Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2021

File:Place D'Youville, Québec, Canada.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Feb 2021 at 20:19:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Canada
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like this photo. At full size, pixel-peeping shows imperfections, such as very narrow red banding around some bright areas (though your eye might see that, too), and not all parts of the photo are equally sharp at full size, but it's a big, sweeping panorama that isn't well judged that way, it's really striking, and it's a nice slice of life. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Those colors only appear for a very short period in the afternoon. I had not planned to take that photo, but seeing those colors I ran to assemble the tripod --Wilfredor (talk) 22:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Saw this in your uploads list a few days ago! —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 22:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great colours and mood! --Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overprocessed Excessive contrasts, the blacks are too dominant, the colors pushed over the limit. There's a potential at the beginning for sure (special clouds, nice light in the building, interesting composition), however, the post-treatment ruins it, sorry, I don't buy it -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support As Ikan notes, there are some small issues at pixel-peeping level. But the light is so special and I can see why you rushed to capture it. I wonder if the stitching process has slightly compressed the image vertically -- the clock is a little bit vertically squashed. I have no idea what Basile is seeing. -- Colin (talk) 18:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Colorful sunsets like this one happen from time to time up here in the northern winters. The colors are out of this world and you make quick dashes to get your camera (or 2)!! I think you may have to have seen it to believe it. The vivid colors are due to the special properties of the atmosphere (tiny ice crystals hanging in the upper layers) during winter temperatures and the angle of the sun. This sunset was probably even more red IRL since most sensors have a hard time capturing ultra-red colors, they usually turn into yellow or perhaps orange in the photo. A few years ago, I took photos and fed into the computer to make side by side comparisons with the live sky. The difference was staggering. --Cart (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed, more space needed in the upper part. —kallerna (talk) 12:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 21:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed and compositionally quite busy. Daniel Case (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel Case. -- Karelj (talk) 17:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose tigth crop --Mile (talk) 13:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plexippus paykulli - 50959617953.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2021 at 20:10:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Salticidae (Jumping Spiders)
Info created by spidereyes2020 - uploaded by Nosferattus - nominated by Nosferattus -- Nosferattus (talk) 20:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nosferattus (talk) 20:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good shot considering the size of the animal, 9 to 11 mm (0.35 to 0.43 in) -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. I didn't realize it was so small. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cbrescia (talk) 22:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 10:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Radomianin (talk) 10:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 05:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 08:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:43, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Mile (talk) 13:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 15:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Cmao20 (talk) 18:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tournasol7 (talk) 09:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Salticidae (Jumping Spiders)

File:Footprints in the snow, Munich 2021 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2021 at 12:49:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other
Info All by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 12:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 12:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light and subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A normal shot for me --Co mmon ists 18:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:55, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Commonists. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Commonists Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This is very good picture for Wiktionary. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 06:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shoeprint -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Clean and good use of light. --Sumit Surai (talk) 12:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It's a nice idea, but the composition doesn't quite work for me. I like the pattern of the shoe sole though, and I think a close-up of that pattern imprinted in the snow could produce an FP-level wow factor. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 19:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the motif and the image quality is good. Cmao20 (talk) 17:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Commonists. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao. Sometimes the simple things are the best. --Aristeas (talk) 08:57, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:SL Colombo asv2020-01 img37 Maradana station.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2021 at 10:54:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info A Sri Lanka Railways M4 diesel locomotive at Maradana railway station, Colombo ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 10:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 10:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well composed, nice colors. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 08:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 05:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 21:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I should be opposing on the grounds that the upper left corner is too distracting. But it isn't ... the light and neutral color does not stand in the way of the locomotive livery, and its shape is complementary. Daniel Case (talk) 03:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 01:16, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles

File:Vank Cathedral church, Isfahan, Iran.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2021 at 08:24:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 08:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 08:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another good one. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are already 3 FPs of this cathedral's gorgeous interior: 1, 2, 3. All are by Poco, but none of them are from this viewpoint. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really stunning. --Aristeas (talk) 09:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Liridon (talk) 10:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 18:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 05:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 15:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 18:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tournasol7 (talk) 09:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran

File:Vassholmen island outside Väjern harbor, Kungshamn 4.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2021 at 10:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Sweden
Info Ok, testing... All by me, -- Cart (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO OK. The sign is a little bit disturbing, but it's very small. The crosses at the island are very small too. I like the composition with snow and ice. --XRay 💬 11:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sign is one of many daylight navigation marks along the coast. The small "crosses" are old mooring devices (a kind of bollards or cleats) from the beginning of the 20th century. These things are such very common maritime items along the Swedish west coast, I didn't even think about them. Now added to description and categories. --Cart (talk) 11:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you for your information. I visited just Malmö and Gothenburg in Sweden. I should go on vacation there. --XRay 💬 08:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice nomination, and nice to see one from you. It's been a while. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:35, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Welcome back (to nominations), Cart! --Aristeas (talk) 17:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks guys for the welcome mat! :-) I may drop in now and then for a nom, but I won't be doing any voting. See my talk page for more info. --Cart (talk) 18:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose A normal shot for me --Co mmon ists 18:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --StellarHalo (talk) 03:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Neither composition nor quality and light are outstanding. Looks also slightly tilted cw. Sorry. --Milseburg (talk) 10:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I too thought it was tilted at first, but check the horizon to the right (you can tell it's the horizon and not some cloud line since there is a white ship on it), it's a bit fuzzy but you can estimate it. The island is asymmetric so it slants away from the camera (check on a map) creating this illusion. You can't go by the ice-line either since the tide keeps disrupting it and re-freeze it. --Cart (talk) 10:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Milseburg. —kallerna (talk) 12:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't understand the comments about composition or light. We have leading line to an interesting island. And the lighting is good, low, clearly marking the 3D form of the island. Photographing snow in blue-sky sunlight is not easy. -- Colin (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to see another nom from you, at long last. Daniel Case (talk) 20:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 05:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent photo, and per Colin Cmao20 (talk) 17:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 15:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Sweden

File:Воронцовський маяк Одеса 3.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2021 at 10:17:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Ukraine
Info created by SNCH - uploaded by SNCH - nominated by Pavlo1 -- Pavlo1 (talk) 10:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pavlo1 (talk) 10:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much color noise to even reach the stage of considering the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality issues. I wonder why the indicated camera settings have been chosen, they are not suitable for this kind of shot. --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sadly per above, but a shame because the composition is IMHO FP level Cmao20 (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao. I would add the serious magenta CA on the bright side of the lighthouse as a technical failure. Daniel Case (talk) 19:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distribution of Presents for the New Year by Shah Sultan Husayn.png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2021 at 17:29:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Groups
Info created by Muhammad Ali ibn Muhammad Zaman - uploaded and nominated by Hanooz -- Hanooz 17:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hanooz 17:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cbrescia (talk) 15:08, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think title should be changed from "New Year" to "Nowruz". --Gnosis (talk) 08:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent reproduction. --Aristeas (talk) 16:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tournasol7 (talk) 09:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Groups

File:Kamianiec Podilsky Stary Zamek DSC 0829 68-104-9007.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2021 at 14:28:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
Info Fortress of the Kamianets-Podilskyi city, Ukraine. Created and uploaded by Haidamac - nominated by DimasSolo -- DimasSolo (talk) 14:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DimasSolo (talk) 14:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pavlo1 (talk) 17:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad quality and no wow --Co mmon ists 18:57, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:54, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nice shot, but not of the exceptional quality we're looking for here. The sky is noisy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not vertical. Please fix the perspective -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Until the issues mentioned above are addressed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others. Insufficient quality. --Milseburg (talk) 10:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose per the poor processing of the castle. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I wish I could support because the composition is beautiful, but the quality is not so good. Cmao20 (talk) 17:56, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Redcurrant (Ribes rubrum) fruits.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2021 at 14:54:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 14:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive closeup of these little berries. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 23:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very well done. Nice background -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 05:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 13:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Superb. Cmao20 (talk) 18:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment juicy. :) Planning to support, but I've added a note regarding a stacking error. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rhododendrites: Done --Ivar (talk) 06:33, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Outstanding. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The stacking error should be fixed but it is not too problematic here. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)

File:Rosa Veilchenblau 2019-06-13 1988.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2021 at 17:20:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Rosaceae
Info created by Salicyna - uploaded by Salicyna - nominated by Salicyna -- Salicyna (talk) 17:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support not perfect but good --Co mmon ists 08:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Too dark, not special enough. —kallerna (talk) 12:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Salicyna: do you know you can also vote to support your own nomination? -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin: I know, but I don't want. Salicyna (talk) 07:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

in fact in my opinion the author should not vote for himself.....--Co mmon ists 16:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is arbitrary, like to consider an oppose should count as much as a support (like at QIC) or that the votes should be hidden (like at Photo challenge). In a presidential election, candidates are allowed to vote for themselves. Considering the current rules, there are at least two advantages of voting for yourself: 1) more green reassure and encourage to follow the "green light", 2) after 5 days, the bot will consider your nomination finished if only one person supports without you (instead of 9 days). Some people at FPC seek the difficulty, or for other reasons abstain, I respect -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like this one and believe the contrast is natural, provided the top of the flower is located in the sunlight and everything else in the shadow. I made a similar shot a while ago -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose this strong contrast from strong sunlight kills the wow effect for me. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The flower is great, but I'm distracted enough from the middle ground behind it (2 leaves and a flower) not to support. I won't be opposing, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Cmao20 (talk) 17:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weißstorch P1190401.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2021 at 15:28:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds # Fam:Ciconidae (Storks)
Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 15:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 15:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Awkward POV. —kallerna (talk) 12:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's really nice how the beaks of the three storks are folded. --Aristeas (talk) 08:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SM:!) (talk) 18:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas, and it also has a cuteness factor. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 05:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:41, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas, not perfect but a nice shot of animal behaviour that deserves the FP star. Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds # Fam:Ciconidae (Storks)

File:Метелик на кульбабі.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2021 at 15:19:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Pieridae_(Whites_and_Sulphurs)
Info Small cabbage white (Pieris rapae) sitting on a dandelion (Taraxacum sect. Ruderalia) in Birch Grove in Kyiv. Created and uploaded by Сергій Мірошник - nominated by DimasSolo -- DimasSolo (talk) 15:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DimasSolo (talk) 15:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looking at this user's uploads, I'm really enjoying their handling of (or even composing of) backgrounds and light. With this macro lens the effect seems almost like two 2D planes. It helps when the subject is nearly 2D, of course. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too much movement in background and antenna, multiople images show. butterfly too dark. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 18:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:59, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wow! I would prefer a slightly tighter crop though. —kallerna (talk) 12:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent, regardless of a bit of movement by the antennae, and the background is quite pretty to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ahmad^talk 18:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 05:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I get Charles' point, but this is still FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Pieridae_(Whites_and_Sulphurs)

File:FCAB GL26C-2 2005, 2010 and GT22CU-3 2402 Ascotan.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Mar 2021 at 06:48:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 06:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition, special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome background. I've never seen a train with 3 locomotives in a row before. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question what are those halos above the train? --Co mmon ists 08:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commonists: do you mean smoke above the locomotives? --Ivar (talk) 09:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yes that is smoke. But I suggest lightening the very dark areas a little. --Milseburg (talk) 10:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --XRay 💬 08:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose don't like the shadows. --A.Savin 16:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I do like the shadows ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice --Isiwal (talk) 08:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support a poty candidate. Tomer T (talk) 04:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 14:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 20:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SM:!) (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 17:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per A.Savin. Shadows too dark. --Milseburg (talk) 11:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 05:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Magnificent Cmao20 (talk) 18:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Town hall tower in Znin (2).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2021 at 07:14:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Poland
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, a bit oversaturized --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Doesn't hit me over the head, but it's peaceful and nice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done; the saturation is IMHO OK (matches the warm light of an October afternoon). --Aristeas (talk) 08:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good but nothing wild here I'd call extraordinary RolfHill (talk) 21:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 05:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan, not immediately stunning but a well-executed photo of a beautiful place. Cmao20 (talk) 18:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Poland

File:Northern cardinal female in CP (02035).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2021 at 21:17:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Cardinalidae_(Cardinals,_Grosbeaks,_Saltators_and_Allies)
Info Female northern cardinal in Central Park. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Thanks Charlesjsharp for the suggestion. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 08:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Fischer.H (talk) 09:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 13:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 15:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 18:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support What a lovely photo - and perfect composition and sharpness. Cmao20 (talk) 18:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 21:53, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tournasol7 (talk) 09:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support My wife and I have, for years now, actually been in the unusual situation of having a bird like this as a pet (one we came into perfectly legally, I should add). So of course I love this one. Daniel Case (talk) 17:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't say I've ever heard of a cardinal as a pet! Do your neighbors think your car alarm is always going off? :)
  I noticed a year or so ago that although the northern cardinal is one of the most well-known, most visually striking, and most common birds in the eastern US, we have no FPs of it! So I've been trying to keep an eye out anytime I have my camera with me, but they're just never quite "cooperative" enough. Very glad to finally get a decent one... but we still need at least one more (a male). Be on the lookout, people in the eastern US! — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, she's quiet enough that her wild counterparts outside take more notice of her than any of our neighbors. Yeah ... getting her as a pet was a totally unplanned situation, legal because no money changed hands. Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 21:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 09:52, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cbrescia (talk) 00:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 04:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Cardinalidae_(Cardinals,_Grosbeaks,_Saltators_and_Allies)

File:Katjes van een hazelaar (Corylus avellana). 26-01-2021. (actm.) 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2021 at 10:13:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Betulaceae
Info created & uploaded by Agnes Monkelbaan - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose quite nice, but I find it looks rather ... flat, due to how it is lit. This, for example feels much more 3D. --El Grafo (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very well demonstrated by El Grafo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support (and I like it more than the file linked above) Kruusamägi (talk) 12:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overprocessed, colors are better on the version with natural background. --Ivar (talk) 13:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would prefer the version mentioned by El Grafo, too. --Aristeas (talk) 16:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment FWIW, I did not write that I would prefer that one over the candidate (I wouldn't, it has its own problems). I just think that it does one particular thing better and used that to illustrate something that is – to my eyes – a flaw in the candidate. --El Grafo (talk) 12:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yes, and I did not misunderstand you ;–). I did not write “I would prefer the other version, like El Grafo”, I just wrote that I would prefer the version you have mentioned (and I would probably vote “pro” on it, while I am neutral on this version) ;–). Thank you, --Aristeas (talk) 09:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per others. It just feels ... well, too clinical, would be how I'd put it. Daniel Case (talk) 06:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. -- Karelj (talk) 16:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 09:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarlyk Yak2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2021 at 10:49:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla
Info created and uploaded by Alexandr frolov - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 10:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 08:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tournasol7 (talk) 09:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:55, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The full reflection of the animal, if possible, would have been welcome, but it's hard to argue with a sharp picture of such an imposing beast with such a great background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the reflected part is so crisp, I think a vertical framing would have made this picture even more striking. Though it's a bit late now to ask the photographer to return to the scene :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin and Ikan Kekek: What do you think about this picture? --IamMM (talk) 03:40, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I like it, and I think it's different enough from this one to nominate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FP level too IMO (except noise). The animal looking at viewer is maybe better here, while the composition with full reflection and blue sky is great on the other one -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:21, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like this picture has given you two plenty to yak about! (ducks). Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No ducks in this picture... :-P -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:44, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Wilfredor (talk) 01:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 07:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)

File:Woman with hand-rolled cigarette cutting rice.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2021 at 10:17:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created and uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 10:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks a lot, IamMM, for the nomination. I like the light and the smile -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support A really authentic portrait, moving and very likeable. --Aristeas (talk) 16:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just a note that we have one other FP of this woman. That's not to say we shouldn't have two, of course. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support I think that I prefer this one, actually. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:16, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Aristeas Cmao20 (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 08:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:33, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 01:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not only a National Geographic-level image, a great one to start off International Women's Month with. Daniel Case (talk) 01:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

File:Biebricher Wasserturm, Wiesbaden, 170416, ako.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2021 at 18:17:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info A water tower lit by golden sunset lighting. I found this unusual and special enough for FP. created by Code - uploaded by Code - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very attractive light, nice shape, good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent light and background, though bottom crop could have been better. --Ivar (talk) 06:42, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 08:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:33, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 02:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per ivar — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 17:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany

File:Camp Lamsdorf - old cemetery.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2021 at 20:21:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Poland
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 20:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 20:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I remain undecided about this photo, but I want to give it a little love. It's touching, and I think having the shadows nearby and the sunlight in the background works. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:46, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 05:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Peaceful and moving. Cmao20 (talk) 18:03, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 18:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:56, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Poland

File:Löwenstein - Wolfertsberg - Weinberge und Waldrand im Oktober.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2021 at 16:48:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
Info Vineyards and the edge of the forest on the Wolfertsberg near Löwenstein, Germany at an autumn evening. It was the most beautiful evening last autumn when I was able to take this shot shortly before sunset. I know that the colours seem exaggerated, but the combination of the colourful autumn leaves with the golden evening sun simply resulted in the colourfulness I have tried to capture here. All by me, --Aristeas (talk) 16:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Aristeas (talk) 16:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support lovely color — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The colours are very bright but in evening light I am sure they were natural. A really special moment. Cmao20 (talk) 18:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 18:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nicely composed. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 20:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 21:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am joining the cheering crowd. --Ivar (talk) 06:45, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:53, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice RolfHill (talk) 16:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:36, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the contrast between the regularity of the vineyards and the fractality of the forest. Daniel Case (talk) 22:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pacefull place --Wilfredor (talk) 20:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Germany

File:Nina01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2021 at 13:05:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info Nina Janković, Serbian actress. Created by Mika Knežević - uploaded by BokicaK - nominated by -- Mile (talk) 13:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 13:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The skin retouch went way overboard. I'd support if that got changed. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very ordinary and over-processed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. While some of the apparent overprocessing can be explained by her heavy makeup, it looks like too much went on one side. Perhaps the creator should have tried for an overall bleach bypass look rather than make it look like one of those "after" pics in the ads for portrait-enhancement software in photo magazines. Daniel Case (talk) 15:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Franz Josef Glacier 17.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2021 at 09:39:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/New Zealand
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 09:39, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 09:39, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose IMO it does not work well with people. I also have the impression that the glacier is only visible as a small piece in the background, despite the picture's name and the description. --A.Savin 14:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the people help a lot to show the scale of the geological features we're looking at. The mountains look imposing to me, and I think the clouds help make the people feel enclosed and almost trapped in nature from all sides. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special for FP nomination, IMO. -- Karelj (talk) 16:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per A. Savin. Maybe with less dull light this would work. Daniel Case (talk) 18:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexander Samuilovich Kravets.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2021 at 22:10:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
Info Alexander Samuilovich Kravets - Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Head of the Department of Ontology and Theory of Knowledge, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation (1998) / Сreated by Alina Gribanova - uploaded by Alina Gribanova - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 22:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 22:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose noisy and very dark for FP Ezarateesteban 13:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose per noise noted by Ezarate. Daniel Case (talk) 15:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zeeland, Netherlands ESA22256852.jpeg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2021 at 18:33:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images
Info Zeeland, the Netherlands. FYI, there is a single faint stitching line in the upper left part of the image. created by European Space Agency - uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot - nominated by StellarHalo -- StellarHalo (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- StellarHalo (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent details, I can even see the street in which I grew up (and it's not in Zeeland) --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are a couple of funny diagonal lines with different colors on either side, but they're subtle, and the photo is great, overall. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support A beautiful part of our world, captured very well. --Aristeas (talk) 08:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tournasol7 (talk) 09:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 17:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite images

File:EL foto, Eimar Kull - 5stROHUKEDRIK-2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2021 at 19:17:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lasiocampidae (Eggars)
Info created by Eimar Kull - uploaded & nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 19:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 19:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The moth is nice, but the shadows and crop need some work. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question ~~I don't like the left part.~~ A square framing would work much better. Image note added. Possible to do that? -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support now -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment File name and description are not on FP level. The taxa name should be given there. --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support either way, but I do agree some of the left could be cropped. PS: I've added an English description. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done I asked Eimar if it was ok for him if I'd crop the image. He was. So here is the square crop. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 14:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 17:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 20:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support A festival of earth tones Daniel Case (talk) 15:27, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 07:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 15:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 15:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lasiocampidae (Eggars)

File:Mykonos .jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2021 at 18:10:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Greece
Info created by GattoCeliaco - uploaded by GattoCeliaco - nominated by GattoCeliaco -- GattoCeliaco (talk) 18:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question GattoCeliaco, could you make an argument for this nomination? If you explained how this composition is great in your eyes, you might help us to see what you're seeing. Also, it's good to put the name of the country in the gallery, so I've added that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Some of these things in combination might have made a great FP, but all of them do not. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:EL foto, Eimar Kull - 2st nõgese õis.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2021 at 19:17:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Urticaceae
Info created by Eimar Kull - uploaded & nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 19:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 19:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Might be a good VI, but the composition isn't impressing me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose agree with Ikan regarding composition, sorry. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 23:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sediment plume at sea.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2021 at 22:31:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images
Info The capital city of Rome and the surrounding areas in Lazio/Latium, Italy. created by European Space Agency - uploaded by StellarHalo - nominated by StellarHalo -- StellarHalo (talk) 22:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- StellarHalo (talk) 22:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 17:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 22:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 17:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the way the sediment plume has such sharp boundaries ... you don't usually see that. 15:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite images

File:Hamamelis x intermedia 'Angelly'. 19-02-2021. (d.j.b) 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2021 at 05:32:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hamamelidaceae
Info Hamamelis x intermedia 'Angelly' (witch hazel). A nice selection of † Jan Van Heijningen. Focus stack of 20 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the arrangement of the petals is mostly responsible for the high quality of the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really beautiful. And: I have recently looked at some Hamamelis plants in bloom, this photo reveals more details than I could see with my eyes. --Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 17:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 17:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 21:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice golden light. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree but surprisingly not golden hour, it was 11:30 am according to the metadata. Was the clock correctly set? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: the clock was set correctly. But at that moment the light from the side fell beautifully through the bare trees.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --XRay 💬 08:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 15:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Meiræ 00:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:50, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Hamamelidaceae

File:New ice cracking on stone as tide goes out at Govik.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2021 at 10:40:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Ice
Info I think it has some EV since it illustrates well what happens with ice when the tide goes out, plus the concept of black ice. All by me (and great thanks to Aristeas for lending me a pair of good eyes!), -- Cart (talk) 10:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 10:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this very much, it is of a subtle beauty. --Aristeas (talk) 16:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 11:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 05:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Really? A stone? --Co mmon ists 08:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:43, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support More than just 'a stone' for me, a sensitive and well composed photo of a geological phenomena. Cmao20 (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of those images where you have to look twice in order to figure out what's going on. I find stuff like that interesting. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tournasol7 (talk) 09:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:23, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:54, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:50, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Ice

File:Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 003.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2021 at 19:22:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Canada
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 19:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think you fell into the trap I saw Diliff caught by sometimes. You take lots of shots all over, and then, because you have them, you want to use them. But the ceiling here isn't anything special, you get the idea of the pattern from less, and your top third has camera-shake issues. The excessive vertical perspective makes the round skylight look oddly distorted, like it is facing the viewer, rather than directly above them. Does your darkest exposure still have the lights blown? I'm not so bothered about the bulbs, but the column ideally shouldn't be blown.

However, I think File:Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 001.jpg is superior to this view. The added height reduces distortions, and we get to see the galleries and the choir better. However, I'd trim it a tiny amount top & bottom to make a 4:3 crop, removing the rear of the pews at the bottom which emphasise them not being straight, and removing a little plain ceiling. -- Colin (talk) 17:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your detailed analysis, I think that with this type of church that is very small it is difficult to get a view without distortion. I did 5 exposures and also raised the ISO a bit to avoid too long exposure time. I had a hard time unifying the 5 exposures in a multi-photo panorama due to high CPU demand. I will take your recommendations into account, I sincerely appreciate your time to make these evaluations as well as reviews of my photos. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ali Gholi Agha hammam, Isfahan, Iran.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2021 at 19:23:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 19:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 19:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 22:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 04:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 17:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:31, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality very rare --Wilfredor (talk) 20:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:50, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 15:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Iran

File:Sheikh Lotfollah Mosque, Isfahan,Iran.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2021 at 13:07:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 13:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 13:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Again a wonderful building. The light reflections on the floor add something extra to it. --Aristeas (talk) 17:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Indeed a beautiful detailed photo, but unfortunately the floor (bottom part) is deformed. --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crap. You should not be allowed to vote. - Benh (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And why not? --A.Savin 02:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think voters should know minimum things about photography and it's rules.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 08:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Everything is deformed in a photo. This sort of (dumb) comment implies it is wrong. And some people might believe and follow in. Since you shoot urself a lot of wide angle, you should know better. I don't think you do urselves good be letting this slips in without raising some warning banner. - Benh (talk) 08:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Check the distortions here. The deformation is visible and the strong perspective increases the irregularity. I don't think Michielverbeek's comment is "crap" or "dumb". Prohibiting regulars from voting is more problematic in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

we have distortion in the floor of this picture too. but this kind of distortion is normal.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 14:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extreme distortions often bother people here. This FP for example caused such reactions too. It happens often. But every voter is different and feel the deformations subjectively. The way I understand Michel's comment: 1) He's saying it's "a beautiful detailed photo" 2) "The floor is deformed". Maybe due to the wide angle (weird effect), or due to the irregularity of the tiles, especially at the bottom, some lines are curved. I add a note -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm an architectural photographer and as I know about distortions, this distortion is not a problem. because every direct lines are direct. perspective error not seen in the picture and every things is OK. if you capture the in front of your feet you will see like the Bottom of this image. and if you want capture Bottom and front side Simultaneously You will have no choice like this kind of distortion. this distortion is very common and normal in architectural photography especially if you want capture front side with floor or dome Simultaneously in one image. we have not any other choice to capture this kind of images without any distortion. your saying "this kind of distortion is wrong" like saying "we should not capture floor or dome with front side in a frame." this kind of distortion not bother people because everybody know mixing the floor or dome with front side can make this distortion and their minds are used to it by see similar pictures in past. --Amir Pashaei (talk) 17:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody's saying "this kind of distortion is wrong", just someone wrote "the floor is deformed", and this is true (for at least two reasons). Now you like the effect, but someone else doesn't like. And this person on Commons is allowed to vote. You can be a star photographer, that doesn't mean your pictures will automatically please everyone. So when someone politely says "beautiful but I don't like the bottom" at FPC, just respect this opinion, and wait for the consensus. Tolerance is crucial. Greetings -- Basile Morin (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you in Tolerance and Accepting criticism. but I think opposing just because "I don't like it" not criticism and that's can Leads to chaos. everybody can oppose easily with no reason just by saying "I don't like it". Criticism has principles and most based on knowledge and reasons not by personal tastes --Amir Pashaei (talk) 18:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Complete Image guidelines: 1) "Featured pictures candidates should meet all the following requirements, must have a "wow factor", 2) "An image "speaks" to different people differently". This rule means a picture can be opposed for personal tastes, of course! -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to capture part of mosque's dome and floor Simultaneously you will have distortion in your picture, but here disturtion isn't annoying or uncontrolled. a lot of pictures featured like this distortion in floor and I can mention to them if you want.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 12:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you complain about distorsion, maybe you're missing a big chunk of photography. It's as dumb as complaining that the water on a waterfall is soft. I could play it the same way and oppose all picture with red on them (arbitrary reason). Wording matters. It's fine not to like it, just say it. Don't say it like it's something that needs a fix like a stitching error or out of focus subjects. Regulars above others should know what they talk about. That's not the case here not matter how you look at it. - Benh (talk) 18:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And come on Basile Morin... - Benh (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Beautiful, but let's not tell regulars that they shouldn't be allowed to vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looking down it feels dizzy RolfHill (talk) 21:34, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support although there are so many lines and patterns, it almost makes you dizzy... Also agree with Ikan and Basile. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 05:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support but shout-out to @Michielverbeek for the distortion work, I personally learned from this discussion. --Gnosis (talk) 08:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow --Co mmon ists 13:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support I do find the distortions a bit unsettling, but as you say, it's not really possible to do any better. Superb quality as ever. Cmao20 (talk) 18:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 21:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I honestly would have thought the light on the floor would have been a greater source of opposes than the distortion. Daniel Case (talk) 15:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral 100% agree, haha! -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:35, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran

File:Dülmen, Börnste, Teiche in der Heubachniederung, Baum -- 2020 -- 3500-4.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2021 at 13:00:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North Rhine-Westphalia
I withdraw my nomination created and uploaded by XRay - nominated by -- Co mmon ists 13:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Co mmon ists 13:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating the photograph. --XRay 💬 13:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Ok, I fixed the page creation error for you, hope it works now. But please also fill in the right section for the nom for the gallery from Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany, otherwise the bot won't know where to place it. You do it by using the #. Like: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Name of section. --Cart (talk) 13:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't really know either, I'll look into it now, thanks. --Co mmon ists 13:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at "Location" on the file page where it says: "Location= Börnste < Kirchspiel < Dülmen < Coesfeld < Münster Government Region < North Rhine-Westphalia < Germany < Europe", it might give you a clue. ;-) --Cart (talk) 13:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed it for you. "Hausdülmen" is not a section on that page, but "North Rhine-Westphalia" is. --Cart (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral A little bit disturbs me the tilted path. -- -donald- (talk) 07:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: The path isn't tilted. Sometimes such things are real. --XRay 💬 12:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This one failed and I notice the same issues here. Burnt parts in the sky and colors alteration -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: The colors aren't altered. But it's a tone-mapped image from a HDRI. --XRay 💬 12:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

XRay, some of your contrejours are really great when the light is well managed. Unfortunately here the sky is unmistakably cooked. Full white, no texture, burnt. Maybe some frames were missing in your HDRI work. Moreover, several parts of the tree are red or reddish, especially around these blown highlights. Red is not the natural color of this trunk, thus color alteration. In addition to these critics, I want to say that I find the DoF rather low, because you were close to the tree, and thus the background is blurry, in addition to be cooked. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was an interesting afternoon with special light conditions. The background, the sky, is (or was) real. The HDRI technique was used the improve the tree itself. The tree would be very dark. But I'll have a look to the unnatural colors. --XRay 💬 13:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps a nice afternoon, but 3:50 pm, according to the metadata, is too early in my opinion to shoot against the sun. Nevertheless, if the speed of your camera is fast enough, you can get a sky without white parts, as far as I know, and branches that are not reddish. The HDRI process after, just consists in adjusting the light between your most exposed frame and the less exposed one, doesn't it? -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BTW I met exactly the same problem two weeks ago with a nomination of mine on Wikipedia. The issue was successfully solved. Check your RAWs, maybe it's fixable? -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For a image taken as HDRI the edges are always a little bit difficult. With the light of the sun the edges of the branches are a little bit overexposed. I'll try to take another shot in the future. And: Afternoon, yes. Just a little bit more than an hour to sunset. I'll try to take the next shot just before sunset. (And a lower position to reduce the visible part of the path.) First, I'll try to fix the current problems with another HDRI tool. --XRay 💬 13:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

-- Basile Morin (talk) 13:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made a redevelopment. IMO it's a good QI. For FP I should take another shot. --XRay 💬 13:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion to be honest: trunk better, sky worse -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Again: Minor improvements, QI yes, but another shot could be a good FPC. (And this photograph is still better than the version before. So it's an improvement.) --XRay 💬 14:15, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You say it's better, but look at the upper part, some leaves disappeared behind the highlight area -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I made the dark parts at the raw a little bit brighter. I think it's the result. I can improve the leaves, other parts will loose. The solution is IMO to take another shot within the next months. --XRay 💬 14:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

-- Basile Morin (talk) 14:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very appealing composition. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much unsharpness in the background. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination--Co mmon ists 11:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Before I forget: Thank you for the nomination! --XRay 💬 11:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Analcime - Kahwan Mountain, Semman, Iran.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2021 at 05:57:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals
Info all by Ivar (talk) 05:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Interesting to look at. Could you identify the other rocks we see? What's the main rock, for example, and is there rose quartz on the left side underneath the analcime? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek: sorry, but I can't say, what the base rock is (it's light and porous, probably volcanic origin), but there is no quartz present. All almost colorless to reddish crystals are analcime. --Ivar (talk) 06:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yeah, I thought it looked volcanic, too. It would be nice if someone knows what it is. There are also yellow/green deposits on part of the rock. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --StellarHalo (talk) 14:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 17:54, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 07:08, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 07:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 15:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals

File:Ship light trails, Rostock.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2021 at 10:10:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
Info Light trails of three ships entering the Baltic Sea. Created and uploaded by Radomianin - nominated by Radomianin -- Radomianin (talk) 10:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain The author abstains from supporting. Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support This isn't what I would consider a traditional composition, but it's a lot more striking than the other related light trail nominee, and I think it deserves a feature as a visual phenomenon. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Red lens flare at the top, green lens flare at the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you for your opinion. Lens flares are usually inappropriate but in this photo I think they emphasize the character of the image, they do not disturb the viewer. They were caused by light raindrops on the lens. The green light on the right side is not a lens flare but the light of a starboard buoy. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:56, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm talking about the big spot in the rocks, at the right, this is clearly a reflection (and technical problem in my opinion) -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for your opinion. The large lens flare on the stones was also caused by small raindrops on the lens. There was no technical problem. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's your opinion. You're welcome -- Basile Morin (talk) 16:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Radomianin, I kind of feel that you protest too much, and Basile has good points. I'd prefer this without the lens flares. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Yes, the lens flares are IMHO a bit much, although it's a nice idea and I think it deserves to be QI. Cmao20 (talk) 18:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Two things: Whether or not we call it "technical," water on the lens that shows up in big splotches in the image is a problem. :) Also, this other FP nomination just ended. That one is missing a little bit of the detail of this one, but is otherwise IMO better. In addition to the water droplets, this one also loses the bright reflection of the lighthouse and has an extra light trail above the others. When an image doesn't get enough votes here, it's often because people have mixed feelings. This was true for me in that nomination. It was an interesting image, with interesting light effects. I was leaning "support" but the overall softness of the image made me hesitate. Before I could go back, it was closed. I imagine some other people went through similar ambivalence. Question, though: @Ikan Kekek: Why was the other one closed early. 5-day speedy close is when it only has the support of the nominator, but that one wasn't supported by the nominator; it was supported by Daniel Case. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I never make a move to close something unless the bot has already specified it as featured or not featured. If the bot made a mistake and it didn't occur to me to look for a mistake, we should reinstate that nomination for the number of days it was cheated out of. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I should add that I don't know how to set that up so that the bot doesn't keep ending the time for voting on the nomination. I'd be more than happy for you to take care of that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: Thank you for your suggestion. I think that both problems can only be analyzed and solved with the help of an experienced commons administrator. I will try to do my best in this matter. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Dear Wikimedians, thank you very much for the intensive discussion about this photo. If it were perfect, there would probably be no discussions. @Ikan Kekek: My answers to Basile's comments were not protests, I just kindly explained that the lens flares were caused by small raindrops falling on the lens during exposure and they were not caused by technical problems. The only mistake was that I didn't protect the lens well enough from light drizzle, which started again during the long exposure. The second mistake was not to increase the aperture value, because the plan was to shoot only one ship. But that evening, due to delays, two Scandinavian ferries and a large Finnish freighter left the port shortly after each other. That's why the light of the red portside beacon is a bit over-illuminated. The additional light trails near the Beacon are from the first ship and the red single light trail comes from the huge rotor sail of the Danish hybrid ferry which left the harbor as the last one. The focus sat on the first ship and thus on the fairway of all three vessels. @Rhododendrites: I also like the first nomination more despite the detail weaknesses. Perhaps it may be taken back into the nomination if that is possible. But the main thing is that the photos are used for Wikipedia to illustrate the articles. Despite their weaknesses I find them well done, I do not want to withdraw my nomination for this photo. Many thanks in advance to all Wikimedians who use their precious time for my photos. Many greetings from Germany. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The cause of the lens flares is not relevant to my preference for the photo not to have them, and they can be regarded as a defect of the photo or not so regarded, irrespective of their cause. You could choose to edit them out, especially as they were not actually part of the scene. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment which I agree. The lens flares are and were not relevant to the image, they were not intentional. But an extensive retouch of this kind would do more harm than good to the picture. Thanks for understanding. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:18, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support because I supported the other one. Daniel Case (talk) 15:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dear reviewers, I have softened the flashy reflection on the bottom right on the stones. Then I colored it red to match the other reflections. Likewise, from the top left, I colored in the first one. An attempted retouching had only made things worse. In my opinion, the photo works with the reflections and does not disturb the viewer. Additionally I have enlarged a bit the image section. @Ikan Kekek: Regarding the two issues with the bot and an undo of the incorrect speedy close, I contacted an experienced OTRS administrator via email. Unfortunately, FP canditatures are outside his field of experience. Perhaps as an advanced reviewer, you can find a way to get some expert advice through the community. Many greetings. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't see what I could do, but there are several regulars here who are admins. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The best thing to do at this point is probably to just renominate the other one. To do that, just pretend that you are nominating the other image for the first time, then add /2 to the end of the nomination. So you will wind up with Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Ferry light trail, Rostock.jpg/2. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thank you very much for your help, I did it the way you suggested. Greetings -- Radomianin (talk) 06:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Major Mitchell's Cockatoo, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2021 at 07:07:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

on foot
in flight

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Order_:_Psittaciformes_(Parrots)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Ivar (talk) 07:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both photos could be criticized, but they're also quite good and I think this is a deserving set. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 14:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 18:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The framing of the first image is a bit large in my opinion, still a beautiful and special bird under a very good light. Per Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 06:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course --Wilfredor (talk) 20:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not a set in my view. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question How come? What is and is not a set is sometimes confusing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For me, the colours and exposure differ too much between the images - e.g. bird feathers and background. Doesn't look like the same bird (which it may be). Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, thanks. You definitely have a point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 07:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 07:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 15:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Order_:_Psittaciformes_(Parrots)

File:Arnhem-Meinerswijk, boom met hoog water tijdens vorstperiode IMG 8171 2021-02-14 09.21.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2021 at 18:48:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
Info The water was extremely high in the Rhine when the cold started. I took this photo in the floodplains one week later. All by Michielverbeek
Support -- Michielverbeek (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose - Sorry, I feel like there's a potential FP in this scene, but I have trouble with the composition. For example, the ice seems to be the main subject, but then I would prefer to see landscape rather than portrait (the tree is nice, but not enough wow for the primary subject). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:16, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The tree is the main subject, but it is special because of the ice. Please realize the water was sinking and at the same time the top changed gradually into ice. When I took the photo I regularly heard the sound of breaking ice. --Michielverbeek (talk) 23:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Rhododendrites, I like it but I'm undecided whether I find the composition special enough for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 18:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In addition to the compositional issues Rhododendrites notices, I find the foreground plants, the awkward crop at left and the contrail slicing across the upper left to be serious distractions from a tree which doesn't seem sufficiently interesting to demand the viewer's attention even without those distractions. Daniel Case (talk) 17:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The chem trail is disturbing --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Rhododendrites. -- Karelj (talk) 16:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:06, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Balantiocheilos melanopterus - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2021 at 14:24:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Cyprinidae (Carps and Allies)
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 14:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wish the head were brighter, but I support anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 15:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can you sort the head out? Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Done --Llez (talk) 23:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 07:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 15:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Qualified support Not technically perfect, but given the likely limitations on the shooting conditions, it came out pretty good. Daniel Case (talk) 20:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family : Cyprinidae (Carps and Allies)

File:Intellagama Lesueurii - AndrewMercer - DSC10454.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2021 at 09:35:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Agamidae (Dragon Lizards)
Info created & uploaded by Bald white guy - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Head is great but distracting background and distracting blurry right hind leg. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:03, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 21:05, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noctua pronuba caterpillar, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2021 at 14:44:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Side view
Top view

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Noctuidae_(Owlet_Moths)
Info All by Ivar (talk) 14:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Definitely not a set according to the FP guidelines. Just two images of the same species, not the same subject, taken on different days, with different lighting conditions. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. Both are FPs if nominated separately, especially the one on the left. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 06:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Illuminated roof of the skyscraper Millenia Tower at night in Singapore.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2021 at 02:20:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:45, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 07:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special to me RolfHill (talk) 21:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wasn't going to vote on this, because the subject doesn't appeal to me, but it is one vote short of FP and it clearly deserves the star in quality and composition IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 03:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore

File:Submerged tree under a dark and cloudy sky in Si Phan Don.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2021 at 02:17:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Clouds
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special cloud in my view, like a piece of cotton that comes off the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 08:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- nothing special and lighting is dim. Seven Pandas (talk) 13:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite dramatic when viewed in full size. Like in some classic landscape paintings the single man in the boat helps me to put myself in the situation. --Aristeas (talk) 16:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 21:56, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:48, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tournasol7 (talk) 09:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:34, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 17:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Clouds

File:Trier Beaulieu 1680.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2021 at 16:05:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
Info Fortification map of Trier, created by Sébastien de Beaulieu (1612-1674), reproduced from an original copper plate print (17^th century), uploaded and nominated by -- Palauenc05 (talk) 16:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 16:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Palauenc05 (talk) 08:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Argiope versicolor female ventral vs dorsal adult vs juvenile, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 03:30:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Adult 9 mm (0.35 in) ventral view
Adult 9 mm (0.35 in) dorsal view
Juvenile 4.5 mm (0.18 in) ventral view
Juvenile 4.5 mm (0.18 in) dorsal view

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Araneidae (Orb-weaver Spiders)
Info Multi-coloured Saint Andrew's cross spider (Argiope versicolor) female on her web, adult vs juvenile, ventral vs dorsal view. The adult specimen measures 9 mm (0.35 in), the juvenile specimen measures 4.5 mm (0.18 in). A web decoration called stabilimentum, conspicuous silk structure included in the web, typical of the genus Argiope, can be seen at the pictures 1, 2, 3. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IamMM (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a set as they are not taken at the same time of the same spiders. The pairs are described as being the same size, but the images are not to scale. Focus on body missed - especially juvenile dorsal. Alos, juveniles usually make a discoid-shaped web rather than the adult's cross, so the example shown could be a sub-adult, not, strictly-speaking, a juvenile. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination I will nominate them separately. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:North view of Charles Bridge from Mánesův most, Prague 20160808 2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2021 at 18:17:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Czech_Republic
Info I don't know whether you'll find this too subtle but I thought the light here was really painterly and beautiful. The bridge is a World Heritage Site and was constructed in the fourteenth century; according to legend Emperor Charles IV laid the first stone. created by DXR - uploaded by DXR - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:55, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tournasol7 (talk) 09:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 17:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose dull light. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Focus problem --Wilfredor (talk) 23:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support 8:08 p.m. on the night of 8/8 ... cute. Yes, the sides are unsharp, but not as bad as nominees I've opposed. As for the dull light, it actually works well with these mostly neutral, earthy colors. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Wilfredor. --A.Savin 21:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp, and so many supporting votes? RolfHill (talk) 21:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 23:31, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Old cemetary near the church.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2021 at 16:40:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
Info created by Vian (Vitalii Bashkatov) - uploaded by Vian - nominated by Pavlo1 -- Pavlo1 (talk) 16:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pavlo1 (talk) 16:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, two problems : 1) blown highlights, burnt clouds, texture missing in the sky 2) oversaturated (like 90% of the uploads by this user unfortunately) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just a side remark: "cemetery" is misspelled in the filename. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. I might have forgiven a lot of this but for the unnaturally yellowish vegetation. Daniel Case (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 23:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 006.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2021 at 02:12:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#United States
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Certainly a quality image, but not an interesting motif or an amazing photo to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Ikan Kekek RolfHill (talk) 11:29, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good quality but the subjet is not wow. Sorry --Wilfredor (talk) 16:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spielfiguren -- 2021 -- 4713.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2021 at 10:09:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Toys
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 10:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 10:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I've liked some of this series, but in this one, the large areas of blur are unpleasant to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Which game did you take this from, out of curiosity? :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no special game, the pawns are just in another color. I've some game equipment independent from other games. --XRay 💬 17:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nothing special for FP nomination, IMO. -- Karelj (talk) 16:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose I like the idea here, but the background is too distracting for FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Really nice idea but sadly per above. Cmao20 (talk) 03:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Misty light on the sunrise (49639040272).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2021 at 06:58:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#France
Info created by Angelo Brathot - uploaded and nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 06:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strong CA in the trees, unrealistic coloring of the sky, lack of sharpness, overprocessed, etc. --Isiwal (talk) 17:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --IamMM (talk) 13:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Dervish from Faryab Crosses the River on his Rug.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2021 at 21:45:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Book illustrations in color
Info attributed to Habiballah – uploaded and nominated by Hanooz -- Hanooz 21:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hanooz 21:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 07:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:28, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:57, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cbrescia (talk) 14:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 20:53, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:33, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Printed#Book illustrations in color

File:Trailer in Har Nof.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2021 at 21:46:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Other land vehicles
Info created by Yitzilitt - uploaded by Yitzilitt - nominated by Yitzilitt -- Yitzilitt (talk) 21:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yitzilitt (talk) 21:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very noisy; I don't think it could pass at QIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no wow, not an exceptional image. Daytime images generally have more encyclopedic value. Buidhe (talk) 00:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose There is no detail here --RolfHill (talk) 11:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Ivar (talk) 17:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Empty upper section and really not that interesting a subject. Daniel Case (talk) 05:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:33, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Argynnis paphia Mitterbach 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2021 at 05:52:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Nymphalidae_(Brush-footed_Butterflies)
Info Silver-washed fritillary (Argynnis paphia). All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 12:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice! --Isiwal (talk) 16:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 17:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice, but you must identify it as male. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Charlesjsharp: Thanks for the hint, added to image description --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:28, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support thanks. I would rotate it left a degree or two, but that's just my desire for summetry. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support RolfHill (talk) 11:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kind of anaglyph 3D at full size :-) We should try to look at this with special glasses :-) Basile Morin (talk) 13:56, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. According to w:Silver-washed fritillary, the wingspan is just 54–70 mm, so the resolution on the file page is already considerably bigger than real life if you're viewing this on a 13-inch screen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMHO slight angle gives butterfly more natural look in great photo! --SM:!) (talk) 10:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Nymphalidae_(Brush-footed_Butterflies)

File:Thuringia Schmalkalden asv2020-07 img18 Schloss Wilhelmsburg.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2021 at 20:37:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info Former "prison tower" of Wilhelmsburg Castle in Schmalkalden, Thuringia ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 20:37, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 20:37, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Taken from too close to the tower. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:05, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the composition, and the closeness to the tower presumably makes it seem taller and more imposing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. An exciting wide-angle composition in excellent quality. --Aristeas (talk) 08:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles. —kallerna (talk) 09:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 14:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 18:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It looks too deformed/unnatural RolfHill (talk) 23:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles--Ermell (talk) 08:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support It doesn't look too distorted compared to the only other picture I could find that we have of it, and look at what happened when that photographer tried to get just a little further back. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per RolfHill --Co mmon ists 15:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sock puppet of Livioandronico2013. In this discussion, it has been decided to strike out all his votes. --Aristeas (talk) 17:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Daniel Case. Cmao20 (talk) 03:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charlesjsharp. --Trougnouf (talk) 17:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan Kekek and Daniel Case -- Radomianin (talk) 09:15, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re-evaluation after removing the sock-puppet vote:

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 17:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany

File:Брянська церква 2019 1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2021 at 17:24:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Ukraine
Info Bryansk Church of Saint Nicholas in Dnipro, Ukraine. Created by Valentyne Kovalov - uploaded by Valentyne Kovalov - nominated by Pavlo1 -- Pavlo1 (talk) 17:24, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pavlo1 (talk) 17:24, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:44, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tempered Support I'd prefer for at least 1/3 of the snowy foreground to be cropped out, but the church is so beautiful that I'm supporting, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:20, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose railing on left. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The church is very sharp and – with its golden onion towers and the snow and the trees – very beautiful. (I would crop ¼ to ⅓ of the foreground, too.) --Aristeas (talk) 08:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tighter crop needed. —kallerna (talk) 09:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charlesjsharp. -- Karelj (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles; also a touch too much sharpening, I think. Daniel Case (talk) 22:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas and Ikan Kekek, not perfect composition but IMO wonderful motif and good quality. Cmao20 (talk) 03:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ersfjord and the mountain range on the north side with Okshornan.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2021 at 10:21:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Norway#Northern Norway (Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)
Info created and uploaded by Frankemann - nominated by -- Co mmon ists 10:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Co mmon ists 10:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The POV and subject is good but the lighting and detail aren't --RolfHill (talk) 11:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow, and not really good quality. --A.Savin 16:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose At small size, the painting-like quality of it is really nice. At full size, the level of detail just isn't quite there IMO. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 09:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Rhododendrites; at full size the aggressive sharpening also becomes apparent. Daniel Case (talk) 15:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hepatica nobilis 20210226.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2021 at 08:50:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Ranunculaceae
Info Anemone hepatica (syn. Hepatica nobilis). Focus stack with 12 images. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful flower, yes, but the shadows and background are too distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 07:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel, stunning flower but I find the composition and sharpness a little below our best photos. Cmao20 (talk) 03:13, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katjes van een hazelaar (Corylus avellana). 26-01-2021. (actm.) 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2021 at 05:29:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Betulaceae
Info Catkins of one Corylus avellana common hazel. Focus stack of 14 photos.
During the shooting I had nice background light. All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 09:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:27, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support RolfHill (talk) 11:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 18:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Last night, I did an image search on hazel catkins and though I admittedly didn't look at every result, I didn't find any photo online that was nearly as much of a closeup as this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, realistic colours, nice soft background. --Aristeas (talk) 19:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 22:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 18:56, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fully sharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IamMM (talk) 14:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:52, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--SM:!) (talk) 10:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--~~

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Betulaceae

File:Turmfalken IMG 3467.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2021 at 15:13:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Falconidae (Falcons)
Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 15:13, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 15:13, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This composition with the bird hidden behind the wall does not work for me. 17:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs)
Oppose Per Charlesjsharp and low resolution and unnatural environment RolfHill (talk) 19:07, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too low resolution to wow me for such an image.--Peulle (talk) 09:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad composition, per others. Daniel Case (talk) 23:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Fischer.H (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weißstoch P1170549.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2021 at 18:19:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not perfect but irresistible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:38, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Awkward POV. —kallerna (talk) 21:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great pose, but lighting is not ideal. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, awkward POV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Noisy, heads in shadow RolfHill (talk) 11:27, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful weak oppose Great pose, per Ikan, but just too much noise. Daniel Case (talk) 18:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice composition but a bit too noisy for me. Cmao20 (talk) 03:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Fischer.H (talk) 16:04, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:EL foto, Eimar Kull - PILT6519 kasekirilased.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2021 at 17:48:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Endromidae
Info created by Eimar Kull - uploaded & nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 17:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 17:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note This is the first photo of the Family : Endromidae. --Cart (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good one, and note the size, from w:Endromis: "The wingspan is 50–70 mm." But can you identify these individuals as male and/or female? "Females are much larger and paler than males and fly only at night in order to lay eggs." I'm guessing these are males. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great photo. Will support with crop, possibly square? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose awaiting crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:53, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Great shot, but you should crop it a bit --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support But I'd also prefer a crop --Llez (talk) 16:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 06:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:09, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 14:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support--IamMM (talk) 14:29, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 21:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:52, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I now croped the image. Better? Kruusamägi (talk) 02:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the square (cropped) version -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Endromidae

File:Jameh Mosque of Kashmar2021.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2021 at 17:02:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Iran
Info created by POS78 - uploaded by POS78 - nominated by POS78 POS78 (talk) 17:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- POS78 (talk) 17:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, not enough quality. A bad top crop, main subject is shadowed and mosque is under constuction. --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And yet you support it? Is that correct? --Cart (talk) 19:00, 6 March 2021 (UTC) No, a mistake --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose Bad top crop, overexposed sky, uninteresting subject with a scaffolding to make it uglier, shadow everywhere, awkward sky color, no detail --RolfHill (talk) 19:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Gnosis (talk) 05:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Not a QI. --Peulle (talk) 09:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. --Trougnouf (talk) 18:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Off kilter in so many ways, as noted by others. Daniel Case (talk) 23:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oryctes nasicornis (50983675732).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2021 at 18:19:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Scarabaeidae (Scarab Beetles)
Info created by San Martin - uploaded & by nominated by User:Junior Jumper -- Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 18:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 18:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bottom cropped off. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 15:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thunderbirds, Blue Angels perform 'Super Delta' 210302-F-JV039-9090.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2021 at 19:15:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Others
Info created by Staff Sgt. Andrew D. Sarver - uploaded & nominated by ToprakM --ToprakM ^✉ 19:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ToprakM ^✉ 19:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Slightly noisy but an amazing sight. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support [David Attenborough voiceover]: while other animals take shelter in the intense southern California heat, the rare multiplane peacock clears a space on the tarmac to unfurl its plumage, hoping to attract a mate — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Strong wow, but technical not perfect --Michielverbeek (talk) 23:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Slightly noisy but impressive. --Gnosis (talk) 05:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 09:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The photographer is not afraid :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 09:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 18:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 23:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IamMM (talk) 14:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 21:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Others

File:Field sparrow in CP (41484) (cropped).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2021 at 21:08:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Passeridae_(Sparrows)
Info A field sparrow in Central Park. I rarely see these, but spent some time with this one and was happy with the sharpness and light in this shot. It's our VI, and about to be promoted to FP on enwiki, so figured I'd give it a shot here. Resolution is on the smaller side (there's an uncropped version), but so is the subject. :) all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 21:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rather low resolution, but sharp enough and good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:42, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'd also support the uncroppped version as I really like the background with its beautiful pattern, colors, and shapes. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:15, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Worth setting up the uncropped version as an alternative? — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whichever way you do it, I must congratulate you on getting such nice backgrounds and settings for your birds. You have moved FP bird photos from 'passport photos of birds' to 'birds in environment'. Both are equally valuable and you can always offer cropped versions of FPs, should there be need for a tighter crop. --Cart (talk) 15:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support For a small bird like this, probably would be unfair to demand higher resolution. --A.Savin 21:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 08:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a really nice bird, but I'd not noticed the branch in front of the tail. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose You know how much I like your bird shots, but I'm with Charles on this one. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC) P.S. Cart is right that your ability to include the environment is super valuable[reply]
Oppose I agree with Charlesjsharp. Most of the already to FP promoted images in Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Passeridae_(Sparrows) are better RolfHill (talk) 11:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Charles, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 17:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Either version is FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 03:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful but there is a branch per Charlesjsharp --Trougnouf (talk) 18:15, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info Given a couple of the comments above, and since it looks like this will run the full 9 days anyway, here's the uncropped version. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Given the time left and the number of votes that have already come in, this probably doesn't have much of a chance, but I'll say this is my weak first choice. I didn't nominate it initially because I get the sense that folks here prefer a tighter crop. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support as stated above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Martin. --Aristeas (talk) 16:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a really nice bird, but I'd not noticed the branch in front of the tail. I prefered cropped version. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Same here RolfHill (talk) 11:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: Just to be clear, this is intended to just support the uncropped version, right? Thanks. (I'm sort of wishing I didn't complicate things :) ). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhododendrites: I'd support either, although right now I think a support here is more likely to result in the image being promoted. Daniel Case (talk) 02:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charlesjsharp, although I prefer this version because we can see what's in front of the bird. --Trougnouf (talk) 18:15, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Passeridae_(Sparrows)

The chosen alternative is: File:Field sparrow in CP (41484) (cropped).jpg

File:Tübingen - Stiftskirche - Chorraum - Chorscheitelfenster unten.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2021 at 03:06:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Sets_of_stained_glass_windows
Info I thought this was a really nice photo of stained glass windows in which the exposure has been controlled really well; additionally there's some superb info in the image description about what we are looking at, which makes this photo IMO even more interesting. created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:06, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:06, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per this excellent nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:57, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:52, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you, Cmao20, for the nomination! --Aristeas (talk) 10:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:52, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IamMM (talk) 14:31, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colourful and historically interesting as well as high quality! --SM:!) (talk) 10:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural_elements#Sets_of_stained_glass_windows

File:Yukon Delta.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2021 at 02:10:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images
Info The delta of the Yukon River in Alaska. This is a natural-color image. created by European Space Agency - uploaded by StellarHalo - nominated by StellarHalo -- StellarHalo (talk) 02:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- StellarHalo (talk) 02:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazingly big and detailed, but you're saying the various shades of red are all natural? Are you sure? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not sure about the colours, but anyway this is a beautiful and extremely detailed (and very big ;–) photo. --Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 16:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 18:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:12, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:17, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IamMM (talk) 14:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ahmad^talk 15:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 21:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite images

File:Dark Hedges near Armoy, Co Antrim (cropped).jpg, not featured , not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2021 at 08:11:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
Info created by Colin Park - uploaded by PaleCloudedWhite - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 08:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 08:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Bruce1ee, would you offer the original as an alternate nomination? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:37, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Ikan Kekek Yes. I was in two minds as to which one to nominate. I'll add the original as an alternative. —Bruce1ee^talk 08:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer the original (alternative below), but if this were the only one to choose from, I'd support it, too, so I'm supporting both. Thanks, Bruce1ee. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Although I uploaded this, I never considered it to be an image special enough to be a featured picture, primarily because the composition makes the tarmaced road too dominant in my eyes. I think I cropped the image because the original (below) does not have a standard size, and when inserted into articles has insufficient height and so looks too small, which is particularly noticeable when viewed at standard Wikipedia image size. To improve the composition it would be better to crop off some of the base, to remove some of the tarmaced road, but this would exacerbate the sizing issue. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 10:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The Dark Hedges make an attractive scene, and are highly photographed since Game of Thrones, though Commons doesn't have many images. (I do like the little dog in this photo). The lighting here is rather ordinary, and the limitations of the tiny camera sensor are apparent here. I agree also the viewpoint is a bit low. Btw, PaleCloudedWhite, the suitability for a Wikipedia page layout isn't really Commons concern, though Wikipedia FP might take that into account. -- Colin (talk) 15:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin. —kallerna (talk) 21:50, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer this to the alternative. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 22:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 15:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:33, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Colin. --Ivar (talk) 17:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Beautiful scene though quality could be better. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info This is the original uncropped version. —Bruce1ee^talk 06:31, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 08:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Breathes more, I think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above. -- Colin (talk) 15:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin. —kallerna (talk) 21:50, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 15:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:33, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Colin. --Ivar (talk) 17:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak regretful oppose I do like the composition, but I also see Colin's point about how the lighting doesn't help. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment But if it were lit more brightly, it wouldn't be the dark hedges. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ferry light trail, Rostock.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2021 at 05:59:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
Info Light trail of the Stena ferry M/S Mecklenburg-Vorpommern leaving the port of Rostock. Created, uploaded and nominated by Radomianin -- Radomianin (talk) 05:59, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photo re-nominated because it was mistakenly handled by the bot with the 5 day quick close. Thanks to user Rhododendrites for suggesting how to deal with this case. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain The author abstains from supporting. Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:59, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I like the overall motif, though wish there were a bit more detail/less softness. Pinging Daniel Case, who commented on the first nomination before it was closed. Also, Radomianin, you are allowed to support your own nomination (most people do). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your tip, I have changed my abstention to support. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support Same as above. Yitzilitt (talk) 21:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support as before. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Something different; and per Rhododendrites. --Aristeas (talk) 07:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've been unsure about this, but ultimately, I think it's interesting enough to look at purely as an unusual spectacle. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Doesn't impress me much, I'm afraid. The highlights on the lighthouse are overexposed. Apart from the light trail there is not much to see. I don't understand why it had to be re-nominated. If a nomination is failed, it is failed. I had a nomination that failed with 5 support and 0 oppose votes. Nonetheless I'm not planning to run it one more time. --A.Savin 16:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. The image quality is not the best but in my opinion the motif is strong enough. The re-nomination happened because the bot probably didn't recognize another user's vote. It apparently thought it was my vote. I am sorry to have caused effort and confusion. I am still a community newbie but I am grateful for every hint to improve my contributions. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:20, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships

File:Пруд в Ахлебиновской роще - 1.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2021 at 08:47:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info 2TE116 locomotive near the lake in the Ahlebinovskaya Grove. Tambov, Russia. Created by Саня_Новиков - uploaded by Саня_Новиков - nominated by Саня_Новиков -- Саня Новиков (talk) 08:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Саня Новиков (talk) 08:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Foreground among other compositional weaknesses Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ... also it's not that sharp - have a look at the number on the side of the locomotive cab. —Bruce1ee^talk 11:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Locomotive isn't that sharp per Bruce1ee and scenery isn't that interesting. For inspiration, look at User:Kabelleger's stupendous gallery of photos of trains in striking surroundings. He has quite a number of FPs. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 09:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for reasons as mentioned above --Isiwal (talk) 19:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just not that exceptional, especially when we have the great railroad pictures that Kabellerger brings us ... As this is the sixth oppose against no additional supports over the past three days, I really think the nominator should consider a withdrawal as this nomination is probably not going to succeed even with ropes, crampons and an ice axe. Daniel Case (talk) 02:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the detailed feedbacks. Саня Новиков (talk) 14:45, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:PK Thatta asv2020-02 img16 Makli Necropolis.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2021 at 21:57:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Pakistan
Info Exterior of Diwan Shurfa Khan's tomb on Makli Necropolis (World Heritage Site), Thatta ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 21:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 21:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The diagonal ledge at the far bottom is unattractive. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Excess elements on the right and left (and slightly lower) sides of the image, such as the tree on the left and the stepped wall, cause a loss of balance.--IamMM (talk) 12:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --A.Savin 12:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karol Hiller - Kompozycja BA220 - Google Art Project.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 08:25:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Others
Info created by Karol Hiller - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 08:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 08:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Gnosis (talk) 20:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp and clear shot -- Radomianin (talk) 22:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good reproduction of an exemplary artwork. --Aristeas (talk) 07:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--SM:!) (talk) 10:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 18:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:19, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Others#Others

File:Romanesco broccoli (Brassica oleracea).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 06:38:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Vegetables_(raw)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 06:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive fractals -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:29, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 08:46, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IamMM (talk) 14:29, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 14:37, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Ahmad^talk 15:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 21:53, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ... and not just because I have some of these for dinner tonight. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question I've never tried cooking these. How do you (personally) cook them? Any favorite recipes? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek They are good if you roast them and use in a pasta recipe. Buidhe (talk) 19:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'll have to lose weight for that! I miss pasta, but no noodles for me for some time to come. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Finally a very good photo of this fascinating artwork made by nature. --Aristeas (talk) 07:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:41, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas -- Radomianin (talk) 09:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:39, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support RolfHill (talk) 22:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 08:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Vegetables_(raw)

File:מנזר השתקנים השוכן בלטרון.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2021 at 09:08:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Israel/Palestine
Info created & uploaded by Giladtop - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That's quite beautiful. Are some of the dark areas of clouds too blue, though? What do you think, Giladtop? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Ikan Kekek: It seems that Giladtop is only active during WLM Israel. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Co mmon ists 15:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:34, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Quality and resolution are not good RolfHill (talk) 11:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lack of detail. --Ivar (talk) 17:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful photo. Cmao20 (talk) 03:18, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose per others ... the building is OK, but the surrounding landscape leaves much to be desired, technically. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It’s a pity – a beautiful, instructive photo with nice colours and light, but the trees etc. look as if too much noise reduction was applied, and the building would benefit from a perspective correction. --Aristeas (talk) 09:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yeah. Actually, the trees in the background look OK to me, but the ones in the middleground are weird-looking. And here's where it would help for the photographer to be reachable and work with us. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Exactly. If the photographer was reachable, the discussion here could help him/her to improve the photo; in the end everybody would benefit from this. --Aristeas (talk) 10:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 20.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 16:08:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 16:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 16:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Was this actually a Cathar castle? If so, it would be good to state that unambiguously in the file description (if it was used in the Crusades against them, that could also be stated). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Cathar castles are well described in a Wikipdia article. Peyrepertuse, one of the Royal citadels, belongs to the "True cathar castles". It played a role in the so called Albigensian Crusade as a base of the Catharism. I added the link to the Cathar castles to the file description. --Llez (talk) 22:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Great! It's a striking ruin with an interesting composition featuring a bisecting diagonal, so I think it deserves a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:44, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support and worth replacing the current illustration on WP -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:35, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:52, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:44, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--SM:!) (talk) 10:11, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 18:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 18:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:08, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France

File:Fish crow in Red Hook (42759).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2021 at 17:07:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)
Info Visually, fish crows are practically indistinguishable from the much more common American crow. They're identified mainly by their call, a cute little nasal caw. I typically just hear them as they fly overhead, often with American crows, and this was the first time I was able to get close enough for a decent shot. I took a few, and debated which to nominate (see also 1 2 3), but figure this one while vocalizing was best. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The bird is beautiful, but why did you blur the thing (top of a fence?) it's standing on so much? That's distracting to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The blurring is just from the 300mm (600mm full frame equivalent) at f/6.3, which makes for a pretty narrow depth of field. I could've boosted the ISO for a smaller aperture but I'd be worried about noise on such a dark subject. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks for explaining. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I don't like the man-made perch and background. 22:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs)
Support I think the urban background is a fitting setting for a crow. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special attitude and nice striking bokeh -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:28, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 07:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking motif, great shot. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 15:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Isiwal (talk) 16:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Percival. --Aristeas (talk) 11:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For a shot like this I expect that at least the head is sharp RolfHill (talk) 11:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is. --A.Savin 16:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 16:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unpleasant background --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:57, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support with the apparent blur on the head explained. It might be a little better with a tighter crop, but I will defer to the photographer on that.
I also always do a slight double take at "Red Hook" ... I know here it's the Brooklyn neighborhood, but for me, in my region of the state, it's the town at the northwestern corner of Dutchess County, where I was just yesterday visiting my son. So I briefly caught myself wondering when you'd found time to come up this way . Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Not recently, but I've spent a decent amount of time in both Red Hooks. If the restaurant Murray's still exists in Tivoli, I'd recommend it. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SM:!) (talk) 17:15, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The background doesn't bother me. —Bruce1ee^talk 06:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Insufficiently sharp. -- Karelj (talk) 15:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)

File:International Space Station star trails - JSC2012E039800.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 19:59:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
Info created by astronaut Don Pettit - uploaded by O'Dea - nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 19:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think we've had any star trail photos taken from space here at FPC. The brilliant photos by Don Pettit are a little old by our standards but they still hold up. I think this is one of his best, since it captures the star trails in a way that can't be done while here on the planet, plus the city trails and thunderstorms. Bonus is the "Star Wars opening shot"-use of ISS at the top of the photo. -- Cart (talk) 19:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Extraordinary, striking, perfect! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unique. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support an out-loud "wow" from me. Almost looks like some sort of planet-printing going on :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The ISS looks surprisingly similar to the Tantive IV. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support If only the pictures of Earth taken by astronauts on the ISS have the same quality as the ones taken by the Earth observation satellite like the Landsat 8... --StellarHalo (talk) 03:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed extraordinary. Thank you, Cart, for pointing out this photo! --Aristeas (talk) 07:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing! Definitely should be part of our featured image collection. --Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 07:28, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Finally an FPC that gives me that unique wow feeling. Simply stunning! --Granada (talk) 13:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Trougnouf (talk) 18:08, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very special --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cbrescia (talk) 19:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Does anyone know the name of this loading ramp where the picture was taken from? There is a flag of Japan on display at the top of the photo, so I thought it is part of en:Kibō (ISS module) but not too sure. --Gnosis (talk) 17:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gnosis, in relation to one of the other photos in this series which was a POTD on the NASA website, I actually asked on Twitter where these photos were taken, and I got a reply from Commander Chris Hadfield (yes, I became suitably starstruck and swooned!):

— Me: "Interesting and beautiful. I wonder where the camera is fixed for this shot. I always thought there would be a lot of vibrations on the station from different vents, pumps etc and steady long exposure shots would not be doable."

— Cmdr: "It's mounted on a bracket in the Cupola. Station is big enough to dampen most of the vibrations you mention."

In some of the shots you can see the interior of the Cupola. --Cart (talk) 19:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cart Thank You, I really enjoyed this. --Gnosis (talk) 01:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support RolfHill (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 08:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 13:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support A scene any Hollywood SFX house would be proud to have made ... thanks Cart for finding this! Daniel Case (talk) 18:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Sky

As the uploader of the nominated image, I support the nomination mildly, but suggest two superior pictures from the same set of 36 pictures.

The first alternative has the virtue of showing a view readily recognisable by those who appreciate star trail pictures: the scene shows circular star trails centred on Polaris. Many terrestrial star trail images show this Polaris-centred view and it is apt to nominate this space-based version of the conventional scene.

But I am more excited to propose the more thrilling alternative image which contains two spacecraft dangling from the space station; which contains light trails on the planet as well as out in the cosmos; and which portrays an exciting kinetic pictorial dynamism, angled composition, and a more dazzling abstract lightshow composed of light streaks on the earth. Of the 36 pictures I uploaded, this one strikes me as being easily the most impressive aesthetic offering. I nominate this superior image as my favoured alternative.

May I note, in conclusion, that a statement included, above, as part of the original nomination, states: "Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 19:59:20 (UTC)." Ikan Kekek rather jumped the gun by closing the nomination three days early, which leaves my alternative proposal annoyingly moot. O'Dea (talk) 10:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No it doesn't, O'Dea. Please feel free to nominate those photos! And to explain why the voting period ended early: When there are at least 10 votes to support a nomination for Featured Picture and no opposing votes, the time for consideration is cut short by the bot. This is a feature, not a bug. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:50, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This so-called "feature" contradicts the statement at the head of the nomination that the "Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021." That is a bug-of-factual-contradiction (or error), not a feature. O'Dea (talk) 10:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eh. It's true that line could use a qualifier like "see COM:FPC for exceptions," but the point is that even if we reopen it, there's no chance of this not being featured, or of it being replaced with something different. Best route is, as Ikan says, just nominate any others you think are better. They're sufficiently different that if people agree they're better, they will likely be supported. Personally, I prefer this one to either of those (which isn't to say I'd oppose). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karevansaraye Mehr.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 13:41:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Iran
Info created by Hadidehghanpour - uploaded by Hadidehghanpour - nominated by POS78 POS78 (talk) 13:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- POS78 (talk) 13:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting composition worth considering, but the caravanserai needs some perspective correction, as it's quite misshapen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It’s a pity that there are some errors in the HDR generation, namely halos at many branches and bright red spots at the branches in the top-left quarter. @Hadidehghanpour: Could you have a look and fix these red spots? --Aristeas (talk) 07:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blown clouds, the perspective problems and the unnatural look of the bark. It can and should be attempted but I don't think it's fixable ... it brings to mind the days some years back when we would get this cartoonish HDR all the time. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Argiope spider female adult on her web ventral view black background Don Det Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 23:44:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Araneidae (Orb-weaver Spiders)
Info Multi-coloured Saint Andrew's cross spider (Argiope versicolor) female adult on her web. A web decoration called stabilimentum, typical of the genus Argiope, can be seen at the upper right and bottom left corners of the picture. The body measures 9 mm (0.35 in) and 49 mm (1.9 in) with the legs. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great pic of such a tiny spider! Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 07:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 08:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--SM:!) (talk) 10:04, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:44, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Trougnouf (talk) 18:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:09, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support RolfHill (talk) 22:39, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support X marks the spider ... Daniel Case (talk) 18:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

E🕷act :-) On this website ... -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Araneidae (Orb-weaver Spiders)

File:Palazzo Terzi Lana Pelati Via Marsala 15 portale Brescia.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2021 at 23:35:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
Info Urban detail, all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 23:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 23:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose why the part moped? Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the composition (cut off moped, graffiti, etc.) just doesn't appeal to me. Buidhe (talk) 00:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting, but not IMO great. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Resolution is great, but only the bottom crop is good, the ligthing is not adding any value and the subject is interesting but not special RolfHill (talk) 11:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Might've worked with a tighter crop on the entrance, one that didn't leave half a moped. Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It wouldn't be an urban detail --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support The half-moped works for me, as a sort of contrast between old and new. However I would've preferred to have the full moped. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charlesjsharp. -- Karelj (talk) 15:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Humayun's tomb by Shagil Kannur 4.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2021 at 07:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
Info-Humayun's tomb (Hindustani: Maqbara-i Humayun) is the tomb of the Mughal Emperor Humayun in Delhi, India. The tomb was declared a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1993. All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great as a thumbnail, but poor quality with dust spots, not sharp, oversaturated. Also, had it been as good at full size as it was as a thumbnail, I would have asked for geocoordinates. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. Technically far from FP. --Milseburg (talk) 10:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:28-2 Sammlung Eybl Европейская кухня (Europäische Küche). 1914. 36 x 51 cm. (Slg.Nr.273).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2021 at 06:37:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Historical
Info created by Alexander Petrowitsch Apsit - uploaded by Hubertl - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 06:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Others#Historical

File:Brzeg Castle 03.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2021 at 09:48:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Walls
Info Uniquely sculptured Renaissance style façade of Brzeg Castle in Poland. Created, uploaded, nominated by Scotch Mist -- SM:!) (talk) 09:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SM:!) (talk) 09:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alexcordovaa (talk) 12:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it, but it is Renaissance style, not Gothic --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Uoaei1: Thanks for the correction! --SM:!) (talk) 23:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 13:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 21:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 09:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural_elements#Walls

File:Theyyam of Kerala by Shagil Kannur (41).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2021 at 07:50:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info--Face art of Theyyam. Theyyam is a popular ritual form of dance worship in Kerala, India. All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a well-composed portrait though, crop and background. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Same reasons. --Gnosis (talk) 20:52, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It would be better cropped in on the sides some more, but to me the makeup is striking enough. Daniel Case (talk) 05:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Daniel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Daniel. --SM:!) (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Daniel. -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:35, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support striking make-up and beautiful colors overall --Kritzolina (talk) 21:20, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Daniel and Kritzolina. --Aristeas (talk) 10:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charlesjsharp – bad crop. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 17:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:26, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Bleachers and goalpost at Brastad Arena in snow.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2021 at 23:00:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Sweden
Info A little minimalist photography. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 23:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 23:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing of interesting here for me (no wow), sorry--Co mmon ists 23:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 15:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Interesting layout.--Ermell (talk) 09:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Commonists. -- Karelj (talk) 13:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think this is a very good composition and fun to look at. I haven't decided whether I consider it an FP yet, but I'm surprised by how quickly it's getting dismissed so far. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not, I'm used to it. ;-) --Cart (talk) 22:20, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Michielverbeek RolfHill (talk) 11:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I tend to think this is good photography that deserves a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per other opposers. --Ivar (talk) 12:38, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination These "sallad votings" never ends well, so let's put it out of its misery. --Cart (talk) 01:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cumulus clouds at sunset over the fields in Brastad 1.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2021 at 11:02:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Clouds
Info "- Bespin. It's pretty far, but I think we can make it. - A mining colony? -Yeah, a tibanna gas mine." — Seriously, situated between the air currents from the fjords, we get a lot of cool clouds here in Lysekil. When I saw this in the distance, I "may" have broken "some" traffic regulations in getting to a good spot in time to capture this before it went away. I got a pretty nice series for my effort. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 11:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 11:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Quite interesting. How do people feel about whether there should be a bit of noise reduction in the grass? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather have the photo a bit noisy in that part than making it plastic-looking with noise reduction. I think we have gone a bit overboard with that particular tool. As it is now, you can imagine the details, you eye will fill them in. With NR you lose that detail forever. --Cart (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I respect your expertise on this, though I was thinking of only mild noise reduction, nothing drastic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A mild NR will not make any difference, so better leave it. As the photo's creator I believe I have some say in this over what "people" would like. --Cart (talk) 22:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's strictly your choice, of course! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Let's end this before the debate gets too deep. --Cart (talk) 01:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Cart, with 2 supporting votes and none opposing, I feel like you may have withdrawn this too quickly. I probably would have abstained but was still undecided. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan, I think it was very rude of you to go and ask "people" before asking the creator, who is present and should be the first one you ask about any changes in their photo. You are usually good manners and civility personified here on Commons, so I'll chalk this up to a "glitch in the Matrix". Nevertheless, I will be reminded of this rudeness every time I see this photo, so I would rather not have it featured. That's why I withdrew. --Cart (talk) 10:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I wasn't so sure of my views that I didn't want other opinions, but I take your point that I should have addressed my question first of all to you. I'll try to remember that in the future. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freienfeld, kapel 2019-08-03 11.47.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2021 at 15:31:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
Info created and uploaded by Michielverbeek - nominated by -- Co mmon ists 15:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Co mmon ists 15:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The church is nice but not special, the resolution not good in comparison to other candidates here and the crop too narrow everywhere, so that surroundings adds no value to the composition RolfHill (talk) 11:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I kind of agree with RolfHill, except that I'd say this photo is certainly good and has a very nice, peaceful atmosphere, but I agree that it's not special compared to a bunch of other photos of Alpine churches and chapels that we've featured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Definitely a QI, but doesn't stand out enough to be featured. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:TR Izmir asv2020-02 img37 Karşıyaka monument.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2021 at 12:55:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Turkey
Info Skyline of Karşıyaka, İzmir, with the Atatürk, His Mother and Women's Rights Monument ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 12:55, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 12:55, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Lighting looks a bit strange with very bright sunlight on the buildings compared to clouds in the background, but perhaps that was just the weather that day. Aesthetics of the monument don't appeal to me but I don't see that as a reason to oppose. Buidhe (talk) 20:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The monument doesn't stand out, the composition is too cluttered --RolfHill (talk) 11:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the monument does stand out and this is a good composition, but especially since most of the buildings we see are very generic, I think a more dramatic, colorful sky is needed for FP. This is surely a QI, though, whenever it's nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --A.Savin 12:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Congresista Merino Dona Sangre en Campaña.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2021 at 12:46:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created by Congreso de la República del Perú - uploaded by Hugener - nominated by Hugener -- Hugener (talk) 12:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hugener (talk) 12:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no wow, not dramatically better than many similar pics on Commons. Buidhe (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't know what justifies the nomination. --Milseburg (talk) 10:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose per others. This should really be withdrawn by the nominator; if not, the page moderators. It clearly isn't going anywhere. Daniel Case (talk) 22:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think we are all page moderators in that sense, no? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:EL foto, Eimar Kull - PILT4427 Boreus.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2021 at 17:48:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Order : Mecoptera (Scorpionflies)
Info created by Eimar Kull - uploaded & nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 17:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 17:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support From w:Boreus: "Species of Boreus are dark in color, 3 to 5 mm long"! It would be nice to know which species this is, though. Any possibility of identification by sight? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I asked from Urmas Tartes (who has photographed all kinds of insects that move on snow) and he replied roughtly that based on this image alone he can't be sure. There is definetly Boreus westwoodi in Estonia and so far he has determind that all the Boreus insects that he has photographed have been B. westwoodi. For instance there have not been any documented sightings of B. hyemalis in Estonia (at least in the database). Kruusamägi (talk) 19:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment We should not support without identity confirmed. The insect is very small in the image and not so sharp. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The feedback is: "99% on Boreus westwoodi". Kruusamägi (talk) 18:40, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Co mmon ists 14:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I now croped the image. Kruusamägi (talk) 02:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SM:!) (talk) 11:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Order : Mecoptera (Scorpionflies)

File:Li Phi falls at dusk with yellow sky in Don Khon Si Phan Don Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 03:34:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info Long-exposure photograph (30 s). Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IamMM (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressiv scene. --Aristeas (talk) 07:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although the sky looks a bit unreal --Ermell (talk) 08:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was a few minutes after this shot, and a few days after this one and that one. Honestly a very impressive sunset. Thanks! -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Llez (talk) 15:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not perfect, but any shortcomings can easily be attributed to the very necessary long exposure. Daniel Case (talk) 18:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos

File:The Athenaeum Library.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2021 at 21:08:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United Kingdom
Info created & uploaded by Mdbeckwith - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 21:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition. Perhaps a little bright in places, but good overall, and the paintings aren't washed out like in the other photo by him that we recently considered. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support An excellent composition and strong brightness gives for me something extra in this photo --Michielverbeek (talk) 23:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 05:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now until perspective correction is done - sides are leaning in --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 18:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:18, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral per Uoaei1. I think it, and the distortion at the sides, can be fixed. Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good image, but nothing special for FP nominatiom, IHMO.-- Karelj (talk) 15:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lavant St. Peter und Paul Hochaltar 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2021 at 08:20:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
Info High altar of the subsidiary church St. Peter and Paul in Lavant, East Tyrol, Austria. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely winged altarpiece and photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice --Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:35, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:37, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:05, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 09:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SM:!) (talk) 11:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:58, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria

File:Sandy Shores of Moreton Bay.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2021 at 11:49:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images
Info Moreton Bay and Brisbane metropolitan area in Queensland, Australia. created by NASA - uploaded by StellarHalo - nominated by StellarHalo -- StellarHalo (talk) 11:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hopefully, you guys have not gotten tired of all the satellite image nominations yet. I only plan to nominate a few more after this one. -- StellarHalo (talk) 11:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not tired of them, bring them on! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IamMM (talk) 14:31, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Having lived in Brisbane this one is more special! --SM:!) (talk) 15:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite images

File:SNCF B81500 Gap - Veynes-Devoluy.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2021 at 14:50:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 14:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Impressive panorama. —Bruce1ee^talk 15:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 16:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michielverbeek (talk) 20:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Scene is outstanding but sharpness isn't. Technically no FP for me. --Milseburg (talk) 21:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:31, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Co mmon ists 14:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Aristeas (talk) 07:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daniel Case (talk) 18:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Draceane ^talk_contrib. 17:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Theyyam of Kerala by Shagil Kannur (9).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2021 at 19:24:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info--Thira Festival of Kerala where the ritual art form Theyyam is being performed. All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 19:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 19:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too small. Is there a much larger full-size image? If not, we'll have to close this nomination right away, as at least 2 MP are required (and rarely remotely sufficient). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the guidelines say: Images (with the exception of animations and SVGs) of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

I withdraw my nomination--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fractal Broccoli.jpg (delist), delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 17:17:08

Info Reason to delist: too small for FP status now.(Original nomination)
Delist -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:17, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist because it has only 0,79 MP. --Ivar (talk) 17:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others, especially as we're likely to have a new FP of Romanesco broccoli soon. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:00, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and hopefully replace by Ivar's version soon. Per Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:55, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others --IamMM (talk) 05:28, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. --Cayambe (talk) 06:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others.--Peulle (talk) 08:15, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. Kruusamägi (talk) 02:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. -- Karelj (talk) 15:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 10 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 23:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abbey of Maagdendale in Oudenaarde (DSCF9199-hdr).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 17:19:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Belgium
Info by Trougnouf (talk) 17:19, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trougnouf (talk) 17:19, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I looked at and thought about this for quite a while, and it's struck me that it has an appealing starkness and symmetry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:29, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Just a little too much going on here for me. Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Could be sharper but like the composition\effect! --SM:!) (talk) 11:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Put van Nederhorst in de mist. 28-02-2021. (d.j.b) 18.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 17:56:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Fog
Info Put van Nederhorst in the fog. Sun breaks through the fog behind the birches.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:56, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:56, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the sphere in this photo --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think I might support this if there were a significantly tighter crop on the right, but I doubt most of the rest of you would agree. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect aesthetics for Corona times: almost black and white; but we hope the sun will finally triumph over the fog. --Aristeas (talk) 07:33, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:52, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--SM:!) (talk) 10:08, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 18:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Llez (talk) 15:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. -- Karelj (talk) 22:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent late winter mood. Daniel Case (talk) 03:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 16:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena#Fog

File:Skučák in the morning (2020) 02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 14:22:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Czech Republic
Info created and uploaded by T.Bednarz - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 14:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice sphere, but not sharp enough --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm going to live with the composition more before deciding, but I don't see why a fogscape should be sharp - it probably can't be, and the point is to capture the hazy atmosphere and the dawn light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The foreground is not in the fog and is definitely unsharp, due to the long focal length (135 mm) and low F-number (F/5). Agree with Michiel -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's not clear to me that there's no mist in the foreground, but it's certainly a defensible position; I won't argue with that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:56, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry ducks are not caused by some fog or mist, but by the very narrow DoF. Obvious from the eyes, verifiable from the metadata -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment OK, I'll accept that, but to me, the composition and atmosphere override that technical point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worry, then. I understand Michiel -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wonderful atmosphere, good composition; even the high vignetting adds something to it. Normally I am a sharpness fan, but as Ikan has already explained it would be wrong to demand crisp sharpness in a fogscape. (I would still wish that either the reed or the birds were sharper – maybe a higher ISO would have been better to freeze the birds in flight – but overall the impression of the photo is fine.) --Aristeas (talk) 12:54, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've already considered nomitation of this image for several times but I wasn't really sure if the sharpness matches the FP standards. However, since I see there are users who don't see this as an no-go issue, I'm to happy to support. --T.Bednarz (talk) 22:30, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very painterly. I think Monet might have approved. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I'm also on the oppose side, because the depth of field is too shallow and, as a result, the ducks of the foreground are just blurry, out of focus. Certainly the speed 1/80s was not fast enough to freeze the birds in flight. The vignetting is not pleasant in my view, I would rather fix these four dark corners. Nice sphere and atmosphere but dull light and colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp and in ways that can't be forgiven by the fog, also dull light colors per Basile. To that I add a very cluttered and uninteresting composition. We have a lot of similar sunrises that are much more satisfying to look at than this and yet that I still wouldn't consider good enough to nominate. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 10:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stanisław Osostowicz - Stara wieśniaczka - Google Art Project.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2021 at 08:20:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Other
Info created by Stanisław Osostowicz - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 08:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 08:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SM:!) (talk) 13:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks like me... -- Karelj (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Because it looks like Karelj Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Scary but intriguing Danu Widjajanto (talk) 19:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good reproduction, one can study the “handwriting” of the artist en detail. --Aristeas (talk) 08:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Printed#Other

File:U.S. Navy T-6B Texans in a 4-ship formation over a military operations area in Southern Texas.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2021 at 20:35:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Propeller aircraft
Info created by Master Sgt. Christopher Boitz - uploaded by & nominated by ToprakM --ToprakM ^✉ 20:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ToprakM ^✉ 20:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have once again fixed the gallery section for you, please try to remember that the next time since the sorting is done by a Bot. --Cart (talk) 20:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exciting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow--Co mmon ists 01:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 22:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The crop is pretty tight, though RolfHill (talk) 11:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 14:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 17:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better staying concentrated, as pilot -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SM:!) (talk) 10:57, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:58, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Propeller aircraft

File:Blind Men and the Elephant, MET accession number 10 211 900 O1 sf.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2021 at 00:26:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Figurines_and_statuettes
Info created by Max Waldman/MET - uploaded by Pharos - nominated by Cbrescia -- Cbrescia (talk) 00:26, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cbrescia (talk) 00:26, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very cool object, but the depth of field is disappointing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above and resolution is quite low, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 11:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: not enough quality (depth of field and low resolution, thanks for the comments. - Cbrescia (talk) 01:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Iglesia de San Martín, Memmingen, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 71.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2021 at 13:36:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Stained glass
Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 13:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not really outstanding in its category to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:06, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Ikan. Also, the description should be a lot more informative -- what symbols/coat of arms are depicted? Renata3 (talk) 03:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --IamMM (talk) 05:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gdów Cemetery 099 - Sylwester Kusionowicz IV.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2021 at 09:40:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors
Info Limestone Statue of Mary, sculpted by Edward Stehlik, warmly aglow in late afternoon sun at Gdów Cemetery. Created, uploaded, nominated by Scotch Mist -- SM:!) (talk) 09:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SM:!) (talk) 09:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alexcordovaa (talk) 12:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not special enough --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:08, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful soft light, nice sky. --Aristeas (talk) 17:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is the white balance correct or was the camera clock not correct? The light is warm like at sunset, but the time is 15:03 on the 15th september. Same place is taken by you on the 19th september at 15:56 and the light is very different. --Ivar (talk) 19:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC) @Iifar: Well spotted - the camera clock was not correct as I had not changed it from GMT (ie the photo was taken while the sun was setting)! --SM:!) (talk) 23:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Uoaei RolfHill (talk) 22:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I get it and it touches me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan: the motif also touches me; the composition works. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The sky look fake --Wilfredor (talk) 19:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Wilfredor: Please accept my assurance that the sky is not "fake" and has only been slightly de-noised - the cloud formation was a fortunate natural occurrence at the time which happened to complement the image of the glowing sculpture of Mary I was attempting to capture in the late afternoon sunlight! --SM:!) (talk) 22:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say it was fake, just that it looks fake, maybe the lighting or the excessive depth of field, I don't know.--Wilfredor (talk) 23:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wilfredor: Respect your point of view but occasionally natural phenomena captured do sometimes look 'unreal' (too special!?) and given the subject here is a religious sculpture the sunlight\sky\clouds IMO add a comtemplative dimension to this photo which is not evident among most other photos in this FP Gallery, perhaps something to be considered by those who ironically might view the overall image as "not special enough". --SM:!) (talk) 07:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Uoaei1. -- Karelj (talk) 22:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Uoaei1. Daniel Case (talk) 08:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice lighting. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Uoaei1. --Fischer.H (talk) 10:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Uoaei1.--Ermell (talk) 22:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 18:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dasht-e Kavir ESA359261.tiff

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2021 at 22:22:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images
Info created by European Space Agency - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Hanooz -- Hanooz 22:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hanooz 22:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Amazing colors! Is that noise or just sand? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If you are talking about the pixels that are all over the image, I don't think they are sand. After all, the FP of the same region does not have them. StellarHalo (talk) 04:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks. That's quite a difference. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose for the noise. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Hanooz 13:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angling in Troubled Waters A Serio-Comic Map of Europe.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2021 at 08:28:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
Info A satirical map reflecting the geopolitical situation in Europe in 1899. created by Fred W. Rose - uploaded by Balkanique - nominated by StellarHalo -- StellarHalo (talk) 08:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- StellarHalo (talk) 08:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great document! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:11, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan -- Radomianin (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 17:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:51, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 10:38, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SM:!) (talk) 10:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:58, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 16:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 15:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Mosbatho (talk) 21:34, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 23:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support RolfHill (talk) 21:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 07:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe

File:Hutebuche auf dem Mathesberg.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2021 at 12:28:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Fagaceae
Info Pasture beech on the Mathesberg in the Rhön Biosphere Reserve. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 12:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:29, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Painterly, very nice. Unfortunately sharpness isn't quite FP-level. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King. Daniel Case (talk) 14:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Illuminated street corner at blue hour - facade of the building Fujiya in Ginza Chuo-ku Tokyo Japan.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2021 at 05:13:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Japan
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:19, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 22:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 07:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Japan

File:Brno View 44.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2021 at 10:30:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

$Portal\Doors Brno Basilica$

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
Info Unique Portal\Doors of Brno Basilica. Created, uploaded, nominated by Scotch Mist -- SM:!) (talk) 10:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SM:!) (talk) 10:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Really interesting motif, but for FP, I think we need every panel to be sharp at full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for taking the time to review and provide feedback. --SM:!) (talk) 14:37, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dirt jump IMG 7936.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2021 at 16:11:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 16:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 16:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:55, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great image. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome! Who said people can't fly on their own power? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support a little bit of vignetting, but of course --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 09:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 13:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 16:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 08:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The vignetting is too obvious RolfHill (talk) 16:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:51, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SM:!) (talk) 11:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 07:19, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Individual sports

File:Snowstorm on lake Baikal.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2021 at 18:41:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Snow
Info created by Sergey Pesterev - uploaded by Sergey Pesterev - nominated by Golmore -- Golmore (talk) 18:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golmore (talk) 18:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 20:20, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Very good composition but unfortunately the rocky top is a bit blurred. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not as good as this one already FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. I don't think it's different enough to consider separately. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per otthers --Milseburg (talk) 21:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above --Co mmon ists 21:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 15:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, the one we already have is better. Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roodbruine schijnridderzwammen (Lepista flaccida). 22-01-2021 (d.j.b.) 05.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2021 at 06:28:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Tricholomataceae
Info created and uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 06:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment FP quality, but File:Roodbruine schijnridderzwammen (Lepista flaccida). 22-01-2021 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg is featured and a very similar composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan: the existing FP has the big advantage of showing the bottom view, which is crucial for mushroom identification. This one doesn't add anything to this. --El Grafo (talk) 11:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I'm sorry, Famberhorst. The other photograph is really good and already FP. So I withdraw this nomination. --XRay 💬 06:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hochdorf Zentrum Ballon 20200704.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2021 at 10:10:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Switzerland
Info created by Domob - uploaded by Domob - nominated by Domob -- Domob (talk) 10:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I find this particular (unusual) view of the roundabout, roads and zebra crossings interesting. -- Domob (talk) 10:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. Almost a Wimmelbild. -- -donald- (talk) 13:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing interesting on this image (some known building, statue or some significant point), one can make hundreds of such photos using dron or small plane over the towns in all the world... -- Karelj (talk) 17:27, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Karelj. --Fischer.H (talk) 10:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As per Karelj --SM:!) (talk) 11:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting idea but kind of busy here. Daniel Case (talk) 16:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pennsylvania Memorial vaulting PA1.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2021 at 19:46:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United States
I withdraw my nomination created and uploaded by Acroterion - nominated by Co mmon ists 19:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Co mmon ists 19:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose not symmetric. Buidhe (talk) 19:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I wish it were symmetric, but to me it's impressive enough that the imbalance between nearly blown sky on the right and normal on the right isn't a dealbreaker. Also, I have put in a renaming request to correct the typo in the filename. Daniel Case (talk) 18:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's usually not so good to rename a file during a nomination. The nom page must be moved as well and the code in the nom and FPC corrected. Re-naming files should be done after the nom is done, or preferably before creating the nom. Anyway, I've fixed things and the Bot shouldn't have any trouble finding this page for the closing later. --Cart (talk) 21:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per Daniel. --Aristeas (talk) 08:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Buidhe. -- Karelj (talk) 11:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination--Co mmon ists 13:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:FA-18F Super Hornet Brisbane Festival 2019 Practice Run - AndrewMercer - DSC00155.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2021 at 16:41:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
Info created and uploaded by Bald white guy - nominated by Co mmon ists 16:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Co mmon ists 16:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Poor light IMO. I'd have preferred the sun rays lit the plane rather than the clouds -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose this is far away from the best shots of fighter jets we have around here --El Grafo (talk) 10:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Seven Pandas (talk) 00:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:Seven Pandas too hard to write a reason?--Co mmon ists 14:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per El Grafo. Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above RolfHill (talk) 13:19, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Osphronemus goramy albino 2015 G1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2021 at 20:33:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Osphronemidae (Gouramis)
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Info Giant gourami (Osphronemus goramy), albino. Good detail allows you to see the capillaries
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 22:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 15:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The fish is okay, but the harsh shadow generated by the flash is really too bothering in my view, and the background looks like some kind of fake wallpaper, not really aesthetic -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I react to this differently. I think the fish is great, the shadow of the fish doesn't disturb me, and the "busyness" of the background contrasts in interesting ways with the albino fish, to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Ikan --StellarHalo (talk) 09:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose background. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin RolfHill (talk) 11:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. --El Grafo (talk) 11:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close-up photograph of a calf's head looking at the viewer in Don Det Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2021 at 02:55:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done for me at that distance.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 11:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support amazing quality considering a setting of ISO 2000 --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 16:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 06:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 08:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tesla - 💬 13:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support RolfHill (talk) 21:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 22:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 07:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 21:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very lovely --Wilfredor (talk) 15:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)

File:Alhambra - Granada - 001 - Panorama.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2021 at 10:48:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Spain
Info created by Ogre - uploaded by Ogre - nominated by Mr. Schnellerklärt -- Mr. Schnellerklärt (talk) 10:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mr. Schnellerklärt (talk) 10:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Hello and welcome to the FPC. A few pointers: New nominations go at the top of the page and for the gallery, Alhambra is not 'Natural', it's a castle and fortification. You also need to add the section (Spain) since we have a Bot doing the sorting. I have fixed these things for you, but keep them in mind the next time. Good luck with your nom! --Cart (talk) 13:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, IMO far away from FP. The perspective should be better, a lot of noise and low sharpness. --XRay 💬 13:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per XRay. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:41, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment top crop is too close. Also, some buildings look tilted. Buidhe (talk) 02:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per XRay. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Obviously bad alignment. --Milseburg (talk) 15:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per XRay, and bad crop. Daniel Case (talk) 00:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above RolfHill (talk) 13:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boerenkrokus (Crocus tommasinianus) 27-02-2021 (actm.) 03.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2021 at 09:54:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Iridaceae
Info created and uploaded by Agnes Monkelbaan - nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 09:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 09:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 11:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:50, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Forgiving the few minor FS issues at the bottom right, not so noticeable. Overall nice image with the subject in focus and well detailed -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question I can't think what FS is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Focus Stacking -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:40, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Co mmon ists 16:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:14, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 17:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Stunning Seven Pandas (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 06:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 08:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support my fave flowers --Andrei (talk) 22:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 07:16, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 21:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:58, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support RolfHill (talk) 13:18, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Iridaceae

File:Petcon (81233).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2021 at 17:45:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Canidae_(Canids)
Info This is Oakley, a golden retriever, shepherd, etc. mix who is also apparently famous on Instagram (I have not verified). Yes, it's silly, but I found that I like the expressive face here. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment white balance seems to be off. See e.g. the highlights of the background, they look very yellow. --El Grafo (talk) 11:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have a point. New version uploaded. How does it look now? (also made a few other tone adjustments while I was at it). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:44, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- Much better, but judging from the white in the eyes, the white hair around the nose, and the over-all appearance of the fur, it still feels a bit yellow to me (I'm not on a calibrated monitor right now, though). Might be that this is due to the artificial light lacking some wave lengths, though ... --El Grafo (talk) 16:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see potential but the result isn't special RolfHill (talk) 13:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ok, well this was a long-shot and doesn't seem to be going anywhere. sorry, pup! — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Закат на озере Баскунчак.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2021 at 15:46:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Russia
Info created & uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by Ivar (talk) 15:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 16:40, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:04, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 03:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 06:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 16:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:11, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The best candidate right now RolfHill (talk) 21:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 22:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 07:15, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 21:45, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Surreal. Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Reminds me of Mono Lake. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! --Ximonic (talk) 08:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Russia

File:A view of CN Tower.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2021 at 02:54:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Canada
Info created by Maksim Sokolov - uploaded by Maksim Sokolov - nominated by Maksimsokolov (talk) 02:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Maksimsokolov (talk) 02:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've fixed the gallery for you. ~~Please check and address your (over)categorization~~ -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, RolfHill and Daniel Case -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I am not very experienced in this yet, but next time I will take care of this -- User:Maksimsokolov

Oppose I don't blame you for taking the picture but this doesn't work as a photograph. Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. However, I didn't understand the feedback -- User:Maksimsokolov

Support --Basotxerri (talk) 16:26, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The point of view and composition don't work for me. I find the foreground awkward with the huge angle and the cut text at the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 22:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I wish there was no text on the right. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 22:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel Case. -- Karelj (talk) 09:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others and the unsharpness of the screen (or whatever) on the right doesn't help. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Maksimsokolov

File:Toronto City Hall at Dusk.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2021 at 15:24:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada
Info created by MaksimSokolov - uploaded by MaksimSokolov - nominated by [[User:{{subst:MaksimSokolov}}|]] -- Maksimsokolov (talk) 15:24, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Maksimsokolov (talk) 15:24, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice photo, but it needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:24, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Michielverbeek. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above RolfHill (talk) 13:37, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Maksimsokolov

File:Galanthus nivalis mit Aphididae--20210301-RM-153708.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2021 at 22:34:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Amaryllidaceae
Info Aphid on a snowdrop flower. Focus stack of 18 frames. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting game of light, very detailed image, the insect also makes a nice addition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support cool and unusual Buidhe (talk) 02:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 06:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 07:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 16:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:11, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support RolfHill (talk) 21:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Who else thought it was a street light at first glance? Daniel Case (talk) 04:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now you point this out 💡 :-) Basile Morin (talk) 09:37, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:11, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Amaryllidaceae

File:Venedig BW 1.JPG (delist and replace), delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2021 at 08:42:59
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Delist and replace with File:(Venice) Bocca di Leone in the Doge's Palace.jpg:

Info The proposed replacement is huge and sharper than the existing FP at greater than that photo's total size. (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, the thumbnails are side by side on this page. The proposed replacement is on the right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delist and replace --Milseburg (talk) 10:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not sure: in the new version, big parts of the inscription are unfocused. If I had to decide this, none of both images are FP for me. --A.Savin 13:07, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question At what size are you finding parts unfocused? I don't think they have to be pinpoint sharp at full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:10, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When clicking on the full size. Letters look unsharp and extensively over-sharpened. --A.Savin 01:51, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I disagree with pixel peeping this. You see how oversized everything is at that size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The light is far better in the original. Compare the text or the upper left corner, the replacement looks like a photocopy -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The original is not sharp even at merely full screen on my 13-inch screen. I haven't seen this in person, but on the face of it, I disagree on the light; it's brighter in the proposed replacement, which I think is good. I'm a little surprised by the reactions so far (except the pixel-peeping; I expected some of that, but it makes no sense to compare a photo at gigantic full size with another photo at much smaller full size, which you are not doing). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The replacement is harsh white + harsh black, while the original displays gradients and subtil shades. In particular the text appears in its natural thickness in the current version, where the outlines are visible, whereas it's just full black without detail in the proposed alternative. More pixels but less appealing aspect in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I understand your point of view. Thanks for explaining. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Neutral for this reason -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delist and replace --StellarHalo (talk) 09:42, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace There is no problem with the light. The difference is in the patina. The two images are very distant in time. Time can be measured here by the thickness of dirt left by tourists who have free access to this sculpture and who do not hesitate to subject it to many outarges. Not to mention those who, despite the mouth is blocked, slip small messages or anything else. For this the sculpture is regularly cleaned which, in the same year, gives different photographic results. Personally I like both but I will vote all the same and take the opportunity to thank Ikan Kekek for this nomination. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You're most welcome. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delist and replace --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --Aristeas (talk) 10:17, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace .--Vulp here 07:19, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 delist, 0 keep, 1 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 13:13, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simmelsberg Winter 2021.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2021 at 15:29:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Hesse
Info Panoramic view from the Simmelsberg over the Rhön Biosphere Reserve. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 16:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:09, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 01:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support My favorite part is on the left, where the sun rays are visible above the trees. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:19, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:50, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 09:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:18, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:43, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Hesse

File:کاروانسرای سنگی علی آباد قم.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2021 at 16:24:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Iran
Info created by Behrad09 - uploaded by Behrad09 - nominated by POS78 POS78 (talk) 16:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- POS78 (talk) 16:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much not-very-interesting foreground for me. I'd recommend cropping out half of it but don't commit to supporting in that case. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality not good enough I'm afraid. --A.Savin 23:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per A.Savin. -- Karelj (talk) 16:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above RolfHill (talk) 13:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:43, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Windows of former Seagram Distillers Building (Seagram Lofts, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2021 at 19:36:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info created and uploaded by Maksimsokolov - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 19:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Too good not to share. -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 19:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:41, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ArionEstar: The correct way to do this is usually to take over the original nomination. You can still do so and withdraw this second nom. That way you will keep the votes already cast. You simply ~~strike~~ the original nominator, declare that you take over the nom and remove the FPD tag. --Cart (talk) 21:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment ArionEstar and W.carter: Thank you! I am not yet very experienced, didn't know about max two active nominations. But I am learning. --Maksimsokolov

Maksimsokolov, that's ok, many of us made the same mistake when we were new here. Your original nom is now open and this will be closed. Could Martin Falbisoner please go and vote on that nom instead.

Also Maksimsokolov, not sure how you sign your posts since there is no time-stamp on them. A lot of functions on this site are depending on the name being followed by the time-stamp. See: COM:SIGN. It seems like you are writing your name and you should just type the four tildes: ~~~~, they will transform into your name and time-stamp when you click 'save'. All the best, --Cart (talk) 10:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Original nomination is now open again and this is redundant. Thank you to ArionEstar for the good intention to save the nom of this photo. --Cart (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:GW 153 Sandplace - Looe.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2021 at 06:35:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Shipwrecks
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 06:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow for me --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 10:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:On the road to Tobermory, Ontario.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2021 at 03:05:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Canada
Info created by Maksimsokolov - uploaded by Maksimsokolov - nominated by Maksimsokolov -- Maksimsokolov (talk) 03:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The colors don't seem natural to me -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I agree: the white balance is off (pink clouds) and it seems to be a bit over-saturated as well. It's a nice shot, though, so worth fixing and trying again. Maybe consider cutting away a bit of the sky on top and yellow grass at the bottom for better vertical balance. --El Grafo (talk) 08:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thank you a lot for the feedback. This was almost a sunset and the colour of the sunset mixed with other colours of the environment this way, I suspect. These colours and their combination was the reason the scenery caught my attention and made me stop driving to take the picture. But of course, I am not the judge of my own work and will respect the verdict of the voters. --Maksimsokolov 14:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sunset was on 23th august at that location 20:15. WB is too warm (Color Temperature 5,834) and photo oversaturated: Saturation Adjustment Orange +69; Yellow +82, Green +40; Blue +57. --Ivar (talk) 17:50, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing. Even I didn't know these details :) --User:Maksimsokolov 19:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --User:Maksimsokolov 19:43, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Put van Nederhorst in de mist. 28-02-2021. (d.j.b) 25.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2021 at 16:22:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Fog
Info Suddenly a small boat emerged from the dense fog. with four fishermen in the small boat. Maybe the picture is too simple. I'll see.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A modern Simon de Vlieger! --Cart (talk) 17:41, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see what look like a couple of dust spots in the upper right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Removed spots. Thank you for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you. I'm still undecided. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 14:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good storytelling, but the compo and quality don't work for me RolfHill (talk) 13:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:52, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:تصویر سراسرنما از بام کاروانسرای دیرگچین استان قم، معماری برجای مانده از دوره ساسانی.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2021 at 03:42:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Iran
Info created and uploaded by Mostafameraji - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 03:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 03:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support it could use a better denoising, but I find the scene a bit surreal and interesting enough to compensate — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:45, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Rhododendrites. Very large file, good at 50% but the foreground is still a little noisy. Unique scene. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mystical. --Gnosis (talk) 00:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 01:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 13:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:08, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 14:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 09:33, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental double vote crossed out. --Aristeas (talk) 12:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per Rhododendrites RolfHill (talk) 13:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:18, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! It's not a very common picture to see. I understand, the noise is pretty much unavoidable without an alien technology camera. Maybe the noise could be reduced slightly but that would probably eat away some details as well. --Ximonic (talk) 08:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although I wish the vertical walls were not leaning in. --Aristeas (talk) 09:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:10, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:03, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:10, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Iran

File:Almond shell.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2021 at 06:50:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 06:50, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:50, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, don't like the greenish background probably caused by WB post-correction. --A.Savin 21:51, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 22:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the green background ... it plays off the color of the almond better than white. Daniel Case (talk) 14:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good quality but boring item, cropped shadow and strange background color RolfHill (talk) 21:27, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not boring to me at this level of magnification. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the green background looks really strange to me. --El Grafo (talk) 08:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)

File:Flickr - Government Press Office (GPO) - An Israeli family in its sealed room.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2021 at 08:18:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1990-now
Info created by Nathan Alpert - uploaded by Matanya - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Image of these days... -- Karelj (talk) 10:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks like pure propaganda. --Gnosis (talk) 23:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It was a reality during the 1991 Gulf War. Israelis were afraid the missiles Iraq was shooting at them might contain chemical weapons (they didn't). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Propaganda? How come? Tomer T (talk) 07:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose interesting, but no FP.--Christof46 (talk) 21:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It's a very interesting photo. I think the picture quality is acceptable for a 1991 photo, but only weak support because there were certainly sharper photos taken then, though perhaps not under such circumstances. If it's not featured (or even if it is), I think it could be a useful VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 11:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Christof. Per Ikan, it would be a good VI. Daniel Case (talk) 14:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The pose doesn't work for me RolfHill (talk) 21:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canal du Rhône à Sète toward Sète.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2021 at 14:57:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#France
Info created - uploaded - nominated by me. -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I supported this at QIC, but I think it's too noisy for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Have to confess that the noise doesn’t irritate me. --Aristeas (talk) 13:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas --Co mmon ists 16:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:10, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:58, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:06, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan, nice composition and colors but too noisy and many boats blurry RolfHill (talk) 13:19, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Noise is a bit high in the shadows and there is flare at the top left, but overall a very compelling composition. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#France

File:Ring-billed gull in Red Hook (42799).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2021 at 19:56:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Larus
Info A ring-billed gull in Brooklyn. I know some have a preference for birds on rocks/water/sand rather than metal, but I think the overall quality and typical context makes this a good FP candidate. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good for me, and seagulls are part of the New York City ecosystem, so it's appropriate to show one perched on a railing or whatever. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 01:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Info Could you please add more information to the image description, e.g. male or female, juvenile or adult, breeding or non-breeding etc.? (for you as a birder that might all be obvious; however, other people might not know that much about this specific species). Also: half a sentence of what "Red Hook" is would be nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done, though I'm not aware of any way to tell male from female on sight. Feel free to edit it. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 04:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Works for me. Thanks! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 13:33, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 14:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:33, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 11:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was going to oppose because this shot is too easy and the composition simple but the sharpness (look at the eye!) impressed me RolfHill (talk) 13:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality, and for that alone I think it might be one of the best pictures out there. Though, we might have to concider demoting some if we start to get too many seagulls as FP in the future. --Ximonic (talk) 08:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:09, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice and sharp shot. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 17:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Larus

File:Santuário Dom Bosco 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2021 at 18:32:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Francisco Willian Saldanha - nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 18:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've liked this ever since it first popped up at WLM and now it's #9 of the international winners. It's serene, almost abstract, and to me, the sheer wow of it outweighs any technical shortcomings. -- Cart (talk) 18:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Seven Pandas (talk) 21:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cart --IamMM (talk) 21:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would appreciate a perspective correction to get the verticals straight --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's an awarded photo so per COM:OVERWRITE we can't alter it now. Anyway, the photo is all about the impression of light and color, not architectural accuracy. --Cart (talk) 08:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wanted to make the same comment as Uoaei1, but Cart is right; this is more an “impressionist” (or even “expressionist”?! ;–) photo. Reminds me e.g. of some cathedral pictures by Lyonel Feininger or Otto Nebel. --Aristeas (talk) 10:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is beautiful, almost made me w ol. It certainly is different from what we normally see here, but that is a big plus for me in this case. --El Grafo (talk) 16:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Request After taking a closer look, I think this needs some work regarding copyright. I'm not sure if {{FoP-Brazil}} applies here, would be great if someone with a bit of experience in Brazilian law could have a look. In any case, it seems clear that the original author of the artwork (windows) would need to be credited. --El Grafo (talk) 16:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've added info about the designer and creator of the windows in the description. --Cart (talk) 16:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 23:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Very nice subject and lighting but the quality could have been better RolfHill (talk) 13:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a VFX software image. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 19:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:10, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very sublime ... looks like a scifi movie set. Not totally perfect—there is some CA on the open sections—but it's almost unnoticeable and to use it as a reason to oppose would be downright churlish. Daniel Case (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 17:50, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Brazil

File:Chinees decoratief vaasje op glas 20-12-2020. (actm.) 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2021 at 05:29:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Ceramics
Info Chinese decorative vase on glass. Focus stack of 12 photos}} --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
all by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:51, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Nice, but what´s about the dark fringes left and right of the reflection? --Isiwal (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Answer: Thank you for your question; It is the shadow of the vase in the mirror. So it is part of the image.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful work! --SM:!) (talk) 10:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Must redo focus stack to correct many errors around reflection. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:56, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Co mmon ists 16:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 15:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 11:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The background is full of stains / dust spots at the bottom, and thus looks dirty. There's a big one at the bottom right corner for example. Fixable IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Removed spots. Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 18:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tesla - 💬 13:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Little detail due to low resolution, I don't find the item special RolfHill (talk) 21:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Ceramics

File:PK Truck on N-5 near Thatta asv2020-02 img1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2021 at 12:53:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Trucks and buses
Info A decorated truck (a.k.a. jingle truck) on the N-5 National Highway, Sindh, Pakistan ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 12:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 12:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:56, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --What a striking photo! Aliwal2012 (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fun! And a fine composition to boot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 22:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support a tiny bit oversharpened maybe - but very cool --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great colourful photo that at first glance I enthusiastically supported but it appears 'post-processing' has created an 'edge-effect' that is most noticeable around the 'straw sack' on top of the truck and IMO should be resolved for FP --SM:!) (talk) 08:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
regretful oppose per SM:!): There are some very clear signs of over-sharpening (e.g. the whole front of the truck, halos around the birds in the sky ...) --El Grafo (talk) 10:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose good light conditions and awesome truck, but the overall result is dissapointing. The photo is clearly overprocessed (per other opposers) and the front of the truck is imo not sharp enough. Maybe the shutter speed 1/250 was not the best solution for a moving subject or focusing was not perfect. --Ivar (talk) 11:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Neutral Weak support for now – great photo, but the sharpening does not justice to it. I hope that with no sharpening in the sky, less sharpening on the truck, etc. the photo will be fine. --Aristeas (talk) 15:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have changed my neutral to weak support above; apart from the sharpening question, it is a very good photo for me, espec. if we consider the quite high resolution. --Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have a similar photo, is it better? --A.Savin 15:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Both are good IMHO, but I would just try to reduce the sharpening on the present candidate and apply stronger sharpening only partially – it’s so a nice photo! --Aristeas (talk) 09:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --A.Savin 12:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 17:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per others --Co mmon ists 17:32, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- per othersSeven Pandas (talk) 00:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 07:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose-- per ivar Seven Pandas (talk) 21:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC) Double vote? --A.Savin 22:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Front of the truck not very sharp, and though the image is quite nice it is also a bit quite too empty IMO. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose per others; apart from that I think the image could stand some cropping in on the left so it includes just the road on the bottom. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:13, 19 March 2 021 (UTC)
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 09:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice composition and item but per above, poor quality RolfHill (talk) 13:16, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --StellarHalo (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:View from Miradouro do Cabo Girão 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2021 at 10:17:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:17, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:17, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:56, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 20:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 22:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:06, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cannot see anything special here RolfHill (talk) 13:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:38, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Portugal

File:Fishing huts reflected in the ice at Fisketången, Kungshamn.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2021 at 19:14:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
Info All by me, -- Cart (talk) 19:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 19:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry to repeat myself but I don't find anything exceptional, a simple photo, undoubtedly pretty, but nothing exceptional to be Featured in my opinion. In addition, the left and right edges lose sharpness. --Co mmon ists 20:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 15:33, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very pretty. --A.Savin 21:49, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 10:50, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:40, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC) Per Commonists --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 20:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 00:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I finally got what's going on in the form; it's a kind of mesmerizing oval eye movement. The fact that it's a reflection on ice, rather than water, is an added plus. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Commonists. -- Karelj (talk) 12:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I am sorry, but I agree with Commonists--Tesla - 💬 13:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Commonists RolfHill (talk) 21:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support it wouldn't work without the yellow one :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Right you are. I was going for the most famous huts in the area (they even made it onto a stamp), but someone was storing a lot of junk on the jetty over winter. :( I'll get them some other time. On the other hand I got the ice here as a bonus. --Cart (talk) 20:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Commonists --StellarHalo (talk) 05:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:20, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Reflections

File:Rainbow Bridge, Tokyo, South view from Odaiba 20190419 1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2021 at 13:39:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Japan
Info created and uploaded by DXR - nominated by Co mmon ists 13:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Co mmon ists 13:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice photo, but no wow and dull sky --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Michiel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Michielverbeek. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above RolfHill (talk) 13:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cluttered compo, in addition to above. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:20, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ice sculpture in Quebec city downtown.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2021 at 03:37:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_outdoors
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 03:37, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:30, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very technically accomplished ice sculpture and a sharp capture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:13, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support background is not perfect, but the sculpture is. --Ivar (talk) 11:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ivar -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Derivative work, needs permission? --A.Savin 16:19, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I always ask permission in my photographs, however, on this occasion the sculptor asked me not to go near to explain anything and that I could take the photo. These are in a public place and are activities funded by the Government of Canada. In my interpretation of the Canadian law of freedom of panorama, sculptures made of ice have a strictly limited and fairly short lifespan before disappearing. Ice sculptures can be "permanent" if the intention was to leave the work in the public place indefinitely or at least for the entire natural life of the work. See also: [1][2] --Wilfredor (talk) 17:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 16:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 17:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:16, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 03:51, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 08:18, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_outdoors

File:Karst mountains colorful clouds and mist at sunrise from the top of Mount Nam Xay Vang Vieng Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2021 at 03:09:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Clouds
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. I guess there's a beaten path up to that summit? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, rather a steep climb, very slippery during the rain season, and this day in the complete darkness :-) Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ivar (talk) 11:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support This could also make a great B/W conversion. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:16, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The quality is quite excellent. The clouds bring some balance to the composition. I think the HDR technique, which I assume is used here, is fine and natural looking, not overdone. I appreciate the landscape to the point of being FP! --Ximonic (talk) 08:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. --Aristeas (talk) 09:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 10:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice mood. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 16:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:09, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:54, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 17:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 08:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena#Clouds

File:Dülmen, Hausdülmen, eisbedeckte Pflanze -- 2021 -- 5015.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2021 at 08:27:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Ice
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 08:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Info Thank you to Ikan Kekek for the idea to nominate this image. -- XRay 💬 08:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support You're most welcome. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 05:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 12:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 16:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Radomianin (talk) 09:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SM:!) (talk) 14:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 17:47, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 08:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena#Ice

File:Northern shoveler pair in Marine Park (33233).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2021 at 16:45:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Subfamily_:_Anatinae_(Dabbling_Ducks)
Info Northern shovelers often work together while feeding. On water, you might see them (as a pair or in a group) spiraling around. On the shore, they sort of march forward with their beaks in the water. That's what's going on here, with a male/female pair "shoveling" together. A nice, outdoor, pandemic-safe couples activity. :) all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:45, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:45, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just the right moment to make a beautiful photo! --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:06, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cute. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nicely done. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 23:45, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 10:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 12:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:03, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --A.Savin 12:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pile-on support as Daniel Case always says. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 16:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:12, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 08:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Radomianin (talk) 09:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great photo! --SM:!) (talk) 14:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Very lovely --Wilfredor (talk) 03:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:51, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 17:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 08:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Subfamily_:_Anatinae_(Dabbling_Ducks)

File:Oxford - Merton College - 0815.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2021 at 17:15:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created & uploaded by Jorgeroyan - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 17:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:51, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd love to know how big this lock is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting --Wilfredor (talk) 15:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral nice object but it needs sharpening, is too dark and the description is poor (size, age, manufacturer,...) RolfHill (talk) 13:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per RolfHill. If I knew how big it was or when it was made, I might support, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very steampunk Daniel Case (talk) 01:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 09:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:56, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:04, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others

File:The Great Belt Bridge, Eastern Bridge, August 2020 -01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2021 at 13:49:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Denmark
Info The eastern part of the Great Belt Bridge, Denmark, at sunset, as seen aboard a cruise ship a few minutes before passing under the construction. All by me, --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special light and zen compo -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 16:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:13, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:50, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 17:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 21:31, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 06:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 08:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 07:16, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:09, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Boring item, abrupt left crop, unsharp compensated with too much sharpening, (see the cables) RolfHill (talk) 13:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#Denmark

File:U.S. Navy’s Blue Angels aerial demonstration team flies.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2021 at 18:35:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft
Info created by Master Sgt. John Winn - uploaded by & nominated by ToprakM --ToprakM ^✉ 18:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ToprakM ^✉ 18:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Might be downsampled, but still quite a sight! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 00:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~* Support~~ --Gnosis (talk) 05:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Seeing the blue angels in the new super hornets is exciting, except that I do not see anything interesting in the picture. Unfortunately the sharpness and lighting is not impressive, for example even the cockpit of the jet closest to the camera can not be seen correctly. Although the photo was taken in 2021, this 2008 image is closer to the FP criteria for me. Sorry --IamMM (talk) 08:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose imho too low resolution for 5D Mark IV. --Ivar (talk) 09:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ivar RolfHill (talk) 21:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per IAN Buidhe (talk) 02:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, as much as I like the Blue Angels sadly I agree with IanMM.--Vulp here 07:14, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above RolfHill (talk) 13:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per others. If this were the only picture of the Blue Angels we had, yeah, maybe I'd support. But it isn't. Daniel Case (talk) 01:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Telc 15.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2021 at 12:02:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info Distinctive Plague Column ("Mary Column") in Telč. Created, uploaded, nominated by Scotch Mist -- SM:!) (talk) 12:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SM:!) (talk) 12:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Gallery fixed. Please remember the section as well or the Bot will not find the right place. --Cart (talk) 12:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC) @W.carter: Thanks and apologies for my omission! --SM:!) (talk) 13:54, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Arbitrary bottom crop to my mind, and the sharpness is not exceptional. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for taking the time to review and provide feedback. --SM:!) (talk) 11:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sediment off the Yucatan Peninsula.jpg (delist), delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2021 at 00:31:39

Info Much of the left side of the image is blurry. There is a series of thick unnatural horizontal yellow lines covering the same area. Overall not sharp enough. Quite small for a satellite image covering an area of that size. (Original nomination)
Delist It was a mistake to promote this image. -- StellarHalo (talk) 00:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Seven Pandas (talk) 00:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist not one of the best satellite images on Commons, for the reasons described by nom. Buidhe (talk) 01:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Maybe it wasn't a mistake in 2009, but the horizontal lines make the decision for me. Otherwise, it's a nice image, though small for our current standards. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. --Cayambe (talk) 11:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. Daniel Case (talk) 04:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others.--Vulp here 17:52, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--Cart (talk) 13:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:SM Wrocław Kościół św Idziego 2016 ID 598584.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2021 at 10:55:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
Info created by SMilejski - uploaded by SMilejski - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 10:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 10:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
strong chromatic aberration in the lamp --Wilfredor (talk) 17:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The blurred person and the CA on the lamps reduce the first positive impression.--Ermell (talk) 22:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose EV would be higher with a daytime pic Buidhe (talk) 02:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Ermell, but this can be removed. Otherwise nice. -- -donald- (talk) 19:19, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above RolfHill (talk) 13:31, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose You want to support this and you wonder why anyone would oppose ... until you look at the grossly unsharp bricks on the right and the previously-noted CA on the streetlight at left. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomb of Hassan Modarres2021-03-23 36.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2021 at 09:50:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Iran
Info created by POS78 - uploaded by POS78 - nominated by POS78 -- POS78 (talk) 09:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- POS78 (talk) 09:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Multiple issues: severe detail loss, perspective warp, too tight top crop etc... This isn't even passing the bar for a QI, let alone being called one of the very best images on Commons. Generally, you need a proper DSLR camera to capture something worthy of FPC.--Peulle (talk) 10:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment thanks for nominating, POS78. I don't want to leave you with the impression this is a bad picture -- it's not. There are technical issues that Peulle points out, but I think many people would be happy to get this kind of shot out of their phone camera. Ultimately, cell phone cameras have improved over the years, but rely on a tiny little lens that just cannot match the quality of a stand-alone camera. There is a level of technical quality that Featured Picture Candidates reviewers expect, and that's just about impossible with a phone camera, sorry. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: outlined above.--Peulle (talk) 10:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Dhole(Asiatic wild dog).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2021 at 06:37:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
Info created and uploaded by Davidvraju - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 06:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Threatened species, but not that sharp for FP. However, if this is the best photo of a dhole on Commons, please nominate at COM:VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 15:59, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Davidvraju: Can you say more about this photo? For example, more precisely where it was photographed? Mainly wondering about whether it was in captivity in some way. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
IMO while this would not be sufficient quality for, say, Vulpes vulpes, if this is a wild dhole it is one of only a couple thousand left and I think it makes sense to take that into consideration. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Rhododendrites’ reasoning. --Aristeas (talk) 10:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I support assuming it is indeed a wild animal, how do you know that, @Rhododendrites: ? RolfHill (talk) 13:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @RolfHill: I don't. That's why I asked above "whether it was in captivity in some way" and didn't vote. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:34, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 17:52, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)

File:Wrocław MuzeumNarodowe.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2021 at 10:49:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland
Info created by Slimark - uploaded by Slimark - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 10:49, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 10:49, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think I mentioned this as a possible FP on QIC. It's not perfect, but it's spectacular to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, nominating after your comment. Thank you! --Andrei (talk) 11:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support - It is beautiful and spectacular POS78 (talk) 16:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 07:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 19:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 19:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 21:45, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lighting is fine but detail poor RolfHill (talk) 13:31, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very nice scene, but too much of the facade is overexposed. For me lights and their immediate vicinity would be fine, but the white parts on the main building are blown out which is too much for me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 17:52, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland

File:Doors of the Bloor Street United Church.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2021 at 01:06:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info created by User:Maksimsokolov - uploaded by User:Maksimsokolov - nominated by User:Maksimsokolov (talk) 01:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Maksimsokolov (talk) 01:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral For me, the bottom of the photo is overexposed. The photo also needs a vertical correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The tight crop will more or less make it impossible to fix the perspective issue noted by Famberhorst and still have something usable. Daniel Case (talk) 15:15, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Maksimsokolov (talk) 17:18, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iceland's Raging Rivers.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2021 at 02:21:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images
Info Reykjavík and the Reykjanes Peninsula in southwestern Iceland. created by NASA - uploaded by StellarHalo - nominated by StellarHalo -- StellarHalo (talk) 02:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- StellarHalo (talk) 02:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose No wow for me; I'm not seeing what makes this superlative compared to other satellite images. I would also prefer to see this image without bits of cloud blotting out parts of the land. Buidhe (talk) 07:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Buidhe. Daniel Case (talk) 02:07, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --StellarHalo (talk) 01:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cherry Blossom in El Retiro Park, Madrid, Spain.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2021 at 01:49:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Rosaceae
Info created by Satdeep Gill - uploaded by Satdeep Gill - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 01:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 01:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment File and nom pages moved due to typo in title plus gallery fixed with added section. Please remember to check for such things when you create a nomination. Cheers, --Cart (talk) 12:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@W.carter: Thanks for helping me out here. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 12:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral The flower on the left is not sharp. The photo also has a disturbing background to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Famberhorst, and the sharp flowers are in shadow, some petals are overexposed --Llez (talk) 08:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Famberhorst. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for so many reasons. Busy composition, unusually cool WB even given the situation, blown areas on the flowers and unsharpness throughout. But most of all ... the filename says this was taken in Madrid while the file information says Norway. Which is it? Daniel Case (talk) 22:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:TR Pamukkale Hierapolis asv2020-02 img29.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2021 at 13:15:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Turkey
Info Roman theatre in Hierapolis of Phrygia, Pamukkale/Turkey ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 13:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distortion and not so sharp. The sky is also strange, it is dark and banded above. --Co mmon ists 20:35, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 13:55, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very good and impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why is the colour of the sky not consistent left to right? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose No wow for me; also technical issues noted by others. Daniel Case (talk) 03:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --A.Savin 13:23, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sacred Heart church in Weimar 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2021 at 11:39:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 11:39, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 11:39, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very pleasant atmosphere but no exceptional composition to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose +1. --Peulle (talk) 10:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, but add for me unsharpness on the trees at left. Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cascade de Saunhac 08.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2021 at 11:35:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Occitanie
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 11:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 11:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice technically and I love the earthiness captured here, but it's a very busy composition and as such doesn't stand out from our other waterfall pics enough. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cherry Blossom in El Retiro Park, Madrid, Spain.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2021 at 01:49:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Rosaceae
Info created by Satdeep Gill - uploaded by Satdeep Gill - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 01:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 01:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment File and nom pages moved due to typo in title plus gallery fixed with added section. Please remember to check for such things when you create a nomination. Cheers, --Cart (talk) 12:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@W.carter: Thanks for helping me out here. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 12:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral The flower on the left is not sharp. The photo also has a disturbing background to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Famberhorst, and the sharp flowers are in shadow, some petals are overexposed --Llez (talk) 08:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Famberhorst. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for so many reasons. Busy composition, unusually cool WB even given the situation, blown areas on the flowers and unsharpness throughout. But most of all ... the filename says this was taken in Madrid while the file information says Norway. Which is it? Daniel Case (talk) 22:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chiesa di Santa Maria della Pace Evangelista ingresso Brescia.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2021 at 09:17:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues indoors
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support A statue with a strongly rhetorical pose, very well presented. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. One of the most impressive Evangelist sculptures I have ever seen (in pictures or reality). --Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 13:33, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:06, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 14:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seeing the light! --SM:!) (talk) 14:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is superb but I see nothing special here. With this camera you could take similar pictures of 50 statues in 1 hour RolfHill (talk) 13:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not sure I see the problem with that. Similarly, User:Llez takes hundreds of photos of shells, and he and some of the rest of us gradually nominate the best of them here. I wouldn't mind seeing equally good photos of equally striking statues nominated over a period of time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:49, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 17:50, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:19, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues indoors

File:Äkäslompolo and Ylläs in Kolari, Lapland, Finland, 2018 September.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2021 at 11:22:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Finland
Info Yllästunturi (a fell, kind of a mountain) rises behind the lake Äkäslompolo in Kolari, Lapland in Finland. Created, uploaded & nominated by Ximonic. -- Ximonic (talk) 11:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ximonic (talk) 11:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great "painting", mood and reflections. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 16:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Interesting composition but only 5,2 Mpx is too small for a landscape image in 2021. The full resolution would probably never pass due to the unsharpness of the background -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Basile Morin. There is missing a little bit sharpness, and it is also a bit noisy/grainy for me. -- -donald- (talk) 07:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. A beautiful picture. But could have been a bit sharper.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Co mmon ists 17:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per Famberhorst --IamMM (talk) 03:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per others. --Aristeas (talk) 08:16, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 08:20, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support No region of the planet does tranquility like the Arctic. Daniel Case (talk) 14:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:57, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit small but good composition. --Laitche (talk) 16:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 06:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Finland

File:E-burg asv2019-05 img41 Opera and Ballet House.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2021 at 13:31:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
Info Statues of muses on the roof of Yekaterinburg Opera and Ballet House, built in 1912 ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 13:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ezarateesteban 16:04, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow and and seems distorted, especially the lower frieze. --Co mmon ists 20:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 17:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose per Commonists, also I find the lighting harsher than optimal. Buidhe (talk) 10:55, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --A.Savin 12:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:European starling in CP (33830).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2021 at 16:28:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Sturnidae_(Starlings)
Info European starling on a branch in Central Park. I wasn't sure whether to nominate this one or this other one, but settled on this one because I like how it's a bit fluffed up and spiky. :) It's a common bird, and a destructive invasive species in the US, but still quite pretty. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support And to my understanding, they were brought to North America by a nut who decided to try to introduce all the birds mentioned by Shakespeare. Impressive photo! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:00, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yeah. Central Park in particular, actually. And it wouldn't be such a crazy story of they didn't have such a devastating impact on native species. Sigh. an article for anyone interested — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- I actually prefer the other one; I find the blurred branch in the background a little distracting. —Bruce1ee^talk 17:35, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice work --Co mmon ists 20:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 17:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose because of the shadow across the eye. --Ivar (talk) 07:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, I thought there was a shadow (and I prefer this one). Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I have nominated the other one, which has a cleaner background and the shadow isn't over the eye. Thanks, all. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fallätsche Adliswil and Sihl valley 20200818.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2021 at 05:07:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Switzerland
Info created and uploaded by Domob - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 05:07, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:07, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much fog in all picture and very dark --Ezarateesteban 16:03, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but for above --Co mmon ists 16:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Above issues aren't so much a problem for me, but to me this landscape, at least in this image, doesn't stand out enough from our other landscapes. Daniel Case (talk) 14:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --IamMM (talk) 14:29, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crimson-spotted forester (Euphaedra themis) male.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2021 at 05:38:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Euphaedra themis
Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 05:38, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:38, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a beautiful butterfly, and I like the contrast with the color of the ground, but come down in the middle because I have a hard time with the focus being on the dirt along the bottom and right. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like the contrast with the background Buidhe (talk) 05:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support To me the contrast is enough to offset any issues with the background. Daniel Case (talk) 18:07, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 06:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Euphaedra themis

File:FCAB GL26C-2 2005, 2010 and GT22CU-3 2402 Salar de Carcote.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2021 at 10:45:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 10:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 10:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:16, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 03:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:53, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great contrast between the endless emptiness of the landscape and the colourful train. --Aristeas (talk) 08:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 09:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:04, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 18:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 13:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Aristeas --Radomianin (talk) 21:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 16:37, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 06:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:47, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Noctua pronuba caterpillar - Keila.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2021 at 07:10:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Noctuidae_(Owlet_Moths)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 07:10, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:10, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great closeup! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:25, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:05, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:17, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 17:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 14:00, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --IamMM (talk) 03:53, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:35, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 06:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Noctuidae_(Owlet_Moths)

File:Stone bridge leading to a cemetery surrounded by trees in the compounds of Chion-in Kyoto Japan.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2021 at 01:24:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Japan
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. For me the photo (especially the building) is a bit gloomy and dark.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 03:53, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit gloomy and dark, but this is appropriate because the bridge leads to a cemetery ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 08:18, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Unfortunately parts of the bridge are overexposed --Llez (talk) 08:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 09:20, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 06:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:33, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Japan

File:Put van Nederhorst in de mist. 28-02-2021. (d.j.b) 31.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2021 at 15:59:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Fog
Info Put van Nederhorst in the fog. Wooden bench near a birch on the bank in the mist.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support probably my favorite of the current FPCs. The light and atmosphere transform this otherwise ordinary setting into something which excellently captures a mood. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:57, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great atmosphere of the nature.--Vulp here 17:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely. --XRay 💬 17:57, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 03:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:53, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Rhododendrites. --Aristeas (talk) 08:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely atmosphere.--Peulle (talk) 10:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool composition, interesting diffuse background with the mist -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 20:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 13:54, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Laitche (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena#Fog

File:Hainesia crocea 01.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2021 at 09:33:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Megalomastomatidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:33, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:33, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 18:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 13:56, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 06:47, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 16:59, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Radomianin (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 06:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:57, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:19, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 15:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Megalomastomatidae

File:Christopher Columbus Statue Torn Down at Minnesota State Capitol on June 10, 2020.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2021 at 19:04:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
Info created by Tony Webster - uploaded by Featous - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 19:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Emblematic image, high EV and WOW factor. -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 19:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Probably a good VI, but the partially blurred people in that background are too distracting for this to be an FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Selective focus is a common photography technique used to highlight certain parts of an image while de-emphasizing others. In this case it makes a lot of sense to apply that technique as the main subject of the image is the toppled statue (yet the bystanders are an important part of the narrative, so you don't want to exclude them completely). I applaud the photographer for shooting this wide open. I find the composition of the photo and the way it tells the story simply outstanding. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't object to them being blurred and agree that it's logical to blur them. It's just the effect on my eyes of this particular blur, and I'm not certain whether it would work better for me if they were more blurred or less blurred. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Too many people with cut heads in the background, distracting cropped photographer at the left -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin. --Fischer.H (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Strong Wow factor, the blurred and cut people do not distract, they highlight that this is an image of the action of tearing the statue down. --Kritzolina (talk) 12:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Despite some technical shortcomings I like it indeed; there is something depressing in this shot. --A.Savin 12:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support high EV event photo, can't be replicated. Buidhe (talk) 07:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose poor composition. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose It is a pity that most of the people are "beheaded". Complete viewers would have done the composition better. Sorry. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the WOW factor of a rare shot. --Joalpe (talk) 12:51, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support political event --Neptuul (talk) 14:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:30, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 17:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A VI perhaps, but per others too many cut heads. Maybe with a tighter crop this could be reframed (literally ) as Christopher Columbus The Morning After. Daniel Case (talk) 14:33, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Mostly because of the shadow --RolfHill (talk) 16:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:JOR-2017-Wadi Rum 06.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2021 at 19:45:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Jordan
Info created and uploaded by Godot13 - nominated by -- Co mmon ists 19:45, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Co mmon ists 19:45, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't know the camera, but I guess this is downsized. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:07, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is this [3] thanks--Co mmon ists 22:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
THanks, so it is seriously downsized then. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I have been to Wadi Rum, and I have taken photographs there that I consider better and more representative of what is undeniably a photographer's paradise than this, that yet I still wouldn't nominate for FP (Although if I had had a DLSR at the time, that might have been different). Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose outstanding compo and very good light, but downsampling is too strong (from 100 to 7 MP) for me. --Ivar (talk) 08:54, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 23:10, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tilley Hats and Silence.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2021 at 17:16:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
Info created by Maksimsokolov - uploaded by Maksimsokolov - nominated by -- Maksimsokolov (talk) 17:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Maksimsokolov (talk) 17:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment When you make a FP nomination, you have to make sure the file description is complete and that the photo is properly categorized. No category should be displayed in red (like 'Street photography in Toronto'), red links mean the page doesn't exist. I have fixed this for you now, so please take a look and think about what you can make right on your next nom. All the best, --Cart (talk) 17:36, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing, thank you. Every time I learn something new here. Each next time I try not to repeat the previous mistake. I didn't know how to find suitable categories methodically and actually still don't know -- Maksimsokolov (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is the official page about categories at Commons:Categories, or you can take a look at a past conversation where I tried to teach another user about this. It might be easier. ;-) See: User talk:W.carter/Archive 13#Coaching.... --Cart (talk) 18:11, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Once again thank you. Next time I will surely do this correctly. -- Maksimsokolov (talk) 18:33, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you get all of this right during your first year at FPC, you will set some kind of record. :-) Don't worry, you'll get there in time, we are used to correcting/teaching 'newbies' but huge bonus points for wanting to learn. --Cart (talk) 18:39, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I wear a Tilley (the only hat with an instruction manual), but silence and Tilley has no connection for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is just an instruction manual to have a moment of silence to appreciate these hats being worn by these ladies :) -- Maksimsokolov (talk) 16:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another non-Canadian Tilley wearer? Wow! I love mine ... you can wear it in hot weather to shade your face (love the dark underside of the rim), in cold and/or windy weather to keep your head warm (even over a hoodie or ski cap), in the rain. And it's pretty lightweight and flattens nicely when you need to pack it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Interesting idea, but doesn't make it to FP on that alone. I bet it could impress the judges in a contest or two, though. Daniel Case (talk) 18:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 23:09, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zeiss Batis Sonnar F1.8 85.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2021 at 18:12:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Optical_devices
Info created and uploaded by Franz van Duns - nominated by -- Co mmon ists 18:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Co mmon ists 18:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too ordinary, these type of photos are commonplace. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a lot of color noise in the black areas and the lens is just gross with all that dust and lint. --Cart (talk) 20:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not seeing the big wow here, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 09:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the composition and contrast, but a) there's CA on the inside rim of the lens and b) color noise on the background between the cap and lens. Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 23:09, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikolai Triik TKM 1549B.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2021 at 22:56:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Other portraits
Info created by Nikolai Triik - uploaded & nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 22:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Info A. H. Tammsaare is considered one of the most important Estonian writers. Artist Nikolai Triik was among the most influential Estonian artists during the I half of the 20th century. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 22:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose is not public domain in US as it was not out of copyright in Estonia before the URAA date; I do not think the artwork is exceptional enough to merit featuring; and photographs of the writer (which exist) probably have more encyclopedic value as a depiction of him. Buidhe (talk) 11:53, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Buidhe's copyright concerns. Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 00:34, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Water reflection of a green island at sunrise with blue sky and pirogue in Don Det Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2021 at 01:56:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:30, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 06:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:55, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:26, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Again a wonderful sight. When I was a child I imagined Laos as a country with a remarkable, beautiful landscape, although I did not know anything about it besides its melodious name and interesting position on the world map. Curious enough, on your photos Laos looks almost as I had imagined it ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 06:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This place, called "4000 islands", is in the Mekong (particularly large at this section, until 14 km), and of course very green with the abundant fresh water. Thanks, Aristeas, come to visit one day if you have the opportunity :-) Basile Morin (talk) 08:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --IamMM (talk) 08:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Reflections

File:Viola odorata 20210226.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2021 at 09:32:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Violaceae
Info Common violet (Viola odorata). Diameter of the florescence about 13 millimetres (0.51 in), focus stack with 17 frames. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support No huge wow but still pretty and interesting enough for a mini-wow. --Radomianin (talk) 21:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support on the strength of the colors and the background being just simple enough. Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 20:01, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Doesn't really do it for me. The flower is nice but not overwhelmingly sharp and detailed compared to some others we've been seeing, and the overall composition leaves me a bit off balance, with the nearer leaf on the lower left and farther leaf on the lower right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan Kekek RolfHill (talk) 16:29, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per Ikan --SM:!) (talk) 10:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Te Whanganui-A-Hei 02.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2021 at 10:12:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/New_Zealand#Waikato
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:12, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:12, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition doesn't work for me RolfHill (talk) 16:36, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose WB is rather cool, and the light seems a little harsh. Daniel Case (talk) 17:16, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not good composition. -- Karelj (talk) 14:46, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]