User talk:Hystrix/archive01

Brabham BT43 Photo Deletion

Hello :

Just wish to enquire why this personal photo was deleted and what would be required for it to be reinstated or upload to just Wikipedia instead of "Commons"?

Thanking You

Regards

TUSC token 81f30b7328c778022f3799e02690e258

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Check categories

Why are you adding {{Check categories}} to lot's of images like for example this edit? The categories you add are all good. The template was created to keep track of images which were categorized by bots. Multichill (talk) 11:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a botanist. Is this image on citrus japonica or another species? --Hystrix (talk) 17:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader thought it was, so that's fine with me. Please don't use {{Check categories}} like this, we already have a huge backlog. Multichill (talk) 18:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorisierung

Hallo Hystrix. Ich habe gesehen, dass du hier beim Kategorisieren von Strukturformeln mithilfst. Vielleicht magst du auch mal bei Commons talk:WikiProject Chemistry/Categories (Unterseite des WikiProject Chemistry) vorbeischauen bzw. in deine Beobachtungsliste aufnehmen. --Leyo 01:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Leyo, die Seite ist jetzt in meiner Beobachtungsliste. Wenn du Hinweise/Kritiken an meinen neuen Kategorien, Änderungen der Einsortierung oder Redirects hast, dann kannst du sie gleich dort schreiben. Grüezi --Hystrix (talk) 09:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Auf meiner Benutzerseite habe ich einige Kategorien aufgelistet, die (nicht deren Unterkategorien) möglichst leer sein sollten. Wenn du also Zeit und Lust hast da mitzuhelfen… --Leyo 21:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mir ist auch noch eine Kategorie aufgefallen: Category:Crystal structures - dort sind Crystal systems enthalten; diese Kategorie existiert nur als Weiterleitung; auf einer Disk.-seite wurde das schon 2007 (?) angesprochen - ohne Erfolg; nur hat User:Saperaud auch Galerie-Seiten zu Crystal systems unter Crystal structures angelegt; ein einziges Wirrwarr. In Category:Media needing categories... sind auch noch Dutzende.

Welche Formeln sollen denn in Category:Skeletal formulae verbleiben, oder alle raus? --Hystrix (talk) 21:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Den ersten Punkt kann ich schlecht beurteilen, da ich mich damit nur bedingt auskenne. Du darfst die Category:Crystal systems natürlich anlegen, wenn diese für einen Teil der Bilder in Category:Crystal structures passender ist. Den zweiten Punkt bitte dort diskutieren (wo ich meine Meinung bereits kundgetan habe). --Leyo 23:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn du magst, kannst du mithelfen, brauchbare Bilder aus Kategorie:Datei:Chemie nach Commons zu transferieren. Mit dem Move-to-commons-Assistent geht der (lizenzkonforme) Transfer ja schnell und einfach. Die korrekte Kategorisierung ist dann schon etwas schwieriger – jedenfalls für mich. --Leyo 16:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sollen auch die PNG-Dateien verschoben werden, die als gute SVG-Versionen schon auf den commons sind?

Beispielsweise:

de:Datei:1,7-Cleve-Säure.PNG und File:Cleve beta acid.svg

de:Datei:Alen-Säure.PNG und File:Freunds acid (1,3,7).svg

de:Datei:Amino-G-Säure.PNG und File:Amino G acid.svg --Hystrix (talk) 21:51, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, man könnte sie als alternative Version hochladen, wenn das Molekül anders ausgerichtet ist. Aber das kannst du machen wie du willst. :-) --Leyo 21:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

bot

We just talked about this in IRC. Fixed. Thank you.--O sama K 21:15, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jugendweihe by year

No content

A tag has been placed on Jugendweihe by year, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Commons. This has been done because it is a very short gallery page providing no content to the reader. Please see COM:GALLERY for more info about gallery pages and their purpose. If you disagree with its speedy deletion, please explain why on its talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

English | español | +/−

Killiondude (talk) 21:57, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elmer Rice (1).jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Quick Delete

Hallo Hystrix. Ich würde dir empfehlen, dieses Gadget zu aktivieren. --Leyo 14:06, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danke! Das hatte ich gesucht. --Hystrix (talk) 14:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

default korrekturen

Danke, fürs Korrigieren der Sortierung bei dem ein oder anderen Fußballspieler. *schäm mich* --WikiAnika (talk) 21:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hmm, danke, lecker ;-) ... und zu schämen ist hier nix; das ist schon kompliziert genug. Hystrix (talk) 21:14, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Hystrix!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:De-Wiktionary 180000.jpg was uncategorized on 3 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Patroller !

Hi Hystrix !

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller ! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use you help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons. If you do not want it, let me know. Thanks for your work combating vandalism. RE rillke questions? 22:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Rillke!

Recht herzlichen Dank für Dein Vertrauen. Frohes Schaffen weiterhin wünscht Dir Hystrix (talk) 15:59, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wieso nicht gleich so? --Leyo 12:13, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wem gilt Deine Frage? --Hystrix (talk) 20:36, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Immer dem, der fragt. ;-) --Leyo 22:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gut, ich werde es probieren.

Könntest Du bitte noch die Übersetzung korrigieren? Meine Englischkenntnisse sind zu gering dafür.

„Nach über drei Jahren mit mehr als 11.000 Bearbeitungen möchte ich mich als Adminkandidat zur Wahl stellen. Hauptsächlich kategorisiere ich Dateien. Neben der Beseitigung von Vandalismus stelle ich häufig Löschanträge. Die erweiterten Rechte würde ich zur Abarbeitung der Löschanträge verwenden.“

„After over three years with more than 11,000 edits I want to stand as a candidate for election Admin. I mainly categorize files. In addition to the elimination of vandalism often do I delete applications. The expanded rights, I would use for processing of deletion requests.“

Vielen Dank schon mal im Voraus. --Hystrix (talk) 11:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vorschlag: „After being active on Commons for more than three years and having contributed more than 11,000 edits, I stand by as a candidate for adminship. My main task is the categorization of files. In addition, I eliminate vandalism and often start and comment deletion requests. I would mainly use the expanded rights to help clearing the backlog of deletion requests.“ Ist aber sicher alles andere als perfekt… --Leyo 14:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nun stell´ mal Dein Licht nicht so unter den Scheffel. Deine perfekte englische Ausdrucksweise wurde hier doch schon oft gelobt. Also nochmals ganz herzlichen Dank! Ein schönes Wochenende wünscht Dir Hystrix (talk) 14:45, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Herzlichen Glückwunsch, Hystrix! Du hast jetzt die Rechte eines Administrators auf Commons. Nimm dir bitte einen Moment Zeit, um dir die Seite Commons:Administratoren und die in Verbindung mit der Beobachtungsliste stehenden Seiten durchzulesen (insbesondere Commons:Administrators' noticeboard und Commons:Deletion requests), bevor du damit beginnst, Seitenlöschungen, Accountsperrungen oder Änderungen am Seitenschutzstatus bzw. an den geschützten Seiten selbst durchzuführen. Der Großteil der Bearbeitungen eines Administrators kann durch andere Administratoren wieder rückgängig gemacht werden, mit Ausnahme der Zusammenführung von Versionsgeschichten, die deshalb mit spezieller Obacht behandelt werden muß.

Wir laden dich herzlich ein, mit uns auf IRC Kontakt aufzunehmen: #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. Es gibt auch einen Channel für Commons-Admins, der für sensiblere Themen sowie zur Koordination unter Admins genutzt werden kann. Du findest zudem in dem Commons:Ratgeber zur Administratorentätigkeit vielleicht eine nützliche Lektüre.

Bitte überprüfe, ob du in der Commons:List of administrators und den jeweils nach Datum oder Sprache sortierten Listen eingetragen wurdest und ergänze deine Daten andernfalls.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Schön, dass es so gut geklappt hat. Willkommen im Team. -- RE rillke questions? 15:16, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Herzlichen Glückwunsch auch von meiner Seite! Lass es ruhig angehen. --Leyo 16:29, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recht herzlichen Dank für Euer Vertrauen und Eure Stimmen. Auch wenn die Abstimmung nicht erfolgreich gewesen wäre, hätte ich volles Verständnis (kann kaum Englisch; zu wenig im Meta-Bereich aktiv; macht nur stupide Änderungen, …) und wäre weiterhin ebenso aktiv. Mir ist schon seit geraumer Zeit das Missverhältnis zwischen den Dingen, die auf commons erledigt werden müssen und denjenigen, die es machen können, aufgefallen. Ich würde mir wünschen, dass Ihr, und ich ebenso, auch andere „hard-worker“ dazu anschuppst und sie mit diesen Rechten auszeichnet, um sie an das Projekt zu binden. Ansonsten kann ich Euch beruhigen: Wenn ich in einem Bereich zu sehr genervt bin, gehe ich irgendwo anders hin, lese ein Buch, erstelle Wörterbucheinträge oder korrigiere Tippfehler. Und Leyo, der mir die Schose eingebrockt hat, bekommt jetzt noch Arbeit ;-) --Hystrix (talk) 18:30, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Verweis auf

User talk:Lukas²³, und bitte erkläre deinem Kollegen, dass mein Edit ein Absatz weiter unten nicht als Vandalismus gedacht war. Grüße, --Lukas²³ 19:48, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Das habe ich auf Deiner Diskussionsseite getan. Gruß --Hystrix (talk) 21:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Файл: D-Erythrulose.JPG

Зачем выставлять к удалению изображение химической формулы углеводорода? Оно Вам чем-то мешало или кушать просило? Это же не панорама, где должно быть гигантское разрешение! После Вашего удаления несколько статей останутся снова без химических формул. В заключается польза для Википедии от Ваших действий? RenJJ (talk) 20:21, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Leyo уже ответил (User_talk:Leyo#Файлы с изображением формул). Есть много формул в этой категории Category:Monosaccharides. Например, File:DErythrulose Fischer.svg. --Hystrix (talk) 13:04, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salvador Sedó i Alabart.jpg

Yep, I hadn't noticed the license but, if the rationale for not being a copyright violation is that it holds a CC-BY licence, why are you breaching the conditions of the license (I mean, I thought at least information about the source should be needed)? Regards --Cortexiphan (talk) 22:03, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is ok? --Hystrix (talk) 22:29, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ed Diener.jpg

Hello! You deleted the image File:Ed Diener.jpg, but the file page linked to a source page (http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~ediener/) that says "Licensed under Creative Commons" and links to a CC-by 3.0-license. Can you perhaps elaborate on your decision? --Bensin (talk) 22:36, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On website: Photo credit to L. Brian Stauffer. Hystrix (talk) 23:10, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to the metadata in the file or to something on the source page? A photo credit does not mean an image can not be released under a Commons license. --Bensin (talk) 23:44, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I took the photo once restored. It can now be discussed there. Hystrix (talk) 10:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for restoring the file. I'll add my vote to the discussion. --Bensin (talk) 18:31, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have just corrected my mistake. regards, Hystrix (talk) 22:52, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hauptwerkstätte Simmering, Schlachtgleis, Typ KH 6365.jpg

Hallo, ich habe gesehen, dass du das oben bezeichnete Bild auf diesen Titel statt File:062R02021179 Hauptwerkstätte Simmering, Schlachtgleis, Typ KH 6965 02.11.1979.jpg verschoben hast. Ich habe an sich nichts dagegen, dass das Datum nicht mehr extra im Dateinamen steht - aber war es wirklich nötig, den "Identifier" am Anfang zu entfernen? Der kann nämlich sehr hilfreich für mich sein, wenn ich überprüfen will, ob ein bestimmtes Bild aus der TARS631-Sammlung schon hochgeladen wurde. Es wäre gut, wenn du es daher wieder entsprechend zurückverschieben könntest. darkweasel94 Diskussion/talk/diskuto 19:41, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo darkweasel94,

wenn ich die Datei zurück verschiebe, hat sie wieder den Fehler im Dateinamen. Ich bin kein Fan von Zahlen- und Buchstabenkombinationen in Dateinamen, aber ich werde den Dateinamen nochmals ändern. Soll das Datum wieder hinzu? Gruß --Hystrix (talk) 19:58, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, jetzt sehe ich die falsche Zahl im Dateinamen, das hatte ich schon wieder vergessen. Ja, die Korrektur ist natürlich in Ordnung, danke dafür. Ob das Datum wieder hineinkommt oder nicht, ist mir relativ egal (aus Gründen der Einfachheit wohl besser nicht?) - mir geht es vor allem um die Zahlen- und Buchstabenkombination am Anfang. lg darkweasel94 Diskussion/talk/diskuto 20:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, die Datei wird nochmals umbenannt. Da sind noch etliche uploads mit falschem Datum: Soll das Datum entfernt oder korrigiert werden? --Hystrix (talk) 20:54, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, ich wäre dir sehr dankbar, wenn du dort das Datum entweder entfernen oder korrigieren würdest (an sich ist mir wiederum egal, ob entfernen oder korrigieren). Bitte aber den Identifier am Anfang so lassen, wie er ist (trotz des auch dort falschen Datums) - den brauche ich wie gesagt, damit ich und andere, die vielleicht drüberschauen, eventuelle Duplikate zweifelsfrei erkennen können. Danke fürs Zurückverschieben! darkweasel94 Diskussion/talk/diskuto 20:59, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hochgeladene bilder aerobearing

Hallo Hystrix,

Habe vorgestern die Bestätigung für folgende Bilder an der mail adresse die du mir gegeben hast abgesendet und leider keine Eingangsbestätigung(zb.Ticket) erhalten. Da es morgen 7 Tage sein werden seitdem ich sie hochgeladen habe,werden sie gelöscht. Ich bitte euch mir den Stand der Dinge zu verraten sodass ich die mail gegebenfalls nochmal absenden kann bevor es zu spät ist.

1 Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:Luftlagerung einer Hochfrequenz-Spindel für das Leiterplattenbohren.jpg

2 Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:Luftgelagerte Hochfrequenz-Bohrspindel mit integriertem Vorschub (mehrfach patentiert).gif

3 Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:Druckverlauf im Lagerspalt von Kugelschalen.jpg

4 Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:Druckverlauf im Lagerspalt einer belasteten Spindel.jpg

5 Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:Strukturanalyse (FEM-Simulation).jpg

6 Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:Druckverlauf im Lagerspalt eines bewegten ebenen, runden Lagerelements.jpg

7 Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:Druckverlauf im Lagerspalt eines gekippten Lagerrings.jpg

8 Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:Druckverlauf im Lagerspalt eines ebenen Lagerelements.jpg

9 Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:Kennlinien eines realen Luftlagers.jpg

10 Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:Vergleich zwischen Berech- nung und Messung.jpg

11 Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:Magnetisch vorgespanntes Gleitsystem.jpg

12 Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:Laserbearbeitung (Schnitt durch ebenes Lagerelement).jpg

Gruß --Aerobearing (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Aerobearing, füge in die Bildbeschreibungen {{subst:OP}} ein, dann sollten sie nicht so schnell gelöscht werden. Eine kurze Erläuterung findest du unter Vorlagen für die Benutzung in Dateibeschreibungsseiten. Was ist mit den übrigen rund 20 von dir hochgeladenen Dateien? --Hystrix (talk) 21:47, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hystrix, werde den code im laufe des tages in die bilder einfügen.Habts ihr eigentlich die E-mail von meinem chef bekommen?Weil wir haben kein Ticket bekommen sowie bei der Textfreigabe...Die ganzen anderen Bilder gehören auch alle mir bzw. meinem Chef welcher die ganzen Bilder während seinen Forschungsarbeiten gemacht hat. Falls du nochmals eine Genehmigung auch für diese Bilder brauchst, so sag mir bescheid.Gruß--Aerobearing (talk) 11:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Da ich kein Mitglied des OTRS-Teams bin, kann ich mir die E-Mails nicht anschauen. Die Abarbeitung der Anfragen dauert erfahrungsgemäß etwas länger. Falls die Dateien trotz der Markierung mit {{subst:OP}} gelöscht werden sollten, können sie auch wieder sehr schnell hergestellt werden. --Hystrix (talk) 12:25, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete these photos

Hi, Could you please advise how the following photos that I uploaded can be deleted? I read the guidelines and these photos do not have the right copyright etc. for Wikimedia Commons:

Thanks--1wikideb1 (talk) 13:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Doebner-Miller_reaction

Doebner-Miller reaction has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 14:22, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Aleksandr Butlerov monument.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 16:21, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perkin Reaktion Mesomerie.png

File:Perkin Reaktion Mesomerie.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 02:38, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Löschung des Fotos File:timvanbeveren.jpg

Die Genehmigungen wurden direkt mit permissions-de@wikimedia.org bereits am 2.1.2016 von Tim van beveren erteilt. Ansprechpartner war Reinard Kraasch. Das lief gemeinsam mit einem weiteren Ticket wegen Bildern die er zur Verfügung gestellt hat. Also bitte wieder rückgängig. Danke

--Screwjack1981 (talk) 00:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Screwjack1981,

das Foto timvanbeveren.jpg habe ich nicht gelöscht. Vielleicht meinst du: Tim van Beveren 01.jpg. Zum Zeitpunkt der Löschung war noch keine Genehmigung in der Dateibeschreibung vorhanden. Wenn die Erlaubnis vorliegt wird das Foto wieder hergestellt. Hystrix (talk) 16:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oder File:Tim van Beveren.jpg? --Leyo 17:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Art 1420523269.jpg

Please do not remove problem tags

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

Hi! It has come to my attention that you have removed a warning which says that a file doesn't have enough information about the source or license conditions. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this information is still missing and I have restored the tag. You may either add the required information or, if you think that required information is already given, put the image up for a deletion request so that it won't automatically be deleted. Thank you.

See here. --Jarekt (talk) 12:51, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Jarekt,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich hatte das Einfügen der Lizenz vergessen. Hystrix (talk) 18:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate

Why an exact or scaled down duplicate does not qualify for speedy-deletion? --C messier (talk) 17:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If a file version, a png and the other is an svg version (Duplicates). --Hystrix (talk) 18:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lyminster

I requested deletion of this so that Category:Lyminster, West Sussex can be moved there as there are no other Lyminster cats and the Wikipedia article is just at Lyminster anyway. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:44, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, now moved. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, very fast. --Hystrix (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted file, despite the permission sent

Hello, Hystrix.

I'm new in Wikipedia and I need some help.

I have got the notification by e-mail from 18.10.2016, that you deleted my file:"My_Pilot,_Whale_film_poster.jpg", I have uploaded to Commons despite the fact that 13.01.2016 I have sent written permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org from the owner's email festival@dolphinity.org. Ticket#2016011310021457

Please help me to recover the file.

Regards, --Ioanradostniy (talk) 12:40, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ioanradostniy,

File:My Pilot, Whale film poster.jpg is restored. Regards, --Hystrix (talk) 14:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hystrix,

Thank you fro restoring the file.

At the same time, i found now, that all the other files that i have uploaded with the poster, are also have been deleted. Please help me to understand what i did wrong and restore them too.

The situation is that when User:Denniss tagged two of the uploaded pictures and asked me to send the written permission - i did that exactly for those two files.

As I understood, I should not do that for all the uploaded files, - am I right?

Working now at the creation of the article in Wikipedia, I found that all other uploaded files are deleted: Here they are:

Please, explain me, what should i do to restore all the files?

(I sent the same letter to User:Denniss, as i do not understand correctly who is responsible for such procedures. I hope that this is normal and will not cause you any difficulties.)

--Ioanradostniy (talk) 20:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ioanradostniy,

please excuse the trouble. I have restored all files. When all have been released by PermissionOTRS, then they should not be deleted. Regards --Hystrix (talk) 20:29, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Ioanradostniy (talk) 15:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Moin, so, you deleted a file, I uoloaded some days ago. How should I transfer this file without a deletion?--Q1q2q3qwertz (talk) 19:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this file File:Twoloud 2011.jpg did not have a valid copyright tag license. For the other file, see How to transfer files to Commons. Regards --Hystrix (talk) 14:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted File:1864 Pay Reply.jpg

I have undeleted this file and disappointed with you for deleting a used image at English Wikisource without alerting that community. That you only allowed one week for addition of details when the image has been at Commons for six years, and three years at English Wikisource prior to that, is completely unreasonable and at odds with your responsibilities. An 1864 file is within scope! I am similarly unimpressed with Ellin Beltz for having nominated this file without basic checks at enWS, or the courtesy to talk to the community. I expect administrators to utilise their grey matter, and to have consideration for other communities. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have made a mistake and you have corrected it. Thank you. --Hystrix (talk) 14:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding the description, source, date and so on in this edit. Prior to that, the file template was blank. Hopefully "the community" would take another look through older, meaningful files in search of others without template information to avoid similar situations in the future. Certainly it is a good thing that the file is no longer blank; the process here at Commons is working! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barnák László 2015.jpg

Hello!

Please restore this file ! He came into her permission to OTRS (2016012310007169 number). OTRS as my manager does the rest . Thanks! Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 11:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. all (Hystrix & Hungarikusz Firkász)! I forget to check that the letter for the permission also been sent or just I got it... This was the reason for lack of the permit. Thank you for your speed! Fauvirt (talk) 12:37, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello, Hystrix. Could you quickly delete File:Jan Kulczyk - Europejski Kongres Gospodarczy, Katowice 2013.jpg? It's urgent ([1] [2]). WTM (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:IVUS of CAD.png

Hallo Hystrix. Ich habe mir noch gerade en:File:IVUS of CAD.png angeschaut. Der Inhalt

== Summary ==
[[Intravascular ultrasound]] image of a coronary artery (left), with color coding on the right, delineating the lumen (yellow), external elastic membrane (blue) and the atherosclerotic plaque burden (green).
== Licensing ==
{{cc-by-sa-2.5|Image created by Karthik Sheka, M.D.}}

scheint zu passen bzw. der dortige Uploader scheint der Urheber zu sein. Der Commonstransfer sowie die Löschung in der en-WP waren aber jeweils Pfusch. --Leyo 00:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Leyo, das Bild ist wiederhergestellt. Den Rest übernimmst bitte Du. Danke Dir. --Hystrix (talk) 01:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nun sollte es passen. --Leyo 01:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dewiki

Was war das denn da mit der AK? Das sieht/sah so aus, als ob jemand dein Passwort hat..... Viele Grüße, Luke 081515 20:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

oh, da bin ich sogar gesperrt. PW geändert. Gestern erschien ein angeblich von mir gelöschtes Bild auf meiner Beo, welches ich vorher nie sah, und vermutlich nicht gelöscht hätte. --Hystrix (talk) 01:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deine de-WP-Diskussionsseite kannst du bearbeiten. Wenn du wieder die (alleinige) Kontrolle über deinen Account hast, kannst du dort um Entsperrung bitten. --Leyo 01:31, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New and file deleted

I had a file deleted and I sent in and have coded it as my own work. What am I doing wrong?

which file you mean? File:A Cold Winters Night.jpg? Maybe this helps? --Hystrix (talk) 02:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:3zweig.jpg

You deleted File:3zweig.jpg; it was listed by User:Josve05a at Commons:Database reports/Getty Images/Whitelist which, according to Commons:Database reports/Getty Images, indicates that the copyright has expired. Could you please restore it? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:55, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ottokee ohio school and students 1905.JPG and File:Ottokee ohio early.JPG

(cur | prev) 01:02, 26 January 2016‎ Filedelinkerbot (talk | contribs)‎ . . (7,771 bytes) (-132)‎ . . (Bot: Removing Commons:File:Ottokee ohio school and students 1905.JPG (en). It was deleted on Commons by Hystrix (No source since 18 January 2016).) (undo) (cur | prev) 01:02, 26 January 2016‎ Filedelinkerbot (talk | contribs)‎ . . (7,903 bytes) (-83)‎ . . (Bot: Removing Commons:File:Ottokee ohio early.JPG (en). It was deleted on Commons by Hystrix (No source since 18 January 2016).) (undo)

Can you tell me why these photographs were deleted from Commons? Both photos are owned by me and my family, and were uploaded by me.

Who was the photographer? And what type of license? --Hystrix (talk) 01:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ESPNews.png

Hello Hystrix,

this is a duplicate, there are thousands and thousands image deleted before with lesser reasons. I'm here since 2005, you decision lead the Commons rules (already very open) ad absurdum. I think its time to stop my work here. Sorry if my argumentation was ambiguous, the time of 1 year difference does really no matter. ↔ User: Perhelion 21:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Perhelion,

here I have made a big mistake. I ask to excuse. Greetings, --Hystrix (talk) 08:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you reversion, that does not everyone, but everyone can do a mistake. Have a nice Sunday. ↔ User: Perhelion 12:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:大江川樋門付近位置図.pdf

You're do not understand Japanese. Discussion of this file has not been completed, is pending. Please do not delete the file in a selfish decision.

Do you understand what he had to do.

Your act is annoying. You have a duty to cooperate to remove withdrawal of the file.
Do not be lead-out to the language of the debate do not understand!--Ursus.japonicus (talk) 05:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The next discussion is here or here? --Hystrix (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DN Close

Greetings: I was wondering if perhaps you forgot to hit "delete" on the DN Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Salvo0066. I see you removed the files, but the DN itself is still open. Thank you for all your hard work on the project! Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permission et suppression d'image

Bonjour,

J'ai fait une " déclaration de consentement standard " pour l'ensemble des fichiers supprimés auprès de OTRS (permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org) le 2 février, où je donnais mon autorisation pour publier ces fichiers sous license CC-BY-NC 2.0 FR. J'en attendais une réponse et pas une suppression.

A présent, pourriez-vous m'indiquer la marche à suivre pour re-uploader ces images ?

Merci.

Bien cordialement,

--LBD Luc (talk) 10:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Wenn die Genehmigung per OTRS vorliegt, werden die Dateien sofort wiederhergestellt. Ich kann mir allerdings nicht vorstellen, dass es eine Erlaubnis gibt. Der Künstler ist erst vor einem Jahr verstorben.

(Google Traducteur: Si l'approbation par OTRS, les fichiers sont restaurés immédiatement. Je ne peux pas imaginer qu'il ya une permission de moi, cependant. L'artiste est mort il y a seulement un an.) --Hystrix (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hystrix,

Thank you for your reply.

All pages have been deleted, it will henceforth be difficult to provide OTRS permission to a file without content. Should I re-upload these images by sending the new link to OTRS ? Shall there not be a conflict with the old files ?

Best regards

--LBD Luc (talk) 15:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frage

Hallo, Mich würde eine Antwort auf wnme's Frage hier interessieren. m:User:Johan (WMF)/Session pollution? --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

done --Hystrix (talk) 14:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Du kannst das nicht einschätzen? Ich meine, du musst doch wissen ob du editiert hast oder nicht? --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permission for deleted file

Please return the deleted file for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Dailey

We went through all the permissions process as required. Both the confirmation of receipt and original permission is attached below:

Begin forwarded message:

From: Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> Subject: [Ticket#2016020110012237] Confirmation of receipt (Re: Copyright Authorizat [...]) Date: February 1, 2016 at 9:45:08 AM EST To: BRIAN ARS <brian.d.dailey@artzrs.com>

Dear BRIAN ARS,

Thank you for your email. This is an automatically generated response to inform you that your message has been received. Because all emails are handled by volunteers, it may take some time for us to reply. We kindly ask for your patience and understanding as we try our best to reply as quickly as possible. If your article or file has been deleted in the mean time, please don't worry. Any administrator can restore these later.

If you want to send more emails about the same subject, please add the following to the subject bar of the email: [Ticket#: 2016020110012237].

Yours sincerely,

The Volunteer Response Team To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

I hereby affirm that I, Brian Dailey the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the works depicted and the media][3] as shown here.[4]

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.[5]

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Brian Dailey

"Copyright holder”

February 1, 2016

File:Self-Portrait (5 of 5).jpg

Hi! Continuing on from post above: acceptable permission for the image has been received (ticket 2016020110012237). The image is here, tagged for transfer here. Would you like to undelete it? Or should I make another attempt to transfer it? – Move-to-commons assistant gave me an error when I tried just now. Thanks, regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

file:V.Copytsko.jpg

Здравствуйте, уважаемый Hystrix ! Дело в том, что разрешение на использование файла было отправлено автором фотографии, Александром Кушнером утром 11 февраля. Разрешение было выслано сразу на 2 адреса: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org и permissions-ru@wikimedia.org. Однако, несмотря на это, файл V.Copytsko.jpg всё равно удалили. Подскажите, пожалуйста, что делать? Акахтонас (talk) 14:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)(обсуждение) 13:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hystrix,
Permission is confirmed by OTRS team member Dogad75, ticket #2016021110005477, so would you mind restoring the file? Sealle (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. Sealle (talk) 05:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lipov headshot.png

Hi Hystrix. Can you check if File:Lipov headshot.png is the same photo as File:Dr lipov.jpg which you previously deleted for lacking proper position. I cannot tell who uploaded the file you deleted, so I don't know if it is the same uploader. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Stefanik~commonswiki

@Didym: Hi. I've just seen this. What makes you think that the files are not his own work? Llywelyn2000 (talk) 22:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You also asked the uploader. I am waiting for his answer. Hystrix (talk) 00:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No I haven't 'asked' him; I've tried to explain to him why some people on Commons take down images with only a week's notice. He is very new at this, and therefore, hasn't seen the info you left on his home page (or the explanation I tried to give on his talk page). The question in fact has nothing to do with him, as he didn't take the 4 images down. So I await your response. Thanks. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 07:39, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you dont 'asked' him; you 'told' him? He is very new at this --Hystrix (talk) 11:12, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion rejection

File:A Cloudless sky in Algonquin Park at sunset - panoramio.jpg is an absolutely pathetic picture, which shows a totally blank blue sky. I accept your rejection because that appears to be the acceptable low standard for bulk uploads from picture sharing sites. Thank you. Secondarywaltz (talk) 03:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lie under a pine tree and look at the sky, you smell the tree. --Hystrix (talk) 09:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File restoration

Hi. Is it possible to undo this deletion request for only few hours in order to move the files to another Wikipedia version? --aad_Dira (talk) 13:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Yes. When is it best? Hystrix (talk) 14:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am trying to get someone experienced to do it but he is a bit busy right now, it will probably be on next week --aad_Dira (talk) 00:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Ok, let us try/do it. Ping me, if you want. Hystrix (talk) 00:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Again. I have finally got someone to do it. He will be free today (January 5th) from 9 p.m. until 2 a. m. UTC, is this time range okay for you? --aad_Dira (talk) 04:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]

All files have been restored. Good luck with the move. Tell me when it's done. --Hystrix (talk) 19:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, thank you for your help! --aad_Dira (talk) 21:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]

I am so sorry for the misunderstanding, I should have explained. I actually only notified the admin from Arabic Wikipedia but he did not move the files yet, I assume you re-deleted them? --aad_Dira (talk) 00:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Ja, die Bilder wurden zirka 24 Stunden nach der Wiederherstellung von einem anderen Admin gelöscht. Diese sollten ja nur wenige Stunden für die Verschiebung zur Verfügung stehen. Wir können es noch einmal versuchen. Siehe dazu einen Abschnitt darunter. google translation: Yes, the pictures were deleted from another admin about 24 hours after restoration. These should be only a few hours available for the shift. We can try again. See a section below. --Hystrix (talk) 06:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to notify me when you restore the files, i free everyday from 9 p.m. until 2 a. m. UTC.جار الله (talk) 00:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, the pictures can be restored for a few hours. Please tell me the desired date and time at least 24 hours in advance. --Hystrix (talk) 06:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Today or tomorrow from 9 p.m. until 2 a. m. UTC, But please ping me when you restore the pictures.--جار الله (talk) 14:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - It's good. Today from 9 pm (UTC). --Hystrix (talk) 16:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Ping. --Hystrix (talk) 22:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - thank you.جار الله (talk) 22:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      - You can delete the pictures, thank you.جار الله (talk) 23:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible to restore this files too Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Buildings in Jeddah? i'm free Today and tomorrow from 8 p.m. until 2 a. m. UTC.جار الله (talk) 17:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The files have been restored. Good luck. --Hystrix (talk) 21:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - You can delete the pictures, thank you.جار الله (talk) 21:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even understand why this category was deleted ??? Perline (talk) 09:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is Sam Perkins replying re pics of San Felice Orphanage in Pavia: I've asked the rights-holders -- the estate of of the subject (Eugenio Gentiki Tedeschi) -- to send an email with the permissions to use these pictures. It should be here with a week or two. It's summer, they're in Italy, pls be patient. Sam Perkins (talk) 16:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have inserted {{subst:OP}}. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Hystrix (talk) 19:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thank you for adding me to the autopatroller group. Prof TPMS (talk) 00:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Hystrix!

Happy New Year!

Hystrix, a new year is like a blank book, the pen is in your hands. It is your chance to write a beautiful story for yourself! Happy New Year 2017. Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 18:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Garbarius

Hello Hydrix. User:Garbarius uploaded non-self-work images as self work again, and I initiated a second batch delete process with VisualFileChange. The resulting request page is appended to the already existing Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Garbarius. Is this OK, should we have a different deletion request page? --Bulgu (talk) 11:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bulgu,

that's OK. Both deletion requests are indeed related. Thx --Hystrix (talk) 14:01, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Antonantoska

Hi, You deleted files by Antonantoska (talk · contribs), but there are not copyvios. Please check the license on the source before deletion. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

System glitch

Hiya Hystrix: I think the system glitched on this close. The file is deleted! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File Restore

- - - Hi is it possible to restore files

File:Nikita Gokhale at 46th international film festival of india.jpg, File:Nikita Gokhale on Red Carpet of American film market 01.jpg, File:Nikita Gokhale on Red Carpet of American film market 02.jpg, File:Nikita Gokhale at 64th Berlin International Film Festival 04.jpg File:Nikita Gokhale at 64th Berlin International Film Festival 02.jpg, File:Nikita Gokhale at 64th Berlin International Film Festival 03.jpg File:Nikita Gokhale at 64th Berlin International Film Festival 01.jpg File:Nikita Gokhale at 64th Berlin International Film Festival.jpg

  Those images are shot by my jvc camera.please let me know procedure for this files. rest you can delete because original author is going to upload those photos and he is getting error (There is another file already on the site with the same content.) please let me know procedure as I am new on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Durga Gokhale (talk • contribs) 15:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Durga Gokhale,

Many of your files were found on other sites on the Internet. If you're the photographer and the owner of the pictures, why do you ask for a restoration? --Hystrix (talk) 17:16, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

    Yes I know most of the files are on other sites on the interenet.but below mention files are not on internet. & I want use those files which is shot by my personal Jvc cammera for film festival & film market para.rest you can delete. I am just talking about below mention files.

File:Nikita Gokhale on Red Carpet of American film market 01.jpg, File:Nikita Gokhale on Red Carpet of American film market 02.jpg, File:Nikita Gokhale at 64th Berlin International Film Festival 04.jpg File:Nikita Gokhale at 64th Berlin International Film Festival 02.jpg, File:Nikita Gokhale at 64th Berlin International Film Festival 03.jpg File:Nikita Gokhale at 64th Berlin International Film Festival 01.jpg File:Nikita Gokhale at 64th Berlin International Film Festival.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Durga Gokhale (talk • contribs) 12:32, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Durga Gokhale,

you dont you didn´t answer my question: „If you're the photographer and the owner of the pictures, why do you ask for a restoration?“ You can use the old or new filename. And you upload new files without Exif, which can be found, for example (File:Nikita Gokhale In January 2017.jpg), on Imgrum. --Hystrix (talk) 21:59, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^[1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^[2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Image File Restoration

Hello,

You have removed a few of my photos from Wikimedia Commons due to supposed copyright violation. These were my photos so I'm not sure why they were removed. I couldn't find them anywhere else on the internet, either. List of photos deleted:

Could you please let me know exactly why these images were removed and what I should do to have them reinstated? Thanks. Supadog (talk) 11:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have a similar problem as you have removed one of my photos from Wikimedia Commons due to supposed copyright violation (Childern book). Indeed, this is a childern book, but an unique one. It is made by parents for their childern in the second grade of Waldorf school. It serves as the first reading book in the process of learning reading. Each childern at second grade in Waldorfs schools around the world get such a unique, handmade reading book from his/her parents (of course its content vary from class to class and the handmade pictures are always unique). The picture is mine. Could you please put it back? Or should I do another upload? Many thx for answer File: Čítanka vyrobená rodiči pro své dítě - waldorfská škola - 2. třída.jpg Removed in May from page: https://cs.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Waldorfsk%C3%A1_%C5%A1kola&oldid=14922719)

krejci.praha6 18:07, 02 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nach langem Kampf ist es wieder hergestellt und eingebunden. Hystrix (talk) 22:55, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Herzliche danke! krejci.praha6 5:07, 04 May 2017 (UTC)

Hiermit protestiere ich.

Hiermit protestiere ich gegen deine Entsperrung des Accounts "Falk2", ohne dass vorher irgendeine Diskussion mit mir gesucht wurde, ohne dass mir überhaupt jemand Bescheid gegeben hat! Ob Fals2 ein Pferd oder einen Nazi gemeint hatte, kann nur er/sie sagen. Es gab für ihn/sie eine Möglichkeit zur Stellunganahme auf der Benutzerdiskussionsseite, aber es kam nichts. ERrst nach der Entsperrung kam eine Stellungnahme, die nicht gerade auf Versuche der Deeskalation hindeutet. Auf COM:AN gab es auch keinen Konsens für die Entsperrung, siehe Steinsplitter und andere. --A.Savin 13:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, aber einfach so entsperren ohne unblck request, ohne irgendwo eine Nachricht zu hinterlasen geht überhaupt nicht. COM:BP. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC) P.S.: Hat Leyo gemacht.[reply]

Und mal abgesehen von der gängigen Praxis hier auf Commons, vor der Entsperrung eines Benutzers immer auch eine Rücksprache mit dem sperrenden Admin zu halten. Alchemist-hp hat offenbar den Ausdruck genau wie ich als zumindest eine zweideutige Anspielung auf Nazi verstanden. So eindeutig ist die Sache also nicht; die Wortwahl von Falk2 war mindestens grobfahrlässig; von der Begründung "Kein Sperrgrund vorhanden" kein niemals die Rede sein. --A.Savin 21:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Die Entsperrung war richtig, aber mit es gibt keinen Grund zur Sperrung (There is no reason for blocking) zu unspezifisch begründet. Es hätte auf die Diskussion unter COM:AN verwiesen werden müssen. Hystrix ist mir mit der Entsperrung zuvorgekommen.

Dass du die Phrase nicht kennst, ist wohl nicht die Schuld von Falk2 oder Hystrix, sondern wohl eher de-4 geschuldet. Ein analoges Wortspiel auf Englisch hätte ich möglicherweise auch nicht als solches erkannt. --Leyo 21:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC) PS. Einmal kurz "Brrr, Brauner" zu googlen hätte gereicht, um eure Wissenslücke zu schliessen.[reply]

Erst einmal ein Danke schön an A.Savin für sein Eingreifen. Aus genau diesem Grund habe nicht nur ich den Revert durchgeführt, sondern zuvor auch Stepro. Sein Revert hat mein Empfinden mit einem N..i Vergleich bestärtk und entsprechend meine Reaktion ausgelöst. Ich glaube zwar weiterhin, dass die Anmerkung von Falk2 doppeldeutig gemeint war, aber wie ich schon geschrieben habe ist die Sache für mich erledigt. Wie heißt es so schön: im Zweifel für den ~~"Angeklagten"~~ gesperrten USer. Gelernt haben wir nun hoffentlich alle daraus. Gruß, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:10, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jetzt habe ich die Nase von dieser Hexenjagd voll. Erstens, Alchemist, lass diese Unterstellungen. Zweitens, A.Savin, sei nur einmal ein Kerl und rede mit mir statt über mich. Hast Du nie gelernt, dass man genau das nicht tut? Wie würdest Du reagieren, wenn das jemand mit Dir täte? Wenn Du nur etwas Mumm hast, dann gib Deine Adminprivilegien zurück. Du kannst damit nicht umgehen. Nimm Deine Kamera, mach Fotos, lade sie hoch und versieh sie mit detaillierten Beschreibungen. Dann hast Du wenigstens keine Zeit, andere Nutzer zu drangsalieren. Ich bin ausgesprochen sauer, dass mich ausgerechnet der Alchemist als »Angeklagten« zu bezeichnen wagt. Geht es noch? Nochmal für alle, die es nicht wissen (wollen): »Ruhig, Brauner« hat absolut nichts mit mit Nazis zu tun. Und, verdammt nochmal, wer was nicht weiß, der soll fragen. Dann gibt es eine einfache und sachliche Auskunft. Das, was hier abläuft, kann einfach nicht wahr sein. Zur Erinnerung, es ging darum, dass Commons von Abmahnern missbraucht wird. –Falk2 (talk) 01:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Falk2 sorry! Ich habe es korrigiert! Jetzt hätte ich es selbst inzwischen besser wissen müssen, dass gewisse Redewendungen auch missverstanden werden können. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC) P.S. von Unterstellungen ist meinerseits keine Rede. Du wirst mir doch aber meinen Glauben nicht verbieten wollen?!?[reply]

Ich habe deswegen nicht "mit" dir geredet, weil ich nach sowas hier folgerichtig nicht mehr auf Einsicht gehofft habe. Hier auf dieser Seite geht es ohnehin vor allem um das Verhalten von Hystrix als Admin. Die Behauptungen, ich würde zu wenige Fotos machen oder müsste meinen Adminflag abgeben, lasse ich lieber unkommentiert, das wird mir sonst zu doof. --A.Savin 01:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[3]. J e e 03:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zeitlicher Ablauf

Am 18. Januar 2017, 21:39 Uhr postete User:Falk2: „Brrr, Brauner, ruhig! ...“

Anmerkungen: Mir war diese Floskel beim Umgang mit Pferden bekannt, aber ich hielt sie auch für missverständlich. Ich habe mir daraufhin einige weitere Diskussionsbeiträge von Falk2 angeschaut und keine „braune“ Soße gefunden (Anmerkung in der Anmerkung: Und anscheinend auch von keinem weiteren hier involvierten Diskutanten). Der gesamte Edit von Falk2 scheint für sich betrachtet ein persönlicher Angriff (PA) zu sein. Allerdings war die vorherige Diskussion schon sehr emotional (bspw. Jüngelchen).

Am 18. Januar 2017, 22:23 Uhr wird der Edit von Falk2 durch User:Stepro zurückgesetzt.

...

Dann waren noch mehrere daran beteiligt, den entsprechenden Absatz (Brauner) wieder einzufügen oder zu löschen.

Am 19. Januar 2017, 8:43 Uhr wird Falk2 durch admin:A.Savin für zwei Wochen gesperrt.

Mit der Begründung: „heavy personal attack ("Brauner")“

Am 19. Januar 2017, 10:25 Uhr wird Alchemist-hp durch admin:Srittau für drei Tage gesperrt

Am 19. Januar 2017, 11:08 Uhr wird Alchemist-hp durch admin:Srittau entsperrt

Am 21. Jan. 2017, 23:25 Uhr wird Falk2 von admin:Hystix entsperrt (es gibt keinen Grund zur Sperrung (There is no reason for blocking))

Grund der Entsperrung

Ich fand keinen ausreichend begründeten Tatbestand zur Sperrung: weder beim Wort „Brauner“ noch im sonstigen Verhalten (zu allen meinen Zweifeln (PA von Falk2) habe ich mich schon weiter oben geäußert).

Ich sah nur, dass Falk2 mehr als 48 Stunden gesperrt war und Alchemist-hp keine 60 Minuten.

Ich hätte keinen von beiden gesperrt.

Wer mich kennt, weiß, dass ich ungern Sätze mit „Ich“ beginne.

Güteversuch

In den nächsten 14 Tagen gehe ich in den Steinbruch und versuche einige Seiten auf Commons:Help etc vom Englischen ins Deutsche zu übersetzen. Außerdem werde ich keine administrativen Handlungen durchführen, außer ich werde angefragt. --Hystrix (talk) 10:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Luther Strange

FYI, a photo you deleted was reuploaded a few minutes after you deleted it, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luther_Strange.jpg I believe the user's account may be in violation of uploading rules, almost exclusively uploading copyrighted material. This is a bannable offense, isn't it? Gage (talk) 01:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Hystrix, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Need your help

Hello.

Have some more files to be deleted because of my mistake. Christer T Johansson (talk) 15:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Christer, What are the pictures? Or what categories? And why they should be deleted? Regards --Hystrix (talk) 17:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mind reader

Am I a fucking mind reader ?, No!, So how about in fucking future use an edit summary - It's not that hard and considering you're an admin you should automatically be using them anyway, See this if you're new to Rollback which I assume you are!, Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 00:25, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to get pissed off but instead of rollbacking it would be helpful if you left an edit summary as had you done so I would've then realised those CSDs were a mistake and I would've sent them to DR much sooner, Also you've deleted about 4 or 5 of the Rugely images so you may want to restore them (Being completely honest they're only going to be deleted again so it may not be worth bothering with but up to you), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 00:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

yes thanks Hystrix (talk) 00:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of images from File:Oímbra, Ourense, Spain - panoramio (52).jpg to File:Oímbra, Ourense, Spain - panoramio (118).jpg

Why the systematic deletion of this images in scope, arguing to that this images are "Out of project scope; unused personal image"?

In case you still dont know or seen the categories on this speedy deleted files, this images are not personal images but images of runners running and competing in Category:Ultra Trail Vilar de Perdizes, an ultramarathon between Portugal and Spain that goes around Vilar de Perdizes, a small Village in Portugal, but one of the most known and famous villages in Portugal. We dont delete images of sports competions, specially if it depicts the competitors competing. If this images clearly show said runners competing in this ultramarathon, how then can you clain that this images are personal images and then speedy deleting said images, and per Commons:Project scope, it says that The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative"".

Even if this were "personal images", you as an administrator know or should know that your justification for speedy deleting does not appears as a criteria for speedy deletion in Commons:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#File.

So as this images are in scope, they should be speedy undeleted, as this images are in scope and their speedy deletion were not based in Commons policies and they provide "knowledge; instructional or informative"". Tm (talk) 01:31, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tm, I had something overlooked. The files are restored. If I should have overlooked one, tell me, and restore them too.

I just saw pictures like this: Some pictures, like this one are outside the commons.

btw

This should not be a succession. Nachtreten

Could not you put such pictures in the upper upper upper category? There is also this category. The sorting process takes longer.

Best regards Hystrix (talk) 08:11, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Complement:

You've just sorted this picture into the categorie. This image is also deleted very quickly (out of PS). These guidelines conflict with this. Best regards Hystrix (talk) 10:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the speedy undeletion, per my explanation. About my categorization of images from Panoramio, i making several basic categorizations, starting with categorizing images into the country categories and with time i (or several other users) categorized or will categorize then into more suitable categories, but alas this takes time and someone, like me and several other users, willing to do an complete job. Tm (talk) 00:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Frage zum Löschen

Hallo Hystrix du hast am 20.06 einen meiner Löschrequests bearbeitet. Und so wie ich es verstanden habe, wurde der Löschen Baustein dabei von mir falsch verwendet (siehe meine Diskussions Seite). Damit ich es diesmal richtig mache hier kurz meine Frage wie ich es richtig hätte machen sollen? Ich habe als nicht eingeloggter User versucht die Kategorie St. Kilian (Pülfringen) (was nicht geht) zu erstellen dabei wurde aber nach dem Login wohl die Seite St. Kilian (Pülfringen) erstellt wie stelle ich jetzt den Löschrequest richtig? --Hecksa (talk) 19:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hecksa,

das Vorgehen wird auf dieser Seite beschrieben: Commons:Löschrichtlinien. Füge auf der Galerieseite {{speedydelete|empty gallery}} ein. Frohes Schaffen noch wünscht Hystrix (talk) 20:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Naturschutzgebiet-Löschungen

Hallo, du hast eben eine Reihe von NSG-Kats als "empty category" gelöscht. Die Anträge kamen von einem Neuaccount und sind in meinen Augen Trollerei. Die Kategorien gehören zu einer Systematik. Sie enthielten vor dem Schnelllöschantrag grundlegende Informationen wie Ortskategorien und Beschreibungen. Sie sind immer wieder für die WLE-Wettbewerbe von Belang und werden allmählich zudem mit Panoramio-Bildern gefüllt. Das Thema hatten wir übrigen in der Vergangenheit wiederholt. Bitte stelle die Kategorien wieder her. Folgende sind auf meiner Beobachtungsliste gelandet, falls es weitere gab auch diese bitte wiederherstellen:

Extended content

15:11, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Zollerhalde (empty category)
15:11, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Warrenberg (empty category)
15:11, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Wacholderbusch (empty category)
15:11, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Tiefer Weg (empty category)
15:10, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Tailfinger Ried (empty category)
15:10, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Stettener Weinberg (empty category)
15:10, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Oberberg-Köpfle (empty category)
15:10, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Nacker Mühle (empty category)
15:10, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Längenloch (empty category)
15:10, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Lauen (empty category)
15:09, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Känzele (empty category)
15:09, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Kugelwäldle (empty category)
15:09, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Immerland (empty category)
15:09, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Hülenbuchwiesen (empty category)
15:09, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Häselteiche (empty category)
15:09, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Hohegert (empty category)
15:09, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Dobelwiesen (empty category)
15:08, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Glaswiesen und Glaswald (empty category)
15:08, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Feuchtgebiete am Ilvesbach (empty category)
15:08, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Felsenberg (empty category)
15:07, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Falchenwiesen (empty category)
15:07, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Erlenbruckmoor (empty category)
15:07, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Ennersbacher Moor (empty category)
15:07, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Elzhof (empty category)
15:07, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Elsenzaue-Hollmuthang (empty category)
15:07, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Egenhäuser Kapf mit Bömbachtal (empty category)
15:07, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Eckenfels (empty category)
15:07, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Dörlinbacher Grund - Münstergraben (empty category)
15:07, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Dreherhofmoor (empty category)
15:06, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Dammstücker (empty category)
15:06, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Brühlwiesen (empty category)
15:06, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Bruggmatt (empty category)
15:06, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Briglirain (empty category)
15:06, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Braunhalden-Schlattboden (empty category)
15:05, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Bockscheuer (empty category)
15:05, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Bisten (empty category)
15:05, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Bannwald Wehratal (empty category)
15:05, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Bannwald Konventwald (empty category)
15:05, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Bannwald Faulbach (empty category)
15:05, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Alter Weiher (empty category)
15:04, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Altenbachtal und Galgenberg (empty category)
15:04, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:NSG Quellhorizonte und Magerrasen am Albtrauf bei Niederhofen (empty category)
15:04, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:NSG Brombachmoor (empty category)
15:04, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Wüstnächstenbach und Haferbuckel (empty category)
15:04, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Weiherbachtal (empty category)
15:04, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Vogtsberg (empty category)
15:04, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Utzenfluh (empty category)
15:03, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Unterer Neckar: Neckaraue zwischen Botzheimer Wasen und Obere Wörth (empty category)
15:03, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Unterer Neckar: Altneckarschleife-Neckarplatten (empty category)
15:03, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Todtenbronnen (empty category)
15:03, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Tiefenhäuser Moos (empty category)
15:03, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Teiche am Landgraben (empty category)
15:03, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Taubenmoos (empty category)
15:03, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Streuobstwiesen Kleingemünd (empty category)
15:02, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Steinbruch Sulzbach (empty category)
15:02, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Steinbruch Kirchardter Berg (empty category)
15:02, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Staufen (empty category)
15:02, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Sotten (empty category)
15:02, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Schollacher Moor (empty category)
15:02, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Schneeglöckchenstandort auf Gemarkung Buch, Landkreis Waldshut (empty category)
15:02, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Schmalzmisse (empty category)
15:02, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Schafhof-Teufelsloch (empty category)
15:01, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Sauscholle (empty category)
15:01, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Sauerwiesen-Fuchsloch (empty category)
15:01, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Sallengrund-Waldwiesen (empty category)
15:01, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Rüttewies-Scheibenrain (empty category)
15:01, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Rotmeer (empty category)
15:01, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Plattenmoos (empty category)
15:01, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Ochsenberg-Litzelstetten (empty category)
15:01, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Oberer Schwarzenbach (empty category)
15:00, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Oberer Gründel (empty category)
15:00, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Neckarufer Seitelsgrund-Moosklinge (empty category)
15:00, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Mühlbachtal (empty category)
15:00, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Mindersbacher Tal (empty category)
15:00, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Laubeck-Rensberg (empty category)
14:59, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Langenbach-Trubelsbach (empty category)
14:59, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Landschaft am Waldangelbach (empty category)
14:59, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Köllbachtal mit Seitentälern (empty category)
14:59, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Kranichsberg (empty category)
14:59, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Kohlhütte-Lampenschweine (empty category)
14:58, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Kohlersloch (empty category)
14:58, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Kirchspielwald-Ibacher Moos (empty category)
14:58, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Katzenbuck-Halde (empty category)
14:58, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Höchenschwander Moor (empty category)
14:58, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Hoher Geisberg (empty category)
14:58, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Hoffenheimer Klinge (3 Teilgebiete) (empty category)
14:57, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Hirschenmoor (empty category)
14:57, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Hilsbacher Bruchwiesen (empty category)
14:55, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Hesel-, Brand- und Kohlmisse (empty category)
14:55, 26. Jun. 2017 Hystrix (A) (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite Category:Naturschutzgebiet Große Tannen (empty category)

--Sitacuisses (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2017 (UTC) Ergänzt um Dutzende weitere aus deinem Löschlog. Siehe auch Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism#Gdampflmonom. --Sitacuisses (talk) 22:00, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keine Panik sagte der kleine Udo schon in den 70'ern. Ist in Arbeit. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 04:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Sitacuisses, herzlichen Dank für Deinen Hinweis und natürlich an Hedwig einen großen Dank für das schnelle Abarbeiten! Hystrix (talk) 12:01, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Sitacuisses, mit mehr als über 100 Template-Einfügen in den letzten Stunden meinerseits: Ist genügend Buße getan? Hallo Hedwig in Washington, ich sah deine Änderungern in den o.g. Kategorien per AWB. Dazu hätte ich ein paar Fragen. Freundliche Grüße Hystrix (talk) 20:08, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh oh.... Ist etwas schiefgegangen? --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 12:15, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nee, nee, Hedwig in Washington. „Den will ich auch haben!“ Den AWB hatte ich in der de:WP vor Jahren genutzt, hauptsächlich um Tippfehler zu korrigieren oder Phrasen wie „... besonders bekannt, berühmt, beliebt“ zu entfernen. Damit habe ich mich nicht besonders beliebt gemacht ;) Eine mir fast peinliche Fragen: Muss ich die Nutzung hier auf extra beantragen? Dazu habe ich gestern mehrere Stunden die Hilfeseiten durchforstet. Ergebnis: nix gefunden. Und noch eine weitere Frage, das Template betreffend. Ein Hinweis darauf wäre auf Seiten wie Commons:Löschrichtlinien#Kategorien hilfreich. Aber ich würde mir nur zutrauen, diesen in der deutschsprachigen Version zu ergänzen. Muss solch ein Tipp erst auf der englischen Seite erscheinen? Auch dazu habe ich in den Archiven nichts gefunden. Bitte um Antwort wie: „Zu blöd zum suchen!“ Hystrix (talk) 13:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moin Hystrix, AWB kann man auf Commons benutzen, wenn man entweder a) Administrator ist oder b) nicht Admin ist und auf dieser Liste steht. Für dich trifft a) zu, kannst also loslegen. Gruß, --Achim (talk) 17:03, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MELE TOI DE TES AFFAIRES D'OU TU SUPPRIMES MES PHOTOS ???

de quoi tu te mele ptit con? les photos de Melisa Asli Pamuk, Neslihan Atagul, Burak Ozcivit sont libres de droits !!! INSTAGRAM c'est une bonne source alors ferme la !!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nezins (talk • contribs) 14:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree with my deletion, please post a request for undeletion at COM:UDEL. Your sincerely Hystrix (talk) 14:19, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chef Dharshan Munidasa.jpg

Hello Hystrix,

I am handling ticket:2017052510005256 of the photo-submission queue. The image which is attached to the permission has a size of about 8 M Bytes, and the email address is of an official domain, ministryofcrab.com, which is a restaurant that belongs to the subject of the photo. But when I uploaded the photo, a warning appeared that an identical to the file (File:Chef Dharshan Munidasa.jpg) has previously been deleted by you. Could you please look into this and let me know what to do, whether to continue the upload process or abort it? Thank you 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:38, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 4nn1l2.

the image is restored. I could not find any copyried on the site. Best regards Hystrix (talk) 15:00, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates

You may be interested in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Correctly merging duplicates which have been automatically identified. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:41, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

Before reverting - you may discuss - some of these names were wrong, some changed and most of them contain only one picture. --Мико (talk) 12:10, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Мико, yes, first discuss. There is this page for this. A category simply empty and then propose the deletion is not the right way. The upper categories are often full enough. Regards, Hystrix (talk) 12:33, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Obviously they will stay empty a few more months. Thanks. --Мико (talk) 12:59, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Мико, you emptied some of them yourself. You could fill it again. And on commons, there are very many categories that are empty. They were created for the future. Yours sincerely Hystrix (talk) 13:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As I said - they contained only one image and no others are expected to appear in the future. I'm trying to bring some order in the IMARO category for some days now. But your call. :) --Мико (talk) 13:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spam Kalispera Dell - nuke possible?

Hallo Hystix - danke für Deletion: File:Blasewitz, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (3183).jpg. Da wir offenbar in einem Boot schwimmen, Du als Admin aber besondere Rechte hast, frage ich an, wie wir des Massenspams seitens Kalispera Dell alias Kay Körner via Panoramiouploadbot Herr werden, bevor ich auf dem Administrators noticeboard einen offiziellen Eintrag mache. Schaust Du bitte z. B. Category:Other speedy deletions, die Dresdner Pissbilder - kannst Du die als Admin Schnelllöschen, oder muss ich mit poor quality, apparently no educational purpose je einen Einzelantrag stellen? B est wishes & THX --Frze ^{> talk} 16:26, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Frze, den Müll hatte ich auch schon gesehen. Das Löschen halte ich derzeit für unsinnig, da der Bot innerhalb von Tagen Bilder und Namen tauscht. Hier zeigte die erste Version ein total verschwommenes Bild eines Schwanenkopfes. Eine Diskussion mit dem Bot-Betreiber hatte ich auf der Adminbeschwerdeseite begonnen. Ergebnislos. Bis Panoramio und damit auch der Bot seinen Dienst einstellt bleibt nur, die sinnlosen Dateien in Kategorien zu sammeln, wie Du es bereits machts, und dann den Inhalt zur Löschung vorschleider. Leider auch frustriet Hystrix (talk) 16:42, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lass uns kämpfen wie Männer.

Mir geht es insbesondere um den ganzen Dresden-Scheiß von Kalispera Dell >30.000 Dateien, >15.000 kategorisiert Category:Photographs by Kalispera Dell - hinter dem sich allerhöchstwahrscheinlich Sockpuppeter Kay Körner verbirgt.

Mit dem temporären Löschen hast Du recht, sinnlos. User:Shizhao (A)

Bis November 2017 warten, nervtötend.

Kann man dem Panoramiouploadbot befehlen, images by Kalispera Dell nicht nach Commons hochzuladen?
Wie ist eine Category zu benennen, ~Category:Photographs by Kalispera Dell proposed to delete , um den Müll zu parken? (solange nicht bewiesen ist Category of sockpuppets of Kay Körner proposed to delete)

Schaust Du heute wieder hier > User:Derbrauni/NeuesDresden/2017 July 1-10#3. Juli 2017 oder hier Category:Großer Garten, Dresden in winter - dann wird Dir schlecht. THX --Frze ^{> talk} 17:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Puh, die Diskussion vom April hatte ich nicht mitbekommen. Das war erst einmal ´ne Menge Text zum lesen. Dank dafür. Aus dieser Lektüre ergibt sich die Antwort auf Frage 1: Dem Bot oder -betreiber kann ich nichts befehlen. Und eine Anfrage beim Betreiber scheint sinnlos, es werden vermutlich nur Antworten wie in dieser Diskussion kommen. Zur zweiten Frage: Die Kategorie sollte eher eine versteckte sein und Photographs by Kalispera for discssion heißen (Wir wollen uns doch kein PA-Vorwurf einhandeln ;)

Der Projektumfang erlaubt leider auch Bilder zur Urination. Und auch mehr als 99 % aller Bilder von Kalispera Dell werden IMHO vermutlich behalten, da immer jemand einen Grund dafür finden wird (siehe Disk. zu Autobahnfotos oder schrägen Häuserbildern aus Strehlen). LG Hystrix (talk) 19:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration : File:Logo Accessi Scol.jpg

Hello Hystrix,

I am Virginie Ventana, project manager at the National Distance Learning Center (CNED)located in France. The "Logo Accessi Scol.jpg" file, "AccessiNum.jpg" file and "Logo Accessi Pro.jpg" file belong to us and were created for the training we designed on wikiversity. They have been deposited on wikimedia by the members of our team. You deleted them. We don't understand why. We would like you to restore them because this compromises our projects.

Best regards

VVirginie Vvirginie (talk) 07:43, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Virginie,

the files are restored. I apologize for the trouble. These files were in this list Category:Media missing permission and are deleted after 7 days. Please add {{subst:OP}} and see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Hystrix (talk) 11:37, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hystrix ,

I work with Virginie Vvirginie. We don't understand the procedure you described overhead in order to restore the files. Where should we add the {{subst:OP}} ? Can you be more clear please ?

Thanks in advance for your help.

Best regards. --Mdia12 (talk) 09:41, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No permission

Hi, Do not remove the "no permission" warning, without adding a "OTRS pending" or "OTRS received" template. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:35, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Garnik shahbandari pics

Hi last [[4] few pictures] that tagged by you have soursec. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern Sciences (talk • contribs) 22:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, the source is specified. I have marked the missing permission. I guess the pictures are from a book. They need the permission of the photographer. For more information see COM:L. --Hystrix (talk) 10:04, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let us talk

Tell me how I shall handle my problem, please. I want all images to be removed from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:C_T_Johansson/Skulpturer_2013

I have this information: "No freedom of panorama in Sweden. The court decision can be read here (swedish):[5]".

How should I handle that? Christer T Johansson (talk) 18:57, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete files

Si eliminar las imágenes, se estan sustituyendo por: File:Función xy discontinua 14a.svg.

Wenn Sie die Bilder löschen, werden sie ersetzt durch: File:Función xy discontinua 14a.svg.

Dáni (talk) 11:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild ist nicht dasselbe wie beispielsweise File:Función 14 discontinuidad 141.svg. Weitere Informationen sind hier: COM:Dupe. --Hystrix (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:52 3109

I have now discovered that such categories were created by vandals. Categories with separate locomotive numbers should be removed as decided below. You see here User talk:5.174.117.225 and here: [6] [7].
In addition, through my mistake I created a new category - Category:ÖBB 152.3109. As you can see I have done the wrong way. --Marokobu (talk) 14:27, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bei einem neuen Benutzer, der am ersten Tag ca. 400 (!) Beiträge liefert, fast alle nur Kategorien betreffend, neue anlegt, Löschanträge stellt, Beschreibungen von Dateien ändert, und das (fast) alles nur bei Dateien mit deutscher Sprache, da gehe ich davon aus, dass es ein erfahrener, der deutschen Sprache mächtigen Benutzer ist. Und ein solch erfahrener Benutzer sollte auch die Regel kennen, Diskussionen dort fortzusetzen, wo sie begonnen wurden. Es gibt viele solcher Betriebsnummerkategorien, nicht alle von Vandalen oder IPs angelget, manch eine sogar von erfahrenen Bahnfans (Category:52 7409). Falls Du eine Diskussion über diese Kategorien starten möchtest, dann gibt es dafür diese Seite. Hystrix (talk) 16:00, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Löschung von Natalie_Grams.jpg

Das Bild ist Eigentum der Abgebildeten, denn sie hat es der Fotografin abgekauft und mir für den Artikel zur Verfügung gestellt. Wenn meine entsprechenden Angaben nicht reichen, was hätte ich genau tun müssen? Gruß --FK1954 (talk) 07:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild ist wiederhergestellt. Das weitere Vorgehen ist dort beschrieben: COM:OTRS/de. Das Bild wurde von Codc vor 7 Tagen mit Missing permission versehen. Leider gibt es noch keine automatische Benachrichtigung. LG Hystrix (talk) 16:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Florian Ross img0157.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Florian Ross img0157.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 03:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted image: Old Seoul City Hall.jpg

Hi, I have just received an email from the author of the above mentioned image on Flickr. Would you please restore the image, or point in the right direction for proceeding. Thanks! Dr.khatmando (talk) 11:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The easiest way would be if the author changes the license to Flickr into a free one. Then upload the picture again. Another way is described here: com:otrs. Best regards, Hystrix (talk) 11:40, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that has already been done, but when I try to upload the file as you say, I get a message that the file can not be unloaded because it was deleted by you. Can you please fix this as I would like to spend my time completing the translation of the article the photo is needed for, and other contributors are waiting. It is an article of architecture and the content relies on the visual references provided by the images. We are working across 3 wikis in 3 languages, so any bit of help you could do given the rights you have would be much appreciated. Dr.khatmando (talk) 15:31, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The problem I can not understand. Just upload the image under a different name, for example Old Seoul City Hall (1).jpg? Hystrix (talk) 19:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lalamove vehicles fleet.jpg lalamove logo.jpg

Image was created by Lalamove and is free to use, and I would like to use it in an article. How should I proceed? Ericlalamove (talk) 01:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The procedure is described here: COM:OTRS. --Hystrix (talk) 07:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File deletions

Hello, sorry you have confused me by deleting my replacement photo files for Christine Riordan. I used the recommended license and then reverted to the prior license and you still removed. Is it the empty metadata for the copyright status that is wrong?Krheroldc (talk) 16:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The photo can be found on many websites. If you was the photographer or have rights to the picture, you must contact the OTRS team. Hystrix (talk) 21:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Danke für den Tipp! (Ich hätte schönere Katzenbilder - selber vier Katzen und zwei Hunde- ,bekomme sie aber leider nicht rein).

Schöne Grüße aus Gleiritsch

Alois Köppl

A. Köppl (talk) 18:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Löschen der Datei "File:Elektronischer Zünder.jpg"

Hallo Hystrix,

bitte um kurze Rückmeldung, warum die Datei gelöscht wurde. Es handelte sich um mein eigenes Werk; entsprechende Nutzungserlaubnis habe ich eingeräumt. https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sprengz%C3%BCnder&action=history

Kannst Du das bitte wieder rückgängig machen?

Vielen Dank und Gruß,

David --DaDoKa (talk) 11:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo David,

Das Bild ist wiederhergestellt. Das weitere Vorgehen ist dort beschrieben: COM:OTRS/de. Das Bild wurde von @Rosenzweig: vor 7 Tagen mit „Keine Genehmigung“ versehen. Frohes Schaffen noch, Hystrix (talk) 12:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DaDoKa: Was ist mit den weiteren Bildern, die auf Deiner Disk. zur Löschung anstehen? Hystrix (talk) 22:55, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dankeschön für die Rückmeldung - ich hatte eine Mail von Wikipedia erhalten mit der Bitte um Bestätigung der Urheberschaft der genannten Bilder. Die Bestätigung habe ich erteilt. Leider habe ich keine Idee, wie weiter zu verfahren ist. Das Wiederherstellen finde ich etwas ... müßig und würde dann darauf verzichten (zwei Mal Arbeit in einen Artikel zu investieren, macht langfristig keinen Spaß...). Dass ohne Nachfrage Medien gelöscht werden und der Autor diese wieder herstellen muss, trägt nicht zur Motivation, zukünftig eigene Werke der Wikipedia-Gemeinschaft zur Verfügung zu stellen, bei und ich werde zukünftig deshalb auch nichts mehr hochladen. Kurzum: wenn es jemand wieder herstellt - gerne - ansonsten eben Pech... Grüße und ein schönes Wochenende! --DaDoKa (talk) 16:48, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Es tut mir unendlich leid, die ganzen Umstände und das komplizierte Gehandhabe (OTRS). Wir aktiven Commons-Mitarbeiter haben tagtäglich mit hunderten copyvios zu tun. Leider kann ich nur auf das Prozedere von COM:OTRS/de hinweisen. Liebe Grüße Hystrix (talk) 17:18, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revert to images not found

Out of curiosity, why did you undo my edits on File:Informal meeting of health ministers (iEPSCO). Arrivals 1106 20170720 (35872064682).jpg, File:Informal meeting of health ministers (iEPSCO). Arrivals A72A0260 (35655513740).jpg, and File:Informal meeting of health ministers (iEPSCO). Arrivals 1100 20170720 (36001462456).jpg? Each of these images got flagged by the Flickr review bot as not being found (as in they used to be on Flickr, but they got deleted). I had a discussion with the uploader and another user already. Elisfkc (talk) 17:58, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please excuse my mistake. I saw this note and this discussion. Unfortunately, I understood them well. I corrected my mistakes. Best regards, Hystrix (talk) 18:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Rarityfan

Hi. Thanks for blocking, please restrict talk page access, it's not being used constructively. — Jeff G. ツ 23:40, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done And thanks for your attention and the many resetting. Hystrix (talk) 23:46, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ 23:53, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Logos Cned :restoration

Hello Hystrix , It seems you didn't see my previous message.

I work with Vvirginie. We don't understand the procedure you described overhead in order to restore the files. Where should we add the OTRS ? Can you be more clear please ?

Thanks in advance for your help.

Best regards --Mdia12 (talk) 13:46, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mdia12,

please excuse me, which I have overlooked your question above. I have created the file File:Logo Accessi Scol.jpg again and provided with {{subst:OP}}. For the further procedure see OTRS/fr. Originally, the file was provided by @Yann: with „No permission“. Perhaps he can help more quickly because he is a member of the OTRS team and also speaks French. Best regards Hystrix (talk) 18:58, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Conchita Martínez & Kathy RInaldi at the 2010 US Open 01.jpg

Hallo, Bitte stelle die Weiterleitung wieder her, siehe Template:FilemoverWelcome/de. Solche löschungen sind von COM:CSD nicht gedeckt (Die Datei wurde 2010 hochgeladen, also keine neue Weiterleitung). Habe auch den SLA steller darauf hingewiesen. Allerbesten Dank im Vorraus! :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Steinsplitter,

die Löschung habe ich hoffentlich richtig revertiert. Es wäre mir lieb, wenn Du diese und andere Probleme löst und mich danach über mein Fehlverhalten informierst. LG, Hystrix (talk) 19:03, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photos and sketches of work by Eugenio Gentili Tedeschi

I was disappointed to see that you didn't wait longer before deleting the images I've been collecting for the Wiki entry on Eugenio Gentili Tedeschi. I said I was obtaining written permission from the rights holders. It's taking time -- the presumed rights holder, Tedeschi's son is a busy guy, it's Italy, he travels and so on. I hadn't posted them to the entry and they weren't hurting anybody. There ought to be more important things to worry about on Wikipedia than something so benign. But so be it.

The images have two categories:

1) Photos of Tedeschi's buildings in Milan and the surrounding area. These are the property of the Estate of EGT. These images date from the 1950's to the 1970's. They have also findable on Google Images. 2) sketches, made by EGT of his friends, including Primo Levi. These sketches are the property of the estate, as well. They have been published in at least one book, the biography of Primo Levi, by Carole Angier, by permission of EGT who was still alive when Angier wrote her book. Some of these are also findable on Google Images.

It would be helpful you could tell me, someone who does't spent much time on Wikipedia and doesn't know this by heart, which categories these images fall into, given the template.

16:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

I had already answered you on the 3rd of July. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Hystrix (talk) 17:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Forgotten deletion

Hi Hystrix,

thanks for concluding on the deletion request for File:Indre By, Copenhagen, Denmark - panoramio (9).jpg. However, the file is stille there. Could you please delete it :-) --Pugilist (talk) 08:49, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done und herzlichen Dank für die Aufmerksamkeit. Hystrix (talk) 11:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads by Iskatelb

Actually uploader fixed descriptions and licenses for these files already. Both works are in public domain by age. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Iskatelb: Прошу прощения. Я исправил свои ошибки. Большой привет, Hystrix (talk) 18:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oк :) Iskatelb 19:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help plz!

Dear Hystrix, Is it possible to upload such a these images in commons? This picture is from a book, but as it is a simple circuit schematic, I don't know whether it subjects to copyright or not. Would you please guide me about the copyright of this file. What about the two others? (They are from the same book.)

Waveform
curve
circuit

Because these images are widely used in various books and articles, I asked this question. this arrangement is not unique and every "buck converter" has the same shape. So still they subject to copyright?

I doubt there is a copyright, at least on the first 2. They are simple mathematical diagrams, no originality.--Freshman404^Talk 12:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see here and there. Hystrix (talk) 17:46, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know that I've asked this several times! I wanna know your opinion, but thanks for your time.--Freshman404^Talk 03:40, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Conference project

Hello

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--Touzrimounir (talk) 22:17, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the hint. Regards, Hystrix (talk) 10:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[1]

[2]