User talk:Xnatedawgx/Archive1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Hi Xnatedawgx, to make this image you've uploaded more useful it would be kind if you could tell within the description where this was shot. Thanks, AFBorchert (talk) 15:10, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token ba3310cbe4426a7a42d9f93ba9c1fded
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:DakotaRidgeHS.jpg is uncategorized since 22 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Re: Oklahoma.JPG
I'm not sure where this photo was taken. I found it on the english wikipedia server and moved it here for my collection since it was better than the version that I had before. If you look at the file history, the old version was taken by me on I-40 between Arkansas and Oklahoma. You would need to contact whoever uploaded it on Wikipedia to find out where exactly the photo was taken. Sorry I couldn't help. But if you're wondering about all the other state sign photos that were authored by me, I can tell you exactly where they were taken. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 15:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
File:Bottom of the Ninth.oga has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
File:101WestOhio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Ytoyoda (talk) 16:25, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
File:IndyNight.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Ytoyoda (talk) 05:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
File:IC,_the_rescue,_SLC_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AVRS (talk) 17:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Why was this a wrong category?
The rail line to Monte Cristo no longer exists. Why was this a wrong category? - Jmabel ! talk 06:20, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
In the photo you can see the rail line when it existed. Photos for the "former" category should only be of rail lines/tracks that look abandoned/unused in the photo, otherwise its not "former". Thanks Xnatedawgx (talk) 16:00, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Then how would one classify a rail line that is now defunct? We use the similarly named Category:Former buildings for buildings that no longer exist; obviously, we couldn't have a picture of a building taken after it no longer exists. - Jmabel ! talk 19:55, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
When looking over the Category:Former railway lines, it appears that most are photos of places showing remains of railways from the past. I do see your point about the Category:Former buildings, but perhaps it should be put under Category:Defunct rail transport companies of the United States. Xnatedawgx (talk) 20:10, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Restaurant signs
Hi. Thanks for all your work categorizing images! I see you're now categorizing restaurant signs, so I created categories for "Restaurant signs in New Orleans" and "Restaurant signs in Louisiana" and wanted to alert you. Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 23:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, I was about to do that before I left my house for the day. Xnatedawgx (talk) 04:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Category discussion notification | Category:Statue of Liberty has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
--Teofilo (talk) 17:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
File:ELP-CJS-LCR-001.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Admrboltz (talk) 21:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on Hornet Stadium/Gaelic football categories!
Thanks for all your work on the new Hornet Stadium category, and the better organization for my Gaelic football picture set. I really appreciate it! TFCforever (talk) 03:01, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Are you sure of this one?
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Everett,_WA_-_2902_Rucker_Ave.jpg&curid=4491586&diff=30168890&oldid=27068952: it's explicitly a gym (see sign). I don't get the sense in which it is a clubhouse. - Jmabel ! talk 00:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Then we should create a Category:Health clubs (which would not be a subcategory of Category:Clubs and societies and certainly not of Category:Clubhouses), since commercial ones like Gold's are not "clubs" in any meaningful sense. Something like the Washington Athletic Club] or New York Athletic Club or, more modestly even the Holtville Athletic Club is really a club, but Gold's Gym is just not a club: its members are entirely passive consumers, at most they are like subscribers. - Jmabel ! talk 01:53, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Denverartmuseum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dcoetzee (talk) 19:49, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Deprecated License
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:IUPUI-Library-trees.JPG, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:20, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
"Condominium"
Unless I'm mistaken, a "condominium" category should probably not replace an "apartment building" category, but be added to it. An apartment building is a type of building; condominiums are a form of ownership, and can apply to other things than apartment buildings (e.g. it's a possible form of ownership for an office building, a resort property, and even (I believe) a ship. - Jmabel ! talk 07:44, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Deprecated License
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Silver Legacy door.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:SilverLegacy0001.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:TennesseeTheater interior.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 00:21, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Tennessee Theater.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 00:22, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Xeroxtower.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Powers (talk) 19:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
File:WayneStateTheTowers.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Justass (talk) 19:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
File:Wingsofprogress.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Powers (talk) 16:29, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
File:Hsbc_Rochester.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Powers (talk) 16:32, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Parent categories
Just a note that, when you added the Sunsphere category, you forgot to remove the "Knoxville, Tennessee" parent category. There's no reason for the two to be on the same image. Might want to go back and double check your other changes. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- D'oh, makes perfect sense. Sorry about that! — Huntster (t @ c) 06:21, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Category discussion notification | Category:Works by year has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
--Teofilo (talk) 09:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Qwest_Building,_Omaha.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Scapler (talk) 17:09, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
File:Fulbrightstatue.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Teofilo (talk) 13:25, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Xnatedawgx,
you seems to have local knowledge about San Francisco. Do you eventually know the name of this building File:AngeschraegtesHochhausSF.JPG? --Túrelio (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
File:Your_friends_burger_chef_and_jeff.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ˉanetode╦╩ 23:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Categories
What did you intend to be the distinction between Category:Former train stations in the United States and Category:Disused train stations in the United States? Choess (talk) 03:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Move
I just wanted to let you know that I moved your new category
Category:Metropolitan Life Insurance Towers to
Category:Metropolitan Life Insurance complex because it was too similiar to
Category:Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Tower,
and would probably cause confusion. (Also, the North Building is not a "tower" per se.) I've also slugged the "complex" category with a note that individual images in it should show both buildings, which I assume was your intention. I left yours as a category redirect. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Regardless of where it came from, the nomenclature is confusing. Check the English Wikipedia article on the Tower which referes to the addition of the complex to the historic registry.
Also, you posted your comment on my user page rather than on my talk page. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Please don't blank pages
Hi Xnatedawgx,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Category:Biological Sciences Building on Commons. If you meant for the page to be deleted, blanking the page is not the right way to do this. Please use {{speedy| type reason here }} and add it on top of the page you would like to have deleted; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regularly for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed. For redirects use #REDIRECT[[Target]] or {{category redirect|Targetcategoryname}}. Thanks again.
- I've deleted it. –Krinkletalk 22:55, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Deprecated License
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:New Regina City Hall (1986).jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 02:18, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Former First Interstate Bank building?
You placed File:General history, Alaska Yukon Pacific Exposition, fully illustrated - meet me in Seattle 1909 - Page 54.jpg in Category:Former First Interstate Bank buildings. Was this based on something you know and didn't document? Because I'm unaware of First Interstate ever operating out of this building. As far as I know, they bought it and tore it down. - Jmabel ! talk 18:47, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Category discussion notification | Category:U.S._Route_223 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
Imzadi 1979 → 10:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 17:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Please see Commons:Village pump#Categorization question (about the Ballard Commons in Seattle and its relation to Category:Skateparks. - Jmabel ! talk 21:38, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot
File:Twenty Years of Mustang.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 17:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Snowmass Trail Map, 2006 or older.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Snowmass Trail Map, 2006 or older.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Snowmass Trail Map, 2006 or older.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:48, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
File:Invisible_Children_Event,_25,_Break_The_Silence,_Blackbox_Theater.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Saibo (Δ) 23:08, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
You might want to stop adding to this category, as I've nominated it for deletion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:18, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- And at least some of the inclusions are plain wrong. For example Category:700 First Avenue, Seattle, which you added: it isn't a building called [something] Avenue, it's a building known by its address, which happens to be on First Avenue. - Jmabel ! talk 00:24, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
File:Boys&GirlsCluboftheNorthernCheyenne.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BMRR (talk) 17:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
File:AnchorageAlleyMural.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
File:CentralCityMuralLampPost.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:22, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Cowboy_mural.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Category discussion notification | Category:Marquees has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
--Jmabel ! talk 15:42, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Freedom_for_Life_mural.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Jack_Rabbit_Trading_Post.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
File:MuralNSLameDeer.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:45, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Re:White Castle District Office.jpg
Can you tell me which section of Queens File:White Castle District Office.jpg is located in? ----DanTD (talk) 16:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Corner of 34th Avenue and 69th Street according to this Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:22, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, so Woodside. Okay. ----DanTD (talk) 12:38, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
File:SafewayHotAirBallon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:40, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Sinclair_Dinosaur,_Wisconsin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 07:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
TUSC token ace227004c71619e62256f5f09b08b01
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token 326eaa8015f74e504a12bfdfc9a008e8
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
File:TorchFriendship&SAnightskyline.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bulwersator (talk) 08:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
File:AlpineExplosion, CowParade.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lophotrochozoa (talk) 12:51, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Demolished buildings
This seems like an odd decision. At least two of the A-Y-P buildings survive a century later (the Women's Building, recently moved, and the Arts Building, now the UW Architecture Building). Offhand, I think the rest are gone, but this still places two standing buildings an a "demolished buildings" category. - Jmabel ! talk 22:50, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
The majority of the buildings have been demolished, as stated in the related article. There would be no sense in putting each of them in the category separately. Xnatedawgx (talk) 22:52, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- No, but you could create a Category:Demolished buildings of the Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition & attach the category to that. Or, probably better, Category:Temporary buildings of the Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition, which would let us distinguish the three buildings that were there for a long time but no longer are. (The temporary buildings all have the same date of destruction; three others besides the survivors do not.) - Jmabel ! talk 23:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Why Category:Lowman Building? The Lowman Building is not the Lowman & Hanford Building. It's next door, I believe. - Jmabel ! talk 22:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
My mistake then. Xnatedawgx (talk) 22:57, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Wait. Maybe my mistake, I think Lowman is the bigger one, on the corner. But I have to rush out of here right now. - Jmabel ! talk 22:58, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yup, my mistake in description. I've now fixed that. Sorry. - Jmabel ! talk 05:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Cowlorado the Beautiful.jpg
- File:CowParade Denver, Stapleton1.jpg
- File:CowParade Denver, Stapleton2.jpg
- File:Cowversity.jpg
- File:Moo-La.jpg
- File:San Luis Valley Cow.jpg
Yours sincerely Lophotrochozoa (talk) 12:20, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Southland Life drawing.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Southland Life drawing.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Southland Life drawing.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:19, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Southland Center construction.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Southland Center construction.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Southland Center construction.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:19, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Gibraltar Life Insurance Co. building, Dallas, TX.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gibraltar Life Insurance Co. building, Dallas, TX.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:20, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:One Brook Hollow Plaza.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:One Brook Hollow Plaza.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:One Brook Hollow Plaza.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:23, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Fountain Place Site Plan (half built).jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Fountain Place Site Plan (half built).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fountain Place Site Plan (half built).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:23, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Original Fountain Place Plan (half built).jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Original Fountain Place Plan (half built).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Original Fountain Place Plan (half built).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:23, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:One Dallas Centre Carnage.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:One Dallas Centre Carnage.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:One Dallas Centre Carnage.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:23, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Rio Grande National Life.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Rio Grande National Life.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rio Grande National Life.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Dallas Centre Rending.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Dallas Centre Rending.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dallas Centre Rending.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:BigTown mall.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:BigTown mall.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:BigTown mall.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:25, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Baker Hotel, Dallas, TX.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Baker Hotel, Dallas, TX.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Baker Hotel, Dallas, TX.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:25, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Audubon Parkway sign.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
File:NewMtnPkwySign.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:23, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Category:Market_Hall has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Fungus Guy (talk) 19:54, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Category:The_Stanley_Hotel has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Fungus Guy (talk) 07:02, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Towers by height has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Fungus Guy (talk) 08:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 12:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Chicago Skyway Bridge has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
–Fredddie™ 18:21, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:NorthstarTahoe1.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:NorthstarTahoe1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 20:24, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Old MGM Reno.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Old MGM Reno.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jarekt (talk) 13:00, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Explosion1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Matthiasb (talk) 12:14, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Plant Explosion West, Texas.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Matthiasb (talk) 12:17, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Plant Explosion Texas.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Matthiasb (talk) 12:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
COM:AN/B
Template:Autotranslate Senator2029 08:09, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Anika (talk) 18:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Stefan4 (talk) 15:57, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Orlady (talk) 22:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Leoboudv (talk) 06:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This image was uploaded to Wikipedia by this user. You only transferred it to Commons. So, you did not commit any copyright violation. You only moved the image from Wikipedia to wikicommons...but the image may not be free as the uploader at Wikipedia has some problems with copyright. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Philafrenzy (talk) 15:22, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate -- Deadstar (msg) 13:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Leoboudv (talk) 08:56, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Comm: Hylife, the original Wikipedia uploader did the copyright violation, not you who just transferred the image as my copyvio note here says: According to the wikipedia uploader, the image source is the church web site just like this other image he/she uploaded on wikipedia. The image would likely not be public domain then...since the source website says "Copyright © 2014 St. James Ev. Lutheran Church. All Rights Reserved." --Leoboudv (talk) 09:01, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Request :)
I was wondering if you could go through the files that I recently uploaded (last month) and added photo location coordinates, they are in the category Category:Interstate 75 in Georgia. I like the way you've added various road sign type categories to other photos and wondered if you'd take a look at the photos and add any categories you think would be appropriate. Thank you. --Mjrmtg (talk) 14:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Mjrmtg (talk) 18:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Re: File:Sheridan Flouring Mills & Mill Inn.JPG
The two files you uploaded (1 2) should have been given different names to distiguish between them. Please make the neccessary changes as the two files should not have the same categories. Allen4names (talk) 16:18, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for noticing and fixing the files of Mississippi River bridges that I had uploaded (of the North Channel Bridge which were actually of the Main Channel Bridge). The two bridges are close together and it was confusing. Royalbroil 13:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Buildings in Atlanta
Atlanta is both in Fulton and DeKalb counties so we cannot assume all photos in the Buildings in Atlanta category also belong in the Buildings in Fulton County category. --Mjrmtg ([[User talk:Mjrmtg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:54, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Hennepin Canal lock numbers
Your category and the uploader's filenames on at least a couple Hennepin Canal photos disagree and I think they might both be off. Details and discussion at File talk:Hennepin Canal Lock 29 Bridge.JPG#Lock number. --Closeapple ([[User talk:Closeapple|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:49, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 11:18, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Bridge Name Question
I just took several photos of a bridge and was wondering if you could help me with a name for the bridge. It is located here [[:Template:Object location]] and would fit in these categories: Bridges in Madison County, Florida, Bridges in Lowndes County, Georgia, Bridges over rivers in Georgia (U.S. state), Withlacoochee River (Georgia), Railway bridges in Georgia (U.S. state), Abandoned railway bridges in the United States and probably others I'm missing. Thanks for your help in finding a name for the bridge. --Mjrmtg ([[User talk:Mjrmtg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:39, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- I just found this website about the trestle in question and the abandoned rail line - http://www.abandonedrails.com/Clyattville_to_Madison --Mjrmtg ([[User talk:Mjrmtg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:36, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Niklem ([[User talk:Niklem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:58, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Geagea ([[User talk:Geagea|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:21, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Josve05a ([[User talk:Josve05a|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:36, 29 December 2014 (UTC)