This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted by Mdaniels5757 at 01:50, 23 October 2022 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7): Wrong photo. This was an R1 not an R7} --Krdbot07:32, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I'm not sure, but I did found the NC license statement on top of the image gallery. Perhaps Gbawden overlooked it? Statement on the copyright said All content published on this Website (text, images, photographs, videos, etc.) is made available under a CC-BY 3.0 licence, unless otherwise stated. I think this falls on the otherwise stated scenario, and the NC tag overrides the statement on the copyright page. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete as likely copyright violation based on EXIF data (‘Original transmission location code’) and low resolution (959 × 960). Brianjd (talk) 11:27, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
@1989: If you see the Permission part in the these pages, you will find an Explanation about the permission of the Tasnim News Agency which states in its footer, and Per this Discussion "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License" and these cases have nothing to do with COM:FOP#Iraq.Thanks.--Mbazri (talk) 12:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: I find it very hard to believe that Tasmin News Agency would be the artist of the depicted artwork. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These files include maps, printed works, and software which was made available by the City of Madrid, but was likely produced by a third party with unknown copyright status.
Keep No, the material was provided by the City of Madrid (...el Ayuntamiento, a través del Área de Turismo de Madrid Destino), so that the license is, in this case, perfectly valid. --Discastotalk20:41, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: I follow here Discasto. The depicted material was apparently created by the tourist office of Madrid as claimed. Per COM:PRP we need significant doubt which has not been substantiated. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The City of Madrid is a major shareholder of Mercamadrid, but they are not the same entity, and it's unlikely that the city can simply license Mercamadrid materials without specific permission.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No evidence of permission. Original blog post has since been removed, but I couldn't seem to find any evidence of a free license in the archived version.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Falsche Angabe des Urhebers. Der Fotograf wird nicht genannt,. Es gibt keine Erlaubnis das Foto unter freier Lizenz zu veröffentlichen. Fiona (talk) 13:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete: The file comes from the Royal Collection, where it's credited as a work by Cecil Beaton. Also, there is no evidence in the source that this particular photograph has been commissioned by the Royal Family, which would had been essential to made this photograph eligible to be PD after expiration of Crown Copyright. As I said prior, this file is still under protection and there is no evidence for the use of this photo under the cc-by-sa-4.0 added by the uploader. It would be PD on January 1, 2051, when the 70 years after Beaton's death's copyright term would be expired. 83.61.243.17816:18, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I believe that my photo is completely legal. I was escorted through Oman by a resident of Oman who did not inform us of any restrictions on picture taking. Our guide was licensed by the state of Oman to give us the tour and our guide was very aware we were all taking pictures. Are we going to get rid of all pictures of the Eifel Tower on Wikipedia because France does not explicitly allow them? I don't see anything in the law that explicitly forbids a photo like this. In law, anything not explicitly forbidden is allowed. Cgeggis (talk) 15:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Cgeggis: freedom of photography is not relevant here. What matters is that your photo under free CC license violates the posthumous copyright of the architect, and Omani copyright law does not provide a freedom of panorama provision that authorizes free shooting of copyrighted public art and works without the need of permission from the architects or sculptors (or their heirs if they are already deceased). Otherwise your photo can only be undeleted 70 years after Makiya died. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)03:31, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 07:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 07:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
StrongDelete Laughably poor quality. SVG version is far, far superior. We may not delete original works by uploaders which have been vectorized, but we very much delete low quality public domain raster images with superior vector images. There should be some kind of speedy deletion for this type of garbage. ~TheImaCow (talk) 18:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. Svg. File Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 00:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
It's not 3, but one: it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days),. And it's Season 1995-95, so it's a 1995 pic.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 16:02, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I suspect this deletion request is due to a misinterpretation of the PD-1996 license, but the image itself is insignificant and can of course be deleted (I was the uploader). Ketil3 (talk) 15:34, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The mascots of Arakawa Ward Arabo (あら坊) and Aramii (あらみぃ) are trademarked, and the Government of Arakawa has the terms of use for these mascots. Restrictions include: it is not allowed to use them 1) in a way that is against the law and order, 2) to defame the Ward, 3) to endorse specific individual or religious organisation, and 4) to promote amusement & sex industries. Meaning: they are not freely usable content. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
misuploaded a blank photo of a desk, Metadata contains device information that could become personally identifiable being linked to my account. There's no need to keep a photo with no uses on the site Kermitigated (talk) 15:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
probable copyright viloation. Stephen Stepanian illustrated died in 1964. Wikipedia (En) uses an identical image with the note: "This image is a faithful digitisation of a unique historic image, and the copyright for it is most likely held by the person who created the image or the agency employing the person. It is believed that the use of this image may qualify as non-free use under the Copyright law of the United States. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information" This seems to be a pretty good analysis os the copright status and is therefore not acceptable to Commons. Headlock0225 (talk) 17:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The portrait of Mrs. Musar on the depicted poster is copyrighted. The image was likely shot in Slovenia. Unfortunately, Slovenia has no freedom-of-panorama exception. So either a permission from the original photographer is required or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No permission has been given to the account according to the commons rules. Whether DoekiDoeki is Ziggy Krassenberg is also unclear. Please follow instructions normally Doekidoek8. Hoyanova (talk) 17:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep I contacted the photographer who confirmed Doekidoek8's statement, that the photo rights were released to him. This is confirmed by email and I will make further preparations here. Preparation to get extra permission by the photographer is set in motion. -- Mdd (talk) 20:50, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Doekidoek8 claims that the rights were released to Ziggy Krassenberg. However, is Doekidoek8 the same person as Krassenberg or a third party? I think they have to make this clear via the e-mail address I mentioned above. Encycloon (talk) 21:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep I contacted the photographer who confirmed Doekidoek8's statement, that the photo rights were released to him. This is confirmed by email and I will make further preparations here. Preparation to get extra permission by the photographer is set in motion. -- Mdd (talk) 20:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No permission has been given to the account according to the commons rules. Whether DoekiDoeki is Ziggy Krassenberg is also unclear. Please follow instructions normally Doekidoek8. Hoyanova (talk) 17:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No permission has been given to the person/account according to the commons rules. Whether DoekiDoeki is Ziggy Krassenberg is also unclear. Please follow instructions normally Doekidoek8. Hoyanova (talk) 17:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep I contacted the photographer who confirmed Doekidoek8's statement, that the photo rights were released to him. This is confirmed by email and I will make further preparations here. Preparation to get extra permission by the photographer is set in motion. -- Mdd (talk) 20:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No permission has been given to the account according to the commons rules. Whether DoekiDoeki is Ziggy Krassenberg is also unclear. Please follow instructions normally Doekidoek8. Hoyanova (talk) 17:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Photos uploaded by Pierluigi Testa with different authors in the metadata
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No, and I don't read Arabic. The problem I see now with this file is not the intention of the uploader but the likelihood that it's copyvio. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:33, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
One of those imaginary election users who dumps fictional maps and flags and historical portraits onto Commons for some offsite screenshot purpose, then walks away. Out of COM:SCOPE.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The focal point of this image is copyrighted box art (non-free logo). If the box art was redacted, it would just be a photo of some computer equipment with little educational value as an image. czar17:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Side aspect (not necessarily related to the legitimacy of the image): The game is freeware since quite a while and the source code is available. Kind regards, Grueslayer (talk) 09:22, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
- File:Reproduktion vom Bild "Lebendig".jpg - dieses Bild habe ich tatsächlich selbst gemacht, weil ich den Nachlass der Künstlerin archiviert habe und so den Zugang zu den Werken hatte. Sind dann die copyrights bei den Erben? Wer soll dann das Bild hochladen oder wie kann ich das machen?
- File:Maria Hafner in ihrem Atelier in Zug.jpg - das Foto ist nicht von mir gemacht, sondern vom Fotograf Stefan Kaiser, der auf meine Anfrage ob ich das Bild für Wikipedia benutzen darf, zustimmte und sagte, dass ich das Bild selber hochladen soll (schriftliche Bestätigung der Korrespondenz vorhanden). Kann man das Bild trotzdem beibehalten oder kann in diesem Fall NUR der Autor sie hochladen?
Für das Bild "Lebendig" ist in der Tat die schriftliche Zustimmung der Erben erforderlich; siehe COM:VRT/de für das genaue Prozedere.
Für das Foto der Künstlerin ist das Verfahren prinzipiell dasselbe, nur das Herr Kaiser und nicht die Erben der Künstlerin seine Genehmigung im Rahmen des VRT-Verfahrens erteilen muss.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Bonjour EugeneZelenko. Ces textes ont été oubliés par la mairie d'Antony à de multiples endroits et sont disponibles à tous. Il suffit de lire ce qui est écrit, il n'y a rien de caché dans ces photos. Maintenant si vous voulez faire du zèle, libre à vous. Bien cordialement. AntonyB (talk) 17:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Misuploaded original full-scale photo thinking there would be a crop feature to use only parts of the photo. Metadata contains device information that could become personally identifiable being linked to my account. Afterwards reuploaded a different properly cropped version in use right now. Kermitigated (talk) 16:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Remaining uploads of this user (not already nominated for deletion). Of this user’s nine uploads, four have been separately nominated for deletion as suspected copyright violations. Therefore, the remaining uploads (all claimed CC BY-SA self) are also suspect. Pinging @Ikan Kekek.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Comment As of January 1, 1996, this image is still under copyright protection is Ecuador. According to COM:URAA, the copyright restored in the United States. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
That's a call for an admin to make. I don't know what the precedents are or whether such cases have been discussed as a matter of policy or best practices. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Further information: This image was uploaded by an en.wikipedia user in an edit that was later reverted (and it's no longer in use anywhere). The user has no other edits, and has not responded to my request on their talk page for information about the picture. The description doesn't describe the picture, instead being the name of a newspaper, implying the newspaper is the actual source of the image. While a username isn't really proof of anything, the user calling themselves "KAPPPK" and editing an article on an individual named Kash Patel suggests a possible connection to (possibly even being) the subject of the photo, which smacks of self-promotion. I find this impression reinforced by the use of what looks like a professional studio photo (where an official government portrait exists instead). The file metadata contains the author name "Silva_Simoes", apparently a nondescript Portuguese-language surname, so I wasn't able to find any more information pursuing that avenue. -- Perey (talk) 11:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyrighted interior architecture, designs, and artisans' works (chandeliers, statuettes et cetera), considering the building does not date to more than 70 years ago. The artisans are unlikely to be dead fir more than 70 years, hence still under their copyrights. Oman has no freedom of panorama that would have legally allowed commercial uses of these public art and works. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque, Muscat for a related deletion request.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyrighted interior architecture, designs, and artisans' works (chandeliers, statuettes et cetera), considering the building does not date to more than 70 years ago. The artisans are unlikely to be dead fir more than 70 years, hence still under their copyrights. Oman has no freedom of panorama that would have legally allowed commercial uses of these public art and works. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque, Muscat for a related deletion request.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Why is that relevant? It is my work, I am free to upload it in the resolution that fits my usage. Just becasue you are an admin that does not give you the right to dectate what quality should I use. You can ask for further prove of authorship but not for a specific quality. Did I miss this new policy? or this more of a power trip? Abdo2905 (talk) 14:42, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd I provided prove. Please read the previous conversation before responding. The work is from my article which I intentionally published under creative licence that allows me to use it for wikipedia. I am contesting @EugeneZelenko request as it is not justified by any policy. Again he is not asking for prove, he is asking for a specific quality.
Everything looks legitimate to me. The resolution for the image published in his paper is also low and is not uncommon in cutting edge experimental work. It is obvious from his writing that he is knowledgeable in the field as well. Bob Clemintime (talk) 03:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Above is a link to all the uploader’s articles and this phrase: The work is from my article which I intentionally published under creative licence …. I don’t want to look through all of those just to verify a copyright status. I did look at one, and was disappointed to find it was not under a Creative Commons licence.
@Brianjd this is getting a bit frustrating to be honest. Here a screenshot for you includes my name (1st author) and the license. I hope this ends it or please go and delete whatever you want! forBrainjd
Another way of ensuring the images are under free licences is for you to put them under free licences yourself. But you can only do that if you are the copyright owner. The second screenshot shows that you are not the copyright owner of J-integral analysis of the elastic strain fields of ferrite deformation twins using electron backscatter diffraction (or you have granted an exclusive licence to the publisher, making them effectively the copyright owner); otherwise, you would not be asking the publisher for rights.
@Brianjd are we looking to the same screenshot? I disagree. The 2nd screenshot shows that I can use the illustration for a non-commercial web page for free.Without spending time in the semantic of your argument, if I don't need to pay to get the image for a non-commercial web page, then it equates to being freely licensed. It refers to the rights one is granted to use, build on, create derivative works, etc. = Creative Commons NonCommercial license.
Unfortunately, none of the images nominated here actually come from that article. are you sure? Look to the paper supplementary information. You will surprised how wrong you are! FuzzyMagma (talk) 07:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@FuzzyMagma I don’t think your argument is valid, but it doesn’t matter. We just need to look at Commons:Licensing, which makes it clear that Creative Commons NonCommercial licenses are not accepted on Wikimedia Commons.
@FuzzyMagma Elsevier keeps accusing me of being a robot, no matter how many times I select all the photos of lions and horses. Hopefully someone else can check the supplementary information. Brianjd (talk) 05:33, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd What discussion? are we reading the same discussion? this conclusion is similar to your argument. You had your conclusions before starting the 'discussion'! You did not even bothered to read or do any due diligence. FuzzyMagma (talk) 07:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless COM:VRT can confirm proper permission. As noted above the only evidence for a free license presented is this paper which does not actually contain any of the images listed in this deletion discussion so that paper's CC license is irrelevant to this discussion as that license only applies to that paper and its contents. Also noted above is that Elsevier requires an assignment of copyright or equivalent as part of its agreement. See this. Uploader also has an incorrect understanding of copyrights, Creative Commons licensing, and open access conflating different uses of the word "free". See User talk:FuzzyMagma#File source problem with File:Modulated microstructure for DSS.jpeg. -- Whpq (talk) 13:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Whpq the file you attached states that I, as journal author, have rights for a large range of uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. How authors can use their own journal articles Authors publishing in Elsevier journals have wide rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission.
Thank you for pointing out it is from the supplemental material. I was looking only in the PDF. I can confirm that [S4 loaded slip band.gif] is under a CC-BY 4.0 license. I do not have time right now to look at the other images but I will look at them later today. -- Whpq (talk) 17:04, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I can see that the File:Twinforescatter diode.tif and File:S4 loaded slip band.gif are CC-BY 4.0 as included in the supplementary data. File:AFMimageforslipband.pngand and File:PSBStructure.tif are own work. For the latter two, has there been previous publication that may have assigned rights to the publisher? Whpq (talk) 01:35, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Whpq for File:PSBStructure.tif, I have recreated the image using the same model as in Generation and interaction mechanisms of prismatic dislocation loops in FCC metals, Fig. 9. Since I used exactly the same model, the schematics are identical but the coloring is (intentionally) different and then there is the labeling of each component in the picture. As there is no novelty of the model, it is not published. I have now amended the description to reflect that.
That paper is not released under a CC-BY license. I see no declaration of a Creative Commons license on the directory page or in the downloaded PDF. Whpq (talk) 20:18, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep File:Twinforescatter diode.tif, File:S4 loaded slip band.gif, File:PSBStructure.tif but Delete File:AFMimageforslipband.png as it doe snot have evidence of a free license. -- Whpq (talk) 20:22, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
You find a hint in the list below. The non-existing exception is relevant only if the depicted work is considered copyrightable, i.e. above threshold of originality. Things too simple are not affected. I.e., a board containing only a bit of trivial text, should not put a problem.--Túrelio (talk) 20:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Please, don't feel targeted. Your upload, which triggered this DR, just came into my view when patroling recent uploads. If this DR-discussion results in a balanced decision, it may serve as a template for the rest of the images. However, feel free to add a few more images from this cat to the list below. --Túrelio (talk) 07:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep Uploaded in June 2022, so not eligible for speedy deletion. Not used, but appears useful. Appears to depict a subject not depicted in other files. In any case, there are not many other files in its category. Brianjd (talk) 12:16, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Likely not own works: low-res/web-sized images with varying quality and styles, some missing EXIF data or with FB transmission code, one is watermarked. I've deleted two uploads by this user which were clearly not "own works", plus there were more deletions done by other admins, so I've come to the conclusion that this uploader is what some term "unreliable".
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Blurred, redundant since many of the same view in better quality exist = not realistically useful (also wrong description) Phso2 (talk) 21:09, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
(Edit: This is the discussion thread between Ymnes and Enyavar on all related DRs which were also held here, here and here. There is little sense in keeping the arguments in quadruple.)
So you say that the CIA has produced this map? Please check closer, there are signs of digital editing, and the original map from the CIA is linked in the description. --Enyavar (talk) 15:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I know what I'am talking about. Suriname had two major disputed areas at the south-east and south-west of it's territory. You're claim is not the full truth. Ymnes (talk) 15:06, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader claims "made by the CIA". Which is false. This specific map has NOT been produced by the CIA. That issue is called "falsification" or "document forgery". (I am aware of the border disputes, and I specifically only object to the forgeries of official maps. I am not calling to delete these ones or these ones or the many other maps that SurinameCentral has produced.) --Enyavar (talk) 14:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is "Which is false" true? Why should we believe you? Incorrect / insufficiently precise maps have gotten the second part of the puzzle which was not yet available yet, so necessary knowledge is now approachable. You even state that you are aware of the border disputes, but a couple of days ago I needed to inform you of them. Please don't luckily claim and state things. Thanks. Ymnes (talk) 08:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
When and where have you "needed to inform" me? When I STARTED this DR, I already had done in-detail categorization of all previous uploads by SurinameCentral - every single one, since they did sloppy categorization - and then I started these four very specific DRs and left everything else alone. Do you think I don't triple-check before doing so??? I am not "luckily" claiming that the CIA has produced this original, SurinameCentral themselves has linked the original as the source of their manipulated file. Similarly, I have not "luckily" guessed which borders are shown in official UN maps - I have looked up official UN maps of the 20th century and such maps all don't display Greater Suriname. Oh, I am disappointed in the UN for being inconsiderate when their officials created those maps, but that doesn't change the fact that in the 1950s, the UN didn't produce fancy Greater Suriname maps. --Enyavar (talk) 19:35, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't get emotional. I'm of good faith and I am convinced the uploader is as well. That is very important on all projects. Please uphold Commons:Assume good faith.
We are talking about the work of a new user and what I see is that s/he is not giving a wrong source intentionally, but has been copy-pasting from a wrong file in order to correct it. Please look at the following similarity:
If someone new wants to correct biased maps here and is new on Commons, it is very understandable to make a copy of the incorrect map and correct it. In fact, when we see this in an article on Wikipedia, we simply correct the error and know that it was not produced because of lack of good faith. We must conclude that here the same is at stake. Here the omission was made to correct "The World Factbook, 1990, p. 295" into "Own correction of File:World Factbook (1990) Suriname.png". So yes, the mention of the source should be corrected, but the véry good work to make Commons less biased should be upheld. These works should therefore not be deleted. On the contrary, I'm very pleased and welcome all these corrections. Ymnes (talk) 01:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Correct biased maps? Presenting the situation as it exists, not as Suriname claims it should be, is not biased, but falsely presenting maps that are edited by a user to reflect Surinamese claims not presented in the original forms of the maps as if they were the original maps is a lie that cannot be tolerated. And calling such edits "corrections" is not tolerable, either. A true description would be "edited to reflect Surinamese territorial claims" or better yet, "edited to reflect Surinamese territorial claims to territory not under its control as of [year]." And the map would still be misleading without the claimed areas being shown with cross-hatching or a different shade. And lest you think I care one way or the other about this territorial dispute, I was not aware of it until I saw this set of deletion requests and have no dog in this fight at all; the only thing I care about is the transmittal of accurate information. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I can agree with ading "edited to reflect Surinamese territorial claims" to these maps, but it cannot be done without adding "edited to reflect Guyanese territorial claims" and "edited to reflect French territorial claims". This is a problem that yet exists on Commons for a long time and needs to be corrected completely. Ymnes (talk) 14:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ymnes, you want to disrupt commons to prove your point? Most people aren't aware of every single border dispute in the world, which includes a lot of people who have uploaded Maps of South America in the past. The conventional border graphics do not need to be marked as incorrect or disputed, as they are displaying de-facto conditions. The "corrected" maps by SurinameCentral are an overcorrection to show the wishful thinking of Suriname revanchism/irredentism, because they are aware of the dispute, and want to publizise their maximal perceived de-jure conditions. As far as I can see, this border dispute has not even be tackled (and much less solved) by any previous treaty or arbitration. SurinameCentral claimed that Guyana "militarily annexed" the Tigri triangle from previous Suriname control, for which I have not seen evidence. An aware and truly neutral editor would have produced maps like this or this, instead of this. My ultimate point is that here on Commons we don't solve RL border disputes.
Back to the question at hand here: the maps in question are falsified documents (the originals produced by UN/CIA/World Bank were "corrected" by an activist user) and they have no place within our educational scope.
And Ymnes, I am not biased againts your political cause! I believe to make a consistent stand against allkindsofmap forgeries, to just link a few. Especially that last of these four examples may be of interest to you: the NYT published an incorrect map of afterwar borders in Europe, and a user went and "corrected" the map 100 years later. To me that's a no-no. --Enyavar (talk) 20:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I feel being attacked here personally. For that reason, I stop with my share in this talk. I HAVE NOT DISRUPTED ANYTHING!! And what is wrong with you, accusing Surinamese of revanchism/irredentism?? There is nothing true of that, at all. Because I cannot talk without being played out, this talk ends now for me.
But I won't leave without playing it once more fairly and with real arguments: also Commons should be neutral and so there should be an inventory of maps that show both sides of the border dispute. And no, there isn't a de jure settlement of the border disputes. The Surinamese government has on going talks with the governments of Guyana and France on diplomatic levels. And no, there isn't a de facto settlement of the border disputes. For instance, the indigenous people in the Tigri area are voting for national elections in Suriname as well as in Guyana. In fact on the disputed area between French-Guyana and Suriname there are talks to make it a nature reserve, since it is not permanently inhabited. My last dime. I quit with this talk. Ymnes (talk) 07:23, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No personal attack or aggression was intended, please calm down. You wrote "this (a change to a few files) cannot be done without that (a change to hundred thousands of files)". That kind of thit-for-that thinking is what I perceived as potential disruptive, and voiced my concern in form of a question. --Enyavar (talk) 08:36, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
(The lengthy discussion between Ymnes and Enyavar is fully available here, there is no sense in posting all arguments in quadruple. All arguments from that discussion also concern this DR here, as well, so please take that into consideration.)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unsourced, falsified map: The UN does not recognize borders as inserted in this file. As of 1973, the UN standpoint on SA borders were like this. Prove me wrong and post the link to that supposed map within the UN repositories? Enyavar (talk) 22:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't about me, so don't use "you" in your reply. I see the issue. The issue isn't who the UN recognizes as controlling what territory, but the fact that - correct me if I'm wrong - the area in question is in fact controlled by Guyana. If that is correct, then yes, any map that is not historically important, not in use and has the wrong boundaries should be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:08, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The main issue here is not neutrality, the uploader has produced dozens of maps with that same POV (see also here). These POV maps shouldn't find use, but they show a legit point-of-view of that Suriname patriot. They want to show off Greater Suriname, which isn't too egregious - after all, we also allow other maps of dubious origins - be it the maps of Morocco stretching over all of West Sahara, be it a unified China, or Russia's borders reaching Hungary and Moldova again, or be it the polished fasco-maps of Greater Hungary as Orban's regime puts on display at every public place possible. Yeaaaah, that stuff is problematic... But I'm realistic, boring regular POVvy disinformation is not gonna get deleted in Commons.
Nope, the issue is that this manipulated map proclaims that the United Nations (!) in an official document (!) from the UN website acknowledged Suriname's claims on the territories de facto occupied by Guyana. Which is just not the case; the UN actually acknowledges Guyana's claims in their official materials, like the one Hans linked above. So: the line should (imo) be drawn when official or historical documents are falsified; including forgeries of "UN maps" and "CIA World Factbook Maps". That kind of blatant lies run totally counter to the educative mission of our whole platform. --Enyavar (talk) 21:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. My point of view would be that POV maps need to be labeled as such, and that when you're seeing a map that shows a bunch of countries, it's not easy to tell that a chunk of Guyana has been given to Suriname unless you know to look for that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:27, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(The lengthy discussion between Ymnes and Enyavar is fully available here, there is no sense in posting all arguments in quadruple. All arguments from that discussion also concern this DR here, as well, so please take that into consideration.)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unsourced, falsified maps: The UN does not recognize borders as were inserted in this file. As of 1973, the UN standpoint on SA borders were like this. Prove me wrong and post the links to the respective originals within the UN repository/library system. Thanks!
The main issue here is not neutrality, the uploader has produced dozens of maps with that same POV (see also here). These POV maps shouldn't find use, but they show a legit point-of-view of that Suriname patriot. They want to show off Greater Suriname, which isn't too egregious - after all, we also allow other maps of dubious origins - be it the maps of Morocco stretching over all of West Sahara, be it a unified China, or Russia's borders reaching Hungary and Moldova again, or be it the polished fasco-maps of Greater Hungary as Orban's regime puts on display at every public place possible. Yeaaaah, that stuff is problematic... But I'm realistic, boring regular POVvy disinformation is not gonna get deleted in Commons.
Nope, the issue is that this manipulated map proclaims that the United Nations (!) in an official document (!) from the UN website acknowledged Suriname's claims on the territories de facto occupied by Guyana. Which is just not the case; the UN actually acknowledges Guyana's claims in their official materials, like the one Hans linked above. So: the line should (imo) be drawn when official or historical documents are falsified; including forgeries of "UN maps" and "CIA World Factbook Maps". That kind of blatant lies run totally counter to the educative mission of our whole platform. --Enyavar (talk) 21:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(The lengthy discussion between Ymnes and Enyavar is fully available here, there is no sense in posting all arguments in quadruple. All arguments from that discussion also concern this DR here, as well, so please take that into consideration.)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Mvolz as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7 Converted to regular DR as file does not qualify for G7-speedy. Courtesy-deletion recommdened. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:27, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: Alamy harvested this from Commons in 2021 or so, so that is not a reason for deletion. However, if this is a photo from the Armenia History Museum as claimed, we'd need a permission from the museum to host the file. The FoP-Armenia and PD-Art tags formerly used for the file clearly don't apply to a 3D object in a museum. --Rosenzweigτ20:43, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: per nomination. The painting is from 2013 and the painter is Torsten Hennig, born 1959 in Stralsund per [2]. The file can be restored 70 years after his death. --Rosenzweigτ16:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep It's still basically text with a sword in the background. Still passes COM:TOO. Also while I'm at it, the English Wikipedia is not the only WMF project that uses this file. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:06, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The sword design looks like a fairly complex work that would be copyrighted in any country. The file can also be moved to other projects if they allow fair use. Yeeno (talk) 18:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like that file was originally just the text but overwritten to include the sword design as well. If this DR goes through it can be reverted to its original version. Yeeno (talk) 18:06, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Die Abbildung ist in der Sprottischwaldau Chronik der Kolonie 1776 -1945 beschrieben und abgebildet. Jürgen Gerner, alias 16Exul82 schrieb dieser Buch. Sprottischwaldau – Chronik der Kolonie 1776–2010, die Entwicklung von Jürgen Gerner Chronik Szprotawki Szprotawka, Internetquelle: |autor=Jürgen Gerner |url=https://kat.martin-opitz-bibliothek.de/vufind/Record/0470872 |titel=Sprottischwaldau |werk=Dorfchronik, Ortsfamilienbuch |datum=2009 |sprache=de |abruf=2021-08-16 . 16Exul82 (talk) 07:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@16Exul82: , as you are stating you are the writer of the book, can you please write to the Volunteer response team to show you also own the copyright of this image. I am sorry nobody explained this to you before. Please follow closely the procedure of COM:VRT. Kind regards, Ellywa (talk) 19:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@16Exul82: , da Sie angeben, dass Sie der Autor des Buches sind, können Sie bitte dem Volunteer Response Team schreiben, um zu zeigen, dass Sie auch das Urheberrecht an diesem Bild besitzen. Es tut mir leid, dass dir das noch nie jemand erklärt hat. Bitte befolgen Sie genau das Verfahren von COM:VRT. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Ellywa (talk) 19:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sollte das Urheberrecht noch bestehen, ginge es ja aber nicht nur um ein etwaiges Publikationsrecht des Buchautors, sondern um das Urheberrecht des Fotografen.
Wenn wir davon ausgehen, dass es sich wirklich um ein anonymes Werk handelt, so liefe die Schutzfrist 70 Jahre ab Erstveröffentlichung oder Todesdatum des Urhebers, je nachdem, was früher liegt (siehe COM:Germany#Anonymous_and_pseudonymous_works).
Man müsste also wohl Publikation (nicht Schöpfung) des Photos vor 1927 nachweisen, damit das Foto sowohl in Deutschland als auch in den Vereinigten Staaten gemeinfrei ist. Felix QW (talk) 21:08, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
16Exul82 ,alias Jürgen Gerner schrieb das folgende Buch. Das Bild ist dort enthalten. Sprottischwaldau – Chronik der Kolonie 1776–2010, die Entwicklung von Jürgen Gerner Chronik Szprotawki Szprotawka. , Internetquelle: |autor=Jürgen Gerner |url=https://kat.martin-opitz-bibliothek.de/vufind/Record/0470872 |titel=Sprottischwaldau |werk=Dorfchronik, Ortsfamilienbuch |datum=2009 |sprache=de |abruf=2021-08-16 (Diskussion) 16Exul82 11:37, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
@16Exul82: , as you are stating you are the writer of the book, can you please write to the Volunteer response team to show you also own the copyright of this image. I am sorry nobody explained this to you before. Please follow closely the procedure of COM:VRT. Kind regards, Ellywa (talk) 19:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@16Exul82: , da Sie angeben, dass Sie der Autor des Buches sind, können Sie bitte dem Volunteer Response Team schreiben, um zu zeigen, dass Sie auch das Urheberrecht an diesem Bild besitzen. Es tut mir leid, dass dir das noch nie jemand erklärt hat. Bitte befolgen Sie genau das Verfahren von COM:VRT. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Ellywa (talk) 19:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Das Foto der Kriegerdenkmales habe ich von meinem 1982 verstorbenen Großvater Hermann Gerner übernommen. Das Foto ist im öffentlichen Raum fotografiert worden und stellt so Panoramafreiheit her. Das Denkmal wurde nach 1945 entfernt, heute ist es polnisches Gebiet. Ich habe viele Fotos der schlesischen Heimat der Großeltern übernommen und geerbt. In der Annahme, dass diese die Fotos gemacht haben habe ich sie veröffentlicht.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Another file uploaded by a sockpuppet of a3cb1 with possibly a bogus license. Normally, Crown Copyright applies to works commisioned by the Royal Family before 1989. However, according with the original painting's page at the Royal Collection, it was "presented to King George VI and Queen Elizabeth by Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the Union of South Africa". I believe that, if I'm not wrong, that "be presented to King and Queen" doesn't mean necessary that "they commisioned it", when we are able to see some different cases of paintings and photos with a clear notice that were "commissioned by (some member of the Royal Family)", in which the Crown Copyright applies. Unless evidence which corroborates otherwise, it might be assumed that the copyright of the original painting belongs to Salisbury (1874-1962) and of this work to the "unknown artist" who made this version after Salisbury's, whose copyright in the UK is still rulling until January 1, 2033, when 70 years from his death have been passed. 83.61.243.17813:06, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This source confirms that the work was commissioned by the governments of those localities. As far as I'm able to tell, by the rules of each locality at the time this would have been considered to be under Crown copyright. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:11, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Nikkimaria: With this new evidences, I have no more objections to this file. Thanks for your clarification. Can you also add the page in which this book cites this work please, to avoid future confussions? Thanks again. 83.61.243.17809:35, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Reppop as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work; this article has a large, cropped image from before the date this image was uploaded. Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as the nominator's premise is incorrect. The external hit is from "July 04, 2016", i.e. >2 weeks after our upload- -- Túrelio (talk) 19:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: I checked TinEye and the oldest copy of this image found online was after the upload here, so there is no reason to disbelieve the uploader. —howcheng {chat}19:09, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The 2021 version of the emblem of Control Yuan and the seal of Legislative Yuan could be simple enough to be covered under {{PD-textlogo}}. Both of which don't have calligraphy included either. —— Eric Liu（Talk）00:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These images claim {{GWOIA}} or {{PD-ROC-exempt}}. However, as per communications from the Taiwanese government:
{{GWOIA}} does not apply to administration's logos (source), and
{{PD-ROC-exempt}} only applies to symbols or emblems that are formulated according to law (source), in which case the particular law that substantiates this claim must be specified.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Deleted as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Comment Decent portrait, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:29, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Keep No, the material was provided by the City of Madrid (...el Ayuntamiento, a través del Área de Turismo de Madrid Destino), so that the license is, in this case, perfectly valid. --Discasto talk 20:41, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Speedy delete per COM:CSD#G7. Also, low resolution and no metadata means suspected copyvio. Brianjd (talk) 14:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 12:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 12:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 12:18, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 12:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 12:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 12:24, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 12:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Question Is that a real view, though? If it is, we should keep and categorize the image. If not, deletion would be appropriate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
![14 File:"Black and White Dick Pic May 2022.jpg".jpg](#File:"Black_and_White_Dick_Pic_May_2022.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_South_Africa.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Suriname.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_IX_-_XX_вв.jpg){kind=link}
![03:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/10/22#c-A1Cafel-20221022030800-File:"Black_and_White_Dick_Pic_May_2022.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
![12:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/10/22#c-George_Chernilevsky-20221029122600-File:"Black_and_White_Dick_Pic_May_2022.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_South_Africa.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_South_Africa.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_South_Africa.jpg){kind=link}
_South_Africa.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_clip.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_aerial_photo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Suriname.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Suriname.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Suriname.png){kind=link}
_Suriname.jpg)
_Suriname.png){kind=link}
_Suriname.png){kind=link}
_Suriname.png){kind=link}
_Suriname.png){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_IX_-_XX_%D0%B2%D0%B2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_IX_-_XX_%D0%B2%D0%B2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}