Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/01/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.gif){kind=link}
_-_480x384.gif){kind=link}
![40 File:Saxon Edmonds using his trademark "Sexy Gaze" which renders most females unable to move, resulting in an almost perfect attempt to pickup ratio.jpg](#File:Saxon_Edmonds_using_his_trademark_"Sexy_Gaze"_which_renders_most_females_unable_to_move,_resulting_in_an_almost_perfect_attempt_to_pickup_ratio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
The image is of low resolution and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 00:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied as obvious Denniss (talk) 01:35, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
the photo can be seen a derivative work of a original portrait photo pictured, and seen that way might be copyrighted. As the uploader of the file I - in case of doubt - myself request the deletion of my file. -- ThomasPusch (talk) 15:45, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted by User:INeverCry a few days ago. --Stefan4 (talk) 01:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unencyclopedic – The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in any Wikimedia project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.252.13 (talk • contribs) 2012-12-14T04:27:06 (UTC)
Keep per previous keep. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)- Keep an unusual file. If this particular act is what you want to illustrate, then this GIF will do the job. --Simonxag (talk) 01:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, useful file, encyclopedic, educational, good quality image. -- Cirt (talk) 22:19, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Kept: Nothing additional has been provided since the last keep, so still no reason to delete this at this time russavia (talk) 19:07, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Závaadný a nevhodný obsah 195.113.180.82 13:34, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Nothing additional has been provided since the last keep, so still no reason to delete this at this time --Krd 17:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
amateur porn 68.185.89.231 01:18, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Per the prevoius three DRs. Commons is not censored. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:16, 16 March 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-4){kind=link}
This is porn 194.233.96.65 07:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept. Yes, it is, but this is not a reason to delete it. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
恶搞，not self shizhao (talk) 06:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Delete and the other uploads are equally questionable --Herby talk thyme 08:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
From the articles it's been added to, it's an attack image, so should be speedied. AnonMoos (talk) 17:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Appreciated - gone! Herby talk thyme 17:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image that is no used on any galleries or articles on any related project. TBrandley 06:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 04:23, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
kuso, not self shizhao (talk) 06:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 04:23, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
The file might be used in violation of copyright. InstantNull (talk) 06:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Rerenaming of File:Wundersleben Kirche 3.jpg. This file was accidentially renamed. Arnd (talk) 21:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Fixed. INeverCry 21:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Unknown copyright status, per file name = File:Screenshot ٢٠١٣-٠١-٠٦-٠٣-٣٨-١٣.png --> screenshot of unknown source. Gunnex (talk) 23:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 04:22, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Es ist der Sportplatz in Hergisdorf-Kreisfeld und nicht der in Helbra Dguendel (talk) 15:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Dann korrigiere doch bitte die Dateibeschreibung und fordere einen {{Rename}} an. --McZusatz (talk) 17:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Keep Löschantrag nach Com:Deletion ohne gültigen Grund, die angesprochenen Fehler wurden von mir überpüft und korrigiert.--Ras67 (talk) 17:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Bellayet (talk) 15:23, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep
speedy close,mistaken and broken duplicate deletion request. --Tony Wills (talk) 01:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- The user has re-added the confusing deletion/duplicate tag, I have repaired it. Apparently considered a duplicate of File:Imambara Hosseini Dallan Dhaka 1904.jpg. But these are not exact duplicate files, they are different versions of the same image. I can see no reason to delete either, we normally keep all versions/revisions of an image. --Tony Wills (talk) 11:53, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Not an exact or scaled-down duplicate. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Broken vector image. Wrong svg. There is a better alternative:
--Angelus(talk) 20:48, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 23:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Broken vector image. Wrong svg. There is a better alternative:
--Angelus(talk) 21:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 23:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
wrong uploader, original uploader sitting in the picture Papooty (talk) 15:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep To take a picture which shows all the participants of the meetup, the photograph has to be taken by a non-participant, who was a generous stranger in this case. This person used the camera on my phone and clicked the photograph as per my instructions. It was I who chose where the camera had to be placed, whose faces should be seen in the picture, and at what angle the photograph should be taken. The stranger mechanically followed my instructions to take this picture. Therefore, I think the copyright goes to me and not to him. It is not possible to ask the photographer to file an OTRS request because his identity is not known to me. --Netha Hussain (talk) 07:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per explanation by uploader, the creative decisions and hence the copyright clearly fall to Netha and not to the photographer. -Pete F (talk) 02:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader's comments. Sreejith K (talk) 05:44, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
"Google" is not a source; probably it hasn't a compatible license 85.242.149.116 00:11, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 09:59, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
(sic) "image owned by me, license I acquired on AP ASSOCIATED PRESS". It doesn't sound that this is a compatible license. 85.242.149.116 00:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:00, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted advertising of a festival. An OTRS confirmation would be needed, as we have no ground to believe it is truly the uploader's own work. Eleassar (t/p) 00:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete advertising --Miha (talk) 09:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:01, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
It doesn't look like an "own work" 85.242.149.116 00:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:02, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
It doesn't look like an "own work" 85.242.149.116 00:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:02, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:03, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:05, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Not own work as noted. Television screenshot of work owned by ABC. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 01:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per nom, clear copyright violation. -Pete F (talk) 02:19, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 10:06, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Too small, unreadlable Funfood ␌ 01:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:06, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Human Male Ejaculation, Freehand Cumshot animated, Semen (Ejakulation, Samenerguss freihaendig) - 480x384.gif
[edit]_-_480x384.gif){kind=link}
_-_480x384.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unwanted material 50.71.215.145 04:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - no valid reason for deletion, perfectly useful image. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Material useful for sex education is definitely wanted --Simonxag (talk) 22:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 10:07, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Human Male Ejaculation, Freehand Cumshot animated, Semen (Ejakulation, Samenerguss freihaendig) - 480x384.gif
[edit]_-_480x384.gif&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Not Encyclopedic Elie Hague (talk) 15:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly encyclopedic per last deletion request, as no new arguments or reasons have been provided. Clearly an SPA in a moral crusade. Tm (talk) 20:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Very low quality image. SilkTork (talk) 14:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
low quality, I agree Makovec (talk) 10:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Seems to be some TV-screenshot High Contrast (talk) 10:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:09, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 13:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 13:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:33, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Unuseful redirect Tangopaso (talk) 19:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:18, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
This was a test Spallin100 (talk) 22:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
See Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2012/09/Category:Heraldry_SVG_elements -- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ 22:28, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom and linked discussions McZusatz (talk) 11:28, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a reproduction of a print or display, i.e. very likely not own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Taken from same original:
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 11:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 22:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 11:20, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 22:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 11:19, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Saxon Edmonds using his trademark "Sexy Gaze" which renders most females unable to move, resulting in an almost perfect attempt to pickup ratio.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 22:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 11:19, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 23:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 11:14, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely cropped from unknown source. Gunnex (talk) 23:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Correct informations
Only the information of the image are incorrect. The image in question was cropped of another image of Commons, as this example the image was cropped of another image in Commons. As I packed the correct data, there is no reason for deletion in my opinion. Pedrohoneto (talk) 22:46, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: cc-license McZusatz (talk) 11:12, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 23:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 11:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of deleted image. See Deletion requests/File:Azerbaijan rug Safiyeedin Urmavi.jpg. Takabeg (talk) 00:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Scan from book, copyrighted shizhao (talk) 00:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
scan from book, unknown license shizhao (talk) 00:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
This appears to be a scan rather than an original photograph. The caption says "circa 1932", so the copyright status of the original is unclear. Many of the uploader's other uploads have been deleted as copyright violations. Kaldari (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, almost certainly a copyright violation. -Pete F (talk) 02:20, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
scan from book, unknown license shizhao (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Scan from book, unknown license shizhao (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Scan from book, unknown license shizhao (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Scan from book, unknown license shizhao (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Completing incomplete request. Tagged with {{Delete}} by an IP address, claiming that the page is out of scope. I agree and think that we should also delete File:El-Subbagh Personal Pic.png if this page ends up being deleted. Stefan4 (talk) 01:37, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Completing incomplete request. Tagged with {{Delete}} by an IP address, claiming that the page is out of scope. I agree. Stefan4 (talk) 01:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Germany: 'Virtually no images would fall under the shorter 50y term for "simple photographs"'. It is too recent for COM:URAA anyway. Stefan4 (talk) 02:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Self-advertising, single upload, out of COM:PS. Funfood ␌ 02:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyvio from http://ppdemugardos.blogspot.com.es/2009_02_01_archive.html or http://popularesdesada.blogspot.com.es/2009_07_25_archive.html Elisardojm (talk) 02:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
dubious source, own work that is impossible Coronades (talk) 03:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Image is too out of blurry and out of focus to be of use to Commons and wikipedia. Leoboudv (talk) 06:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Support imho delete--Steinsplitter (talk) 13:36, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Comment: Could you please use either {{Vd}} or {{Vk}}? --McZusatz (talk) 10:18, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Commons has another image so this is not irreplacable. --Leoboudv (talk) 00:05, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, as long as this person is notable enough to have an en-wp biography, it seems worthwhile to have one photo with her eyes open (unlike photo mentioned above). Deletion might make sense if more high quality photos are uploaded in the future. -Pete F (talk) 02:23, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per Pete F. McZusatz (talk) 23:50, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution, probable copyvio Sealle (talk) 06:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Society was founded in 2011. Copyvio (http://www.guido.be/Studentennieuws/ArticleDetail/tabid/169/ArticleId/8270/Default.aspx) EvilFreD overleg 08:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Tattoos are unlikely to be copyright free as the designer/tattooist may retain rights. Fæ (talk) 10:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Agreed. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Original image is copyrated by AFP, not by WOA, that's why it is can't be used under conditions of Public Domain and should be deleted. 128.70.252.102 10:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Original image is copyrated by AFP, not by WOA, that's why it is can't be used under conditions of Public Domain and should be deleted. 128.70.252.102 10:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Original image is copyrated by AFP, not by WOA, that's why it is can't be used under conditions of Public Domain and should be deleted. 128.70.252.102 10:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Original image is copyrated by AFP, not by WOA, that's why it is can't be used under conditions of Public Domain and should be deleted. 128.70.252.102 10:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
This image was used in numerous websites (For example here) before the uploader posted to Commons. There is no proof of {{Self}}. Takabeg (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. This image seems a commercial photograph. There is no proof of {{Own work}}. Takabeg (talk) 12:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per Takabeg.--Rapsar (talk) 15:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. This image is the derivative work of published image. There is no proof of {{Own work}}. Takabeg (talk) 12:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per Takabeg.--Rapsar (talk) 15:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of the sculptures included in the photo. Artist or publication date info was not supplied for any of them. Dcoetzee (talk) 13:11, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Image involving deleted image (File:Մայր Հայաստան.JPG). Takabeg (talk) 13:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per Takabeg.--Rapsar (talk) 15:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
According to the Wikipedia article it's used in, both artists are born after 1976. Derivative work of non-free sculptures. Several other images in use in article may be affected. Dcoetzee (talk) 13:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Advertising Funfood ␌ 13:41, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jack ma as duplicate (dup) of File:MontbronFonchevade4.JPG, which is no exact duplicate. Didym (talk) 14:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I would have just deleted the {{Dup}} tag. It is not a duplicate, it is another photo of the same scene, a slightly zoomed in version, it is a matter of personal preference as to which is more useful. As per normal Commons practice, keep both unless there is a compelling reason to delete one. --Tony Wills (talk) 22:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Own work very dubious 190.27.162.243 15:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, "own work" does seem dubious in the absence of any note to OTRS. Appears to be a scan from a magazine. -Pete F (talk) 02:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, say that is "own work" in the source box, and in the author box specifies "Lic. Aquino". This makes no sense. Coronades (talk) 15:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Apears to be nothing more than avetisement. GMLSX (talk) 15:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
This is a snapshot of a video or screen, which is not allowed by the rules of Wikimedia Commons. Coronades (talk) 15:33, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Apears to be nothing more than avetisement. GMLSX (talk) 15:33, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
very possible copyvio Coronades (talk) 15:35, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
very possible copyvio, own work dubious Coronades (talk) 15:37, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
scanned image, is obvious. Own work very dubious Coronades (talk) 15:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
own work very dubious. Coronades (talk) 15:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Not own work, not indicate the correct license of an logo. Obious copyvio Coronades (talk) 15:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyvio, some details of metadata do not match with the information described by the user. dubious Own work. Coronades (talk) 15:46, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Dubious own work, possible copyvio. Coronades (talk) 15:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
The picture is not own work, obvious copyvio. Coronades (talk) 15:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
The user is attributed copyrights that do not belong. The photo is in the University Francisco Marroquin in Guatemala City, this is the owner of the copyright. Is clearly copyvio and copyright theft. Coronades (talk) 15:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Clearly copyvio: http://liturgia.mforos.com/1699092/8490369-asuncion-de-nuestra-senora-15-de-agosto/?pag=2 Coronades (talk) 15:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Is not own work, possible copyvio. Coronades (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, The website which was taken is copyright all rights reserved. Coronades (talk) 16:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
This is a snapshot of a video or TV screen, which is not allowed by the rules of Wikimedia Commons. Coronades (talk) 16:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
This is a snapshot of a video or screen, which is not allowed by the rules of Wikimedia Commons. Coronades (talk) 16:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
This is a snapshot of a video or TV screen, which is not allowed by the rules of Wikimedia Commons. Coronades (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio, permission and license doubtful Coronades (talk) 16:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, The user uses OTRS tickets incorrectly Coronades (talk) 16:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
obvious copyvio, doubtful own work Coronades (talk) 16:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably bogus licence and copyright violation. The file is from here. Citation: The use of these files is prohibited on web pages without the permission of the director of 3dediana.com.mx. We need an OTRS ticket from the director! Ras67 (talk) 16:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably bogus licence and copyright violation. The file is from here. Citation: The use of these files is prohibited on web pages without the permission of the director of 3dediana.com.mx. We need an OTRS ticket from the director! Ras67 (talk) 16:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably bogus licence and copyright violation. The file is from here. Citation: The use of these files is prohibited on web pages without the permission of the director of 3dediana.com.mx. We need an OTRS ticket from the director! Ras67 (talk) 16:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation, the file is from here. Ras67 (talk) 16:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio, lack of EXIF and metadata, doubtful own work Coronades (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio, lack of EXIF and metadata, doubtful own work. Coronades (talk) 16:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio, lack of EXIF and metadata, doubtful own work. Coronades (talk) 16:46, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, image (even in lower res) already circulating before upload date via (examples) 09.2012 or 09.2012, credits: "© Bola.net" Gunnex (talk) 16:48, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
I use the dvd video from the international friendly game Georgia vs Portugal (May, 2008) and from that dvd video I made couple of photos of Petar Segrt and Luis Felipe Scolari after the game. I sent the photo to official website PSM Makassar, and then they send it to Bola.net and all other sites. SO, I didnt get this file from some other website. Thanks. Kakoste7, 17:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, The user uses OTRS tickets incorrectly. The website where the image was taken is copyright all rights reserved. Coronades (talk) 16:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of Pinocchio. Stefan4 (talk) 16:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation. The image is from here. Ras67 (talk) 16:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, the image isn't own work. Coronades (talk) 16:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio, doubtful own work. Coronades (talk) 16:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio, doubtful own work. Lack of EXIF and Metadata. Coronades (talk) 16:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio, doubtful own work. Lack of EXIF and Metadata. Coronades (talk) 16:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio, doubtful own work. Lack of EXIF and Metadata. Coronades (talk) 16:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio, doubtful own work. Lack of EXIF and Metadata. Coronades (talk) 16:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio, doubtful own work. Lack of EXIF and Metadata. Coronades (talk) 16:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio, doubtful own work. Lack of EXIF and Metadata. Coronades (talk) 17:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio, doubtful own work. Coronades (talk) 17:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, The user uses OTRS tickets incorrectly. The website where the image was taken is copyright all rights reserved. Coronades (talk) 17:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of US Sperm Oil Imports 1805-1905.jpg Kurzon (talk) 17:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected Lymantria (talk) 11:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Obvious copyvio, The user uses OTRS tickets incorrectly. The website where the image was taken is copyright all rights reserved. Coronades (talk) 17:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, The user uses OTRS tickets incorrectly. The website where the image was taken is copyright all rights reserved Coronades (talk) 17:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation. The image is from here. Ras67 (talk) 17:06, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, The user uses OTRS tickets incorrectly. The website where the image was taken is copyright all rights reserved. Coronades (talk) 17:06, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, The user uses OTRS tickets incorrectly. The website where the image was taken is copyright all rights reserved. Coronades (talk) 17:06, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, The user uses OTRS tickets incorrectly. The website where the image was taken is copyright all rights reserved. Coronades (talk) 17:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, The user uses OTRS tickets incorrectly. The website where the image was taken is copyright all rights reserved Coronades (talk) 17:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, The user uses OTRS tickets incorrectly. The website where the image was taken is copyright all rights reserved Coronades (talk) 17:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, The user uses OTRS tickets incorrectly. The website where the image was taken is copyright all rights reserved Coronades (talk) 17:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, The user uses OTRS tickets incorrectly. The website where the image was taken is copyright all rights reserved. Coronades (talk) 17:10, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation. The image is from here. Ras67 (talk) 17:10, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
No page links to this picture. Seems like a picture of a random person. Arsenalkid700 (talk) 17:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation. The image is from here. Ras67 (talk) 17:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation. The image is from here. Ras67 (talk) 17:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation. The image is from here. Ras67 (talk) 17:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation. The image is from here. Ras67 (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation. The image is from here. Ras67 (talk) 17:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation. The image is from here. Ras67 (talk) 17:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Because it's irrelevant to any practical public use Goose friend (talk) 17:41, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Same picture has been used in here, in june 2008. Copyright violation.Rapsar (talk) 17:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and own work claims are doubtful. I think these files should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation. The image is from here. Ras67 (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 18:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 18:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Its not the uploader's own work and we don't know if the real photographer is died before 1942. Probably from here. Ras67 (talk) 18:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 18:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused logo - single upload of user INeverCry 18:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 18:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Don't remove please
Here is the Permit, It says: The use of images and content on this website is completely free
At the end of the page: http://piruzdilanchi.com/foto.en.html --Aztap (talk) 00:32, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- But the owner of the website is not the copyright holder of these pictures, I think.--Rapsar (talk) 15:53, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
because it is not a right place Mayur.dadhich (talk) 18:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
i want to delete Mayur.dadhich (talk) 18:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 18:42, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 18:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 18:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:46, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
I fail to see why this is PD-USGOV, and further, the source is dead. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 19:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:46, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Unuseful redirect Tangopaso (talk) 19:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The redirect has been there for over a year and a half and the file was available under this name for two months before it was used. Someone might be using the redirect and depend on it being available. For example, there is no way to see if anyone uses the redirect using mw:InstantCommons. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 23:47, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 19:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 19:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:48, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image - only link is to AFC declined for lack of notability INeverCry 19:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:48, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:28, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 19:31, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 19:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 19:33, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
CC-BY license is nonsense; also, it has an explicit statement "reprinting without consent is prohbited"... AnonMoos (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small, unused, unidentified, single upload from user Funfood ␌ 19:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
User has uploaded several pictures of his favourite football club. Most of them are clearly not own picture, probably taken from the press. I found the picture used in a blog post of 2011, while the picture was uploaded in Nov. 2012. Other images uploaded by the same user, also in the same situation.
- File:Perlaza, gol de la Salvación.jpg
- File:Asencio Goleador Histórico del Barcelona.jpg
- File:Barcelona Finalista de América 1998.jpg
- File:Otto Viera, Dt del Barcelona S.C. en los 80'.JPG
- File:Pre inauguración en 1987.jpg
- File:Monumental 2012.JPG
- File:Campeón Nacional en 1991.jpg
- File:Barcelona Finalista Copero en 1990.jpg
- File:Equipo de Barcelona en 1989.JPG
- File:Barcelona Campeón de 1971.jpg
- File:La Chilena de Victor Ephanor.JPG
- File:Rubén Darío Insúa eterno tecnico de los canarios..jpg
- File:Desepción torera.jpg
All of them should be deleted. --B1mbo (talk) 20:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 21:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Unknown, likely non-notable person. Uploader did reply to my question whether he/she has expressed permission from depicted to publish her photo. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 21:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 22:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete It is an image that does not contribute to the wikipedia, of those images that are put on facebook profile. --Coronades (talk) 14:40, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Wrong license: Sreenshot of a TV Show from 1996. Nothere (talk) 22:06, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
New England is a unofficial region of Australia, and all Australian speed limit signs are standardized with black numerals. This is a fake and there is no scope. Fry1989 eh? 22:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: Hoax created by known sock puppet. Bidgee (talk) 10:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Poor quality and no EXIF. Unlikely own photo by the uploader, suppose a TV screenshot. A.Savin 00:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- File:Tomb of the Unknown Soldier - Baghdad.jpg
- File:Monument to the Unknown Soldier in Baghdad.jpg
- File:Tomb of the Unknown Soldier 2 (1).jpg
- File:Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, Baghdad 2006.jpg
- File:UnknownSoldierBaghdad.JPG
- File:Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Iraq Takabeg (talk) 00:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Comment Can you please specify where you see exactly a problem with this image? --High Contrast (talk) 00:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- This is one of the works of Marcello d'Olivo who died in 1991. Accroding to COM:FOP#Iraq, rights of him have to be protected. Takabeg (talk) 00:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- OK. Does the author Marcello d'Olivo still hold the exclusive right to exercise the rights in his work? --High Contrast (talk) 00:36, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Since Marcello died in 1991, legal heirs/heiress may hold rights. I don't known the name of present copyright holder(s), but I believe that we have to behave according to Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Cheers. Takabeg (talk) 00:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Not yet. By now we only have the speculation that the copyright holder of this architecure is the designer himself. As you pointed out: heirs/heiress may hold rights. I personally doubt that - hardly believable that Saddam would have given any panorama rights to the architect.
We need more information. --High Contrast (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Not yet. By now we only have the speculation that the copyright holder of this architecure is the designer himself. As you pointed out: heirs/heiress may hold rights. I personally doubt that - hardly believable that Saddam would have given any panorama rights to the architect.
- Since Marcello died in 1991, legal heirs/heiress may hold rights. I don't known the name of present copyright holder(s), but I believe that we have to behave according to Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Cheers. Takabeg (talk) 00:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- OK. Does the author Marcello d'Olivo still hold the exclusive right to exercise the rights in his work? --High Contrast (talk) 00:36, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: While I respect High Contrast's opinion, I think it more likely that Saddam would have simply ignored copyright. I see no reason to believe that this work is not still under copyright and that the copyright is owned by the heirs. If that is not the case, it is up to the uploader to prove it beyond a significant doubt. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
--- Keep Marcello d'Olivio, was the architect of this sculpture, but the Iraqi sculptor, Khaled al-Rahal was responsible for its orignal design and oversaw all phases of its construction. Al-Rahal died in 1987 and is buried beside the monument. I believe tht a case can be made for keeping the image, based on its historical and architectural/artistic significance. It is an excellent example of al-Rahal's work - many of his public monuments were destroyed either in the 2003 US invasion or in its immediate aftermath. Thus, the image illustrates a surviving work for an important Iraqi sculptor. The monument also illustrates part of the history of 20th-century Iraqi art - illustrating how it increasingly abstract and sophisticated during the first half of the 20th-century. Comparison with earlier works, including those of al-Rahal, show that their execution was considerably more kitch and the symbolism was very 'in-your-face'. This monument, and other monuments by al-Rahal, are the subject of an important book, The Monument: Art, Vulgarity, and Responsibility in Saddam Hussein's Iraq, written by K. Makiya, K. and S. Al-Khalilm published by IB Taurus in 2004. It may also be worth noting that Wiki Commons has relatively few images of modern Iraqi art - and the image of this important public monument in Baghdad helps to flesh out the collection in useful ways. I am strongly in favour of keeping the image - and would be happy to write a suitable rationale for it, if someone could just tell me where to post such a rationale. ̴̴̴̴ — Preceding unsigned comment added by BronHiggs (talk • contribs) 01:10, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 00:44, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
map data unknown source shizhao (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- The intermediate version has been deleted and the original version by the uploader restored. --Denniss (talk) 01:09, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Germany: 'Virtually no images would fall under the shorter 50y term for "simple photographs"'. They are too recent for COM:URAA anyway.
- File:Schmuggler afaf93b830f42fc70fbe1a6a2e156128 image document xxl.jpg
- File:Kaffeepanzer 4f14ab227c92dc5d69b2bf92fa30753a image document xxl.jpg
- File:Sanka fbb9fb1e71025295584b4e1d35a2bb1f image document xxl.jpg
- File:Kaffeepanzer 64e776683c43590a76bc2598529ebe64 image document xxl.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 02:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Contrary to the uploader's claims, those are not official works by German law, because they were not shown to be part of any law, statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment. This was already discussed in great depth at the German wikipedia, where the 1924 image, there as de:Datei:Karte Sendernetz (1924).jpg, was deleted several months ago. A few days ago, the uploader asked for the file to be reinstated in order to transfer it here as an "anonymous work". When this was denied, he obviously simply uploaded it here anyway, claiming it is an official work. But those files were neither shown to be official works (as alreday noted), nor can one claim they are anonymous works, because in Germany, for works before 1995 to be anonymous in a legal sense, you'd have to prove their author was mentioned nowhere in public, not in newspaper article, not in a public lecture, nowhere. This cannot be done, so the German law for anonymous works cannot be used for works before 1995. This is BTW a good example of how copyright laws in European countries still differ considerably, even if the uploader thinks different (as he mentioned at de.wp).
.jpg){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 16:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:48, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
obvious copyvio: http://www.flickr.com/photos/vicepresidenciadeguatemala/ Coronades (talk) 03:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- I don't see any licensing on the VP's flickr account, so no it's not so obvious. Fry1989 eh? 03:28, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Source given is Facebook, which is copyrighted . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nachiiitox15 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Scans from newspapers
Ralgistalk 05:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution, probable copyvio Sealle (talk) 06:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Why state symbols are copyvio? Carefully somebody drawed something free of copyright. Maybe he thought that it is object of copyright, maybe even not. At any case, why must we support this wrong opinion, that maybe even not belongs to the author of the drawing?Longbowman (talk) 15:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Appears several places on the web at exactly this size. COuld not have been drawn at this size. If you really did create it, then upload it a much higher resolution. If you did not create it, then please don't make false claims. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
empty file Amada44 (talk) 08:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Julo (talk) 10:21, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
恶搞，来源不明，不是自己拍摄 shizhao (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Delete and the other uploads are equally questionable --Herby talk thyme 08:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps if somebody could translate the Shizhao's DR note in English, it will be helpful. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2013 (UTC).
- If you look at one of the other DRs the rationale is "not own work" and it certainly seems very likely that all the uploads are PR type shots to me. --Herby talk thyme 09:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:07, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
The files provide no educational purpose for Wikimedia projects. It seems like they have been uploaded just to illustrate the Russian Wikipedia article Train surfing which is currently being discussed for deletion due to lots of non-encyclopedic propaganda of this dangerous hobby you may find there. Btw, it seems VERY outlandish to me to callthe motif of this image a "train surfing" (though this particular image seems OK to me, concerning both copyright and educational purpose). Looking at this, I can only guess that the uploader is "on a mission" here, so that we should not provide a place for him here on Commons to glorify this kind of "fun" which causes several deaths and injuries nearly every week. A couple of illustrative images on this topic would be OK. But Commons should not provide train surfers any facility to host their images and videos. This has nothing to do with the project scope of Commons.
- File:ER2R-7018 Backride Smog.jpg
- File:ER2-1274 Roof antenna.jpg
- File:Passenger train roof ride.jpg
- File:Under train wheels.jpg
- File:Under train ride.jpg
- File:EM4 Backride.jpg
- File:Freighthop View between carriages.jpg
- File:ER2R Roofride Nikolskoye 3.jpg
- File:ER2R Roofride Nikolskoye 2.jpg
- File:Sapsan meets trainsurfers 1.jpg
- File:ER2R Roofride Nikolskoye 1.jpg
- File:ER2R Roofride Kuchino 1.jpg
- File:ER2R Roofride Kuchino 2.jpg
- File:First Sapsan to Nizhniy 2.jpg
- File:First Sapsan to Nizhniy 1.jpg
- File:First Sapsan to Nizhniy 3.jpg
- File:ER2 Backride.jpg
- File:Freighthop flatcar container.jpg
- File:Freighthop gondola.jpg
- File:Freighthop 2.jpg
- File:Freighthop between tanks.jpg
- File:ED2T Between Carriages.jpg
- File:MetroBackride.jpg
- File:MetroFrontride.jpg
- File:Sapsan backside climb 2.jpg
- File:Sapsan backside climb.jpg
- File:Sapsan between carriages ride.jpg
- File:Sapsan between carriages arrival.jpg
- File:Sapsan meets trainsurfers.jpg
- File:Roofrider climbs inside.jpg
- File:JumpOnER2.jpg
- File:ER2R Resistors.jpg
- File:PomogaloAttack.jpg
- File:Freighthop.jpg
- File:Trainsurfers Losinka.jpg
Forgottenhedgehog (talk) 08:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep File:Sapsan backside climb 2.jpg; it's being used appropriately at en:wp and seemingly appropriately at de:wp. No comment on any other particular files, but since the nominator either omitted this fact for this image or didn't observe that it was an issue, I'm forced to question the nominator's conclusion that these images are out of scope. Nyttend (talk) 14:37, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- * Keep. I've uploaded these files not only for illustration of the single article "Train surfing" on Russian wiki, but for creating a big illustrative media-collection about riding on outside of trains (Category:Train surfing and it's subcategories) such as other media-collections about riding on other vehicles (Category:Cycling, Category:Motorcycling and etc.), so I upload all free files related to train surfing, including my own files (I am one of Russian trainsurfers) and free files from Flickr, historical archives and etc; and I think that «A couple of illustrative images on this topic would be OK» is not correct opinion. These files have educational purposes for Wikimedia projects, because they illustrate riding outside of different types of trains and carriages in different places of them, they illustrate phenomenon of train surfing in different countries; also they illustrate Category:Views from outside of trains as a part of Category:Views from trains. Some of these files can be used in articles about trains, their parts and railroad lines - for example, File:ER2R Resistors.jpg illustrates article about train brake resistors, and File:Sapsan meets trainsurfers.jpg illustrates article about 2010 in rail transport of Russia, because a lot of people in Russia surfed trains during that year due to overcrowding of them and strong heat, and high-speed trains "Sapsans" appeared there at the same time. Also some of these files can be useful for categories about trains (such as ER2), because they illustrate how and where passengers can ride on them. Moreover, in the future I plan to write articles about train surfing in Russian sections of Wikibooks (how to-guides) and Hitchwiki (wiki about hitchhiking and travelling), and these files would be very useful and illustrative for these projects. In addition, train surfing is not a hobby, it's a type of travel, like cycling, motorbiking and other types of riding. In summary, I don't see any reason for deletion. ZCP4 (talk) 09:40, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- PS. Article about train surfing on Russian wiki has been nominated for deletion not for propaganda, but for unreliable sources and using unacceptable style and register for Wikipedia. At the present time, this article contains a much less material without reliable sources and deleted sections of this article are under rewriting; so even in case of deletion this article will be rewriten later, and these files will be useful to illustrate it too. ZCP4 (talk) 09:40, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Kept one per Nyttend. I share the view that we should not be glorifying deadly activities. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Commons is not a social network, and neither a place to promote illegal and dangerous activites (does not apply to the last two). All four seem to be personal images (the second even Own work) with very little to no educational value. Also per above.
- File:Soweto train surfer.jpg
- File:ED2T climb between cars to outside.jpg
- File:Ecuador train roof riders 3.jpg
- File:Ecuador train roof riders 4.jpg
FDMS 4 20:33, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and previous discussions. --Krd 08:06, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
The names of tops on photo are incorrect according to uploader - new version = File:Osobita T58.3.jpg Tony Wills (talk) 09:44, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- and he requests delete File:Osobita T58.2.jpg for same reason. --Tony Wills (talk) 09:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Not own work, but reproduction from an existing photo (?) in a museum[1]. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- If an owner of these images, is the Deportivo Toluca SA de CV
- I think the Deportivo Toluca SA de C.V. will agree if the images are not used for commercial purposes.
- --Anonimo122 (talk) 17:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- You still don't understand. You said that you made this reproduction in a museum and you still didn't tell when the original photo has been shot and by whom.
- Images uploaded to Commons have to be free also for commercial use, no exception allowed. --Túrelio (talk) 18:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- I hope we can get a mediator to help us translate and understand you because I do not speak English and you do not speak Spanish. And that is creating confusion.
