Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/21

20 October 2024

22 October 2024

Deletion requests on 21 October 2024

October 21

File:طمطمانية حمير بالمغرب ، لغة سكان شمال إفريقيا الفنيقيين.svg

False and misleading information with anti-amazigh intentions. Zakaria rif (talk) 16:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

False and misleading information with anti-amazigh intentions. Zakaria rif (talk) 20:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aminuddin Maruf.jpg

Copyrighted photo from aminuddinmaruf.com Urang Kamang (talk) 01:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mural @ Coit Tower @ San Francisco (16949959531).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is a WPA mural, so it should be in the public domain as a work of the US Federal government. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiril marichkov.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shturtzite.JPG

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia.png

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 06:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to this government report, it stated this logo was first illustrated by Syed Abu Bakar Syed Salim in the early year of 1980s. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 06:45, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AshlandPostCard.jpg

Copyrighted postcard, date is not stated but based on the cars this seems fairly recent and not old enough to be in public domain. MKFI (talk) 07:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Everyday Objects Under the Microscope (SHOCKING).webm

“Dude, heh-heh-heh… This sucks.” (Beavis and Butthead impression) Arguably this is patronizing content authors, but I doubt this media is suitable for any serious educational use. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 07:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Are you being serious here? It features lots of microscopic videos of interesting subjects. For example it's the only microscopic imagery of toilet paper. Moreover, it's notable because of the popular attention and useful also for illustrating the JET Crew, e.g. if there ever is an article on them. You really should look into videos on WMC, most of them are not nearly as useful as this one, not all content has to be boring and uneducational. This one is about putting things under the microscope and clearly is educational and more useful than ~95% of videos on WMC, I have concerns that you don't understand COM:SCOPE and have not seen many videos on here...please browse some. Moreover, those comedic type of content is also useful for that purpose and such reactions don't make a video less useful. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are countless ways this file is useful so I didn't list all of them...for example also 'Microscopy in popular culture' etc. Nowhere is it implied WMC would only host serious content, what is "serious" about these files for just one example? Please first get familiar with WMC such as viewing a few newly uploaded videos before nominating content. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Prototyperspective:

Notability, interestingness, or popularity are irrelevant for Commons. Please leave these concerns to Wikipedia discussions where they can matter.
Special: Search/microscope~ "toilet paper"~ yields File: Туалетная бумага.jpg.
The constant shaking renders the microscopic imagery worthless for sincere depictions of the objects under magnification. The main subject of the video is rather two dudes toying around with their new gear.
Actually I criticized the referenced category, but the current deletion policy does not merit precedent. The argument “we must keep A, because B was kept” or “we must delete B, because C was deleted” is not recognized. Every file is assessed individually (and that’s also why said category is filled to the brim with female nudes).
Sorry for the inadvertent double entendre, the content does not need to be serious, but it must be realistically useful to teach/instruct/educate. Frankly, if my physics teachers in school had been fooling around like this, I would not have learned anything. That is my point. Apparently you’re a different kind of learner, though.

‑‑ Kays (T | C) 08:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not mention notability or interestingness as a reason to keep what I said/meant is that this is educational in terms of informing about popular culture and e.g. types of popculture media content.
You really mean to argue that because there is one image that looks entirely different that this one comprehensive video would not be useful?
And? WMC can have videos of guys toying around. What is the main subject to you may not be the actual main subject and is not the actual subject to me. The microscopic videos are the main content and the reactions to that are also useful and context.
As said over ~80% of videos on WMC are far less useful and less educational than this video. So I suggest that instead on insisting you know things here well despite being a very new user very unfamiliar with the site you first look around such as first editing for a while.
Achieved with the microscopic videos contained there. You would learn how things look at the microscopic scale that can't be seen with bare eyes.

Prototyperspective (talk) 10:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The educational value of this video - which, to be clear, is two guys joking around with a USB microscope, not a serious attempt to demonstrate microscopy - is negligible, and I don't see any substantial likelihood that it could be useful in educational content on Wikimedia sites. Mirroring comedy shows is not a good use of Wikimedia resources. Omphalographer (talk) 17:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To document the notable people, in fact one of the people in the video has a Wikipedia article
Microscopy in popular culture
What reaction videos are
No explanation given, you just don't like it and want to COM:CENSOR it due to that while ignoring my points
COM:INUSE anyway
The video features various household objects under the microscope of which we have no other media, it's one of the most educational valuable contents due to that...for example the one and only media showing how toilet paper looks like under toilet paper

Prototyperspective (talk) 18:24, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and also lots of other things like various particular parts of human skin etc of which there is no media. That you want to delete this educationally valuable media just reveals your censorship attitude. This is one of the most valuable educational files on here, more educational and more useful thanat least ~80% of videos on here, and there is no policy for that content has to be boring. Prototyperspective (talk) 18:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info You should disclose that you created these uses in response to this deletion request. At the point in time of the deletion nomination the file was not in use. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 08:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't create them "in response", I missed adding them earlier since I didn't know there was a Wikipedia article about one of the two people and didn't look into this video much until now. I'm very much allowed to add them after the DR was opened. Nominating files for deletion that are as useful as this is the problem, not that the file that is clearly useful is put into use. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Prototyperspective: It’s a matter of courtesy. Without it you create the impression I filed this DR in spite of (then‑)present uses. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 04:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Светлицкий Д.С..webp

Some concern about a licence. Most probably this historical image in web format is not own. Bilderling (talk) 08:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Amanda Hoelzel (talk · contribs)

Old photos, dates of death from 1970 to 2011. Not 2021 own work

Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep PD-Brazil-Photo, Brazil did not award copyright for ordinary photos. --RAN (talk) 00:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gijs Tuinman RMWO (cropped).jpg

incompatible license non free image see metadata "Author Rick Smulders Copyright holder R. Smulders www.ricksmulders.nl Online copyright statement www.ricksmulders.nl" Hoyanova (talk) 08:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Selbstbildnis Andreas Gering.jpg

Painter died in 1957, license without permission, should be restored in 2028. Anvilaquarius (talk) 08:43, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Escola luziabaruquekirche (talk · contribs)

Old photos, not own work. And scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dated old photos document fashion. It would be better if the subject had a Wikidata page and the decade of the images was clearer. --RAN (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AI YUKI.webp

Nonsensical AI-generated building floorplan, with garbled text and many inaccessible rooms. Belbury (talk) 09:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ANCIENS DU GUE VERSION DU 20 JUILLET 2024.pdf

Derivative work of non free content. Also probably out of scope. On Commons, we don't accept articles. If this is suitable for Commons, it should be done on a gallery. Yann (talk) 09:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Traduction en Français: Œuvre dérivée de contenu (non libre?). Probablement (hors de portée?). Sur Commons, nous n'acceptons pas (d'articles?). Si cela convient à Commons, cela doit être fait dans une galerie.

Je vais essayer de justifier l'intérêt de cet ouvrage en forme de litote...

Historique:

- le site Anciens du gué version du 20 juillet 2024 ( http://cetgat.over-blog.com/ ) à été créé par Gilles Gauthier en 2017 et clos en 2024, voir l'historique du gué page 112 à 114 sur 154.

ce site se ramène à quelques têtes de chapitres:

- Historique du gué, objectif pédagogique, professeurs, internat garçons dans un lycée d'art entre 1947 et 1964 (cours, dortoirs...), repas et activités extérieures, quelques travaux réalisés à cette époque, profession de quelques anciens élèves, conclusion.

° Historique du gué: pages 110 à 114.

° Objectif pédagogique:

- Apporter un éclairage sur la vie d'un internat d'art masculin(céramique, staff, peinture décoration) entre 1946 et 2024.

° Professeurs: (voir à la page 18/154° dont en céramique Mr Courant MOF, en staff Mr André Chauvet 5 fois un des MOF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATmoENqt0Wg , en peinture décoration Mrs Vedrenne et Monnet (artistes peintres), Jean-Claude Poiley professeur de dessin technique ( https://fr.pinterest.com/gasrond/dessin-dessin-technique-1-ab-cap/ https://fr.pinterest.com/gasrond/dessin-dessin-technique-2-ab-cap/ https://fr.pinterest.com/gasrond/dessin-dessin-technique-3-ab-cap/

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cahier_de_perspective_de_Jean-Claude_Poiley.pdf (voir page 28/154) ...

° Internat garçons dans un lycée d'art entre 1947 et 1964 (cours, dortoirs, sanctions...): voir les pages 34, 35, 39, 40,41...sur 154.

° Repas et activités extérieures: pages 84 sur 154...

° Quelques travaux réalisés à cette époque: pages 31, 32, 42, 74, 80, 83, 84, 128 à 132, 134 à 140 sur 154...

° Profession de quelques anciens élèves: Gilles Gauthier (pages 142 à 145), Gérard Welter

(pages à 150), et quelques autres cités page 52.

° Conclusion: J'ai pensé que ce site http://cetgat.over-blog.com/ réalisé en forme d'ouvrage avec l'autorisation de gilles Gauthier Avait sa place à Staff (matériau) lien Traînage puis "Staff (building material)" car le gué à tresmes ayant été longtemps la seule école de staff en France, or, il semble intéressant de connaitre la vie d'un internat à cette époque (1946-1964). Il serait peut être intéressant que vous puissiez consulter cet ouvrage dans son intégralité.

Gérard Rondeau (ancien élève 1963-1966 au gué-à-tresmes section staff (MOF section architecturier-maquettiste, auteur de trois ouvrages sur le staff).

PS:

- gilles Gauthier ma signalé n'avoir mis aucune licence de protection sur le site qu'il a créé (http://cetgat.over-blog.com/ ).

- le staff est une invention Française (voir l'ouvrage TECHNIQUES ET PRATIQUE DU STAFF page 22 sur 232 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/TECHNIQUES_ET_PRATIQUE_DU_STAFF.pdf GRDROND (talk) 09:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Traduction en Français: Œuvre dérivée de contenu (non libre?). Probablement (hors de portée?). Sur Commons, nous n'acceptons pas (d'articles?). Si cela convient à Commons, cela doit être fait dans une galerie.

Je vais essayer de justifier l'intérêt de cet ouvrage en forme de litote...

Historique:

- le site Anciens du gué version du 20 juillet 2024 ( http://cetgat.over-blog.com/ ) à été créé par Gilles Gauthier en 2017 et clos en 2024, voir l'historique du gué page 112 à 114 sur 154.

ce site se ramène à quelques têtes de chapitres:

- Historique du gué, objectif pédagogique, professeurs, internat garçons dans un lycée d'art entre 1947 et 1964 (cours, dortoirs...), repas et activités extérieures, quelques travaux réalisés à cette époque, profession de quelques anciens élèves, conclusion.

° Historique du gué: pages 110 à 114.

° Objectif pédagogique:

- Apporter un éclairage sur la vie d'un internat d'art masculin(céramique, staff, peinture décoration) entre 1946 et 2024.

° Professeurs: (voir à la page 18/154° dont en céramique Mr Courant MOF, en staff Mr André Chauvet 5 fois un des MOF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATmoENqt0Wg , en peinture décoration Mrs Vedrenne et Monnet (artistes peintres), Jean-Claude Poiley professeur de dessin technique ( https://fr.pinterest.com/gasrond/dessin-dessin-technique-1-ab-cap/ https://fr.pinterest.com/gasrond/dessin-dessin-technique-2-ab-cap/ https://fr.pinterest.com/gasrond/dessin-dessin-technique-3-ab-cap/

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cahier_de_perspective_de_Jean-Claude_Poiley.pdf (voir page 28/154) ...

° Internat garçons dans un lycée d'art entre 1947 et 1964 (cours, dortoirs, sanctions...): voir les pages 34, 35, 39, 40,41...sur 154.

° Repas et activités extérieures: pages 84 sur 154...

° Quelques travaux réalisés à cette époque: pages 31, 32, 42, 74, 80, 83, 84, 128 à 132, 134 à 140 sur 154...

° Profession de quelques anciens élèves: Gilles Gauthier (pages 142 à 145), Gérard Welter

(pages à 150), et quelques autres cités page 52.

° Conclusion: J'ai pensé que ce site http://cetgat.over-blog.com/ réalisé en forme d'ouvrage avec l'autorisation de gilles Gauthier Avait sa place à Staff (matériau) lien Traînage puis "Staff (building material)" car le gué à tresmes ayant été longtemps la seule école de staff en France, or, il semble intéressant de connaitre la vie d'un internat à cette époque (1946-1964). Il serait peut être intéressant que vous puissiez consulter cet ouvrage dans son intégralité.

Gérard Rondeau (ancien élève 1963-1966 au gué-à-tresmes section staff (MOF section architecturier-maquettiste, auteur de trois ouvrages sur le staff).

PS:

   - gilles Gauthier ma signalé n'avoir mis aucune licence de protection sur le site qu'il a créé (http://cetgat.over-blog.com/ ).
   - le staff est une invention Française (voir l'ouvrage TECHNIQUES ET PRATIQUE DU STAFF page 22 sur 232   https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/TECHNIQUES_ET_PRATIQUE_DU_STAFF.pdf

Bien respectueusement.

GRDROND (talk) 10:21, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:8JQG+3M8 Temple of Nefertari, Abu Simbel, Aswan Governorate 1211501.jpg

لانه ليس لي بل صوره من جوجل ولا اعرف صاحبه ملوكا (talk) 09:16, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:تنزيل (10).jpg

صورة ترفع ضمن الاستعمال العادل Mohammed Qays 🗣 09:28, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sejong statue.jpg

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 10:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel I can confirm that I am the author of this photograph. I took it on March 2024 in Seoul, South Korea. This is the first time I am hearing about freedom of panorama laws. Notwithstanding such a law, I feel that 'Sejong the Great' page deserves to have a photo of this beautiful monument on Wikipedia. Benzekre (talk) 18:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check the COM:FAIRUSE policies on individual Wikipedias, where you might be able to upload a picture if it's needed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prabowo-Gibran Baliho 2023.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 10:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The nominator may be correct about FOP in Indonesia. However, the image is not claimed to be FOP. Rather, the artwork on the depicted poster is described as AI-generated, consistent with a statement that the publisher of the poster provided to Indonesian media [1] (cited at en:Prabowo_Subianto_2024_presidential_campaign#Controversies).

Per Commons:AI-generated_media#Copyrights_of_person_using_generative_AI this implies that the artwork would be public domain in most countries, which includes Indonesia according to this article authored by some Indonesian lawyers:

Despite being entirely new creations, images generated by AI cannot be copyrighted because they do not meet the criteria of uniqueness and personal expression required by the Indonesian Copyright Law.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HaeB the policy page on AI-generated media should be reformatted to include specific rules by each jurisdiction. Alternately, all of CRT pages should have a section devoted to AI-generated media, and those sections be transcluded to that policy page. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 17:37, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JWilz12345: It's an idea, but probably one that is better discussed on the talk pages of COM:AI and/or COM:CRT. For now I have added a mention at COM:AI. Regards, HaeB (talk) 02:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The news source you're linking to is about a TV advert, not this billboard. Belbury (talk) 22:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury: Yes, it is about the use of AI-generated images (assuming that Google and Bing translate dari teks menjadi gambar yang di-generate melalui AI correctly) in a TV advert, not a poster. But I meant "consistent" in the sense that this source confirms that the campaign had been using AI-generated images in general.

In any case, this Reuters article features this particular poster motive as illustration for the use of generative AI in those elections, writing that A doe-eyed cartoon version of Gen. Prabowo Subianto - produced using generative AI - is emblazoned on billboards across Indonesia. It's reproduced on sweatshirts and stickers, and featured prominently on #Prabowo-tagged posts that have some 19 billion views on TikTok.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 03:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Agree with HaeB, {{PD-algorithm}} should apply here even though it can't be de minimis. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marked. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:3B4B6170.jpg

Previously published in https://lancethealthservices.com/about.html with no indication of a free license. VRT permission needed to verify copyright. MKFI (talk) 10:45, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inisfree Foundation, cleanup ca. 1970.jpg

COM:Derivative work: photograph-of-photograph, original source and author unknown. MKFI (talk) 10:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Zachm360 (talk · contribs)

Out of COM:Scope as per COM:WEBHOST: these are apparently screencaps from the uploaders Vlogs.

MKFI (talk) 10:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samfylkingin merki 2023.svg

~~The uploading user is not the copyright owner. Maybe this qualifies as simple logo though? Bjarki S (talk) 11:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

On second thought, I changed the license to PD-textlogo and removed the deletion request. If someone disagrees that it meets the threshold for PD-textlogo, they can revive this request. --Bjarki S (talk) 12:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It looks too complex to me, especially as COM:TOO Iceland is a red link. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Motorland motos TMR.jpg

File:Urban-square-sukher-udaipur-rajasthan-p30jaiq8e9.jpg

Appears to be downloaded from https://www.justdial.com/Udaipur-Rajasthan/Urban-Square-Sukher/9999PX294-X294-200622160513-R4J1_BZDET/gallery?tab=all&template=1&ncatid=&mncatname=&vrsn=3.0&bd=&pselect=344402732 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:53, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hélène Devilleneuve.jpeg

Not own work, no atribution, cropped from other photo no source Triplecaña (talk) 13:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nuope (talk · contribs)

Unused content related to non-notable company, uploaded for advertisement purposes, no obvious educational value: en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comikey

Nutshinou ^Talk! 13:28, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than being promotional uploads the three first listed screenshots were seemingly uploaded for illustration purposes in the Comikey related Article for Deletion discussion. The point was to show how Crunchyroll marks content that is based on press releases vs actual articles on Crunchyroll (which could be used as secondary sources to establish Comikey's) notability. Either way, they are likely out of scope. Nakonana (talk) 18:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yahya al-Sinwar 2011.png

The file is an AI upscaled version of File:Gaza police exercise in 2011 (05).jpg. I believe this file is redundant as it doesn't adhere to the Manual of Style regarding AI-assisted upscaling of images, i.e. MOS:HOTLINK. Additionally, I believe the file currently used for the English article on Yahya Sinwar (File:Yahya_Sinwar_portrait_3x4.jpg) is preferable in accordance with MOS:IMAGEQUALITY. Quidama (talk) 13:28, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or overwrite with an un-upscaled version if this crop is useful. Per COM:Redundant The low quality source of this upscale makes it look like a watercolor. . Narnat (talk) 01:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have uploaded the No-AI version of the image, and the 3:5 aspect ratio of this bust shot is quite good. Perhaps other languages Wikipedia might want to use it, keeping it will be useful. Nagae Iku (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lol message in convo.jpg

Screenshot including copyrighted Apple emoji (cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sitelen Emoji Rendered on Apple.jpg) where they are broadly the focus of the screenshot and editing them out would alter the meaning. Belbury (talk) 13:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Знак утилізації.jpg

Unused, low quality Recycling symbols (3 arrows), unlikely to see use Nutshinou ^Talk! 14:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Union Geretsberg gegen Union Ostermiething 1b (2024-05-11) 04.jpg

The picture merely shows the side view of a referee at an amateur football match without a recognisable match situation and without documentary value. It does not contribute to the illustration of a Wikipedia article and offers no added value for articles about football or the clubs involved (Union Geretsberg, Union Ostermiething). Despite its good technical quality, the image does not fulfil the requirements for content quality. Commons is not a private photo album, but serves to provide images with documentary value, which is not the case here. Reb-el-mar (talk) 14:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corrupted Barnstar Hires.png

The file is fine for me but on Wikimedia(commons) it doesn't show the actual file, let me know if the same happens for you Hydrogen astatide (talk) 14:24, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The File:Corrupted Barnstar.png works fine, I think this one doesn't work cuz it is much larger than the previously mentioned FIle. Hydrogen astatide (talk) 14:29, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Typha angustifolia 1-eheep (5098012014).jpg

minuscule, too small to be of any use, thus out of Commons scope MPF (talk) 14:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:KaShioN bRO LOGO.png

Copyright Violation IDB.S (talk) 14:43, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:آثار كهف السيد المسيح عراق الأمير-البصة-عمان-الأردن 01.jpg

ظهور اشخاص لا يرغبون بالظهور على الانترنت Cestsalam (talk) 14:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:스매쉬캐스트 로고.png

Unnecessary Redirect YeBoy371 (talk) 14:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:연합뉴스TV 로고.png

Unnecessary Redirect YeBoy371 (talk) 14:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Façade de l'hôtel de ville de Lyon sur la place des Terreaux par Jean-Pierre Gentot.png

Un fichier de meilleure qualité importé par le même groupe de l'Ecole du Louvre Anne Marie (AM Lyon) (talk) 15:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keepy up, Amy Sharrocks photo Hugo Glendinning.jpg

Likely not own work: credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. And not notable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mjibndeen (talk · contribs)

Historical photos, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. And File:Allama Muhammad Din Sialvi.jpg is taken from FB as per EXIT data.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poppy aurora.jpg

Random virtual artwork, out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 15:46, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as well as additional artwork by the same uploader. Commons is not DeviantArt.

Omphalographer (talk) 17:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo TABULARASA.png

Possible copyvio (declared as own work but seems to be a capture from website) mfG - Martin ^{(Rede gerne mit mir)} 16:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kunsthalle Mesmer.jpg

Unused photo of nondescript logo/pattern, no context, no educational use, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The context is in the file name (albeit with a typo): Category:Kunsthalle Messmer. Might be a architectural element or part of the exhibition in that art gallery. If it's a work of art, it might fall under the threshold of originality maybe? The gallery is located in Germany. Nakonana (talk) 19:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lancement de Tweest à la Cantine (4274913318).jpg

Unused photo of non-notable event/people, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:13, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: photo of Category:Ronan Le Goff attending event at which other notables were present SecretName101 (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SecretName101: Thanks for your reply, but how do you know it is actually Ronan Le Goff? --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hair and clothes are the same as another photo of him on the same day (File:Ronan Le Goff (4274169927) (1).jpg) SecretName101 (talk) 19:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If so, it is COM:REDUNDANT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:UK Government Crown Crest 2024.png

The United Kingdom Open Government Licence v3.0 does not cover the Royal Arms. Mike Rohsopht (talk) 16:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:UK Government Crown Crest 2024 black.svg

The United Kingdom Open Government Licence v3.0 does not cover the Royal Arms. Mike Rohsopht (talk) 16:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indubio producer.jpg

no selfie, no author given, no permission, out of project scope, used for promotional article on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by HeinrichZieglerGmbH (talk · contribs)

Unused diagrams without clear purpose, no educational value, unusable, out of scope.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Those are illustrations of corner joints. They show how those joints look like and how they work. Nakonana (talk) 19:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HF-Dichtung Ausschnitt.jpg

Unused and needless tiny crop from File:HF-Dichtung 660x660.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leadec-Weltkarte deutsch.jpg

Unused promotional corporate map, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:410w (987834207).jpg

Appears to be a copyrighted image per https://eu.ocala.com/story/news/2007/08/02/bridge-collapses-into-mississippi-river-in-minneapolis/31213264007/ Caption: "This video frame grab taken from KMSP television". Sam Walton (talk) 16:34, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blason fam fr Refuge.png

Imported from Man8rove for draft Thibaud4141 (talk) 17:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag-map of Jamaica.svg

No muestra la imagen. Maximum 1995 (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I cannot explain what happened to the image, but this seems to be a Commons-wide problem as I've seen it happen to other files over the last few months as well. The file will need to be repaired. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Donald Davies.jpg

No evidence that this photo has been released under CC BY-SA 4.0 as claimed by the uploader (the given source page doesn't say so, it also didn't around the time of the upload). Regards, HaeB (talk) 18:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1863, Resende, New Zealand Feiteira na freguesia do Figueiredo, Sertã, em 2009.jpg

Foto desatualizada Luccas 31 (talk) 18:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a deletion reason. However, is this photo in COM:SCOPE? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:21, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nicholas Alexander Chavez.webp

Image is not a free image; does not belong on Commons. Livelikemusic (talk) 18:30, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Osu!

I am nominating these files for deletion (including one of my own) because osu!'s licensing is complicated. osu!lazer is under an MIT license [2] but the skin, etc. could be not permissible as it is a CC BY-NC license. [3] This deletion request should help sort out the components which are permissible and the components that are not.

Aasim (talk) 18:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader of File:OSU lazer song selection.jpg. This file was previously nominated for deletion here, and was kept under Commons:De minimis. I have no strong feelings regarding this file, it was uploaded years ago before I really understood copyright, and it is no longer used on enwiki. I simply wanted to bring the previous deletion discussion into the scope of the conversation. Thanks, Scaledish (talk) 18:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since there were osu! images on wikimedia commons already, I thought I could upload one screenshot and I didn't think that this would happen. However, since this happened now, I am not against deleting those screenshots, including my screenshot (in fact, please delete my screenshot) TheRealUser3412 (talk) 01:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For File:Slider2.jpg and File:Hit circle.png that might be COM:TOO in the US at least. Not sure about Australia where osu! originates. Aasim (talk) 19:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Пам'ятник О. Й. Партицькому, українському вченому-мовознавцю.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1995. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alex Breingan.jpg

Same deal as other Alex Breingan image; Extremely likely to be a copyright violation (e.g. "I found it on the internet and claimed ownership and/or pulled a CC-license out of my butt"). Alleged source is another Wiki, uploaded by a user self-identifying as an AI bot MonkeyMonkeyHere (talk) 19:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Francois Bonneau2020.png

https://www.alamyimages.fr/le-president-de-la-region-france-renaud-muselier-et-le-vice-president-de-la-region-france-francois-bonneau-arrivent-a-l-hotel-matignon-a-paris-le-30-juillet-2020-pour-signer-l-accord-de-partenariat-avec-les-regions-de-france-accord-de-partenariat-avec-la-region-france-photo-de-raphael-lafargue-abacapress-com-image388186727.html?imageid=FB80F983-4011-417B-9F0E-20084C513AE5&p=1366776&pn=1&searchId=b3fb041dfa40ee6e1863039d88e96327&searchtype=0 Lomita (talk) 19:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Normalement, cette image est libre de droit.

Bien à vous, François Tellier--Michon (talk) 19:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sans titre murale par Zema2.jpg

enlever à la requête de l'artiste de la murale Anthraciter (talk) 19:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by User:GamerHashaam

GamerHashaam (talk) has uploaded multiple files that have been subsequently deleted for copyright violations – see upload log here. User has often tagged these files as own work when they patently are not. Per COM:PAKISTAN and COM:US the original photographs from 1965 are possibly in the public domain. However, no precise publication information is available via reverse image search, which only points to Facebook, etc. --Peloneous (talk) 19:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:4 канал (2020-2021).svg

Ukrainian logo, no information at COM:Ukraine about ToO. Abzeronow (talk) 20:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Нормальний логотип, взятий з відкритих джерел, ліцензія та ж, що і на сайті джерела. Тим більше, це закритий телеканал, ніхто судитися з Вікіпедією не буде. Залиште лого. Iamthebest3000 (talk) 10:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Фендом не є власником авторських прав, а телевізійна станція. Крім того, «вони не подадуть до суду» суперечить духу Wikimedia Commons. Що мені потрібно знати, якщо поріг оригінальності в Україні.

[Fendom ne ye vlasnykom avtorsʹkykh prav, a televiziyna stantsiya. Krim toho, «vony ne podadutʹ do sudu» superechytʹ dukhu Wikimedia Commons. Shcho meni potribno znaty, yakshcho porih oryhinalʹnosti v Ukrayini.] (via Google translate) @NickK: Abzeronow (talk) 16:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:5-4 PIANC meet Pope Pius XII, Congress 1953.jpg

1953 Belgian photograph, possibly PD there if published in 1953, but would have been restored by URAA. Likely needs VRT from organization. Abzeronow (talk) 20:30, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miss Universe Latvia 2023.jpg

The sourced youtube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=dqo2DRVu3ow has a CC license. However, during the recorded interview some (unsourced) still photographs are displayed that IMO are not covered by the CC license as they most likely are not shot by Chance TV. This photo can be seen on Kate's Instagram account https://www.instagram.com/kate.xeeva/p/CmuIU0wKWd3/ Achim55 (talk) 20:58, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amy groening.jpg

possible copyvio (c) Kevin McIntryre https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4082592/mediaviewer/rm4137319681/ - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucid Games Logo.svg

Might be above COM:TOO UK. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 23:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The word "Lucid" in a bog-standard font and two slashes in a blue box. I don't think this is something even the UK would copyright. Unlike the Edge example cited in the TOO guideline, the font here has seemingly not been altered in any meaningful way. IceWelder [✉] 06:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The font may still be copyrighted in the UK. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 02:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm not mistaken, it is just a bold Helvetica, not a proprietary font that would fall under UK copyright law. IceWelder [✉] 06:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two slashes in a box may be enough original effort to merit copyright in COM:TOO UK.

Delete per COM:PCP? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]