Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/12/09
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Files uploaded by Lucia penninckx (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Berlin 4.jpg
- File:Beeld 1.jpg
- File:Ezeltje Omgeving.jpg
- File:Toneel.jpg
- File:Herwaardering van mijn werk als kunstenaar.jpg
- File:Eend-haaskop.jpg
- File:Fullsizeoutput 21c.jpg
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:04, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Waga872006 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Self-promotion of a non-notorious person.
Mussklprozz (talk) 17:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 18:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Issmar Rouse (talk) 19:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- I am certainly sorry to have offended you - that was never my intent. In my view, many photos in the Commons will not be used in articles. Instead, they serve as a repository for images that other people can freely use (in newsletters, blogs, etc.). Personally I think this is useful. Again, my apologies for offending you - all best wishes, Daderot (talk) 19:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Issmar Rouse (talk) 19:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- I am certainly sorry to have offended you - that was never my intent. In my view, many photos in the Commons will not be used in articles. Instead, they serve as a repository for images that other people can freely use (in newsletters, blogs, etc.). Personally I think this is useful. Again, my apologies for offending you - all best wishes, Daderot (talk) 19:28, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Henrickydiniz02 (talk) 21:13, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: by Elcobbola. --Achim55 (talk) 21:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Jimerveille (talk) 12:57, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per request; unused personal photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:32, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of ASUS. Solomon203 (talk) 13:51, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Not de minimis. Tagged as G7. – Pbrks (t • c) 14:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 17:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
probably wrong author - copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 11:59, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nsho Officials (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: fictional "historical" flags without proper sources (Note that this request only applies to the uploader's files that are unused; many more fictional flags are currently in use all over WP's language versions, those files need to be adressed as well)
- File:Lazica-Egrisi.png
- File:Ottoman 1375-1453.png
- File:Ottoman.png
- File:Asturias kingdom flag (alt).png
- File:Galicia kingdom flag (alt).png
- File:Asturias kingdom flag.png
- File:Leon kingdom flag.png
- File:Castille kingdom flag.png
- File:Al-andalus kingdom flag.png
- File:Aragon royal ensign.png
- File:Charlemagne banner.png
- File:Vedic Civilisation waving flag.png
- File:Tidore Sultanate flag.gif
- File:Demak Sultanate flag.gif
- File:Medes flag.gif
- File:Mutapa flag.png
- File:Shiv Sena flag.webp
- File:Avar Khaganate flag.png
- File:Flag of Scythians.png
- File:Funan flag.png
- File:Chenla flag.webp
- File:Tsangpa flag.jpg
- File:Alternative flag of Qing Dynasty.png
Enyavar (talk) 12:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Gibran Rakabuming Raka, Candidate for Vice President of Indonesia 2024 (no background).png
[edit]DPP Partai Gerindra © 2022 Urang Kamang (talk) 13:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
DPP Partai Gerindra © 2022 Urang Kamang (talk) 13:28, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
DPP Partai Gerindra © 2022 Urang Kamang (talk) 13:28, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
DPP Partai Gerindra © 2022 Urang Kamang (talk) 13:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution picture Urang Kamang (talk) 14:49, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Low resolution is not a deletion reason by itself, but the weird filename and strange, bordered appearance suggest the likelihood of copyright violation. I don't think the photographer would have given their photo such a filename. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused map, no educational value: No map key; uses absolute numbers with a relational method Enyavar (talk) 14:58, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Unfree movie poster Pahkiqaz (talk) 15:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Superior6296 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Personal fiction
- File:Senegambia Union Flag (Fictional).webp
- File:Hypothetical Czechoslovak Togo Flag.png
- File:Hypothetical yugoslavia flag.png
Enyavar (talk) 15:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Superior6296 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Motley collection of images coming from internet wrongly tagged with CC BY SA licenses, some may be in Public Domain for various reason, however none have the relevant information for why they could be in Public Domain. Some are obvioulsly recent images uploaded here witouht permissions.
- File:Militar Jurchen Flag 02.webp
- File:Militar Jurchen Flag 01.webp
- File:Lan Xang Flag (1353 - 1707).jpg
- File:Chandragupta Maurya's Court.jpg
- File:The Auspicious Beast; The Twelve Precepts, Kotobuki.png
- File:Manchukuo's 3 year propaganda poster (1934).jpg
- File:Manchurian Pavilion at the World's Fair in Chicago (1933).jpg
- File:Propaganda Poster of Manchukuo (1932).jpg
- File:Military Parade of Manchukuo's Army (1940).jpg
- File:The Tokyo Station welcoming Emperor of Manchuria.jpg
- File:Chaghan Temur on Campaign (Yuan Dynasty Painting).jpg
- File:Ancient Egyptian Standards.png
- File:Ancient Egyptian Standards in 3D.jpg
- File:Banners of Rameses and Moses.jpg
- File:Rameses' Banner 03.jpg
- File:Al-Andalus Banners.png
- File:Al Andalus Colls Standard.gif
- File:Ptolemaic Egyptian Vexilloid 1.jpg
- File:Yuan Dynasty Military Banners.jpg
- File:Aurangzeb's Banners.jpg
- File:Banner of Arms of The Hauteville Family.png
- File:Pre-Qing Ancient Imperial Chinese Banner.webp
- File:Royal Coat of Arms of Margaret I of Denmark.jpg
- File:Irish Monks Flag.jpg
- File:Bhutanese Banners.jpg
- File:5784i89tsh181.webp
Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- While I also can't verify a source for the two propaganda posters (File:Manchukuo's 3 year propaganda poster (1934).jpg, File:Propaganda Poster of Manchukuo (1932).jpg), I think these two are safe to Keep as pd-old, 90 years after the events.
- Even more so the beast image File:The Auspicious Beast; The Twelve Precepts, Kotobuki.png from 1850, unless there are better versions on Commons. It is also in use, so Keep
- File:Yuan Dynasty Military Banners.jpg is in use, I can find multiple sources and it's very very likely covered by pd-old: Keep
- for sure, Delete the modern graphics, the "standards"-reconstructions and the photos of figurines.
- Neutral on the whole rest, although caution: several of them are also in use. --Enyavar (talk) 20:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- It appears that the "Great Chang Banner" (File:Pre-Qing Ancient Imperial Chinese Banner.webp) is historically "accurate" as a religious symbol, information about it should be kept as it is important, but this detail of it was a religious symbol should be stressed about more, it was not a national flag rather it was a Chinese equivalent of European Category:Crosses in heraldry:
- Cactus Ronin (talk) 19:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- it appears according to Chinese trademark law that religious symbols, especially local practices, can not be trademarked therefore "Great Chang Banner" should be under public domain, at least the idea of it. Misattribution of religious symbols have no legal approvement. The webp file itself however appears to be the work of the author so the author can attribute CC-NY to image itself but the name and information itself is in public domain, my vote is still keep in this regard:
- [5]https://www.hfgip.com/news/can-you-register-trademark-religious-sign
- [6]https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/11/246
- [7]https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320963832_Protection_of_Religious_Signs_under_Trademark_Law_A_Perspective_of_China's_Practice Cactus Ronin (talk) 19:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: most per nomination; a few kept per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 15:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 15:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 15:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Türk-Genci8 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Pseudohistorical flag maps with improperly sourced maps and fictional flags; unused
- File:Hiung-nu Empire- Xiongu Empire map flag B.C.209 Mete Khan Period.png
- File:Göktürk Khaganate-Turkic Khaganate Map flag 576.png
- File:Tolunids Flag of Map (868).png
- File:Ottoman Empire (1595) Flag of Map.png
- File:German Empire (1918) Flag of Map.png
- File:Golden Horde Map Flag.png
- File:Cuman Kipchaks Map Flag.png
- File:Kievan Rus map flag (1054).png
- File:Afsharid Empire map flag.png
- File:Timurid Empire map flag.png
- File:Ghaznavids Empire map flag.png
- File:Hephthalite Empire (White Huns).png
Enyavar (talk) 15:38, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Couldn't find any information on this organization. Either it's not widely known or made-up. Out of scope in both cases Kelly The Angel (talk) 15:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of permission given. John Yunshire (talk) 15:48, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Unused {{Low quality chem}}, low resolution image. Replaced by File:Chlordiazepoxide.svg. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The plus/minus-signs are completely illegible. DMacks (talk) 21:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 05:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
{{Low quality chem}} due to having a stereocenter with stereobonds going to and from it. Only used on a user subpage on the German Wikipedia. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 16:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Proposed replacement resolves the ambiguous-representation problem noted. But among all Category:Campestane, only the nominated file represents the actual ambiguous nature at the lower corner of the A–B ring-fusion. DMacks (talk) 21:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. @DMacks: I have uploaded File:5αβ-Campestane-2D-skeletal.svg as an exact replacement of the nominated file, including the wavy bond and resolved ambiguous-representation. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! Now I can say Delete. DMacks (talk) 19:44, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kami.wargocka (talk · contribs)
[edit]Flags that are either completely fictional (thus out of scope); or reproductions of already existing flags on Commons. Files are badly described, badly categorized, and unused.
- File:Flag of reich.jpg
- File:Flag of Third Reich 4.jpg
- File:Flag of third reich 3.jpg
- File:Flag of third reich.jpg
- File:Flag of german empire.png
- File:Prussia flag 3.png
- File:Yuan flag 3.png
- File:YUAN FLAG 2.png
- File:Yuan flag.png
- File:Mongolska flaga.gif
- File:Mongoool.png
- File:Mongol.f.png
- File:Mongol empire flag 10.gif
- File:Mongol empire flag.png
- File:Mongol khamagte.png
- File:Russiaq0.gif
- File:First french empire flag.jpg
- File:Landrus.png
- File:20181228112219!Royal Banner of Stanisław II of Poland.svg
- File:Stanisław leszczyński baner polski.png
- File:Flag of luthuanian.png
- File:Flag of poland 1620.png
- File:Flag of poland 1638.png
- File:Flag of lithuanian - poland.png
- File:Crown the kingdom of poland.png
- File:United kingdom of poland.png
- File:First kingdom of poland.jpg
- File:German empire 1849.png
- File:Flag of german confederation 1.jpg
- File:Rhime flag.png
- File:Flag of roman empire 7.png
- File:Luxseborg.png
- File:Flag of nassau dynasty 1.png
- File:Flag of welf.jpg
- File:Hohenstaufen flag.png
- File:Frankish sallicy.png
- File:Caroligian 2 flag.png
- File:Frankish 2 flag.jpg
- File:Frankish flag.png
- File:Roman empire flag 6.png
- File:Roman empire flag 5.png
- File:Roman empire flag 4.png
- File:Roman empire flag 3.png
- File:Flag of roman empire 2.png
- File:Flag of roman german.png
- File:Flaga cesarstwa rzymskiego 4.png
- File:Flaga cesarstwa rzymskiego 3.png
- File:Roman republic flag.png
- File:Roman kingdom flag 2.png
- File:Królestwo rzymskiego.png
- File:Ottomanflag.png
Enyavar (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 16:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction, unused Enyavar (talk) 16:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 16:38, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Fiction Enyavar (talk) 16:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 16:41, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted video game boxart/promotional material.
- File:Super Mario Bros. 2 poster.jpg
- File:Super Mario sticker.jpg
- File:Super Mario Bros. 2 sticker.jpg
- File:Myst video game box, CD and manual.jpg
- File:Myst video game box.jpg
- File:The Simpsons - Bart vs. the Space Mutants cartridge.jpg
- File:Super Mario Bros. 1985 box and cartridge.jpg
- File:Super Mario Bros. 1985 cartridge and box.jpg
- File:Super Mario Bros. 1985 cartridge.jpg
- File:World of Warcraft CD cover 14-day trial.jpg
- File:The Mystery at Greveholm 3 - The old legend front.jpg
- File:The Mystery at Greveholm 3 - The old legend inside.jpg
(Oinkers42) (talk) 16:41, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. As far as I can see all of these have eligible licences according to Commons:Licencing: either CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. The licence is stated in the link to https://digitaltmuseum.se/. I have tried as far as I can to acredit the authors of the work in the "authors" parameter, but if that's somehow insufficient or erronous, I'd like to know. Sabelöga (talk) 00:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- The problem is not necessarily the licensing of the photographs, but the fact that they are photographing copyrighted works (such as video game box arts or marketing material). Sorry for the confusion. (Oinkers42) (talk) 02:21, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- So, how do we resolve this? Sabelöga (talk) 14:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- The problem is not necessarily the licensing of the photographs, but the fact that they are photographing copyrighted works (such as video game box arts or marketing material). Sorry for the confusion. (Oinkers42) (talk) 02:21, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HBTgovernment (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Personal fiction
Enyavar (talk) 16:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CrispedTrack973 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Fictional flags
Enyavar (talk) 16:43, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: yes, it is funny, but unused personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 16:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction, unused Enyavar (talk) 16:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction for sale Enyavar (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 16:59, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 17:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction; bad photoshop; unused Enyavar (talk) 17:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction
Enyavar (talk) 17:08, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:25, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kate gorlova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Personal fiction
Enyavar (talk) 17:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:25, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 17:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:25, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Poor color choice, many better quality images available about how positions are named in a 6-member ring. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 17:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete hand-drawn and barely-legible diagram. Have high-quality File:Ortho-meta-para.svg. DMacks (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:24, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Turkey.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. COM:VRT suggested. Strakhov (talk) 17:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency project. Omphalographer (talk) 18:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency project.
Omphalographer (talk) 18:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency exchange. Omphalographer (talk) 18:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:21, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency token. Omphalographer (talk) 18:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:21, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juradzerox (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: logo and screenshot of a non-notable cryptocurrency exchange.
Omphalographer (talk) 18:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:21, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency exchange. Omphalographer (talk) 18:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Clearly clipped from Google Verne Equinox (talk) 18:25, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amanda Lima da Silva Lopes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Satellite images cannot be own work. Likely a GoogleMaps (or other servce) CopyVio
Enyavar (talk) 18:35, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Picture from the 60ies, a PD-70 rule cannot apply here. Photographer probably still alive. Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:19, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation Solemn1 (talk) 18:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- The image has an ImageCollect watermark on it. ImageCollect is a website for celebrity photos. Solemn1 (talk) 18:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Too small to be useful. Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Small and out of focus, unlikely to be useful. Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Works by Michel Majerus
[edit]- File:Installation view controlling the moonlight maze, neugerriemschneider, Berlin 2002.jpg
- File:"if we are dead, so it is", Michel Majerus, 2000.jpg
Non-free content. Images sourced from the Michel Majerus estate, presumed to be copyrighted. Each image also contains copyrighted painting by Michel Majerus, photographed at temporary events/exhibitions, out of bounds of any FoP. --19h00s (talk) 19:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:15, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Historical photo, unlikely to be own work. Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Historical photo, unlikely to be own work. Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused fantasy flag. Strakhov (talk) 20:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Map is fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 20:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Map is fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 20:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Veverve (talk) 20:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Veverve (talk) 19:14, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Picture uploaded in 2015 but published here https://www.en-attendant-nadeau.fr/2021/03/17/magies-ete-delay/ with the legend "Florence Delay, à Paris (2007) © Jean-Luc Bertini" Arcyon (discuter) 21:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Al*from*Lig (talk) 21:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this File or remove the public google entry in combination with my username. thanks Derrobin154 (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE and uploaded in July, so well beyond the automatic courtesy deletion period. As for the Google entry, you need to contact Google, and good luck with that. Commons has no control over Google. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Judging by the EXIF table, this image comes from Facebook; better sourcing and licensing are needed. Also observe that the rest of user's uploads are all copyvios. Gikü (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Accidental upload Prosperosity (talk) 22:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Unidentified stage work, poor quailty. Out of scope, I would say. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:38, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted for RONNY GOETTER, no permission from that person. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Any reasons? It’s out of an official photoshoot from the artist for promotional use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YetiMfj (talk • contribs) 23:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- According to Commons rules, there must be signed permission from the photographer, see here. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 14:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text Omphalographer (talk) 23:34, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: textual diagram Omphalographer (talk) 23:35, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: joke image. Omphalographer (talk) 23:38, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Google Image search shows multiple instances of this image before the upload date (including here from Apple Daily in 2010), making it unlikely to be the uploader's original work as claimed. Underbar dk (talk) 00:03, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:58, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
As stated in the file details (see the URL) this photo is copied from a news article, where the photographer's name is mentioned in the credit (in Hebrew). It cannot remain in the Commons without a VRT (formerly, OTRS) release note. Ldorfman (talk) 01:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use besides user talkpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE, the crop fails de minimis A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 04:13, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete If text is significant, it should have been transcribed to Wikisource maybe Nv8200p (talk) 12:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, SEO keyword stuffing spam cats, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IslandMan89 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The life + 50 years license was used for the uploads, but the author is unknown for all the files.
- File:Rafael Leonidas Trujillo (2).jpg
- File:El Jefe trujillo was a fan of tiny mustaches uniforms and hungarian gunsmiths.jpg
- File:Independencia-trinitarios-rd.jpg
- File:Bernardo Vega.jpg
- File:Alfredo Fernández Simó.jpg
- File:Pedro-Henríquez-Ureña.jpg
- File:Rafael-trujillo-killers.jpg
- File:Luis Manuel Caceres.jpg
- File:Roberto Pastoriza.jpeg
- File:Miguel Angel Baez.JPG
- File:Luis Amiama Tio.png
- File:Huascar Tejeda.jpeg
- File:Amado Garcia Guerrero.jpeg
- File:Rafael Trujillo and Rafael Estrella.jpeg
- File:Antonio Imbert Barrera.gif
- File:Antonio de la Maza.jpg
- File:Juan-Francisco-García.jpg
- File:Tulio Manuel.jpeg
- File:Ercilia-Pepin-3.jpg
- File:Antonio Guzman.jpg
- File:Casimiro Nemesio de Moya.jpg
- File:Dr-miguel-canela.jpg
- File:Rafael-Trujillo2.jpg
- File:Donald-Reid-Cabral.jpg
- File:Guillo Pérez.jpeg
- File:Juan Isidro.jpeg
- File:Franklin Franco.jpg
- File:Francisco Caamaño Deño.2.JPG
- File:Sebastian Lemba.jpg
- File:MAXIMOGOMEZ.JPG
- File:Emilio Prud Homme.jpg
- File:Salome Urena.jpg
Underlying lk (talk) 12:38, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IslandMan89 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works: low resolution, incomplete metadata, most of which can be found on google maps and reddit.
- File:Miches, El Seibo, Dominican Republic 4.webp ➝ google maps
- File:Miches, El Seibo, Dominican Republic 5.webp ➝ google maps
- File:Miches, El Seibo, Dominican Republic 6.webp ➝ google maps
- File:Miches, El Seibo, Dominican Republic 1.webp ➝ google maps
- File:Miches, El Seibo, Dominican Republic 3.webp
- File:Miches, El Seibo, Dominican Republic 2.webp ➝ google maps
- File:Polo, Barahona, Dominican Republic.jpg
- File:Polo, Barahona, Dominican Republic 2.jpg ➝ reddit
0x0a (talk) 05:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IslandMan89 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: Small reoslution, no EXIF data, user with bad history.
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella neighborhood 2.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella 3.jpg
- File:IMG San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella neighborhood.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella beach 6.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella beach 3.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella beach 4.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella Christmas.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella beach 2.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella beach.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown streets 4.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown city 44.webp
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown city 88.webp
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown city 3.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown city 9.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown city 8.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown city 6.webp
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown city.webp
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic town 2.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic city 2.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic city town.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic city.jpg
0x0a (talk) 05:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 16:32, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Flickrwashing of manufacturer photo (see https://www.cnet.com/pictures/htc-tattoo-photos/ for example) Logan Talk Contributions 05:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Contains screenshot of copyrighted HTC software (see COM:Android). Logan Talk Contributions 05:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Low resolution, lack of metadata, unlike own work. 0x0a (talk) 08:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:50, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:13, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:13, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:13, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:13, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:13, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep (see userpage), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:20, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; pixelated atoms and bonds. In addition, the methyl group on the left side should be written as H3C rather than CH3 to indicate a C-C bond to the carboxyl group. Replaced by File:Methyl-acetate-2D-structure.svg as high-quality version drawn according to MoS guidelines. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, methyl bound via H. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Materialscientist as no permission (No permission since) Krd 08:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be Weintrob. This is a new account, only this upload, PCP, we need verification to keep Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
not educationally useful Kelly The Angel (talk) 09:46, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
not educationally useful Kelly The Angel (talk) 09:46, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
not educationally useful Kelly The Angel (talk) 09:48, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 09:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 09:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 09:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 09:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 09:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by org, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 09:57, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 10:01, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 10:01, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Mormegil (talk) 10:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like unused personal image. Nv8200p (talk) 12:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Questionable licence, as the image had already appeared at larger sizes in other places prior to the July 2017 upload:
- higher quality but cropped in https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5ndqig (at 0m20s), from May 2017
- slightly higher res (according to TinEye) at https://vadamagazine.com/entertainment/television/7-reasons-why-brian-blessed-is-the-best-human in July 2013
- slightly higher res at https://mobility.ccny.cuny.edu/Callaway/djec.html (the person on the left in the photo), undated
The uploader only uploaded this image, and has a username that matches one of the people in it (the person on the right), which doesn't mean much. Belbury (talk) 10:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Only used for spam ro:Best Auto Accident Lawyers Gikü (talk) 10:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IdioticAnarchist2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Personal fiction
- File:Map of the United Republic of the Tralensi Isles (un-highlighted).jpg
- File:Map of the United Republic of the Tralensi Isles (highlighted).jpg
- File:Flag of the fictional Kingdom of Trals (1801-1973).png
- File:Flag of the fictional Trals Freedom Front (1943-1945).png
- File:Flag of the fictional United Republics of the Tralensi Isles (1973-).png
Enyavar (talk) 11:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Matwiejczuk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Official-looking logos, seals and flags that are unsourced, undescribed, unused and (doing a quick websearch on a few of these names) apparently fictional.
- File:Flag of Benelux Communist Party.jpg
- File:Logo of Benelux Communist Party.png
- File:Flag of Islamic Republic.gif
- File:Flag of 4th All-Polish Republic.jpg
- File:Flag of The Great Rebellion of May 22.png
- File:Seal of APG.png
- File:Logo Probing Lagers 1000 Moments.png
- File:Seal of RPLA.png
- File:Emblem of APG.png
- File:Seal of Socialist People's Liberation Army.png
- File:Logo Probing Lagers Endless Plasmatic.jpg
- File:Logotyp zespołu.png
- File:Logo Probing Lagers Endless Plasmatic.png
Enyavar (talk) 11:28, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
This is owned by Disney. SL93 (talk) 07:49, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
1997 artwork by artists TJ Dixon and James Nelson--see COM:Copyright rules by territory/United States#Artworks and sculptures DanielPenfield (talk) 13:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:09, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
This was on of my first uploads when I didn't understand Common's policy. This is a work from Argentine artist León Ferrari (1920-2013) and therefore it is still protected in its country of origin. That the photo was taken by the Argentine government and released with CC-BY-SA is irrelevant. We can undelete this image in 2084. Günther Frager (talk) 14:45, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Violation of sculptor's copyright. Commercial freedom of panorama is not granted in Ukraine. According to this site, the statue dates to 1990 and was authored by sculptor Ференц Бені.
- File:1. Ужгород. Пл. Ш. Петефі Пам'ятник угорському поету Ш. Петеф.jpg
- File:1I9A0083.jpg
- File:1I9A9724.jpg
- File:21-101-0071 Uzhgorod DSC 2116.jpg
- File:P1360224 пл. Ш. Петефі.jpg
- File:P1360226 пл. Ш. Петефі.jpg
- File:Uzhgorod Petefi Monument RB.jpg
- File:Uzhhorod Zakarpatska-monument to Sandor Petofi in 2022.jpg
- File:ЗакарпатськаУкраїна77.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник національному поету Угорщини - Шандору Петефі.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник угорському поету Петефі.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник угорському поету Ш. Петефі, Ужгород, пл. Ш. Петефі.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник угорському поету Ш. Петефі. Ужгород.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник угорському поету Ш. Петефі.jpg
- File:Ужгород (685).jpg
- File:Ужгород Пам'ятник Шандору Петефі.jpg
- File:Ужгород, пл. Ш. Петефі.jpg
- File:Ш.Петефі.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:50, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of previously deleted content. May be speedied upon closing admin's decision. Yasu (talk) 15:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 15:51, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
copyvio of a book cover of a book published in Belgium Culex (talk) 16:12, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Too blurred. A better quality image is available. Nv8200p (talk) 02:33, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted monument. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine. According to w:uk:Список пам'ятників Тарасові Шевченку#Дніпропетровська область, the bust was unveiled in 2013 and authored by renowned sculptor of the city of Karnaukhivka, Петро Куценко. Commercial Creative Commons license permit from Петро Куценко is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:08, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Same case of violation of sculptor's copyright: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Пам'ятник Шевченку у Карнаухівці.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Modern statue of Kenji Miyazawa (1896-1933). No FOP for 3D artwork in Japan. Abzeronow (talk) 18:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
The photo is very blurry. Taivo (talk) 20:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The apparent author was А. П. Скобликов (source). No death year has been specified; someone must determine the artist's death year to know the year when this image is going to be undeleted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 21:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom od panorama in Ukraine. The memorial plaque was inaugurated in 1991 and authored by sculptor В. Луцак. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 21:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
The monument dates to 2011 according to w:uk:Пам'ятники Борисполя. As there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine, a commercial Creative Commons license permission from the sculptor is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:20, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Probably not an own work. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Probably not an own work. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alley of the Heroes of Soviet Union, Boryspil. Same case of no-commercial FoP violation. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:00, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The monument was installed in 2020 and authored by sculptor Олексій Пергаменщик. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The sculpture dates to 2001. A commercial license permission from the sculptor or his heirs is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Пам'ятник вченому-етнографу П. П. Чубинському.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Пам'ятник вченому-етнографу П. П. Чубинському.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Пам'ятник вченому-етнографу П. П. Чубинському.jpg. The sculpture is centered so not de minimis. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:World War II memorial in Boryspil for the same case of no-commercial FoP violation. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Same case of no-commercial FoP violation as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Пам'ятник вченому-етнографу П. П. Чубинському.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be a component of this copyrighted sculptural monument. No commercial FoP in the source country of the artwork. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be part of this copyrighted memorial in Ukraine, but Ukraine does not allow commercial freedom of panorama. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be part of this copyrighted memorial in Ukraine. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:41, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Apparently one of the component busts of the copyrighted Alley of the Heroes sculpture in Ukraine. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:45, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Perhaps the same work and no-commercial FoP case as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alley of the Heroes of Soviet Union, Boryspil. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:46, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Switzerland has a standard of life plus 70 years but the artist Alis Guggenheim died in 1958. I suggest to undelete in 2029. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:33, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hotel Zlatibor (Užice)
[edit]No FoP in Montenegro, architect Svetlana Kana Radević died in 2000
- File:Užice hotel zlatibor IMG 9779.JPG
- File:Užice IMG 9756 hotel zlatibor.JPG
- File:Užice, June 2013 (1).JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Užice is a city in Serbia though, not Montenegro. --Bdx (talk) 08:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Bdx. Building is not in Montenegro. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:01, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- My bad. I withdraw my nomination--A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, the crop fails de minimis A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- The tower shown in the photo displays its exterior in the above-mentioned photo. As there is no commercial freedom of panorama in France, a commercial license permission from architect Jean Nouvel is required. As such license has not been issued as of this date of the deletion request, I endorse the request for deletion. Mortadella42 (talk) 22:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Taiwan woman pussy.jpg Sandy131468 (talk) 13:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- You didn't give a deletion reason. Why don't we let the speedy deletion tags be considered, as this is the type of photo that's likely to be stolen? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:30, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The monument was erected in 1967 and authored by sculptor М.Вронский. Assuming the sculptor is now dead, the undeletion year must be carefully determined, because this monument won't be truly in public domain even if Ukrainian copyright expires, if the longer U.S. copyright will still exist, established to eligible international works by the 1994 Uruguay Round Agreements Act that Wikimedia must also follow. URAA issue can be ignored had Ukraine introduced commercial freedom of panorama (see {{Not-free-US-FOP}}), which is evidently denied in December 2022.
- File:Китаево1.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник М. С. Боровиченко, IMG 7626.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник М. С. Боровиченко.jpg
- File:Украина, Киев - Памятник Марии Боровиченко (1).jpg
- File:Украина, Киев - Памятник Марии Боровиченко (2).jpg
- File:Украина, Киев - Памятник Марии Боровиченко (фрагмент).jpg
- File:Украина, Киев - Памятник Марии Боровиченко.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:41, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Memorial to Shuliavka Republic
[edit]Sculptural copyright violation. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The monument was publicly displayed in 1985, and was authored by sculptor Микола Рапай (died 2021).
- File:0996951316264l.jpg
- File:80-389-0026 Peremogy 37 Shulyavka 2.jpg
- File:80-389-0026 Peremogy 37 Shulyavka.jpg
- File:80-389-0026 Пам'ятний знак Шулявській республіці.jpg
- File:P1940922 Пам'ятний знак на честь Шулявської республіки.jpg
- File:В пам`ять студентів та викладачів КПІ.jpg
- File:Київ, Пам'ятний знак на честь Шулявської республіки.jpg
- File:Пам'ятний знак на честь Шулявської республіки Київ Перемоги просп., 37.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник Шулявській республіці DSC 0038.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Шулявській республіці.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine. According to w:uk:Список пам'ятників Тарасові Шевченку#Донецька область, the statue was unveiled in 1962 and authored by Гонтар С.О.. As a pre-1978 sculptural work, it is eligible for U.S. copyright made existing to all eligible sculptures globally through Uruguay Round Agreements Act. Assuming the artist died too early and the work falls out of copyright in Ukraine earlier, the longer U.S. copyright (95+1 years after 1962) means these images as well as one video must not be undeleted for the meantime, until U.S. copyright expires. URAA can be ignored by using {{Not-free-US-FOP}}, but this tag is invalid for Ukraine, because Ukraine has no commercial FoP in the first place.
- File:Пам'ятник Тарас Шевченко . м. Красногорівка,1.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Тарас Шевченко . м. Красногорівка,2.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Тарас Шевченко.webm
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Unfree public monument. Ukraine does not allow commercial freedom of panorama. The statue dates to 1995 and its author is sculptor Еммануїл Мисько.
- File:Vasyl Stefanyk Monument in Subcarpathian National University.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник В. Стефанику, вул. Шевченка, 57,на подвір'ї університету.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник В. Стефанику, вул. Шевченка.webm
- File:Пам'ятник В. Стефанику, Шевченка,57, на подвір'ї університету.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник В. Стефанику,вул. Шевченка.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник В. Стефанику,Вулиця Шевченка , 57, на подвір'ї університету.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Стефанику.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
According to this site, the monument dates to 1998 and is authored by sculptor М. Посікіра and architect М. Федик. As commercial freedom of panorama is not granted in Ukraine, commercial Creative Commons licensing clearances from the two authors is required.
- File:Івано-Франківськ Пам'ятник міліціонерам.jpg
- File:Івано-Франківськ, вул. Сахарова, Пам'ятник міліціонерам які загинули в мирний час у боротьбі зі злочинністю.jpg
- File:Липень 2021 року. Івано-Франківськ.jpg
- File:МВС України. Працівникам органів внутрішніх справ загиблим при виконанні службових обов'язків. м. Івано-Франківськ.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник міліціонерам, вул. Сахарова, Івано-Франківськ.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник міліціонерам, які загинули в мирний час у боротьбі зі злочинністю, Івано-Франківськ.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник міліціонерам, які загинули в мирний час у боротьбі зі злочинністю, вул.Сахарова.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник міліціонерам, які загинули в мирний час у боротьбі зі злочинністю,Івано-Франківськ.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник міліціонерам,що загинули в мирний час, вул. Сахарова, м. Івано-Франківськ.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:38, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to Ustym Karmaliuk
[edit]There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The work dates to 1974 as per these two sources, this and this. No sculptor is named, but assuming the work will fall of out copyright very early in Ukraine, then images of this statue (from pre-1978) should not be restored until the longer U.S. copyright (95+1 years after the date of public display, which is 1974+95+1=2070) expires, courtesy of Uruguay Round Agreements Act. The lack of commercial FoP for Ukraine means {{Not-free-US-FOP}} is not applicable.
- File:+ASN 1118.jpg
- File:+ASN 1125.jpg
- File:+ASN 1129.jpg
- File:+DSC 6346.jpg
- File:+DSCF5473.jpg
- File:+DSCF5474.jpg
- File:+Кармалюк Устим Якимович1.jpg
- File:Letychiv Karmaliuk Monument RB.jpg
- File:Letyczow Karmaluk IMG 2203 68-230-0012.JPG
- File:Башта. Летичев.jpg
- File:Вежа та Кармелюк.JPG
- File:Кармелюк перед Баштою замка.jpg
- File:Кармелюк Устим. Летичев.jpg
- File:Кармелюк. Летичев.jpg
- File:Комплекс замку i домiнiканського монастиря (ракурс 2).JPG
- File:Летичів - замкова башта DSC 1518.JPG
- File:Летичів - Пам'ятник керівнику селянського руху на Поділлі Устиму Кармалюк-1.jpg
- File:Летичів - Пам'ятник Устиму Кармалюку DSC 1519.JPG
- File:Летичів Монастир 1.JPG
- File:Мури з круглою баштою (мур.) і пам'ятник Кармелюку Летичів.jpg
- File:Мури з круглою баштою та пам'ятник Кармалюку (Летичів).JPG
- File:Мури з круглою баштою, м.Летичів.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник 015 Устиму Кармалюку.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник 016 Устиму Кармалюку.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Кармелюку у Летичеві Хмельницької області.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Кармелюку у Летичеві.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник керівнику руху Устиму Кармалюку.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник керівнику селянського руху на Поділлі У. Кармалюку.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник керівнику селянського руху на Поділлі Устиму Кармалюку і вежа замку.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник керівнику селянського руху на Поділлі Устиму Кармалюку смт Летичів.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник керівнику селянського руху на Поділлі Устиму Кармалюку, смт Летичів.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник керівнику селянського руху на Поділлі Устиму Кармалюку. Летичів.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник керівнику селянського руху на Поділлі Устиму Кармалюку.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник керівнику селянського руху Устиму Кармалюку.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Устиму Кармалюку P1820473.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Устиму Кармалюку на фоні замку.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Устиму Кармалюку!.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник Устиму Кармалюку.jpg
- File:Устим Кармелюк зблизька.jpg
- File:Устим Кармелюк на фоні Вежі замку.jpg
- File:Устим Кармелюк.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:58, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Friendship Monument, Henichesk
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine - 1958 monument
INeverCry 04:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:29, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Friendship Monument, Henichesk
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the Ukraine.
- File:Henichesk Monument of Frienship (YDS 1983).jpg
- File:Генічеськ Пам'ятник дружби.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник дружби, Генічеськ.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Дружби.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 22:19, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:59, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Friendship Monument, Henichesk
[edit]There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The monument dates to 1958 and is authored by sculptor С. Урушадзе. Still under sculptural copyright.
- File:Генічеськ, пам'ятник дружби.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник дружби в м. Генічеськ.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник дружби, Генічеськ 2021.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 21:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:21, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Григір Тютюнник меморіальна дошка.JPG. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 21:54, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:21, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Removal in 2022 does not take away sculptors' posthumous copyrights. According to w:uk:Пам'ятники Борисполя#Колишні, the sculptural ensemble was inaugurated in 1991. Still a copyrighted work as the sculptor (not named in the ukwiki list article) is not yet dead for more than 70 years.
- File:Алея Героїв Радянського Союзу DSC 0106.jpg
- File:Алея Героїв Радянського Союзу DSC 0109.jpg
- File:Алея Героїв Радянського Союзу DSC 0110.jpg
- File:Алея Героїв Радянського Союзу DSC 0111.jpg
- File:Алея Героїв Радянського Союзу DSC 0112.jpg
- File:Алея Героїв Радянського Союзу DSC 0113.jpg
- File:Алея Героїв Радянського Союзу DSC 0114.jpg
- File:Алея Героїв Радянського Союзу DSC 0115.jpg
- File:Алея Героїв Радянського Союзу DSC 0116.jpg
- File:Алея героїв Радянського Союзу. Іван Кудря (Бориспіль).jpg
- File:Алея Героїв, Бориспіль.JPG
- File:Аллея героев Советского Союза. Борисполь.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:03, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Removal in 2022 does not take away sculptor's copyright. According to w:uk:Пам'ятники Борисполя#Колишні, the work dates to 1975 and is authored by sculptor Б. Ф. Никончук (still alive as of this writing and deletion request).
- File:Меморіал на честь воїнів-визволителів (Бориспіль).jpg
- File:Меморіал на честь воїнів-визволителів та воїнів-бориспільців, які загинули в роки війни 1941-1945 рр. DSC 0121.jpg
- File:Меморіал на честь воїнів-визволителів та воїнів-бориспільців, які загинули в роки війни 1941-1945 рр. DSC 0148.jpg
- File:Меморіал на честь воїнів-визволителів та воїнів-бориспільців, які загинули у Другій світовій війні.jpg
- File:Мемориал воинам-вызволителям 1941-1945гг. Борисполь.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:08, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The work dates to 1994 and was jointly authored by О. Скобліков (died 2005), Є. Скоблікова, Ю. Новохацько, І. В. Моліт, and В. Мохнієнко. The authors may have had different roles in various components of this sculptural work.
- File:Пам'ятний знак на честь перебування в м. Борисполі Т. Г. Шевченка 02.jpg
- File:Пам'ятний знак на честь перебування в м. Борисполі Т. Г. Шевченка DSC 0105.jpg
- File:Пам'ятний знак на честь перебування в м. Борисполі Т. Г. Шевченка IMG 1656.jpg
- File:Пам'ятний знак на честь перебування в м. Борисполі Т. Г. Шевченка, Бориспіль.jpg
- File:Пам'ятний знак на честь перебування в м. Борисполі Т. Г. Шевченка.jpg
- File:Памятный знак пребываания Т.Г. Шевченко в Борисполе. Борисполь.jpg
- File:Памятный знак пребывания Т. Шевченка в Борисполе. Борисполь.jpg
- File:Т. Г. Шевченка в м. Борисполі IMG 20191108 150747155.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:28, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Probably not an own work. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Nigeria is 50 years, so restore 1979+50+1 years = 2030. --RAN (talk) 17:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fma12 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.nationalsoccerhof.com/ . COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:43, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Textlogo per COM:TOO US. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Below threshold of originality for US. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
It does not correspond to any real flag of the province of Formosa, it is a proposal from a user. Goldsztern ✶ 12:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 20:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Yugoslavia (1946-1992).svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 20:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Wrong person picture, original person: https://www.instagram.com/ayudiandrasari Hsnfirdaus (talk) 09:28, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. You can start a discussion on the file's talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:32, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 12:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use, not in com:scope 82.124.119.228 13:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake. I don't want it here. It's my own work. Pustam.EGR (talk) 17:35, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 12:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
SUPER old file that has been superseded MANY times and is not used on ANY mainspace articles ItsCheck (talk) 19:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid reason for deletion. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 12:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
copyviol from https://giancarloriccardi.com/fratini-gian-carlo-riccardi/ Fresh Blood (talk) 22:49, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023121010003037 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 07:54, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
copyviol from https://giancarloriccardi.com/amanti-gian-carlo-riccardi/ Fresh Blood (talk) 22:51, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023121010003037 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 07:54, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Uploader request Officer781 (talk) 00:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Previously kept due to the COM:INUSE policy. Now it is unused and continues to be out of scope. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
KeepOut of scope, you say? Quite a significant Wikipedia article, I say. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:44, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- I think looking at (and linking) the deletion request where it was kept is a good idea: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Machado de Assis real negro.jpg, which gives some insight. Reading trough the comments there it seems like it's a derivative of File:Machado de Assis aos 57 anos.jpg with some changes done to his face (which seems purely like authors imagination). Due to that it seems like this is non-notable fake and out of scope due to that. In the previous request it was kept purely due to it being in use, while a similar picture was deleted. So I think Delete due to it not being in use anymore.--DJ EV (talk) 18:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- I take your point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:08, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:28, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:COURTESY, I want to delete this image. This image is outdated, so it is deprecated. This image can be replaced File:Tallest buildings 2022 whether or not FoP.png. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as uploader courtesty. "Outdated" is irrelevant; media related to tallest buildings in the world in 2020 is just as much in scope as images related to tallest buildings in 2022 or any other year. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:35, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Contains screenshot of copyrighted HTC software (see COM:Android). Logan Talk Contributions 05:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- I've blurred out the copyrighted system UI. 0x0a (talk) 08:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Simply deleting the non-blurred version in the file history is enough I think. Veverve (talk) 08:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: version with DW blurred; Deleted older version. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 02:58, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Nope. Please do a web search. Murdered for disobeying, the story of Saman Abbas, Saman Abbas: Family on the run over teen's disappearance in Italy, Saman Abbas: Uncle of teen who refused arranged marriage arrested, etc., etc., etc., etc. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:49, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I'm dedicating a page to her murder, which is easily verifiable through a quick research online. Inimer (talk) 05:54, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:58, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyviol (image used by media, like this: https://www.rainews.it/articoli/2023/11/omicidio-di-saman-abbas-pm-dai-familiari-mai-un-gesto-di-pieta-famiglia-come-una-ndrina-510a756c-b33b-49c8-9bad-4883adf9aeba.html ) Holapaco77 (talk) 09:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep So what that it's used by media? Of course a Creative Commons Attribution-licensed image is used by media! Who are you claiming owns the copyright other than the YouTube source, which predates the article you linked by several months? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:36, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:39, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Image description says that source licences are not known by the uploader: These planetary textures (Or maps) were created by people other than me, and I do not hold licensing rights to the textures. The screenshot itself is my own work, but the textures are not. I do not know the license status of these particular textures.
Damian Peach is credited for the textures, in the image description. Their planetary image website at https://www.damianpeach.com says Copyright © 2021. www.damianpeach.com. No material used within this website may be used, amended or distributed without the consent of the author unless specifically stated otherwise.
If Peach has given permission for their work to be uploaded to Commons as CC-BY, evidence of this permission needs to be shown. Belbury (talk) 12:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:40, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. "Dmitry Plantorama" is not author of the map. Plants of the World Online is owner of licensee ("We are the owner or the licensee of all intellectual property rights in our Website and in the content published on it. Those works are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All such rights are reserved.") https://www.kew.org/terms-of-use oryginal source of map: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:228732-1 Kenraiz (talk) 12:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely own photo, obviously scanned from a magazine/newspaper. May pass PD-Venezuela or PD-VE-Photo but the original date is unknown. Gumruch (talk) 14:25, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Attribution and license now fixed. He looks about 25 so that puts us at roughly 1953. Looking at the biography he played for the Venezuelan Winter League from 1952 to 1953. Both Tineye and Google Image found no attributed photographer or anyone making an active copyright claim. --RAN (talk) 16:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN; false claims removed. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:42, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
random documents with no VRT permission, probably out of scope.
- File:Certificado de Aprobación 7.jpg
- File:Certificado de Aprobación 5.jpg
- File:Certificado de Aprobación 6.jpg
- File:Recepción de Solicitud 4.jpg
- File:Solicitud 2.jpg
- File:Recepción de Solicitud 3.jpg
- File:Solicitud 1.jpg
—Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Highly probable that the photos inside the owl are copyvios. Also, no COM:EDUSE.
—Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Este logotipo fue creado por el autor: Lenin Ventura Madrigal , y fue aprobado por el congreso del estado de Tabasco tiene dos versiones y esta, es al natural, si no conoces de la historia del Tecolutilla de las Montañas, Tecolutilla hoy Ciudad Tecolutilla, te invito a conocerla a través de los tres libros escritos por el mismo autor del Logo del tecolote, no es imagen con plagio es imagen autentica. No tienes ninguna autorización para eliminar la imagen, porque tiene derecho de autor. Lenin Ventura Madrigal 06:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Linavj (talk • contribs) 06:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; even if uploader created the logo design, unattributed images in the collage are COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:45, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
This photo was published after 1957 and took after 1947, so it's not in public domain. Sété40 (talk) 16:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:17, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
1919 photo claimed as "own work". Other images uploaded by this editor may also be worth checking. PamD (talk) 17:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all uploads, looks like a return of the single-focus copyvio user Enujrecneps (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) , possibly the same images reuploaded. Belbury (talk) 17:35, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly PD-UK for an anonymous UK image. TinEye searched over 64.2 billion images but didn't find anyone making an active copyright claim or find an attributed photographer. We have performed our due diligence and the PD-UK license is correct and the photographer is anonymous. You want to punish the uploader but can't, so you try and punish the image with deletion. --RAN (talk) 15:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Richard, you've updated the file to say that it's a scan of the original work - how are you able to determine that? The uploader could have taken it from a biography or newspaper article. (The original version simply claimed it as the uploader's "own work".) It's exactly the kind of photo that would have appeared in a retrospective of a 100-year-old actress's career.
- I don't think anyone is trying to "punish" anyone or anything here, just to check (or in absence of a response, guess) what an uploader actually meant when they told us that they took this photo in 1919. Belbury (talk) 16:30, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): I have come across an unrelated case with a prime example of why it is unwise to rely on TinEye searches to claim an image is free from copyright. If you run File:Donald Cameron Lochiel, 26th Chief.png (before it is deleted) through TinEye, you should be told that it has checked 64.3 billion images and found a single match on a blog (with no copyright information recorded). However, TinEye doesn't tell you that the image is also available on Getty Images[8] with information showing it is in copyright. If TinEye is capable of missing matches on stock image sites like Getty, we can't trust it to rule out copyright violations. Also, TinEye can't report on images in print media or from scanned works that aren't in its database. It remains a useful tool where it finds a positive match but a negative result doesn't mean the image is safe. From Hill To Shore (talk) 22:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of anonymous work, no publication data (we cannot be sure, that 70 years have passed from first publication). Taivo (talk) 08:26, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of this being an anonymous work. Declaring an upload of a user known for copyright violations as an anonymous work does not meet the threshold of making a "reasonable enquiry" as required by the licence inserted by RAN. Enthusiasm for retaining old images does not negate COM:PRP. From Hill To Shore (talk) 09:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. This one *might* be out of copyright, but not demonstrated. Almost all other images by uploader shown to be blatant copyright violations. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:21, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The article where image was used has no proofs, probably faux. If an own work, may be just neural generation. Ignatus (talk) 19:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; date, source, and claimed license all clearly false. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Recording of music from the television series Prison Break which is copyrighted Johnj1995 (talk) 20:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Recording of music which is not in the public domain: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCObXuAwCIA Johnj1995 (talk) 20:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation?? Photographer and subject claimed to be the same person Flickr washing?? Headlock0225 (talk) 20:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Point of order - User:Headlock0225 asserts flickr-washing. Uploader is the subject. Hasn't the term flickr-washing always been used when we suspect a third-party is trying to claim ownership of the intellectual property rights of images to which they are un-related? Headlock0225, do you have reasons why you would use the term flickr-washing here, in a new and novel way? Geo Swan (talk) 01:08, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- This picture was taken circa 1990. Modern cameras have a timer function, that allows the photographer to set the camera up, on a tripod, press the shutter and then get themselves in front of the camera in time for the shutter to open.
- When was this feature available in high end cameras? If it was available a couple of decades ago we could assume Ms Rinaldi used this feature to take her own picture.
- Alternately, we could speculate a friend took the picture, and subsequently gave it to her. Some people would assert that if we were to follow the very strictest interpretations of the precautionary principle we would delegate someone to try to contact Ms Rinaldi, and request her to complete an OTRS ticket, where she confirms she really does own the rights to this image of herself, as stated in the license she used.
- I am concerned that there are instances where the precautionary principle is followed to unreasonable lengths. Sorry User:Headlock0225, I think your challenge may be an instance of carrying the precautionary principle beyond reasonable lengths.
- I think this link says commons users have uploaded over 25,000 of Ms Rinaldi's images. We have respected the free license she put on all those other images. Do you really want to pursue whether we should respect the free license she put on this image? Geo Swan (talk) 01:40, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- FWIW: Camera timers date back at least to the 1890s; Kodak was offering them for mass-market cameras by the late 1910s. (I remember my father using the timer on his camera for family photos in the 1970s, setting up the shot then stepping in to place.) As the Flickr user is a professional photographer, nothing improbable with them being familiar with how to use self timers. - Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:32, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:26, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
As a television station logo (for w:KWCH-DT), unlikely to be own work. It's probably well below TOO anyway, but the actual source is not is given. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Detete – Reason:
- It looks fake, and it couldn't have be used before 2022 also because KWCH-DT was using the logo they adopted under Media General ownership.
- Mer764Wiki (talk) 22:50, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Murals in British Columbia
[edit]There is not freedom of panorama for two dimensional works in Canada.
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:35, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
This photograph was published in Austria in 1931 and is credited to a photographer named Martha Kerling from Graz. It is in the public domain in the US (because it was not protected in Austria on January 1, 1996, {{PD-1996}}), but it is most likely still protected in Austria now.
Martha Kerling (Wikidata: d:Q123737179) was apparently born in 1897 (per [9]), resided in Zurich (Switzerland) in 1920, was briefly active as an illustrator (woodcuts) for books in Switzerland ca. 1922/1923 and then as a photographer (in Munich, Germany in 1923, in Graz, Austria, in 1927, and finally in Cologne, Germany from 1927 to 1950). I could find her in the Cologne address books from 1928 to 1952, but not in 1953 or 1954, so either she died or she moved away. I suspect she moved, because Martha Kerling is actually not a very common name, and Ancestry (or more precisely its database Sweden, Births from the Swedish Death Index, 1901-2006) tells me that a "Martha Louise Maria Kerling" born on June 2, 1897 in "Tyskland" (Germany) died in Sweden at some point in the time period from 1901 to 2006. Gravar.se, a Swedish web site about graves in Sweden's cemeteries, has more here: A woman named Martha Louise Maria Kerling, born 1897-06-02 (same date as Ancestry), died 1980-05-18 in sv:Hardeberga and was buried on 1980-05-24 in the Hardeberga cemetery in en:Södra Sandby. Even if it's unclear how she came to Sweden, that is most likely her because the name is uncommon and I haven't been able to find another Martha Kerling in Germany (or Switzerland or Austria) that could have been born in 1897. Only a Marta (without an h) Kerling in Dessau, who is listed as a Pelznäherin (woman who sews furs) in 1926 and 1936 and as a pensioner in 1944 (so probably born before 1880), while the photographer Martha Kerling was living in Cologne.
So, tl:dr: The photographer was born in 1897, was still living in Cologne in 1952 and probably died in Sweden in 1980. Even if one were to think that the woman who died in Sweden in 1980 must have been someone else, 1952 or 1953 would be a bit early for someone born in 1897 to die, and death at some later point seems more likely. The file should therefore be deleted per the precautionary principle and be restored either in 2051 (if the 1980 death date is correct) or 2052 (with {{PD-old-assumed}} and {{PD-1996}} based on the 1931 publication date). Rosenzweig τ 23:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- The person in the image only lived to age 56, so dying in your 50s isn't that unusual. I agree with your rationale and the person dying in Sweden is most likely her. I will ask a genealogy friend in Sweden to see if she had an obituary to confirm or refute. --RAN (talk) 16:32, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
my ID name Vajihehd is inthis page and you should remove my ID Vajihehd from this page. Thisi is due to my privacy concern. 2607:FA49:CF42:BE00:E8ED:93CA:BAA5:60A1 23:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, not useful format. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. The "dead architects" exception as claimed by Italian parliament pronouncement is already deprecated. Artist César Pelli died in 2019 A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Porta_Nuova_view.jpg
and
-https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Skyline_Milan_Winter.jpg
I am in favor of rapidly deleting them all, in case my opinion is asked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barjimoa (talk • contribs) 08:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Barjimoa (talk) 08:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - The other two are general skylines and are fine. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Freedom of panorama
[edit]Not used images. COM:FOP refers only freedom of panorama for tallest works of architecture. These images do not refer freedom of panorama for tallest works of architecture.
- File:Height comparison of notable statues whether or not FoP.png
- File:Height comparison of notable statues whether or not FoP.svg
- File:Tallest Observation Decks in Europe whether or not FoP.png
Ox1997cow (talk) 04:45, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- So is your concern that the diagram isn't accurate? Because I'm struggling to understand your argument as at least the SVG one is being used [10]. Smasongarrison (talk) 04:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- In this case, it can be applied File:Height comparison of notable statues (vector).svg. Ox1997cow (talk) 20:26, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
ミスをしてたため 1738b88su87 (talk) 09:41, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- {{subst:delete2|image=File:STARTOENTERTAINMENT Logo.jpg|reason=ミスをしてたため}} ~~~~ 1738b88su87 (talk) 09:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request within window. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. "Dmitry Plantorama" is not the author of the illustration. It is takes from Plants of the World Online, where is not under free license. Source: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:30008848-2 According to Terms: "We are the owner or the licensee of all intellectual property rights in our Website and in the content published on it. Those works are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All such rights are reserved." Kenraiz (talk) 13:12, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- the author field changed to show the link to the POWO site. To my understanding the distribution map on the POWO site is placed under the following conditions:"Kew Backbone Distributions
- The International Plant Names Index and World Checklist of Vascular Plants 2023. Published on the Internet at http://www.ipni.org and https://powo.science.kew.org/
- © Copyright 2023 World Checklist of Vascular Plants. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0" (https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:30008848-2#source-KBD) which is CC-BY-3.0 and allows the use of the image Dmitry Plantorama (talk) 17:20, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:30008848-2#source-KBD. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
This image is essentially a duplicate of this image. However, unlike the latter image, this image has a mistake with the distributions of Inuvialuktun and Inuktitut. Seeing as the only other difference between the two images is that this one doesn't label the smaller Eskaleut varieties, and it is already not in use on any Wikimedia projects, I see no reason why it should not just be deleted instead of corrected. – Treetoes023 (talk) 14:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable to me. Turn this into a redirect, also fix the incoming redirect. - Jmabel ! talk 19:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: They now have significant labeling differences and are both in use. user:Treetoes023 if you depreciate the file, feel free to come back and renominate it, but we can't get rid of it while it's in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
This image is no longer in use, the reasons are the same as the previous deletion request. – Treetoes023 (talk) 18:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Did not realize that this was already uploaded LostplanetKD73 (talk) 17:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - file:WP 806A West of Boca Apr 17 2004xRP - Flickr - drewj1946.jpg. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Did not realize that this was already uploaded LostplanetKD73 (talk) 17:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - file:WP 806a Soda Springs crossing Ap15 04xRP - Flickr - drewj1946.jpg. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Did not realize that this was already uploaded LostplanetKD73 (talk) 17:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - redir to File:WP 806 a leaving Truckee April 2004xRP - Flickr - drewj1946.jpg. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted image Verne Equinox (talk) 18:48, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Despite what is stated in the watermark, the author published it in 500px under a free license. We have many situations like this one here in Commons, both in watermarks and EXIF copyright notices. But despite these standard copyright notices, the author may certainly choose to publish the work somewhere under a free license, as was the case. Darwin Ahoy! 20:25, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Darwin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
unclear purpose, not in use Arlo James Barnes 19:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- It was used for dialogue messages in some welcome pages. Yes, it is left unused at the moment, so I have no comment to delete it. Waihorace (talk) 03:50, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per Wailhorace (So page histories don't break). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
1912 German photograph, could be public domain if the photographer died before 1953. We could use PD-old-assumed in 2033. Abzeronow (talk) 19:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" is the proper license. Tineye and Google found no one making an active copyright claim or found an attributed photographer for this 1912 image. --RAN (talk) 16:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Photo of 1992. The copyright on the photo is on the source website: "© Photographs from the personal archives of Maria Stepanivna Mishchenko and Oleksandr Valentinovych Mishchenko." (© Фотографії з особистих архівів Марії Степанівни Міщенко і Олександра Валентиновича Міщенка.). There is no permission to publish under a free license Venzz (talk) 21:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
This image is not a logo used by Ralston College -Mrn5768 (talk) 00:12, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment It would appear that it was used. Do you dispute that, Mrn5768? If it was used, the image should be kept, and the filename and description can be changed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Potentially has a use, keep for now. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
No proof of CC 4.0 license. I looked through the website that this was taken from and I cannot find any mention of the license. Panamitsu (talk) 05:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- No worries. It was on Google images. Source given was the website. Chavmen (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I think we can keep the photo on commons.
- Please see here: https://www.indigenouscoalition.org/our-people where it states "Images of personnel are license free for documentary or review purposes". Chavmen (talk) 10:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nope. Please read COM:Licensing. Commercial use has to be allowed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- No worries, I am going to see if I can get in touch with them. Thanks for the info. The term "review purposes" I took to be pretty broad. Chavmen (talk) 08:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek I am not an expert on this so I wrote to the organisation and got a response today that they would up date the site to say "Images are license free with no restrictions". Can you advise if this is correct? [11] Chavmen (talk) 03:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- I don't want to talk out of turn on this. It sounds good to me, but someone else like an admin who's more of an expert on Commons' licensing requirements should address this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'll try the help page. Thanks. Chavmen (talk) 11:09, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- I don't want to talk out of turn on this. It sounds good to me, but someone else like an admin who's more of an expert on Commons' licensing requirements should address this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nope. Please read COM:Licensing. Commercial use has to be allowed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Image page now has a VRT ticket notice. Can someone please check the ticket? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to have been checked. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Now has VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
The owner is requesting this file be deleted. Lksantos2003 (talk) 05:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep To old for courtesy deletion. PaterMcFly (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as a derivative work. It seems likely that Geronimo Cristobal took the paper photo in a photo booth. The uploader, and presumably the photographer of the paper photo object, does not seem to be Cristobal. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per IronGargoyle. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution and blurred. Higher quality images of disc golf baskets are available. Nv8200p (talk) 11:51, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but not of hole 17 at Milo McIver State Park's Riverbend DGC. Many of these low quality pictures are useful for historical reasons, as they document the type of basket that was in use on a particular hole at a specific point in time and help validate layouts. I'd also like to keep Flickr collections complete for now unless there are redundant images. Iketsi (talk) 14:57, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: poor quality but no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Keep.
(1) This photo was taken from a public highway, of items placed next to the public highway for the purpose of public viewing and phogotraphs. The objects were part of a scarecrow festival, and were placed next to an exhibit as part of the show. All this is covered in the UK by Panoramafreiheit.
(2) The link given above is about US law only and the US does not have Panoramafreiheit. If you extend your US laws to all photographs uploaded from the UK, then you will have to delete all photographs taken from public highways, including all public monuments. You are not doing that, though, are you?
(3) As I understand it, toys count as utilitarian in the UK, since they fulfil a need for all children (and for plenty of adults, who may keep a favourite toy all their life). For example, toys are commonly used as a sleeping or calming aid for very young children.
(4) The stuffies (as I believe you call them in the US?) in the picture are almost certainly hand-made by the householders who created the scarecrows for the festival. Commercial toy manufacturers turn out thousands of identical toys, but this pair consists of two individual items. In my generation in the UK, girls were taught cookery and sewing at school, and the boys were taught woodwork and metalwork. I made loads of stuffed animals, as a kid. Thus, most women of my generation can easily make items like the ones in the picture, to our own designs or from patterns. 3D hand-made objects like that are not matters of commerical copyright in the UK, and, I repeat, the ones in the photo are covered by Panoramafreiheit. Storye book (talk) 09:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Bad decision above. These clearly have a copyright as sculptures -- all created works have copyrights. They are not permanently displayed, so FoP doesn't apply. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:TOYS. --Jarekt (talk) 01:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Photo Weitzmann"
[edit]These two photographs published in 1925 in Austria are credited to "Photo Weitzmann". They are in the public domain in the US, but most likely not in their source country Austria.
The Weitzmann family were a whole dynasty of Jewish photographers based in Vienna (sources: [12] and [13]). Some of them died over 70 years ago, but the others most likely did not, so their work would still be copyrighted in Austria.
The founders, brothers Jakob and Salomon Weitzmann, died in 1916 and 1922 respectively, so it's unlikely one of them is the author of these photos published in 1925. Salomon's wife Anna, who continued his business, died in 1942, and Jakob's wife Rosa continued her husband's business too, but I couldn't find a year of death for her. Jakob's son Oskar died in 1947 in the US (at the age of 49), while his younger brother Berthold, who had also emigrated to the US, seems to have lived longer. Several other children of both Jakob / Rosa and Salomon / Anna were also photographers (10 photographers among those children in total, including Oskar and Berthold), and some were engaged in legal conflicts after the Second World War to get back the families' assets in Vienna which were confiscated in 1938 when the Nazis came to power in Austria. Some of those legal conflicts ran until 1957, so clearly less than 70 years ago.
Since we do know that an Austrian "Weitzmann" photographer took these photos, but not which one (except that it was most likely neither Jakob nor Salomon), and we also do not know a year of death for most of them, these photos are most likely still protected in Austria. The files should therefore be deleted. They can be restored in 2046 with {{PD-old-assumed}} and {{PD-1996}}.
Rosenzweig τ 19:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- The photo studio had no other employees or photographers they contracted with? That's the thing -- a corporate credit is still anonymous, unless we know nearly for sure that there were no other photographers. And if there were 10+ possibilities, that is still anonymous to me. If there were just two possibilities, and we knew both lived a long time, it's more gray. But at any rate the particular human author needed to have been known before the mid-1990s -- even figuring it out now would not change anything. Keep for me I think. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: It's not "a" photo studio, and it's not a corporate credit. These photographers from the Weitzmann family didn't work for one big "Weitzmann" studio, they had several studios named after themselves. --Rosenzweig τ 13:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)