Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/05/07
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![13 File:Buch "Hotelzimmer-Yoga" von Stefanie Arend, Schirner Verlag.jpg](#File:Buch_"Hotelzimmer-Yoga"_von_Stefanie_Arend,_Schirner_Verlag.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(533059254).jpg){kind=link}
_189-8979_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
_189-8974_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
_189-8972_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
_190-9004_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
PELKINMOJON Oaksyaqui (talk) 00:53, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Test/Vandalism. INeverCry 01:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Although the company is dated 1784, the date of creation/publication of the logo is not clear. On en.wiki the logo is being used under fair-use claims and even the unused previous versions have been deleted. See en:File:Svyturys_logo.jpg. The present file on Commons is unused and should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Also, the file certainly has wrong license here on Commons and file description says, it has been taken from Facebook by a new uploader who is perhaps not so well-versed with copyright laws. Rahul Bott (talk) 06:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, non-admin closure. The file has been speedily deleted (copyvio) by Eugene Zelenko. De728631 (talk) 22:32, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Although the company is dated 1784, the date of creation/publication of the logo is not clear. On en.wiki the logo is being used under fair-use claims and even the unused previous versions have been deleted. See en:File:Svyturys_logo.jpg. The present file on Commons is unused and should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Also, the file certainly has wrong license here on Commons and file description says, it has been taken from Facebook by a new uploader who is perhaps not so well-versed with copyright laws. Rahul Bott (talk) 06:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, non-admin closure. The file has been speedily deleted (copyvio) by Eugene Zelenko. De728631 (talk) 22:32, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Some doubts whether the Flickr-user is really the photographer, as the image likely dates to the late 1990ies (band was active until 1997), whereas it is labelled to be from May 2013 and was uploaded to Flickr only 4 days before upload to Commons. Eventually Flickr user (who has Flickr-uploaded 3 more images from the band) should be contacted for clarification. Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Flickrwashing of https://www.myspace.com/kevindanczak/photos/50843936/tagged#{%22ImageId%22%3A50843936} --Stefan4 (talk) 12:57, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:34, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by François Melchior as Speedy (Nonderivative) –moogsi (blah) 11:53, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Keep I missed and converted this to a DR instead of removing the template :) The user who tagged this speedy thinks it clearly surpasses the threshold of originality –moogsi (blah) 11:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Indeed... — François [Discussion] 12:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- It is distributed under the following license:
Copyright (C) 1998-2000. All rights reserved.
Graphic design by Alexandre Nakonechnyj (nako@openlink.com.br).
PostScript programming by the Lua team (lua@tecgraf.puc-rio.br).
Permission is hereby granted, without written agreement and without license
or royalty fees, to use, copy, and distribute this logo for any purpose,
including commercial applications, subject to the following conditions:
* The origin of this logo must not be misrepresented; you must not
claim that you drew the original logo. We recommend that you give credit
to the graphics designer in all printed matter that includes the logo.
* The logo can be used in any scale as long as the relative proportions
of its elements are maintained.
- In fact it seems that the threshold of originality is very high in US and other lands - by comparison with Belgium or France for example... Maybe there should be a new {{PD-shape-US}} or the like? Anyway for the moment I will remove the deletion template. — François [Discussion] 13:06, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- It's a very difficult issue. There is a tendency on Commons to apply U.S. standards to logos regardless of their origin. As you say, it is relatively high in the U.S., but really {{PD-textlogo}} is meant to be applied with respect to local laws. Unfortunately it's unclear to us where the threshold of originality for a logo is in many countries. In some cases it's low enough to practically not be there at at all. I'll leave this open for now –moogsi (blah) 15:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Circles and Text are {{PD-ineligible}}. {{PD-textlogo}} and/or {{PD-shape}} would be apply... -- Perhelion (talk) 10:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I uploaded that file and we are using it in many pages since Lua is a technology used by Wikimedia now. Lua is an open source project and the spirit of the license is CC, but probably at the time they created the logo such license didn't exist or they were not aware of it. I actually emailed them asking for relicensing but got no response. I tried...--Qgil (talk) 16:21, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: The nomination is withdrawn and there's no arguments in favour. It can be said that the license is in fact a reassertion of the moral rights that they already have with respect to the logo, and don't affect the copyright status. –moogsi (blah) 16:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Possible flickr washing. Only 3 images. Uploaded since 1 day. Alan Lorenzo (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Flickrwashing of http://perezhilton.com/cocoperez/2013-03-21-christina-aguilera-parker-the-voice-season-four-screening?photo=11#gallery --Stefan4 (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation, image available via http://photo.wenn.com/ Polarlys (talk) 20:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Coyrighted by the National Portrait Gallery, London. Pompilos (talk) 14:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 05:21, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Non free logotype. Uploader doesn't have permittion. – GeMet [talk] 20:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all JuTa 23:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright unclear, we do have SVGs. Fry1989 eh? 19:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all JuTa 11:43, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gediminas Monument in Vilnius
[edit]There is no FOP in Lithuania.
- File:Equestrian statue of Gediminas (8603522866).jpg
- File:Equestrian statue of Gedimino (8123186463).jpg
- File:Equestrian statue of Gedimino (8123200708).jpg
- File:Equestrian statue of Gedimino (8123202674).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 09:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 09:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gediminas Monument in Vilnius
[edit]The monument was compeleted in 1996 by Vytautas Kašuba (1915–1997). There is no freedom of panorama in Lithuania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2068.
- File:Gediminas and historical flag of Lithuania.jpg
- File:Gediminas Monument in Vilnius 01(js).jpg
- File:Gediminas Monument in Vilnius 02(js).jpg
- File:Gediminas Monument in Vilnius 2019.jpg
- File:Gediminas statue, Vilnius - panoramio.jpg
- File:Gediminas Statue, Vilnius.jpg
- File:Gediminas statue1.jpg
- File:Grand Duke Gediminas (27017950784).jpg
- File:Senamiestis, Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (100).jpg
- File:Statue Of Grand Duke Gediminas Vilnius (114085309).jpeg
- File:Vilnius - panoramio (16).jpg
- File:Vilnius - panoramio (17).jpg
- File:Vilnius 2013-05 (12664823514).jpg
- File:Vilnius Historic Centre-110896.jpg
- File:Vilnius Landmarks 103.jpg
- File:Vilnius Landmarks 36.jpg
- File:Vilnius Landmarks 37.jpg
- File:Vilnius Landmarks 38.jpg
- File:Vilnius Landmarks 39.jpg
- File:Vilnius Landmarks 40.jpg
- File:Vilnius Landmarks 90.jpg
- File:Vilnius Landmarks 91.jpg
- File:Vilnius Landmarks 92.jpg
- File:Vilnius Landmarks 93.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- See comment below file list ... SM:!) (talk) 07:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
It's a pity there is not more focus by some on progressing Lithuania to allowing FOP so that the great work of the artists, sculptors and creators of the country can be more widely appreciated and presented to the rest of the world in essentially a non-commercial environment. It is relatively much easier to delete someone's work from this forum than to create it in the first place, and in some of the photos nominated the work in question (eg Vilnius Landmarks 103.jpg) is not the primary focus of the image or the work is essentially in shadow so not a challenge to artistic content. From past experience it is probably a forlorn hope but reconsideration of the images included in the above list would be welcomed, not only by the photographers but by those interested on selflessly promoting the work of Lithuanian artists. --SM:!) (talk) 07:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- File:Gediminas and historical flag of Lithuania.jpg the monument is visible in the right; and the historical flag is visible in the left. Does it copyrightable? TentingZones1 (talk) 04:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 13:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
broken pic McZusatz (talk) 11:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
![11:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/05/07#c-McZusatz-2013-05-07T11:20:00.000Z-File:Buch_"Hotelzimmer-Yoga"_von_Stefanie_Arend,_Schirner_Verlag.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:19, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
![22:19, 10 May 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/05/07#c-Denniss-2013-05-10T22:19:00.000Z-File:Buch_"Hotelzimmer-Yoga"_von_Stefanie_Arend,_Schirner_Verlag.jpg){kind=link}
Same shot in higher resolution, but more cropped, found at http://www.toledoblade.com/Walleye/2010/07/13/Peralta-will-return-to-Walleye.html. So, both have obviously the same source, which seems to be unknown so far. It might be relevant to note, that all other uploads of this user were also found to be copyvios. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:19, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Appears blank, out of scope. Fæ (talk) 07:52, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Also the same file is uploaded under:
File:Al - 1.png File:Al - 10.png File:Al - 11.png File:Al - 16.png File:Al - 3.png File:Al - 6.png File:He's.png Sinnamon Girl (talk) 02:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Blank, out of project scope. Jean-Fred (talk) 18:55, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope. Jean-Fred (talk) 19:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused bad photo. Please protect the filename. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted Now a protected redirect. INeverCry 00:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Not educational. Probably not own work MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:33, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
It appears to be a screenshot of a television programme. Jespinos (talk) 00:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with OP --Sphilbrick (talk) 20:53, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work as claimed MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:34, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
This is about Category:Église Sainte-Jeanne-d'Arc de Nice A similar discussion was held in 2011 (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Église Sainte-Jeanne d Arc Nice.JPG). This church was designed by architect Jacques Droz who died in 1955. That means that his works are still copyrighted in France. Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama in France, so we can't host images that depict copyrighted works of French architecture. De728631 (talk) 19:45, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Below is the list of files:
- File:Choeur de Ste-Jeanne d'Arc de Nice.jpg
- File:Eglise sainte jeanne d'arc Nice.jpg
- File:Lintérieur de léglise Sainte Jeanne dArc (Nice) (5956931383).jpg
- File:Léglise Sainte Jeanne dArc (Nice) (5956931765).jpg
- File:Léglise Sainte Jeanne dArc (Nice) (5957146809).jpg
- File:Maquette de léglise Sainte Jeanne dArc (Nice) (5957491306).jpg
- File:Église Sainte-Jeanne-d'Arc Nice P1010415.JPG
- File:Eglise Jeanne d'Arc.jpg
_(5956931383).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5956931765).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5957146809).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5957491306).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Delete Agreed. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - undelete in 2026. russavia (talk) 02:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama in France, so we can't host images that depict copyrighted works of French architecture. Will be OK in 2026. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:31, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Personal photo, not in use. Alan Lorenzo (talk) 00:34, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
We have this seal in SVG format. Fry1989 eh? 00:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete SVG located at File:Seal_of_Massachusetts.svg--Sphilbrick (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:45, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree.
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Image states it was taken by an employee of the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. While some employees are federal workers, a number are contract workers or other civilian employees, and Smithsonian does not distinguish which is which when publishing images. Thus, it is not possible to tell if this image is without copyright (this also applies to the majority of other Smithsonian-created images we have). — Huntster (t @ c) 03:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- I agree, it should be deleted. I shouldn't have copied it to Commons. Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 03:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
duplicate, lower pixel count (also trimmed differently) of File:Cheese platter.jpg Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: higher pixel count, actually. Both files in use. Lupo 11:46, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The source page, http://sandraeichler.com/web/ says "Copyright© 2013 Sandra Eichler. All Rights Reserved." —teb728 t c 04:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of uploader, out of project scope. —Bill william comptonTalk 04:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
A white boy sitting on a black man's lap. I don't know how this is a "intercultural" depiction. No educational value. —Bill william comptonTalk 05:09, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Very poor description. "International students" from where? Where they are? What they are doing? and how this is relevant to an encylopedia. No educational value. —Bill william comptonTalk 05:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Unrecognisable man playing guitar. Out of project scope. —Bill william comptonTalk 05:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Unremarkable person. Out of project scope. —Bill william comptonTalk 05:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
File is a "courtesy of photography@latrobe.edu.au". It needs OTRS permission and a better description. —Bill william comptonTalk 05:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't think a photograph of an aboriginal boy peeking out of a window qualifies as an "intercultural image". Actually, I find it a little racist. No educational value. —Bill william comptonTalk 05:26, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete The photo is not racist, simply bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:00, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in the USA for modern 2D or 3D Art unfortunately. Only for buildings and for artwork installed before 1977. Leoboudv (talk) 05:40, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in the USA for modern 2D or 3D Art unfortunately. Only for buildings and for artwork installed before 1977. The artwork is the main object in the image. Leoboudv (talk) 05:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Not a simple PD-text logo IMO. Definitely copyrightable. Rahul Bott (talk) 06:40, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Modern copyrighted work; per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 07:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 07:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 07:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Protagonist - links im Bild wünscht keine Bildpräsenz bei Wikipedia Haraldbischoff (talk) 07:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unused; let's honor German personality rights. Lupo 11:51, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 07:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Protagonist wünscht keine Veröffentlichung bei Wikipedia Haraldbischoff (talk) 07:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unused; let's honor German personality rights. Lupo 11:51, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted.{{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 07:52, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Russia. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 07:53, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 07:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 07:57, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Yes_ you are right. But this monument is famous memorial of russian history.One of the world wide known symbols of revolutionary Petersburg.Hence that is PD indeed.Витольд Муратов (обс, вклад) 08:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The work of art was published in 1975. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 08:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The work of art was published in 1975. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 08:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The work of art was published in 1975. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 08:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The work of art was published in 1975. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 08:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The work of art was published in 1975. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 08:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The work of art was published in 1975. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 08:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The work of art was published in 1975. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 08:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The work of art was published in 1975. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 08:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The work of art was published in 1975. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 08:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 08:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Modern statue in Massy, France by French sculptor Alex Garcia, still living. No FOP in France. Lupo 09:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is modern (1999). {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 09:22, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 09:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 09:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. Clarissy. 09:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 09:26, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 09:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 09:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 09:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 09:32, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is modern. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 09:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 09:39, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The work of art was created in 1957. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 09:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
personal photo, out of scope, bad file name Mjrmtg (talk) 10:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope, bad file name Mjrmtg (talk) 10:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused composite image. Taivo (talk) 12:40, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The work of art is modern. There is no FOP in Russia. Clarissy. 10:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Small resolution. Missing EXIF. It is copyvio, a cropped version (compare the shape and the position of the clouds). Clarissy. 00:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of modern in Russia. Erected after 2006. No Panorama Freedom in Russia. A.Savin 10:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- The photo shows Kostroma university's courtyard, not just the statue! Zinoviev's statue stands in place of public resort and isn't the basic object of this photo! The main object - the bench in the foreground! :) See Article 1276 of Part IV of Civil Code of the Russian Federation: "Free Use of Work Permanently Situated in Place of Public Resort. Reproduction, broadcasting to the air or via cable shall be allowed, without the author's or other copyrightholder consent or payment of royalties, of photographic work, work of architecture or visual art, that permanently standed in places of public resort, except where portrayal of the work by such method is the basic object of that reproduction, broadcasting to the air or via cable or where portrayal of the work is used in commercial purposes." --Almapater44 (talk) 11:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- "...or where portrayal of the work is used in commercial purposes..." => freely licensed stuff must be eligible for commercial usage. Composition is imo way too centered and focused on the monument to apply de minimis here. --A.Savin 12:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unfortunately we must delete that. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of modern sculpture in Russia. This monument was erected in 2003. No Panorama Freedom in Russia. A.Savin 10:57, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
broken image. please reupload. ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpDestFile=RusEmb_-_Phnom_Penh.JPG&wpForReUpload=1 ) McZusatz (talk) 10:59, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
broken image McZusatz (talk) 11:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
broken image McZusatz (talk) 11:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused logo, probably copyvio Taivo (talk) 12:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Official university theater production group logo, no evidence of permission GrapedApe (talk) 12:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 12:48, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file is to be deleted, as wrong and replaced by a new one correct. I'am sorry. --Roberto.Amerighi (talk) 12:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Image does not meet the terms of the given licence and no evidence that original artist gave permission for the use of the image. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- License tag doesn't match the uploader's comments either, "Personally photographed the original painting with permission of the owner". There is no message on the uploader's talk page; has this user been contacted by email? ▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 07:15, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The photo is freely licensed, but the statue might not be. There is no description, so we have no way of knowing if the statue's creator died more than 70 years ago or not. (Greece has no freedom of panorama) – Quadell (talk) 13:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 13:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Simple text is out of scope. Fæ (talk) 13:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- This file has three copies:
Delete all Taivo (talk) 12:59, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image Taivo (talk) 13:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Blurry, unused, uploaded by single-purpose account with a history of copyvios. (See on en.wiki) – Quadell (talk) 13:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete! God knows why I transferred this in the first place. Regards, Plrk (talk) 12:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, bad quality, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 13:39, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image, bad file name, uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 13:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work. Stefan4 (talk) 13:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
This is an election poster in Iraq. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. Stefan4 (talk) 14:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
This is an image of election posters in Iraq. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. Stefan4 (talk) 14:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
This is an image of election posters in Iraq. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. Stefan4 (talk) 14:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work. Stefan4 (talk) 14:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Seems to be a copyright violation per COM:URAA. Stefan4 (talk) 14:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- Transfer notes: No adequate explanation is given in the file description regarding why this is PD in either Germany or Canada (don't know author, if it's an anonymous work, or publication date). Not transferred. Dcoetzee (talk) 19:47, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
This shows a building by architects Martin Robain, Rodo Tisnado, Jean-François Bonne, Alain Bretagnolle René-Henri Arnaud, Laurent-Marc Fischer and Gaston Valente. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. Stefan4 (talk) 14:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete The building of the European Parliament is very well an encyclopedic topic but then there's the FOP issue. De728631 (talk) 18:54, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The statue by ru:Ковальчук, Андрей Николаевич might be too prominent on this image. Unfortunately, there is only non-commercial freedom of panorama for statues in Finland. Stefan4 (talk) 15:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
This is a photo of an artwork in Mariehamn made by Allan Palmer in 2000. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. Stefan4 (talk) 15:15, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Clearly a copyrighted television screenshot, still has station bug in image Brianhe (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Likely screenshot from same TV program as this: File:Mh19x4x3.jpg. No reason to believe uploader was present to photograph the orcas, either. Brianhe (talk) 16:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
broken file. No permission? McZusatz (talk) 17:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Me he equivocado de foto. Grupodeproyectos (talk) 17:08, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photo. Taivo (talk) 14:16, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Me he equivocado de imagen. Grupodeproyectos (talk) 17:09, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Apparently a GoogleMaps screenshot, copyrighted. A.Savin 18:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Didym (talk) 19:15, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Didym (talk) 20:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Unnecesary image, it's only a logo made by a fan about a future evente that has no plans in the next years Duque Santiago (talk) 22:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
imho that flickr upload is a violation of privacy & personality rights of individuals not in public life respectively they would not have been asked for permission to upload as Common Share-Alike, Roland 22:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC) Roland 22:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Please read http://www.flickr.com/people/babasteve/ -- Steve is a professional photographer with quite a resume. Someone with the affiliations, etc he has, and the work he has done, would have consent. As to {{Personality}}, that is an entirely different issue which is dealt with by using that tag. As to educational value; all of his photos of people from around the world are of educational use. russavia (talk) 03:22, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(533059254).jpg){kind=link}
_(533059254).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
imho that flickr upload is a violation of privacy & personality rights of individuals not in public life respectively they would not have been asked for permission to upload as Common Share-Alike, Roland 22:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep FoP and personality rights in India closely follows the UK, so I see nothing here to worry about. This is not candid photography, the ladies know they are being photographed and pose for the camera rather than looking away, glaring, or covering their faces. My experience of photographing relatives, friends and strangers in India (away from the tourist spots), was that people generally enjoy being photographed and will ask you to take a photograph as a memento. Surprisingly, at a funeral pyre I put my camera away out of respect for such a private event, and the relatives immediately asked if I would take photographs as a way of remembering their mother/grandmother. --Fæ (talk) 23:15, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Please read http://www.flickr.com/people/babasteve/ -- Steve is a professional photographer with quite a resume. Someone with the affiliations, etc he has, and the work he has done, would have consent. As to {{Personality}}, that is an entirely different issue which is dealt with by using that tag. As to educational value; all of his photos of people from around the world are of educational use. russavia (talk) 03:22, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
_(533059254).jpg){kind=link}
_(533059254).jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Election posters
[edit]Derivative works.
- File:ISIE advertisement.jpg
- File:Iyad Allawi campaign - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg
- File:Joko-FX.jpg
- File:National Council Candidate, Sonam Yangchen, Bhutan.jpg
- File:Nouri al-Maliki campaign poster - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg
- File:Olivia-mitchell-poster.jpg
- File:Placa de propaganda eleitoral de Obama.JPG
- File:Shkoder 002.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 14:32, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Keep. Tell me why this is a derivative work? Have some logical foundation this your justification? HallelTalk 03:40, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- They are derivative works because they show election posters which were not made by the photographers. --Stefan4 (talk) 08:08, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:DW. INeverCry 00:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Enver Hoxha Museum
[edit]There is no FOP in Albania.
- File:ALB 20070713 img 1248.jpg
- File:Brosen tirana hoxha mausol.jpg
- File:Deti se klouzaji po stenach Hodzova mauzolea v Tirane.jpg
- File:Enver Hoxha Mausoleum 001.jpg
- File:Enver Hoxha Mausoleum 002.jpg
- File:Enver Hoxha Mausoleum 003.jpg
- File:Enver Hoxha Mausoleum 004.jpg
- File:Enver Hoxha Mausoleum, Tirana, July 2012, 2.JPG
- File:Enver Hoxha Mausoleum, Tirana, July 2012, 3.JPG
- File:Enver Hoxha Mausoleum, Tirana, July 2012.JPG
- File:Enver Hoxha Mausoleum.jpg
- File:Enver Hoxha planned mausoleum, now a night club. Tirana Albania (3940181642).jpg
- File:Mausoleum von Envar Hoxha.jpg
- File:Nekdejsi hrobka Envera Hodzi ve tvaru pyramidy, dnes disk.jpg
- File:Pyramid of Tirana.JPG
- File:Pyramida e Enver Hoxhës.jpg
- File:Tir-hox.jpg
- File:TiranaPyramideAusMarmor.JPG
.jpg){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 08:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 06:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:Ahonohai
[edit]Here are all files uploaded by user Ahonohai which are not yet presented for deletion:
They are both unused personal files. Taivo (talk) 13:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Dhirajsharmachd
[edit]User Dhirajsharmachd uploaded into Commons some photos, which are presented for deletion. Here are all his other uploaded images:
They are all unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 12:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 00459849ferrero (talk · contribs)
[edit]mass upload of useless screenshots
Didym (talk) 19:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abii marthu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violation. All images appears in http://www.skyscraperlife.com/city-versus-city/36267-guatemala-vs-el-salvador-13.html and on more results on a search using Google images.
- File:Teatro santa ana dos.jpg
- File:Teatro santa ana.jpg
- File:Palacio mpal santa ana.jpg
- File:Santa an night.jpg
- File:Entrada ciudad santa ana.jpg
- File:Edificios unicaes.jpg
- File:Palacio municipa navidad.jpg
- File:Santa ana cielo.jpg
- File:Interior Metrocentro Santa Ana.jpg
- File:Exterior Metrocentro Santa Ana.jpg
Alan Lorenzo (talk) 00:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abii marthu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status:
- File:Collage ciudad santa ana el salvador.jpg --> The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. No related uploads by user. Uploaded in 2014 most likely all parts grabbed from Internet, considering also (part) https://www.flickr.com/photos/ccader/399732417/ (2007, © by "Carlos E. Cáder").
- File:Coofffeee cup sa mtrcnr.png --> site screenshot, unlikely own work, may be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.
Gunnex (talk) 06:54, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adam10Rocks (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative work of a probably copyrighted work.
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete both Taivo (talk) 11:45, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
Jespinos (talk) 00:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Errol pierre
[edit]
These files were all uploaded by Errol pierre (talk · contribs). They should be deleted because there is no sufficient evidence the uploader photographed these images freely or obtained permissions for these images. --24.6.164.7 01:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. Random images taken from the net. Lupo 11:44, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by J'apprends mushagalusa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
- File:J'apprends and Yves.JPG
- File:Christian, J'apprends and Yves.JPG
- File:Les grand.JPG
- File:Between-us.JPG
- File:J'apprends ft James.JPG
- File:La roche ft J'apprends.JPG
- File:Les bogards.JPG
- File:Flackson ft Yves.JPG
- File:J'apprends ft Yves.JPG
Jespinos (talk) 01:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete all Taivo (talk) 07:47, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jovan Kevin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Pemandian 3.jpg
- File:Pemandian2.jpg
- File:Pemandian1.jpg
- File:Pemandian.jpg
- File:Penginapan Pemandian WW Kartini Mantingan.jpg
- File:Wana Wisata Pemandian RA Kartini Mantingan.jpg
- File:Pemandian RA Kartini Mantingan.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jovan Kevin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:51, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
out of scope
- File:Gsl-uca.jpg
- File:Google-cover.png
- File:Facebook-cover.png
- File:Afiche-flisol-2013.png
- File:Gsluca-radio-ysuca.jpg
- File:Flisol-sv.png
Didym (talk) 20:41, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MinorTardigrada (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own work. Varying resolution. Some look like TV stills. Only two have EXIF, but the EXIF seems to have been created by an image editor on the day the images were posted to Commons, so the EXIF can't be used to determine the copyright status of the images.
- File:Paavo 2012.JPG
- File:Manu82.png
- File:Paavo1995.png
- File:Demarit.JPG
- File:Puhemies Heinäluoma.png
- File:Rafael Paasio.png
- File:Arkki Kuusela.png
- File:Kalevi Sorsa 1975.png
- File:Jutta Urpilainen at Party Congress.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 14:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
All these images are of low resolution / low pixel count. It is highly doubtful that these images are the uploader's own work
- File:LG Dressta Dozer.jpg
- File:LG Dump Truck.jpg
- File:LG Group.jpg
- File:Liugong-CLG-418.jpg
- File:Liugong CLG-777.jpg
- File:CLG920D Excavator.jpg
- File:LiuGong Mini 6Ton Excavator.jpg
- File:Liugong Wheel Loader.jpg
High Contrast (talk) 16:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope
- File:Offline izwebz 2012.jpg
- File:Izwebz-2013.jpg
- File:Izwebz-2008.jpg
- File:Office stuff.jpg
- File:Php-mysql.jpg
- File:Psd2html + Wordpress.png
- File:Izwebz-logo.png
Didym (talk) 19:19, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by UrbanodallasR (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
- File:Alicia pietri.jpg
- File:7179g-nelson-merentes-venezuela.jpg
- File:Giordani-fidelvasquez.jpg
- File:Ministro de justicia.png
- File:Carmen-Melendez.jpg
- File:Esposa de carlos andres.png
Jespinos (talk) 01:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by UrbanodallasR (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Unused tiny and grainy photos, unusable and out of scope. And like above, not own works.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Looks like collection of advertisement, not own work.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
Jespinos (talk) 00:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete First mage used here which isn't definitive proof but does suggest uploader has to supply some evidence.--Sphilbrick (talk) 20:57, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
It was posted by a rival squadron as a joke, and it's purpose has been made. VFA-211JOPA (talk) 00:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Bad quality image, author requested. Better image exists. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:09, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Given source is [2], Author is stated to be ЦСКБ-Прогресс, so where's the evidence that this is PD-NASA? El Grafo (talk) 10:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
![[2]](http://tihiy.fromru.com/Rn/image_Soyz/perf2.gif){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 06:00, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
_189-8979_IMG.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_189-8979_IMG.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Reduntant. Almost similar picture with a bit better quality (clearer) is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
_189-8980_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
_189-8979_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 05:49, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
_189-8979_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
_189-8974_IMG.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_189-8974_IMG.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Reduntant. Almost similar image (clearer) is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:52, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
_189-8973_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
_189-8974_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 05:48, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
_189-8974_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
_189-8972_IMG.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_189-8972_IMG.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Reduntant. Almost similar image (clearer) is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:52, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
_189-8972_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 05:48, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
_189-8972_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
Obsolete; new version: File:Enrique Simonet - Marina veneciana 6MB.jpg Smnt (talk) 15:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:39, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Clearly an invalid license. Cover would be a design of the Israeli government so a 2d scan would be a derivative image that cannot assign new license rights to the person doing the scan. Spartaz (talk) 16:19, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:49, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
This is absolutely uncorrectly licensed. The design of the page is a standard format incorporated in the 1954 convention on stateless persons and clearly does not belong to the uploader. I suspect this should be PD as the overall design belongs to the UN and I doubt that a national crest would qualify in its own. Spartaz (talk) 16:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:06, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect license. This is a derivative image of a page that is owned by the lebanese government. Possibly arguable that this is too simple to be licensed but should either be PD or deleted the license doesn't belong to the uploader Spartaz (talk) 16:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect license. This is a derivative image of a page that is owned by the Egyptian government. Possibly arguable that this is too simple to be licensed but should either be PD or deleted the license doesn't belong to the uploader Spartaz (talk) 16:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:38, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Surely not licensed correctly. The scanner does't acquire a license through a derivative copy. The format comes from the 1951 convention on refugees so probably belonmgs to the UN. The design of the cover belongs to the French government but i suspect its not unique enough to be licensable. ?PD or delete but not to keep the license here, Spartaz (talk) 16:39, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:29, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
I believe this is misidentified as Queen Tiye--it is rather the iconic mask of Tutankhamun 67.241.183.89 16:45, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see [3] no evidence the uploader had permission to release it under a free license. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:05, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see [4] no evidence the uploader had permission to release it under a free license. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:05, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
not working, unused, useless, no cat, no encyclopedic value, etc Frédéric (talk) 18:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
No evidence that the author Matthieu Desailly agreed to publish his work under a free license. Pymouss Let’s talk - 18:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:55, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
unidentified logo, pure raster image embedded in svg, unused, useless, no encyclopedic value, no cat, etc Frédéric (talk) 19:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:06, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:30, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:30, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:29, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:15, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:30, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:15, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:31, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:31, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar picture which is a bit sharper is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:19, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:31, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:35, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant, almost similar to this. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:40, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:35, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
containing nothing but text, out of scope Didym (talk) 20:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:04, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Personal photo, no educational use. Rondador (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:50, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
puede causar problemas personales Uchiha Guilbeaux (talk) 22:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:48, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Low-quality image with no educational value. Commons is not your free personal webhost. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 23:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:32, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Untuk menjaga keamanan file dari penyalahgunaan. 180.251.173.215 08:24, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Comment I do not understand Indonesian, but the file is used. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- FWIW Google Translate says “To maintain the security file from abuse.”—Odysseus1479 (talk) 02:34, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Untuk menjaga keamanan file dari penyalahgunaan. 180.251.175.89 10:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: wat FASTILY 06:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use; unclear what the deal with the last deletion request was Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Pepito Tey (talk) 17:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Datei irrtümlich übermittelt. Statue befindet sich auf Privatgrund; deshalb bitte löschen.
Keep There is freedom of panorama in Austria. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Please delete. Sent by mistake. Statue stands on private property. Pepito Tey (talk) 14:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Don't open a Deletion request for your own uploads. Please use {{Speedy}} instead. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
While published on a NASA site, this image is Russian in origin and not freely licensible. Just because NASA publishes an image on their site does not mean copyright restrictions are automatically removed. — Huntster (t @ c) 02:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- I agree! because the image is licensed in Russia.SpaceRu 7 May 2013
- I added a second source. This one is clearly marked as CC-0/public domain. I don't know if it helps - if NASA lies about the copyright, this doesn't help either, but the copyright info is at least clear there. --Julian H. (talk/files) 15:06, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- That copyright (or lack thereof) refers to the book publication, being a production of NASA. Images contained therein may still belong to other entities, as is the case here. — Huntster (t @ c) 01:48, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. In this case, the copyright of these files should also be checked:
- File:Gagarin Vostok Flight Mission Profile.png
- File:M·48 Spaceplane Project Conceptions.png
- File:Post Sputnik Era Long-Range Ballistic Missile Evolution.png
- File:Object OD-2 conceptions.png
- File:R-2A missile.png
- File:Konstantin Rudnev.png
- File:Soviet ballistic missile development between 1946 and 1956.png
- File:GPN-2002-000184.png
- File:R7 Saturn I.png
- File:R7 Saturn I cs.png
- File:GPN-2002-000180.jpg
- (They don't necessarily violate copyright, but they might.)
- --Julian H. (talk/files) 05:32, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. In this case, the copyright of these files should also be checked:
- That copyright (or lack thereof) refers to the book publication, being a production of NASA. Images contained therein may still belong to other entities, as is the case here. — Huntster (t @ c) 01:48, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I added a second source. This one is clearly marked as CC-0/public domain. I don't know if it helps - if NASA lies about the copyright, this doesn't help either, but the copyright info is at least clear there. --Julian H. (talk/files) 15:06, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, what a mess. While I find it likely that NASA produced File:GPN-2002-000184.png and File:Soviet ballistic missile development between 1946 and 1956.png, I simply can find no actual evidence of NASA producing any of them. What puts so much in doubt is that NASA is stated as the source of some of the Soviet-era photographs, which, given the secrecy of the Soviet program, has zero percent chance of being NASA-produced. They have really done themselves and the public a disservice by not specifying sources for their material, but it really has only been recently that they've cracked down on unsourced material on their sites. — Huntster (t @ c) 06:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that these files are indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 00:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
A bunch of girls jumping on a seashore. This user has uploaded several images of black, aboriginal and Mongoloid people all with a same description "intercultural image"—none of them is of any educational value, IMO. —Bill william comptonTalk 05:40, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I like that. I added it in Category:Jumping females. There is only 1 more photo about more than one female jumping. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Het is de verkeerde naam dit is villa Mariaheuvel in Baarn Atsje (talk) 07:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I do not understand Dutch, but maybe Atsje wants to say, that this file needs renaming, not deleting. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Dit is niet de Zandheuvelweg maar de Zantvoortweg Atsje (talk) 07:39, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I do not understand Dutch, but maybe Atsje wants to say, that this file needs renaming, not deleting. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Non utilisé depuis plus de 4 ans. Alorange (talk) 08:52, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I added it in Category:Construction sites in France. Excellent construction site! Taivo (talk) 11:53, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 00:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
_190-9004_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
_190-9004_IMG.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Reduntant. Almost similar picture with a bit more light is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
_190-9006_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
_190-9004_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
Keep Kulmalukko says that File:Himmelsrichtungen_(Blinky_Palermo)_190-9006_IMG.JPG has an additional interest because it has more light, and, I suppose, he thinks it's interesting to keep it because shows clearer some details that in File:Himmelsrichtungen (Blinky Palermo) 190-9004 IMG.JPG are lost or more difficult to be seen. This is the reason not to delete File:Himmelsrichtungen_(Blinky_Palermo)_190-9006_IMG.JPG and I agree with him in not deleting it.
_190-9006_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
However, the ambient was not clear. Light was scarce and File:Himmelsrichtungen_(Blinky_Palermo)_190-9006_IMG.JPG doesn't show its scarcity, because it's clearer than the room actually was. File:Himmelsrichtungen (Blinky Palermo) 190-9004 IMG.JPG is a good complement because it's darker and therefore it matches better what the place actually was.--Pere prlpz (talk) 12:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
_190-9004_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
_190-9004_IMG.JPG){kind=link}
According to the link, this entered the public domain in the source country in 1998. That is two years too late: it remains protected by copyright in the United States for 95 years since publication. Stefan4 (talk) 14:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, but not for the reason given. The poster is actually still copyrighted in Switzerland. It is the work of Ernst Keiser (1894-1960).[5] However, it could be moved to the English Wikipedia, since it is PD-US-1923-abroad. (The poster was published 1920, not 1927 as the image description page claims.) Lupo 19:46, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I wish that people would provide accurate source information when uploading files... --Stefan4 (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- So do I. However, the 1927 date came from some undetected vandalism that I have reverted now.[6] Lupo 11:20, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- Just as an aside: if the author were unknown, it would have been published anonymously, and then it would have gone out of copyright in Switzerland at the end of 1950. See en:Copyright law of Switzerland. (Until 1955, Switzerland had a copyright term of 30y, then until 1993 50y, since then 70y, and all extensions applied only to works still copyrighted when the extensions ocurred.) But since the author is known, all that is moot here: the poster is copyrighted in Switzerland until the end of 2030. Lupo 19:46, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Feel free to add this information to w:WP:Non-U.S. copyrights. It affects the copyright status of many anonymous Swiss works in the United States and unless that Wikipedia page contains the correct information information, people may incorrectly try to delete a Swiss work as copyrighted in the United States. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- w:WP:Non-U.S. copyrights already mentions the 50y term, which is sufficient for correct URAA-determination of copyrights. Granted, it only mentions 50y p.m.a., but that kind of implies for anonymous works 50y since publication, as that's the usual way to treat anonymous works in most countries having a p.m.a scheme. Lupo 11:20, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- Feel free to add this information to w:WP:Non-U.S. copyrights. It affects the copyright status of many anonymous Swiss works in the United States and unless that Wikipedia page contains the correct information information, people may incorrectly try to delete a Swiss work as copyrighted in the United States. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- I wish that people would provide accurate source information when uploading files... --Stefan4 (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Frauenstimmrecht01.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=95886141){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 00:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
A cropped and downscaled version of this file is also available at [7], and the uploader seems to claim to be/represent the owner of that web site ("own work" given as source, but the web site owner "Liliputbahn im Prater GmbH" given as author). It is not entirely clear to me who copied from whom. Strange situation here, it would seem best if the company who owns that web site - if the uploader really represents them - sent an email to OTRS. darkweasel94 16:09, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
I am the author of the photo, the manager of the railway and the author of the company's website as well - all in one person, so there is no issue with ist. Thank you very much for supervising this subject anyway. Ronron1 18:34, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for clearing this up. I'm not sure if an OTRS email is necessary, since the version that's available elsewhere is cropped and downscaled, so strictly the entire image (in this quality and detail) hasn't been published elsewhere yet. What do other users (esp. administrators) here think? darkweasel94 20:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, email COM:OTRS FASTILY 00:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Restored by OTRS permission. --Krd 20:23, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
It looks like a scan rather than an original work Ralgis (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Does not seem as scanned for me. Look his contributions. He has uploaded a lot of Portuguese coats of arms. Taivo (talk) 14:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
This is obviously the logo of a private company and there is no evidence that the uploader has permission to release the copyright on it. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep This logo is so simple, that even I am able to do that! Taivo (talk) 14:19, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- Logo of a private company. No educational value, not in use on any WMF project in any capacity. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:53, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per previous DR resolved as kept two years ago. No reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:05, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- I believe if you actually take a moment to read my nomination you will find that I did present different reasoning this time. this is a useless promotional image not being used in any way on any project. It has no educational purpose and adds nothing of value. I don't believe the prvious discussion constitutes a permanently binding seal of approval for this to be hosted at Commons. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- You still didn't provided newer rationale. The WMF projects are not the only places where the file could be used. And, the two users involved in the previous DR (who voted as keep and who resolved it as kept) are admins. --Amitie 10g (talk) 07:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Anyone who can read can see that you are incorrect. This argument I made last time was that the image could not be released under a free license. One user argued that it was too simple to be copyrightable, and another user closed the discussion. That they werre or are both admins is not relevant.
- This time I am arguing that this has no educational value and is therefore outside of the scope of commons, and that it is entirely unused so there's no issue there. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- You still didn't provided newer rationale. The WMF projects are not the only places where the file could be used. And, the two users involved in the previous DR (who voted as keep and who resolved it as kept) are admins. --Amitie 10g (talk) 07:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- I believe if you actually take a moment to read my nomination you will find that I did present different reasoning this time. this is a useless promotional image not being used in any way on any project. It has no educational purpose and adds nothing of value. I don't believe the prvious discussion constitutes a permanently binding seal of approval for this to be hosted at Commons. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept I see no particular reason to delete this. While the subject does not have a WP article, it is mentioned on WP:EN and an article would probably be welcome.. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
It is a lousy image done in paint, low quality, is not used, and there are much better alternatives
(I created it) SuperJew (talk) 18:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The image is bad, but it is used in japanese wikibooks. Taivo (talk) 14:19, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- Then it should be replaced by an SVG/PNG version --SuperJew (talk) 15:38, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 00:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
ref. "National Army Museum Copyright", Roland 18:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The artwork is created in 1857 and published in 1858, clearly it is PD-old now. Taivo (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
imho not a 'panoramics', it's a collage, i.e. no sources given for the media used for, Roland 18:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Clearly stitched together from several photos, which are clearly taken at the same occasion and with the same camera based on the light levels, colour balance (note, for example, the cyan tint of the sky), sensor noise etc. We also have File:View from top of Mapungubwe hill.jpg by the same user, which is similar enough in character for me to believe on the balance of probability that this is indeed the uploader's own work as claimed. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar picture (a bit less blurred) is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:22, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Not equal. Even different focus.--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant. Almost similar picture (less blurred) is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- I (the author) agree.--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:32, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 00:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted modern architecture. Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not eligible for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 07:33, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Well yes... But only a small part is visible so I'm tempted to say de minimis here. --MGA73 (talk) 12:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- It's a small part, but the reason for taking the photo is "Das Grand hotel Bernardin"... --Eleassar (t/p) 12:59, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Keep - clearly de minimis.. --Sporti (talk) 07:31, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- It's very unlikely DM: "Copyrighted work X is a key part of the subject (eg it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing it would make the derivative work radically different, but potentially still useful." --Eleassar (t/p) 11:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Slovenia FASTILY 00:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Self-request for deletion as no longer wish to have the image featured on Wikipedia. -PZFUN (talk) 04:45, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Kept. CC/GFDL licences are non-revocable, and as this image is in use I decline the request. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
The is incorrectly licensed as this is clearly a work of art of the Danish government and as a derivative work the license clearly cvannot be assigned to the scanner just because they copied it. Spartaz (talk) 16:22, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 00:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Unneeded inferior duplicate by prefered fileformat File:Wappen dietkirchen.png and File:Wappen Dietkirchen.png -- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ 12:49, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Kept: In use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:27, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- That was definitely my last DR! Schnauze voll for ever. --
ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ℗ 00:43, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Uploader :
Unused inferior subsequently version of File:Wappen dietkirchen.png --Perhelion (talk) 08:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 00:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
This is the photo of the person, who has been considered as not notable in ru.wiki. He is Ukrainian and most likely he will not be considered as a notable in any other wiki. Sindar (Синдар) (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Keep In use on Ukrainian wikipedia. Also there is a diff between notable and educational. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 06:24, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not arguing. The ukrainian article was created in the same moment I made this deletion request. I guess we can close this one now. --Sindar (Синдар) (talk) 11:36, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 00:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Anne Frank
[edit]Images showing a woman born in 1929. These are protected by copyright for 95 years since creation in the United States as they were not yet in the public domain in the source country on 1 January 1996. Unclear if they are currently in the public domain in the source country. Some listed as own work by the uploader, but it is unclear how the uploaders would have been able to take these images in the 1920s, 1930s or 1940s.
- File:AFT.GIF
- File:Andrew Nicastro and Miep Gies.jpg
- File:Anne Frank portrait.jpg
- File:Anne Frank stamp crop.jpg
- File:Anne Frank-stamp.jpg
- File:DBP 1979 1013 Anne Frank.jpg
- File:Anne Frank stamp.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 13:59, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Probably true for the stamps and the logo (but for other reasons like all other German stamps). But what about File:Andrew Nicastro and Miep Gies.jpg. That photo was taken in 1996 and that's plausible as it shows an older, different woman (Miep Gies). --Kungfuman (talk) 16:33, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- I don't know how I ended up including File:Andrew Nicastro and Miep Gies.jpg in this deletion nomination. That one is a completely different case and more an issue of whether we trust an "own work" claim by a user who has only made one single contribution. Obviously a scan, but is it a scan of a photo or of a magazine? --Stefan4 (talk) 17:02, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 00:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
See User talk:Fastily#File:Andrew Nicastro and Miep Gies.jpg. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
