Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/10/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Because it is Blurry Minkha767 (talk) 05:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 07:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Highly unlikely to be own work. 103.131.14.12 09:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. --Brateevsky {talk} 10:16, 8 October 2022 (UTC)- Identify source and copyright status before jumping to conclusions. Fanx (talk) 10:33, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- its a clear copyvio so there's nothing to investigate Denniss (talk) 10:48, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RakibulIslamju (talk · contribs)
[edit]Speedy delete as F10
SVTCobra 11:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was requested to be speedily deleeted before, because somebody assumed it violates copyright. I changed the speedy deletion request to a normal deletion request, because User:Greatquack17 claims to be the author of this work (and if he/she is the author, there would be no copyright violation). We don't know yet, which person or institution Greatquack17 is. That user has made no other contributions before. So we should first discuss, before the file is deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heinz (talk • contribs) 12:54, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Just reintroducing link which was in the original speedy deletion request. The image was earlier published here: https://twitter.com/Edita_Muthoni/status/1578604803403677696/photo/2. Msz2001 (talk) 13:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 15:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
random penis - out of project scope - account has uploaded many similar ones Hoyanova (talk) 14:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:21, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:18, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
(Self) portraits from different artists
[edit]VRT received an invalid "permission" per Ticket:2022100610007118 from a person who is not the copyright holder. It is also unlikely that the drawings are the respective uploader's own work. Permissions sent to VRT by the artists are necessary. VRT a reçu une "autorisation" invalide par Ticket:2022100610007118 d'une personne qui n'est pas titulaire du droit d'auteur. Il est également peu probable que les dessins soient l'œuvre de leur téléchargeur respectif. Des autorisations envoyées par les artistes à la VRT sont nécessaires.
- File:Agathe Rousselle.jpg
- File:AzMarie Livingston drawtober 2021.png
- File:Brigitte Lainé.jpg
- File:Johanna Müller-Hermann.jpg
- File:Louise Bourgeois.tif
- File:Louise Peltzer.png
- File:Tess Asplund.jpg
- File:Vivian Maier.jpg
Mussklprozz (talk) 11:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi concerning File:AzMarie Livingston drawtober 2021.png I am the "artist". This drawing was done using Krita, a free software.
- I am worried why are you suddenly putting these drawings up for deletion ? These drawings were done during our annual event "Dramwtober" and all have been done by the artists and uploaders. Hyruspex (talk) 14:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- These are not "self portraits" by the way, I don't know how you came to the conclusion ? I do not know what is th content in the ticket Category:Ticket2022100610007118 you are mentionning. Can you tell me who sent it and what it says ? Hyruspex (talk) 14:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- PS @Yann: help please .... Hyruspex (talk) 14:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC) (Nattes à chat, I renamed my pseudo)
- As far as I know, even if the ticket is invalid, those files doesn't infringe any copyright as they are only published on Commons (and not any other website) by their authors, whom placed the files under CC-BY-SA licensing. Or am I missing something ? Linedwell (talk) 15:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Mussklprozz, as opposed to the title of this section "(Self) portraits" and what you wrote "It is also unlikely that the drawings are the respective uploader's own work.", these are not self-portraits, and these are indeed the uploaders' work (note the plural as there are several people involved). Please see the following discussion from last year Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_87#Question where it was concluded that no VRT was necessary, as every artist uploaded their own work in Commons under open licence. Celinea33 (talk) 16:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- As far as I know, even if the ticket is invalid, those files doesn't infringe any copyright as they are only published on Commons (and not any other website) by their authors, whom placed the files under CC-BY-SA licensing. Or am I missing something ? Linedwell (talk) 15:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Keep Sorry for all the confusion and thanks to all for clarifying. My misunderstanding was caused by the "permission" that was sent by someone who had nothing to do with the images. – Can some admin please close the case? Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 18:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- I wonder whether the ticket was in fact about File:Drawtober_les_sans_images_2021.png, that is a collage (used for communicating about the project), assembling the 8 portraits above. Hsarrazin (talk) 20:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 20:37, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
a cause d une erreur Francois Guilbert (talk) 01:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright infringement of Agência O Globo https://oglobo.globo.com/cultura/stories/caso-daniella-perez-relembre-o-crime-que-chocou-o-pais-e-que-vai-virar-serie-no-streaming.ghtml Sorocabano 32 (talk) 02:32, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright https://www.bo-pb.com/les-equipes/ Remy34 (talk) 20:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Useless image vandalized by its author. Vipz (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:04, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake PottyBot (talk) 20:42, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Hoax flag SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 19:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete unsourced flag Alexphangia Talk 15:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unsourced hoax flags have no place here. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:49, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Hoax flag SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 20:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete unsourced flag Alexphangia Talk 15:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unsourced hoax flags have no place here. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:50, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced Flag Alexphangia Talk 14:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unsourced hoax flags have no place here. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:52, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Intended to overwrite; not to create new file. Made a mistake with croptool. Mycranthebigman (talk) 17:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:42, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
duplicated file with File:Corymica_arnearia_on_wall (001546).jpg (file) Der fliegende isländer (talk) 18:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uplaoder shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:44, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Published prior to upload to Commons, and in a more complete version (e.g, here)
File:Aytekin Merdanova.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{Subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. 89.219.184.92 19:54, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Zatən Azərbaycanlısan niyə özüvə əziyyət verib ing dilində yazırsan +da ip adresslə :D - Onyeddi (talk) 23:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 14:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. Images on packaging to manufacturers of Paeso baby wipes. Headlock0225 (talk) 18:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:03, 13 October 2022 UTC: Derivative work of non-free content (F3): Commercial packaging --Krdbot 19:54, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
The red arrow is pointing to the wrong bond - it should point to the C-O bond of the ester. I have created File:Ciclesonide metabolism-fr.svg as a replacement. Innerstream (talk) 17:42, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. @Innerstream: the nominated file has a nice
|description=whereas your upload just has placeholder text. Could you sync it? DMacks (talk) 19:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Good catch.
Done. Innerstream (talk) 00:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Good catch.
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 09:34, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Same essential content, but with an overall border (interferes with reuse) and not-very-large JPG (vs scaleable and easily-translateable SVG) DMacks (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. File:Strained cycloalkynes.svg is a high quality alternative that should be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 16:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 05:35, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 09:34, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
This was transferred from enwiki based on a claim by the uploader that it was their own work. However, the original upload provided as summary of www.dolphincruises.co.nz as the only text. That would seem to indicate the image actually came from that web site. The editor's talk page on enwiki includes things like this message which does not give me any confidence the uploader had a proper understanding of copyright and licensing when the image was uploaded. It's is very doubtful this image is the uploader's work and should be deleted under COM:PCP. Whpq (talk) 02:57, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. Seems to be an album cover or promotional shot. Headlock0225 (talk) 18:38, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
no permission for more than a month > ready for deletion Czeva (talk) 18:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 05:21, 15 October 2022 UTC: No VRTS permission since 2 September 2022 --Krdbot 13:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Images from WhatsApp, permission needed.
- File:IMG-20191203-WA0005.jpg
- File:IMG-20191203-WA0007.jpg
- File:IMG-20191203-WA0001.jpg
- File:IMG-20191203-WA0010.jpg
- File:IMG-20191203-WA0009.jpg
- File:IMG-20200129-WA0021.jpg
- File:IMG-20191203-WA0004.jpg
- File:IMG-20200129-WA0023.jpg
- File:IMG-20191203-WA0002.jpg
- File:IMG-20191203-WA0006.jpg
- File:IMG-20191130-WA0030.jpg
- File:IMG-20191203-WA0011.jpg
- File:IMG-20191203-WA0008.jpg
- File:IMG-20191203-WA0003.jpg
- File:IMG-20191110-WA0011.jpg
- File:IMG-20191110-WA0015.jpg
- File:IMG-20191110-WA0014.jpg
- File:IMG-20191110-WA0012.jpg
- File:IMG-20191110-WA0013.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mauricio Amuy Tenorio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self promotional images that are of no obvious use to this project. Commons is not a web hosting service
- File:Celebrity Mauricio Amuy during PFW2022.jpg
- File:Celebrity Mauricio Amuy visiting Windsor.jpg
- File:Celebrity Mauricio Amuy Tenorio.jpg
- File:Celebrity Mauricio Amuy and Keylor Navas.jpg
- File:Mauricio Amuy and Tommy Hilfiger.jpg
- File:Mauricio Amuy.jpg
- File:Mauricio Amuy Tenorio in Soho, London.jpg
- File:Mauricio Amuy Tenorio and Jocelyn Wildenstein.jpg
Herby talk thyme 13:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Itsshekhar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Blatant self-promotion/vanity. Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:Shekhar Lama Talk with Nature.jpg
- File:Se Phoksundo lake with Shekhar Lama.jpg
- File:Beaute Nature with Shekhar Lama.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama ON Kalinchock.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama Play with snow.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama with Khilraj Regmi.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama Dursan Bhimeswor Temple.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama award winner.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama receiving winner certificate.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama attend Film Festival.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama award winner film festival.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama at Thailand airport.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama arrived thai airport.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama on coffee time.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama coffee time thai resturent.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama at pataya thailand.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama at pataya.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama at office.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama with sunil maske and chetan sapkota.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama received award.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama received award in thailand.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama with chetan sapkota.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama rest in hotel.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama at office time.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama rest in thai hotel.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama on thai airport.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama with karishma manandhar.jpg
- File:Shekhar lama dursan hindu kashi temple vanaras.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 16:32, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alanshawn001444 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Used for self promo on en.wp and wikidata.
- File:Alan Shawn - " LOVE " covert art.pdf
- File:Alan Shawn - " The Light " covert art.png
- File:Alan Shawn - "dragon eyes" covert art.png
- File:Alan Shawn sings for the world.png
- File:Alan Shawn - "NO ONE" covert art.png
- File:Alan Shawn during the show.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn - "I WILL NEVER RUNAWAY" covert art.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn "FEEL BETTER" covert art.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's performing on live.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's beginning.jpg
- File:Alan shawn.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's performing on his live concert.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's performing live.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's performing.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's first concert.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's new concert is on the way... it's the beggining.jpg
- File:ALAN SHAWN.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn's voice.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn's performing images.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn's performing with guitar.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn performs with his guitar.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn performs with his guitar . he is incredible.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn live with mic.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn live.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn performs with his guitar on live.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter green back.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter street view.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter cover.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter- street.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter - live.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter cover sea.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter live 2.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter street.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter street 2.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter live.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter interview.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer cover.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer sea 2.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer sea 1.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn - wiki pic.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn cover.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn singer.jpg
- File:Alan shawn.png
- File:Alan Shawn - help me feel again cover.jpg
- File:Alan shawn.pdf
- File:Alan shawn energy.pdf
- File:Alan Shawn.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:39, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The music cover artwork will be copyrighted too Herby talk thyme 14:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alanshawn001444 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, created for advertising.
- File:Alan shawn the last one 1.jpg
- File:Alan shawn backlight.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's world.jpg
- File:Alan shawn savior group music.jpg
- File:Alan shawn performance.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's looking.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singing with the people.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's life style.jpg
- File:Alan shawn voice of the truth.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's guitar.jpg
- File:Alan shawn laughs.jpg
- File:Alan shawn new one.jpg
- File:Alan shawn 3.jpg
- File:Alan shawn savior logo.jpg
- File:Alan shawn savior.jpg
- File:Alan shawn Martin guitars.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn savior.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singing with people.jpg
- File:Alan shawn laughing.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer.jpg
- File:Alan shawn fender.jpg
- File:Alan shawn solo.jpg
— Afeef (talk) 18:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. It does appear to be nothing more than cross-wiki advertising/self-promotion. Marbletan (talk) 12:36, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pedfalseferjos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Improperly uploaded as 'own work', those files were copied from government sites, like this. Copyrighted material with no permission.
- File:Bolsonaro retrato.png
- File:Tcmin.png
- File:Rmminii.png
- File:Cmmin.png
- File:Ifmin.png
- File:Mgmin.png
- File:Hsmmin.png
- File:Jdmin.png
- File:Jpcmini.png
- File:Jgmin.png
- File:Mtmin.png
- File:Rmmini.png
- File:Mffmin.png
- File:Alsmin.png
- File:Asamin.png
- File:Gbmin.png
- File:Mfmin.png
- File:Almin.png
- File:Pntmin.png
- File:Icmin.png
- File:Jmcmin.png
- File:Rmmin.png
- File:Jnmin.png
- File:Jpcmin.png
- File:Sgmin.png
- File:Iarmin.png
- File:Jnmmin.png
- File:Ammmin.png
- File:Sbmin.png
- File:Ptmin.png
- File:Jacmin.png
- File:Pgmin.png
- File:Mcfmin.png
- File:Mcpmin.png
- File:BICMIN.png
- File:PcMIN.png
- File:FAmin.png
- File:IRmin.png
- File:EPmin.png
- File:AMCmin.png
- File:LAmin.png
- File:TAmin.png
- File:MCxxiii.png
- File:Nuno crato.png
- File:MiguelRelvasministro.png
- File:Passos Coelho 2011.png
- File:Pàf.png
- File:EDmai.png
- File:JGCmdn.png
- File:JLmf.png
- File:MCmf.png
- File:MVSmp.png
- File:AASmne.png
- File:PSVmetd.png
- File:ACpm2019.png
- File:MCAmaa.png
- File:AAmct.png
- File:PNSmih.png
- File:DCma.png
- File:MPms.png
- File:MTms.png
- File:AMGmtsss.png
- File:JCme.png
- File:EFmctes.png
- File:PASmc.png
- File:ACSmem.png
- File:ACMmap.png
- File:FMmf.png
- File:CSCmj.png
- File:JLCmai.png
- File:HCmdn.png
- File:JGCmne.png
- File:MVdS.png
- File:Primeiro-ministro António Costa.png
- File:Joaquim Miranda Sarmento.jpg
—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Falcaojpfsf (talk · contribs)
[edit]Series os files of politicians that can be easily found on internet. See also edits by User:Pedfalseferjos. Uploaded as own work, but are copyrighted.
- File:Luismontenegropm2026.png
- File:LM vs. PNS.png
- File:Luis montenegro ppdpsd.png
- File:Rui-rio-psd 00.jpg
- File:Luis montenegro.png
- File:Emidiopsd.png
- File:Luis-montenegro-psd.png
- File:Governo-de-portugal-cor2.png
- File:Santana-lopes-psd.jpg
- File:Hugosoares.png
- File:JFFerreira.png
—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Falcaojpfsf (talk · contribs)
[edit]Again, uploading unfree files that can be easily found on internet and claiming ownership.
—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 19:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Too tiny to be useful. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:33, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Uninteresting, not really sharp picture of part of a room in a warehouse. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:38, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
ordinary person, img not used Mateus2019 (talk) 06:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emrullahkorogluu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal self promotional images that are outside our scope. Commons is not a web hosting platform
Herby talk thyme 07:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Seemingly useless pictogram, not in use. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Student graphic design work. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Student graphic design work. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Crude thumbs-up icon, not in use. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused pictogram of a bed. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused pictogram of a bed. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Just a letter X. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Just three parallel lines. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused pictogram of a sofabed. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused drawing of a page for a day on a calendar. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Comic strip-style question bubble by non-notable individual. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Drawing by non-notable individual. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Drawing by non-notable individual. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't see a use for this "edge wallpaper." Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
ordinary person, img not used anywhere @ WM Mateus2019 (talk) 09:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Trimethylolethane-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope; AI altered image of an unknown person SVTCobra 12:58, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, and I should note, the sole purpose of the upload seems to have been to vandalize the page w:Mayor of Jersey City, New Jersey. SVTCobra 11:58, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
random penises - out of project scope - account has uploaded many similar on one day Hoyanova (talk) 14:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
random penises - out of project scope - account has uploaded many similar ones Hoyanova (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
random penis - out of project scope - account has uploaded many similar ones Hoyanova (talk) 14:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, personnal file, no encyclopedic value, etc F (talk) 16:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, poor personal 'art' without reedeming qualities. Probably a copyvio (derivative work of a photograph of José Juan Figueiras García). Strakhov (talk) 17:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 3+3Anticristo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Probably a derivative work of copyrighted content (this 'official' photograph) too.
Strakhov (talk) 17:31, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamidrezaezzatkhani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of project scope.
- File:Abtin Taban (7).jpg
- File:Abtin Taban (6).jpg
- File:Abtin Taban (5).jpg
- File:Abtin Taban (4).jpg
- File:Abtin Taban (3).jpg
- File:Abtin Taban (1).jpg
- File:Abtin Taban (2).jpg
— Afeef (talk) 18:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 21:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Personal file, outside COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 20:22, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 21:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:46, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 21:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:46, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused and out of scope as plain text Vahurzpu (talk) 21:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:46, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Not useful, possibly used for harassment on it.wiki M7 (talk) 21:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
This photo exists already on Wikimedia Commons with the same format (File:El grafico 3050.jpg) DZwarrior1 (talk) 21:52, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, he's right, I uploaded both images and one is the exact duplicate of another. Fma12 (talk) 22:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. Low quality portrait with no reedeming qualities of a non notable person. Description that qualifies as "hoax" and "vandalism" Strakhov (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
{{Duplicate |file=Cnelbolo.png|reason=This logo exists already on Wikimedia Commons with the same format.|user=DZwarrior1}} DZwarrior1 (talk) 22:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
No longer used in any article (unnecessary) D2h (talk) 21:35, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Since the SVG version was deleted according to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Orellanine synthesis.svg, this version should get deleted as well. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:16, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Info Used in ja:オレラニン. --Leyo 15:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Yasu (talk) 15:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Lower-quality variant of the SVG, which has now been undeleted via COM:UNDEL. As a superior file (size, translatability, angles of bonds/avoiding atomic collisions), I have replaced the GIF uses with the SVG, so this file here is no longer in-use. DMacks (talk) 22:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The file is no longer in-use and can get deleted. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 05:36, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:49, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
copyvio of a Tony Bennett & Lady Gaga album, includes art features Czeva (talk) 18:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
image of a higher quality is uploaded here: https://www.google.cz/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fyt3.ggpht.com%2FiiUxI3_mxCvkOA1oST_upDLoyx4D7XnNwan6HsR50JzK2owu7vcZ1kCXzkD5SZE_w2ZY5vpScw%3Ds900-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fc%2F%25C5%25A0egyOfficial&tbnid=dh4kjW1od59JZM&vet=12ahUKEwiI9Y7tn9H6AhXY_4UKHfRkATQQMygAegQIARBp..i&docid=TjuC3haFobR61M&w=900&h=900&itg=1&q=%C5%A1egy&ved=2ahUKEwiI9Y7tn9H6AhXY_4UKHfRkATQQMygAegQIARBp, so this one is, most probably, a derivative Czeva (talk) 18:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. Graphics belong to website www.kuttystory.com. Headlock0225 (talk) 18:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation - looks like promotional shot plucked from somewhere - unlikely to be "own work" Headlock0225 (talk) 19:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
earlier upload: https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fimg38.rajce.idnes.cz%2Fd3802%2F17%2F17851%2F17851207_73b9be447be8e424635f05db0a3db385%2Fimages%2FDSC_0580.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fpsytrance007.rajce.idnes.cz%2Fpamatnik_CoVidiocie%2F&tbnid=B0x9hocpyho2-M&vet=12ahUKEwjyqNTGrtH6AhXLhaQKHR-iBn0QMygDegQIARAt..i&docid=2K25EtsMf7zEDM&w=2000&h=1325&q=pam%C3%A1tn%C3%ADk%20covidiocie&ved=2ahUKEwjyqNTGrtH6AhXLhaQKHR-iBn0QMygDegQIARAt Czeva (talk) 19:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
This does not look like "own work", rather like it was taken somewhere. The vertical writing at the lower right (not really legible unfortunately) suggests a copyright notice or similar. Having just deleted a copyvio about apparently the same event and uploaded by the same user, I suspect this is a copyvio too, and it should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 19:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. Looks like promotional material unlikely to be Uploaders own work Headlock0225 (talk) 20:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
According to the meta data the photo was made by a professional photographer and not by the uploader. Permission seems to be missing Barbasca (talk) 21:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Not this guy, who seems notable, so not notable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:27, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:03, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement Arceonix (talk) 07:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement Arceonix (talk) 07:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement Arceonix (talk) 07:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement Arceonix (talk) 07:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
COM:DW: Photo taken in 1992, still protected by copyright A1Cafel (talk) 08:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
wrong information see https://www.google.com/search?q=Kunal+singh+kolkata+rapper&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwiUgKmVpND6AhXfk_0HHXP2AnYQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=Kunal+singh+kolkata+rapper&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzoECCMQJ1C_A1iuFWCTF2gAcAB4AIABjAGIAc8GkgEDNS4zmAEAoAEBqgELZ3dzLXdpei1pbWfAAQE&sclient=img&ei=5D1BY5T-J9-n9u8P8-yLsAc&bih=461&biw=1025&client=firefox-b-d , out of scope Mateus2019 (talk) 09:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted program. The image is a COM:Derivative work. MKFI (talk) 09:52, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Culex (talk) 10:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Obviously a copyright violation. Clemens (talk) 12:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Clear copyright violation; no mention of the said creative commons license on the source Rejoy2003 15:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. See this URL. --Karim talk to me :)..! 15:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Futbolista australiano Lelo Sejean practicando en el Corrales FBC del Barrio Obrero de Asuncion.jpg
[edit]The subject of this photo is not a professional football player. No reliable source, or any statistic about his football career exists. Articles and files about the subject have been deleted before in this and other wiki projects due to it's lack of notoriety and use for promotion. Ardije (talk) 16:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
The subject of this photo is not a professional football player. No reliable source, or any statistic about his football career exists. Articles and files about the subject have been deleted before in this and other wiki projects due to it's lack of notoriety and use for promotion. Ardije (talk) 17:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
The subject of this photo is not a professional football player. No reliable source, or any statistic about his football career exists. Articles and files about the subject have been deleted before in this and other wiki projects due to it's lack of notoriety and use for promotion. Ardije (talk) 17:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Nehme1499 (talk) 17:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
The subject of this photo is not a professional football player. No reliable source, or any statistic about his football career exists. Articles and files about the subject have been deleted before in this and other wiki projects due to it's lack of notoriety and use for promotion. Ardije (talk) 17:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per all photos of him per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:51, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by WPPilot as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: 1. I am confused by this speedy deletion tag and I think it may have been meant for File:N72EX by Don Ramey Logan (original scale).jpg, an alternate version of this file that I just uploaded (see the related deletion request for that file). However, I also oppose deleting this file, as I think it is valuable to have the file history of the version before color adjustments were made. I don't think this file is a copyright violation, as the photographer (who is the same user who tagged it as a copyvio) uploaded it themselves with a free license, and it stood for 2 years until now. IagoQnsi (talk) 07:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Upload error, this file is copyrighted by me and registered with the USTPO. Delete it and any copies at once. --Don (talk) 07:52, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Attention: Wikicommons/Wikimedia copyright office
Pursuant to 17 USC 512 (c)(3)(A) this communication serves as a statement that:
I am the EXCLUSIVE rights holder and duly authorized representative of the exclusive rights holder for N72EX by Don Ramey Logan.jpg. These exclusive rights are being violated by material available upon your website at the following URL: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:N72EX_by_Don_Ramey_Logan.jpg & https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:N72EX_by_Don_Ramey_Logan_(original_scale).jpg
I have a good faith belief that the use of this material in such a fashion is not authorized by the copyright holder (me). I certify that under penalty of perjury in the United States of America court of law that the information contained in this notice is accurate and that I am authorized to act on my own behalf as the exclusive copyright holder of the exclusive rights to the material in question.
I may be contacted by the following methods: Don Ramey Logan i.c.o. the Law Offices of Mario Iskander, 1100 6th Street Santa Ana California. 949 872 6806. Don@logan.com
I hereby request that you remove access to this file as it appears on your site at once, thank you. Regards: Don Ramey Logan — Preceding unsigned comment added by WPPilot (talk • contribs) 16:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
- Keep You uploaded the file in 2020 under the CC BY-SA 3.0. Mistake or not, the license is irrevocable. The 2018 registration is neither here nor there. --Guerillero Parlez Moi 16:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Query @WPPilot: - you were asked a query by Guerillero above, which would be a necessary one to answer. You need to demonstrate why your earlier upload would not stand, given the terms of the license. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete 9 out of 10 times my work is used, it is used unlawfully. A perfect example of this is here:
https://www.lamag.com/askchris/take-3-dick-dales-favorite-beachside-spots/ no attribution whatsoever. I reached out to the publisher and informed them, and its response was to highlight the fact that it took the picture from Wikipedia, and refused to give me attribution, Wikipedia does not own ANY of my work. When this file N72EX was uploaded, I had just had a full shoulder replacement and was under heavy medication. It was not my intent to upload copyrighted items and I never released the file to the public domain, to the contrary, it was copyrighted in 2018 well before I made the mistake of uploading it here. I will take whatever step is necessary to remove this photo from the site. --Don (talk) 19:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- You don't need to !vote delete - it's assumed that any nominator is doing such. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Guerillero (talk · contribs). CC licenses are irrevocable, even if misused by third parties. SV1XV (talk) 01:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Comment With respect to the use by sources in a manner that is not consistent with the terms of the license by third-party websites, the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license does allow for people to take actions against violators of the license's terms. I would suggest that WPPilot issue DCMAs to the sites that are not following the license terms, but I can't see how the Creative Commons license itself is not valid, though please note that nothing I say should be construed as legal advice. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)- Comment: To continue on with what Red-tailed hawk posted above, even if the file is deleted from Commons as a "courtesy" per the copyright holder's request, there's no way for Commons to get the file removed from other websites since Commons isn't the copyright holder of the image as explained in COM:ENFORCE. Deleting the file might means, perhaps, that nobody could newly download the file from Commons, but anyone who previously downloaded the file would still be able to continue using it as long as they complied with the terms of the original license. As explained here, you can't really change your mind after the fact when it comes to CC licenses. That's just the way they've be set up to work and that has nothing to do with Commons. "Creative Commons" and "Wikimedia Commons" are not the same thing and you don't need to upload a file to Commons in order to release it under a Creative Commons license; that's why it's probably a really good idea read the fine print before releasing anything under a Creative Commons license. The copyright holder could try sending the Wikimedia Foundation a COM:DMCA takedown request and the WMF could then delete the file if it felt warranted, but the copyright holder would have to repeat that process for everyone reusing the file in a way that doesn't comply with the original licensing. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- It is unfortunate that many photos do get used without attribution. The Los Angeles Magazine one is quite disturbing, as they should be far more careful about copyright than that -- crediting it to wikipedia is still not conforming to the license, so they are still committing a copyright violation. There are instructional articles out there -- including one I just found at empowerla.org which you could perhaps send them, perhaps along with your desired credit, when mentioning that they are still in violation. Wikimedia however is not, as it has been uploaded for a couple of years now. The uploader indeed is still the copyright owner, but those rights have been licensed to the extent in the license, provided users conform to the license's terms, which we are. This would be a courtesy deletion, at most. If requested relatively quickly after upload, that usually happens, but after some years (and when the photo is used on articles), it is very rare. Carl Lindberg (talk) 12:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As per above comment, the uploader just wants his work removed from Commons, but license is irrevocable. Yann (talk) 18:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep- If I've read this correctly you want to delete this file because a website has used it and refused to attribute you ? - Well what's stopping anyone from using your new image and pulling the same stunt ? ... I'm baffled if I'm being honest....Either way licences are irrevocable and at the end of the day your beef is with them so you should direct all of your anger and frustration at them. Demanding deletion and getting pissed at everyone here simply doesn't further help your cause. –Davey2010Talk 16:54, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- It is a bit understandable, as photos from Wikipedia are often used without attribution -- it can be frustrating for those who want the licenses used as intended, with proper credit. We do try to educate -- there is the page Commons:Reusing content outside Wikimedia, and Help:Gadget-Stockphoto provides a "Use this file" link on every image page which puts up a suggested credit line (not active on this image at the moment presumably due to the DR). Maybe there are things that we could educate better that we aren't. Granted, when using the text from Wikipedia *articles* it's pretty common to only credit Wikipedia, since it's pretty impossible to identify all the individuals involved, but images are different. Mr. Logan has gone to considerable lengths on his license tags and his own page to inform users better as well, but general culture still manages to ignore it all too often. I did find one registration by Mr. Logan for 258 photographs created or published during the calendar year 2014; unsure if the Los Angeles Magazine photo was one of them, but if so that means there can be some real consequences to not following the license, as in the U.S. there are automatic fines which come with that (using a registered work without permission). I just noticed though that Los Angeles Magazine has replaced his photo with one from Getty; they managed to properly credit *that* one. Sheesh. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:56, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- @WPPilot: I did see your reply before the revisions were deleted (only the publisher name/number should probably have been removed; the rest of the comment seemed fine). Hard to believe LAMag would pay up for a Getty image, just to avoid fixing the credit in a manner similar to the one they had to use for the Getty image anyways. But, that would eliminate any possible complaint from you, I guess :-) It's not that hard to conform, really. One thing that does come with being the copyright owner though, is that nobody else can act as your agent when it comes to enforcing copyright, which is a pain obviously. I'm not sure that I want to spend my time doing that, either, especially if they aren't my photos :-). One thing we do have is the template {{Published}}, which can be used on image pages to mark external usages of particular photos, and they have a "legal" parameter where you can put in if the re-use complied with the license or not. Not sure if that has real effect, but it's one thing you can use to point out good (and bad) re-users. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann and Davey2010: Probably COM:TOO US would be another potential valid reason, as this aircraft was fairly designed so that too hard to re-design a same one. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure the uploader is claiming copyright over the photo and not the design of the craft. Similar to cars as explained in COM:CB#Vehicles, the design being below the TOO would just mean that the craft could be freely photographed by anyone without worrying about infringing upon the copyright of the designer; it wouldn't mean that photos taken of the craft were ineligible for copyright protection in their own right. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Not sure what you are saying; the subject is utilitarian, but the photograph is obviously copyrightable. You can't use the photograph elsewhere without crediting the photographer. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:56, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- It is a bit understandable, as photos from Wikipedia are often used without attribution -- it can be frustrating for those who want the licenses used as intended, with proper credit. We do try to educate -- there is the page Commons:Reusing content outside Wikimedia, and Help:Gadget-Stockphoto provides a "Use this file" link on every image page which puts up a suggested credit line (not active on this image at the moment presumably due to the DR). Maybe there are things that we could educate better that we aren't. Granted, when using the text from Wikipedia *articles* it's pretty common to only credit Wikipedia, since it's pretty impossible to identify all the individuals involved, but images are different. Mr. Logan has gone to considerable lengths on his license tags and his own page to inform users better as well, but general culture still manages to ignore it all too often. I did find one registration by Mr. Logan for 258 photographs created or published during the calendar year 2014; unsure if the Los Angeles Magazine photo was one of them, but if so that means there can be some real consequences to not following the license, as in the U.S. there are automatic fines which come with that (using a registered work without permission). I just noticed though that Los Angeles Magazine has replaced his photo with one from Getty; they managed to properly credit *that* one. Sheesh. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:56, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Collapsing - Apologies if anyone was genuinely offended over the cluser_ comment.
|
|---|
|
- Keep per Guerillero, and the irrevocable nature of the CC licensing back in 2020.
- I see no value to the upscaled version though, so long as the relevant file histories are kept clear. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn, I will restore the page, remove the request and reduce the scale.. This has drawn too much attention, please excuse my error. --Don (talk) 21:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- @WPPilot: FWIW, I don't think you're wrong in being frustrated when third-parties reuse your photos without complying with the way you've licensed them. It's just that there's not much that Commons can do about such things. All Commons users are just a bunch of volunteers and any serious problems you're having outside of Commons are going to need to resolved outside of Commons. Unfortunately, copyright licenses are not things many out in the real world understand or are concerned about; so, you often need to seek assistance from professionals familiar with relevant copyright laws when you have trouble like this. en:Copyright infringement is a big problem because there can be big money involved when it comes to reusing creative works. It's easy for big corporations to lawyer-up to handle such disputes, but individuals have it much tougher and often are taken advantage of because they lack the resources to fight back. Perhaps if you have similar problems in the future, it might be better to avoid the any potential en:Streisand effect and simply quietly contact the offending party and see if things can be resolved amicably. If not, then you may have to lawyer-up. Publications like Los Angeles Magazine should, in principle, really know better, but not all of their employees may be on the same page or are the people who's job it is to deal with such things; so, a bit more of a stronger push may be needed if they still insist they're doing nothing wrong. Maybe in many cases, the best you can hope for is that they change the photo like the magazine seems to have ultimately done. Anyway, I hope this experience hasn't soured you on uploading quality photos to Commons, but you have to do what you think is best to protect your intellectual property rights. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:02, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly Thank you for your comments, it is frustrating dealing with the unintended consequences of what is really my own generosity with my images. Out of 1400+ images I have loaded here, over 50% are in use on a wiki somewhere in the world, and I try my best to be reasonable about reuse, but as another user commented, I have gone to great lengths to assure that attribution requirements are well defined and clear. The LA Mag issue was the fact that I focused upon and publications like Los Angeles Magazine should, at all times really know better. I have people now in place to deal with them and considering the facts I just might, take further action to make my point. Copyrights are well known, and any normal person should be well aware of the fact that you can not take images off the web from anywhere and use them for commercial gain like "Los Angeles Magazine" I felt it was best to just move on here and let sleeping dogs, sleep. Cheers! Don (talk) 00:15, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Why not just send a bill to the people constantly violating the license, so you could gain money with this? Commons guidelines only want that you give them a polite warning first, but if they do not response this would be absolutely fine. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly Thank you for your comments, it is frustrating dealing with the unintended consequences of what is really my own generosity with my images. Out of 1400+ images I have loaded here, over 50% are in use on a wiki somewhere in the world, and I try my best to be reasonable about reuse, but as another user commented, I have gone to great lengths to assure that attribution requirements are well defined and clear. The LA Mag issue was the fact that I focused upon and publications like Los Angeles Magazine should, at all times really know better. I have people now in place to deal with them and considering the facts I just might, take further action to make my point. Copyrights are well known, and any normal person should be well aware of the fact that you can not take images off the web from anywhere and use them for commercial gain like "Los Angeles Magazine" I felt it was best to just move on here and let sleeping dogs, sleep. Cheers! Don (talk) 00:15, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- @WPPilot: FWIW, I don't think you're wrong in being frustrated when third-parties reuse your photos without complying with the way you've licensed them. It's just that there's not much that Commons can do about such things. All Commons users are just a bunch of volunteers and any serious problems you're having outside of Commons are going to need to resolved outside of Commons. Unfortunately, copyright licenses are not things many out in the real world understand or are concerned about; so, you often need to seek assistance from professionals familiar with relevant copyright laws when you have trouble like this. en:Copyright infringement is a big problem because there can be big money involved when it comes to reusing creative works. It's easy for big corporations to lawyer-up to handle such disputes, but individuals have it much tougher and often are taken advantage of because they lack the resources to fight back. Perhaps if you have similar problems in the future, it might be better to avoid the any potential en:Streisand effect and simply quietly contact the offending party and see if things can be resolved amicably. If not, then you may have to lawyer-up. Publications like Los Angeles Magazine should, in principle, really know better, but not all of their employees may be on the same page or are the people who's job it is to deal with such things; so, a bit more of a stronger push may be needed if they still insist they're doing nothing wrong. Maybe in many cases, the best you can hope for is that they change the photo like the magazine seems to have ultimately done. Anyway, I hope this experience hasn't soured you on uploading quality photos to Commons, but you have to do what you think is best to protect your intellectual property rights. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:02, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Free licenses are irrevocable. The photo is used in multiple projects and apparently in scope. Using your photo outside Wikimedia projects without crediting you is bad and violates your copyright, but Commons is not guilty in that. Per Leo, sending them bill seems to be quite good idea. Taivo (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Disputed speedy; reason given for speedy was "1" by User:WPPilot. See context at User talk:IagoQnsi#Please talk to me before you just modify my work and User talk:Túrelio#Speedy deletion of File:N72EX by Don Ramey Logan (original scale).jpg. IagoQnsi (talk) 07:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Upload error, © 2018 Don Ramey Logan copyrighted photo needs to be removed. --Don (talk) 07:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- A summary of events, as it has gotten a bit messy: I noticed that File:N72EX by Don Ramey Logan.jpg appeared to be artificially upscaled, so I reverted it to a version that was not upscaled. WPPilot, the uploader and photographer, reverted my change and left me a talk message asking that I not modify his photos. I responded that I would not modify the file again but instead would upload a separate file (File:N72EX by Don Ramey Logan (original scale).jpg) at the original scale. WPPilot tagged the new file for speedy deletion as an exact duplicate, and Túrelio deleted it for that reason. I left a message to Túrelio explaining why I did not believe it should have been deleted. Túrelio restored the file, saying it would have to go through a deletion request instead of speedy. WPPilot tagged the restored photo as a speedy, and was reverted by Túrelio, and then I created this deletion request. WPPilot also tagged the original file as a speedy deletion, and I converted that to a deletion request as well. WPPilot removed the deletion request tags on both pages to replace them with speedy tags again, and I reverted those changes. –IagoQnsi (talk) 08:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- This is MY copyrighted photo, it was filed as copyrighted in 2018. It is a error to have here as it has been copyrighted, speedy delete. --Don (talk) 08:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- You uploaded the photograph with a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, which cannot be revoked (as it says at that link, "The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms."). IagoQnsi (talk) 08:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- This is MY copyrighted photo, it was filed as copyrighted in 2018. It is a error to have here as it has been copyrighted, speedy delete. --Don (talk) 08:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Upload error © 2018 copyrighted photo, speedy delete, end of story. --Don (talk) 08:09, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Attention: Wikicommons/Wikimedia copyright office
Pursuant to 17 USC 512 (c)(3)(A) this communication serves as a statement that:
I am the EXCLUSIVE rights holder and duly authorized representative of the exclusive rights holder for N72EX by Don Ramey Logan.jpg. These exclusive rights are being violated by material available upon your website at the following URL: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:N72EX_by_Don_Ramey_Logan.jpg & https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:N72EX_by_Don_Ramey_Logan_(original_scale).jpg
I have a good faith belief that the use of this material in such a fashion is not authorized by the copyright holder (me). I certify that under penelty of perjury in the United States of America court of law that the information contained in this notice is accurate and that I am authorized to act on my own behalf as the exclusive copyright holder of the exclusive rights to the material in question.
I may be contacted by the following methods: Don Ramey Logan i.c.o. the Law Offices of Mario Iskander, 1100 6th Street Santa Ana California. 949 872 6806. Don@logan.com
I hereby request that you remove access to this file as it appears on your site at once, thank you. Regards: Don Ramey Logan — Preceding unsigned comment added by WPPilot (talk • contribs) 16:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
- Comment: I have notified legal@wikimedia.org of the above. —IagoQnsi (talk) 17:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Billinghurst. --Rosenzweig τ 10:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hom Ling Zum (talk · contribs)
[edit]These such flags are unsourced
- File:Flag of Mandalay.svg
- File:Flag of Tizi Ouzou Province.svg
- File:Flag of Naâma Province.svg
- File:Flag of Tamanrasset Province.svg
- File:Flag of Sétif Province.svg
- File:Flag of Adrar Province.svg
- File:Flag of Shenyang.svg
- File:Flag of Guiyang.svg
- File:Flag of Georgetown, Ascension Island.png
Alexphangia Talk 15:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete obvious hoaxes. Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs)
Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs) 22:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC) - Delete per nom. Unsourced hoax flags have no place here. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- no please. Əminə Hacıyeva (talk) 03:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Əminə Hacıyeva: Do you mean "no keep"? Ok, I'll take that. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- no please. Əminə Hacıyeva (talk) 03:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
ethane.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2787015990).jpg){kind=link}
_(6636463319).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
ethane.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ethane.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
ethane.png){kind=link}
ethane.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: all files already deleted by various admins. --Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
_(2787015990).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2787015990).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Artist died in 1980, copyright is not expired yet A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
_(2787015990).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Artist de:Fritz Rosen (Grafiker) died in 1980, so the file can be restored in 2051. --Rosenzweig τ 06:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
_(2787015990).jpg){kind=link}
_(6636463319).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6636463319).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Artist died in 1974, copyright is not expired yet A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
_(6636463319).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Artist de:Karl Petau died in 1974, so the file can be restored in 2045. --Rosenzweig τ 06:32, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
_(6636463319).jpg){kind=link}
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 13:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
[1] Book cover, VRT permission from copyright owner needed. Strakhov (talk) 17:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
[2] book cover. COM:VRT permission from copyright owner needed. Strakhov (talk) 17:36, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 12:30, 1 November 2022 UTC: No license since 7 October 2022 --Krdbot 17:25, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Murals in Washington (state)
[edit]No FoP for 2D works in the United States
- File:A friend of mine in Yakima suggested I check out the murals on buildings in Toppenish, WA. (3936673076).jpg
- File:Behind feed and seed store on Railroad Avenue (33371283252).jpg
- File:Boeing Everett Factory mural, 2012.jpg
- File:Colorful mural on side of building near Lummi Ferry Dock (14269313149).jpg
- File:Hoquiam Washington Mural (2655905197).jpg
- File:Line6142 (19752469686).jpg
- File:Long-Bell Lumber Company executives mural in Longview, WA. (15108879280).jpg
- File:Mural - Former Post Office in Hillyard District - Spokane, WA.jpg
- File:Mural along Burke Gilman Trail near Bothell (9575788416).jpg
- File:Mural at old children's museum in Bellingham, 2011 (9106762696).jpg
- File:Mural in downtown Edmonds - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg
- File:Mural on side of building along Snohomish Centennial Trail in Arlington, WA. (10375552186).jpg
- File:Murals in Connel, WA. (4936745121).jpg
- File:Murals in Connel, WA. (4936745165).jpg
- File:Murals in Connel, WA. (4937330700).jpg
- File:Ridgefield, Washington, October 2020 - 26.jpg
- File:Ridgefield, Washington, October 2020 - 27.jpg
- File:Snoqualmie Falls Mural 665.jpg
- File:Vancouver, WA mural, 2016.jpg
- File:Visual C++ mural seen on Microsoft Redmond campus.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 00:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File:Ridgefield, Washington, October 2020 - 26.jpg Photo of building with signage consisting of font simple text and incidental centuries old simple figures. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:09, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination except for 1 kept per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Sugam Pokharel || https://pokharelsugam.com.np (talk) 03:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; unused personal photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:40, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW, we need the source of the image of the two candidates A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Correctly described as "low grade image of skull," but why would anyone be interested in this 132 x 165-pixel picture? Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:32, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OOS, unused, uncat since 2016. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:42, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Not released under the stated license. Too complex for PD-textlogo. Auguel (talk) 03:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:43, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marked as Courtesy Photo at the end, indicated that this is not from the US Secretary of Defense A1Cafel (talk) 08:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Nominator seems to be right. —Frodar (talk) 13:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:44, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The Flickr source shows incompatible CC licensing. The Smithsonian source states "New-York-based artists Marianne Greer Appel (who later became a Muppets designer) and her husband, Austin “Meck” Mecklem, painted the piece as a commission of the federal Treasury Section of Fine Arts", suggesting a work for hire rather than the work of a U.S. government employee, therefore calling that claimed licensing into question. RadioKAOS (talk) 10:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, RadioKAOS, and may I clarify what is your point? I'm asking because this is a photo of a mural commissioned by the United States government.--Taterian (talk) 02:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- What is my point? The licensing template you used contains the following text: "This image is a work of the United States Department of the Treasury, taken or made as part of an employee's official duties". You admit that isn't the case here. Copyright is assumed to inherently rest with the artist. You haven't proved that they relinquished their copyright or that the mural lapsed into the public domain for another reason. Abuses of this exact same sort abound on this site. Piecemeal actions such as DRs are ineffective for dealing with such a widespread problem, only enabling further abuses.RadioKAOS (talk) 11:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, RadioKAOS, and I got it!
This is not about this particular image but about a bunch of images that are uploaded under "PD-art|PD-USGov-Treasury" licence, and you argue that this would be in violation of the U.S. copyright, is this correct? --Taterian (talk) 03:04, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, RadioKAOS, and I got it!
- What is my point? The licensing template you used contains the following text: "This image is a work of the United States Department of the Treasury, taken or made as part of an employee's official duties". You admit that isn't the case here. Copyright is assumed to inherently rest with the artist. You haven't proved that they relinquished their copyright or that the mural lapsed into the public domain for another reason. Abuses of this exact same sort abound on this site. Piecemeal actions such as DRs are ineffective for dealing with such a widespread problem, only enabling further abuses.RadioKAOS (talk) 11:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Keep — Art produced by the New Deal art projects is owned by the U.S. government, and photographs of the work are public domain. This is stated clearly in this article by the National Park Service: "Collectively, the New Deal artists created hundreds-of-thousands of paintings, murals, sculptures and limited edition prints between 1933 and 1943. These artists were federal employees, or sometimes contractors, so their art became public property." — WFinch (talk) 20:03, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above. Yes, US "New Deal" muralists were US Federal Gov't employees. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
I want to delete because I uploaded the wrong image, I want to replace a new image PurpleViss (talk) 10:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- @PurpleViss: Just upload the file again with the same file name. A new file version will be created. --Rosenzweig τ 19:41, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:48, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong author... Xocolatl (talk) 10:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:47, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
L'immagine è di un gruppo telegram (tra l'altro praticamente inattivo). Rappresenta una (ormai ex) community di Torino di Pokèmon Go non ufficiale. La persona che l'ha caricato inoltre non so nemmeno se sia l'effettiva proprietaria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by an unknown user 21:04, 7 October 2022 93.66.46.192
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
unsourced flag Alexphangia Talk 15:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, dubious. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced flag Alexphangia Talk 15:12, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, apparently fictional. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:52, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded this image as I believed it to be Public Domain. The source website for the image (https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/016429) says the image is Public Domain, and I think this is indeed the case in Australia. However, I'm uncertain as to whether this is also the case in the U.S.
Looking at the Wiki page for non-U.S. copyrights, my interpretation is that as the image in question was created before 1955, the "50 pr" rule for Australian photographs applies when determining whether it was PD in 1996. 50 years after 1944 would imply that copyright ceased in 1994. However, my interpretation of this rule may be wrong, and I'm not convinced that the "circa January 1944" is strong enough to state that it was definitely out of copyright in 1996, given the proximity to that date.
I've nominated this for deletion in the hopes that someone more knowledgeable than I can either confirm or deny my assumptions. Many thanks in advance! Unexpectedlydian (talk) 16:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No US problem (PD Australia; for 1944 work to be copyrighted in US would need specific mark registration and renewal). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:54, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused in any article, out of scope. /Leonel Sohns 12:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This is in COM:SCOPE, see de:Societas Urielis#Fahne, Zirkel und Wappen. This is a logo or symbol of a student fraternity at a German university (similar to the Greek fraternities at the American colleges). --AFBorchert (talk) 12:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep per AFBorchert. Fatuous nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Minoraxtalk 03:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Look at File:Zirkel2.gif#filelinks. Leonel Sohns 20:48, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Leonel Sohns: Is that supposed to be a reason for deletion? If so, I don't understand what you are trying to say. --Rosenzweig τ 21:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per the first section and censure Leonel Sohns for creating yet another fatuous nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:57, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Senator Coons surprises Delaware students with service academy nominations (49231154117).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author is Courtesy Photo, which means this photo is not come from the Senator Office of Chris Coons A1Cafel (talk) 00:37, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Luxembourg A1Cafel (talk) 00:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 01:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 01:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in the USA C.Suthorn (talk) 02:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative work copyright violation. France does not allow commercial freedom of panorama. This public work remains copyrighted until the 70th anniversary of sculptor Alexander Calder's death, which was in 1976. So 1976+70+1=January 1, 2047. Public works and art in France are subject to their designers' copyrights, up to 70 years after their designers' deaths consistent with COM:France#General rules. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ZhiyuanLiu2022 (talk · contribs)
[edit]effectively a dupe of File:Evolution of egg tart.png but contains typo.
RZuo (talk) 06:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No permission that this is a photo taken by an employee of the US Federal Government, source link was broken A1Cafel (talk) 07:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Fake SVG with raster version available. Leonel Sohns 07:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marked as Courtesy Photo at the end, indicated that this is not from the US Secretary of Defense A1Cafel (talk) 08:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Nominator seems to be right. —Frodar (talk) 13:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marked as Courtesy Photo at the end, indicated that this is not from the US Secretary of Defense A1Cafel (talk) 08:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Nominator seems to be right. —Frodar (talk) 13:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Marked as Courtesy Photo at the end, indicated that this is not from the US Secretary of Defense A1Cafel (talk) 08:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Nonna Mordyukova
[edit]Photos are from private archive. No evidence of early enough publication to meet requirements of PD-Russia.
- File:Нонна Мордюкова (1-й ряд, в центре) с братьями и сёстрами.jpg
- File:Родители Нонны Мордюковой.jpg
_%D1%81_%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BC%D0%B8_%D0%B8_%D1%81%D1%91%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B8.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Xunks (talk) 13:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia. The building was completed in 1987 and the photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 16:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 1978 by architect Friedrich Silaban (1912–1984). Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. The copyright terms of the country lasted for 70 years, and they can be undeleted in 2055. A1Cafel (talk) 16:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I created this file using incorrect interpretation of sources AAAAA143222 (talk) 18:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I created this file using incorrect interpretation of sources AAAAA143222 (talk) 18:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Chikorita as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Missing freedom of panorama in France Yann (talk) 20:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- FOP issues require a regular DR, but this should probably go. Yann (talk) 20:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. The Smurfs are copyrighted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
random penis - out of project scope - account has uploaded many similar ones Hoyanova (talk) 14:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep To avoid racial bias, we need a variety of images. Same for other in series. --RAN (talk) 15:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, deleted as copyright violation. I do not understand, which racial bias RAN speaks: depicted man is white like in most our penis pictures. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SVTCobra as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. Seems to be used on a user-page. DaB. (talk) 13:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- The so-called user page is a failed vanity article for WP in an act of self-promotion. User does not contribute to Wiki projects in any other way. SVTCobra 13:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 08:03, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
random penis - out of project scope - account has uploaded many similar ones Hoyanova (talk) 14:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:03, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
random penis - out of project scope - account has uploaded many similar ones Hoyanova (talk) 14:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:44, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
random penis - out of project scope - account has uploaded many similar ones Hoyanova (talk) 14:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:44, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
random penis - out of project scope - account has uploaded many similar ones Hoyanova (talk) 14:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:44, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
{{Duplicate|file=Peru v Austria 1936 Juan Valdivieso.JPG|reason=This photo exists already on Wikimedia Commons.|user=DZwarrior1}} DZwarrior1 (talk) 17:31, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of File:Peru v Austria 1936 Juan Valdivieso.JPG; deleted and redirected. --Rosenzweig τ 15:22, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2A02:810D:BCBF:FD88:4533:D4E5:6347:95E0 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Unusable because of bad quality. Here are more than enough alternatives: [[Category:Elvis Presley in 1957]]. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment 12 year held images should be discussed, not speedied — billinghurst sDrewth 02:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- And is bad quality a reason for speedy deletion? But be that as it may, this tiny photo or a crop of File:Elvis Presley promoting Jailhouse Rock.jpg, so Delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- And is bad quality a reason for speedy deletion? But be that as it may, this tiny photo or a crop of File:Elvis Presley promoting Jailhouse Rock.jpg, so
- Delete per Ikan Kekek above and COM:Redundant. Ajpolino (talk) 22:35, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
{{Duplicate |file=Logo Club Sport Unión Huaral.png|reason=This logo exists already on Wikimedia Commons with the same format.|user=DZwarrior1}} DZwarrior1 (talk) 22:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:07, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of publication before 1967, missing author's name, so no indication why this could be PD. Xunks (talk) 20:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. This is a strange photograph, with distorted badges. There was another postcard, with a drawing of this photo made by L.P. Stolygvo (1889-1952); its copyright will expire in 2-3 months. Materialscientist (talk) 22:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:11, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
