User talk:Geo Swan/archive/2023
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2005
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2006
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2007
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2008
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2009
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2010
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2011
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2012
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2013
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2014
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2015
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2016
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2017
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2018 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2019 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2020 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2021 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2022
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2023
- User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/2024 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
TUSC token 70dfd90b6e52c9080a8e30c0dd592336
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! 70dfd90b6e52c9080a8e30c0dd592336 Geo Swan (talk) 01:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Royal Oak Inn - s1465 fl0377 it0026.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Royal Oak Inn - s1465 fl0377 it0026.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Royal Oak Inn - s1465 fl0377 it0026.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
File:Polar bear WWF (51132162310).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Boylarva99.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 15:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Cosmonauts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Josh (talk) 05:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Tiff files
[edit]Hi Geo, Just to let you know rather than cropping tiff files, its better to either get the jpg version from the institution and upload that, or if it doesn't have one use GIMP to export the file to jpg and load that. Tiff files are reference files they are overlarge and cumbersome for websites, and we prefer not to use them. Jpeg files load faster and scale better. Cheers. Broichmore (talk) 18:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Dunkleosteus Diptych (29426704838).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 14:20, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Dunkleosteus (13748269283).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 14:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Dunkleosteus Attack! (39057009955).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 14:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Dunkleosteus (6924550911).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 14:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Dunkleosteus (39057010905).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 14:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Old Soviet machine gun ammunition, 120113-A-LP603-115.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Old Soviet machine gun ammunition, 120113-A-LP603-115.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Old Soviet machine gun ammunition, 120113-A-LP603-115.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Behind Verzlun, Reykjavik (3443680331).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 16:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Caldea Spa in Andorra (52625851623).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lukas Beck (talk) 10:24, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:44, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination graciously withdrawn. Geo Swan (talk) 07:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
File:CNE 2010 -8 (4945405378).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 08:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Icebreaker Baikal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator says that there are explicit exceptions to DOE images being in the public domain, specifically, LBL images may not be in the public domain. Geo Swan (talk) 07:09, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Kilo Moana dock.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator says that there are explicit exceptions to DOE images being in the public domain, specifically, LBL images may not be in the public domain. Geo Swan (talk) 07:09, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
File:RV Persei, Lake Baikal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator says that there are explicit exceptions to DOE images being in the public domain, specifically, LBL images may not be in the public domain. Geo Swan (talk) 07:10, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Changes to author field
[edit]Hi GeoSwan,
Can you please help to clarify a little the reason for which you changed in 2021 the author field information that the uploader had provided in 2011 in a few files such as for example [1] or [2]? Was it a mistake? Could the change have resulted from a confusion about two persons of the same name? Or was it at the request of the user or with his consent? Or following some independent finding? This could have an incidence on a current deletion request. Thank you in advance for any light you can bring on this matter. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:20, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Hudson's Bay Company shipyards at Gravel Point - pa-2218-136 141.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adamant1 (talk) 10:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Millennium park II (4756687001).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
COM:AN/U
[edit]
Adamant1 (talk) 04:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
File:King Hassan II Mosque in Casablanca (52188873071).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:10, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2273 (36661309063).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2275 (36661318293).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2276 (37283801676).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2277 (36661318203).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2278 (37283801576).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2279 (36661318043).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2280 (36661317913).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2281 (23479180248).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2282 (36661317543).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2283 (23479180028).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2284 (36661308933).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2285 (36661317373).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2289 (37283801026).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2292 (23479179398).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2293 (37283800776).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2295 (36621365504).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2296 (37283800666).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2297 (37283800286).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2298 (36621364324).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2299 (37283799086).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2302 (36661308743).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2305 (37283798946).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2306 (36661314943).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2307 (37283798676).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2308 (23479174478).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2309 (23479173988).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2310 (23479173538).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2311 (23479173068).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2312 (36621359034).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2313 (23479172458).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2314 (23479172198).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2315 (23479171528).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2316 (23479170878).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2317 (23479170458).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2318 (36661308403).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2319 (23479169868).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2321 (23479169388).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2323 (36661312003).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2324 (23479160768).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2325 (36661311783).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2326 (36661311593).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2327 (36621361104).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2329 (23479160658).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2330 (36621360914).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2331 (36621360714).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2332 (36621360584).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2334 (37300797072).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2335 (37300796412).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2336 (37300796022).jpg
- File:Maumee River HABs Sept 22 2017 2338 (36621365304).jpg
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 09:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
File:King Hassan II Mosque in Casablanca (52189126524).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:03, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Adamant1
[edit]Just a request, and with absolutely no suggestion that this is a one-sided matter: could you please try, when engaging with User:Adamant1, to keep your remarks to statements about the issue at hand, not his character or qualifications? It would go a lot smoother. - Jmabel ! talk 18:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Jmabel, it sounds like you may be encouraging me to treat Adamant1 with kid gloves, because they are unusually apt to mistakenly interpret fair, civil, collegial comments and questions about his or her edits as if they were personal attacks. Clarification please. Is that what you are suggesting?
- If that is what you are suggesting, well, I am not sure that is a good idea.
I think Adamant1 is a contributor who generally does good work. I think their recent work on challenging questionable logos looked like good work.
But, when they do questionable work, themselves, I think that merits civil and collegial questions and comments.
What happens to contributors whose work is generally good, but who also have blind spots, weaknesses, when the people who notice their lapses treat them with kid gloves?
The tune out the kid-glove advice. They ignore it. Their lapses continue to bug people. I think what then happens is that frustrations build up, over those (unchallenged) lapses, to the point there is an avoidable over-reaction, like sanctions, or blocks.
I think it is far better for the individual, and for the project, if those who notice their lapses make a good faith effort to spell them out, prior to the avoidable over-reaction of sanctions, or blocks. Geo Swan (talk) 20:39, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- No, I'm not suggesting "kid gloves". I'm saying that unless the context is specifically a discussion on (say) AN/U about his character or qualifications, stick to the substance of the matter rather than his character/qualifications. If he's wrong, absolutely say he's wrong, but don't say he's ignorant or duplicitous. This is a pretty general rule, but I haven't seen you do that with other established users. (And I'm glad to see that you acknowledge that his work is generally good, as certainly is yours.) - Jmabel ! talk 21:07, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Cough cough. I said I'm fine with honest mistakes. That said, I find it extremely hard to believe that him repeating I'm not an expert on ships right after you told him not to comment on my qualifications was one though. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:33, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: Adamant1 stated or implied I was dishonest, multiple times. I don't think I ever stated or implied he or she was dishonest, just mistaken.
- WRT "qualifications", I think the record of the Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs from David Adamec discussion showed terrible disrespect to the community, by telling them they should use tineye to confirm his hunch that the 36 images included copyright violations. When I did check for myself I found that his or her hunch wasn't valid for even one of the images.
Is this what you mean by "qualifications"? I'd call it "competency". They did not seem to have the competency to interpret tineye results. It was as if they thought that if tineye found other instances of the image that proved that the commons versions were copyright violations, without considering that the other sites might have copied the image from the commons. One has to check the date found on tineye images. Which Adamant1 wasn't doing.
I said I didn't think Adamant1 should use tineye in nominating files as copyright violations, unless he or she learns how to use it properly. I stand by that, even if Adamant1 thinks it was mean of me to say so. Geo Swan (talk) 22:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- The TinEye thing wasn't great and I definitely could have handled the DR better. People make mistakes and DRs are kept sometimes though. That's life. I'm learning how to do this as I go along just like everyone else is. It definitely doesn't warrant you making comments about my qualifications and character for a month straight. Regardless, all I want is for the personal comments to end. That's it. I don't think it's that unreasonable of a request either. Especially since it's a general rule not to comment on someone's qualifications or character anyway and an administrator has asked you to stop once already. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:28, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- No, I'm not suggesting "kid gloves". I'm saying that unless the context is specifically a discussion on (say) AN/U about his character or qualifications, stick to the substance of the matter rather than his character/qualifications. If he's wrong, absolutely say he's wrong, but don't say he's ignorant or duplicitous. This is a pretty general rule, but I haven't seen you do that with other established users. (And I'm glad to see that you acknowledge that his work is generally good, as certainly is yours.) - Jmabel ! talk 21:07, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:28, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Queen Sabine at the Italian Party for TIFF (21565449172).jpg
- File:Queen Sabine Mondestin at TIFF (21388408110).jpg
- File:Sabine Mondestin (22212585776).jpg
Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Attorney General William Barr (Shane T. McCoy - US Marshals).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Attorney General William Barr (Shane T. McCoy - US Marshals).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Attorney General William Barr (Shane T. McCoy - US Marshals).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Lorene Scafaria Close-up (48749032293).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2600:100C:A211:73E1:78BC:D15B:EA1D:2C4 19:36, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Sibelius Monument (52432255671).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
File:SIM Training Center (51476904739).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Asclepias (talk) 13:12, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Andrew Durnford, plantation owner and rare instance of a black slaveowner (1800-1859).jpg
[edit]File:Andrew Durnford, plantation owner and rare instance of a black slaveowner (1800-1859).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
MassiveEartha (talk) 11:43, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 13:36, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
File:A book from the Guantanamo captives' library.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Di (they-them) (talk) 20:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Portrait of Frank Austen -a.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Obscure2020 (talk) 15:13, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Actress, and actress Maria
{{Autotranslate|1=File:(L-R) Actress Gina Eduardo and actress Ma (14914821603).jpg|2=Cred}]]) 00:38, 13 October 2023
Salt River, Northwest Territories has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
ModernDayTrilobite (talk) 15:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Spiderman (43172253254).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 00:09, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
File:20210626 51 Astoria Blvd. @ 18th St. (51630051005).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 07:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Bust of landscape painter Arkhyp Kuindzhi (14938406083).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 21:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Monument to Young Pioneer Tolya Bakabukha (15371955519).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Monument to Young Pioneer Tolya Balabukha (15371955649).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
File:WWII Memorial (15372572297).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
File:WWII Memorial (15372946260).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest (51879943436).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
File:USNS Mendonca (T-AKR-303) undeway at sea.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
– Recoil16 (talk) 14:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
te pasaste de pendejo 2806:102E:18:16DC:606C:3160:3EF9:A0DB 11:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
File:The Motherland Monument in Kyiv (51879024667).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 07:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
File:The Motherland Monument in Kyiv (51879991401).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 07:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Romania-1355 - Marble Hallway (7589097074).jpg
- File:Romania-1357 - Costumes (7589101482).jpg
- File:Romania-1361 - Hallway (7589089402).jpg
- File:Romania-1363 - Nicolae Iorga Hall (7589105464).jpg
- File:Romania-1368B (7589108028).jpg
- File:Romania-1373 - 13th of September Entrance (7589111256).jpg
- File:Romania-1375 - Magnificent Room (7589114198).jpg
- File:Romania-1378 (7589117650).jpg
- File:Romania-1380 (7589121062).jpg
- File:Romania-1388 - 13th of September Entrance (7589124558).jpg
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Eva Rinaldi, Tony Anthony Rinaldi (50936945268).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Headlock0225 (talk) 20:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Younger Eva Rinaldi (51065404618).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Headlock0225 (talk) 20:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Eva Rinaldi, Tony Anthony Rinaldi (50936945268).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |