Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/07/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 27th, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fluzio Fashion (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photo of unnotable person, out of scope.

0x0a (talk) 07:03, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of unnotable company/brand, out of scope. 0x0a (talk) 07:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake モトテツ (talk) 02:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7; per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a non-notable website, out of project scope. 0x0a (talk) 11:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Billinghurst. --Rosenzweig τ 17:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bettina Cramer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

this is really looking like advertisement.  Delete

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 17:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete COM:CSD G10 QuickWittedHare (talk) 18:55, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:58, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos by French photographer Patrick Cariou published in the book Yes Rasta published in 2000 and registered in the US Copyright Office [1].

Günther Frager (talk) 16:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a work of an employee of the US government. the author of the collage is the artist Richard Prince and it was created in the 2000s. The inclusion on a court case is de minimis, so it cannot be extracted. For a similar DR see Commons:Deletion requests/Illustrations extracted from Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith. Günther Frager (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Modern primat as Speedy (db-advert) and the most recent rationale was: | G10, Advertisement. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 17:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC) [reply]

this product literally has this writing: """REAL ASBESTOS BEST QUALITY"". when i saw this file first, i didnt even look the image. i thought "it must be advertisement".. but.... the image is really about "REAL ASBESTOS BEST QUALITY" xD.... i dont know we should keep this file or remove.. or we should just change its name? modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 17:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me, this is NOT an advertisement: this pipe is even forbidden in Flanders in Belgium since 1998! The pipe is a historical type of pipe, not readily available commercially, perhaps only second-hand. Please keep this photograph of interest to the history of tobacco smoking. Thank you, uploader Hilde As59 (talk) 17:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Hilde. --Achim55 (talk) 17:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Hilde as well, not an advertisement in my opinion. QuickWittedHare (talk) 18:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

then it is  Speedy keep. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept as there seems to be a consensus that this isn't an advertisement. QuickWittedHare (talk) 20:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Olavipoika (talk) 18:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Olavipoika (talk) 18:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image for non-contributor, out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 19:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is "social media" (metadata points to Facebook) Günther Frager (talk) 20:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by I Kadékk Gilang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

None of these is own work.

Yann (talk) 06:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete every file I've checked has been a copyright violation or a misrepresentation of public domain content, and of that it was often duplicated. Highly unlikely anything here is actually own work. Traumnovelle (talk) 09:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please no I Kadékk Gilang (talk) 12:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Don't delete I didn't include the source because I don't understand how to make it, which is why I only included the name of the uploader, the site that uploaded it. I also didn't know it caused copyright 🙏I Kadékk Gilang (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The images are copyrighted, that's a fact, even if you say it is no longer mine. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 12:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nooooo!

[edit]
Don't delete I didn't include the source because I don't understand how to make it, which is why I only included the name of the uploader, the site that uploaded it. I also didn't know it caused copyright 🙏I Kadékk Gilang (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC) I promise not to change the copyright and will say it is no longer mine 🙏[reply]
If you don't understand copyright, don't upload works created by other people. COM:CARES which is why we have to delete these. Abzeronow (talk) 17:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as per above QuickWittedHare (talk) 19:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD F1. Every file I checked was already available online elsewhere and in several cases the uploader cropped out watermarks to hide the correct attribution. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jenna brooks 2600:1000:A121:254B:A195:F4AA:D7BE:7AD 23:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 07:51, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional-only content; author is part of a SEO spamming group and the source has been globally blacklisted. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 17:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional-only content; author is part of a SEO spamming group and the source has been globally blacklisted. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 17:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted: Screenshot of Google Maps. Deor (talk) 18:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete copyright violation of Google's intellectual property QuickWittedHare (talk) 19:16, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 15:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Fugit hora (talk) 21:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request for removal by uploader as works created by the state of Washington are copyrighted and uploader did not realize. QuickWittedHare (talk) 21:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by GPSLeo. --Rosenzweig τ 15:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the "Colorado Public Records Act documents and other works created by the state or local governments may be trademarked or copyrighted." Request deletion by author. QuickWittedHare (talk) 21:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by GPSLeo. --Rosenzweig τ 15:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sony 19th (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: an enormous, indiscriminate collection of unused, undescribed, and largely uncategorized or miscategorized nighttime photos of streets, buildings, parking lots, and building interiors in the Los Angeles region. A few of the photos are of posters or advertisements containing copyrighted images; most are just dark suburban streets.

Full disclosure: I haven't reviewed all of these images in detail; there's simply too many of them. But most of them are simply unremarkable, and they're all taken at night with a cell phone, so the image quality is fairly low, and there's just no educational use for most of these. Please let me know if there's anything that looks potentially usable in here.

List of all 1,884 images

Omphalographer (talk) 03:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we start mass deleting here we also would need to delete much more. Many of the files could be useful if identified and are also easily identifiable for people with local knowledge. Therefor  Keep in this request and make individual requests for the really unusable ones and the ones with copyright concerns. GPSLeo (talk) 06:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem here is that the vast majority of these photos aren't of anything in particular; even if we knew where they were taken, there just isn't anything meaningful in frame to identify. Picking five at random:
I'd love to be proven wrong but, as far as I can tell, there's absolutely nothing useful here. Omphalographer (talk) 07:45, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I only agree with File:Inland Empire CA 20230814 224949042.jpg that it is not not usable. All other files are fine to illustrate the building or the street if identified especially if no photos of higher quality are available. GPSLeo (talk) 07:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as no consensus for bulk deletion. (Note: I agree that probably most have little to no usefulness, but no one seems to be inclinded to sort through them all. No prejudging renomination of individual or subsets.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sony 19th (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTWEBHOST

Mazbel (Talk) 00:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. See my reasoning for previous images at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sony 19th (second nomination). Some of these photos are at least taken in daylight, but they still all appear to be photos of utterly ordinary "urban exploration"; some annotated examples include:
Enough is enough. None of these photos are described in any kind of useful fashion (the description for all is simply the name of a city, like "Rancho Cucamonga" or "Ontario"), and none have geotags to allow them to be identified without substantial sleuthing (like I did in the nomination linked above). Commons is not a dumping ground for your unsorted camera roll. Omphalographer (talk) 04:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would give the user a last chance to describe and categorized the photos properly. If they do not do so and continues uploading such files they should be blocked and the files deleted. GPSLeo (talk) 07:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Personal opinion: I don't think the user is really dedicated to categorize all the photos he has been uploading (+50000) If we contextualize for example the first uploaded photos, they are of the same cabity as the ones previously mentioned in this DR, in fact, the first posted image (File:Inland Empire CA 20230801 232837611.jpg) is simply a night photo, with low resolution. --Mazbel (Talk) 17:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake player created in video game. No encyclopedic purpose. Robertogilnei (talk) 23:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reupload with previous rationale still standing at Commons:Deletion requests/File:FelixGarcia3.jpg. Also a direct screenshot or photo of a video game. DatGuy (talk) 12:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio (screenshot). --Wdwd (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of Panorama has been abolished in Nigeria since March 17, 2023; this Wiki Loves Africa-related upload dates to April 30, 2023. The statue depicts w:en:Moshood Abiola who died in 1998. The year claimed on the tarpaulin at the bottom is "2023", so the statue is obviously recent and still under sculptor's copyright. This commercially-licensed image infringes that copyright, considering the Nigerian copyright law no longer allowing FoP for photos since March 17, 2023. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for photographs of copyrighted works exposed to public in Nigeria. This image is ultimately a derivative of the copyrighted billboard graphics/photo. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of Panorama has been abolished in Nigeria since March 17, 2023; this upload (part of Wiki Loves Africa campaign) was from May 19 of that year. The building was built in 1975. As no architect has been mentioned, this government building can be considered as an anonymous work, subject to "Publish + 70 years". So 1975+70+1=January 1, 2046, the date when the copyright of the building expires. Until then, with no FoP in Nigeria since March 2023, this commercially-licensed image infringes the architectural copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no more Freedom of Panorama in Nigeria since March 17, 2023; this upload was made three days after the effectivity of the more restrictive Nigerian law. Per w:en:Ikoyi, the district saw numerous apartments and high rises built in the modern history. The architecture depicted here is unlikely to be more than 70 years old (or the designer is unlikely dead for more than 70 years) for the work to be in public domain and can be commercially reproduced on Wikimedia. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Nigeria and same work as: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rivers State Government Secretariat (Podium Block).jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of Panorama has been abolished since March 17, 2023; this upload was made six days after the change to more-restrictive Nigerian law. As FoP is no longer valid for photographs of copyrighted works exposed in public spaces, this commercially-licensed image infringes the copyright of the building author, w:en:FMA Architects. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no valid Freedom of Panorama in Nigeria. The depicted street art is likely under its artist's copyright, so this commercially-licensed image is an infringement and cannot be defended by the restrictive, limited FoP of Nigeria. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --CptViraj (talk) 05:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture was completed in 1982 by Jean Marais (1913–1998). There is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2069 A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. The copyright status of the painting and the statue are unclear. 0x0a (talk) 08:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; telegram group screenshot. CptViraj (talk) 09:16, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a work by Tasnim, as it is mentioned in the article, this illustration is handed out to the agency during a panel discussion by Alireza Saeedi, a government official. HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A school group photo, unused, out of scope. And the uploader is the group account, therefore permission from the photographer or proof of auto-click is needed. CptViraj (talk) 13:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This would be {{PD-textlogo}} basically anywhere in the world, but COM:TOO Australia is very low, and I think that (especially given the lettering on the left) this may be above it. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flyer published in Spain this year. The usage of {{PD-US}} as it was clearly not published before 1929 and there is no indication it has a CC0 license. Günther Frager (talk) 15:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tjcmorgan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

metadata literally has this: "screenshot". i guess it is a screenshot.

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pan kartofel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope.

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:27, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly non-free. Speech synths, especially ones from 10 years ago, work by concatinating together clips of actual human speech. This would make it not pd-algorithm. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality: badly blurred, obtrusive overexposed foreground object MPF (talk) 22:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Radisson Blu Lagos by User:Stephanie cheks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Wiki Loves Africa-related images that show the Radisson Blu Hotel Lagos as the main or intended subject. Freedom of Panorama has been abolished since March 17, 2023, and these uploads from April 30 of that year infringe the building architect's copyright. This site claims the hotel was built in 2016, so still under architect's copyright.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by nonnotable youtuber; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iran A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteCOM:NETCOPYVIO. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful, also potentially out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no valid Freedom of Panorama in Nigeria since March 17, 2023. The depicted artworks are unlikely to have been made by artists who died more than 70 years ago; these commercially-licensed images infringe the sculptural copyrights.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Lithuania, architect Kārlis Reisons died in 1981

A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the UK SchroCat (talk) 08:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete it Royiswariii (talk) 12:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This bad JPG image was replaced by the same uploader with File:Aminogruppe mit Blau (ohne Hintergrund hoffe ich).png. 77.58.7.44 00:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 20:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 77.58.7.44 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Amine Functional Group.png -- different file format but agree it should be deleted The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination--poorer file-format and nearly-illegible key text. --DMacks (talk) 20:52, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Famfa Oil Tower by User:Jeremyida002 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Freedom of Panorama has been abolished in Nigeria since March 17, 2023. These are Wiki Loves Africa-related uploads from April 19, 2023 showing Famfa Oil Building as the main or intended subject. The exterior architecture is already identifiable in these images, making these commercially-licensed images infringements of architect's copyright.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Radisson Blu Lagos by User:Jeremyida002 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Same no-FoP in Nigeria issue, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Stephanie cheks#Radisson Blu Lagos by User:Stephanie cheks (talk · contribs) for details on the copyrighted architectural work.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{copyvio|1=The upper part of the image was taken from the official Olympics opening ceremony live stream (e.g. https://www.rts.ch/sport/video/rts-sport/15057839-la-ceremonie-douverture-des-jo-de-paris-2024-en-integralite.html at 03:00:31)}} Nicolapps (talk) 12:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: My concern with this deletion is that while I 100% agree that it does have some form of significance, with all due respect to copyrights, there needs to be a way to replace it in a way that does not facilitate a potential copyright infringement. 20chances (talk) 15:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • @20chances: Copyrighted material may not be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons regardless of their significance.
      English Wikipedia does accept copyrighted material in certain cases under Fair Use (see en:WP:Non-free content and criteria at en:WP:Non-free content criteria) but I suspect this image would not meet the criteria, particularly en:WP:NFCC8: Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Even though it is an interesting situation that happened, I don't think that the photo significantly increases readers' understanding of the Opening Ceremony topic as a whole, not enough to justify hosting copyrighted work. Consigned (talk) 17:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy delete Obvious copyvio. Consigned (talk) 17:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Abzeronow. --Rosenzweig τ 07:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name Change, as the band we changed our names Bragiler to Zevk. so we also changed the album covers. I will send new album cover pictures after deletion. Bragilerband (talk) 13:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name Change, as the band we changed our names Bragiler to Zevk. so we also changed the album covers. I will send new album cover pictures after deletion. Bragilerband (talk) 15:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name Change, as the band we changed our names Bragiler to Zevk. so we also changed the album covers. I will send new album cover pictures after deletion. Bragilerband (talk) 15:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:20, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rzt 7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

AI-generated trophies where, according to the notices on the talk pages from the uploader, The image does not infringe copyright because the trophy generated with AI is a generic trophy and does not have a particular shape. If these images do not depict the real trophies, they are misleading and not in an educationally useful COM:SCOPE. The images are in use, but only where the uploader has added them to Wikipedia article infoboxes, with no explanation that they are generic AI images.

In some cases a Wikipedia project already had a fair use image of a trophy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Copa_Interamericana_trophy.png) which Rzt has replaced with a generic AI version of an entirely different shape and colour (File:Foto de referencia para la Copa Interamericana.jpg).

Belbury (talk) 16:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Against this work being deleted. They are reference images. If they were carbon copies of trophies like the Copa Interamericana, they would be a copyright violation. Copying the exact shape and color of a non-generic trophy would be a violation of the trophy's copyright. These images do not infringe those registered rights. In the case of the Liguillas, trophies of different shapes and types have been awarded, therefore the respective images serve an informative purpose that does not infringe a registered right. User:Rzt 7.
Commons has a lot of photos of football trophies from around the world within Category:Trophies of association football, is there something different about these that makes representations of them copyrighted?
If there is, any picture which deliberately avoids resembling its subject in order to avoid infringing its copyright seems of very little use to the reader. In the case of the English Wikipedia, a fair use image of a copyrighted trophy would be much more useful. In Wikipedia projects with no fair use process, I'd say that no image at all was better than a misleading one. --Belbury (talk) 17:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did you check the photos? Mostly the name of the tournament was written on the AI-generated trophy. This matter is not to be believed. There is work time that is lost because a user does not review the photos they intend to delete. As for the replaced image, it was an image of a yellow star on a checkered background and not a trophy. I hope the user who proposed the deletion recognizes this objective fact, which is of utmost importance in the vote. Rzt 7 (talk) 17:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"The Star" This is the photo that the user regrets was replaced. The replacement? A photo of a trophy with the name of the tournament. This cannot be believed. Rzt 7 (talk) 17:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Belbury Hola ¿Puedes negar que en los trofeos que pides borrar está escrito el nombre de los torneos asociados?. Es clave en la votación. Este es un trabajo serio. Rzt 7 (talk) 17:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, yes, I can see that the names are written on three of the trophies. Belbury (talk) 17:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the replacement I'm referring to: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Copa_Interamericana&diff=prev&oldid=1236834705 - you replaced a fair use trophy image with an AI-generated one, and the two images look very different (one is a gold trophy, the other silver; one has a pattern around its lower half, the other has text across the middle; one curves in at the top, the other curves out; etc).
Is File:Foto de referencia para la Copa Interamericana.jpg an accurate AI-generated picture of a different version of the Copa Interamericana trophy? (I looked online but the only other design I can see is a simple gold wineglass-shaped cup.) Or is your image showing a fictional trophy which, as I thought you were saying on the talk pages, deliberately looks nothing like any of the real Copa Interamericana trophies in order to avoid infringing their copyright? Belbury (talk) 17:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The photo you are citing has a very low resolution. Sooner or later they will delete it because it is a reduced image of a non-generic trophy. If your problem is that the generic cup is not gold, I inform you that only in 1994 was that cup awarded and in 1998 a very similar one, in the rest of the seasons it was a different trophy. Evidence Rzt 7 (talk) 17:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Evidence 2 Evidence 3 Evidence 4 Evidence 5 Rzt 7 (talk) 17:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My question is just what you intend these images to look like. Are they meant to look like the trophies in the filenames? Or are they meant to look different from the real trophies so as not to infringe copyright? Belbury (talk) 17:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The answer, as the evidence shows, is that there was not a single type of trophy in the history of the tournament, there were small cups, larger ones, silver, gold, with handles of different shapes. Your concern is that the generic cup with the name of the tournament does not infringe copyright.
Rzt 7 (talk) 17:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So is your point that because the trophy has had many redesigns, you feel that a fictional AI-generated trophy with "Copa Interamericana" inscribed on it is a useful and educational representation of that trophy? Belbury (talk) 18:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's much better than nothing. It serves to illustrate the articles. Rzt 7 (talk) 18:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The other strange thing in this deletion request is the images of the tournaments "Campeonato de Apertura" (1933-1950), "Torneo de Consuelo", "Liguilla Pre Sudamericana", "Liguilla Pre Libertadores" Can you show an image on the internet of those original trophies?
Rzt 7 (talk) 18:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, got it.
This seems like going to a local trophy store and asking them to engrave Copa Interamericana onto a cheap fishing trophy, and using an image of it on Wikipedia to illustrate the Copa Interamericana. An article like es:Liguilla Pre-Sudamericana (Chile) would be better served with a fair use image of the real thing, or no image at all.
Images of things which aren't a real trophy, but made to look as if they were that trophy, are not educationally useful. Belbury (talk) 18:27, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think your problem then is that you don't like images designed via AI. Regarding the question, yes, a generic trophy from a tournament where there is no single type of trophy, with the name of the tournament written, is more informative than the cups that abound and have no relation to Chilean soccer or the South American football. Rzt 7 (talk) 19:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, I've used and uploaded AI images before, that is not my problem. --Belbury (talk) 19:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So you simply nominated images that do not violate any type of copyright, without knowing what the trophies of most of those tournaments were like, and you nominated them because in your personal opinion they were superfluous. This was only done with works with artistic pretensions that were not useful to illustrate any article.
Rzt 7 (talk) 20:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment An overview of the arguments for preserving these works:
  • The images do not violate copyright rights of any kind. This is important considering the history of images deleted on Commons due to the copyright of non-generic trophies.
  • In the case of the Inter-American Cup there were various designs of the trophy (the links are available in the thread). The trophy referred to by the person requesting the deletion would only correspond to one edition (1994) and is in no way similar to previous designs. Therefore a generic trophy is necessary to represent all editions. The trophies were large, small, silver, golden, with different bases, shapes and handles.
  • The person requesting the deletion has acknowledged in the thread that the name of the tournament is written on most of the trophies generated by AI. They are therefore more informative and illustrative than any randomly chosen trophy. They are works designed to enrich the articles.
  • The person requesting the deletion could not find on the internet photographs of the "Apertura Championship" (1933-1950), "Torneo de Consuelo" (1933 and 1949), "Liguilla Pre Sudamericana" and "Liguilla Pre Libertadores" (where the trophies different from each other, for example in 1986 and 1992). This reaffirms the importance of representing these trophies with generic images that have the name of the tournament.
Rzt 7 (talk) 00:26, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete one of those rare times I’m willing to violate COM:INUSE because they are clearly not only not educational but also arguably anti-educational because they don’t depict what they claim to be or otherwise deceive the reader by implying a random trophy is relevant to whatever unrelated topic. Dronebogus (talk) 09:58, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete After thinking the matter through, I agree to it being deleted. The only thing this work has generated is debate, abstract thought, illustration of articles mostly without photographs. Here they think that people are not so intelligent to differentiate a referential image, literally called referential in commons. I don't agree with that, but I don't consider it to be such a relevant issue. I'm sure that many of those who give their opinion here will upload images of those trophies tomorrow.
Rzt 7 (talk) 15:17, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and meaningless photo without any educational value Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:52, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request: this was created by mistake; crop was meant to replace the original image. Packer1028 (talk) 02:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was uploaded on May 31, 2024 but according to the flickrbot review the image was not on the given source. No image appears at the source. Since the image is unused, perhaps it should be deleted. Leoboudv (talk) 02:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlos Paredes Colin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: personal fantasy artwork, all unused outside a user sandbox.

Omphalographer (talk) 23:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you request something that doesn't break Wikipedia rules? I am the original artist, not a clown posing as the artist, it is unusual to see a person without grounds to request something very big Carlos Paredes Colin (talk) 04:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete spam. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:18, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlos Paredes Colin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: two additional images similar to those previously nominated.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/cleanpng

[edit]

cleanpng.com is a sketchy-looking image repository that appears to be taking images from other websites. Their terms of usage are All the transparent images in cleanpng is free to download, and unlimited. You do not need register your email, do not need login with your social account. What we hope is: Share us to your friends and like our facebook page to get the news of cleanpng. and they have a DMCA page at https://www.cleanpng.com/dmca.html which says that the content is only "believed" to be in the public domain and they'll take it down on request. Search for any celebrity name and you get straight up photos like Bill Gates - Marriage Cartoon which is just a Stephen Voss photo with the background cropped out. I don't think we can trust this licensing.

Belbury (talk) 17:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unattributed painting which could have been painted at any time in the past hundred years, neither the source nor uploader identifies the artist. Belbury (talk) 20:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 17:37, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1940s photograph with no location or photographer specified, may still be under copyright. Belbury (talk) 20:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 17:38, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

次の東スポの記事の画像の無断転載の疑いが強いため 印度孔雀 (talk) 13:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:08, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

次のウマニティの記事の画像の無断転載の疑いが強いため 印度孔雀 (talk) 13:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:10, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

次のスポニチアネックスの記事の画像の無断転載の疑いが強いため 印度孔雀 (talk) 13:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:10, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10; in use so cannot be speedied; though the source and derivative images does not proper community review  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:16, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Article has been speedy deleted as an advertisement. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, screenshots. --P 1 9 9   17:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10; in use so cannot be speedied; though the source and derivative images does not proper community review  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Article has been speedy deleted as an advertisement. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, screenshots. --P 1 9 9   17:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Axelghd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of Horseshoe Crab Anatomy Dorsal.png RenaMoonn (talk) 02:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: resolved: duplicate already redirected here. --P 1 9 9   17:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by nonnotable youtuber; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotional logo, unused, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by nonnotable youtuber; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. We need to know how old the painting is. 0x0a (talk) 09:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. To keep it we need to known the author and creation date of the painting. Günther Frager (talk) 15:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by POS78 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

بی‌کیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین

POS78 (talk) 12:17, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Close as Kept, seems properly sourced; existence of other montages of subject not a reason to delete this one. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by POS78 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No year of photo publication

{{User|POS78}}talk 19:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --4nn1l2 (talk) 19:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by POS78 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of random people, no educational use.

0x0a (talk) 09:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this category! Also this category! I do not agree with you. @Orijentolog: What do you think? I tagged you because you are active in these categories (Category:People in buildings). {{User|POS78}}talk 10:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This has nothing to do with categorizing. I don't care about that. 0x0a (talk) 10:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@0x0a Unlike you, I see many images like this filling these categories. Like File:2018 Christmas at the Vank Cathedral 09.jpg! And the uploader is the image of User:Hanooz and User:Christian Ferrer did not see any problem in this picture! If you don't understand somewhere, forgive me; My English is really poor. :) {{User|POS78}}talk 10:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the "whataboutism." Please see COM:PS and explain the educational value of them. 0x0a (talk) 11:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the images are recorded in historical buildings and there are people from a city in the pictures. For example, I am a person from Germany, I want to know what the people of Isfahan look like, what clothes they wear? I use the Category:People of Isfahan and I see this picture. So this is an educational goal of the culture and coverage of the people of a city or country. If there is no educational use of these images, why did a famous news agency in Iran publish them?[2][3] {{User|POS78}}talk 11:55, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, per nomination. These photos purely focus on unknown, non-notable, random people. Commons has long-held precedent that such photos are out of scope. Kept: several images of crowds (not same as photos of non-notable individuals) and images without people. --P 1 9 9   17:39, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

all images of this user seem to be grabbed from the web / license bogus. Don't know, what's written in the mali, but this image for example (low quality, no meta data) was published on the web many years ago > https://www.pinterest.de/pin/574701602426439801/ + https://x.com/TeamAlbanians/status/1268036437074513920/photo/1 . Seems it first was posted on the website of the municipality in 2010: https://bashkiafier.gov.al/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/church-and-mosque.jpg Albinfo (talk) 10:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 00:17, August 20, 2024, by Krd (No ticket permission since 20 July 2024). --P 1 9 9   17:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal video with unclear educational value Fenikals (talk) 11:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A very strange nomination.

