Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2013

File:4 Cilindros, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-02-11, DD 07.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2013 at 09:33:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info BMW Tower ("4 Cylinders") framed by the BMW Welt, Munich, Germany. All by me, Poc o² 09:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 09:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nice composition. Kleuske (talk) 09:58, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 16:41, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 18:02, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:24, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Beautifully framed.58.106.252.114 00:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC) Please log in to vote. --Joydeep _Talk 08:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --RichardKongrosian (talk) 07:09, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 08:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:21, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good and appealing composition, IMO--Jebulon (talk) 12:41, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:18, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 06:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 11:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice composition.--ArildV (talk) 12:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  10:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:15, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Austernfischer Haematopus ostralegus Iceland RB.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2013 at 00:35:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info C/U/N by --  Richard  [®]  00:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info Eurasian Oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus) also known as the Common Pied Oystercatcher, or (in Europe) just Oystercatcher, is a wader in the oystercatcher bird family Haematopodidae.
Support --  Richard  [®]  00:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:05, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:46, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 09:48, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --mathias K 13:48, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:10, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 15:15, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Very nice. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 18:58, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 19:37, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 08:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:44, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 11:06, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--ArildV (talk) 14:50, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:16, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Geirangerfjord from Ørnesvingen, 2013 June.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2013 at 16:20:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info A view to UNESCO World Heritage site Geirangerfjord from Ørnesvingen, Møre og Romsdal, Norway in 2013 June. Created, uploaded & nominated by Ximonic -- Ximonic (talk) 16:20, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ximonic (talk) 16:20, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Makele-90 (talk) 17:07, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:15, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support V-wolf (talk) 22:14, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 04:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support great panorama.--ArildV (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 15:13, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great panorama and quality, but I don't see a good excuse for the whole center area being in the shadow. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 16:39, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 19:38, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --RichardKongrosian (talk) 07:13, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 08:18, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light could be better ( see Julian) but the motive and shooting position is such outstanding that this picture is surely an FP for me. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the reviews! I would have been glad if the opposite coast was in sunshine but unfortunately it wasn't going to get better that day. The rains became. --Ximonic (talk) 09:23, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 11:06, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:16, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Juncus articulatus - läikviljaline luga Keilas.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2013 at 09:35:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Jointleaf rush with capsules, all by Ivar (talk) 09:35, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 09:35, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 21:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose could have been more in focus and sharper with a closer composition.Flickrworker (talk) 09:45, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 13:20, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:India - Painting a staircase - 0063.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2013 at 15:37:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Jorgeroyan - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 15:37, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 15:37, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:21, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Love the composition. Kleuske (talk) 09:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another good choice, Tomer T !--Jebulon (talk) 12:39, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. Tomer T (talk) 18:21, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice composition. --Joydeep _Talk 12:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Citron (talk) 18:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 03:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support You wouldn't expect an FP out of this situation. Daniel Case (talk) 05:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Focal point too low but wonderful composition and scene. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 06:44, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wish the painting hand and head were more focused but for the composition and scene I'd like it to be an FP. --Ximonic (talk) 09:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice.  Richard  [®]  10:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 07:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Phare du Mont-Saint-Clair, Sète, Hérault 05.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2013 at 04:49:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Christian Ferrer - uploaded by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Not a fan of the (dark) wall on the right, but getting closer wouldn't be better. Very good quality. --Julian H. (talk/files) 06:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice ✿ --Laitche (talk) 07:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 19:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 07:34, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment too bluish. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 09:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 14:53, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ sorry, but I have to second Carschten. Certainly the image is a QI (I was the one who promoted it), but the color temperature (correctible) and the wall (not correctible!) prevent it from being special enough for an FP. --A.Savin 09:59, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done New version less bluish, much better IMO, thanks anyway -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:38, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would prefer if the left bit of a wall were cropped. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done I've tried a crop, better or not? -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Difficult to say if it's better with or w/o the crop. The dark wall is no longer disturbing, but on the other hand, I'm not really sold by the right-hand edge position of the tower. The WB has got better anyways. Neutral for now --A.Savin 11:40, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - There is an alternative crop where the lighthouse is at 1/3 right (you can download it in the file page) -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have changed to the alternative crop whitch is better IMO -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The first composition is better. No need to crop, I think :) --Laitche (talk) 13:05, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment You're right IMO, definitive version with a crop like the first version -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 08:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Gemini 11 Agena.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2013 at 11:58:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NASA - uploaded by Craigboy - nominated by Soerfm -- Soerfm (talk) 11:58, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Soerfm (talk) 11:58, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question I'm sorry, did the nominator really "create" this picture ?--Jebulon (talk) 12:37, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- He isn't even the original uploader and, frankly, did more harm than good compared to the version uploaded by Craigboy. The current image is very noisy and not much sharper. Kleuske (talk) 17:59, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Missing categories, editing is not ideal. It has the potential for FP I think, I might look into editing the Tiff in the next few days, but clear oppose for this version. --20:37, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
- Just looked into the tiff, everything but the earth surface is so much out of focus, I don't see any FP chances here. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 20:44, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:43, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charmosyna stellae Stella Lorikeet PNG by Nick Hobgood.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2013 at 17:59:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Nick Hobgood - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 17:59, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 17:59, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. Carpodacus (talk) 15:36, 2 August 2013 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, less than 50 edits --A.Savin 15:53, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 11:35, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Isabelle Faust B 09-2012.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2013 at 11:23:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by --A.Savin 11:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 11:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Nikhil(talk) 17:12, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Every time I view this it seems grainy to me. Flickrworker (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good quality, but the combination of a little sweat and direct flash (or direct flash alone, really) is worse than a little noise imo. On the other hand, sharpness really is perfect. I might change my mind again, but neutral for now. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 18:46, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Flickrworker: Not really sure what you mean, as the picture is imo decently denoised; @ Julian: I use 430 EX II and as far as I remember I swang up the flash. --A.Savin 19:10, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~The problem is a too much good quality : there is too much color, details. At full resolution, we can see her.... beard!!! I hope it's not her in reality. IMO, anyway a very good quality image~~ --Christian Ferrer 05:31, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~A very good quality image for dermatology (don't worry, it's french humour)~~ --Christian Ferrer 05:39, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - - Please Isabelle forget my comments --Christian Ferrer 12:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Je suis d'accord, l'humour français est très mince -- Chelovechek (talk) 13:10, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's for me impossible to not come back on my precedent bad taste comment. I support this picture for all the things I've said before : for the high quality of the details (intelligent expression in one's eyes, calluses on her musician's hands, ect...), this image give rise to comment, this is why it's featured. --Christian Ferrer 17:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Her facial expression looks like disgust. Carpodacus (talk) 15:39, 2 August 2013 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, less than 50 edits --A.Savin 15:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 11:36, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:London Eye Thames.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2013 at 04:13:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

all by me, -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:13, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:13, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The picture seems to be blured, especially the fence by the river. Besides I don't see the "wow" factor in this picture. --Florian Fuchs (talk) 06:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Foreground is under-exposed. The Eye is always an interesting subject, but I'm not won-over by this particular viewpoint. Colin (talk) 11:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Convinced! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 11:37, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Senecio radicans, jardín botánico de Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-13, DD 01.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2013 at 14:20:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 14:20, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 14:20, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
New version uploaded to improve the image quality. Thanks for the nomination Tomer! Poc o² 20:40, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. Tomer T (talk) 09:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support V-wolf (talk) 22:29, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 19:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support after some final adjustments, Poc o² 10:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 09:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acanthus mollis Prague 2013 2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2013 at 19:37:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Karelj -- Karelj (talk) 19:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- Karelj (talk) 19:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose IMHO it is neither QI, because the photo is unsharp. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question Could you show me, what is unsharp on image of this plant flower in the centre? Which part of flower is unsharp or what problem is here for you? Thanks. --Karelj (talk) 18:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot, because the whole plant is unsharp and/or blurred. IMHO there are two possibilities: 1. You forgot to activate vibrance reduction on your lens (does the lens have VR?) 1/160 @ 100mm could be critical without VR oder you mis-focused the plant. It looks as if the focus lies in front of the plant. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, if you are right, the problem must be in age of my eyes. --Karelj (talk) 21:44, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --Karelj (talk) 21:44, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Roodpootschildwants.jpg

File:Feldherrnhalle München.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2013 at 23:23:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 23:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 23:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 11:09, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tomer T (talk) 08:50, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's kind of an art to show us these places (my city) without humans. Great and somehow spooky.  Richard  [®]  10:39, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Festival of Lights 2012 - Französischer Dom.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2013 at 23:32:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 23:32, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 23:32, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful. --A.Savin 09:48, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Kitsch. Kleuske (talk) 10:59, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The aesthetics of the cartoon lubok -- Chelovechek (talk) 12:10, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality and nice illumination. It is the "Festival of Lights", this should to be Kitsch... --mathias K 19:12, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really so nice. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:17, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:21, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 11:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support maybe the light is Kitsch (some would say the building is Kitsch) but the photograph is good. --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Top technical quality IMO. Kitsch ? Probably. But also unique, and therefore featurable.--Jebulon (talk) 20:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful combination of colors. Carpodacus (talk) 15:37, 2 August 2013 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, less than 50 edits --A.Savin 15:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:56, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Lighthouse Malarrif at Snæfellsnes peninsula.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2013 at 08:03:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Lighthouse and Reef "Malarrif" at Snæfellsnes peninsula, Iceland. c|u|n by --  Richard  [®]  08:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --  Richard  [®]  08:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 08:35, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 09:45, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 09:46, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 10:13, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - again: WOW! -- Felix König ✉ 10:59, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support However there is a small anti-clockwise rotation that should be corrected. Use the sea horizon or the lighthouse windows as a guide. -- Colin (talk) 11:41, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed.  Richard  [®]  16:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 04:50, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 07:47, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 09:42, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Nikhil(talk) 11:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot! --mathias K 18:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 06:31, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:16, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition, excellent quality overall. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:47, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Z 22:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:55, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Panther Fahrradwerke Logo, SahiFa Braunschweig, AP3Q0192 edit.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2013 at 22:38:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info c/u/n by Christoph Braun (talk) 22:38, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough. Besides, why did you set the aperture to 7.1 although the motive does not have any depth? --Florian Fuchs (talk) 05:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The logo is attached to the motorcycle's fender - a round surface. You might want to have a look at the annotations of File:Wiki-Projekt Private Fahrzeugsammlung Braunschweig NIK 1826.JPG. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 06:09, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From what distance did you take the picture? What is the depth of the logo? --Florian Fuchs (talk) 07:44, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~0,3-0,5m distance, ~1-3cm depth due to the fender's curvature. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 09:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At a distance of 50 cm, a focal length of 100 mm, and an aperture of 7.1 the DOF is 0.86 cm. This can never be sharp if the depth of the log is somewhere between 1 und 3 cm in my opinion, unless you use focus stacking. --Florian Fuchs (talk) 09:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'm well aware of using a depth of field table. The intention for this shot was neither to get the entire logo in focus, nor to use focus stacking to compensate. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 19:54, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, what was your intention then? --Florian Fuchs (talk) 04:32, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are looking at it. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 14:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Puente de Triana anochecer.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2013 at 21:05:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Gzzz
- Abstain as author -- Gzzz (talk) 21:05, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 22:19, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dunsjöfjälleet July 2013 01.jpg

File:Paris - Playing chess at the Jardins du Luxembourg - 2966.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2013 at 17:03:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Jorgeroyan - nominated by Paris 16
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 17:03, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:17, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and light. --Ximonic (talk) 18:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Captures the moment nicely. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 03:54, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 04:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 07:42, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment FP to me if you correct the tilt (it needs a cw tilt) Poc o² 09:46, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Done! Thank Poco!--Paris 16 (talk) 13:28, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you, FP Poc o² 20:18, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support --Laitche (talk) 04:34, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If you don't mind, I edited your Weak Support to a support because only supports and opposes seem to count now. Weak ones etc seem have caused some problem to the system. --Ximonic (talk) 11:10, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, No problem :) --Laitche (talk) 12:59, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Very good composition, and nicely catched indeed, but I think the light is very bad. All what is important (to me) like the face, the clock etc are in shadow. What I mean is that in the same situation, I've had photographied the other player (if any).--Jebulon (talk) 12:50, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good IMO--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:25, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. Spontaneous moment captured well, enough to overlook lighting flaws. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:11, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:丽江黑龙潭公园.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2013 at 22:37:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black Dragon Pond, a landmark in the Old Town of Lijiang

Info created by Gisling - uploaded by Gisling - nominated by Gisling -- Gisling (talk) 22:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gisling (talk) 22:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose left hand side is to dark, the picture is blurred --Florian Fuchs (talk) 05:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp at full resolution. Sorry, --Cayambe (talk) 08:15, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Goethe (ship, 1913) 028.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2013 at 18:25:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rolf H. -- Rolf H. (talk) 18:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author --Rolf H. (talk) 18:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant Oppose Great composition, but not quite sharp and a bit noisy. Sorry.--Nikhil(talk) 15:59, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Art Institute of Chicago, Illinois, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-20, DD 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2013 at 09:35:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Art Institute of Chicago reflexing the Grant Park, Chicago downtown, Illinois, USA. All by me, Poc o² 09:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 09:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice reflection. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 08:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cute--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:20, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Sorry, but despite nice reflections the composition and the light is somewhat boring imo.--ArildV (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the composition doesn't work for me. The central area is empty and the photo becomes more interesting towards the edges, but then just ends there. I can't find anything to really focus on. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 12:44, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Julian the building has a massive reflection driving the viewer down the right and it ends as we get to something.Flickrworker (talk) 09:55, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Ok, I got it, thanks anyhow, Poc o² 21:41, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berlin Cathdral at night (MK).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2013 at 12:13:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Berlin Cathedral at night. c/u/n by me, -- mathias K 12:13, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- mathias K 12:13, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The crop is too tight on the sides, otherwise very nice image. ■ MMXX ^talk 15:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 11:04, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Loses the top of the building and there seems to be a lot of noise from the street light which have created a yellow/golden glow around the bottom. Flickrworker (talk) 09:57, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support −ebraminio^talk 22:53, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:54, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flatiron building 1918.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2013 at 07:34:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by W.W. Rock - uploaded by Kaldari - nominated by Kaldari -- Kaldari (talk) 07:34, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kaldari (talk) 07:34, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful. Tomer T (talk) 09:50, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:23, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 15:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This "higher resolution" image has some serious quality problems. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 21:55, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Building in the centre of the road so to speak seems out of focus.Flickrworker (talk) 09:49, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Artifactfest. Looks like it's been upsampled. ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 10:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Does anyone else see green and red on the clouds and building? --99of9 (talk) 23:51, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Passirac Epitaphe XIXe versifiée 2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2013 at 08:46:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Carved plaque on a tombstone, with versified epitaph of Jeanne Delafaye (1774-1817). Country churchyard, France. Created by JLPC - uploaded by JLPC - nominated by JLPC -- JLPC (talk) 08:46, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JLPC (talk) 08:46, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 08:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support You've got it !--Jebulon (talk) 12:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:23, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 18:20, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but a plaque on thumbstone (which is imho not a very artistic one) as FP does not work for me. BTW: For an FP candidature of such an object I had expected a better sharpness (e.g. like this stone plate) and I am not sure if the plaque is 100% in focus. If I am correctly informed three of the pro-voters are French - probably one can only understand the FP quality with knowledge of French history? --Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not really sure what you mean - whatever, one of the "pro-voters" is the author, and on Commons it's OK for the author to support their own work. --A.Savin 23:26, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I only tried to explain why I do not understand why this photo has FP qualities. My idea was that is has somethin to do with French history. --Tuxyso (talk) 04:50, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, it has nothing to do with french history. My support is only due to pure national canvassing, of course and as usual. Good answer ? If not, I think that this picture is really charming, I feel some emotion when reading the text, a special poem in a typical and classical french form (alexandrins). This makes me a little sad and "romantic". I do like the contrast between the stone texture and the metal, the capture of colors is perfect, and well, this testimony of love through the centuries speaks to me. For me, there is something "special" in this picture, far much more than in the tons of top quality butterflies or spectacular landscapes we have here (I appreciate them too). Maybe it is a part of the "french spirit" (if any)?--Jebulon (talk) 11:47, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not really a fan of poems (french or not) and I've voted only for the picture. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support the overall composition is convincing. --A.Savin 23:26, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 15:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Rhinomuraena quaesita Ribbon Eel Fiji by Nick Hobgood.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2013 at 13:28:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Nhobgood - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 13:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 13:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Even at maximum magnification this image remains crisp and clear with nice depth of field. Well done. KDS444 (talk) 08:06, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great picture. It's a pity that this kind of pictures aren't noted here.  Richard  [®]  10:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:13, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 22:20, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:15, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 01:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 18:56, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support great moment! Poc o² 07:45, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:54, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish

File:Afiladura - 5481.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2013 at 07:20:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Jorgeroyan - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 07:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Good idea (I like the composition), but CAs (see notes) and oversharpened. The detail is not good IMO --Miguel Lmbuga 16:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 07:07, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Théatre de la Mer, Sète, Hérault 05.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2013 at 11:03:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All (c/u/n) by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good quality anyway, but I miss sth. special in light / weather condition (compare: [1], [2]) --A.Savin 19:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Reworked version more dramatic especially the sky. You have had a good idea IMO it's a good track -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:29, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Noisy, nothing special impo. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:31, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination OK, thanks to both -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:12, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panorama Hafen Cuxhaven Alte Liebe 2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2013 at 16:20:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Re-nomination because previous nom had a lot of stitching-erros. The new version is hopefully free of this anoying (and time-consuming to fix) errors and I hope you will also support this new nomination
created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 16:20, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 16:20, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 16:41, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 18:02, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:24, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 19:03, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some minor stitching errors are still there, but nevertheless FP for me. --Ivar (talk) 19:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Thanks for the hint. I've corrected the two minor erros. IMHO such a harbour is the worst possible motive for a panoramic view because of the mass of ropes, and long horizontal elements :) The single photos were all hand-held, unfortunately I do not own a nodal-point adapter which had been the best hardware in the case here. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:59, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:20, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 15:24, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry. No "wow" factor to me. It is a panorama of a harbor. Nothing special. Even the light is not very pleasing. --Florian Fuchs (talk) 03:40, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I cannot change your "Wow perception" but imho the light is at this special daytime is quite good. If you take a look on this direct Suncalc link you can see that at the daytime of the photo all important parts of the harbour als well-lightened by the morning light. Take e.g. a look at the tower on the very right. Later at the day you have got the problem of contra-light situations. --Tuxyso (talk) 04:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - All important parts may be well-lightened. However, the cloudy sky makes the picture look boring to me. Besides I find the shadow on the left hand side disturbing. Overall, although it may have been difficult to stich the pictures together, the picture seems like an ordinary snapshot, escpecially if I compare it to the FPs you have taken so far. --Florian Fuchs (talk) 05:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - An interesting argument, but I think the term "snapshot" is misplaced here. If I take a photo I always think about the light and composition. You are right that this photo was a relatively spontaneous one. I took it before a boad trip to seal banks near the harbour of Cuxhaven. Spontaneous photos (not snapshots) are not bad per se - in contrary. A very special light situation, sky formation or motive is seldom planable. If I take a look on my FPs I would say that about 50% of them were spontaneous photos (with the meaning that I have not planned to photograph exactly that motive in that compositon). --Tuxyso (talk) 06:25, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For me, the composition is too busy: a lot of elements without a clear arrangement. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:01, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- My main purpose was to take a very detailed and documentary photo of the harbour with good light. I had also wished Queen Mary in the harbour, but she was not there :) --Tuxyso (talk) 06:25, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - In my opinion you achieved that goal. However, that doesn't necessarily make it a FP. --Florian Fuchs (talk) 06:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Let the Crowd decide :) Some users do obviously like this image and would like to see it as FP. Another user on QIC encouraged me to nominate this image. IMHO it is good enough for an FP, let's wait. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:00, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technically it is very good, very sharp, great detail. But I agree with King of Hearts that the composition just isn't working. The right-hand-side isn't helping, with the white tower block "looking out of the picture". Suggest you try cropping to include just the left 9000px and see how you feel about that composition. I think that improves it, but still perhaps not enough to go wow. I feel for you Tuxyso, because this was not an easy feat and I've had my share of mixed-opinion FPCs. -- Colin (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment enough wow for me (I've already pro-ed the image a few lines above) - especially considering the almost meticulous level of details in superb photographic quality! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:51, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 21:51, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 11:04, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Laitche (talk) 11:38, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I understand the oppose-votes but I will support for same reason as I did the first time.--ArildV (talk) 12:33, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as the King of hearts --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:35, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition doesn't work for me, no wow, sorry Poc o² 07:43, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition. Snowmanradio (talk) 08:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 14:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Pont du Tivoli, Sète, Hérault 16.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2013 at 04:53:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Tivoli Bridge, Sète, Hérault, France. Same composition but not the same picture of File:Pont du Tivoli, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg. All (c/u/n) by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great quality improvement. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 11:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Julian H. --JLPC (talk) 16:42, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 07:14, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Chelovechek (talk) 09:30, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support really not bad --A.Savin 18:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 01:25, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:09, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 07:46, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 14:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Tuscan Landscape 4.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2013 at 09:18:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

all by me, -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:18, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:18, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 17:03, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 11:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow factor.Flickrworker (talk) 09:58, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 22:16, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 14:48, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MJJR (talk) 15:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Tomer T (talk) 14:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodite adult-en.svg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2013 at 12:21:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by KDS444 - uploaded by KDS444 - nominated by KDS444 -- KDS444 (talk) 12:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KDS444 (talk) 12:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice --Citron (talk) 12:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support and Comment Outstanding work overall—especially with the germ cells. Bézier quality is poor though—there are far more points than necessary, and lots of strokes have been converted to outline paths (with excessive numbers of points). Visible curve deformities in the Rectum/Anus area. The circle on the pharangeal/intestinal valve has seams and is for some reason, an outline instead of a stroke. Visible seam between the two halves of the intestine too—first half is under the inset shadow, the second half is above it. Expect for the overpointing, those are minor problems though.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 19:31, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kelvinsong: I will re-examine the picture in light of your comments, but I should point out that the difference you are seeing in the halves of the intestine are intentional: the left/ anterior arm of the intestine is "above" (from the viewer's perspective) the anterior gonad arm, and then around the middle of the animal it switches to the other "lower" side. For more clarity on this, consider seeing the Wormatlas page on hermaphrodites. Thank you for your comment and your support! KDS444 (talk) 01:05, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant is that the shadows contradict the z-layering of the shapes themselves. The first half of the intestine is drawn as above the gonads, yet it's under the inset shadow of the worm's body. The second half is drawn under the gonads but it's above the inset shadow. You can see where the shadow abruptly cuts off where the blue meets the purple.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 01:19, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I have now gone over the image and I believe I understand what you were talking about and have now corrected it: the rear portion of the intestine is now as transparent as the forward part, and the gray shadow can be seen through both. I have also fixed the seams around the p/i valve and between the sections of intestine. The overabundance of curve points appears to be an outcome of Adobe Illustrator CS6 converting the image from an AI file to an SVG-- I tried removing a few of these from the SVG file but then the curves end up needing major corrections all over again (this is not the only thing Illustrator did that wasn't asked for) and I decided the image was going to be better off and much more aesthetic if I did not mess with these any more than I already have done. But let me know if I addressed your points on transparency and on the seams. XOXO KDS444 (talk) 04:29, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that looks fine. There is a small rectangle next to the left end of the scalebar; I'd remove it myself but Inkscape makes the filesize explode for some reason. There is still a seam between the intestines but that is an RSVG bug (the renderer that mediawiki uses). There's a solution (bend out the edge of the lower element) but it's not applicable in this case (topology and transparency). Also the scalebar looks kinda big, can you shrink the text a little?—Love, Kelvinsong talk 14:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. KDS444 (talk) 19:37, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Well done and very high EV. --Cayambe (talk) 11:02, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 18:54, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morray (talk) 19:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:51, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 08:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:46, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated

File:Gatschina-Schloss 2013.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2013 at 19:08:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info This Gatschina Schloss 2013. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 19:08, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The weather is bad. Too much of the building is covered by trees.Flickrworker (talk) 11:03, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The sky in bad weather creates a nice contrast. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 15:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - for me, not the weather is the biggest problem, but the composition with distracting trees. Also, not really sharp and significant perspective distortion. --A.Savin 19:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too many trees blocking the view. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 22:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Théo Mancheron competes in the men's decathlon pole vault, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2013 at 06:41:52 (UTC)

Info created by Jastrow - uploaded by Jastrow - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 06:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 06:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 07:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! Nice set !--Jebulon (talk) 11:01, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good shot. Nice value. Letartean (talk) 13:48, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 15:34, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Most would be FP worthy in their own right. Kleuske (talk) 21:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 01:23, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:20, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:53, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 17:09, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 17:19, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great set! Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 07:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Et hop ! Nice and useful set with a clear depiction of the leap. --Myrabella (talk) 10:40, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:44, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:India - Varanasi paper bag maker - 0078.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2013 at 09:25:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Jorgeroyan - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 09:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe some CAs but very interesting subject. --Ximonic (talk) 11:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 15:34, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{o}}~~ CAs, improvable. If someone fix it, I think that I will change my vote--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 16:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Overexposed areas but very good composition and interesting picture--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 16:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice, minor quality issues are for me in the case here no reason for decline. The paper bag maker is framed very well. Expression is also great. I wish to have more people / street photography shots like that on Commons. As far as I know only The Photographer is another photographer (with some FPs) who has similiar people/street motives. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:44, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 22:45, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good job! Poc o² 07:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 07:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great!  Richard [®] 08:22, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:32, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
weak support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:09, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey Miguel. You already opposed, so if you chose to support, I'll be thankful if you can remove your oppose vote. Tomer T (talk) 21:28, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks, new review--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:38, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 10:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Fireworks over Ponte Vecchio 2.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2013 at 09:29:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

all by Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:29, 30 July 2013 (UTC). A few weeks ago, I already successfully nominated another image of fireworks over Ponte Vecchio. Still, imo the current photo deserves a FP nomination in its own right too. The type of explosion and its color are significantly different, creating a distinct atmosphere.[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:29, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 10:58, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not that different but noticeably worse in quality, so I don't see why it should also be FP (waiting with my vote until I've heard some comments, not sure what the policy is on very similar shots). --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 14:22, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Why is it worse in quality in your eyes? The WB is different and it's somewhat darker in appearance, but this doesn't make it necessarily worse as a whole. As far as the policy concerning similar motifs is concerned, I'm still wondering myself... Best, Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Because the smaller aperture creates stronger star artifacts around light sources and also led to more brightening in post (I assume), which boosted the noise level and killed a few details. It's not horrible but, as I said, noticeable. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 15:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 15:45, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:16, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:09, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 07:31, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Palau de Congressos de Barcelona 2013.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2013 at 10:54:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. -- Felix König ✉ 10:54, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 10:54, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I thought that to be FP it must be more info: Architect? I'm not sure of this--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 15:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition.  Richard  [®]  10:28, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Richard. Simple, but good! --mathias K 18:58, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:09, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MJJR (talk) 15:54, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ --Fbnpch (talk) 09:01, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits needed. -- Joydeep _Talk 17:56, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:59, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Porto Covo July 2013-12a.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2013 at 21:42:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Sunset at Porto Covo, west coast of Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - beautiful. -- Felix König ✉ 11:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tilted --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:22, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have a good internet connection right now and can't fix the problem. Maybe someone wouldn't mind to help?... Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:44, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tilt is now fixed.  Richard  [®]  07:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 20:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ -- Not a great composition.58.106.243.29 00:38, 1 August 2013 (UTC) please log in to vote. --mathias K 19:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC) [reply]
Support very nice colors and a simple but Good composition. --mathias K 19:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Always tilted and the horizon line is rounded --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:35, 02 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Fbnpch (talk) 08:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits needed. -- Joydeep _Talk 17:56, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:03, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Porto Covo July 2013-15.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2013 at 21:44:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Longing for the sea. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:44, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:44, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! I lost in thoughts... -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 11:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No "wow", sorry. --Kikos (talk) 12:14, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 19:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ as Kikos, sorry. --Florian Fuchs (talk) 04:56, 31 July 2013 (UTC) only one vote per a person. Flickrworker (talk) 17:17, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Frankly a person sitting on the seat is odd for what is a landscape image.Flickrworker (talk) 09:44, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the minimalistic composition! --mathias K 19:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support me too.--Jebulon (talk) 20:45, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Kikos and Flickrworker --Florian Fuchs (talk) 05:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:11, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose What is the educational value? Snowmanradio (talk) 08:53, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:03, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Puma concolor stanleyana - Texas Park - Lanzarote -PC06.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2013 at 02:03:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Lmbuga - uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Lmbuga -- Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 02:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 02:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:09, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Seems a bit ordinary. The trunk behind him obstructs the feel and composition of the shot.--LeavXC (talk) 16:19, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree to the disturbing background elements, and the image is too greenish. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:17, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Is a fallen tree a disturbing background element when the picture is about nature? Problem with the color...? Sorry withdrawn, but no problem, it's your opinion. I could upload a new version less greenish, but... why?--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 16:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:02, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snart høsttid.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2013 at 15:45:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 15:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 15:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. -- -donald- (talk) 18:43, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 05:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Llorenzi (talk) 06:36, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is nice but the composition could be simpler/cleaner. The head on the left distracts my eye and the central head has some out-of-focus stalks in front of it, obscuring it a bit. As a picture that is relatively easy to create/reproduce, I think it needs to be stronger. Colin (talk) 11:49, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment oh - a picture must be hard to create to become a featured picture, that is what Colin think! ... I do not agree. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 12:54, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - No, I certainly don't think an FP picture should be hard to create. That's not what I said. Colin (talk)
Oppose Sorry, I have to agree with Colin. It is a nice idea but not featured for me. --mathias K 19:19, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 22:18, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin, and I'd prefer a non-centered main object here. Nice idea though. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Fbnpch (talk) 09:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits needed. -- Joydeep _Talk 17:56, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:04, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lime butterfly, dorsal and side views, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2013 at 06:09:56 (UTC)

Side view
Dorsal view

Info created by Jkadavoor - uploaded by Jkadavoor - dorsal picture cropped by Pine - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 06:09, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 06:09, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 19:56, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:25, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 15:38, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, nice quality but for my taste the background is too messy. --mathias K 19:02, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 18:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:59, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Fbnpch (talk) 08:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits needed. -- Joydeep _Talk 17:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:02, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Andrey Suchilin Birthday 25.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2013 at 19:19:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Dmitry Rozhkov -- Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 19:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 19:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --sasha (krassotkin) 19:23, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Im sorry but to dark imo, even the face are very dark and hidden behind the cap.--ArildV (talk) 19:26, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, but it's a feature, not a bug =). Alternative versions: Category:Vladimir Ratzkevitch --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 19:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comment. I had a second (and third) look, but Im still not really convinced. The combination of a very dark and hidden face, and the color does not convince me that it's a really strong concert picture. Sorry. Regards --ArildV (talk) 19:46, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Dmitry Rozhkov--Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 19:59, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ----Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 20:00, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --sasha (krassotkin) 19:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For featurable, at least we need a image without sunglases. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He never plays without black glases. --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 21:28, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 08:40, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:View to Romsdalen from Litlefjellet, 2013 June.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2013 at 19:11:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Views from Litlefjellet ridge to Romsdalen and its surrounding Romsdalsalpene mountains, Møre og Romsdal, Norway in 2013 June. Also the highest vertical rock face in Europe (one of the highest in the world), the Trollveggen, is featured in this landscape on the other side of the valley. Created, uploaded and nominated by Ximonic -- Ximonic (talk) 19:11, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ximonic (talk) 19:11, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both are very good, but I prefer this one. --Vamps (talk) 20:36, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Me too. --Florian Fuchs (talk) 03:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:00, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Second version preferred. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:09, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great.ArildV (talk) 07:30, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 10:26, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 16:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality and composition. Did you use a polarizing filter? The sky in the center of the pano is visibly darker than the edges. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did. Need for a correction? --Ximonic (talk) 18:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not for me - IMHO it is good as it is. But it is a bit curious that up to now no one has realized it. Former nomination of mine were regualary critized in cases of irregular brightness distributions on the sky. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:19, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I felt the urge to try a little. I found kind of a handy tool for reducing the dark. Maybe it's less intense. Usually less cloudy situations are a bit more difficult with a filter because the effect can be easier to notice. --Ximonic (talk) 18:30, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the angle to the sun and thus the intensity of the polarizing filter changes when you rotate your camera for the panoramic view. To archieve a homogenous brightness distribution you must rotate your polarizing filter after every rotational step. To do that precisely is nearly imposible. I have decided for me to photograph panos without polarizing filter to avoid additional post-processing. I've seen your correction. Better than before. Which tool did you use? Viveza 2? --Tuxyso (talk) 18:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC) --Tuxyso (talk) 18:43, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I opened it in Photoshop and chose a soft brush in divide mode. Then I searched for an appropriate tone of gray for the brush and - as little as enough - used it for the target areas. The brush didn't harm the details, only whitened the dark a bit. Maybe this is a good hint for someone but it has to be used carefully. --Ximonic (talk) 07:49, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Colin (talk) 11:51, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 18:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 09:42, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice.  Richard  [®]  10:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. --mathias K 19:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info I'm aware that these are two different pictures from different positions. Yet I concidered there are so much same features in both of the pictures that it is an either/or or neither situation. What do you think? --Ximonic (talk) 19:11, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ximonic (talk) 19:11, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 16:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 08:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 19:56, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've had a really tough time deciding between the two. Ultimately, I chose this one because of the use of a bold, sweeping line curving into and directing the viewer's attention to the peak of the mountain. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:09, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really so difficult to come to a decision. I like King of Hearts argument. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 09:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 08:38, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

The chosen alternative is: File:View to Romsdalen from Litlefjellet, 2013 June.jpg

File:Spb 06-2012 Palace Embankment various 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2013 at 10:52:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by A.Savin 10:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 10:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work with the ~~precedent~~ reworked version --Christian Ferrer 11:42, 31 July 2013 (UTC) language correction --Christian Ferrer 04:44, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 15:32, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment—Is it just me or is there a slight counterclockwise tilt?—Love, Kelvinsong talk 00:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I did my best I think --A.Savin 04:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 15:46, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:13, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Z 22:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /—Love, Kelvinsong talk 17:39, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Trifolium arvense - kassiristik Keilas.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2013 at 11:08:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info haresfoot clover at golden hour, all by Ivar (talk) 11:08, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 11:08, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 17:29, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 17:42, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Citron (talk) 21:29, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 05:48, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely  Richard  [®]  08:19, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support POTY finalist, at least --A.Savin 09:35, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 10:04, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Fbnpch (talk) 08:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits needed. -- Joydeep _Talk 17:54, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Claus (talk) 07:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --sfu (talk) 15:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 06:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:02, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

File:High Coast from Skuleberget - Panorama.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2013 at 19:48:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by P.Lindgren - uploaded by P.Lindgren - nominated by P.Lindgren -- P.Lindgren (talk) 19:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- P.Lindgren (talk) 19:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination--P.Lindgren (talk) 18:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Montbazin, Hérault 11.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2013 at 05:15:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All (c/u/n) by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- New version uploaded (contrast, colors...) -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:07, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow factor. Flickrworker (talk) 14:48, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Uninteresting composition. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 15:50, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:32, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:White-Lined Sphinx Moth.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2013 at 15:21:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by tylerscribble -- (talk) 15:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tylerscribble (talk) 15:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp, lack of detail. -- Joydeep _Talk 18:04, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad quality. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 01:25, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination

File:Lución (Anguis fragilis), Jurata, Península de Hel, Polonia, 2013-05-24, DD 04.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2013 at 08:47:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Slow worm (Anguis fragilis), Jurata, Hel Peninsula, Poland. All by me, Poc o² 08:47, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 08:47, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Considering that I can take a picture of a slow worm in my garden (considering they only like it when it's hotish and therefore more than likely sunny) I don't see what's special about this. Flickrworker (talk) 21:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, maybe you are right, but to me it was a highlight. I have no garden and last time I saw one if this was 25 years ago. Poc o² 17:10, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poc o² 17:10, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:BMW Welt, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-04-22, DD 08.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2013 at 21:40:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Night view of the BMW Welt with the BMW Tower in the background, Munich, Germany. All by me, Poc o² 21:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 21:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Mono 21:50, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer 04:43, 02 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question You have a lot of former (successful and good) nominations of the BMW Welt in Munich. I wonder if it is a good idea to give all those BMW photos a prominent place by an FP seal? It is something like free advertising for BMW. I would like to hear other opinions on this question. For sure most of your BMW noms are nice, but the educational value (vs. advertising value) is imho very limited. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:16, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Answer Categorizing my pictures as advertising is IMO a blow below the belt. I have also successfully nominated a couple pictures of Mercedes like this one. I just happen to live close to the BMW buildings and they are just fascinating to me. I see them rather as architecture masterworks, visited by millions of people every year, than just advertising. But, don't worry, I will refrain from nominating anything related to them Poc o² 19:37, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Poco, probably my words were misunderstanding. I have not categorized your pictures as advertising. Most of them are good or very good architecture shots. My problem is the motive. As far as I know the "BMW Welt" was solely built for representation and advertising purposes. FP means giving those pictures a prominent place on Commons which might be in the case here not a good idea. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:36, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't really care much about the official purpose of the building, it is one of the nicest modern architecture buildings I have seen. But don't worry, I will bring new subjects in the coming week from a bunch of countries in Asia. Poc o² 08:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For this one. The building is not particularly well lit (no fault of the photographer) and as Tyxyso says you've had others and imo better images of this already featured.Flickrworker (talk) 10:56, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and we have a current FP with the same point of view which is better IMHO. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:01, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poc o² 08:42, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Terminal 4 del aeropuerto de Madrid-Barajas, España, 2013-01-09, DD 13.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2013 at 21:37:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info View of the roof of the terminal 4 of the airport Madrid-Barajas, Spain. All by me, Poc o² 21:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 21:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Mono 21:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, completely excluding the ground would be fine in my opinion, but just cutting it off like that makes me want to see it. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 06:39, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, and what crop do you propose so taht you don't want to see the ground (full of people)? Poc o² 07:31, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't know what would be wrong with showing people. Airports are filled with people. This ist just a far better picture to me (not in quality of course, but in what it shows). --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 08:51, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose With Julian: Crop does not work for me. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose crop. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info Ok, new try without a sharp crop, what do you think? would it have a chance? Poc o² 19:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 21:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose This crop is MUCH better than the previous one but the overall quality is not convincing. For sure: The shot was hand-held but with such a motive I would expect more details in the background areas. Question Is it possible that you have nominated a very similiar shot about half a year ago? Or was it on QI? From a compositional viewpoint there is a lot of accentuated (but nearly empty) foreground due to wide-angle and deep shooting position. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:52, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated a couple of them in QI, check the category, but none here. This is the first nomination. Poc o² 08:42, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah OK. I somehow recognized the motive :) As far as I can remember I have reviewed one of the airport photos on QI. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:28, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but not featurable enough for me. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I take it back, I am not convinced, either Poc o² 21:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Birka June 2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2013 at 09:05:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info MS Birka (formerly MS Birka Paradise) arriving at Stockholm, June 2013. c/u/n -- Arild Vågen (talk) 09:05, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 09:05, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 09:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer 11:18, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 23:15, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can you fix the moire on the railings. --Laitche (talk) 08:32, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done i removed moire, and uploaded a new version. --ArildV (talk) 17:35, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks Arild :) --Laitche (talk) 17:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support --Laitche (talk) 17:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:19, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support but per Laitche. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 09:50, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for votes and comments. I will try to reduce moire in LR tonight (i dont have Photoshop). Happy for help if anyone are more used to removing moire, I have never done it before.--ArildV (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:05, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 07:25, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --sfu (talk) 16:07, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 06:53, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 11:33, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:CathedralOfOurLadyOfTheAngels.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2013 at 00:32:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior view of Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels

Info Interior view of w:Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels; all by DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The blown window ruins it for me, sorry --A.Savin 09:40, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—Too much empty in the lower half.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:31, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 11:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chemin-de-halage-le-long-du-Lot-pres-de--St-Cirq-Lapopie-DSC 0728-.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2013 at 22:37:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Ancient towpath along the river Lot near St-Cirq-Lapopie, Lot, France. All (c/u/n) by Pline -- Pline (talk) 22:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pline (talk) 22:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support strong and beautiful composition, I also like the fog in the background. I think the quality is ok.--ArildV (talk) 23:03, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice mood :) --Laitche (talk) 04:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Nice composition. —Bruce1ee^talk 04:54, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:11, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 12:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:13, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow.--Jebulon (talk) 20:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 22:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 06:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paris 16 (talk) 08:09, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Landscape shot. So why oh why do we have people in this? For that I have to oppose.Flickrworker (talk) 10:59, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps to demonstrate that it is used as a path and also for scale. --Ximonic (talk) 11:52, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support sharpness could be better, but everything else is convincing. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:14, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 16:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:08, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 07:42, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot! Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 10:08, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 07:29, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per kaʁstn. --Avenue (talk) 20:04, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 11:30, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:La Martre lighthouse - La Matre,QC,CA - 16-06-2013.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2013 at 13:46:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by me - uploaded by me - nominated by me -- Letartean (talk) 13:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Letartean (talk) 13:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful. Needs counter-clockwise rotation (cf. horizon) and afterwards some perspective distortion correction. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 15:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not that good with perspective correction. Would be glad to see a corrected version to replace this nom by someone else. Thank you in advance! Letartean (talk) 15:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I uploaded a new version (perspective corrected only). I find it hard to see the horizon here, I saw no tilt in the picture otherwise.--ArildV (talk) 19:29, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ok. Admittedly, the horizon is not very prominent. Support. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 10:07, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:00, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:20, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 08:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 17:18, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support −ebraminio^talk 22:21, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very nice composition and atmosphere but the the sharpness is not the best and, above all, the lighthouse is not straight, still needs a cw tilt and probably perspective correction Poc o² 07:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:18, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support—while sharpness is fine given the giant size, Poco has a good point about perspective distortion.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:34, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 11:31, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Paris - Accordion Player - 0956.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2013 at 15:30:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jorgeroyan - uploaded by Jorgeroyan - nominated by Lmbuga -- Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 15:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 15:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  10:29, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Citron (talk) 12:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paris 16 (talk) 08:09, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good job! Poc o² 07:45, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:33, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 07:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 11:28, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Reichstag Fernsehturm.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2013 at 22:41:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 22:41, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 22:41, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 11:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torkilstöten Panorama Jule 2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2013 at 07:52:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Mount Helags (left), Sylarna after sunset seen from Torkilstöten, Ljungdalen. c/u/n by -- Arild Vågrn (talk) 07:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 07:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 11:46, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Lots of Dustspots.  Richard  [®]  13:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Thank you. New version uploaded, dust spots removed.--ArildV (talk) 15:03, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 22:22, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 05:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 14:45, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I notticed an unknown flying object shaped like a triangle just above the righest peak in the image. Any idea of what that is? --G Furtado (talk) 17:44, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It is a a construction at the top of Helags (see also some construction photos).--ArildV (talk) 18:51, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:22, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 07:49, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Fbnpch (talk) 08:56, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits needed. -- Joydeep _Talk 17:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 11:16, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Alte Nationalgalerie at night (MK).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2013 at 18:52:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Another "Berlin at night" shot from me. This one shows the Alte Nationalgalerie at night. c/u/n by me, mathias K 18:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- mathias K 18:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot, although the tree does distract but you can't do anything about that.Flickrworker (talk) 11:02, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 12:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support −ebraminio^talk 22:23, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great job. Sometimes scenes with artificial lighting are hard to get right. --99of9 (talk) 00:04, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The sky is too noisy IMHO, did you apply a sharpness mask? Poco² 07:47, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed, the sky is a bit noisy. But not too much imo. I didn't use any masks or layers but I'm pretty happy with the result for a single shot without any exposure blending or other hdr stuff. But anyhow, thanks for the review. ;-) --mathias K 15:08, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco --Claus (talk) 07:29, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — ℳ₪Zaplotnik 18:54, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  12:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /—Love, Kelvinsong talk 21:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:C4 photosynthesis is less complicated.svg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2013 at 19:54:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Most plants with C₄ photosynthesis have a special type of leaf structure called Kranz anatomy, illustrated here.
Semi-renomination (It's a simplified version of File:C4 photosynthesis is really complicated.svg) All by Kelvinsong—Love, Kelvinsong talk 19:54, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 19:54, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like ur works! So cute and valuable. --Mehdi^Talk 10:10, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 17:48, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Clear and concise --Morray (talk) 19:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 10:09, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — ℳ₪Zaplotnik 18:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:01, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated

File:Northern California Coast as seen from Muir Beach Overlook.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2013 at 21:52:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Frank Schulenburg; nominated by —Mono 21:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Mono 21:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 14:44, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light, very pretty, illustrative of the coastline. --99of9 (talk) 00:01, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:09, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Fbnpch (talk) 08:56, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits needed. -- Joydeep _Talk 17:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 21:29, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Point Cabrillo Lighthouse (panoramic view).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2013 at 21:49:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Frank Schulenburg - uploaded by Frank Schulenburg - nominated by —Mono 21:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Mono 21:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tilted (sea level) --Christian Ferrer 04:39, 02 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Shadow in the foreground is too harsh for me. Question Have you tried to crop it out? But cropping out would possibly destroy the composition. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose tilted horizon, could be sharper, disturbing shadow --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:02, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 11:45, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Carschten. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schwalbenschwanz (Papilio machaon).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2013 at 08:32:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Fbnpch - uploaded by Fbnpch - nominated by Fbnpch -- Fbnpch (talk) 08:32, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fbnpch (talk) 08:32, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Citron (talk) 20:46, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Good view of an excellent specimen. The photo itself is very appealing and could have multifaceted utility for other wiki projects. SteveStrummer (talk) 00:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 01:32, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 07:32, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:38, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support and now in use in fr:WP. --Myrabella (talk) 10:30, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:54, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Where was the photo taken? And is the flower Tagetes patula? Tomer T (talk) 17:55, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info Italy, Südtirol, Bozen; in a garden --Fbnpch (talk) 19:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP Poc o² 03:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 07:23, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support narrow DOF. --Laitche (talk) 03:20, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:40, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 06:53, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 19:59, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:28, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:02, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Teichfrosch Pelophylax esculentus Gruga 003.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2013 at 20:46:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:46, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:46, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:17, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 08:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:19, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:14, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 16:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment what is the plant? Tomer T (talk) 16:26, 6 August 2013 (UTC
- I have no idea. Probably someome can help?! I have asked on the German biological portal. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - These are Lemnoideae. Probably I will get a reply with the exact species name, but currently this information should be sufficient. I added it to the image description. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:29, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thanks. Support Tomer T (talk) 20:27, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - Done I've now got the exact species: There are two different surronding Lemnoideae: Lemna minor and Spirodela polyrhiza (thx to the de-WP user Fice for the precise determination). The names of the surronding plants add additional EV to the photo - good hint of you. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:17, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 17:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 01:27, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:03, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I enjoy the moment you chose, just emerging out of the water Poc o² 03:27, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 07:25, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 06:53, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely  Richard  [®]  12:47, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Amphibians

File:Деревня Борешино под Смоленском.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2013 at 00:01:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by -- Chelovechek (talk) 00:01, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Chelovechek (talk) 00:01, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Far too nondescript for FP. No "wow"-factor in sight. Kleuske (talk) 07:05, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Brightness of lubok does not match the reality of life -- Chelovechek (talk) 07:51, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Brightness of what? Besides, "Featured picture" is not about the "reality of life" but about good images. Kleuske (talk) 09:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, I also love to grumble about the quality of the image in the mirror -- Chelovechek (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Uninteresting composition and content (per Kleuske), very bad compression artifacts, strong loss of detail through compression or noise reduction, clipped whites. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 09:45, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is closer to the truth and more useful empty subjectivity. But this image excites cooperative negative opinion, and it makes me happy. -- Chelovechek (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition and quality are not sufficient. The wires at the top left corner is also disturbing. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Uninteresting composition, bad quality, and disturbing wires. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 01:30, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 12:21, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:«Тиха бухта», Крим.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 08:14:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by Деревягін Ігор (PIRZKHGL) - nominated by Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info The Black Sea coast of Crimea. Vicinity of Koktebel. View from the Cape Chameleon. On the right - Tikhaya (Quiet) bay, on the left - Myortvaya (Dead) bay.
Support -- Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wow, absolutely wow, what a fantastic landscape. But the sky replacement is very bad. --— Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—Hard seam at the edge of the sky, and the cloud positions are highly unrealistic.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 16:01, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:32, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plant.svg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2013 at 18:36:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A diagram of a highly idealized eudicot.

Info A diagram of a highly idealized eudicot. All by Kelvinsong—Love, Kelvinsong talk 18:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 18:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please can you make the leaf colour a bit less garish? (and maybe the flower too) --99of9 (talk) 04:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you checked your monitor? A lot of older ones have problems with overblown greens for some reason. It looks fine on my iPhone (and I trust Apple to get the screen colors right).—Love, Kelvinsong talk 14:19, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, sorry. It wasn't even an old monitor... but its colours were obviously off. --99of9 (talk) 14:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, I was uploading a new version which was desaturated and darkened. Can you check both thumbnails on the file page? I like the original colors better, but if only the new ones work, then I'll leave it at that.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 14:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Both now work for me. I prefer the newer darker version, but it's your call. --99of9 (talk) 14:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I uploaded a third version which has just one Desaturate operation done (the other had two plus a Darken operation).—Love, Kelvinsong talk 14:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support don't really see why it's necessary to convert the text to paths here, though. --El Grafo (talk) 10:23, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 12:20, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:01 Gorges du Tarn Roc des Hourtous.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2013 at 07:12:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Myrabella - uploaded by Myrabella - nominated by Myrabella
Changing wheather in the end of the afternoon above the Gorges du Tarn lights up the narrower part of the canyon, called les Détroits, i.e. the Straits (Lozère, France). -- Myrabella (talk) 07:12, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Myrabella (talk) 07:12, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:43, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 15:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Supportllorenzi (talk) 15:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:41, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Fbnpch (talk) 12:48, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits needed. --Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Love the changing weather. Flickrworker (talk) 14:51, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice --Rjcastillo (talk) 15:39, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—But the trees look really funny at 100%, almost as if they were made out of playdoh—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:25, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /—Love, Kelvinsong talk 13:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Aerial view - Fernsehturm St. Chrischona5.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2013 at 06:26:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Wladyslaw. Very usefull general view with the remarkable tripod construction at the basement. Nice autumn light. -- Wladyslaw (talk) 06:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 06:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Picture is not sharp especially the mast. It also has low contrast and eroded colors. I couldn´t see nice autumn light. The backround is dusty. Qflieger (talk) 09:01, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see no lack of sharpness. We have here a high resolution picture. I can downsize the image than it will seem even sharper. I see also no problem with the contrast. The far background is dusty, this has nothing to do with bad contrast. The dust is acceptable IMO for a airview picture but I can try to improve this. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Color space is said "uncalibrated" in the EXIF data. Maybe a reason why not everyone would see the autumn light you mentioned? --Myrabella (talk) 13:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Good composition, but there is a lack of contrast an sharpness (in 100%) und some noise in the "darker" parts. Somehow this image looks overlightend?? // Martin Kraft (talk) 21:54, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cymbacephalus beauforti Crocodilefish PNG by Nick Hobgood.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2013 at 12:28:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Nick Hobgood - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 12:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 12:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Fbnpch (talk) 12:46, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits needed. --Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --P.Lindgren (talk) 13:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Qflieger (talk) 16:43, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ~y (talk) 17:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  19:37, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:14, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 06:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 08:15, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 11:08, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish

File:Dornach - Goetheanum - Grosser Saal2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2013 at 06:20:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 06:20, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 06:20, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why did you crop away the auditorium? --Martin Kraft (talk) 22:05, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green Sea Turtle grazing seagrass.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2013 at 21:34:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by P.Lindgren - uploaded by P.Lindgren - nominated by P.Lindgren -- P.Lindgren (talk) 21:34, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- P.Lindgren (talk) 21:34, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot, but I think that it can be improved, though. Did you try a sharpness mask? Poco² 03:10, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I've now applied a bit more sharpening. --P.Lindgren (talk) 18:46, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Actually, I was thinking rather of a mask (selective sharpening avoiding the water) than of a filter Poc o² 07:27, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Fbnpch (talk) 06:19, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits needed. --Joydeep _Talk 17:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support WOW  Richard  [®]  07:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 10:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ~y (talk) 17:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 17:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Superb color and clarity. SteveStrummer (talk) 03:44, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 06:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:10, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 21:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:35, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

File:Liberty Bridge in Budapest.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2013 at 08:28:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Endrjuch - uploaded by Endrjuch - nominated by Endrjuch -- Endrjuch (talk) 08:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Endrjuch (talk) 08:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Fbnpch (talk) 09:34, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits needed. --Joydeep _Talk 17:48, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose—Barely minimum size and all I see is points of light—no shadow detail.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:23, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:32, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Long-billed Curlew eating sand crab.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2013 at 10:43:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Mike Baird - uploaded by Howcheng - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 10:43, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:43, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kasir (talk) 11:25, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Fbnpch (talk) 11:34, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits needed. --Joydeep _Talk 17:48, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ~y (talk) 17:42, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:48, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  19:38, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:15, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:39, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 06:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:04, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 08:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --mathias K 13:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 19:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 14:01, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:52, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:32, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Pierre-Denis Martin - View of the Château de Fontainebleau - Google Art Project.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2013 at 04:43:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Pierre-Denis Martin - uploaded by Dcoetzee
Support -- Claus (talk) 04:43, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The quality is outstanding good. But imho there is a stitching problem at the bottom right side (see note). --Tuxyso (talk) 07:57, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:34, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scadoxus multiflorus Blutblume 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2013 at 08:47:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

I've photographed this flower at the Botanical Garden of Grugapark. The scientific name is Scadoxus multiflorus. I've photographed it in the late noon, the flower was only lightened by the sun.

Info created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 07:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 21:29, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:04, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:36, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quai Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Sète 02.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2013 at 05:22:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All (c/u/n) by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice.--ArildV (talk) 06:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:45, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice mood and perspective but chromatic aberration in the reflections of boats and distortions. --Laitche (talk) 08:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The distortion is because of wild angle 14mm and I don't see any CA, can you add note please -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:05, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I added image notes of CA. --Laitche (talk) 11:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - I don't see any CAs there. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 12:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - Well then what is that pink, yellow and green color? A rainbow? --Laitche (talk) 13:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        Looks like color banding to me. CAs can not be more than a few pixels wide, and are necessarily always the same width across a whole part of the photo. It's not possible to have CAs in a small isolated spot, at least not if the lenses aren't horrible messed up. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 14:17, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        As you are saying those are not CAs maybe. It's maybe a flaw by sensor or low pass filter, in any case a flaw is a flaw. --Laitche (talk) 14:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ Quality is excellent, I'm slightly torn with my vote because the scene could probably have been captured in a similar way from 1-2 meters further away with slightly less distortion and a little more space around the boat on the right. ~~Also, the dark areas have been brightened quite heavily, I don't think brightening was necessary to that extent.~~ It's definitely a beautiful image though. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 12:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done (in part) I have see what you mean Laitche and Julian_Herzog is right, this is because of too much brightened, I've tried to correct it. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support Then, thanks. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 17:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay I withdraw opposing vote. --Laitche (talk) 18:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and quality are really good. I do not agree with Julian: IMHO the extreme wide-angle view makes the photo somehow special. A photo from 1-2 meters back had not been that good. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:46, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:54, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 15:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 15:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the color balance is incorrect. The picture is too dark and the color of the sky is unnatural. Is seems for me like the first version was better. --sfu (talk) 15:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
no response. Oppose --sfu (talk) 13:34, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes you're right, for me too the first is better, but I will no change another, read the others comment, thanks anyway --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - And a lot of users have voted for the current version, what do you want? I can't change this version, they have voted for --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:08, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - I red comments before voting. Actually you have already done what you are talking about. Four people have voted before the change. You don't know weather they were following the discussion. Counting the votes it's better to keep the current version. Anyway I think the color flaw is more important than some details one, because not really too many people are going to watch this beautiful picture in full resolution, but everbody's going to watch is small version. And anyway the picture is going to be FP, I just want to express my oppose for promoting incorrectly color balanced images. Otherwise it's FP for me --sfu (talk) 20:51, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I will reworked it, and maybe I will renominate it, but now I revert on the first version --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schloss Prunn Sued.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2013 at 15:37:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Qflieger - uploaded by Qflieger - nominated by Qflieger -- Qflieger (talk) 15:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Qflieger (talk) 15:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 15:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 06:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice view but way too soft --A.Savin 21:29, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

please can you explain "way too soft"? -- Qflieger (talk) 10:38, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I mean unsharp. You may examine the picture at 100 % view and compare to similar FP's (e.g. this one) --A.Savin 20:24, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry A.Savin the example picture you honorably mentioned, isn´t sharp in all regions. Just take a look at the right end of the train.

I withdraw my nomination -- Qflieger (talk) 12:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altes Rathaus Bonn.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2013 at 22:35:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 22:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 22:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice! Poc o² 07:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As already written on German EB: The smooth look of the fassade and on the stones in front of the building is not convincing. There are still stitching errors (see notes). As far as I remember you promised on EB to correct them :) --Tuxyso (talk) 15:11, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Base soviética de submarinos, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 20.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2013 at 21:06:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Remainings of a former Soviet submarine base, Lahemaa National Park, Estonia. All by me, Poc o² 21:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 21:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! -- Wolf im Wald (de) 22:43, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 05:47, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dust spots (at least 4) on the sky. Imho this and this have much better composition. --Ivar (talk) 06:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dust spots removed, thanks! regarding my other pictures, it is true that they belong to the same series and are also nice, but IMHO differnt subject and idea than this one. And, to be honest, taking this one was not easy, I had to climb a wall Poc o² 07:11, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 07:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Excuse me, but I honestly cannot follow what's nice and featurable on this structure. Neither is the scenery "wow" for me, nor the light/weather conditions in whatever way special. --A.Savin 09:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In my case, it's an artistic impression of existence :) No longer this subject is a structure, I'm seeing this as an objet. --Laitche (talk) 11:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)--Laitche (talk) 12:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Good quality, but uninteresting. Sorry. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 01:35, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 21:27, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting composition. --Kadellar (talk) 15:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Casa de Barro.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2013 at 15:47:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by Rjcastillo -- Rjcastillo (talk) 15:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rjcastillo (talk) 15:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp for me, no "wow". --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've added an English description. -- Joydeep _Talk 07:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:CathedralOfTheBlessedSacrament.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2013 at 01:28:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Interior view of w:Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament (Sacramento, California); all by DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:28, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. Nice picture despite blown-out windows. Unsharpness at 100% can be forgiven due to high resolution. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kasir (talk) 11:22, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 06:53, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 21:30, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escenius midas (Midas blenny).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2013 at 07:08:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Jason Marks - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 07:08, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:08, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ -- Fbnpch (talk) 08:39, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits needed. -- Joydeep _Talk 17:54, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:54, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice one. Often very shy and not easy to photograph Nhobgood (talk) 21:37, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 06:53, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—Bokeh noise and sharpening artifacts visible even in the file page preview—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:30, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 21:28, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 21:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice!--P.Lindgren (talk) 08:58, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /—Love, Kelvinsong talk 13:32, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish

File:Estrilda astrild -Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain-8 (1).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2013 at 08:45:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Juan Emilio - uploaded by Snowmanradio - nominated by Snowmanradio -- Snowmanradio (talk) 08:45, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Snowmanradio (talk) 08:45, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:19, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Berthold Werner (talk) 06:46, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose There is a clear halo around bird--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:29, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose I agree with Miguel; the halo is disturbing. (P.Lindgren) 23:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lovely work, interesting composition and great execution. Penyulap ☏ 06:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Papageitauche Fratercula arctica 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2013 at 20:16:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Puffin (Fratercula arctica) Patreksfjörður, Iceland. C/U/N by  Richard  [®]  19:51, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --  Richard  [®]  19:51, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! -- Wolf im Wald (de) 21:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think ISO 100 version is better but prefer this pose :) --Laitche (talk) 03:14, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:38, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:00, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 06:37, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 06:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I also prefer this one (color, format, composition, brilliance). But both are very good. One tiny critical remark: Some areas beneath the head are slightly overexposed (not formally in the histogram but due to RGB(99.9%, 99,9%, 99,9%) and other RGB (x,x,x) values). This point is too marginal compared to the beauty of this photo. I look forward to further Island nominations. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:39, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Close to oversaturated for me but brilliant in every other way. --— Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:07, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice subject and composition Poc o² 08:14, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --mathias K 13:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 17:32, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:59, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 01:23, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 11:08, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolutely lovely photo. Speaking of your bird photos I cannot help mentioning that as we drove through Innsbruck earlier this Summer, these eyes kept popping up in my head. Thats when we decided it was time for a sleep-over after driving non-stop from Denmark! --Slaunger (talk) 14:53, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent for me too. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:51, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Papageitaucher Fratercula arctica.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2013 at 19:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Puffin (Fratercula arctica) Patreksfjörður, Iceland. C/U/N by  Richard  [®]  19:51, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --  Richard  [®]  19:51, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Are you sure the geocode is correct? The maps display a position over the littoral waters of Iceland, but the photo object is located on ground? --Slaunger (talk) 20:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Google maps displays it correct  Richard  [®]  20:57, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It so happens there is a discrepency between the satelite imagry coastline and the map coastline. In satellite images the camera location is in the ocean, but not acording to the map. --Slaunger (talk) 14:43, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very good work! -- Wolf im Wald (de) 21:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --mathias K 13:19, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 19:57, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. --Slaunger (talk) 14:45, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great // Martin Kraft (talk) 21:47, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support and now in use in fr:WP. --Myrabella (talk) 04:43, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah!  Richard  [®]  11:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support excellent --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:13, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent for me too. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:52, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:24, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Sumpf-Stendelwurz Epipactis palustris.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2013 at 21:28:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Holleday - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 21:28, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 21:28, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 07:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Accnis edit.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2013 at 13:37:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Pierre Dalous - uploaded by Pierre Dalous - nominated by Nikhil --Nikhil(talk) 13:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Nikhil(talk) 13:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Fbnpch (talk) 19:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not eligible to vote. 50 edits needed. --Joydeep _Talk 17:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 06:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:43, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 13:56, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:07, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 20:51, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Biergarten at Night 2.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2013 at 14:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by me. A typical summer night in a Munich beer garden. Yes, there's some harsh contrasts, a bit of motion blur, even noise. Still, I think this image constitutes a feasible compromise. The alternative would be a photograph
exposure of two minutes
with almost no noise at all, but a tremendous level of motion blur instead. Artsy and I do like it, but for illustrative purposes less than ideal. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done! -- Wolf im Wald (de) 12:32, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 06:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:56, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support // Martin Kraft (talk) 21:57, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 20:48, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Im Leibersteig Richtung Zalimtal Panorama.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2013 at 10:28:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Im Leibersteig von der Mannheimer Hütte kommend mit Blickrichtung Zalimtal c/u/n by -- Böhringer (talk) 10:28, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 10:28, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great view and composition. Are the clipped whites in the snow correctable? — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Julian, danke für das Lob. Ich verstehe nicht ganz, was ich im weißen korrigieren soll. Kannst du mir das auf deutsch erklären? Mein englisch ist puhhh :-)) --Böhringer (talk) 19:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Die Sache ist, dass im linken Bereich, im Schnee, einige Bereiche relativ scharf abgegrenzt den Farbwert 1 haben (also überbelichtet sind), wobei die Umgebung korrekte Belichtung zeigt (vermutlich, weil der Bereich beim stitchen abgedunkelt wurde). Wenn das möglich ist, wäre es gut, diese abgegrenzten Bereiche ein wenig der Umgebung anzupassen - manche Programme bieten dafür Werkzeuge an, ansonsten kann man es auch eventuell mit einer manuellen Bearbeitung etwas reduzieren. Die Bereiche sind aber nicht groß oder übertrieben auffällig, insofern ist es vielleicht auch ok so wie es ist. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:42, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:31, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination thanks for the comments --Böhringer (talk) 11:13, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:360° Grad Oberzalimalpe, Panorama.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2013 at 10:43:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info 360° Grad Oberzalimtal mit Blick auf den Wildberg und den Panüelerkopf. c/u/n by -- Böhringer (talk) 10:43, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 10:43, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great  Richard  [®]  12:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:38, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice panorama, but shouldn't those cows be purple? Kleuske (talk) 10:50, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the purple cows are not far from here :-)) --Böhringer (talk) 19:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Stas1995 (talk) 11:07, 10 August 2013(UTC)
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:32, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The red balls are for the aviation security - here a ropeway leading to the Mannheimer hut - it is powered by the Oberzalim hut.

thx --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support well done ! --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 08:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:35, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 11:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 16:20, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Columna de la Victoria de la Guerra de la Independencia, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 15.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2013 at 17:47:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Independence War Victory Column and St. John's church, at the Freedom Square in Tallinn, Estonia. All by me, Poc o² 17:47, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 17:47, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Detail quality could be better (with regard to the resolution) but the compostion is beautiful. I really like all the eye-catching vertical elements and the nice interrelated compositional placement of objects and buildings. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:05, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:18, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:40, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:09, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 16:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 14:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Gynaephora selenitica - kuu-villkäpa röövik aas-seahernel.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 19:55:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Caterpillar of Gynaephora selenitica on meadow vetchling (Lathyrus pratensis). All by Ivar (talk) 19:55, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 19:55, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 20:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 02:57, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 06:20, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --P.Lindgren (talk) 07:13, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:55, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:30, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 11:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --sfu (talk) 13:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice! --mathias K 14:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 20:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 16:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Portrait of ASTP crews - restoration.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2013 at 11:03:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NASA - uploaded by Adam Cuerden - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 11:03, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kasir (talk) 11:03, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- If only for its historical value. Kleuske (talk) 10:30, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support High historical value — Stas1995 (talk) 12:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course high historical value. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:12, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 08:42, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support High historical value! --P.Lindgren (talk) 09:04, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --High Contrast (talk) 09:56, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:28, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paul Munhoven (talk) 08:36, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 14:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Space exploration

File:Swallow August 2013-2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 15:35:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Barn swallow juveniles in the nest (about two weeks old) waiting for being fed. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kleuske (talk) 17:45, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:01, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 18:03, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 20:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 21:26, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:35, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support and now in use in fr:WP. --Myrabella (talk) 13:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 02:54, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- needs subtitles though ;) Penyulap ☏ 21:17, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 09:52, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 10:55, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice pic, although it looks slightly oversharpend imo --mathias K 14:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 20:38, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 16:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Kleiner Sonnenröschen-Bläuling.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2013 at 11:05:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info The Brown Argus is a small butterfly in the family of the Lycaenide. Its winglength is about 22mm. created, uploaded and nominated by Qflieger -- Qflieger (talk) 11:05, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Qflieger (talk) 11:05, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 13:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fore-wing blurred. In my opinion for a butterfly image the wings should be sharp. --Joydeep _Talk 17:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- in view of the smallness of the butterfly and the magnification through the lens you always have the problem of a very short dof. I found the same problem of current sharpness on all wings with other featured pictures like these ones:

Qflieger (talk) 18:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Joydeep _Talk is right. Increases the power of the flash, and try to f29 --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:04, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Qflieger (talk) 07:48, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Damselfly 08 (MK).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2013 at 09:56:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Yeah, a damselfly! ;-) I know some of you can`t see these little critters anymore but I like them somehow. Sharpness, resolution and the details are pretty nice so I think it is FP worthy. Now you... ;-) c/u/n by me, mathias K 09:56, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- mathias K 09:56, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 11:42, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Anagoria (talk) 11:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Qflieger (talk) 12:12, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 13:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  14:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:27, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:31, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:59, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:21, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:10, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 20:35, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 01:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 19:56, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Royal Palace in Brussels.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2013 at 05:32:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:32, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:32, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support  Richard  [®]  12:22, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:39, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I'm not convinced by the light: the main facade is in shadow. --A.Savin 21:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 06:55, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as A.Savin --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:07, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as A.Savin too. --Myrabella (talk) 04:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Contrary to Komrade Savin´s subjective opinion, the image is well executed. It has many graphic elements such as color, texture, perspective, rythm and great dynamic range that looks "natural" unlike other photographs being promoted here. The fact that the facade is in the shadow does not diminish the qualities of the subject, for its architectural qualities are perfectly present. Besides, it has encyclopedic value. Judging a photograph from a "gut feeling" or preconceived notions (sometimes ill informed) can be a tricky thing. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:40, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FABULOUS ! Penyulap ☏ 23:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — ℳ₪Zaplotnik 16:20, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree regarding the lighting and the subject lacks wow effect and detail (too much denoising?) to compensate this problem, sorry, Poc o² 11:04, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 13:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Pakri pank1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2013 at 13:07:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Pakri cliff, all by Ivar (talk) 13:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 13:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, valued and featured for me -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:50, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 06:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Joydeep _Talk 12:12, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 10:40, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:59, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice scenery --mathias K 13:56, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 21:47, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Aegires gardineri PNG by Nick Hobgood.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2013 at 21:39:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Nhobgood - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 21:39, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 21:39, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—On the small side, but quality is good.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 21:42, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ugly as. Penyulap ☏ 06:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Joydeep _Talk 12:11, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 09:50, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 10:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:58, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 20:31, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:07, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have sligtly expanded the file descr. Where did you take the photo? In the wild, in a public aquarium? --Cayambe (talk) 15:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 13:24, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals

File:Attica 06-13 Athens 28 Academy of Athens.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2013 at 11:43:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by A.Savin 11:43, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 11:43, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality and centring --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Harsh light but still ok and really appropriate for this subject. Very nice composition. --— Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 20:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP for me. — Stas1995 (talk) 21:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support // Martin Kraft (talk) 22:10, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:31, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 17:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Lighting, wrong time of day... Adjustments work best when used to slightly enhance or diminish certain characteristics such as contrast, dynamic range, etc., but look artificial when used to over-correct. The problem with abuse of the digital lab is that often it is used to bypass sound photographic principles or practices. There is no substitute for good original technique. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:16, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The adjustments create a (somewhat) unnatural look - but still, I do like the colors. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:39, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:24, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 13:31, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Averbode Abdijkerk R06.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2013 at 07:24:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by MJJR - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 07:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 13:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support but tilted a tiny bit, stands out because of the perfect symmetry. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:27, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support-Très belle photographie et très nette. Bravo. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 08:41, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 13:34, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 14:35, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 13:17, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Computer generated image of the Mærsk Triple E Class (1).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2013 at 09:40:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Maersk Line - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 09:41, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- russavia (talk) 09:41, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:54, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good! -- Wolf im Wald (de) 11:43, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a cropped version of the same image which is in use for article infoboxes. I've chosen the full image for the FP process though. russavia (talk) 11:53, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 14:05, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment—The ship itself is done very well, but the ocean needs some work and the foam is highly unrealistic.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 18:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Model detail level is very good, but shader quality and expecially the shading of the turbulent areas in the water is bad (distinctive pixels from a fluid simulation or more probably from bad texture interpolation settings). — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 20:42, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 21:28, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ...and 7 :) Poc o² 11:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 13:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 13:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated

File:Charbonnage du Hasard 21.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2013 at 13:19:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Bourgeois.A - uploaded by Bourgeois.A - nominated by Bourgeois.A -- Bourgeois.A (talk) 13:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info Taken in native JPEG with that
Support -- Bourgeois.A (talk) 13:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see any "wow" even without the two lampposts in front. Daniel Case (talk) 06:59, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
These are window bars... and if you don't like industrial arhitecture, why do you vote? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bourgeois.A (talk • contribs)
I like industrial architecture including the example shown, but i still wonder, what are those two bars doing in the image? Kleuske (talk) 09:26, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
They are parallel to the buildings and it gives a special cosmetically. obviously nobody likes. Bourgeois.A (talk) 09:38, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot speak for anyone else, but i do think they rather spoil the image. Which is a shame. Kleuske (talk) 11:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For me the problem with these bars is, that it's not possible to see what they are from the picture itself. Hence, for the unknowing observer they are just a kind of disturbing element with no apparent purpose. The idea is great, but it looks like it doesn't work as intended. Maybe it would work better if the picture showed more of the window, e.g. by including the whole frame? —El Grafo (talk) 09:49, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed... but it's too late now. Bourgeois.A (talk) 11:17, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Bourgeois.A (talk) 10:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 21:36, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schluesselfeld BW 2013-06-18 17-18-40.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2013 at 11:31:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 11:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 11:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Noticeable chromatic aberration and neither sharpness nor resolution are very impressive for this subject. Light, composition and content are good, but not outstanding. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:38, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 20:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lysimachia ciliata Prague 2013 2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 21:22:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Karelj -- Karelj (talk) 21:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 21:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 16:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stora Tuna kyrka July 2013.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 08:38:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Interior of Stora Tuna church. Today a parish church, but built as a cathedral and consectrated in 1469. c/u/n -- Arild Vågen (talk) 08:38, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 08:38, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 16:26, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christabel Nettey.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 01:04:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Dmitry Rozhkov -- Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 01:04, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I suppose it's a good shot indeed. -- Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 01:04, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I see some things to improve, I'll try to make an useful review. The tilt is not helping here to create a better composition, so it would be better to have it straightened; and it would much better if we could see more of the sand into where she's jumping (I guess that's a problem of using a fix lens, composition is much harder), even if there are some distracting elements. Was noise reduction applied? It looks a bit noisy for ISO800 with 5DII. Good focus and gesture nevertheless! --Kadellar (talk) 13:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks for informative review! I reduced the noise a bit more. Unfortunatelly, it's impossible to change the crop or to rotate the image. --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 13:38, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 16:25, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SantaClaraLibraryCropped.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2013 at 19:26:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior view of the Santa Clara City Library

Info all by DavidLeighEllis (talk) 19:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DavidLeighEllis (talk) 19:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not very sharp but I think it's acceptable due to high resolution and low noise. --— Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 20:31, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not only per Julian but I would add that it's offset by getting such a low-contrast image to work without any blown highlights or too-dark areas. Daniel Case (talk) 14:11, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 21:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greenwich Foot Tunnel, Greenwich side.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2013 at 10:58:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by me. Heuschrecke (talk) 10:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good light and outstanding composition in my opinion. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 20:43, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Julian, could you describe what is outstanding with the composition in your view? Probably there is something I oversee. --Tuxyso (talk) 00:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I meant the fact that the foreground subject is located nicely off-center, the rest of the foreground space is filled with a nice balance of grass and paved ground and the space that is then free left of the building shows the Thames, the slowly rising building size on the Isle of Dogs all the way to the skyline of Canary Wharf. This way, I think it shows where the tunnel leads to, the only downside being that the other end of the tunnel is not visible. Maybe "outstanding" is too much, but I like it very much. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:18, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
May I add that lighting is indeed somewhat special: despite the cloudy day, the sun came out of the clouds behind me for a minute - hence the smooth glossy look of the roof and the Canary Wharf buildings. Photos that I've done before the sun came out do not share this quality. Heuschrecke (talk) 09:54, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That is true, although I would think that this would almost be more effective with the white balance being a little more shadow-oriented (warmer). — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 11:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your in-detail information. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:13, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support (but can the bird at left be removed?) --Kadellar (talk) 15:22, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done Removed gulls. Played with wb but could not find anything better. Heuschrecke (talk) 23:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 13:42, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grassy grass plant.svg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2013 at 03:17:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info A diagram of a typical lawn grass plant. All by Kelvinsong—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:17, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:17, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice and detailed illustration, but there are a few things I'm missing/curious about:

Which group of grasses is shown here? I'm guessing Poaceae?
If Poaceae: They often (always?) have nodes along the culms.
I know it's supposed to be a rather simplified diagram, but I'm missing the parallel nerves running along the leaves.
Once again, I don't see why it's necessary to convert text to paths in a simple diagram like this. It makes translations unnecessarily complicated – took me a while to figure out how to enable the hidden text layer.
What's so special about the crown that it deserves a little crown drawn behind the label?
What does the "Dinkelberg." mean (only visible when opened in e.g. Inkscape)?

Cheers, --El Grafo (talk) 09:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's Poaceæ. The source I used didn't show any nodes. Are they along the flowering culm? I never included the leaf veins before, but if it's that important I can add them. The text is in paths for typographical reasons, I have a short tutorial on how to make and use the invisible text layers. The "Dinkleberg" is a Fairly Odd Parents reference ;) (neighbors feuding over lawn quality), the faint crown behind the "crown" label is an extension of that joke. The crown of a grass plant is also the core and most important part of it, because that's where all the other parts come from.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 13:14, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think the veins would be a nice touch since all grasses have parallel ones (other than many "flowers"). Might be informative for people who didn't now that yet, but I wouldn't insist on them. I also don't care too much about most of the other points I mentioned, so let's go directly to the interesting one, the nodes:

I'm not really an expert for grass (though I've got some background), so I've checked some descriptions of the poaceae family and they all mentioned that the stem/shoot (=culm, but as far as I get it not necessarily = flowering culm) is devided by nodes (with the spaces between them being the internodes – same thing as with the stolon and rhizome). See e.g. [3] or [4]. They are of some importance in terms of stability, because those are the points where the stem is not hollow (think of Bamboo!). Those are also the places where the leaves are actually attached to the stem. Note that the leaves may wrap around the stem, so the nodes are often positioned several centimeters below the point where the leaves spread away from the stem (that section with the ligule etc.) or even covered by the next leaf that comes up from below.

Here are some illustrations that show this rather nicely: File:472 Alopecurus pratensis.jpg, File:Illustration Phleum pratense0.jpg, File:Illustration Avena sativa0.jpg, File:Illustration Aira flavescens0.jpg. File:Maize_plant_diagram.svg shows how this could look like in an SVG. To get a feeling for this, it might actually help alot to just head outside, find a place where the grass is allowed to grow for a while without mowing, grab some flowering examples from as many species as possible (chances are good not to accidentally grab something else as long as it looks like typical grassy grass ;-) and the culms are round and hollow) and start ~~ripping~~ gently peeling off some of the leaves. It's OK, it's for the sake of science. But don't you dare having fun with that! ;-)

Cheers, --El Grafo (talk) 15:24, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I've added in the nodes. I get it now!—I always thought the stem was compressed down in the crown, and its just the apical bud that shoots up to make the inflorescence. So it's the whole crown that elongates to elevate the apical bud? I also added in some faint leaf midribs (but they're not that visible in real life). I got rid of the crown icon, but I left in the Dinkleberg cause that's not really hurting anyone is it? Please refresh page to get the new thumbnail & picture.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 16:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I get it, the stem is actually more or less compressed down there after the winter until the plant starts growing vertically again (wheat in spring vs. wheat in the early summer). Assuming of course that you have a climate with actual seasons, not taking into account possible differences between annual and perennial plants etc. – but again: I'm not an expert. --El Grafo (talk) 09:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Penyulap ☏ 21:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good to me now. --El Grafo (talk) 09:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support KDS444 (talk) 21:18, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — TintoMeches, 12:38, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 13:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 21:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open air museum Petronell - Basilica thermarum.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2013 at 20:56:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 20:56, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 20:56, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Penyulap ☏ 21:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 21:40, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ancient Roman amphitheatre in Bad Deutsch-Altenburg - panorama.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2013 at 20:54:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 20:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 20:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The tops of the trees are cut off, hurting the composition. --LeavXC (talk) 21:43, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with LeavXC also not seeing much of the stadium. Flickrworker (talk) 21:31, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 16:22, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castle Geyser Yellowstone.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2013 at 19:37:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Eruption of Castle Geyser in Yellowstone National Park in August 2013. Created, uploaded & nominated by Clément Bardot -- Clément Bardot (talk) 19:37, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Clément Bardot (talk) 19:37, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:20, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but too tight crop for me, we can't see the entire vapour -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 11:07, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Penyulap ☏ 21:28, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 21:39, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rianxo. Galicia-Galiza-5.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2013 at 21:19:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Lmbuga - uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Lmbuga -- Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:19, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:19, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ok for me, and nice, but I see a little dust spot, I have add note --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no Wow factor for me. Flickrworker (talk) 14:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Light very much from the side and in the middle of the day creates a contrast that is not very nice. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:02, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 14:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distelfalter (Vanessa cardui).JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2013 at 08:42:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Fbnpch - uploaded by Fbnpch - nominated by Fbnpch -- Fbnpch (talk) 08:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fbnpch (talk) 08:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:39, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is there a way to have a more generous crop at the bottom? Poc o² 03:17, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 06:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—Bad composition per Poco. Margin at the top could also be wider.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:27, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 10:42, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Троїцький монастир.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2013 at 20:30:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by Valerii Sorokin (Shredingerz cat) - nominated by Ю. Данилевский(talk) 20:30, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info Holy Trinity Cathedral in Chernihiv, build in 1695, architectural style Ukrainian Baroque. View from the bell-tower.
Support -- Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:30, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP for me. Flickrworker (talk) 21:33, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:28, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 18:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 20:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(weak) Oppose A pity, it's a really beautiful view, but there are several technical flaws (detail loss on parts of the facade due to overexposure; some noise; perspective distortions). --A.Savin 21:12, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose With A. Savin: Very nice few, but the light is too unfortunate. >50% of the building are in shadow (main reason for decline), the parts in the sun are partially overexposed. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Penyulap ☏ 21:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:28, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The subject, the background and the clouds are really nice, but, the quality is not really good, there is a bit of CA, strong perspective distortion (the tower of the left is clearly leaning out), the crop in the bottom is unfortunate and the lighting is not really optimal, the side almost parallel to the photographer is in shadow, overall I have to oppose, sorry, Poc o² 11:00, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose noisy, CA, bad exposure (main issues); agree with all the other oppose voters. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 13:18, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 21:34, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Bicycle reflections.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 18:14:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I liked the idea --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Uninteresting composition. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 19:46, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per AmaryllisGardener + imo the picture is out of COM:SCOPE. --A.Savin 20:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment And what is Komrade Savin, the reasoning that preceeds your opinion, that is, the arguments that lead you to find find the image as having an "uninteresting composition"? Even though your opinion is the result of a subjective analysis, it still is interesting to find out the logic according to you. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Read COM:SCOPE#Must_be_realistically_useful_for_an_educational_purpose. I don't see any potential for usage on WMF projects. --A.Savin 21:01, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - I have read the scope of common´smany times dear Komrade Savin, and your opinion about the relevancy is just that, your opinion on that part of your reasons to oppose. Contrary to your opinion, in my opinion the image is within scope for many reasons. But I was not referring to your opinion about the relevancy according to the scope of the project. I was more referring to your opinion regarding your assertion of "uninteresting composition" as a basis to oppose. Surely that that opinion is the result of a sentence or a series of sentences that have to do with your analysis of the image, it is those arguments that verse on the aesthetics of the image that I would like to know about. It would be nice for you to enlighten me so I can become a better contributor to this forum. Unless of course, your opinion in that regard is not supported by an argument based on universal values or practices for evaluating photography.--Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Dear Komrade Savin, instead of running to AN user problems and denounce me as a trouble maker for asking you to explain your negative vote, you should take a look at Alvesgaspar comment, objective, constructive and definitely informed as to photographic values. Alvesgaspar´s comment invites introspection and acknowledgement of possible flaws of the image, whereas your comment is simply empty and lacking objectivity. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:41, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- This is the kind of image that I would have taken/nominated myself. It is certainly not out of scope and I like the idea, which is a classic in Photography. A pity that the actual framing is not a good realization of it, with the presence of disturbig elements like the building and the tree. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:26, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- I'd think the image could be used to educate those who have only a little skill in photography to get a better feel for what people love. Good photographers will stand and organise for hours to be sure about reflections of buildings and trees and take those things into account and do studio work. Great photographers know what people want by instinct alone and capture a long swathe of moments, weaving them into a body of work that makes them famous.

I won't even vote on this one, if people don't know what's this great and what's not without someone else to tell them, I'm wasting my breath. Penyulap ☏ 23:11, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support We have people that routinely argue every picture of topless girl is in scope yet when someone places a beautiful image up for FPC we get people saying it is out of scope? Utter bullshit. Saffron Blaze (talk) 03:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support imo definitely FP! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:32, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is definitely an honor to have such good photographers on Commons. As already pointed out the photographic idea of the photo is quite good but the possible usage on wm projects is at least limited (which is no problem for me even not as an FPC). But the following fact disturbs me: the photo is massively downscaled (2,3 megapixel) wihtout an objective reason and on the image description a direct link to the professional website of Tomascastelazo is placed. An FP (together with the link to the commercial pro website) gets a prominent place on Commons but only a very downscaled version of the photo is provided to Commons (probably to fit the 2 megapixel criteria for FPCs). --Tuxyso (talk) 07:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On the size: it meets the requirements. Period. On the link. Creative Commons license allows for authors to share their work and have their work attributed to them, according to their requirements. This can be looked as "compensation" for sharing the work for free. Photography costs. Cameras, computers, lenses and most irreplaceble commodity: time. Is it legal? yes. Is it moral? Yes. Is i ethical? Yes. Is it allowed? Yes. Funny thing that I do not hear a defense for copyright violations that occur when people use the images in publications in violation of the terms of the CC licenses and in detriment to the author and Commons itself. And besides, sometimes one has to deal with the local trolls... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

actually I popped it into a few articles before you mentioned usage, and it seems just fine to me. Now, if we had more brilliant photographers and less admins doing what they can to fuck them off from the project we'd be able to get their help describing the techniques and so on, that are used in the images, and then we could better describe such techniques in our photography and art articles. As it is, I don't dare consider myself an expert in those areas (although my own work, which I don't share online, is widely acclaimed. I'm modest and don't mind saying so :D ha!) I found the image useful already, and as I said before, a good example for teaching techniques to the inept, but for now it goes nicely in half a dozen articles or so. Penyulap ☏ 08:10, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess, the downscaling (from 18 MP to ~2 MP) is because the higher-res version is only available for money. --A.Savin 10:11, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right, you are guessing. And you are guessing wrong. And even if it were, so what? Do you have a problem with that? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:21, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're free to do it. For me, however, it's a further reason to oppose. Other people may see it different way though. --A.Savin 15:50, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You would find that the WMF disagrees with you. WMF fully supports artists using WP and its sister projects as a means of showcasing their work. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:17, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is Kafkanesque! Complying with the rules is reason to oppose! Do what you want man, oppose, rant, go crying to your buddies, oppose some more, all on the clear direction that your "guess" may take you! This reminds me of what someone put up in one of these forums: "German people says: "Everybody disgrace themselves as good as they can." Well, you´ve done it! Congratulations! And if you truly believe that this image is out of scope, then your obligation as an admin is to make a DR. I´d be happy to see you in that forum. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:19, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, the "usages" conjured up by Penylap are inappropriate, as this is not a typical "mirror image" (with the full mirror effect, where elements at the left appear at the right and vice versa), this is just a usual reflection. For illustrating the article about mirror images, this picture is more appropriate, imo (though still not perfectly matching). --A.Savin 12:14, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Savin, what´s this all about? So now you are into judging people´s judgement? Stick to the merits of this image from yur personal perspective, if you can. Jeez... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:28, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wah ! I've never seen someone fight so hard against great artwork. 'inappropriate' ? WTF ? I never put it into any article called "mirror image" I put in into صورة المرآة, imaxe especular, imatge especular and 鏡像 as well as 镜像 (几何). Why you have to be so hostile and unreasonable rather than just judge the image on it's obvious merits alone ? Even if you have to judge Tomas instead of judging the image, he's a lovely chap with a great sense of humour, why be so mean ? Me I'm not voting, because I like Tomas work just far too much :D maybe you can do the same eh ? Just let people judge the image itself, nice and unbiased. Penyulap ☏ 20:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support The picture has definitely an useful aspect, furthermore its nice, too.  Richard  [®]  09:53, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
CommentI uploaded this picture in good faith as a contribution to Commons, in the same spirit that I´ve uploaded many images. I apologyze for the distraction that has been created from my request to have an oppose vote explained by A Savin, which every user who receives an oppose vote is entitled to. A Savin not only refused to explain, but he took issue on my request and posted my action as a complain in AN user problems. I invite the members of this forum to express themselves there and to leave this forum as a FP process where the criteria for discussion is photography or graphic arts. If A Savin does not like the picture, fine, but an oppose vote has at least a moral obligation to be explained, and as an out of scope he has the duty to start a DR. Failure to do constitutes a dereliction of duty. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:38, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, what has happened here? It was not my intention to open such a great discussion on this topic. IMHO it is Tomascastelazo personal decision to artifically downscale his uploads and I surely respect his decision. My only interest was to hear something about his motivation for that. I am an enthustiatic amateur photographer and I am happy to share my photos with people on Commons (and on other WM projects) and exchange knowledge. It would never come to my mind to artifically downscale my photos (with commercial interests in mind) because I like the idea of sharing and of free content. I also own expensive photographic equiqment, but I bought it for me not for Commons. I do not know how I would think about the topic if I would earn money with photos. Tomascastelazo, one compromise could be to provide at least your FPCs in higher resolution. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:20, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, the extremest Free Culture bullshit. Give away your works so others can make a profit on them but try to make money off them yourself and somehow you are an evil capitalist. WMF has made it clear it respects the right and even need of original artists to be able to enjoy the benefits of their works and freely acknowledges that exposure on the projects may assist in that regard. Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Right on Saffron Blaze! Thanks on my behalf and many, many others... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:59, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Only a judicious crop IMO, really a good idea but not featured for me --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:06, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support as a literary atmospheric photo. --Laitche (talk) 22:56, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Richard. although composition could be better. ■ MMXX ^talk 18:06, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The resolution is low; but I assume Tomas has enough reasons for it. I can see many high and medium resolution files in his gallery. Very artistic. (I visited this page from the AN/U out of curiosity. It is disappointing to see how a simple healthy discussion is extended to repeated, cyclic, never-ending battles (yes; I'm seeing it the third time) outside this FPC community.) J Kadavoor J e e 08:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pssst, wanna see some megapixel porn ? Someone whined that this one had poor lighting and was 'fuzzy', so WAH! look at this baby !! ...Huh ? ...Huh ? ...(nudge nudge) <wink> <wink> look at that resolution. Penyulap ☏ 08:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Canoe1967 (talk) 15:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 09:54, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buen trabajo Tomás, Poc o² 10:52, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose. Unfortunately, I think the crop should have been higher. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as stated per others. --Yikrazuul (talk) 08:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like an evidence. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 08:59, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I definitely thought its a different image from what we usually see in Commons FPC. The idea is interesting and the use of B/W as well. The composition could have been better, however -- Dey.sandip (talk) 12:15, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice picture with a very nice composition --mathias K 14:01, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 13:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 20:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Látrabjarg Vestfirðir Iceland.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2013 at 13:01:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info The Látrabjarg cliffs on the Vestfirðir coast in Iceland. It's the westernmost point of Iceland and Europe. c|u|n by  Richard  [®]  13:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --  Richard  [®]  13:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 13:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:25, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:25, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive angle of view with grey clouds like stone. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 08:23, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --mathias K 13:28, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Amazing photo, sadly with clipped whites in the foam and some CAs on the right, quite noticeably in the birds. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:48, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Joydeep _Talk 17:50, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 23:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:12, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 13:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Seagull July 2013-3.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 15:33:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Yeloow-legged gull in flight. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—But can it be cropped a little?—Love, Kelvinsong talk 15:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Why? The bird needs some space to fly. Kleuske (talk) 17:47, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support good shot --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:01, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 20:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 13:40, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent image quality and good composition! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 20:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Loewe frontal.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2013 at 15:30:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

all by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:30, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:30, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:59, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 17:06, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:25, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Arrghh !!!!! <Penyulap runs away without voting> Penyulap ☏ 21:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - --Paul Munhoven (talk) 08:52, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 09:32, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:08, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support My, what big eyes you have ... This should be an FP purely for taking it and surviving. That lion looks hungry ... Daniel Case (talk) 16:15, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support sweeet little kitty :D darkweasel94 19:31, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 20:28, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support !!! — Stas1995 (talk) 20:38, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! --Tuxyso (talk) 20:52, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support puss, puss, puss... ;) --A.Savin 09:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --P.Lindgren (talk) 13:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Kraft (talk) 10:50, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 13:01, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good profile :) --Dey.sandip (talk) 05:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 21:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Green Marsh Hawk (Orthetrum sabina), Burdwan, West Bengal, India 22 09 2012.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 20:39:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Green Marsh Hawk Orthetrum sabina (male) is a common dragonfly of gardens and fields. Abdomen: 30-36mm, Hind wing: 30-36mm. This dragonfly perches motionless on shrubs and dry twigs for a long time. This species can be seen far away from water. Breeds in ponds and tanks. Widely distributed in Ethiopian, Oriental and Australian region. It is found throughout Indian subcontinent. Created/ uploaded/ nominated by -- Joydeep _Talk 20:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 20:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice, useful --A.Savin 21:25, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice catch, but the focal plane doesn´t fit exactly. For a shot like this the focal plane should fit for the whole body, so the tail has the same sharpness as the head. Sorry, mathias K 09:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 06:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Its not an extraordinary picture and lacks sharpness as user mathias K posted -- Qflieger (talk) 12:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Slightly unsharp. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 20:25, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:54, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with others, not your best shot. The eyes (especially) and the tip of the tail are unsharp, sorry Poc o² 15:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 09:45, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per mathias — TintoMeches, 07:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 10:12, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:One-eyed African leopard.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 22:12:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info A one-eyed African leopard in Kruger National Park, South Africa.

Created, uploaded and nominated by -- P.Lindgren (talk) 22:12, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- P.Lindgren (talk) 22:12, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice. Tomer T (talk) 10:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — TintoMeches, 21:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Penyulap ☏ 21:17, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vassil 17:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 20:36, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 08:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 10:21, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Sears Tower from the river.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2013 at 13:42:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by WorldTraveller101 - uploaded by WorldTraveller101 - nominated by WorldTraveller101 -- WorldTraveller101 ? 13:42, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WorldTraveller101 ? 13:42, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Low resolution for a still object (but over 2Mpx), jpeg artifacts, noisy, composition (disturbing fence, the tower is too small in the picture), sorry. --Kadellar (talk) 18:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

I withdraw my nomination. Thanks for your time. WorldTraveller101 ? 19:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Larus canus - Aurlandsfjord - 07.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2013 at 21:30:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Micha L. Rieser - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 21:30, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:30, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 21:52, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 07:17, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's an action shot, so some flaws are ok, but the overexposure (clipped whites) is too strong imo. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 11:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above, sorry. And imho higher shutter speed was necessary. --Ivar (talk) 17:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp, tight crop. --Mile (talk) 18:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 23:47, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sadi-Carnot Bridge, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2013 at 15:56:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for FP not more beautiful place --Fbnpch (talk) 18:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe not featured but beautiful places and wonderfull animals are not the only subjects we can promote (I hope) -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - And for information it's a beautiful place but maybe my composition not, please vote for the picture, not for the place -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:55, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Platamon.2013.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2013 at 12:50:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Alex fand - uploaded by Alex fand - nominated by Melirius -- Melirius (talk) 12:50, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Melirius (talk) 12:50, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tilted, jpeg artifacts, bad crop at bottom. --Kadellar (talk) 13:58, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—Per Kadellar.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 17:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 13:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Russische Bär (Euplagia quadripunctaria) nach Schlüpfen.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2013 at 09:46:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Fbnpch - uploaded by Fbnpch - nominated by Fbnpch -- Fbnpch (talk) 09:46, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 09:46, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice shot, but for FP the head of the butterfly should be in focus, sorry. Poc o² 14:38, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poc o² --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:49, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lacking quality --mathias K 13:29, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad quality — Stas1995 (talk) 20:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 13:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mongolian Armed Forces engineers with the 017 Construction Regiment receive instructions before participating in Khaan Quest 2013 in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, July 22, 2013 130722-M-MG222-001.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 15:28:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Sgt Ben Eberle - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Mmxx ■ MMXX ^talk 15:28, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ■ MMXX ^talk 15:28, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A well-done but aesthetically typical picture of soldiers at attention. Might be improved a little by cropping in to the four guys in focus, but even still I don't see an FP here. Daniel Case (talk) 07:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- But I think it is FP-worthy and it's a nice addition to our people category. I added a cropped version. ■ MMXX ^talk 17:29, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped version

Support ■ MMXX ^talk 17:29, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but not FP quality IMO (cropped or uncropped). Compare this existing FP, for instance. --Avenue (talk) 00:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 20:39, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erica Jarder (2013 World Championships in Athletics) crop.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 13:42:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Dmitry Rozhkov -- Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 13:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another good shot from that competition. -- Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 13:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 15:34, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad lighting on face and body. --Kikos (talk) 18:02, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent lighting on face and body. ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 10:41, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose High ISO noise is clear visible. The lines or better the whole picture is aslope. The woman is not clear separated from the multicolored background -- Qflieger (talk) 16:58, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:21, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --sasha (krassotkin) 15:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --Dey.sandip (talk) 05:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 20:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spathiphyllum-Flower.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 09:38:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flower of Spathiphyllum, an indoor plant

Info created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 09:38, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 09:38, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a nice flower and the image quality is also good, but i dont like the composition. The leafs on the left and the down right corner are distracting and i dont like the background colors. --mathias K 15:26, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've expected that someone will oppose due to the background :) Especially the flower is shown in its "natural" enviornment - it is a room plant. The background comes from indoor light, a lilac wallpaper and a door frame. IMHO the leafs are not distracting, they are placed exactly there on puropse: I've choosen this composition very carefully and integrated the leafs as framing elemenst. I've used golden ratio for different elements of the flower. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Imo the leaves [sic] are easy to clone out, esp. the right-hand one. You should try to find a usage for the picture. --A.Savin 21:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As already written: The leaves are there on purpose. If one do not like the composition - it is OK (as mathias has already opposed). --Tuxyso (talk) 21:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:35, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 13:28, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spathiphyllum-Flower-Edit.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2013 at 19:33:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Richard
A variant without the leafs  Richard  [®]  19:33, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your initiative. I look forward to the reviews and comments :) --Tuxyso (talk) 19:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Way better imo, but i still don´t like the bg colors. --mathias K 14:03, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 20:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 10:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:OHM lights.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 08:07:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Skhaen - uploaded by Skhaen - nominated by warddr -- Warddr (talk) 08:07, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Warddr (talk) 08:07, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Penyulap ☏ 21:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paul Munhoven (talk) 06:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 13:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bonner Münster.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 00:05:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 00:05, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 00:05, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support However, I do have a soft spot for Bonn. Kleuske (talk) 11:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 07:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sacred turtle in China.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2013 at 08:31:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Paul - uploaded by Paul - nominated by Paul -- Paul Munhoven (talk) 08:31, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paul Munhoven (talk) 08:31, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ne pas compter mon vote s'il vous plaît, cela me gêne de voter pour moi. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 08:32, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, Paul, so do we have to count your vote as

Neutral or

Abstain ? — TintoMeches, 19:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- rare, very impressive work. Much needed. Brilliant educational value in this image. Penyulap ☏ 21:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I wanted a big contrast between brightness and darkness like yin and yang. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 08:29, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. The 'divine light' effect for this image is so appropriate. I would be appalled if it were a 'turtle in a pet shop with kids looking at it' effect with the lighting. Once again, Well done ! Penyulap ☏ 08:35, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Cedric31 (talk) 08:58, 15 August 2013 (UTC)--Cedric31 (talk) 09:58, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Techniquement c'est perfectible, mais pour une fois que l'on voit une image intéressante. Bravo Paul. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:55, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 16:20, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JPS68 (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, rare picture. — TintoMeches, 14:29, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:01, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The use of light is good here. --Dey.sandip (talk) 15:45, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning picture with good lightning! The technical quality could be better (I've noticed its taken 9 years ago with an old compact) but there's nothing to do about that now. I've support it despite this because the image really captured the rare moment! --P.Lindgren (talk) 09:05, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great capture of the moment!! --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Citron (talk) 09:00, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 21:41, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:The combine Claas Lexion 584 in the wheat harvest.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2013 at 14:22:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:36, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- despite the fact that there's a lot of dust ;). Kleuske (talk) 17:06, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 17:57, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 06:18, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~I see jagged edges in many places (oversharpened?) and posterization on the background.~~ --Ivar 06:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support now. --Ivar (talk) 08:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ivar: Oversharpened artifacts. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:30, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- A lot better now. Still quite small and tightly cropped but ok. Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 06:03, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Qflieger (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Info The quality of the picture is much better now, but I don`t like the color and contrast. IMO they are poorly. At least I don´t like the composition. I´ve seen better pictures you made. Qflieger (talk) 08:30, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Very nice image but the quality of the very foreground is not good enough at full resolution IMO -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:24, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I'm not a fan of the centring (too tight at right for me) but I support for good reworking, much better IMO -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info I updated the image without sharpening. Ivar, Julian H., Qflieger and Christian Ferrer: I think you like the image now. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:32, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Penyulap ☏ 21:16, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support and much better than before. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:21, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Much better! It was way too much sharpening applied before! --P.Lindgren (talk) 07:12, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:31, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 21:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Lago Nam Van, Macao, 2013-08-08, DD 04.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2013 at 03:16:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Night view of the Nam Vam Lake along with the Gobernador Nobre de Carvalho bridge and some of the city casinos, Macau. All by me, Poc o² 03:16, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 03:16, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 12:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --P.Lindgren (talk) 13:30, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot. --Clément Bardot (talk) 14:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment unsharpness and pixelation (see annotation) on the two rightmost buildings. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:02, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 16:03, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another great shot from the Wikimania visitors (I think?). Pixillation is not severe enough to bother me. Daniel Case (talk) 17:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed ;) Poc o² 14:55, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:07, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support clearly FP --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:02, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dey.sandip (talk) 15:37, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 14:18, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 15:25, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:47, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 12:13, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Valais Cup 2013 - OM-FC Porto 13-07-2013 - Brice Samba en extension.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2013 at 11:14:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Pleclown - uploaded by Pleclown - nominated by Pleclown -- Pleclown (talk) 11:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pleclown (talk) 11:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support slightly tilted? FP anyway! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:22, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 11:41, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 13:28, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technically excellent, but composition leaves a lot to be desired. The background is far too busy; I can't see the subject right away and this is not an issue that could be solved by cropping, unfortunately. I also can't see a ball, so it's hard to tell if the keeper is just jumping up for the hell of it or actually making or attempting to make a save. Daniel Case (talk) 14:09, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The ball is on the goal frame. Pleclown (talk) 14:20, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And for this picture to even begin to get into the office, you wouldn't have had to tell me that. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to tell you that, but you're the first one to tell me that they don't see the ball. And a lot of people have seen this picture. Pleclown (talk) 05:39, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Even I had difficulty working out where the ball is which tells you that all though you wanted to frame it right it's too noisy. Flickrworker (talk) 18:12, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And just because other people didn't tell you that doesn't mean they saw it. Daniel Case (talk) 07:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Background too busy, the player is basically hidden in detail. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:34, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Would what you except to be in the background? That's just the regular sceneray for a soccer game. Tomer T (talk) 14:55, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - It could be either blurred, in the shade (with the foreground in the sun), it could be grass (photo from an elevated position) or it could be the trees on the left (photo from further to the right). Aside from that, the fact that no better photo was possible doesn't mean it should be FP. If the composition is bad, it's bad. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 17:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
CommentTomer, in this type of photography the use of long lenses and wide apertures is what is needed to blurr the backgroung and stop the action, thus separating the distracting backgrounds and concentrating on the subject. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:57, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In this case, the tilt should be fixed. Imo it would look much nicer. Is there CA on his pants? Just a little detail, I know, but if it can be improved, it's not hard. --Kadellar (talk) 15:13, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've tried to correct the tilt. Pleclown (talk) 16:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Background too sharp, blending player with background. the sacle relationship player-background is not adequate. The position of the ball is uncertain, there is no definitiveness as to whether it went in or not. Ball and player too small. Tilted. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:57, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've tried to correct the tilt. I don't understand the need of "definitiveness as to whether it went in or not", but one can see that the ball is on the frame, slightly distorting it, thus not in.

For the background, there is little I can do. I already was at the max aperture of my lense (f/2.8). I'm quite puzzled how the background can be this "sharp" at this aperture, but hey.

Pleclown (talk) 16:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment read about Henry Cartier Bresson's "precise moment" it applies to action photography.--Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think this was the Moment. But it's only my opinion. Pleclown (talk) 05:58, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose These three images apparently from the same match, and taken by other contributors here, show how to use dof and fl to define the players properly.

A more expensive lens isn't actually necessary to get better results. There seems to be greenery to the left of the image, so moving 50 feet to your right would have done the trick and we'd be able to see the player better. Penyulap ☏ 06:07, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are comparing results made with a full frame body, I think (DoF is lower for the same framing on a FF). --PierreSelim (talk) 11:55, 19 August 2013 (UTC), PS: moreover this pictures are done at 200mm --PierreSelim (talk) 12:01, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support FP for me, impressive action, good timing, and the player does separate from the white background behind him. --PierreSelim (talk) 11:55, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP to me. Right moment. Kyro (talk) 21:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Quality is good. The positions of ball and goal-keeper are fantastic. I think it's ok for a FP. Ludo (talk) 15:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality is ok and the timing is perfect. Pyb (talk) 05:51, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:Clerodendrum speciosissimum Tropenhaus Gruga.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2013 at 13:19:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 13:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I personally like the red-green contrast and the detail quality. I look forward to your comments. -- Tuxyso (talk) 13:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can you correct the clipping of reds almost everywhere in the blossoms? — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:42, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- As often I do not know if we are talking about the same. Formally (histogram) there are no clipped red colors. Probably you have detected the furry ("pelzig") surface of the blossoms as clipping. How have you detected clipped reds? Done Nonetheless I have worked a bit on the hightlights and on the brightness red channel and think it is better now. I have also slightly modified the crop at the right. Do you think it is better now? --Tuxyso (talk) 19:13, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm talking about the fact that of the blossom, about a quarter of all pixels have a red-channel-value of 1, meaning that they are oversaturated and can't show and color detail any more. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 06:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Can you please mark the area? I cannot reproduce it neither in LR nor Photoshop. Is new new version no improvement? --Tuxyso (talk) 06:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - It's better, but not fixed. I'm not sure how best to show you. Is it ok if I upload an b&w image of the areas with red channel=1 somewhere (outside of commons, just temporarily)? — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:33, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - Or, nevermind. If nobody except me has a problem with it, it can't be that bad. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        Thanks for your persitency and thanks for your helpful information on your discussion page. Fixed IMHO I have finally fixed the issue. Interestingly the red channel is clipped more in sRGB color space than in AdobeRGB. I have to make up my mind how to handle such issues in future because ~~LR does not show clippings of only one color channel (no channel-separated histogram)~~. It would be great to take another look. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:07, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        Perfect, thanks for being so interested in improving the image. Support. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 20:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        That is one of the things I like on Commons: learning from each other. The lesson I've learned today: Do not rely on the Lightroom highlight warning but control for clipped color channels separately with an alternative software especially for critical motives :) --Tuxyso (talk) 20:59, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        Who is interested in it. I wrote a small memo how to handle channel clipping in Lightroom. It was a quite complex problem with color spaces in LR and sRGB export color space, see Channel Clipping in Lightroom (unfortunately in German, but with a lot of screenshots) --Tuxyso (talk) 15:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—I see no clipped reds—Love, Kelvinsong talk 21:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 09:55, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 10:40, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry,it is a nice picture but imo it looks a little uninspired. Sharpness is good but the composition doesn`t works for me. Tight crop on the top and left side, the cut off part on the right and the other unsharp parts of the blossom makes the whole picture a little messy imo and, I´m missing that something special in the picture that makes it FP worthy for me. (I don`t like the no wow argument...) It looks, don`t get me wrong, like a "simple" macro snap shot of a nice blossom. --mathias K 13:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your circumstantial comment. I agree with you that the composition is not outstanding. But with macro shots it is seldom the composition which make them FP but the overall quality and the light. I cannot see that e.g. with this other FPC the composition is the main reason for the strong support but the light and quality. The reason why I have nominated the image here is mainly because I really like the green-red color contrast paired with some very dark areas in the background (compare with other shots in the category). Also notice that the border of the blossoms matches nearly exactly with the dark areas in the background. Calling my photo "uninspired" does not justice to it. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support--H. Krisp (talk) 20:33, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 09:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry Tuxyso, but the composition doesn't work for me, either. I agree word by word with Matthias's comments: the crop is not convincing and the blurred blossoms mixing with the focused blossoms is disturbing to me. In addition, to be honest, I'd rather keep a bit of red channel clipping, the result is pale to me. Poco² 12:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please look into Category:Clerodendrum speciosissimum. The flower is not that red as it originally was before I've corrected the clipping issue. Thus I think it is much better than before (especially the fine differences in red tones which are always quite critical in digital photography) and the strong red-green contrast still works. Composition is always a matter of personal taste (e.g. I could not see a compositional idea with your high-riser crop). Regarding focus I can neither follow matthias nor your arguments - DoF is more than sufficient in the case here. All important parts of the flower are in focus. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:08, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 04:31, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

File:Squaw Valley Gondola.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2013 at 07:16:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Frank Schulenburg - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 07:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 13:37, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 14:35, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good detail and nice angles (I can't help thinking of the movie Good Guys Wear Black whenever I see this. Daniel Case (talk) 16:03, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 21:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful view and good details! --P.Lindgren (talk) 09:24, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 15:10, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Crisix - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2013 at 15:18:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Spanish metal band Crisix at Asaco Metal Fest 2013, Parla, Spain. Created, uploadedand nominated by Kadellar (talk) 15:18, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 15:18, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Le cadrage est approprié au sujet. Très bien. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 14:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thank you for your support, Paul. --Kadellar (talk) 15:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Kadellar (talk) 15:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Puits Notre-Dame pluie.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2013 at 12:23:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Bourgeois.A - uploaded by Bourgeois.A - nominated by Bourgeois.A -- Bourgeois.A (talk) 12:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info Taken in native JPEG with that
Support -- Bourgeois.A (talk) 12:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 10:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support This image is deeply melancholic, and that makes it special in my opinion—because of the rainy atmosphere, but also because of these almost hidden remains of an extinguished industry, in an region that once was more flourishing. --Myrabella (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor composition. No wow factor and I take it the little stump thing is the subject. Flickrworker (talk) 16:38, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow, per Flickrworker. Daniel Case (talk) 17:03, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not extraordinary picture or outstanding quality. Qflieger (talk) 17:25, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is useless to vote by just personal taste and false argument. This image has an artistic sense, if you do not see it, it's sad for you. Bourgeois.A (talk) 18:51, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Useless Oppose per Qflieger. I didn't vote yet because I always thought I might still see something special in it at a later time. But I don't. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 18:58, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 15:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pérignac 16 Sablière D10 2013.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2013 at 08:19:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by JLPC - uploaded by JLPC - nominated by JLPC -- JLPC (talk) 08:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JLPC (talk) 08:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 10:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beau panorama. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 08:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no wow factor. Flickrworker (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support yes, it's not wow but it's nice and educative valued is a good substitute to the wow factor --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose "Sand pit"? "wow"? --Kikos (talk) 07:59, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- And why not ?!? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sand pit have not the good status to be featured ?!? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - This page is for the featured images candidate, not featured subjects candidate --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - Don't worry, Christian : this is a joke. As old as photography, as old as painting. If it wasn't many questions could be asked about such a review. --JLPC (talk) 09:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose now wow, not really sharp (low details). --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It's true that the quality is a bit low, especialy for a subject that don't have the "wow statut" --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:51, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Uninteresting composition. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 18:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 15:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viaducto Agrícola Batalla de Niquitao II.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2013 at 23:47:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Rjcastillo - uploaded by Rjcastillo - nominated by Rjcastillo -- Rjcastillo (talk) 23:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rjcastillo (talk) 23:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 12:09, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 14:36, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although I would like to see it used somewhere. Daniel Case (talk) 23:40, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose tight crop at bottom, bad quality (unsharp and low details esp. in the left corner of the image). --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 21:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 15:07, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Belt of Venus over Paranal Observatory.jpg

File:MGM Grand, Macao, 2013-08-08, DD 14.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2013 at 14:35:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Casino resort MGM Grand, Macau. All by me, Poc o² 14:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 14:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice colours and reflections. --Kadellar (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Could you add the location, please? --Kadellar (talk) 15:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done, both, object and photographer location, Poc o² 17:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The motive has definitely a lot of "Wow inside", quality and light is at a high level, but Question why did you crop the bottom? For me the crop is a bit unfortunate that way. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why? because it is too ordinary and bussy, cars, signs and so on. In my opinion it loses its magic. If you don't believe me, I can upload the uncropped version, but only for information, I wouldn't change this nomination. Poc o² 17:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It has nothing to do with "believing" - I do not know the location and in most cases it is better to ground an architecture shot (besides it is a tele detail shot) otherwise ones get the impression that something is missing. It would be interesting to see the whole location and I look forward to an uncropped version just for informational purposes. BTW: I have NOT opposed but only asked --Tuxyso (talk) 17:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here you are (I have many other pictures that I will upload when I get time, the sortiment is generous, I also have several with 3 traffic lanes :)). BTW, I didn't affirm that you oppose. Poc o² 18:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice artful rendition of an artful object. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good light! --P.Lindgren (talk) 20:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 06:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support You did this on a day trip from Hong Kong before Wikimania, I presume? Makes me think I should have gone over there myself. Oh yes, it's a great pic. Daniel Case (talk) 07:06, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad composition (or bad croping). Whole building will be better. --Kikos (talk) 07:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! did you follow the discussion above with Tuxyso? After several attempts (currently with no reliable Internet conexion) I could update 3 additional pictures of the building that show more: [5] [6] [7]. As already said, in my opinion not better. Poc o² 15:17, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 16:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:25, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:07, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:56, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IMO this one [8] is much better --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:15, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I was never really convinced of this photo. The example of Christian (also by Diego) shows that there is a much better perspective. The problem with the nominee is that the crop is imho not audacious enough. At the bottom it looks a bit random to me. If you had cropped tighter without visible elements from the ground you could have accentuated the artistic structure of the building in a better way. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:50, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree with Christian Ferrer. The version with uncropped bottom is better. --Ivar (talk) 07:22, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer this version. — TintoMeches, 12:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 21:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question What is the FoP situation in Macau? --99of9 (talk) 07:33, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Ok, guys, so it be, new alternative below Poc o² 10:25, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support this is better, maybe it needs some cloning on the right (lamp) --Ivar (talk) 10:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The reflections of the other picture are much more lively, this one is duller. I find the other one has a good composition, it shows the coloured parts of the building (this one showing the whole building might be better, but both are good imo). I agree with Ivar about the street lamp, it's disturbing. --Kadellar (talk) 13:07, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
...gone! Poc o² 13:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
...and regarding the image being a bit duller, I agree with you. I improved it giving it a bit more contrast and a bit more of light. If I may also express my opinion: the reflexions here are not as nice as at the other one (due to the cloudes, although the gap between both pictures is only 2 minutes), I don't like the road and I am not fan of the shadow on it. That being said, it is a nice picture, as well. Poc o² 03:51, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me it's this one without hesitation, it's a more valued image with this centring, but it's also true that the quality is a bit better on the first --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - even though the reflections are not as nice, I definitely prefer this one. --— Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 16:37, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 08:23, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

The chosen alternative is: File:MGM Grand, Macao, 2013-08-08, DD 14.jpg

File:Tigridia pavonia flower.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2013 at 09:19:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded & nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 09:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 09:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 09:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 14:00, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 17:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 22:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:51, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, it is indeed a nice picture of a nice flower but the dof is way too short. --mathias K 13:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 20:30, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 10:11, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:55, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 10:56, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

File:Grand Prismatic Spring.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2013 at 13:17:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Grand Prismatic Spring in Yellowstone National Park. Edited Version. Created, uploaded & nominated by -- Clément Bardot (talk) 13:17, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Clément Bardot (talk) 13:17, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Le grain de la photographie est d'une beauté indiscutable. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 14:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors, Poc o² 14:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow! darkweasel94 14:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{o}}~~ The beauty of the branch in the foreground, however, is quite debatable. Kleuske (talk) 15:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—The dead tree on the right ruins it for me, sorry.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 17:13, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but now the crop messes it up. The edge of the lake is cut off and there are now random treetops poking into the bottom of the image.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 21:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If you edit out the branch I will support. Nice image. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support it's great. Tomer T (talk) 22:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:23, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 06:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kleuske (talk) 07:56, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Is there really any effort needed to capture this kind of image? Guess, somehow just be there and point at it and shoot. I don't find any kind of compositional inspiration or creativity in this photo. Neither, lighting has anything impressive about it. However, nice eye-catchy colors, definitely ! --Dey.sandip (talk) 11:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I've seen many pictures that capture the subject so much better (e.g. this one, or this). The image shown above lacks composition and doesn't convey the beauty of the place. Sorry. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice place but blurred image --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:03, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I've to agree with Christian, sorry. Definitely lacking detail. --A.Savin 09:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Christian Ferrer --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:46, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but definitely blurred. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice view but poor sharpenss --Martin Kraft (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 21:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree with the points named above. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 05:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The first version of the image was great apart from the branch that ruined it. This crop don't capture the beautiful scenery as well as the first version. --P.Lindgren (talk) 09:26, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Arcalino (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 11 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 21:15, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sadi-Carnot Bridge, Sète, Hérault 02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2013 at 05:33:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

all by -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:32, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:32, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the composition and the shadow in the foreground --Clément Bardot (talk) 12:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Une photographie bien prise et encyclopédique. Le travail de Christian Ferrer est de longue haleine et très intéressant. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 06:41, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 14:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Well-done technically and certainly an encyclopedically-valuable picture of the bridge, but no wow. Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Piazza Signoria - Firenze.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2013 at 08:55:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Zolli - uploaded by Zolli - nominated by Zolli -- Zolli (talk) 08:55, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zolli (talk) 08:55, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose perspective distortion (should be fixable though) - also, is this impossible to take with the sun behind the camera, so that all visible walls of the church are lit? 2-3 hours later perhaps? darkweasel94 21:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info is impossible to take sun on the left of Palazzo Vecchio!, an alternative is night photo or no-sun. bye! Zolli (talk) 06:32, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:57, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Santa croce piazza.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2013 at 09:06:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Zolli - uploaded by Zolli - nominated by Zolli -- Zolli (talk) 09:06, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zolli (talk) 09:06, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:57, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santuario di Santa Lucia - Notturno.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2013 at 11:48:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Valerio Manassero - uploaded by Valerio Manassero - nominated by Valerio Manassero -- Valerio Manassero (talk) 11:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Valerio Manassero (talk) 11:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor lighting, severe artefacts. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad lighting. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 15:54, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Interno del Santuario di Santa Lucia.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2013 at 11:53:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Valerio Manassero - uploaded by Valerio Manassero - nominated by Valerio Manassero -- Valerio Manassero (talk) 11:53, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Valerio Manassero (talk) 11:53, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Doppelsonne Halo Echzell Hessen 12-08-2012.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2013 at 12:54:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Neptuul - uploaded by Neptuul - nominated by Neptuul -- Neptuul (talk) 12:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Neptuul (talk) 12:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Provided that all sunsets are fascinating, I appreciate the idea of one seen from a cornfield. However, if the horizon is acceptable, I don't like at all the bare ground and the grass in the foreground. — TintoMeches, 14:00, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per TintoMeches --Fbnpch (talk) 14:11, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Flash on corn is very distracting and amateurish-looking. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Others --Dey.sandip (talk) 05:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 22:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martino Ghisleni (talk) 11:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Shape of Change - A Mærsk Triple-E infographic.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2013 at 04:18:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Maersk Line - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 04:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not sure if we have had full infographics as a FP candidate before, let again being an FP, but given the amount of detail and information in this infographic, it would certainly be a great example of an infographic.
Support -- russavia (talk) 04:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Impressive artwork, but a good infographic imo should list the sources used for the facts and numbers depicted. Also:
- JPG is the wrong file format for things like this (see Commons:File types).
- The bar chart for the CO₂ emission is missing a unit of measurement at the y-axis (22.5 g/s? kg/km? t/h?) and the x-axis is inverted for no apparent reason.
- The "less polluting transport"-diagram is lacking a circle for the mean CO₂ emission of transport ships in general for comparison.
- CO₂ is written "CO2" at least thrice.
- Some other minor typographic errors (hyphens instead of dashes, whitespaces where they should not be, missing whitespaces where they should be (for example "43km / h" instead of "43 km/h"))

All in all that's not featurable for me. --El Grafo (talk) 17:06, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose a JPEG in a case where JPEG is the wrongest file format one can use isn't our best work, sorry. darkweasel94 17:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose—Jpg is unacceptable; and hyphens where endashes should be!! Of course that can't be fixed because of the format. 😕—Love, Kelvinsong talk 14:03, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 18:49, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

file:Warinerbeijing.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2013 at 14:28:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

This picture is an exclusivity of wp commons, showing the arrival of the 400m of the Beijing Olympics in 2008 and the "diving for the bronze" of David Neville caught in action.

Info all by me -- Jmex (talk) 14:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it is less than 2 megapixels and very poor quality. --Joydeep _Talk 17:39, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

What do you mean by "poor quality" ? This image is a pure exclusivity of wp commons. You'll never find this action picture anywhere else, this is it's quality. And yes, it is not one of those insects or flowers on "close-up shoot". If it is just a question of pixels, i'll withdraw the proposal. Jmex (talk) 21:31, 20 August 2013 (CEST)

Comment Hello Jmex, thanks for uploading this photograph on Wikimedia Commons: it's a very good shot.
Unfortunately, it's just a problem of pixels. One of the requirements for a Featured Picture or a Quality Image is having at least 2 real megapixels of information. For further information you can read Commons:Why we need high resolution media. I hope I've helped. If you need something else, please do not hesitate to contact me. — TintoMeches, 19:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Version with more than 2 megapixels

Info Thanks Tinto : i have uploaded the original picture here with all the informations and i think, the right number of pixels. OK like this ? Jmex (talk) 22:03, 30 August 2013 (CEST)
OK, the new version seems to meet all the requirements. Please, remind your vote must be clearly stated: so delete your previous vote by adding <del> before {{Support}} and </del> after that; then add a new vote down here. — TintoMeches, 20:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support even if the athletes are a bit blurred (I understand it's complex pic to take). — TintoMeches, 20:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad quality. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 22:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jmex (talk) 10:55, 21 August 2013 (CEST)
Oppose It is a valuable picture. However, imho the quality (noise, unsharpness) does not qualify it for FP. Sorry! --P.Lindgren (talk) 09:31, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose higher shutter speed was necessary, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 09:42, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp at full resolution, very noisy, overall bad quality. We have featured sports photos like this, this and this all of which are moving action photos. --Joydeep _Talk 10:19, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp, jpeg artifacts, tilted; per others. --Kadellar (talk) 18:14, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cloudy sky over Bergamo.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2013 at 20:42:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Martino Ghisleni - uploaded by Martino Ghisleni - nominated by Martino Ghisleni -- Martino Ghisleni (talk) 20:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martino Ghisleni (talk) 20:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Uninteresting composition, bad quality. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 23:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- If you don't like skies, why do you say this picture is "uninteresting"? --Martino Ghisleni (talk) 09:43, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Some skies are very interesting, especially when something big is brewing. This one (Stratocumulus) is too common to be FP-interesting. See here for more examples. Kleuske (talk) 10:38, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You might achieve a better composition if you include the horizon, which provides some depth and scale to the image and i have the impression the image needs a tilt clockwise. Kleuske (talk) 10:41, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just a cloudy sky, nothing special here. Very noisy too and with lack of contrast. --Kadellar (talk) 13:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kadellar --FbnPch • (talk) 16:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per all others. When I first saw this I wondered if someone had accidentally uploaded the picture that they they took while fumbling around with the camera before taking the picture they really wanted to take. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Good idea, but bad quality. — Stas1995 (talk) 12:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 12:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know why Stas1995 put confirmed result tag before FPCbot! I think this will cause bot malfunction. The bot will put unconfirmed result in 5th day in case of speedy closure. Manually putting confirmed result tag before FPCbot is totally wrong procedure and should not be done at all. Not only this nomination but Stas1995 have done this in more than one nominations. -- 117.227.137.67 08:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:2013-08-16 14-49-26-batterie-eperon.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2013 at 18:45:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 18:45, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 18:45, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 04:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dey.sandip (talk) 05:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 07:06, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 11:03, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:11, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:52, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very good composition. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 10:15, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:39, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Melitaea phoebe and Dactylorhiza fuchsii.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2013 at 19:44:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Male knapweed fritillary drying wings on the common spotted orchid. All by Ivar (talk) 19:44, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 19:44, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's me the first! a wing a bit blurred but fantastic -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:54, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I had to sacrifice upper wing to get sharp flower. --Ivar (talk) 21:02, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 09:24, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 10:06, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 14:18, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:47, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 17:44, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:24, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 17:59, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:58, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Paldiski bay 23-03-2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2013 at 19:44:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: icy Paldiski bay with mute swans before sunset. All by Ivar (talk) 19:44, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 19:44, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 17:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:25, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 12:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:53, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:St. Volodymyr's Cathedral in Kiev.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2013 at 14:33:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by PetarM -- Mile (talk) 14:33, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 14:33, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 23:10, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like the colors, but the wide-angle distortion is way too obvious here (similar problem, unfortunately, I often have with Sigma 8-16, when I have to approach the building very close... very evil in this image for example); furthermore, the woman in the foreground is disturbing, and why so much space at the bottom? --A.Savin 09:02, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Info Nice to hear for colors. Otherwise, I saw that photo, of course, fisheye focal (8 mm) is not good for such type of photo, unrealistic shape. And that's why I have used two shots, at f/4,5 (16 mm is far from 8 mm), lower photo tilted to the ground limits distortion, and one more for upper part. When I stitch them one on top of another I had minimal distortion correction. For woman, this is place of worship - church. That woman is a beliver/pilgrim. She stays. --Mile (talk) 14:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

oops, I didn't realize that it's stitched. Nonetheless, the effect is just similar to wide-angle, which is probably caused by the perspective distortion of the upper shot and the follow-up deformation made by the pano software in order to equalize stitching inconsistencies. The woman is annoying for the composition, but not essentially. --A.Savin 17:35, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have to leave this comment: Perspective distortion, both in wide-angle lenses and after stitching, is not an error, it's just a representation of the mapping of a curved area onto a flat image. It's not a mistake and can't be corrected or avoided, it's necessary and different projections only vary in the way the distortions are visible. That doesn't change that it doesn't look good, but many comments make it sound like a perfect lens or stitching could avoid perspective distortion. That's mathematically impossible. End of unrelated comment. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 18:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 21:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 02:16, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Тајга (talk) 21:09, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nice shrine, nice angle. -- Bojan Talk 06:26, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would like to support but there is a serious stitching error in the building above the guy with the stripy t-shirt. If you use Hugin, you might want to try SmartBlend with it, as I find it generally does a better job. Also you can get Hugin to keep the (otherwise temporary) aligned segments and manually fix stitching images using layers with Photoshop. Colin (talk) 16:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Info You were right, haven't saw that error, it was from smudge tool (accidentaly hit there), now corrected. Otherwise it was stitched much higher. Thanx for observation. --Mile (talk) 19:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support It is often tricky to shoot large buildings -- trees and stuff get in the way and you often can't stand far back enough. This is an attractive building, well shot. Colin (talk) 20:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:55, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ašhabad (talk) 20:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Young Capra Ibex at Passo dei Salati.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2013 at 18:34:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by SteGrifo27 -- SteGrifo27 (tell me) 18:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SteGrifo27 (tell me) 18:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:03, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paul Munhoven (talk) 06:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is there a way to create a version with less compression? The artifacts in the fur are really bad. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Julian. --Kadellar (talk) 15:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 14:18, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Edited sharpness. --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 19:13, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Strong halos. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:47, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 23:05, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hong Kong Wetland Park893.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2013 at 16:56:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by me, Matthias Süßen (talk) 16:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Matthias Süßen (talk) 16:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful composition, but sadly with clipped blacks and whites, chromatic aberrations and colour noise in the sky. Possible to fix through different editing? — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 06:55, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 23:05, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ceps, Roquebrun, Hérault 04.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2013 at 19:23:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 02:11, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:27, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:40, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - --Paul Munhoven (talk) 10:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful view, but the crispness could be better. Maybe it still can be solved (lightroom or so) --A.Savin 21:11, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Sharpened and less noise reduction -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Somewhat I cannot see significant difference, sorry. --A.Savin 09:37, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done You're right, not significant difference, new version uploaded -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 12:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better now --A.Savin 12:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 18:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:49, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now that is striking. Nothing wrong with it technically. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:51, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 23:09, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Clitocybe nebularis Nebelkappe.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2013 at 20:57:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- H. Krisp (talk) 20:57, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- H. Krisp (talk) 20:57, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 12:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — TintoMeches, 14:05, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 14:18, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 15:12, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 09:36, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi

File:Estatua de Guan Yin, Macao, 2013-08-08, DD 08.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2013 at 23:49:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 23:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 23:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Zolli (talk) 06:59, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, but you need 50 edits in Commons to vote for other (not your) candidates. Please read featured picture candidate policy. --Ivar (talk) 17:06, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 15:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 18:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support thank you once more Tomer! Poco² 11:37, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You'e welcome. Tomer T (talk) 18:59, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ian Furst (talk) 19:23, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:07, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 11:26, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:IC 2944, Nicknamed the Running Chicken Nebula.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2013 at 21:02:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ESO, u/n by Stas1995 — Stas1995 (talk) 21:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 21:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 12:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:49, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — TintoMeches, 14:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:47, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 19:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 01:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 09:37, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

File:Sassetta at sunrise 1.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2013 at 13:23:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Haneburger - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 13:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting light and good shooting position. But imho the crop at the top is too tight and the sharpness is not convincing. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Tuxyso -- Arcalino (talk) 14:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 14:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vieussan, Hérault 08.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2013 at 06:34:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:34, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:34, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Concrete road and dull shed spoil this. The valley is nice but this view doesn't seem exceptional. -- Colin (talk) 08:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dendroaspis polylepis striking.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2013 at 11:39:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Tad Arensmeier on Flickr- uploaded by Sebastian80 - nominated by Nikhil -- Nikhil(talk) 11:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nikhil(talk) 11:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting shot but overall too dark and missing some depth of field for me to grant FP stamp Poco² 13:36, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the comment. Yes, I too observed the lack of DOF, but the difficulty in taking this shot again, and the timing prompted me to nominate it :). Nikhil(talk) 15:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm with Poco a poco here: The technical quality is not sufficient for a FP imho. But I'd highly suggest to nominated it at COM:VI (Scope could be something like "Dendroaspis polylepis, striking"). --El Grafo (talk) 08:54, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thanks for your suggestion. :) Nikhil(talk) 15:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I withdraw my nomination. Nikhil(talk) 15:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Men 200 m French Athletics Championships 2013 t161532.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2013 at 17:26:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Jastrow - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 17:26, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:26, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fbnpch (talk) 19:37, 23August 2013 (UTC)
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I know it is easier to say than implement, but the DoF is too low and most runners are not sharp. I think this shot would have been easier with a tele. The crop is also a bit to tight to me. Still a nice sport shot. Poc o² 13:48, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The objects of interest here, the runners, are not well lit and their faces, certainly the (or one of the) most interesting features of a human, cannot be seen. MrHarman (talk) 02:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per MrHarman Kruusamägi (talk) 11:38, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 13:20, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Justizpalast at dusk.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2013 at 04:19:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:19, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:19, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WorldTraveller101 ? 16:52, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:26, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iguane des Fidji2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2013 at 14:24:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Fiji Banded Iguana (Brachylophus fasciatus). Created, uploaded & nominated by --Clément Bardot (talk) 14:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Clément Bardot (talk) 14:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 18:35, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Not best quality, but I like it! Nice colors! -- Wolf im Wald (de) 01:28, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 14:19, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 14:48, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bebe - MN Gredos - 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2013 at 12:43:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Spanish singer Bebe live at Músicos en la Naturaleza, Hoyos del Espino, Ávila, Spain. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 12:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 12:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 06:27, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your support. --Kadellar (talk) 18:14, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 14:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:2013-08-06 09-06-33 Switzerland Kanton Graubünden Poschiavo Lagh da Val Viola.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2013 at 20:15:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by simisa - uploaded by simisa - nominated by simisa -- Simisa (talk) 20:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Simisa (talk) 20:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is is just me or does the image need a slight tilt counter-clockwise? Kleuske (talk) 23:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have checked the tilt vertically (from peak to peak); it is 0.12° and therefore I think it is not necessary to upload a new version. Simisa (talk) 10:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry, but I notice it as well. I would appreciate a fix. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:03, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 04:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:51, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 09:59, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — ℳ₪Zaplotnik 12:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kds11 (talk) 18:45, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 20:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basteibrücke morgens.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2013 at 17:43:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 17:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 17:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 18:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very Good! --Rjcastillo (talk) 20:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality and detailed. --Dэя-Бøяg 01:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:07, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:25, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- It's beautiful! --Martino Ghisleni (talk) 09:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. But I personally prefer this crop. With the photo here the area around the trees at the right is a bit too large (and unsharp due to focus on the bridge) and the area at the bottom left is quite dark. Nonetheless the nomination is an FP imho. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:42, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 11:47, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:57, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agree with Tuxyso that it would be improved by cropping the tree down/out of the right side, but don't feel strongly enough about it to not support. Almonroth (talk) 17:08, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pile-on Support Detail so fine I thought I could keep clicking enlarge down to the subatomic level. Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Overexposed sky --The Photographer (talk) 14:32, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:47, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FbnPch • (talk) 07:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:53, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Citron (talk) 19:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Only me missing? :) Poc o² 13:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 11:40, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very sharp! --P.Lindgren (talk) 13:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 15:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 28 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 20:52, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2013 at 15:10:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Deep Purple performing at Músicos en la naturaleza 2013 in Hoyos del Espino, Ávila, Spain. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 15:10, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 15:10, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 05:08, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow, very good capture --A.Savin 08:24, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The guys are having fun... I like that. Kleuske (talk) 08:46, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's a bit noisy, but that's acceptable for lightning conditions like this. Don Airey in the background is a bit disturbing, but it's an awesome shot nevertheless. Fun Fact: Roger Glover seems to prefer the good old swing-top-bottle rubber seal in favour of security strap-locks :D --El Grafo (talk) 11:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 12:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! Poc o² 03:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little grainy in the middle but the essence–these two musicians having a good time doing what they do—comes through. Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good capture! They sure seems happier now than 30 years ago... :) --P.Lindgren (talk) 07:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 11:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 20:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Libélula (Orthetrum sabina) sobre un Gymnocalicium mihanowichii, Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2013 at 11:17:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Dragonfly (Orthetrum sabina) on a Gymnocalicium mihanowichii, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. All by me, Poc o² 11:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 11:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 12:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 13:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:13, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 15:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 17:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support but looking at the tail and body strips I think the species is Orthetrum sabina. Please have a look. And also please check my image, looks very similar. -- Joydeep _Talk 17:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
...and you were right, I updated all relevant data, thanks a lot! Poc o² 11:33, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 18:00, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 18:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:49, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:06, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 08:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 20:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Nymphenburger Schloss at sunset.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2013 at 09:10:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:10, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:10, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Straight spot to remove (see note), there is few birds and a plane (I've no problem with that), but darkness areas are very dark and the left part seem a bit blurry -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:31, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done the spot is gone, brightness adjusted --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:24, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry but I'm not very satisfied with this composition with the fountain at the front. I also find the shadow at left a bit disturbing, which is a pity because it spoils the nice symmetry. There's also lack of detail at the roof and regarding other little details, sorry, maybe also because the light of the day when you took the picture. See this already FP, which I find perfect: File:Image-Schloss Nymphenburg Munich CC edit3.jpg. --Kadellar (talk) 15:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Hmm, yes, this image is great. I already knew it before taking my own picture. That's why I wanted to give it a shot with exactly this composition, ie the fountain in the center and the warm light of sunset reflecting on the facade. I admit that the harsh contrasts that this situation tends to create are somewhat unfortunate... Any other opinions? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:36, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I just tested what happens if you brighten the dark areas a little and in my opinion, that improves the image because the shadows, especially the one on the left, aren't that black any more then. I'm not sure if it's enough though, the composition is still slightly weird. A camera position about 2 m higher would of course be better but also very difficult to get. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 18:02, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment OK, I tried to brighten up the dark areas (and also a little bit the image as a whole). A camera position 3,5m above the ground would be great, but I suppose the park administration wouldn't really appreciate me building a scaffold right there... ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:55, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:47, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Arcalino (talk) 15:27, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good reworking -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 14:21, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 20:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Two Coracles and Tungabhadra River.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2013 at 15:31:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Two coracles and Tungabhadra River. c/u/n by Dey.sandip -- Dey.sandip (talk) 15:31, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Dey.sandip (talk) 15:31, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice composition. --Kadellar (talk) 15:57, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:17, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 17:37, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 14:18, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:06, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:47, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --P.Lindgren (talk) 20:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — TintoMeches, 10:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 22:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 11:20, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry but I don't like the composition and the sky (and even the rest of the picture) seems to be too yellow. --Clément Bardot (talk) 20:34, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 12:02, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 20:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Tabanus sudeticus MHNT Portrait.jpg

File:Cepaea nemoralis - Living animal - 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2013 at 06:19:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 17:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 18:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 01:15, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:55, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:59, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:46, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow--Citron (talk) 19:47, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I would have preferred a different kind of view of the snail. --P.Lindgren (talk) 09:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree, overall quality is very good but the flash lighting, angle and subject are not outstanding for FP, sorry Poc o² 13:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per citron --Dey.sandip (talk) 06:43, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I thought about it for some time now, and I agree that the light is a problem. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 08:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Llez (talk) 18:20, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Attica 06-13 Athens 25 Olympian Zeus Temple.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2013 at 20:58:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by A.Savin 20:58, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 20:58, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO the crop like a square broke the dynamic (motion) of the picture, it would be much better with a crop at top and at the bottom (see notes), but anyway a very good picture --Christian Ferrer 05:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Done I've made a more appropriate crop; however, not as tight at the top as you suggested. Thanks --A.Savin 08:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Just for information, I've tried on my pc and a more audacious crop just below the fence is possible and give a nice effect --Christian Ferrer 11:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 18:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 18:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 12:12, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:48, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jklamo (talk) 14:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 19:06, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Colombo April 2013-2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2013 at 10:00:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info 121 windows in Colombo's Commercial Mall: exercise on minimalism -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice work! Nikhil(talk) 13:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 17:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice capture! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 19:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good job --Christian Ferrer (d) 19:46, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice Poc o² 22:09, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cool! --P.Lindgren (talk) 07:12, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice work. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:35, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great stuff. Love the composition, the light and the colours. --Slaunger (talk) 17:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition, look like a computer render --The Photographer (talk) 14:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brilliant! -- Arcalino (talk) 14:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Certainly not minimalist, but a good architectural shot. We need more of this kind of photos in FPC, in place of boring buildings and bridges and statues taken in broad day light --Dey.sandip (talk) 06:09, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- It is not the building which is minimlist but the photo! I must confess that I am surprised with the success of this nomination. The shot was made some time ago and I never dared to present it here fearing that you guys would consider the composition and subject too trivial... Anyway symmetry is the best known element of beauty in art and nature! Hércule Poirot, Agatha Christie's Belgium detective, would have been much pleased :) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I hope to see again trivial nominations. This is the error that I make myself, have to be risky and nominate strange things. If we dont this, soon all FP images will only nice --The Photographer (talk) 12:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Hesitatingly. I like the photo, I hate the Copy/Paste-architecture. Victor Hugo was right. Kleuske (talk) 01:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could almost be used as a game board ... definitely a nice desktop image. Daniel Case (talk) 05:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 12:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- please add coordinates --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 15:58, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:24, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 12:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 19:14, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Lutte sénégalaise Bercy 2013 - Mame Balla-Pape Mor Lô - 32.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2013 at 14:19:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Pyb - uploaded by Pyb - nominated by PierreSelim -- PierreSelim (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support An impressive picture of indoor Senegalese wrestling during World African Wrestling world tour, Paris Bercy. -- PierreSelim (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I do like this picture, but in which article would you use it? MartinD (talk) 16:13, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In en:Senegalese wrestling for exemple --PierreSelim (talk) 16:27, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, added to Senegalese wrestling. Great action, but it looks a bit underexposed to me, --Ivar (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 11:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- A fine brown frame... Kleuske (talk) 07:40, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 19:05, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleclown (talk) 11:06, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 12:14, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 12:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 19:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:Prague Panorama - Oct 2010.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2013 at 13:48:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Jirib -- Jirib (talk) 13:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jirib (talk) 13:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good photo --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — TintoMeches, 14:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jklamo (talk) 20:32, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:49, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 12:08, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 12:08, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 19:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:RhB ABe 4-4 III Kreisviadukt Brusio.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2013 at 08:15:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Nikhil -- Nikhil(talk) 08:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nikhil(talk) 08:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 09:03, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer(talk) 09:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleclown (talk) 11:13, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 16:27, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:01, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 18:16, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support How did you do that? you were "just there"? great shot! Poco² 22:08, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Well, more like sitting on five trains and one bus to get there (6 hour journey), a rather scary 30 minute hike to get up to the foto position, taking pictures of two trains, and then going back home (another 6 hours). Don't ask me why I'm doing this, but its kinda fun. --Kabelleger (talk) 23:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ah! ok, I thought it was an aerial shot and you arranged the flight with the train schedule. Regarding doing things like that, who are you telling that :) Poc o² 13:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very nice. —Bruce1ee^talk 06:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:27, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 14:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 17:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 02:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MJJR (talk) 09:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 11:36, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a Model Railway -- Arcalino (talk) 15:02, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:33, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Maire (talk) 10:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 12:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Citron (talk) 22:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 19:13, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Rhinopias aphanes Lacy scorpionfish PNG by Nick Hobgood.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2013 at 09:00:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Nhobgood - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 09:00, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 09:00, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fbnpch (talk) 09:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 14:17, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:47, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — TintoMeches, 20:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 17:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:13, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 18:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish

File:Souq Waqif, Doha, Catar, 2013-08-05, DD 11.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2013 at 03:21:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Original umbrellas roof in the Souq Waqif market, Doha, Qatar. All by me, Poc o² 03:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 03:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 10:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support cool --A.Savin 19:25, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Maire (talk) 13:41, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 12:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 15:05, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dey.sandip (talk) 06:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice contrast between earth-toned, unexceptional street scene and colorful, slightly surreal umbrellas. Looks like an album cover. Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Michael Barera (talk) 03:21, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 19:11, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors