Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2010/08/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.GIF){kind=link}
Blatant advertising. SchuminWeb (Talk) 08:08, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme: Page is out of project scope: content was: '{{delete|reason=Blatant advertising.|subpage=Ignite_Memories|year=2010|month=August|day=15}} =filename|border|right|top Bio
Ignite Memories was formed when
undefined 211.44.205.176 07:15, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Speedy kept, non admin closure. Undefined deletion rationale (aka vandalism) --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
undefined 211.44.205.176 07:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Speedy kept, non admin closure. Undefined deletion rationale (aka vandalism) --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Blatant advertising. SchuminWeb (Talk) 08:08, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme: Page is out of project scope: content was: '{{delete|reason=Blatant advertising.|subpage=Ignite_Memories|year=2010|month=August|day=15}} =filename|border|right|top Bio
Ignite Memories was formed when
This file violates the copyright. Just the image comes from a website and a movie. Commons:Lisensing Elberth 00001939 (talk) 18:14, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Martin H.. King of Hearts (talk) 22:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Este archivo viola los derechos de autor. Simplemente la imagen viene de una página de internet no tiene bastante información. Elberth 00001939 (talk) 19:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 20:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
This file violates the copyright. Just the image comes from a website does not have enough information. Elberth 00001939 (talk) 19:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 20:45, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
copy of exist image --Dark Eagle (talk) 12:06, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Comment Marked for speedy deletion. -- King of Hearts (talk) 22:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio: Exact or scaled down duplicate: File:Boriss Bogdaskins.jpg
This file violates the copyright. Just the image comes from a website does not have enough information and seems to be taken from some commercial. Elberth 00001939 (talk) 19:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete Looks like a professional studio shot. -- King of Hearts (talk) 23:09, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyvio so speedy to me - thanks Herby talk thyme 08:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
image is on Commons Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Whoops! Only intended to nominate for deletion on fr:wiki; since I'm not an admin here, I can't do much other than ask for speedy keep of this image. Sorry. Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file violates the copyright. Just the image comes from a website does not have enough information and logos are not allowed on commons. Elberth 00001939 (talk) 18:45, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I've never heard of logos not being allowed on the Commons. Infact there's tonnes of them on here. Fry1989 (talk) 02:06, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- The logos if allowed at commons, but only if simple logos can be uploaded, but this logo is not as simple to say.--Elberth 00001939 (talk) 13:56, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Logo is above the treshold of originality, see Commons:Licensing#Simple design. Martin H. (talk) 21:22, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File uploaded under wrong name, has been re-uploaded as File:280 Park Avenue South Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC) Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - changed to duplicate, should be deleted soon - Theornamentalist (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, it's gone. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:00, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Amada44: Exact or scaled down duplicate: File:280 Park Avenue South.jpg
The License was not entered by the uploader. - see here. JuTa (talk) 09:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ich withdraw my nomination because the author and uploader now set the CC-by-sa-3.0 License himself at the de: Image, which I will remove soon as NowCommons. regards --JuTa (talk) 18:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Please delete this as I upload my first meetup with wiki, that time I was not aware about copyright. Replaceable File:Koyel Mallik.jpg available. Jayanta Nath (talk) 18:11, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:41, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
copyright violaton Also here Off2riorob (talk) 18:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC) Delete Please delete this image. This image uploaded by me at that time when I am new in wikimedia project and misconception regarding free image. And please help me anyone admin, how do I tagged with that kind of image uploaded by me should be delete. I want to delete my uploaded images which is not genuine free image.
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
File shares same name as previously deleted fil, but doesn't appear to be same image. This one is an underexposed personal snap, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Delete Please delete this image. This image uploaded by me at that time when I am new in wikimedia project and misconception regarding free image. And please help me anyone admin, how do I tagged with that kind of image uploaded by me should be delete. I want to delete my uploaded images which is not genuine free image. Jayanta Nath (talk) 19:00, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete Please delete this image. This image uploaded by me at that time when I am new in wikimedia project and misconception regarding free image. And please help me anyone admin, how do I tagged with that kind of image uploaded by me should be delete. I want to delete my uploaded images which is not genuine free image. Jayanta Nath (talk) 19:01, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete Please delete this image. This image uploaded by me at that time when I am new in wikimedia project and misconception regarding free image. And please help me anyone admin, how do I tagged with that kind of image uploaded by me should be delete. I want to delete my uploaded images which is not genuine free image. Jayanta Nath (talk) 19:03, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete Please delete this image. This image uploaded by me at that time when I am new in wikimedia project and misconception regarding free image. And please help me anyone admin, how do I tagged with that kind of image uploaded by me should be delete. I want to delete my uploaded images which is not genuine free image. Jayanta Nath (talk) 19:03, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope --George Chernilevsky talk 04:05, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete Please delete this image. This image uploaded by me at that time when I am new in wikimedia project and misconception regarding free image. And please help me anyone admin, how do I tagged with that kind of image uploaded by me should be delete. I want to delete my uploaded images which is not genuine free image. Jayanta Nath (talk) 19:04, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete Please delete this image. This image uploaded by me at that time when I am new in wikimedia project and misconception regarding free image. And please help me anyone admin, how do I tagged with that kind of image uploaded by me should be delete. I want to delete my uploaded images which is not genuine free image. Jayanta Nath (talk) 19:04, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
It is posted in another website and is being treated as a copyright violation again and again. Theglobalbiz (talk) 08:15, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Speedied. @Theglobalbiz: I don't see another upload of this picture from you (perhaps under another account). You are not allowed to copy something from the Internet unless it's published under a valid license. Besides this person is out of COM:SCOPE since your draft (en:Draft:Priyanka NK) on English Wikipedia has been turned down yesterday. Then, unless it's accepted, photos of this artist will be deleted here. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:31, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - gone. --Herby talk thyme 10:49, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete Please delete this image. This image uploaded by me at that time when I am new in wikimedia project and misconception regarding free image. And please help me anyone admin, how do I tagged with that kind of image uploaded by me should be delete. I want to delete my uploaded images which is not genuine free image. Jayanta Nath (talk) 19:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete Please delete this image. This image uploaded by me at that time when I am new in wikimedia project and misconception regarding free image. And please help me anyone admin, how do I tagged with that kind of image uploaded by me should be delete. I want to delete my uploaded images which is not genuine free image. Jayanta Nath (talk) 19:06, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete Please delete this image. This image uploaded by me at that time when I am new in wikimedia project and misconception regarding free image. And please help me anyone admin, how do I tagged with that kind of image uploaded by me should be delete. I want to delete my uploaded images which is not genuine free image. Jayanta Nath (talk) 19:07, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete Please delete this image. This image uploaded by me at that time when I am new in wikimedia project and misconception regarding free image. And please help me anyone admin, how do I tagged with that kind of image uploaded by me should be delete. I want to delete my uploaded images which is not genuine free image. Jayanta Nath (talk) 19:07, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete Please delete this image. This image uploaded by me at that time when I am new in wikimedia project and misconception regarding free image. And please help me anyone admin, how do I tagged with that kind of image uploaded by me should be delete. I want to delete my uploaded images which is not genuine free image. Jayanta Nath (talk) 19:08, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
duplicate of File:M-32 Grenade Launcher.jpg; please see related nom above. Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:42, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete Duplicate. Luispihormiguero Any problem? 
21:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 21:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
duplicado Percisco (talk) 23:34, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 21:08, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
double of File:Foerdergeruest Headframe Ottiliae Schacht von 1876.jpg --Markscheider (talk) 19:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- can be deleted. --Arcy (talk) 20:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio: Exact or scaled down duplicate: File:Foerdergeruest Headframe Ottiliae Schacht von 1876.jpg
Author is Ernst Hoffmann or Bernhard Walter. Both were not employees of Bundesarchiv but SS officers. Bundesarchive has not right license their photos under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany license. They obvisously died after 1939 (not PD photo). 90.178.227.202 14:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Keep Bundesarchiv believe they have rights to release the low resolution versions of the images - Just like with most other established institutions we trust their judgment on this matter. This reason for deletion would also apply to 90% of Bundesarchiv images. --Jarekt (talk) 04:06, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Comment Low resolution is not reason for copyright violation. We trust their judgment on this matter. :-) Some another copyright violations were deleted in past. Can I also upload low resolution versions of copyrigted images without permission? --90.178.227.202 08:36, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Keep This image was provided to Wikimedia Commons by the German Federal Archive (Deutsches Bundesarchiv) as part of a cooperation project. The German Federal Archive guarantees an authentic representation only using the originals (negative and/or positive), resp. the digitalization of the originals as provided by the Digital Image Archive. --Svajcr (talk) 19:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- Löschen (delete) - Fotos vom BA sind immer argwöhnisch zu betrachten, sie behaupten, die Rechte zu haben, stimmt aber nicht. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 00:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Keep I agree with Jarekt and Svajcr. Jacopo Werther (talk) 12:24, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete The Bundesarchiv has not substantiated the rights.
“Please document permissions you received upon your enquiries at the appropriate page and please forward a copy of the permission to permissions-commons-at-wikimedia.org, which serves as the Wikimedia Foundation's Central archive for permissions.” The Bundesarchiv shall observe this. Fingalo (talk) 20:20, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Keep Bundesarchiv, a German state organisation with a huge experience in application of IP-related laws, believes that they have the right to license it. Much more serious arguments are needed to prove the contrary. MaxSem 21:56, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment State organisations are not better or worse than private individuals. See requests like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-10537-0001, Plakat der Friedensfahrt 1951.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F078972-0032, Frankfurt-Main, Hauptbahnhof.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-P104696, Berlin, 3. Freie Berliner Kunstausstellung.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-2008-0129-500, Ruhrtal, Überschwemmungen nach Luftangriff.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-P104696, Berlin, 3. Freie Berliner Kunstausstellung.jpg... --90.178.227.202 07:27, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept, per the agreement with the Bundesarchiv: "asserts that the Federal Archives owns sufficient rights to be able to grant this kind of license.". Kameraad Pjotr 11:34, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for statues in the United States. Wknight94 talk 00:02, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Clear picture of copyrighted statue.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:19, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as per COM:FOP, sorry... I did not read this on a time.----László (talk) 00:04, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:09, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United States. BrokenSphere 03:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. According to en:AT&T#Statues, this statue was dedicated to Orlando Cepeda on September 6, 2008 and created by sculptor William Behrends of North Carolina. ZooFari 00:19, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United States. BrokenSphere 03:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. According to en:AT&T#Statues, this statue was created by sculptor William Behrends of North Carolina (still living). ZooFari 00:22, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United States. BrokenSphere 03:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. According to en:AT&T#Statues, this statue was created by sculptor William Behrends of North Carolina (still living). ZooFari 00:23, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United States. BrokenSphere 03:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. According to en:AT&T#Statues, this statue was created by sculptor William Behrends of North Carolina (still living). ZooFari 00:25, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Watermark suggests self-made claim is false. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:21, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:26, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Watermark suggests this is a copyvio. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:22, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:26, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
screenshot of nonfree software Samuell (talk) 04:24, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:27, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
not suitable for project scope, low quality --4028mdk09 (talk) 08:48, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:49, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
not suitable for project scope, low quality --4028mdk09 (talk) 08:53, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:50, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
not suitable for project scope, low quality --4028mdk09 (talk) 08:58, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:50, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
not suitable for project scope, low quality --4028mdk09 (talk) 09:00, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
not suitable for project scope, low quality --4028mdk09 (talk) 10:14, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Spam. ZooFari 00:53, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
not suitable for project scope, low quality --4028mdk09 (talk) 10:17, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:54, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
not suitable for project scope --4028mdk09 (talk) 10:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:54, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
not useful for project scope, low quality --4028mdk09 (talk) 10:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:55, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
not useful for project scope, low quality --4028mdk09 (talk) 10:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:55, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
low quality, not useful for project scope --4028mdk09 (talk) 10:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Generally we allow users to post a picture of themselves on their user page, as long as they don't turn it into their Facebook. -- King of Hearts (talk) 22:27, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep no, it's useful, see COM:SCOPE#File in use in another Wikimedia project. Trycatch (talk) 11:32, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. In use. ZooFari 00:56, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
low quality, no use for project scope --4028mdk09 (talk) 12:10, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:42, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope --4028mdk09 (talk) 12:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:42, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope, bad quality --4028mdk09 (talk) 12:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:43, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
bad quality, out of project scope --4028mdk09 (talk) 12:33, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:45, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope, bad quality --4028mdk09 (talk) 12:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Used on Userpage Amada44 talk to me 12:32, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
personal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 18:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Amada44 talk to me 12:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Image has a source and licence but the source is Welsh Wikipedia, where it is unlicenced had has no source. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 13:33, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyvio: http://www.icelebz.com/celebs/will_young/photo20.html -- Common Good (talk) 19:29, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Files of User:Trazos Mania
[edit]
All contributions from this user, in wiki es and commons, are autopromotion as noted here es:Trazos Mania and here es:Usuario Discusión:Trazos Mania. These files are unused and unusable - out of scope. Also, File:Logotipo TrazosMania.jpg is incorrectly categorized. --Santosga (talk) 02:15, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 00:10, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Photographs uploaded by Wenoby
[edit]Canon PowerShot A480
[edit]
Canon DIGITAL IXUS 700
[edit]
Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XSi
[edit]
Nikon D80
[edit]
Nikon E3200
[edit]
Nikon E3700
[edit]
Nikon D300
[edit]
Digimax A7/Kenox D7
[edit]
Kodak Easyshare C743
[edit]
Sony DSC-S650
[edit]
Sony DSC-P93
[edit]
Olympus FE190/X750
[edit]
Samsung S760
[edit]
Scanner
[edit]
Unknown camera model
[edit]- File:Rayo en la serena.jpg
- File:Terremoto Ovalle.jpg
- File:Puclaro.jpg
- File:CalleCordovez.jpg
- File:Chile ayuda.JPG
- File:Anahi en Viña.JPG
- File:Quinta vergara 2010.jpg
- File:Soledad y Felipe.JPG
- File:Liserco.jpg
- File:Americo en vivo 2.JPG
Summary
[edit]I came across Wenoby's uploads when I processed the speedy deletion of File:Faro La Serena 2008.jpg which was copied from Flickr. When I subsequently went through the uploads I found one of the typical signs of someone claiming other works as their own: widely different camera models (see listing above). Given that one of the {{Own}} claims as already been proven wrong and the diversity of the EXIF data, I suggest to delete the whole set. But I want to give Wenoby the opportunity to comment and, as some of these images are widely used, the community the opportunity to look for replacements. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: See also COM:AN/U#Copyvios and sockpuppets of Wenoby/Whenoby. --AFBorchert (talk) 10:27, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete The EXIF data alone leaves me thinking that the licensing is highly unlikely to be valid. --Herby talk thyme 11:07, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. File:Americo en vivo.jpg was nicked from http://www.portavoz.cl/2009/10/concierto-de-americo-en-antofagasta/. File:Parque Japones.jpg was nicked from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/20416334. File:Liceo De Niñas.jpg was nicked from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/8439002. The list goes on. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:12, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Those three are gone then...:) Thanks LX. I don't think this one needs to stay a live DR for long but 24 hours will not hurt I guess? --Herby talk thyme 13:34, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete I checked to see if the unknown images were uploaded on dates that significantly differed from the rest, but no. So we're fairly certain those are copyvios too. -- King of Hearts (talk) 22:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. I really see very little doubt about these so - considering them as speedy copvios - gone Herby talk thyme 16:00, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Don't we have enough of these? How many images of a woman sucking penis do we need to illustrate a concept? IMO, this low quality (and resolution) image does not sufficiently meet our guidelines of being a serious database of free knowledge to warrant inclusion. Blurpeace 19:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Low res and just another pornographic image. fetchcomms☛ 19:36, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, in answer to the (seemingly rhetorical) question of "Don't we have enough of these images", we seem to have a total of five photographs of fellatio, of which there are three that are useful and illustrate unique positions/situations. This one illustrates oral sex, but without the whole passive object (penis) hidden by the active object (mouth) - so it seems it does fit a useful niche. Max Rebo Band"almost suspiciously excellent" 04:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Not the most brilliant of photographs perhaps, but it's being used on two sister projects (da., eo.) and therefore is within project scope. Anatiomaros (talk) 23:06, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Comment, Max Rebo Band just added those images – check the pages' histories. I could easily revert and use a higher quality photo available. Blurpeace 18:34, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for that information Blurpeace; I'll remember to do so next time. Have you a particular image in mind? Regarding the retention of this image, I feel it's becoming increasingly difficult in the current climate for editors to support our hosting "pornographic" images of any description, regardless of quality, without being accused of wanting to see Commons becoming a "porn host". That is sad and a bit scary. If we had a decent and varied selection of images in this category I'd have no problem with deleting an image of borderline quality, but I don't think that is the case here. I certainly don't want to see Commons "flooded with porn" though. Problem is we have no clear guidelines as to what constitutes an acceptable range of images and probably never will have: I usually categorise such exciting things as fields, buildings and roads (e.g. GeographPtoject) and nobody has ever argued for deleting our thousands of files of farm gates in Britain, even though the image quality of many of them is poor and they illustrate pretty much the same thing. But hey, that's life... Anatiomaros (talk) 22:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Siilar to what Anatiomaros is saying, I am not sure which "higher quality photograph" you could replace the image with - as mentioned, it seems to be the only illustration of fellatio that doesn't obscure the penis. Max Rebo Band"almost suspiciously excellent" 03:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Not again ... --JN466 20:59, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Could you be more specific, other than "it depicts something I find sexually arousing"? Because we have 250 photographs of bare feet, which I find sexually arousing, and this is the only clear photograph of fellatio, as mentioned above. Max Rebo Band"almost suspiciously excellent" 01:50, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- It's a poor image in many respects. Most of the penis is in fact obscured, by the woman's hand. In fact, nothing of the man can be seen, except for one half-inch of his penis. The woman herself has been clumsily "cut out", as though with scissors, and dropped onto a white background -- presumably because the original background was distracting. This is an amateur porn shot (Description: "sucking last drops"), and I resent the po-faced argument that this should in fact be an image created for an educational purpose, or one that would really be suited for fulfilling one. The argument that images of fellatio are just like images of farm gates is remote from real world attitudes. By all means, let's have images of fellatio, images that are technically accomplished and have an educational and aesthetic value, but let's not collect tacky images of the act which do the whole idea of illustrating such subjects for an educational purpose a disservice. Okay? --JN466 05:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Could you be more specific, other than "it depicts something I find sexually arousing"? Because we have 250 photographs of bare feet, which I find sexually arousing, and this is the only clear photograph of fellatio, as mentioned above. Max Rebo Band"almost suspiciously excellent" 01:50, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep In new version of this file is better quality now -I found an original picture. By the way, I agree with Max Rebo Band and Anatiomaros. Remas6 22:19, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- Where exactly did you find it? If it is no longer the Flick image, the source needs to be updated. --JN466 05:57, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- You have right, now is correct source and it is the Flick image. Remas6 15:00, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep It's in use now; whatever you might way about how it was put there, it's been in use for a couple weeks on some of these WPs and no one has removed it from the page. And we have six photos of fellatio and this is from a different angle from any of the other ones.--Prosfilaes (talk) 13:25, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- The principle of "silence is consensus" on smaller projects is moot. I could easily go in, switch the photos, and nobody on the local project would know. They probably don't even know this deletion request is happening. Blurpeace 07:31, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- Images get deleted from en.Wiki all the time without anyone knowing the deletion request is happening. In this case, we have images on multiple WPs being changed for weeks, and not on tiny WPs; if it is at all possible for them to deal with vandalism, then at the very least some patroller has looked at it.--Prosfilaes (talk) 10:37, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Fellation-spam makes it not better in any respect. I think more and more people realize that you can abouse commons as data storage for private pics and crap. --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:42, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- Says someone spamming Commons with stuff like File:Kadethrin.svg, which looks practically the same as File:Imidacloprid.svg; do we really need 100 chemical diagrams for insecticides alone? And if we do, how can you complain about six pictures of fellatio?--Prosfilaes (talk) 14:25, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- The truth is that some people find that even one picture is one too many. I was going to ignore JN466's comment (above) - "The argument that images of fellatio are just like images of farm gates is remote from real world attitudes" - as I was not implying anything of the sort, pretty obviously, but I'll bring it in here now as it in itself sums up a certain attitude where "real world attitudes" actually means "my point of view". We do not have an effective "cap" or limit on the images in any particular category and nobody ever complains that we have too many images unless the subject is related to sex and sexuality. As Prosfilaes notes, we only have 6 images here not thousands. And just where are we supposed to get the "images that are technically accomplished and have an educational and aesthetic value"? It would be great to have them but where are they? Are we supposed to get rid of every image that does not meet those requirements - which are themselves open to debate, of course - in the meantime? If amateur sexual images by private individuals are "spam" how are we supposed to find professional ones that are not copright violations? With respect, this whole line of argument is disingenuous and unhelpful. Anatiomaros (talk) 15:37, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- Says someone spamming Commons with stuff like File:Kadethrin.svg, which looks practically the same as File:Imidacloprid.svg; do we really need 100 chemical diagrams for insecticides alone? And if we do, how can you complain about six pictures of fellatio?--Prosfilaes (talk) 14:25, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. COM:PORN High Contrast (talk) 11:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep This file was condidate for speedy deletion [1] by High Contrast as Out of scope: COM:PORN because (in High Contrast opinion) it is copyrighted and not published under a free license, but the original file is published under a free license, please have a look to http://www.flickr.com/photos/47114695@N06/4332217348 Jacopo Werther (talk) 12:45, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep No good reason for deletion. --Dezidor (talk) 15:24, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep This file was restored JUST ONE WEEK AGO as a result of an undeletion request. I'm adding the undeletion debate below as it is now archived:
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AGlans_Stimulation.png&action=historysubmit&diff=42612034&oldid=42361998){kind=link}
Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2010-08#File:Glans Stimulation.png (replaced text with link to archive: Prosfilaes.)
I'd like to know what has changed since the 8th of August, or is this simply part of a campaign to "clean" Commons of all sexuality-related material for whatever excuse happens to be convenient? Anatiomaros (talk) 15:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep It can't be out of scope. It's in use.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. In use. ZooFari 00:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Eyes closed = dominating behaviour. Best alternatives uploaded. Unused. ~ FAP (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Dominating behavior = usable on pages about domination in human sexuality. Do we really need to go over and over the same pictures? The fact that it was in use is good evidence it is usable in an educational context.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:39, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept - Having your eyes closed is not dominating behaviour, sometimes you just want to be able to concentrate on what's in your mouth, not watching pubic hair fly at your eyes. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:52, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
This member is no longer active on Flickr - permission no longer given Hold and wave (talk) 21:41, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Keep That's what {{Flickrreview}} is for. Anytime the image source goes absent, we know that the image had been reviewed under a free license. --ZooFari 22:04, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Permission is irrevocable, otherwise we couldn't use Flickr.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:22, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Question Do we have evidence of the subject's consent to distribute this? (Flickr-review is about a different issue, licensing status.) If we don't, this now fails COM:PEOPLE (per recent WMF resolutions). --99of9 (talk) 14:08, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Kept Creative Commons licences are irrevocable. It is not of interest whether the flickr user is still active or not. --High Contrast (talk) 14:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
No EXIF data, possible flickrwashing - account no longer exists. Poor description, while that is not a reason for deletion, it is not educational in any manner. No Flickr also means lack of model release, identifiable person. Other images of better quality of this topic exist. (And I had no clue this was nominated so many times in the past..sorry to beat a dead horse, ha!) Missvain (talk) 13:02, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Please note that the closing admin on the latest discussion was unaware of the latest WMF resolutions on identifiable subject consent to publish, and agrees they mean deletion here. We now require evidence of consent, usually at least a statement by the uploader. --99of9 (talk) 13:18, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - As per 99of9.--Hold and wave (talk) 15:50, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - on the closer's talkpage, it was suggested that COM:PEOPLE be updated to include this WMF resolution before renominating - this has not been done. Can somebody please do this so we're all singing from the same hymn sheet? -mattbuck (Talk) 16:30, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Among other mentions of requirements for evidence of consent, we now have: "an identifiable individual with no evidence of consent given... normally not OK: Nudes, underwear or swimsuit shots, unless obviously taken in a public place (unreasonable intrusion without consent)". Although there may be further tweaks, this is one of our most obvious cases IMO. --99of9 (talk) 11:14, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted - Jcb (talk) 16:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Image quality suggests this is a video screengrab. User has previously uploaded screengrabs of TV broadcast. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:57, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete --KAPour les intimes 22:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Image quality suggests this is a video screengrab. User has previously uploaded screengrabs of TV broadcast. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:32, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:57, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
No conceivable educational purpose. SchuminWeb (Talk) 08:09, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Bandspam. --Martin H. (talk) 17:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
No conceivable educational purpose. SchuminWeb (Talk) 08:10, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Bandspam, see also en:User talk:NateMays. --Martin H. (talk) 17:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no Freedom of Panorama in France, sculptor death 1966, not PD Frédéric (talk) 08:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no Freedom of Panorama in France, sculptor death 1966, not PD Frédéric (talk) 08:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.GIF&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.GIF&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
undefined Jimmylai0312 (talk) 10:36, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
.GIF){kind=link}
- Delete copyvio from http://www.abclubhk.com. Amada44 talk to me 12:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:03, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
.GIF){kind=link}
This photo was not taken by an US governmental employee. As the source states q, the photographer is "Yuriy Maltsev" (Photo Courtesy) from the newspaper "Vladivostok daily". Unfortunately, this fact was ignored during the upload process. High Contrast (talk) 12:42, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- I uploaded this image. I ignored nothing. If the consulate's page credited Maltsev when I uploaded the image, then I overlooked that credit. The difference between "ignored" and "overlooked" is the difference between an assertion of bad faith and an suggestion of normal human error. Geo Swan (talk) 16:52, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- delete -- I acknowledge that the webpage (now) credits Maltsev, so the image is not PD and should be deleted. Geo Swan (talk) 16:52, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:05, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Copyrights probably violated - part of A.D.A.M. MedlinePlus pictures series (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/presentations/100087_4.htm) Lb.at.wiki (talk) 13:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as copyvio. -- King of Hearts (talk) 22:47, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:05, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. The license on the source site is non-commercial usage only. 99of9 (talk) 13:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; no evidence this photo is freely licensed. Postdlf (talk) 21:13, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
That´s right. I could get OTRS-Permission from the author, if necessary.
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:06, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Copyvio http://www.3fm.nl/dj/Thymen-Wabeke --Kattenkruid (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
copyrighted logo Santosga (talk) 16:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:21, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Shchusev who died in 1949. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 17:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Shchusev who died in 1949. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 17:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Shchusev who died in 1949. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 17:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
This file violates copyright because commons can not be up logos. See Commons:Licensing Elberth 00001939 (talk) 17:45, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:23, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Shchusev who died in 1949. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 17:47, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Where is "Undelete in 2024" comming from? Copyright in Russia is 70-years (i.e. 2020). --Elekhh (talk) 00:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
unused photo of a French artist with no notability as decided here fr:Karl Hioh - out of scope Santosga (talk) 17:52, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete - private image Cholo Aleman (talk) 06:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 17:54, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 17:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:26, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 17:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:26, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 17:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:26, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 17:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:27, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 17:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:27, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
This file violates the copyright. Just the image comes from a website and no information. Elberth 00001939 (talk) 18:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:27, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
probably against personality righst, out of project scope, low quality --4028mdk09 (talk) 18:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep used on en:Andrew_Kirkpatrick_(climber). Looks like as if uploader is Andrew Kirkpatrick himself. Amada44 talk to me 12:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Per Amada44, appears to be OK. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:30, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Unused personal image, poor quality, out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:57, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 23:52, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
No information about author, source or date of publication. No confirmation for PD-old. GeorgHH • talk 18:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Is this a notable person? GeorgHH • talk 18:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:34, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
This file violates the copyright. Just the image comes from a website does not have enough information and logos are not allowed on commons. Elberth 00001939 (talk) 18:33, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Logos consisting solely of text in a common typeface are in the public domain. -- King of Hearts (talk) 22:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. This image of simple geometry is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship. Sólo son formas geometricas !
See:
Nanovapor9 (talk) 05:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. After the debate, I withdraw the request for deletion.--Elberth 00001939 (talk) 02:46, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 18:38, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
This file violates the copyright. Just the image comes from a website does not have enough information and logos are not allowed on commons. Elberth 00001939 (talk) 18:38, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Involves only two printed letters and two squares, so PD for lack of originality. -- King of Hearts (talk) 23:04, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Per King of Hearts -- Sozi (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 18:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Which law this photo tresspass? Please, state explitly. And preferable, in russian. I can speak leagal at russian, but I completly unable to use foreign law terms. #!George Shuklin (talk) 21:58, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- You see it here. --Fernrohr (talk) 22:12, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. The heirs of Leonid Polyakov own the copyright to the design of the building until the year 2035. Any photograph of the building is a derivative work of that copyright. Without permission from the heirs, we cannot have the image on Commons. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
This file violates the copyright. Just the image comes from a website does not have enough information and logos are not allowed on commons. Elberth 00001939 (talk) 18:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Neutral It is not true that "logos are not allowed on commons"; those that are too simple to be eligible for copyright are allowed. But I'm not sure if the typeface of this logo constitutes originality. -- King of Hearts (talk) 23:06, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- you're right, but what it would take more seriously the logo.--Elberth 00001939 (talk) 23:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Our policy is that typefaces and logos consisting only of type are PD-text. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 18:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:41, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 18:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:41, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 18:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:41, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 18:42, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:41, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 18:43, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:41, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 18:43, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:42, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 18:44, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:42, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 18:44, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Again, please switch to russian, I unable to discuss russian legal terms in english. #!George Shuklin (talk) 21:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- You see it here. --Fernrohr (talk) 22:12, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:42, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 18:45, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:43, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Building was designed by Leonid Polyakov who died in 1965. There is no FOP in Russia. Fernrohr (talk) 18:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:43, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
This file violates the copyright. Just the image comes from a website does not have enough information and logos are not allowed on commons. Elberth 00001939 (talk) 19:02, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Our policy is that typefaces and logos consisting only of type are PD-text. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:45, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
This file violates the copyright. Just the image comes from a website does not have enough information and company logos contain copyright. Elberth 00001939 (talk) 19:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Just text in a common typeface. -- King of Hearts (talk) 23:17, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- I edited this page: the image is in the public domain.--95.75.168.241 08:25, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Our policy is that typefaces and logos consisting only of type are PD-text. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
This file violates the copyright. Just the image comes from a website does not have enough information, the logos of companies or organizations contain copyright. Elberth 00001939 (talk) 19:33, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Just text in a common typeface. -- King of Hearts (talk) 23:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
They have uploaded two versions of this file the first was a logo It was simply not to say, and second, this file if it is simple and I withdraw the request for deletion.--Elberth 00001939 (talk) 23:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Smaller version of File:Deftones_logo.jpg. Policy is to keep only the better one. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Useless, used as political propaganda on Wikis. Diego Grez return fire 22:11, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I copied this image over from EnWiki because a) Thehelpinghand (talk · contribs) asked for that, b) it was much easier for me to move it over than to explain how (commons helper, etc), c) I checked and believe from the copyright tags on EnWiki that it was an appropriate candidate for such a move (as it is derived from an appropriately licenced image, and the status of the copyright seemed in order, etc). I choose not to offer an opinion as to its appropriateness within scope; I will leave that to others to discuss. I have notified the user of this discussion. Chzz ► 01:36, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep how this file is useless, if it's in fact used on the user page? Trycatch (talk) 11:33, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. This is nothing more than propoganda from a MySpacing user who has been blocked on the English Wikipedia. The only reason this user is here is because he was blocked. He has not edited anything outside his userspace. Delete, ignore, and move on. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:11, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:53, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Files by User:Sefer ibrahim
[edit]
I feel that the most of (if not all) uploads by User:Sefer ibrahim are copyvios, collected from all around the Web. EXIF shows that several dozens of different cameras was used - it's a very clear sign of copyvio. Generally it's easy to find the exact source of borrowing, for many uploads it's a random photostream on Panoramio. Also the several copyrighted book scans have been uploaded. Many uploads by Sefer ibrahim already have been deleted as copyvio, see their talk page. Trycatch (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Canon EOS 30D
[edit]Most of these uploads had been copied Karabakh tourism dept photostream:
- File:Azıx mağarası.jpg
- File:Azıx kəndi.jpg
- File:Xocavənd, Tuğ kəndi.jpg
- File:Kəlbəcərin Vəng kəndi yaxınlığında şəlalə.jpg
- File:Laçın panorama.jpg
- File:Laçınqaya qalası panorama.jpg
- File:Ağdərə.jpg
- File:Sərsəng su anbarı 1.jpg
- File:Sərsəng su anbarı 2.jpg
- File:Daşaltı kəndi.jpg
- File:Şuşa panorama.jpg
- File:Murov dağ.jpg
- File:Daşaltı1.jpg - http://www.panoramio.com/photo/32813513
- File:Ağdərə panorama.jpg - http://www.panoramio.com/photo/32813959
- File:Ağdərə 3.jpg
- File:Ağdərə 2.jpg
- File:Ağdərə 4.jpg
- File:Çartar kəndi.jpg
- File:Daşaltı 3.jpg
- File:Daşaltı 4.jpg
- File:Daşaltı2.jpg
- File:Xudavəng 4.jpg
- File:İsa bulağı.jpg
Sony DSC-H10
[edit]
Sony DSC-H20
[edit]- File:Amaras 1.jpg - http://www.panoramio.com/photo/34885236
- File:Amaras 5.jpg - http://www.panoramio.com/photo/34885289
- File:Amaras 6.jpg - http://www.panoramio.com/photo/34885316
- File:Amaras 7.jpg - http://www.panoramio.com/photo/34885279
KENOX S860 / Samsung S860
[edit]
Nokia 6120c
[edit]- File:Qarakober yasayis yerinde Atropatena dovrune aid boyali saxsi qab.jpg
- File:Torpaqqala qab.jpg
- File:Xelveti seyxine mexsus papaq.jpg
- File:Babadervis saxsi qazan.jpg
- File:Babadervis saxsi vaz.jpg
- File:Xacbulaq ritual qabi.jpg
- File:Xacbulaq ritual qabi daxil.jpg
- File:Sərdarabad qalası İrəvan.jpg - scan from a book?
- File:Sah abbas mescidi 13.jpg
Canon PowerShot A460
[edit]
Canon PowerShot A510
[edit]- File:Pəriqala yaxın.jpg
- File:Pəriqala uzaqdan.jpg
- File:Mərdəkanda dairəvi qala yeni.jpg - http://www.panoramio.com/photo/9539909
- File:Qəbələ qalası görünüş.jpg
- File:İlisu şəlaləsi.jpg
- File:Qax qədim körpü.jpg
Other cams
[edit]- File:Qomeş dağı.jpg - Sony Ericsson T650i
- File:Şuşa musiqi məktəbi.jpg - Sony Ericsson K800i
- File:Şuşa Saatlı məscidi.jpg - Sony Ericsson K800i
- File:Ktiş qalası.jpg - SONY DSC-R1
- File:Şuşa tarix muzeyi.jpg - Nikon E5200
- File:Monument of Babek in Xaçmaz city of Azerbaijan Republic.jpg - SONY DSC-W35
- File:Baku Carpet museum.jpg - SONY DSC-W100
- File:Baku library by named Mirza Fatali Akhundzadeh.jpg - Samsung Techwin Digimax S500 / Kenox S500 / Digimax Cyber 530
File:Askeran fortress-001.jpg- SONY DSC-H5 - http://flickr.com/photos/85203497@N00/1794545699 (looks like the source file is free!)- File:Dərbənd qalası yeni.jpg - Canon PowerShot A630 - http://www.panoramio.com/photo/8825473
- File:Ləv qalası Kəlbəcər.jpg - SONY DSC-P73
- File:Cıdır düzü 1.jpg - OLYMPUS C2020Z
- File:Ağdərə 5.jpg - SONY DSC-W170
- File:Cuvarlı kəndində bulaq.jpg - Sony DSC-S700
- File:Xudavəng 1.jpg - Canon DIGITAL IXUS 80 IS
- File:Təxti Süleyman.jpg - Canon PowerShot SD300
- File:Qax görüntü.jpg - NORITSU KOKI QSS-29_31
- File:Qax mənzərə.jpg - OLYMPUS FE100,X710
- File:Qaxda Humay bulağı.jpg - Canon PowerShot A540
- File:Zöhhak qalası 1.jpg - SONY DSC-W130
- File:Zöhhak qalası 2.jpg - Nokia 6303 classic
Nokia & no camera EXIF
[edit]"Nokia" EXIF was added by some Nokia photo editing software.
Scans
[edit]Scans from different books. Some may be PD-old.
- File:Calut.jpg
- File:Qadın bəzək əşyaları.jpg
- File:Azərbaycan Kişi aksesuarları.jpg
- File:Azıx əmək alətləri Aşel.jpg
- File:Azıx əmək alətləri III təbəqə.jpg
- File:Azıx əmək alətləri V təbəqə.jpg
- File:Azıx əmək alətləri X təbəqə.jpg
- File:Azıx mağarası ayı kəlləsi.jpg
- File:Qarabağ milli geyim.jpg
- File:Qarabağ xanlığı.jpg
- File:Azərbaycan milli geyimləri.jpg
- File:Azərbaycan milli geyimləri 1.jpg
- File:Azərbaycan milli geyimləri 2.jpg
- File:Azərbaycan milli geyimləri 3.jpg
- File:Azərbaycan milli geyimləri 4.jpg
- File:Lakit church in Azerbaijan history book.jpg
- File:Mingəçevir bir nömrəli kilsə.jpg
Book covers
[edit]Book covers of the recently published ([2]) books:
- File:Azerbaijan literature Nizami Ganjavi Leyli and Majnun.jpg
- File:Azerbaijan literature Nizami Ganjavi Sirlər xəzinəsi.jpg
- File:Azerbajan literature Nizami Ganjavi Khosrov and Shirin.jpg
- File:Azerbaijan literature Nizami Ganjavi Seven beauties.jpg
- File:Azerbaijan literature Nizami Ganjavi İskendername Sharafname.jpg
- File:Azerbaijan literature Nizami Ganjavi İskendername İqbalname.jpg
Maps
[edit]Maps of unknown origin:
- File:Azerbaijan arabian.gif
- File:Azerbaijan abbasids.gif
- File:Azerbaycan Ereb xilafeti terkibinde.jpg
- File:Azerbaycan Ereb xilafetinin terkibinde Nailə Vəlixanlı.jpg
- File:Khurramides - Xürrəmilər üsyanı.jpg
Discussion
[edit]- Delete User obviously not complies with our requirements and claims credit for other peoples work. Unless the user gives a reasonable explanation: Delete all, not have the time nor the interest to review all contributions individually and demonstrate that they are copyright violations. Thank you for you work with this deletion discussion. Maybe we have to extend this deletion discussion to files uploaded by Sefer azeri on az.wikipedia.org. --Martin H. (talk) 17:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've added several files I've missed. Trycatch (talk) 18:03, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Impressive detective work. Part of the files contains controversial description. Geagea (talk) 20:52, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete I dropped a notice to him at AZ Wikipedia. However, I don't have any doubts: these images are most likely completely copyvio. Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 04:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Well done Martin - Sherlock Holmes rests :). Anyway, I am sorry for the photos - some of them are really nice.--George M. (talk) 12:19, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Extra information for users without admin rights: Two days ago I've deleted files that Martin H. had tagged as he had found them at panoramio. A quick check of his last edits showed that Sefer had seen those tags and removed them in several cases (e.g. File:Khachen style albanian cross stones in Khudavang albanian monastery.jpg) or recreated the files in case they were deleted already (e.g. File:Caucasian Albanian Artsak cross stone.jpg). -- Cecil (talk) 14:09, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Comment Uploader wrote on Martin H.s talk page that he will provide a list of the images that are his own. He now provided this list with images he claims as his own, but among them once again there are several copyvios like File:Berde Imamzadeh mosque.jpg, a file that is not in this list because he had uploaded it at his home wiki and somebody else had transferred it. Well, it was taken from the website of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism of Azerbaijan. Furthermore the list of his supposed own images contains once again images from other panoramio-users (see Martins statement below the list). Sorry, but even if the user now brings a second list of images that he claims are his own, I would not believe him anymore. -- Cecil (talk) 18:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- The conversation between Sefer ibrahim and Martin H. is slightly messed up. First edit by Sefer ibrahim (first list of the really own work images), response by Martin H., response by Sefer ibrahim (second list of the really own work images). While the first contains copyvios without any doubt, I am still not sure about the second list. Trycatch (talk) 21:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- To the second list: I am not sure how good pictures you can make with a phone but the quality of the second list ranges from IMO too good for phones quality to 'looks like a scan from a book' (e.g. File:Cugha style albanian cross stones.jpg has a grey border on the left and then the colours; File:Bakı qalası gecə.jpg has a wave in the middle as if it was spread over two book pages and was not flattened enough; Cəbrayılda Qız qalası.jpg has a border at the bottom; File:Gədəbəydə Koroğlu qalası.jpg has the book-binding-shadow and looks as if the scanner was stuck). -- Cecil (talk) 08:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for linking, Trycatch. I would delay the 21 images of the second listing for the moment. But Im also not sure about the second listing too and share the doubt Cecil just explained. Maybe own "photo" - but only a derivative work of another photographers photo, so still not free. --Martin H. (talk) 17:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- A little addition: File:Albanian idols in the garden of Azerbaijan State Khankendi city History Museums garden.jpg is a blatant copyvio from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/34310127. It is retouched but it is the same, stones are not moving, but have a look at the cars and plants. Note that the EXIF is changed - the original EXIF is Canon PowerShot G11, this file is 'Nokia', likely a Nokia software was used to retouch the file. Now that we found this out and do our best here on Commons to have this mess removed from our project the user not eventually stopped uploading non-free files and not do his best to finally comply with the rules - no, he repeats the upload at az.wikipedia az:Şəkil:Albanian idol in the garden of Azerbaijan State Khankendi city History Museums garden.jpg! Same for various other files. I stop assuming good faith at this moment, this user is simply not able to comply with our project(s). Delete all files, here on Commons and on az.wp (otherwise we will have the same problem again sooner or later). --Martin H. (talk) 17:42, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- I've asked Sefer ibrahim (thanks to İrada for translation) about these images. Sefer ibrahim answered that these pictures are indeed scans, he didn't knew that scans should not be uploaded, and asks for their deletion. What about Nokia 6120c photographs (with original cam EXIF), I tend to believe to the user -- he uploaded numerous files created with this cam to az-wiki, often with a little time span between creation and uploading (w:az:Şəkil:Shirvanshahs palace 1.jpg, w:az:Şəkil:Gədəbəy 1.jpg, etc.). Interesting enough, his own photographs are watermarked "by Sefer Azeri" as opposed to all his other uploads. Trycatch (talk) 18:59, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- Great! Would he reupload them w/o the watermark? Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 21:38, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know. Files with this watermark have been uploaded to az-wiki only, not to Commons. If some of these files will be uploaded to Commons, it will be easy to crop watermark out. Trycatch (talk) 09:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- Great! Would he reupload them w/o the watermark? Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 21:38, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- I've asked Sefer ibrahim (thanks to İrada for translation) about these images. Sefer ibrahim answered that these pictures are indeed scans, he didn't knew that scans should not be uploaded, and asks for their deletion. What about Nokia 6120c photographs (with original cam EXIF), I tend to believe to the user -- he uploaded numerous files created with this cam to az-wiki, often with a little time span between creation and uploading (w:az:Şəkil:Shirvanshahs palace 1.jpg, w:az:Şəkil:Gədəbəy 1.jpg, etc.). Interesting enough, his own photographs are watermarked "by Sefer Azeri" as opposed to all his other uploads. Trycatch (talk) 18:59, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- To the second list: I am not sure how good pictures you can make with a phone but the quality of the second list ranges from IMO too good for phones quality to 'looks like a scan from a book' (e.g. File:Cugha style albanian cross stones.jpg has a grey border on the left and then the colours; File:Bakı qalası gecə.jpg has a wave in the middle as if it was spread over two book pages and was not flattened enough; Cəbrayılda Qız qalası.jpg has a border at the bottom; File:Gədəbəydə Koroğlu qalası.jpg has the book-binding-shadow and looks as if the scanner was stuck). -- Cecil (talk) 08:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- The conversation between Sefer ibrahim and Martin H. is slightly messed up. First edit by Sefer ibrahim (first list of the really own work images), response by Martin H., response by Sefer ibrahim (second list of the really own work images). While the first contains copyvios without any doubt, I am still not sure about the second list. Trycatch (talk) 21:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete и заблокировать участника за систематическое нарушение авторских прав.--Taron Saharyan (talk) 23:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete It is impossible to tell which are legitimate images and which are copyvios. To be safe, we should delete all.--GrapedApe (talk) 00:06, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. What a lot of work tracking all these down -- thank you Trycatch. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:04, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- I pointed out above that the user now uploads the same stolen files to az.wp with empty file descriptions, I asked at az.wp (hope I found the right place) to have all this reuploads on a different project removed. Older uploads by User:Sefer ibrahim/az:User:Sefer azeri must be revied, on an by case basis or in a subsequent deletion request on az.wp. --Martin H. (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Not useful for an educational purpose because of poor or mediocre quality. D'oh! (talk) 05:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Currently used on en. -- King of Hearts (talk) 22:15, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- The image is used on an article which is up for AFD. d'oh! talk 10:29, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
At the moment in use. Kept. Mbdortmund (talk) 19:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Not useful for an educational purpose because of poor or mediocre quality. D'oh! (talk) 05:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Currently used on en. -- King of Hearts (talk) 22:15, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep files that are in use on another wiki are in scope. And while it could be replaced with a larger picture, it's sufficient to show what it portrays.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:19, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- The images are used on an article which is up for AFD. d'oh! talk 10:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- We need to let en.WP finish their processes before doing anything. It looks quite possible that it will live or be merged into another article that might use the image.--Prosfilaes (talk) 18:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- The images are used on an article which is up for AFD. d'oh! talk 10:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Not useful for an educational purpose because of poor or mediocre quality. D'oh! (talk) 05:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 19:58, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
not suitable for project scope, low quality --4028mdk09 (talk) 10:11, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep in use in the article draft. Trycatch (talk) 11:40, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
bad quality Benj05 (talk) 13:51, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination + not in use, plenty of much better images - Theornamentalist (talk) 16:13, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 20:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
It's not what I thought! Superaryan85 (talk) 18:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Although it's not the same image, it appears to be an advertisement of some sort, similar to this one here, which is likely not PD - Theornamentalist (talk) 02:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 20:39, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Official COA file page here: File:Wade Family Coat of Arms.svg --ZooFari 18:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Original file was a poor-quality photo meant solely for use as a basis to make said SVG. upstateNYer 22:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep if SVG was based on this photograph, then the original of SVG should be kept of course. Trycatch (talk) 11:50, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
personal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 18:50, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 20:40, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Not useful for an educational purpose because of poor or mediocre quality. D'oh! (talk) 05:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep It's not that bad and the image is well categorised. ZooFari 16:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept, quality is not that bad to be deleted. --Màñü飆¹5 talk 17:11, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Not useful for an educational purpose because of poor or mediocre quality. D'oh! (talk) 05:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep It's not that bad and the image is well categorised. ZooFari 16:57, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept, quality is not that bad to be deleted. --Màñü飆¹5 talk 17:11, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Official COA file page here: File:Walsh Family Coat of Arms.svg --ZooFari 18:50, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Original file was a poor-quality photo meant solely for use as a basis to make said SVG. upstateNYer 22:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. --Màñü飆¹5 talk 17:12, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Este archivo viola los derechos de autor. Simplemente la imagen viene de una página de internet no tiene bastante información y los logotipos de una empresa contienen derechos de autor. Elberth 00001939 (talk) 19:08, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- I`am a autor of this file and I whant to use it on some pages of Wikipedia. I need in file on page http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Молодёжное_интернет-радио_МИР
- But in Commons not allowed to upload logos and also the license is not suitable forthe file.--Elberth 00001939 (talk) 19:54, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- OK, but i must paste logo on the page http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Молодёжное_интернет-радио_МИР What can You advice?
- Actually, on Commons, logos are allowed if they are either simple enough to be ineligible for copyright or if they are released by the author. But it appears that on the Russian Wikipedia the article is going to be speedily deleted; if that happens, Delete for being out of scope. -- King of Hearts (talk) 23:11, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, on Commons, logos are allowed if they are either simple enough to be ineligible for copyright or if they are released by the author. But it appears that on the Russian Wikipedia the article is going to be speedily deleted; if that happens,
Deleted. I've just deleted the article in ruwiki (via DR, not speedily), so the logo is out of scope. Blacklake (talk) 09:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Bernhardt Walter and Ernst Hofmann died later than in 1939, this photo can´t be public domain or under free licenses. 90.178.227.202 14:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Keep Bundesarchiv, a German state organisation with a huge experience in application of IP-related laws, believes that they have the right to license it. Much more serious arguments are needed to prove the contrary.
- Comment This is not photo from Bundesarchiv. --90.178.227.202 07:36, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Keep As per MaxSem. If 90.178.227.202 believes the photo is not licensed with the Bundesarchiv, then maybe this individual can provide evidence to as who is? Surfing bird (talk) 13:56, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Keep For MaxSem. Jacopo Werther (talk) 17:36, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. As a matter of fact, this is not Bundesarchiv photo. The source is USSHM, but it does not claim copyright over the photo under the law of the country of origin which is Germany. Neither is the USA the country of first publication. Bernrard Walter was alive in 1963, see [3]. Therefore, the photo is still protected by copyright. Blacklake (talk) 14:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
This file violates the copyright. Just the image comes from a website does not have enough information, the license also is not suitable for this type of file. Elberth 00001939 (talk) 19:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Es una imagen libre, por lo que considero que no debe ser borrada--Astillerense (talk) 20:06, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Si es una imagen libre, pero lo que pasa, es que la licencia no es la indicada para esta imagen y la licencia que tiene la imagen es de tu propiedad, pero, no creo que sea tuya por lo que no tiene metadatos o algo que indique que es tuyo, sin embargo, la fuente debe ser de una página de internet o algo.Commons:Sobre las licencias --Elberth 00001939 (talk) 20:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. still the uploader claimed "Propio". --Martin H. (talk) 23:01, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
No permission by composer and/or musician. JuTa (talk) 20:21, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- PS: de: image was deleted because of no permission. Uploader requested removeal on commons too -see [4] (viewable for de: admin only) --JuTa (talk) 20:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Be free to delete, even speedy. The file is no longer needed. I myself had already requested speedy deletion of the identical file in german language wikipedia in May, but had not been aware, that the file on commons was not deleted. [5]. Greetings, --Latschari (talk) 16:26, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Guggenmusik.ogg. Uploader requesting deletion as well. --JuTa (talk) 02:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Не верное написание. Сверьте со статьей про Цоя в корейской Википедии. Там написано 최 и это типичная корейская фамилия. An7on1vanov (talk) 13:24, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep What I get from Google Translate is "Do not correct spelling. Check the article about Choi in Korean Wikipedia. It says 최 and this is a typical Korean name." No reason to delete. -- King of Hearts (talk) 22:48, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Incorrect spelling. Korean Wikipedia article gives only transcription of name from Russian, but original korean name is 최 and this is how Koreans pronounce it.
Kept, unclear deletion request. Kameraad Pjotr 20:42, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
No description so no educational value Avron (talk) 20:19, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - Admittedly not the best, but definitely usable IMO, for flying, plane engines, island, I don't know, I would say weak keep. - Theornamentalist (talk) 02:56, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, out of project scope. Kameraad Pjotr 21:54, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
the uploader himself wanted this image to be deleted (see previous deletion debate). Nothing is known about this image. Saibo (Δ) 20:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Info Uploader's deletion request was not related to copyright problems, he requested deletion of his entire upload because of conflict on Polish Wikipedia. A.J. (talk) 12:40, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, without a source the public domain status cannot be verified. Kameraad Pjotr 20:29, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
I want to update a larger picture Jamie2k9 (talk) 20:45, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete larger image updated, I assume he wants to remove the much smaller previous image. - Theornamentalist (talk) 02:53, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: Nominator wants to Keep this file, but remove the first revision? Or delete both versions, large and small? Benchill (talk) 03:58, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- I think it is likely the smaller one, but I've sent them a message asking. - Theornamentalist (talk) 12:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep the file looks fine, I think the deletion request has been abandoned. Nominator can say "withdrawn" if they want to end this disussion and keep the file. Benchill (talk) 01:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep a new high-resolution version has been uploaded. MKFI (talk) 22:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Kept, larger version has been uploaded. Kameraad Pjotr 22:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Own work from 1931. The author should be now min. 95+ years. should be confirmed through commons:OTRS/de. JuTa (talk) 09:38, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - source is the family archive. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted, lacks suitable permission. Kameraad Pjotr 19:24, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
unknown author and license does not fit together. Max. Pd-old-100 could fit, but in 1909 the "object" (de:Otto Keller (Schriftsteller)) was 34 years old. Does this realy fit to the image? JuTa (talk) 09:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Obviously there was a mistake when transferring the image automatically by CommonsHelper. It seems that it actually was uploaded under a PD license to German Wikipedia before being transferred to the Alemannic one, but the license isn't due to the fact that it's older than 100 years. What would be the correct license in this case? --Strommops ð 13:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- The license was the same on de: (I'm admin on de:) and the file was marked "DÜP" (Dateiprüfung) - more or less the de: equivanlent to a deletion request on commons. (That was the reason why I removed the file on de: and opened this request on commons) --JuTa (talk) 20:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep with {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted, no author, no source. Kameraad Pjotr 19:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
"The following images may be used by media, individuals, schools and other organisations free-of-charge." is not free enough for Commons. It does not mention derivative works or free commercial use by anyone. The website quoted as a source for this permission clearly says "Hi-res video and photographs of Earthrace are for news networks only." and "Footage and photographs cannot be resold to other news companies or reproduced in any way for other purposes." -- Kam Solusar (talk) 23:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I'm not sure how you can get any more free than "and other organisations free-of-charge." That seems to leave it wide-open. As I indicated at File talk:PeterBethune with Earthrace.JPG, the "freeness" of this image was discussed at en:File talk:PeterBethune with Earthrace.JPG before uploading here. I also indicated that the licensing page has changed since the image was first uploaded (possibly because it could only be viewed by some browsers) and archive.org doesn't have any post 2008 copies of the page. The image is not shown on the current web site so the current license does not apply to it. It was free when it was uploaded, this was confirmed in the discussion at en:File talk:PeterBethune with Earthrace.JPG, (that's why it was uploaded here) and there is no proof that it's not free any more. --AussieLegend (talk) 08:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, insufficient permission. Kameraad Pjotr 20:53, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Whoops, looks like someone deleted the discussion at File talk:PeterBethune with Earthrace.JPG! That's odd.... Oh well, down the memory hole. 180.25.77.245 12:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC)This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
- Whoops, looks like someone deleted the discussion at File talk:PeterBethune with Earthrace.JPG! That's odd.... Oh well, down the memory hole. 180.25.77.245 12:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
not needed Karamazon (talk) 03:38, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- In use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anything_That_Moves --Mbdortmund (talk) 19:52, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. by Bdk Captain-tucker (talk) 11:48, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Was nominated for speedy deletion by Amada44 with following comment: no exif, only contribution, I doubt own work. – Kwj2772 (msg) 11:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete This version is larger and earlier. I tagged it as copyvio, to speed up deletion. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:04, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. by Yann Captain-tucker (talk) 11:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of WORK [ http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jannike.pdf].
I agree to publish that work under the free license LICENSE [GFDL].
I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs, as long as they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.
I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me.
I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc.
I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.
2010-08-16, Jannike Stenlund
- Keep pending a successful OTRS. - Theornamentalist (talk) 02:58, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Why .pdf? --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:41, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - it has an OTRS ticket now. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Verified OTRS ticket. Captain-tucker (talk) 13:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)