User talk:Magellan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sorry, but for applying {{PD-old}} tag this stamps should be printed not later then in 1936, when DDR even not existed. --EugeneZelenko 16:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Magellan, benutze auch für die DDR Briefmarken die Vorlagen wie ich sie für "normale" Westdeutsche Briefmarken genommen habe, da die Bildrechte an die BRD übergegangen sind.
Also am besten immer folgendes reinkopieren:
Copyright-Begründung auf: [[:de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Amtliche_Werke]]
{{Template:PD-Germany}}
{{Template:PD-GermanGov}}
[[Category:German stamps]]
--Viele Grüße - kandschwar
Hallo, ok, thx. Gruß --Magellan 08:54, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Kategorien

[edit]

Hallo Magellan, da es ja die Category:German Democratic Republic stamps gibt, kannst Du bei den DDR-Briefmarken, die Ober-Category:German stamps weg lassen. ... Ich weiß, oben habe ich noch was anderes geschrieben, aber was interessiert mich mein Geschwätz von gestern ;-) --Viele Grüße - kandschwar 16:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi kandschwar, ja, ist bei mir ähnlich. Rede manchmal auch viel, wenn der Tag lang ist ;o) Werde nachbessern und soweit erkennbar die Stempelungen mit angeben. Gruß Magellan, 10:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi Magellan, bezugnehmend auf User_talk:H.A.,_Dresden, kannst Du bei der Einstellung der Briefmarken ja schon mal unten stehende "Vorlagenmuster" nehmen:
==Beschreibung==
eingescannt von: [[User:Hier Dein Name eintragen]]
eingescannt am: tt.mm.jjjjj
===Briefmarkenbeschreibung===
Oberkategorie der Briefmarke sollte es sich um eine Serie handeln
*Text der auf der Briefmarke steht
*Ausgabepreis: xxx Pfennig
*Erstausgabetag / First Day of Issue: TT. MMMM JJJJ
*Auflage: xxx Stück
*Entwurf: xxx
*Druckverfahren: 
Michel-Katalog-Nr: Ländercode-MiNr: xxx
== Licensing ==
*Copyright-Begründung auf: [[:de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Amtliche_Werke]]
{{Template:PD-Germany}}
{{Template:PD-GermanGov}}
[[Category:Stamps]]
[[Category:German stamps]]
[[Category:German Democratic Republic stamps]]

Dann brauch ich nur noch die Daten eintragen ;-) --Viele Grüße - kandschwar 11:26, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hab noch was vergessen. Da es eine Art Mustervorlage ist, bitte immer dann die unpassenden Kategorien rausnehmen oder ergänzen. --Viele Grüße - kandschwar 11:30, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, ich bins schon wieder, habe jetzt mal auf der Diskussionsseite von den deutschen Briefmarken auch die Vorlage eingefügt, von daher bitte dort rauskopieren bzw. auch ergänzen, wenn dir noch was einfällt. Talk:Stamp/Germany#Mustervorlage Bis dann und --Viele Grüße - kandschwar 17:46, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi kandschwar, stimmt, da hast Du Recht, werde die bisherige und zukünftige Angaben wie in der Muster angegeben verwenden. Es kommen jetzt noch 3-4 DDR Briefmarken und dann einpaar Westdeutsche. Falls ich noch Bock habe, dann auch aus andere Länder der Welt. ;o) Gruß Magellan 13:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Jo mach das. Allerdings habe ich nur für deutsche Briefmarken Michel-Kataloge. Also alles andere kann ich dann leider nicht ergänzen, aber dennoch kann man ja die Vorlage schon mal mit einbauen. Dann wird es ein wenig einfacher. Noch eine Bitte, solltest Du auch mal Briefmarken auf kompletten Briefen, Postkarten oder ähnliches haben dann auch bitte komplett oder zumindest mit Stempel mal einscannen. Siehe auch bei meinen eingescannten Briefmarken. --Viele Grüße - kandschwar 20:15, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vorlage für Briefmarken

[edit]

Hallo Magellan, mir hat es einfach keine Ruhe gelassen. Ich habe jetzt mal Vorlagen für deutsche Briefmarken entworfen. Eine genaue Erklärung findest Du unter Template talk:PD-German stamps. Diese können wir dann nun für die deutschen Briefmarken bzgl. der Copyrights verweden. Schau Dir die Vorlagen bitte mal alle an, ob ich dort eventuell einen Fehler gemacht habe. --Viele Grüße - kandschwar 19:34, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allgemeine Hinweise zur Vorlage

[edit]

Habe mal eine Vorlage für deutsche Briefmarken entworfen. Die rechtliche Grundlage hierfür ist auf verschiedenen Seiten in der deutschen Wikipedia zu finden, u.a. hier:

All dies habe ich nun in dieser Vorlage versucht zusammen zufassen. --Viele Grüße - kandschwar 18:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hi kandschwar, auf den ersten Blick fiel mir das hier auf. Es ist ein wenig unverständlich, Du meinst als Zusammenfassung diesen Template Template:PD-GermanGov?

Die anderen Vorlagen z. B. für den früheren DDR-Briefmarken scheint in Ordnung zu sein, aber die Inhalte von diesen bitte auch mit Profis nochmals durch sehen, sicher ist sicher.

Demnächst lege ich noch 4 DDR Marken auf und nehme die neuen Vorlagen + tausche sie dann bei den anderen Bilder ebenfalls aus. Inklusive Michelgerechtigung. ;o) Gruß --Magellan 11:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC)


Hi Magellan, mit dem Hinweis auf PD-GermanGov, habe ich den dort enthaltenden § 5 (1) UrhG gemeint. Sozusagen doppelt gemoppelt angegeben. ;-) Ich hoffe es ist jetzt verständlich dadurch. Ansonsten können wir dann solche Änderungen jetzt in der Vorlage vornehmen und schwuppdiewupp ist es in allen betreffenden Briefmarken erledigt :-)

Deinem zweiten Wunsch kann ich nur zustimmen, auch ich würde mich freuen, wenn noch mal irgendjemand über die Vorlage drüber sehen würde und eventuell es auch mal in ein gutes englisch übersetzen würde.

Was die DDR-Briefmarken angeht. Wunderbar.

--Viele Grüße - kandschwar 16:18, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Verwendung der Vorlage

[edit]

Hallo Magellan, wenn Du die Vorlage in die Artikel einbauen willst, musst du nicht den Quelltext einbauen, sondern einfach nur {{PD-GDR stamps}} (für z.B. DDR-Briefmarken) schreiben. Der Rest wird dann direkt von der Vorlage gemacht. --Viele Grüße - kandschwar 18:40, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ach stimmt ja, ok, ist auch kein Aprilscherz. Ich müsste mich halt mehr hierhin konzentrieren ;o) lol* Gruß --Magellan 10:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

For cooking, oder?

[edit]

Hi Magellan. I like your Image:Kesselgulasch.jpg. I'm working on categories, and I wonder if this object is for boiling water only (eg for washing) or also for cooking? Sorry to write in English - I can read German, if you prefer to reply auf Deutsch... JackyR 01:04, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Antwort liegt bei Dir vor. Gruß Magellan 18:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Vielen dank! Alles klar (höffentlich)! Ich habe seine Wörte auf dem Seite geschrieben, weil finde ich die benützliche da zu Lesen. Sie sehen, daß meine Deutsch so häßlich is. So ich hoffe daß mein Übersetzung nich falsch ist... Aber Sie haben das wichtigste Frage ganz klar geantwörtet - cooking, not heating water for washing! So the file is now in Category:Stoves. And now you can stop laughing at my German... :-P JackyR 23:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
PS enschuldigen daß ich habe nur den englisch gelinked: veilleicht ist es sicherer wann Sie den Deutsch selbst linken... Gruß, JackyR 23:49, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, if I speak in English, than it is the same how by your german. But we can understand us and that is good. Ihre Übersetzung auf deutsch ist in Ordnung, ich habs verstanden. Bezüglich Verlinkung in deutsch wird bald was unternommen. Viele Grüße --Magellan 08:58, 2. May 2006 (CEST)


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MatthiasRex.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jkelly 18:46, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete the image Image:MatthiasRex.jpg because the Licensing/Copyright is not definitely at the moment. Thanks. Magellan 07:33, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:Rroberos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
87.230.112.245 17:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
All right, delete it please. Magellan 19:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Safari pics

[edit]

But of course! I'm delighted you like them! Viele Grüße, JackyR 16:40, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Missing license/wrong author information for several animated images

[edit]

Hallo Magellan, kannst Du bitte alle Bildbeschreibungen in Deiner Galerie nacharbeiten? Es fehlen bei den von mir durchgesehenen - vermutlich bei allen - die konkreten Angaben zu den verwendeten Bildquellen, den Autoren und den jeweiligen Lizenzen. Ob überhaupt Bilder unterschiedlicher Lizenzen, z.B. einerseits GFDL und andererseits CC-by-sa-2.0 (also nicht mehrfach lizenzierten Bildern) in einer Datei zusammengepackt werden können, wird üblicherweise bestritten; auch ich bin der Ansicht, dass das in fast allen Fällen nicht geht (vgl. Wikipedia:Bildrechte).

So oder so, notwendig ist, dass Du in der Reihenfolge der gezeigten Bilder jeweils wenigstens folgendes angibst:

Verwendete Bilder:
1) [[Bild:xy.jpg]] - (Kurzbeschreibung zur schnellen Identifizierung) - Urheber: [[User:XY|XY]] - Lizenz: GFDL
2) [[Bild:xy.jpg]] - (z.B. Gänseblümchen) - Urheber: [[User:YZ|YZ]] - Lizenz: GFDL/CC-by-sa-2.0
usw. 

Wichtig übrigens: Du wirst nicht zum Autor, nur weil Du Bilder anderer Leute zusammenbastelst. Bitte korrigiere die entsprechenden Angaben.

Danke --Überraschungsbilder 23:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Überraschungsbilder, hast recht, in meine Bilderdarstellungen muss mehr Übersicht her. Werde es nachholen. Die Situation mit z. B. animierte Bilder die gemischt sind mit GFDL und cc-by ist mir allerdings nun etwas iritierend, weil bei wiki.de hieß von eine Userin (EvaK), dass es mit der Lizenzierung (siehe hier: Image:Blumen1.gif) die ich einsetzte in Ordnung ist.
Was ich zukünftig tun kann ist, einerseits von vorne herein die Bilder getrennt animieren, also nur GFDL oder nur cc-by ... Bilder erstellen und andererseits klar definierte Angaben über den Herkunft etc. zu den Photos machen. Viele Grüße --Magellan @_/" 11:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die schnelle Reaktion. Ich habe kurz geguckt, was Du gemacht hast und das sieht schon viel besser aus :-) Die Detailkontrolle überlasse ich Dir, Du weißt jetzt wohl, wo es drauf ankommt.
Sofern alle verwendeten Bilder z.B. GFDL und/oder GFDL+andere Lizenz aufweisen (PD sowieso), sollte eine Kombination möglich sein, nur nicht bei ungleichen Lizenzen, bei denen keine optionale Lizenz übereinstimmt.
Grüße --Überraschungsbilder 23:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Gut, gut, bin beruhigt, dass es nun besser ist. Die restlichen (auch animierte) Bilder werde ich etwas später bearbeiten, hoffe, dass es noch dieses Jahr klappt. Wie meinst Du folgendes: nur nicht bei ungleichen Lizenzen, bei denen keine optionale Lizenz übereinstimmt.? Gruß --Magellan 14:08, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian money

[edit]
Image deletion warning Following a generic deletion debate about copyright of money at various countries, one or more images uploaded by you has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests / Commons:Deletion requests/Brazil money (2007-03-03). We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Lugusto҉ 02:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, unfortunately the {{PD-BrazilGov}} don't apply to brazilian money and (also unfortunately) apparently Brazil don't have nothing releasing money representations into PD like USA and EU have. No one from Portuguese Wikipedia up today has found a solution for this copyright gap and I think that all imagens on Commons:Deletion requests/Brazil money (2007-03-03) may get deleted :( Lugusto 20:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

Hello :-) May have a look at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Liste_der_Nutzfahrzeughersteller#Informativ_und_Bilder - You may help us? Thank You :-) --217.229.249.1 20:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because of pictures in future ask here please: Bilderwerkstatt (German)

5 Pfg DDR Rudelburg

[edit]

Hallo Magellan, ich hatte mir zum Hochladen Deine Linzenzvorlage kopiert und konnte beim Einfügen nicht sehen, das Du als der Einscannende dann wieder mit auftauchen würde. Habe es gleich an Ort und Stelle vermerkt. Weiß aber nicht wie man das ggfls reparieren kann. Sorry! Herzlichst, --Kresspahl 21:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:1_Rupee.jpg

[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:1_Rupee.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 08:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:5-DM.jpg

[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:5-DM.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 12:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 12:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

If you know the breed of the horse, please mention it in the description. We have a lack of photos for the articles of Horse breeds but dont need much additional Photos without known breed. Kersti 21:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baha'u'llah image (religion1.gif)

[edit]

Hello, I'm requesting that you remove [Image:Bahaullah from miller.jpg] from [Image:Religion1.gif]. I can see by the usage that there is certainly no malicious intent but this is a very controversial image and, all other things being equal, it would be a great mark of respect to remove it. You can refer to Aniconism in the Bahá'í Faith and Talk:Bahá'u'lláh/Photo for more information on this subject. I'm sorry I don't speak German but this paragraph looks similar to the one on the en.wiki:

Um einer unangebrachten Bilderverehrung vorzubeugen und aus Respekt vor der Person des Religionsstifters, werden seitens der Bahai keine Darstellungen Baha’u’llahs vervielfältigt oder verbreitet. Jeder Bahai kann während einer neuntägigen Pilgerreise für eine kurze Zeit einen Blick auf ein Bild Baha’u’llahs werfen. Für die Vorstellung, wie Baha’u’llah auf die Menschen gewirkt hat, ist die Beschreibung, die ein westlicher Besucher von ihm gab, hilfreich:
In der Ecke, wo der Diwan an die Wand stieß, saß eine hoheitsvolle, ehrwürdige Gestalt mit jener Kopfbedeckung, wie sie bei den Derwischen Táj genannt wird (aber von ungewöhnlicher Höhe und Form), und um deren unteren Teil ein kleiner weißer Turban gewunden war. Das Antlitz, in das ich nun blickte, kann ich nie vergessen, obgleich ich nicht imstande bin, es zu beschreiben. Diese durchdringenden Augen schienen auf dem Grunde der Seele zu lesen. Macht und Würde lagen über diesen breiten Augenbrauen; die tiefen Falten auf Seiner Stirne und Seinem Gesicht verrieten ein Alter, das Sein tiefschwarzes Haar und der in üppiger Fülle bis zur Leibesmitte herabwallende Bart Lügen zu strafen schienen. Unnötig zu fragen, in wessen Gegenwart ich stand, als ich mich vor Dem verneigte, Der das Ziel einer Verehrung und Liebe ist, um die Ihn Könige beneiden könnten und nach der sich Kaiser vergeblich sehnen.
– Edward Granville Browne[33]
In der Darstellung der Bahai-Religion durch Außenstehende wird häufig ein Bild von Baha’u’llah genutzt, welches der christliche Missionar William McElwee Miller in seinem Buch „The Baha’i Faith: Its history and teachings“ veröffentlicht hat (siehe rechts).

Uncontroversial images associated with Baha'is can be found here. Thank you for your consideration. -LambaJan 20:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! -LambaJan 22:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted contents

[edit]

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  한국어  日本語  简体中文  繁體中文  עברית  العربية  +/−


Hello Magellan,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

Image:Ringgit.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions. Lugusto 21:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Magellan!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.
BotMultichillT 07:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flugzeuge2.11.06.gif

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flugzeuge2.11.06.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
High Contrast (talk) 23:28, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flugzeuge11.06.gif

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flugzeuge11.06.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
High Contrast (talk) 23:28, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tcup1.JPG

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tcup1.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Tcup1.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
Amada44  talk to me 08:08, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Briefmarke-D-vor1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:10, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Briefmarke2-D-vor1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:15, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Briefmarke3-D-vor1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 09:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates

[edit]

Hello,

I have just selected a couple of Images you have uploaded, which has duplicate in better resolutions;

File:Römisch Katholische Kirche in Csokvaomány.jpg
File:Csokvaomány-RomanCatholicChurch-Hungary-2.JPG
File:Csokvaomány-RomanCatholicChurch-Hungary-3.JPG
File:Csokvaomány-RomanCatholicChurch-Hungary-4.JPG
File:Csokvaomány-RomanCatholicChurch-Hungary-5.JPG
File:Csokvaomány-RomanCatholicChurch-Hungary-6.JPG

Regards,

-- ato (talk) 07:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, (talk) 16:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:100 Mill Pengoe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 13:33, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 14:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 20:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 22:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:4seasons.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 07:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]