User talk:Zetpe0202

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Zetpe0202!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Edytowałeś to na pliku svg czy png? A co do licencji to zaznacz w źródle ze na podstawie i odnośnik do pliku. Winnetou14 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winnetou14 (talk • contribs) 14:52, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

zdjęcia

Fajnie, że dodajesz nowe zdjęcia, ale mam małą uwagę. Nie dodawaj zdjęć do wszystkich możliwych kategorii, lecz staraj się wybrać tą najbardziej pasującą. Jeżeli dajesz kategorie podrzędną, to nie dodawaj kategorii nadrzędnej. Bartek444 (talk) 19:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Witaj

dzięki za podpowiedź, ale ja się uczę i wiem że robię błędy, jestem bardzo wdzięczny za krytykę, wiem że mam problemy z kategoryzacją.

Pozdrawiam i polecam się

ZetZetpe0202 (talk) 19:29, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Podstawowe rady masz powyżej. Jeżeli nie możesz wybrać kategorii spróbuj użyć narzędzia CommonSense.

Zarówno tu jak i na wiki odpowiadaj na stronach dyskusji tych co do Ciebie piszą.

pozdrawiam Bartek444 (talk) 20:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Zetpe0202!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Logo SC Wanda Krakow ,Poland.jpg was uncategorized on 2 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Staraj się jak najdokładniej określić kategorię dla dodawanego przez Ciebie zdjęcia. Nie dodawaj kategorii nadrzędnych. Zgodnie z propozycjami projektu WLZ dla zabytków powinno założyć się nową kategorię jeśli jeszcze nie ma. Dalej rób zdjęcia, twórz i poprawiaj artykuły na wiki. Gratulacje za ilość i wytrwałość.

PS Widziałem, że próbowałeś kiedyś stworzyć swoją galerię i dlatego dodałem część Twoich zdjęć tu.--Bartek444 (talk) 14:31, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Bądź pochwalon dobry człowieku

Za te wszystkie foty! Willa Baszta - cudo!--Nietzsche (talk) 21:22, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Category:Church of St. Vincent Pallotti in Kraków

Helo, gratuluję ładnych zdjęć. Czy jesteś jednak pewny, że wezwanie tej parafii to Wincenty Pallotti, a nie Wincenty a Paulo? Pozdrawiam serdecznie, Paterm (talk) 23:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Dziękuję za odpowiedź! Bartek jest pewien, że odpust tego kościoła wypada 22 stycznia, więc jest to na pewno "starszy" od Pallottiego Wincenty - Wincenty z Saragossy. (a zmienić nazwę już załadowanego pliku mogą tylko commons-administratorzy) Pozdrawiam, Paterm (talk) 21:59, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Pozwalają wykorzystać swoje zdjęcie

Hello, Zetpe0202! I know that I am free to share (to copy, distribute and transmit) your works published here due to free lincences. And I want to upload this photo to the TRANSPORT AUTOBUSOWY galeria zdjęć autobusów, but administration of this site requires the consent of the author to publish his photo there. If you agree, just write about it here or you can register yourself there and spend uploading from first-hand. Sorry for English. Yours sincerely, Sidik iz PTU (talk) 16:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Krakow Philharmonic Hall, 1 Zwierzyniecka street, Krakow, Poland.jpg

Cześć. Musiałem usunąć z pliku info, ze został on przesłany we wrześniowym konkursie - był przesłany w lutym. BTW - czapki z głów za Kraków. Przykuta → [edit] 14:57, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Parę innych też. Nie martw się - nie jesteś jedyny, który nie przeczytał tego (mimo że pisałem pogrubionymi literami), że w konkursie liczą się jedynie te nadesłane we wrześniu. Przykuta → [edit] 15:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

e-mail

Cześć. To jeszcze raz ja :) Nie masz aktywnego maila. Możesz go dodać w preferencjach - nie będzie widoczny dla innych, ale dzięki niemu mogła będzie się z tobą kontaktować komisja konkursowa, gdyby to twoje zdjęcia nagradzano. Pozdrawiam. Przykuta → [edit] 17:35, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Zetpe0202, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 14:40, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Zabytki

A zerknij proszę tutaj: [1] i [2]. Mi świta, że były gdzieś oficjalne zalecenia mające na celu unifikację opisów zabytków, ale niech mnie gęś kopnie jeśli pamiętam, gdzie to było. Albo zapytaj Karola, on w tym siedzi. Masur (talk) 07:37, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Andrzej Szczeklik

• Czy odwiedzisz jeszcze kiedyś krakowski Salwatorski ? Stografujesz jego grób ? Pleonazm9084 (talk) 07:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Cmentarz Batowicki

• Nic złego się nie stało, bo jednak dość szybko uzyskałem od Ciebie odpowiedź :) Czy jest szansa że odwiedzisz również tę nekropolię ? Bardzo bym prosił o Andrzeja Zauchy, Michała Łyska oraz Bogdana Łyszkiewicza. W hasłach na Wikipedii dotąd brak jakichkolwiek fotek. I mam jeszcze prośbę o uwzględnienie wszystkich napisów, bo wiesz może się zdarzyć się że w chwili odwiedzin coś tam przysłania jakiś okazały bukiet czy znicz. Spróbuj tak jak w przypadku zamieszczonych w mojej dyskusji piosenkarza Jacka Lecha. Z góry serdecznie Ci dziękuję ! Pleonazm9084 (talk) 14:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
• Oczywiście cierpliwie poczekam, nawet 2 miesiące, bo rozumiem że jest duża szansa ! Tylko żeby zdążyć przed pierwszymi śniegami, bo foty już nie będą atrakcyjne Pleonazm9084 (talk) 10:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
• O !!! To lotem błyskawicy wykonałeś ! Mam rozumieć że Batowicki jest dla Ciebie na wyciągnięcie ręki ? Pleonazm9084 (talk) 15:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Andrzej Zaucha

• Ma zupełnie nowy pomnik. A czy mogę Cię prosić jeszcze przy okazji kolejnej wizyty o uwiecznienie całej jego sylwetki ? Pleonazm9084 (talk) 17:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Batowicki

• Skoro nie stanowi dla Ciebie poważnego problemu, więc proszę jeszcze o 1.ANDRZEJ FIRST 2.JERZY BEREŚ 3.JAN KACZARA 4.WOJCIECH ŚWIĄTKOWSKI 5.KAZIMIERZ PASZUCHA

PS I jeszcze taka uwaga: staraj się właśnie zawsze w pogodne dni to realizować, NIE MUSISZ NATYCHMIAST, spokojnie poczekam :) Jeszcze raz bardzo dziękuję za wszelkie wysiłki ! Pleonazm9084 (talk) 17:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Zetpe0202, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Zetpe0202, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wojsko Polskie w Krakowie

Skoro lubisz robić zdjecia....Zobacz jakie tu masz pole do popisu [3]. Zrób zdjecia koszar i dopasuj je do odpowiednich jednostek w podkategoriach. Rób też zdjecia zlikwidowanych koszar. Gdybyś mógł wstawić do artykułów współrzedne geograficzne -byłoby super:)--keriM (talk) 20:50, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

• jasne - przy okazji. Mamy czas:)--keriM (talk) 10:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Infobox Baza - przyznam ze jestem troche monotematyczny. Nie używam infoboxu baza baza i boję się na jego temat wypowiadać. Używam często infoboxu jednostka wojskowa. Moje prywatne zdanie odnośnie współrzednych - sądze że ze wszech miar potrzebne. Przy jednostkach wojskowych piszemy je nad artykułem, a jesli jest taka potrzeba(np straznice WOP), piszemy przy sekcji "struktura organizacyjna". Osobiście "przeraża mnie" automatycznie generowana poteżna mapa:) Infoboź przybiera wtedy kształt monstrum w stosunku do treści. A pzrecież w infoboxie jest miejsce stacjonowania - i to, moim zdaniem wystarczy.

co do zdjęć - jesli wszystko dobzre z licencjami - należy je wstawiać--keriM (talk) 19:42, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Błędne podpisy do fotografii: Chrzanów, kościół Św. Mikołaja

Znalazłem dodane przez Ciebie 2 fotografie fasady i wnętrza kościoła Św. Mikołaja w Chrzanowie [File:St. Lawrence Church and bell tower, 5 Mickiewicza street, City of Chrzanów, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland.jpg] i [File:St. Lawrence Church (interior), 5 Mickiewicza street, City of Chrzanów, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland.jpg] niestety zatytuowane i podpisane błędnie jako kościół św. Wawrzyńca (poprawna nazwa kościoła znajduje się wypisana na tablicy z jego historią przy głównym wejściu do świątyni). Podpisy pod fotografiami poprawiłem, błędną tytulaturę zdjęć nie mogę. Może zrobisz to Ty. Podejrzewam, że błąd jaki zakradł się do podpisów wynika z korzystania przez Ciebie z jednego z błędnych wpisów do polskich encyklopedii i przewodników, które sam widziałem. Ktoś błędnie nazwał kiedyś w jednej z tych publikacji chrzanowski kościół imieniem św. Wawrzyńca i błąd ten został bezkrytycznie powielony w licznych kolejnych publikacjach na zasadzie copy and paste. Chrzanowski kościół nigdy nie nosił imienia św. Wawrzyńca i od swego powstania w średniowieczu znany był zawsze jako kościół Św. Mikołaja i tak pozostaje do dzisiaj. Porównaj strony internetowe parafii św. Mikołaja w Chrzanowie [[4]] lub tę www.chrzanow.dk rozdział: Zabytki obecne. Pozdrowienia, Kiejstut9 (talk) 12:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Kiejstut9 (polska Wikipedia)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Zetpe0202⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Chrzanów, kościół Św. Mikołaja

Dziękuję za odpowiedź. W sumie dość przypadkowo natknąłem się na Twoje fotografie z Chrzanowa. Jak pisałem ktoś kiedyś omyłkowo „przechrzcił” chrzanowski kościół i nieprawidłowa nazwa jest powielana tu i ówdzie. Fajnie, że fotografujesz również Chrzanów. Serdeczne pozdrowienia i życzę wielu udanych sesji fotograficznych. Kiejstut9 (talk)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Zetpe0202,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Photo of Dudayev

	Photo of Dudayev
	Hello, Mr. Zetpe0202! Can you tell me please about this photo - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dzhokhar_Dudayev,_President_of_the_Chechen_Republic_1991-1996.jpg? Is it from book or may be magazine? Thank you very much. My mail - anv-12@yandex.ru. Ammian (talk) 21:08, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Jarosław Śmietana

• Czy odwiedzisz Rakowicki i sfotografujesz jego grób ? Pleonazm9084 (talk) 06:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
• Dla pewnego ułatwienia szukania: oto link
• Ale proszę spróbuj ! Lato, wakacje, czyż nie wyśmienite warunki ? Pleonazm9084 (talk) 06:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Dzhokhar Dudayev, President of the Chechen Republic 1991-1996.jpg

Yours sincerely, Underlying lk (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Rakowicki Cemetery, grave of Adam Chmiel, 26 Rakowicka street, Kraków, Poland.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rakowicki Cemetery, grave of Adam Chmiel, 26 Rakowicka street, Kraków, Poland.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Rakowicki Cemetery, grave of Stanisław Krzyżanowski, 26 Rakowicka street, Kraków, Poland.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Beksński - galeria

Zdjęcie skupiało się na ekspozycji dzieł ZB (stanowiły one główny element kompozycji), a te są chronione prawem autorskim. Dostępność publiczna nie ma tutaj znaczenia. Masur (talk) 15:32, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Cmentarz Rakowicki

Cześć. Widzę że dodawałeś zdjęcia z Cmentarza Rakowickiego. Gdybyś jeszcze kiedyś wykonywał zdjęcia nagrobków tam, to może udało by Ci się znaleźć kilka takowych (w kolejności alfabetycznej; w niektórych przypadkach w biogramach na Wikipedii jest podane położenie pochówku):

• pl:Władysław Belina-Prażmowski
• pl:Kazimierz Bogacz (geolog)
• pl:Piotr Burzyński
• pl:Leon Getz
• pl:Marian Kruczek
• pl:Janusz Kurtyka
• pl:Bronisław Laskownicki
• pl:Teofil Modelski
• pl:Józef Morawski
• pl:Kazimierz Piech
• pl:Tadeusz Olbrycht
• pl:Stefan Schoengut-Strzemieński
• pl:Stanisław Stojałowski
• pl:Władysław Szafer
• pl:Tadeusz Vetulani
• pl:Aleksander Wareński
• pl:Andrzej Wołkowski

Pzdr. Lowdown (talk) 16:27, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Khatchkar in Krakow, 9 Kopernika street,Poland.jpg

Hi Zetpe0202, i wonder if you could provide the GPS coordinates of the object in linked photo? Thanks, --Arnd (talk) 19:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Zdjęcia

Co do NAC, to jak widzisz u mnie w dyskusji, toczy się na ten temat dyskusja precyzująca. Ja publikowalem zdjecia pochodzace z NAC, gdyz wczesniej zauwazylem, że inni także je publikowali w commons. Co do kwestii ublikacji tych zdjęć lub tych z Jugoslawii to proszę spytaj o to bardziej kompetentne osoby czyli polskich adminów. POlecam np. User:Masur. Pzdr. Lowdown (talk) 20:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Mapy, kolej itd.

mapkę mogę spróbować przerobić. A co do szablonu, to chcesz po prostu dodać na mapę mosty? --Winnetou14 (talk) 19:07, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

• Myślę, że mapki do mostów bardziej pasują. --Winnetou14 (talk) 19:33, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Kościół Najświętszego Serca Pana Jezusa - Rączna

Witam, na wikimapii znalazłem zdjęcie Kościoła w Rącznej, mniemam że to ty jesteś autorem tego zdjęcia. Czy mógłbyś wstawić go do commons. Chciałbym wykorzystać tą fotografię do artykułu o Rącznej i parafii. Pozdrawiam i z góry dziękuję Przemek2547 (talk) 23:09, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Dobrze, dzięki i mam nadzieję, że uda Ci się znaleźć. Pozdrawiam Przemek2547 (talk) 20:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Dzhokhar Dudayev, President of Chechen Republic 1991-1996.jpg

File:Dzhokhar Dudayev, President of Chechen Republic 1991-1996.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

NickK (talk) 18:47, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Hint

Hello! Comments like you this here will not help the issue but get you(!) blocked in the end. So please, stay Mellow. Thanks, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 09:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Dzhokhar Dudayev, President of Chechen Republic 1991-1996.jpg

File:Dzhokhar Dudayev, President of Chechen Republic 1991-1996.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BAW024 (talk) 11:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Michał Łysek

• W 2013 r. zrobiłeś zdjęcie jego grobu na Batowickim (Prądniku Czerwonym), a czy sfotografujesz też jego aktualny wygląd ? Jak ustaliłem rok temu pochowano tam matkę. Pleonazm9084 (talk) 08:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

• Nie musi być natychmiast ! W słoneczny dzień odwiedź i wykonaj ! Dziękuję ! Pleonazm9084 (talk) 10:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

• Czy sfotografujesz dzisiaj albo jutro ? Bo pogoda zapowiada się możliwsza niż tydzień temu. Pleonazm9084 (talk) 05:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

• Może być. Widać że się starałeś. Dziękuję bardzo Pleonazm9084 (talk) 09:09, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Rotate Nifo

Thank you for the edit on my Nifo's photo. But there is one thing that I've not understood: who will rotate the picture? I or an admin? If the answer is that I have to do it, how can I do? Sorry for the questions but I use Commons only since this April, so I don't know a lot of things. Thanks for the answers. 😊 --Giacomo Antonio Lombardi (talk) 11:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Prawa autorskie

Ciężka sprawa, bo zależy od krajów. Ale skoro masz fizycznie te odbitki to na 99% nie są one zwolnione z PA, a nawet jakby były, musiałbyś to udowodnić. No ale to ciężko udowodnić dla odbitki, chyba że znalazłbyś ją na jakiejś stronie www czy innej publikacji, i na tej podstawie możnaby zerknąć czy została ona uwolniona. Masur (talk) 15:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Andrzej Wajda

• Jego pogrzeb odbędzie się w przyszłą środę na Salwatorskim. Czy jest szansa że będzie na nim i sfotografujesz ceremonię, kondukt ? Pleonazm9084 (talk) 17:14, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
• Czy będziesz jutro na jego pogrzebie ? Udało by się sfotografować urnę z bliska ? Pleonazm9084 (talk) 09:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
• Dobrze. Nie szkodzi. Ale grób myślę że na pewno niebawem sfotografujesz. Pleonazm9084 (talk) 17:08, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Michel Micombero, President of the Republic of Burundi (1966-1976).jpg

File:Michel Micombero, President of the Republic of Burundi (1966-1976).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Norden1990 (talk) 04:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Blessed John Paul II Church (interior1), Totus Tuus street, Krakow, Poland.jpg

And also:

• File:Blessed John Paul II Church (interior2), Totus Tuus street, Krakow, Poland.jpg
• File:Blessed John Paul II Church, Church of the Relics, Chapel of Leviticus, Totus Tuus street, Krakow, Poland.jpg
• File:Blessed John Paul II Church, Church of the Relics, Chapel of St Jadwiga of Poland, Totus Tuus street, Krakow, Poland.jpg
• File:Blessed John Paul II Church, Church of the Relics, Chapel of St Kinga of Poland, Totus Tuus street, Krakow, Poland.jpg
• File:Blessed John Paul II Church, Church of the Relics, Totus Tuus street, Krakow, Poland.jpg
• File:St. John Paul II church (interior), Totus Tuus street, Krakow, Poland.jpg
• File:St. John Paul II Church, Church of the Relics, Chapel of Our Lady of Ludzmierz, Totus Tuus street, Krakow, Poland.jpg
• File:St. John Paul II Church, Church of the Relics-interior, Totus Tuus street, Krakow, Poland.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ankry (talk) 20:33, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Jarosław Śmietana

Cześć ! Czy jest szansa że odwiedzisz Rakowicki i sfotografujesz obecny stan grobu tego gitarzysty ? Może ma już pomnik ? Pleonazm9084 (talk) 08:24, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Lebowa coat of arms.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lebowa coat of arms.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Wcam (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Zetpe0202,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Zetpe0202,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Zetpe0202,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:WKS (Military Sport Club) Wawel logo, Kraków, Poland.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:WKS (Military Sport Club) Wawel logo, Kraków, Poland.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:WKS (Military Sport Club) Wawel logo, Kraków, Poland.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 22:28, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Piotr Bikont

• Cześć ! Czy jest szansa że odwiedzisz Rakowicki i zrobisz zdjęcie jego mogiły ? Pleonazm9084 (talk) 08:26, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

• Świetnie ! Widać że się starałeś żeby napisy były widoczne. Dziękuję Ci bardzo ! Teraz proszę o Jarosława Śmietany. Fotografowałeś to już 5,5 roku temu, ale ciekaw jestem czy coś się zmieniło od tego czasu. Może ma pomnik ? Pleonazm9084 (talk) 15:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Dziękuję za przepiękne zdjęcia Nowej Huty! Matlin (talk) 10:32, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Zetpe0202,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Grave and memorial to the Fallen Workers of Semperit of 1936, 1951 design. Maria Jarema, Rakowice Cemetery, 26 Rakowicka street, Kraków, Polanda.jpg

Copyright status: File:Grave and memorial to the Fallen Workers of Semperit of 1936, 1951 design. Maria Jarema, Rakowice Cemetery, 26 Rakowicka street, Kraków, Polanda.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Grave and memorial to the Fallen Workers of Semperit of 1936, 1951 design. Maria Jarema, Rakowice Cemetery, 26 Rakowicka street, Kraków, Polanda.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Podgórze new cemetery, Tomb of Dariusz Gnatowski (Polish actor), 13 Wapienna street, Kraków, Poland.jpg

Copyright status: File:Podgórze new cemetery, Tomb of Dariusz Gnatowski (Polish actor), 13 Wapienna street, Kraków, Poland.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Podgórze new cemetery, Tomb of Dariusz Gnatowski (Polish actor), 13 Wapienna street, Kraków, Poland.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Lebowa coat of arms.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lebowa coat of arms.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Wcam (talk) 21:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:World War I, Military cemetery No. 387 – Kraków,, 55 Miodowa street, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland.JPG

Copyright status: File:World War I, Military cemetery No. 387 – Kraków,, 55 Miodowa street, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:World War I, Military cemetery No. 387 – Kraków,, 55 Miodowa street, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:St. Anthony of Padua Church (interior), 16 Pod Strzechą street, Bronowice Małe, Kraków, Poland.jpg

Copyright status: File:St. Anthony of Padua Church (interior), 16 Pod Strzechą street, Bronowice Małe, Kraków, Poland.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:St. Anthony of Padua Church (interior), 16 Pod Strzechą street, Bronowice Małe, Kraków, Poland.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:06, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:Antoni Pawlikowski

Category:Antoni Pawlikowski is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Palosirkka (talk) 09:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bekierskich tenement house, 13 Stradomska street, Kraków, Poland.jpg

Copyright status: File:Bekierskich tenement house, 13 Stradomska street, Kraków, Poland.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bekierskich tenement house, 13 Stradomska street, Kraków, Poland.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Grodzka street, view to N, Old Town, Kraków, Poland.jpg

Copyright status: File:Grodzka street, view to N, Old Town, Kraków, Poland.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Grodzka street, view to N, Old Town, Kraków, Poland.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Christ the King Church, stained-glass window “Last Supper”, 1968 desig. by Wiktor Ostrzołek, 1 Zaskale street, Kraków, Poland.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ankry (talk) 20:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:30_Łobzowska_Street_in_Kraków

Category:30_Łobzowska_Street_in_Kraków has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Misiek2 (talk) 17:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Podwale 6

Witam, na wstępie chciałbym Ci bardzo podziękować za fotodokumentację Krakowa, bo Twój wkład jest przepotężny i bardzo istotny. Chciałbym zapytać, czy masz albo mógłbyś zrobić zdjęcie kamienicy przy ul. Podwale 6? Przydałoby się do tego artykułu w:pl:XI Gimnazjum i Liceum im. Józefy Joteyko w Krakowie, na razie tam wstawiłem takie zdjęcie z remontu w 2015 roku. Serdecznie pozdrawiam i życzę kolejnych wspaniałych zdjęć! Gower (talk) 08:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Witaj,

Wybacz, że dopiero teraz odpisuję ale tak wyszło. Zdjęcie z dzisiaj, starego nie miałem czasu szukać. Ciężko podejść, mało miejsca. Jak drzewa będą bez liści postaram się zrobić lepsze. Z Zetpe0202 (talk) 16:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Prośba o zgodę na wykorzystanie zdjęcia

Szanowny Panie, wydawnictwo IRSA przygotowuje nowy numer czasopisma naukowego "Artibus et Historiae". Autorzy jednego z artykułów chcieliby wykorzystać zdjęcie Pana autorstwa przedstawiające płytę Kallimacha (opisane jako Kościół Świętej Trójcy, epitafium Filippo Buonaccorsiego „Kallimacha”, ul. Stolarska 12, Stare Miasto, Kraków). Zdjęcie została przez Pana udostępnione na licencji CC BY-SA 4.0, ale chcielibyśmy uzyskać Pana zgodę na publikację tej fotografii na warunkach innych niż określone w tej licencji. Bardzo prosimy o kontakt w tej sprawie na adres mailowy irsa@irsa.com.pl Z poważaniem Artibusethistoriae (talk) 08:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Category:29_Karmelicka_Street_in_Kraków

29 Karmelicka Street in Kraków has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Archiwald (talk) 22:09, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Christ the King Church, stained-glass window “Last Supper”, 1968 desig. Wiktor Ostrzołek, 1 Zaskale Street, Kraków, Poland.jpg

File:Christ the King Church, stained-glass window “Last Supper”, 1968 desig. Wiktor Ostrzołek, 1 Zaskale Street, Kraków, Poland.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: living artist, no freedom of panorama in Polish churches Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Gower (talk) 21:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Christ the King Church, stained-glass window “Last Supper”, 1968 desig. Wiktor Ostrzołek, 1 Zaskale Street, Kraków, Poland.jpg

File:Christ the King Church, stained-glass window “Last Supper”, 1968 desig. Wiktor Ostrzołek, 1 Zaskale Street, Kraków, Poland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 15:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Odp.

Witaj, na wstępie chciałbym Ci bardzo podziękować za niezliczone świetne zdjęcia, zwłaszcza z Krakowa. Ja również uwielbiam fotografować kościoły i witraże, ale polskie prawo zabrania rozpowszechniania dzieł objętych majątkowymi prawami autorskimi bez zgody autora i niestety witraże w kościołach sfotografowane od wnętrza wliczają się w kategorię utworów takich, jak np. obrazy malarskie. Więc aby te pliki ocalić od usunięcia musielibyśmy mieć zgodę samego Wiktora Ostrzołka, która by była poświadczona w systemie OTRS, a jak przypuszczam, na chwilę obecną takiej zgody nie mamy.

Wnętrza kościołów nie podpadają pod przestrzeń publiczną w polskim prawie. Art. 33 ustawy o prawie autorskim stanowi wyraźnie, że wolno rozpowszechniać: „utwory wystawione na stałe na ogólnie dostępnych drogach, ulicach, placach lub w ogrodach”. I tu dołączam interpretację prawną: „Tym samym nie będą objęte prawem panoramy np. „dzieła wystawione w halach dworcowych, wnętrza kościołów czy sal teatralnych lub kinowych (niezależnie od tego, czy to są obiekty prywatne, czy publiczne i niezależnie od tego, że są to miejsca ogólnie dostępne)” (źródło: link). Podobnie jest to objaśnione w tabelce tutaj: Commons:Freedom_of_panorama/pl.

Więc od biedy moglibyśmy takie witraże sfotografować, ale z zewnątrz… Jeśli coś jeszcze budzi Twoje wątpliwości, to mogę spróbować to wyjaśnić. Pozdrawiam :) Gower (talk) 21:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

OK, dzięki za wyjaśnienia. No to są setki zdjęć do skasowania w plWiki. Chociaż National Geographic trochę inaczej to interpretuje. No dobrze. Miłego łykendu. Z Zetpe0202 (talk) 19:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Remuh Synagogue and Cemetery, gate, 40 Szeroka street, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland.jpg

Cześć. Bez słowa wyjaśnienia zrewertowałeś moją edycję Twojego zdjęcia. Czy wiesz co to jest aberracja chromatyczna? Czy masz dobrze skalibrowany monitor, nie z użyciem tablic testowych tylko sprzętowego kolorymetru? Jaką masz matrycę w swoim monitorze? IPS czy inną? Pozdrawiam Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Prośba: bądź człowiekiem i zajmij się swoimi zdjęciami. Moje są jakie są, nie biorą udziału w konkursach piękności, niosą tylko informację. A swoją poprawką spowodowałeś, że zdjęcie zrobiło się nijakie, bez cieni. A jeśli chodzi o monitor to chyba masz za bardzo przyciemniony. Wzajemnie pozdrawiam. Z Zetpe0202 (talk) 14:16, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Andrzeja Potebni in Kraków. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 03:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

OK :) Zetpe0202 (talk) 15:27, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Rakowice Cemetery, Tomb of Walery Rzewuski (Polish phtographer), 26 Rakowicka street, Kraków, Poland.jpg

File:Rakowice Cemetery, Tomb of Walery Rzewuski (Polish phtographer), 26 Rakowicka street, Kraków, Poland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fallaner (talk) 19:16, 30 November 2024 (UTC)