Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/05/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(43987930730).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![37 File:Landappbw 500966 1821 Ehemaliges "Schwäbisches Worpswede" Falschengehren.jpg](#File:Landappbw_500966_1821_Ehemaliges_"Schwäbisches_Worpswede"_Falschengehren.jpg){kind=link}
_(43987936460).jpg){kind=link}
_(30864913637).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_(30864918107).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![58 File:Landappbw 325571 1822 Hotel Gasthof "Zum Rössle" Heilbronn- Frankenbach.jpg](#File:Landappbw_325571_1822_Hotel_Gasthof_"Zum_Rössle"_Heilbronn-_Frankenbach.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_24-4-2023.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; troll bad faith disruption request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Keep: No valid reason request created by a vandalism account.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(43987930730).jpg){kind=link}
_(43987930730).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
_(43987930730).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
_(43987930730).jpg){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Landappbw 494562 1819 Fachwerkbau mit Glockenturm, Versammlungsraum und Bushaltestelle Etzlenswender Kelterle Etzlenswenden.jpg
[edit]
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Com:Pene, galeria 186.173.148.129 01:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, unused collage of unsourced low res penis snapshots. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:19, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:19, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:19, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
_(43987936460).jpg){kind=link}
_(43987936460).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
_(43987936460).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
_(43987936460).jpg){kind=link}
_(30864913637).jpg){kind=link}
_(30864913637).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
_(30864913637).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
_(30864913637).jpg){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
_(30864918107).jpg){kind=link}
_(30864918107).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
_(30864918107).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
_(30864918107).jpg){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- May I ask why this photo has been marked for deletion? Noah Wulf (talk) 01:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, disruptive troll deletion request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Grand Valley, Garfield County, Colorado. LOC sanborn01008 002.tif
[edit]```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Landappbw 187374 1819 Christbaumständermuseum und Etterdorfstube 7547 Mühlacker, Friedenstraße.jpg
[edit]
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
deleted page Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
```````` Moonfvblofg2678 (talk) 01:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- What's the issue with this file? I just uploaded it. Glasshouse (talk) 01:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Vinzroosen (talk) 09:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 11:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Wrong file name Navtech Hyderabad (talk) 16:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Not a reason for deletion (files can be renamed) but prompt uploader request is. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
copyrighted photo from external website, no information indicating free license Quenhitran (talk) 02:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clear false license claim; source website clearly marked "Copyright © 2000-2023 GlobalSecurity.org All rights reserved.". --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Photo copied from the Internet Quenhitran (talk) 03:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, CV, clearly false claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. New user, how is already known for copyright infrigement. No metadata! Lukas Beck (talk) 04:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete From https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/lionel-messi-of-paris-saint-germain-and-neymar-of-paris-news-photo/1457086844?adppopup=true Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, blatant copyright violation. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
This image is incomplete. And it is a duplicate of this one ( File:Guatemala or United States of Central America.jpg ) Thecaribbeancoast (talk) 23:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In use image and properly licensed crop. --RAN (talk) 05:13, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep For reason given above. --Lubiesque (talk) 21:49, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. And not a duplicate, but a crop. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
This is a duplicate file of [File:Guatemala or United States of Central America.jpg] ActiveWindows (talk) 05:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- ActiveWindows, what changed since last year, when this was kept as a crop and not a duplicate? Would you like to withdraw this nomination, or do you have some new argument? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- And
Speedy keep: COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use, not a dupe. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation 90.61.81.172 09:15, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: from where?. Ruthven (msg) 09:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
CWC/Kiwi Farms-related drivel. Nate • (chatter) 17:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Commons Is not a paedophile assembly. 186.172.159.38 19:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Block this kid. 186.172.159.38 20:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Penis only vandal 186.172.159.38 20:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Minor vandal 186.172.159.38 20:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Falsche Bild wurde hochgeladen Muchland1981 (talk) 15:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
There is evidence that this may be a copyright violation. The image was not taken on the date specified by the uploader, and was actually taken at the premiere of the Absolutely Fabulous movie on June 29, 2016. This date is also in the metadata. The metadata also shows that a program was used for watermarking, but no watermark is found on the photograph, suggesting it may have been cropped out. While I can't find an exact match for this photo, there are many similar ones taken at the event, which are decidedly less altered/manipulated. Breaktheicees (talk) 02:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 10:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Company service advertisement, use of copyrighted materials Quenhitran (talk) 08:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Delete. Meets criteria for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G10. Marbletan (talk) 17:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Kadı. --Rosenzweig τ 09:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
It can be easily found on Twitter and it isn't the first time that the uploader uploads copyrighted images of Im Si-wan classifying them as their own work. Bloomingbyungchan (talk) 13:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 09:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
1980 American album cover. Listed as "fair use" on English Wikipedia, Flickr uploader didn't create this album cover. Abzeronow (talk) 18:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Kadı. --Rosenzweig τ 09:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely own works, others were found in YouTube, no indication of own works.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator. I doubt that a user may be related to User:Mar252525, User:Joycieeexxx, or User:Smash154. Perhaps I will make a case if they come back as a sock. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 20:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC); edited: 21:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: all files already deleted by Red-tailed hawk. --Rosenzweig τ 09:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
I don't believe this is a NASA work as it seems to have been derived from this ESA image and rotated by 180 degrees. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:ExoMars Orbiter (transparent).png for a similar case. However, the ESA does have a freely licensed version elsewhere (search for "figure 27") that can be used instead. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Comment: It's not a perfect replacement, but I've uploaded the alternate at File:Artist rendering of the XMM-Newton telescope.jpg. — Huntster (t @ c) 17:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)- @Ixfd64: I happened across ESA's apparent CC trove of XMM images, and found File:Artist rendering of the XMM-Newton telescope against Earth.jpg. As a derivative of this new image, File:XMM-Newton spacecraft model.png should be without issue. I have modified the license and description accordingly. — Huntster (t @ c) 18:08, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Good find. I guess there are no issues with the image from the NASA website. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:17, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn due to free license found. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:18, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Personal document - Commons is not a free hosting for all your personal stuff Quenhitran (talk) 03:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
File not realistically useful for the project scope. Chiyako92 (talk) 08:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
A screenshot: doubtful copyright and probably out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to be own work, photographer appears in image, but it is not a selfie. Odd quality, meta says Photoshop/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 14:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Elcobbola. --Rosenzweig τ 13:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this is the uploader’s own work. It is a photograph of a work by a painter who died in 1994, therefore is still under copyright WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this is the uploader’s own work. Appears to be downloaded from the artist's site https://rebadickersonhill.com/about-reba-dickerson-hill/ WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Auto propaganda 186.173.148.129 01:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Quién es él? 186.173.148.129 01:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Unfree sport club logo Quenhitran (talk) 03:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Unfree sport club logo Quenhitran (talk) 03:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Unfree sport club logo Quenhitran (talk) 03:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
The usage of a private football club logo here is clear copyright infringement. The image should uploaded to the local wiki. Kj1595 (talk) 10:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 15:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Unfree sport club logo Quenhitran (talk) 03:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Unfree sport club logo Quenhitran (talk) 03:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Unfree sport club logo Quenhitran (talk) 03:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Unfree sport club logo Quenhitran (talk) 03:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Unfree sport club logo Quenhitran (talk) 03:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Obvious copyrighted material Quenhitran (talk) 03:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (F1). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
当該団体の著作権違反 宗教研究家 (talk) 03:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- I've no idea. How should a kanji trademark like this be treated? Consider COM:TOO as well. Is this a simple series of letters (usually hard to protect by copyright) or is it a creative work (and thus protected) owing to the calligraphic element? Andy Dingley (talk) 10:46, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- This kanji writing is from the monthly magazine and registered trademark. It is obvious that the uploader made this image file from the magazine and does not belong to him/her.
- If the uploaded image or picture is purely written or taken by themselves, it should not be a problem.
- This writing is a part of registered logo. 宗教研究家 (talk) 12:48, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
copyvio|（violating to the registered logo of Sukyo Mahikar monthly magazine） — Preceding unsigned comment added by 宗教研究家 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: According to our summary of ToO in Japan, Kanji are not protected. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
copyrightvioration 宗教研究家 (talk) 03:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Just kept on April 13. Why would you think it would be deleted this time? Nothing has changed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per previous close. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:00, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Commons is not a storage for personal photos Quenhitran (talk) 03:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of Scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Unfree sport club logo Quenhitran (talk) 03:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Unfree sport club logo Quenhitran (talk) 03:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jancarlos López (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unfree sport club logo
- File:Abissnet - Superiore.png
- File:Kukësi Club.png
- File:KS Teuta Durres.png
- File:KF Bylis.png
- File:Vllaznia Shkodër.png
- File:FC Egnatia.png
- File:KF Laci.png
- File:Partizani Tirana.png
- File:KS Kastrioti Kruje.png
- File:KF Tirana.png
- File:Erzeni.png
- File:CSD Zacapa - Banner.png
- File:Redes Sociales - CSD Zacapa.png
- File:Club Social y Deportivo Coban Imperial.png
- File:Antigua GFC.png
- File:FC La Libertad.png
- File:Torneo Doradobet.png
- File:Liga Guate.png
- File:CSD ZACAPA PNG.png
- File:Deportivo San Pedro.png
- File:Coatepeque F.C.png
- File:CD Marquense.png
- File:CSD Nueva Concepción.png
- File:Sololá.png
- File:CSD Suchitepéquez.png
- File:Aurora Fútbol Club.png
- File:Chimaltenango FC.png
- File:Mictlán.png
- File:CSD Sacachispas.png
- File:Deportivo Sanarate.png
- File:San Benito FC.png
- File:USAC Guatemala.png
- File:CSD Puerto San José.png
- File:Juventud Pinulteca.png
- File:CSD Zacapa.png
- File:Deportivo Achuapa.png
- File:Deportivo Mixco.png
- File:Club Xinabajul-Huehue.png
- File:Coatepeque FC.png
Quenhitran (talk) 03:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, false license claims, over TOO -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: All but two deleted per F1. Remaining two are PD:SHAPE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Commons is not a hosting of self pictures Quenhitran (talk) 03:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Do some basic due diligence, will you? There is a w:Vladimir Valjarević article, and a quick web search shows that Pavlina Dokovska also has some notability. This is not just a "personal photo" but a photo of two pianists and pedagogues of some note. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Ikan Kekek -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This and File:A young woman in Ponta de Piedade, Portugal.png are posed and look like a model shoot, not personal photos. But it wouldn't surprise me if they are stolen images, and I might check later. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: both deleted as out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment These and File:A young woman in Ponta de Piedade, Portugal.png are from the same model shoot (not personal photos), but uploaded by different usernames and probably stolen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AnnaHan2007 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Unused personal photo
- File:A young woman vacationing in Phuket, Thailand.png
- File:A young woman vacationing aboard a boat.png
- File:A young woman aboard a boat in Phuket, Thailand.png
A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Low quality breasts photo, please see COM:PORN A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed on low-quality, but do note that photos of breasts are not covered by COM:PORN. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete eh looks like bad amateur porn to me. Potato, pototo. Dronebogus (talk) 17:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Low quality breasts photo, please see COM:PORN A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete bad photo of anything Dronebogus (talk) 17:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1995. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor Іван Сонсядло. Микола Василечко (talk) 05:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Company service advertisement, use of copyrighted materials Quenhitran (talk) 08:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Meets criteria for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G10. Marbletan (talk) 17:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Company service advertisement, use of copyrighted materials Quenhitran (talk) 08:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Meets criteria for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G10. Marbletan (talk) 17:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Company service advertisement, use of copyrighted materials Quenhitran (talk) 08:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Meets criteria for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G10. Marbletan (talk) 17:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Company service advertisement, use of copyrighted materials Quenhitran (talk) 08:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Meets criteria for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G10. Marbletan (talk) 17:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Company service advertisement, use of copyrighted materials Quenhitran (talk) 08:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Meets criteria for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G10. Marbletan (talk) 17:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Company service advertisement, use of copyrighted materials Quenhitran (talk) 08:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Meets criteria for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G10. Marbletan (talk) 17:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Less valuable than the other photo, but I would still note that a web search shows that Pavlina Dokovska is of some note: One example. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: apparently notable person. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep illustrates subject well Dronebogus (talk) 17:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I disagree. It seems to be worse at illustrating the condition than most of the images in Category:Hirsuties papillaris genitalis. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 11:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|The copyright holder has requested for deletion as he found some serious mistakes in the published text.}} सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 04:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:00, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Molotov cocktail in art
[edit]These files are containing instructions and ingredients for making a Molotov coctail, which are forbidden in many countries.
- File:Covered by the poster. The controversial content. Instructions Molotov cocktail.jpg
- File:I throw the bottle for you, girl. Poznan.jpg
- File:Manual preparation of the bottle with gasoline. Poznan.jpg
- File:Molotov cocktail 4.png
- File:Molotovcia.jpg
- File:Protests Poznan Piatkowo. Bottle with gasoline.jpg
- File:The Freedom Fighter's Manual cartoon - Molotov Cocktail.jpg
YanchikYT (talk) 05:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep any that have no copyright issues, as Commons does not censor content just because it violates a law somewhere. Besides, File:Molotov cocktail 4.png and File:Molotovcia.jpg are COM:INUSE and therefore have to be speedily kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:57, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, it violates a law and banned in Russia. See Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation at dangerous products. YanchikYT (talk) 07:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Russian law other than on copyright is not relevant. If it were, Commons would have to delete anything referring to the aggression against Ukraine because doing so in Russia would land you in jail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- I won't to do that, but I don't want to attract the people to make dangerous products like these YanchikYT (talk) 09:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Then don't publicize the links like you did by starting this totally useless thread. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Russian law other than on copyright is not relevant. If it were, Commons would have to delete anything referring to the aggression against Ukraine because doing so in Russia would land you in jail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. (Unless there is some decison from Wiki Legal that we shouldn't host such, US law (country of hosting) applies to non-copyright questions). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:07, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Personal file. Also nominate File:TheSiervo.jpg. Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 06:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; unused personal file by non-contributor -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:08, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 06:57, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation. No evidence that Tony Duran has released the image under cc 4.0 licensing. Bookish Worm (talk) 07:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Test edit, no meaningful use Quenhitran (talk) 08:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, can i anywhere send test edit? TesterGiga (talk) 09:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Test edit, no meaningful use Quenhitran (talk) 08:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
see results of Google Lens, unlikely to be own work, no permission Lukas Beck (talk) 08:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Account use for advertising purposes; no indication of self work (exif data, etc); include website/email address on photo Quenhitran (talk) 08:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. This file is not realistically useful due to the promotional text across the middle. Therefore it is outside of COM:SCOPE. It may also quality for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G10. Marbletan (talk) 17:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope: PR/advertising materials Quenhitran (talk) 08:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ludovic45SBN (talk · contribs)
[edit]small file size, (mostly) missing EXIF, unlikely to be own work given the history of unfree uploads
- File:AlexisTomassian.jpg
- File:Alexismichalik.png
- File:Mlesser2022.jpg
- File:Thancisse2021.jpg
- File:Damwitecka.jpg
- File:Bhenry2015.jpg
- File:Campan2.jpg
- File:Alexjollien.jpg
- File:Lolohoudré.jpg
- File:Benjaminvoisin1.png
- File:Davidk.png
- File:Stefangodin.png
- File:Michelderain1 (2).jpg
- File:Danielnjolobé.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Polarlys (talk) 09:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (and some of the images that do have EXIF credit different photographers). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Advertising account, included links to company websites/email addresses Quenhitran (talk) 09:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. This file is not realistically useful due to the promotional text across the middle. Therefore it is outside of COM:SCOPE. It may also quality for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G10. Marbletan (talk) 17:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It is taken from https://kingswoodtales.wordpress.com/tag/ranjith-chandrasekara/ without the copyright holders permission Dan arndt (talk) 09:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
this map in not from reliable sources, but a personal drawing by one RuWiki user MBH 10:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- 1. I'm not a ruwiki user
- 2. This map depicts an irredentist claim. Most reliable sources do not deal with irredentist claims in the first place, becsause irredentist claims are not based on truth-seeking but on nationalism.
Glide08 (talk) 10:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- There are many different irredentist claims, you should depict certain of them, using reliable sources MBH 01:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, dubious usefulness. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Reportaje 186.173.148.129 11:19, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of free license from copyright holder. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Logo of completely non-notable webpage. Less than 100 followers on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram combined. Ich (talk) 11:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, no evident usefulness. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not an own work, to be honest. N61l16fwts (talk) 20:05, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
It's same and taken from the web. Flag Creator (talk) 11:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete Navassa Island does not have a flag (other than that of the United States). This design is not "unofficial" or "local" or anything else. It was made up by a random person unrelated to Navassa Island, it has never been flown on Navassa Island, and it has never been used or recognized in any capacity that would give it legitimacy. I can't just make up flags for places that don't have any and pretend it's the "unofficial" or "local" flag of that place. This is purely fictional, has no educational purpose, and should not be used on any Wikipedia project.
- Reywas92 (talk) 01:42, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
I agree. Nerdqwertyoof (talk) 20:52, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Since I created this work, I would rather delete it. Im very sorry for uploading a file from the web. Flag Creator (talk) 15:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
No clear indication that the subject of the image owns the image, or that it is licensed into the Creative Commons. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:31, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Geniac as no permission (No permission since) DesiBoy101 (talk) 12:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; credited to "Paparazzi". --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unidentified campus map, unused. Seems too simplified to be useful and contains a multitude of errors. Enyavar (talk) 12:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:39, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Vinzroosen (talk) 12:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. This file also qualifies for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G7. Marbletan (talk) 17:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 12:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:40, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 13:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE non-personal photo. Did you nominate the wrong photo by mistake? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Food waste is definitely in scope. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Thariqpane (talk) 13:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- But it's COM:INUSE. Do we do courtesy deletions of newly-uploaded files when they're already in use? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- The request for deletion is due to graphical mistake, by which wikimedia denied my request to change it.
- The flag that is being uploaded in Papua Tengah article is a new upload under a new title "Bendera Papua Tengah.svg". Therefore, this file is no longer necessary because it is no longer being used in any articles. Thariqpane (talk) 13:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- This file is in use. Look at "File usage on other wikis." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:44, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Well, now that the matters had been resolved since I corrected the flag within the Russian page. Maybe we can continue to discuss about the deletion of the file Thariqpane (talk) 02:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- This file has more detail than the other, but is the rainbow in the flag or not? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- This file is in use. Look at "File usage on other wikis." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:44, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: prompt uploader request, was no longer in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:42, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, flag and coat of arms of a non notable fictional country.
Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 08:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- I agree AAAAA143222 (talk) 14:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE#Artwork without obvious educational use, coat of arms of a non notable fictional entity.
Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 15:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:44, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdulazeez Taufeeq (talk · contribs)
[edit]Watermark, not own works. No source, no evidence of a free license.
- File:The Dodo of wawa 11.jpg
- File:The Dodo of wawa 10.jpg
- File:The Dodo of wawa 09.jpg
- File:The Dodo of wawa 08.jpg
- File:The Dodo of wawa 07.jpg
- File:The Dodo of wawa 06.jpg
- File:The Dodo of wawa 05.jpg
- File:The Dodo of wawa 04.jpg
- File:The Dodo of wawa 03.jpg
- File:The Dodo of wawa 02.jpg
Yann (talk) 15:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The watermark is a logo applied by the camera phone that was used to take it (w:Tecno Camon 17) - it has no bearing on ownership. If anything, it's a hint that the photo was probably not professionally taken. Omphalographer (talk) 17:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Omphalographer. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:46, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
obvious copyright violation (see exif: author is Harris Corp.) Quenhitran (talk) 16:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:47, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
possible non-free photo Quenhitran (talk) 16:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- This image was obtained from the West Bend/Washington County Daily News e version. This newspaper company does have some articles online that must be paid for, but the article that this image originates from does not have that restriction. MiniatureTZ (talk) 12:27, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation, false license claim. (That one does not have to pay for a newspaper article online has nothing to do with copyright status. Claimed CC license not seen at source site, which to the contrary is clearly marked "© Copyright 2023 Greater Milwaukee Today"). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Typo by me Milićević (talk) 17:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
While large deletion groups are sometimes a problem, it appears that each of these images has been previously published and are not own work of uploader.
- File:Ali Afzal Sahi.jpg
- File:Saleh Muhammad Khan.png
- File:Shahid Ahmad Khattak.png
- File:Atif Khan.jpg
- File:Mir Ghazanfar Ali Khan.jpg
- File:Raja Jalal Hussain Maqpoon.jpg
- File:Syed Mehdi Shah.jpg
- File:Khalid Khursheed Khan.jpg
- File:Omar Ayub Khan.jpg
- File:Omer Sarfraz Cheema.jpg
- File:Sibtain Khan.png
- File:Wasiq Qayyum Abbasi.jpg
- File:Mehmood Jan.jpg
- File:Meher Taj Roghani.jpg
- File:Qasim Suri.jpg
- File:Agha Siraj Durrani.jpg
- File:Kamran Tessori.jpg
- File:Haji Ghulam Ali (KPK Governor).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (reverse image search of sample confirms). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Strong doubts about the persons identity; must be cleared, pic shouldn't be spread with a wrong identification --Wereldnieuws (talk) 04:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Can you articulate your doubts? --RAN (talk) 01:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- I second RANs question. Looking at the edit history it appears that the nominator changed the files description from "Anton Bamberger (1886–1950)" to "Unidentified German soldier." Although there doesn't seem to be a basis for their edit. If I'm being honest it's a little weird for the nominator to nominate the image for deletion based on the lack of information about the persons identity when they are the one who removed said information. So I'd like to know exactly what basis they have for saying the identification is wrong. Otherwise the image should be kept. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:30, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- I am the uploader of this picture. I am in direct contact with its source, Professor Peter Bamberger, PhD who is the grandson of Anton Bamberger. I changed the description of the picture because the person on this picture doesn't look like all the other pictures of Anton Bamberger I also uploaded. I had my doubts right from the start, but trusted its source. I assume that the picture shows another relative and I have an idea who this could be, but this is not confirmed, yet. Anton Bamberger in WWI wore another uniform as he belonged to the Army medical service of the German imperial forces, he also was a non-commissioned officer which shows by the uniform. The uniform on this picture is different. It will get uploaded again with another name as soon as it becomes relevant for another biography. Currently it is irrelevant for Wikipedia and shouldn't be exploited to users as it might be a victim which couldn't be identified, yet. Wereldnieuws (talk) 16:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hhhmm your story sounds plausible. That said I don't think the image should be deleted if you just have "doubts" its him. At least not until your sure it isn't. Although in that case it seems like the better thing to do would be to just rename the image and change the description to reflect that it's a picture of someone else. The fact that it doesn't serve a biographical purpose on Wikipedia isn't really relevant. Most images on here don't. It can still be within scope regardless. Not to mention it would suck if you turned out to be wrong and it was actually Anton Bamberger. I don't think you could just re-upload the image in that case. As it's not really how this works. Commons isn't a personal host where we can just upload and delete images at our whim for whatever random reason we want to. I think users have a 7 day grace period to request an upload be deleted and it looks like your out of that window since this was uploaded in March. The only other way to have it deleted in absence of that is if it's a copyright violation, which maybe you could argue, but then it would put all your other uploads into question. It would be kind of funny to see a user try to get their own uploads deleted as copyright violations though lol. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- I am the uploader of this picture. I am in direct contact with its source, Professor Peter Bamberger, PhD who is the grandson of Anton Bamberger. I changed the description of the picture because the person on this picture doesn't look like all the other pictures of Anton Bamberger I also uploaded. I had my doubts right from the start, but trusted its source. I assume that the picture shows another relative and I have an idea who this could be, but this is not confirmed, yet. Anton Bamberger in WWI wore another uniform as he belonged to the Army medical service of the German imperial forces, he also was a non-commissioned officer which shows by the uniform. The uniform on this picture is different. It will get uploaded again with another name as soon as it becomes relevant for another biography. Currently it is irrelevant for Wikipedia and shouldn't be exploited to users as it might be a victim which couldn't be identified, yet. Wereldnieuws (talk) 16:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- I second RANs question. Looking at the edit history it appears that the nominator changed the files description from "Anton Bamberger (1886–1950)" to "Unidentified German soldier." Although there doesn't seem to be a basis for their edit. If I'm being honest it's a little weird for the nominator to nominate the image for deletion based on the lack of information about the persons identity when they are the one who removed said information. So I'd like to know exactly what basis they have for saying the identification is wrong. Otherwise the image should be kept. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:30, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: File has been renamed; I have recategorized it. Image is still of some in scope usefulness if for nothing else of a good portrait photo of 1915 German military uniform. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:43, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|The copyright holder has requested for deletion as he found some serious mistakes in the published text.}} सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 04:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; not used. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:44, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 06:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; lacking context to suggest any in scope usefulness. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Account use for advertising purposes; no indication of self work (exif data, etc); include website/email address on photo Quenhitran (talk) 08:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. This file is not realistically useful due to the promotional text across the middle. Therefore it is outside of COM:SCOPE. It may also quality for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G10. Marbletan (talk) 17:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Account use for advertising purposes; no indication of self work (exif data, etc); include website/email address on photo Quenhitran (talk) 08:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. This file is not realistically useful due to the promotional text across the middle. Therefore it is outside of COM:SCOPE. It may also quality for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G10. Marbletan (talk) 17:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Account use for advertising purposes; no indication of self work (exif data, etc); include website/email address on photo Quenhitran (talk) 08:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. This file is not realistically useful due to the promotional text across the middle. Therefore it is outside of COM:SCOPE. It may also quality for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G10. Marbletan (talk) 17:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Account use for advertising purposes; no indication of self work (exif data, etc); include website/email address on photo Quenhitran (talk) 08:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. This file is not realistically useful due to the promotional text across the middle. Therefore it is outside of COM:SCOPE. It may also quality for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G10. Marbletan (talk) 17:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Account use for advertising purposes; no indication of self work (exif data, etc); include website/email address on photo Quenhitran (talk) 08:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No indication of self work. Uploader has the history of uploading self-PR materials Quenhitran (talk) 08:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: OK in scope photo; advertising text removed. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:54, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Advertising account, included links to company websites/email addresses Quenhitran (talk) 09:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: spammy text removed; usable photo in scope category. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Advertising account, included links to company websites/email addresses Quenhitran (talk) 09:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. This file is not realistically useful due to the promotional text across the middle. Therefore it is outside of COM:SCOPE. It may also quality for speedy deletion, COM:CSD#G10. Marbletan (talk) 17:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Se permite? 186.173.148.129 11:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Description says "public figure" and looks like it was published prior to upload on Commons. Probably a netcopyvio. Abzeronow (talk) 18:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (reverse image search confirms). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Notice the overprinting that shows this wasn't own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and other copyviols in series by uploader. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
If this were own work, it would be of decent quality - also google lens finds an older use, but I cannot get the website to open Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:29, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Large photo, low quality, gets a google hit to a stadium photo webpage, but I cannot open the page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:31, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Poorly doctored/manipulated version of File:Geri Halliwell at Goodwood 2014 001.jpg Breaktheicees (talk) 19:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Agree with assessment as poorly photoshopped, but in use in article space. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Poorly doctored version of File:Geri Halliwell at Goodwood 2014 001.jpg; no longer in use in article space Breaktheicees (talk) 16:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
File:2021 Benjamin Bühring Die Deutsche Kanzlei in London, Göttinger Schriften zur Landesgeschichte.pdf
[edit]clear copyright violation, the uploader has no permission to upload this book from 2021. --Ourgmich (talk) 19:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Nonsense. Why don't you look at the source page? --Achim55 (talk) 21:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
File:1990 Bernd Schälicke (Red.), Regine Timm (Bearb.), Ludwig Schreiner Die Gemälde des neunzehnten und zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts Katalog der Niedersächsischen Landesgalerie, Bildband.pdf
[edit]clear copyright violation, the uploader has no permission to upload this book from 1990. --Ourgmich (talk) 12:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- No. See the licence on the given page. Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 21:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, clear case. --Achim55 (talk) 21:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
It's just a random vectorial image from vecteezy.com (https://www.vecteezy.com/vector-art/16125826-birthmark-stain-on-the-face-of-the-child-and-adult) Hyméros --}-≽ ♥ Yes ? 20:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
looks to be taken from social media with tag removed https://www.facebook.com/MessagefromMay/posts/pfbid028EHsV9aBxNfnNdwaFXjkab4EefGt5GijZR7B7EDHeAfhzz7PYv57xRcKRKQYgHDTl Evaders99 (talk) 21:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:36, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Flickrwashed album cover art. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:36, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Flickr user does not own this image. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:36, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
These are uploads by a long-term abuser sock (see en:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur; several socks remained unblocked on Commons).
The following are copyvios, some of them edited to misrepresent the depicted subjects as certain historical persons, and to make reverse search difficult:
- File:Garh kundar fort built by Chandel emperor Yasho-varman I. front View.jpg - copyvio from bulleteers.com
- File:Garh kundar fort built by Chandelas. 2nd face.jpg - copyvio from bulleteers.com
- File:Garh kundar fort built by Chandelas. 3rd face.jpg - copyvio from bulleteers.com
- File:Garh kundar fort built by Chandelas. 4th face.jpg - copyvio from The Times of India
- File:Last Great Chakravarti Purbiya Emperor Paramardidev Chandel.jpg - copyvio, cover of सम्पूर्ण आल्ह खण्ड, the subject depicted is Alha, not "Paramardidev Chandel"
- File:Paramardideva Chandel defeating Prithviraja Chauhan.jpg - This is a copyrighted painting signed by Chitrapal, with prints available for sale on various sites (example on Flipkart)
- File:Samrat Kirttivarman I Chandel and his Wife.jpg - derived from Cover page of the novel Kadal Pura
- File:Chakravartin Samrat Kirttivarman I Chandel with his Wife.jpg - same as above, derived from Cover page of the novel Kadal Pura
- File:General Vanfaar Alhat Singh Chandel aka Alha.jpg - watermarked, copyvio from oviyan.studios @ instagram
- File:Vidyādhar and his Army.jpg - copyvio from an illustration of Rajendra Cholan by Sai keerthi Akaash
- File:Emperor Yasho-varman I Chandel.jpg - variant of Mahabharata illustration available on several websites (e.g. [1][2])
The following are likely derived from copyrighted images, and/or fail COM:EDUSE, although I don't have the time and energy to find the original sources.
- Given the user's history, the following images are likely edited versions of illustrations from comic books, posters etc. Also, no historical images are available for the subjects they purport to depict: as evident from the copyvio links above, the uploader has a history of misrepresenting what's depicted in the image, thus failing COM:EDUSE.
- File:Vidyadhara Chandel and his wife Satyabhama (Chauhan Princess) during 1010 CE.jpg
- File:Demigod Shishupal painting, the cousin of Krishna from Mahabharata.jpg
- File:Last Purbiya Rajput Emperor Paramardidev-Varman Chandel.jpg
- File:Hindu Rajput Emperor Kirttivarman I Chandel and Lord Sahastrabahu Sudarshan or Shrimann Narayan.jpg
- File:Samrat Kirttivarman I Chandel & Lord Vishnu.jpg
- File:Emperor Shallakshanavarman-Deva Chandel.jpg
- File:Haihaya king Chandra-Varman Chandel.jpg
- File:Emperor Madana-Varman Chandel.jpg
- File:Emperor Vidyādhara Chandel.png
- File:Chakravartin Emperor Vidyādhara Chandel.jpg
- File:Digvijayi Maharāja Vidyādhara Chandel.jpg
- File:Chakravartin Emperor Kirttivarman I Chandel.jpg
- File:Emperor Paramardidev Chandel after defeating Prithviraj Chauhan in battle of Kirttisagar.png
- Made-up emblem / flag - fail COM:EDUSE
- Maps with exaggerated, made-up borders, fails COM:EDUSE:
_during_1010_CE.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Utcursch (talk) 22:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:37, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
On en is published as fair use, unsure if it falls under COM:COPYVIO or qualifies for {{PD-textlogo}} Jose8122 (talk) 22:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I'm unsure, too. Since there is no really analogous image at COM:TOO United States, I would tend to delete following the precautionary principle, but I may be wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I would consider somewhat analogous to File:Best Western logo.svg, but not exactly (a symmetric border, dashs and dots, a stylized key and text with a barely stylized fonts) but still not a strong bond to convince me that falls under COM:TOO United States Jose8122 (talk) 00:15, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, questionable TOO, license claim is certainly false. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:31, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
copyright image - taken from social media - https://twitter.com/daystar_990529/status/1509470875384692738?cxt=HHwWhIDS4e_w2_IpAAAA Evaders99 (talk) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Not in use Rwalmond (talk) 11:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Not in use is not a deletion reason! However, this photo was taken from Facebook, per the EXIF. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zaibekhan876 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploader is a sock of an individual who is globally locked for repeated attempts at cross-wiki self-promotion using multiple accounts (see Category:Sockpuppets of Kalasa Saab). Some of these files appear to be duplicates of older socks' previously deleted files so speedy deletion may apply (COM:CSD#G4).
- File:CH Amir Kalasa Elite Force Punjab.jpg
- File:CH Amir Kalasa Gujrat Village.jpg
- File:CH Amir Kalasa Elite Police Force.jpg
- File:CH Amir Kalasa Elite Police School Lahore.jpg
- File:CH Amir Kalasa (Gujrat).jpg
- File:CH Amir Kalasa Elite Force.jpg
- File:CH Amir Kalasa Elite Force Gujrat.jpg
- File:Daira CH Amir Kalasa Green.jpg
- File:Daira CH Amir Kalasa 1.jpg
- File:Daira CH Amir Kalasa pic.jpg
- File:CH Amir Kalasa Gujrat.jpg
- File:CH Amir Kalasa (punjab police).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Marbletan (talk) 12:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- I added two more files uploaded by another sock, User:Monojsirkar654. Marbletan (talk) 13:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 15:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. obvious copyvio as a poster image of television show. Robertsky (talk) 06:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Talon Briceington as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Not real signature . Too old for author's request G7 deletion, converting to discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request, questionable veracity, unused, questionable scope -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE Ameisenigel (talk) 21:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE Ameisenigel (talk) 21:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:57, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:GCSD G7 Vacant0 (talk) 14:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:16, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
This map is worthless without years and sources, and it may be totally bogus (Brazil a colony of "Galicia"? Sure ...) Rosenzweig τ 17:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, upload by a glocked LTA Category:Sockpuppets of Bmmederos. --Achim55 (talk) 16:19, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
copyright - ©2015 MTA RCAES Geographical Institute - http://www.mtafki.hu/konyvtar/karpat-pannon2015/en/supplementary_maps.html Aristeus01 (talk) 11:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- This is a map made by Hungarian Academy of Science regarding the history of Hungary. The user several times tried to remove this map from article, contrast to this he wanted to use many fake maps in articles, the deletion request based on personal grievance: [3]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vlach_law#Map. I contacted with the authors, the director of the MTA research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences Geographical Institute and if need they will happy to allow to use that map in Wiki. If need they will provide the copyright materials what Wikipedia ask. He also said the copyright logo is because of the institute website. If need, let me know about this. OrionNimrod (talk) 14:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- I suggest to take the accusations against user to a different administrator.
- You proposed this map for an article and checking on it I found there is a © on the page it was taken from. Hence I raised here. If we are to speak of grievances we should ask how the file passed the upload wizard check, since the copyright was not, by your words, provided, meaning it was given false information about it. Aristeus01 (talk) 20:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Copyright symbol is because of the main website, the director of the MTA research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences Geographical Institute said this to me. They will provide any copyright material if need. OrionNimrod (talk) 12:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- @OrionNimrod: The only relevant issue here is if the map is free licensed. Source website has clear copyright notice. If the copyright holders have agreed to share under the claimed free license, please submit proof per COM:VRT, thank you. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023051110004986 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: permission received. --Wdwd (talk) 09:46, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Personal sketches without any COM:EDUSE.
- File:Serm@art y la estampillta.png
- File:Serm@rt y la literatura.png
- File:Serfm@rt ya pasó.png
- File:Serfm@rt y el bicilindrico.png
- File:Ecuación Eco Humberto y Texto de wolf disfuncionales o funcionales o apocalipticos e integrados.png
- File:De un pizarron vacio a uno escrito.png
- File:Serfm@rt stamp.png
Achim55 (talk) 11:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal photo used on no Commons pages Quenhitran (talk) 16:19, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE Ameisenigel (talk) 21:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 09:44, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio Yann (talk) 21:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Rubin16. --Rosenzweig τ 18:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: PR/advertising materials Quenhitran (talk) 08:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:20, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: PR/advertising materials Quenhitran (talk) 08:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:20, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep not so bad it couldn’t be used to illustrate subject Dronebogus (talk) 17:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- I disagree. The image has only 800 x 600 resolution plus slightly blurry. I don't think it illustrate the subject properly. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:09, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 13:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons scope: self photo with no context Quenhitran (talk) 16:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 13:54, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Typo by me Milićević (talk) 17:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: dispensable redirect, renamed a few days after upload. --Achim55 (talk) 18:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
This potraite is a politically changed. It should be changed into original picture which exist years before this modern potraite Kirhmuru (talk) 05:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete no evidence of claimed license; "Source: My fathers own property Author:K.R.Venugopal Sarma, Author of approved thiruvalluvar portrait by government of india". Needs COM:VRT -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:46, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:57, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Infrog. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Architectural copyright violation. Iceland does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. A commercial license permission from architect Dr. Maggi Jónsson, who authored this work in 1993, is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unlikely to be own work, no metadata and new user Lukas Beck (talk) 08:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work, no metadata and new user Lukas Beck (talk) 08:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
_24-4-2023.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_24-4-2023.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons is not a hosting of self pics Quenhitran (talk) 16:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
_24-4-2023.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
_24-4-2023.jpg){kind=link}
possible non-free photo Quenhitran (talk) 16:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
possible non-free photo Quenhitran (talk) 16:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
possible non-free photo Quenhitran (talk) 16:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
possible non-free photo Quenhitran (talk) 16:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
possible non-free photo Quenhitran (talk) 16:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
This picture contains information that is IP of Saab AB. Saab AB (publ) is a Swedish company that develops, manufactures and sells sophisticated defence systems to various Governments throughout the worlds. Our products and systems are sensitive to our Customers and form part of our Customers national defence capability. We own all the IP and sensitive Know How and data included in our systems. We give our Customers limited rights to our IP in order for them to be able to operate the systems for defence purposes. Needless to say, we never give any general publishing rights, and certainly not for publishing on Wikipedia or the like. Please have the picture deleted form your website. 136.163.203.4 11:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - This is a large image with full camera EXIF. It is unlikely that it was stolen from SAAB. We do not generally react to takedown requests from IP users as they are often vandals. If you are actually a representative of SAAB, please send a message from an email adess at SAAB to VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted photo, says it’s own work. Clearly not own work. A.R.M. 14:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo description inaccurately describes the building as a Coakley Brothers Warehouse. However, this photo is of CH Coakley. Coakley Brothers & CH Coakley are two different companies. 67.52.39.146 14:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- use Template:Rename. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
photocredits ©Delmati/Lapresse photojournalistic agency, incompatibles with a Governative licence; also, no indication about a free release — danyele 15:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi! I use the Governative license becouse this type of image was taken in Italy back in the 80s. I took this photo from the same site that i link for the source. All the photographs are free, as you can see in the 'Who we are' area. Hope this comment will be helpful becouse is such an important photo. Meaby the solution could be to change the Copyright license in this particular photo (putting another code). Thanks Fixand (talk) 09:34, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - THe source site is a private site that collects photos without getting any license. There is no evidence that this is free in any way. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR China A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR China A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR China A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR China A1Cafel (talk) 15:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR China A1Cafel (talk) 15:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR China A1Cafel (talk) 15:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
possible non-free photo Quenhitran (talk) 16:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Image is from DVIDS and in the public domain. Will update info on the file's page. —Tcr25 (talk) 13:51, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Map is by ru:Голубцов, Иван Александрович who died in 1966 so this is not public domain yet in Russia. Undelete in 2041 since the author worked during 1941-1945. Abzeronow (talk) 16:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Map is by ru:Голубцов, Иван Александрович who died in 1966 so this is not public domain yet in Russia. Undelete in 2041 since the author worked during 1941-1945. Abzeronow (talk) 16:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The photographer for this died in 1983, Undelete in 2054. Abzeronow (talk) 16:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation; no permission for the texts, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 16:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- the author of the photo has given cc permission( ticket #2023050210010834). The Text in the image is not readable, in this way not affected by copyright. Tressbo59 (talk) 17:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - The text is perfectly readable. The image violates its copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 17:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- I assume the claim of "Own work" is bogus (it would at least need VRT verification). @Ralf Roletschek: Oletteko tosiaan maalannut tämän?
- There is no claim on FoP. I assume the painting might have been in a public space, but there is no information on what painting this is and whether it is part of a temporary exhibition. "Landtag-niedersachsen" isn't very specific, especially as the template says that all rooms were to be documented.
- Ah! It seems to be the painting in the background here. So is it covered by FoP? –LPfi (talk) 20:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Re @LPfi: There is generally no FOP indoors in Germany. The contemporary artwork could be pixilated/blacked or whited out, so the architectural image could be kept. But curiously enough this option is never mentioned in the many cases like this. Questions and discussions are rarely followed up by nominator, let alone any pixilation. Would you like to join a petition of worried wikimedians to try to get this behavior officially sanctionized? ME TOO! It is just rotten lazy to not even add the notion 'indoors'. Oma työ viittaa tietysti kuvaan. "Oma työ" on vakioilmaus, kun lataajat lataavat oman valokuvansa. Peli (talk) 21:48, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 17:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please specify where there is no FoP. There indeed is FoP in Germany and it seems to include public spaces indoors. Are you saying that this isn't a public space? The art on the wall might also qualify as de minimis (I don't know the German threshold). –LPfi (talk) 19:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- It does generally not include indoor spaces like railway stations, churches, musea, temporary exhibitions, showroom windows. The contemporary artwork is far to central and prominent in the picture to make any chance of surviving by declaring it as de minimis. Owner of building can allow architectural images to be shared but this will not get around copyrights on their creations owned by visual artists. We may need a way to make a blur and mask process a much easier route to go for, than to propose for mass deletion and forgetting about it.Peli (talk) 15:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please specify where there is no FoP. There indeed is FoP in Germany and it seems to include public spaces indoors. Are you saying that this isn't a public space? The art on the wall might also qualify as de minimis (I don't know the German threshold). –LPfi (talk) 19:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Unfortunately freedom of panorama laws in Germany don't cover museums and as the last comment says the artwork is to prominent to qualify it for de minimis. There doesn't seem to be any other justification to keep the image. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Julia Roessing (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 1968.
Martin Sg. (talk) 16:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Julia Roessing (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyright violation.
Martin Sg. (talk) 16:57, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Royalbroil 12:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work, extremely low resolution, no metadata, new user how is already known for copyright infrigement Lukas Beck (talk) 04:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:51, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Image must be PD in both Argentina and the US to be on Commons. It is not (Argentina only). Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:51, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 2012. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor Дмитро Пилип’як. Микола Василечко (talk) 05:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is not a self-hosting services of everyone's photos Quenhitran (talk) 08:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no contributions here or on DE. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is not a self-hosting services of everyone's photos Quenhitran (talk) 08:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
This picture contains information that is IP of Saab AB. Saab AB (publ) is a Swedish company that develops, manufactures and sells sophisticated defence systems to various Governments throughout the worlds. Our products and systems are sensitive to our Customers and form part of our Customers national defence capability. We own all the IP and sensitive Know How and data included in our systems. We give our Customers limited rights to our IP in order for them to be able to operate the systems for defence purposes. Needless to say, we never give any general publishing rights, and certainly not for publishing on Wikipedia or the like. Please have the picture deleted form your website. 136.163.203.4 11:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: This is a large image with full camera EXIF. It is unlikely that it was stolen from SAAB. We do not generally react to takedown requests from IP users as they are often vandals. If you are actually a representative of SAAB, please send a message from an email address at SAAB to VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused, (defunct?) commercial logo. First google result for "siteswebs.com" points to this page. Ich (talk) 11:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Threshhold of Originality - Simple letters only. Royalbroil 12:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:58, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Logo Vagabondah (talk) 13:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Threshhold of Originality - Simple letters only. Royalbroil 12:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
possible non-free photo Quenhitran (talk) 16:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Lower quality version of File:HMS Trent in Gulf of Guinea MOD 45169607.jpg. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
possible non-free photo Quenhitran (talk) 16:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete image's original source is this press release. Per MAN's imprint page: "The content and structure of this website are protected by copyright. Information or data, in particular texts, parts of texts and picture or video materials, unless expressly indicated otherwise, may not be duplicated without the prior consent of MAN Truck & Bus UK Ltd." —Tcr25 (talk) 14:14, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
This is Ama Mahler - but it sometimes displays incorrectly as the only known photo of composer Amy Woodforde-Finden DTOnline (talk) 17:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE, and why do you think that's a deletion reason? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep We need to keep it so it can be properly identified and we store info on the misidentification. --RAN (talk) 15:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation; shows contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 17:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Do you mean the architecture or the painting in the background? Is there any reason not to see the latter as de minimis? –LPfi (talk) 19:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Re @LPfi: There is generally no FOP indoors in Germany. The contemporary artwork could be pixilated/blacked or whited out, so the architectural image could be kept. But curiously enough this option is never mentioned in the many cases like this. Questions and discussions are rarely followed up by nominator, let alone any pixilation contibuted. Would you like to join a petition of worried wikimedians to try to get this behavior officially sanctionized? ME TOO! It looks just rotten lazy to me, to not even add the notion 'indoors' to the nomination, since this is a recurring confusion. Oma työ viittaa tietysti kuvaan. "Oma työ" on vakioilmaus, kun lataajat lataavat oman valokuvansa. Peli (talk) 21:48, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Valitettavasti "oma työ" on vakioilmaus myös muuten. Jos valintaa ei aktiivisesti muuta (jolloin joutuu "hämäävien" uusien kysymysten kohteeksi), niin tuloksena on "oma työ".
- What do you think about the de minimis proposition? The painting could be blurred – pixelating emphasizes the "removal" on the expense of the rest of the photo; it looks awful – but to me it seems blurred already. It isn't, but you cannot appreciate any detail of it in this photo.
- –LPfi (talk) 05:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that my opinion does not matter on this page. (" who would profit from deletion: nobody, would it harm anybody to keep it: no"). This file is on the deletion list now and can be gone anytime soon. (=made invisible for undefined time) Ofc. IMHO the art is just de minimis, but the practice of extreme precaution and strictness seems to rule here, so the only solution seems to mask or blur any possible contemporary art pixels in cases like this. Since it is just daily routine here to empty the list, I don't even know if anyone reads these discussions. Is this a fair trial? Is it courtious or fair towards the photographers to keep their generously donated and licenced work locked in a secret treasure bin, instead of returning the files including the all copyrights to them by mail? I don't think so. Retorical Queston. How come any file page has three or more buttons towards the deletion process and not one button or link to help artists (mostly new to this site) to easily find and go through the VRT process? Peli (talk) 14:27, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- I have no answer to your question, but we need to be cautious for the sake of reusers, who might use the images in a self-published book, in worst case (I assume) having to destroy the edition with an offending image. Still, I agree that the painting is de minimis. If the closing admin doesn't agree on that, I hope they can blur it (or ask somebody to blur it) before deleting. –LPfi (talk) 14:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that my opinion does not matter on this page. (" who would profit from deletion: nobody, would it harm anybody to keep it: no"). This file is on the deletion list now and can be gone anytime soon. (=made invisible for undefined time) Ofc. IMHO the art is just de minimis, but the practice of extreme precaution and strictness seems to rule here, so the only solution seems to mask or blur any possible contemporary art pixels in cases like this. Since it is just daily routine here to empty the list, I don't even know if anyone reads these discussions. Is this a fair trial? Is it courtious or fair towards the photographers to keep their generously donated and licenced work locked in a secret treasure bin, instead of returning the files including the all copyrights to them by mail? I don't think so. Retorical Queston. How come any file page has three or more buttons towards the deletion process and not one button or link to help artists (mostly new to this site) to easily find and go through the VRT process? Peli (talk) 14:27, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Re @LPfi: There is generally no FOP indoors in Germany. The contemporary artwork could be pixilated/blacked or whited out, so the architectural image could be kept. But curiously enough this option is never mentioned in the many cases like this. Questions and discussions are rarely followed up by nominator, let alone any pixilation contibuted. Would you like to join a petition of worried wikimedians to try to get this behavior officially sanctionized? ME TOO! It looks just rotten lazy to me, to not even add the notion 'indoors' to the nomination, since this is a recurring confusion. Oma työ viittaa tietysti kuvaan. "Oma työ" on vakioilmaus, kun lataajat lataavat oman valokuvansa. Peli (talk) 21:48, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:04, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary paintings; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 17:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:04, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 511KeV as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author's request. Too old for COM:CSD#G7, but Delete. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:04, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
There's zero evidence that the image on this book cover is free licensed. So the file should be deleted per [[4]]. Adamant1 (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
I was unable to find any evidence that this image was released under a free license by the original photographer Alfredo Cunha and the uploader has had multiple images of the same person deleted as COPYVIO in the meantime. So it's pretty likely that this is also COPYVIO given the uploaders history and lack of clear information about the copyright status of the photograph. Adamant1 (talk) 18:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
File:1990 Bernd Schälicke (Red.), Regine Timm (Bearb.), Ludwig Schreiner Die Gemälde des neunzehnten und zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts Katalog der Niedersächsischen Landesgalerie, Textband.pdf
[edit]clear copyright violation, the uploader has no permission to upload this book from 1990. --Ourgmich (talk) 12:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 21:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - source has clear CC-BY-SA-4.0. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
No indication of self work. Uploader has the history of uploading self-PR materials Quenhitran (talk) 08:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no doubt of own work in this case. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
No indication of self work. Uploader has the history of uploading self-PR materials Quenhitran (talk) 08:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no doubt of own work in this case. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
I'm dubious this is uploader's own work: no exif data, low resolution Quenhitran (talk) 08:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:24, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Google maps copyvio TentingZones1 (talk) 10:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unclear satellite image source. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:21, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" Hochlader ist allerdings eine Marketingabteilung, Urheber kann aber nur eine natürliche Person sein Lutheraner (talk) 13:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Verwertungsrechte können übertragen worden sein; Account allerdings noch nicht verifiziert. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
possible non-free photo Quenhitran (talk) 16:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no response. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
possible non-free photo Quenhitran (talk) 16:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no response. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
crop from unknown source. Masti (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Probably not own work, given the low resolution and lack of relevant metadata. Elli (talk) 22:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no response. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
The source claims that it's from the VOA, but actually it's a recording from BBC World Service's programme the World Today. UK recordings entered the public domain 70 years after creation, so undelete in 1968+70=2038. 源義信 (talk) 16:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible flickr washing. Image was uploaded from Flickr, but the metadata there indicates the image was from Facebook. Some searching, and I found this - [5]. Uploaded on FB 14 July 2017, the day before it was uploaded to Flickr. The FB image indicates it was for a specific magazine and includes a watermark. The flickr image includes that same watermark, but also adds one matching the Flickr account. There's a twitter account [6] and Instagram [7] that matches the flickr account, but the linked website is dead. The Facebook account where the image was uploaded does not appear to match the Flickr account. Honestly not sure what's happening here. Ravensfire (talk) 17:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely flickrwashing; COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
File:India Gate, with honourable Former Vice president Vainkaiya Naidu Proceeding for Meeting with Veterans on the eve Kargil day.jpg
[edit]
No indication of user's own work. User appears to be in the image, but it is not a selfie. No useful metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no evidence of permission from the copyright holder. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo - but it appears to have at least one interior image sourced. Changing to Nomination because file is in wide use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: We are talking about two completely different versions of the file. The one that was initially uploaded, back in 2006, is most probably OK regarding its copyright nature. However, the newer version that was uploaded here, clearly, consists a copyrights infringement. As such, I suggest to revert back to the initial "clean" version of the file and hide or delete (no idea what is exactly possible with such cases on Commons) the current "problematic" one. 🙂 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 18:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Εὐθυμένης: Taking it as a copyright violation would break a lot of content and I'm not willing to do that unless someone else checks it. If you intend only one version for deletion, that's not a speedy, that's a discussion. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: Obviously, I saw only the most recent version of the file at first, while guessing that either all of its versions were quite similar to one another or that it was just a bit more "updated/upgraded" version of the original but certainly not this. Here, we have two completely different files being uploaded one on top of another and I'm not even quite sure if that's really allowed on Commons. 😅 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: The file has been reverted to the old version in light of discussion here and COM:OVERWRITE. The new version, however, will be revision deleted in line with COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Files copied from elsewhere on the Internet Quenhitran (talk) 03:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment from where? Not found in reverse image search -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no answer, nothing I can see either. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Jayden ? 186.172.86.126 12:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- This is correct. This is jayden hussain Imcoachjohnny (talk) 12:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Y quién es el? A qué dedica el tiempo libre? Juega fútbol en el barrio? 186.172.86.126 12:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely Out of Scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
La foto y el borrador 186.172.86.126 12:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Borrar foto y artículo. El archivo no es trabajo personal tampoco. 186.172.86.126 12:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
kullanılmıyor Bugraozdal (talk) 13:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination,PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Imagen de baja calidad e importancia. Ciudades (talk) 23:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: May have a use. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
wrong date - copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 18:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused file with unidentified person ("Olga N" -- not very useful) = out of scope. —holly {chat} 17:05, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 18:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused file with no explanation of who is in the photo = out of scope. —holly {chat} 17:05, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 18:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused file with no explanation of who is in the photo = out of scope. —holly {chat} 17:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Klippiti as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not in use (except a user's profile), contains my monogram on the picture, previous username in the title, derivative work of copyrighted Doom video game Klippiti (talk) 17:08, 1 May 2023 (UTC) Yann (talk) 21:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion: it may be a derivative work, but the original is PD-textlogo, so there's no copyright violation. —holly {chat} 17:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
1950s Lithuanian photograph. Could be public domain, but would probably need more information on when it was published to determine that. Abzeronow (talk) 16:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Even if {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} is valid, the earliest it could be PD is 2021, which is past the 1996 URAA date. —holly {chat} 17:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
