User talk:Kungfuman/Archive
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
-- skINMATE 14:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright Image:R-Type-GBC-Cartridge.jpg
[edit]Pay attention to copyright | Image:R-Type-GBC-Cartridge.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image talk page.
|
Martin Rizzo 02:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright Image:KungFuMaster-GB-Cartridge.jpg
[edit]Pay attention to copyright | Image:KungFuMaster-GB-Cartridge.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image talk page.
|
Martin Rizzo 02:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning Image:R-Type-GBC-Cartridge.jpg
[edit]Image deletion warning | Image:R-Type-GBC-Cartridge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry. |
Cartridges are ok but it has nintendo artwork on it. thanks. (my english isn't so good but you can voice your opinion on its entry).
Martin Rizzo 12:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello, i realy dont think this image can be free, because a lot (maybe) of sprire are taken from Capcom games. ~ bayo or talk 07:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- OK. The software has a free licence, but maybe you're right. --Kungfuman 11:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I just move your category into this new name. ~ bayo or talk 10:07, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
File tagging File:Half-Life_2_arcade_neepster.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Half-Life_2_arcade_neepster.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Half-Life_2_arcade_neepster.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Half-Life_2_arcade_neepster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 20:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Hi, man. You delete a picture of Metroid that I upload from Flickr. I saw before others pictures of videogames that many of them have the box of the game, so I thought that I might not have a problem at all with uploading that picture. Sorry, thank you, and I promise not to do that again. See you later. --Ahabvader (talk) 17:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
File:Confrontation figure.jpg
[edit]Hi, warum hast du die Datei File:Confrontation figure.jpg gelöscht ? Mit dem Bild hatte ich kein Urheberrecht verletzt.
--Thiemo Schuff (schuff.eu) (talk) 13:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks "a lot". Nice career... Tchüß --El Carlos (talk) 06:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Luftkampf2
[edit]I needed a photograph of a cassette containing a computer game. I can hold my breath for a long time but probably not as long as it would take to have a photograph of a KIM-1 cassette to be uploaded here.
http://carol.gimp.org/GIMP/gimp-2.7/some_splash.php#luftkampf <-- it is the "this is not gimp-2.7 splash"
There are a lot of really great things about working with young people. This is going to be about one of the not-so fun things about working with them. If all a person gets to see is toddlers learning how to walk.... Whee!! You took your first step on two feet! And then the next one, Whee!! You took your first step on two feet! And then the next one, Whee!! You took your first step on two feet! ....
This group is a little older though. Due to the circumstances, the age, the lesson being learned -- it is usually not good to ask directly "have you beaten hunt the wumpus yet?" So there is a surplus of time spent being respectful and not asking if they have beat this one particular game yet and in this "time of respectful not asking" a lot of superiority from the recipient of the respectful not waiting is often exuded which makes it feel like I am saying to toddlers over and over again Whee!! You took your first step on two feet!
That being said, I am quite certain that this computer I use here -- that the design of the box was probably augmented by a gamer. I often cry when I take it apart, it is so perfect with snap together parts and about as perfect of a cooling design as can be made and still be so attractive and even the snap on decorative plate over the bays prevents me from acquiring the cheapest of addons. Do you know, they even included the correct number of screws needed for adding a new cdrom or whatever on the little plastic piece that gets removed when the piece is added? 3 for the cdrom bays, 4 for the floppy bay.
I admit, perfection is overwhelming to me and makes me cry. My computer box is such an instance of perfection.
Anyways, before I go dab my eyes (even writing about the perfection of this box does it to me), thanks for acquiring and uploading that image. I really really needed something like that and am grateful that it was here. -- carol (talk) 10:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Max Payne on PC
[edit]I honestly don't understand why you deleted the image. That's not copyright infringment, otherwise, why aren't File:Game & Watch NWS- Donkey Kong JR.jpg, File:Nintendo Game & Watch Donkey Kong JR.jpg, File:Zelda-Game&Watch.jpg, File:Super Mario Bros - Game & Watch NWS.JPG (to name a few) copyright infringment also? They even show a better image of the game than the one I added. Explain yourself. Melancolicsphere (talk) 14:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, Kungfuman, thanks for your reply! Well, I see what you are saying but the Game & Watch pictures clearly show the games, and the Max Payne picture you can hardly tell the logo is there, it is quite dark and out its normal colour. I never understand what happens in cases like this, because usually it seems like files are excluded purely out of admin's own individual views, leaving other images on Commons that would fall in the same case. Melancolicsphere (talk) 19:50, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for the explanation. Melancolicsphere (talk) 12:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Russian Scrapbooking Images
[edit]Hello.
- Category - ep.
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Scrap_old.jpg
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Scrap_albom.jpg
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Scrap2.jpg
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Scrap_old.jpg
- Copyright - http://rus-scrap.ru/wikipedia.html
- Autor about - http://rus-scrap.ru/contact.html
- --Ромуальд Лисовски (talk) 05:05, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. But the information should be in the image descriptions. And if possible not in russian. --Kungfuman (talk) 07:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Mario Kart Arcade GP videocrab.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Jappalang (talk) 02:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Game & Watch Fire Widescreen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Jappalang (talk) 03:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
I don't understand why you mark my own work as violation licensing. For you information, I am taking this picture by my own with my own camera and doesn't have intention to reproduce any of the comic character. The picture was taken during a Talk Show about launching a republished the famous comic "The Adventures of Tintin" in Indonesia, and I do believe I doesn't break any violation at all. So please reactivating it. Thank U NaidNdeso (talk) 02:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- I have read your explanation and some reference you gave to me and it's now clear to me why it's not allowed to show this kind of picture in Commons. Again, thank you very much for the explanation about it. RegardsNaidNdeso (talk) 10:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Your marking of my Image:Isolde Hallensleben.jpg as "derivative work of a copyrighted image" (which it isn't)...
[edit]Hello Kungfuman!
For your information: The Image:Isolde Hallensleben.jpg is a picture, entirely created by me. I had never heard of the website you were presenting a link to (chakana.nl), but you aroused my curiosity, so I went to take a look there.
As I already expected, it was most definitely them infringing on my copyright, instead of the other way around... Upon my first request they have sent me proof that they removed the picture from their site.
My reason for not using the "original shot" is quite simple: that was a rough image with poor quality, only meant as a starting point for the image I uploaded to Commons. Isolde owned a copy of that pic and without given it much thought she made a copy for Chakana (for which she recently became a goodwill ambassador) to use on their site. She, too, understands now that this should not have happened, and she apologized for letting it slip.
I am an author and graphical artist myself, and as such I have never infringed on any rights of my fellows ever. I am a creator, not a thief, and I take your trying to finger me as one extremely serious. And personal! -- Thor NL (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your swift reaction. I see no need whatsoever to send a usage permission to OTRS for a picture which is entirely my own work. That would be like giving myself permission to use my own picture as my own work. I have never done that; Commons does not require OTRS permissions for uploading your own work, and I will not be the first to do so regardless. Please look at my other uploaded work to see that I have always been very exact in working with licenses. Whenever I uploaded pictures from third parties I DID take care of OTRS permissions as required. This picture, however, does most definitely NOT fall into THAT category. Kind regards, Tom Ordelman. -- Thor NL (talk) 19:00, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Your Flickr uploads
[edit]Hello Kungfuman!
Thanks a lot for your contributions! Thank you for transferring images from Flickr to Commons! Two hints ahead:
- Always upload the highest resolution of a photograph that is available on flickr
- You can use this tool for your flickr uploads. It makes the hole procedure much easier and faster for you!
Thank you for your support! Greets, High Contrast (talk) 17:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- Du meinst wohl File:Ambush-arcade cabinet 1973.jpg , das gibts voll unter File:San Francisco Rush 2049-Ms Pacman-Ambush Gun-Dragonball.jpg. Ich brauchte zusätzlich einen Ausschnitt. EIn Tool brauche ich auch nicht. So viel lade ich nicht von Flickr hoch. --Kungfuman (talk) 18:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Musée Mécanique 239.JPG
[edit]Hi.
You should open a deletion request, there is:
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mus%C3%A9e_M%C3%A9canique_017.JPG
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mus%C3%A9e_M%C3%A9canique_238.JPG
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mus%C3%A9e_M%C3%A9canique_239.JPG
~ bayo or talk 19:21, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- I did a copyvio on the third 239, which only showed a near screenshot. The others are not clearly copyvios and show arcade cabinets like many others. Especially the one with a player. File:Donkey Kong arcade.png which even you had edited and stayed for years is not more copyvio. There are some more in Category:Musée Mécanique. Perhaps even all images are problematic as it's unclear if it's allowed to photograph other properties in this museum. I did some other copyvio, but will only make deletion proposals for obvious cases. But you might to do it if you want. --Kungfuman (talk) 19:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
File tagging Image:Ecran (1,25) de 19 pouces Gordes.JPG
[edit]It is a of me photo on the screen of 19 inch. So, it is an error this delete of this image. Thank, of to restaure this image.
C'est une de mes photo sur l'écran de 19 pouces. Donc, c'est une erreur cette suppression de cette image. Merci de restaurer cette image. Vi..Cult... (talk) 10:45, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- I can't restaure images as I'm no admin. I don't remember exactly, but I think it showed a copyrighted content on that monitor. If you have further questions, please ask User:Killiondude who deleted that image. --Kungfuman (talk) 12:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Warhammer images
[edit]I made an answer about the Warhammer images at my talk page. //Scouten (talk) 15:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Stuntcycle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kragenfaultier (talk) 08:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Filminou.JPG
[edit]Hi,
I took this picture at an exhibition (summer 2008). Sadly I don't remember artist name.
Regards, Julien
dein Problem mit meiner Datei
[edit]Hallo Kungfuman,
du hast mein User-Pic als Copyright-Problem markiert. Das kann ich nun so nicht ganz verstehen, da es sich nicht um ein Bild aus den Simpsons handelt, sondern um folgendes: Auf der beim Bild klar angegebenen Webseite kann man ein Foto von sich selbst hochladen und simpsonizen lassen - Käse, ja, aber wohl keine Copyrightverletzung. Es wäre also nett, wenn du diesen Baustein wieder entfernen würdest. -- Pommesgabel (talk) 08:16, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Man kann sich simpsonieren lassen, aber das Bild ist IMO trotzdem ein unfreies Derivat. Wo steht denn, dass man das veränderte Bild für alle Zwecke zB kommerziell weiterverwenden darf? Ich bin sicher, dass man dass nur für private, unkommerzielle Zwecke nutzen darf, sonst könnte ja auch die Konkurrenz dies verwenden. Und das ist bei diesem Kaliber von Franchise unvorstellbar. Leider funktioniert der Dienst nicht mehr und deshal steht dort zu der Lizenz nichts. Aber auch der Dienst ist von der komerziellen Seite. Als Userbild ist das nicht geeignet und zulässig, denn es ähnelt zu sehr einer Simpson-Figur denn eines Menschen. --Kungfuman (talk) 17:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Ok, schaun wir einfach mal, was die Checker hier sagen, ich sterb nicht ohne das Bild -- Pommesgabel (talk)
Space Tanks Cover art
[edit]Hallo !
ich versuche nun schon seit tagen nen blödes cover hochzuladen ...kannst du mir vielleicht mal verraten , wie das gehen soll?
zugegebenen...bin neu hier bei wiki, aber was zur hölle muss man alles anstellen, dass kein ober- schlauer bot dieses blöde cd-cover löscht ? (OHNE COPYRIGHT)
kannst Du mir mal nen dediziertes beispiel geben, was ich ins template zu schreiben habe oder wie ich's direkt nach wiki anstatt nach wiki common kriege ?
es geht um den artikel "space tanks" .... wollte nicht die ganzen ferien dran sitzen ;-( danke !
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Drecksackblase (talk • contribs) Antwort folgt gleich bei dir. --Kungfuman (talk) 14:24, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Donkey Kong arcade - zapwizard 34102189.jpg
[edit]Ouf! Anyway, I dont know how many time it will exists in Commons :-) CU. ~ bayo or talk 12:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
File:Philips Odyssey 2001.png
[edit]Hello! Can you explain me the problem of my image, so I will not make this error next time? The problem is the presence of the box/case containing the console? If so, can I remove the box/case from the image and resubmit the image to resolve the problem? Thank you, --Arosio Stefano (talk) 20:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
File:Chucks Challenge iPhone.jpg
[edit]I own the right to the picture, what do you need me to do to say it's OK? I sent serveral email the last time and no-one answered them. Please help the http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates page makes no sense whatsoever. (Allack (talk) 16:38, 3 May 2011 (UTC))
- Now it's OK and OTRS received. --Kungfuman (talk) 16:11, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
M
[edit]HI KUNGFUMAN .....WHAT IS PROBLEM OF MY PHOTO File:2011-05-11 02-44-46 866 Iran.jpg YOURE DELETED IT? IT WAS IMAGE THAN FORZA 3 MOTORSPORT AND I CREATE IT ....I MUST TOO SET SECRET FOR GAME SERIAL NUMBER ON THE GAME PACK??
