Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/08/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
COI. Used for promotion. MexTDT (talk) 07:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio[1]. --Túrelio (talk) 10:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|<G1. Test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content>}} KM2cTv7U (talk) 07:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
من ان را در اینترنت گرفتم Mitrayasna (talk) 12:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & copyvio. --Achim55 (talk) 13:26, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
کون کردن 5.215.210.38 13:16, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 13:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The source link stated does not show the file and no evidence that the file is licensed under CC 4.0. 103.131.14.11 02:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:25, 13 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation. The source link stated does not show the file and no evidence that the file is licensed under CC 4.0. --Krdbot 13:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The source link stated does not show the file and the file likely belong to FBI. 103.131.14.11 02:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:32, 13 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation. The source link stated does not show the file and the file likely belong to FBI. --Krdbot 13:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The source link stated does not show the file and no evidence that the file is licensed under CC 4.0. 103.131.14.11 02:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:29, 13 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation. The source link stated does not show the file and no evidence that the file is licensed under CC 4.0. --Krdbot 13:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The source link stated does not show the file and no evidence that the file is licensed under CC 4.0. 103.131.14.11 02:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:28, 13 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation. The source link stated does not show the file and no evidence that the file is licensed under CC 4.0. --Krdbot 13:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The source link stated does not show the file and no evidence that the file is licensed under CC 4.0. 103.131.14.11 02:36, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:31, 13 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation. The source link stated does not show the file and no evidence that the file is licensed under CC 4.0. --Krdbot 13:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The source link stated does not show the file and no evidence that the file likely belongs to FBI. 103.131.14.11 02:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:31, 13 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation. The source link stated does not show the file and no evidence that the file likely belongs to FBI. --Krdbot 13:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The source link stated does not show the file and the file likely belong to FBI. 103.131.14.11 02:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:29, 13 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation. The source link stated does not show the file and the file likely belong to FBI. --Krdbot 13:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
COI. Used for promotion. MexTDT (talk) 07:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:20, 13 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Promo/press photo --Krdbot 20:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
No longer needed DatPrawn (talk) 20:12, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:26, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
London published edition, by British author with no lifetime information provided. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Keep I did a search, but was unable to determine the year of death for J. Pocock. However, as Model Engine-Making: In Theory and Practice was published in 1888, I've updated the license to {{PD-two|PD-old-assumed|PD-US-expired|publication=1888}}. —RP88 (talk) 08:05, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- It's a shame that there aren't easily accessible scans of the relevant census, as we know the author was living in Harlesden (at the time of publication), and is unlikely to have written this book early in their lifetime. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:48, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I too saw in the preface that Pocock lived in Harlesden, North West London. I did find in the The Literary World magazine that his book was based on a series of papers in an "amateur worker's" magazine[2], which I determined to be Amateur Work, Illustrated. In addition to papers published in that magazine by Pocock, there is also correspondence between Pocock, the editors, and readers. Unfortunately none of it was helpful in tracking down his death date. I searched newspaper archives for obituaries, hoping that an obituary might mention his common surname in combination with one of publications or his interests in model building, but I also failed in that endeavor. I searched FreeBMD for his death date as well, but none of those searches panned out, largely because I couldn't narrow the searches sufficiently. —RP88 (talk) 10:56, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn on rationale provided. It would be nice to get more definitive dates to use something like FreeBMD on. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-old-assumed-expired. --Yann (talk) 14:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
copyvio see metadata - "Copyright holder Fotografie Studio Ziezo". See also here. Hoyanova (talk) 19:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- The author has now requested that the file be speedy-deleted. I've tagged the file accordingly. Daniuu (talk) 14:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Churchserver (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without metadata, unlikely to be own works. User blocked for socking.
- File:Fr. Edik Baroni.jpg
- File:Vescovo Edik Baroni.jpg
- File:His Excellency Bishop Edik Baroni.jpg
- File:His Grace Bishop Edik Baroni.jpg
- File:The Most Rev. Edik Baroni.jpg
- File:Bishop Edik Baroni in Choir dress.jpg
- File:Bishop Edik Baroni with Patraich Ignatius Aphrem II.jpg
- File:Bishop Edik Baroni with Patriarch Mar Addai II.jpg
- File:Bishop Edik Baroni Sahak II Mashalian.jpg
Yann (talk) 16:42, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete COM:PRP and COM:WEBHOST A09090091 (talk) 18:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)- Speedy delete per nom and A09090091 also promotional photos and being used for promotional use on English Wikipedia Qwv (talk) 11:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
out of project scope ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 13:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Thegussers85
[edit]- File:Missouri Compromise Line.svg (2).png
- File:Missouri Compromise Line.svg (1).png
- File:JGHGFHHGFGFHFGFG.png
- File:1872TAYLOR.png
- File:1860TAYLOR.png
- File:1868TAYLOR.png
- File:1864TAYLOR.png
- File:1856TAYLOR.png
- File:1852TAYLOR.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files by User:Thegussers85. Fictional "alternate History" maps. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. In my opinion fake election maps are just inviting embarrassing mistakes by unsuspecting users. --Jahobr (talk) 15:27, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:47, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" diagram. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 15:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:47, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 15:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:46, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
advertising/self-promotional content not permitted on Wikimedia Commons. Senator2029 15:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:46, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 15:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:46, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Porn Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 15:26, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - "Porn" is not a reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:54, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Antisexual nomination. Beta M (talk) 04:57, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep once more a annoying nonsense deletion request. --Saibo (Δ) 01:40, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Unused low quality masturbation gif -- blurry and jerky; we already have plenty of higher quality gifs of this. See also COM:PENIS. Cathfolant (talk) 03:05, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Seems ok to me, and COM:PENIS applies to new uploads. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:41, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, ok, it does only apply to new uploads. I missed that. I guess this isn't new anymore. But 'ok' how? Wouldn't you agree that, say, this is higher quality and shows basically the same thing? In any case, unused files aren't educating anyone, especially when other existing files would equally serve the purpose. Cathfolant (talk) 03:25, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Let's see... I can see that I didn't correctly support my nomination with policy. However, I can find policy that supports my nomination. This covers the unused file issue, and specifically mentions unused pornographic images; this also seems relevant and was referenced in a number of similar nominations below. The criteria for nominating those other images seems valid to me but I will wait to see what happens. Cathfolant (talk) 20:50, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep nothing changed since the last nomination. Multichill (talk) 21:08, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Files not legitimately in use are listed as not being within project scope. They are not educating anyone. This file is not legitimately in use, is low-quality, and is replaceable by existing files. What isn't making sense? Cathfolant (talk) 21:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. --Krd 15:08, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
No clear consensus to delete -FASTILY 04:44, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:NOTUSED, this file falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons. It is not being used on any Wikimedia project (although it is being used on external projects to vandalise pages) and it is not realistically usable for educational purposes, due to the low quality of the work. DaneGeld (talk) 16:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Yann (talk) 18:00, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:44, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Low quality, configuration of one stereocenter missing, not used, replaced by File:Boldine.svg. Wostr (talk) 17:10, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Zhust Production
[edit]- File:Logo Zhust.jpg
- File:Salman Abouzar 1.jpg
- File:Salman Abouzar.jpg
- File:Sobhan Abouzar Singer.jpg
- File:Sobhan Abouzar سبحان ابوذر.jpg
- File:Sobhan Abouzar.jpg
- File:Sobhan abouzar.jpg
Cross-wiki self-promotional spam –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 16:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:17, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Zhust Production
[edit]- File:Salman abouzar.jpg
- File:Salman 2.jpg
- File:Sobhan abouzar.jpg
- File:Sobhan abouzar 2.jpg
- File:Sobhan abouzar3.jpg
Reuploads of self-promotional spam –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 00:23, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Maliksales1234
[edit]- File:Corbin Butler 5.jpg
- File:Corbin Butler 4.jpg
- File:Corbin Butler 2.jpg
- File:Corbin Butler 3.jpg
- File:Corbin Butler 1.jpg
- File:Nahid24 10.jpg
- File:Nahid24 7.jpg
- File:Nahid24 11.jpg
- File:Nahid24 5.jpg
- File:Nahid24 3.jpg
Promo, no educational value --JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 00:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete fails COM:SELFIE. Seems they're only using Wikidata for self-promotion. SHB2000 (talk) 10:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, not for WMF purposes Taichi (talk) 01:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
unused photomontage of non notable person Ske (talk) 03:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:SELFIE. Born2bgratis (talk) 05:02, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
poor quality, unidentified person Ske (talk) 06:22, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Selfie of non-contributive user, unused Nutshinou Talk! 12:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:01, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Selfie of non-contributive user, unused Nutshinou Talk! 12:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:01, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
unidentified person Ske (talk) 12:34, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dronebogus (talk · contribs)
[edit]BEFORE YOU ACCUSE ME OF BEING A CHILD PORNOGRAPHER WIKIPE-TAN IS AN ADULT IN THESE IMAGES Requesting deletion as uploader. While I genuinely hoped I was filling some kind of useful illustrative niche here the extreme negative reception I’ve received says otherwise. These images are not in legitimate use and never will be and are instead just a constant source of stress for me.
- File:Nude Mirai Suenaga decensored.png
- File:Wikipe-tan Minna no Kisekae 2 sitting nude.png
- File:Wikipe-tan Minna no Kisekae 2 topless.png
- File:Wikipe-tan Minna no Kisekae 2 nude.png
- File:Wikipe-tan Lingerie.png
- File:Wikipe-tan Topless.png
- File:Jenny Everywhere Nude.png
- File:Wikipe-tan Nude Censored.png
Dronebogus (talk) 13:27, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 22:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No likely reasonable educational use and Commons is not deviantart. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:59, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No educational value. Llwyld (talk) 07:46, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per what I wrote over here. Maybe we can quickly close/delete these now that the uploader requested deletion, and spare them the stress mentioned in the nom statement. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- I actually requested an admin do that but I don’t think they replied. Dronebogus (talk) 13:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Good and neutral
[edit]- File:Voldokia FLAG.jpg
- File:Sanctonia FLAG.jpg
- File:Five Lords FLAG2.jpg
- File:Nuraelum Present Political 0.5.jpg
- File:Lyria FLAG.jpg
- File:Gryphon FLAG.jpg
- File:Granphonia FLAG.jpg
- File:Five Lords FLAG.jpg
Fictional map and flags for sandbox fantasy page. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. --Jahobr (talk) 13:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:51, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Sepehrchavoshi
[edit]- File:Sepehr-chavoshi chera man.wav
- File:Sepehr Chavoshi & Yeganeh - Tajrobe Kardam (320) (R3D) (1).wav
- File:Msg500109108-923 (1)sepehrchavoshi.jpg
- File:20220702 150955 2007086853 (1)sepehrchavoshi.jpg
- File:Singer.png
- File:Msg500109108-1324.jpg
- File:Msg500109108-1325.jpg
- File:Msg500109108-1255.jpg
- File:Sepehr Chavoshi.jpg
- File:Msg500109108-1249.jpg
- File:Sepehr chavosh.jpg
- File:Sepehrchavoshi.jpg
- File:Avatar500109108-2.jpg
- File:Avatar5253664093-3.jpg
sepehrchavoshi.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
sepehrchavoshi.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Self-promotional spam, no educational value –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 23:15, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly OOS self-promotional spam. Commons isn't a personal file host. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:05, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Sepehrchavoshi
[edit]- File:Msg500109108-1886 (1)Sepehrchavoshi.jpg
- File:20220801 120852 1199596921Sepehrchavoshi.jpg
- File:Photo 2021-08-31 23-37-19sepehrchavoshi.jpg
- File:Msg500109108-1395Sepehrchavoshi.jpg
- File:Sepehrchavoshi.jpg
- File:Msg500109108-925 (1) Sepehrchavoshi.jpg
- File:Msg500109108-924 (1) Sepehrchavoshi.jpg
- File:Msg500109108-1325sepehrchavoshi.jpg
- File:Msg500109108-1324.jpg
Sepehrchavoshi.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sepehrchavoshi.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sepehrchavoshi.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Reupload of self-promotional spam –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 00:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete fails COM:SELFIE. Seems they're only using Wikidata for self-promotion. SHB2000 (talk) 10:23, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:32, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Femmefataleracing (talk · contribs)
[edit]Vanity/self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:Bad Bunny 717.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 711.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 733.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 734.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 732.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 731.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 730.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 729.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 728.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 727.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 726.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 725.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 724.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 723.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 722.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 721.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 720.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 718.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 777.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 716.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 715.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 714.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 713.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 712.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 719.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 707.jpg
- File:Bad Bunny 710.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 08:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego Technic official models
[edit]COM:DW: Full shots of models whose design is copyrighted by Lego (cf. model numbers in file names); see COM:TOYS.
- File:Lego 42000 Render 2 (8233945188).jpg
- File:Lego 42065 - RC Tracked Racer - 2017-04-08.jpg
- File:Lego 42065 - RC Tracked Racer and RC Off-Road Truck - 2017-05-14.jpg
- File:Lego 8041 Race Car (2) (4485536883).jpg
- File:Lego 8094 Control Centre (2) (4485537705).jpg
- File:Lego 8094 Control Centre (4) (4485538519).jpg
- File:LEGO 8439 Front End Loader 05.jpg
- File:Lego Circuit Shock Racer (8422) (3965988740).jpg
- File:Lego Excavator (8294) B model (3514294863).jpg
- File:Lego Excavator (8294) with Power Functions (8293) (3514882068).jpg
- File:Lego Excavator (8853) (3516880947).jpg
- File:Lego Expert Builder 8844 - Helicopter.jpg
- File:LEGO Expert Builder 948 Go-Kart.jpg
- File:Lego Fire Engine (8280) (3965994972).jpg
- File:Lego Hovercraft (8824) (3965218209).jpg
- File:Lego Hovercraft (8839) B model-1 (3517690396).jpg
- File:Lego Motorised Bulldozer (8275) (3514881626).jpg
- File:Lego Night Chopper (8825) (3517686852).jpg
- File:Lego Rally Shock n Roll Racer (8840) (3517689478).jpg
- File:Lego Snow Scooter (8620) (3516877151).jpg
- File:Lego Snow Scooter (8620) crop (3516877151).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 41999 4x4 Crawler (9531067026).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42007 Moto Cross Bike (50007643168).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42010 Off-road Racer (8434477942).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42021 Snowmobile (11114545653).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42022 Hot Rod on stairs.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42024 Container Truck (15286503686).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42026 Black Champion Racer (11140032794).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42030 Volvo B-model (14590915507).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42030 Volvo L350F Wheel Loader (14797278793).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42034 Quad Bike 1 (24928794931).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42035 Mining Truck (15906934774).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42045 acrobatic plane 4 (25911994306).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42049 Mine Loader (24151724599).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42052 Heavy Lift Helicopter (34485000763).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42053 Volvo EW160E (28484758802).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42053 Volvo EW160E (28484759982).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42055 Bucket Wheel Excavator (28008071684).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42057 Ultralight Helicopter (30883511410).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42058 Stunt Bike (30470358504).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42059 Technic Stunt Truck (31599585136).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42060 Roadwork Crew (31192508462).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42062 Container Yard (32500023565).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42063 BMW R 1200 GS Adventure (50008176376).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42068 Airport Rescue Vehicle (36283367615).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42070 6x6 All Terrain Tow Truck (35787979430).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42071 Dozer Compactor (28313258939).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42072 Whack (41155811185).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42072-Whack-P1060900 (40248233330).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42073,42072 Bash,Whack (41155811505).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42073-Bash-P1060884 (42058088631).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42074 Racing Yacht (27589547439).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42077 Rally Car (38556581945).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42078 Mack Anthem (25959434748).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42079 Heavy Duty Forklift (28842199387).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42080 Forest Harvester (30325081478).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42081 Volvo Concept Wheel Loader (30851570818).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42088 Cherry Picker (44541725160).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42089 Power Boat (32898477808).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42092 Rescue Helicopter (46314312362).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42093 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 (44515113440).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42094 Tracked Loader (45627582724).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42096 Porsche 911 RSR (45415912495).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42098 Car Transporter (48354645747).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42098 Car Transporter car (48354518741).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42099 4x4 X-Treme Off-Roader (48431652707).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42099 4x4 X-Treme Off-Roader (48453376327).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42100 Liebherr R 9800 (48837649508).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42102 Mini CLAAS XERION (49367876731).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42103 Dragster (49430099962).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42103 Dragster B-model (49429401638).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42103,42104 Dragster, Race Truck B (49470930387).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42104 Race Truck (49470925517).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42104 Race Truck B-model (49470212348).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42105 Catamaran (49277731416).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42106 Stunt Show Truck & Bike (49439334281).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42106 Stunt Show Truck and Bike B-model (49438862508).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42107 Ducati Panigale V4 R (50090730496).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42108 Mobile Crane (49298752266).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42111 Dom's Dodge Charger (49860267432).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42112 Concrete Mixer Truck (50119128996).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42113 Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey (50167502807).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42113 Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey (50167502967).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42114 6x6 Volvo Articulated Hauler (50128562661).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42115 Lamborghini Sian FKP 37 (49979966946).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42117 Race Plane (50725015333).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 42124 Off-Road Buggy (50821605373).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8022B Multi Model Starter Set, tow-truck.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8032D Multi Functional Starter Set, Helicopter.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8040 Universal Set.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8041 Race Truck (5662121693).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8043 Motorized Excavator in Action.webm
- File:Lego Technic 8044 Universal Pneumatic Set, Forklift Truck.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8051 Motorbike (50008436947).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8210 Nitro GTX bike.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8222 VTOL.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8256 Go-Kart airflow.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8271 Wheel Loader.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8273 Off Road Truck 1 (2600985708).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8273 Off Road Truck 2 (2627929328).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8289 model2 tow truck.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8291 Dirt Bike (50008436757).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8297 Off-Roader tyres (7608916290).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8297 Off-Roader tyres (7608916432).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8297 Off-Roaders (7570834436).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8416 Fork-Lift (28842200317).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8416,42079 Fork-Lifts (28842200927).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8419 B Bulldozer.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8419 Excavator.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8420 Street Bike (50007642858).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8420 Street Bike (821886558).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8422 Circuit Shock Racer (50008436902).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8425 Black Falcon.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8430 Mag Wheel Master (50008176556).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8434 Aircraft.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8444 Air Enforcer (14862505583).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8451 Dump Truck.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8453 Front-End Loader.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8454 Rescue Truck (8060083513).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8456 Fiber Optic Multi Set, helicopter.jpg
- File:LEGO Technic 8457.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8466 4x4 Off Roader (14884288495).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 856 Bulldozer.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8640 Polar Copter (14807626163).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8760 Search Sub (14831594601).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8812 Helicopter.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8818 Dune Buggy.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8824B Helicopter.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8828 Front End Loader (821020997).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8835 Forklift (821022109).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8836 Sky Ranger (821885514).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8839 Supply Ship (14615689097) gray-bg.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8839 Supply Ship (14615689097).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8842 Go-Kart (24158096460).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8851 Excavator (5617240802).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8858 Rebel Wrecker (821905002).jpg
- File:Lego Technic 8860 Car Chassis.jpg
- File:Lego Technic 9397 Logging Truck (22416840350).jpg
- File:Lego Technic Supercar (8070) (14497906150).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4485536883).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4485537705).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4485538519).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3965988740).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_B_model_(3514294863).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_with_Power_Functions_(8293)_(3514882068).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3516880947).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3965994972).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3965218209).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_B_model-1_(3517690396).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3514881626).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3517686852).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3517689478).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3516877151).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_crop_(3516877151).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_gray-bg.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14497906150).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mammaddli011 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works of non-free paintings.
- File:Qarabaga qayidis.jpg
- File:Yukhari Govhar Aga Mosque.jpg
- File:Susa qalasi.jpg
- File:Nigar Helmi eseri.jpg
- File:Gurban Said.jpg
- File:Keklik 2022.jpg
- File:Horses of Karabagh.jpg
- File:Triptix sualti ailemi.jpg
- File:Delafruz Bagırova.jpg
- File:Shexirizada.jpg
- File:Naturmort “goycay narlari”.jpg
- File:Nar agacı.jpg
MER-C 14:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:40, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PacalEzredes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Personal flags and logos
Enyavar (talk) 11:42, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:38, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Askeuhd (talk) 12:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep in practice there is minimal use for this kind of image, but it is in fact in scope and unique enough to keep. Dronebogus (talk) 17:18, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|<G1. Test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content>}} KM2cTv7U (talk) 07:46, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 12:23, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope and COM:PENIS Askeuhd (talk) 14:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete in scope but we already have more than enough of these. Dronebogus (talk) 07:48, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|<G1. Test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content>}} KM2cTv7U (talk) 07:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 12:23, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope and COM:PENIS Askeuhd (talk) 14:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep we only have 13 files of fleshlights in use, so it’s relatively unique. On the other hand, it’s still a COM:PENIS— when you’ve seen one pocket vagina being used you’ve seen ‘em all. Dronebogus (talk) 15:55, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|<G1. Test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content>}} KM2cTv7U (talk) 07:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 12:23, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: 2-page file that seems put together in a random way; its title has nothing to do with its text, which was copy-pasted from eswiki, uncredited and unreferenced—how is this a useful thing to have when MediaWiki lets you export articles as PDF already?). It was categorized in Category:LibreOffice but I fail to see how it is related to that category or useful to it; it isn’t a hybrid PDF that can be modifiable with LO Writer, so it’s not a demonstration of that particular LO feature. COM:NOTUSED also applies; it seems it was never used anywhere. Born2bgratis (talk) 02:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --Rosenzweig τ 18:58, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Unnatimishraa
[edit]
Blatant copyright violations. The images are taken from the corporate website, which are copyrighted!; 1 Karan Adani, 2 Priti Adani. --Hatchens (talk) 06:11, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. Do note that you can simply just use {{Copyvio}} next time though. SHB2000 (talk) 11:17, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- @SHB2000 no action has been taken yet by commons' admins. Do I need to re-nominate these files? - Hatchens (talk) 10:19, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Hatchens: Don't renominate these files as that will create a duplicate DR but tag them using {{Copyvio}}. I'll do these two for you. SHB2000 (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- @SHB2000 no action has been taken yet by commons' admins. Do I need to re-nominate these files? - Hatchens (talk) 10:19, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: both files already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 18:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
London published work, by an uthor with no lifetime information provided. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Could this be the same author? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 11:23, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PMA 70 years. --RAN (talk) 20:27, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Information required provided. Thank you ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:45, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: DR was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Seite ist . Daten werden nach Löschung erneut hochgeladen. Babewyn (talk) 17:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Question Ich kann nichts sehen, was kaputt ist.. Was an diese Seite ist beschädigt, bitte? DaneGeld (talk) 18:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
photo taken from disney wiki Earthfork (talk) 18:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:55, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Not so sure the reasoning of being "published by a public university" stands; copyright holder is Reed Hutchinson and metadata says rights granted to UCLA for "editorial and non-commercial internal marketing." reppoptalk 04:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clearly not gov-work and expressedly NC (© Reed Hutchinson 2017 - Rights granted to UCLA for editorial&non-commercial internal marketing). --Túrelio (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Copied from [3].Copyright violation. Gahukuro (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:18, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Sumbul-touqeer-aka-imlie-is-a-hot-chic-see-her-from-different-side-202107-1627379474.webp
[edit]
Non-copyright free image. Bastewasket (talk) 14:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete from https://smfclyrics.com/sumbul-touqeer-khan-biography-wikiage-career-photos-and-facts/ 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright CC-BY-NC 3.0 (Au) Gderrin (talk) 23:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:30, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mounir Neddi (talk) 00:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, superseded. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mounir Neddi (talk) 00:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, superseded. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mounir Neddi (talk) 00:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, superseded. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mounir Neddi (talk) 00:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, superseded. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mounir Neddi (talk) 00:54, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, superseded. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mounir Neddi (talk) 00:55, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, superseded. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mounir Neddi (talk) 00:56, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, superseded. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RobloxianMoth (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]Old photos uploaded by unreliable uploader. These do not appear to be older than 1920s that would have made these eligible for {{PD-old-assumed}}. Also, the year of first publication as well as the country of first publication of the photos should be determined. The Philippines may not be the first country of publication of these old photos; the United States has been known to publish old Philippine photos, and if this is true, there may be chances of restoration of U.S. copyrights over U.S.-published photos.
- File:BirhensaCotta1954.jpg – claimed date 1954
- File:BirhensaCottaOld2.jpg - claimed date 1954
- File:BirhensaCottaOld.jpg - no year indicated
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:42, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RobloxianMoth (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Last uploads by uploader. Given the numerous questionable uploads as evidenced on the uploader's talk page, I doubt these are the uploader's self-photographed images. Missing or incomplete metadata (giving only Twitter-like transmission codes for some images), plus varied and inconsistent resolutions, ranging from small photos like File:OzamizCottaEntranceMarker.jpg to big ones like File:OzamizCottaShrine2.jpg. COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle.
- File:OriginalBirhensaCotta.jpg
- File:OzamizBirhensaCotta3.jpg
- File:OzamizBirhensaCottaRelief.jpg
- File:OzamizCottaShrine2.jpg
- File:OzamizCottaShrine.jpg
- File:OzamizCottaEntranceMarker.jpg
- File:OzamizCottaRelief.jpg
- File:BirhensaCottaOldChurch.jpg
- File:OzamizBirhensaCottaRelief2.jpg
- File:BirhensaCottaAltar.jpg
- File:BirhensaCotta2017.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep all the ones prior to 1972, the Philippines award s 50 years protection. --RAN (talk) 20:36, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): not every old Philippine photos fall under Philippine law. We are not sure that if those old photos are first published here or, as in cases of many old Philippine photos, first published in the U.S.. If the latter is true, then we have a problem. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- We should rely on Occam's Razor, the most plausible explanation is usually the correct one, that the images were taken in Philippines and made public there. We can challenge every image that way, maybe it was taken in country X by only shown to people in country Y. We are talking about two images, three at most. --RAN (talk) 01:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. None of these images have any dates, missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:03, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted article at Romanian Wikipedia. Kun Kipcsak (talk) 07:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
no source no permission, uploader claims to have made this picture but since he is portrayed himself it cannot be a selfie.... Hoyanova (talk) 07:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
no source no permission, cannot be a selfie as claimed (uploader is similar to person portrayed) Hoyanova (talk) 07:54, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship. Photo in low resolution without metadata. Larryasou (talk) 08:17, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
While these photos may have been taken by the uploader (complete with seal of company on top like a watermark), the products depicted were not created by the photographer thus they cannot license them. These are COM:PACKAGING and promotional, containing derivative works of the packages shown.
- File:Kava-conquistador-cafes-lote-extra-1000g.png
- File:Delta-cafes-lote-chavena.jpg
- File:Delta cafes portugalshop.png
- File:Portugal-shop-portugalska-kava-delta.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 03:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work. I verified a couple of the images uploaded by Hlavomet that are not deleted ATM, and the first four or so were copyvios. considering the user has a history of uploading non-free images (see their talk), I think we should delete the remaining files per the precautionary principle.
- File:Adastra Nile House – inside.jpg
- File:Adastra Nile House.jpg
- File:Kavovnik-plody.jpg
- File:AWD centrale hannover.jpg
- File:Centrala AWD.jpg
Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:55, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and previous DR Herby talk thyme 10:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission). 2013 upload, no evidence of earlier circulation, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: copyvio. A higher resolution version of this image is available through getty: https://www.gettyimages.co.nz/detail/news-photo/lebanese-singer-magida-al-roumi-poses-after-being-awarded-news-photo/160021516. Njd-de (talk) 11:36, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Njd-de. Photo created on 24 January 2013 per Getty, but uploaded to Commons on 12 February. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:11, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible CopyVio from here Enyavar (talk) 11:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr. Joachim Fischer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violation. Emil Loos was a German painter, died on 30.08.1979, so less than 70 years ago, so his paintings are not yet in the public domain. I do not see a VRT ticket. AND the uploader claims these files are his own work, but he only may have made the photos, NOT the paintings.
JopkeB (talk) 13:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Exif Info shows that the photo was edited with Darktable, a photography application program. Information such as camera, model, time etc. is missing. The only photo of the author. No own work. Nemracc (talk) 13:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. Not found elsewhere online. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by KCCruQWXJ1Sj as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: G7. По желанию автора или человека, загрузившего изображение
Converted to regular DR, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy (uploaded in 2020 and in use).-- Túrelio (talk) 13:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Нарушение авторского права KCCruQWXJ1Sj (talk) 13:50, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, no longer in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation? I doubt that this photo was taken by the uploader, as he claims. This photo is on a lot of (commercial) websites, for instance https://www.posterazzi.com/a-royal-moroccan-air-force-kc-130-refueling-aircraft-at-the-marrakech-air-show-in-morocco-poster-print-item-varpstgca100458m/ (photograph by Giovanni Colla). JopkeB (talk) 13:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
It is out of date and misleadingly represents the Long Shop Museum as a construction site to potential visitors 91.125.211.250 13:40, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Have you considered uploading an up to date image and using that image at Wikipedia? Out of date isn't a reason for deletion at Commons, the image shows the subject as it was at the time. If you want Wikipedia to remove the image try discussing it at their article talk page. Oxyman (talk) 13:46, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Not a valid reason for deletion. Commons has many old photos, some over 100 years old. The photo might be used by some future researcher studying construction in 2006. I think most potential visitors will realise that the picture shows temporary building works. Please upload some good more recent photos. AlasdairW (talk) 22:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Per above, upload an newer one to show after construction. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:42, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
File:MarinetTraffic.com in 2007.png File:MarineTraffic Density Map 2018.png These are screenshots of the site, but the "own work" license is controversial, because this is the site data in the picture and the site probably has other conditions for distributing its data (especially lines - sea traffic data). https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/p/user-agreement "The Data may be protected by copyright" "The User shall use the Information and Data for his/her own internal use only." Sunpriat (talk) 13:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Please delete this version. If someone needs to crop the original, they can do it after downloading the portrait. Having only the original and uncropped version on Wiki Commons is perfectly sufficient. OliverMarkCC (talk) 13:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- I cropped the image to get a better portrait of Mr Harlan, in the biography on wikipedia. So would be good if we could keep it. Erik den yngre (talk) 19:24, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Please delete this version. If someone needs to crop the original, they can do it after downloading the portrait. Having only the original and uncropped version on Wiki Commons is perfectly sufficient. OliverMarkCC (talk) 13:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Please delete this version. If someone needs to crop the original, they can do it after downloading the portrait. Having only the original and uncropped version on Wiki Commons is perfectly sufficient. OliverMarkCC (talk) 13:52, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Isaac Wori Duku (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unremarkable personal photos, OOS
Dronebogus (talk) 13:54, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: one as OOS, deleted the first one as not own work (not a selfie). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Low quality spam image Dronebogus (talk) 13:55, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rejunpoudel7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Screenshot 20220813-193737 YouTube.jpg
- File:Sahid Stadium 2021.png
- File:Biratnagar Bazar Drone view.png
- File:Biratnagar Drone Footage.png
- File:Brt Bazar Drone.png
- File:Brt Drone.png
Didym (talk) 14:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: the drone images, not found elsewhere online. Deleted two images taken from YT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:BIGGUYSTRIKESAGAIN953
[edit]- File:1988ALT.svg
- File:1984ALT.svg
- File:1980ALT.svg
- File:TEESTTTT.svg
- File:ElectoralCollege2012Alternate.svg
- File:SFOIDSHGFOFDSHFGDFUHGDF.png
Files by User:BIGGUYSTRIKESAGAIN953. Fictional "alternate History" maps. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. In my opinion fake election maps are just inviting embarrassing mistakes by unsuspecting users. --Jahobr (talk) 15:07, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Hypothetical map not based on professional election poll. Unused private artwork, no educational value. - out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 15:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Hypothetical map not based on professional election poll. Unused private artwork, no educational value. - out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 15:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Sophisticated logo, vague authorship claim, unlikely to be licensed by {{Attribution}}. Logo is unused. Recommend delete as COPYVIO. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 23:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
logo of unremarkable company; not in use by any WMF project. Senator2029 15:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Delete per Commons:License laundering
- Unlikely the the organization would upload their intellectual property to YouTube and then give it a Creative Commons license
- YouTube uploader account name is 'Farmac the Kemmist' (ฟาร์แมค เดอะเคมมิสต์).
- YouTube account was terminated. (Perhaps due to repeated copyright violations?) Senator2029 17:30, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hangman'sDeath as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|no indication that the image was ever published under a free licence. Per [4], the caption is "Eglise romane de Saint-Julien-le-Pèlerin; source photo : Saint-Julien-le-Pèlerin; crédit photo : Libre de droit", which Google tells me says "Romanesque church of Saint-Julien-le-Pèlerin; photo source: Saint-Julien-le-Pèlerin; photo credit: Royalty free". Is this sufficent? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Mdaniels5757: What does "photo source: Saint-Julien-le-Pèlerin" mean? Who made these images? photo credit: Royalty free: are the images used royalty free or can they be used by everyone under the same conditions? Also "Royalty free" is not a usable licence since there is no additional information like for CC-0 or if the image is published into the public doimain. In my opinion Royalty free is also not a free licence since even an image may be used "without the need to pay royalties or license fees for each use" (Wikipedia). There is no information about reuse and modification on the image. Both have to be allowed for the file to be uploaded to Commons. If you want to have the files on Commons contact the copyright holder (the person who has taken the images) and ask if the files can be published under a free licence (like for example CC-BY-SA-4.0). Then the author should send an OTRS mail to confirm the licence choice. See Commons:OTRS. --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 19:10, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: "Libre de droit" isn't sufficiant, as per com:Licensing: "simply writing that "the material may be used freely by anyone" or similar isn't sufficient". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
"libre de droits" is not CC-BY-SA-4 at last an OTRS ticket would be needed Miniwark (talk) 18:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Re-upload of previously deleted image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:39, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
This file is misspelled and superseded. Buaidh (talk) 18:17, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
It is a picture of me that I uploaded containing sensitive information. Evan Rossiter (talk) 18:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pius as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: a photograph of a copyrighted TV series poster Yann (talk) 21:56, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no FOP in Italy. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:41, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
No source, obviously not own work. User globally locked. Yann (talk) 22:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:42, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Uses Google Maps, which is copyrighted by Google (as seen on photo) reppoptalk 22:34, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:42, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
The origin image is copyright CC-BY-NC 3.0 (Au) Gderrin (talk) 23:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 219.78.190.7 as no permission (No permission since). OGL? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: I can't find any evidence of OGL at https://www.gchq.gov.uk/section/about-this-website/terms-and-conditions#section_2 - which in facts states that this is Crown Copyright. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
This image of Chinese paddlefish uses an inappropriate license: There's no evidence that either the author (an expert specialized in this area, who is still alive) or the host website withdraws the claim of copyright. Alneth (talk) 16:33, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. There are images floating around on twitter from the same set of images that have a copyright notice, eg [5]. I've also nominated a crop of the image for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Psephurus gladius 1993.jpg. Perhaps these could be consolidated. Hemiauchenia (talk) 14:59, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:07, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Taken from the book: Всемирная история. Том 3. М.: Госполитиздат, 1957. PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:52, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
File description says these images originate at legit.ng, possibly https://www.legit.ng/1422860-meet-nigerian-medical-doctors-nineteenth-century-1800s.html. Copyright status is unclear (neither the photographer nor the country the image was taken in is mentioned), and uploading a heavily distorted COM:DERIV version of the image is not a way to avoid any possibly copyright issues. If the image is public domain, it should be uploaded directly.
Lord Belbury (talk) 15:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong license Xocolatl (talk) 19:14, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep License corrected, the date was correct, it was the date the derivative copy was made when the original was scanned and was imported from the exif data. We only leave room for one date, so you can't complain when it isn't the one you are looking for. You can just fix these things yourself. --RAN (talk) 19:34, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
SITEUR logos
[edit]- File:SITEUR L1 Santuario Mártires de Cristo Rey.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 España.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 Isla Raza.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 Patria.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 Auditorio.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 18 de Marzo.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 Unidad Deportiva.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 Urdaneta.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 Santa Filomena.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 Mexicaltzingo.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 Washington.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 Juárez.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 Refugio.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 Mezquitán.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 Ávila Camacho.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 División del Norte.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 Atemajac.svg
- File:SITEUR L1 Dermatológico.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Central de Autobuses.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Lázaro Cárdenas.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Tlaquepaque Centro.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Río Nilo.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Revolución.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 CUCEI.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Plaza de la Bandera.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Independencia.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Guadalajara Centro.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Santuario.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 La Normal.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Circunvalación Country.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Ávila Camacho.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Plaza Patria.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Zapopan Centro.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Mercado del Mar.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Periférico Belenes.svg
- File:SITEUR L3 Arcos de Zapopan.svg
The logos nominated belong to the en:SITEUR light train system of Guadalajara, Jalisco. Judging the OTRS conversation related to them, I think there's a misunderstanding by Rayo on the concept of "public" (i.e. "The logos represented in the images are public domain [because they are] station logos for the public light rail system and other symbols of the public transportation system"). As indicated by COM:NOP Mexico ({{PD-Coa-Mexico}}), they would fall into the PD if, and only if, they are considered into: VII. Reproductions or imitations, without authorization, of shields, flags or emblems of any country, state, municipality or equivalent political division, or denominations, acronyms, symbols or emblems of international governmental, non-governmental organizations, or of any other officially recognized organization as well as the verbal designation of the same". These are not "shields, flags or emblems" of "any country, state, municipality or equivalent political division", these are pictograms / logos of a public transit system operated by the Government of Jalisco. Like the US, each Mexican state is independent and has its own copyright policies on its copyrights. Mexico City, for example, has an open license ({{LGACDMX}}) but even with such license, the Mexico City Metro logos are not acceptable due to a legal technicism. Jalisco, on the opposite, lacks a visual copyright identification but it is found at their main website: Copyright. The publication of copyrighted material of any kind, whether textual content, images, graphics, commercial drawings, videos, emblems, slogans, badges, logos and any other copyrighted element, without the express permission of the copyright holder, is prohibited. Unless Rayo is the author or he knows the main author(s) of the logos, or he actually gets the permission of them by the government of Jalisco and it is verified by the VRT team, the Commons:Precautionary principle should be satisfied. Tbhotch™ 20:42, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tbhotch, I'm afraid that English is not my primary language, and I constantly fail to communicate. I understand that you are a native Spanish speaker, so I hope to be able to communicate better with you directly. I got a permission from SITEUR which I sent attached to my e-mail to VRT regarding the vector files, I've uploaded it to Google Drive in case this happened (the files got nominated for deletion again). You can see it here, and as you can read, it is not "my understanding" of what is public domain, but rather a statement made by the Social Communications Manager from SITEUR. From this point on, I don't know what other documents do you want me to request to SITEUR in order to satisfy whatever keeps you nominating the logos for deletion. On 2018, the logos have disappeared from Line 1 railway stations since its extension and renewal, so I thought a good way to preserve them was to upload them to Wikipedia, and I've tried to comply with Commons politics as much as I can, what other proof do you need? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SistemaRayoXP (talk • contribs) 22:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- The main problem relies on the upload itself. When you upload a file that was not created by you but let the default settings untouched, you are attributed as the author. In the first file, for example, the template reads as it follows:
- Date
- 30 July 2022
- Source
- Own work
- Author
- Edson Armando
- I [Edson Armando], the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under [a public domain license].
- What you had to do was to upload then with the correct information coupled with the VRT template linked to the correct ticket
- Date
- (The year the logo was adopted)
- Source
- (Website you got it; if they were taken from the street signaling and if you manually recreated them, then say it)
- Author
- SITEUR (most likely according to the email) or Gobierno de Jalisco
- Permission
- VRT template with the respective ticket
- License
- {{Pd-author}}
- I'm going to guess that the VRT hasn't approved the mail because it is in Spanish and they are unable to understand the whole layout of the mail and the short answer provided by SITEUR. But, due to legal reasons, it is recommended to wait on the VRT team before continuing with related uploads. The United States has stronger sanctions on copyright infringements than in Mexico and copyright violations are taken way more seriously. Tbhotch™ 13:52, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- I totally accept the problems with the author, source and the other fields on the files, I was unaware about how to properly tag the files, or how to reference the author (or if I even should). I will correct this.
- About the VRT conversation, I translated the file to the VRT contact themselves, but I think it could've been misunderstood or something. The last response I got was: "I personally have doubts that such vectorization is covered by freedom of panorama. Anyway, even if it is, no approval by the VRT is required as it can be clarified directly at Wikimedia Commons. If you disagree please advise in detail." and this was after you added the {{FoP-Mexico}} template to the Category:Guadalajara light rail station logos which I linked during that VRT conversation. I think this was a misunderstanding, and I don't know how to proceed with the permission (note that this conversation was about a month ago).
- I uploaded the remaining Line 1 and 3 logos given what I understood from the OTRS conversation (since the logos are public domain). But anyway, I'm going to wait for uploading the remaining logos of Line 2 until this situation is clarified. SistemaRayoXP (talk) 16:14, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tbhotch I've already corrected the file information, what should be next? The deletion nomination notice in each file page makes me nervous, and it has already been almost 2 months since nomination. OTRS hasn't sent me any new e-mails about the copyright status of these files, should I contact them again to get a permission? (which I don't really think I will get). SistemaRayoXP (talk) 20:13, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- @SistemaRayoXP: As far as I know, OTRS merely verifies the information provided. I don't know why it has taken this long to verify the e-mail and the account provided (I think it is related to the language). I can withdraw the nomination as there has been little discussion beyond us both and it is unlikely that an admin deletes the files at this point, unless OTRS finds incorrect information, but then again, they would re-request the deletion of the files. So I'm withdrawing the nomination pending the OTRS team. Tbhotch™ 03:59, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Tbhotch I've already corrected the file information, what should be next? The deletion nomination notice in each file page makes me nervous, and it has already been almost 2 months since nomination. OTRS hasn't sent me any new e-mails about the copyright status of these files, should I contact them again to get a permission? (which I don't really think I will get). SistemaRayoXP (talk) 20:13, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Keep
[edit]As I have previously stated, the logos of SITEUR light rail stations are public domain, and no, it is not my understanding, anyone who can read Spanish can confirm what I say within this file which SITEUR provided to me. In the file, it is stated that the station logos are of public domain, so there are no copyright issues.SistemaRayoXP (talk) 01:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Comment
[edit]If the decision is to delete these files from Commons, they can still remain on en:WP as non-free content, but their use would be limited to a single instance on each respective station page. Useddenim (talk) 13:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn, the e-mail provided looks credible enough. Pending the VTRS/OTRS response without prejudices. Tbhotch™ 04:05, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Etonmessisthebest
[edit]- File:Palisades Menorah Lighting.jpg (from Chabad, specific image)
- File:Billy Crystal Chanukah.jpg (from Palisadian-Post)
- File:Billy Crystal Chanukah (cropped).jpg (from Palisadian-Post)
- File:Village Green.jpg (from Palisadian-Post)
- File:Zimmermann Palisades.jpg (from Palisides Village website)
- File:Palisades Village.png (from MapQuest image, specific image)
- File:Erewhon Palisades.png (from Erewhon website, specific image)
- File:Yapchik.jpg (mirrored from here)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A lot of copyright violations by the user who uploaded the photos, I've given all the images from where the user took them above. I didn't nominate the rest of their uploads, but they're also suspicious as well (especially when they've uploaded a lot of non-free images). --reppoptalk 21:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Etonmessisthebest (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Yapchik 2.jpg
- File:Lokshen mit kaese.jpg
- File:Egg Noodles with Cheese.jpg
- File:Sweet noodle kugel.jpg
- File:Noodle kugel.jpg
- File:Cornflake topping.jpg
- File:Graham kugel.jpg
- File:Lokshen kugel.jpg
- File:Starbucks Palisades.jpg
- File:Business Block.jpg
- File:Matzo Lasagna.png
- File:Pilpelchuma.png
- File:Palisades Holiday.jpg
- File:Palisades Village Menorah.jpg
- File:Bay Theater Palisades.jpg
- File:Bugatti Chiron 1.jpg
Didym (talk) 13:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:57, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Doubt this is the youtube uploader's own work. Interview was done by Youku. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:02, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Please delete this version. If someone needs to crop the original, they can do it after downloading the portrait. Having only the original and uncropped version on Wiki Commons is perfectly sufficient. OliverMarkCC (talk) 13:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:19, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
probable copyvio : copied from internet without source mention Ske (talk) 11:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 07:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
This flag is not on the source page and I don't see evidence that this flag has ever been used as a flag of the Turkish minority within the former SFR Yugoslavia. As such, there is no educational purpose to hosting this image, so the flag is out of COM:SCOPE, and this flag should be deleted. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, it is in the source, see [6]. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Fixed the source link on the file. The website itself cites Veliki geografski atlas Jugoslavije, SNL (1987), which I believe is a reliable enough source? Vipz (talk) 19:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: within scope and in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Low quality. Redundant to ;File:M.H.delPilaryGatmaitan.jpg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Same quality as original, but adjustments have been made to improve the quality, we usually retain the original when editors make a derivative copy. --RAN (talk) 21:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Low quality. Redundant to ;File:M.H.delPilaryGatmaitan.jpg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Same quality different aspect ratio on the crop. Some people prefer a more square crop for the infobox and some people prefer a more rectangular crop. --RAN (talk) 06:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine Kharkivian (talk) 11:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:45, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Is there any reason to believe that this color photograph was published before 1927 (as the licence claims)? Ghirlandajo (talk) 19:14, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- I sloppily misread the Russian copyright principles for photography of 3D works in public spaces. I agree that this can be tagged for speedy deletion. Peachseltzer (talk) 20:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:45, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, user blocked for multiple copyvios, unlikely to be own work.
