User talk:Geo Swan/archive/2018 12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TUSC token 70dfd90b6e52c9080a8e30c0dd592336

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! 70dfd90b6e52c9080a8e30c0dd592336 Geo Swan (talk) 01:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

why the speedy tag?

[edit]

Geo Swan, why did you tag File:Newmarket Coach Lines bus 32 at garage.jpg as speedy based on URAA requirements? I see your talk page has a number of URAA-related deletion requests, but all of them are normal deletion discussions. Given the nature of the URAA debate on Commons, I don't see how a speedy tag applies for such files. Mindmatrix 18:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sure.
Images Salmon took himself passed into the public domain, in Canada, on the 50th anniversary of his death -- ie 2008. Years ago I uploaded some of images he took shortly before his death, taking the "public domain" license on the TPL and COTA at face value. However, one of those images was challenged, by someone who stated that, under US law it was not the PD status of those images, today, that counted. It was their copyright status in 1996, that counted. When I learned this I stopped uploading images Salmon captured after 1948-12-31. A couple of years ago I acquired several really dogged wikistalkers, who continue to harass me, even after they were served with indefinite blocks on the English language wiki. One of these individuals challenged an image I uploaded that Salmon took prior to 1948-12-31, but after 1946, claiming it too couldn't be proven to be in the public domain, in the USA.
I don't know how much you know about Salmon... He died in his forties, of cancer. Most of the images from his collection, that he took personally, are from the last few years of his life. So I think he took them when he had to take early retirement to get cancer treatment, but was sometimes well enough to get out of the house. It shows admirable determination.
Anyhow, I decided to check his images, and speedy any I uploaded, prior to learning about this URAA wrinkle, that could be challenged under the URAA wrinkle. I saw you also uploaded some, as did SecondaryWaltz. In retrospect I should only have speedied the ones I uploaded myself, and initiated a discussion over the ones other people uploaded. I apologize for that.
I have considered making an appeal to the Toronto Public Library, the City of Toronto Archives, to request that they formally waive any foreign intellectual property rights they retain, for all the images in their collection that are already in the public domain, in Canada.
If they agreed we could restore those Salmon image then, as opposed to waiting fro 2033.
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 22:59, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. I noticed what you had done well after the fact. As a side note, Salmon authored or contributed to at least two books (Etobicoke in Pictures, Rails from the Junction), so it's likely some of his photos made it into these books. I've only managed to find a reprint of Etobicoke in Pictures in Google Books (1971), but no preview is available. I can't find the other book. The Toronto Public Library has both in reference (Rails from the Junction - many copies, Etobicoke in pictures - one copy). If you happen to be anywhere nearby, can you briefly pore over them (a trip to TO for me would take too long; no library remotely close to me has these books). I suspect if a photo appears therein, and they were published early enough, it allows those images to skirt URAA, keeping in mind that IANAL. Mindmatrix 00:24, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • When I got that first challenge, 6 or 8 years ago, I found his images were included in a book sold at Montgomery's Inn, a heritage site in Etobicoke. The author of that book had collaborated with Salmon, sixty years ago. The Etobicoke Guardian used to have column about the history of Etobicoke, written by the collaborator, and illustrated with a photo from Salmon's collection.
The pair collaborated, for years. Montgomery Inn gave me the other guy's email address. He was, at the time, semi-bedridden. (His wife said he only came downstairs on good days, when she explained why she was answering his email.) They only received $2 per column. Yipes!
I am guessing that Salmon's widow may have only received one cent per image for his collection. Less, maybe.
The book available at Montgomery's Inn might have been "Etobicoke in Pictures".
Is it possible there is a video version of "Rails from the Junction"?
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 00:40, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Swansea's Herne Hill, in 1925.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Swansea's Herne Hill, in 1925.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

AntonierCH (d) 16:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Los Angeles Meteorite 002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

World's Lamest Critic (talk) 00:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guantanamo captive Ahmed Zaid Zuhair.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B (talk) 00:05, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geo Swan, Canada has freedom-of-panorama exception for 3D works. So, copyright of the statue shouldn't be a problem. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 07:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 19:35, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 19:35, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:USMC Sergeant Remedios Cruz, on an endurance hike.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The source of this image is MarineTimes. As the site clearly says "http://www.marinecorpstimes.com © 2018 Sightline Media Group Not A U.S. Government Publication ",
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

World's Lamest Critic (talk) 16:05, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]