Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/10/31
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Keine Erlaubnis dieser Privatperson zur Veröffentlichung ihres Bildes zu sehen. 95.157.18.206 14:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Keine Erlaubnis der abgebildeten Personen zur Freigabe ihres Bildes zu sehen. 95.157.18.206 14:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Das Foto hat meine Gattin aufgenommen, als wir uns mit Fürst zu Löwenstein trafen. Auf dem Original, das ich auch hochladen kann, stehe ich neben der Fürstin. Das ist nur ein Ausschnitt von dem größeren Originalfoto -- wo ist das Problem? --Kumbalam (talk) 22:39, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Nur zur Info - DR gestartet von einem IP-Troll/Vandalen. Treibt sich häufiger hier rum mit ähnlich seltsam begründeten DR. --Denniss (talk) 15:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Keine Erlaubnis der abgebildeten Privatperson zur Veröffentlichung ihres Bildes zu sehen. 95.157.18.206 14:18, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Das Foto habe ich selbst mit Zustimmung des Fürsten in der Stiftskirche Neustadt aufgenommen. Es ist ein Ausschnitt aus dem größeren Original. Wo soll also das Problem sein?--Kumbalam (talk) 22:47, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Uploader with a single contribution; no explanation on how he would be in prominent enough of a position to snap a quality photograph of two major world leaders together. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Keep PD-USGov. Credited to the White House. Do we have a tag for that? --Stefan4 (talk) 14:47, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
copyvio from http://www.daniel-djokic.com/ Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:40, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 15:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Restored following UnDR per OTRS #2013022810011738. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:08, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, personal photo Mjrmtg (talk) 02:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: in use = in scope Denniss (talk) 01:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, personal photo Mjrmtg (talk) 02:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: in use = in scope Denniss (talk) 01:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Je suis le détenteur des droits d'auteur de cette photo et je voudrais qu'elle soit supprimée pour une raison privée . Soso34 (talk) 11:52, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Wer?Du?! (talk) 11:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:04, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
probably Flickrwashing, see here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slick (talk • contribs) 2012-09-26T20:39:10 (UTC)
Kept: this image is ok, consistent camera info Denniss (talk) 01:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Not in scope. Not a monument per description.
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
British logo. This looks more complex than the Edge logo, which we know is copyrighted in the United Kingdom. See COM:TOO#United Kingdom. Stefan4 (talk) 15:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:23, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Overseas territories are no longer existing. For a more general catory covering all statuses see Category:Overseas France. verdy_p (talk) 16:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:23, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Invalid and nonsensical public domain rationale. Just because it was on someone's blog doesn't mean it's public domain. TenPoundHammer (talk) 20:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:29, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
joke? "EC" for Ecuador? Skull and bones flag? heavily used once? Interwikis are wrong btw. → «« Man77 »» [de] 23:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Delete skull and bones revisions as vandalism and then recreate as a redirect to Template:Cc-by-sa-3.0-ec. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:11, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:26, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
copyvio, screenshot Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:25, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
The file lacks proof that the image was published over 70 years ago. The quoted source shows an upload date of six weeks after the upload to Wikipedia. The file is likely still under copyright in the United States. Diannaa (talk) 01:10, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- If it was first published in Italy, it's enough if it was published before 1976 without a copyright notice. However, there is no evidence of any pre-1976 publication either. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:46, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Seem like a personal image, out of scope Morning ☼ (talk) 04:12, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with Morning Sunshine, it does seem, like a personal image, which is out of scope. See Deletion Policy for what is out of scope. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 14:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Julo (talk) 23:48, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Higher resolution, likely Flickr washing Morning ☼ (talk) 10:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Keep I think is not Flickrwashing——Happysony (talk) 22:43, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete and block Happysony and Happysony's rather obvious sockpuppet 白色路虎. I'm getting really tired of people with no shame in their body who are too lazy to take photos of their own and think we're all idiots who are going to let them pollute our free content project with copyright violations if they just create enough accounts for themselves to play with. —LX (talk, contribs) 00:57, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- Keep it doesn't meet. watermark! — Furorz (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- Like I said, people with no shame who think we're all idiots. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:10, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: From http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-633.html. The watermark is amateurishly edited, a white stripe at the right side of the first wheel is removed too, the wheels are scraggy and the remaings of the "u" of the watermark are still visible. Martin H. (talk) 21:42, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
copyvio, Marvel Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
copyvio, belongs to marvel Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:06, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Seems to be a film screenshot! It is been mentiooned it is a PD image with no mnetion of date (no help from sources too). Subject died in 1986 (per Wikipedia) Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 00:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
romantic, but out of scope unused personal foto Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:11, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
copyvio, to small Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:36, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
There's inadequate evidence of permission of the original photographer. Diannaa (talk) 01:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
copyvio, Blizzard is very strict about their copyright Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
copyvio, Blizzard is very strict about their copyright Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
file damaged?! Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:19, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
copyvio:© Denimu on http://www.denimu.com/page2.htm Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:53, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the Uk for 2D works. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:11, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Borderline, but IMO contains enough creative input to be copyrightable, so per COM:PRP, should go. Rodhullandemu (talk) 01:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Birmingham New Street Station from Queens Drive - New Street Station Car Park - sign (4387743197).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in the UK for 2D works. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:12, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It's simple enough not to be copyrightable- the images, even if copyrighted, are de minimis as incidental, and there's nothing in the layout to make it an "artistic work", so FOP is irrelevant. Rodhullandemu (talk) 02:18, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, photo of self Mjrmtg (talk) 02:28, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
See COM:CB#Product packaging Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Clear example of product packaging.--Sphilbrick (talk) 13:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
See COM:CB#Product packaging Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Clear example of product packaging.--Sphilbrick (talk) 13:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible screenshot. Other uploads of same editor were screenshots. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Source is unclear, as a wider, uncropped version of this is available here and elsewhere. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Advertisement, out of scope Sreejith K (talk) 05:29, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Technal as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: I don't want that this logo appear on Wikimedia so I download the logo on Wikipedia. It was a mistake. Could you delete this logo just on Wikimedia ? Thank you very much! Sreejith K (talk) 05:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment: Still in use: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:GlobalUsage/Technal.jpg --McZusatz (talk) 08:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:45, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 06:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio. Rapsar (talk) 06:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 06:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 06:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 06:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 06:41, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 06:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 06:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 06:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 06:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 06:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 06:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 06:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 06:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not useful for any educational purpose, therefore out of scope. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Personal photo not useful for educational purposes, therefore out of scope. SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Нет энциклопедической значимости kosun (talk) 07:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Keep Shows a female stretching. The main subject of the image is the female and the photo quality is quite good. In Scope in Category:Females stretching. --High Contrast (talk) 07:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Keep I agree, good quality and fits a category which isn't over-populated--Sphilbrick (talk) 14:08, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Personal photo not useful for educational purposes, therefore out of scope. SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Personal photo not useful for educational purposes, therefore out of scope. SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Personal photo not useful for educational purposes, therefore out of scope. SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Personal photo not useful for educational purposes, therefore out of scope. SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Personal photo not useful for educational purposes, therefore out of scope. SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Personal photo not useful for educational purposes, therefore out of scope. SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:21, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Cette photographie a été volée. Non Histogeek n'est certainement pas son auteur. Moi, Albert Videt, je le suis. Image originale ici : http://www.albert-videt.eu/photographie/site/belgique/bruxelles-capitale/bruxelles-ville/maison-bellone_00.php Je vous prierai de bien vouloir supprimer cette image de wikipédia, cad ici et dans les 4 (plus ?) pages qui l'utilisent. Cordialement, Albert Videt. 88.162.191.247 07:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- It's becoming increasingly clear that Histogeek (who is apparently no longer active here) was a serial copyright violator. The camera used to create this photo (Canon EOS 5D) is different from the cameras used to create the user's other uploads (Nikon D50, Fujifilm FinePix F30, Olympus C750UZ). It is, however, the same camera used for the other photos on the nominator's site. According to the file's timestamp on that server, it was there before it was uploaded here. Histogeek claims that it was taken a week before it was uploaded here, but the metadata clearly shows that's false. In summary, there's overwhelming evidence that this is a copyright violation, so Delete —LX (talk, contribs) 18:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 08:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It shows a man taking fume / smoke out of his man. A slice of life image. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 08:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC).
- Delete. Additional low resolution for own work, missing exif, difficult position to photography yourself - doubtful authorship. --Art-top (talk) 08:55, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Obviously copied from http://www.freesun.be/belgique/bruxelles.html, where the image was already present in March 2008[1]. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, obvious {{Copyvio}} by serial copyright violator. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:45, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
We have a better version of this file and this one is not being used. Rapsar (talk) 08:27, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#United Arab Emirates. 84.61.186.88 09:56, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#United Arab Emirates. 84.61.186.88 09:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:16, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#United Arab Emirates. 84.61.186.88 10:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
No evidence that the uploader is Abbey Drucker or that they have Drucker's permission to release this photograph under a free license. ˉanetode╦╩ 11:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio Guildwars2 is © 2012 ArenaNet, Inc. Wer?Du?! (talk) 11:36, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope Wer?Du?! (talk) 11:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Cette photographie a été volée. Non Histogeek n'est certainement pas son auteur. Moi, Albert Videt, je le suis. Image originale ici : http://www.albert-videt.eu/photographie/site/belgique/bruxelles-capitale/bruxelles-ville/maison-bellone_00.php Je vous prierai de bien vouloir supprimer cette image de wikipédia, cad ici et dans les 4 (plus ?) pages qui l'utilisent. Cordialement, Albert Videt. 88.162.191.247 07:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- It's becoming increasingly clear that Histogeek (who is apparently no longer active here) was a serial copyright violator. The camera used to create this photo (Canon EOS 5D) is different from the cameras used to create the user's other uploads (Nikon D50, Fujifilm FinePix F30, Olympus C750UZ). It is, however, the same camera used for the other photos on the nominator's site. According to the file's timestamp on that server, it was there before it was uploaded here. Histogeek claims that it was taken a week before it was uploaded here, but the metadata clearly shows that's false. In summary, there's overwhelming evidence that this is a copyright violation, so Delete —LX (talk, contribs) 18:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Meaningless photo. With the subject's face blocked, the file is of no value. Senator2029 11:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
bad quality, therefore no use Wer?Du?! (talk) 12:04, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Need a Lift Sir Richard? - Chiltern Railways billboard - Moor Street Station (7923900652) (2).jpg
[edit]_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:FOP. Not covered by COM:FOP#United Kingdom - Poster or mural. Sunil060902 (talk) 12:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope (specifically: photos of yourself and your friends, etc.) Senator2029 12:11, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:22, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Low res of file:Bargue The Chess Game.jpg Shakko (talk) 12:29, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisment Wiki13 13:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused personal image Wiki13 13:08, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF Wiki13 13:10, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Poster clearly above threshold of originality and thereby copyrightable. I somewhat doubt that the poster is intended for permanent installation, which is required to fulfil terms of FOP-exemption of Germany. However, that might merit discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
unused personal foto, with to personal information Wer?Du?! (talk) 14:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:22, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
These stamps are obviously not 50 years old and thereby do not meet the terms for PD-Gov-Israel (see Category:Stamps of Israel). -- Túrelio (talk) 14:06, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
This poster is an original work of art and clearly above threshold of originality. I doubt whether a poster presented at a protest fulfils the terms of FOP-exemption of Germany. However, that might merit a discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:25, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, but the 2 photos on this poster are clearly above threshold of originality. I question whether a poster presented at a temporary protest fulfils the terms of FOP-exemption of Germany. However, that might merit discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:19, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:25, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, but the impressive photo on this poster is clearly above the threshold of originality. I doubt that a poster presented at a protest or fixed to a construction fence fulfils the terms of FOP-exemption of Germany. However, that might merit discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: "Permanently" meaning a few weeks is OK when it is a sand sculpture, but this poster might last years and I doubt it was up for that long. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
{{[[Template:Delete |Delete ]]|reason=superseded|subpage=File:Kyōko Kagawa 4.gif|day=26|month=October|year=2012}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABNOIC (talk • contribs) 2012-10-26T13:36:14 (UTC)
- Superseded by what? Do you mean that the image should be replaced by File:Kyōko Kagawa 5.gif? --Stefan4 (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No clear reason for deletion . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Thsi photo is a derivative of the image on the left package. de minimis seems unlikely to me. Company might be asked for a permission. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:27, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:22, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
probably Flickrwashing, see here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slick (talk • contribs) 2012-09-26T20:37:43 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:25, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Name of patient in the image is a privacy violation
- Keep Patient name can be cleaned and older versions deleted. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 09:57, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: I am not so concerned about privacy as that this is probably Flickrwashing. It is very unlikely that the actual copyright holder (the clinic where this was made) is going to post it on Flickr -- that would be a serious violation of HIPAA. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Per Donald Duck. Undelete in 2029 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coentor (talk • contribs) 2012-09-24T08:27:42 (UTC)
- Delete and undelete in 2038 instead.[2] --Stefan4 (talk) 00:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:26, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
License section contains PD-US, but the book was published in London (UK). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aushulz (talk • contribs) 22:18, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Published simultaneously in London, Toronto, New York, therefore PD-US is OK. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:34, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
"Obtain written permission prior to using this photo." clause is incompatible with Commons' licensing requirements. This invalidates the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license, meaning the file must be deleted. This is also Sven Manguard (talk) 14:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
