, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I notice the tag has been updated; to qualify, though, it notes that "Warning sign This tag can be used only when the author cannot be ascertained by reasonable enquiry. If you wish to rely on it, please specify in the image description the research you have carried out to find who the author was." - this is currently lacking from the file. Hchc2009 (talk) 10:15, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, the license change isn't really responsive to genuine issue: there's no source substantiating any claim. The anonymous license requires that a work be genuinely anonymous and intended as such (i.e., a source neglecting to mention an author or an author merely unknown to us is not sufficient). The other new, erroneous tag requires publication before 1923. The 1920 date is mere creation, which is entirely different. Эlcobbola talk 16:36, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: As above Natuur12 (talk) 13:04, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE - unused, blurry, non-notable people Эlcobbola talk 03:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source image was deleted as a copyright violation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 08:25, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This uploader has not uploaded any images in 2013 and only 4 images in 2014. But this web site's link says on section "6.1.1. All objects placed on the Site, including design elements, text, graphic images, illustrations, scripts, software, music, sounds and other objects and their collections (hereinafter the Content) are subject to exclusive rights of the Site Administration, Users and other rights holders, all rights in these objects being reserved" & "6.1.4. The Content made available exclusively for the purpose of personal non-commercial use may be used by the User on the condition that all copyright marks or other authorship notices, name of the author and the work remain unchanged." This image is a copyvio...and nothing here is in the public domain Leoboudv (talk) 05:55, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request Orrlingtalk 06:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Sorry but you are being disruptive about this renaming. Please stop. The fact that a file is renamed is not a valid reason to delete. PierreSelim (talk) 07:13, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request Orrlingtalk 06:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep -- only reason for uploader's request seems to be being in a petulant snit that this was renamed from "Mukta.jpg" (see Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Technical_assistance_in_filemoves_for_names_that_are_taken_by_redirects)... AnonMoos (talk) 10:30, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Sorry but you are being disruptive about this renaming. Please stop. The fact that a file is renamed is not a valid reason to delete. PierreSelim (talk) 07:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request Orrlingtalk 06:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Sorry but you are being disruptive about this renaming. Please stop. The fact that a file is renamed is not a valid reason to delete. PierreSelim (talk) 07:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request Orrlingtalk 06:34, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Sorry but you are being disruptive about this renaming. Please stop. The fact that a file is renamed is not a valid reason to delete. PierreSelim (talk) 07:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request Orrlingtalk 06:34, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Sorry but you are being disruptive about this renaming. Please stop. The fact that a file is renamed is not a valid reason to delete. PierreSelim (talk) 07:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a logo of the fund. Registered Logo can't be free. Bilderling (talk) 06:48, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 08:25, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a logo of the fund. Registered Logo can't be free. Bilderling (talk) 06:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 08:25, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Did the uploader take this World War Two image before 1943? I doubt it unfortunately 96.48.245.156 06:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:51, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work Rondador (talk) 07:18, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 08:25, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

明显侵犯著作权http://www.wxmarry.cn/News/News5.asp?ID=3377 Techyan (talk) 07:23, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 08:25, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence the photographer released the copyright for this photo, and the newspaper (Birmingham News) most likely holds copyright anyway. Arbor to SJ (talk) 08:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio: all rights reserved JurgenNL (talk) 10:51, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low quality, unused Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality seflie, unused Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Vandalism Alan (talk) 08:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality selfie, unused Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope and copyvio (cd-cover) JurgenNL (talk) 10:53, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality selfie, unused Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:54, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an advert, out of scope IMO Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:54, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality selfie Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:54, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spanish language text only pdf file. Resubmit as text to w:es. -- Tuválkin 10:17, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation Alan (talk) 08:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spanish language pdf file with simple text and one photo. Apparently off scope: Biopgraphy of non-notable person. -- Tuválkin 10:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio and out of scope Alan (talk) 08:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spanish language pdf file with simple text and one photo. Apparently off scope: Biopgraphy of non-notable person. -- Tuválkin 10:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio and out of scope Alan (talk) 08:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English language text only pdf file. Resubmit as text to w:en. -- Tuválkin 10:21, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:54, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simple text in tabular format in a pdf file. Resubmit as text to the appropriate projects. -- Tuválkin 10:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:54, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

XY plot chart in a pdf file. Resubmit as image to the appropriate projects. -- Tuválkin 10:24, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:55, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spanish language pdf file with simple text and one photo. Apparently off scope: Biopgraphy of non-notable person. -- Tuválkin 10:26, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio and out of scope Alan (talk) 08:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spanish language pdf file with simple texts and two images. Apparently off scope: Biopgraphy of non-notable people. -- Tuválkin 10:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio and out of scope Alan (talk) 08:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bo mi przeszkakdza 77.65.1.8 10:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Troll nomination, keep and block IP. Fry1989 eh? 18:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: dismissed Alan (talk) 08:19, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution photo of an unknown person. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 11:06, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:56, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio (also probably owner of company in the website.). Tekstman (talk) 12:41, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation Alan (talk) 08:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio (also probably owner of company in the website.). Tekstman (talk) 12:41, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation Alan (talk) 08:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture, not notable. Tekstman (talk) 13:11, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:53, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Savhñ 14:26, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation, series poster/cover. Savhñ 14:34, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • i have not at all violated any copyrights the picture is 100% authentic and copyrights are owned by me as i screen captured it.I want to make wikipedia know that any of allegation the picture is facing are answerable so please do not delete this free work
  •  Delete this and the rest of this user's uploads. I don't trust him whatsoever - see images like File:Nurmahal.jpg, which are obvious copyvios. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:24, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 08:13, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation, no metadata and various results on google. Savhñ 14:47, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 08:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image set is from San Diego Comic Con 2007. There is no COM:FOP for artworks and sculptures in the US. Materialscientist (talk) 15:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm sorry, but this is not covered by COM:FOP#Japan JuTa 20:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked, per COM:PRP, considering also logs. Gunnex (talk) 22:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Very unlikely to be own work PierreSelim (talk) 12:45, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo for a band that appears not to meet Wikipedia's notability criterion; here for promotional purposes only, no clear educational value. Pete F (talk) 22:06, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:TOO Natuur12 (talk) 12:49, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status: Sourced with (unspecified) http://www.reportefenix.com/ (© Todos los derechos reservados. 2012), licensed with {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} (which would fail - without further info - a {{License review}}), but available via (cropped) http://www.flickr.com/photos/reportefenix/8571106293/ under CC BY 2.0. Doubtful if really work of "Reporte Fenix", considering (e.g.) another pic from that stream = http://www.flickr.com/photos/reportefenix/8360994109/ (01.2013) = grabbed from (e.g.) http://www.flickr.com/photos/43528949@N04/5261236142 (2010) Gunnex (talk) 22:51, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is at least a reasonable doubt Natuur12 (talk) 13:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution, no camera EXIF data, uploader has uploaded nothing but copyvios since 2010 (!), including copyvios related to this person. Quack? Эlcobbola talk 23:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Cc-zero}}+{{PD-old}}-fail as indicated source (precisely: http://historiskaya.blogspot.de/2013/10/caleidoscopio-zacatecas-antes-y-despues.html) isn´t licensed as {{Cc-zero}} and without relevant info about the author (= "unknown") {{PD-old}} doesn´t work. Gunnex (talk) 23:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear copyrightstatus Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be some TV screenshot; very likely false authorship claims High Contrast (talk) 23:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio: TV screenshot PierreSelim (talk) 12:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alfred Kühlewindt

[edit]

Creator died 1945; see Creator:Alfred Kühlewindt. German photographer: his works are under copyright in the source country (Germany) until 2015-12-31. Concerns the following images from Category:Alfred Kühlewindt:

See also Commons:Village_pump/Copyright. All these were published before 1923, so are PD in the US, but not yet in Germany. Should be deleted, possibly after transferring them to the English Wikipedia, where PD-US-1923-abroad would apply. Can be undeleted here in 2016 (this DR is already in Category:Undelete in 2016). Lupo 22:29, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

