Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/05/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
2.JPG){kind=link}
Copyvio - Obvious book scan from a Dorling Kindersley book Andy Dingley (talk) 00:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:13, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio --> speedy Jcb (talk) 21:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Copyvio - Britannica copyright still visible in the image. User's other uploads equally suspicious Andy Dingley (talk) 00:40, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:13, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/226592/gasoline-engine/259105/Two-stroke-cycle Common Good (talk) 18:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
filename says its toxandria, but this house is Oosterhoutse clubhuis Jasperjaspers (talk) 08:51, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: use {{Rename}} instead Jcb (talk) 21:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Harris Garden Autumn Bank.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. - Chris j wood (talk) 11:22, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Harris Garden Flower Bed.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. - Chris j wood (talk) 11:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Harris Garden Jekyll Border.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. - Chris j wood (talk) 11:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Harris Garden Meadow.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. - Chris j wood (talk) 11:25, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:25, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Harris Garden Pond.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. - Chris j wood (talk) 11:25, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Please delete this iamge. Jayanta Nath (talk) 11:14, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: no reason specified Jcb (talk) 21:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
I upload this images but in copyright policy said that all images you uploaded its need to permisssion from the copyright holder.note the clause that "The permission to reproduce this material shall not extend to any third-party material." That means that if that pib.nic.in publishes pictures that are owned by some other party, those pictures cannot necessarily be reused , so it need to permission. I have no permission. Please delete this iamges. Jayanta Nath (talk) 09:39, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted uploader hasn't the copyright of the picture Ezarateesteban 22:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Harris Garden Tree.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. - Chris j wood (talk) 11:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Whiteknights Park 9.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. chris_j_wood 11:39, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Fry's Island 7.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. chris_j_wood 11:42, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Fry's Island 6.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. chris_j_wood 11:44, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Fry's Island 5.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. chris_j_wood 11:46, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Fry's Island 4.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. chris_j_wood 11:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Fry's Island 3.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. chris_j_wood 11:49, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Fry's Island 2.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. chris_j_wood 11:51, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Fry's Island 1.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. chris_j_wood 11:52, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:River Pang near Bradfield College.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. chris_j_wood 11:55, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Cholsey_and_Wallingford_Railway_level_crossing_over_Wallingford_Bypass_-_geograph.org.uk_-_393273.jpg
[edit]
This is a lower resolution version of File:Cholsey and Wallingford Railway 1.jpg, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. Chris j wood (talk) 14:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:31, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Region 6 War Room 1.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. Chris j wood (talk) 14:22, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Reading_Enterprise_Hub,_Whiteknights_Park,_University_of_Reading_-_geograph.org.uk_-_452693.jpg
[edit]
This is a lower resolution version of File:Reading Enterprise Hub.jpg, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. Chris j wood (talk) 14:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Footbridge_in_The_Wilderness,_Whiteknights_Park,_University_of_Reading_-_geograph.org.uk_-_452698.jpg
[edit]
This is a lower resolution version of File:Whiteknights Park 3.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. Chris j wood (talk) 14:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:33, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Whiteknights Park 2.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. Chris j wood (talk) 14:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:33, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Tilehurst railway station 2.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. Chris j wood (talk) 14:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Datchet railway station 1.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. Chris j wood (talk) 14:35, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Datchet railway station 2.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. Chris j wood (talk) 14:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:35, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a lower resolution version of File:Woolhampton Swing Bridge.JPG, which has been transferred from the Geograph project without noticing that the original photographer (that is me) had already posted the full resolution image to Commons as well as a version to the Geograph project at the reduced resolution required at that time by that project. Chris j wood (talk) 14:39, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- support I have copied/pasted the geodata from this image to the full res version Oxyman (talk) 18:22, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Exact or scaled-down duplicate -- Common Good (talk) 18:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Wrong file upload Dimm5x (talk) 15:25, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 21:39, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