copyvio? (facebook logo) Wer?Du?! (talk) 14:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Photo on upper magazine cover is above threshold of originality and thereby copyrightable. I doubt that this image is acceptable per de minimis, but this might be discussed. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
no evidence of sources, or possible date, or anything. I doubt that this is really PD-old. Also, how can we check who is this, and where? Propose deletion. WhiteWriter speaks 20:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Kept. - uploader didn't get the opportunity to respond to the nomination, because nominator failed to drop a notification at his talk page - Jcb (talk) 12:31, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
That is not the reason for keeping bad image. Uploader was notified, on the notification red link ocean... --WhiteWriter speaks 20:44, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:35, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Delete Image with copyright of Endesa (see metadata). --Goldorak (talk) 16:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:26, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Delete Image with copyright of Endesa (see metadata). --Goldorak (talk) 16:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:26, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Delete. Imagen con copyright. [3]. Captura de programa de TV. --88.31.18.64 18:31, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
![[3]](http://www.google.es/imgres?q=eduardo+garc%C3%ADa+serrano&um=1&hl=es&sa=N&rls=com.microsoft:es&biw=1272&bih=595&tbm=isch&tbnid=znsaQceZWb9LHM:&imgrefurl=http://franciscopilo.blogspot.com/2010/06/todos-somos-eduardo-garcia-serrano.html&docid=mWAZ_VhD7Uc0mM&imgurl=http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_YJIXbp2bRcI/TBkqJHp3OvI/AAAAAAAABC8/s-1tcQ9u9QI/s1600/081beb7125c72a5eeb697eb551f047a3o.jpg&w=640&h=480&ei=tT1nUI3lBYaEhQeTlIHYDw&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=443&vpy=145&dur=187&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=130&ty=93&sig=109448224649424285304&page=1&tbnh=130&tbnw=187&start=0&ndsp=21&ved=1t:429,r:2,s:0,i:77){kind=link}
- Delete. Screenshot. --Goldorak (talk) 16:23, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:58, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Display of non-permanent contemporary 3D art. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1Veertje (talk • contribs) 20:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It is permanent, it has limited lifespan and protected by FoP as seen in: the general discussion.--Coentor (talk) 21:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:41, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Display of non-permanent contemporary 3D art. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1Veertje (talk • contribs) 20:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It is permanent, it has limited lifespan and protected by FoP as seen in: the general discussion.--Coentor (talk) 21:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio Del♉sion23 (talk) 14:25, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete mage taken from website with copyright notice (http://www.rrjp.in/). --Guillaume2303 (talk) 14:31, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:31, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
problème de license: ce n'est pas un tavail personnel mais vient de la page http://www.mariowiki.com/File:Gunpei_Yokoi.JPG (image sous copyright) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SyntaxTerror (talk • contribs) 01:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:59, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Map is duplicate of File:Romania Constanta Location map.jpg which has been updated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afil (talk • contribs) 05:35, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: The two are not identical. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:01, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
I have uploaded now a identical film version with better quality - File:Hinken 2010 PD bigscreen PD 2012.ogg. So this older (low quality) version should be deleted. --Bin im Garten (talk) 07:52, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Both appear to be privacy violations -- taken in a private place with no evidence that the subject has given consent to have her limp shown all over the Internet. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:05, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
la photo vient de http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/73/biz_japanrichest08_Hiroshi-Yamauchi_LZWJ.html et n'est pas un travail personnel — Preceding unsigned comment added by SyntaxTerror (talk • contribs) 01:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:06, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
I doubt that it is "own work". User Jarocajavi is obviously not a creator of this photo. Google search shows that this image was posted on web earlier than 2013, and has better resolution photos, but that does not prove anything, though. Lone Guardian (talk) 09:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, was online in 2013 here. Ruthven (msg) 20:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
reason=only test of uploadwizard for WikiLovesMonuments 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Limojoe (talk • contribs) 13:10, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:31, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as this file is an attack on a living person, therefore a violation of BLP KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ...
- keep Ridiculous nomination. The image is of a sign used by some political extremists. Yes, it attacks the president of the United States with it's imagery. No that is not a valid reason to delete it. The nominating user and I have been having a bit of a disagreement at en.wp that is wholly unrelated to this image, yet right at the same time he suddenly became interested in Commons after a two year hiatus and as his first ever act outside of his own userspace here he just happened to nominate a file I uploaded for deletion. Seems a rather unlikely coincidence, suggesting a bad faith nomination. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:25, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I acknowledge the argument that Beeblebrox and I had on en.wp. This image is linked to from his en:wp page and that's how I found this image.
I've requested the deletion because it's an attack image only, no other reason. BTW - Beeblebrox, you're a sysop and you mean you're not aware of Commons:Deletion_policy#Self-promotion_or_vandalism.2Fattack I'll give you the brief version, any file apparently created and / or upload for the purpose of vandalism or attack can be deleted per commons policy..
No this image isn't vandalism, no you didn't create it, Larouche did, but
1.) The image is derivitave, and copyright status cannot be verified , thus it fails on copyright
2.) The image is an attack image on Obama and as such fails the above mentioned criteria on vandalism or attack image.
It needs to be deleted for those two reasons.
As far as the sockpuppeteer, let's see, the AFD I started got closed (aftre I stop commenting, voluntarily) and he kept his copy of a previously deleted page, so he's happy. I'm not opening afd's or speedy's or taking any other action, so , bad faith ? I don't believe so. KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ...
- I certainly do not intend to continue our disagreement from en.wp here, I only mentioned it as it appears to be the proximate cause of this nomination.
- As to the copyright status of the image, I have uploaded images of many of signs to commons, for example this bar near sarah Palin's house, the second highest point on Alaska's road system, this local landmark, sadly covered in graffiti, the westermost point on the North american contiguous highway system, and even a giant santa Claus and it has never been a problem before. I won't pretend to be a copyright lawyer but I am fairly certain that in the United States the principle of freedom of panorama would make such images fair game for free media.
- Which brings us to your premise that this is an attack image. You are accusing me of deliberate vandalism with this line of argument. You do realize that, right? In exactly the type of argument I have rapidly come to expect from you, you cite a policy section that directly contradicts your attempted use of it, as if you either did not actually read it or failed to understand what it says, namely this part: "Pre-existing designs and symbols that are or have been associated with nationalistic, religious or racist causes are not out of scope solely because they may cause offence." I didn't create this image to attack anyone,I was surprised to see LaRouche activists in our sleepy little town and I took a few pictures (including this one which contains several more of their signs. Odd that you didn't notice then when perusing my uploads for something to delete as it is right underneath it...) and added them to relevant WP articles on the LaRouche movement. To see someone try and twist that into a deliberate act of vandalism would be very troubling if it came from someone who took the time to make sure they knew what the hell they were talking about before acting, but that clearly is not the case here. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- For the record I would also note that the nominator does not appear to be cognizant of the fact that Commons and Wikipedia are not the same thing (I am admin at en.wp, not here) and as such I am thinking that the supposed "BLP" violation mentioned in the nomination is based on the en.wp policy on biographies and not COM:BLP as there is obviously not a privacy issue in taking a picture of a publicly displayed sign deliberately posted to draw attention. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:41, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: I think the image is in poor taste and don't think for a minute that it is in any way a valid political tool. With that said, however, it is protected free speech in the USA. It is uploaded here not to attack Mr. Obama, but as a record of an attack made during the campaign now thankfully ended. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:13, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of a possibly unfree photograph. It resembles File:Official portrait of Barack Obama.jpg, but there are some differences, e.g. the position of the eyes. Leyo 21:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep It seems exceedingly obvious to me that it is a derivative work of the official portrait. They could easily have changed the position of the eyes using photoshop to make Obama look more "shifty". The nomination is based soleley on an very unlikely speculation. If this isn't taken from the official portrait it is so close as to make no difference. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Just text and a photo licensed under CC-BY. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:14, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep (source added) Jee 01:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I closed this above, so I'm not going to do it here, but my opinion has not changed. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. Natuur12 (talk) 21:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Logo taken (and then edited) from club's official website (see here). PD-textlogo does not apply in Spain.Fma12 (talk) 12:47, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:26, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
mögliche copyvio, bei nutzung durch dritte. dontworry (talk) 06:20, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:24, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
The person is denigrated photography--The Photographer (talk) 14:16, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept: I don't understand the reason given. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:24, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Sir William Thomson, Baron Kelvin, 1824 - 1907. Scientist, resting on a binnacle and holding a marine azimuth mirror.jpg but with the wrong name. /Esquilo (talk) 20:20, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:26, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Just a wrong upload. The image intended is: File:Narcissus Golden Bells (1).jpgUleli (talk) 11:54, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: That's not a reason for deletion, but the image is a duplicate of File:Narcissus Salome (2).jpg . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:33, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
While the image itself may be free, the sequence of musical notes and the lyrics contained therein are not public domain. --Ohconfucius (talk) 08:44, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:34, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
mögliche copyvio, bei nutzung durch dritte. dontworry (talk) 06:20, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:34, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
mögliche copyvio, bei nutzung durch dritte. dontworry (talk) 06:20, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:34, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
I loaded up the wrong kind of file. Correct PNG is available at File:Sprachen Osttimors-en.png --Patrick (talk) 08:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept: The TIF file is 60% the size of the PNG -- I see no reason to delete it. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:44, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Display of non-permanent contemporary 3D art. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1Veertje (talk • contribs) 20:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It is permanent, it has limited lifespan and protected by FoP as seen in: the general discussion.--Coentor (talk) 21:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:44, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Neither Theater-Fabrik-Sachsen GmbH nor R. Meissner are the creators and copyright-holders of the artwork. Tvwatch (talk) 06:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Low-quality duplicate of File:Nikolai Vysheslavtsev - Tatiana Schloezer.jpg. → Ӛ (talk) 15:06, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:27, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- Image with copyright, and copy of this page: [4] also copyrighted. --88.30.115.94 00:15, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Archivo con copyright. --Goldorak (talk) 15:39, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It is a pathetically simple logo to be eligible for copyright. Just a common font and a national flag. Cambalachero (talk) 23:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Copyright? What are you talking about? It's extremely simple, just an ordinary font and a national symbol (which are ineligibles for copyright in Argentina according to Law 22.362). Fma12 (talk) 04:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep too simple for any form of copyright. Fry1989 eh? 20:53, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:45, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
File:World Wide Famous Children Writer Dr Prof Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi From Karachi,Pakistan.JPG
[edit]
Completing incomplete deletion request. This was tagged by 212.107.101.147 (talk · contribs) with "{{delete|Uploaded from a Sock puppet account of User:Rafi ul haq}}". Is this photo in scope for Commons? Stefan4 (talk) 15:06, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:27, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisment Wiki13 15:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Completing incomplete deletion request. This was tagged by 掬茶 (talk · contribs) with "{{delete|This file is too small and inferior to use.}}". The file is in use, so the reason is not a valid reason for deletion. Stefan4 (talk) 15:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:27, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Just an unused simple formula symbol which can be easily replicated with Latex. Torsch (talk) 15:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:27, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Philippines. 84.61.186.88 16:24, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:28, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
The person on this foto is not Fyodor Poletaev. This is Andrey Poletaev (son of I.A.Poletaev) as a student at Moscow State University in1963. Not PD-Italy, as well. Fastboy (talk) 16:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Prooflinks: http://7iskusstv.com/2011/Nomer12/Revich1.php + http://foroff.phys.msu.ru/1968/pages/photo5.htm --Fastboy (talk) 16:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by Butko Morning ☼ (talk) 16:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational use Wer?Du?! (talk) 16:47, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
copyright violation from flickr - flickr user name doesn't match signature, type of work extremely likely to be a copyvio (artworks of indian religious figures are often passed around without regard to copyright) Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:20, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio (no FoP in France and the architect is still alive) Remi Mathis (talk) 17:30, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Inferior format, we have an SVG. Fry1989 eh? 17:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:28, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation. Low-resolution photo with no metadata. The uploader claims that this is their own work and that they are the copyright holder, but also that the author is anonymous, which doesn't really make any sense. Found at http://www.ptimmermans.com/egl/onepic.php?id=11 since 2004 according to the file's timestamp on the server. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
I didn't see this file and uploaded the same file, with more information. This can be deleted. Rapsar (talk) 18:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation. The uploader claims that this is their own work and that they are the copyright holder, but also that the author is anonymous, which doesn't really make any sense. An interlacing pattern is clearly visible in the full-resolution version of the photo, which suggests that it's a photo of a TV screen or similar. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:24, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Justass (talk) 19:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This image is taken from the official site of RSC Anderlecht. See: http://www.rsca.be/go/nl/article/28110/roland_juhasz_verlengt_contract_tot_2014 Narayan (talk) 19:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Seems like an official picture, taken at the stadion. Narayan (talk) 19:45, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Seems to be grabbed from https://twitter.com/aysimgs/status/232079955675209728/photo/1 (4:45 AM, 5 Aug 12 versus upload date 3:58 PM, 5. Aug. 2012, same res) Gunnex (talk) 19:45, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Upps... Twitter time changed to "1:45 PM"... Gunnex (talk) 21:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Rechanged to "4:45 AM"... :-) Gunnex (talk) 22:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom.--Rapsar (talk) 10:47, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
No reliable evidence about the public domain status of the image. Eleassar (t/p) 20:53, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyvio - the architect's official web page [5] and a Japanese authority for architects [6] publish the same picture with no free license. I believe it was created as a work for hire. Since the uploader has not identified him/herself, I am not sure if he/she has the rights to publish it under CC-BY-SA/GFDL. Presumably, it is likely to have been cropped and retouched from the second link I gave, because most of their EXIF entries are identical. whym (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
copyvio, no written permission of Drake Photography HD. see http://www.drakephotographyhd.com/copyright/ Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:22, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm sorry, but this is not realy covered by COM:FOP#United States. JuTa 23:28, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:16, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio:©2012 *Dreamkeepers Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:16, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Author request. Riley Huntley (talk) 23:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:15, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
The file lacks proof that the image was published over 70 years ago. The quoted source is the Latvian Wiki, where the file is present as fair-use. I was unable to find any proof of publication that pre-dates the upload to the Latvian wiki. The file is likely still under copyright in the United States. Diannaa (talk) 01:39, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Delete, as per discussion on lv.wikipedia, it seems likely to be same as [7], which lists author as studio, which as far as I gather was a one-man's business venture, and in turn that man died in 1962 ~~Xil (talk) 06:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)- On second thought - the author died 50 years ago, as I understand that was copyright term when the pic was made, so it should be PD as copyrights are not retroactive ~~Xil (talk) 08:28, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Died in 1962 = still copyrighted on URAA date. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Нет энциклопедической значимости kosun (talk) 07:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep In my opinion happiness has "encyclopedic value", obviously. The photo can be used to illustrate, e.g. ... happiness or drinking beer. Commons stores files not only for the current use but also for the future. Electron ツ ➧☎ 07:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: per Electron. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:08, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Без энциклопедического содержания kosun (talk) 08:09, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep As above: In my opinion happiness has "encyclopedic value", obviously. The photo can be used to illustrate, e.g. ... happiness or drinking beer. Commons stores files not only for the current use but also for the future. Could you don't waste my (and other users) time, please... Electron ツ ➧☎ 08:53, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept Agreed, not a bad image of a happy person. Please do not nominate this again without a valid reason for deletion.. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:42, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
이 사진은 2년이 지난 사진으로 현재 활동멤버들로 사진이 교체되어야 함 조현진 (talk) 07:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Not a valid reason to delete. However, I will be nominating all this user's uploads as suspicious. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:10, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio. The source seems to be this blog where there is no information on the photograph. I fail to see how this could be PD-China, since we don't know the author, nor the real date of the photo. 194.6.163.244 12:27, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- The photograph is unknwon. This file is labelled "Thamzing of Tibetan woman circa 1958", date is compatible with {{PD-China}}.--Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 18:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: PD-China. Yann (talk) 13:49, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
I've created a better quality PNG version of this file, so we should remove this one.Kurzon (talk) 14:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Please give us a link to the new file, or this will be kept. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:36, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Different enough from File:Adult Sperm Whale Head Anatomy.png that it wouldn't hurt to keep it. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:16, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Sperm Whale Head Anatomy.png Kurzon (talk) 14:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept The jpg is half the size and somewhat sharper than the PNG, particularly at high magnifications, so I see no reason to delete the jpg and think we might consider deleting the png. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:59, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
This file is superseded by :File:Sperm Whale Head Anatomy.png Kurzon (talk) 16:44, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Please delete this and the other images created by Special:Contributions/OctoberReignz for no other reason than to use to vandalize a Wikipedia article. [8] Dream Focus (talk) 22:31, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Vandalism King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
This image seems to be a montage, based on this image (#75), which is (C)ARR, for the background. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Info: Direct link to .jpg from above gallery. Gunnex (talk) 07:24, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Not true SVG format. Fry1989 eh? 17:22, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- I will make it back from the beginning, to completely original SVG format. Thanks for the notice. Bozky (talk) 00:45, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Non-uploader artwork, possibly more complex than the threshold of originality for the United States. Closeapple (talk) 19:08, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: Amar Tu Vida appears to be a web-based novela from the USA. The same uploader claimed that File:Telemundo-logo2013.jpg.gif and File:MiniLogoETV.jpg (just resized versions of the official logos of two television networks) were his own work also, so the own-work claim is doubtful. The only question seems to be whether the shapes surpass the threshold of originality. --Closeapple (talk) 19:12, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Por derechos de autor Fotosargentinacom (talk) 21:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:50, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Picture is shown on the website of Vogue magazine since July ([9], where it is part of the slide show. It's also for example on tumblr, [10]) and was probably taken from one of these sites without permission. No permission by photographer Bruce Weber via OTRS, User:KeithRichardsWife is most probably not photographer Bruce Weber (he wouldn't call himself like that, I assume). Very doubtable situation.
![[10]](https://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m7d6yiHNC41qz72b4o2_1280.jpg){kind=link}
User KeithRichardsWife also uploaded other pictures of Keith Richards and Anita Pallenberg (K. Richards' ex girlfriend) or Patti Hansen (Richards' wife), allegedly all his/her own work. Some more family pictures, also from Vogue, already were deleted because of missing licenses (User talk:KeithRichardsWife). Some research in these other cases about the photographer(s) is at least necessary, but I recommend, to delete them too, they are all professional looking ones, some can be found very often in the internet on several websites (see examples below). I found them all, except one so far (File:Patti Hansen.png), in the web. The user obviously doesn't pay attention to copyright enough (Vogue pictures), so better delete them all. He/she also provides rare information, no mentioning for example (varies) of the date or occasion a picture was taken, not even the full names of the shown persons in the description (just "Patti"). Something, that doesn't seem professional at all.