Lupo 22:05, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Both the "Author" line and the EXIF show Cynthia Yock as the author. The uploader is FactChkGal13, who claims this is "own work". There is no evidence of permission from Yock. Google images does not show any hits except WMF. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#United Arab Emirates. 84.61.157.189 17:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Al Ghazi Tractors, D.G. Khan.jpg Green Giant (talk) 13:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen cap from unknown documentary is likely protected by copyright. Pete F (talk) 22:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- Sorry yes it is copyrighted by TVNZ in NZ. Feel Free to Delete. --TreesCanTell (talk) 21:17, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thank you for being this honost. Natuur12 (talk) 15:22, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#France. 84.61.157.189 17:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

</noinclude> This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 17:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

</noinclude> This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 17:43, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2071 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 17:32, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

you could find the photo all over the web: here, but there is no indication it is released under a free license Offenbacherjung (talk) 18:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image looks remarkably similar to an image found at Panoramio, where the uploader ("muhammad bilal") asserts copyright. Green Giant (talk) 12:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: we need com:otrs McZusatz (talk) 16:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small low-res image unlikely to have educational uses. Green Giant (talk) 12:44, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:SUZUKI MOTORS,D.G.KHAN.jpg Green Giant (talk) 13:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears remarkably similar to one found at Panoramio where the uploader ("Xohaib Shirani") asserts copyright. Green Giant (talk) 13:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This exact file was deleted previously on 1 Feb 2012 for copyright violation - (File:DPS School.jpg). Green Giant (talk) 18:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 19:04, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text of the sign is probably copyrighted. --Jakob (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 17:41, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded to illustrate an irrelevant and promotional page.

Uploaded for an irrelevant page that has been removed Pompilos (talk) 19:26, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded for an irrelevant page that has been removed Pompilos (talk) 19:26, 10 January 2014 (UTC) Estimado Pompilos! lamento tu solicitud de borrado ya que la consulta sobre la página del este libro "El lado humano de la fe" de Eduardo Casas es materia de estudio para aquellos que se dedican a la teología espiritual. Tal vez el artículo no esté bien redactado, aunque eso se puede corregir. De mi parte solicito que no sea borrado.[reply]

Lamento que haya sido borrado.


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No obvious educational uses; no different to any picture of people enjoying a swim in the local pool Green Giant (talk) 12:04, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational uses for a photo of people using the uploaders own swimming pool. Green Giant (talk) 13:24, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of File:Fort Munro,road.jpg. Green Giant (talk) 13:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве, нет подтверждения заявленной свободной лицензии, загружает в Рувику файлы разных фотографов Dogad75 (talk) 18:48, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2066 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 17:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nonsense licence. In fact Copyright 2014, Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners 91.66.152.124 17:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 91.66.152.124 16:51, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an "own work" 91.66.152.124 13:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:04, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 91.66.152.124 13:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:04, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published work. Likely copyvio. Dismas (talk) 16:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: If you are the copyrightholder please contact com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 15:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Savhñ 14:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be of educational use; it just shows the gates of what I presume is a high school. Green Giant (talk) 12:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:04, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2066 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 17:35, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"own work" (of the screenshot???) 91.66.152.124 13:43, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.TuanUt (talk) 15:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possibly copyright infringement from [1] Der Checkerboy (talk) 14:29, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 22:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:22, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF data, web resolution, very suspicious upload  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Likely the photo seen at http://jillkelley.net/.--Auric (talk) 02:39, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:28, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image (uploaded 10 Jan 2014) appears to be identical to an image on this news report from haalaat.com on 23 Aug 2013. A larger version of the image is located here. Green Giant (talk) 20:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution, no camera EXIF, all other user uploads are copyvios related to Iranian film (this woman is an Iranian actress). Quack? Эlcobbola talk 23:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 16:25, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE - what is the educational purpose of the LittleMonsters.com logo? Эlcobbola talk 03:41, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational uses - this is a photo of someone's house, albeit a colourful one Green Giant (talk) 12:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from http://dst.co.kr/en/ without evidence of permission. PCock (talk) 13:47, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, all the uploads of User:MVRS-3000 appear to have been copied from that website and are only being used promotionally on English and Korean Wikipedia articles. PCock (talk) 13:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:28, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is effectively a duplicate of File:Khalid abad.jpg, just taken from a few metres further back or zoomed out a bit. Green Giant (talk) 13:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it because I wanted to add this photo to the page Michele Salemi, which unfortunately has been cancelled, so this file is orphan now. Sai Luci (talk) 15:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#United Arab Emirates. 84.61.157.189 17:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнени в авторстве, участник загружает в Рувики фото разных фотографов без их разрешения Dogad75 (talk) 19:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2066 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

U.S. Navy photo courtesy of Huntington Ingalls Industries-> not a U.S. Navy photo --Cobatfor (talk) 17:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per above. Not a made by a member of the US Marine Natuur12 (talk) 15:21, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is almost certainly a copyright violation of the image at Geology.com, which asserts its copyright at the bottom of the page. Green Giant (talk) 18:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2077 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 17:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is not named, so how can we be certain he is dead for at least 70 years? Also, the image is most likely not yet in the PD in the USA. Rosenzweig τ 22:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Du scheinst dich mit dem Urheberrecht und mit Commons nicht auszukennen. Dass ein Werk in den USA noch urheberrechtlich geschützt ist, spricht sehr wohl dagegen, eine Datei davon auf Commons zu laden. Und dass ein Werk vor 78 Jahren erschienen ist, heißt noch lange nicht, dass es jetzt frei ist. Die Schutzfrist von 70 Jahren läuft nämlich ab dem Tod des Urhebers, und der dürfte in den seltensten Fällen unmittelbar nach Veröffentlichung des jeweiligen Werks gestorben sein. --Rosenzweig τ 22:48, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The copyrightstatus remains unclear and even if it was in the public domain in Germany, it would have been pd in 2006 after the URAA date. (Best case scenario) And per above. Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicts three minors in an apparently private location; no indication of consent. See COM:IDENT Pete F (talk) 23:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NOT OK Younis khosa qatar (talk) 17:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason given for deletion. Ices2Csharp (talk) 19:23, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map was uploaded on 10 Feb 2012, but it looks just like the map in this article from 11 Jan 2012 by the Nation newspaper. That website asserts copyright on all content from its website. Green Giant (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Pete F (talk) 22:04, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:12, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 22:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:12, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by an single-purpose obscure fa.wikibooks account with a forged attribution. Obviously scanned or photographed from a material source, and is not trivial (i.e. {{PD-ineligible}} is also forged). Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC), 13:18, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence disputed since November 2011 and not resolved; time to delete per COM:PRP Cube00 (talk) 13:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 17:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

China has a very low COM:TOO this could very well be copyright. Cube00 (talk) 13:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Table copied from unknown source. Should not be used, because the information is unsourced and not reliable. Uploaded by Tirdenir only to be added in spam article. A5b (talk) 12:26, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfocused and unused image. There are at least two similar but better images of the same object: File:Campanille at Mission San Miguel.jpg and File:MissionSanMiguelFrontOuterWalls.jpg Niklem (talk) 12:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:02, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, no clear educational value; also consent of a legal guardian likely needed per COM:IDENT Pete F (talk) 22:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:23, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metin Canbalaban reposted this 1922 image, but he is not the copyright holder. OTRS for his photos is not relevant. Jarekt (talk) 18:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Khalid abad.jpg Green Giant (talk) 13:55, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 17:47, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very blurred, no useful description, facebook-like private image, orphaned - out of scope of wikimedia Andy king50 (talk) 21:47, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:12, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Savhñ 14:26, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use for pictures of uploaders own homes. Green Giant (talk) 13:23, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Дата на фото не совпадает с датой загрузки, сомнения в авторстве Dogad75 (talk) 13:26, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 22:48, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет подтверждения авторства: все права на фото принадлежат фотографам, а не изображённым лицам, за исключением передачи прав на фото изображённому (что оговаривается отдельно) Dogad75 (talk) 15:51, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. No indication uploaders has the rights. Tekstman (talk) 12:24, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:57, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of panorama in UK requires that the work be on permanent display, these were not they were only on display from 27 July - 9 September 2012.

LGA talkedits 22:24, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Members of the public could take pics of these for their own private use, but uploading them to Commons is against UK FoP as stated above in the nom. INeverCry 19:18, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building has been designed by the architect Auguste Perret (1874-1954). As there is no FOP in France, it can't be freely shared less than 70 years after the artist died. So, these picture should be deleted untill 2025.

Pymouss Let’s talk - 12:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:02, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted 2025 now in France. Abzeronow (talk) 00:36, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshots from a film by Akira Kurosawa. The template used, Template:PD-Japan-film, explicitly excludes those, stating that they remain copyrighted until 2036.

Rosenzweig τ 22:32, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right, the last sentence from that template has "In 2008, the Intellectual Property High Court affirmed the lower court's decision. The report states the "Japanese Intellectual Property High Court ruling that establishes the Tokyo District Court's September 2007 decision to be correct," and that "the preceding judge Nobuyoshi Tanaka is quoted as stressing that 'the copyright over films is protected for 38 years from the year after the death of the director.'"". Akira Kurosawa died on 6. September 1998, though so I am unsure whethere the United States laws would further extend the period of copyright, past 2036. -84user (talk) 01:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 19:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anonimo122 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, most likely screenshots of unknown videos (+/-1975—2008) for es:Historia del Club Deportivo Toluca.

Gunnex (talk) 18:12, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:51, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boomed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

After today identifying around 25 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different Panoramio-/Flickr-accounts etc.) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. Most of below files were previously published at fotolog.com which is currently in maintance. Example: File:1216099080670 f.jpg --> Google.

Gunnex (talk) 11:52, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:54, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dharmesh Kumar Pandey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of scope.

Savhñ 14:35, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PS Alan (talk) 08:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gavin o fearraigh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I think, the real en:Gavin Ó Fearraigh would donate some bigger photos.

91.66.152.124 16:47, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Even than. Permission from the photographer is still missing. Natuur12 (talk) 13:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Geider (talk · contribs)

[edit]

private family album, all files unused

91.66.152.124 13:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gilberthebrard (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused user portraits

91.66.152.124 16:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Golfgamebook (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files need an OTRS ticket

91.66.152.124 11:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation Alan (talk) 08:18, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Halfling (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, images are taken from elsewhere.

Sealle (talk) 10:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 08:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Larr1983 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible copyvios - old B&W images from the 1950s & 1980s - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 03:06, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 10:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammad Hijjawi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files were uploaded for use in a non-notable (auto)biographic article on Arabic Wikipedia. The article was deleted. The images are out of scope of Wikimedia Commons.

Abanima (talk) 19:23, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 23:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammad Hijjawi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammad Hijjawi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on any of these images including one obviously copied from some other source. Two images have metadata, but it's different, the others have nothing.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rogerio.rag (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personel files

91.66.152.124 17:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tusaliadosmkt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 03:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PS Alan (talk) 08:19, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Viannisa castillo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wabten (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unclear whether the uploader is the author

91.66.152.124 13:51, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Younis khosa qatar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are of personal things that would be of limited eduational use:

Green Giant (talk) 20:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:12, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Younis khosa qatar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 22:05, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Per User talk:Younis khosa qatar I am currently "cleaning" uploads by this user. The difficulty here is to differ between uploads previously published on uploaders 1530 images heavy Panoramio stream via http://www.panoramio.com/user/3308075?show=all (see also [2] + [3] + etc.) and works which were taken from copyrighted images by other (mostly Panoramio) user. So, files like File:Heavy snowfall, Fort Munro, D.G. Khan.jpg (and it's nominated redirect File:HEAVY SNOWFALL FORT MUNRO,D.G.KHAN.jpg) may be okay as also File:Snow fall, Fort Munro, D.G. Khan.jpg (nominated redirect: File:SNOW FALL FORT MUNRO,D.G.KHAN.jpg), considering cropped from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/84859868.
But e.g. File:Danish School, D.G. Khan.jpg (exif: Canon PowerShot A550, an obvious cropped photo) offers a digicam which (so far I could verify) was never used on his Commons and/or Panoramio uploads and might be a copyright violation too = nominating. Gunnex (talk) 23:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:36, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no usar dado que tiene url privadas Spavezv (talk) 21:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested. (for safety) Alan (talk) 02:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ESA site http://www.esa.int/esaKIDSen/SEM8Q5WJD1E_OurUniverse_1.html claims ESA copyright, while NASA site http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/2004solar.html claims joint NASA/ESA copyright. Precautionary principle suggests deleting this file due to lack of definitive information. Huntster (t @ c) 17:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PRP Alan (talk) 02:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer is French Navy rather than US Navy, copyright unclear. (talk) 15:18, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The photo was posted on the U.S. Navy media website, so the image is PD.Marcd30319 (talk) 15:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I sent the following email to the U.S. Navy (http://www.navy.mil/submit/contacts.asp):Marcd30319 (talk) 16:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am a contributor to Wikipedia. I recently uploaded two U.S. Navy photos to WikiCommons. They were 131229-N-ZZ999-379 and 131229-N-ZZ999-378 Both images are annotated as follows: "U.S. Navy photo courtesy of the French navy by Frederic Duplouich/Released. The 131229-N-ZZ999-379 image has been nominated for deletion because the photographer is French Navy rather than US Navy, copyright unclear. Can you clarify this situation since it is my belief that the 131229-N-ZZ999-379 image is a public domain image. Ditto 131229-N-ZZ999-378. Thank you and could you expedit the response to this query?

NAVY.MIL CONTACT US. Thank you for your input! Your question/comment has been forwarded to the appropriate Navy organization for review and action. If you provided an email address you will receive a response within a few days.

Thanks for sending the email; you may want to compare with User:Fæ/email/DoD which I never got replies for. I note that normally photographs hosted by DoD but taken by members of non-US forces are given VIRINs using the "-O-" code. I think this was a human error in this case. By the way, there is no reflection on your good will in uploading these photos, the situation with the DoD's website is unclear to many of us. Thanks -- (talk) 16:21, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you and understood. Based on the Defense Department standard, your suggestion that the image was given an erroneous VIRIN is the likeliest explanation. Regards, Marcd30319 (talk) 13:23, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file will not continue to be updated. The color version should be used instead. Aldaron (talk) 21:47, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unopposed; redundant Stifle (talk) 17:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we require proof that this new account is indeed Fryer's Inc. and therefore permitted to upload this logo under this particular license? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:51, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

この名前のファイルは存在しません。 Niko 13:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 02:51, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#France. 84.61.157.189 19:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Who suggested to delete the file? Why should it be deleted?--Torbenbrinker (talk) 18:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commons doesnot allow photographs of modern buildings in France, for more information please see com:FOP Natuur12 (talk) 19:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#France. 84.61.139.62 15:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Commons:De minimis/fr ~Pyb (talk) 22:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP France. Gaston Broquet (1880 - 1947) Labattblueboy (talk) 01:55, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#France. 84.61.181.19 16:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Denniss (talk) 11:52, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP France. Gaston Broquet (1880 - 1947) Labattblueboy (talk) 01:55, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Annotations

[edit]

Deux plaques (qui ne sont pas une oeuvre artistique) en l'honneur de soldats morts pour la France avec en fond la poste de Chalons en champagne, la porte d'entrée du bâtiment est un ancien monument de Chalons, je ne vois rien là de soumis à un copyright. Mais comme je ne sais pas pourquoi la photo est ^proposée à la suppression, je ne puis ajouter de détail spécifique.

Merci Garitan (talk) 15:48, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plaques are, or at least can be, artistic works. There is obvious design intention here, it may be simple but certainly intentional. Need not look much further than other Gaston Broquet.--Labattblueboy (talk) 00:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

you could find the photo all over the web, e.g.: http://www.delikomat.hr/tvrtka/internacionalno , but there is no indication it is released under a free license Offenbacherjung (talk) 19:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Commons is a first choice for copying images to other websites. The image is uploaded in 2011. Have you seen a website that claims an earlier date? That said, the source "café+co" is unclear (Source of data? Image source?). Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 07:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OliverTwist1789 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). Some historical photos may be in public domain, but proper information should be supplied.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 07:23, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Громада. №5.pdf is a scanned version of the same book but it has a better quality (at least separated pages) DixonD (talk) 22:32, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:13, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by Mavi16

[edit]

All of these are 3D works at the Reial Acadèmia Catalana de Belles Arts de Sant Jordi. All of them are tagged as PD-Art which is, of course, limited to 2d works. I could not find any of them on the source web site, but the site has an explicit copyright notice. While the works themselves are, I think, all out of copyright, we have no permission for the photographs.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi James. These images are part of a GLAMwiki collaboration in Barcelona with Amical Wikimedia. Images were actually uploaded by the GLAM itself. Give me a some days for fixing the whole thing. They have the permission (they created the content) and they are uploading it under an open license. Please be patient. Best,--Kippelboy (talk) 16:31, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold: On hold 7 days. --Alan (talk) 08:17, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Permisison has been added to files. Thanks for your patience--Kippelboy (talk) 10:25, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The template which you have added states that there is permission, but gives no evidence of it. We need a free license from the museum, using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. If the museum writes a general license for all its works, then the OTRS number could be added to the template.
Also, as I noted in the initial nomination, these are all tagged PD-Art, which cannot be applied to 3D works. While I think that all of the works pictured qualify as being out of copyright, the PD-Art tag must be removed and an appropriate tag added.
We can hold this open a little while longer, but sooner or later the museum must either do its part or these must be deleted since, as it stands now, they are copyvios. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 09:15, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "A" part of the logo may be too complex to fall under Commons:TOO#United_Kingdom per Commons:Deletion requests/Two British logos. I'm aware that content from the National Archives has been contributed to Commons under the [Open Government licence] however it includes the statement This licence does not cover: departmental or public sector organisation logos so if this logo does not fall under PD-text-logo (due to very low threshold of originality) then it needs to be under some other licence, unsure what. Concerns were originally raised during an attempted move from en.wiki. Related deletion request for UK government logos. Cube00 (talk) 12:17, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the "A" in the National Archives logo is simply a letter in a commercial font, rather than a custom design. The logo was uploaded as part of a GLAM partnership with the National Archives, but that project may be moribund. I'll post a note there as see if we get a response. - 216.178.108.231 18:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, that comment was from me. - PKM (talk) 18:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello. <Waves hand> I was that GLAM project. Sort of. Thanks for pointing this out Paula. TNA are perfectly happy for the logo to be here. If people think the wrong licence is being used then that is the change that needs to be made. There's no need to throw the baby out with the bathwater. If necessary I can get fresh permission to use the logo but that will be a massive pain so I'd much rather we all agreed that everything is fine. --Mr impossible (talk) 16:11, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I can vouch for Mr impossible, if he says this is okay then it is. If we need an email on record with OTRS to make this "official" then I'm sure it can be arranged as I'll happily be the OTRS volunteer that adds a ticket. -- (talk) 16:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: As stated above, the 'A' exceeds the threshold of orginality for the UK. This can, and should be restored if we can get COM:OTRS permission for it FASTILY 23:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Started this move two months ago in the cat's talkpg. Nonsense category, that serves no interest nor any type of helpfulness that I can think of, and I might be right because there is evidently no other country on Commons with this category. I can't think of any sound interest, educational, botanical or another, in "Brances in Israel" more than in "Branches in Canada" or "Leaves in Tanzania" or "Pollens in Ireland". And if this isn't enough, this cat's subcat - Category:Branches in Haifa - is plainly as idiotic a category as Commons can get. Orrlingtalk 18:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with the above. Yann (talk) 06:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 23:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]