Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/01/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 26th, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is not under public domain, not under any free/libre license. TSU9 (talk) 06:23, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, this is correct KozutaLt (talk) 07:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence probablement fausse. Image tirée d'un livre Pªɖaw@ne 07:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per author request. --VIGNERON (talk) 08:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the uploader of this work. I did not adequately think through how to make my work available before uploading and I would like to request deletion in order to better figure that out. Buoyantfrenzy255 (talk) 12:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Knight of Fortune 2023 movie poster ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:20, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistake by my self Milićević (talk) 06:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty page deleted. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:23, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SenvinCanvin2009 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality and unverified flags uploaded by a long-term abuse account. Some of these flags are unverifiable and likely fake (e.g. File:Flag of Augusta, Georgia.svg, File:Flag of Nephi, Utah.svg); others are low-quality SVG autotraces of uncredited images (e.g. File:Flag of Ghanzi District.svg, File:Flag of Natchez, Mississippi.svg), and the source images cannot be assumed to be available under a free license. Some of these images were also previously deleted under Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by 2022 jansin, which was another sockpuppet of the same user.

Omphalographer (talk) 06:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Reuploading of previously deleted images, sometimes previously deleted more than once, by apparent sock of blocked user. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not own work as it ancient coin and again how it could be a coin? Did you excavate? ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not own work as it look like scanned image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not own work as it ancient coin and again how it could be a coin? Did you excavate? ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.tamilibrary.com/%E0%AE%95%E0%AF%80%E0%AE%B4%E0%AE%9F%E0%AE%BF/ ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/chess-piece-name-set-gm867453148-144302521 ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not own work as it look like scanned image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 14:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not own work as it look like scanned image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 14:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not own work as it look like scanned image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 14:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sono rottami destinati al macero, che non rendono giustizia alla bellezza del territorio di Morbello 82.62.14.245 15:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In addition, still available on flickr. --Achim55 (talk) 16:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nudity, improper representation of ethnic group, Misrepresentation of Kabyle People (the woman being shown in sexualising way) 14.201.101.60 12:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Photograph is more than 100 years old. --Achim55 (talk) 12:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep We are not censored. --RAN (talk) 12:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - historic postcard of some 120 years ago; document of colonial era, with whatever unfortunate attitudes of the era. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unflattering Rien123456789 (talk) 16:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: still no valid reason for deletion, file page semi-protected. --Achim55 (talk) 18:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Me Sirve OrlandoR503 (talk) 16:03, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no lo necesito OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es Basura X3 OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy Kept: kept repeatedly before; no valid reason for deletion; in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CACACACAC OrlandoR503 (talk) 18:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy Kept: disruptive repeat deletion requests without reason; user blocked for 1 week. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No parece trabajo propio de quien lo subio. Como dije, unico foto archivo del usuario y solo 141 KB. 186.172.21.85 21:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No Me Gusta Borrenloooo OrlandoR503 (talk) 15:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Si la borramos no será porque no te gusta. 186.174.242.149 16:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Creo que Orlando necesita dos semanas. Una no le sirvió mucho. 186.174.242.149 16:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: On facebook 2 years before Commons upload [1]. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright 211.197.54.36 04:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Performance appears to be copyrighted, and thus a copvio. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. (https://antalyahaber.tv/politika/iyi-parti-antalya-milletvekili-adayi-ugur-poyraz-kimdir-17468h) MarinaMann (talk) 19:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harriet Rodriguez Rivera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality photos of a kid drawing. Commons is not a COM:WEBHOST.

Günther Frager (talk) 11:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 22:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no proof that the copyright owner permitted to use this file. The uploader is now blocked for uploading unfree files. Karol Jakubiec (talk) 15:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Clearly copyvio. 185.172.241.184 06:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And Speedy close. Young admins are not your monaguillos. 186.174.32.165 13:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Krd per "no permission". --Achim55 (talk) 13:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless low-quality image; doesn't seem very 'modern' if it only goes to element #105. DMacks (talk) 17:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete; copyvio. Appears to have been copied from http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pertab/pertab.html without attribution. The "About" page on that site" [2] makes it clear that its content is not available under a free license ("It is not freeware or shareware. It must not be copied or mirrored without authorization."). Omphalographer (talk) 21:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good find! DMacks (talk) 22:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Uploader is several-years copyvio sock-drawer. --DMacks (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and thus out of COM:SCOPE since they are per definition superseded by their raster equivalents. Some are used in the category discussion of this very category but as can be seen it's only to mark them for potential deletion, so it should not be a reson to keep them.

Jonteemil (talk) 14:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I request a speedy deletion of File:City Seal of Canton.svg as the uploader of the file. ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 05:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All these images should be deleted, they are fake SVG. All of these images have png or jpg versions that can be used instead. Not all of these images could or should be vectorized, but leave a tag on the ones that could be vectorized.

 Goldsztern  ✶  06:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Procedural keep: Many of these are per definition in scope since they are in use and hence should not be deleted. Many of the files that are not in use are however the source of other derivative files and hence need to be kept for attribution. I know that it's compelling to make a mass request however since each file should be judged individually it would be better if you made non-mass nominations, i.e. one DR per file, on the files that truly should be deleted, not files that are in use or are the source of other derivative files. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 21:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Music album cover, The uploader is not the author, as per the description CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All the rights of this picture belongs to the author Manifestrosa and respects the politics and rules of Wikipedia. The only thing you should be erasing is the profile CoffeeEngineer which in his history record shows an amount of entries to be considered deleting. This profile is acting under LGTBIFOBIC principles, and the organization must be punishing these acts of hate. Manifestrosa (talk) 12:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wasabi - not a fairy tale 2024 movie poster ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Unnerving duck (talk) 06:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Elcobbola. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope

--Alaa :)..! 14:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted photograph from https://drawingmatter.org/journal/dmjournal-committees/paul-emmons/ Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 14:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Includes personal information of a wikipedian without his permission. I'am an anonymous user, i don't want anyone to share my personal information. I am very upset about someone posted something like this. LostMyMind (talk) 19:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, Someone can see the deceased Wikipedian's name and his image via his user page in trwiki. The user's death announced in 2019 in trwiki, you can see the post here. Also, you can see his name via using this Turkish government's source. I uploaded his grave's photo for commemorating him, I do not think that the image contains private personal information. His name, image and death date was announced. In addition, everyone can go to Paşaköprü Cemetery and visit his grave. The graveyard is open to everyone so his grave is not confidential. Regards, --Kadı Message 20:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Also, giving information about deceased Wikipedians is appropriate. Please click to this link to see the examples. Kadı Message 22:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete Sharing the non-public personel data is disallowed and needs an oversight action. The deceased user preferred to use his real name in Wikipedia as an username and shared his photograph under the Creative Commons license. These are public personal data and therefore it is safe to keep them (the ones shared on Wikipedia are limited to these). However; date of death and birth and the surname that the deceased user did not share on Wikipedia publicly are non-public personel data and these can not be shared. An oversight action is needed if these data are shared. As a matter of fact, a discussion about this issue on Turkish Wikipedia, started in the Village Pump, was rightfully hidden by an oversight (see page history). I think this photo also contains non-public personal data and it should be deleted immediately. A user with sysop rights uploading a photo containing non-public personal data and defending it to remain requires his/her sysop rights to be discussed. Fyi, --justinianus | talk 11:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader request.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto: Peter Hartung means that Maren Strack is not photographer, permission not visible Alabasterstein (talk) 06:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 13:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality LWJ15 (talk) 15:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 15:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality LWJ15 (talk) 15:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy-deleted...prompt uploader request. --DMacks (talk) 15:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not needed. I uploaded this file but decided against using it. Either not needed for conveying information or wrong data format LWJ15 (talk) 23:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly copyrighted stock photo (https://homseus.com/cdn/shop/files/Woman-speaking-over-the-phone-with-security-panel-speaker-two-way-communication.jpg, https://www.poptelecom.co.uk/poptelecom/images/mobile3%20(1).png ), looks like it was uploaded for Wikidata spam rather than anything in COM:SCOPE. Belbury (talk) 10:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. Probably not spam but an ad (G10). Günther Frager (talk) 15:22, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Replaced with File:EDITPRESS.png. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok, we put a png file Marketing Editpress (talk) 10:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parce que je ne souhaite plus que mon nom soit associé à cet article. KUZANGAMANA Christian (talk) 15:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep nonsense request, and COM:INUSE. Günther Frager (talk) 16:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Should the delete request template be removed? -MoonOwO- (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep Andy Dingley (talk) 18:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Accidental request. --Achim55 (talk) 21:34, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality selfie ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 08:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence this photograph taken in 2023 is in the public domain. Archer1234 (talk) 19:16, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User4edits (talk) 12:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is cited as Tasnim News Agency, and contains a video to www.aparat.com. While the clothes worn are the same or similar, it is not evident that the image presented is from that video. Either way the cited image is not at Tasnim as stated, at best it seems to be a screenshot from a video that is not certainly free of copyright. Suggest another pair of eyes and we consider deleting.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

all vanity article at swWP and here; article nominated for deletion, and if resolved to delete, then this image can go to  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see that this is an image in scope; unused, and no scope for use  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vanity spam; has been nomonated for deletion where vanity spam, once deleted can be removed  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1935 painting by Pablo Picasso (who died in 1973), still copyrighted. Rosenzweig τ 08:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hardly "own work", both source images are probably still copyrighted, and the collage was probably also grabbed from the web. Rosenzweig τ 08:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Passes architectural threshold, but no FoP in the source country. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted logos. Stifle (talk) 16:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyright violation from [3] -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, apparent screenshot from TikTok video [4] -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo elsewhere online a year before Commons upload (eg [5]) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not see the claimed free license at the source site Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in South Korea. Violation of architectural copyright. The store was opened in September 2002, so assuming the building was completed just before this opening, the architect is not yet dead for more than 70 years for this work to fall in public domain. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lotte department store Nowon branch 20181122 135912.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:대구역 전경.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apprent copyright violation web screenshot (note bit of scroll tab at right of image) - Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badge or emblem of a possibly Iraqi led military group. Clearly post-2003, it wouldn't be public domain in Iraq yet. Abzeronow (talk) 22:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook is the source of this file per metadata. Abzeronow (talk) 23:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omlat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: fictional flags.

Omphalographer (talk) 00:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo used in vandalism, I see no future use for this photo of a teenager from Minnesota. Liz (talk) 00:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 2022 jansin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As with this user's previous uploads, many of these images are unverifiable and potentially fake, or appear to be autotraced SVGs from unidentified and/or non-free sources. For example:

Given that a number of these flags are clearly fake, and that others may be copyright violations, I feel that we're better off deleting the whole lot and restoring (or recreating) individual images if we're able to verify their accuracy and license status. There's simply too much wrong with these images to assume good faith.

Full list of files:

Omphalographer (talk) 20:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:49, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 2022 jansin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These US city flags that contain logos, seals and hoaxes

Alexphangia Talk 16:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Between the historical improbability of many of these flags, the lack of sources, and my comments in the previous deletion nomination, I'm not inclined to trust any flag uploads by this user. Omphalographer (talk) 18:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. I don't know why he wasn't actioned prior for the absurdity of the sheer levels of vandalism committed here. --NorthTension (talk) 02:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also he's *still* continuing to upload even with the deletion request in, he's never responded to a single message about it. NorthTension (talk) 06:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I think all of their uploads are suspicious. The user should also be checked as a potential sockpuppet of User:Jurisdrew. Fry1989 eh? 17:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I want to mention that Jansin has made an alt and has continued a mass spam upload while still spam uploading on the Jansin account. NorthTension (talk) 06:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Socking, DENY. --Yann (talk) 09:34, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 2022 jansin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All the sock of this user Uploading lots of hoax flags, nearly all of them should be checked

Lemonaka (talk) 00:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all as before. I've opened Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SenvinCanvin2009 to address similar uploads by a related user. Omphalographer (talk) 06:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AI fantasy work uploaded for self-promotion Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:13, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:18, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:New Bannister Street water main.jpg. Sam Wilson 02:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Content outside the scope of Commons. It was uploaded as part of a vanity article. ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 02:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random nude photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I don't see it as a superfluous and unimportant picture. There are many pictures, especially in the area of male nudes, which are more like random nude photos. This picture is of a seated person in a state of sexual arousal. Such an image does not yet exist in the combination of nudity-man sitting-sexual arousal. Of course, I admit that the photo is not exactly a work of art, but it is still more aesthetic than many other images of male nudity on commons. In this respect, I would like to ask that this picture not be deleted, as I think it has its justification. Ravie (talk) 10:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What I forgot to add is that the person in the picture was underweight at the time the photo was taken due to a chronic inflammatory disease. The picture was taken in the context of an art project over 15 years ago. The photos in Wikimedia Commons mainly show pictures of healthy people when it comes to the depiction of the naked body or sexuality. I would be delighted if pictures could also be shown in Commons in which the people do not correspond to the usual ideals. With this in mind, I would be very happy if this picture is not deleted. Ravie (talk) 16:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tik Tok logo ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ни кем не признанная фантазии художника и еще без источников. 212.154.56.32 03:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Likely fantasy flag per nom; no source ("Телеграм канал" = "Telegram channel"). Omphalographer (talk) 22:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no source. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality personal photo by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS fantasy image Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NOT OOS: The educational scope of this image is to illustrate the idea of medieval learning (scholasticism) carried on into the modern computer age. The combination of a medieval outfit and IT-technology was deliberate. ALSO: the image intentionally shows a woman rather than a man to counter the general bias of men-dominated learning. And, the image goes together with the prompt used to create it as well as with explicit copyright information on the Commons-page. Well documented AI images might be of some future interest concerning the early years of AI-history. These are three argument for: keep. Rhetos (talk) 05:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution USA flag, out of scope ZimskoSonce (talk) 03:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: epicentrk.ua (online shop) Душ сухой SHOWER PACK "Медицинский" 7 пенных перчаток ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad drawing, out of scope ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unliekly to be own work. http://www.salambarkhorshid.blogfa.com/1385/03 ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work. https://medium.com/swlh/in-todays-world-what-really-is-a-brand-a545d7210658, https://www.huffpost.com/archive/ca/entry/visit-the-worlds-most-walkable-cities_b_12336826, ETC, ETC,..... ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Notability Matthewleih (talk) 04:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Notability Matthewleih (talk) 04:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Notability Matthewleih (talk) 04:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dansangchuka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use

Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:28, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work. http://www.salambarkhorshid.blogfa.com/tag/%D8%B3%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D8%B9%D9%84%DB%8C-%D8%A7%DA%A9%D8%A8%D8%B1-%D8%AD%D8%B3%DB%8C%D9%86%DB%8C ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:28, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work. https://manhom.com/%D8%B4%D8%AE%D8%B5%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AA/%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B5%D8%B1-%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%AC%D9%8A%D9%84/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence that this person is notable and that we have anything more than a vanity image  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the webpage user says this photo is from, it is © 2016 Millie Pilkington, and so cannot be changed by the user to a CC license, unless the user is Millie Pilkington Babakathy (talk) 06:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation MJXVI (talk) 08:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:34, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is published in 2003 Midleading (talk) 09:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:34, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be a screencap from YouTube or similar, so likely nonfree license Gnomingstuff (talk) 09:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:34, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 09:22, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wlindor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

appears to be a personal ebook; out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 10:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: given the black border at the bottom and 1080 pixel width I believe this image is a video screencap. MKFI (talk) 10:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted manga, not user's own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:36, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ya No es util Nazi Skinhead 88 (talk) 11:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No valid reason. In use on es:Leonardo Farkas. --Achim55 (talk) 11:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete despite the nonsensical request, the image is widely available on the web. For example, it was used for this meme in 2008. Günther Frager (talk) 16:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:36, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Solicito Eliminar Esta Imagen Por Favor Ernesto Casas Rz (talk) 16:20, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate request. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:36, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Metal1125 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: likely fantasy flags/emblems related to deleted es:Ideologia sablista.

Omphalographer (talk) 22:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rick2000S (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: fantasy flag/CoA.

Omphalographer (talk) 22:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fantasy flag. Omphalographer (talk) 22:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused JPEG duplicate of File:Flag of Morocco.svg et al. Omphalographer (talk) 23:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused duplicate of File:Flag of Ethiopia (1975–1987).svg et al. Omphalographer (talk) 23:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background and colored atom labels; not drawn according to MoS guidelines. Replaced by two high-quality alternatives in Category:Propyl acetoacetate. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 11:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Realtalk6 (talk) 18:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete the image was available on the web 3 years before it was uploaded to Commons, see https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-protests-1968-george-floyd/2020/06/15/bc5475e6-ab28-11ea-9063-e69bd6520940_story.html. Günther Frager (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source given is "Official Facebook" so likely not free license; borderline F10 Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that "official" poster has been released under a free license. BillHPike (talk) 00:16, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2024. UMAMI COLA(クラフトコーラ) All Rights Reserved. ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. © Dmytro Zinkevych https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-businessman-sitting-table-working-horizontal-portrait-handsome-laptop-looking-camera-happy-smiling-image44281228 | https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/horizontal-portrait-handsome-businessman-sitting-table-215532532 ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted photos on low quality "famous birthdays" website screenshot ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portrait of Persian woman. (Antoin Sevruguin/Smithsonian) https://medium.com/timeline/sevruguin-photos-iran-persia-9befabd8b5a ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Antoin Sevruguin died in 1933. Most other photos of his are labeled as {{PD-Iran}} or otherwise in public domain. Fix the information on the file, but deletion isn't warranted. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Tcr25, PD-Iran. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality before and after images ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Janik98 as Copyvio (copyviol) and the most recent rationale was: Official logo of political party, no source given to back the claim of an "own work" or the licensing under the "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International"== {{int:filedesc; needscommunity review, if own item then it is not belong ing here; if it is from usage, then there is likely to be copyright issues. It may be best to upload locally at the wiki of use as "fair use".  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1) [Copyright violation:] This photo cannot be "own work" because it was taken in 1932. So who took the photo in reality? 2) [Out of scope:] Too little information to be reusable. Where is this? Who are depicted? JopkeB (talk) 04:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

we already have Moselle River Mateus2019 (talk) 06:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

500px license laundering. credit: Rooksana Hossenally https://www.bbc.com/vietnamese/culture_social/2015/12/151213_the-master-of-japans-ancient-tattoo-tradition_vert_tra ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

500px license laundering. credit: Rooksana Hossenally. https://www.bbc.com/vietnamese/culture_social/2015/12/151213_the-master-of-japans-ancient-tattoo-tradition_vert_tra ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. © Ed van Alem https://www.gelderlander.nl/sport-maasland/thuisfavoriet-jochems-pakt-zege-bij-de-nieuwelingen-in-daags-na-de-tour~ac5437c3/?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Flens.google.com%2F ZimskoSonce (talk) 09:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation Tim Landy (talk) 09:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation MJXVI (talk) 11:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Such prediction for year 2097 needs clear source, because if this is uploader's own prediction, then it is totally out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. This is a screenshot of https://www.populationpyramid.net/state-of-palestine/2097/. The estimates of future demographics generated by this tool are wildly speculative and are generally unsuitable for educational use. Omphalographer (talk) 18:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree content, author Josef Lada died in 1957. in PD in 2028 — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted map in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted map in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UK logo. COM:TOO UK has low threshold -- DaxServer (talk) 16:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FDFGHJKL OrlandoR503 (talk) 01:18, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ya No Me Sirve OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: A 216 px high flag GIF is always dead giveaway that an image was nabbed from FotW-ws: In this case, it’s from its page sv-un-03.html, a 2014 image by Fred Drews. Of course, Fred cannot claim copyright over this image, but neither can Orlando, and it’s Fred’s pixels we’re looking at. (Not fully correct, either, as this 3:5 flag should be 360×216 px for an exact match.) I’ll edit the file page for proper source. As for this absurd D.R.,  keep, of course. -- Tuválkin 20:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, stripes should be 72+72+72 px high, not 73+72+71, and a 4-pen palette is enough; will correct. (Sorry, Fred!) -- Tuválkin 20:53, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per @Tuvalkin. --Ooligan (talk) 21:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Lo Necesito OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do q necessitas é dum ganda banhammer-azo, pá. -- Tuválkin 09:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Still in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es Basura OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Also, looks like the «last warning» went unheeded. -- Tuválkin 20:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Me Gusta, No Me Sirve OrlandoR503 (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per previous; nominator reblocked for a month. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es Pura Basura X2 OrlandoR503 (talk) 20:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

metadata indicates different owner SecretName101 (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:54, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

metadata indicates different owner SecretName101 (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:54, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

metadata indicates different owner SecretName101 (talk) 22:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

metadata indicates different owner SecretName101 (talk) 23:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:54, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

metadata indicates different owner SecretName101 (talk) 23:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mi own... 200.111.17.97 21:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dear,
This painting is generated by myself using water colour, colour pencils and gel pens on paper. I used the colour photo of "Deniz Gezmis" in Wikipedia as my object. If that violates the rules, then I will withdraw my submission.
Respectfully
Erol Karacabeyli Erol Karacabeyli (talk) 22:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Erol Karacabeyli: In this case please make sure this image satisfies copyright per COM:DW. It sounds like it doesn't (per used the colour photo of "Deniz Gezmis" in Wikipedia as my object). Thanks! A09 (talk) 21:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Photo is in the category. FOP. 200.111.17.97 21:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please let me know what was the arguments for deletion so that I can try to address the shortcoming? Erol Karacabeyli (talk) 18:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's OK,sorry. I didn't know that you paint. Don delete. 200.111.17.97 20:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is my painting. I would like the deletion request be removed. Erol Karacabeyli (talk) 00:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw the request. 200.111.17.97 21:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Achim55 (talk) 21:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BASURA FEA OrlandoR503 (talk) 13:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ya Nio Me Sirve Para Nada OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Lo necesito OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Still in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es Basura X2 OrlandoR503 (talk) 17:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Me Sirve BORRENLO OrlandoR503 (talk) 15:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Algunos usuarios tampoco sirven mucho pero soportamos nomás. 186.174.242.149 16:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per previous; nominator reblocked for 1 month. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es Pura Basura OrlandoR503 (talk) 20:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text; printout of a Spanish Wikipedia user sandbox page. Omphalographer (talk) 17:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 17:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. (https://www.sabirgazetesi.com/saadet-partisinden-birol-aydin-istanbul-buyuksehir-belediye-baskanligi-icin-aday-gosterildi) MarinaMann (talk) 19:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by non-contributor. No usage. Possible promotion and/or copyvio. MexTDT (talk) 20:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Флаг не имеет никаких авторитетных источников и не является флагом кряшен. Кряшены себя не выделяют в отдельный этнос от татарского народа и соответсвенно флага не имеют. Прошу удалить этот файл, потому что это просто выдумка автора. Diniyar Khasanov (talk) 14:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Также можете посмотреть страницу в русскоязычной википедии «Кряшены». Там вы не найдете какой-либо флаг кряшенов, так как у них его просто нету. Diniyar Khasanov (talk) 15:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will also duplicate this text in English, as there are many English-speaking administrators here. The flag does not have any authoritative sources and is not a Kryashen flag. The Kryashens do not distinguish themselves as a separate ethnic group from the Tatar people and, accordingly, do not have a flag. I ask you to delete this file, because this is just an invention of the author. You can also view the page in the Russian-language wikipedia "Кряшены". You won't find any Kryashen flag there, as they simply don't have one. I translated it through a translator, so something may be incorrect. Diniyar Khasanov (talk) 15:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I'll delete source file file:Flag of Kryashens.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 12:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence that this is a useful file within scope, unused; uploader should identify its purpose  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there,
I was creating wikidata item on this photo but my wikidata profile is blocked for some reason, that is the why this picture isn't used i will fix my wikidata profile then i will use this photo, please do not delete this photo.
Thanks Biirchin (talk) 09:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - also dubious own work claim. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably not "own work" and wrong date. see metadata and othe uploads of this user Xocolatl (talk) 18:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per below nom. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete

The page Fahimsifat (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: uploader request within window. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Emiratos 200.111.17.97 20:22, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: oos. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own passport 200.111.17.97 20:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: oos. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Videominer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: an image of gibberish text, various fantasy flags, and a related map.

Omphalographer (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:55, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Oesterreicher12 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: [https://www.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url={{filepath:Habib-ibrahim-rahimtoola.jpg; being facebook doesn't automatically make it speedy delete. Research needs to be done to identify underlying copyright and whether we can host image or not  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Claimed license is unsupported; no progress in determining if it is free for any other reason. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:16, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2603:7000:B8F0:960:2513:D14C:D5C3:95D9 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: reason=Unofficial logo  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete for now unless we had editable SVG version of it. According to https://brand.wbd.com/other-brands/warner-bros-brands/warner-bros/ (official guideline of WB logo), this generic WB logo is bannerless, and the bannered version (known as sash) are only deserved for four divisions (Warner Bros. Pictures, Warner Bros. Pictures Animation, WB Television, and WB Games). So, anything other than four divisions had considered "unofficial" logo. However, i inclined to  Keep if we can find a better vector version of this logo, because the supposed SVG image uploaded by BiggieSMLZ in fact cannot be editable so it is considered PNG file instead of SVG file, also considering COM:INUSE. 114.125.251.21 05:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. It's an unofficial logo. 2603:7000:B8F0:960:3CD2:5BCC:5991:B113 01:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per COM:INUSE. Just as it is the unofficial logo doesn't mean that it has justify to delete the file. 103.144.14.55 10:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted logo A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:18, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: too little information: What do we see here? What are the names of the organizations that merge? Where is the photo taken? Who are depicted? JopkeB (talk) 04:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unused photo of unidentified people sitting at table in unidentified place for unidentified purpose. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beaest (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader uploaded a huge amount of AI generated renaissance-era fan-art, most of which has already been nominated for deletion. These are the ones left over. They are out of scope as not having any educational use.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beaest (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Beaest (above) and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Beatrice d'Este all'assedio di Novara, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Conquiste amorose di Galeazzo Sanseverino, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Incontro tra Beatrice d'Este e Massimiliano I d'Asburgo, and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Missione diplomatica di Beatrice d'Este a Venezia. This is just more of the same.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted work, no such license in the source (as stated) Mateus2019 (talk) 07:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove it. I added a nother file, done with my phone where I have full copyrights Mgdeline (talk) 08:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Derived from photo from the subject's memoir. See https://www.theweek.in/theweek/leisure/2023/08/04/indrani-mukerjea-memoir-unbroken-tells-her-truth-unfiltered.html Jay (talk) 06:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Screen grab from this interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icz291GeTFw Jay (talk) 07:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

500px license laundering ©Jeremy Sutton-Hibbert 2012. All rights reserved. https://jeremysuttonhibbert.photoshelter.com/image/I0000_SSpOi6F_.4, ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

500px image laundering (Image credit: Rooksana Hossenally) https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20150512-the-master-of-japans-ancient-tattoo-tradition ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by nonnotable creator, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

500px license laundering ©Jeremy Sutton-Hibbert 2012. All rights reserved. https://jeremysuttonhibbert.photoshelter.com/image/I0000pUrtKrcmUko ZimskoSonce (talk) 08:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed to be "unknown author" - but has a clear credit to "Howard Levy" in the original caption in Jane's All the World's Aircraft. No evidience that this is a US government work as claimed by the licence. Nigel Ish (talk) 08:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this is probably the Howard Levy in question.Nigel Ish (talk) 12:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Talesbymales (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seem to be promotional files for a slide template collection; out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted as seen on watermark? or “own work.” vemap provides “free svg maps” alas Terms of service are not clear about reuse. Either OTRS ticket or fixing of license, or delete as COPYVIO -- I levae this to experts. Qualitätssicherung (talk) 10:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not free - copied from the web as reverse image search shows Alexf (talk) 11:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violação de direitos autorais Danielly Figueredo (Projeto Mais+) (talk) 12:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:23, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused art of non-notable artist is generally considered out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused scribble level drawing. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsoleto Richardnsfg (talk) 14:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Commons is for historic as well as current media. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 16:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non educative purpose image, consider also deleting the pages on French Wikipedia by the user, it's just a local joke or something. 2806:10A6:19:98C8:8CD:5B13:D485:F931 16:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Derivative work. Copryright violation. Original (without spectacles) appears all over the web (try Google Image search or TinEye) many pre-dating the Upload of this file in 2016. One example is https://www.flickr.com/photos/25304575@N02/2468086416 uploaded to Flickr in 2008 and marked copyright "All Rights reserved". Even then I am not sure this was the original. However it is pretty clear that the Uploader is NOT the Author as claimed.

I would love to claim that it is Out of Scope as well, as it clearly has no realistic educational value but it is in use. !! --Headlock0225 (talk) 12:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCREENSHOT of a quote tweet, not explicit that the original tweet was releasing its photo under a free licence. Belbury (talk) 17:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to AFC Bournemouth's YouTube channel, which has a blanket CC license for all its videos, but match footage belongs to the league and its licensed broadcasters. The club only owns its original content (i.e. interviews, behind the scenes footage etc), not match footage.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:07, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And I'd like to revisit File:Liam Delap CC video screenshot.png. It's sourced to AFC Bournemouth, but the it's the same shared Carabao Cup footage with the club's own commentators. The club owns the audio, but not the video. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:14, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. The Dominic Solanke one for example is a screenshot from at least two videos showing the same highlights but for some reason the commentators audio can't be heard from both Fulham's and Bournemouth's channels making the videos identical to each other.
Also by looking at "File:Steve Cooper.jpg", that file is reviewed by Dudek1337, I don't see that info on any of those listed here excluding the Liam Delap picture which was reviewed by a different user. Iggy the Swan (talk) 15:50, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete. The uploaded images pass all guidelines of (licence) verifiability. The unsourced reason to delete them does not meet te verifiability guidelines. According to Wikipedia:Verifiability everything must be verifiable (en:Wikipedia:Verifiability). The copyright of the images I uploaded are verifiable according to the "Guidelines for images and other media files" (en:Wikipedia:Copyrights#Guidelines for images and other_media files). The official AFC Bournemouth YouTube channel has posted video's since 2012 and their video's have not been taken down by YouTube. We/I dont have access to their standard (license) contracts and/or addidional (license) contracts. Please provide a verifiable claim to the copyright concerns or don't delete the images. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlippyFlink (talk • contribs) 09:50, August 29, 2022‎ (UTC)

@FlippyFlink: Hi, thank you for responding. A few things:
  • WP:V is guideline for encyclopedia content on the English Wikipedia. It's entirely irrelevant to licensing questions on Commons.
  • The reason YouTube hasn't taken the video down is because the EFL generally allows clubs to post match footage on their sites and social media content. The question is whether it is licensed correctly on YouTube.
  • COM:License laundering is something that can happen intentionally or unintentionally, where a YouTube user takes copyrighted content and assigns a free license. Even if YouTube shows a Creative Commons license, if the source material is copyrighted, then the resulting work is considered copyrighted.
  • Sure, we don't have access to the EFL's media contract terms. But we follow COM:PCP, specifically, #4. Not knowing who really owns the footage isn't a reason to keep an image. If there's doubt, the onus is on the uploader to show that the content is actually free to use. Since we have a pretty good idea that match footage belongs to the EFL, it's up to you to show that AFC Bouremouth correctly licensed the video.
I hope this answers your questions. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:27, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as above - content created by the club is fine, match footage is not.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Really... I mean he is a prominent footballer in a country where football sadly isnt very well covered, and he just made history for the Pakistan national team as staten in his Wikipedia page. As staten by FlippyFlink, the uploaded image clearly pass the guidelines of license verifiability. I really struggled to find an image of him watching the whole match for nearly 2 hours and the image in question is just a mere screenshot of a fraction of the whole video lasting just a few seconds as I precisely stated in the source section. I will eagerly wait for the conclusion of the discussion but this is just straight up disheartening. Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 00:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; there must be other videos on QPR's channel that show him. holly {chat} 19:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as the above deletions, AFC Bournemouth does not create or own match footage.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rose Del-Ray (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on sandbox page of user without meaningful edits.

P 1 9 9   17:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Scarlet Strange (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: handwritten school notes. Not educationally useful in their current form; not substantial enough to transcribe.

Omphalographer (talk) 18:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation, probably not the uploader's own work. Photographs of photographs taken in 1940.May be newspaper photos of the men's heroic arrival in Glasgow in 1940, see w:en:MV San Demetrio. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW, status of original photos not established. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Want to update an older image to this picture Malokkii (talk) 21:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep What old picture? That one might be useful too. We're documenting history so we don't delete old pictures to replace them with newer ones. Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map does nost show an accurate map of the Rif Republic in 1926. If true the Rif Republic would have taken over the spanish cities of Ceuta and Melilla,which it never ever did. Also, it shows having taken over the cities and hinterlands of the most important cities of the Spanish Morocco such as Tetuan, Larache, or Ksar el-Kebir which it never did either. Also it shows having taken over Tangiers, which it never did either. ANAGSPC (talk) 22:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the background map most likely comes from Google Maps (https://www.google.cz/maps/@35.7680755,-2.7933899,6.83z?entry=ttu). --Harold (talk) 17:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gnomingstuff as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10; in use so cannot be speedied, though target page at sister wiki now nominated for deletion, if successfyul can be deleted  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's "in use" on a userpage. Per COM:INUSE (bolding mine): "If an image is in use on another project (aside from use on talk pages or user pages), that is enough for it to be within scope." Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality personal image, likely related to deleted article w:en:Ricky Guillart. Noting that this user has been blocked at enwiki and other projects for abuse. Kinu (talk) 00:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment. This should be not be deleted yet for scope reasons as it is still in use on two projects and one Wikidata page. That said, this does seem to be a selfie uploaded by someone other than the photographer. It could potentially be deleted immediately on those grounds. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --P 1 9 9   15:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: https://www.ville-semur-en-auxois.fr/musee/. all rights reserved ZimskoSonce (talk) 02:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
La qualité de la photo est effectivement très bonne, elle appartient bien au musée de Semur-en-Auxois, prise par un agent de service doué pour la photographie. L'oeuvre photographiée appartient bien au musée et l'auteur de la photographie a mis son cliché à la disposition du musée. Donc mon opinion : gardons la photo ! Elle est belle et libre de droits. GenieDumont (talk) 10:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected of infringing on the copyright of original creations, and the pixel and size of the images are too low to be referenced by specific entries — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strpesha sheldld (talk • contribs) 02:07, 26 January 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. Quality is is so low, no copyrightable elements distinguisable. --P 1 9 9   15:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work. https://iict.ac.ir/anjomantahavol/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 04:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. FPTI (talk) 20:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was uploaded several months after initially being published (e.g. here). It is asserted as own work, but is lacking evidence, and the uploader's username appears to be a name different than the artist's name. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 06:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uploaders asserts that they are a festival organizer here, so perhaps we could reach out and get permission that way. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 06:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9   15:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image contains Rose Hulse (name of uploading account) as a subject, and it appears to be the work of a professional / wedding photographer. The copyright holder of a portrait is probably the photographer, and image looks very professional. See Commons:But it's my own work!, points 3 and 4. Babakathy (talk) 06:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, subject appears to be the same as uploader. --P 1 9 9   15:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Інформація не відповідає дійсності! Mykhailopark (talk) 07:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you refer to the caption on uk:Прибузьке (Вінницький район) it's no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 09:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion (Google Translate: "The information is not true!"). Use {{Fact disputed}} instead. --P 1 9 9   15:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

de volgorde van de foto's is onjuist Verloren16 (talk) 09:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   15:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 13:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not own work as it look like scanned image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Texts can type as it in the image, and the explantion does not have reference. ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9   15:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Texts can type as it in the image, and the explantion does not have reference. ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9   15:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Texts can type as it in the image, and the explantion does not have reference. No need to create images for such texts ~AntanO4task (talk) 13:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unsharp photograph, not reusable, unclear what this photo depicts. JopkeB (talk) 13:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not own work as it look like scanned image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 14:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not own work as it look like scanned image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 14:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A imagem não é do bairro de Campo Grande, no Rio de Janeiro, mas sim do bairro Jardim Paulistano, em São Paulo. Uma busca reversa no Google revela rapidamente esse fato. Além disso, há a possibilidade de a imagem estar protegida por direitos autorais, já que o autor não é a Prefeitura do Rio, como é alegado na página. Sneto12 (talk) 14:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work as declared, needs permission via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9   15:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete this page Rikardlif (talk) 14:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I don't like it" is no reason for deletion. OTRS passed. --Achim55 (talk) 15:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: non-notable, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

foto 6 is niet scherp Verloren16 (talk) 14:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   15:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

plik jest dublem pliku: File:Hadziewicz, Rafał (1803-1886) - Portrait of Barbara Brodowicz - MNK II-a-67 - National Museum Kraków.jpg AnieDA (talk) 14:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagem completamente desatualizada. Cor, nome e ícone da linha Nordeste (Antiga Linha Mucuripe) foi modificado. Desta forma a imagem só causa confusão aos usuários. Ruan moreira (talk) 14:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arquivo duplicado. Uma versão melhorada do arquivo foi adicionada. Ruan moreira (talk) 14:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny duplicate of File:Flag of Iran.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

painting by living artist, COM:DW. Per COM:FOP Honduras no exception of freedom of panorama. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eén foto te weinig Verloren16 (talk) 15:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   15:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only upload by User, small resolution, no Exif, filename looks like an online download Vera (talk) 16:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9   15:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Precautionary deletion given that the uploader has posted dozens of copyrighted/permissionless astronomy-related images since 2022, including another of Greenwich observatory at File:Greenwich observatory dome.jpg. There's no EXIF on this image and they have no other uploads of personal photos from the UK. Belbury (talk) 16:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. Unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9   15:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1971 artwork, no indication of claimed license Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painting by living artist; no indication of permission to free license Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image has a good academic purpose, dont delete it please — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.2.154.86 (talk) 07:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't trace the exact source of this image but given that all the other user's uploads have been copyvios and this is a WEBP (meaning it's likely it was plucked from the internet), I would assume this is a copyvio. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 17:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. There's some kind of watermark in the lower right corner. I don't recognize the logo (and the name is cut off) but it certainly doesn't support a claim of own work. Omphalographer (talk) 18:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   15:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Web resolution photo; Online months before upload to Commons [6], photo credit does not match uploader. (Currently in use, but we have many other higher quality photos of the Cathedral) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and redirected to alternate file for the many incoming links. --P 1 9 9   16:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt claim of own work, apparent screenshot from web (note navigation arrows at either side of image) Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Displayed person couldn't be the author of this image, which was also not made in the United States so the given license is incorrect. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The so-called corrections are baseless assumptions. --P 1 9 9   16:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in South Korea. The mall was opened in 2003; this site claims FRCH Design Worldwide (based in Cincinnati, Ohio) were behind the design of the building. As the Korean law does not allow commercial selling of copies of this building (against the commercial CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, CC-zero, or PD-user licenses that Commons only permits), a commercial licensing permit from FRCH Design Worldwide is required to keep this infringing image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 12:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:대구역 전경.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 12:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exclusão solicitada pelo autor. Arquivo duplicado. Ruan moreira (talk) 12:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be somewhat redundant to File:Linha Sul Metrô de Fortaleza.png. I'd suggest redirecting as a better option. [24Cr][talk] 20:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: different file, in scope. --Krd 18:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nome de algumas estações está errado. As integrações com outras linhas não estão visíveis. Uma versão melhor, atualizada e sem erros já está disponível e presente nas paginas sobre a Linha Sul do Metrô de Fortaleza. Ruan moreira (talk) 14:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader nomination, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flag Creator (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Missing original source or authorship to determine their copyright status. It cannot be ruled out that they are modern works. See DR: COM:Deletion requests/File:汉质帝.jpg.

0x0a (talk) 15:13, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

don't delete emperor mu of jin, ming of jin as File:JinAi.jpg is still there and nominated for deletion but declined as it was PD-OLD. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 15:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
other than that, delete the other files. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 15:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
or nvm, File:Huan.jpg and File:Emperor Ling of Han.jpg are kept and nominated for deletion but they were declined as it was also PD-OLD. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 15:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
also, delete an of han and ping of han as they are not pd-old. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 15:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Any proof? 0x0a (talk) 15:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I already told you the proof. If you think im wrong, then nominate User:HuangdiOfSongChina's uploads too. [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 20:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here I created another discussion. 0x0a (talk) 19:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
if you nominated, then don't delete mu of jin, ming of jin . [[User:Flag Creator|Flag Creator]] (talk) 19:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. Lacking information to establish if actually old. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exceeds COM:TOO. Stifle (talk) 16:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All are modern architecture, violation of architect's copyright as the source country has no Freedom of Panorama.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The deletion request is made at the request of the person depicted. --Badener (talk) 12:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also File:Lutz Fischer-Lamprecht 2021-05-13.jpg.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Badener: Was machen wir mit dem Rest von Category:Lutz Fischer?
What are we to do with the rest of Category:Lutz Fischer?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, sorry, @Jeff G. 🇺🇦 I wrote the answer at the wrong place: «:The rest, ecpect oft the two pictures, is okay.»--Badener (talk) 07:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as uploader's nomination. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 11:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion. holly {chat} 18:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is image of me. The picture was taken and uploaded without my permission violating the EU policies. 2A02:A319:823E:880:110D:E834:BAB1:5B9E 13:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We pay a shit of attention to EU policies. (What does this mean by the way: Rules? Laws? Dictatorship?) If you don't want to be photographed stay home and close the curtains. KEEP. 186.173.161.35 20:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's no need to be uncivil. FPTI (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Being a university lecturer you are a public person. If this photo showed your appearance in somehow unfavourable way, it would be a point to start a discussion. In my opinion this photo is neutral - you are a scholar doing the scholar's stuff. Panek (talk) 13:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Again: Wikimedia Commons is for free licensed images only, and sometimes the only free licened images of someone notable we have are midling snapshots. Notable people are very welcome to have better photos they like uploaded under free license (if the photographer is not the one uploding, needs explicit permission to share under a free license). Cheers. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; subject was in a public place with no expectation of privacy. If you don't like the photo, please consider uploading one that you approve of. holly {chat} 19:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear copyright status Panek (talk) 13:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Maybe it's the famous photographer ape that you discussed a lot about. Now I don't remember, in that case who is the author, the ape or the owner of the camera? 186.175.22.190 11:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was actually a monkey - as I remember, a macaque, who produced a selfie by hitting the shutter. The camera's owner was ruled not to have copyright over the photo, since he didn't shoot it, but since the monkey is not a person, neither was the monkey awarded copyright, and thus, the decision was that the work is in the public domain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per previous keep. --Gbawden (talk) 14:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image presents me. I never agreed to make it public. The author does not respond to my request to take it down. I am trying to have this image removed already few months. Ksafarzy (talk) 08:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment You were in public, were you not? I think you're out of luck. I don't think you or I have the right to tell people they can't photograph us while we're appearing in public and can't post the photo. If that's wrong, you should cite Polish law instead of repeatedly demanding a takedown, thinking you'll succeed by wearing down Commons, when that won't happen if there's no legal reason to necessitate it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:40, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ksafarzy:  Comment The request for deletion listing is still open, there is no need to relist it repeatedly while discussion is open. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ksafarzy:  Comment Also I again encourage submitting a better image(s) under a free license as the best way for notable people to avoid having mediocre snapshots of them used on Wikipedia. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nome de algumas estações está errado. As integrações com outras linhas não estão visíveis. Uma versão melhor, atualizada e sem erros já está disponível e presente nas pagiinas sobre a Linha Sul do Metrô de Fortaleza. Ruan moreira (talk) 14:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and redirected to File:LinhaSul.png. holly {chat} 19:50, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

O projeto da linha foi modificado, as estações presentes estão erradas. As integrações com outras linhas também estão incorretas. Uma versão melhor, atualizada e sem erros já está disponível e presente nas paginas sobre a Linha Leste do Metrô de Fortaleza. Ruan moreira (talk) 14:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and redirected to File:Linha Leste do Metrô de Fortaleza.png. holly {chat} 19:51, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is most likely a clerical error made by Anefo (error made as early as 1961?). It could perhaps be the wife of the man on the right, C. M. J. H. Hustinx. But it's not the wife of the man on the left, as suggested by Anefo Frank Geerlings (talk) 15:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It could be @Vysotsky: made a mistake here. Usually this user works pretty accurately but we are all humans so occasionally we all might make mistakes. - Robotje (talk) 16:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I was definitely the culprit who added a short line to the Anefo description, on 6 Sept. 2018. I first added: "Tussen hen in mogelijk Corrie Oudegeest." 8 minutes later I changed that to "Tussen hen in Corrie Oudegeest, Tweede Kamerlid 1956-1963 en echtgenote van Ab de Roos." So if this turns out to be a mistake (which seems very likely), it was my mistake. I never trump things up, so I must have found this photo with (possibly wrong) caption somewhere, or must have jumped to conclusions on the basis of some text that I didn't refer to. For now: I didn't find the original photo in Delpher nor in any other digital archive, so I guess it could have been a book about Dutch feminists. I checked several, but couldn't find one with this photo. There are 7 photographs about this trip in Anefo and Commons, and the lady in question appears in at least two images. I agree with Frank Geerlings that she doesn't look like Corrie Oudegeest one year later (comp. the teeth). I will do some searching to the real identy of this lady, and in the meantime upload a real photo of Corrie Oudegeest. I will also change descriptions. But the photo can be kept in Commons, with improved title and name. Vysotsky (talk) 17:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The solution doesn't seem very difficult. But before making a mistake again, please correct me if I am wrong. I think the lady in question is the spouse of Charles Hustinx, Emma Anna Jacoba Reijnders. She can be seen here together with her husband in 1959, two years before the disputed photo. Vysotsky (talk) 17:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a photo of Hustinx and his wife in 1967. Keeping this cropped picture is OK with me as long as the filename no longer suggests the lady is mrs. Roos. - Robotje (talk) 20:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course I will change the name of the file as soon as you seem to agree with me. Vysotsky (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your explanation regarding the cause of the confusion! As suggested I also suspect it's mrs. Hustinx. My suggestion for deletion was based on my assumption that she was not notable enough to need a cropped-out photo of her own, but renaming the photo is just fine by me. This should resolve the issue. Do I need to rescind my request? I am not really familiar with Commons deletion procedure. –Frank Geerlings (talk) 07:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Update: It seems I am late and everything has been fixed already. Thanks! –Frank Geerlings (talk) 07:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since it was cropped from a file we still have on Commons, you could consider adding "(cropped)" to the original filename. That would be File:Vertrek 10 burgemeesters naar Amerika Links wethouder A de Roos , rechts C M, Bestanddeelnr 912-5897 (cropped).jpg. - Robotje (talk) 07:39, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Completed. Thanks for taking this trouble, and apologies for the original mistake. Vysotsky (talk) 23:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; error has been fixed. holly {chat} 19:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La Porteresse, Jean Fréour (1983)

[edit]

France does not allow commercial Freedom of Panorama. The depicted statue dates to 1983 and authored by sculptor w:en:Jean Fréour who died in 2010. These commercially-licensed images, therefore, are infringements to his posthumous copyright and should be deleted.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:53, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ost316 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Appears to be scan of a cover of a brochure. Scan may be own work, but original likely has copyright. Similar work at https://web.archive.org/web/20120426001639/http://www.archive.mksac.co.uk/History/gear/images/history1.JPG

1950s brochure, could be public domain in the UK if published before 1954 and if research is done to find author. Subject to URAA. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 18:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a scan of a brochure in my possession. The printed item may date from the mid or late 1950s. The Heinke company is long gone, having merged with Siebe-Gorman in the early 1960s. Image now removed from Heinke article, where it was intended to be a supportive illustration. I did not post a scan of the entire publication and the original Heinke article was unillustrated. Delete image if it breaches Wikipedia rules. Helmardine (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check for any dates of publication and also if there were any credits for photography. Also please check if Siebe-Gorman has any information on which photographers were used for Heinke's publications. These would be helpful in determining a restoration date. If photographer cannot be found, then we can undelete in the 2050s when U. S. copyright would expire (knowing the year of publication will narrow down to which year). Abzeronow (talk) 20:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ost316 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Appears to be scan of a cover of a brochure. Scan may be own work, but original likely has copyright. Similar work at https://web.archive.org/web/20120426001649/http://www.archive.mksac.co.uk/History/gear/images/history2.JPG

1950s brochure, could be public domain in the UK if published before 1954 and if research is done to find author. Subject to URAA. Converting to DR for discussion Abzeronow (talk) 19:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a scan of a brochure in my possession. The printed item may date from the mid or late 1950s. The Heinke company is long gone, having merged with Siebe-Gorman in the early 1960s. Image now removed from Heinke article, where it was intended to be a supportive illustration. I did not post a scan of the entire publication and the original Heinke article was unillustrated. Delete image if it breaches Wikipedia rules. Helmardine (talk) 19:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check for any dates of publication and also if there were any credits for photography. Also please check if Siebe-Gorman has any information on which photographers were used for Heinke's publications. These would be helpful in determining a restoration date. If photographer cannot be found, then we can undelete in the 2050s when U. S. copyright would expire (knowing the year of publication will narrow down to which year). Abzeronow (talk) 20:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.illibraio.it/autori/michela-martignoni/ https://www.illibraio.it/autori/elena-martignoni/ Maybe75 (talk) 07:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

buongiorno,
gradirei sapere perché avete richiesto la cancellazione dell'immagine. E' un'immagine amatoriale, priva di copyright, scattata dalla sottoscritta.
quali requisiti deve avere la foto per essere accettata?
grazie molte per la risposta.
mariacristina Riva Mariacristina Riva (talk) 07:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mariacristina Riva: Do you have a larger version of this photo with the EXIF from the camera? holly {chat} 19:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

L'auteur de la photo et la personne représentée sur la photo sont la même personne, ce qui est impossible puisque ce n'est pas un selfie. Donc le dépôt de cette image est probablement une violation de copyright Olivier Tanguy (talk) 09:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No hits via Google Lens or TinEye, so no reason to doubt claim of own work. Author's name changed to uploader's. holly {chat} 19:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

plate in Shin-Okubo Sta

[edit]

East Japan Railway Company (JR East) owns the copyright to the text in the photos.(Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Noticeboards_and_signs)--IXTA9839 (talk) 14:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:18, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid public domain claim, not a UK Government work. The Imperial War Museum attributes it to 'Ralston W, Glasgow'.[7] Glasgow Museums identifies W Ralston Ltd as a family photography business based in Glasgow.[8] Verbcatcher (talk) 19:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Glasgow Museums link no longer works. Here are some other sources that confirm the existence of the Glasgow photographic business:[9][10][11] Verbcatcher (talk) 16:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr photos of random unnamed graduates. Educational value very unlikely.

TheImaCow (talk) 20:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Individual files may be deleted though per the last comment. --Bedivere (talk) 04:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no evidence of a free license

Circa 1940s photograph, sitter is in their 20s. We would need information on publication to keep, converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 21:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep United States case law has sided with a photograph as being "made public" when it leaves the custody of the photographer and is transferred to the sitter, it doesn't have to appear in a newspaper or a magazine. We generally reserve "unpublished" for images where we have a provenance showing that an image has remained with the photographer. We do that for images found in commercial archives like Getty where they buy the negatives directly from the photographer or the photographer's estate. --RAN (talk) 19:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per RAN. --Bedivere (talk) 04:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (C) Boston Globe

Circa late 1920s photograph per caption at source. This is a portrait photograph, could have been done by Cambridge High and Latin. It's possible this is public domain due to age or formalities. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 21:20, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not David Douglas Cunningham (my great-grandfather's brother). For him see the Wikipedia page. Roryharrow (talk) 21:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.

A1Cafel (talk) 14:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination : no FOP in France. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 13:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused license template (at time of nomination, its only transclusion was Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ноздрачов Олексій Олексійович.jpg which I just deleted). There is no indication on the website cimic.com.ua of any license terms, nor is there any explanation of how the website is related to the Ukrainian military. holly {chat} 18:13, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose, it was a website of Ukrainian Ministry of Defense. It shared content under a free license. See footer:
Now this site, obviously, has another owner unrelated to MOD, but until its domain was changed, it's a perfectly acceptable source.
@Holly Cheng, can you say what was the URL source specified for File:Ноздрачов Олексій Олексійович.jpg? VoidWanderer (talk) 15:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
UPD. File:Ноздрачов Олексій Олексійович.jpg was shared under a free license. Opened an undeletion request: Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Ноздрачов Олексій Олексійович.jpg VoidWanderer (talk) 15:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As the site currently does not have any CC license declaration, I still think we shouldn't keep this template around, as it will give the wrong impression. Any content uploaded from archived versions of the site can just use {{Cc-by-4.0}} on its own. holly {chat} 21:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I looked into archives, it seems it belonged to MOD till 2019. So might rename it to {{Cimic.com.ua (2014-2019)}}. VoidWanderer (talk) 10:45, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's a possibility, but it was only used for one file. Is that really worth having a template for? holly {chat} 17:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I undeleted File:Ноздрачов Олексій Олексійович.jpg. See the DR, and the undeletion request. Yann (talk) 19:32, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Template is in use. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation, probably not the uploader's own work. Has the appearance of a newspaper photo of the men's heroic arrival in Glasgow in 1940, see w:en:MV San Demetrio. Published online before the upload to Commons.[12] Verbcatcher (talk) 19:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP, copyright status of the photograph is unknown, and depending on where it was published, would have been restored by URAA. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mögl. Urheberrechtsverletzung. Genehmigung der Fotografin fehlt offensichtlich. Barbasca (talk) 23:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Die Fotographin, Giulia Iannicelli, hat der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg die Verwendung des Fotos von Prof. Dr. Peter Dabrock auf Wikipedia genehmigt. Sie ist als Quelle in der Beschreibung des Fotos zu erkennen. Freund der ST (talk) 13:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. I also cannot find a free license at source, permission to use on Wikipedia is not enough. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work, uncropped image found on https://www.facebook.com/111046170547021/photos/pcb.194310602220577/194310542220583/?type=3

Old published photograph. Could be from the 1950s or older. Converting to DR for discussion, we'd need to know publication info to keep. Abzeronow (talk) 19:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Named subject could be K.H. Achmad Djauhari Chotib, the father of a Mohammad Tidjani Djauhari born in 1945. That would make it an Indonesian image, which would be free from URAA concerns if published before 1946. Unfortunately, it seems we don't really have enough to go on to make that determination. Felix QW (talk) 16:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uncropped and with better quality found on https://maulanahabib28.blogspot.com/2013/02/foto-foto-ulama-makam-tuan-abah-guru.html

Old photograph. We'd need more information on when it was published to keep. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 19:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, if you have evidence, that the photo was publisged more than 50 years ago, you can create an undeletion request. Taivo (talk) 22:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no evidence of a free license; https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/janet_waldo_p_2016.jpg

1946 American photograph. We should confirm pre-1978 publication and whether it was renewed or not. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 19:16, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete We generally side with Getty, unless someone can find this image in a newspaper or on eBay. Getty never includes the margins, and CBS would include any copyright information in the lower margin. Getty also tends to host images that were never distributed, they buy up the rights to entire archives. --RAN (talk) 20:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]