User talk:Koppchen

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to the Commons, Koppchen!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Sz-iwbot 16:21, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Orotava Cementerio 04.jpg

[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Orotava Cementerio 04.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 16:21, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Orotava Calvario 02.jpg

[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Orotava Monteverde 02.jpg

[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Orotava Monteverde 02.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 15:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong

[edit]

Sorry if you had to wait, by the way, now the images are ok. Sorry again, --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 09:25, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Puerto_Galdo_02.jpg

[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Puerto_Galdo_02.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 22:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:151149332 78dbc49069 m.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright Image:151149332 78dbc49069 m.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--mattbuck (Talk) 20:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Koppchen!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 17:30, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hola

[edit]

Hola, muchas gracias por subir fotos de Santa Cruz de Tenerife, puedes subir fotos también de su patrimonio artistico como por ejemplo su arte sacro que es riquisimo sobre todo de las iglesias de san francisco y la concepcion (posee retablos que son obras de arte), también el interior se sus museos como el de la naturaleza y el hombre. gracias por subir foto de cada rincon de santa cruz.

Disculpe que no puedo responder en Español. Sé leer pero no sé escribir en Español. So I hope English will do. I am going to take pictures of all important places in Santa Cruz de Tenerife and – of cause – of the churches too. For the museums you normally need special permissions. At the moment I am busy with “escultura en la calle” and all kinds of memorials. My first intension is to improve the German Wikipedia in regard to Tenerife “en general” – pictures as well as texts. For me it is easier to take the pictures than to improve the texts. For there is no reliable information in German to be quoted. I think, the German Wiki-Fans don’t trust my translations! (and perhaps they are right). Kind regards --Koppchen (talk) 21:30, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Negret 02.jpg

[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:56, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


Hallo Koppchen, habe dir in Commons:Help_desk#File:Negret_02.jpg geantwortet. Danke für das Foto! Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 13:58, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, nochmal ich, ich hab gerade mal deinen anderen ganzen Fotos kurz angesehen. Hier ein Verbesserungsvorschlag - weil ich sah, dass du "red sculptures" übernommen hast. Bei der Maskierung des Hintergrunds sind dir übrigens ein paar kleine Fehlerchen unterlaufen - wenn man genau Hinsieht. Wenn man das Bild nicht in groß anschaut, sieht es in der bearbeiteten Version aber schon besser aus. Optimal ist halt, wenn man den unscharfen Hintergrund schon gleich beim Fotografieren durch geringe Schärfentiefe erzeugt. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 22:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Saibo! Im Prinzip ja - aber! Bei der Aufnahme kann man bei einer Halbformatkamera so eine offene Blende gar nicht haben um, bei der doch großen Entfernung, den Hintergrund unscharf zu bekommen. Aber ich glaube, die neue Version von Martin Chirino 01 ist nicht mehr zu beanstanden. Bei anderen Bildern hatte ich eben noch nicht so den Dreh raus.Da muss ich noch mal drüber gehen. Der Hinweis "Dieses Bild wurde digital nachbearbeitet…" gefällt mir. Ich werde ihn in Zukunft anwenden. Dabei ist die erste hochgeladene Version natürlich nicht das Original sondern auch schon bearbeitet (aber eben nicht besonders gut). Auf jeden Fall vielen Dank für die Kritik. --Koppchen (talk) 01:17, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plaza de España

[edit]

Hallo Rémi!

Du hast im Juli 2003 ein sehr schönes Foto der Plaza de España in Santa Cruz de Tenerife gemacht. Es zeigt den Platz vor der Umgestaltung. Ich beabsichtige den Artikel über die Plaza de España in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia zu überarbeiten. Dazu habe ich Dein Foto etwas verändert und dabei den Schwerpunkt etwas mehr auf das Monumento de los Caidos gelegt. Ich hoffe Du bist mit der Veränderung einverstanden.--Koppchen (talk) 13:10, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, kein Problem, das Foto ist mit der neuen Gestaltung noch besser.--Florival fr (talk) 20:05, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Danke! Es dauert aber wohl noch einige Zeit bis ich es einbinden kann,--Koppchen (talk) 20:16, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camara de Comercio 01.jpg

[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


File:Blasco 03.jpg

[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:19, 20 July 2012 (UTC)


File:Patos 32.jpg

[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:54, 21 August 2012 (UTC)


File:José Francisco Morazán 01.jpg

[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Tenerife forums, I advise you to go to San Cristobal de La Laguna, there are many things to photograph onitas elemplo as the surroundings of the Church of Concepcion and elsewhere.--83.41.95.104 11:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do know! In 2008 I took a lot of pictures of La Laguna, La Orotava, Puerto de la Cruz … (Have a look for example at the Category:Buildings in San Cristóbal de La Laguna) Things have changed and I changed my camera too. So when I come to a certain point in Santa Cruz de Tenerife I will concentrate on other villages as Tacoronte, were I am living now.--Koppchen (talk) 12:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 21:39, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Koppchen,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 13:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello

[edit]

You can take pictures of the Anaga as San Andrés its impressive castle and church, Taganana, Igueste, etc...--81.36.123.137 19:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ugarte 02.jpg

[edit]

Es que en la descripción pone Gipúzcoa y eso me ha confundido.--Sebasweee (talk) 19:38, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ya lo he arreglado, lo siento.--Sebasweee (talk) 19:41, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

El artista Ricardo Ugarte viene de Gipúzcoa.--Koppchen (talk) 19:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Vale, espero que mi error no haya ocasionado demasiados problemas.--Sebasweee (talk) 23:00, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:20120523 1384K1.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Koppchen, dem Anschein nach dürfte diese Skulptur neueren Datums und daher geschützt sein. Selbst wenn das Foto gem. Panoramafreiheit o.k. sein dürfte, musst du aber den Namen des Künstlers und möglichst auch der Skulptur angeben. Auch der Dateiename ist völlig ungeeignet. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio! Eben um diese Angaben, die mir fehlen, zu erhalten habe ich das Bild hochgeladen und Laranablanca der sich da wohl auskennt auf der spanischen Wikipedia gebeten die Sachen auszufüllen. Panoramafreiheit ist gegeben.--Koppchen (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ich halte die Aufnahme nicht für so bedeutend, dass sie unbedingt in Commons erscheinen müsste aber Laranablanca scheint so etwas zu suchen. Wenn er die Angaben nicht in angemessener Zeit einfügt kann das Bild von mir aus auch gelöscht werden.--Koppchen (talk) 20:54, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
O.k., den FOP-Baustein hatte ich schon eingesetzt. Dann bleib aber bitte dran, damit ich das erstmal vergessen kann. --Túrelio (talk) 20:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Túrelio! Es tut mir leid, dass ich Dir Arbeit bereitet habe. Ich habe gerade einen Löschantrag für das Bild gestellt. Ich hatte es bereits im letzten Jahr hochgeladen.--Koppchen (talk) 21:54, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 17:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Hi, thanks for this plant of the Church of the Immaculate Conception: File:Concepción3.jpg. You can do anything but plant Candelaria's Basilica?: Basilica of Candelaria.--79.151.45.106 12:39, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola!
I will have a look to find a ground plan of Basilica de Candelaria to redraw it. The plan of Concepción I drew to use it in a new article about that church for the Wikipedia in German language. My pattern for this was the plan in the book of Cioranscu Historia de Santa Cruz de Tenerife II 1494 – 1803 P. 401 --Koppchen (talk) 20:16, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola

[edit]

Hola, quisiera preguntarte algo, ¿tienes fotos de la Estatua de Juan Pablo II que se encuentra en la Iglesia de la Concepción de La Laguna?. Es esta estatua. Gracias.--81.35.207.157 11:15, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, no tengo. En el momento no es possible fotografia cosas normales en la iglesia. Todo esta en desorden por la Semana Santa. Mañana tengo mas fotos de la Iglesia con los santos listo para los procesiones.--Koppchen (talk) 11:23, 17 March 2013 (UTC) ¡Perdón! Mis fotos son de Santa Cruz. En la iglesia Concepción de La Laguna hay una prohibición de fotografiar.--Koppchen (talk) 11:30, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias, pero la estatua está en via publica no en el interior de la iglesia. La estatua esta junto a la puerta de entrada en la plaza Doctor Oliviera. Usted ya ha sacado fotos de esa plaza (ver aquí) y se ve esa estatua, pero está de espalda y muy lejos.
OK -¡Proxima semana!--Koppchen (talk) 12:52, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Habemus papam Juan Pablo II File:Juan Pablo II 01.jpg, File:Juan Pablo II 02.jpg--Koppchen (talk) 16:53, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Muchas gracias.
Gracias a su ayuda he podido crear este artículo, mil gracias: Monumento al Papa Juan Pablo II (San Cristóbal de La Laguna).--81.34.255.118 19:13, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias

[edit]

Muchas gracias por su ayuda y por sus fotos de la Iglesia de la Concepción y San Francisco, si quiere puede visitar otras iglesias de la ciudad que también se preparan para la Semana Santa como la Iglesia del Pilar y la de San José. Por otro lado, también puede vistar el pueblo de San Andrés y fotografíar su castillo (que es uno de los monumentos históricos más importantes de Tenerife) y la bella iglesia. Esto son solo sujerencias, en cualquier caso, gracias por sus fotos.--79.158.243.206 08:08, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rotonda San Lázaro.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Koppchen, zu dem Bild möchte ich dir einen kleinen Tip geben. Bei Fotos von modernen Skulpturen in Spanien empfiehlt es sich, bei der Lizenz gleichzeitig den Baustein {{FoP-Spain}} zu verwenden. Das ist ein rechtlicher Hinweis darauf, dass in Spanien Panoramafreiheit besteht, und man derartige Kunstwerke ungestraft ablichten darf. Und bei der Gelegenheit auch gleich der Hinweise auf Category:Sculptures in Tenerife. Gruß, De728631 (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nu eben! Den Baustein öffentliches Kunstwerk, Panoramafreiheit usw. gebe ich dann ein, wenn ich sicher bin von wem verrostete Blechhaufen ist. Ich gehe davon aus, das Laranablanca, den ich gebeten habe den Rest einzutragen, sich da auskennt.--Koppchen (talk) 14:23, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Na, älter als 70 Jahre wird der Rosthaufen wohl nicht sein. Dann lassen wir Laranablanca mal den Rest machen. :) De728631 (talk) 14:27, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, der von mir verdächtigte Künstler José Abad lebt noch!--Koppchen (talk) 14:31, 10 April 2013 (UTC) Aber wenn den sein muss! auch FoP-Spain--Koppchen (talk) 14:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Santa Cruz de Tenerife

[edit]

Hallo / Hello / Hola / Hej

Hello, Koppchen. You have new messages at Jonkerz's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Hola

[edit]

Hola gracias por sus fotos. Tiene usted fotos del interior del Museo de la Naturaleza y el Hombre y de las Momias guanches?¿.--81.37.85.199 18:25, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

¡No, no Tengo!--Koppchen (talk) 18:37, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For uploading new versions from File:Gent Coupure 082.JPG and 083.JPG Lotje (talk) 12:26, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Academiepaleis en tuin

[edit]

Hallo Koppchen, währen Sie so nett diese Nummernschilder unlesbar zu machen? Danke. Lotje (talk) 11:47, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

und dieses Lotje (talk) 08:45, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Lotje (talk) 05:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dieses auch noch wenn möglich Lotje (talk) 05:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank youLotje (talk) 15:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Koppchen, ich hätte da noch eine Frage bezüglich dieses Bild. Wähen Sie so nett auch hier dass Nummernschild unlesbar zu machen? Lotje (talk) 07:01, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen vielen Dank. Lotje (talk) 18:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Koppchen, only me again, dieses Nummernschild sollte vielleicht auch unlesbar gemacht werden. Was meinen Sie? Lotje (talk) 12:19, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dankeschön. Wissen Sie ob es eine Kategorie gibt wo ich files mit identifizierbare Nummernschilder linken könnte? Ich meinte ja. Lotje (talk) 03:08, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola

[edit]

Hola quisiera saber si tienes alguna foto de [esta estatua http://fotos00.laopinion.es/fotos/noticias/318x200/2010-11-25_IMG_2010-11-25_01:56:30_25lo10afot1.jpg], para colocarla en un recién creado artículo: Monumento al Padre José de Anchieta (San Cristóbal de La Laguna). Gracias.--81.36.123.238 18:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fiestas de Mayo 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 19:20, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

La Laguna

[edit]

Hello. You have created in 2014 the categories "Lunes Santo", "Martes Santo" and "Pasos en las Iglesias" about the village of San Cristóbal de la Laguna, in Tenerife. If you want create a category you must be more explicit with the names because, for instance, Martes Santo is the translation to Spanish of Holy Tuesday and its celebrated in the whole Spain so someone should believe that the category Martes Santo is for all the pictures of that they in all the municipalities. An accurate name should be, for instance, "Martes Santo in La Laguna". I have moved the pictures of the category "Pasos en las Iglesias" to the category "Pasos en las iglesias de La Laguna" because in all the places where pasos exists sometimes they are inside the churches (iglesias) before of the procession.--CarlosVdeHabsburgo (talk) 17:49, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:27, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jungfrau von Candelaria

[edit]

Muchas gracias por la felicitación por la foto de la Virgen de Candelaria. Ahora he puesto la foto en el artículo "Jungfrau von Candelaria", en Wikipedia en idioma alemán, con este pie de foto: "Statue in der Basilika von Candelaria (Teneriffa)". No sé si sería mejor poner "Bild von..", o "Figur von...", en vez de "Statue...". https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungfrau_von_Candelaria Saludos,--Carlos Teixidor Cadenas (talk) 10:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola Carlos! "Statue" es correcto, "Figur" también. "Bild" en idioma alemán es pintura sólo. ¡Saludos!--Koppchen (talk) 10:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:La recova 022 Lechuga batavia.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:35, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Magog, sorry, but I can't see what should be wrong with the licenses. --Koppchen (talk) 09:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ermita de Regla, Santa Cruz de Tenerife

[edit]

Hola, se puede aclarar esta foto está muy oscura. Saludos: Virgen de Regla.--87.223.26.243 09:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SÍ SE PUEDE – pero esta borrosa y tiene baja resolución.--Koppchen (talk) 09:19, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Catedral de San Cristóbal de La Laguna

[edit]

El retablo en mal estado de la capilla de la Purísima de la catedral de La Laguna (cuya fotografía sin restaurar usted había realizado) ya ha sido restaurado según he podido leer en el texto del artículo respectivo. ¿Habría alguna manera de añadir una fotografía reciente del mismo? Saludos.--Zumalabe (talk) 20:35, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Puerto Amaro 11.jpg

[edit]
File:Puerto Amaro 11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Discasto talk 17:08, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Re:Nutzung von Fotos

[edit]

Hallo Koppchen! Ich "google" mich zwar relativ regelmäßig und bekomme gelegentlich Belegexemplare von Publikationen, die meine Bilder verwenden, aber dieser Artikel ist mir noch nicht untergekommen - also vielen Dank für den Hinweis ! Ist vielleicht eine Motivation, noch ein paar Aufnahmen von den Kanaren hochzuladen. Nochmals danke und lg -- Wolfgang Sauber (talk) 11:19, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Torriani

[edit]

File:La Laguna Torriani 1590.jpg

Is 1588 not 1590: https://issuu.com/arsdidas/docs/unidad_did__ctica_plano_de_torriani — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.223.125.110 (talk) 23:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toledo-catedral-de.png

[edit]

Guten Abend Koppchen,

  • zuerst einmal allgemeines Lob für deine klare Grafik.
  • dann spezielles Lob, dass du für ein Gebäude in Spanien primär einen auf Spanisch beschrifteten Plan erstellt hast.

Trotzdem habe ich versucht, bei der deutsch beschrifteten Version ein paar Dinge besser zu machen:

  • PNG-Format, denn JPG spart zwar bei Fotos an Datenvolumen, wird aber mit jedem Bearbeiten und Abspeichern schmieriger.
  • Schriftgröße: Nach Möglichkeit sollen die Leser/innen die Beschriftungen in der Projektionsgröße einer Grafik lesen können, in der sie in einen WP-Artikel eingebunden ist.
  • Die Farbsignaturen habe ich versucht, etwas logischer zu gestalten: Heiligtümer in Rottönen, Team- und Wartungsbereiche in Grüntönen.

Beste Grüße, --Ulamm (talk) 18:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P. S. Deine Bemerkungen zu informativen versus stimmungsvollen Belichtungen haben meine volle Zustimmung.--Ulamm (talk) 18:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Universidad de Alcalá de Henares. PortadaK.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Universidad de Alcalá de Henares. PortadaK.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Universidad de Alcalá de Henares. PortadaK.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Universidad de Alcalá de Henares. PortadaK.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auditorio Nord 02.jpg

[edit]

Hi Koppchen! I’ve used your photo of Auditorium of Tenerife for the 437th ArchiGuesser, thank you for your great photos!! Flibust1er (talk) 10:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 04:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Chaves Báculo.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chaves Báculo.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Koppchen&oldid=816310649"