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Milad Mosapoor (talk • contribs) Images were deleted by an admin. Images showing copyrighted covert arts. Please read links in the blue box above. --Kungfuman (talk) 14:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 18:13, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:EstradaRealDigital.jpg was uncategorized on 16 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:13, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Torpedo Fist.jpg
[edit]Hi, I don't understand why this file is reported for copyright violation: I shoot this picture, so where is it the violation? -- Il Passeggero - I love to love you 18:48, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- See File talk:Torpedo Fist.jpg and description in Category:Action figures. Action figures are copyrighted franchise and so pictures can't have a free license as they shows copyrighted objects. --Kungfuman (talk) 18:03, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Hase Felix
[edit]Hallo Kungfuman, warst du das auch? Falls ja, hat dieses Stofftier wirklich eigene Schöpfungshöhe gegenüber anderen Stoffhasen? --Túrelio (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Nein, das war ich nicht. Keine Ahnung ob es hier eine SH gibt. Vermutlich ja, da es sich um ein Lizenzprodukt handelt. --Kungfuman (talk) 17:59, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
PacMan free licensed-file
[edit]I changed your speedy deletion tag into a discussion. Characters can't be copyrighted under English law, am I missing some Commons guideline that is relevant to the situation? Diego Moya (talk) 10:06, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- Also in case that the characters requires a fair use rationale to be used in Wikipedia, is there a tool to automate the movement of a file from Commons to Wikipedia? I'd like to provide a fair use rationale for the other PacMan images that you tagged for deletion, but I don't want to download and re-upload all them. Diego Moya (talk) 10:49, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Nicolas gaume.png
[edit]Hello, Kungfuman. You have new messages at User talk:Beaubourientouslesjours#File tagging File:Nicolas gaume.png.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
-- Trevj (talk) 12:19, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 22:24, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Ernst Juenger stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lovy Singhal (talk) 12:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 13:59, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Eichelkondom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MSJapan (talk) 23:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 09:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Scherzratte2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vikiçizer (talk) 21:52, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
File:Amigurumi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vikiçizer (talk) 13:43, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Datei:180-Grad-Kino-fix.jpg
[edit]Hallo Kungfuman, auf der Diskussionsseite zum Artikel Traumlandpark in der Wikipedia geht es momentan um die Bezeichnung des 180-Grad-Kinos des Parks, Cinema 2000 und Cinema 180 stehen zur Diskussion. Bist Du Dir sicher, dass Dein Foto das 180-Grad-Kino im Traumlandpark in Bottrop-Kirchhellenzeigt? Vielleicht könntest Du Dich auf der entspr. Seite dazu äußern. Vielen Dank dafür schonmal im Voraus. Besten Gruß, Dachbewohner (talk) 10:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Dein Bild wird ja nun wahrlich oft eingebunden. Falls die Briefmarke dir gehört, kannst du bitte ein neues Bild mit besserer Qualität hochladen. Seit 2007 hat sich ja bei der Hardware einiges getan ... Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 15:49, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Die Briefmarke ist in dieser Qualität. Zudem gibt es ja ständig Probleme mit den Urhebberrechten. Fast alle Briefmarken werden ja gelöscht. --Kungfuman (talk) 17:01, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Tagging copyvios
[edit]Hi, When tagging copyvios, please inform the uploader. This is best done with the gadget. See in your preferences. Thanks for your help. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:46, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- I always inform the uploader, although it's much work. Maybe not each time for multiple images. --Kungfuman (talk) 12:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jarekt (talk) 12:47, 1 October 2015 (UTC) Jarekt (talk) 12:47, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Correlatio (talk) 20:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Hologramm-Briefmarke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Correlatio (talk) 23:56, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Correlatio (talk) 18:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Liliana-60 (talk) 23:22, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 18:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Amigurumi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |