Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/12/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Copyright Violation Starts (talk) 05:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 07:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Felaktig information i kommentaren Svionen (talk) 08:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason given for deletion request. INeverCry 09:14, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyright Violation Starts (talk) 11:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader reqested deletion of recently uploaded unused file McZusatz (talk) 11:57, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyright Violation Starts (talk) 11:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader reqested deletion of recently uploaded unused file McZusatz (talk) 11:57, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Derivative of TV screen Morning ☼ (talk) 13:14, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyvio Tabercil (talk) 15:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
its not important Anabel hepayo (talk) 05:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: User page so speedy Herby talk thyme 12:37, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
špatně jméno obrázku Dakstor (talk) 21:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Duplicate ; other one is in use. Elvey (talk) 03:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Auf Wunsch von Karoliner Müller SpreeTom (talk) 16:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted cover of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 19:55, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
down scaled version of 
Catfisheye (talk) 18:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Low resolution Techman224Talk 22:03, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
This is a cropped version of the official photo found at the county website [1]. Attribution as such can be seen in this newspaper [2] "Image courtesy Office of Brevard County Commissioner Andy Anderson" ; It is not a self-made image, unless the uploader meant the crop. -- 70.24.248.246 06:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Seems to be an obvious copyvio based on the evidence given here. Dennis Brown (talk) 13:29, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:48, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
The ESO source page says that this contains additional color data from an amateur astronomer but doesn't say if that person released their rights under the ESO license - Pine✉ 02:51, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:48, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. Senator2029 04:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 00:04, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 00:05, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Orozco-Rico Miguel MPSS U. VIH Faringoamigdalitis en la edad pediátrica Rev Med MD (12,2010).pdf
[edit]out of scope INeverCry 00:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 00:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 00:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. Additionally, photo is underexposed. Senator2029 04:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 00:47, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 01:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 01:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 01:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 01:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
The image is watermarked with the name of the photographer, who is likely not the uploader of it. Jespinos (talk) 01:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 01:25, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content Martin H. (talk) 01:38, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:52, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - simple text in a jpg file INeverCry 02:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 02:14, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Hello INeverCry, can you explain why this picture is out of scope? Timboliu (talk) 11:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't see what the educational value of this image is? INeverCry 17:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Hello INeverCry, can you explain why this picture is out of scope? Timboliu (talk) 11:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: screenshot of text, no educational value Julo (talk) 00:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 02:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 02:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user w/ company name INeverCry 02:41, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 02:44, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 02:45, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 02:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:02, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:51, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:51, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:53, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:53, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 02:54, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 02:55, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
See http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Burning_Man_228_(241613953).jpg . Same situation, IIRC. Elvey (talk) 02:57, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 00:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope Ignacio 
(discusión) 06:42, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
This is another Russian architect: Ernest Gibert (ru:Жибер, Эрнест Иванович). Photo of Alexander Zelenko can be found here, but it is probably under copyrigt. Sealle (talk) 10:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm not seeing anything anything in OTRS (it's been six weeks since promised submission with evidence of licensing) DMacks (talk) 10:50, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Varnent as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: unintentional duplication McZusatz (talk) 11:50, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Still in use. --McZusatz (talk) 11:50, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
This looks like an official potrait of Anura Bandaranaike from when he was Speaker of Parliament. It is unlikely to Masako Kawasaki's own work. Obi2canibe (talk) 13:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
This looks like an official potrait of Udaya Gammanpila. It is unlikely to be Photos by Anuradha's own work. Obi2canibe (talk) 13:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
this is my private page, please delete this!!! Charmbook (talk) 13:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
The relief is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 14:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted:
|
Copyright warning: A subject in this image is protected by copyright.
This image features an artistic work, photographed from a public space in Russia. Except for buildings, there are no freedom of panorama exemptions in Russia, which means that artistic works like sculptures and monuments cannot be photographed freely for anything other than noncommercial purposes. However, Russian jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work is an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". If a copyrighted artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted. Framing this image to focus on the copyrighted work is also a copyright violation. Before reusing this content, ensure that you have the right to do so. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's copyrights. See our general disclaimer for more information. |
Julo (talk) 00:30, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Delete as unused and uneeded. This was a prototype of a biography wizard I had started but abandoned and the image is no longer needed. Kumioko (talk) 14:32, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Vandalism based on File:Evangeline_Lilly_(2008).JPG. The user added what I suppose is supposed to be lasers from the black man's eyes in the background. Nymf (talk) 15:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Nymf pls
Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 15:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, unused personal image Julo (talk) 00:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Image appears to be same as from [3] which does not mention the subject of the image.Also would not appear to be useful as image to describe with the subject. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 19:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 15:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of a picture unlikely taken by the uploader, no details on permission. A.Savin 15:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
This is my own work, why not have permission Barano-baranov2010 (talk) 15:31, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- I actually don't think that you work in NASA somewhere... --A.Savin 15:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
I do not work for NASA, it's just the logo of my new Internet channel Mars. And YATV files, Skype TV, Quake Live, XX (Dvadtsatochka), it too was my logo. So that it's not relevant to NASA. Barano-baranov2010 (talk) 09:43, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 15:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, unused personal image Julo (talk) 00:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
The licence says the photo must be published before 1994 without a copyright notice. Here we don't really have a source that we could use to assume that it was published before 1994 or that there was no copyright Plushy (talk) 15:26, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- This photo was published in Poland in 1977, on the cover of book from series Współczesne życiorysy Polaków, title: Wanda Wasilewska, author: Zatorska Helena, editor ISKRY. See here. Julo (talk) 00:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: published in Poland in 1977 without (c) Julo (talk) 00:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
OTRS received, but the license doesn't aplies to commons. Denied. Willy Weazley 15:44, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- +the watermark suggests that the file cant be used for commercial purposes with attribution to "Bbl reviews". The uploader did not provide correct information. --Martin H. (talk) 14:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 16:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:31, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
It is incomplete and has been superseded by File:SicilianMafia1900Cutrera.jpg Kurzon (talk) 16:51, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Logo from football club which is copyright protected according to http://www.beachsoccerlansingerland.nl/ Miho (talk) 17:30, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 18:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
This is not in use on any page and its purpose is better served by code-generated maps. Kurzon (talk) 18:45, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, found on various websites. Funfood ␌ 18:47, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
We already have the Somali flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 18:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Appears to be a video snapshot. Jespinos (talk) 18:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
We have an SVG at File:Flag of Occitania (with star).svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Occitania (with star).svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:21, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. Alan (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
We have an SVG at File:Flag of Occitania.svg Fry1989 eh? 19:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Lengadòc.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Closed. Not exists. Alan (talk) 19:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
unused and inaccurate Hoodinski (talk) 19:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
IPN is an institute of research and education, not an international or "recognized" organization, or NGO. Ralgistalk 19:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 19:57, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 19:57, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 20:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 20:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 20:03, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
it's my own work for a movie produced by myself. I own all necessary rights - so, there is no need to delete it!
Best,
the creator
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 20:05, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 20:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 20:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 20:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 20:11, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 20:12, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 20:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 20:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Forged attribution ("Nils Penarc"), suggesting that it is a work by the Commons uploader. Also, there is no evidence that the Wikitravel contributor approved to license the image under the indicated licence. There is no licence specified on Wikitravel. Stefan4 (talk) 20:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Forged attribution ("Nils Penarc"), suggesting that it is a work by the Commons uploader. Also, there is no evidence that the Wikitravel contributor approved to license the image under the indicated licence. There is no licence specified on Wikitravel. Stefan4 (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Forged attribution ("García Penarc"), suggesting that it is a work by the Commons uploader. Wikitravel doesn't tell who the photographer is. Stefan4 (talk) 20:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 20:27, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Logo- Threshold of originality concern. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Logo- Threshold of originality concern Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:41, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
File apparently copied from http://en.wikivoyage-old.org/wiki/File:Havanna_Buenos_Aires.jpg where it doesn't say where the image comes from. Stefan4 (talk) 21:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Image taken from http://en.wikivoyage-old.org/wiki/File:Knueppelski_on_Snake.jpg in violation of {{Do not upload Wikipedia thumbnails}} where it is both unsourced and unlicensed. Stefan4 (talk) 21:20, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Image taken from http://en.wikivoyage-old.org/wiki/File:Brac-Beach.jpg where neither source nor licence are indicated. Stefan4 (talk) 21:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete No license information available. Badzil (talk) 15:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 21:35, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 21:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 22:54, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Likely no encyclopedic value - the file is not used in any Wikimedia project nor seems it to be a user image High Contrast (talk) 23:05, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Image from Dutch police Twitter account (twitter.com/politie). No evidence of permission. 213.10.17.29 23:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
If we don't know who the author is, the we don't know if this pictures is in public domain. Also, if the author was Mexican (González was Mexican), we would have to wait 100 years since the death of the copyright holder. Ralgistalk 23:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
All of the following are 22 to 43 years old. While it is possible that they are all "own work" of this new uploader as claimed, he has uploaded at least three copyvios, also claiming own work, so we should have further explanation for these.
- File:DrErmilNichifor AteneulRoman1980.jpg
- File:DrErmilNichifor1969.jpg
- File:DrErmilNichifor1970.jpg
- File:DrErmilNichifor1980.jpg
- File:DrErmilNichifor1990.jpg
- File:DrNichiforEnachescuDiaconescu1971.jpg
- File:ErmilNichiforConcertOrchestraMedicilor 1.jpg
- File:ErmilNichiforConcertOrchestraMedicilor 2.jpg
- File:ErmilNichiforRepetitieOrchestraMedicilor 1.jpg
- File:ErmilNichiforRepetitieOrchestraMedicilor 2.jpg
- File:ErmilNichiforRepetitieOrchestraMedicilor 3.jpg
- File:ErmilNichiforRepetitieOrchestraMedicilor 4.jpg
- File:OrchestraMedicilor AteneulRoman1988.jpg
- File:OrchestraMedicilor1988.jpg
- File:Dr. Ermil Nichifor, dirijor.jpg
- File:Dr. Ermil Nichifor, medic.jpg
- File:Dr. Ermil Nichifor, Premiul Criticii Muzicale, 1998.jpg
- File:Gheorghe Nichifor.jpg
- File:ProfGhNichifor&DrErmilNichifor1942.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:52, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 02:30, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
unused duplicate of File:Fdmadfe.jpg INeverCry 02:33, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
unused duplicate of File:HochsauerlandWasser.jpg INeverCry 02:50, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo INeverCry 02:57, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 20:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
IPN is an institute of research and education, not an international or "recognized" organization, or NGO. Ralgistalk 20:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:53, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 20:58, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 21:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 21:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 21:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo INeverCry 21:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. Blacklord12 (talk) 20:48, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 21:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 21:21, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 21:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 21:26, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:27, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 21:30, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:33, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 21:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 21:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 21:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 21:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 21:51, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 21:57, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo INeverCry 21:58, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 22:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - unsourced collage INeverCry 22:04, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 22:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 22:20, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope at this size INeverCry 22:21, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 22:21, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:27, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
I was wrong. Khonkaen09 (talk) 16:38, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Fair use rationale is not applicable here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maxdolan1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 00:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. Additionally, photos are too dark to be useful. Senator2029 04:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saska Aylin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 00:47, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Neyfernand0 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 01:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sonia.chaine (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
- File:Born Wild Signature.jpg
- File:Panther Swarovski.pdf
- File:Red Jean.pdf
- File:David millenium.jpg
- File:Blue crocodile.pdf
- File:Red crocodile collier.pdf
- File:Bright Letters.tif