The pictures can be found for example here:
File:Anita Pallenberg and Keith Richards Rome 1967.jpeg, from a photo series: [11]
File:Anita Pallenberg sixties.jpeg, [12]
File:Patti Hansen.png, didn't find it so far --Miss-Sophie (talk) 23:56, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Most probably copyvios. I suggest all images from this user to be deleted. Yann (talk) 13:43, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
typo (should be Corzo – content should therefore be categorized in existing Category:Chiapa de Corzo, Chiapas)→ «« Man77 »» [de] 23:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Procedural closure. Blatant typos should be submitted to User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands instead. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:23, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
I uploaded this picture by accident froma larger folder. I don't agree with the policy, but it doesn't change the fact that as this picture is taken in a zoo, I don't have full rights to it. I would like this to be taken down before any legal issues arise. Thank you. Amicitia (talk) 19:49, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Do you mean that as this picture was taken (by you) in a zoo then you don't have full right to it? Well, actually you do have. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- The picture was taken in a zoo in the USA. By their copyright laws I really don't have full rights to this picture. In addition to not being allowed to sell pictures taken in a zoo, I'm not allowed to upload it to Wikimedia either. Zoos in the US have gone as far as to threaten people with lawsuits for uploading high-quality pictures to Flickr (because somebody could download that picture and print it). (Amicitia (talk) 21:55, 6 November 2012 (UTC))
- I might be wrong on the copyright law part. The fact is that most zoos are private institutions (including the one this picture is taken at) and they can uphold their own policies. Animals are considered private property, so using pictures of them for other than personal needs has to be coordinated with the institution that owns the zoo and the animals. Hefty fees apply. (Amicitia (talk) 22:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC))
- The picture was taken in a zoo in the USA. By their copyright laws I really don't have full rights to this picture. In addition to not being allowed to sell pictures taken in a zoo, I'm not allowed to upload it to Wikimedia either. Zoos in the US have gone as far as to threaten people with lawsuits for uploading high-quality pictures to Flickr (because somebody could download that picture and print it). (Amicitia (talk) 21:55, 6 November 2012 (UTC))
I'm actually confused why this picture was included as a Teadusfoto 2012 file. Noticing my mistake, I was careful to not upload it with a Teadusfoto 2012 tag, although other pictures in that group had that tag. Unfortunately it took me some time to figure out how to get this picture deleted. I'm new to this system and I'm truly sorry for creating such a mess. (Amicitia (talk) 22:01, 6 November 2012 (UTC))
- Keep This is a wonderful picture. I've seen one these in the wild in Tunisia, but never this close. I would like very much for Commons to keep it. It is well established Commons policy to ignore restrictions placed on museum and other collections, see Commons:Image_casebook#Museum_and_interior_photography. It is also policy to remind uploaders that their licenses are irrevocable. So we would be on good grounds to simply keep it.
- With that understood, I would like you to reconsider your request. The zoo is not identified and need not be, so I don't see how they could get excited over this. Even if they did, what would be their remedy -- a lawsuit forcing you to pay them all of your profits from the image? They're unlikely to do that, as there's not much point in paying good money to sue for zero money.
- So, please reconsider. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:05, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- Admins: Let's hold this a few days to give Amicitia time to respond. Thanks. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
I would like to get this removed, still. That particular zoo, which I'd prefer not to name, is known for actually looking for pictures of their animals online. That fennec is easy to identify, especially in that environment. And, if I had to guess, the lawsuit could easily be for the price of the license - it's about 500 USD. Not significant, of course, but lawsuits have been started for more ridiculous reasons. I think that this particular picture doesn't contribute much to Commons, considering that the search "fennec" gives many wonderful pictures to choose from. In that light I see no reason to ignore my request. In the end - having this picture up here makes me really uncomfortable, so please remove it.
Deleted: OK. As I said above, it's against policy for several reasons -- and I can't imagine that the zoo would sue for $500 -- the lawyer that they would be required to use would cost much more.
Nonetheless, we try not to bite newbies, especially newbies who have shown that they can take great images. Please give us some more photos that you are comfortable with -- or, go to the zoo management and suggest that having their animals on WP is a good thing, not something they should forbid. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:16, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
The architect is dead in 1952. No FOP in Belgium. But maybe de minimis ? M0tty (talk) 19:46, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Kept: yes, DM is fine for this one Jcb (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Obviously copied from http://la.fenetre.pagesperso-orange.fr/Bruxelles.htm, which dates from 2007 and says "copyright Christian Rau ©". Regrettably nobody took note of the strange combination of claiming the image as "own work", but at the same time claiming the author to be unknown. I think all uploads of this user should be checked. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:11, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, obvious {{Copyvio}} by serial copyright violator. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GustavoMeloParaíba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution photos without exif or taken with different cameras, one of them marked as copyvio. Doubtful authorship.
- File:Serra da matarina.jpg
- File:São joão de Prata.jpg
- File:Prata -PB.jpg
- File:São joão da prata pb.jpg
- File:Prata Paraíba Centro.JPG
Art-top (talk) 04:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Post communist East Asia
[edit]
These files are clearly based on original research and are out of project scope. --Elmor (talk) 06:10, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, that's fine. I made them years and years ago for my user page on EN, but I ceased displaying them some time ago. Thanks for being proactive with clean-up.-- Patrick, oѺ∞ 16:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for the fast response. :-) Elmor (talk) 05:29, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- "Original research" is not actually a policy here on Wikimedia Commons. They're obviously irredentist maps; the question is whether they're irredentist maps of use to Commons or not.. AnonMoos (talk) 01:41, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- They're more like fantasy maps. The independence of Tibet, for example, can hardly comply with Chinese irredentism. However, since the author agreed to delete them, the discussion is seemingly over. Elmor (talk) 05:29, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:46, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jonandpoochy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Watermarked images in low resolution or taken with different cameras, some of them marked as copyvio. Probably promo photos - out of project scope.
- File:Aradale Hospital from Male Tower.jpg
- File:Ararat Asylum Male Overpass.jpg
- File:Aradale Morgue.jpg
- File:Aradale Male Ward.jpg
- File:Ararat Hospital.jpg
- File:Aradale TC6.jpg
- File:Ghost at Aradale.jpg
- File:Aradale Lunatic Asylum.jpg
- File:Aradale s (5).jpg
- File:Aradale s (7).jpg
- File:Ararat Asylum.jpg
- File:Aradale mental Hospital.jpg
- File:Aradale Hospital.jpg
- File:Aradale ghost.jpg
- File:Aradale Asylum.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Art-top (talk) 08:13, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I'm deleting the obvious copyvios as speedy. --Herby talk thyme 17:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:21, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bishisht.np.mnr (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution photos without original exif - doubtful authorship.
- File:Vishow Prakash Sharma.jpg
- File:Sher Bahadur Deuba.jpg
- File:Pradip Poudel.jpg
- File:N P Saud.jpg
- File:Mahendra Sharma.jpg
- File:Kishore Singh Rathore.jpg
- File:Keshav Singh.jpg
- File:Kalyan Kumar Gurung.jpg
- File:Guru Ghimire.jpg
- File:Dhan Raj Gurung.jpg
- File:Bimalendra Nidhi.jpg
- File:Bal Krishna Khand.jpg
- File:Ranjit Karna.jpg
Art-top (talk) 09:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JNKnutrition (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement, minor educational value
- File:BSN.jpg
- File:Gaspari Nutrition.jpg
- File:Universal Nutrition.jpg
- File:Ultimate Nutrition.jpg
- File:Optimum-Nutrition.jpg
- File:Musclemeds..jpg
- File:Muscletech.jpg
- File:Dymatize.jpg
- File:Mhp.jpg
- File:JNK GENERAL TRADING LLC.jpg
Wer?Du?! (talk) 11:12, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
This files are copyrighted because they were created by NBCUniversal.
- File:Schakalen.1.jpg
- File:Murciélago.1.jpg
- File:Lowen.1.jpg
- File:Klaustreich.1.jpg
- File:Hässlich.1.jpg
- File:Hundjäger.1.jpg
- File:Eisbiber.1.jpg
- File:Dickfellig.1.jpg
- File:Dämonfeuer.1.jpg
- File:Steinadler.jpg
- File:Ziegevolk.jpg
- File:Wildermann.jpg
- File:Spinnetod.2.jpg
- File:Spinnetod.jpg
- File:Skalenzahne.jpg
- File:Rißfleisch.jpg
- File:Skalengeck.jpg
- File:Siegbarste.jpg
- File:Seltenvogel.jpg
- File:Reinigen.3.jpg
- File:Mordstier.jpg
- File:Mellifer.jpg
- File:Mausehertz.jpg
- File:Lausenschlange.jpg
- File:Jägerbärs.jpg
- File:Jagerbar.2.jpeg
- File:Fuchsbau.jpg
- File:Geier.jpg
- File:Hexenbiests.jpg
Wer?Du?! (talk) 11:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Porky Pig
[edit]Porky Pig first appeared in en:I Haven't Got a Hat. That film was renewed,[13] so these files violate the Porky Pig character copyright.
Some images also show Daffy Duck. He first appeared in en:Porky's Duck Hunt which was later. I don't know if that film also was renewed.
- File:Looney Tunes 1930s title card.png
- File:Looney Tunes title card 1.jpg
- File:Porky Pig.png
- File:Porky's Preview (1941).ogv
- File:Porky's Preview.djvu
- File:Porky-daffy-1943-Daffy the Comando.png
- File:Porkys-pooch.jpg
- File:Thats all folks clàssic -Daffy Comando 1943 - amb porky (2).png
- File:Thats all folks clàssic -Daffy Comando 1943 - amb porky.png
- File:YankeeDoodleDaffy1.jpg
- File:Yankeedoodledaffy6.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 13:36, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Renewal for Daffy Duck here. Daffy Duck enters the public domain two years after Porky Pig. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:48, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Although there is OTRS ticket #2011092910022206 from Thomas Patterson, the photographer/copyright holder, it is very informal, does not mention any of our standard licenses, and gives permission only for use on WP:EN, with attribution. There is no mention of any use outside of Wikipedia, of commercial use, or of derivative works. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- This is the text from OTRS email. I would be happy for you to use the image, if I am given a proper credit line, linked to the image.. Given that the copyright holder is willing to permit the usage of this image in Wikipedia, shouldn't we ask him to send an explicit statement of permission first rather than putting a DR? --Sreejith K (talk) 09:38, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- As you saw, the OTRS exchange was several messages. I don't know why the volunteer handling it did not ask for an good license, but the fact is that right now we have only permission for WP:EN. My philosophy is that a DR is the only way to get a question out in front of the community and is not a big deal -- we do more than a hundred a day, after all. Without a DR, who is the "we" in your question?
- Also please note that my only involvement here is at Nyttend's request -- see my talk page -- he is a very respected colleague from WP:EN, particularly involved with National Register sites. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- "we" meant all of us. Anyways, I have sent the copyright holder an email now. --Sreejith K (talk) 06:26, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Also please note that my only involvement here is at Nyttend's request -- see my talk page -- he is a very respected colleague from WP:EN, particularly involved with National Register sites. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Are from the same photographer, also claimed as "own work" by the uploader and are not mentioned in the OTRS. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:55, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence that we have permission to host them on Commons, let alone evidence of a free license. If you get an acceptable permission from the copyright holder, let me know, especially if the permission include other images from the same book; I have a copy, and I'd be happy to start scanning and uploading the images if we get permission. Nyttend (talk) 13:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:21, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Faslalkhetab.jpg
Files uploaded by BorisAirwolf (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Maria Conesa (1892-1978).gif
- File:COTAC 01c3.jpg
- File:COTAC 01c2.jpg
- File:COTAC - Cadetes, varones y mujeres, en celebración casual.jpg
- File:COTAC - Cadetes de la Banda de Guerra en desfile militar.jpg
- File:COTAC - Promoción 1994-1995 - Marcha Final de Selva.jpg
- File:COTAC - Promoción 2008-2009 - Cadetes de 6to. curso en Instrucción Militar.jpg
- File:COTAC - Clase de Inglés.jpg
- File:COTAC - Promoción del 90 - Plataforma de la Base Aérea de FAE -02.jpg
- File:COTAC 1987.jpg
- File:COTAC 01e.jpg
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:42, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Likely copyright violations based on the uploader's track record (see User talk:Histogeek). The uploader claims that this is their own work and that they are the copyright holder, but also that the author is anonymous, which doesn't really make any sense. All other files uploaded by the user with these contradictory claims have been shown to be copyright violations.
—LX (talk, contribs) 19:08, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:19, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal images, out of scope
- File:Juventud peronista patagones.jpg
- File:Soy todo tuyo.jpg
- File:Para vos.jpg
- File:Con gonzalito el periodista mas popular de CQC.jpg
- File:Mirada al horizonte.jpg
Justass (talk) 19:28, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mayankkatiyar (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - close up pics of tigers - map scans - own work claim very doubtful
- File:Sri Purnagiri Temple.jpg
- File:Varanasi Ganges River panorama.jpg
- File:Pilibhit Forest Map.JPG
- File:A Monument At Bareilly.jpg
- File:Sunset at Chuka Beach near Pilibhit.jpg
- File:Tigers playing at Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:Tiger with its cab at Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:Tiger resting at Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:Tiger on walk at Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:Tiger Drinking Water at Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:Tiger at Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:CLose up a tiger at Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:Back pose of a tiger at Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:A week tiger at Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:A tiger near Sarada canal in Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:A tiger cught his food at Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:A Tiger at Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:A Peacock in Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:A monkey in Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:A deer running in Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:A Cheetal in Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:A bunch of monkeis in Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:A baffalo attacted by a tiger in Pilibhit Tiger Reserve area.jpg
- File:Foot Mark of A Tiger.jpg
- File:Pilibhit Tiger Reserve Area An Old Map.JPG
- File:Pilibhit Reserve Area An Old Map.jpg
- File:Fisheries Reservoir Pilibhit.gif
- File:A tiger in Pilibhit Tiger Reserve.jpg
- File:St Aloysius College Pilibhit.JPG
- File:Air distance of states capitals from Pilibhit.JPG
- File:Chuka Beach.JPG
- File:Gurudwara pilibhit.jpg
INeverCry 20:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 01:29, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
unused, bad quality, facebook like personal pictures.
- File:LOS JOVENASOS.jpg
- File:DOS QUERIDISIMOS AMIGOS.jpg
- File:DOS GRANDES AMIGAS.jpg
- File:ElYZABETH.jpg
- File:EL GRUPO DE MI EX "ELENA VEGA DUARTE".jpg
- File:LA MAYORIA DE MIS COMPAÑEROS.jpg
- File:ALGUNOS CUATES.jpg
- File:MIS BELLISISMAS COMPAÑERAS.jpg
- File:GAMAELENA..ALBUM DE MIS COMPAÑEROS.jpg
- File:Encuesta de monica.DARIN GAMAELENA.PNG
Wer?Du?! (talk) 22:30, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:15, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
copyvio, belongs to http://www.anamariapolo.net/fotos_detalle.php?idgaleria=47
Wer?Du?! (talk) 22:53, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:15, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sandandclaysilt (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyvio, no public domain... https://www.kabam.com/de/corporate/terms-of-service#tab-en Point 3.
Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:08, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:19, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
copyvio. Tibia has no CC, its Copyright © 1996-2012 CipSoft GmbH. All rights reserved.
Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Completing incomplete deletion request. This was tagged by A1 (talk · contribs) with the reason "{{delete|uploader's request}}". This is not a valid reason for deletion. Special:PermanentLink/81715805 says that the photo was taken by Юрій Булка (talk · contribs) but A1 (talk · contribs) is listed as the copyright holder. There is no evidence that the copyright has been transferred from Юрій Булка (talk · contribs) to A1 (talk · contribs). The file is in use on Wikimedia Ukraine's blog. Stefan4 (talk) 15:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 04:16, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Completing incomplete deletion request. This was tagged by Panic2k7 (talk · contribs) with "{{delete|Image purpose was satisfied, it is no longer required}}". This is not a valid reason for deletion. The image is in use on English Wikibooks, so it is currently in scope. Stefan4 (talk) 15:27, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- I find strange that this merits a discussion, especially since its pair image was deleted with the same tag without any issues. I'm all for preventing uploaders deleting useful content but I don't see this being the case. A speedy deletion would, as it was requested be the best outcome...
- The image was needed (and why I uploaded it) to show a bug on wikibooks and it was simply used on a personal talk page, after users there reviewed the images their purpose was expended. Unless any one finds it useful for something else (not that it is hard to replicate) I see no point in this procedure beyond the need for a second opinion due to an inability or refusal to qualify the merits of works proposed for speedy. I'm not very active on commons but what are the rules for speedy deletions here ? (I attempted to look for a way to tag the image, I was lucky that the same template we use on wikibooks works here as the deletion pages offered no clear indications). --Panic2k7 (talk) 06:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:51, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque
Violates COM:FOP#United Arab Emirates. es:Mezquita Sheikh Zayed tells that the building was finished in 2007.
Some of the images of people might be de minimis.
- File:Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque - Prayer Hall 01.jpg
- File:Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque - Prayer Hall 02.jpg
- File:Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque.jpg
- File:Beautiful Chandelier.jpg
- File:Crystal Chandelier in the Entrance Hall of Sheikh Zayed Mosque.jpg
- File:Defense.gov News Photo 100311-D-7203C-002.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-003.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-004.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-005.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-006.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-017.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-018.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-019.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-021.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-022.jpg
- File:Defense.gov photo essay 100311-D-7203C-023.jpg
- File:Minaret Schaich-Zayid-Moschee.jpg
- File:One of the 7 imported chandeliers..jpg
- File:Opulence and Majestic.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque Courtyard Arcade 01.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque Courtyard Arcade 02.jpg
- File:Soft beautiful carpet..jpg
- File:Swarovski Crystal Chandelier in Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque 01.jpg
- File:Swarovski Crystal Chandelier in Abu Dhabi Sheikh Zayed Mosque 02.jpg
- File:The Entrance Hall of Sheikh Zayed Mosque 01.jpg
- File:The Entrance Hall of Sheikh Zayed Mosque 02.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 22:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- We seem to be stuck in a merry-go-round of images of this mosque being deleted and then a whole load more being uploaded again. Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Sheikh Zayed Mosque only happened in July. If the category is kept because of some images being de minimis, then a note should be put-up on the category page about the lack of FOP - that might of least slow down the amount of inappropriate uploads. CT Cooper · talk 21:16, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- I've added {{Nouploads}}. Let's see if that helps. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:28, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque
See discussions immediately above. These images weren't included in the previous nomination because they hadn't been added to the relevant category when I nominated the other files for deletion.
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque Entrance Gate.JPG
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque Side View.JPG
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque taken from the opposite side..JPG
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque taken from the roadside. 01.JPG
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque taken from the roadside. 03.JPG
- File:The sun setting behind the Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque..JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:Sheikh Zayed Mosque
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in United Arab Emirates.
- File:Abu Dhabi- Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (14281040608).jpg
- File:Grand mosque Abu Dhabi (44438067762).jpg
- File:Oasis of Dignity.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (37567364540).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (37567370080).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (37825596581).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque (52566909455).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi (15424401753).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi (15856605778).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi (15858086109).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi (16018361986).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15421779894.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15424399703.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15424413633.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15424487883.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15424491923.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856606508.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856767520.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856771020.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856856690.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15856858080.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858000519.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858082909.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858084459.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858084649.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858277597.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858281077.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858284077.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 15858367487.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018267226.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018268376.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018270486.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018271336.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16018274396.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16043350652.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16043434852.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16043436562.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044044755.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044048725.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044136375.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044137955.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque @ Abu Dhabi - 16044141545.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque in Abu Dhabi DSF3637-HDR FUJIFILM X-T1 + Mitakon Zhongyi Lens Turbo Focal II Reducer Adapter for M42 + M42 Tokina RMC 17mm f3.5 (37961413742).jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 1.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 10.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 11.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 12.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 13.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 14.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 15.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 16.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 17.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 18.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 19.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 2.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 20.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 21.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 22.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 23.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 24.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 25.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 3.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 4.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 5.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 6.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 7.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 8.jpg
- File:Sheikh Zayed Mosque 9.jpg
- File:Sunset at Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque.jpg
- File:The Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)