user request Cassowary (talk) 16:14, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Common Good (talk) 18:13, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Re-uplodaded to ru-wiki as FairUse Image - http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BA%D0%B0_13-08-1992_%D0%B3%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BF%D0%BF%D0%B0.jpg Kaganer (talk) 14:56, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: We don't allow fair-use images on Commons russavia (talk) 10:09, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Because I found out that the way I made it (copy from a Google Map on a blanc layer) is still considered as derivative work. So it is not permitted to be used in wikipedia. Hoverfish (talk) 00:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Per Feist v. Rural, "information alone without a minimum of original creativity cannot be protected by copyright." Since Google Maps attempts to catalog all public geographic data, which itself is not copyrightable, making a derivative of that would not be subject to Google's copyright. The only copyright Google holds on Google Maps is the specific manner in which the information is presented, which you clearly did not copy. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:16, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept Jcb (talk) 14:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Copyvio from http://www.partidoliberal.org.ar/home/index.php/documentos/cat_view/60-material-para-actividades-y-diseno unless PD-textlogo is applied, but there but there's a clear warning that says Copyright © 2011 Partido Liberal Libertario. Todos los derechos reservados. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep as PD-textlogo. Just because they claim copyright on it doesn't mean they get it. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:11, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 14:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Copyvio from http://www.partidoliberal.org.ar/home/index.php/documentos/cat_view/60-material-para-actividades-y-diseno unless PD-textlogo is applied, but there but there's a clear warning that says Copyright © 2011 Partido Liberal Libertario. Todos los derechos reservados. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep as PD-textlogo. Just because they claim copyright on it doesn't mean they get it. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:11, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 14:33, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Unclear source. Is it a PD-self? Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:51, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. The source URL means that it was previously uploaded on en.wiki, but was moved to Commons and subsequently deleted under w:WP:CSD#F8. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept Jcb (talk) 14:33, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
low-quality (resolution so bad, can't see the key features!), unused (have File:Decamethylcobaltocene.svg, and incorrect (if there are two bonds to the Co, it is not formal +2 charge) DMacks (talk) 03:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality and unneeded. ChemNerd (talk) 18:03, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a logo of an agency of the government of the Philippines. This is not eligible to be relicensed. See en:Template:Non-free Philippines government. Bluemask (talk) 05:11, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment although, this image can be uploaded to the English Wikipedia with a valid non-free tag and rationale. --Bluemask (talk) 05:17, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: if somebody wants to transfer it to EN.wiki, please contact me at my talk page and I will temporary undelete the file Jcb (talk) 14:36, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a non-free logo. Bluemask (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 14:36, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a non-free logo. Bluemask (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Lymantria (talk) 11:19, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a non-free logo. Bluemask (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 14:37, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Not used, no educational value Torin (talk) 05:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: (not by me) Jcb (talk) 14:21, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Wrong license; logo of a governmental body. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
COM:DW 92.227.132.242 06:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete as derivative work. Global usage tool doesn't show any projects that need it to be moved there. --InfantGorilla (talk) 12:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 07:54, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Killiondude (talk) 03:08, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
no FOP in Georgia 124.148.157.166 08:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Je suis l'auteur de cette photo et je ne comprend pas pourquoi quelqu'un (qui ?) demande d ela supprimer. Merci de votre réponse.
Henri MOREAU 05:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: the problem is not the copyright of the picture, but of the bridge Jcb (talk) 14:43, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Tagged as disputed for incorrect alkene geometry, also has undefined stereocenters. Replaceable by various Category:Jasmonates, which resolve these problems. DMacks (talk) 08:59, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. --Yikrazuul (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality and incorrect. ChemNerd (talk) 18:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Poor quality (pixelated), orphaned/replaced by File:Methyl jasmonate skeletal.svg and File:Methyl jasmonate.svg. Leyo 01:03, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Note, this is not the same file that was previously deleted. DMacks (talk) 01:26, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This was the drawing I moved from en-wiki some 5 years ago. The svg file is, of course, better Ronhjones (Talk) 15:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
unused low-res diagram missing stereochemical details; many replacements in same and better formats available in Category:Jasmonates DMacks (talk) 09:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. --Leyo 10:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality and unneeded. ChemNerd (talk) 18:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Tagged as incorrect (missing N on H). Fixable, but unused and already have correct structure at File:Anatabine.svg DMacks (talk) 09:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. --Yikrazuul (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Incorrect chemical structure. ChemNerd (talk) 18:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Tagged as having major chemical mistakes (6 bonds to each of 3 carbons). Unused, replaceable by File:Cis-jasmone 3D balls.gif, a comparable diagram-type that does not appear to have the errors. DMacks (talk) 09:07, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Incorrect → Delete --Leyo 10:08, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality and incorrect. ChemNerd (talk) 18:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a non-free, copyrightable model. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- This also applies to File:Falcon City of Wonders Model Pict 5.jpg. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- ... but not File:Falcon City of Wonders Model Pict 1.jpg, or #2 or #3 ? NVO (talk) 17:16, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Well, yes, those too. I was cleaning up in Category:Towers and came across the first two, but not the others. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 14:46, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Self Photo, not own photo shizhao (talk) 09:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Jcb (talk) 14:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Very low quality image, not useable. OSX (talk • contributions) 11:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 14:48, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
The file is uploaded by a vandal for the purpose of vandalism in the Thai Wikipedia (this article). Aristitleism (talk) 12:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: (not by me) Jcb (talk) 14:21, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Great suspicion that it is a copyright violation, see talk page File_talk:Anoop_Menon.jpg Tony Wills (talk) 12:33, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: (not by me) Jcb (talk) 14:21, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
User page image for es:Usuario:Valentin estevanez navarro. No longer in use and so it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose and therefore out of scope for Commons. – Adrignola talk 15:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope... self promotional picture Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra talk 21:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep Per COM:INUSE: An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a user page (the "User:" namespace) of another project, but by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed --Discasto talk 15:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: only contribution from this user. No edits since 2011. Thus can be considered unused. McZusatz (talk) 22:12, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
unknown, not-notable person. Drakosh (talk) 15:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
por que a fotografia é minha e eu não autorizei ninguém a usa la Patrícia Jardini (talk) 15:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Low quality (badJPG), not used anywhere, alternatives in Category:Choline. Leyo 17:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. DMacks (talk) 18:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality and unneeded. ChemNerd (talk) 18:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Low quality (badJPG), alternatives in Category:Choline. Leyo 17:25, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I replaced its single use with one of the alternatives. DMacks (talk) 18:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Low quality, not used anymore, alternatives given. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:08, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Low-res graphics, mis-formatted text (should be subscript "2"). DMacks (talk) 15:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Low quality, artefacts, not used anymore, alternatives exist. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete The chemical structure is incorrect too. Ed (Edgar181) 00:21, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per Ed (impossible bonding patterns). DMacks (talk) 15:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality, not used anymore, numerous alternatives given. Yikrazuul (talk) 21:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete. Not enough detail to even know if it's ribose vs numerous other pentoses. DMacks (talk) 15:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality and the missing stereochemistry is essential for depicting sugars. ChemNerd (talk) 18:01, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unused low-resolution. Have File:Medetomidine.svg of same level of detail and File:Dexmedetomidine skeletal.svg that even includes stereochemical information not present here DMacks (talk) 22:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. --Yikrazuul (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality and unneeded. ChemNerd (talk) 18:00, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Unused lower-res version of same-format File:Ethane-flat.png DMacks (talk) 22:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. --Yikrazuul (talk) 19:31, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality and unneeded. ChemNerd (talk) 18:00, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Lower-res version of same-format File:Ethane-flat.png (I'm having trouble displaying the charsets needed to replace it in the 3 remaining uses at the moment. DMacks (talk) 22:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I replaced the last three uses, and the file is now redundant to the better versions. Ed (Edgar181) 00:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Incorrect typography (numbers should be subscripted) and in-image caption text that interferes with reuse. Have File:Ethane IUPAC.png among tons of Category:Ethane raster and vector alts, and it's plain-text anyway DMacks (talk) 06:09, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 12:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
tiny, no exif, only upload from this user -- probable copyvio Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- see promotional text that have been removed, so delete--Motopark (talk) 12:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
I am unsure whether this qualifies for PD-ineligible. It's certainly not CC. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 15:34, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
This photographs is not 60 years old, therefore it was not published >60 years ago and therfore it is not in the public domain. Martin H. (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Lymantria (talk) 20:51, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Low res, no metadata, I suspect a copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed: http://hilalfari.com/vb/showthread.php?t=272&page=1 Lymantria (talk) 20:53, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Lymantria (talk) 20:53, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Source: TV interview. Author: TV interview. Delete ~ NVO (talk) 17:40, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission (OTRS). --ZooFari 23:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Source: TV show. Author: TV show. Delete ~ NVO (talk) 17:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- More from user:Krupski Oleg:
- File:Чумак А.jpg - "TV poster"
- File:Лонго_Ю..jpg - "TV broadcast"
- File:Бехтерєва Н.П..jpg - "Film" (meaning motion picture, not own photo film. However, compare with ru:File:Behtereva.jpg, - it's more like a photo still, not video)
- File:Рогозін Г..jpg - "Film"
- File:Ратніков Б..jpg - "Film"
- File:Аура1.jpg - "Film"
- File:Силовий гіпноз1.jpg, File:Силовий гіпноз1.jpg, File:Силовий гіпноз1.jpg - "Film"
- File:Кулагіна.jpg - "Film"
- File:Поклик безодні.jpg - "title card of a film". NVO (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission (OTRS). --ZooFari 23:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
It's a poster; for one, with all the writing, it's not in scope. Secondly, even if the poster was made by the user, I doubt all the photographs and drawings were. Prosfilaes (talk) 18:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted --ZooFari 23:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Not simple enough for {{PD-textlogo}}. I have transferred it back to the English Wikipedia as "en:File:Temasek Polytechnic logo.gif" under a fair-use justification. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 19:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted --ZooFari 23:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- yes, dete it. JAn Dudík (talk) 21:15, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Low quality file with better substitutes. --94.199.40.135 12:28, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted --ZooFari 23:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Maker died in 1948. No public domain. Tekstman (talk) 20:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Common Good (talk) 20:09, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Maker died in 1948. No public domain. Tekstman (talk) 20:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Common Good (talk) 20:10, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
seems to be copyvio as it was only released under CC-NC license http://www.solarcentury.co.uk/media/picture-library/solar-projects/c21e-and-c21t-tiles-rotherham-south-yorkshire-housing-association/ ELEKHHT 21:49, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-compatible license. --ZooFari 23:45, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
likely copyvio: company releases images under CC-NC license http://www.solarcentury.co.uk/media/picture-library/solar-products/c21e-tiles-and-slates/c21e-solar-electric-slates/ ELEKHHT 21:51, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-compatible license. --ZooFari 23:45, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
I may be missing something here, but it looks to me like this is out of scope -- not useful for anything. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE. --ZooFari 23:43, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
No solid source is given. The only URL is the image at en:wp that's linked above the permissions template; if you look at that image, you'll see that it's never had a source given. I've checked multiple National Park Service websites, such as its National Historic Landmark profile, but I can't find this image anywhere. Nyttend (talk) 22:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No verifiable source. --ZooFari 23:46, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
1955 photo, not public domain for any reason, not the uplaoders own work, beeing the owner of a copy of a photo does not allow you to do anything with this copy, especially it does not give you the right to allow others to reuse it. Martin H. (talk) 11:56, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Do what you think right,--Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 14:40, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 11:14, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
No proof app is CC/GFDL -mattbuck (Talk) 13:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 11:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
The uploader is not the owner of this work, which is a corporate logo. He has no rights to release it into the public domain absent permission of the corporation/rights holder. Imzadi 1979 → 15:13, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As far as I know, Brazilian currency is not in public domain. So, this photo is a derivative work of copyrighted material. --~ Shureg (talk) 15:15, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The site of "Brazil's Central Bank" doesn't "authorizes" here? --MisterSanderson (talk) 15:22, 8 May 2011 (UTC)- Ops, wrong link. --MisterSanderson (talk) 15:47, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 14:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Image with same name already exists.Want to upload with a different Name Ash647 (talk) 17:54, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: use {{Rename}} instead Jcb (talk) 14:15, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
copyrighted.Hector Guimard died in 1942. No freedom of Panorama in France Jebulon (talk) 21:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 19:01, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
RCAF-LowVis-Roundel.svg is existing SVG file, No forseable use. Was also created by a sockpuppeteer on Wikipedia-EN. Fry1989 (talk) 19:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: the existence of a vector file is no reason to delete the raster version Jcb (talk) 16:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
First, we have a vector version already. Second, this file was created by a sockpuppeteer on Wiki-EN. His disruptions much be ended completely. Delete. Fry1989 eh? 01:18, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept I don't see nothing for delete it, the uploader isn't blocked on enwiki and this is another project with diferents policies. --Ezarateesteban 22:17, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
2.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in France. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Notre Dame du Haunt by Le Corbusier, Ronchamp.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Notre-Dame-du-Haut à Ronchamp (1977)4.JPG. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
4.JPG){kind=link}
2.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted Jcb (talk) 16:34, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
2.JPG){kind=link}
Architectural rendering of existing building, most likely copyrighted Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Why would you delete a file that was uploaded by its copyright owner? It's clearly the Museum, and no one has asked you to remove it. Why are you arbitrarily choosing to remove files? The Ukrainian Museum can be reached at info@ukrainianmuseum.org. Since there is no clearly visible method for adding to any kind of discussion about this image, please be good enough to get in touch with me via email. The Ukrainian Museum is the only institution that owns the image.
- I see you found how to comment here, that's great. Let me try to explain some things.
First off, this is not the English Wikipedia, this is Wikimedia Commons, which is a different site with somewhat different rules. On en.wiki, you can upload copyrighted images under (very strict) "fair use" policies, but here, copyrighted images can only be uploaded if their use is released in specific ways by the copyright owner. In order for this to happen, some proof has to be offered that the uploader is the copyright owner -- although your user name is "Ukrainianmuseum", that is no proof. I could right now go and make the user ID "Moma NYC", but that wouldn't be proof that I was actually a representative of MoMA. So, step #1 is that you need to prove that you are a bona fide representative of the Ukrainian Museum. After that is done, you must release some of the rights to the picture in a way that's consistent with the Commons' upload policies. You don't have to give up the copyright, but you do have to allow re-use, although you can specify how the image is to be attributed.
The place to go to get all this started is here, just click on this link and follow the directions there. The process may take a while, but in the end, if you're able to provide the neeeded information, the image will be able to stay here. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:52, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- I see you found how to comment here, that's great. Let me try to explain some things.
Deleted: It is very unlikely that the Museum owns the copyright to this rendering. The copyright is almost certainly owned by the architect, but in any case, we do not have permission to use it. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 00:30, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Picture from 1926, if the uploader should be the photographer, he must have an age over 100 years. Not really believable. The combine "Author = Uploader" cannot be correct. Permission needed, because too young for exceptions. Quedel (talk) 17:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 00:31, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France for 3d models; therefore this is a derivative work, and there is no indication that the original work was suitably licensed or in the public domain. Jarry1250 (talk) 18:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 00:31, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
If you read the source website, photographer name Maurice Branger is mentioned. According to http://www.yellowkorner.com/artistes/147/Maurice-Louis-Branger.aspx he was born in 1874 and died in 1950. Teofilo (talk) 18:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- If it's still under copyright then it must go - no question about it Androstachys (talk) 21:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 00:32, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
- Undeleted per request. The copyright term in the country of origin has expired and in all likelihood this was published before 1926 (PD-US). De728631 (talk) 22:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Question raised on Wikipedia as to whether this file has been published before 1923; request that it be deleted while copyright status is determined. ScottyBerg (talk) 21:43, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep: An independent 3rd party news source uses the image saying its from 1903 thus no copyright issue. Best, Mifter (talk) 23:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Mifter has misread that story. It refers to an event in 1903, but puts no date on the image. Fences and windows (talk) 02:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- There's really no question about the date of the image, as the Chinese Theater closed in 1911 and became a rescue mission. I've found some sources indicating it closed in 1910. ScottyBerg (talk) 12:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- When it was closed isn't the issue; when the image was published is. I think it is very likely this is a pre-1923 publication, but I can't know this for sure. It's possible this image laid in wait for years before being published, perhaps on a historic places type of postcard. — Huntster (t @ c) 00:16, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- There's really no question about the date of the image, as the Chinese Theater closed in 1911 and became a rescue mission. I've found some sources indicating it closed in 1910. ScottyBerg (talk) 12:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- That independent news source also included a photo credit which reads "courtesy of www.arcadiapublishing.com, from 'Manhattan's Chinatown' (2008)", so it is a poor example to choose. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:52, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Mifter has misread that story. It refers to an event in 1903, but puts no date on the image. Fences and windows (talk) 02:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep; I would have thought this a typical case of "I own the physical media so I own the copyright" confusion, were it not for the fact that the purported complainant is a publisher and — one would expect — is quite familiar with copyright statute. Coren (talk) 14:30, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete: The date of publication is unknown and there is a claim of copyright violation. Unless we are sure of the status of this image, it should be deleted. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:52, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- However you want to handle it is fine with me. I nominated it for deletion to clarify its legal status when objections were raised. I found another PD photo of the same building on the LOC website and have uploaded it. However, this is a better picture, so if it's legal it should be kept. ScottyBerg (talk) 23:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Although the image is c 1910, there is no evidence of publication before 1923. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 00:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Art. 81 Ustawy o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych. Nie wyrażałem zgody na publikację wizerunku na wolnej licencji, nie jestem też osobą publiczną = powszechie znaną. Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 13:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK - jak zainteresowany sobie nie życzy - to zdjęcie jest do usunięcia. Z tymże w takim razie należało zastrzec w momencie wykonywania zdjęcia - które nie było robione z ukrycia, lecz było robione jawnie, w trakcie wystąpienia publicznego, że nie życzy sobie Pan fotografowania. Osoba publiczna to osoba wykonująca funkcję publiczną - niekoniecznie powszechnie znana - choć faktycznie zapis art 81. mówi o tym, że osoba ma być powszechnie znana. Polimerek (talk) 10:40, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- Dziękuję za odpowiedź. Podczas przygotowania do wystąpienia, a tym bardziej w trakcie wygłaszania referatu koncentruję się w całości na prelekcji, nie na sali - do tego stopnia, że nawet nie spostrzegłem fotografów, choć nie twierdzę, że działali z ukrycia. Tym bardziej nie miałem jak zastrzegać. Poza tym moje obiekcje nie dotyczą robienia mi zdjęc, a ich publikacji na wolnej licencji i publicznego rozpowszechniania wizerunku bez zgody. To są dwie różne sprawy. O ile wiem zdjęcia wolno robić bez zgody i pytania (mogę się mylić, nie jestem prawnikiem), zgoda jest potrzebna przy upowszechnianiu. Co do wykonywania funkcji publicznej - rzecz w tym, że ja na Wikimedia nie występowałem jako jakikolwiek funkcjonariusz publiczny, nawet nie jako przedstawiciel uczelni - zaprezentowałem w prywatnym czasie (sobota)czysto prywatnie obserwacje i analizy dokonane również w większości w prywatnym czasie lub analizy innych osób z Wikimedia (zgodnie z licencją). Co prawda tematyka wielu błędów wiąże się z "moją" dziedziną, a np. sprawę błędów na plWikipedii wykryłem kiedyś przy okazji służbowego sprawdzania skąd tylu studentów piszacych kolokwium wzięło identycznie brzmiące błędne informacje, podobnie parę innych błędów czy plagiatów, ale trudno założyć by czyniło to moje wystąpienie na Wiki wystąpieniem funkcjonariusza. A tym bardziej osobą powszechnie znaną. Z uszanowaniem --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 11:39, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Obviously the same problem with File:Wikimedia Wroclaw 2011 Robert Niedzwiedzki 1.jpg and File:09-Konferencja Wikimedia Polska 2011.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 06:51, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, it is the same problem. --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 19:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Accordin with Polish law robert need to give permission and he didn't. Béria Lima msg 21:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Uploads by Aliya
[edit]Claimed as "own work"
[edit]- File:4 mois.jpg
- File:3 mois et demi.jpg
- File:2 mois et demi.jpg
- File:8 semaines.jpg
- File:3 semaines.jpg
- File:1 jour.jpg
Under different authors and sources
[edit]- File:CADILLAC ELDORADO DU MONT DE SENE.JPG
- File:E'Dream timeless dite daisy Of Pack-Ice Wolves.jpg
- File:E'Dream Timeless dite Daisy Of Pack Ice Wolves.jpg
- File:E'Dandy Beauty Of Pack Ice Wolves.jpg
- File:H'Aiyana des perles siberienne.jpg
- File:E'Dandy Beauty dite Laia Of Pack Ice Wolves.jpg
- File:Fantastic black beauty dite aliya of the indian legend.JPG
User has uploaded files under different types of author and source names, thus no evidence of permission for most files. Others are claimed as "own work" though no EXIF data (unlike some of the older uploads). --ZooFari 00:43, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 14:28, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
ASDFGHJ (talk · contribs), en.wp ASDFGH, uploaded other city skyline photos stolen from the internet, retouched and with false claims of "own work" to Commons and Wikipedia. I refer to File:Nanchang_Skyline_2006.jpg, File:Qingdao_Skyline_2008.jpg, en:File:Chongqing at night.jpg - that’s the photo I identified as bloody obvious copyright violations.
For example the May 4 2009 uploads are from 3(4) different cameras. That’s the first time I became aware of him, already at May 4 2009 File:Busan Skyline.JPG was widely spread on the internet.
I later searched for his uploads in December 2009, using new image search engines - and using Baidu imageseach - I found more evidences or hints that can explain possible copyright violations.
Decorating lists like en:List_of_cities_in_China with beatiful pictures is not a justification to steal photos, to break the law or to violate policies of Wikipedias. Having beautiful photos of cities is nice, having beautiful stolen photos is not the project goal of Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons, in such cases no image is better.
ASDFGH(J) may explain what drives him to upload a mixture of photos he possibly created himself and photos grabbed from the web. Obviously, and likely he know this himself because he does good work in many parts of Wikipedia, that the stolen photos are the worst vandalism one can do: they give us the impression that we have a good photo of a city so that other people dont see a reason to upload their self-created good photos, but in fact we only have this stolen trash and in the end we have nothing. Please, ASDFGH(J) revise youre uploads!
List of files, without claim that I caught all photos:
- File:Baiyun Airport at dawn.jpg
- File:Baiyun Airport bird eye view.jpg
- File:Baiyun Airport Front Entrance.png
- File:Baiyun Airport Termal.jpg
- File:Busan Skyline.JPG
- File:Changchun Skyline 2009.jpg
- File:Changsha Skyline 2008.jpg
- File:Changzhou Skyline 2009.jpg
- File:Chengdu Skyline 2008.jpg
- File:Chongqing 2008.png
- File:Daegu Skyline.jpg
- File:Daejeon Skyline.jpg
- File:Dalian Skyline 2009.jpg
- File:Dongguan Skyline 2008.jpg
- File:Foshan Skyline 2004.jpg
- File:Goyang Skyline.jpg
- File:Guangzhou Tower June 2009.jpg
- File:Gwangju Skyline.jpg
- File:Hangzhou West Lake Skyline 2009.jpg
- File:Harbin Skyline 2008.png
- File:Incheon Skyline 03-08-2009.jpg
- File:Incheon Skyline.jpg
- File:Incheon-NewSongdoCity-July2008.jpg
- File:Kumming Skyline 2008.jpg
- File:Lanzhou Skyline 2009.jpg
- File:Nishi-Umeda.jpg
- File:Seongnam Skyline.jpg
- File:Shenyang Skyline.png
- File:Shijiazhuang Skyline 2009.jpg
- File:Tianhe, Guangzhou 02-28-2009.jpg
- File:Tianhe, Guangzhou 17 July 2009.png
- File:Tianjin Skyline 2009.jpg
- File:Ulsan Skyline.jpg
- File:Ürümqi 2008.png
- File:Wuhan Skyline.jpg
- File:WuhanSkyline.jpg (strange history)
- File:Yuexiu, Guangzhou 02-28-2009.jpg
- File:Yuexiu, Guangzhou 17 July 2009.png
--Martin H. (talk) 14:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Good work, Martin! We should also block the user. --Yikrazuul (talk) 12:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Im awaiting an answer, but I think he learned it and continues with editing inside the projects goals (of both, Commons and Wikipedia). --Martin H. (talk) 12:44, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted - Jcb (talk) 13:11, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
No date of death of the author. No reason to believe he is already more than 70 years dead. Date of production about 1920 - but this is not sufficient. Date is too young to assume author is dead more than 70 years. → inapplicable license. Saibo (Δ) 17:28, 6 May 2011 (UTC) edited. --Saibo (Δ) 01:42, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
So langsam vergeht mir die Lust an der Mitarbeit bei Wikipedia. Ich finde hier auf eben dieser Seite nur englischen Text, den ich nur erraten kann, aber keinen Button, der mir hilft, den Text gleich ins Deutsche zu übersetzen. Bitte ihr Wikipedianer, denkt daran, dass auch Ältere wie ich ( fast 73 Jahre) noch viel Wissen in Wikipedia einbringen können. Macht es uns leichter !!!
So, nun zu dem Bild:
Das Foto ist nur ein Ausschnitt einer Postkarte des Ortes Conow, vermutlich vor 1926 aufgenommen. Hauptmotiv auf dieser Postkarte war , wie üblich, die örtliche Gastwirtschaft. Ich habe als Quelle eine "Carola Borchers" deswegen angegeben, da diese Dame so nett war und mir diese Postkarte gescannt per Mail mal zugeschickt hat.
Und wenn dies immer noch gegen die Lizenzvorschriften verstößt, dann - so sagt man ja heute - haut sie doch in die Tonne ! --Berginspektor (talk) 08:03, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo Berginspector, kein Problem, ich kann dir den Text auch auf Deutsch schreiben. Standardmäßig tue ich dies jedoch auf Englisch, damit ihn die meisten Leute verstehen. Ich schreibe dir gleich noch etwas auf deiner Diskussionsseite.
- Danke schonmal für deine Antwort. Aber, ja, leider sieht das Urheberrecht (an das wir uns halten) lange Schutzfristen vor (siehe dazu auch Commons:Lizenzen). In dem Lizenzbaustein, den du auf der Dateiseite angegeben hast, steht ganz deutlich drin, dass der Autor mehr 70 Jahre verstorben ist. Dies ist für das abgebildete Foto aber in nicht Weise belegt oder nachvollziehbar. Weißt du mehr über die Postkarte (Kaliwerk)? Wenn wir wüssten, dass der Fotograf schon mehr als 70 Jahre verstorben ist, wäre es kein Problem. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:42, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Lieber Saibo, vielen Dank für die Aufklärung. Ich weiß auch nicht, ob der Fotograf schon über 70 Jahre tot ist. Ich hatte aber nicht angenommen, dass für alte Postkarten generell noch eine Lizenzfreiheit nachgewiesen werden muß! Bist Du Dir da so sicher? Jetzt schreib aber bitte nicht, ich solle in irgendeine der Wikipedia-Lizenzvorschriften reinschauen. Mich schreckt davor schon das Englische und die Informationsfülle ab. Die Nerven setze ich lieber produktiver ein. Wenn Du mir helfen möchtest, weil Du im Lizenzdickicht den besagten Durchblick hast, so schick mir bitte eine Nachricht, wo genau darin steht, dass auch alte Postkarten unter die Lizenzvorschriften fallen. Vielen Dank im Voraus ! Berginspektor--Berginspektor (talk) 09:10, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- Alles klar. Ja, ich bin mir sicher, dass die Gemeinfreiheit nachgewiesen werden muss. Das steht auch in der deutschen Version der zugehörigen Richtlinienseite Commons:Lizenzen (bzw Commons:Lizenzvorlagen).
- Bei einer Postkarte von 1920 müsste (damit das Foto bei bekanntem Fotografen nicht mehr geschützt ist) der Fotograf spätestens 20 Jahre nach Erstellung des Fotos gestorben sein. Das kann keineswegs als sicher gegeben angesehen werden.
- Ich möchte dir nicht vorenthalten, dass es auch den Lizenzbaustein {{Anonymous-EU}} gibt. Für die Anwendbarkeit dessen müsste aber sicher sein, dass es sich bei dem Foto um ein anonymes Werk handelt. Ich gehe nicht davon aus, dass du sehr viel über dieses Foto weißt, insofern sehe ich diese Regelung als nicht anwendbar an. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 22:50, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- 2011-05-16, 09:51:43 Uhr wurde vom Hochlader {{Anonymous-EU}} eingefügt. Mein Kommentar dazu vorstehend. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Lieber Saibo, vielen Dank für Deine Antwort. Bitte kläre doch in Deinem Lizenz-Expertenteam , ob diese alte Postkarte , um die sich mit Sicherheit kein Mensch mehr kümmert, nicht doch so, wie ich angegeben, unter "Lizenzfrei" eingestuft werden kann. Glück auf, Dein Berginspektor--Berginspektor (talk) 13:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Bitte siehe zu "um die sich mit Sicherheit kein Mensch mehr kümmert" jenes: Commons:Projektrahmen/Vorbeugendes Prinzip. Ja, es wird sich noch ein Lizenzexperte darum kümmern. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 22:45, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: license is OK now Jcb (talk) 11:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Wie ich oben schon sagte, aber von Jcb ignoriert wurde: Für die Anwendbarkeit von {{Anonymous-EU}} müsste sicher sein, dass es sich bei dem Foto um ein anonymes Werk handelt. Siehe dazu auch den Inhalt des Lizenzbausteins.
As already stated above but knowingly ignored by Jcb: We have no evidence that the author's name (the original photographer) was not published in conjunction with the image within 70 years of its original publication. Saibo (Δ) 02:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - we have to do the reasonable to see if the author is know, not the impossible - Jcb (talk) 09:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- In future, I will simply not tell people anymore of this template if this is every time such a time consuming process. Who said that it must be easy to use this template? Nobody. If you go with your reasoning you can trash PD-old-70 and simply tag every file with a anon-license. The requirements are stated in the template and I suggest you to read here: de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Bilder.2C_deren_Urheber_nicht_bekannt_ist and de:Anonymes Werk (Urheberrecht). Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 23:37, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- Comment (largely copy&pasting what i've written elsewhere) we cannot simply assume something to be an anonymous work just because it appears somewhat plausible -- there are, in fact, myriads of ways the creator may use to identify herself -- with the result that in case someone gets sued after publication of the image, she has to prove to have done really extensive research on the author's name (see Katzenberger in Schricker/Loewenheim, UrhR, 4th ed., § 66, 10). authors, for instance, do have the explicit right to determine whether or not they want to be named at all (§ 13 urhg) - in many cases, they are not named simply because it's very difficult to do that technically or because it is not typical for their line of business ("Branchenübung") (think about industrial design or the advertisement industry). but that does not mean such works are automatically not protected 70 years p.m.a., see § 66 (2) urhg: "An die Identifizierbarkeit des Urhebers [sind] [...] keine hohen Anforderungen zu stellen, so dass einem Dritten, der sich auf die verkürzte Schutzdauer [...] berufen will, durchaus ein beträchtlicher Ermittlungsaufwand zuzumuten ist" (Katzenberger ibid.; translation). and that is exactly why the uploading process for anonymous works on dewiki is so complicated. for instance, if the postcard included the name of the company publishing it, you have to contact them etc. —Pill (talk) 00:11, 16 June 2011 (UTC) (@Berginspektor, hier eine automatisch generierte Übersetzung)
- Keep the copyright on anonymously published works is not 150 years; it is 70 years. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- And what, if I may be so bold as to ask, does this have to do with what we are discussing? —Pill (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. No research has been demonstrated. Just the fact, that the image does not have the author's name on it, is not sufficient for Anonymous-EU. As has been stated several times: Thorough research has to be done. I can't see any evidence of that here. -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 13:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Files of User:Verticaljump (talk — contribs)
[edit]Lots of issues here: questionable authorship claims (own work for files supposedly sourced from Youtube and Fareham Solicitors), project scope concerns (a basketball player dressed in a cape, a screenshot of a video of a man in a purple t-shirt, multiple photos of a dog categorised and described as a solicitor), and spamming (several of the file descriptions and supposed source pages are just blatant advertising).
- File:Fareham Solicitors -The best solicitors in town.JPG
- File:Fareham solicitors.JPG
- File:Fareham Solicitors looked after me thank you.jpg
- File:IMA REVIEW.jpg
- File:The Best Washington dc divorce lawyers.jpg
- File:Vertical jump man.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per LX: private or trivial images without any ed. purpose. --Yikrazuul (talk) 12:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted --ZooFari 23:48, 13 May 2011 (UTC)