Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/12/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
This file was initially tagged by Kephir as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: licate|Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement.svg. It's not an exact duplicate. For me, this version renders better (centered text), so if we're deleting anything, I'd prefer to delete the other one. 99of9 (talk) 12:26, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- But for the record, I
oppose deletion of either, since both files are heavily in use. Get users to decide which version they prefer, and when usage of one is down to 0, then delete that one. --99of9 (talk) 12:28, 27 December 2012 (UTC) - I think I know why this was the case: the other file had a few, hmm, I guess rounding errors in the hand-coded SVG markup. The text was centred around a vertical line which was a bit off to the right from the centre of the "triangle" (which, due to other rounding errors, is not actually a triangle composed of straight lines). I adjusted the markup, which made it render better in ImageMagick (which is what Wikimedia uses) and librsvg, but strangely, worse when rendered directly in Chromium… blame the latter, I guess. I already uploaded the corrected file.
I think we can do without this copy. It has text embedded as paths - which guarantees it will render the same way regardless of available fonts, but on the other hand inflates file size and makes the image harder to translate — it is no longer as simple as opening the file in a text editor. (Speaking of which, where could I request a German version?) Nineteen uses is hardly "heavy", when compared to over 150. Some of them are in archives, though. Editing these is… frowned upon. Keφr (talk) 21:26, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Widely used, therefore policy forbids deleting it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Accidentally Uploaded Image Lorraineereso (talk) 03:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 09:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
politiken.dk/udland/ECE2149524/kims-magtfulde-onkel-er-udrenset-i-nordkorea/ and other sources indicate author Ma Zhancheng/(newswire) Brian Dell (talk) 19:09, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Maxim(talk) 21:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence that this file is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 license. El Grafo (talk) 21:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
two errors in picture (N missing, double bonds), new version already uploaded Ghilt (talk) 09:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- You could have uploaded a new version right there, but OK. Wnt (talk) 00:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request, incorrect image. Leyo 23:43, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 09:07, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 01:26, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:23, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete: It is a bad montage — the pasted head doesnt match the brightness and contrast ranges of the body, not to mention mismatching anatomy. But it could be kept as an example of common mistakes. However, since the uploader requests (this time only once, just by duplication the original nomination, instead of seconding it…), it can be safely deleted. Such bad montages are easy to recreat at need. -- Tuválkin ✉ 23:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, per Tuválkin. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
book illustration, re-uploaded after deletion Kaganer (talk) 01:47, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:04, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Photo of copyrighted Dutch magazines (not even by the uploader, if it matters...). Kaluga.2012 (talk) 02:21, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:05, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:05, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Abdul razak barus adalah loook http---www-kisahabdulrazakbarus-blogspot-com 2013-12-03 20-08.jpg
[edit]unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:20, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:05, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:04, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:04, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:23, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:31, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:04, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
PDF with non-notable fringe pseudo-science. -- Tuválkin ✉ 04:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:05, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The artist died 1981. Stigfinnare (talk) 07:59, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The artist died in 1981. Stigfinnare (talk) 07:59, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
this is wrong Omnia.blanes (talk) 08:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'd recommend writing why it is wrong in a text annotation to the file, or remaking the table with revised text and uploading the new version. Deletion isn't the right way of dealing with it - Commons doesn't require sources and figuring out "right" and "wrong" is therefore not something readily done. Wnt (talk) 00:46, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope -- this should be set as text in a table . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
File:蒙古國國家宮 (國會與總統-總理辦公室) 正面右側窩闊臺像 Statue of Ögedei Khan at the Parliament Building of Mongolia in Ulaanbaatar.jpg
[edit]Mongolia has no Freedom of Panorama for modern sculptures. Leoboudv (talk) 08:47, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 17:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Overwritten file: two in one. Both files should be deleted, but for different reasons:
- Copyright violation: derivative work of content deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shiba Doge meme.jpg. Deleted content shouldn't be reposted without going via COM:UR. Also derivative work of an image at http://crazy-frankenstein.com/baywatch-tv-series-wallpapers.html
- Out of project scope. Stefan4 (talk) 10:52, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
The Nobel Prize medal is a copyrighted artistic work by the Swedish sculptor and engraver Erik Lindberg (1873–1966), see Category:Nobel Prize 4ing (talk) 11:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- I guess the NCI made a mistake in licensing this as PD. The category is interesting, it includes photos like File:Jimmy Carter Library and Museum 145.JPG and File:Nobel Prize of Agnon IMG 6972.JPG. --Fæ (talk) 11:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:55, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Nama saya Cecepz Zaresva-alamat kabupaten Lebak banten kecamatan malingping-tanggal lahir saya 10 agustus 1994,-telah lulus sma 2013,-fanfage FB Cecep Zaresva Herdiana,-namber telepon yang bisa di hubungi 0877 2013-12-03 23-28.jpg
[edit]unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:10, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:21, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- File is uploaded by User:Osman gelooğlu. Normally it is not a practice to start a user page for someone else, but I think it would be nicer to start his user page by adding that photo to it than to delete his photo for being out of scope, given a choice of the two. Wnt (talk) 00:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Nicer, perhaps. But, as a practical matter there is no one to actually do that for a hundred or so such images every day. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:24, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:30, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:38, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Blurred and no description. Leyo 12:58, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
The banner is not permanently installed as it is about a specific exhibition. Fails COM:FOP#United Kingdom. Stefan4 (talk) 13:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
The painted stuff on the car looks copyrigthable. Country unclear, but there is Chinese text on the wall, and COM:FOP#China, People's Republic of only applies to artworks which are outdoors. Stefan4 (talk) 13:57, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- There are 96 images these BMW Art Cars in Category:BMW Art Cars. I suppose we'll have to delete them all, since each is an original artwork. What difference does it make what country the photo was taken in? The cars have been shown all over the world. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: The country matters because in a few countries, this would be covered by FOP. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused image of a non-notable person. —Bill william comptonTalk 13:59, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Uploader claims: „This file gave me the owner of this file for using it on wikipedia.“ In this case we need a written permission from the copyright holder (which may be the photographer or the subject or even someone else). See Commons:OTRS for details. El Grafo (talk) 14:03, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized, text-only image. Description is translated by Google to "Apology from the Tokyu bus", appears to be out of scope. El Grafo (talk) 14:14, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
out of scope 4ing (talk) 14:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Anonymous tourist in anonymous place with anonymous sculpture. From user with 1 edit. Not in use. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 15:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ask the poster to provide more details. If someone uploaded a photo of an iPad we wouldn't delete it if we didn't know where it was taken - so why should we delete a sculpture of an elephant for that reason? Wnt (talk) 00:52, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: We're here to give the opportunity for the uploader to explain. It is a better than even chance that this is a copyvio of the sculpture. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:12, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
author isn't copyright holder of the work Edgars2007 (talk) 15:47, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion —ШαмıQ✍ @ 15:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:13, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion: See —ШαмıQ✍ @ 15:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:13, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Unfree coins. Stefan4 (talk) 16:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- These are not real coins, but an artistic interpretation thereof. This is also a photo of a collection of items, not just one item. Irrespective of these points, see also Commons:Currency#Euro, which permits depictions of Euros in certain circumstances. (If Euro coin depictions are considered unfree, shouldn't everything in the Category:Euro coins tree be deleted?) Mindmatrix 16:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: my guess is this image is exactly as free or unfree as the decoration of the depicted candy. - Jmabel ! talk 19:58, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: The chocolates themselves have a copyright, and the coins also two -- 2x copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:17, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyvio and out of project scope. Jespinos (talk) 16:31, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Photo taken by Rolf Mahrenholz 1, who died in 1991. Photo is copyright protected till 2062. Paulae (talk) 16:33, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:19, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Nobody really known wwho made this image and where it was taken, info required to verify PD-Thailand. Uploader removed no source tag Denniss (talk) 17:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Please see Elizabeth Hunter. This photo was taken at the wedding of she and Chula Chakrabongse in 30 September 1938. The original file is [1] (The person on the right is en:Chula Chakrabongse. And on the left is Elizabeth Hunter his wife.)
Deleted: That is all very well, but the copyright to this image is almost certainly held b the photographer's heirs. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:20, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Poorly aligned shot showing what appears to be the uploader. Commons is not a substitute for (eg) Flickr. Out of scope. Timtrent (talk) 17:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, in use on the uploader's user page on en.wiki. January (talk) 23:07, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: In use . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:20, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
It's a modern monument (2007). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:21, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:36, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: 1910 is 25 years too recent to assume that this is PD for age. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from (information on file page relates to an earlier upload) MilborneOne (talk) 19:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:41, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:42, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept Died 1913 . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:42, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept Died 1913. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:27, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:27, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:27, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
It is rather unlikely that the uploader is the author of all parts of this image (including but not limited to: that the uploader is the photographer of the portrait, and that the uploader is the designer of every single one of the various logos near the bottom of the image) UV (talk) 21:30, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright protected modern three-dimensional museum model (User:Elcobbola/Models) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:31, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Gun Powder Ma.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright protected modern three-dimensional museum model (User:Elcobbola/Models) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Gun Powder Ma.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright protected modern three-dimensional museum models (User:Elcobbola/Models) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Gun Powder Ma.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright protected modern three-dimensional museum model (User:Elcobbola/Models) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Gun Powder Ma.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright protected modern three-dimensional museum model (User:Elcobbola/Models) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Gun Powder Ma.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright protected modern three-dimensional museum model (User:Elcobbola/Models) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Gun Powder Ma.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright protected modern three-dimensional museum models (User:Elcobbola/Models) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Gun Powder Ma.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright protected modern three-dimensional museum model (User:Elcobbola/Models) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Gun Powder Ma.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright protected modern three-dimensional museum model (User:Elcobbola/Models) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Gun Powder Ma.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright protected modern three-dimensional museum model (User:Elcobbola/Models) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Gun Powder Ma.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright protected modern three-dimensional museum model (User:Elcobbola/Models) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Gun Powder Ma.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright protected modern three-dimensional museum model (User:Elcobbola/Models) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Gun Powder Ma.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright protected modern three-dimensional museum model (User:Elcobbola/Models) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Gun Powder Ma.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright protected modern three-dimensional museum model (User:Elcobbola/Models) Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Gun Powder Ma.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 13:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Only when the upload was completed did I realize the same image already existed under another name... Sorry! Sofffie7 (talk) 22:36, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
A haphazard mobile screenshot. There may or may not be issues with the copyright of icons, however the main reason for deleting would be that this has no obvious educational value that would give a resonable expectation of reuse for an educational purpose. Fæ (talk) 00:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: And crossword puzzles are almost always copyrighted in the USA. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
This is a derived work from a photograph of a vase, see http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/illustration/greek-art-achilles-slays-penthesilea-queen-of-the-stock-graphic/112189601. As such, although the artwork is ancient, the photograph is of an 3D object and requires a verifiable release from the original photographer. The size and lack of EXIF data throws significant doubt on the claim of own work. I note variations of this image appear on book covers and websites, though I have not noticed a direct digital match for a source. Fæ (talk) 00:09, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Wait a minute. The surface of the vase may be curved, but it is still two-dimensional. The artwork is shot from the obvious point directly centered over the artwork. You could put the vase on a scanner and get pretty much the same picture. I don't see "composition" here, I see a low-res copy of some lovely ancient art. Wnt (talk) 00:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- This photograph is a cropped shot of an amphora owned by the British Museum, Museum number 1836,0224.127. The figures are of Achilles slaying Penthesilea.
- I might have swallowed that rationale if this were part of a curved fresco or mosaic intended to be seen as mostly flat, however this is not mostly orthogonal to the viewer, in fact Achilles' head in the artwork (the file name appears misleading) is at 45° or more at a angle away from the observer in this photo. The photographer is not credited, probably in breach of a copyright licence, and this thumbnail has certainly been nabbed from an unknown website, possibly even taken from a book cover displayed on Amazon. The Precautionary Principle applies with regard to the rights of the photographer, and the image is not only pretty unusably small, but easily replaceable as this is normally on public display in the British Museum in London [room G13/8, see catalogue record, there are several good photos] and normally I would offer to take a decent photo as I drop in several times a year, being a member I make use of the member's reading room/cafe; however it is on loan right now according to the BM database ('Beyond' at Alexander S Onassis Foundation, New York & Museum of Cycladic & Ancient Greek Art, Athens November 2013 - June 2014). --Fæ (talk) 09:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Although following Bridgeman is settled WMF policy, which I support, we must remember that it is actually settled law in only one US District, and no other jurisdictions have followed it. It applied only to scans of old master paintings. Stretching it beyond that is not possible. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
This is not a free image. The licensing terms do not allow for free modification.[2] Eleassar (t/p) 00:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- This file was on internet newspaper Magyar Kurir, where it is written, that is free.--Stebunik (talk) 18:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Al ser de una página web, presentan licencias. Isn't a file free. — ♫♫ Leitoxx
The Police ♪♪ — 02:29, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
_正面右側窩闊臺像_Statue_of_Ögedei_Khan_at_the_Parliament_Building_of_Mongolia_in_Ulaanbaatar.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-12-03_22-19.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![77 File:RIAN archive 1062963 Museum-Panorama "Borodino Battle" opens after reconstruction.jpg](#File:RIAN_archive_1062963_Museum-Panorama_"Borodino_Battle"_opens_after_reconstruction.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(9348048818).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_%E6%AD%A3%E9%9D%A2%E5%8F%B3%E5%81%B4%E7%AA%A9%E9%97%8A%E8%87%BA%E5%83%8F_Statue_of_%C3%96gedei_Khan_at_the_Parliament_Building_of_Mongolia_in_Ulaanbaatar.jpg){kind=link}
_%E6%AD%A3%E9%9D%A2%E5%8F%B3%E5%81%B4%E7%AA%A9%E9%97%8A%E8%87%BA%E5%83%8F_Statue_of_%C3%96gedei_Khan_at_the_Parliament_Building_of_Mongolia_in_Ulaanbaatar.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-12-03_22-19.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2013-12-03_22-19.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_2013-12-03_22-19.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-12-03_22-19.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](http://topicstock.pantip.com/chalermkrung/topicstock/2008/12/C7300971/C7300971-161.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Modern (post-1945) building, no FoP in Russia PereslavlFoto (talk) 00:49, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Uploader does not likely own copyright in this image -- see http://bleacherreport.com/articles/401448-report-card-grading-the-yankee-offense-through-first-third-of-seaso/page/10 discospinster (talk) 01:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:42, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 01:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Argentinian actors and real-life spouses Diego Olivera and Monica Ayos. Suspect copyvio (perhaps a still from hd video) but can't find exact match. Kaluga.2012 (talk) 02:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Google finds it all over the web . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:33, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:21, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:43, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:45, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Uploader don't add sourcepictures and they are missing in picture collection Motopark (talk) 03:32, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Comment: One source picture is missing unfortunately. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:58, 10 December 2013 (UTC)- Comment Also see File:Falkirk Wheel from the top. - geograph.org.uk - 11035-2011-05-03.jpg— Preceding unsigned comment added by Billinghurst (talk • contribs)
- Keep It's extremely unlikely that any copyright will be claimed on this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anarchistdy (talk • contribs)
- I think you have misunderstood the very core of copyright, Commons and Wikipedia. See Commons:COPYRIGHT. Nymf (talk) 18:46, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment You have nominated both this and this page for deletion under this deletion request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anarchistdy (talk • contribs)
- Delete as per Leoboudv. Nymf (talk) 18:46, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: I looked for a while and could not find the missing image on Commons. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:34, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:33, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:45, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:45, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
the picture is too old today to be accurate and is not being used anymore. Please delete it Dam00 (talk) 04:06, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep (but rename to File:Thomas Damuseau) Wikipedia has an article w:Thomas Damuseau where it could/should be used. Commons wants photos from any point in life, not just current photos. Wnt (talk) 00:40, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Yes. Multiple photos of notable people are a good thing -- would be useful for a biographer, for example. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:35, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Photo of metal seal, insufficient justification for free license GrapedApe (talk) 04:38, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Vanderbilt was founded in 1873. It is likely that this is PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Even if the underlying medal is PD due to age, which does seem likely, the photo of the object is still copyrighted by Vanderbilt, because Commons:PD-art#This does not apply to photographs 3D works of art. (JWL--I don't like to re-run DRs, but I see that probably should have been more clear in my original DR's rationale.)--GrapedApe (talk) 12:50, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted You are absolutely right -- since it is obvious from the size that this was lifted directly from the Vanderbilt web site, this is a speedy. As you say, it would have been helpful if you had provided the link in the first DR -- or even just put a {{Copyvio}} tag on it with the link. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
copyrighted logo, dolphin shapes are non-ineligible L!tt|e+ung?\2o/3=] 05:20, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Not own work, files are taken from various sites: [3], [4] and so on.
![[3]](http://www.mpbikz.ru/fotocatalog/000_02.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](http://belsvk.by/images/51.jpg){kind=link}
Sealle (talk) 05:30, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fozzy network
[edit]Likely copyright violations from unidentified sources.
- File:Peje00.jpg
- File:Hidalgo 290711.jpg
- File:1255895936852 f.png
- File:Efren Arellano.jpg
- File:Paul Reubens.jpg
Closeapple (talk) 06:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per own nomination: All of unclear or disputable provenance, and unusual dimensions. User's edit history on es.wp indicates that some of these images were inserted there in the past, then reverted by others. In detail:
- File:Hidalgo 290711.jpg: same size as hidalgo_290711.jpg via "Concluye obra de Hidalgo a 200 años de su fusilamiento", a newspaper that credits the photo to itself, and appears to be a screen capture from a film. Addition to es:Historia de México was reverted.
- File:Efren Arellano.jpg: unsourced crop of Abuelo24.jpg (though that also has a "Fozzy Network" watermark on it) via http://efrenarellano.tk/galeria.html — apparently some sort of dumb meme I don't understand, in which everyone has the same old guy's face. Also fails COM:SCOPE.
- File:1255895936852 f.png: unsourced copy of Abuelo34.jpg, same meme from same website above. Also fails COM:SCOPE.
- File:Peje00.jpg: Unsourced copy, with black border, of a photo that exists in larger resolutions elsewhere on the web, usually with some captions: see this Google Image Search for examples. Apparently Andrés Manuel López Obrador (or someone trying to look like him). Descriptions (original and edited) also make it clear this was not intended to be realistically educational under COM:SCOPE. --Closeapple (talk) 08:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- File:Paul Reubens.jpg: Unsourced copy of image that also appears at higher resolutions at, for example, tumblr_l7bytnMuUa1qa2rjoo1_1280.jpg via http://peeweesplayhouse.tumblr.com/post/970335614/paul-reubens-the-man-behind-pee-wee-herman and may have been taken from Playboy like the interview text (possibly Playboy volume 57, issue 8, September 2010, starting on page 39). --Closeapple (talk) 08:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
I am the original creator of this file and I deem it to not be of high enough standards for Wikimedia. Prod0016 (talk) 07:10, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Don't be so hard on yourself - it looks nice. As long as it's free licensed it does no harm for us to keep it; meanwhile maybe you'll make a new version and you can upload the higher-quality version to the same place. Wnt (talk) 00:43, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
The file is marked as cc-by-sa-3.0, however I see no evidence of such license for the file on the source website or elsewhere. Moreover, a version of the video is uploaded by simpleshow on their youtube channel (video) and is licensed under Standard YouTube License which is not creative commons or free by any means. CyberXRef (talk) 08:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: The source site is (C) -- in fact, it sells its works. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Restored. Now CC-BY. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:11, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
The file has an OTRS-permission, but it appears to me that the owner of the website it came from does not actually own the copyright. 1) It appears to be a satellite image. 2) In the upper right corner it has a german watermark saying "Verkleinern Sie die Ansicht für einen besseren Überblick" ("Zoom out for a better overview"). To me it looks very much like a screenshot from something like Google Maps. El Grafo (talk) 08:47, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- I uploaded the file after getting the otrs. I haven't noticed the problem stated above. You are probably right and just to be on the safe side, I agree that Deletion is needed. Thanks for your attention. Assayas (talk) 19:08, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
discoloured by Photoshop, better versions uploaded; Eric Timewell (uploader - deletion request completed by -Anna reg (talk) 09:41, 10 December 2013 (UTC))
Deleted: Next time, please upload the new versionover the old -- it saves both computer and human resources. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
this file must be deleted because it is inappropriate context. Go-Myanmar (talk) 10:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Looks OK to me. The "sink" is interesting. The name might be improved to be more descriptive. Wnt (talk) 00:50, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not own work. No evidence of permission from the central banks or banknote designers.
- File:10000 XPF Verso.jpg
- File:10000 XPF Recto.jpg
- File:50 FJD reverse.jpg
- File:50 FJD obverse.jpg
- File:20 FJD reverse.jpg
- File:20 FJD obverse.jpg
- File:10 FJD reverse.jpg
- File:10 FJD obverse.jpg
- File:5 FJD reverse.jpg
- File:5 FJD obverse.jpg
- File:2 FJD reverse.jpg
- File:1 FJD obverse.jpg
- File:1 FJD reverse.jpg
- File:2 FJD obverse.jpg
- File:5000 XPF obverse.jpg
- File:5000 XPF reverse.jpg
- File:50 SBD reverse.jpg
- File:20 SBD obverse.jpg
- File:50 SBD obverse.jpg
- File:20 SBD reverse.jpg
- File:10 SBD obverse.jpg
- File:10 SBD reverse.jpg
- File:5 SBD reverse.jpg
- File:5 SBD obverse.jpg
- File:2 SBD reverse.jpg
- File:2 SBD obverse.jpg
- File:50 SBD rev.jpg
- File:50 SBD obv.jpg
- File:20 SBD rev.jpg
- File:20 SBD obv.jpg
- File:10 SBD rev.jpg
- File:10 SBD obv.jpg
- File:5 SBD rev.jpg
- File:5 SBD obv.jpg
- File:2 SBD obv.jpg
- File:2 SBD rev.jpg
- File:1000 XPF rev.jpg
- File:1000 XPF ob.jpg
- File:500 XPF rev.jpg
- File:500 XPF ob.jpg
- File:5 francs Banque d'Indochine, Nouvelle-Calédonie (verso).jpg
- File:5 francs Banque d'Indochine, Nouvelle-Calédonie (recto).jpg
- File:5 francs Nouvelle-Calédonie (recto) 01.jpg
- File:5 francs Nouvelle-Calédonie (recto) 02.jpg
- File:500 VUV rev.jpg
- File:500 VUV ob.jpg
- File:5000 VUV rev.jpg
- File:5000 VUV ob.jpg
- File:1000 VUV rev.jpg
- File:1000 VUV ob.jpg
- File:100 VUV rev.jpg
- File:100 VUV ob.jpg
- File:200 VUV rev.jpg
- File:200 VUV ob.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 10:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by XXXLeoxXXX (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope.
- File:P-siamesa.JPG
- File:P-grabe.JPG
- File:P-emo.JPG
- File:P-cumbiero.JPG
- File:Dez.GIF
- File:P-zoro.JPG
- File:P-Ussop.JPG
- File:P-Sanji.JPG
- File:P-Pikachu.JPG
- File:P-rokero.JPG
- File:P-picolo.JPG
- File:P-Nami.JPG
- File:P-Luffy.JPG
- File:P-libra.JPG
- File:P-jitler.JPG
- File:P-hawkeye.JPG
- File:P-goku.JPG
- File:P-Dito.JPG
- File:P-chopper.JPG
- File:P-floguer.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 10:49, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete No aporta nada a ningun wikiproyecto. — ♫♫ Leitoxx The Police ♪♪ — 02:33, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete No educational purpose, no scope. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:53, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, not the best quality here, not in scope. -- Cirt (talk) 06:50, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, useless without File:P-vegeta.jpg.
- Just kidding, this is useless no matter what. 217.255.144.85 09:06, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:06, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sophieg044 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, logo/promotional material for non-notable company. Logo is UK origin and the shadowing effect might be just enough for copyright per COM:TOO#United Kingdom.
January (talk) 10:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: .. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Obs.: High wiki use. Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in 06.2007 by Supaman89 (talk · contributions · Statistics) this file was edited by Mexican IP 201.116.140.246 revealing in 2012 the original author = http://www.flickr.com/photos/39899488@N00/474047547 (04.2007, all rights reserved by "Eduardo Ramirez", high res version available). Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 11:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: It may once have had a free license on Flickr, but we did not capture that. It is now ARR. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:56, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Context of this seems to be a public event, and as such very much in scope. (Regardless of one’s views on the this kind of distateful and problematic events where pre-pubescent girls are so obviously sexualized.) -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:46, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- I retract my nomination then. --Mjrmtg (talk) 02:29, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:27, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above.
Unused personal image . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:47, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:47, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:58, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:51, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:51, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. 4ing (talk) 13:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above, and copyvio. Yann (talk) 12:51, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal foto, out of scope. El Grafo (talk) 13:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:25, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
unused personal foto, out of scope. El Grafo (talk) 13:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:52, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Dubious own work: magazine scans, certificates and similar.
- File:Shifu knives.jpeg
- File:University basel.jpg
- File:Duan-Wei-Graduierungs-Examen.pdf
- File:Regionalspitalzeitung 2003 No s 20.jpg
- File:Regionalspitalzeitung 2003 No s 21.jpg
- File:Shifu Damian Mohler.jpg
- File:Bai Si Tee.JPG
- File:2013WWMAC Dec5 Damien Mohler.jpg
- File:11 Seite aus PROMO Shifu Damian Tien Lung Benefit Weisser Ring Calendar 2014 Prototype -2.pdf
- File:13 Seite aus PROMO Shifu Damian Tien Lung Benefit Weisser Ring Calendar 2014 Prototype -3.pdf
- File:Kwok Seemo Kwok Tian Long.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 13:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins
[edit]Derivative work of coins.
- File:- Money 01 -.jpg
- File:Centimes euro vrac.jpg
- File:Euro muntstukken.png
- File:Eurobox Blue.jpg
- File:Le beurre et l'argent du beurre.jpg
- File:Wiener Schachtel.png
Stefan4 (talk) 10:53, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, what is the problem with derivative works of coins ? Lionel Allorge (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- You are not the copyright holder to the coins, so you can't upload photos of them. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:19, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, after reading COM:EURO, I believe it does not apply to my picture (File:Le beurre et l'argent du beurre.jpg) because the copyright faces of the euro are a very small part of my picture and therefore, De Minimis should apply. Lionel Allorge (talk) 14:04, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- De minimis doesn't depend on the size of the images but on the purpose of the photograph and whether the shown parts are above the threshold of originality. See for example this court ruling from the European Court of Justice. Showing coins is one of the main purposes of the image (the file name even mentions money), and the coins are clearly visible. The coins therefore do not satisfy de minimis. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:02, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, after reading COM:EURO, I believe it does not apply to my picture (File:Le beurre et l'argent du beurre.jpg) because the copyright faces of the euro are a very small part of my picture and therefore, De Minimis should apply. Lionel Allorge (talk) 14:04, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- You are not the copyright holder to the coins, so you can't upload photos of them. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:19, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins
[edit]Non-free coins. Some of them are tagged with {{PD-GermanGov}}, but as explained at Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review, that template can only be used for text. A coin is not text. Some of the images do not have permission from the photographers, which a coin always must have.
- File:1 Cent - Juan Pablo II (2002-2005).jpg
- File:1 Cent - Sede Vacante (2005).jpg
- File:1 Euro - Benedicto XVI (2005-2013).jpg
- File:1 Euro - Juan Pablo II (2002-2005).jpg
- File:1 Euro - Sede Vacante (2005).jpg
- File:1 eurocent 1 pfennig.jpg
- File:1-€-Münze.jpg
- File:10 Cent - Benedicto XVI (2005-2013).jpg
- File:10 Cent - Juan Pablo II (2002-2005).jpg
- File:10 Cent - Sede Vacante (2005).jpg
- File:2-€-Münze.jpg
- File:5 euro cent Slovenie.png
- File:50 cent coin SK Bratislavsky hrad.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 15:24, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Files in Category:Euro coins
[edit]Euro coins are not free for Commons: derivative works are not allowed if they are not in the "faithful likeness" and "not detrimental to the image of the euro". See also the previous discussions.[5][6]
- File:Austria 2e.gif
- File:Europa 2009 face.jpg
- File:Europa 2010 face.jpg
- File:Money - The last Cent.jpg
- File:Pièce 1000€ Côté Pile.jpg
- File:Pièce 100€ Côté Face.jpg
- File:Pièce 100€ Côté Pile.jpg
- File:Pièce 200€ Côté Face.jpg
- File:Pièce 200€ Côté Pile.jpg
- File:The Austrian 25 Euro bimetal coin 'Renewable Energy'.jpg
- File:The Austrian 25 Euro bimetal coin 'Year of Astronomy 2009'.jpg
- File:Tire-Euro-Bad.JPG
Eleassar (t/p) 13:33, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Files in Category:Euro coins
[edit]Non-free coin.
Stefan4 (talk) 15:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins
[edit]Non-free coin. One of the files can be saved by reverting to the original revision which doesn't contain any coin and deleting only those revisions which show a coin.
Stefan4 (talk) 14:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Reverted one per Stefan, deleted the other. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins
[edit]Unfree coin.
Stefan4 (talk) 11:19, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 00:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins
[edit]Non-free coins.
Stefan4 (talk) 21:18, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Delted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins
[edit]Per COM:DW.
Stefan4 (talk) 21:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:29, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Euro coins
[edit]Missing permission from engraver. See COM:CUR#Euro.
- File:1 euro 1999 España.jpg
- File:1 euro 2010 España.jpg
- File:1 euro 2011 estonia.jpg
- File:1 euro cent 1999 España.jpg
- File:1 euro cent 2010 España.jpg
- File:1 euro cent 2011 estonia.jpg
- File:10 euro cent 1999 España.jpg
- File:10 euro cent 2010 España.jpg
- File:10 euro cent 2011 estonia.jpg
- File:2 euro 1999 España.jpg
- File:2 euro 2010 España.jpg
- File:2 euro 2011 estonia.jpg
- File:2 euro cent 1999 España.jpg
- File:2 euro cent 2010 España.jpg
- File:2 euro cent 2011 estonia.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativa EURO 2012 estonia.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo 2009 austria.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo 2009 belgica.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo 2009 eslovaquia.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo 2009 holanda.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo 2009 italia.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo 2009 luxemburgo.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo 2009 malta.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo 2011 malta.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo 2011 portugal.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo 2012 monaco.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo 2012 san marino.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo 2014-1 malta.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo 2014-2 malta.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo EURO 2012 bélgica.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo EURO 2012 chipre.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo EURO 2012 irlanda.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo EURO 2012 italia.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo EURO 2012 malta.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativo EURO 2012 portugal.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativos 2005 España.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativos 2010 España.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativos 2011 España.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativos 2012 España.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativos 2013 España.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativos 2014 España.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativos EMU 2009 España.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativos EMU 2009 francia.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativos EURO 2012 España.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativos EURO 2012 francia.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativos ROMA 2007 España.jpg
- File:2 euro conmemorativos ROMA 2007 francia.jpg
- File:20 euro cent 1999 España.jpg
- File:20 euro cent 2010 España.jpg
- File:20 euro cent 2011 estonia.jpg
- File:5 euro cent 1999 España.jpg
- File:5 euro cent 2010 España.jpg
- File:5 euro cent 2011 estonia.jpg
- File:50 euro cent 1999 España.jpg
- File:50 euro cent 2010 España.jpg
- File:50 euro cent 2011 estonia.jpg
- File:Reveal-DX.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 21:12, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
There's no problem in using images of the designs of euro coins. I wrote the european central bank and various central banks of europe. The problem is when you use images of an specific web page. I made the photographs of every coin I uploaded. Euro images CAN BE USED because they DON'T HAVE COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS. European central bank even told me that I could use the images in their web page if I cite them as authors of it. That's even written in their web page!! For all those reasons I think that this topic MUST BE INVESTIGATED BEFORE DELETING THE FILES --Philloven (talk) 16:16, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Everything you say is true, but not the whole story. At the European Commission web site it says
- "Only the following reproductions are allowed:
- reproductions in a format without relief (drawings, paintings, films) provided that they are not detrimental to the image of the euro."
- "Only the following reproductions are allowed:
- This means that you cannot use images of the coins to create parodies of the Euro or any other derivative work. And that means that they are not free enough to keep on Commons. As you will see above, this has been well established over eight DRs. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:44, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- Euro coins are more complex than that. There is one common side, shared by all countries. The European Central Bank owns the copyright to this side of the coins and decides the restrictions, and the conclusion on Commons is that the common side is unfree. Therefore, pictures of the common side may not be uploaded to Commons.
- There is also a national side, for which the restrictions depend on the country of issue. For the national side of the coins, coins from Latvia are fine per {{Latvian coins}}, while coins from Finland probably are fine per {{PD-FinlandGov}}. Lithuania will introduce the euro on 1 January 2015, and Lithuanian euro coins will be fine per {{PD-LT-exempt}}. The national side of the coins from other countries are not fine, and can't be uploaded to Commons without OTRS permission from the copyright holders. The list above does not cointain any coins from Finland, Latvia or Lithuania. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:59, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
I asked if I could use the images to write an article in wikipedia and they answered "yes, you can if it is not detrimental to the image of the euro". The use of the image, as I used it, is not detrimental in ANY WAY to the euro. It's not a parody either. Yes I see it has been discused but I think it's a mistake. It can't be that the BCE itself says that the images can be used and we delete them based on interpretations. --Philloven (talk) 16:11, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- Commons requires that all images hosted here are free for any use by anybody anywhere. Your WP article may be perfectly all right with the Bank, but that is not enough to keep it here -- they must be OK with any use, even parody, which, obviously, they are not. You can probably use the images on WP:EN for a single article under Fair Use, but they cannot be kept here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 16:44, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
out of scope: used only on user page of user with no other contributions; deleted at en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AbbiePound JohnCD (talk) 15:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Low resolutions and no valid EXIF. The images are likely not own work.
Jespinos (talk) 16:00, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michepartik (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvios or out of project scope. Unused images.
- File:Stenope gk.JPG
- File:Jojolaculasse.jpeg
- File:Holybluesband-journal.pdf
- File:Holybluesband.jpg
- File:Voiliere-photo-org.jpeg
- File:Voiliere-journal.pdf
- File:Stenope.pdf
- File:Musique-grp.jpeg
- File:Licorne-revue-deco.pdf
- File:Licorne-photo-org.jpeg
- File:Kingkong-journal.pdf
- File:Gk.jpeg
- File:Gk-beurdin.jpg
- File:Georges-kirsch-gilles-bailly-(clp).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jespinos (talk) 16:08, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Low resolutions, PNG format or missing (or no valid) EXIF. The images are likely not own work.
- File:Edin Dzeko v Watford FA Cup.png
- File:Javi Garcia and David Silva.png
- File:Javi Garcia Man City 2013.png
- File:Widnes team away fixture v Wigan Warriors.jpg
- File:Wigan Warriors v Widnes 2012, Tomkins, Finch and Crosby.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 16:24, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 16:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 16:49, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Cover of a copyrighted book Banfield - Amenazas aquí 17:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
- No, no es un libro con copyright Barlaan
- Todos los libros tienen derechos de autor, ¿en qué te basás para afirmar que este no los tiene? --Banfield - Amenazas aquí 18:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Worldcat lists it as © 1989. [7] Of course, if it was under a free license, Worldcat probably wouldn't tell us. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 01:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily. Yann (talk) 17:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyvio or out of scope. Jespinos (talk) 17:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Nothing about the page this comes from suggests that the logo is anything but copyright. Non free file. Timtrent (talk) 17:24, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: It's probably PD-text-logo, but out of scope as not notable . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
no useful content, sexual exhibitionism - see for the username and other deletions of files of thi one-purpose uploader Andy king50 (talk) 17:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
_(9348048818).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(9348048818).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of the artwork, not a building or permanently in a public place situated object, so it doesn't fall under Freedom of Panorama CennoxX (talk) 17:38, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
_(9348048818).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
_(9348048818).jpg){kind=link}
Erro na descrição Pinhelense (talk) 17:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Sreejithk2000. Yann (talk) 12:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a press image. And the background of the image seems to be simply deleted, infering that the edges of the iPhone are looking a bit choppy. TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk) 18:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- The only elements from Apple's press image are the cameras and Apple symbol, just because it looks identical it doesn't mean there the same
Justin14 (talk) 21:36, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: It is identical to images that are all over the Web, right down to the different borders right and left. Taking elements from an Apple photo is a copyvio just as much as taking the whole image. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
source without a free license Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:55, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Low resolutions and missing EXIF. The images are likely not own work.
- File:Natalia Téllez.jpg
- File:CONDUCTORES.jpg
- File:Train en los Premios Telehit 2010.jpg
- File:PANDA PREMIOS 2010.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 18:32, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:21, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
photos prise sans permission Angel jezabel (talk) 18:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:06, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EffeminateNico (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works
- File:Logo Transilien R plan RATP.jpg
- File:Logo lignes l et u..jpg
- File:Transilien K Infogare - Gare d'Aulnay.jpg
- File:Transilien K Infogare - Gare de Mitry - Claye.jpg
- File:Transilien K Infogare - Gare d'Aulnay(1).jpg
- File:Infogare à Poissy..jpg
- File:Infogare Transilien J Poissy.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-mattbuck (Talk) 18:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: four on the grounds of quality -- no educationalpurpose. I kept the other three because I don;t think there is anything there with a copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused in personal pages. Ciaurlec (talk) 18:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work/inconsistent exif, per COM:PRP: Uploaded by Gilbert David Barbosa Fernandez (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 09.2013 who "suffered" recently 6 copyvio marks (Flickr, blogs etc., different exif), including File:Panorámica de Pacho (Cundinamarca).jpg, a collage of 2 photos of a panoramic of Pacho, Cundinamarca (Colombia): this one and 1 copyvio. The file was also apparently previously published via http://pachoactivo.blogspot.de/2011/04/mapa-de-pacho-cund.html (2011) = http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-seTFNEBT3I8/TZ-npEHGvxI/AAAAAAAAAEQ/hfyBwNmyo4c/s2560/SDC10184.JPG, even watermarked, without exif and not reaching the res. Obs.: Files with exif = "BlackBerry PlayBook " most likely his work. Gunnex (talk) 18:49, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:45, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:47, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:49, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:50, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:51, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:52, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:52, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:55, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Author died 1913 . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:56, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Author died 1913 . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of public domain status and no information on source or where it has been copied from MilborneOne (talk) 19:59, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Document probably does not have a copyright, but the photograph does. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely a crop, previously published via http://investblognery.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/mercado-5/ = (small res banner) http://investblognery.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/image0025b15d.gif (last modified: 2012) Gunnex (talk) 20:21, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cambrils
[edit]Possible copyvio: Antique Photo raises questions that the uploader is the author. Image taken from a website. Low Resolution.
Cameta (talk) 20:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 20:50, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:56, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2072 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
false authorship claims - not the uploader's own work: source with higher image resolution here High Contrast (talk) 20:52, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:56, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2069 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:31, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2069 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2076 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2080 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:45, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2070 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:47, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tripp Trapp
[edit]Copyrighted artwork by w:Peter Opsvik according to the supreme courts in Copenhagen,[8] Karlsruhe[9] and Oslo.[10] Norwegian law doesn't permit photos of copyrighted artworks without permission from the artist.
Stefan4 (talk) 21:08, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep A picture of a chair like this is not protected as far as I know. The rulings mentioned goes on copying the chair itself, not making a picture of the chair. Commons have a lot of similar pictures: Here the iconic Category:PH_lamps. Nsaa (talk) 23:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- See this PDF file, page 19, footnote 77. There it says that "online advertisements reproducing the so-called ‘TRIPP TRAPP chair’" (i.e. this chair) were found to violate the copyright of the chair. Dutch law, true, but the case was about the same chair. See also for example COM:TOYS. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:56, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep This are two pictures of the actual chair (taken in a private setting) and not pictures of a copy. All the court rulings refered to above is about making a copy of the chair, photographing the copy and then advertising and selling the copy, with a possible exeption for the information refered to in the footnote in this PDF file, page 19, footnote 77. This could be about using a picture of the Tripp-Trapp chair to sell a different product. On page 15 in the PDF file it says. Article 15a of the Dutch Copyright Act provides:‘Quotations from a literary, scientific or artistic work in an announcement, criticism or scientific treatise or publication for a comparable purpose shall not be regarded as an infringement of copyright, provided that: 1. the work quoted from has been published lawfully; 2. the quotation is commensurate with what might reasonably be accepted in accordance with social custom [...]; 3. [...]; and 4. so far as reasonably possible the source, including the author’s name, is clearly indicated.’. and in footnote 62 on the same page: in natural language usage, it is extremely important for a quotation that third-party intellectual property is reproduced without modification in identifiable form. As is made clear by the general examples cited in Article 5(3)(d) of the directive, according to which the quotation must be for purposes such as criticism or review, this is not sufficient in itself. There must also be a material reference back to the quoted work in the form of a description, commentary or analysis. The quotation must therefore be a basis for discussion’. As far as I can see it is quite legal to use a photograph of the actual Trip-Trap chair taken in a private setting when the picture is accompanied with copyright information and commented in a proper objective and neutral Wikipedia article. -- ツツ Dyveldi ☯ 08:27, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Commons can only accept images which can be used for any purpose. If the image only can be used in a Wikipedia article, then the "permission" to use the image is insufficient. About photos as opposed to real chairs, see this court ruling. Some random quotes of 11 words were found to infringe the copyright of the articles from which they were quoted because some of the quotes showed the creativity of the original author. These two photographs show what's so special about the Tripp Trapp chair, so the same problem applies here too. The EU court ruling is relevant to Norway because the w:InfoSoc Directive is part of the EEA treaty. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:04, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: In most countries, copyright gives the holder the exclusive right to make copies, including 2D copies of 3D works and vice versa. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
derivative of File:Galvan Prime2.png, which is a copyright violation El Grafo (talk) 21:09, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2076 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:49, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No reference of a publication before 1990. Eusebius (talk) 22:56, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Keep This picture was taken and published in "La Gaceta" (a newspaper form Tucumán, Argentina) in 1975 during the "Operativo Independenc~ia" (Spanish for "Operation Independence"). --Turkmenistan (talk) 00:49, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Thanks for the sourcing. Eusebius (talk) 07:51, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
I re-nominate this image because it has a Commons:URAA problem. Although it is PD in Argentina, in the US its still copyrighted until end of 2070 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 16:18, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Promotional picture for "Alarm für Kobra 11" – not the uploader's own work. El Grafo (talk) 21:23, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Magog the Ogre. Yann (talk) 12:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Lot of copies on the web, small size, no EXIF, probably not own work. Yann (talk) 21:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- The file was uploaded to the English Wikipedia in 2004. Already then was an experienced user. There is no evidence that this file is not his own work. Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 11:14, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: I galnced through the Web copies and found credits to Commons or our uploader. I think we can assume good faith for this 2004 upload. EXIF was just coming in back then -- it wasn't defined until 1998 . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
jest podwojny Sebastian Kuzma (talk) 22:08, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Google doesn't translate "podwojny", but I see nothing wrong here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Використання сховища як особистого архіва/Use as a personal archive Wikimedia Commons/Использование Викихранилища в качестве личного архива Максим Підліснюк (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- But you are using it. uk:Користувач:Олександр Ясінчак. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:33, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: In use . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license. The uploader added a CC license later. But I think thats a COM:DW of a copyritghed advertisement. JuTa 22:41, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Quite identical to File:Louis XIII par Milhomme.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 23:08, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
I uploaded this from af.mil in 2005 but I can't find it there anymore to prove it's a valid fedgov image. At least one source claims it's an AFP/Getty image. If no Fedgov confirmation is found it should be deleted but replace it in articles first. Denniss (talk) 23:11, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Comment What should a "Fedgov confirmation" be? --High Contrast (talk) 13:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- A version clearly marked as made by USAF personnell (or of similar fedgov service) found on a .mil site or on their Flickr streams. --Denniss (talk) 16:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely cropped, considering that the original frame is available via (example) http://www.jornalopcao.com.br/arquivos/files/Serrinha%20-%20vista%20aerea.jpeg Gunnex (talk) 23:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Useless image ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:27, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Useless image, questionable licensing ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:31, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:59, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Useless image, questionable licensing ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:32, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:59, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
JPG version uploaded at File:Ismail Yakubu 14-04-2012 1.jpg. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:47, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status: Photo of the Brazilian stadium pt:Estádio de General Severiano, uploaded in 2008. {{PD-old}}-fail as author is unknown. Fails also {{PD-BR-1937}} ("finished before January 1, 1937") as - per file description - it was taken/published in 1937. Source is "Escaneado de livro." = scanned from book. Alternative license via {{PD-Brazil-media}} (= +1 +70 = 2008) would result in {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Gunnex (talk) 23:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
It looks as if the website from which this image comes has a collection of family photos (or similar). Family photos are often unpublished, and unless this was published sufficiently long ago, it is therefore unfree in the United States, as explained at COM:HIRTLE. Stefan4 (talk) 23:57, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Taigariver (talk) 07:31, 11 December 2013 (UTC) NOTE I believe this file should not be deleted, as it is in the public domain in Finland, where it was created in 1940. I uploaded this file to wikipedia uploads, which was the wrong place, and also mishandled the copyright. Twice. However.. This file is I believe free to use as per {{PD-Finland50}}. It is not a work of art. The photo was created in Helsinki Finland by Jaakko Kuusisto (commercial photographer, deceased) in 1940. It was a publicity photo for a theater event. It has been in the public domain in Finland since 1990 and it also qualifies in the U.S., since it was PD before 1996. It is currently available online at archives of the Institute of Migration. If needed I can of course get permission from them to use it, but since the photo is 73 years old, I do not believe that is needed. Pls advise. - Many thanks.
- It is only in the public domain in the United States if it was published before 1 March 1989 (necessary but not sufficient condition). You have not proved that it was published before that date. The source looks like a page which contains a large collection of previously unpublished family photos. Some of them may have been taken by commercial photographers, but that doesn't automatically make them published. It is unlikely that the Institute of Migration holds the copyright to the photograph in the United States. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:02, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Taigariver says that this was a publicity photo -- that is consistent with her career as an actress and author. It was PD in Finland from 1966, so even if unpublished, it does not meet the second URAA test. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
The question is not whether publicity photos are published, but whether the photo is a publicity photo in the first place. The uploader has not provided any evidence that this is a publicity photo, but only linked to a place which hosts what looks like a collection of family photos. User:Jameslwoodward claimed that "It was PD in Finland from 1966, so even if unpublished, it does not meet the second URAA test" but he didn't tell what this means. The URAA test only affects published photographs, whereas all unpublished photographs have to satisfy the terms in {{PD-US-unpublished}}, regardless of whether they were in the public domain in the source country on the URAA date. Stefan4 (talk) 16:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
First: The second URAA test to which I referred is at COM:URAA. There is a more comprehensive test at Wikipedia:Non-U.S._copyrights#Four-point_test which doesn't seem to match Stefan's conclusion:
Four-point test
The answers to questions on this page help determine the copyright status. Answering these questions in order will lead to a conclusion in bold.
- Is the source country a WTO member or a Berne Convention signatory?
- NO: apply the test at Non-restored copyrights.
- Is the work copyrightable in the United States?
- NO: Are you sure?! The main exception is architectural works (i.e. buildings) constructed before December 1, 1990.
- Had the copyright expired in the source country on the date of restoration?
- YES: The work is probably in the public domain in the United States, but see "subsisting copyrights.".
- Was the work published before January 1, 1923?
- YES: The work is in the public domain in the United States, but may still be under copyright in the source country and in other countries.
- NO: The work is under copyright in the United States, and will remain so until at least 2019. See "Wartime copyrights" for a limited exception. [links adjusted]
This image gets a "Yes" to questions #1, #2, and #3, leading to the bold statement following #3 -- that it is PD.
Why does this not apply in this case?
Second: The woman was an actress and author. This looks like a publicity photo, which she certainly would have needed. The uploader says its a publicity photo. A larger crop at the source site appears to be signed by her -- how many family photos are signed? The fact that it appears on a site with other family photos doesn't say that it is not a publicity photo -- if my grandmother were an actress, one of her publicity photos would be among my family photos. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Question #3 says "probably in the public domain", but "probably" doesn't mean that it is in the public domain. Most importantly, the source country of a work is irrelevant to the copyright status of the work in the United States if the work is unpublished. This is shown at for example COM:HIRTLE, where the section "Never published, Never registered works" doesn't contain any exception for works from other countries. Also, if you go down to the "Works First Published Outside the U.S." section, you will find that the source country is irrelevant if the first publication was on 1 March 1989 or later (unless any of the "Anytime" cases at the bottom applies). This matter is also explained at Commons:Subsisting copyright.
- Note the text at the bottom of the page: "Kuvaaja: Jukka Kuusisto." (Photographer: Jukka Kuusisto). The text on the photograph seems to be Kuusisto, i.e. the photographer's name and not the signature of the subject of the photograph.
- Compare for example with e.g [11] ("Aira -Tampere-", clearly a photo studio and a city name) or this (contains a name, street address and city - clearly the photographer's contact information). --Stefan4 (talk) 22:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC)