Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/09/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
i dont like it Arjunajjuk (talk) 11:13, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Simple spanish personal text, out of COM:PS. Funfood ␌ 00:36, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Unused Userpageimage. Out of COM:SCOPE. JuTa 01:57, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:52, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 03:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
It's unlikely that the author owns the copyright to this block and white image, but the only source I found was http://blogs.elcomercio.pe/huellasdigitales/2010/08/pepe-y-lola-vilar-en-el-recuer.html David1217 (talk) 15:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Photo of Punkrockpunk, which is a sock of this person which was checkusered in March 2012. File of this vandal from back March - April is here and the new one can be found here: nl:Wikipedia:Checklijst langdurig structureel vandalisme/Italiaanse fotovandaal. Person is known to replace good images to photos of his own crosswiki. Therefore requesting to delete this bad qualitiy image. Wiki13 08:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Skunk Anansie in rome by Paride.jpg as well. Mathonius (talk) 13:49, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/2012 07 31 02 Re 4 4 II 11314
No artist info, Naumann appears to be the writer of the book, not the artist. Other versions of theimage has the same problem. FunkMonk (talk) 15:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Johann Friedrich Naumann seems to have been the engraver. FunkMonk (talk) 19:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
No info on when W. Foster died. FunkMonk (talk) 15:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: Good, that's all we needed to know. Should be added to the description. FunkMonk (talk) 19:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- I'm far away from my computer for another week, but I try to do what I can with my phone. Regards, Totodu74 (talk) 07:51, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Watermarked image NatGertler (talk) 19:33, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 05:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Bilder von Neonazies gehören nicht nach Pappritz 87.170.196.173 19:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Und warum soll er ausserhalb des com:scopes sein? Schliesslich sind die Personen gewisse Berühmtheiten.--Sanandros (talk) 23:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Und was ist der Löschgrund? --Ralf Roleček 23:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Keep Kein gültiger Löschgrund ersichtlich, Foto ist eindeutig innerhalb commons scope. Bildverwendung auf [1] ist auf dortiger Diskussionsseite zu klären. --Smial (talk) 20:48, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- @87.170.196.173, es scheint, dass dich eigentlich die Benutzung dieses Fotos im Artikel Pappritz stört. Das kann ich zwar verstehen, aber hier ist der falsche Ort dafür, weil das eine inhaltiche Diskussion ist. Hier auf Commons wird das Foto nur bereit gehalten. Diese Diskussion sollte auf der Diskussionsseite des Artikel (de:Diskussion:Pappritz (Dresden)) geführt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 06:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept: There was no valid reason given for deleting the image. --32X (talk) 06:53, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Own work very doubtfull. Simple enough for {{PD-textlogo}}? Unused anhow. JuTa 00:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept: not in use, no educational purpose Ezarateesteban 20:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
wrong upload Skrod (talk) 00:33, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request, not in use Ezarateesteban 20:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
own work very doubtfull. Simple enough for {{PD-textlogo}}? Unused anhow. JuTa 00:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, no educational purpose Ezarateesteban 20:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio. Not own work. INeverCry 01:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete 25 years isn't up yet if this is a 1988 image so not pd. --Herby talk thyme 18:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, not own work Ezarateesteban 20:57, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
I don't need it. I created it while thinking it may be useful to have a new template, just for our GLAM project, but found another way. Ldorfman (talk) 11:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:18, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:18, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
No source, terrible quality. Way better file in SVG format available at File:Coat of arms of the Czech Republic.svg Fry1989 eh? 01:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Source fixed (it was there all the time, just wrongly formatted, so it didn’t show up). This is a different rendition of the Czech coat of arms than File:Coat of arms of the Czech Republic.svg. This Štorm’s version is available in vector format at the source site, so if anyone is able to convert an AI file to an SVG file… The only unclear issue is the license: František Štorm originally released his version “as freeware”, but with a note “All images can be used freely, in any way, and anywhere (except fascist pages and press of any kind!!!) even without attribution. Only, please, do not deform or modify them.” which makes the picture effectively non-free, as far as Commons is concerned. A different, but in effect similar, statement was made at the current page: “These files are freely available only to non-artists, civil servants, and government institutions and their webmasters. Professional graphic artists are able to draw their own coat of arms, so they are asked not to use this coat of arms nor its parts without prior consultation.” Again – effectively non-free. However, we might argue that the coat of arms of the Czech Republic – in any rendition – is, as a state symbol, ex lege excluded from copyright protection, and therefore in the public domain. --Mormegil (talk) 21:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by fastily for having no license since 9/7 Sven Manguard Wha? 02:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
No source, terrible quality. Way better file in SVG format available at File:Small coat of arms of the Czech Republic.svg Fry1989 eh? 01:57, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by fastily as No license since 7 September 2012 Sven Manguard Wha? 02:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Low quality, no EXIF. Own work claim doubtful. INeverCry 01:57, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal images. INeverCry 02:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom at Commons:Deletion_requests/2012/09/08 Sven Manguard Wha? 02:22, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal images. INeverCry 02:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/2012/09/08 del nom[ Sven Manguard Wha? 02:23, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/2012/09/08 del nom[ Sven Manguard Wha? 02:23, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 02:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:24, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Only link is to a talk page archive. INeverCry 02:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 02:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 02:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Blurry. INeverCry 02:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Unusable, per nom. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Spongebob character is still copyrighted in the U.S. Kaldari (talk) 02:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Photo taken in Chile, where freedom of panorama exists. --Jorge Barrios (talk) 23:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Firstly, COM:FOP#Chile was outdated. (I've now updated it.) Articles 43 and 44 were repealed in May 2010 (before this photo was taken) and replaced by Article 71F. Secondly, freedom of panorama in Chile, as in most jurisdictions, only applies to works permanently placed in a public place (which this clearly isn't). Thirdly, it only applies if it was placed there with the copyright holder's permission. (It's not clear whether this use was approved by Viacom, but since it's not permanent, it's a moot point.) Therefore: Delete. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- Firstly, COM:FOP#Chile was outdated. (I've now updated it.) Articles 43 and 44 were repealed in May 2010 (before this photo was taken) and replaced by Article 71F. Secondly, freedom of panorama in Chile, as in most jurisdictions, only applies to works permanently placed in a public place (which this clearly isn't). Thirdly, it only applies if it was placed there with the copyright holder's permission. (It's not clear whether this use was approved by Viacom, but since it's not permanent, it's a moot point.) Therefore:
- Delete Agreed - even if Viacom approved this use of their copyrighted character, they had no reason to expect that it would become PD as a result. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 18:22, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per LX Sven Manguard Wha? 02:26, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Para poder concunsar en Wiki Loves Monuments Prontor (talk) 15:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:25, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused. INeverCry 02:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 02:28, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:13, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 02:28, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:13, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 02:28, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 02:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:34, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:14, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 02:29, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:14, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 02:29, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 02:36, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 02:29, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:39, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 02:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 02:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Blurry, unused. INeverCry 02:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 02:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 02:31, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 02:31, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Appears to be a scan of a magazine or newspaper photo rather than an original photo Ytoyoda (talk) 02:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Non-notable company logo. INeverCry 02:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Not necessarily own work, third party logo. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:35, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:02, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:43, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:45, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:45, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 02:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 02:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:53, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 02:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:43, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:53, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:57, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 05:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 05:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 05:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 05:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
It is extremely unlikely that this editor owns the copyright to this. It is also possible that this is in the public domain, but I would like to defer this to someone with more experience. Also, it needs more information about location and possibility of being PD-USGov, etc Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
probably stolen from http://www.marionaydalot.fr/article-retrouvez-moi-sur-footineo-com-le-site-de-pierre-menes-49172524.html , perhaps by the owner... need OTRS --MGuf (d) 08:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope (seems to be private photograph), poor quality, no useful description Torsch (talk) 09:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
This photo is taken by me. The photographic quality is not good.It does not describe the flower well. It has no importance on commons. JDP90 (talk) 09:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photo is taken by me. The photographic quality is not good. The animal is very unsharp. Commons have better photograph of the subject than this one. JDP90 (talk) 09:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
This photo is taken by me. The photographic quality is not good. It has wrong white balance. Commons have better photograph of the subject than this one. JDP90 (talk) 09:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
This photo is taken by me. The photographic quality is not good. It is very unsharp, has halos. Commons have better photograph of the subject than this one. JDP90 (talk) 09:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Dit is niet de echte Sint-Jozefkapel. Bij nader onderzoek in dezelfde straat, staat nog een andere kapel en dat is de Sint-Jozefkapel. Als deze verwijderd is, zal ik de andere uploaden. Mijn excuses voor het ongemak maar ik wil ook geen verkeerde informatie plaatsen. Ritipitie (talk) 10:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Accroding to Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-signature_tag#China, People's Republic of, this file should be deleted.--王小朋友 (talk) 10:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
plik zdublowany Apilek (talk) 10:34, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
plik znalazł się w mojej galerii przez pomyłkę, nie jest moją pracą Apilek (talk) 10:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Para poder concursar en Wiki Loves Monuments, lo subí mal, gracias Prontor (talk) 11:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Para poder concunsar en Wiki Loves Monuments Prontor (talk) 15:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Does not realy look like own work but more like copied from commercial webpage. JuTa 11:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
The old version by User:Capmas1 appears to be unfree. No need to delete the other versions of the file. Stefan4 (talk) 15:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
and other uploads by Travisnulo (talk · contribs). Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Text-only logo of company with questionable notability. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
and other uploads by Anubhavyadav35 (talk · contribs): Low quality images of subjects which very likely to have much good coverage on Commons already. See Category:Taj Mahal as example. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
and other uploads by Spiagie (talk · contribs). Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Low quality. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
and other uploads by Calvoosorio (talk · contribs). Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
given the extremely small size and low resolution of this image, I find it very unlikely that the uploader actually had the rights to this image DS (talk) 17:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
given the extremely small size and low resolution of this image, I find it very unlikely that the uploader actually had the rights to this image DS (talk) 17:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 18:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 18:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 18:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 18:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 18:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 18:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 18:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 18:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 18:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 18:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 18:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Unnecesary, we have the flag already at File:Flag of the Workers' Party of Korea.svg Fry1989 eh? 18:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 19:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 19:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 19:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 19:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 19:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 19:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 19:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 19:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 19:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 19:21, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 19:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 19:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
No own work, but COM:DW, see Category:Jorge Oteiza - I am not sure if FOP applies on this work. Funfood ␌ 19:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Small unidentified portrait painting in a PDF, single upload from user, out of COM:PS. Funfood ␌ 20:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
An s orbital is spherical. It does not have two separate "lobes", so this animation is not correct for either "different views" of the entity nor the way the entity itself could move over time. DMacks (talk) 21:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Chemically incorrect. Have File:XeF2.png that illustrates the MO results, but F–S–F (en:Sulfur difluoride) is not linear so it would not have the two F at directly opposite ends of the central S "p" orbital. Also doesn't make sense to talk about specific atoms' orbitals contributing specific numbers or spin-directions of electrons in this direct AO combination illustrated. Use-case is specifically talking about two of the F in SF6, but that's not clear from the diagram (and still the atomic electron contributors is not correct from a simple en:LCAO perspective), and the actual MO of this compound is more complex than this. DMacks (talk) 21:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Is that within the scope? 4 me it looks like that she just put here own pic on commons to promote her self Sanandros (talk) 23:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Doubtfully own work. Looks like official press photo. Funfood ␌ 23:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
- File:Gourgen Yanikian.jpg en:Gourgen Yanikian (1895-1984)
- File:John Sahaki Kirakosyan.jpg en:John Kirakosyan (1929-1985)
I think that these two images, which were uploaded by User:Unodante, were scanned from books, newspapers. The possibility of {{Own work}} is doubtful (extremely low). Takabeg (talk) 17:14, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello. I am Unodante and I uploaded these two images. The reason I consider them my own work is that both the images appear in my newly-published book entitled "Sentinel of Truth, Gourgen Yanikian and the Struggle Against the Denial of the Armenian Genocide". So, basically these images appear in my own copyrighted book which has just been published in Armenia (I can provide the ISBN if necessary). Needless to say, the two images have been published in my book lawfully. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unodante (talk • contribs)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:19, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:19, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. INeverCry 02:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:20, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:20, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 02:59, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:20, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 03:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:20, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 03:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:20, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 03:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Keep notable person. See en:Susan Whelan.Érico Wouters msg 19:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:26, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:23, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 04:25, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:23, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 04:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:38, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Comment I see this gentleman is the subject of an article on en.wiki: w:Robert "Bob" Fifer and so should probably be kept. I'm not sure if permission is needed for the image, as there's no EXIF etc. INeverCry 17:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Hope I'm putting this in the correct place...
I don't understand the issue with the photo we submitted of Bob Fifer. Please explain what "Out of scope. Unused personal image" means. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onlinemarketingbranch (talk • contribs) 03:35, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete We generally do not keep images of people who are not notable -- that is what is suggested by the nomination. The fact that there is a WP:EN article eliminates that problem. However, there is a different problem. The image description says "Professional headshot of Bob Fifer", while User:Onlinemarketingbranch claims this is "Own work". In order to keep this, we will need permission from the photographer using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:52, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:35, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:33, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:36, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:38, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:39, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:43, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:44, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:01, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:01, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:52, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:01, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Promotional. INeverCry 04:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:01, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:01, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 04:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:01, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 05:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 05:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:33, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Church still copyrighted since built during the fourth quarter of the 20th century in France, country with no COM:FoP. Léna (talk) 08:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
- This Church is described in a Wikipedia article (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89glise_Sainte-Jeanne-d%27Arc_de_Rouen) with photos, already.
- French-speaking Wikipedia communaity has decided not to respect copyright for buildings. That's why the picture are uploaded on fr.wikipedia and not on Commons. There is no FoP in France => the photo have to be deleted since it's a copyvio. Remi Mathis (talk) 11:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Info The architect is Louis Arretche (1905-1991). The building should be in public domain in 1991+70=1 January 2062. --Coyau (talk) 16:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
The stained glass windows are in the public domain, but the church was built during the last quarter of the 20th century and thus still copyrighted. No Com:FoP in France. Léna (talk) 09:36, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Info The architect is Louis Arretche (1905-1991). the building should be in public domain in 1991+70=1 January 2062. --Coyau (talk) 16:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
This church was built in 1957. As there is no FoP in France, this file should be deleted. / Il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France, les bâtiments dont l'architecte n'est pas mort depuis au moins 70 ans sont sous copyright. Sebleouf (talk) 10:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete No FOP in France. Pymouss Let’s talk - 22:45, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Marce79 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: deletion|orphan and old logo; Superseded by File:Antoniano logo 2012.svg FASTILY (TALK) 10:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason. --McZusatz (talk) 14:25, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept: We generally keep old versions for historical reasons. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Not out the copyright in the US: copyright expired in Israel in 2006, so it was still in-copyright on the URAA date (1 January 1996). That means that in the US, it is protected for publication+95 i.e. copyright will only expire in 2050, unfortunately. Jarry1250 (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I cannot even start to understand the logic behind this request. This picture was taken in Israel and by an Israeli government photographer. According to Israeli law, it's copyrights expired worldwide. Oyoyoy (talk) 13:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Jarry1250, the weirdest DR I ever met. This has nothing to do with US law, and you can't enforce URAA on photos taken by Israeli government photograph taken and published in Israel. Keep matanya • talk 12:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- Jarry1250, the weirdest DR I ever met. This has nothing to do with US law, and you can't enforce URAA on photos taken by Israeli government photograph taken and published in Israel.
Deleted: Unfortunately, you can enforce US law on an image kept on servers in the United States, so Commons rules require that we respect the copyright status in the country of origin and the USA. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:26, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio (Church built in the XXth century ; no FoP in France) Remi Mathis (talk) 14:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
- Info The architect is Louis Arretche (1905-1991). the building should be in public domain in 1991+70=1 January 2062. --Coyau (talk) 16:45, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Comment, could it be seen as COM:De Minimis ? Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:49, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- Comment No, it's obviously a picture of the church and named like that. Remi Mathis (talk) 12:10, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:26, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a two-dimensional work of art which does not fall into FOP as per Indian copyright laws. Lovy Singhal (talk) 15:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- just a hint: it's a carpet/tapestry you could by directly from the artist at "Museum Rietberg" on September 1, 2012, Roland 18:23, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- [added] same for File:Museum Rietberg - Adivasi art of Hazaribagh 2012-09-01 19-20-04 (P7000).JPG, Roland 18:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
No COM:FoP in France, Le Corbusier died in 1965. Coyau (talk) 18:33, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete No FOP in France. Pymouss Let’s talk - 22:42, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
The architect of this monument, Eugène Lux (1864-1952) according to this document, page 12, isn't dead for 70 years. As there isn't FoP in France, this file should be deleted. Sebleouf (talk) 18:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Support to delete this file --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:37, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Promotional. Non-notable company logo. INeverCry 19:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Shouldn't it be tagged as lacking permission? David1217 (talk) 00:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 19:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
not yet PD, undelete in 2013 Liliana-60 (talk) 19:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- When they changed the law? Used to be 10 years.--Sanandros (talk) 22:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- can You wait 3 months?2.179.74.180 21:11, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 19:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 19:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 19:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:33, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 19:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:33, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 19:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:49, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:33, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:49, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:33, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:34, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:34, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:34, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:35, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Unused, low quality image without good description Bulwersator (talk) 21:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Lack of use is not a reason to delete. Image quality is fine when displayed at a lower resolution. Description is adequate. Note that the above user is currently the subject of a discussion at en.wikipedia AN/I regarding disruptive deletion nominations of files. Link. - The Bushranger (talk) 21:21, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- But lack of use + extremely low probability of use due to extremely low quality and lack of description is valid reason for deletion Bulwersator (talk) 07:42, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Image is clearly PD. 70.183.204.189 13:16, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Yes, unused is not a valid reason for deletion, but low-quality images are less likely to be in scope. Such a blurry image really won't be useful, except in the case of hard-to-photograph subjects, and an assortment of random seashells is definitely not hard to photograph. Read the paragraph of COM:SCOPE where the word "bird" appears for a further explanation. Nyttend (talk) 21:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep per Bushranger. It is impossible to determine what use it will have tomorrow, even if it has none today, I might add. Reducing the number of obviously free and potentially useful images doesn't seem to be within the scope of the project. Dennis Brown (talk) 12:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete We should not keep a file just because it was nominated by someone who was reported on AN on en-wiki or because it has a free license. We should keep files that are expected to be usable.
- We delete unused, low res files all the time. The photo is not unique and cameras get better and better all the time so I really doubt that someone would choose an old low res photo instead of a newer high res photo. --MGA73 (talk) 16:41, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- Note: The nominator has been topic-banned from all deletion processes on en.wiki. - The Bushranger (talk) 20:15, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep The image is still useable. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:36, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Google Books says this book is from 1922, but the margin says it's from July 1923, making it copyright protected Vera (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Yes this and File:Marriage of Kamehameha IV at Kawaiahao Church.jpg and File:Marriage of Kamehameha IV at Kawaiahao Church (bw).jpg. It has already been ruined User:1Veertje.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 21:52, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kept: The magazine "The Friend" has no copyright notice. There is also no copyright renewal, so it is PD. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:43, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
2D board, not covered by {{FOP-UK}}. Layout and photo are almost certainly copyright. Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete As the photographer and uploader, I agree the file must be deleted. I just didn't have as much experience with potential copyright issues on Commons back then as I do now. There are probably a few more in a similar vein lurking that I uploaded a few years back. Of course, I would not deliberately upload such a file nowadays. (notwithstanding the odd accidental file that might occasionally slip through during a large "Commonist" bulk upload). But in these cases, it has since become clear to me that such files must be deleted from Commons as per the nom. Thanks and Best Regards, Rept0n1x (talk) 06:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:44, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ivan.sychev108 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvios. Low quality, no EXIF. Own work claim doubtful.
- File:Mayboroda and his wife.png
- File:Mayboroda against a space backdrop.png
- File:Photo of Alexander Mayboroda.png smaller, but all rights reserved on A.Ms Website [[2]]
INeverCry 00:38, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
All images are photomontages. Where does the background come from? --AtelierMonpli (talk) 20:59, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: In doubt, we delete iot Ezarateesteban 20:56, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MadayBeatboxer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
INeverCry 01:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete all. Per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ezarateesteban 20:58, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Promotional. Non-notable singer/band.
- File:Albert El Prodigioso live.jpg
- File:Albert el prodigiosoen tv show.jpg
- File:258809 213851401969250 122811087739949 740522 4836662 o.jpg
- File:Logotipo de HME.jpg
INeverCry 02:21, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete all. Per nom.Érico Wouters msg 19:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:26, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RingOfScars (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Promotional.
INeverCry 02:44, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Files of User:Diligent Terrier
[edit]- File:Cutecat.jpg
- File:Jackrussellcropped.jpg
- File:Balanced_Rock.jpg
- File:PeopleBirding.JPG
- File:Florida_Aquarium.jpg
- File:Old_Florida_Capitol.jpg
- File:HighlandsSkyline.JPG
- File:BirdhouseInTheHighlandsArea.JPG
- File:Harris_Lake_Highlands.jpg
- File:Franklin_Tailgate_Market.jpg
- File:Charlestonhome.jpg
- File:Alpaca_head.jpg
- File:Rudy_Giuliani_speaking.jpg
- File:Typical_cat.jpg
Author or uploader hereby requests deletion. --Diligent Terrier (talk) 19:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Can I ask why? These are some great pics!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:34, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept, No valid reason given - license is irrevocable. Lymantria (talk) 16:18, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
This template is very advantageous for us. But, unfortunately there is no legal basis. I'm not a member of OTRS, so I cannot read OTRS no 2012081610008185. Who gave permission ? Who can give for copyright of all municipality. Why this template is restricted to the coats of armes of municipalities ? Takabeg (talk) 10:57, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Now I read [3], thaks to Rd232.
E-mail says:
TPE Portalına 2012-07-29 tarihinde yapmış olduğunuz info başvurunuza ilişkin cevap aşağıdadır. Sayın xxx; Bahsetmiş olduğunuz belediye logo ve amblemi telif hakları ile değil marka ile korunabilir. Bunun için ilgili kuruluşun başvuru yapması gerekmektedir. Marka isim tescili alındığında tescili yaptıran kurum kuruluş yada kişiye başvurduğu isme veya başvurduğu logoya ait tekel hakkı kazandırır. Bunun için kurumumuzla değil söz konusu logo ve ismin sahibi belediyelerle görüşmeniz gerekmektedir. Saygılarımızla."
This e-mail doesn't say that logos of municipalities are public domain.
It apparently says that users have to contact with each organization and get each permission for each organization (municipalities).
But I don't known the user sent e-mail to which organization ? I asked to User:Taysin (member of the Wikimedia OTRS team). Thank you.
Takabeg (talk) 11:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Email was to User:Infestor - did someone confuse trademark and copyright, or is the email just not clear enough? I've asked Infestor to comment. Rd232 (talk) 11:34, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Who reply to User:Infestor ?
I can show some examples on copyright of logo of municipality/province etc.
The notice about the competition for the logo of Çelikhan municipality says that the copyright will belong to the municipality.
The notice about the competition for the emblem of Kırkkale Province says that the copyright will belong to the government of province. Takabeg (talk) 11:39, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- What is the confusion here? TPE told me that logos of municipalities cannot be protected by copyright but by trademark. So, one has to see whether each individual municipality has indeed trademarked their logo. Naturally, there are some which has trademarked and some has not. If there are (Turkish mun.) logos on Commons that are protected by trademark then sure, go ahead and delete them (I guess). But the question for me here is, are trademarked logos cannot be uploaded to Commons? There are {{PD-textlogo}} & {{Trademarked}} templates used together for logos that does not meet the threshold of originality in Commons (Microsoft logo for instance). --Infestor (talk) 15:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Turkish Patent Institute under the Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology has competence over patents in Turkey not over copyrights in Turkey. The General Directorate of Copyright (http://www.telifhaklari.gov.tr/ana/default.asp) under the Culture and Tourism has competence over patents in Turkey. As you known, trademark and patents are protected with registration. Copyrights are protected without registration. So some works are doubly protected both with Decree-Law No. 551 on the Protection of Patent Rights (Patent Haklarının Korunması Hakkında Kanun Hükmünde Kararname) and Copyright Law (Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunu). Takabeg (talk) 16:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Why does it matter whether they have jurisdiction over patents or copyrights? You ask a government body about a law, and you expect their response to be correct. If they didn't know about something, they would refer you to the correct body and not make up an answer. Now, what does the email actually say in English? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:14, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- this is my translation:
"Dear xxx,
Logos and emblems of municipalities that you had mentioned cannot be protected by copyright but by trademark. In order to do that, the institution in question (municipality) should apply for it itself. When trademarked, whomever person or whichever institution completed that registration can then have the monopoly rights on that particular logo or name. For this (matter), you need to contact the municipality for that particular logo or name and not our institution." --Infestor (talk) 18:11, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- In that case Keep. They have stated clearly that those emblems are not subject to copyright. The clause about having to contact them is to, say, license it for trademark use, which we are not concerned with. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- also Keep. unless one can bring conflicting information from other turkish official institutions, TPE seems to be correct in their reply to me (why should they lie anyways?). TPE also has a trademark database where one can seek a particular logo. take çorlu municipality logo (File:CorluLogo.svg) for instance, it is protected as a registered trademark. however, in commons or wikipedia we are not infringing their trademark, i.e we are not using their logo "in trade" or so to say: it is not in the business scope. at least this is what i know. --Infestor (talk) 05:34, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I think KoH and Infestor are entirely too trusting of government agencies, particularly on subjects on which they are not expert. There is nothing in the English translation of the law which suggests in any way that such things would not have a copyright in the ordinary course of events. It is very likely that municipal CoAs can be protected by both copyright and trademark -- that is the case in every other country with which I am familiar. We are not concerned at all with trademark, but only with copyright and I find it hard to believe that CoAs do not have a copyright in Turkey.
- One reason for the mistake could be that as a practical matter, trademark is a much stronger and easier to defend protection that copyright. A registered trademark has no requirement for particular originality and no expiration. A government agency might well think that the only practical protection for a municipal CoA would be trademark. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:23, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
- I would much prefer to understand the legal basis for their opinion, but I don't think that not understanding it is enough to reject it. There are also a number of countries where we routinely say "official COAs are not subject to copyright", eg {{PD-Coa-Germany}}, {{PD-Coa-Finland}}, {{PD-Coa-Hungary}}. Rd232 (talk) 05:54, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Question ok, so how about i send an email to the appropriate institution regarding the coat-of-arms of municipalities of turkey? tell me where to send and precisely what to ask, so that we can have a consensus (according to their reply). --Infestor (talk) 18:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Info i've tried to ask the question to Telif Hakları Genel Müdürlüğü (General Directorate of Copyrights) but their contact form seems to be not working. how surprising and lovely (!). -- Infestor T • C 10:19, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Basically per what Jim said. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this template is indeed representative of a free license compatible with Commons, we simply cannot be using it. FASTILY (TALK) 01:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC)