Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/22
October 22
[edit]Per discussion [1], editor is simply indicating that they "have permission" from someone managing a LinkedIn from the company. Is not "own work." CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 01:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it not knowing that even know the company is defunct, it may still be copyrighted March8613 (talk) 03:06, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Below the threshold of originality in the US. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it not knowing that even know the company is defunct, it may still be copyrighted March8613 (talk) 03:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Below the threshold of originality in the US. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it not knowing that even know the company is defunct, it may still be copyrighted March8613 (talk) 03:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Below the threshold of originality in the US. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it not knowing that even know the company is defunct, it may still be copyrighted March8613 (talk) 03:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Below the threshold of originality in the US. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Logo (help=off). To me the logo seems simple enough. Bedivere (talk) 03:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed – we do not need to delete this one. Gnom (talk) 05:44, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure as to the ToO threshold for logos in Portugal (this is from pt.wiki, so assuming Portugal copyright laws), but the photo definitely isn't copyrightable, but the logo might be. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is definitely below the threshold of originality for logos under Portuguese copyright law. Gnom (talk) 18:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure as to the ToO threshold for logos in Portugal (this is from pt.wiki, so assuming Portugal copyright laws), but the photo definitely isn't copyrightable, but the logo might be. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Gnom. This is below the ToO. Abzeronow (talk) 17:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it not knowing that even know the company is defunct, it may still be copyrighted March8613 (talk) 03:25, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it not knowing that even know the company is defunct, it may still be copyrighted March8613 (talk) 03:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Below the threshold of originality in the US. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 04:49, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep @A1Cafel: Advertising poster removed. Solomon203 (talk) 11:47, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyviol from https://whitelevy.fas.harvard.edu/biographies-person-and-place-tomb-complex-weni-elder-abydos-vols-i-and-ii 89.97.197.105 05:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
U3: “Inappropriate use of user pages. These include user pages […] that contain gibberish or unrecognisable content.” This does not appear to constitute anything intelligible, resembling formatting experiments one might encounter in a sandbox. Dronebogus (talk) 07:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work due to low quality. The same image can be found here [2] with attribution to User:Pear285 from 2013, although this image is missing. I request an admin to check if Pear285 has any deleted uploads. Also nominating File:DFS by T Galleria Auckland.jpg Traumnovelle (talk) 09:04, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saidboateng1431 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No exif, unlikely to be own work of new user. PCP
Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No copyright in Somalia. --RAN (talk) 01:08, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work. Fountain sculpture unveiled in 1963 by Alvar Aalto (Wikidata:Q82840), died in 1976. Not in PD yet, no Freedom of Panorama in Finland for sculptures, buildings only. Htm (talk) 12:25, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
It's a mistake that's Edgar Allan Poe not his dad IceStorm 54 (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Normally, I'd say rename and correct/update the info, but we have several versions of the same portrait: File:Edgar Allan Poe; a Centenary Tribute - Portrait of Edgar Allan Poe p32.png and File:Edgar Allan Poe by John Sartain, 1849, mezzotint and engraving on paper, from the National Portrait Gallery - NPG-S-NPG 78 36.jpg and File:Edgar A. Poe (NYPL Hades-255666-430693).jpg. If an additional oval, cropped version is needed, a better quality version could be extracted from one of these. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Not clear pic Soumava2002 (talk) 13:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Perfectly usable, but if you'd like to resubmit, consider submitting a larger photo, and include EXIF Metadata to show clearly that you took the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: The user usually don't submit good-quality photos compared to average photos uploaded by many other Indian users, which often lead me to doubt whether the photos are taken by him (yes, Soumava, a variant of Soumyabha, is a male name). Some of the photos are aerial shots. Let me ping him to confirm it. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 12:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Any comment, User:Soumava2002? Are the photos you submit photos you shot? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
corrupted file + file no more in use Yunan973 (talk) 14:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SabielRamirez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from modern art. Should be cropped/blanked to keep.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- The 2nd one might be OK because the painting is blurred, but it would probably be better to blur it more. The other one does have to be deleted unless the artist gives permission to COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyright concern, no evidence Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 15:35, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- This photo was taken by me. At that time, this male singer participated in an event that allowed fans to take photos. Do you know that I had to push through everyone to take this photo?. You did that as if you did not respect my copyright. I am very sad because of your actions. I beg you not to delete this photo of me. I beg you Miss grand trà vinh (talk) 05:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 16:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Martin Sg. Please indicate the image components that you believe infringe copyright or are part of contemporary works of art. This enables us to correct the image or obtain copyright from artists. Lucorient (talk) 07:45, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Any individual copyrighted works here are de minimis. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:09, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- altar, ambo, font, cross – d.m. not at all, imho! Martin Sg. (talk) 17:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- The altar, ambo, and font are all utilitarian objects made out of rough-cut stone. Germany has a high threshold of originality for applied art per COM:UA. The cross details are not clearly visible and it takes up only a small portion of the frame, making it clearly de minimis. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- altar, ambo, font, cross – d.m. not at all, imho! Martin Sg. (talk) 17:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Corrupted file 2001:448A:11A4:1735:9098:7A4C:EC08:9CF3 17:25, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think the file is fine. Ymblanter (talk) 19:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
This page violates the information security of the Israel Defense Forces. External parties can use this information against the IDF, and harm the current security of the state by using this information. It should be remove from the IDF page, and delete this file. Nivst (talk) 18:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- You are quite late. The file has been here since 2009; the current version since 2013. Nakonana (talk) 19:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Widely COM:INUSE. Is there any copyright problem with it? It's not Commons' job to protect Israeli security. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Copy of File:Sb Astvatsatsin Church Yeghipatrush08.JPG Kareyac (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Copy of File:Sb Astvatsatsin Church Yeghipatrush09.JPG Kareyac (talk) 18:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Shouldn't this be moved or deleted? The page is "inactive" and WMC (now) uses TimedTexts so the page seems nothing but confusing and to not belong into cats "Commons video resources", "Commons help", "Commons features". Prototyperspective (talk) 18:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
This isn't CC, At best it's PD only in the US. Should be localised to English Wikisource. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait, how does this all work? Blahhmosh (talk) 19:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I thought that since the servers of wikipedia are in US they should be subject to US copyright laws. Blahhmosh (talk) 19:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Commns follows country of origin rules, Dorthy L Sayers wrote in the United Kingdom (which has a 70 year pma term) - Sayers died in 1957. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded this file and I want to delete it and re-upload it with a better name Ioannis wiki (talk) 19:25, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Or, someone please change the name from Τσαι με Αγγλους to Olympiacos in 1927 Ioannis wiki (talk) 19:56, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ioannis wiki I've added a renaming request to the file. Speedy keep Nakonana (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hold it. Ioannis wiki, who took this photo, and why is it OK to license on this site? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Although it's apparently a 1927 photo that was presumably hand-colored, it's obviously not "Own work," and a real source should be credited. Is it public domain? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:54, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- rename Done. Hehua (talk) 15:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, there seems to be an issue regarding the copyrights statement of this photo. I was able to find the same photo, a bit more expanded, and definitely in higher quality over here. So, who's the copyrights holder and original owner of the original photo? Maybe the precautionary principle should apply here... 😕🤷♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Circa late 1960s photograph, this being an own work is doubtful. Abzeronow (talk) 19:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not necessarily, if the uploader is in their 70s or 80s, but maybe we'll hear from them. User:MRANONYMOUS7777, sorry for writing in English, but did you yourself shoot this photo in the 1960s or so? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I did not say impossible, merely unlikely. I'm willing to hear an explanation from the uploader though. Abzeronow (talk) 22:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Photography from 1968. in Yugoslavia is not in public domain. Very unlikely that uploader is author of the photo,. Ђидо (talk) 20:19, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
This has to be one of the worst dragonfly image on Commons, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:45, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Yeah, not good, and thanks for nominating it for deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 20:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
higher resolution version exists here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fort-Bidwell-1877-FSDM2.jpg PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 20:57, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pretzelles as no permission (No permission since). Says "own work". User:Auldcathy, are you actually stating that you took this photo in 1958? Jmabel ! talk 21:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, once again I have mistakenly categorised an image. I did not take the photo as you suggested but I own the photo which was from the estate of the late Canon Judge. "My own work" was the closest category to this, or so I thought. Please advise which category should be applied in these circumstances. Once again apologies for causing you extra work. Best F Auldcathy (talk) 16:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Auldcathy: no, "own work" is not close. "Own work" means you took the photo. To put it bluntly, the fact that you own a copy of it doesn't make you the author.
- The author is the photographer, whoever that may be. If you don't know who that is, and the photo is from 1958, then there is literally no way you can be in a position to grant a license nor, assuming that the picture is from the UK, for the picture to be in the public domain (where copyright lasts 70 years past the death of the photographer; even if the work is truly anonymous, it is still copyrighted for 70 years from creation).
- The source in this case appears to be a photo album or simply a print of the photo. Unless you inherited the intellectual property rights of the photographer, though, owning that no more gives you any rights to publish the photo than owning a book lets you re-publish the book. - Jmabel ! talk 18:22, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
copyvio - this is a 2d work so not covered by NZ FOP laws TheLoyalOrder (talk) 21:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Pictures/logo's that are either owned by the company or have been shot by various photographers. Proof of permission is needed to indicate copyright owners agreed with the given licence.
- File:RVL Logo Stacked RGB Color Pos 2400.png
- File:RVL Logo Stacked-red.png
- File:RVL Logo Horizontal RGB Color.png
- File:DZL.jpg
- File:VLlogo.jpg
- File:Pipes Blue Sky.jpg
- File:Hq Van Leeuwen Pipe and Tube.jpg
- File:Van Leeuwen Canada.JPG
- File:Van Leeuwen Australia.jpg
- File:Buizen.jpg
- File:Opslag singapore.jpg
- File:Opslag vilvoorde.jpg
- File:Haistory van Leeuwen Buizen.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto buizenopslag van leeuwen.jpg
- File:Van Leeuwen Buizen employees.jpg
Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:04, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- The logo is way above COM:TOO, but File:Luchtfoto buizenopslag van leeuwen.jpg is not found on TinEye or Google Lens except on Wikimedia sites, so providing that the uploader actually photographed it, we might be able to keep it. There are umpteen exact matches for File:Buizen.jpg on Lens, but all of them are much smaller than this one, so maybe we can keep that, too. File:Opslag singapore.jpg is suspect because exact matches of the same size are on a couple of company LinkedIn pages, though the uploads are not dated on Google Lens. No results for File:Opslag vilvoorde.jpg on TinEye are as old as this upload, and the one on vanleeuwenbuizen.com is much smaller than this file. Undated non-Wikimedia uploads of it found on Lens are much smaller, too, so I think this photo might be OK. However, File:Haistory van Leeuwen Buizen.jpg, photographed in 1924, is obviously not "own work" as claimed, so that makes all the "own work" claims suspect, and instead of looking at more photos, I think we need to demand that User:Leonum state clearly whether any of these photos were shot by them, and if so, which ones. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- The picture photographed in 1924 is takenm from the private collection of the owner of the company where this wikipedia page is about. The company is a family owned company and on the picture is the founder of the company in the middle. The founder is the grandfather of the current owner and chairman of the board. All other photos are also from the private collection of the company. Leonum (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting us know. The private collection is your source, so you should state that on each file page, but that doesn't answer the question of who the photographers were and whether the copyright-holders consent to a license acceptable to Commons. But it's absolutely not OK for you to falsely claim that any of these are your "Own work." So please fix everything and have the copyright-holders contact COM:VRT. Otherwise, Commons will delete (hide) any of these photos that aren't old enough to be public domain (and I doubt 1924 is old enough). Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- The picture photographed in 1924 is takenm from the private collection of the owner of the company where this wikipedia page is about. The company is a family owned company and on the picture is the founder of the company in the middle. The founder is the grandfather of the current owner and chairman of the board. All other photos are also from the private collection of the company. Leonum (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)