- Yo tomé las fotos de un museo, el museo del que hablo es el "Salón de la fama del Deportivo Toluca", la mayoría de las fotos son muy antiguas algunas tienen más de 80 años, definitivamente el autor original de las imagenes ya no existe por lo que yo pienso que si existe un dueño actualmente es el Deportivo Toluca (propietario del museo donde las tome). Sin embargo es solo una posibilidad y si así fuera yo creo que el Deportivo Toluca no tendría inconveniente en permitir su uso. Si el Deportivo Toluca no es dueño de las imagenes, entonces son del dominio público pues no hay otro posible propietario.--Anonimo122 (talk) 19:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: The copyright belongs to the photographer's heirs. Unless he died before 1943, this is still under copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cassiorene (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (+/- 10 copyvios identified) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either.
- File:Entrada p.jpg
- File:Entrada..jpg
- File:Cagepa.jpg <- found here, though cropped and in lower resolution.
- File:Margarida cardoso.jpg <- found here in same resolution.--Túrelio (talk) 18:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Gunnex (talk) 11:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Almost a duplicate of file File:Явка.gif. The only difference is a presumably wrong number. Here, one district has got a percentage of 98.6%, despite the color suggests less than 51%. In File:Явка.gif this number is 47.2%, as expected. Torsch (talk) 11:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hardik.choudhary (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Choudhary Gajendra Singh at Toll Plaza.jpg
- File:Ahlawat Khap.jpg
- File:Choudhary Gajendra Singh At Ahlawat Khap.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 3D sculpture protected by copyright
Converted to DR by me. Sculptor August Falise died in 1936, whereby his works should be in the PD since 2007. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, I added the photo of the statue made by August Falise. The statue is my property and i took the photo myself. Of course i am not a specialist in copyright issues but i see no problem in displaying this picture and make the photo available for others to use.--Butch (talk) 20:56, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Owning the sculpture does not give you the right to license its use. However, the sculptor died in 1936, so it is PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Own work very dubious, possible copyvio Coronades (talk) 15:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Own work very dubious, possible copyvio, the OTRS ticket does not match to the source of the work and the license specified. Coronades (talk) 15:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
This image was cropped from File:Hrob_solzhenicyna.JPG. No reason to think that the photographer of the grave was also the author of this portrait. Shureg (talk) 15:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Bornean Peacock Pheasant.png
- File:Ph Joloanon fowl.png
- File:Ph Banaba fowl.png
- File:Ph Parawakan fowl.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karnataka ka (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Belgaum-Airport.jpg
- File:Yadur temple.jpg
- File:Sirsangi temple front.jpg
- File:Shani-shingnapur.jpg
- File:KalikaDevi.jpg
- File:Krishna River yadur.jpg
- File:Veerabhadreshwar Temple.jpg
- File:Lord Veerabhadra of yadur.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karnataka ka (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Veerabhadreshwar Temple1.jpeg.jpg
- File:Shani-shingnapur.jpg
- File:Sirsangi temple front.jpg
- File:KalikaDevi.jpg
- File:Shanidev-idol-shingnapur-shani-temple.jpg
- File:Yadur temple.jpg
- File:Veerabhadreshwar Temple.jpg
- File:Krishna River yadur.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
"copyleft" claimed - but see full map at source: stamp from some official government (catastro). I cannot see any copyleft notice. Saibo (Δ∇) 20:45, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:31, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
possible copyvio, doubtful own work. Coronades (talk) 16:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
deleted . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 18:06, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The image is a cropped version of File:Diputado Carlos Montes Cisternas.jpg. Jespinos (talk) 01:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logos - single uploads of user with company username
INeverCry 18:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jacobus young (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 18:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sajin Narayanan (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 18:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gemamorate (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal/promotional images of non-notable person/writer - google search only turns up a few social media hits for her
- File:Gema Moraleja Paz (Escritora y Autora). nacida en Madrid..jpg
- File:Gema Moraleja Paz Escritora que vive en Inglaterra y se dedica a escribir y a publicar libros a otros Autores..jpg
- File:Gema Moraleja Paz (Escritora & Editora) 2012.jpg
- File:Gema Moraleja Paz y Jose Antonio Jauregui.jpg
- File:Dexeo Editores La editorial de Gema Moraleja Paz.jpg
- File:Gema Moraleja Pax (Autora y Editora).jpg
- File:Gema Moraleja Paz (Autora y Editora).jpg
._nacida_en_Madrid..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2012.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 18:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mayur Dadhich.jpg
Files uploaded by Upt sistemas (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 18:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images
- File:Fullscreen capture 6152011 71623 AM.jpg
- File:Fullscreen capture 1062011 95457 AM.jpg
- File:Fullscreen capture 11222011 73103 AM.jpg
- File:Fullscreen capture 11182011 35949 PM.jpg
INeverCry 18:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Solidarity International (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 18:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images - only link is to declined AFC
INeverCry 18:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maxdolan111 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 18:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnholmstrom (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - personal artworks - no educational value
- File:Whirlwhirl.jpg
- File:Retromint.jpg
- File:Lmrandom.jpg
- File:Circles-lm-circles.jpg
- File:Lmdisc.jpg
- File:Strangerings.jpg
- File:Minttornado2.jpg
- File:Retro mint2.jpg
- File:Vintage green2.jpg
- File:Cubisthaze.jpg
- File:Mint wawes1.jpg
- File:Strange wawes.jpg
INeverCry 18:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value
- File:November. .Morning. .Alley.jpg
- File:November..Morning..Alley.jpg
- File:November. .Night. .Alley.jpg
- File:November..Night.. Alley.jpg
- File:November.Morning.Alley.jpg
- File:November.Night.Alley.jpg
- File:November. Night. Alley.jpg
- File:November. Morning. Alley.jpg
INeverCry 19:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alcochete 2013-8.jpg
out of scope - promotional images
- File:Planisfero flash.jpg
- File:Nuovo logo (1).jpg
- File:Obika Mozzarella Bar - New York.jpg
- File:Obika Mozzarella Bar Tokyo 5.jpg
- File:Obika Firenze3.jpg
- File:Obika RM Prefetti3.jpg
- File:Obika Mozzarella Bar - MI Rinascente.jpg
- File:LogoOBIKA.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 19:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - blurry/low quality INeverCry 19:09, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:55, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sodiumsugar (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - no educational value
- File:Photo 8-van.jpg
- File:Photo 6-van.jpg
- File:Photo 7-van.jpg
- File:Photo 1-van.jpg
- File:Photo 3-van.jpg
- File:Photo 4-van.jpg
- File:Photo 5-van.jpg
- File:Photo 2-van.jpg
INeverCry 19:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment -- I suggest that any image that is a valid member of a valid category that is in scope, is therefore in scope. Geo Swan (talk) 15:44, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- File:Photo 6-van.jpg was in Category:Starbucks Coffee in Vancouver. I'd like our nominator to clarify whether they meant to question whether this was a valid category? There are thirteen images in Category:Starbucks Coffee in Vancouver, there are well over one hundred images under the 32 subcategories of Category:Starbucks Coffee by city. Does our nominator think they too should be deleted? If not, why are they singling out this image? Geo Swan (talk) 15:44, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment -- I suggest that any photo of an identifiable location in the downtown of a major city is in scope. I upload lots of historic images of downtowns. Unfortunately, these kinds of images weren't generally kept in the past, unless they fell into the hands of a foresightful curator, because many people thought, "this is a street scene, not worth keeping, since everyone already knows what this street looks like." No, not everyone knows what downtown Vancouver looked like, at night, in 2011. And, even if they did, downtowns are very mutable. Buildings are modified, making it useful to have not deleted perfectly adequate images. Alternately, they are torn down, making it useful to be able to compare how the street looks now, with how it looked in the past.
- I added categories to the remaining images in this nomination. As above I request nominator to go on record as to whether every image that belongs in a valid category is in scope. I invite them to explain in greater detail why they don't believe these images are in scope. Geo Swan (talk) 16:20, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination INeverCry 00:28, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by nomonator--Morning ☼ (talk) 00:43, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Ya existe archivo http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_PF-1b.svg GPOChile (talk) 19:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request. {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:53, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kushagrashakya99 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 19:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Ya existe archivo de mayor calidad http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_PF-1c.svg GPOChile (talk) 19:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request. {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:54, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Ya existe archivo de mayor calidad http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_PI-4dR.svg GPOChile (talk) 19:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:54, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Ya existe archivo de mayor calidad http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_PI-4dL.svg GPOChile (talk) 19:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:54, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Ya existe archivo de mayor calidad http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_PI-4b.svg GPOChile (talk) 19:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:54, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 19:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
ya existe archivo de mayor calidad http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_RR-4.svg GPOChile (talk) 19:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_RR-7.svg ya existe archivo de mayor calidad GPOChile (talk) 19:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_RR-6.svg ya existe archivo de mayor calidad GPOChile (talk) 19:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_RPI-1.svg ya existe archivo de mayor calidad GPOChile (talk) 19:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_PI-4a.svg YA EXISTE ARCHIVO DE MAYOR CALIDAD GPOChile (talk) 19:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_RA-1.svg ya existe archivo de mayor calidad formato .xvg GPOChile (talk) 19:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_IAA-2.svg ya existe archivo de mayor calidad GPOChile (talk) 19:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_IAA-1.svg ya existe archivo de mayor calidad GPOChile (talk) 19:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DallasStudios (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
- File:GMZ Gamestop at CRM Studios.jpg
- File:Studio for Your Health Show.jpg
- File:CRM Health Show.jpg
- File:Screen Shot 2011-12-02 at 11.12.59 AM.png
- File:Screen Shot 2011-11-28 at 7.24.35 PM.png
- File:Screen Shot 2011-11-28 at 7.23.59 PM.png
- File:Screen Shot 2011-11-28 at 7.22.28 PM.png
INeverCry 19:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:48, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_RPO-8.svg ya existe archivo de mayor calidad GPOChile (talk) 19:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:56, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_RPO-12.svg ya existe archivo de mayor calidad GPOChile (talk) 19:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:56, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_RPO-10.svg ya existe archivo de mayor calidad GPOChile (talk) 19:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:56, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_RPO-11.svg ya existe archivo de mayor calidad GPOChile (talk) 19:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:56, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DeanBrundage (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images - only link is to declined AFC
- File:Skylight German Dunkelweizen Label.png
- File:Bellows Texas Amber Ale Label.png
- File:New Republic Brewing Company Logo.png
INeverCry 19:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:48, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_PF-2.svg ya existe archivo de mayor calidad GPOChile (talk) 19:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:57, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_IAA-5.svg existe archivo de mayor calidad GPOChile (talk) 19:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:57, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_IAA-4.svg existe un mejor archivo, mayor calidad GPOChile (talk) 19:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:57, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_IAA-3.svg ya existe un mejor archivo del mismo contenido GPOChile (talk) 19:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:57, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_PT-1.svg ya existe un archivo de mejor calidad y el mismo GPOChile (talk) 19:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not used, per user request: {{Duplicate}} Érico Wouters msg 01:57, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Ya existe un archivo de mayor calidad y el mismo contenido http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chile_PE-5.svg GPOChile (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
загружена более качественная версия (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Oldenburgskaya_estate_mixer_tap.JPG) Тиндол (talk) 20:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Agree --Eugeny1988 (talk) 00:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
An image with a resolution of 120 x 68 pixels which supposedly shows fragments from a document is essetially useless. It could be anything or nothing, impossible to recognize at this resolution. Furthermore, GFDL/CC is given as license without any specific reasoning, and the image is completely unsourced. --Uwe (talk) 12:56, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:49, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Copyvio (http://www.cafe.be/images/galleries/129159818875203923.JPG and http://www.cafe.be/Forms/frmPubDetails.aspx?id=51) EvilFreD overleg 21:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
- File:Richysize on consultation trip.jpg
- File:Richysize with friends.jpg
- File:Richysize with friend.jpg
- File:Richysize with friends females.jpg
- File:Richysize with prince delance.jpg
- File:Richysize with kkb.jpg
- File:Richysize random pics.jpg
- File:Richysize car pose 2.jpg
- File:Richysize matric.jpg
- File:Richysize site seeing.jpg
- File:Site seeing richysize.jpg
- File:Richysize during matric.jpg
- File:Richysize eating again.jpg
- File:Richysize after freestyle with blacksun.JPG
- File:Richysize mornig wake.jpg
- File:FINE richysize.JPG
- File:Dats wats up richysize.jpg
- File:Richysize.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 21:37, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lord-rocker (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 22:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mextri agung prabowo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 22:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom (possible copyvio as well) McZusatz (talk) 11:22, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 22:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 11:20, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Looks like yet another single-purpose account for exhibitionism, without any additional educational value in its contributions. See also: Commons:Nudity#Very_similar_to,_and_no_better_than,_existing_images.
- File:Eichelkranz.jpg
- File:Eichelkranz von der Seite.jpg
- File:Eichel nah.jpg
- File:Zeige meinen Eichelkranz.jpg
- File:Mein Eichelkranz.jpg
- File:Eichel.jpg
- File:Eigene Eichel.jpg
- File:Hole mir einen runter.flv.OGG
- File:Pickel an der Eichel.OGG
- File:Ppp.OGG
- File:Stuhlgang von hinten.OGG
- File:Defecation.OGG
- File:Stuhlgang.OGG
- File:Hornzipfel.OGG
- File:Hornzipfel an der Eichel.OGG
- File:Samenerguss.OGG
- File:Der Samenerguss.OGG
- File:Meine Eichel 11.jpg
- File:Meine Eichel 10.jpg
- File:Meine Eichel 9.jpg
- File:Meine Eichel 8.jpg
- File:Meine Eichel 7.jpg
- File:Meine Eichel 5.jpg
- File:Meine Eichel 6.jpg
- File:Meine Eichel 4.jpg
- File:Meine Eichel 3.jpg
- File:Meine Eichel 2.jpg
- File:Meine Eichel 1.jpg
- File:Eichel von oben gesehen.jpg
- File:Penis mit zurück gezogener Vorhaut.jpg
- File:Hornzipfel an meinem Eichelkranz.jpg
- File:Mein Penis beim Onanieren.jpg
- File:Steifer Penis mit Hornzipfeln am Eichelkranz.jpg
- File:Eichelkranz sehr nah fotografiert,mit vielen Hornzipfeln.jpg
- File:Hornzipfel am Eichelkranz mit zurückgezogener Vorhaut.jpg
- File:Penis Eichel mit Hornzipfeln.jpg
- File:Eichel beim Onanieren.jpg
- File:Eichelpickel.jpg
- File:Hornzipfel sehr nah.jpg
- File:Eichel mit Hornzipfel.jpg
- File:Eichel direkt von oben.jpg
- File:Penis steif,18cm lang.jpg
- File:Samenerguss beim Mann.jpg
- File:Masturbieren.jpg
- File:Penis beim Samenerguss.jpg
- File:Steifer Penis mit Unterhose.jpg
- File:Anus 6.jpg
- File:Anus 3.jpg
- File:Anus 4.jpg
- File:Anus 5.jpg
- File:Eichel beim Masturbieren.jpg
- File:Eichel mit Hornzipfeln beim Onanieren.jpg
- File:Eichel von oben.jpg
- File:Eichel mit Hornzipfeln.jpg
- File:Penis beim Onanieren.jpg
- File:Hornzipfel am Eichelkranz 1.jpg
- File:Pearly Penile Papule 3.jpg
- File:Pearly Penile Papule 2.jpg
- File:Pearly Penile Papule 1.jpg
- File:Hornzipfel am Eichelkranz.jpg
- File:Sehr nah am Eichelkranz.jpg
- File:Pearly Penile Papule.jpg
- File:Hirsuties papillaris genital.jpg
- File:Hornzipfel und Eichel.jpg
- File:Eichel und Vorhaut.jpg
- File:Meine Eichel von der Seite.jpg
- File:Vorhaut zurück.jpg
- File:Mein steifer Penis,18cm lang,vor dem Samenerguss.jpg
- File:Mein steifer Penis mit zurück geschobener Vorhaut.jpg
- File:Mein Penis von der Seite.jpg
- File:Mein steifer Penis,18cm lang.jpg
- File:Mein Penis mit Vorhaut.jpg
- File:Meine Eichel sehr nah.jpg
- File:Hornzipfel.jpg
- File:Vorhaut zurück gezogen.jpg
- File:Hirsuties papillaris genitals.jpg
- File:Meine Eichel mit Hornzipfeln.jpg
- File:Mein Eichelkranz mit vielen Hornzipfeln.jpg
- File:Mein Eichelkranz mit Hornzipfeln.jpg
A.Savin 14:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep the lot and refer to Category:Hirsuties papillaris penis. It is clearly educational in scope as per this journal (Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine), plus countless others. If there are individual photos which could be deleted because they are similar to others, then start individual DRs on those images. A bulk nomination such as this is NOT the way to go. russavia (talk) 14:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment - I would like to point out that the motives of the uploader are not germane to this discussion. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Per russavia: A mass deletion request is inappropriate in this case. --Leyo 19:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Keep some selected, educationally useful and good quality images, delete the other stuff (especially most of the clips). As the upload text clearly shows he's one of the "Look at my big dingdong" guys. --Denniss (talk) 20:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, agree with analysis by Russavia (talk · contribs), above. -- Cirt (talk) 22:20, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per consensus. As Russavia says, If there are individual photos which could be deleted because they are similar to others, then start individual DRs on those images. INeverCry 21:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
The licence only seems to apply to the scan and not to the underlying photo. Stefan4 (talk) 02:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am the owner of the original photo from my father. And the origin of the upload file was a photo of the original and not a "scan" as you assumed. Is this clear enough? --Drdoht (talk) 05:31, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- It says that the original photographer is "Deutsche Wehrmacht". Is your father called Deutsche Wehrmacht? It sounds like the name of an organisation and not like the name of a person. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- My father was at this time in duty of german wehrmacht. And he took the photo and he got the sign from his chief Hemmerich. § 43 UrhG "Urheber in Arbeits- oder Dienstverhaltnissen" is to be applied. On the other hand there is §72 UrhG, Abs. 3 "Lichtbilder" (sv.: "Fotografiska bilder", engl.: „photographic pictures“, dt.: „Lichtbilder“): 50 Jahre nach deren Aufnahme, wenn sie unveröffentlicht blieben, ist copyright abgelaufen.
- similar photos can be found File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-R19465, General Curt Liebmann.jpg
File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-2004-0164, Johannes Blaskowitz.jpg --Drdoht (talk) 11:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- If your father took the photo, then I suppose that it is fine.
- The German law about simple photos changed when Germany applied the w:Copyright Duration Directive in the 1990s, and the result is that almost all German photos currently are treated as "complex photos" (that is, protected for the lifetime of the photographer plus 70 years). Under the Copyright Duration Directive, Germany was forced to restore the copyright to all photos which were still protected by copyright elsewhere in the European Union unless it either is an anonymous photo published more than 70 years ago (see {{Anonymous-EU}}) or unless the photographer died more than 70 years ago (see {{PD-old-70}}). Under the "Ley de 10 de enero de 1879, de la propiedad intelectual", all German photos were protected by copyright in Spain unless the photographer died more than 80 years ago, so lots of German photos regained copyright protection in Germany. The problem with German photos is discussed at numerous places, for example at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Germany.
- People claim that the copyright to the Bundesarchiv photos has been acquired by the Bundesarchiv. I don't know what this statement is based on or whether it is correct. The Bundesarchiv has made lots of images available under a Creative Commons licence (which is permitted if the Bundesarchiv is the copyright holder). --Stefan4 (talk) 13:19, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sure if I would give this picture of Hemmerich (10x15 cm) to the german bundesarchiv they are going to publish it online by adding their own "copyright Bundesarchiv"-advice. --Drdoht (talk) 08:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
