Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2024-05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Charivnanatusya

The batch of files uploaded by Charivnanatusya was deleted as unused personal photos (see also the deletion request's talk page) for context). However, the photos likely have encyclopedic / illustrative value as depicting Ukrainian folklore; they were submitted to the international Wiki Loves Folklore. The author clearly intended for the photos to depict folklore and Ukrainian traditions rather than use Wikimedia Commons as a storage for personal photos, as she herself wrote on her talk page in response to the notification about the deletion request (in Ukrainian). --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (talk) 05:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

@AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) and Yann: I have to agree with the nominations and then Yann's actions. These were poems in English, without attribution, and what seems unrelated images, and these look like personal images rather than clear folklore. If the contributor knows English then send them here, If they do not know English, then what are they contributing? I see neither encyclopaedic nor illustrative value in the [uploads.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose I agree. It looks to me like a personal photo album with 193 images. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose restoration per above. Bedivere (talk) 20:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion. Out of scope. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo was deleted without cause. It contributed to the article --DN27ND (talk) 06:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose 1969 picture scan claimed as own work, without permission from copyright holder. Yann (talk) 08:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This picture contributed to this article. Please undelete --DN27ND (talk) 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Newspaper scan claimed as own work, no permission from copyright holder. Yann (talk) 08:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo was released by the owner of the newspaper and contributed to the article. Please undelete --DN27ND (talk) 06:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Newspaper scan claimed as own work, no permission from copyright holder. Yann (talk) 08:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo was released by its owner and contributed to the article. Please undelete --DN27ND (talk) 06:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Newspaper scan claimed as own work, no permission from copyright holder. Yann (talk) 09:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo was released by its owner and contributed to the article. Please undelete. --DN27ND (talk) 06:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose 1969 picture scan claimed as own work, no permission from copyright holder. Yann (talk) 09:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please kindly undelete the photo, since it was provided by the person herself alongside with her agreement to publish it. The copyright belongs to Liliya Podkopayeva, as she personally confirmed that it was a private photoshoot for which she had paid, therefore the copyright was transferred from the author to the owner. We have sent an email, ticket 2024042210009148

I'm forwarding the info here: The photograph in question, depicting me, was taken during a paid photoshoot, for which I hold the copyright now, because I paid for it and the copyright was granted to me. Initially, it was shared on my private Instagram account. Subsequently, it has garnered attention from various media outlets, as evidenced by its appearance in the following publication: https://stars.clutch.net.ua/75376-zatmila-pervuyu-ledi-ukrainy-liliya-podkopaeva-opublikovala-foto-s-elenoy-zelenskoy-obe-v-chernyh-kostyumah-foto I would like to propose its inclusion on Wikipedia as an alternative to the current image. As a gymnastics champion, it would be more representative to showcase a photograph featuring myself with my medals, rather than one in a dancing dress. I am amenable to the dissemination of this photograph and would be grateful for its incorporation into the Wikipedia entry. Thank you in advance.

That was signed and sent bu Liliya herself. Please restore the file, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naruighich (talk • contribs) 14:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

 Oppose Per the response at Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard#Liliya Podkopayeva ticket # 2024042210009273. The estimated processing time for VRT tickets in English is 7 days. Thuresson (talk) 15:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

@Thuresson exactly. and they have passed.


 Not done: The file will be undeleted if and when the permission is validated. No need for further action from the uploader. --Yann (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undelete this file plz


 Not done: Repeated abuse of COM:WEBHOST, see Special:Undelete/File:Shahroz_ahmed.jpg. --Yann (talk) 10:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The photograph in question is my own work. I have sent a release to allow anyone to use the work. I kindly ask for you undelete this media file.

--Lina.elza (talk) 14:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


 Not done: Not deleted, and this was never deleted. --Yann (talk) 14:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

public domain image in Paraguay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedrovjrv (talk • contribs) 22:59, 25 April 2024‎ (UTC)

 Info Deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pedro Cayetano J Vera. Thuresson (talk) 03:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Why is this public domain? Did the photographer die 70 years ago? Bedivere (talk) 20:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done No response. Ankry (talk) 01:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

public domain image in Paraguay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedrovjrv (talk • contribs) 23:00, 25 April 2024‎ (UTC)

 Info Deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pedro Cayetano J Vera. Thuresson (talk) 03:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
@Pedrovjrv: How can a 2022 photo be public domain in Paraguay? Thuresson (talk) 22:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done No response. Ankry (talk) 01:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please do hot delete File:윤운영-배우2.jpg. Because I recieved this photo file from the owner who is the actor, 윤운영. And I mended the photo with Photoshop by myself. 윤운영, the actor who is the owner of this photo already said that anyone can use this file. If my saying is not true, I will take the resposibility for the any result.

Thanks a lot. I love Wiki and everyone here.

--K-wiki-editor (talk) 15:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)


 Not done: Same image as above request. --Yann (talk) 15:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files of Sainte Marie de la Tourette

Both photos were taken of my group of graduate students (FH Cologne, architectural department), as incidental images, on which almost nothing is shown of the monastery. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 17:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose The roof's architecture is a main subject in the first, and the building is the subject of the second. Abzeronow (talk) 17:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
First picture: the main motive is the group of my students and the "roofs architecture" consists of the concrete walls (students standing) and of the steps (students sitting), both of which can`t be seen and can´t be visoned as bridge-construction between the church and the housing part of the former monastery. The cube in the foreground is the top of a banal staircase exit, and in the back one can see only the last part of the chimney. All elements are mere functional as one can see on this pic: https://www.german-architects.com/images/Projects/03/90/19/33a05007fe63472b8314379afd0d6855/33a05007fe63472b8314379afd0d6855.8945f03a.jpg (church is on the right of the slot between buildings, housing on the left) and not the "architectural roofgarden" which is typical for Corbusier`s "Unité s`habitation"-buildlings i.e. in Marseille: https://www.designweek.co.uk/issues/march-2014/living-laboratory-richard-pare-on-le-corbusier-and-konstantin-melnikov/ (first picture). Please undelete under: CC BY-SA 4.0 Legal Code, Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Second picture I agree that there is too much to be seen of the whole building. should be deleted. Thanks Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 05:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
@Peter Christian Riemann: Yes, we could keep the first picture after cropping the building, but the quality is poor, so what is the educational use of this picture without the building? Yann (talk) 16:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Yann: My intention was to visualize in the article the "pilgrimage" of architectural students. But without the banal rest of the building, this would make no sense, thanks though. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 06:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: This can be considered as withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 05:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi there!

I am wondering to know, why my uploaded file was deleted, since I mentioned references.

Reference: https://reform.ee/euroopa-parlamendi-valimised-2024/yoko-alender

Person on the picture gave a permission for publishing as well as every picture on reform.ee is for free use all across the globe.

Maybe I wrote Authors rights form incorrect, but I will wait for your answer and will stay on that this picture IS NOT violate the authors rights.

Thank you in advice, Roccki69 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roccki69 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 29 April 2024‎ (UTC)

@Roccki69: I don't see any kind of explicit free license there. Estonia is a signatory of the Berne Convention and all photographs are automatically considered copyrighted unless explicitly said otherwise. Abzeronow (talk) 20:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
@Roccki69: "Free use" is not a free license; see COM:L for minimal requirements. Also, any license has to be granted in a written form. Ankry (talk) 01:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I have found out that this rendition of Dixie was written and conducted by Richard Bales. It was released in an album called The Confederacy in 1958. The file was deleted due to it not being known weather it violated copyright or not, since Richard Bales passed away in 1998 this version of Dixie might be in public domain. https://archive.org/details/lp_the-confederacy_richard-bales_0/page/n6/mode/1up https://archive.org/details/lp_the-confederacy_richard-bales_1/disc1/02.05.+Dixie's+Land+With+Quckstep+And+Interlude%3A+Year+Of+Jubilo.mp3 Andrew Adams fan (talk) 03:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose 1958 sound recording is protected until 2068. Also even if the life of the author figured into this, 1998 is not 70 years ago. Abzeronow (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done as per Abzeronow. Ankry (talk) 20:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello,

The picture that has been uploaded can be used for Wikipedia, but I have indicated the wrong copyright type in the uploading process. Is it possible to undelete it?

Have a nice day, Pieter PieterDS (talk) 19:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Unless there is an explicitly free license at the source, we'd need VRT permission from the photographer to host it here. Abzeronow (talk) 19:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
@PieterDS: Which license is correct in your opinion and where has it been granted? Ankry (talk) 01:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: Copyright information at the source doesn't indicate any free license. --Yann (talk) 11:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The image was captured by my one of the friend and I have acquired full permission and rights to use it as my own work and upload it to Thirumali's page. Please remove the copyright violation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rydex64 (talk • contribs) 20:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

@Rydex64: Then please ask your friend to confirm the permission for a free license via COM:VRT. The file will be undeleted when the permission is validated. Yann (talk) 20:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Definitely. Thank you, will ask him to do so. Rydex64 (talk) 20:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done waiting for VRT action. Ankry (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

It isn't a copyright violation. I linked the YouTube video source, which is under a Creative Commons license, as can be read in the description. I specifically put in the license which the image was under, both in English and in Brazilian Portuguese. Pato ilógico (talk) 01:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

 Support CC-BY-3.0 at youtube.com. Thuresson (talk) 04:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Could we expedite the image undeletion? The Wikipedia page is currently without an image due to this issue. Thanks! Pato ilógico (talk) 15:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
I usually wait for 24 hours after the request, or after the last comment. Yann (talk) 16:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: License reviewed. --Yann (talk) 05:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:윤운영배우1.jpg I directly recieved this photo from 윤운영. 윤운영 is the man of the photo. There is no reason you should delete this file. Please do not delete this photo file.

--K-wiki-editor (talk) 14:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose You said you are the owner of this file, which is wrong. The copyright holder is usually the photographer, not the subject. So we need a formal written permission for a free license from the copyright holder. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. The file will be undeleted if and when the permission is validated. Yann (talk) 14:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 24 days. . .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request by Mitumial

Ich bitte darum, genannte Dateien wiederherzustellen, da diese Teil diverser Wikipediaprojekte sind, an denen ich teils auch als Autor mitgearbeitet habe.

Mitumial (talk) 11:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose I have looked at half a dozen of these and they all were deleted by Yann as personal images from a non-contributor. I see no reason to disagree with that. Commons is not Facebook. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Most of the pictures have been part of different projects showing different models for illustration not for private use Mitumial (talk) 18:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I wrote Yann, he understood my issue and he told me to ask here Mitumial (talk) 18:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: Stalled. No consensus to undelete. --Yann (talk) 13:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Just a piece of artwork, but it is licensed under {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebiguglyferret (talk • contribs) 09:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

@Thebiguglyferret: Per policy, the uploader is required to provide a verifiable evidence of free license permission or ensure that the copyright holder did sent the permission via email following VRT instructions. There is no evidence of the permission on this page. The image may be undeleted when the evidence is provided. Ankry (talk) 20:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 11:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file is a vectorized version of File:Toho Cinemas.png. File:Toho Cinemas.png has been posted for two years and has not been deleted for copyright infringement, so I believe the license is appropriate. I believe the decision to delete is inappropriate and I request the withdrawal of the deletion.
Thank you.
Amaterasu 1-1 (talk) 03:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Much too complex. PNG version nominated for deletion. Yann (talk) 05:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: per Yann. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

After I got warning, I changed the source URL to proper one. Luke atlas (talk) 03:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: pd-textlogo and has a valid source. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Some files

File:Pasar logo.svg
File:Expasa logo.svg
File:Pavarie logo.svg
File:Neopasa logo.svg
I believe these logos are not logos with complex shapes that exceed the threshold of originality, but are logos composed of simple shapes.
Your incerely,
Luke atlas (talk) 05:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: At least these require a regular DR. Done for 3 of them. --Yann (talk) 11:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello, I believe that deleting the image is not correct because it is licensed under Creative Commons 3.0, as you can see in the footer of the website that it has been published there.

Thank you.

https://www.coleccionistasdemonedas.com/author/javier/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coleccionistasdemonedas (talk • contribs) 11:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

 Oppose Personal image for advertising purpose. Yann (talk) 11:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 11:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello, I believe that deleting the image is not correct because it is licensed under Creative Commons 3.0, as you can see in the footer of the website that it has been published there.

https://www.coleccionistasdemonedas.com/graduacion-estado-de-conservacion-de-monedas-antiguas/

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coleccionistasdemonedas (talk • contribs) 11:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

 Oppose The license is only CC-BY-ND-3.0 which is not OK for Commons. This doesn't allow for derivative works. We need a license for any use for any purpose, including commercial ones. Also what is the educational use of this screenshot? Yann (talk) 11:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 11:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

url of source is available, license info is present - all files are {{Noord-Hollands Archief-de Boer}}. These were probably auto-deleted before I could remove the issue tag.

same is true for:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tertius3 (talk • contribs) 11:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

@Krd and Didym: as involved admins. Yann (talk) 11:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: {{Noord-Hollands Archief-de Boer}} seems to apply here. --Yann (talk) 13:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Photos by Christophe Péan

Please undelete

We have permission from the photographer by Ticket:2024050310003731.

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Mussklprozz (talk • contribs) 13:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)


✓ Done: @Mussklprozz: FYI. --Yann (talk) 13:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Restauración de imagen antigua y recategorización . Autor: Paul Marcoy del libro "Viaje a través de América del Sur. Del océano Pacífico al océano Atlántico".


Restoration of old image and recategorization. Author: Paul Marcoy from the book 'Journey through South America. From the Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean.'" ArticleAmazon (talk) 17:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

 Support 1870s book. Abzeronow (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done @ArticleAmazon: Please fix license/source/description. Ankry (talk) 18:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Logos for Kosovo ethnic Serb municipalities

Please permanently undelete these files:

The deletion requests were:

The nominator User:AceDouble gave the rationale "Fictional emblem used by serbian parallel structures and not in official use by kosovan authorities see here: [...]". Similar files have since been kept following deletion requests, on the basis that these emblems are probably not fictional but are emblems of towns or regions in Kosovo that have ethnic Serb majorities, so these files are in COM:SCOPE. The deleting admin has no objection to undeletion, see User talk:Infrogmation#Deleted requests for Kosovo Serb files.

Several similar deletion requests have since been issued with the same rationale, as follows:

Verbcatcher (talk) 17:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

@Verbcatcher: Are you able to provide evidence that the logos are really used in public space if the abovementioned DRs are reopened? Ankry (talk) 10:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Some or all of them are linked in the newer batch of deletion requests. I will try to add some here. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
@Verbcatcher: These "logos" were never adopted officially as required per law on local self-government in Kosovo => https://mapl.rks-gov.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Law-On-Local-Self-Government.pdf Article 7 Symbols 7.3 "The symbols of a Municipality shall be approved and changed by the municipal assembly pursuant to the constitutional and legal provisions of Republic of Kosova and shall not resemble to symbols of other states or municipalities within or outside Republic of Kosova". For example: the Municipality of Graçanica which has a serb majority population, did approve its own symbols according to the law and they are included in the official site: https://kk.rks-gov.net/gracanice/
The forementioned files should be removed as well (Leposavic, Zvecan, North Mitrovica, Zubin potok) .png .gif .svg AceDouble (talk) 19:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
@AceDouble: we do not require that images are approved or adopted by any government. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Being official / adopted by any government is not required to host an image in Commons. Being actually used is enough. However, if the image is not official, we cannot apply any copyright exception related to government and official works and so we need an evidence that the image is too simple for copyright protection or a free license from the author. Ankry (talk) 10:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
@Ankry: Verbcatcher has no evidence for the use of these nonexisting symbols in public spaces whatsoever.

Sources:

    • [[1]] - North Mitrovica
    • [[2]] - Zvecan
    • [[3]] - Zubin Potok
    • [[4]] - Leposavic

AceDouble (talk) 00:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

@AceDouble: , I do have evidence. As I said above "Some or all of them are linked in the newer batch of deletion requests. I will try to add some here." I will add some links soon. Your new links only identify the symbols used by the Kosovo Government. They do not relate to the symbols discussed here. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Here are links that confirm that the symbols are used. I do not have access to the deleted files, but the placenames indicated in the file names match our current files and it is probable that they have the same symbols. I don't understand these languages and I cannot confirm the reliability of these sources.

@Vanjagenije: you commented on some of the recent deletion requests, can you comment here? Verbcatcher (talk) 01:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Here are Google Maps photos that show the symbols displayed in two of these places.
Verbcatcher (talk) 01:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
These Municipalities are located in the Republic of Kosovo full stop. By quoting unofficial links and trying to make them "legal" is not the proper way to enrich wikipedian articles.
Official sites:
AceDouble (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 Support undeletion and reopening the DRs as they may need wider discussion about their status. While they are not "official", the declaraion that they are "fictional" is a lie if they are actually in use. However, the {{PD-Kosovo-exempt}} cannot be applied to unofficial emblems and so we need a valid copyright tag (probably a free licese declaration by their human authors). Ankry (talk) 11:06, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
@AceDouble: we are not trying to make these 'legal'. There are other symbols on Commons that are probably illegal in their recognised nation state, such as the flag of Islamic State. If these files should not be used in specific Wikipedia articles then please discuss in on their talk pages, or in a Wikiproject such as w:en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Kosovo. If it is reliably established that these symbols are illegal under the law of Kosovo then we could indicate this in the description on the file page, or a template could be created.Verbcatcher (talk) 11:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose They are not in use, per given source.
AceDouble (talk) 12:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 Comment Hi. I declined a few deletion requests on the basis the rationale was not a valid reason for deletion, but I pointed out copyright status was a more sensible reason for deleting them (for example here), since I took a look on the template used there ({{PD-SerbiaGov}}) and I was not entirely convinced on its applicability. Strakhov (talk) 13:40, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
  • I accept that these files may have a risk of copyright violation because both {{PD-Kosovo-exempt}} and {{PD-SerbiaGov}} look invalid. The four deleted files should be undeleted (they might have a valid license), and a mass deletion request should be raised for all these files. There are various reasons by which they could be 'free': these could be old public domain symbols, possibly dating from the Yugoslav period. Alternatively, someone with local contacts might identify the authors or copyright holders, and establish free licenses. The municipal authorities might be able to issue valid licenses even if the Kosovo national government did not recognise these authorities. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
    • I can assure you that these don't have valid licenses neither they date back from the yugoslav period. And something i almost forgot.. The UN Habitat programme in Kosovo which has partnership with the municipalities of Kosovo, check out these symbols they have for Zvecan, Zubin potok and Leposavic on their site:
    • [[25]] Zvecan
    • [[26]] Zubin Potok
    • [[27]] Leposavic
    AceDouble (talk) 22:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Stale. If requesting again, please provide clear information about suggested license template and its evidence. The status may be different for each logo. Ankry (talk) 13:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Prof Hashimoto from JAXA and ISAS who oversaw the project sent a VRT for the file as far as I am aware. Also, as stated before, there is a notice on JAXA website regarding free use of their images and its verified that it applies to Commons.--VectorVoyager (talk) 14:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

@VectorVoyager:
  1. If an image requires a VRT perimission, you do not need to make a request here; the image will be undeleted after the permission is verified and accepted.
  2. You declared at upload that the photo is {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} licensed; I see no mention of this license on the abovementioned JAXA page.
  3. This page is not the right venue to discuss non-standard license compatibility with Wikimedia Commons requirements; if there was a discussion in this matter with a clear consensus and the appropriate template was created, please point them out. I cannot find any JAXA-related copyright template.
Ankry (talk) 20:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

{{Not done}}: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 11:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Reopening: @Ankry: , @Yann: , I'd ask you to look at the linked JAXA Data Policy page. Section 3 indicates that "Digitized documents, photos, pictures, videos, etc., which are created with the aim of long-term and universal use." are included under the open data policy. Section 6 states that the open data policy follows Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use (Version 2.0) and that those standards are compatible with Creative Commons BY 4.0. The proper license template should be {{GJSTU-2.0}}. —Tcr25 (talk) 13:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

 Support undeletion per above. Ankry (talk) 17:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. --Bedivere (talk) 02:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I don't understand why this file was deleted. I wonder what the interior of that plane looked like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maarghra (talk • contribs) 21:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)


 Not done: There is no deleted file by that name, and this user has no deleted file. Please provide a file name with a valid rationale for undeletion. --Yann (talk) 21:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SwitchBoot logo.svg was speedily deleted as CSD G10 (advertisement) by User:Pi.1415926535 during the course of this deletion request of a lower quality png file of the same logo. The lower quality file is currently in use in an article on the Japanese language Wikipedia about the company. It is debatable whether a simple logo like this could qualify as an advertisement and CSD G10 does not apply to advertisements within project scope anyway. The presence of an article on Japanese Wikipedia renders this file as being in scope for as long as Japanese Wikipedia choses to retain this article. Pi.1415926535 brought up the fact that the file was uploaded by a spammer when declining to undelete the image, but this does not seem germane if the file is in scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

 Support PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 21:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: simple. --Bedivere (talk) 02:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Screenshots cannot be copyrighted. Unless the maker of the screenshot asked for it to be taken down, this delete was superfluous. The software itself is proprietary; its likeness is not.

Compare to pages for each version of MacOS and OS X, all very much proprietary software backed with aggressive legal teams, yet those screenshots remain live on those pages.

The enaction of Wikimedia's policies on copyrighted work must be based in actual copyright law, and should be used only to keep Wikipedia free and open. I cannot see how deleting this screenshot accomplished that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.65.44.226 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 3 May 2024‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Screenshots can very well be copyrighted. We need a permission for a free license from the copyright holder. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Yann (talk) 21:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose I agree with Yann, screenshots can definitely be copyrighted. Abzeronow (talk) 22:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: Per above. --Bedivere (talk) 02:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo was is owned by me, and was taken in November 2023. I own the copyright. I don't understand how it has been decided that someone else owns copyright to this from 2016 (the photo has only existed since November 2023). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peggyfuggall (talk • contribs) 11:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

@Peggyfuggall: That's what the EXIF data says: Artist: Steven Robert Breen, Copyright: Steven R Breen 2016 Yann (talk) 11:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
@Peggyfuggall: If you are Steven R Breen or you have copyright transfer contract with Steven R Breen then you need to prove that contacting VRT. We cannot verify any of them on-wiki. Ankry (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 24 days. . .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I took the picture myself — Preceding unsigned comment added by Europaganymede (talk • contribs)

 Oppose This was copied from Facebook. If you are the photographer, then please upload the original image with EXIF data. Otherwise the copyright holder must send a permission for a free license via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 11:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 15:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is the picture of "Maria Poonlertlarp" a Thai actress, model and beauty pageant.

The reasons for the request is 1. This photo was taken by me with Maria's permission. 2. Uploading this picture was a request from Maria herself. Because she wanted to change her picture on Wikipedia to this picture.

--Mint Panida (talk) 13:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, This seems to be an edited copy from Instagram, and there is no EXIF data. So you need to confirm the permission for a free license via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 14:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 24 days. . .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Images of the civic acqueduct of Ferrara

Hello everyone, I'm writing here in order to ask for the undeletion of File:Acquedotto Ferrara.jpg, File:Ferrara acquedotto.jpg and the earliest version of File:Acquedotto.jpg (the present version is another image of an historic acqueduct in a different city, Perugia and not Ferrara). All these images were deleted in 2013 after this DR and they all depict the it:Acquedotto di Ferrara, commissioned by the local municipality to the engineer Carlo Savonuzzi, who at that time was an employee of the Municipality of Ferrara (see here and here). Therefore the monument falls under Template:PD-ItalyGov since 1953. It was built before 1990, so no issue with US copyright.--Friniate (talk) 15:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Friniate: Please add the {{PD-ItalyGov}} template. --Yann (talk) 21:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ich wuerde dieses Foto (oder ein anderes von Liliom Lewald desselben Fotografen) gerne hochladen. Wieso wurde es geloescht? Wenn ich es jetzt versuche, noch einmal hochzuladen, ist dies nicht moeglich, weil die Datei in Wiki Commons bereits geloescht wurde.

Koennen sie mir helfen? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meri Libra (talk • contribs) 11:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

@Meri Libra: Please provide a file name. Thanks, Yann (talk) 11:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Hey Yann, the file name is Liliom Lewald.jpg
Thank you! Meri Libra (talk) 11:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
@Meri Libra: Who is the photographer? Yann (talk) 12:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
His name is Niklas Berg, and I was speaking to him personnally about the publication Meri Libra (talk) 12:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
@Meri Libra: Speaking about permission is no-op. Free license permissions required for Wikimedia Commons publication must be in a written form. See VRT for the procedure. Ankry (talk) 13:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 15:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Neil Doljanchi 2024 622.jpg and all others from the series listed below

There is a proper and confirmed agreement from author and copyrigh owner for the following files:

See ticket:2024022710002569. It is a bit unusual case as the original agreement is in Hangul, but I managed to translate it using google translate + some help of upoloader to confirm identiy of copyright owner. Polimerek (talk) 14:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Polimerek: FYI. --Yann (talk) 21:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Why have you deleted this photo of Jacques Harthong? I have take this photo at the ENSPS Gala in 2002. If it is because the photo is already used on the net, the use on the net are all related to the Telecom Physique Strasbourg Engineering (former ENSPS) school, where I have co-organized a conference and contribute to a paper dealing with Jacques Harthong. The rights on this photo are still mine. --Sylvain.Lecler (talk) 14:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC) 4 May 2024 Strasbourg Sylvain Lecler

@Sylvain.Lecler: Hi,
If you are the photographer, please upload the original file with EXIF data. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer, see above. --Yann (talk) 15:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo was really taken in 2010 when the celebrity "Da Xiaojie" visited Fahrenheit's "Too Hot" album signing event at Guangsan SOGO in Taichung, using a digital camera. It contains EXIF data. This is because the image on the Wikipedia page was removed at the time. So in the end, the image was nominated for deletion under the reason "Unused personal image". But in 2010, "Da Xiaojie" was already a celebrity, so how could it be nominated for deletion under this reason? --Czechtaxes (talk) 15:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

The quality is not good and there are other photos here of Frances & Aiko. Thuresson (talk) 18:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Recategorización de imagen con su respectiva fuente.


Recategorization of image with its respective source. ArticleAmazon (talk) 07:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

@ArticleAmazon: If you are the photographer, could you please upload the original image with EXIF data? Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
The image in question was obtained from the official fan page of the regional government institution of Loreto-Peru. This photo was taken by the drone of the Institutional Image Office of the previous regional government during the period (January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022).
Unfortunately, due to changes in the administration, the group that was in charge of the office is no longer available, and therefore, I do not have access to the image in its original format with the EXIF data. I have tried to locate the image in its original format, but I have been unsuccessful as the personnel who worked in the previous office are no longer available.
Since the new administration does not have information about the image, it is impossible for me to obtain the image in its original format with the EXIF data requested by Wikimedia Commons.
Please consider that the image in question was published on the official fan page of the government institution, which suggests that it was publicly shared as part of the government's official communication. Considering that the government is an entity that represents all citizens, I believe that the image should be considered public domain or at least be available under a license that allows its use.
I would greatly appreciate it if you could consider this situation.
Fan page source:
https://www.facebook.com/goreloretoperu/posts/pfbid02y4yKwFLGk134rQqd7ZyPKxEyjUuvYsgBQfN5nMcjiVLphy1NuPsjqwdGExCa4thzl ArticleAmazon (talk) 14:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
@ArticleAmazon: Then the copyright holder will have to confirm the permission via COM:VRT. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 24 days. . .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file (image) is owned by me and I would appreciate you undeleting. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delilahdean (talk • contribs) 19:30, 4 May 2024‎ (UTC)

@Delilahdean: If you are the photographer, please upload the original image with EXIF data. Otherwise the copyright holder has to send a permission for a free license via COM:VRT. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer, see above. --Yann (talk) 13:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I took this picture of kpop girl group TWICE while at their concert in February 2022. I do not know why my photo has been deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dalvago (talk • contribs) 21:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

@Dalvago: If you are the photographer, please upload the original image with EXIF data. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
@YannThanks for the reply, I just reuploaded it with data here: File:Close-up photo of TWICE performing.jpg Dalvago (talk) 22:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
No, that's not the original image. Stop fooling us. Yann (talk) 15:23, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose Not the original image with EXIF data. Thuresson (talk) 08:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 13:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Добрий день, прошу відновити файл, файл створено мною особисто та надаю його у вільне користування. --Керрот (talk) 09:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

@Керрот: Where did the copyright holder of the book cover grant you a permission to make and publish its photo under a free license? Such permission must be in a written form and we need its copy. Ankry (talk) 22:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: When this file was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, it was available from YouTube under the stated license of "Creative Commons Attribution license". Since then the YouTube channel changed the license but Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable in this manner. https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&oldid=4299#What_if_I_change_my_mind.3F

The exact time the file was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons shows the video was under the Creative Commons Attribution license : https://web.archive.org/web/20240501055624/https://youtube.com/watch?v=UDM9p8kBIWI

Current YouTube video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UDM9p8kBIWI&t=1256s Cxhd (talk) 09:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: by Túrelio, license reviewed. --Yann (talk) 19:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

A proper agreement has been sent to VTRS. See ticket:2024043010004922 Polimerek (talk) 12:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Polimerek: Please fix the license, which is currently wrong. --Yann (talk) 13:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete. We have permission per Ticket:2024050510005271. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Mussklprozz: Please fix the license, which is currently wrong. Yann (talk) 13:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC). --Yann (talk) 13:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I request the undeletion of this file as this page is created to introduce and inform people of a personality whom I, as well as many of the people of Bangladesh, recognize as an important personality for his contributions to Bangladesh's social standards as well as his blogs posted on various newspapers. I believe that in the previous upload, no credible citations were included but if proper citations can be added, it will be easy to prove the credibility of the person the page is about. --Muhammad A. Saman (talk) 08:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose The biography included with the image is out of scope for Commons. It is also likely out of scope for WP. In any case, the image is a formal portrait and the subject claims to be the photographer. That seems unlikely. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello Jim, I understand what you're saying, but are biographies out of scope for both commons and WP? I knew biographies are within the scope of WP which is why I wanted to add this biography to WP, also the formal portrait is not photographed by me but I took permission of the owner to publish it on WP for free. Can you please help me regarding where I can upload this such that it's within the scopes of WP, and also what types of citations I should add to this article to make it credible? Thank you!! Muhammad A. Saman (talk) 08:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Naming the wrong author is a nuisance and creates confusion here. Please do not do it again.
As I said above, there are two questions here. The first is whether the person is sufficiently notable to have an article on one of the WP projects. That is up to the editors there. Only if the answer is "yes" is the image is in scope here.
The second question is the copyright for the image. In order for it to be restored here, the actual photographer must send a free license using VRT. Note that the subject of an image very rarely has the right to freely license it. That right is held by the photographer in almost all cases. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply, Jim. The free license agreement for the media work (Person in portrait) has been sent to the VRTs as per Ticket:2024050610009597 and the work depicting the media has been fully authored by me. Can you please check if the criteria are fulfilled or not? Muhammad A. Saman (talk) 19:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

I have removed {{PermissionTicket}} posted by User:Muhammad A. Saman. Since he is not a member of VRT, it was not valid. There remains the question of whether the subject is in scope for one of the language Wikipedias. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Not just "probably not notable person" (uncertain scope/unused selfie), but already known engaging in enwiki promotional editing for them (enwiki disruption, and now we see commons disruption/promotion too). See also Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2023-09#File:Md. Robiul Azam.jpg. DMacks (talk) 20:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: per DMacks. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Добрий день, прошу Вас відновити файл, він створений мною особисто, цей файл важливий так як описує спортивні здобутки людини, я надаю його у вільне користування--Керрот (talk) 09:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Two problems here. First, clips from magazines should generally be cited, with the text included in an article. Second, did you really write the text and take the photographs seen here? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 20:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Good afternoon, the deletion of this file seems unfair to me. It's part of a photograph taken by myself. Therefore, I request that the image be restored since it does not infringe copyright. Thank you so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CharlesT854 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 5 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

Pinging @Yann and Minorax: users involved in the DR.
@CharlesT854: Please, upload the original photo from your camera with complete EXIF info as your authorship evidence, or follow instructions provided at COM:VRT. We must carefully review files uploaded by users who have previously uploaded copyright-infringing content. Ankry (talk) 22:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Weak  Support. The uploader should prove that at least some of their uploads were taken by them. Yann (talk) 07:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer. --Yann (talk) 16:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

بنده ۳ سال مقاله رو انتشار دادم با عنوان سبک نقاشی اسید ریلیک و به تازگی تصویری را از یک نقاشی دیواری اثر هنری خودم را برای درک بهتر مخاطب انتشار دادم که ناقض قوانین کپی رایت نبوده و عکاسی با بالاترین کیفیت انجام شده ولی چون هنگام عکسبرداری نور بلک لایت روشن هست عکس این اثر کمی غیر واضح دیده میشود از همه خواهش میکنم برای انتشار این اثر و درک بهتر مخاطب اثر رو تایید کنن مچکرم — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tohidabolhasani3 (talk • contribs) 09:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Out of scope personal "artwork". On Wikimedia Commons, we only accept artworks by notable people. Please read COM:SCOPE. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: per Yann. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Buenas, necesito que algún administrador restaure el Logo del Partido Mesa de la Unidad Democrática este logo forma parte del {{PD-textlogo}} el Logo aparece un símbolo la manito pero tipo escritura con los colores amarillo, rojo y azul según la fuente (https://twitter.com/manuelrosalesg/status/956712085848772609) según las opiniones del Usuario:Jameslwoodward y User:Koavf en el Commons:Help desk#Too Simple el Logo esta por encima del umbral de Originalidad (Threshold of Originality) AbchyZa22 (talk) 22:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose We have no information on the Threshold of Originality in Venezuela. I think it is far above the threshold in the UK and possibly above that in the USA, so in accordance with PCP we should not keep it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination OK, tienes razón, por favor cierra el UDR. AbchyZa22 (talk) 15:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: Complex enough to be copyrighted. --Bedivere (talk) 17:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg I use it for fair use

I use this movie photo in fair use for educational purposes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uhhh..what? (talk • contribs) 16:20, 7 May 2024‎ (UTC)


 Not done: Not a valid request. --Bedivere (talk) 17:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file was deleted in 2008 because there was no Freedom of Panorama in Belgium but, since 2016, the Freedom of Panorama has been put in place. So the file could therefore be undeleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:6a8:3081:6f07:cc40:87f:57bd:7c78 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 8 May 2024‎ (UTC)

Procedural close, undeleted in 2016. Thuresson (talk) 15:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am the photographer and sole owner of the photograph. The deletion requester suggested that the date on the file was wrong, and maybe other information, so that he/she thought there might have been a copyright violation. As I am the owner. There is no copyright violation. The date was reset to 2024 because I had to transform the old file type to one that I could upload.

MikeDiNovi (talk) 00:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC). 6 May 2024

 Oppose At Commons:Deletion requests/File:Richard Jackson Barnet.jpg you say, "The photo is one that my wife, Richard's daughter, asked me to add to her dad's entry." That does not say that you were the photographer. The image looks like it might be a halftone. There is no camera EXIF and the image is small (480 × 640). If you are really the photographer, please reload the image at full camera size with EXIF. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 18:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted by Kameraad Pjotr

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: files found via User talk:Kameraad Pjotr/Archive1a#fop - latvia. Assuming the images were uploaders' own works (or imported from freely-licensed Flickr sources etc.), and that the depicted works pass the requirements of COM:FOP Belgium (found in public spaces on a permanent basis), then these images can be restored/undeleted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

 Support, mostly. The third image is indoors, so FoP does not apply. The last image may or may not be indoors. It should not be restored unless we can show that it is, in fact, outdoors. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
To be more specific, the third image is of a work by Martin Guyaux who is still living, and it's inside a metro station. Abzeronow (talk) 18:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: all but the third and last file have been undeleted as they are covered by FoP in Belgium. The last one is indoors but could been seen from the outside, the photograph was taken indoors. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Zeitungsbericht

Die gelöschten Dateien spiegeln Zeitungsveröffentlichungen über mich als Schwarzwaldautor wieder. Das Bild ist vom mir und die Quellen wurden genannt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:8071:3180:3200:870b:c426:3f78:978 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 7 May 2024‎ (UTC)

Please provide a file name or other information on what file(s) you want us to look at. Also please log in. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 18:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Images of the Arengario

Hi everyone, I'm writing here in order to ask for the undeletion of File:Arengario piazza vittoria brescia.jpg (deleted in this DR in 2013) and File:Arengario piazza vittoria brescia2.jpg (deleted in this DR in the same year). Both images depict the "Arengario", a podium made in it:Piazza della Vittoria (Brescia) in 1932 and decorated by the sculptor it:Antonio Maraini. As it can be read here (p.4) and here, it was commissioned by a public entity. Therefore it fell under Template:PD-ItalyGov in 1953, way before URAA, so US copyright is not an issue.--Friniate (talk) 14:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Friniate: Please add the template. --Yann (talk) 18:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Daniel Lurie Headshot.jpg

I'm requesting that File:Daniel Lurie Headshot.jpg be undeleted. This is not a proprietary photo, and Daniel Lurie has requested that this photo be used. As such, it will not present any copyright issues. --Tashrima.hossain (talk) 21:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Tashrima Hossain 05/07/2024

If previously published, the copyright owner (usually the photographer) needs to send permission via the COM:VRT process. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Carl L. --Yann (talk) 21:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo is actually mine because i took it during my trip from manila onboard M/V 2go masikap. im requesting an undelition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princekingbest2011 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 7 May 2024‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Princekingbest2011. Thuresson (talk) 15:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: All other images by uploader deleted as copyvios with false licenses; forfeited assumption of good will. User since indef blocked as sockpuppet. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The image is mine, and I need temporary access to distribute it privately to another location.

Derrikisa (talk) 22:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 Not done: No file by that name. --Yann (talk) 09:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Photo de l’Ambassadrice de France au Liban Anne Grillo avec Karl Anthony Eid lors de la soirée de lancement du projet de soutient en équipement photovoltaïque aux lycées et établissements français au Liban.


 Not done: not deleted. Denied the speedy deletion since both subjects are notable per Commons standards. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I believe that File:Testxss.gif is not out of scope because it shows that generating a high-resolution GIF file with only 30 bytes is technically possible. It can be used to examine the capabilities of the GIF file format.

That file is listed on the Wikipedia records (revision as of writing) as "Highest size-to-resolution ratio: Testxss.gif, which is 24,891 x 25,964 (646,269,924 pixels) despite being only 30 bytes". The file is potentially interesting to anyone researching properties of the GIF file format.

After undeleting this file, please also rename it to something descriptive like File:High-resolution GIF with only 30 bytes.gif .

Regards, Elominius (talk) 18:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Random demonstrations of tech stuff is not in Commons' scope. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I assumed it falls under "educational purpose", but otherwise, would someone send it to me using catbox or some other file sharer? Elominius (talk) 06:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC) - last modified 06:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose not useful Bedivere (talk) 16:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: out of Commons scope. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Could only the first page of this PDF be restored, for example as a JPEG file? The first page contains black text on a pink background. The first page lacks originality and could be used to illustrate the article als:Grundbegriffe der Psychologie von heute. Thank you in advance.--2A02:1210:3605:1E00:4DA4:C8EB:D82D:877E 22:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, This can't be done online. You have to get it from the source, and upload the first page as a separate file. Yann (talk) 09:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done I uploaded the cover as File:Grundbegriffe der Psychologie von heute - cover.png and inserted it into the article. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Images of the "Bigio"

Hi everyone, I'm wiritng here in order to ask for the undeletion of File:Bigio brescia oggi.jpg (deleted in this DR in 2013) and File:Bigio da via X giornate.jpg (deleted in this DR in the same year). They both depicts the so-called "Bigio", a statue by en:Arturo Dazzi. As it can be read here (p. 680), the statue was commissioned by the municipality of Brescia and it was finished in 1932. Therefore it falls under Template:PD-ItalyGov at least since 1953, way before the URAA, so no issue with US copyright.--Friniate (talk) 14:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: per request and previous requests. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Incorrect copyright used, should have been standard open license. Owner ((Redacted)), Peninsula Field Naturalists Club has sent through the email template providing consent as per 'Supplied by author' template attached to image. We are requesting undeletion and will change copyright to the correct one. Thank you.

--JEastaugh (talk) 01:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose VRT permissions should be processed through COM:VRT. Thuresson (talk) 14:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Thuresson. --Yann (talk) 20:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I got this image from the web site. However, tihs logo's shape is too simple to have copyright.
Thank you.
Amaterasu 1-1 (talk) 02:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose The text "Workman" certainly is too simple, but the abstract art square above it isn't. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Yann (talk) 12:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello,

This file was deleted because the permissions were never received. I am requesting undeletion and a change of the author/owner from Ryan Johnson to Kamal Kheldouni. The file was originally uploaded with Ryan Johnson as the author, but the actual author and copyright holder is Kamal Kheldouni who send in the permissions. Matthewvetter (talk) 13:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose VRT permssions should be processed by VRT volunteers. Thuresson (talk) 14:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Thuresson. --Yann (talk) 12:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I would like to request the undeletion of the following files;

I have found with a CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 DEED (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic) use. Here are the links to the original images on flickr where this license is indicated;

Have a good day, and thank you for your help and for trying to contribute to Wikimedia Commons regarding licences ;) Michail Angelos Georgoulas (talk) 15:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Non-commercial and non-derivative clauses are incompatible with Commons' policy, see COM:WKL. Günther Frager (talk) 15:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Günther Frager. --Yann (talk) 12:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The source website did indicate a Creative Commons (CC) license, just like File:光隆家商 女生夏季制服上衣.jpg, so I don't know why it was still determined to be copyright infringement.--Copyhums21357 (talk) 02:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

 Support Licence compatible, video still under this licence. Michalg95 (talk) 17:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: CC license confirmed at source. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This figure is worthy of publication and has many supporting references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Latifasari (talk • contribs) 21:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)


 Not done: Not a file, this page never existed on Commons. I suppose you are talking about some Wikipedia page, but you are on the wrong board and the wrong project. --Yann (talk) 21:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file entered public domain on 10 April 2024, when 70 years elapsed since death of Auguste Louis Lumière, so it's time to undelete it. Michalg95 (talk) 10:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose No, it will be in the public domain on January 1st next year. Yann (talk) 10:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: Yann is correct, this file will be undeleted in 2025 when French copyright expires. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I think we need further discussion about Fars. It still has cc-by-4.0 license. Hanooz 13:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose @Hanooz: the link you provided is not about this particular photo. The source https://farsnews.ir/Hadisfaghiri/1714578928525475436/ doesn't a CC-BY indicate a CC-BY license, on the contrary it states ©1041 Fars, Inc. Günther Frager (talk) 16:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
So the license has to be on every subpage of a website? Hanooz 19:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
@Hanooz: The deletion message says "Fars News Agency no longer publishes photos under CC-BY-SA 4.0 after Feb 2024, the photo was taken on May 1st 2024". The date is the issue here. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Yeah. I see. Hanooz 17:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Yann (talk) 16:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Portrait of Yves Plasseraud comes from a personal archive and was used in an bio article of a living person (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yves_Plasseraud). A wiki bot deleted this image, for no apparent reason. Please reinstate. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KiteWORKS (talk • contribs) 12:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

 Oppose Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yves Plasseraud.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 11:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Author and copyright owner is Eléonore Muyard. She has to send the permission. Quite bad for a "doctor of law for intellectual property" to violate others' copyright... Yann (talk) 12:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 16:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore these similar files: File:سد شاه قاسم یاسوج - Shah Ghasem dam 1.jpg, File:سد شاه قاسم یاسوج - Shah Ghasem dam 2.jpg, File:سد شاه قاسم یاسوج - Shah Ghasem dam 3.jpg, File:سد شاه قاسم یاسوج - Shah Ghasem dam 4.jpg, File:سد شاه قاسم یاسوج - Shah Ghasem dam 5.jpg, File:سد شاه قاسم یاسوج - Shah Ghasem dam 6.jpg, File:سد شاه قاسم یاسوج - Shah Ghasem dam 7.jpg, File:سد شاه قاسم یاسوج - Shah Ghasem dam 8.jpg, File:سد شاه قاسم یاسوج - Shah Ghasem dam 8.jpg, File:سد شاه قاسم یاسوج - Shah Ghasem dam 9.jpg, File:سد شاه قاسم یاسوج - Shah Ghasem dam 10.jpg

The license of the published images is written in the bottom box of the main page of the Farsi (فارسی) language of this website in (here). It is written in Farsi that "the use of the news (data) of this website is allowed by mentioning the source of ISNA news agency". This means the license is cc-by-4.0. ckeck it (here) I made a mistake and didn't add the address of the main page where the license for the website's contents is mentioned.

Thanks. Alireza numberone (talk) 15:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose The website states "© 2024 Iranian Students' News Agency. All rights reserved" at the bottom. In addition, the permission statement such as "the use of the news (data) on this website is allowed ..." is too vague to be an acceptable permission, see COM:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses.
0x0a (talk) 16:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per 0x0a. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted by Majora

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: the Kosovar FoP in the current (2023) law is now acceptable for WikiCommons; see [28]. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: per request. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: if the sculptures shown are found in public places as indicated in the current FoP clause of the Kosovar copyright law (see COM:FOP Kosovo), these images can now be undeleted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: per request, covered by FOP. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted by INeverCry

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: there is now an acceptable FoP in Kosovo. Provided that the work is found in public places, the image can be restored and file tagged with {{FoP-Kosovo}}. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: per request. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo belongs to the musician’s family archive. Please cancel the ban and restore the photo.

Vladimir Khlopovskiy (talk) 02:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Besides that it's a non notable individual, the photo is out of scope. Bedivere (talk) 03:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
I think notable enough for Commons (musician with albums, film musics, concerts, studio producer), although Wikipedia decides about the article. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
@Vladimir Khlopovskiy: Please see the page Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team (or Commons:Волонтёрская команда содействия) for how to confirm the rights and permissions for the photos. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The photo shows the musician himself, about whom the article is written. The photograph was taken by his order and belongs to him. Please restore the photo Vladimir Khlopovskiy (talk) 02:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Besides that it's a non notable individual, the photo is out of scope. Bedivere (talk) 03:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
I think notable enough for Commons (musician with albums, film musics, concerts, studio producer), although Wikipedia decides about the article. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
@Vladimir Khlopovskiy: Please see the page Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team (or Commons:Волонтёрская команда содействия) for how to confirm the rights and permissions for the photos. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The photo was taken by the musician personally. The photo was uploaded by us to this resource, which you use as a reference for blocking. All rights belong to the musician about whom the article was written (https://yandex.ru/maps/org/154284496619/gallery/?ll=37.666360%2C55.769641&photos %5Bbusiness%5D=154284496619&photos%5Bid%5D=urn%3Ayandex%3Asprav%3Aphoto%3A11004775_2a0000018ce5c67fd15f2a933c37ca70b7fb&z=18)

Vladimir Khlopovskiy (talk) 02:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Besides that it's a non notable individual, the photo is out of scope. Bedivere (talk) 03:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
I think notable enough for Commons (musician with albums, film musics, concerts, studio producer), although Wikipedia decides about the article. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
@Vladimir Khlopovskiy: Please see the page Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team (or Commons:Волонтёрская команда содействия) for how to confirm the rights and permissions for the photos. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The page relates to an advancement of contra rotating vertical axis wind turbines

Please refer to https://crvawt.com/

I had more information in the first page I posted here but your admin didn't appear to understand the technology

Initial research showed me the CR VAWT appears to defy physics as it harvests more energy from a column of wind than Betz's Law (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betz%27s_law#) says is possible. However what I've discovered is the CR VAWT doubles the wind speed within Betz's formula which shifts the harvest curve to the left. The result is the energy is harvested at a lower actual wind speed, with the huge benefit of lower air speed harvest when other turbine types are idle. The net result is double the energy up to the limit of a particular generator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CRVAWT (talk • contribs) 14:22, 12 May 2024‎ (UTC)


 Not done: Not a request about a file on Commons. Please refer to Wikipedia. --Yann (talk) 08:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file was (I presume) a photo of David Homak, the founder of a notable website w:Lurkmore. The file was deleted by User:Daphne Lantier (who later turned out to be a sockpuppet of a globally banned user) per nomination "Out of scope Commons is not a social media site". However the photo of the founder is clearly appropriate for the article about that website. Thus the deletion was ungrounded. colt_browning (talk) 16:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes, the photo is of David Homak. Abzeronow (talk) 16:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: per request, subject is notable. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore. We have permission from the photographer per Ticket:2024042910012032. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Mussklprozz: FYI. --Yann (talk) 08:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bedirhan Karadağ.png

I have permission from the man in this photo Bedirhan Karadağ in this photo there is nothing wrong with (personal photos by non-contributors) it is not personal it is a famous player in Turkey--Quekker (talk) 14:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Why so small? If you are the photographer, please upload the original image with EXIF data. Otherwise, the copyright holder has to send a permission via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 12:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Sorry I did not see your message. I will upload it Quekker (talk) 13:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

This is not speedy deletion, this person is a famous Brawl Stars player in Turkey, we uploaded that picture because of upcoming wikipedia page. We have the permissions from him.--Quekker (talk) 13:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Quekker (talk) 16:33, 14 May 2024 (GMT+3)

 Oppose We need the permission from the photographer, not the subject. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Yann (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 07:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am writing to request the undeletion of the file "File:Shanku_pillai_kollam.png" which was recently deleted from Wikimedia Commons. The deletion was performed by [User:Yann] on [13/05,2024] due to concerns regarding the image's copyright status. However, I believe that the file meets the criteria for being in the public domain, and its deletion may have been a misunderstanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acc231543 (talk • contribs) 07:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

 Oppose And why would it be in the public domain? This is an enlarged and colorized copy of a non-free image ml:File:Kumbalath sanku pillai.png. Yann (talk) 07:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Notably, this image originates from an original physical source, freely available in Indian bookstores and stalls. Its primary purpose in being uploaded is to identify a renowned social reformer from Kerala. It's worth noting that surnames like 'Shanku Pillai' are common in Kerala. I believe this image is freely usable and not sourced from the ml:File:Kumbalath sanku pillai.png. 2409:4073:4D87:5D4D:0:0:224A:610A 11:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
The page used an old copy of an article which contains a low-quality image. Since the English page is mainly visited for identifying the person, this picture is necessary. 2409:4073:4D87:5D4D:0:0:224A:610A 11:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
ml:File:Kumbalath sanku pillai.png used low quality image for identification purposes during that period. Now, English pages need it, so a freely usable orginal high quality image available from the physical source is needed more than the Malayalam version. 2409:4073:4D87:5D4D:0:0:224A:610A 11:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose Copyrighted photos do not become public domain by being widely used in advertising/promotion. Thuresson (talk) 00:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi,the photo uploaded by me wasn't intended for any promotion. I lost access to that account. The main purpose of uploading this photo was to highlight him from another person named Chittor Shanku Pillai, who is also a social reformer, and shares the same name. This photo is from a free office source, but a different version is readily available offline.
For example I've shared two websites where you can see different versions, with the second one a government website being freely available for use.
https://ksmdbc.ac.in/founder-2/
https://amritmahotsav.nic.in/district-reopsitory-detail.htm?17240
You can check the quality of this image, which is far different from the copyrighted picture used in the Malayalam version of his page. 2409:4073:2ECE:3194:0:0:22CA:8008 01:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Sorry there is a typing mistake not chittor, it's "chittedathu shanku pillai". 2409:4073:2ECE:3194:0:0:22CA:8008 01:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 07:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Le fichier a été supprimé, hors celui-ci appartient bien à l'association dont je suis membre.

je ne comprends donc pas cette suppression.

ElPolloLoco88 (talk) 08:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

@ElPolloLoco88: Bonjour,
Le détenteur des droits d'auteur doit confirmer la license par email. Voyez COM:VRT/fr pour la procédure.
Mais quelle est l'utilité éducative de ce fichier ? Wikimedia Commons n'est pas une plateforme pour promouvoir votre association.
The copyright holder must confirm the license by email. See COM:VRT for the procedure.
But what is the educational usefulness of this file? Wikimedia Commons is not a platform to promote your association. Yann (talk) 09:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Le but de l'article lié à cette image est de présenter une course cycliste amateur et de son historique (puisqu'elle a plus de 40 ans d'existence) en aucun cas de la promouvoir.
Cela fait, à mon sens, partie de l'éducation de parler de toutes les organisations pour lesquels des bénévoles se battent chaque année pour avoir le mérite d'exister... ElPolloLoco88 (talk) 09:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Where is the article? Images for not-yet-created articles are out of scope. Ankry (talk) 01:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 07:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Reason: it is a photo of Samarth Kaimliya child actor so whats wrong with that. This is a freely used image.--SamarthRor (talk) 08:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Pirate Dzns 2:10 pm 14 May, 2024

 Oppose The copyright belongs to the photographer, not the subject, so a permission is needed. But Wikimedia Commons is not the place to promote yourself. This is out of scope. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: Personal photo by LTA sock. --Эlcobbola talk 22:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This was a public domain file that should not have been deleted. It was tagged for speedy deletion by an anon IP vandal. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 22:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

 Support Undelete and make a formal deletion request. My experience is that the administrator who deleted the file do not respond to being pinged at this page. 00:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done per above. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Chicago Police Department.png. @Illegitimate Barrister: We would need an evidence that the image was indeed published on that date with no copyright notice, not just your declaration in this matter. Ankry (talk) 01:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Buenas administradores,necesito que restaure el logo (ese logo fue generalizado por un sector público como indica en el último parrafo de la licencia en Venezuela {{PD-VenezuelaGov}}) el Usuario:Taivo removio por falta de fuentes como indica el DR (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Institutodeportepedraza.jpg) el usuario (uploader) publicó sin EXIF (ese logo lo encontré en Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/IMDEP-Pedraza-100077336294328/) AbchyZa22 (talk) 11:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Support per above. Ankry (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. --Bedivere (talk) 18:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Цим я підтверджую, що я єдиний власник ексклюзивного авторського права на фотографії для БО «БФ «Хелп фор Юкрейн» (англ. «Help for Ukraine»)»:

File:Спілкувалися проєкт під час звітної прес-конференції в Укрінформі.jpg Файл:Пишаємося нагородами від військових.jpg Файл:Допомога полку ім. Кастуся Калиновського.jpg Файл:Генератори на фронт.jpg Файл:Волонтерство немає спочинку.jpg Файл:Фонд задоволення всім, хто цього потребує.jpg

Та на всі інші фото, як показано тут: https://uk.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%87:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%96%D1%8F_%D0%9A%D1%83%D1%86%D0%B0%D0%BA&veaction=edit

і маю законні повноваження щодо звільнити авторські права на цю роботу. Я погоджуюся опублікувати вищезазначений вміст за такою безкоштовною ліцензією: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates#cite_note-5 Я визнаю, що, роблячи це, я надаю будь-кому право використовувати роботу, навіть у комерційному продукті чи іншим чином, і змінювати її відповідно до своїх потреб, за умови, що вони дотримуються умов ліцензії та будь-яких інших чинних законів. Мені відомо, що ця угода не обмежується Вікіпедією чи пов’язаними сайтами. Я усвідомлюю, що власник авторських прав завжди зберігає за собою право власності на авторські права, а також право на приписування відповідно до вибраної ліцензії. Зміни, внесені до роботи іншими особами, не будуть вважатися зробленими власником авторських прав. Я усвідомлюю, що я не можу відкликати цю угоду, і що вміст може або не може постійно зберігатися в проекті Вікімедіа.

Наталія Куцак Власник авторських прав 11.05.2024 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Наталія Куцак (talk • contribs)

  • Free license permissions should be emailed to the address provided in the instructions on your user talk page. This page is not the right venue for providing permissions. We are unable to verify user identity on-wiki. Ankry (talk) 00:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 22:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Цим я підтверджую, що я єдиний власник ексклюзивного авторського права на фотографії для БО «БФ «Хелп фор Юкрейн» (англ. «Help for Ukraine»)»:

File:Спілкувалися проєкт під час звітної прес-конференції в Укрінформі.jpg Файл:Пишаємося нагородами від військових.jpg Файл:Допомога полку ім. Кастуся Калиновського.jpg Файл:Генератори на фронт.jpg Файл:Волонтерство немає спочинку.jpg Файл:Фонд задоволення всім, хто цього потребує.jpg

Та на всі інші фото, як показано тут: https://uk.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%87:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%96%D1%8F_%D0%9A%D1%83%D1%86%D0%B0%D0%BA&veaction=edit

і маю законні повноваження щодо звільнити авторські права на цю роботу. Я погоджуюся опублікувати вищезазначений вміст за такою безкоштовною ліцензією: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates#cite_note-5 Я визнаю, що, роблячи це, я надаю будь-кому право використовувати роботу, навіть у комерційному продукті чи іншим чином, і змінювати її відповідно до своїх потреб, за умови, що вони дотримуються умов ліцензії та будь-яких інших чинних законів. Мені відомо, що ця угода не обмежується Вікіпедією чи пов’язаними сайтами. Я усвідомлюю, що власник авторських прав завжди зберігає за собою право власності на авторські права, а також право на приписування відповідно до вибраної ліцензії. Зміни, внесені до роботи іншими особами, не будуть вважатися зробленими власником авторських прав. Я усвідомлюю, що я не можу відкликати цю угоду, і що вміст може або не може постійно зберігатися в проекті Вікімедіа.

Наталія Куцак Власник авторських прав 11.05.2024 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Наталія_Куцак (talk • contribs)

  • Free license permissions should be emailed to the address provided in the instructions on your user talk page. This page is not the right venue for providing permissions. We are unable to verify user identity on-wiki. Ankry (talk) 00:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 22:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Доброго дня! На жаль, як людина, яка власноруч для фонду робила видалені фото, я прошу Вас їх повернути. Не кожна робота має ліцензію чи іншу ліцензію. І, якщо робота ніде не захищена авторським правом, вона не може бути ліцензована. Тому і ці фото апріорі не можуть бути ліцензовані, бо зроблені мною, як представником благодійного фонду. Фонд творить історію українського волонтерства під час російської агресії, допомагаючи всім українцям, тому на рівні з іншими такими ж фондами, заслуговує мати власну сторінку у Вікіпедії з власними фото, як мають її й інші. Я не можу сама собі надати якийсь документ і поставити печатку, тим більше - видати ліцензію. Присутність видалених Вами фото ПРИНЦИПОВА саме з огляду на те, що ці фото підтверджують реальність подій і фактів, описаних в статті для Вікіпедії - що і є головним принципом діяльності самої енциклопедії. Видалені Вами фото є на офіційному сайті та в соціальних мережах Фонду, і посилання на них - місця їх розміщення - для підтвердження автентичності і приналежності фонду було мною надано на сторінці фонду у Вікіпедії. І вже саме через це не потребують авторства, бо на сьогодні стали надбанням суспільства. Так як вказаний благодійний фонд не є державною структурою держави Україна, присутність написаних матеріалів, фото та відео на сайті і в соцмережах і є підтвердженням права власності. Я вважаю це ДИСКРИМІНАЦІЄЮ по відношенню до фонду, який зробив дуже вагомий внесок для підтримки українців за час російської агресії. Поверніть, будь ласка, нашу власність - видалені фото - на нашу сторінку у Вашій енциклопедії. --Наталія Куцак (talk) 16:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Цим я підтверджую, що я єдиний власник ексклюзивного авторського права на фотографії для БО «БФ «Хелп фор Юкрейн» (англ. «Help for Ukraine»)»:

File:Спілкувалися проєкт під час звітної прес-конференції в Укрінформі.jpg Файл:Пишаємося нагородами від військових.jpg Файл:Допомога полку ім. Кастуся Калиновського.jpg Файл:Генератори на фронт.jpg Файл:Волонтерство немає спочинку.jpg Файл:Фонд задоволення всім, хто цього потребує.jpg

Та на всі інші фото, як показано тут: https://uk.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%87:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%96%D1%8F_%D0%9A%D1%83%D1%86%D0%B0%D0%BA&veaction=edit

і маю законні повноваження щодо звільнити авторські права на цю роботу. Я погоджуюся опублікувати вищезазначений вміст за такою безкоштовною ліцензією: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates#cite_note-5 Я визнаю, що, роблячи це, я надаю будь-кому право використовувати роботу, навіть у комерційному продукті чи іншим чином, і змінювати її відповідно до своїх потреб, за умови, що вони дотримуються умов ліцензії та будь-яких інших чинних законів. Мені відомо, що ця угода не обмежується Вікіпедією чи пов’язаними сайтами. Я усвідомлюю, що власник авторських прав завжди зберігає за собою право власності на авторські права, а також право на приписування відповідно до вибраної ліцензії. Зміни, внесені до роботи іншими особами, не будуть вважатися зробленими власником авторських прав. Я усвідомлюю, що я не можу відкликати цю угоду, і що вміст може або не може постійно зберігатися в проекті Вікімедіа.

Наталія Куцак Власник авторських прав 11.05.2024 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Наталія_Куцак (talk • contribs)

  • Free license permissions should be emailed to the address provided in the instructions on your user talk page. This page is not the right venue for providing permissions. We are unable to verify user identity on-wiki. Ankry (talk) 00:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 22:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Доброго дня! На жаль, як людина, яка власноруч для фонду робила видалені фото, я прошу Вас їх повернути. Не кожна робота має ліцензію чи іншу ліцензію. І, якщо робота ніде не захищена авторським правом, вона не може бути ліцензована. Тому і ці фото апріорі не можуть бути ліцензовані, бо зроблені мною, як представником благодійного фонду. Фонд творить історію українського волонтерства під час російської агресії, допомагаючи всім українцям, тому на рівні з іншими такими ж фондами, заслуговує мати власну сторінку у Вікіпедії з власними фото, як мають її й інші. Я не можу сама собі надати якийсь документ і поставити печатку, тим більше - видати ліцензію. Присутність видалених Вами фото ПРИНЦИПОВА саме з огляду на те, що ці фото підтверджують реальність подій і фактів, описаних в статті для Вікіпедії - що і є головним принципом діяльності самої енциклопедії. Видалені Вами фото є на офіційному сайті та в соціальних мережах Фонду, і посилання на них - місця їх розміщення - для підтвердження автентичності і приналежності фонду було мною надано на сторінці фонду у Вікіпедії. І вже саме через це не потребують авторства, бо на сьогодні стали надбанням суспільства. Так як вказаний благодійний фонд не є державною структурою держави Україна, присутність написаних матеріалів, фото та відео на сайті і в соцмережах і є підтвердженням права власності. Я вважаю це ДИСКРИМІНАЦІЄЮ по відношенню до фонду, який зробив дуже вагомий внесок для підтримки українців за час російської агресії. Поверніть, будь ласка, нашу власність - видалені фото - на нашу сторінку у Вашій енциклопедії. --Наталія Куцак (talk) 16:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Цим я підтверджую, що я єдиний власник ексклюзивного авторського права на фотографії для БО «БФ «Хелп фор Юкрейн» (англ. «Help for Ukraine»)»:

File:Спілкувалися проєкт під час звітної прес-конференції в Укрінформі.jpg Файл:Пишаємося нагородами від військових.jpg Файл:Допомога полку ім. Кастуся Калиновського.jpg Файл:Генератори на фронт.jpg Файл:Волонтерство немає спочинку.jpg Файл:Фонд задоволення всім, хто цього потребує.jpg

Та на всі інші фото, як показано тут: https://uk.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%87:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%96%D1%8F_%D0%9A%D1%83%D1%86%D0%B0%D0%BA&veaction=edit

і маю законні повноваження щодо звільнити авторські права на цю роботу. Я погоджуюся опублікувати вищезазначений вміст за такою безкоштовною ліцензією: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates#cite_note-5 Я визнаю, що, роблячи це, я надаю будь-кому право використовувати роботу, навіть у комерційному продукті чи іншим чином, і змінювати її відповідно до своїх потреб, за умови, що вони дотримуються умов ліцензії та будь-яких інших чинних законів. Мені відомо, що ця угода не обмежується Вікіпедією чи пов’язаними сайтами. Я усвідомлюю, що власник авторських прав завжди зберігає за собою право власності на авторські права, а також право на приписування відповідно до вибраної ліцензії. Зміни, внесені до роботи іншими особами, не будуть вважатися зробленими власником авторських прав. Я усвідомлюю, що я не можу відкликати цю угоду, і що вміст може або не може постійно зберігатися в проекті Вікімедіа.

Наталія Куцак Власник авторських прав 11.05.2024 --Наталія Куцак (talk) 16:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

  • Free license permissions should be emailed to the address provided in the instructions on your user talk page. This page is not the right venue for providing permissions. We are unable to verify user identity on-wiki. Ankry (talk) 00:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 22:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Доброго дня! На жаль, як людина, яка власноруч для фонду робила видалені фото, я прошу Вас їх повернути. Не кожна робота має ліцензію чи іншу ліцензію. І, якщо робота ніде не захищена авторським правом, вона не може бути ліцензована. Тому і ці фото апріорі не можуть бути ліцензовані, бо зроблені мною, як представником благодійного фонду. Фонд творить історію українського волонтерства під час російської агресії, допомагаючи всім українцям, тому на рівні з іншими такими ж фондами, заслуговує мати власну сторінку у Вікіпедії з власними фото, як мають її й інші. Я не можу сама собі надати якийсь документ і поставити печатку, тим більше - видати ліцензію. Присутність видалених Вами фото ПРИНЦИПОВА саме з огляду на те, що ці фото підтверджують реальність подій і фактів, описаних в статті для Вікіпедії - що і є головним принципом діяльності самої енциклопедії. Видалені Вами фото є на офіційному сайті та в соціальних мережах Фонду, і посилання на них - місця їх розміщення - для підтвердження автентичності і приналежності фонду було мною надано на сторінці фонду у Вікіпедії. І вже саме через це не потребують авторства, бо на сьогодні стали надбанням суспільства. Так як вказаний благодійний фонд не є державною структурою держави Україна, присутність написаних матеріалів, фото та відео на сайті і в соцмережах і є підтвердженням права власності. Я вважаю це ДИСКРИМІНАЦІЄЮ по відношенню до фонду, який зробив дуже вагомий внесок для підтримки українців за час російської агресії. Поверніть, будь ласка, нашу власність - видалені фото - на нашу сторінку у Вашій енциклопедії. --Наталія Куцак (talk) 16:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Цим я підтверджую, що я єдиний власник ексклюзивного авторського права на фотографії для БО «БФ «Хелп фор Юкрейн» (англ. «Help for Ukraine»)»:

File:Спілкувалися проєкт під час звітної прес-конференції в Укрінформі.jpg Файл:Пишаємося нагородами від військових.jpg Файл:Допомога полку ім. Кастуся Калиновського.jpg Файл:Генератори на фронт.jpg Файл:Волонтерство немає спочинку.jpg Файл:Фонд задоволення всім, хто цього потребує.jpg

Та на всі інші фото, як показано тут: https://uk.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%87:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%96%D1%8F_%D0%9A%D1%83%D1%86%D0%B0%D0%BA&veaction=edit

і маю законні повноваження щодо звільнити авторські права на цю роботу. Я погоджуюся опублікувати вищезазначений вміст за такою безкоштовною ліцензією: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates#cite_note-5 Я визнаю, що, роблячи це, я надаю будь-кому право використовувати роботу, навіть у комерційному продукті чи іншим чином, і змінювати її відповідно до своїх потреб, за умови, що вони дотримуються умов ліцензії та будь-яких інших чинних законів. Мені відомо, що ця угода не обмежується Вікіпедією чи пов’язаними сайтами. Я усвідомлюю, що власник авторських прав завжди зберігає за собою право власності на авторські права, а також право на приписування відповідно до вибраної ліцензії. Зміни, внесені до роботи іншими особами, не будуть вважатися зробленими власником авторських прав. Я усвідомлюю, що я не можу відкликати цю угоду, і що вміст може або не може постійно зберігатися в проекті Вікімедіа.

Наталія Куцак Власник авторських прав 11.05.2024 --Наталія Куцак (talk) 16:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC) ==


 Not done: as per Ankry above. --Yann (talk) 22:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Доброго дня! На жаль, як людина, яка власноруч для фонду робила видалені фото, я прошу Вас їх повернути. Не кожна робота має ліцензію чи іншу ліцензію. І, якщо робота ніде не захищена авторським правом, вона не може бути ліцензована. Тому і ці фото апріорі не можуть бути ліцензовані, бо зроблені мною, як представником благодійного фонду. Фонд творить історію українського волонтерства під час російської агресії, допомагаючи всім українцям, тому на рівні з іншими такими ж фондами, заслуговує мати власну сторінку у Вікіпедії з власними фото, як мають її й інші. Я не можу сама собі надати якийсь документ і поставити печатку, тим більше - видати ліцензію. Присутність видалених Вами фото ПРИНЦИПОВА саме з огляду на те, що ці фото підтверджують реальність подій і фактів, описаних в статті для Вікіпедії - що і є головним принципом діяльності самої енциклопедії. Видалені Вами фото є на офіційному сайті та в соціальних мережах Фонду, і посилання на них - місця їх розміщення - для підтвердження автентичності і приналежності фонду було мною надано на сторінці фонду у Вікіпедії. І вже саме через це не потребують авторства, бо на сьогодні стали надбанням суспільства. Так як вказаний благодійний фонд не є державною структурою держави Україна, присутність написаних матеріалів, фото та відео на сайті і в соцмережах і є підтвердженням права власності. Я вважаю це ДИСКРИМІНАЦІЄЮ по відношенню до фонду, який зробив дуже вагомий внесок для підтримки українців за час російської агресії. Поверніть, будь ласка, нашу власність - видалені фото - на нашу сторінку у Вашій енциклопедії. --Наталія Куцак (talk) 16:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Цим я підтверджую, що я єдиний власник ексклюзивного авторського права на фотографії для БО «БФ «Хелп фор Юкрейн» (англ. «Help for Ukraine»)»:

File:Спілкувалися проєкт під час звітної прес-конференції в Укрінформі.jpg Файл:Пишаємося нагородами від військових.jpg Файл:Допомога полку ім. Кастуся Калиновського.jpg Файл:Генератори на фронт.jpg Файл:Волонтерство немає спочинку.jpg Файл:Фонд задоволення всім, хто цього потребує.jpg

Та на всі інші фото, як показано тут: https://uk.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%87:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%96%D1%8F_%D0%9A%D1%83%D1%86%D0%B0%D0%BA&veaction=edit

і маю законні повноваження щодо звільнити авторські права на цю роботу. Я погоджуюся опублікувати вищезазначений вміст за такою безкоштовною ліцензією: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates#cite_note-5 Я визнаю, що, роблячи це, я надаю будь-кому право використовувати роботу, навіть у комерційному продукті чи іншим чином, і змінювати її відповідно до своїх потреб, за умови, що вони дотримуються умов ліцензії та будь-яких інших чинних законів. Мені відомо, що ця угода не обмежується Вікіпедією чи пов’язаними сайтами. Я усвідомлюю, що власник авторських прав завжди зберігає за собою право власності на авторські права, а також право на приписування відповідно до вибраної ліцензії. Зміни, внесені до роботи іншими особами, не будуть вважатися зробленими власником авторських прав. Я усвідомлюю, що я не можу відкликати цю угоду, і що вміст може або не може постійно зберігатися в проекті Вікімедіа.

Наталія Куцак Власник авторських прав 11.05.2024 --Наталія Куцак (talk) 16:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

  • Free license permissions should be emailed to the address provided in the instructions on your user talk page. This page is not the right venue for providing permissions. We are unable to verify user identity on-wiki. Ankry (talk) 00:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 22:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Official of Governor Eloy S. Inos.jpg

I do not know what the reason for the deletion of this file as I cannot find the . This file was found here: https://web.archive.org/web/20130509162120/http://gov.mp/biographies-2/governor-2/ by me. I have every reason to believe this is an allowable use. Section 313.6(C)(1) of the Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices (PDF page 83 of 1,396) states the bar on copyright protections also includes works prepared by an officer or employee of the government of the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the organized territories under the jurisdiction of the federal government. The Northern Marianas Islands are an organized territory. Therefore, I am requesting an un-deletion of the image.--Mpen320 (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Just so that I don't send myself on a fool's errand, 1) what is the standard of proof for employee? 2) are people under a contract paid for by the government considered employees for these purposes?
Regular employee. Sometimes that can be checked in lists of employees or a reference to the status can be found. An independent photographer doing occasional paid contracts is not a regular employee. Also, an employee in the course of his ordinary duties would not likely have signed the photo. But it's probably possible to contact Benson and ask him. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done, it appears that Del Benson is a professional photographer working independently offering his services to the public for a fee. Thuresson (talk) 21:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Zeitungsbericht über meine Buchveröffentlichungen

Das Bild ist von einem Zeitungsbericht über mich als Autor und über Veröffentlichungen als Schwarzwaldautor. Es soll ein Hinweis auf die Relevanz sein, dass ich als Autor in der Öffentlichkeit bekannt bin. Solche Berichte sind in mehreren Tageszeitungen, Acher-Bühler-Bote, Badische Zeitung, Schwarzwälder Bote, Offenburger Tageblatt, Schwarzwälder Post und andere erschienen. Die Ablehnung eines Hinweises in Wikipedia oder die Entfernung von Bildern halte ich ungerechtfertigt und nicht objektiv. Walter W. Braun Schwarzwaldautor--Walter W. Braun (talk) 17:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Probably about:
Blatant copyright violation: at upload you claimed that you are the author and copyright holder of the articles and the images in them. As an author, you should be particularly sensitive to respecting the rights of other authors. In order to host the article scans we need free license permissions from all authors (including the article authors and photographers). Ankry (talk) 01:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 10:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Such file along with File:WIPR 2019 - Cover.png and File:GII Index 2023 Report Cover.png were deleted by Trade, but in the links given in the upload is notorious that the files come from a publication with a free license compatible with Wikimedia Commons licenses:

There no reason to delete such files considering copyright. I gently ask for undeletion. --Salvador alc (talk) 23:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

At least with the first two images the CC BY 3.0 IGO license says "No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material." Although it's not clear if that applies specifically to the covers or not, but it doesn't seem to be compatible with Commons' policies either way. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
It is a common practice that when cover is exceptuated from the license it is given that exception explicitely. We can't create exceptions where there is not any one. It's obvious that the whole publication is on such license. Salvador alc (talk) 00:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Also. so far, we have accepted CC BY 3.0 IGO as compatible with Commons. There's even a category of media with such license: Category:CC-BY-3.0-IGO, why should it be this an exception?
I think you could make an argument for hosting images of single page works on Commons like a graph under a CC BY 3.0 IGO license. Since there's a reasonable assumptions it's covered in that case. But you can't make the same argument for something like a magazine because there's no telling which pages or what parts of the magazine are covered by the license or not. Especially if your only uploading a single page or just the cover. And where exactly is it obvious that the whole publication is on a such license? --Adamant1 (talk) 01:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
The purpose of copyright pages and en:Copyright notice is precisely to inform about the rights given to the whole publication, which includes the cover. Any exception is showed there. Otherwise, in the case of publications, we would be asking for a visible license in every image and every page, which is unusual in publications and almost and absurd. Salvador alc (talk) 01:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 Support undeletion: the file is under Commons-compatible free license. The restrictions in the warning are not copyright-based. Ankry (talk) 00:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: LIcense reviewed. --Yann (talk) 10:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I would like to request this file is undeleted as it is an image I created myself based off of images and stock that exists on the internet. I added this image to the capri sun wikipedia page with added context around larger formats that existed / exist today. Can I be provided with reasoning as to why this was deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Lollipopgrl333 (talk • contribs)

@Lollipopgrl333: You probably mean "File:Capri Sun 96 oz Big Jug.jpg", the only file you uploaded. The reason for deletion is stated in the deletion log comment. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 10:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

this is a copyriɡht free photo. please don't delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabuj.bd71 (talk • contribs) 08:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

 Oppose And what is the evidence of that? It is also probably out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 10:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Paradoxa10

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ce fichier avait été proposé en remplament d'un fichier contestable mais l'opération ne se fasit pas. aussi j'ai demandé la suppression pour avoir un espace libre et propre. Cette image ne figure nulle part sur internet (je viens de vérifier). C'est normal puisque c'est une photo que l'ai pris en novembre 2011 au Mans pendant les répétitions d'Até mis en scène par Alain Béhar, jamais diffusée. Paradoxa10 (talk) 10:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Erreur ce ne sont pas ce fichiers que je veux restaurer mais c'est le fichier AlainB.png. Le module de demande n'est pas clair et comme il y avait "remove" à côte des 5 fichiers, j'ai pensé qu'il fallait enlver le remove de celui à restaurer, alors que c'était l'inverse. Ce serait plus simple que vous ne proposiez que le seul fichier dont on demande la restauration.
Je recommence la demande du coup
Mais c'est vraiment compliqué de gérer une page ici. Paradoxa10 (talk) 10:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: Duplicate of request below. Answer also posted to requester's talk page. --Yann (talk) 09:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg RESTAURACIÓN. CRIPTOKABALLÁH.

Zac. 8:3 Así dice YHWHW_/: »Yo he restaurado a Sión y habitaré en medio de Jerusalén. Jerusalén se llamará ciudad de la Verdad, y el monte de Jehová de los ejércitos, monte de Santidad. Is. 58:12 Y edificarán los de ti los desiertos antiguos; los cimientos de generación y generación levantarás: y serás llamado reparador de portillos, restaurador de calzadas para habitar. Salmo 89:14-16 Justicia y juicio son el cimiento de tu trono; Misericordia y verdad van delante de tu rostro. ProverBios 2:9-15 Entonces entenderás justicia, juicio Y equidad, y todo buen camino. Cuando la sabiduría entrare en tu corazón, Y la ciencia fuere grata a tu alma,La discreción te guardará; Te preservará la inteligencia, Para librarte del mal camino, De los hombres que hablan perversidades, Que dejan los caminos derechos, Para andar por sendas tenebrosas; Que se alegran haciendo el mal, que se huelgan en las perversidades del vicio; Cuyas veredas son torcidas, Y torcidos sus caminos. ZAC H:C. IS. EH:ABL. SALMO QIH:ADNAFO. PROVERBIOS B:I-AEÑ. (ANAGRAMA).

ATTE. M4Z4TO 1MP4CT. FREELANCER. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M4Z4T0 1MP4CT (talk • contribs) 22:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)


 Not done: No file name provided. All uploaded files are out of scope. --Yann (talk) 22:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete. We have permission per Ticket:2024051410001034. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 11:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Mussklprozz: FYI. --Yann (talk) 11:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Uploaded with Upload Assistant under CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed (not CC-Zero), both the name of the author and the source has been added, along with many more infos. Rectilinium (talk) 07:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

@Rectilinium: If you provide a file that is not your own unpublished work, you need to provide a verifiable source. Anybody needs to be able to verify that the license you provided is correct. Ankry (talk) 00:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
I did, but never mind. Go ahead with speedy deletions, because you are not able to verify an information within seconds, while others spend hours to find pictures, that can be used for Wikimedia Commons Rectilinium (talk) 01:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
????? Don't restore, simply close this discussion. Thank you. Rectilinium (talk) 02:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 09:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ce fichier ne figure nulle part sur internet puisque c'est une photo prise par moi en 2011 pendant la répétition Até au Mans et jamais diffusée. L'historique explique pourquoi je l'ai supprimée et quelle erreur de manip j'ai faite lors de la précédente demande restauration il y a 10 minutes. Paradoxa10 (talk) 10:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Pourquoi si petite ? Si vous êtes le photographe, merci d'importer l'image originale avec les données EXIF.
Why so small? If you are the photographer, please upload the original image with EXIF data. Thanks, Yann (talk) 11:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Bonjour,
Le détenteur des droits d'auteur n'est pas le sujet, mais le photographe. Il faut que celui-ci confirme l'autorisation de publication sous une licence libre via email. Voyez COM:VRT/fr pour la procédure. Ce n'est nécessaire de redemander la restauration. L'image sera restaurée automatiquement quand l'autorisation sera validée. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
The copyright holder is not the subject, but the photographer. S/He must confirm authorization for publication under a free license via email. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. There is no need to request the restoration again. The image will be restored automatically when authorization is validated. Sincerely, Yann (talk) 09:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. Answer also posted to requester's talk page. --Yann (talk) 19:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Per the changes to copyright law in Mongolia enacted in 2021 (see COM:CUR Mongolia), currency is not protected under copyright, and I would like the files deleted as part of the above deletion requests to be reinstated. These are:

Regards Chinneeb (talk) 11:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Question Is the law change retroactive? Otherwise, it may apply to the curency items that were valid ot the time of change and newer. Ankry (talk) 16:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
The entirety of the previous 2006 law was explicitly repealed (see https://legalinfo.mn/mn/detail?lawId=16230812163971), so my understanding is yes. Chinneeb (talk) 05:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per discussion. --Yann (talk) 09:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Per the changes to copyright law in Mongolia enacted in 2021 (see COM:FOP Mongolia), I would like the files deleted as part of the FOP-related deletion requests to be reinstated. These are:

If these can be reinstated I'll follow up by opening undeletion requests for relevant files listed under subcats (such as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statue of Migjid Janraisig (Gandan Monastery).

Regards Chinneeb (talk) 13:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Doing… Feel free to make more undeletion requests. Abzeronow (talk) 16:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:DemocraticGer.jpg is a mural, which is still not covered by Mongolian FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 17:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Human-like Stone Statues of Turkish Period (35324301060).jpg is text and photographs, not covered by FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 22:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Khujirt.jpg is tricky since the photograph has a building (covered now) and a mural on that building (not covered). The mural doesn't look de minimis to me, but we might be able to do a Gaussian blur and still be useful. Abzeronow (talk) 22:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mongolian script at CMNH.JPG is a 2D artwork, not covered by FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 23:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm going to go to bed soon. I'll finish this request tomorrow. Abzeronow (talk) 03:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Torre en Mongolia.jpg looks like an architectural rendering to me, not covered by FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 16:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:UB Street Art 2.jpg is a mural. Not covered by FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 16:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:UyghurMongolia2.jpg is text and photos, not covered by FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 17:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:ZaisanMural.JPG is a mural, not covered by FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 17:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:ÖmnöGobi24.JPG is a 2D artwork for a resturant. Not covered by FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 17:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Undeleted the buildings and 3D art that I could. Feel free to request more undeletion of buildings and outdoor 3D art. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

the license for this photo Ugo biggeri.jpg is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED, as indicated at the bottom of the page https://valori.it/numeri-crescita-banca-etica/. If I'm not mistaken, this should allow for its use, correct? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homeless (talk • contribs) 18:24, 15 May 2024‎ (UTC)


 Not done: as per Эlcobbola. --Yann (talk) 19:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Mayor Kim McGuinness.jpg

Hi,

This picture is freely available and is Kim's current facebook page header.

https://www.facebook.com/NorthumbriaKim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrg08 (talk • contribs)


 Not done: Obviously not, per above. --Yann (talk) 09:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Imported by User:Юрий Д.К. but was self-nominated for deletion, possibly due to FoP issue. However, the recent liberal FoP of Mongolia introduced in mid-2021 has been recently accepted as usable for Commons, and this image can now be restored. Tag as {{FoP-Mongolia}}. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 09:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: files by User:Betta27, deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Betta27. However, there is now Commons-usable FoP there since mid-2021, just recently-recognized. {{FoP-Mongolia}}. (If the monument is found outdoors) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: Please add the FoP category to files. --Yann (talk) 17:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)



The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Can you please undelete the nicki minaj met gala picture as it does not violate policies of this website if it does please correct this mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Releeh labanep (talk • contribs) 16:13, 17 May 2024‎ (UTC)


 Not done: as per Эlcobbola. --Yann (talk) 17:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Mongolian images by Pierre Andre LeClerq

There is now Freedom of Panorama in Mongolia as per the 2021 law (see COM:FOP Mongolia and {{FoP-Mongolia}}). Kindly undelete the images that may show architecture or sculpture found permanently outdoors. If not (like showing 2D works or plaques/tables/literary memorial texts), then remain the file deleted as it is.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

@Yann: Kindly re-delete the following files because those do not appear to be eligible for Mongolian FoP (either showing 2D works or those found indoors):

Also kindly restore the old revision of File:Oulan-Bator, The Blue Sky Hotel and Tower .- Sukhbaatar Square.jpg which probably shows the Blue Sky Tower. Regards JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

@JWilz12345: OK done, except 4 files. These appear to be 3D to me. I think a new DR is needed in these cases. Thanks for looking into this. Yann (talk) 08:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: Please add the FoP category to files. --Yann (talk) 17:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Musée du Temps de Besançon

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: has more than 1 image and reason for deletion was not stated. Jcb told me today on his talk page that the page was probably blanked by someone and he (Jcb) found the page empty and so deleted it (not checking the history). Please undelete the version before the blanked one. Mateus2019 (talk) 12:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: OK. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)



The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

There is now FoP in Mongolia, see COM:FOP Mongolia and {{FoP-Mongolia}}. --Chinneeb (talk) 12:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: Please add the FoP category to files. --Yann (talk) 18:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)




The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: files deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Holy Trinity Orthodox Church, Ulan Bator. Now, {{FoP-Mongolia}} and COM:FOP Mongolia. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: per request. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted by Ellywa

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: if any of the images here show architecture or sculpture permanently found in public outdoors, then the images can be restored as there is now usable FoP in Mongolia: COM:FOP Mongolia and {{FoP-Mongolia}}. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: per request. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Byambyn Rinchen. There is now FoP in Mongolia recently, see above undeletion requests. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:12, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: per request. --Abzeronow (talk) 01:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I need this to be undeleted in order to regain temporary access to this file to transfer to another fair use project. It is my own work.

Derrikisa (talk) 12:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2023-11#File:Nude American Female Buttocks.png. Also, "fair use" is not an acceptable license for a Wikimedia user's own photos. Thuresson (talk) 21:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: No valid reason for undeletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

He died in 1995, the Italian copyright law is 20 years, which would be 2005. It is not a copyright violation regardless. Nokia621 (talk) 18:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

@Nokia621 Images need to be free in both the United States and the country of origin; see COM:L. This is likely copyrighted in the US; and also possibly in Italy (20 years only applies if the photo is "simple"). —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

More Mongolia FoP cases

Requesting undeletion (per COM:FOP Mongolia) of select files from the categories:

Files to be undeleted:

Thanks, Chinneeb (talk) 03:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)


 Not done: Sorry but those files are either not covered by the new legislation, or have other issues. I left a note at the DR's, explaing the issue. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

As per Commons:Stamps#Soviet Union and Commons:Russia#Stamps. --Quick1984 (talk) 13:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Support undeletion, but pinging @Jameslwoodward: as the deletion nominator. Ankry (talk) 16:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Not to say I necessarily disagree with the images being recreated, but it seems like what is done with stamps of countries where they are PD but the original work is copyrighted in another country is to just delete the image. Since there's no way to know what type of re-use arrangement exists, if any. Like if there were to be a North Korean stamp of copyrighted character from an American Cartoon it would be pretty likely they created the stamp without getting permission from the original artists. Things are a little different in Russia, but not by much. And there still have to be a compatible license for the United States anyway, which I assume doesn't exist in such a case. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above, and comments in the DR. --Yann (talk) 17:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Este escudo fue realizado por mi. solicito sea restaurado

Ali vill 1 (talk) 21:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


 Not done: Complex logo, no permission. --Yann (talk) 16:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Segundo Escudo MSC.png

Escudo realizado por mi y que es de dominio publico

Ali vill 1 (talk) 21:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


 Not done: See above. Wrong name, no permission anyway. --Yann (talk) 16:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Escudo elaborado por mi y que es de dominio publico. Por favor restaurar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali vill 1 (talk • contribs) 22:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)


 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 16:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

CC0 licence (CC-zero), widely used online and in newspapers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamestalks (talk • contribs) 17:01, 16 May 2024‎ (UTC)

There is no file of that name. You might be thinking of File:Official portrait 2023 Chandni Mistry.jpg. The website [34] indicated in the deletion comment is not under CC0, but it is under Open Government Licence v3.0 [35]. OGL3 is fine for Commons, but possibly the uploader did not indicate the source and license and claimed own work, which was the problem with another of their uploads. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Notifying Whpq as speedy deletion nominator. You tagged the file for copyvio, which I suppose was indeed the case if it was attributed or licensed incorrectly, but do you see an objection to the photo from the website linked above if tagged with OGL3 and attributed to Brighton & Hove City Council? -- Asclepias (talk) 23:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
No objections. I missed the OGL license or else I would have corrected the license instead of deletion, -- Whpq (talk) 00:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

The user has now uploaded (17 May 2024) a small copy of the photo under the previously unused filename File:Official portrait of Chandni Mistry, 2023.jpg. That probably makes this undeletion request without object. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Why wouldn't we undelete the larger one and redirect this one? Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

✓ Done: I undeleted the oldest file, and reuploaded the original image over. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Napisałem kto zrobił te zdjęcie i mam zgodę na wykorzystanie go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Celgrim (talk • contribs) 11:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

 Oppose Please ask the copyright holder to send a permission via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 11:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

CC-zero licenced — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamestalks (talk • contribs) 12:33, 17 May 2024‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Earlier published at brightonandhovenews.org. Thuresson (talk) 15:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Thuresson. --Yann (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Original photograph that I took at the Eras tour. You will not find a reverse Image search because I took it and wanted it on Commons. Not sure why it was immediately deleted. Nokia621 (talk) 11:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Ping @Didym: Thuresson (talk) 15:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 Info I think I found it on https://www.tiktok.com/@idk_marg0/video/7255032751387135274 (at 49s)... —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose Yeah, that's the same photo, the TikTok is from last year, and Nokia621 uploaded this image earlier this year. I'd want to see Nokia621 produce the original resolution with metadata, and have an adequate explanation about the TikTok, to consider undeleting. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I don't have my phone anymore from that time. It's okay if you want to remove it because I don't have the metadata you seek. My apologies. Nokia621 (talk) 11:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Sure you don't make backups of your photos or you are blatantly lying now that you've been caught? Bedivere (talk) 16:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
I recover them from my social media when I lose them, which makes metadata lost or not included. You can't just make accusations. Nokia621 (talk) 16:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Perhaps you should not make then groundless statements without giving yourself some credit. Bedivere (talk) 22:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 Comment It looks like the uploader is now conceding that they're not the author, at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nokia621. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm speaking in third person about myself, who is the author, to avoid confusion for people who aren't reading my username as I added my own comment. Apparently, it's creating more confusion. Nokia621 (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 16:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

A shape of star is too simple to have copyright.
Luke atlas (talk) 06:14, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose peer Commons:Deletion requests/File:Neopasa logo.svg
AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 Comment This logo was undeleted following Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2024-05#Some files. Yann (talk) 17:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: No consensus to undelete. --Yann (talk) 08:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The copyright to this file belongs to me. The site you are referring to used my photos without permission. These are scammers who use my photos to deceive customers. They stole my photos, which I write about in my telegram channel. https://t.me/HotFitnessBaby/439 The photos were stolen from the Playboy Russia website and from my Instagram page (https://instagram.com/hotfitbaby) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anevendo (talk • contribs) 16:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

 Oppose Small image, no EXIF data. Please confirm the permission via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 16:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 08:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File by unknown author, was taken in 1979 by unknown author and later colorized. Please undelete file, because it doesn't violate any copyright. Michalg95 (talk) 17:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Copyright often lasts for the life of the photographer plus 70 more years. The colorization may have a separate copyright. Which country was this first published in, and how has copyright expired? Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done, no response to relevant questions. Thuresson (talk) 12:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Images of buildings designed by Piacentini in Piazza della Vittoria

Hi everyone, I'm writing in order to ask for the undeletion of File:Piazza della vittoria Brescia.JPG, File:Piazza vittoria brescia lato est.jpg, File:Piazza vittoria brescia lato ovest.jpg, File:Piazza vittoria brescia torre inail.jpg, File:Piazza vittoria brescia.jpg (deleted in this DR), File:Brescia, Piazza Vittoria.jpg (deleted in this DR), File:BS-Brescia-1941-piazza-della-Vittoria.jpg (deleted in this DR), File:Possibile sistemazione pallata brescia.jpg (deleted in this DR). All DRs happened in 2013. These images depict buildings designed by en:Marcello Piacentini (who designed also the general development plan of the whole area) and commissioned by the Municipality (see and here, pp. 597-598). The Municipality then gave the projects by Piacentini to the buyers of the different land's allotments, who paid for the construction of the different buildings:

All the buildings were finished in 1932 and therefore the public ones are Template:PD-ItalyGov since 1953. No issue with US copyright since they were finished way before 1990. Other buildings though were paid by private companies, which therefore are likely the holders. It should be verified which buildings are depicted in each photo and if the private ones are de minimis or not.--Friniate (talk) 13:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done @Friniate: Please add the PD-ItalyGov template. PS: I have a problem with Help:Gadget-DelReqHandler. Yann (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is our own logo, we want to use it on our Armada Music Wiki page

Stefan van den Hurk IT Manager Armada Music — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefanvandenhurk (talk • contribs) 12:56, 22 May 2024‎ (UTC)

@Stefanvendenhurk: please contact COM:VRT if you want to verify permissions. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 17:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Matrix. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

It’s a official with permission from owner and event organiser

Why is the picture deleted, it’s a legal and official picture taken with permission at at public event. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happyfruit288 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)

@Happyfruit288: Please provide a file name, and a valid reason for undeletion. "legal and official picture" is not one. Yann (talk) 19:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: No response. Presumably they're talking about File:「馬來西亞賽區」中華小姐2024發佈會.jpg, which was found on Facebook and has a corporate watermark in the file. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Princess Aiko

This file was wrongfully deleted. These could be classified as government photos but I copyrighted them wrong, I take fault for that. But nobody claimed copyright over this because, well they aren't. They were taken by outer sources but belong to the Japanese government. Also the person who requested deletion never even responded to my first comment. (I am requesting more files undeleted so will copy this reasoning) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camillz (talk • contribs) 21:57, 22 May 2024‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Per Commons:Deletion requests/Japanese Imperial Family uploaded by User:Camillz. Thuresson (talk) 22:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Firstly there English is hardly comprehensible. They also bring up points more than once. Also the reason the author is unknown is because nobody claimed copyright. As I said these could be classified as government licenced photos. Yes, it is my fault for getting copyrighting wrong, I will say that. But these photos were viewed by many and nobody has ever taken a problem with them. Many people have also used these photographs. News websites ect. Camillz (talk) 14:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Also with the hardly comprehensible English bit. Yeah my spelling isn't the best, but the English used by them doesn't make sense at times. Camillz (talk) 14:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
If the claim is that the media companies were using the images sourced from an official royal/state image that was available as public domain or under an open license, then simply provide a copy of the source image or other demonstration of the images' copyright (or lack there of) status. Without that, the images need to remain deleted. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Nonsense request. Per COM:EVID: "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable license." (underline added) This has not been done at upload, at the DR, or here. Acknowledgement that the author is unknown ("reason the author is unknown is because nobody claimed copyright") is acknowledgement that there is no basis to claim these are government photos. Copyright subsists upon creation, and does not need to be "claimed". That the author is not known to the uploader personally, or was not indicated on the site from which these images were taken, is without meaning. Эlcobbola talk 15:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Photos by Lucian Wintrich

The following files are photographs taken by and uploaded to Commons by Lucian Wintrich. It seems he also uploaded some photos of himself, of which he wasn't the photographer, probably misunderstanding Commons' copyright rules. This led to some confusion at the deletion request, in which the nominator seemed either to believe that every photo depicted Wintrich, or just did not notice that several of the photos are photographs by Wintrich of others, since they wrote a permission from the photographer is needed. Maybe VRT is desirable, but in the meantime, these files should be restored:

Zanahary (talk) 05:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Although what you say may have been the case in the first DR, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jvander22, the subsequent DR, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jvander22 (2), seems to conclude that VRT verification is needed. -- Asclepias (talk) 12:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose Regardless of the copyright concerns, this appears to be out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Maybe VRT is desirable, but in the meantime, these files should be restored”. Doesn’t work like that! VRT is needed and once that has been approved, the files be restored. Bidgee (talk) 19:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
The files may be restored. VRT isn't an end run around scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. There is no evidence that the uploader has permission to publich these files under a free license. Previously published files required a formal written permission. --Yann (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

WP:TOO: this is a common type of grave in Ukraine, isn't creative (there are no decorations, portraits, and other visual designs to have some creative basis) --Shiro NekoОбг. 11:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per request. --Yann (talk) 20:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am looking for this to be undeleted in order for me to continue my work on this project. I have come across new information and new sources that are of better quality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natascha.Stone (talk • contribs) 13:25, May 21, 2024‎ UTC (UTC)

This is in response to Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Langfeld Family.pdf. I can't see the file. If the .pdf is pure text of your own creation, then Wikimedia Commons is not the project for it -- it could be either a Wikipedia article, or on b:Wikibooks, or if raw material written by someone else, it could go on s:Wikisource. If the .pdf is a scan of source material, it can be OK here to serve as the basis for a Wikisource text -- but the copyright needs to have expired, which is the life of the author plus 70 years in many places. The DR claims it's an excerpt of a book, so how long did that author live, and in which country can the book be found? The book you link in the DR was published in the 1870s and the author died in 1883, so a scan of that book would be fine here, but it doesn't sound like that is the same one. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Carl L. Out of scope. Copyright is also uncertain. --Yann (talk) 20:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

--Minated (talk) 06:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose This selfie is their only contribution on any project. Clear F10. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Yann (talk) 20:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The photo is my property. There is zero possibility of copyright infringement. The current image has been set as a form of bullying.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by HaterSlayer357 (talk • contribs)

Hi, I was the one who nominated the file for deletion. It was my perception that you found the picture on Sharissa's Twitter account. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose Previously published at https://twitter.com/SharissaSings/status/1789263212300419128. COM:VRT is required. I also deleted your second upload of the same image. Do not upload it again; if the determination is made that you own the copyright and the image is in COM:SCOPE, the original upload will be undeleted. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Yann (talk) 09:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I do not understand why this was deleted; Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cyber tux.jpg shows that two people supported keeping it on the basis that it was in scope, and one person supported deleting it because it was "ridiculous". I don't know how deletion requests on Commons are supposed to work, but at any rate, I would like to use the image. JPxG (talk) 12:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 Not done: Out of scope personal art. No educational use, although it is aesthetically pleasing. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:34, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Whoever said this is stupid. OF COURSE ITS FICTINOUS! we made this in a Minecraft world for fun. don't take that away from me just because it's not real or it's stupid. why does it matter to you at all? please undelete this to save our fun — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgill531 (talk • contribs) 10:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose Sorry, but your fun is out of scope for Commons. There are many other image hosting sites that you can use. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Tcr25. --Yann (talk) 20:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Reasons as to why this file should be undelated

1. It's a unit insignia of a disbanded unit from over 70 years ago

2. Its author (or the last of its authors in the case of a collaboration work) died more than 70 years ago (CPI art. L123-1) and did not benefit from any copyright extension (CPI art. L123-8:https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006278950 L123-9:https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006278951 and L123-10:https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006278952)

3. It is an anonymous or pseudonymous work (the identity of the author has never been disclosed) or a collective work and more than 70 years have passed since its publication (CPI art. L123-3 of French Law:https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006278941)

Date: May 24th 2024 --Salfanto (talk) 17:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Salfanto

What about the photograph of the object itself? That doesn't appear to be freely licensed. Abzeronow (talk) 17:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done, no response. #2 and #3 can not both be true at the same time. Thuresson (talk) 23:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Photo not ilegal in gettyimages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sssluz (talk • contribs) 19:34, 25 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)


 Not done: Getty Images are not free. --Yann (talk) 19:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Photo not illegal in gettyimages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sssluz (talk • contribs) 19:34, 25 May 2024 (UTC) (UTC)


 Not done: Getty Images are not free. --Yann (talk) 19:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Photo image File:Sylvia Jane Kirby.jpg was sent to me by the owner Sylvia Jane Kirby to replace old image of her.--Doncapps1961 (talk) 08:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

 Support if she sends free licence per COM:VRT. Michalg95 (talk) 09:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose The permission has to be sent by the copyright holder, who is usually the photographer. If the copyright was transferred to the subject, proof is required. Yann (talk) 09:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

im the sole owner of copyright to that photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cam123123cam (talk • contribs) 11:39, 25 May 2024‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Copied from the Internet, no evidence of a free license. Yann (talk) 16:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 11:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The image was a picture of a Maltesers Bucket, why i am requesting Undeletion of the picture is because of the Commons:De minimis policy, stating that A Page should not be deleted if it is curved or something along the lines of it.

If you are reading this, Have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheNuggeteer (talk • contribs)


 Not done: Hardly de minimis. Front and centre, and the filename would disagree with you.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:رضا حمیدی.jpg این تصویر توسط خبرگزاری مهر تولید و منتشر شده است. اسم عکاس هم موجود است. میتوانید به لینک زیر مراجعه کنید: [36]

[37] در انتهای صفحات این وبسایت نیز چنین نوشته شده است: All Content by Mehr News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License تصویر باید undelete شود. --Boffin 2024 (talk) 14:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)


File:رضا حمیدی.jpg This image was produced and published by Mehr news agency. The name of the photographer is also available. You can refer to the following link:

[38]

[39]

At the end of the pages of this website, it is written as below:

All Content by Mehr News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

The image must be undeleted. --Boffin 2024 (talk) 08:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)


✓ Done fixed source and verified license Ankry (talk) 10:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The information and materials presented in the atlas are free for copying, republishing, and distribution if they are carried out free of charge for the end user and if, during such copying, republishing, and distribution, there is a mandatory reference to the authors and subjects of property rights to this information and developments (the Atlas, p. 2). Rino ap Codkelden (talk) 21:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Oppose The above statement clearly forbids commercial distribution. This is not acceptable. Ankry (talk) 10:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done, per Ankry. Thuresson (talk) 22:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Where was it determined that this is a Boeing proprietary logo and not any other patch like those used on the SpaceX missions? -- RickyCourtney (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Procedural close, not an undeletion request. Thuresson (talk) 22:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Wappem_Woldriken.jpg

It isnt copyrighted, you deleted just cause u wanted.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheNuggeteer (talk • contribs) 00:20, 28 May 2024‎ (UTC)

Not done, no response from OP. Thuresson (talk) 23:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Deleted file by User:Krd

Undeletion requests for this file, because I want to use this file on wikidata item.

--Loischaa (talk) 06:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Loischaa

 Oppose No accepted VRTS permission. Ankry (talk) 11:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose: Requester is CU-blocked on enwiki = locked uploader m:Special:CentralAuth/Amirdelv. --Achim55 (talk) 19:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done, VRTS issues should be dealt with at Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard. Requester is not blocked but uploader is. Thuresson (talk) 23:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Requester locked for evasion. No need to suffer the socks. DMacks (talk) 00:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Requester also blocked at en: since May 10. Thuresson (talk) 14:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I Request undeletion of this file, because it was deleted by mistake. It will be undeleted if Commons allows fair use. Michalg95 (talk) 12:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Commons doesn't allow Fair Use. Magnus (talk) 12:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: As above, Commons does not allow fair use. This is also not a media file as defined by COM:SCOPE. --Эlcobbola talk 16:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:GheorgheCormos3x4.jpg

I have contacted Gheorghe Cormos and given him the release language to affirm and send to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. He should be doing this within the next week. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedDrum1824 (talk • contribs) 03:42, 30 May 2024‎ (UTC)

 Oppose This is a matter for VRTS, not this page. Thuresson (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: As per the perfectly clear instructions at the top of this page: "If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed.". --Эlcobbola talk 16:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)