Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2019-27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality photo of listing with no meaningful description/title. Unused file with no educational value. Malcolma (talk) 08:15, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:58, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted posters

Pattern of the Sea (talk) 12:58, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, previous DR was closed for procedural reasons. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:00, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted posters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file. Out of project scope. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:03, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination + copyvio (image from facebook). --Wdwd (talk) 15:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted UEFA champions-leage flag in the background, which stays dominant and cannot be de-minimis and not be under threshold of originality. As this flag isn't permanent, no freedom of panorama applies. Quedel (talk) 00:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haagendaxh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

~Cybularny Speak? 06:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Haagendaxh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal photos, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in EXIF data and COM:PACKAGING. ~Cybularny Speak? 06:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Mishi dar (talk) 06:57, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per original nomination (in the version history; I suppose that the uploader overwrote it due to a lack of knowledge of how things work here) and uploader request. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this seems more like an advertisement than a useful photo within our scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:53, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wenn der Urheber unbekannt ist, weiß man auch nicht, ob er schon 70 Jahre tot ist. Xocolatl (talk) 11:53, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep Dutch Copyright Act, Art. 38. Vysotsky (talk) 21:23, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:02, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr. Sroy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alright no problem. I would request a speedy deletion. I don't public myself on internet these days so I wouldn't use them. Dr. Sroy (talk) 09:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:06, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Profesor tm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvios and other out of COM:SCOPE images, escape block by user.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:40, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion)
 Comment See also Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Suwanda Sitorus. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:56, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion, nominating remaining files for deletion.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nearly all (or perhaps literally all) are recreations of deleted uploads from older socks (COM:GCSD#F4); also OOS/NOTHOST/DENY. --Эlcobbola talk 18:29, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Profesor tm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvios and other out of COM:SCOPE images, escape block by user.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:40, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion)
 Comment See also Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Suwanda Sitorus. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:56, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion, nominating remaining files for deletion.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nearly all (or perhaps literally all) are recreations of deleted uploads from older socks (COM:GCSD#F4); also OOS/NOTHOST/DENY. --Эlcobbola talk 18:29, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 08:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

president standard appears to violate COM:FAIRUSE DBigXray 09:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, protected 70 years from creation. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indoor COM:FoP in Mainland China. WQL (talk) 13:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:44, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 11:48, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:08, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indoor COM:FoP(全景自由)in Mainland of China. WQL (talk) 13:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose subjects are simple stick-man diagrams, which a Chinese high court has ruled ineligible for copyright in a similar case. Read COM:TOO China for more.--Roy17 (talk) 15:37, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If it is not Supreme High Court, then it will have no value for reference, since Chinese law is not case law.--WQL (talk) 16:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Commons community makes decisions by drawing comparison between real-life cases and Commons files. Whether or not a country practises common law is not relevant to the discussion on copyright of an actual work.
In this case, the figures are simple geometric shapes or doodles, or stick-man figures. They are similar to an example in COM:TOO China which decided a figure like 黑棍小人 (头部为黑色圆球体,没有面孔;身体的躯干、四肢和足部均由黑色线条构成;小人的头和身体呈分离状;小人的四肢呈拉长状) was ineligible for copyright.--Roy17 (talk) 16:38, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You can make such a comparison, but as I said before, due to the fact that Chinese law is not case law, the example given is not ruling by Supreme High Court, and the case is not listed in the Typical Case published by Supreme High Court, your comparison is meaningless. --WQL (talk) 03:28, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose per above. David290 (talk) 05:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per discussion, especially per Roy. Taivo (talk) 18:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 沈澄心 as Dw no source since (dw no source since)

The previous DR was closed as kept because the figures on the image are considered below the relatively low TOO of the People's Republic of China. I don't see any new arguments for deletion here.  Keep pandakekok9 05:22, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]