INeverCry 02:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 02:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - images of teddy bears hanging from a headboard - no educational value - some are very low quality - possible COM:DW issues with the pics of the Carousel and crystal object as there's no indication of the age of the objects or who created them
- File:C'est plus fidèle le qu'une blon onde ! eh ça dépend quelle blonde je parle pas de Monroe !.jpg
- File:Avoir un bon copain c'est la meiulleure chose au monde !.jpg
- File:Mon copain roux est venu à ma rescRousse ! Merci l'ami je t'aime bien !.jpg
- File:Vraiment tout seul ....mais je connais un plat qui se mange froid sur des siècles et des siecles !.jpg
- File:Et je finis tout seul !.jpg
- File:Nous sommes 3 et moi je suis au milieu.jpg
- File:Petit caprice des dieux.jpg
- File:....ni Nicolas ni lemarchand de sable cou - cou !.jpg
- File:Et oui c'est moi nounours eh oui c'est Moi nounours ne cherchez pas pimprenelle....jpg
- File:Drin ? qui ne sazit qui drin ?.jpg
- File:Ouh..ouh je suis l'ours des ténèbres ...jpg
- File:Et là vous avez eu peur ? c'est moi le nounours de Titine néé en 1960 (2è indice).jpg
- File:Coucou me revoilou !.jpg
- File:Inspecteur Gadget !.jpg
- File:P'tite tête ....jpg
- File:Photo réalisée sans trucage iiii.jpg
- File:....font plus que rage ...voir La fontaine et ses fables ! PUB !.jpg
- File:Le carroussel va se courrousser ....patience et longueur de temps ...jpg
- File:Ceci est un manège de chevaux de bois en porcelaine ....jpg
- File:Ça c'est le vide poche de Nénenne mon arrière grand - mère qui était coiffeuse avec son mari - M1 Mme Fappez avantt d'entrer - rue du Molinel à Lille, le petit moulin à musique comme celui que vous verrez ailleurs dans une autre page Wiki iii.jpg
- File:Bonjour c'est moi le groom ! Regardez cette belle cavalière ( ou cavalier ?) sur un beau cheval blanc "un jour mon prince viendra !".jpg
INeverCry 02:29, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Techman224Talk 03:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Spudspud94 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 02:38, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lebanon office (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 02:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 01:02, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TechieCrunch (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional - unused text logos - only uploads of user with same company name
INeverCry 03:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tomorrow's Yesterday (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 03:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AngelicaPro (talk · contribs)
[edit]obvious flickr washing
- File:Jaume-10.jpg
- File:Jaume-9.jpg
- File:Jaume- 8.jpg
- File:Jaume-7.jpg
- File:Jaume-6.jpg
- File:Jaume-4.jpg
- File:Jaume - 4.jpg
- File:Jaume- 3.jpg
- File:Jaume-2 .jpg
- File:Jaume -1.jpg
Morning ☼ (talk) 04:43, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: I forgot to turn to Copyvio mode in VisualFileChange.js. Speedy delete Morning ☼ (talk) 04:45, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AngelicaPro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Professional photoshot, all of them are stated to be taken yesterday, which suggests that the Flickr account may not be the author
- File:Paola vintimilla -3.jpg
- File:Paola vintimilla- 5.jpg
- File:Paola Vintimilla-2.jpg
- File:Paola vintimilla.jpg
Morning ☼ (talk) 15:49, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete them all unfortunately. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:22, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ulster Museum Troubles Exhibit
[edit]The photographs of this exhibition feature too much copyrighted text / contemporary photographs to be cleared from copyright
- File:Ulster Museum (45), October 2009.JPG
- File:Ulster Museum (46), October 2009.JPG
- File:Ulster Museum (47), October 2009.JPG
- File:Ulster Museum (48), October 2009.JPG
- File:Ulster Museum (49), October 2009.JPG
- File:Ulster Museum (50), October 2009.JPG
- File:Ulster Museum (51), October 2009.JPG
- File:Ulster Museum (52), October 2009.JPG
- File:Ulster Museum (53), October 2009.JPG
- File:Ulster Museum (54), October 2009.JPG
Vera (talk) 10:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
At least 5 uploads are copyvios and the user's talk page indicates there have been problems with copyvios before. So the rest is likely to be a copyvio, too.
- File:M5pcACxoE90.jpg
- File:Post-404-1317335405.jpg
- File:Авиачартет.jpg
- File:Boeing 757-200 avia Utair.jpg
- File:UTair Vnukovo.jpg
- File:Domodedovo2.jpg
- File:Японские авиалинии.jpg
- File:С7 Сибирь.jpg
- File:ВИМ-Авиа.jpg
- File:Домодедово.jpg
- File:200132-ap2.jpg
- File:Japan boeing 787.jpg
- File:JAL 787.jpg
- File:Московия.jpg
- File:LogoRus.jpg
- File:Airbus A330-300 Vladivostok Avia.jpg
- File:CRJ-200 Air Volga white.jpg
- File:CRJ-200 Air Volga red.jpg
- File:RusLine Air.jpg
- File:Airbus-a319-3.jpg
- File:A320 China Southern.jpg
- File:London A321 Airways.jpg
- File:Airbus A319 Scandinavian Airlines System.jpg
- File:Post-51639-126059363328 thumb.jpg
- File:Normal A320 Alitalia.JPG
- File:Fv plane 1.jpg
- File:D-AILC-1.jpg
- File:Airbus A319 Aeroflot-Russian Airlines.jpg
- File:Airbus A319-111 - Iberia.jpg
- File:A321aus2.jpg
- File:Airbus A320 Grecce.jpg
- File:S7 Airlines A319 airport.jpg
- File:A321 Aeroflot.jpg
- File:Sheremetievo A320.jpg
- File:Airbus A320 domodedovo koltsovo.jpg
- File:S7 Airlines A320 fly.jpg
- File:0 5f517 1d39103a XL.jpg
- File:CRJ-200 IRaero.jpg
- File:Tulpar-Air.jpg
- File:0 59db0 fd70e6a8 orig.jpg
- File:Sochi-airport.jpg
- File:DomodedovoSpotting 05.jpg
- File:KA380.jpg
- File:000815siberia.jpg
- File:1Q9X3810 big.jpg
- File:N211.JPG
- File:Phoca thumb l ART7109.jpg
- File:Phoca thumb l ART7003.jpg
- File:KUBANN7373SR.jpg
- File:Сибирочка.jpg
- File:DONAVI7375SR.jpg
- File:Илюша.jpg
- File:0 8a742 fa19b565 XL.jpg
Didym (talk) 16:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement of some king. Appear to be used in article about food product and not related to subject directly.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:04, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nissanmaxima35 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:04, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnwang7683 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Canberra Hospital Centre View.jpg
- File:Coombs Building ANU.jpg
- File:Canberra Hospital bird's eye view.jpg
- File:John curtin ANU.jpg
- File:Hyung-a kim.jpg
- File:ANU campus walk.jpg
- File:ANU school of Art.jpg
- File:Ian Chubb ANU.jpg
- File:Rudd in Yonsei Univ.jpg
- File:Law building at ANU.jpg
- File:ANU University House.jpg
- File:The Australian National University 1.jpg
- File:Aerial view of ANU.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
REQUEST FOR CANCEL THE DELETION REQUEST--------------------
You have requested deletion of the files I have uploaded, as following: File:Canberra Hospital Centre View.jpg File:Coombs Building ANU.jpg File:Canberra Hospital bird's eye view.jpg File:John curtin ANU.jpg File:Hyung-a kim.jpg File:ANU campus walk.jpg File:ANU school of Art.jpg File:Ian Chubb ANU.jpg File:Rudd in Yonsei Univ.jpg File:Law building at ANU.jpg File:ANU University House.jpg File:The Australian National University 1.jpg File:Aerial view of ANU.jpg
I understand why you have done so and I accept the fact that I was not aware of copyright policy that I should not upload any material gained from the internet, in which are not my work.
HOWEVER, NOT all files above are gained from the web. There are several photos that I HAVE TAKEN with my OWN CAMERA.
They are: File:ANU campus walk.jpg File:ANU school of Art.jpg File:Law building at ANU.jpg File:ANU University House.jpg File:The Australian National University 1.jpg
I really would like to you know this and cancel the deletion request on the five of my own work.
The rest of them are gained from the internet and I will accept the decision of the wikimedia common council.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.156.27.85 (talk • contribs)
- File:ANU campus walk.jpg is a cropped version of this photo from nothinglikeaustralia. captioned with the name Claire Long on that page.
- File:ANU school of Art.jpg is a downscaled duplicate of File:ANU School of Art panorama.jpg created by our user User:Bidgee.
- User is not saying the truth. --Martin H. (talk) 15:35, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 02:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Web cabecera pano big tp.jpg
- File:Torresdemonterrey.jpg
- File:Panoramicabucaramanga1.jpg
- File:Bucaramanga08.jpg
- File:54292722785958731b94b.jpg
- File:Ashgabat.png
- File:Georgetown.png
- File:Villavicencio.png
- File:Monteria.png
- File:Riohacha la Guajira.png
- File:POPAYAN.png
- File:YOPAL.png
- File:Bucaramanga collage mejorado.png
- File:Bucaramanga collage extra.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. INeverCry 17:52, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Bouslimani M..jpg
- File:الشيخ محمد بوسليماني.jpg
- File:Mohamed Bouslimani.jpg
- File:محمد بوسليماني.jpg
- File:فريق التصميم.jpg
- File:Makri et Chikh Nahnah.jpg
- File:عبد الرزاق مقري ومحمد أحمد الراشد.jpg
- File:Makri Abderezzak.jpg
- File:عبد الرزاق مقري وإسماعيل هنية.jpg
- File:قسم السلوك لأكاديمية جيل الترجيح.jpg
- File:ملقتى الأكاديمية جويلية 2009.jpg
- File:ندوة شبابية سياسية.jpg
- File:دورة حفظ القرآن الكريم.jpg
- File:مهرجان السمعي البصري الأول 2011.jpg
- File:مهرجان السمعي البصري الثاني.jpg
- File:شباب أكاديمية جيل الترجيح.jpg
- File:دورة تدريب مدربين.jpg
- File:فريق الويب لأكاديمية جيل الترجيح.jpg
- File:فريق الويب.jpg
- File:فريق التدريب الدفعة الثانية.jpg
- File:ملتقى القرآن الكريم.jpg
- File:عرض مسرحي لقادة أكاديمية جيل الترجيح.jpg
- File:A. Makri.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anastasyafhily (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Cakkabasket.jpg
- File:Cakkaelangtftree.jpg
- File:Kkaandguitar.jpg
- File:Cakka Nuraga.jpg
- File:Cakka geronimo.jpg
- File:Kka.jpg
- File:Cakka-nuraga-icil2-baim-wong-sinet-dewi.jpg
- File:Cakka 14.jpg
- File:Cakka 13.jpg
- File:Cakka 12.jpg
- File:Cakka 11.jpg
- File:Cakka 10.jpg
- File:Cakka 9.jpg
- File:Cakka 8.jpg
- File:Cakka 7.jpg
- File:Cakka 4.jpg
- File:Cakka 6.jpg
- File:Cakka 2.jpg
- File:Cakka1.jpg
- File:Cakka 3.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karavaggio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sdjkskdsj23 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 18:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by María Gattas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - text in jpg and unused text logo - only link is to declined AFC
INeverCry 20:44, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Salvador Meegeren (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal image and personal artwork
INeverCry 20:50, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 20:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khokhani.kevin (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional - unused logos - only uploads of user - may also be complex enough to be copyvio
INeverCry 21:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 21:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Berthuysentruyt (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 21:47, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnnywaynedepp (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 22:03, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
- File:Aficiones.jpg
- File:Carol dandolo todo.jpg
- File:Carol dando Penica.jpg
- File:Sobreviviendo a 15ºC bajo cero.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 22:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patrickhass (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 22:26, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 10:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal logos
INeverCry 23:20, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- File:Gcclogo.jpg
- File:Banquets.jpg
- File:Wedding1.jpg
- File:Purple bay.jpg
- File:Kesario.jpg
- File:Pool side cafe.jpg
- File:Gym2.jpg
- File:Sauna1.jpg
- File:Kesario GCC.jpg
- File:Badminton GCC.jpg
- File:TT GCC.jpg
- File:Swimming GCC.jpg
- File:Tenniscourt GCC.jpg
- File:Playarea GCC.jpg
- File:Billiards GCC.jpg
- File:GCC Business hotel & club.jpg
- File:GCC Buisness Hotel & Club.jpg
Pictures used for promotional purpose. Out of scope. User blocked from en:WP for spamming. Badzil (talk) 23:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Apparently, this was uploaded by a brand new user, who then some time later nominated his own picture for deletion because some people pictured did not want to have it on commons (see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:DaCruz.JPG). This picture is not used anywhere, and I doubt it will ever be used anywhere. And yet it was kept. Uh..
I suppose I could explain why this was wrong on so many levels, but I'll spare myself the effort and just point at Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Brazil. People pictured explicitly do not want the picture here, so we have to delete it. Conti|✉ 01:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Info: the old DR is here. --JuTa 09:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Keep In this case that would describe our situation: "people who are present in a public space or participating in a public event (unless the depicted person is the main focus of the picture)"--Sanandros (talk) 09:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- It is entirely possible that the picture shows a wedding or some other private event. Laws aside, we know that a person depicted does not want the picture to be here, we know that the original deletion request comes from the uploader himself(!) and we know that the picture is unused. Showing some basic human decency here instead of clinging to every single picture on commons as if it were the holy grail would be kinda nice, really. --Conti|✉ 11:58, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- OK we could accept a blurred version but legally i c it no problem cause it was photographed form a public space as we can c at the litle wall.--Sanandros (talk) 02:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- It could still have been a private event. --Conti|✉ 02:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- but there it's writen OR public event.--Sanandros (talk) 03:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- It could still have been a private event. --Conti|✉ 02:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- OK we could accept a blurred version but legally i c it no problem cause it was photographed form a public space as we can c at the litle wall.--Sanandros (talk) 02:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- It is entirely possible that the picture shows a wedding or some other private event. Laws aside, we know that a person depicted does not want the picture to be here, we know that the original deletion request comes from the uploader himself(!) and we know that the picture is unused. Showing some basic human decency here instead of clinging to every single picture on commons as if it were the holy grail would be kinda nice, really. --Conti|✉ 11:58, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This picture is not used on any Wikimedia project, and does not offer any unique educational value. I see no reason not to accommodate the wishes of those in the photo. -Pete F (talk) 21:04, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: I am reluctant to create a precedent of deleting images on request, but this does seem very useful to anyone -- perhaps even out of scope. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused overwritten personal image INeverCry 03:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete No clear educational value to any of the 3 versions of the image. Uncategorized, no meaningful description. -Pete F (talk) 21:07, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:47, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
author:Elisabeth Conrad, no permission Morning ☼ (talk) 03:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Uploader name is "EinReisender" (English "A Traveler") and that is obviously not the real name. All uploads by "EinReisender" is credited to "Elisabeth Conrad" so I think that it is the real name of the uploader. --MGA73 (talk) 14:56, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- It seems that the user hasn't filled in any real name at Special:Preferences (check by adding "?action=credits" at the end of the URL to a page edited by the user). Still, all files by the user are credited to the same name (except for one file which is uncredited), so that is probably the uploader's real name. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't understand how the import-from-WikiVoyage process works. Where are you finding the user name or user page of the original uploader? Has anybody left her a note about this? I tried to confirm, but was unable to find where her user page is (which seems like a problem for the "attribution" component of the license for all imported photos, apart from the questions like here). -Pete F (talk) 21:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- The import-from-Wikitravel process has been split up in multiple steps, and there are now multiple different websites with more or less identical content. This file was originally uploaded by this user, who was last active in 2005. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:10, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you -- and yes, now I see that link in the "source" field. It seems to me if this is kept, the file should somehow link to this reasoning: that as far as we know, the person who uploaded the file is the person who is named as the author. That would help the person accessing the file to (1) be confident about the legitimacy of the licensing claim, and (2) comply with the "attribution" component of the license. I don't know what the cleanest way to do this is, perhaps in a link to this discussion from the "source" field? -Pete F (talk) 23:34, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- The import-from-Wikitravel process has been split up in multiple steps, and there are now multiple different websites with more or less identical content. This file was originally uploaded by this user, who was last active in 2005. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:10, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- I don't understand how the import-from-WikiVoyage process works. Where are you finding the user name or user page of the original uploader? Has anybody left her a note about this? I tried to confirm, but was unable to find where her user page is (which seems like a problem for the "attribution" component of the license for all imported photos, apart from the questions like here). -Pete F (talk) 21:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- It seems that the user hasn't filled in any real name at Special:Preferences (check by adding "?action=credits" at the end of the URL to a page edited by the user). Still, all files by the user are credited to the same name (except for one file which is uncredited), so that is probably the uploader's real name. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: There is automatically a link to the DR discussion from the talk page of every kept file. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
it's a picture of woman born in 1940. How can be own work? 188.86.2.202 19:28, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The "date" field lists 2012, but this is clearly not a 72 year old woman. As the nom asserts, "own work" is therefore hard to believe. -Pete F (talk) 21:16, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree that this one seems unlikely, hence my deletion, but some of us are older than you think -- I have at least one "own work" image on Commons from the 1950s. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
UK copyright law does not apply for this image because Ceylon gained independence from the UK in 1948 and had full legislative power. Obi2canibe (talk) 13:49, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Wikimedia Foundation is a US-based entity and is bound by US copyright laws, not by Sri Lankan laws. kashmiri 15:56, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Why not just move it at Wikipedia with a fair use rationale?--94.65.29.101 01:15, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- That would be ok, but someone needs to do it. kashmiri 03:16, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- Well, why don't you do it?--94.65.29.101 01:28, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- That would be ok, but someone needs to do it. kashmiri 03:16, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- Why not just move it at Wikipedia with a fair use rationale?--94.65.29.101 01:15, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete from Commons BUT upload to Wikipedia with a fair-use rationale--94.65.29.101 02:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: contemporary art, protected by copyright Denniss (talk) 16:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- It is a detail photo of the front of this tractor File:Roßthal 2010 Schulfest 23.jpg. -- sk (talk) 21:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: The medals are de minimis in the larger image, but a copyvio here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Obersachse as Copyvio (db-copyvio) INeverCry 19:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- It was Obersachse himself who told me to upload it here. Talk about the quality of RuWP administration. I'm not too experienced with Wikimedia and I apologize for the disturbance - I simply followed his instruction, which aparently was a mistake. Please delete the file. Leo711 (talk) 20:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Question Does this pass the threshold of originality? That is what we need to look at with this logo. russavia (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: I think it passes TOO, but it's on WP:EN as fair use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United States. Additionally:
- Erroneously credited to something containing the name of the Commons uploader ("Shannon LaBelle Penarc") instead of the original Wikitravel uploader ("Shannon LaBelle"), thereby violating the attribution requirement.