1. There is nothing "personal" in the video (it does not show any person or events in personal life).

2. Commons is not an educational project and therefore 99% of the materials have no "educational value".

At the moment, this is the only video in Commons that recorded what this village looked like in the summer of 2022. RG72 (talk) 04:31, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope. --P 1 9 9   17:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's extremely blurry, so it's useless. TheOffShoot (talk) 13:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   17:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Once I uploaded this photo, but now this University is closed and demolished, I don't want my photo still exist here. Tnohutcu (talk) 12:46, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the owner of this photo, and I don't want to publish this photo anymore for special reasons. I want it to be deleted. Thanks. Tnohutcu (talk) 13:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep No valid reason for deletion. Courtesy deletion are only performed a few days after they were uploaded. This image was uploaded 12 years ago. Also COM:INUSE. Günther Frager (talk) 15:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Günther Frager. --P 1 9 9   17:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Once I uploaded this photo, but now this University is closed and demolished, I don't want my photo still exist here. Tnohutcu (talk) 12:47, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the owner of this photo, and I don't want to publish this photo anymore for special reasons. I want it to be deleted. Thanks. Tnohutcu (talk) 13:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep No valid reason for deletion. Courtesy deletion are only performed a few days after they were uploaded. This image was uploaded 12 years ago. Also COM:INUSE. Günther Frager (talk) 15:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Günther Frager. --P 1 9 9   17:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miityu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos and content related to non-notable corporation, advertisement: en:User talk:Miityu

Nutshinou Talk! 13:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The last File (File:HEALING SUMMIT 2018.jpg) has no logo or advertisement. --Berlinschneid (talk) 18:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thought the file was not particularly useful because the conference itself isn't notable but it seems to be the only file on Commons showing the interior of Category:Hotel de Rome, Berlin, additionally it also depicts en:Valerie Smaldone so  Keep. Thank you for the comment Nutshinou Talk! 11:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Kept one per above. --P 1 9 9   17:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The audio does not reflect an Arabic pronunciation of the filename at all (cf. wiktionary:يستطيع, which also has a transliteration for those who do not read Arabic). The file description also mentions Tamil (a language not written in the Arabic script), but on asking a Tamil speaker, they stated that the audio also makes little sense from a Tamil perspective. Mnemosientje (talk) 13:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already on this Baqotun0023 (talk) 13:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9   17:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guest7772 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious symbols.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused slideshow type image, effectively out of COM:SCOPE as nothing educational other than raw text because the background image is meaningless. Belbury (talk) 16:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:57, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful. This image is a self-created and personal artwork without educational use. See also: [4] Bart Buchtfluß (talk) 16:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:57, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

portions from copyrighted books

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zorozara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

own work claim questionable

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, "screenshot". --P 1 9 9   17:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional-only content; author is part of a SEO spamming group and the source has been globally blacklisted. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 17:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Modern primat as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: obvious screenshot - but... description says it is from 1950. maybe it is free licensed? modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC) [reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info, COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9   18:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oj0124 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

looking like copyvios. Copyright © EMBL 2022 | EMBL-EBI is part of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory | Terms of use | License and Disclaimer https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amirzwaz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mia_plays not notable. possible copyvio. please  Delete

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ALEXIS KALANTIDIS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

it is either not notable image or to complex logo to be free licensed. please  Delete

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:27, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Olavipoika (talk) 18:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In use and outside of G7 window. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope, no longer used. --P 1 9 9   18:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope of Category:Nesle-Normandeuse. --P 1 9 9   18:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source URL does not confirm that this picture was drawn in 1870, nor give any reason to think that the artist must have died before 1954. Belbury (talk) 20:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the description notes, it is no longer accurate. It is unused on any Wikimedia projects. Beland (talk) 21:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - Not a valid reason for deletion. Use {{Factual accuracy}} and {{Superseded}} templates instead. --Sreejith K (talk) 03:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Out of date ≠ out of scope. --P 1 9 9   18:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant Adriazeri (talk) 21:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant Adriazeri (talk) 21:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of a wikipedia page containing a non-free image. derivative of non-free content, unlikely de minimis applies Fastily 02:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image inside was formerly uploaded to Commons as File:Alan MacMasters circa end of 19th century.jpg. Per the article the image is uploaded by hoaxer with a free license, but since it is based on a photo of hoaxer himself which hoaxer may not be the photographer, The unmodified image may be copyrighted by the photographer and thus not in free license. However we may blur out the image from screenshot.--GZWDer (talk) 16:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; significant COM:DW of media of uncertain source and license status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. The billboard is created recently within the past few years and it is more than simple text. It is likely not under a free license. Itscyp (talk) 03:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag without source. Jingiby (talk) 05:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a fictional flag, there are multiple photos of the Special Unit "Lions" using this flag during parades in 2001 Ivanavram (talk) 17:44, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Such as the following Ivanavram (talk) 17:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ivanavram, then link them as a sources for the flag to resolve the issue. Jingiby (talk) 10:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: false license claim, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio https://happiful.com/i-fight-the-pain-of-my-mums-death-every-day CzarJobKhaya (talk) 05:03, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a Getty image - https://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/news-photo/members-of-a-french-archaeological-team-walk-on-top-of-a-news-photo/80679574 Yuyutsu Ho (talk) 06:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, dubious license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no metadata no permission from given author "Ätelier Nine Network" used for advertising article on nl-wiki about a brand of convection doors of the same name. Hoyanova (talk) 06:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no simple textlogo Krd 07:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion it meets the criteria COM: TOO Italy. Furthermore File:Wind Telecomunicazioni logo 1997.png and File:Three logo.svg are both textlogo. So what is the difference? InterComMan (talk) 09:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, not simple text. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no author no permission copyvio from https://www.sanitear.nl/douche/douchegarnituren/hoofddouche/ used for advertising/linkspam on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 07:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it is not without permission. Photo is from Sanitear and has given permission to post where possible. is a beautiful photo and that is why I used it. If there is a problem with this, I didn't know about it from your point of view. Broeren A (talk) 18:47, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Useful, but Broeren A, you need to have the photographer contact COM:VRT to give permission for the relevant Creative Commons license. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:24, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still frame [5] from the French film Belle de Jour by Luis Buñel (1900-1983) released in 1967. The film is copyrighted in France its country of origin. Notice that the usage of {{PD-Italy}} is incorrect. It was premiered in France in May 24, 1967 [6]. The Italian release was during the Venice Film Festival in September 1967. The usage of {{PD-1996}} is also incorrect. The film is under copyright in the US as it was also published in the US and registered in the Copyright Office under the record LF30 [7]. We can undelete it in 2063 when it enters in the US copyright. Günther Frager (talk) 19:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. I'm not so sure we can restore the file in 2063. The film itself is protected in France (and the EU) until the end of 2091 because co-writer en:Jean-Claude Carrière did in 2021. I'm not sure how long a single frame of the film would be protected in France. In Germany, it would be considered a work of the camera operator (for this film en:Sacha Vierny, who died in 2001). I'll set the undeletion category to 2092. --Rosenzweig τ 11:23, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still frames from the Italian film La notte released in 1961. These images are currently in the Italian public domain (still frames have a protection of 20 years), but they are still copyrighted in the US. The film was registered in 1962 under the record LP21952 [8] and renewed in 1989 under the record RE0000433071 [9]. We can undelete them in 2057.

Günther Frager (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:51, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from the Italian film Nuovo Cinema paradiso released in 1988. The film was registered in the US Copyright Office under the record PA0000495766 [10], thus it is still copyrighted in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 17:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:35, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from Italian film Caligula released in 1979. The film is copyrighted in the US as it was registered in the Copyright Office in 1980 under the record PA0000083587 [11]

Günther Frager (talk) 17:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in 2076 (US copyright term should be 95 years for a work for hire). --Rosenzweig τ 11:32, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshots from the Italian film Una lucertola con la pelle di donna published in 1971. The images are in the public domain in the Italy (film still are protected for 20 years), but it is still copyrighted in the US. The opening credits have a copyright notice [12] and its copyright was renewed in the US Copyright Office in 2009 [13].

Günther Frager (talk) 18:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshots from the Italian film A ciascuno il suo released in 1967. The usage of {{PD-1996}} is incorrect because it was registered in the US Copyright Office under the record LF38 [14]. Notice that it is registered under its German name de:Zwei Särge auf Bestellung. We can undelete it in 2063.

Günther Frager (talk) 19:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:49, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshots and still frames from the Italian movie C'era una volta il West in 1968. It is correct that these images are in the public domain in Italy (still frames are protected only for 20 years), but the usage of {{PD-1996}} is incorrect. The movie was also published in the US and it was registered under the record LF34, see the Catalog of Copyright Entries, Cumulative Series 1960-1969, published in 1971 [15].

Günther Frager (talk) 14:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If these are not pd in the US, too bad.--Judithcomm (talk) 18:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshots or still frames from the Italian movie Il buono, il brutto, il attivo released in 1966. It is correct that the images are in the public domain in Italy (still frames have only 20 years protection), but the film was also published in the US and registered in the Copyright Office under the record LF21 [16]. We can undelete them in 2062, when the film enters in the US public domain.

Günther Frager (talk) 14:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshots and still frames from the Italian film Per qualche dollaro in più in 1965. The images are in the public domain in Italy (still frames are protected for 20 years), but they are not in the US. The film was also published in the US and registered in the Copyright Office under the record LF11 [17]. We can undelete them in 2061.

Günther Frager (talk) 15:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshots or film stills from the Italian film Per un pugno di dollari released in 1964 (Notice that I excluded the press photos and film stills). The images are in the public domain in Italy (film stills are protected for 20 years), but they are still copyrighted in the US. The film was registered in the Copyright Office under the record LF5 [18]. We can undelete them in 2060.

Günther Frager (talk) 15:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from Italian film Danger: Diabolik! released in 1967. The usage of {{PD-1996}} is incorrect. The film was also published in the US and registered in the Copyright Office under record LF26 [19]. We can undelete it in 2063.

Günther Frager (talk) 19:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; congtemp. artwork; no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:55, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake player created in video game. No encyclopedic purpose. Robertogilnei (talk) 23:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake player created in video game. No encyclopedic purpose. Robertogilnei (talk) 23:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake player created in video game. No encyclopedic purpose. Robertogilnei (talk) 23:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improbable own work of the uploader, more than 60 years old at the time of upload. Copyright situation in Germany unclear, but American copyright should certainly still be running until 95 years after publication. Felix QW (talk) 18:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; not enough information to determine the copyright status in both the US and Germany. The file can be restored in 2074 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 15:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As can be seen at User:Didym/Mobile upload/2014 March 9-12, the user uploaded several copyright violations in this batch of uploads. This is also an unlikely own work since it was almost 60 years old at the time of upload. Felix QW (talk) 19:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; not enough information to determine the copyright status in both the US and Germany. The file can be restored in 2075 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 15:04, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, uploaded 66 years after the photo was made. Felix QW (talk) 19:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; not enough information to determine the copyright status in both the US and Germany. The file can be restored in 2070 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 15:02, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader claims copyright, although he is only the photographer. No statement of original author (painter) exists. This is a newly made painting Creuzbourg (talk) 18:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sadads (talk) 01:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

High-Resolution Images of old Nebraska License plates

[edit]

Old versions only (Those posted before July 27, 2024)

COM:PRP and COM:TOO. Plate designs probably exceed the threshold of originality, reuploaded low-resolution images to the same file name. QuickWittedHare (talk) 18:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete entire files If they're non-free, the size of the image is irrelevant. We don't allow fair use on this project, and fair use is why non-free images are shrunk on English Wikipedia. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, they are used on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_registration_plates_of_Nebraska as low quality, is that not fair use? If not, would that mean all images of license plates designed post 1985 are all copyright violations? I can open a request to remove all post 1985 designs. QuickWittedHare (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Edit, 1989, not 1985. QuickWittedHare (talk) 21:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind, I didn't realize you could upload images directly to the English Wikipedia if you wish to use them for fair use. That is my misunderstanding. Delete all files per COM:TOO and COM:PRP QuickWittedHare (talk) 22:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images (dating from 2008) claimed to be freely usable. However, {{Grandfathered old file}} does not apply to images uploaded in 2008. A valid permission through COM:VRTS correspondence is needed, instead of blanket statement "Elder and Sister Badger and the Cameroon members took pictures with shared camera for 'everyone to freely use however they want'."

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  • Oppose - I received this email from a participant that they were given the pictures by the owner to use however they wanted. Ben forwarded the pics to me for uploading.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Aba Temple photos
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:34:11 -0600
From: Julie [hidden] <julie@[hidden].com>
To: Ben [hidden]<ben@[hidden].com>
Hi Ben: I found the photo you asked for. I have good news and bad
news. The good news is its one of the Badger's photos, and they gave us
permission to use them any way we wanted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trödel (talk • contribs) 05:59, 31 July 2024 (UTC+8)
@Trödel: can you forward this correspondence to COM:VRTS volunteers? Thru: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. The file was uploaded in 2008, and cannot be grandfathered. Only files that were uploaded before 2007 can be eligible for grandfathering. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zweifelsfrei Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - Bild soll die Hochladerin und Urheberin zeigen, es handelt sich aber zweifelsfrei nicht um ein Selfie

Undoubtedly mislicensing as “own work” - image is supposed to show the uploader and author, but it is undoubtedly not a selfie Lutheraner (talk) 12:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete obvious copyvio, imo a case for a speedy delete. Also out of scope: person is non-notorious, according to deletion of her German Wikipedia article. --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:07, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Datopaduka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

looking like screenshot, probably not own work images.

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:48, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drphungmanhcuong (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images that are uploaded to promote a service. Out of scope.

0x0a (talk) 08:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope per nomination. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 19:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio © Stephan Kleinert - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Photo is indeed by Stephan Kleinert, it was published under CC-BY-SA, with his website stated as the author. The website where it was originally posted with license details is unfortunately no longer online. --Waithamai (talk) 20:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Confirmed via archive.org https://web.archive.org/web/20150203161904/http://blog.botanybay.cc/family-album/. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

次のスポーツ報知の記事の画像の無断転載の疑いが強いため 印度孔雀 (talk) 13:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright infringment. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

次の競馬のおはなしの記事の画像の無断転載の疑いが強いため 印度孔雀 (talk) 13:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clear copyright infringement. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_of_Oh.provista Qa6r (talk) 15:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, looks more like own work. 186.172.47.194 19:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
IP paisano, pero hay otra foto detras, por lo tanto es un trabajo derivado. Borrar. 186.173.7.167 18:06, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Could be own work, but account activity makes it too unlikely. User can choose to reupload and email VRT for verification. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright infringement. There is no license information on the source page. 159.205.179.12 17:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeśli nie ma oznaczenia o zastrzeżonych prawach autorskich, to można domniemywać, że jest w domenie publicznej. Ledowiczka (talk) 19:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Above: "If there is no copyright marking, it can be presumed that it is in the public domain." PD-Poland, Poland did not allow automatic copyright of anonymous photographs until 1994. --RAN (talk) 00:47, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-Poland. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a fake video that is being used for propaganda purposes. There is no "Officer Grayson" bodycam video because he never had a camera on. Staticshakedown (talk) 21:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

False. The Illinois State Police uploaded all videos related to the Massey shooting on their YouTube page (link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFun2GydGyU&list=FLJuzdjwrT-829RwfH1bEulg). At 28:07 a title "Body Worn Camera #2" is seen. This is officer Grayson's body camera footage. In the subsequent clip (28:20) Massey can be seen throwing the pot at him. This is from the original posted YouTube clip (go see for yourself). There seems to be confusion about whether officer Grayson had his body cam on. The model of body camera he was wearing is designed to record continuously even when "off." When the officer turns their camera on it will capture the previous 30 seconds and save it. In this case, officer Grayson turns his camera "on" immediately after shooting Massey, which caused the video clip of the incident to be captured. The video is not fake and can be clearly seen in the original video posted by the Illinois State Police. BreakingTheDivide (talk) 21:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, blatantly fake videos don't belong on Wikipedia. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 01:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are literally unbelievable. Why are you so scared of the public knowing what actually happened? BreakingTheDivide (talk) 01:48, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, you need to cut it out. You don't even live in America. Why are you so determined that the part about Massey throwing the pot be omitted? BreakingTheDivide (talk) 01:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Liliana, I don't think the video is fake UNLESS the Illinois State police is deepfaking bodycam footage. Watch from here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFun2GydGyU&list=FLJuzdjwrT-829RwfH1bEulg go to the 28:00 minute time, make sure you are on a desktop computer and slow the speed to -50 or slower, then honestly provide your thoughts. What I don't understand is the fact that several media outlets mentioned he didn't have his BWC (body worn camera) in operation until AFTER the shooting. If that is true either someone misrepresented that fact accidently, was confused, or outright lied. Either that or the Illinois State police made an AI deepfake video. Transparently speaking I have no idea what to think. However until this video's authenticity can be verified as well as the media coverage of former Deputy Grayson's bodycam inoperability, the video should be removed for further investigation. 97.113.143.148 06:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Liliana is not interested in having an honest discussion judging by their interaction with me on Sonya's Wikipedia page. And your stance is very bizarre. There's no authenticity that needs to be verified here. The video is the official video released by the Illinois State Police on their YouTube page which we both linked to. You even said it yourself that the clip I uploaded matches what is seen in the YouTube clip. So why on earth would we delete the media? I already explained why it was reported that his body camera was off. That's because it was off, but right after the shooting he turns it on and it retroactively saved the prior 30 seconds because that's what the camera is designed to do. In fact, when you read the user guide for the specific model of body camera they were wearing (Axon Body 3 X60A7941G) it outlines on page 11 that there are two modes: Ready (Buffering) and Recording (Event). When in ready mode the camera records in a 0-120 second loop and when the camera is switched on to recording mode the previous 0-120 seconds of the recording are saved without audio. The guide notes that by default the camera is set to record a 30 second loop in ready mode without audio but can be configured to record anywhere from 0-120 seconds with audio. Officer Sean Grayson's body camera was clearly set to default mode because exactly 30 seconds of audio free footage is captured before he switches his body camera on which is when the audio kicks in.
The reason I know the make and model of the cameras they were wearing is because it's stamped in the top right of the video released by the Illinois State Police.
Source: https://my.axon.com/s/axon-body-3?language=en_US BreakingTheDivide (talk) 03:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment This kind of dispute doesn't seem like any reason to delete a file from Commons. I suggest you have the discussion on the talk page of a relevant Wikipedia article or on the talk page of the file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @BreakingTheDivide if you're going to contribute to Commons, please be sure to use the proper tags. A municipal police camera is not a work of the US Government. Currently, we view bodycam footage as public domain as per PD-CCTV, but since there's no legislation on this, this is a presumption on the part of Commons. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: As it was officially released by Illinois State Police, the debate about the veracity of the video is not for Commons to determine; and even if it was the determination that the IPD faked it, that would still give reason for Commons to host it because it would still remain topical and newsworthy. Body cam footage is PD as per previous discussions. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been replaced by File:Pennsylvania Presidential Election Results 1816 by county.svg. It is not used on any article anymore. It does not provide a source for its data and is incorrect. Take Philadelphia, for example. According to A New Nation Votes, the top Monroe elector in Philadelphia recieved 6,874 votes, while the top Unpledged elector recieved 4,107 votes. And yet, here it shows Monroe as losing Philadelphia Wowzers122 (talk) 22:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. This is the original map. CottonDuggan (talk) 03:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "own work" attribution seems unlikely to be correct. The user who uploaded it and claimed it as "own work" did add it to the Spanish wikipedia article at that time (diff), but simultaneously cited an article which included the photo in the Arabic 2012 version here. That Arabic article seems to be real source and seems unlikely to be public domain. LEvalyn (talk) 23:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clearly not he uploader's work. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gnomingstuff as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 08:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep we allow personal photos for people's userpage. It's not promotional in any way. No reason to delete this. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Bastique. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suspect that this image is a copyright violation of the logo/crest of the w:Central Hawke's Bay District Council as seen here. While it is in the form of a coat of arms, the uploader has not indicated if it is based on a blazon and thus free from copyright per template:coa blazon. It's always possible that this logo doesn't actually have a blazon and is intead just designed to look like a coat of arms. As such, unless the uploader can provide a source for the blazon, I suspect this is instead based on the image of the logo itself. Radicuil (talk) 12:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:49, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the uploader of this image. I now understand that it is probably a copyright violation as it doesn't comply with template:coa blazon and was based on the image of the Palmerston North coat of arms as seen here and here. While I do beleve there is a blazon for this coat of arms based on at least this, I haven't been able to actually view this or find another source for the blazon. Radicuil (talk) 12:55, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:50, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected infringe child protection, a sex toy made from child body. See discussion page. Lemonaka (talk) 02:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cropped image: Commons:Deletion requests/File:28码脚型飞机杯(右脚) (cropped).jpg メイド理世 (talk) 03:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lemonaka: If the image violates child protection policy, why did you upload a cropped version? Dronebogus (talk) 09:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus I'm a little bit fuzzy that time. I only cropped the watermark of photos, randomly. Lemonaka (talk) 09:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lemonaka: should I add the crop to this DR? Dronebogus (talk) 09:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Lemonaka (talk) 09:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I don’t think this constitutes child pornography per se but the implications are sufficiently disturbing/disgusting enough to bring the project into disrepute. For those afraid to click the link: it’s just a silicone foot and is SFW. Dronebogus (talk) 09:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per the previous DR. --Yann (talk) 19:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Renominated, Suspected ChildPorn, under the request by Special:PermanentLink/903481066#c-Whym-20240723122200-Lemonaka-20240723074300 since last DR was closed badly. Lemonaka (talk) 14:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Whym @Dronebogus, requesting again under request, waiting for another sysop to review. Lemonaka (talk) 14:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per same rationale + Yann supervoting and never explaining/reverting it Dronebogus (talk) 14:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like an artificial foot, so where is the CP?  Keep, somewhat disgusting but free file which can be educational used, I don't see any reason to delete. TheImaCow (talk) 16:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TheImaCow see the talk pages of this file. Lemonaka (talk) 09:21, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this -now for some reason globally locked- person who uploaded this dosen't want to be affilated with the image, it might be possible to revision delete the name, but this dosen't change the file being in scope (considering there are MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH more explicit images of this subject like this)
No idea if possession of such dolls is illegal, but images of them or their feet are not, at least I can't see any evidence for that. TheImaCow (talk) 10:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TheImaCow this one was locked for cross-wiki abuse. They also uploaded some sex toys previously. @Dronebogus pointed out possible problem of the uploader, see archive of AN:U, the topic is "'Assifbus"' Lemonaka (talk) 02:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have contacted T&S as probably should have been done from the start due to the possible concerns. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 09:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MatrixContacted long ago, no actions taken or replies got. Lemonaka (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Matrix Any further updates? Lemonaka (talk) 07:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, they didn't reply. What do we hire a legal team for :/ —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 16:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good to have confirmation, changing my !vote to Strong  Keep as there are no issues with the file. ~TheImaCow (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Nothing new since last time. Yann (talk) 05:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Yann's close of previous was correct and Trust and Safety has taken no action per Matrix. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:52, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I undeleted File:28码脚型飞机杯(右脚) (cropped).jpg as per the result of this discussion. Yann (talk) 09:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krystian Korolczuk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Presumably uploaded for use in the autobiography they wrote in polish Wikipedia - which I have also listed for deletion on that project. Out of scope personal images of a non-notable individual.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think Joaquin took this photo if he is in the photo. Not own work. Heylenny (talk) 08:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Left user message on his ptwiki user talk page, since he does not seem to read his Commons User talk page. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 19:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:21, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]