Cadidatas a imaxes de calidade

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 47% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.
Shortcut
↓ Salta a nomeamentos ↓
Other languages:

Estas son as candidatas para converterse en imaxes de calidade. Por favor, que quede claro que non é o mesmo que as imaxes destacadas. Ademais, se queres obter información sobre as túas imaxes podes conseguila en Críticas fotográficas.

Propósito

O propósito das imaxes de calidade é animar ás persoas que son a base de Commons, aos usuarios individuais que proporcionan as imaxes únicas que expanden esta colección. Mentres que imaxes destacadas identifican as mellores imaxes subidas a Commons, imaxes de calidade serve para identificar animar a que os usuarios se esforcen para proporcionar imaxes de calidade Commons. Ademais, as imaxes de calidade pode ser un lugar onde outros usuarios expliquen métodos para mellorar unha imaxe.


Directrices

Todas as imaxes nomeadas deben estar creadas por usuarios de Commons.

Para os nomeadores

Debaixo están as directrices xerais para Imaxes de calidade; criterios máis detallados están dispoñibles en Directrices de imaxes.

Requisitos das imaxes

  1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
  2. As imaxes deben estar en conformidade coas todas políticas e prácticas de Commons, incluído Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
  3. As imaxes de calidade deben ter un nome de ficheiro significativo, estar axeitadamente categorizadas e ter unha descrición precisa na páxina do arquivo nunha ou máis linguas. É preferible, pero non obrigatorio, incluír unha descrición en inglés.
  4. Sen anuncios ou sinaturas na imaxe. Os dereitos de autor e información da autoría das imaxes de calidade deben atoparse na páxina do ficheiro e poden estar nos metadatos da imaxe, pero non interferir co contido da mesma.

Creador
Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.


Requisitos técnicos

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolución

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Calidade das imaxes

As imaxes dixitais poden ter varios problemas que se orixinan na captura e no procesamento das mesmas, como ruído, problemas coa compresión JPEG, falta de información en áreas de sombras ou altas luces, ou problemas coa captura de cores. Todos estes probemas deben ser tratados axeitadamente.

Composición e iluminación

A disposición do obxecto principal dentro da imaxe debe contribuír á mesma. Os obxectos da fronte o do fondo non deben desviar a atención. A iluminación e o enfoque tamén contribúen ao resultado xeral; o obxecto principal ten que estar nítido, despexado e ben exposto.

Valor

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

Como nomear

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section: 

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Descrición breve  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below: 

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Número de nomeamentos

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Avaliando as imaxes

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

Como revisar

Como actualizar o status

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

  • If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Descrición breve --~~~~ | }}

a

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Descrición breve --Sinatura do nomeador |Porque che gustou. --~~~~}}

Noutras palabras, cambia o modelo de /Nomination a /Promotion e engade a túa sinatura, posiblemente con algún comentario curto.

  • Se decides rexeitar o nomeamento, cambia a liña relevante de
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Descrición breve --~~~~ | }}

a

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Descrición breve --Sinatura do nomeador |Porque non che gustou. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

Como executar unha decisión

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Instrucións manuais (abrir só en casos de emerxencia)

If promoted,

  1. Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
  2. Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
  3. Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives novembro 2024.
  4. Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

  1. move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives novembro 2024.
  • Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
  • Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
  • Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 08 2024 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Actualización da páxina: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with: 

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 02:21, 8 novembro 2024 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
  • Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
  • If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms
Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).


November 08, 2024

November 07, 2024

November 06, 2024

November 05, 2024

November 04, 2024

November 03, 2024

November 02, 2024

November 01, 2024

October 31, 2024

October 30, 2024

October 29, 2024

October 28, 2024

October 27, 2024

October 26, 2024

October 25, 2024

October 24, 2024

October 23, 2024

October 22, 2024

October 21, 2024

October 20, 2024

October 17, 2024

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".



File:Bisi_Adeleye_Fayemi_01.svg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:ARINA_HENDRIKA,_Cargo_ship,_ENI_02203863,_MMSI_244131479._15-07-2024._(actm.)_01.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:Capitolio,_Toulouse,_Francia,_2023-01-06,_DD_120-122_HDR.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:Zaouiat_Moulay_Abdeslam,_Tizguite_3.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:Close_wing_posture_Nectaring_of_Eurema_hecabe_(Linnaeus,_1758)_-_Common_Grass_Yellow_WLB_DSC_4525.jpg

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Željko_Obradović_KK_Partizan_EuroLeague_20241101_(1).jpg

  • I understand that this is a difficult shot, but the result is really below avergade. Currently, the requirements for QI are minimal. If we approve any blurry photo here, then the QI project must be closed as useless. -- George Chernilevsky 10:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, this is QI, and IMO your picture does not meet the QI guidelines. It is noisy and blurry due ISO 2500 and also low f-number (since the ear is sharp). We could probably accept low DoF for a difficult shot, but then the focus should be on the face, not on one ear.
  • Sorry, the image is clearly usable. But it is not a quality image. It is true that we accept limited depth of field and higher level of noise for sports and indoor photography (if the conditions do not allow a tripod), but quality images should not have obvious technical flaws unrelated to the conditions. Here the focus is clearly wrong, it would have been possible to take a picture where the face and not the ear was in focus.--ArildV 16:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Although I like to concede a certain amount of image deficiencies in available light photos, I unfortunately have to agree with the other voters here, because even in A4 size the wrong focus is recognizable. This does not mean that the picture is garbage and unusable. --Smial 14:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Southern_Theatre_(Gerasa,_Jerash;_Jordan_v2)_-_مسرح_جرش_الجنوبي.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:At_the_Cradle_of_Aviation_Museum_2023_121.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:2024_Kłodzko,_ul._Walecznych_3_(2).jpg

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 09:14, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arch_of_Hadrian_(Gerasa,_Jerash;_Jordan)_-_قوس_هادريان_(جرش).jpg

  •  Oppose, mainly because there's at least one stitching error, visible especially at the information board in the center (behind the arch). This also shows that the different frames have different focus. And it's obviously a panorama, but the panorama template is missing. --Plozessor 12:47, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Yellow boy is redrawn, but some behing are not so well since moving and i used Hi-res shot. @Kadellar, Plozessor Nominal this is 20 MPx sensor, and people in back dont spoil so much. Those people are from 20 MPx and had to be enlarged to this size, ×2 --PetarM 11:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:14, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mercado_del_pescado,_ciudad_de_Kuwait,_Kuwait,_2024-08-12,_DD_30.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:Il_Pitosforo_(Otranto).jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:Slaski_tydzien_5057.JPG

  •  Info Just butting in, quickly, to mention that the Guidelines specify that: "The purpose of quality image status is to recognize that at the moment of creation, a Commons user skillfully achieved a desirable level of quality, a recognition that is not erased by later advances." So technically, the standards of 2011 (not 2024) are the ones that apply. If that makes it hard for users to judge, there's always the option of leaving it unreviewed.--Peulle 09:44, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --MB-one 13:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarlat-la-Canéda_-_Place_de_la_Liberté_-_1.jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

File:Plaque_at_La-Z-Boy,_Newton,_MS.jpg

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 09:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sompura_Mahavihara_2024_17.jpg

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 09:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pilot 111 SE Visby October 2024 01.jpg

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 09:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Porsche_Macan_4_IMG_2159.jpg

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Renault_Master,_Busworld_Europe_2023,_Brussels_(P1140367).jpg

Commons:Quality images candidates/gl/Discuss

Táboa de tempo (8 días despois do nomeamento)

  • xov 31 out → ven 08 nov
  • ven 01 nov → sáb 09 nov
  • sáb 02 nov → dom 10 nov
  • dom 03 nov → lun 11 nov
  • lun 04 nov → mar 12 nov
  • mar 05 nov → mér 13 nov
  • mér 06 nov → xov 14 nov
  • xov 07 nov → ven 15 nov
  • ven 08 nov → sáb 16 nov
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/gl&oldid=908384638"