Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/03/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
|
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
|
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Belgium. This building has been designed by Léon Guiannotte (1891-1976) ; his work won't be in PD before 1st Jan 2047. Pymouss Let’s talk - 00:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
It appears to be a screenshot of a television programme. Jespinos (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mayli.colman (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
Jespinos (talk) 00:05, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 00:07, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JV01226IKROM (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 00:07, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:07, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kellyxalvador (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
- File:Kelly10.jpg
- File:Kelly11.jpg
- File:Kelly5.jpg
- File:Kelly9.jpg
- File:Kelly8.jpg
- File:Kelly6.jpg
- File:Kelly7.jpg
- File:Kelly3.jpg
- File:Kelly1.jpg
- File:Kelly4.jpg
- File:Kelly2.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 00:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khitiriketi (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of images.
- File:Kk00007512.jpg
- File:Kk 2 small.jpg
- File:Kk 5 small.jpg
- File:Kk0006231.jpg
- File:Kk00003.jpg
- File:Kk00001.jpg
- File:Kk00002.jpg
- File:Kk24.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 00:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:55, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution, missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 00:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:55, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:56, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:56, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:56, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ZubairAzizkhan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 00:34, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, only text contribution. Jespinos (talk) 00:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:38, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Parsa fakhari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 00:40, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution, missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 00:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 00:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:54, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, outside project scope. moogsi (blah) 01:29, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
The JPEG images have low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. The logo is likely above the threshold of originality.
Jespinos (talk) 01:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:58, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
Jespinos (talk) 01:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:58, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Larryluvlife (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 01:37, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:59, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Huntster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image is specifically credited to Lockheed Martin, not NASA. INeverCry 02:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Image is presumably copyrighted and should be deleted.--Craigboy (talk) 02:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I believed this was fairly straightforward, but in any case, there is no evidence that this is freely licensed. — Huntster (t @ c) 04:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 05:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Not a free photograph - from gallery's website. moogsi (blah) 02:55, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Please note that this image has been marked 'Public Domain' by the Yale Center for British Art. I will reconfirm with the curators. MarmadukePercy (talk) 03:48, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't see it: the "Public domain" link doesn't appear on the page unless you have javascript enabled. At their Using images page:
- The rights status or rights holder will be indicated by the linked text displayed immediately beneath the image. For further information on the rights status of the work shown and how available images of the work may be used, click on this text. If the work is in the public domain and/or images may be downloaded, a download link will appear to the right.
- Clicking on this link for this item brings you to here:
- As far as the Center is concerned, you may download and use the Center’s image(s) of works in the public domain for any purpose. You do not need to ask our permission or pay any fees to us to publish the image(s.)
- It seems this is compatible with Commons. However, back to Using images:
- Copyright in a work of art itself is distinct from any rights in the photograph/digital image depicting the work (where applicable) and may be held by individuals or entities other than the Center.
- And from their terms of use:
- The YCBA makes every effort to accurately determine the rights status of its works and images, but makes no warranties to this end. The user is solely responsible for the use of any images or data obtained from the Center’s site. See Using Images for further details.
- Clearly the bust is PD, the copyright status of the photo (by Richard Caspole) is less clear. It still seems like it's probably OK but asking the Center can't hurt. They're definitely more open with their digital images than most galleries/museums --moogsi (blah) 13:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't see it: the "Public domain" link doesn't appear on the page unless you have javascript enabled. At their Using images page:
They are more open about the use of their digital images than most academic sites, and that is true, in general, of the Yale University sites. I will check with the curators, but clearly if an image is labeled "Public Domain," it is referring not only to the bust but to the photograph of the bust, as well. MarmadukePercy (talk) 18:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I think so too. It seems like the photo probably comes from their imaging dept, so I do feel kind of dumb for nominating this now :) --moogsi (blah) 20:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Yale made the image and they've put "PD" on it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Not in scope. moogsi (blah) 03:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image, outside project scope. moogsi (blah) 03:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio. This image is not a proper image of VOA. According to Le Figaro, Crédits photo : Mitzban/AP. Takabeg (talk) 03:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Delete I've missed the "license laundering" by VOA when uploading. Materialscientist (talk) 03:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
¿Copyvio? Permission link is blank. On the page (footer) we can read: Copyright © 2013 Education News. All Rights Reserved. Alan Lorenzo (talk) 04:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Cover art of a music cd 188.104.108.71 04:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Changed to copyvio. – JBarta (talk) 04:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by INeverCry Morning ☼ (talk) 08:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
The file seem to have made-up OTRS ticket number added by first time user. Source file is copyrighted. Jarekt (talk) 04:34, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Same story with File:Shontelle L.jpg --Jarekt (talk) 04:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
copyviol from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=98804198 Threecharlie (talk) 04:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
copyviol!!! I doubt if the uploader has been in Iran for photographing the mockup and also he had been doubt that the Iranian military would have allowed. Threecharlie (talk) 04:51, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, {{Copyvio}}. The uploader has obviously tinkered with the metadata, and this is not his/her first copyright violation, so it seems rather deliberate. The original is http://i.alalam.ir/news/Image/650x375/2013/02/02/alalam-634954371144248791.jpg and can be found at http://en.alalam.ir/news/1442445, which carries a clear "All rights reserved" copyright notice. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 05:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:52, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Unremarkable person. File has no encyclopaedic value. —Bill william comptonTalk 05:05, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:04, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of uploader. Out of project scope. —Bill william comptonTalk 05:07, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:05, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Unremarkable person. File has no educational value. —Bill william comptonTalk 05:16, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:05, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
The German Wikipedia article says that he didn't come to the US until 1967. (Also inferable from the English WP article.) That said, this photo is not a US photo and thus is most likely in copyright in its home nation Prosfilaes (talk) 05:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:04, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
No reason to think the webpage this was sourced from has any sort of copyright claim to it. Year unknown, but surely 20th century. Prosfilaes (talk) 05:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Actually I erred when I submitted the image to the Commons, as it was over 70 years old when it was added to this repository, and thus in the Public Domain under Article 8 of Argentine copyright law. I have corrected the image's permission status block and removed the unneeded deletion nomination notice. Sorry for the confusion. HarryZilber 06:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 07:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:07, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 07:12, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:07, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Own work? Anyway, out of scope as it is. Yann (talk) 07:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:07, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
per COM:DW Morning ☼ (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Only applies if the the derivative work is identifiable!! How can you claim a copyright on a picture that has a blurred screen of a video which nobody can even identify? (just by visual elements alone, and without text, I dont think you can identify the original work whose rights are being "infringed") -A1candidate (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: DM . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Very blurry image Morning ☼ (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Retouched so it looks clearer, and the image displays clearly in the en:Jerome James wikipedia article when shrunken. Lpdrew (talk) 03:52, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:55, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
poor quality Rybec (talk) 08:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Lizenzproblem Xocolatl (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- There is no licence problem as this is not licensable: there is no art in this simple reproduction of a commemorative plate.--FLLL (talk) 12:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete That is plain wrong. This photograph is NOT a "simple reproduction of a commemorative plate", it is a photograph showing this monument among other things. --Rosenzweig τ 21:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- There is no licence problem as this is not licensable: there is no art in this simple reproduction of a commemorative plate.--FLLL (talk) 12:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Before taking decision on deletion, see discussion in [1]--FLLL (talk) 08:03, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Without question the photograph has a copyright. The only time we do not worry about the photograph's copyright is when it is a reproduction of a flat work of art that is itself PD. In addition, it is possible (although not necessary to my decision) that the monument itself also has a copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Lizenzproblem - das sieht nach einer Ansichtskarte aus, wer hat die Urheberrechte? Xocolatl (talk) 09:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Authorization given by Orna Marhöfer,1.Vorsitzende of the Jüdische Gemeinde Mannheim (JEWISH COMMUNITY MANNHEIM)--FLLL (talk) 12:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Who is the author of this image? Is the person you named the author or the author's heir? Or does she hold any copyrights for this image? If so, why? Why do you and why does she think that she is in a position to "authorize" anything concerning this image? --Rosenzweig τ 21:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Authorization given by Orna Marhöfer,1.Vorsitzende of the Jüdische Gemeinde Mannheim (JEWISH COMMUNITY MANNHEIM)--FLLL (talk) 12:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Before taking decision on deletion, see discussion in [2]--FLLL (talk) 08:04, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Lizenzproblem - wer hat das Urheberrecht? Xocolatl (talk) 09:34, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Authorization given by Orna Marhöfer,1.Vorsitzende of the Jüdische Gemeinde Mannheim (JEWISH COMMUNITY MANNHEIM)--FLLL (talk) 12:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Who is the author of this image? Is the person you named the author or the author's heir? Or does she hold any copyrights for this image? If so, why? Why do you and why does she think that she is in a position to "authorize" anything concerning this image? --Rosenzweig τ 21:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Authorization given by Orna Marhöfer,1.Vorsitzende of the Jüdische Gemeinde Mannheim (JEWISH COMMUNITY MANNHEIM)--FLLL (talk) 12:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Before taking decision on deletion, see discussion in [3]--FLLL (talk) 08:04, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Lizenzproblem - wer hat das Urheberrecht? Xocolatl (talk) 09:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Authorization given by Orna Marhöfer,1.Vorsitzende of the Jüdische Gemeinde Mannheim (JEWISH COMMUNITY MANNHEIM)--FLLL (talk) 12:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Who is the author of this image? Is the person you named the author or the author's heir? Or does she hold any copyrights for this image? If so, why? Why do you and why does she think that she is in a position to "authorize" anything concerning this image? --Rosenzweig τ 21:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Authorization given by Orna Marhöfer,1.Vorsitzende of the Jüdische Gemeinde Mannheim (JEWISH COMMUNITY MANNHEIM)--FLLL (talk) 12:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Before taking decision on deletion, see discussion in [4]--FLLL (talk) 08:05, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Lizenzproblem - wer hat das Urheberrecht? Xocolatl (talk) 09:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Authorization given by Orna Marhöfer,1.Vorsitzende of the Jüdische Gemeinde Mannheim (JEWISH COMMUNITY MANNHEIM)--FLLL (talk) 12:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Who is the author of this image? Is the person you named the author or the author's heir? Or does she hold any copyrights for this image? If so, why? Why do you and why does she think that she is in a position to "authorize" anything concerning this image? --Rosenzweig τ 21:12, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Authorization given by Orna Marhöfer,1.Vorsitzende of the Jüdische Gemeinde Mannheim (JEWISH COMMUNITY MANNHEIM)--FLLL (talk) 12:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Before taking decision on deletion, see discussion in [5]--FLLL (talk) 08:06, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
No real motive, out of scope. Jonund (talk) 09:55, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Keep. I reverted to the real motive. (The uploader seems to have uploaded a trashy version by accident) --McZusatz (talk) 11:48, 5 March 2013 (UTC)- Keep Ok, then I can withdraw my nomination. Modern buildings are indeed ugly, but as much as i'd like to see them all erased, I accept their presence on Commons. :) --Jonund (talk) 20:13, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: withdrawn McZusatz (talk) 11:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Private image. Out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 09:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
This file is in the public domain, because I didn't find any copyright notice for it. Interesting. sугсго 10:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Already seen this colorized pic : see File_talk:Solvay_conference_1927.jpg. Speedy delete ? Zeugma fr (talk) 13:21, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Colorization has its own copyright, so even if the B&W is PD, this is not. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:48, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
This file is in the public domain, because the photo is in the imdb profile of the actress sугсго 10:19, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Nice ides -- it would give us a lot of images, but it isn't accurate. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:49, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Btw, no related uploads by user, so these files, if they are in Commons, may coming from other authors. I checked Category:Mayagüez, Puerto Rico - but without success. The sunset might be originally coming from http://www.flickr.com/photos/josue_cruz/2203476990 (2007/2008, identical clouding forms). Obs. for eswiki-related user: es:Plantilla:Montaje fotográfico (derivated from en:Template:Photomontage) which allows to construct a montage for cities etc. locally, avoiding the procedure of providing relevant source/license and author information. Gunnex (talk) 10:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
A modern architectural work. Per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 10:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:18, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
A modern architectural work. Per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 10:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:18, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
A modern architectural work. Per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 10:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Keep - this bridge consists of a standard metal fence and a single concrete arch. I don't think any of these are distinguishable or complex enough to be copyrighted. --Sporti (talk) 13:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Keep - I agree with Sporti. --Miha (talk) 14:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- To me, this bridge seems like an individual creative work. It is clear that it was carefully designed. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:43, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Slovenian copyright for architecture is the most restrictive that I have seen. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:49, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
The uploader hasn't provided any evidence that the National Broadcasting Corporation indeed has released this document to the public domain. There are lots of renewal registrations for "Victory at Sea", so this is probably covered by one of those. Stefan4 (talk) 10:48, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- The Wikipedia article claims it's public domain but there's no reference. (I added "citation needed") It's listed here and there as public domain but again, nothing definitive. I did find this discussion however at archive.org where copies of the film are available. I'm not arguing one way or another for now... I'm simply commenting. – JBarta (talk) 14:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- A search for "Victory at Sea" at www.copyright.gov gives me a list of 170 different kinds of registrations. For example, RE0000088692 appears to cover the music in the first episode. If the broadcasting company somehow forgot to renew this image or if it was for some reason renewed incorrectly, then it's fine, but it seems a bit scary to assume this since there are so many different registrations which seem to cover many different things. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The license as given needs a source; that claims the copyright was otherwise valid but NBC explicitly has relinquished their rights. I think it's PD-US-not_renewed though; a renewal would be required and I see none on copyright.gov (and the records should be there). You can restrict the query for dates before 1954 (since the renewals come tagged with their original date); the music has plainly been renewed but I don't see any renewals on the visual TV episode itself. I would not distribute copies of the entire episode (due to the contained music) but I don't see an issue with the screenshot. It's possible we are missing something but given the ease of searching, it should be easy to disprove the license by giving a renewal number. I couldn't find any. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per Carl . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
out of com:scope? McZusatz (talk) 11:56, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete – picture of non-notable person. No educational value.—Bill william comptonTalk 14:26, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 17:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
respect privacy Electra1002 (talk) 12:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 04:10, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Most probably not own work. ALE! ¿…? 12:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:19, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
out of scopde, del on DE Nolispanmo 12:37, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:19, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation from http://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/photo/green-sea-turtle-swims-past-school-of-high-res-stock-photography/200070584-001 58.96.105.220 13:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:19, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Had been a derivative work of ([6]), which was deleted as "Media missing permission". Therefore, this image is lacking in permission itself. GrapedApe (talk) 13:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:19, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:19, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:16, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:21, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:19, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:29, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:29, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work. I am not sure if the base work is original enough to get a copyright. Yann (talk) 13:38, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
The OTRS ticket sender does not claim to be the photographer or copyright holder, only the person who is in the posesion of the photograph. Unfortunately that is not enough. Jarekt (talk) 14:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:23, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Unremarkable person. No encyclopaedic value. —Bill william comptonTalk 14:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:23, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Very sharp resolution and no EXIF data. Definitely a screenshot. —Bill william comptonTalk 14:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:23, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Logos are usually copyrighted and in my view it doesn't pass {{Textlogo}}. —Bill william comptonTalk 14:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:23, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ralgis as no license (no license) Jarekt (talk) 14:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily Morning ☼ (talk) 04:11, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
I uploaded this file and it is no longer in use or relevant to its original page or any other, thanks EricMachmer (talk) 14:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
I uploaded this file and it is no longer in use or relevant to its original page or any other, thanks EricMachmer (talk) 14:51, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 15:01, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Uploder requested deletion. See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#OTRS_request and ticket:2013021110005581. --Jarekt (talk) 15:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- same goes for File:Younes Burjawi Icon.jpg and File:Younes Burjawi 240.jpg. --Jarekt (talk) 15:07, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Personal unused image - out of scope. --Jarekt (talk) 15:05, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all - personal, unused, out of scope.--ukexpat (talk) 15:12, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused user photo. Out of scope. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Fastily: Personal unused images PierreSelim (talk) 10:13, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Outside project scope, derivative of Valve Software artwork. moogsi (blah) 15:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
This is a vanity photo of an individual who has no article anywhere in the Wikipedia Projects. There is therefore no educational use for this file. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 15:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:25, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
This is a vanity photo of an individual who is not stated on any Wikipedia project. This photo therefore has no educational purpose. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 15:51, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:25, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image, outside project scope. moogsi (blah) 16:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:25, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, mostly text contribution with some likely non-free images. Jespinos (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, copy from eswiki Didym (talk) 22:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:26, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
no es el tamaño ni la imagen que necesito CC356DT (talk) 16:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ronhjones Morning ☼ (talk) 04:11, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Note: This was a malformed deletion request by MichaelOnTheGo25 (talk · contribs). I am just cleaning up the request
MichaelOnTheGo25 (talk · contribs) states: "I am requesting the file be deleted because I uploaded a version with the background brighter by accident, so I changed the picture but the original that I didn't want uploaded is still archived so I am requesting this be deleted please so I can ONLY have the one I want online"
- DR fixer's comment - no comment, just fixing the deletion request. Storkk (talk) 16:50, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:26, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
It is not free under creative commons. It is a copyrighted image that I uploaded accidentally. ASCStaunton (talk) 16:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ronhjones Morning ☼ (talk) 04:11, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 17:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:26, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 17:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:26, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 17:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:26, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
The Ifni War was fought in 1957–1958, which is less than 70 years ago, so the claim that the photographer has been dead for more than 70 years is obviously not true. (User:Marocdima's original claims of having personally created the photo and being the copyright holder also seem rather unlikely based on their history of uploading copyright violations and the fact that the photo was available in higher resolution on other websites.) —LX (talk, contribs) 17:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied. (seems to be a copyvio) McZusatz (talk) 23:13, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 17:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
False authorship and licensing claims; actually a non-free Internet image grabbed from tobac.ma. Downloading the image from there with wget results in a file dated 2012-05-29 – more than half a year before it was uploaded here. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Highly likely not the uploader's own work: can somebody maybe find something that can proof a possible PD status? High Contrast (talk) 17:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:29, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 17:29, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:29, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Cronica Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 17:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Thumbnail size image widely circulating on the web in various forms and presumably originally a promotional image. No exif data, and highly dubious that this image was taken by the uploader. DAJF (talk) 17:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:30, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Highly likely not the uploader's own work: can somebody maybe find something that can proof a possible PD status? High Contrast (talk) 17:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:30, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
False authorship and licensing claims; actually a Internet image grabbed from ahlabaht.org, where it's been available since 2011-02-10, nearly two years before it was uploaded here. Most likely a scan from a book, based on the arabic text on the other side of the page visible through the paper. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:34, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:30, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 17:34, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:30, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Obvious derivative work Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 17:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution and the uploader's history of uploading copyright violations with false authorship claims. Looks like a scan from a book based on the visible wrinkles in the paper. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Released under cc-by-nc-sa-2.5-it according to Condizioni d'uso. Not free enough for Commons. Lymantria (talk) 17:40, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
I am not an expert of Wikipedia's copyrigth conditions. Excuse me. User:Nick.mon (User talk:Nick.mon) 14:03, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Released under cc-by-nc-sa-2.5-it according to Condizioni d'uso. Not free enough for Commons. Lymantria (talk) 17:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. I modified another picture without realizing that their origin was doubtful.--EeuHP (talk) 12:47, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Seems to be screen cap of BBC series 1990-1995 (see en:Hyacinth Bucket) Man vyi (talk) 17:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
The author worked for the Royal Navy (and possibly ordered this painting). However, the Crown Copyright applies to artistic works created by United Kingdom Government. Unlike the {{PD-US-Gov}}, where makes all the works from any federal employee be in the public domain, the Crown Copyright seems to work in a different way Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 17:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Tee artist was a war artist throughout the second world war working for Admiral Cunningham. Crown copyright applies specifically to war artists. This is mentioned in the biography of the artist and the painting is labelled up with the correct template. Victuallers (talk) 18:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Comment Can you provide a source for said statement? Thanks --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 21:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- this is the reference given in the wikipedia article for Ronald Victuallers (talk) 18:31, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Comment I assume you refer to served as official Admiralty artist to the Commander-in-Chief Mediterranean Fleet. If that means that his works were created by United Kingdom Government, it's fine for me. --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 21:57, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Ecemaml -- if a work created by a UK government employee is not under Crown Copyright, then what is? The "Government" doesn't actually create anything, its employees do that. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:05, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Provided by subject, but when I asked for a permission statement, it turned out this came from source subject to copyright. (A free image has been provided.) Sphilbrick (talk) 18:07, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:34, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Book cover copyrighted by the publisher. moogsi (blah) 18:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:34, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Htm (talk) 18:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree, not worth keeping. --Fæ (talk) 21:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Jarekt (talk) 03:40, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope Htm (talk) 18:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete agreed, as uploader. --Fæ (talk) 22:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Jarekt (talk) 03:40, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope Htm (talk) 18:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed, as uploader. --Fæ (talk) 22:55, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Jarekt (talk) 03:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope Htm (talk) 18:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed, as uploader. --Fæ (talk) 22:56, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Jarekt (talk) 03:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Htm (talk) 18:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed, as uploader. --Fæ (talk) 22:57, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Jarekt (talk) 03:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope Htm (talk) 18:52, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed, as uploader. An argument might be made that this shows a nice trail through the floating ice, but it would be marginal.. --Fæ (talk) 22:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Jarekt (talk) 03:43, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
MI PAPA PEDRAZA. DIONIS2013 (talk) 19:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 13:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Uploaded to Commons before being publish elsewhere. Yann (talk) 08:23, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
We have the Norwegian flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all JuTa 09:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 19:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 19:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 19:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Probably not own work: personality, small size. Yann (talk) 19:48, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Probably not own work: personality, small size. Yann (talk) 19:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Old image: not own work, wrong license. Yann (talk) 19:51, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Old image: not own work, wrong license. Yann (talk) 19:51, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Old image: not own work, wrong license. Yann (talk) 19:51, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work; scale models are sculptural works per 17 U.S.C. § 101. Previously kept based on nonsense argument with no basis in reality. The U.S. Copyright Office explicitly includes "scale model" as a category on its visual arts registration form; the U.S. Copyright Office Catalog of Copyright Entries is replete with models and scale models; and Monogram Models, Inc. v. Industro Motive Corp., 492 F.2d 1281, 1284 (6th Cir. 1974) found scale models to be eligible for copyright. See User:Elcobbola/Models for more explanation. Эlcobbola talk 19:55, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Keep the only possible copyright holder is Henschel as the designer and manufacturer of this tank. Did Henschel register a copyright for this vehicle? Any model of this tank is to be considered a derivative work of the original and used without permission then. --Denniss (talk) 20:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Registration is not necessary to secure a copyright. Tamiya, the model's creator, would hold the copyright, but even that doesn't matter per COM:PRP. Эlcobbola talk 20:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- If Tamiya registered a (doubtful) copyright then the image may be deleted, otherwise there's no valid reason to delete. --Denniss (talk) 11:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- A readily accessible example of a Tamiya notice on a Tiger I is here: "This kit has a copyright date of 1984." Tamiya routinely registers copyrights; the company has hundreds (thousands?) of entries in the Copyright Office Registry. It's laborious to search for the Tiger I specifically, but quick examples from the list of records are models of the Japanese battleship Musashi and Harley-Davidson FLH Classic (note, for example, that Tamiya and not Harley Davidson got the copyright). There's every reason to believe a diligent search would find the Tiger I, but it really isn't relevant because copyright attaches upon creation. Registration isn't necessary to secure the copyright. Эlcobbola talk 15:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- If Tamiya registered a (doubtful) copyright then the image may be deleted, otherwise there's no valid reason to delete. --Denniss (talk) 11:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss is not correct. The full size tank does not have a copyright and never did because it is utilitarian. All models have a copyright -- in some countries they are "sculpture", while in others, including the USA, they are explicitly named in the copyright law. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:09, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
No Freedom of panorama in Iceland. This building was first opened on the 23rd of April 2003. Snaevar (talk) 19:57, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete As the uploader I'm happy to see this speedy deleted based on this advice. I had expected that buildings would have been covered based on how FOP in other countries in the Nordic region is interpreted, so I am please to be put right on this for Iceland. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 21:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Jarekt (talk) 03:44, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 19:58, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:39, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Iceland. This is an image of the artwork "Sólfarið" by Jón Gunnar Árnason who died in 1989 Snaevar (talk) 19:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete As the uploader I'm happy to see this speedy deleted based on this advice. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 21:10, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Jarekt (talk) 03:45, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Iceland. This is an image of the artwork "Sólfarið" by Jón Gunnar Árnason who died in 1989 Snaevar (talk) 20:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete As the uploader I'm happy to see this speedy deleted based on this advice. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 21:12, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Jarekt (talk) 03:45, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for recent artwork in Iceland. Till (talk) 16:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- It was only temporarilly undeleted to move it to the Icelandic Wikipedia. Now that it's done it will be deleted within a few hours. --Steinninn ♨ 22:10, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted again by Ymblanter. --Rosenzweig τ 21:44, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Iceland. This is an image of the artwork "Sólfarið" by Jón Gunnar Árnason who died in 1989 Snaevar (talk) 20:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete As the uploader I'm happy to see this speedy deleted based on this advice. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 21:13, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Jarekt (talk) 03:45, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Photo of a photo, no source for the original. moogsi (blah) 20:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:39, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
I doubt we can trust the uploader on en.wikipedia. User has only few contributions years ago. Image has small size, it seems to be copied from elsewhere. Avron (talk) 20:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted work, presumed to be non-free, per COM:PRP, and per comment by uploader on image talk page. -- Trevj (talk) 20:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Two years later I still don't care either way. Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
The freedom provided by Section 62 does not apply to graphic works - such as a mural or poster - even if they are permanently located in a public place. These cannot be uploaded to Commons without a licence from the copyright holder.
Deleted: INeverCry 23:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
User has been asked in November 2012 if he works for the company. There was no reply. It is difficult for a private person to make such high quality photos of military weapons, so I doubt we can trust the user. Avron (talk) 20:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
User has been asked in November 2012 if he works for the company. There was no reply. It is difficult for a private person to make such high quality photos of military weapons, so I doubt we can trust the user. Avron (talk) 20:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
User has been asked in November 2012 if he works for the company. There was no reply. It is difficult for a private person to make such high quality photos of military weapons, so I doubt we can trust the user. Avron (talk) 20:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
User has been asked in November 2012 if he works for the company. There was no reply. It is difficult for a private person to make such high quality photos of military weapons, so I doubt we can trust the user. Avron (talk) 20:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
User has been asked in November 2012 if he works for the company. There was no reply. It is difficult for a private person to make such high quality photos of military weapons, so I doubt we can trust the user. Avron (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
User has been asked in November 2012 if he works for the company. There was no reply. It is difficult for a private person to make such high quality photos of military weapons, so I doubt we can trust the user. Avron (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
User has been asked in November 2012 if he works for the company. There was no reply. It is difficult for a private person to make such high quality photos of military weapons, so I doubt we can trust the user. Avron (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
No valid license. License not set by uploader. See history on de:File:Maiden Castle02.jpg.--Wdwd (talk) 21:13, 5 March 2013 (UTC) Wdwd (talk) 21:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep As the uploader corrected author and source with this edit after the license was added by another user, he very likely agrees to this license. --Didym (talk) 22:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
it is correct, i agree to the licence --Bkroll (talk) 20:58, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
We have permission for the photo, but do not have permission for the copyright two-dimensional artwork therein displayed. Diannaa (talk) 21:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:42, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
The Flickr uploader claims that there are "no known copyright restrictions". I don't believe this can be true for this 1938 photo taken in Germany. Rosenzweig τ 21:19, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:42, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
No longer of interest 2.97.3.37 21:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: nonsensical Tom (talk - email) 23:05, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 21:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:42, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
foto of a non-free design of chocolate bar pack. Abiyoyo (talk) 21:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete --Sasha Krotov (talk) 22:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC) (uploader)
Deleted: copyvio Morning ☼ (talk) 13:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
This image is said to be from ca. 1930, the author is not known, yet the uploader claims that the copyright has expired. How can he if he does not know when the author died? Also, most likely this image is still protected in the US per the URAA until 2026 or so. Rosenzweig τ 21:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Authorization given by Orna Marhöfer,1.Vorsitzende of the Jüdische Gemeinde Mannheim (JEWISH COMMUNITY MANNHEIM) --FLLL (talk) 21:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Why should that matter? --Rosenzweig τ 21:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Authorization given by Orna Marhöfer,1.Vorsitzende of the Jüdische Gemeinde Mannheim (JEWISH COMMUNITY MANNHEIM) --FLLL (talk) 21:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Before taking decision on deletion, see discussion in [7]--FLLL (talk) 08:06, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
1938 photo from Germany. Author is unknown, it is well possible that (s)he was still alive after 1942. Also most likely still protected in the US until 2034 or so. Rosenzweig τ 21:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- The same is true for File:Weinheim Synagoge 1938.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 21:38, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Authorization given by Orna Marhöfer,1.Vorsitzende of the Jüdische Gemeinde Mannheim (JEWISH COMMUNITY MANNHEIM)
- Who is the author of this image? Is the person you named the author or the author's heir? Or does she hold any copyrights for this image? If so, why? Why do you and why does she think that she is in a position to "authorize" anything concerning this image? --Rosenzweig τ 21:38, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Before taking decision on deletion, see discussion in [8]--FLLL (talk) 08:07, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
This photo is not in the public domain, and there is no permission by the author to upload it here. Rosenzweig τ 21:37, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- This photo is not eligible to copyright. It is not a work of art, but the copy of a commemorative plate.
- Wrong. The plate may not be eligible for copyright, but this photo is eligible for copyright. --Rosenzweig τ 21:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- This is not true. The court has always decided that it must be a work of art, that means that the author has brought his artistic knowledge (not a technical knowledge) , which is not the case in this photo.--FLLL (talk) 21:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- It is a not a simple 2D reproduction, but a photo taken from the side, a 3D photo in other words. That is enough to make it copyrightable. --Rosenzweig τ 21:54, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- It also shows more than the plaque of course. --Rosenzweig τ 21:55, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- This is not true. The court has always decided that it must be a work of art, that means that the author has brought his artistic knowledge (not a technical knowledge) , which is not the case in this photo.--FLLL (talk) 21:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Wrong. The plate may not be eligible for copyright, but this photo is eligible for copyright. --Rosenzweig τ 21:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- This photo is not eligible to copyright. It is not a work of art, but the copy of a commemorative plate.
To be copyrightable, it must be an art work. This is not an art work. Sorry. I am sure a court will not consider it as an art work. Don't be a quibbler --FLLL (talk) 16:52, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- You have very very strange ideas about copyright. Of course there are other things besides works of art that can be copyrighted. Photographs like this one for instance. That the plaque shown by the photograph may not have enough originality to be copyrighted does not mean that any photograph of the plaque can't be copyrighted as well. Please read Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag - not entirely on topic, but I think it should clear up some of your obvious misunderstandings. --Rosenzweig τ 17:28, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Before taking decision on deletion, see discussion in [9]--FLLL (talk) 08:08, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: The photograph certainly has a copyright. The plate probably has a copyright. The text also has a copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:11, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Useless (and bad) image of a unidentified place Yanguas (talk) 21:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:11, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
1933 photo from Germany. Author is unknown, it is well possible that (s)he was still alive after 1942. Also most likely still protected in the US until 2029 or so. Rosenzweig τ 21:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC) Before taking decision on deletion, see discussion in [10]--FLLL (talk) 08:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:12, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
this mosaic looks very cotemporary, making it copyright protected Vera (talk) 21:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm sorry. I see it's in a public place. --Vera (talk) 21:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Panoramafreiheit in Germany. The picture is photographed from the street. fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 21:55, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept, COM:FOP appliesVera (talk) 21:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Ca. 1938 photo from Germany. Author is unknown, it is well possible that (s)he was still alive after 1942. Also most likely still protected in the US until 2034 or so. Rosenzweig τ 21:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- As you mention, the author is unknown and it is possible he was still alive after 1942. But there is also possibility he has died before 1942. Who knows. To be sure, let say, he was 15 years when he took the picture,he could still be alive now and only die at 100. So to be sure, we must wait till 2100? That is totally stupid.!!!--FLLL (talk) 22:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Until 209
34 in that case, assuming the author dies in 2023. The possibility that an author died within a few years after taking the image is there, but it's not overwhelmingly likely. Not likely enough for Commons anyway. --Rosenzweig τ 22:12, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Until 209
- As you mention, the author is unknown and it is possible he was still alive after 1942. But there is also possibility he has died before 1942. Who knows. To be sure, let say, he was 15 years when he took the picture,he could still be alive now and only die at 100. So to be sure, we must wait till 2100? That is totally stupid.!!!--FLLL (talk) 22:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Then, please explain what is acceptable for Commons?. What are the acceptable criteria. If an author is unknown, he can be dead more than 70 years ago, he can be dead less than 70 years ago and have no heir, or he can be not interested by the copyrighting. Also, as being unknown, it is impossible to ask him his authorisation for publication. This could be likely enough.--FLLL (talk) 17:06, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Also, if this image has been used by the nazi propaganda, its copyright belongs to the Land of Bavatia and is in the public domain 70 years after its creation--FLLL (talk) 17:06, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- You have strange ideas about copyright. If an image was used for Nazi propaganda, that doesn't change anything about the copyright status. It does not mean that its copyright belongs to any state. (Did you mean Bavaria BTW? There is no state of "Bavatia", at least not in Germany.) Bavaria does own the copyright to the works of Hitler because of a specific court decision from 1946 or so, but even in this case the copyrights are still valid for 70 years after the death of the author (Dec. 31, 2015), not "after creation".
- As to your first question: Did you honestly never look what the criteria to upload files to Commons are, after all the years you have been contributing? That is a serious mistake. Please do so now if you don't want to risk being blocked for repeatedly uploading copyvios sometime in the future. The upload wizard says, as a rule of thumb, "usually over 150 years old". Works that are ok to upload may be younger, but you should be able to tell why they are in the public domain then. Usually that involves finding out the author and the year (s)he died, before 1923 preferrably. Perhaps later depending on the circumstances and the country of origin, international copyright can be very complicated. You should read the Commons policies and guidelines, especially those in the Category:Commons licensing help, and then act accordingly in each case. Or else refrain from uploading files with an unclear copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 17:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yes i have read the Commons licensing help. I have seen that for anonymous work, it is for Germany 70 years after publication (if author never disclosed) [11] and that there is also a Threshold of originality (Photos of memorial plates do not show originality)[12]--FLLL (talk) 18:53, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- But you obviously misunderstood it. That you don't know the author of an work does not mean it's truly anonymous. In almost all cases it simply means you have to do research to find out the author. And the threshold of originality applies to the plaque itself and to faithful reproductions of it, not to a photo like the one in question (which was done by somebody else). --Rosenzweig τ 06:32, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Dear Mr Rosenzweig: please read (I am sorry, it is in French) the court-case dated Oct 20, 2011 [13] from the French supreme Court of appeal: the photo of "two beheaded fishes on a plate" cannot be considered as copyrightable. (Note: it is a 3D object)!! But maybe due to the recent date of this judgment, it has not yet been implemented in Commons --FLLL (talk) 12:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- We're talking about German photographs here, so it doesn't matter what a French court says. Only German and US law are relevant for these cases. --Rosenzweig τ 22:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- If it is a German photo, I understand that German law is relevant. But why US law and not French? WP is an international organization. All countries are normally equal. --FLLL (talk) 07:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- Don't you know anything about Commons? It is Commons policy that files uploaded here must be free a) in their country of origin b) in the USA. WP/Commons is unfortunately not really an international organization, it is run by the Wikimedia Foundation in the USA. --Rosenzweig τ 13:36, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- BTW, I now a found a blog entry (here [14]) about this French decision, also in French, but easier to understand than the original decision which is full of legalese in French (as was to be expected from such a document). The gist seems to be that this is a decision about the idea for a photograph: A photographer takes two fish, arranges them on a distinct yellow plate, and photographs them for a book. Another photographer later takes
twosix different fish, arranges them on a yellow plate identical or very similar to that used by the first photographer, and then photographs them for a magazine. Then the first photographer sues the second one, essentially for stealing his idea. That description may be simplifying events a bit, but I think essentially that's what that French case was about. It was certainly not about someone reproducing someone else's original photograph without permission, which is essentially what FLLL has done here in the case of those photographs showing a street sign or a memorial plaque. So for the record, even if French law is not in any way relevant for these German photographs: The French decision cited by FLLL is not about reproducing an original photograph done by someone else, it is about recreating it with a similar photograph using the original idea. --Rosenzweig τ 20:28, 9 March 2013 (UTC) - Furthermore, it seems that the actual decision saying that the idea of fish on a plate etc. is not original enough (radically simplified explanation) is that of the Court of Appeal of Aix-en-Provence, one of 35 such courts in France. The higher-ranking Court of Cassation, who issued the decision mentioned by FLLL, is as I understand it only authorized to review decisions of lower courts for legal or procedural errors. Only if they find these, they can set aside (casser in French) rulings of lower courts. Apparently, they didn't find any in this case. So all this is is a single decision from one court among 35 such courts in France. --Rosenzweig τ 21:09, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: 1938 is way too late to make assumptions about the author's death. I normally use around 1880 as a safe cutoff -- photographer born in 1860, takes photo in 1880 when he or she is 20, lives to be 80, therefore dies in 1940, and the image is out of copyright in 2010 in most countries. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
The plaque may not be copyrightable, but the photo is, and I don't see any permission to upload it here. Rosenzweig τ 21:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Before taking decision on deletion, see discussion in [15]--FLLL (talk) 08:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:12, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Photo from Germany, date unknown, not earlier than 1906, probably as late as 1938. Author is unknown, it is well possible that (s)he was still alive after 1942. Also probably still protected in the US until at least 2019, depending on if it was published before 1923 or not, which is also unknown it seems. Rosenzweig τ 21:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Before taking decision on deletion, see discussion in [16]--FLLL (talk) 08:11, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:12, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
The sign may not be copyrightable, but the photo is, and I don't see any permission to upload it here. Rosenzweig τ 21:52, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Before taking decision on deletion, see discussion in [17]--FLLL (talk) 08:11, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:12, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Btw, no related uploads by user, so these files, if they are in Commons, may coming from other authors. Gunnex (talk) 21:54, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 21:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
permission missing Imagination0010101 (talk) 22:07, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 04:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
permission missing Imagination0010101 (talk) 22:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 04:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
permission missing Imagination0010101 (talk) 22:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- permission exists.
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 04:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
It was a test Angélica Maria Rodriguez Bencosme (talk) 22:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 13:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution, missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 23:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:49, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Copyright violations
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
CoA files from speedy-deletion. Reason was: Not 70 years PMA, see below
RE rillke questions? 21:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC) Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 03:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Changing from {{copyvio|Tous droits réservés - Arnaud BUNEL - 1997-2011}} because I don't agree. They all seem to be from before 1500 so the copyright would have expired. Arnaud Bunel's contribution is probably below the threshold of originality.
Stefan4 (talk) 14:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. FASTILY (TALK) 20:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I do not agree that these files are copyright violations. They are logos of the United States and look sufficiently simple, cf. examples at COM:TOO#United States. However, some can probably be deleted as duplicates.
Stefan4 (talk) 23:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Dupes deleted by User:Sreejithk2000. FASTILY (TALK) 20:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These were originally speedy-nommed because the Flickr license is NC. These are by a NASA employee, so the question is whether or not this negates or trumps the NC on Flickr.
INeverCry 19:51, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Keep. I uploaded these files on the basis that work by NASA is normally in the public domain and allowed here on Wikimedia. There is nothing to suggest that astronaut Don Pettit shot these pictures for private reasons using his own personal camera. If he intended them to be private holiday snaps he could have created a personal website and posted them there with copyright restrictions. In fact, I doubt his terms of employment at NASA would allow him to make pictures private that were taken from a NASA space station using NASA camera equipment. The pictures were posted at a NASA controlled website, not at Pettit's own website. They have all been assigned official NASA photo identifications (e.g. JSC2012-E-051505, JSC2012-E-051506, and JSC2012-E-051507) and some have been posted at NASA's main website – NASA.gov – where the usual freedom of use applies (picture at NASA's Flickr account; same picture at NASA's main website. Second picture at NASA's Flickr account; same picture at NASA. Third picture at NASA's Flickr account; same picture at NASA). I assume the employee at NASA who created the NASA Flickr account may not have known that he was setting a licence parameter that restricted image usage more than at NASA's main website. If the same pictures at NASA.gov cannot be used from NASA's Flickr account, that is inconsistent and makes no sense. O'Dea (talk) 03:32, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: per consensus to kept. Érico Wouters msg 02:56, 8 December 2012 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Speedy nommed as copyvios by User:Smial, but may be covered by FoP. Discussion seems like a better idea than speedy deletion.
INeverCry 19:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted the interior kept exterior as FOP. --PierreSelim (talk) 11:19, 14 January 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Original speedy rationale: Unfortunately, this artwork by Miquel Barceló is under copyright--User:LPLT (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
INeverCry 17:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
My pictures are the 4 first ones listed above. I would however demand that the same deletion rules apply to the following files, which don't even mention the artist's name. The US Mission should not be above rules that apply to others.
Thank you for your patience and your understanding --BiiJii (talk) 18:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
--BiiJii (talk) 12:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY (TALK) 02:43, 14 March 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Tagged for speedy deletion as copyvio logos by User:Ostiamare. Most of these look too simple to be copyrighted, but I'd like more opinions.
INeverCry 01:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC) Deleted -FASTILY (TALK) 02:43, 14 March 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Previously tagged as Copyvio by Ellin Beltz: © 2008–2015 Astronomical Institute of the Charles University, Josef Ďurech, Vojtěch Sidorin
Alan (talk) 21:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: CC BY 4.0. Alan (talk) 19:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These files was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Cropping out artistic parts of postal covers and stamps is strictly prohibited by PD-RU-exempt (read the footnotes about cropping). These artistic renderings by themselves are protected by copyright until expiration, and none are old enough to have expired copyright yet. Until such time, the artists of these works, like Pyotr Bendel and Anatoly Kalashnikov, retain the rights to these works.
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These three stamps were sent to copyvio, but I think they need to be discussed, because the argument presented is a little bit above the quick decision needed for CopyVio.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 04:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These files were initially tagged by Matthias Winkelmann as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F5}}{{SD|reason=No information is given regarding consent, and the tone of the description and the inclusion of "ex-girlfriend" in the filename raise the possibility of this being intentional harassment. Plus, it's pornographic and low-quality. User has about 80+ similar photos. The uploader (@Ulflarsen: ) asserts the following: "I put this picture up for deletion, to stop a speedy deletion. The picture is posted with the full consent of my ex-girlfriend, she know of it and is still doing amateur pornograpy with me now and then. If this picture (and my 90+ similar pictures) shall be deleted, then there are some tens of thousands of others that also should be removed, and Wikimedians would have to ask what other content that may be problematic, perhaps pictures of war?“
FredWalsh (talk) 00:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
The primary issue of this DR seems to be consent of the other partners, rather than scope or other topical reasons. I have kept those files for which OTRS consent has been received, and deleted one for which it cannot be obtained. If there has legitmate scope or other topical concerns, they can be addressed in a separate DR. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These files was initially tagged by Yinweiaiqing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: videos of performances captured by audience. missing permission from performers. They've sat in CAT:COPYVIO for a few days; converting to DR.
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:37, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Polarlys. --Minoraxtalk 04:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Appear to be from 1910s/1020s-era, likely a PD original (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ghidul Constantei si Tekirghiol.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:CityStudyCasinoArchive.jpg for evience of this timeframe and porential original being PD).
DMacks (talk) 11:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. While the text of the name list is not eligible for copyright, the photograph of the list probably is (barely). --Rosenzweig τ 07:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Copyright violations[edit]Converting these to DR since they've sat in the copyvio queue for a while. Gleb Leo tagged these as copyvio as apparently containing work by author not covered under the existing license template.
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination, no objection nor counterargument presented. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 11 November 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Uploads by User:Myrrine[edit]Source site: "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License." According to the uploader, he/she has the permission to upload the files under the provided license. User_talk:Myrrine#Non-commercial_use_is_not_allowed_on_Commons. --Polarlys (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Polarlys (talk) 18:07, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC) |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Synagogue_de_Rastatt_-_Vue_arri%C3%A8re_apres_la_Nuit_de_Cristal.jpg){kind=link}
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpDestFile=Main_Hall,_St._Norbert_College.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:Copyright violations
[edit]Speedy tagged by IP user. Wait: "Such booking photographs may be broadcast, published, and/or posted to a website in the normal course of business." is arguably a free license (although it does not expressly permit derivative works), and I will reach out to the named contact for clarification and to see if consent can be sent to COM:VRT.
- File:Rudolph Giuliani booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Scott Hall booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:David Shafer booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:John Eastman booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Sidney Powell booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Mark Meadows booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Ray Smith booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Kenneth Chesebro booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Jenna Ellis booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Cathleen Latham booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Floyd Harrison booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Noting that File:Donald Trump booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png should be restored if VRT permission is granted. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- These should be deleted, it doesn't seem like I'm making progress with the contact person, unfortunately. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trump Mug Shot.webp. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Copyright violations
[edit]No permission and no evidence of a free license.
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID4784-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID231357-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID5011-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID231466-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID231077-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID231370-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID11744-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID231354-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID4819-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID9495-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID231369-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID231102-av.jpg
Yann (talk) 21:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
بناءربرؤساء 84.235.91.59 02:01, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: incomprehensible request Masur (talk) 09:00, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fabrice Mickhael NYIKA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private pictures of user, out of project scope.
- File:MICKHAEL FB.jpg
- File:MICKHAEL DJ.JPG
- File:Fb dj fnika.JPG
- File:MICKHAEL.JPG
- File:MICKHAEL DJ FNIKA.jpg
Martin H. (talk) 05:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:03, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
The image ca 1900, from negative no. N-1740, is housed at Nova Scotia Archives and Management in Halifax, Nova Scotia and appears on their website. This image has definite restrictions regarding its use. It was lifted from the PANS website in 2007 and has been used without permission since that time. Dheffernen (talk) 13:20, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Image is stated to 113 years old - thus well out of copyright - there's a printed name and date in the bottom right, just under the houses - looks roughly like "J.Ir???? ?900" Ronhjones (Talk) 17:05, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Source states the image is from circa 1900, well before 1946, putting it in the public domain in the United States, and well before 1949, putting it in the public domain in Canada. 117Avenue (talk) 06:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 06:53, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Despite the recommendation to contact an administrator, I am posting another request for deletion. This photograph from the grain elevator was taken from the Public Archives of Nova Scotia website. To date, I have not seen any citations saying this image is being used with permission. Even though the image is over 100 years old and the copyright per se may have expired, some Wikipedia contributors display prevailing ignorance regarding Rights to Ownership in Canada. It is a valid concern and should be respected. Just because it is on the Internet does not mean it is free. I do not believe this photograph is available anywhere else other than the PANS website. Authors require permission to use photographs that belong to PANS. This photograph is one of them. Contributors to Wikipedia should be required to show more due diligence regarding copyright laws in Canada. Should anyone take the time to contact the senior archivist at PANS for permission to use the photograph, such use may even be permitted as a courtesy. First, though, you have to ask. If the administrator did not do this, perhaps someone else should be assigned for the task. Dheffernen (talk) 05:55, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep You've shown no evidence that Canadian copyright law protects this photo. Even if it does, it is Commons policy, Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag that we do not pay attention to copyright claims on copies of PD works, and it is US law that we don't have to.--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:47, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The Public Archives of Nova Scotia do not have the ability to place restrictions on the use of public domain photographs. Resolute (talk) 14:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, what do you think copyright has expired means? 117Avenue (talk) 04:00, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept All photographs from Canada taken before January 1, 1949 are PD. Period. see File:Canadian Public Domain.svg. No one can claim copyright in the image or restrict other people's use of it. If they do, they are committing copyfraud. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:Big Ben 2007-1.jpg
Files uploaded by Richard A. Buitrón (talk · contribs)
[edit]Impressive talk page: now 57 warning templates. After today identifying around 17 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different panoramio-/flickr-accounts, blogs etc.) it´s hard to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. There a also some montages (like File:Volcán Imbabura, en sus tres éocas al año, estival, invernal y veraniega.png or File:Parque Pedro Moncayo de Ibarra.png) with source/license and author information of every image used in this collage missing or insufficient, compromising the whole file. 1x historical image (File:Castillo del Cuartel durante la Independencia de Ibarra.png, "own work" from 07.2012?) which may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.
- File:Hornado en Ibarra.png
- File:Pastel de durazno ibarreño.png
- File:Diferentes tipos de cervezas en Ibarra.png
- File:Cuy asado de Chaltura-Ibarra.png
- File:Carnes al vino ibarreñas.png
- File:Arroz moro de Ibara.png
- File:Castillo del Cuartel de Ibarra enmarcado al ladod el pedro Moncayo.png
- File:Volcán Imbabura, en sus tres éocas al año, estival, invernal y veraniega.png
- File:Parque Pedro Moncayo de Ibarra.png
- File:Panorámica del Estadio Olímpico Ciudad de Ibarra.png
- File:Nogadas de Ibarra.png
- File:Jinetes de La Cacería del Zorro llegando a la Iglesia de San Agustín.png
- File:Helados de Paila en Ibarra.png
- File:Iglesia Jesús del Gran Poder-Ibarra.png
- File:El regreso a Egipto de Miguel de Santiago en el museo de la Catedral de Ibarra.png
- File:Diferentes tomas del Parque de La Merced.png
- File:Corrida de Torors en La Candelaria-Ibarra.png
- File:Corrida de caballos en la Cacería del Zorro de Ibarra.png
- File:Castillo del Cuartel visto desde Calle de Oviedo.png
- File:Castillo del Cuartel durante la Batalla de Ibarra.png
- File:Capilla Episcopal de Ibarra.png
- File:Proyección 3D de Céntrica Parque Bulevar-Ibarra.png
- File:Atigua Hacienda española a las afueras de Ibarra-Ecuador.png
- File:Patio interno del Conjunto catedralicio de Ibarra.png
- File:Patio del Claustro de La Merced-Ibarra.png
- File:Palacio de La Gobernación en Ibarra.png
- File:Morro de Tulcán y Parque de Las Caldas.png
- File:La Ibarra española de hoy.png
- File:Iglesia de Santo Domingo-Ibarra.png
- File:Iglesia de San Agustín.png
- File:Centro de Tuclán.png
- File:Iglesia de La Merced.png
- File:Cementerio de Tulcán 3.png
- File:Cementerio de Tulcán 2.png
- File:Catedral de Ibarra con el Parque Pedro Moncayo.png
- File:Fachada del Antiguo Colegio Teodoro Gómez de La Torre en Ibarra-Ecuador.png
- File:Colegio San José La Salle en Quito-Ecuador.png <-- valid CC-BY-SA-3.0 license on Panoramio
- File:Academia Aeronáutica Mayor Pedro Travesari.png
- File:Colegio Benigno Malo en Cuenca-Ecuador.png
- File:Patio de Comidas de La Plaza.png
- File:Castillo del Cuartel durante la Independencia de Ibarra.png
Gunnex (talk) 07:58, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This user should have been blocked long ago. Yann (talk) 09:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as per COM:PRP, except File:Colegio San José La Salle en Quito-Ecuador.png that has a valid CC-BY-SA-3.0 license on Panoramio. There may be more free images taken from Panoramio, but he should not have labeled it as "own work"! --P199 (talk) 05:50, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, indeed File:Colegio San José La Salle en Quito-Ecuador.png should not have to be included here, as I checked the file previously as valid... Gunnex (talk) 08:02, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:14, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wildcursive (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:DW
- File:Best Director Ang Lee Thanks TAIWAN for "Life of Pi" 李安以《少年PI的奇幻漂流》再獲2013奧斯卡金像獎最佳導演獎時謝謝臺灣.jpg
- Keep:This was a picture of "The Apple Daily" of Taiwan shot in a convenient store the day after Taiwanese Ang Lee awarded the second Oscar Best Director on February 24 2013. -- Wildcursive (talk) 08:26, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: This is a derivative work, thus, unless the the photographer have authorization from the copyright holder or the copyright has expired and it is in the public domain, it should be deleted. See Commons:Derivative works.--Koresdcine (talk) 14:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- File:臺灣黨外雜誌與黨外運動 TAIWAN's short-life Pro-democracy Magazines and Non-KMT Movement.jpg
- Keep:This picture was shot in TAIWAN's National Park for Human Rights. These are short-life Pro-Democracy magazines during the Martial-Law period in TAIWAN (1949-1987). All these magazines were asked to close during that period. So none of them exist since long time ago. And I don't believe our Government intends to keep any rights about the image as it is part of the civil education. That's why we transfer the jail to the museum. -- Wildcursive (talk) 08:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: This is a derivative work, thus, unless the the photographer have authorization from the copyright holder or the copyright has expired and it is in the public domain, it should be deleted. See Commons:Derivative works.--Koresdcine (talk) 14:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- File:江南案汪希苓 Introduction about state violence of 江南案 in TAIWAN's National Museum for Human Rights.jpg
- Keep:This picture was also shot in TAIWAN's National Park for Human Rights. The person in the introduction was a major general who involved a murder. I don't believe our Government intends to keep any rights about the image as it is part of the civil education. That's why we transfer the jail where he was to the museum. -- Wildcursive (talk) 08:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: This is a derivative work, thus, unless the the photographer have authorization from the copyright holder or the copyright has expired and it is in the public domain, it should be deleted. See Commons:Derivative works.--Koresdcine (talk) 14:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Morning ☼ (talk) 08:12, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious cases may use {{Copyvio}} Эlcobbola talk 15:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. For File:Lisbon Monatage.png a warning from 2011 was "resolved" with this edition. Btw, no related uploads by user, so these files, if they are in Commons, may coming from other authors. Obs. for ptwiki-related user: recently I created pt:Predefinição:Montagem fotográfica (derivated from en:Template:Photomontage) which allows to construct a montage for cities etc. locally, avoiding the procedure of providing relevant source/license and author information.
File:Evora-Montage.png=
Done --> [18]File:Porto montage.PNG= Done --> [19]- File:Lisbon Monatage.png =
Not done --> 1 file missing
![[18]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AEvora-Montage.png&diff=92007341&oldid=92002172){kind=link}
![[19]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3APorto_montage.PNG&diff=92008637&oldid=92002857){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 09:54, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
I just put the sources of all the montages; they all use commons images. I do apologize for my lack of diligence when creating the montages. I hope that my addition of sources will allow my montages to stay. Cheers and thank you, 207.62.201.30 16:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- File:Evora-Montage.png + File:Porto montage.PNG updated, File:Lisbon Monatage.png: 1 file missing. Gunnex (talk) 18:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- The missing file is http://i263.photobucket.com/albums/ii159/rubenbriosa/port145.jpg (last modified: 2008, credits: "Carlos Augusto Magalhães"), grabbed via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=602289 (2008) by banned user "ruben.briosa"... The original can be found here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/gutooo/253817980/ (2006) Gunnex (talk) 20:52, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Kept two, deleted one -- the pink palace is ARR. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:46, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Загружу то же изображение, но с лучшим разрешением! Metruka (talk) 13:19, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Загрузил то же изображение, но с лучшим разрешением и глубиной цвета! Metruka (talk) 23:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 13:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 00:45, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. Érico Wouters msg 20:47, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 07:41, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept see Bruno Ferrat . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:01, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 13:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image
Deleted: INeverCry 23:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
The bee in these photographs is out of focus. The pictures are thus not usable.
- File:Unknown insect 4.JPG
- File:Unknown insect 5.JPG
- File:Unknown insect 3.JPG
- File:Unknown insect 2.JPG
Leyo 16:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:26, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SergiiLogunov (talk · contribs)
[edit]The images appear to be screenshots of non-free content.
- File:Ispit dla vladi2.png
- File:Na zviazky iz uradom.png
- File:Ispit dla vladi.png
- File:Afterlife logo.jpg
- File:Shuster studio.png
- File:Shuster adrenalin.jpg
- File:Shuster logo2.jpg
- File:Shuster logo.jpg
- File:Pidsumki air.jpg
- File:Magia cirky.jpg
- File:Faces of ukraine nut.jpg
- File:For independence ntu.jpg
- File:Faces history nut.jpg
- File:20 steps dream nut.jpg
- File:A629e6bcec30d849a89a2951568a1210df7e7e11.jpg
- File:Site ntu.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 17:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Nothing in the Crónica site states what the template claims. The text in Spanish quoted just says that it's possible for anyone create a link from their site to the Crónica site. Therefore, the license is far from being valid Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 17:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Invalid license. Alan Lorenzo (talk) 19:22, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 17:34, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Usman afif (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, outside project scope.
- File:Afifusman-bali.jpg
- File:Afif-weri-dakoy.jpg
- File:Afif-malaysia.jpg
- File:Afif-holiday-bali.jpg
- File:Afif-holland-jersey.jpg
- File:Afif fany bali.jpg
moogsi (blah) 18:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Santer blok (talk · contribs)
[edit]questionable authorship - no EXIF - cropped images - File:Emiliana cantone.png can be seen on Facebook in a smaller version but uncropped - File:Natale galletta.png is obviously cropped from another image
INeverCry 18:05, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 05:43, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Héctor Díaz Polanco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some copyrighted press photos and images of indeterminate origin. No indication that the uploader is the copyright holder of the images, even if he is the subject.
- File:Díaz-Polanco y López Obrador Auditorio 20 mar 2011.jpg
- File:Díaz-Polanco AMLO Octavio 1 - copia.jpg
- File:Díaz-Polanco y López Obrador 4.png
- File:Díaz-Polanco y López Obrador Indianilla 3.png
- File:Díaz-Polanco y López Obrador Indianilla 4.png
- File:Armando Bartra, López Obrador, Díaz-Polanco y Víctor Suárez.jpg
- File:Díaz-Polanco 1b2.jpg
- File:Díaz-Polanco 4.JPG
- File:Díaz-Polanco 5.jpg
- File:Díaz-Polanco 2.JPG
- File:Díaz-Polanco 3.jpg
- File:Diaz-Polanco 1.jpg
moogsi (blah) 18:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:35, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Seems unlikely to be own work. moogsi (blah) 18:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Response
[edit]
Need alternative, then. Preferably something NOT subject to ANY copyright.
Had to edit an image obtained from elsewhere using MSPaint to get that one.
Are ALL images of Glen Larson ALWAYS subject to INFLEXIBLE copyright?
That may not make any sense.
Parker Gabriel (talk) 08:21, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- If there are no free images of Larson, you can upload this to Wikipedia as fair use. There is a bot to do this automatically. Use {{Fair use delete}} on the file. Commons:Fair use explains some more --moogsi (blah) 11:50, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:36, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Inconsistency in whether the atom labels C and H are shown. {{BadJPG}} and orphaned. Leyo 19:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Is there a real alternative for this picture? I don't think the 'inconsistency' is a problem: the picture just uses a different level of detail for different parts of the molecule. Pbech (talk) 20:19, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: See 86 files in Category:Triglycerides . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
- None of which offers the same schematic view... My question wasn't entirely rhetorical, but this is not an answer. Pbech (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Syed.sarwatt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, outside project scope. Mobile test uploads?
- File:Lead Photo For صفحہ اول0-21015439415350556.jpg
- File:Lead Photo For صفحہ اول0-9553532409481704.jpg
moogsi (blah) 19:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Infringement of copyright, for which the current holder of licenses to use the logo - Česká televize - paid over 400 000 CZK (Resource: http://www.mediar.cz/podivejte-se-nove-logo-ceske-televize-od-studia-najbrt/). Properly licensed logo as a replacement can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:%C4%8CT1_logo.svg Dvorapa (talk) 19:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- It's too simple for copyright, though it should still be deleted and the SVG brought down here. Fry1989 eh? 21:30, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
The same applies to
--Mormegil (talk) 10:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- Both also too simple for copyright. Fry1989 eh? 18:06, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: PD text logo . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
SVG at File:ČT1 logo 2012.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:57, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:25, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andresfelipetamr (talk · contribs)
[edit]4 sports team logos and 4 Colombian govt images uploaded as own work
- File:LBEB.png
- File:Logo LCBP.svg
- File:Pumas.svg
- File:Aa.png
- File:Escudo defensa civil.jpg
- File:LOGOTIPO DEFENSA CIVIL Colombiana.svg
- File:LOGO DEFENSA CIVIL.svg
- File:LOGOTIPO DEFENSA CIVIL.svg
moogsi (blah) 19:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
We have an SVG of the Croatian coat of arms. Fry1989 eh? 20:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, this one is different. Animal on the right is not black, but yellow. --WhiteWriter speaks 20:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- That can be changed on the SVG if there is a source that the animal is the wrong colour. Fry1989 eh? 00:14, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, actually, i dont know which color is right... Maybe someone should ask on en wiki WikiProject Croatia. Maybe they know... --WhiteWriter speaks 00:44, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- That can be changed on the SVG if there is a source that the animal is the wrong colour. Fry1989 eh? 00:14, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Unlcear which is correct, so keep both . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Re-nominatiing. The keep reason is not really relevant. If the uploader has a source for a different colour, he can provide it and it will be applied to the SVG. If the uploader doesn't have a source, this is a personal augmentation and out of scope. The section in question is the coat of arms of Slavonia, which is emblazoned "a marten proper courant". Proper means as it appears, and the animal is brown. Also the Croatian Government's main site shows the animal brown as on the SVG. We don't need to keep an un-used, un-sourced JPG. Fry1989 eh? 17:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:53, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Agonzalez2013 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 20:38, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Denisse Yanovich as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: I request that this image be deleted because it is protected under copyright (derecho de autor) laws in the country of origin of Gabriel Silva Lujan, Colombia. According to Law 23, 1982 of Colombia, a protected work (obra) is any personal expresion manifested in a perceptible and original way and susceptible of being published or divulged (Toda expresion personal de la inteligencia manifestada en forma perceptible y original y susceptible a ser divulgada o reproducida) This signature is a personal manifestation of identity and us such is protected. FASTILY (TALK) 21:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: see Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-signature_tag . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photos by Istolethetv
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 21:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Comment In the first photo, I had thought that De minimis may apply, but as they are all the same toy, I'm not sure. --Fæ (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
There is no entry for the United Arab Emirates at COM:CUR, so I would assume that coins are copyrighted.
- File:1 dirham UAE ob.jpg
- File:1 dirham UAE rev.jpg
- File:50 fils UAE ob.jpg
- File:50 fils UAE rev.jpg
- File:Dirham2.jpg
- File:UAE 1 dirham.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 22:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:44, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kristijannn (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of promo/fan photos, no own work.
- File:Jujujujuju.jpg
- File:Martinaggg.jpg
- File:Dejan od stihovbno.jpg
- File:Koncertддддд.jpg
- File:S4031698.JPG
- File:Vasko sv.jpg
- File:Zanko i Vasko na 9 Magnolija.jpg
- File:KI4O & ZANKO 3.JPG
- File:7585400 orig.png
- File:180786 143789572352570 100001645840310 291678 2892927 njjj.jpg
- File:Сссс.jpg
- File:Снимање на "Нашите Песни" (2011).JPG
- File:Снимање на Понуда.jpg
- File:Јјјј.jpg
- File:Дива Лига (2010).jpg
- File:Стиховно Војување (Декс, Патуљче, Жанко, Кичо).JPG
- File:Стиховно Војување (Декс, Патуљче, Жанко, Кичо).jpg
- File:Мартин Шишкин.jpg
- File:Снимање на "Модерен Заплет" сцена во Смилево.jpg
- File:2009 година.jpg
- File:Дејан Лутовски - Декс.jpg
- File:Жанко Котевски.jpg
- File:Васко Мирчевски - Патуљче.jpg
- File:Подарок за блиски раце - Аџиоски Христијан.jpg
- File:Христијан Аџиоски - Кичо.jpg
- File:Промоција на "Ме Научи Да Научам" (10.12.2011) НУ Центар за култура.JPG
- File:Промоција на книгата "Подарок за блиски раце".jpg
- File:Промоција на книгата "Подарок за блиски раце" (01.07.2012) КЦ Магаза.jpg
- File:Промоција на книгата "Подарок за блиски раце" (01.07.2012).jpg
- File:Стиховно Војување - Продукција.jpg
- File:Снимање на "Кога Си Тука" сцена во Охрид.JPG
- File:Снимање на "Нашите Песни" сцена на автобуска станица во Битола.JPG
- File:"Ништо Нема Да Не Промени" (2009).jpg
- File:"Ме Научи Да Научам" (2011).jpg
- File:Стиховно Војување.jpg
- File:Васко Патуљче "Шоуто мора да продолжи" (2011).jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%9D%D0%A3_%D0%A6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80_%D0%B7%D0%B0_%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%82%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B0.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%9A%D0%A6_%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B0.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kristijannn (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution photos without original exif, historical photos without sources - doubtful auhtorship. Some of files marked as copyvio.
- File:Kicevo.jpg
- File:ОУ Кузман Јосифовски - Питу.jpg
- File:Ламели.jpg
- File:Населба Бала Маало.jpg
- File:Населба Календарица.jpg
- File:Населба Девеана.jpg
- File:Центар.jpg
- File:Ппппппппппппппппппп.jpg
- File:Лололоололо.jpg
- File:Кирче.jpg
- File:Поглед од Крушино 1.jpg
- File:Kicevo-26.09.1943.jpg
- File:Pogled Kale.jpg
- File:Starooeee.JPG
- File:Панорамаррррррррррррр.jpg
- File:Панорама 2јјјј.gif
- File:Room with modern musical instruments.jpg
Art-top (talk) 20:45, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kristijannn (talk · contribs)
[edit]After today identifying around 18 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different panoramio-/flickr-/facebook-accounts, blogs etc.) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user (1 block, new block requested) uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. A few historical photos in his uploads (like File:Старата чаршија во Кичево.jpg) - they may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided (and certainly not "own work"). File:Китино кале.jpg was a "lucky" Flickr-CC BY-SA 2.0 hit...
- File:Кичево во зима.jpg
- File:Рана пролет во Кичево.jpg
- File:Бело Кичево.jpg
- File:Кичево во снег.jpg
- File:Кичево и Китино Кале.jpg
- File:Возот Кирче.JPG
- File:Куќата на уметноста - Кнежино.jpg
- File:Кичево во минатото.jpg
- File:Народен митинг во слободно Кичево на 26 септември 1943.jpg
- File:Старата чаршија во Кичево.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 23:48, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:48, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Absolutely Colourful (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvios or out of project scope.
Jespinos (talk) 23:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:49, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Загружу то же изображение, но с лучшим разрешением! Metruka (talk) 13:19, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Загрузил то же изображение, но с лучшим разрешением и глубиной цвета! Metruka (talk) 23:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 13:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LosNuevaEra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused self-promotional images.
Jespinos (talk) 23:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:49, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
No valid license. License not set by uploader. See history on de:File:WiesbadenKurhausNachts.jpg.--Wdwd (talk) 18:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC) Wdwd (talk) 18:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hallo Wdwd, danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit. Da habe ich nicht ordentlich in die Versionsgeschichte geschaut, in der Tat. Kannst Du bitte mal schauen, wie das mit den anderen bereits nach Commons transferierten Dateien des Nutzers aussieht? Waren die denn auf de.WP korrekt lizensiert? http://kasselgalerie.de/ gibt es offenkundig nicht mehr. Der Fotograf wäre aber zum Beispiel via [20] oder XING durchaus ansprechbar. Ich würde gerne wissen, ob ich ihn "nur" wegen dieser Datei ansprechen muss, bevor ich ihn anschreibe, okay? --Emha (talk) 08:41, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Emha, ja gut. Auf de.wp weisen die gelöschten Dateien folgenden Lizenzstatus auf:
- File:ITU6 Ruhnke.jpg
OK (GFDL) - File:FrankfurtMainWest kasselgalerie de.jpg OK (GFDL)
- File:ITUKreis Ruhnke.jpg OK (GFDL)
- File:Reichstagkuppel kasselgalerie de.jpg OK (GFDL)
- File:WasserspieleKasselNachts kasselgalerie de.jpg
Warning - Keine Lizenz vom Uploader. Lizenz wurde von de:User:Ahellwig eingetragen - File:Staatstheater Kassel.jpg Warning - Keine Lizenz vom Uploader. Lizenz wurde von de:User:Ahellwig eingetragen
- File:SchlossWilhelmshoehe kasselgalerie de.jpg OK (GFDL)
- File:FridericianumBeuys kasselgalerie de.jpg Warning - Keine Lizenz vom Uploader. Lizenz wurde von de:User:Schaengel89 und de:User:Crux eingetragen.
- File:ITU6 Ruhnke.jpg
- Wenn Du vielleicht diese 3 Dateien auch noch anfragen könntest. Es wäre schade wenn das gelöscht werden müsste, zumal tlw. vielfach verlinkt. Auf de.wp könnten wir diese Dateien eventuell als "Altbestand" wiederherstellen, wenn hier nicht haltbar.--Wdwd (talk) 20:09, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Emha, ja gut. Auf de.wp weisen die gelöschten Dateien folgenden Lizenzstatus auf:
Deleted: Apparently missing evidence of permission. Please contact COM:OTRS FASTILY 09:38, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