- Uploaded using the wrong licence template: {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} instead of {{Cc-by-sa-all}}. Stefan4 (talk) 19:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- How does FoP apply in this case? Badzil (talk) 14:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- It doesn't apply since USA doesn't provide freedom of panorama for dolls on a cart. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:13, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep FoP
notapplicable. The description of the image needs to be modified, but it can be kept. Badzil (talk) 15:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)- Image description has been modified per source. Badzil (talk) 15:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Please clarify. FOP clearly doesn't apply, so you need permission from the one who made the doll. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:27, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant that FoP applies in this case. This is not a work of art. Badzil (talk) 15:55, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Dolls are art, so why don't you think that this doll would be art? Check Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Barbie dolls. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- The reason for deletion in the Barbie case was the following: "It would appear that the copyright on Barbie dolls was renewed". Please tell me where the copyright is here. Badzil (talk) 16:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- No, the reason for deletion in the Barbie case was the following: The dolls are protected by copyright. That reason is also valid here. The only difference is that the Barbie dolls are old, so they need a copyright notice and a renewal, whereas this is a recent doll which is protected by copyright automatically without any need for any formalities. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Agree with Stefan. U.S. law does not require copyright to be filed, and has not for several decades. -Pete F (talk) 21:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- No, the reason for deletion in the Barbie case was the following: The dolls are protected by copyright. That reason is also valid here. The only difference is that the Barbie dolls are old, so they need a copyright notice and a renewal, whereas this is a recent doll which is protected by copyright automatically without any need for any formalities. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- The reason for deletion in the Barbie case was the following: "It would appear that the copyright on Barbie dolls was renewed". Please tell me where the copyright is here. Badzil (talk) 16:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Dolls are art, so why don't you think that this doll would be art? Check Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Barbie dolls. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant that FoP applies in this case. This is not a work of art. Badzil (talk) 15:55, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Please clarify. FOP clearly doesn't apply, so you need permission from the one who made the doll. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:27, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Image description has been modified per source. Badzil (talk) 15:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- It doesn't apply since USA doesn't provide freedom of panorama for dolls on a cart. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:13, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as the "doll" is subject to copyright. There are surely many free pictures of the Portland Soapbox Derby that would not have this issue (just search Flickr). -Pete F (talk) 21:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Badzil, again, most toys, dolls, models, inflatable animals, and the like have a copyright as sculpture. In general, unless an object is useful, it almost certainly has a copyright, and many useful objects also have copyrights. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
duplicata du fichier Ighil Ali.JPG Beyonce70 (talk) 19:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Not even close to being a duplicate -- some of the same buildings, but not a dupe. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Duplicata du fichier Ighil ali Beyonce70 (talk) 20:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate of what file? . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a movie. Rapsar (talk) 20:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Comment - apparently from 1933, so may not have been renewed. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Possibly not renewed, or, since it is a Spanish laguage poster, probably not published in the USA. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
This file equivalent to Wundersleben_Kirche.JPG and contains the wrong description. Arnd (talk) 23:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with deleting this as a duplicate, notwithstanding the difference in file size. Do you know where this church is? Tunzenhausen and Wundersleben are 2 small towns less than a km apart - maybe it would be better to ask the uploader if one description is more correct. File:Tunzenhausen_Kirche_3.JPG, a picture of the same building, is used to illustrate de:Tunzenhausen --moogsi(blah) 14:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
The uploader (an elderly man) requested my to delete the picture (File:Tunzenhausen Kirche.jpg). He accidentially uploaded it with the wrong name. This church is in Wundersleben and he already uploaded the same file with the correct description (File:Wundersleben_Kirche.JPG). --Arnd (talk) 15:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Thanks, I've changed the description on File:Tunzenhausen_Kirche_3.JPG and asked for a rename --moogsi(blah) 17:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Moogsi, the file File:Tunzenhausen_Kirche_3.JPG was fine. It is located in Tunzenhausen. Could you please revert your changes. I only ask to delete File:Tunzenhausen Kirche.jpg because it is in Wundersleben (already uploaded File:Wundersleben_Kirche.JPG) --Arnd (talk) 18:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Argh sorry they are clearly not the same building :) - I wasn't paying attention. I'll make sure all the descriptions and categories are right after it's been rerenamed :) --moogsi(blah) 21:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- The file File:Tunzenhausen_Kirche_3.JPG has been rerenamed to File:Tunzenhausen_Kirche_3.jpg. Sorry again everyone :/ --moogsi(blah) 22:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Moogsi, what about File:Tunzenhausen Kirche.jpg, could you please remove it now? --Arnd (talk) 09:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:07, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deletion Request isn t correct any more, i downloaded the new version, the new picture Sorry, but I´m not the author of this picture, even it´s better than mine.--Schorle (talk) 15:57, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
„File:Carolin Golubytskyi.jpg“ 79.218.147.206 18:25, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- I assume the original one from 2009 was taken by Schorle, the new one from 2012 was taken by Cagol. I further assume - as Cagol seems to be a short form of Carolin Golubytski -, that the pictured person is trying to replace the old image with a new one. So the copyright question should be clarified and the deletion is not necessary. -- Köllner (talk) 19:33, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Nichts löschen, nur revertieren. Das neue Bild von Frau Golubytski ist schon hier korrekt hochgeladen: File:London 12.jpg --Friechtle (talk) 06:14, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- Hinweis: das vormals London 12.jpg genannte Bild findet sich nun unter File:Carolin Golubytskyi London 2012.jpg. Das Bild auf den der Löschantrag läuft habe ich wieder auf die ursprüngliche Version revertiert. Der Löschantrag hat sich eigentlich erledigt und kann entfernt werden ohne das was gelöscht werden müsste. --Friechtle (talk) 05:22, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Nichts löschen, nur revertieren. Das neue Bild von Frau Golubytski ist schon hier korrekt hochgeladen: File:London 12.jpg --Friechtle (talk) 06:14, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: per Friechtle McZusatz (talk) 10:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
this is not lang=zh-hans. Steinsplitter (talk) 22:25, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: hope this did not break any templates McZusatz (talk) 11:05, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Unknown source (uploaded by me from Internet years ago), possibly wrong location. Hugo.arg (talk) 10:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete No way to find out where this originally came from --moogsi(blah) 15:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- Question So, the deletion reason is no permission? If so, then I agree with deletion. Otherwise the profile of the mountains closely resembles those at the right side of this panorama of Salinas Grandes. Before this is deleted, we should replace all uses with File:Salargrande.jpg which is a view matching the left side of that panorama. -84user (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- It seems like the panorama was taken from a very similar location. I agree that redirecting to a similar image is prudent as this file is used on so many pages --moogsi(blah) 15:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- I enhanced File:Salargrande.jpg a bit and then replaced all usage. This DR can now be closed as "Deleted". --McZusatz (talk) 10:52, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 19:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Sri Lankan logos
[edit]- File:Anu central logo thishura.jpg
- File:AV.jpg
- File:Bmmv crest.jpg
- File:BMMV crest.jpg
- File:Debate circle logo kingswood college kandy.jpg
- File:DsLogo.jpg.jpg
- File:Elakiri.jpg
- File:Gateway symbol2.jpg
- File:Gothami Kanishta Vidyalaya.jpg
- File:Hutch logo.jpg
- File:IET Logo low res.png
- File:IT club logo kingswood college kandy.png
- File:Jvc logo.jpg
- File:Kalutara Vidyalaya.jpg
- File:Kingswood College Kandy crest.jpg
- File:Lakbima.jpg
- File:Logo janadhipathi.png
- File:Mahanama college colombo 03.jpg
- File:Maliyadeva Scout logo.jpg
- File:Nalanda emblem.png
- File:News 01.jpg
- File:NTB-AMEX.jpg
- File:Pol.sri lanka.JPG
- File:Pol.sri lanka.png
- File:Richmondlogo.jpg
- File:Rahula1.jpg
- File:SanghamittaGirlsCollege.jpg
- File:Sbvcrest.jpg
- File:Screen shot 2011-07-03 at 18.06.17.png
- File:Sjnsp logo.jpg
- File:SLAC.png
- File:Slpolice.gif
- File:SMC-Crest.jpg
- File:SMC-Logo.jpg
- File:SouthlandsCollege.jpg
- File:Sri Lanka Air Force Crest.png
- File:Sri Lanka EMT.jpg
- File:Sri Medananda Daham Pasala.jpg
- File:Sripalee Logo.jpg
- File:St. Thomas' Girls' High School Crest.jpg
- File:Sujatha Vidyalaya Crest.jpg
- File:Symbolamc.jpg
- File:The science society logo of kingswood college kandy sri lanka.png
- File:Tnl tv logo.png
- File:Wijayaratnam Hindu Central College.jpg
- File:WssckCrest.jpg
- File:WUSLflag.jpg
- File:WuslLogo.jpg
All these images are logos of Sri Lankan companies, schools and other organisations. The copyrights to these logos are likely to belong to the organisations, not the uploaders. --Obi2canibe (talk) 13:49, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep File:Hutch logo.jpg as probably too simple to meet threshold of originality, possibly even if following British threshold of originality. (Hutchinson operates in multiple countries, and it's not clear whether this logo was first published in India, Sri Lanka, or elsewhere. Some of these countries may follow the very low threshold inherited from the United Kingdom; some others might not.) Some of the other logos may be so old that their copyrights have expired, but I don't know. Most should probably be deleted. --Closeapple (talk) 11:27, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- To make my above statement clearer: Delete (or move to projects) most of the nominated files, if they cannot be shown to be out of copyright. (My "Keep" is only for the logos so simple that they are unlikely to meet Commons:Threshold of originality for their originating countries.) --Closeapple (talk) 22:33, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- To make my above statement clearer:
- Question Are logos not allowed in commons? --Lee (talk) 03:38, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Logos are allowed on Commons: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Trademarks. (The deletion reason put on each file was unclear.) There are two protected "rights" that a logo often has:
- A logo is usually a trademark, but that right is not relevant to Commons. (We follow Commons:Non-copyright restrictions and put a template on a file to warn others, but the file is allowed.)
- A logo also can have enough artistic "originality" that it is copyrighted like any art. Artistic works in almost every country are now copyrighted from the moment they are created. Commons only accepts files that have no copyright, or have licenses to allow free copying. This is the important question on Commons.
- Some countries (like the UK) have very a very low threshold of originality: That is, almost any small change to a font or shape is enough to make it original enough for copyright. Some other countries (like the U.S.) have a high threshold: There are many combinations of words and shapes that are considered "obvious" in the United States and will not create a copyright. The problems with logos are that:
- We have to know what country the logo was first published in, to know what country's copyright standards apply. A multinational logo is often from a different country than the article it is used in on Wikipedia.
- Even once we know the country, sometimes it is unclear what that country's Commons:Threshold of originality is. Does Sri Lanka have a very low threshold like the UK, or something else?
- Sometimes the copyright has expired because the logo is so old; but sometimes the logo has been re-drawn in the previous century, which might make the "new" drawing copyrighted anyway. Commons:Copyright rules by territory has the length of copyright terms for each country. Also, copyrights are often based on the time after an artist's death, and it is often difficult to determine what "artist" created a logo, so it is difficult to determine when the copyright might expire.
- I hope this helps. --Closeapple (talk) 11:04, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Logos are allowed on Commons: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Trademarks. (The deletion reason put on each file was unclear.) There are two protected "rights" that a logo often has:
- Yes, You answered my question perfectly. I don’t have much knowledge on the said law in Sri Lanka, so I won’t be doing much of contribution in this discussion. But I guess some of these logos can/should be moved to projects that are referencing them. Is there a possibility to automate that? --Lee (talk) 11:12, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Usually it is done manually, but I think a few users may have scripts/bot that can do many of them at once. Maybe an administrator knows of users who can run a process for that. Before it happens, someone will need to determine whether each project allows "fair use". Also, even when done manually, there are tools to help: for example, Commons:CommonsHelper 2 has a checkmark option to move the file "backwards" from Commons to another project, instead of from another project to Commons. --Closeapple (talk) 14:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, You answered my question perfectly. I don’t have much knowledge on the said law in Sri Lanka, so I won’t be doing much of contribution in this discussion. But I guess some of these logos can/should be moved to projects that are referencing them. Is there a possibility to automate that? --Lee (talk) 11:12, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Question: Isn't File:Mahanama college colombo 03.jpg just an out of process recreation of the previously deleted copyright violation File:Mahanama College Colombo 03 Logo.png, also uploaded by repeat copyright violator Tharakaromesh? —LX (talk, contribs) 10:18, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- It is. --McZusatz (talk) 12:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Keep Most of them can be kept as {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}} and maybe {{TM}}. I do not know of any strict TOO in Sri Lanka. --McZusatz (talk) 12:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Keep Agree with McZusatz. --Jonund (talk) 10:24, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept for now. Most of these files should be nominated for deletion individually. -FASTILY (TALK) 02:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Copyright violations
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
CoA files from speedy-deletion. Reason was: Not 70 years PMA, see below
RE rillke questions? 21:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC) Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 03:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Changing from {{copyvio|Tous droits réservés - Arnaud BUNEL - 1997-2011}} because I don't agree. They all seem to be from before 1500 so the copyright would have expired. Arnaud Bunel's contribution is probably below the threshold of originality.
Stefan4 (talk) 14:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. FASTILY (TALK) 20:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I do not agree that these files are copyright violations. They are logos of the United States and look sufficiently simple, cf. examples at COM:TOO#United States. However, some can probably be deleted as duplicates.
Stefan4 (talk) 23:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Dupes deleted by User:Sreejithk2000. FASTILY (TALK) 20:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These were originally speedy-nommed because the Flickr license is NC. These are by a NASA employee, so the question is whether or not this negates or trumps the NC on Flickr.
INeverCry 19:51, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Keep. I uploaded these files on the basis that work by NASA is normally in the public domain and allowed here on Wikimedia. There is nothing to suggest that astronaut Don Pettit shot these pictures for private reasons using his own personal camera. If he intended them to be private holiday snaps he could have created a personal website and posted them there with copyright restrictions. In fact, I doubt his terms of employment at NASA would allow him to make pictures private that were taken from a NASA space station using NASA camera equipment. The pictures were posted at a NASA controlled website, not at Pettit's own website. They have all been assigned official NASA photo identifications (e.g. JSC2012-E-051505, JSC2012-E-051506, and JSC2012-E-051507) and some have been posted at NASA's main website – NASA.gov – where the usual freedom of use applies (picture at NASA's Flickr account; same picture at NASA's main website. Second picture at NASA's Flickr account; same picture at NASA. Third picture at NASA's Flickr account; same picture at NASA). I assume the employee at NASA who created the NASA Flickr account may not have known that he was setting a licence parameter that restricted image usage more than at NASA's main website. If the same pictures at NASA.gov cannot be used from NASA's Flickr account, that is inconsistent and makes no sense. O'Dea (talk) 03:32, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: per consensus to kept. Érico Wouters msg 02:56, 8 December 2012 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Speedy nommed as copyvios by User:Smial, but may be covered by FoP. Discussion seems like a better idea than speedy deletion.
INeverCry 19:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted the interior kept exterior as FOP. --PierreSelim (talk) 11:19, 14 January 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Original speedy rationale: Unfortunately, this artwork by Miquel Barceló is under copyright--User:LPLT (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
INeverCry 17:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
My pictures are the 4 first ones listed above. I would however demand that the same deletion rules apply to the following files, which don't even mention the artist's name. The US Mission should not be above rules that apply to others.
Thank you for your patience and your understanding --BiiJii (talk) 18:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
--BiiJii (talk) 12:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY (TALK) 02:43, 14 March 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Tagged for speedy deletion as copyvio logos by User:Ostiamare. Most of these look too simple to be copyrighted, but I'd like more opinions.
INeverCry 01:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC) Deleted -FASTILY (TALK) 02:43, 14 March 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Previously tagged as Copyvio by Ellin Beltz: © 2008–2015 Astronomical Institute of the Charles University, Josef Ďurech, Vojtěch Sidorin
Alan (talk) 21:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: CC BY 4.0. Alan (talk) 19:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These files was initially tagged by PlanespotterA320 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Cropping out artistic parts of postal covers and stamps is strictly prohibited by PD-RU-exempt (read the footnotes about cropping). These artistic renderings by themselves are protected by copyright until expiration, and none are old enough to have expired copyright yet. Until such time, the artists of these works, like Pyotr Bendel and Anatoly Kalashnikov, retain the rights to these works.
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These three stamps were sent to copyvio, but I think they need to be discussed, because the argument presented is a little bit above the quick decision needed for CopyVio.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 04:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These files were initially tagged by Matthias Winkelmann as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F5}}{{SD|reason=No information is given regarding consent, and the tone of the description and the inclusion of "ex-girlfriend" in the filename raise the possibility of this being intentional harassment. Plus, it's pornographic and low-quality. User has about 80+ similar photos. The uploader (@Ulflarsen: ) asserts the following: "I put this picture up for deletion, to stop a speedy deletion. The picture is posted with the full consent of my ex-girlfriend, she know of it and is still doing amateur pornograpy with me now and then. If this picture (and my 90+ similar pictures) shall be deleted, then there are some tens of thousands of others that also should be removed, and Wikimedians would have to ask what other content that may be problematic, perhaps pictures of war?“
FredWalsh (talk) 00:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
The primary issue of this DR seems to be consent of the other partners, rather than scope or other topical reasons. I have kept those files for which OTRS consent has been received, and deleted one for which it cannot be obtained. If there has legitmate scope or other topical concerns, they can be addressed in a separate DR. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These files was initially tagged by Yinweiaiqing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: videos of performances captured by audience. missing permission from performers. They've sat in CAT:COPYVIO for a few days; converting to DR.
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:37, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Polarlys. --Minoraxtalk 04:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Appear to be from 1910s/1020s-era, likely a PD original (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ghidul Constantei si Tekirghiol.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:CityStudyCasinoArchive.jpg for evience of this timeframe and porential original being PD).
DMacks (talk) 11:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. While the text of the name list is not eligible for copyright, the photograph of the list probably is (barely). --Rosenzweig τ 07:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Copyright violations[edit]Converting these to DR since they've sat in the copyvio queue for a while. Gleb Leo tagged these as copyvio as apparently containing work by author not covered under the existing license template.
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination, no objection nor counterargument presented. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 11 November 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Uploads by User:Myrrine[edit]Source site: "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License." According to the uploader, he/she has the permission to upload the files under the provided license. User_talk:Myrrine#Non-commercial_use_is_not_allowed_on_Commons. --Polarlys (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Polarlys (talk) 18:07, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC) |
.jpg){kind=link}
_(W2-7).png){kind=link}
..JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(W2-7).png){kind=link}
_(W2-7).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(W2-7).png){kind=link}
_(W2-7).png){kind=link}
..JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
..JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
..JPG){kind=link}
..JPG){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_sur_un_beau_cheval_blanc_%22un_jour_mon_prince_viendra_!%22.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_October_2009.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_October_2009.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_October_2009.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_October_2009.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_October_2009.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_October_2009.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_October_2009.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_October_2009.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_October_2009.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_October_2009.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:Copyright violations
[edit]Speedy tagged by IP user. Wait: "Such booking photographs may be broadcast, published, and/or posted to a website in the normal course of business." is arguably a free license (although it does not expressly permit derivative works), and I will reach out to the named contact for clarification and to see if consent can be sent to COM:VRT.
- File:Rudolph Giuliani booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Scott Hall booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:David Shafer booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:John Eastman booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Sidney Powell booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Mark Meadows booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Ray Smith booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Kenneth Chesebro booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Jenna Ellis booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Cathleen Latham booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
- File:Floyd Harrison booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Noting that File:Donald Trump booking photo Fulton County Georgia.png should be restored if VRT permission is granted. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- These should be deleted, it doesn't seem like I'm making progress with the contact person, unfortunately. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trump Mug Shot.webp. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Copyright violations
[edit]No permission and no evidence of a free license.
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID4784-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID231357-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID5011-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID231466-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID231077-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID231370-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID11744-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID231354-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID4819-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID9495-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID231369-av.jpg
- File:AT-KHMW-MK-ID231102-av.jpg
Yann (talk) 21:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)