- File:Jazigo do Almirante Américo Thomaz e de sua família.jpg
- File:Túmulo de D. Mariana Vitória.png
- File:Túmulo de D. José I.png
- File:Túmulo de D. João V.png
- File:Túmulo de D. Maria Sofia de Neuburgo.png
- File:Túmulo de Manuel Teixeira Gomes.png
- File:Cemitério de Carnide.jpg
- File:Cemitério do Lumiar.jpg
- File:Sede da Assembleia Municipal de Vila Franca de Xira.png
- File:Jazigo de Cosme Damião.png
- File:Jazigo de José Vianna da Motta.png
- File:Jazigo da Família Rebelo de Sousa.png
- File:Casa onde nasceu António de Spínola, em Estremoz.png
- File:Casa onde nasceu Óscar Carmona, em Lisboa.png
- File:Arma que matou o Presidente Sidónio Pais.png
- File:Túmulo de D. Pedro II de Portugal.png
- File:Túmulo de D. Maria Francisca de Sabóia.png
- File:Túmulo de D. Afonso VI de Portugal.png
- File:Túmulo de D. Luísa de Gusmão.png
- File:Túmulo de D. João IV.png
- File:Caixões dos Patriarcas sobre os arcazes da Sacristia.png
- File:Túmulo do Cardeal Dom José Policarpo no Panteão dos Patriarcas de Lisboa.jpg
- File:Túmulo do Cardeal Dom António Ribeiro no Panteão dos Patriarcas de Lisboa.png
- File:Túmulo do Cardeal Manuel Cerejeira no Panteão dos Patriarcas de Lisboa.png
- File:Túmulo do Cardeal Antonio Mendes Bello no Panteão dos Patriarcas de Lisboa.png
- File:Túmulo do Cardeal José Sebastião Neto no Panteão dos Patriarcas de Lisboa.png
- File:Túmulo do Cardeal Inácio Morais Cardoso no Panteão dos Patriarcas de Lisboa.png
- File:Túmulo do Cardeal Manuel Bento Rodrigues no Panteão dos Patriarcas de Lisboa.png
- File:Túmulo do Cardeal Guilherme Carvalho no Panteão dos Patriarcas de Lisboa.png
- File:Túmulo do Cardeal Francisco de S. Luis no Panteão dos Patriarcas de Lisboa.png
- File:Túmulo do Cardeal Frei Patrício da Silva no Panteão dos Patriarcas de Lisboa.png
- File:Túmulo do Cardeal Carlos Cunha e Meneses no Panteão dos Patriarcas de Lisboa.png
- File:Jazigo de Maria do Carmo Carmona e de sua família.png
- File:Túmulo de Manuel Gomes da Costa.png
- File:Túmulo de Francisco Costa Gomes.png
- File:Jazigo do Almirante Américo Thomaz.png
- File:Tumulo do infante d Fernando.png
- File:Tumulo de infante D. João.png
- File:Túmulo do infante D. Pedro duque de Coimbra.png
- File:Lápide invocativa a Aristides de Sousa Mendes.png
- File:Jazigo da Família de Jorge Sampaio.jpg
- File:Jazigo da Família Barroso Soares .webp
- File:Tumulo de Antonio de Spínola.png
- File:Nuno Alvares Pereira.png
- File:Infante D Henrique.png
- File:Afonso de Albuquerque.png
- File:Pedro Alvares Cabral Cenotáfio.png
- File:Eusébio da Silva Ferreira.png
- File:Sophia de Mello Breyner Andresen.png
- File:Túmulo de Aquilino Ribeiro.png
- File:Manuel de Arriaga.png
- File:Amália Rodrigues.png
- File:Humberto Delgado.png
- File:Óscar Carmona.png
- File:Teófilo Braga.png
- File:Gjjjjjjj.png
- File:Jddddd.png
- File:Algarrtt.png
- File:Dspais.png
- File:Carrilhão.png
DCB (talk) 22:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:08, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
official flag, definitely not an own work (as stated), for sure not licensable under CC BY-SA 4.0; it would have to be checked if this is an official work or something similar
- File:Bandeira de Ponta Delgada.png
- File:Bandeira de Estremoz.png
- File:Bandeira de Portimão.png
- File:Bandeira da Horta.png
- File:Bandeira de Caminha.png
- File:Bandeira de Castelo Branco.png
- File:Bandeira de Chaves.png
- File:Bandeira de Loulé.png
- File:Bandeira de Oeiras.png
- File:Bandeira de Cascais.png
- File:Bandeira de Carnaxide.png
DCB (talk) 22:43, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Previously speedily deleted in a mass purge of uploads by this uploader, contested by 83.61.234.200 at COM:UDR. Converting the discussion to a formal DR to discuss whether these fall under {{PD-Portugal-URAA}}. You may wish to review the prior discussion at UDR.
- File:Gertrudes Thomaz.jpg
- File:Américo Thomaz.png
- File:Salazar 10.png
- File:Mário Novais, António de Oliveira Salazar (1959).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I agree "PD-Portugal-photo" --RAN (talk) 15:33, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No proof that these were published in Portugal under the criterias to be PD"-Portugal-photo". Tm (talk) 12:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Image produced before July 1, 1970, is in PD-Portugal-URAA, in addition to the authors of the photos being PortugueseAntónio F.123456 (talk) 17:06, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Image produced before July 1, 1970, is in PD-Portugal-URAA, in addition to the authors of the photos being Portuguese António F.123456 (talk) 17:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Info António F.123456 uploaded the same images as Ser.Silv. and has the same interests. No coincidence if the accounts quack. Tm (talk) 18:08, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Comment: With this evidence it would be appropiate to verify them. 83.61.243.178 14:19, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- António F.123456 and I are brothers, we share the same internet, so we always have the same ipSer.Silv. (talk) 19:14, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- user Ser.Silv. claims that he is brothers with user António F.123456 or António Fragoso (as the dates of upload of the same photos to commons and flickr match). When two users have the very same uploads, equal edits and edit each other, something is quacking. Tm (talk) 19:20, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Funny that someone who is portuguese can have Fragoso as surname and have a brother with a Sil[va] (or similar) as surname, i.e. not use the same surname. Tm (talk) 19:21, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- What's the problem that we have the same tastes?, besides that wikipedia doesn't prevent brothers from having two accounts António F.123456 (talk) 19:24, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- What's wrong with my name and my brother's, why can't we have two surname? António F.123456 (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- In pt.wikipedia it was confirmed the sockpuppetry, according with which I was able to see. That resolution is recorded here. 83.61.243.178 15:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- Funny that someone who is portuguese can have Fragoso as surname and have a brother with a Sil[va] (or similar) as surname, i.e. not use the same surname. Tm (talk) 19:21, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- user Ser.Silv. claims that he is brothers with user António F.123456 or António Fragoso (as the dates of upload of the same photos to commons and flickr match). When two users have the very same uploads, equal edits and edit each other, something is quacking. Tm (talk) 19:20, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- António F.123456 and I are brothers, we share the same internet, so we always have the same ipSer.Silv. (talk) 19:14, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:47, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Senator2029 as Logo Yann (talk) 21:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tang Wei
[edit]Not YouTube uploader's own work. (credited to Youku) Original source needed for license verification.
Minoraxtalk 04:46, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:10, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tang Wei
[edit]Doubt this is the youtube uploader's own work. Interview was done by Youku.
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The Youku logo is all over the place in the youtube films. The youtube channel is not of Youku, so the licensing with CCBYSA on Youtube seems unjustified. --Ellywa (talk) 22:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- File:Queen Elizabeth II Golden Jubilee Medal.jpg
- File:Jubilee 2002 Medal reverse.jpg
- File:Jubilee 2002 Medal obverse.jpg
- File:Jubilee 2002 Medal Canada reverse.jpg
Crown copyright applies to the medal, so copyright will not have expired until 2053. DrKay (talk) 07:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
I note that a number of other modern Jubilee medals have been downloaded onto Wikipedia as non-free images, e.g.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_Platinum_Jubilee_Medal.jpg). As having a photo of the medal aids the article, it would make sense to do the same with the photos of the 2002 medal. Hsq7278 (talk) 14:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. If a rationale exists for fair use on en:WP, please ask for temporary undeletion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:41, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 110.54.172.208 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: F1, Out of project scope. Clearly in scope per COM:INUSE. Is it above COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Above COM:TOO Hungary. --Ellywa (talk) 22:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 218.250.79.47 as no permission (No permission since). OGL claimed, please discuss. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This is not material created by the UK government. It is from the Romanian Embassy in the UK. I do not think the OGL license is applicable in this case. Therefore the image should be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 22:59, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Renvoy as no permission (No permission since). Many Ukrainian government works are available under a free license, needs someone who understands Ukrainian to review. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:02, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi! Yes, many websites of government agencies have free lacences but not the website of Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources where this photo was taken from Renvoy (talk) 09:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Well, find the one which goes by free license, but till then let us keep this. I don’t think, that Ministry is gonna sue Wiki for it. Especially now PaBro2906 (talk) 21:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Comment: I have uploaded a different version of the subject (that is definitely available with free license) in case this file is deleted due to questionable permission. OhanaUnitedTalk page 22:32, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. No evidence on the source website is showing this photo is available with a free license. --Ellywa (talk) 23:02, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Above TOO imho per COM:TOO South Korea. --Ellywa (talk) 23:04, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Specifc renewal located " The merchant of Venice. Edited by Pauline W. Leonard. (Golden key series) © on pref., introd., notes & appendix; 16Feb31; A34507. Margaret L. Derby (C of P. W. Leonard); 6Nov58; R224127." ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:42, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 23:05, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Btspurplegalaxy as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The license no longer exist.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. Archived source-site shows CC-BY icon, though not the image. Regrettably, a license-review hadn't been performed after upload. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Same problem with:
The website licence is for all pages. It's like any other website where the licence is indicated at the bottom. Tistory has this feature, see for example this site where we also have photos from in commons https://sjcontents.tistory.com/311 and check the main page. We have a lot of other photos by Rokiei on commons that have been checked for the licence, for example File:Yoo Seung-ho in 2012 04.jpg, also search for "rokiei" in Commons. Xia (talk) 12:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The CC license term "Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright) license" means it doesn't matter that the source no longer lists a free license (or even if the host no longer exists at all). If it was *ever* legitimately free-licensed, that's all that matters, and it can't be clawed back. DMacks (talk) 15:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Uploader is a trusted user and while there was not a formal review at the time, I see no reason to disbelieve the source link was where the image was found. There is continuing evidence of CC licensing from archive sites and CC licensing is not revocable. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:44, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio of a Trademark logo , i doubt than Nitendo release their logos in Creative Commons Miniwark (talk) 18:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: See the relevant discussion at Commons:Village pump/Archive/2022/07#Does the logo File:Super Mario party Logo.jpg exceed the COM:TOO Japan?, regarding if the logo exceeds COM:TOO Japan or not. --Stylez995 (talk) 17:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion here and at VPC. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:50, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
The author is given as Tony Phillips but the file was unloaded by DreamOfShadows~commonswiki. The license given on the linked source website here is "Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License" which isn't suitable for Commons with the Noncommercial restriction. - Aa77zz (talk) 14:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:48, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
No publication history means that the copyright status cannot be determined Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:04, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Specfic Renewal located " The two gentlemen of Verona, edited by Charles Washburn Nichols. (The Arden Shakespeare) © on introd., notes, appendix & glossary; 31Jul31; A40724. Charles Washburn Nichols (A); 6Nov58; R224142." ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The work was not properly renewed. The copyright proprietor is D. C. Heath and Company, but Charles Washburn Nichols is claimed as the person renewing the copyright; as he was not the proprietor, he had no authority to renew, and thus the renewal is invalid. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Did the copyright 'revert' to the author at some point? I wasn't aware of an easy search process for that though.
Also do we have a templated license tag for PD by virtue of incomplete/invalid renewal?
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- The original copyright entry is at https://books.google.co.uk/books?redir_esc=y&id=_FNaAAAAIAAJ&q=The+two+gentlemen+of+Verona#v=snippet&q=%22The%20two%20gentlemen%20of%20Verona%22&f=false which lists the publisher as claimant.
- Also - https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Compendium_of_US_Copyright_Office_Practices_(1973)/Chapter_11#11.7.1 seems to suggest that an Author can file a renewal claim, separately from the copyright "proprietor".ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:17, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Authors can file renewal claims.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:52, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom and Pro. --Natuur12 (talk) 22:18, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Specfic renewal located " FRASER, W. H. Standard French grammar. By W. H. Fraser, J. Squair and Davis Hobart Carnahan. © on new matter; 21Aug31; A41550. Mabel C. Carnahan (W); 6Nov58; R224145." ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. This work was not properly renewed. The proprietor of the copyright is given as “D. C. Heath and Company,” yet the person listed on the renewal is Mabel C. Carnahan as a widow. As a company cannot marry, she cannot have been the widow of the company; thus, she would have had no authority to renew the copyright. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:14, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Renewals are a way for authors to grab back copyright from the company, and Mabel C. Carnahan most likely had a right to make that renewal.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- What do you mean by “grab back copyright from the company” and “most likely had a right”? Can you couch your !vote comment in legal terms, please, so that I may respond to them likewise? TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 04:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Renewals, in part, are a right for authors to take back the rights to a copyright they licensed out. As the widow of the author, Mabel C. Carnahan would have had the right to renew his part in the copyright. Since Carnahan was a professor at the University of Illinois, this would not be work for hire and thus this would be a valid renewal.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- “Renewals” “are a right for authors to take back the rights to a copyright”—what are you even talking about? That’s not what a renewal is, at all. And a renewal isn’t a “right for authors,” it’s a procedural step to claim the copyright. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 19:47, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- See the Copyright Office circular; "For example, if an author dies before the 28th year of the original term and a statutory renewal claimant registers a renewal within the 28th year, that claimant can terminate an assignment made by the deceased author authorizing the exploitation of a derivative work." and the list of who may claim renewal, which starts the second section with "Only in the case of the following four types of works may the copyright proprietor (owner) claim renewal:".--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- “Work copyrighted by an employer for whom such work was made for hire.”—This is on the next page. This circular, of course, concerns current copyright law, which has some dealings with so-called “moral” rights, but this was not the procedure of the Copyright Act in force at the time; for which see the Compendium, 1st edition. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 17:59, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- And again, work for hire doesn't apply to a professor employed by a university and contracting on the side with a publisher. Don't point me at a several-hundred-page book; give me a specific section to look at.--Prosfilaes (talk) 20:47, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- And again, don’t confuse the current law with the law in effect at the time. It’s section 11.8.5, which was cited in another discussion on the same topic. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- http://copyright.gov/history/comp/compendium-one.pdf is a link to that compendium and all it says is a work for hire is where the proprietor employed the author. The basic rules hasn't changed; the details have changed, but a professor is still generally not an employee of a publisher, no matter what contacts are between them. It also says that the Copyright Office will make no effort to determine if the work was a work for hire, and we, having less information, should take the same position.----Prosfilaes (talk) 15:53, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- And again, don’t confuse the current law with the law in effect at the time. It’s section 11.8.5, which was cited in another discussion on the same topic. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- And again, work for hire doesn't apply to a professor employed by a university and contracting on the side with a publisher. Don't point me at a several-hundred-page book; give me a specific section to look at.--Prosfilaes (talk) 20:47, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- “Work copyrighted by an employer for whom such work was made for hire.”—This is on the next page. This circular, of course, concerns current copyright law, which has some dealings with so-called “moral” rights, but this was not the procedure of the Copyright Act in force at the time; for which see the Compendium, 1st edition. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 17:59, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- See the Copyright Office circular; "For example, if an author dies before the 28th year of the original term and a statutory renewal claimant registers a renewal within the 28th year, that claimant can terminate an assignment made by the deceased author authorizing the exploitation of a derivative work." and the list of who may claim renewal, which starts the second section with "Only in the case of the following four types of works may the copyright proprietor (owner) claim renewal:".--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- “Renewals” “are a right for authors to take back the rights to a copyright”—what are you even talking about? That’s not what a renewal is, at all. And a renewal isn’t a “right for authors,” it’s a procedural step to claim the copyright. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 19:47, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Renewals, in part, are a right for authors to take back the rights to a copyright they licensed out. As the widow of the author, Mabel C. Carnahan would have had the right to renew his part in the copyright. Since Carnahan was a professor at the University of Illinois, this would not be work for hire and thus this would be a valid renewal.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- I've added a question to Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Who_could_renew_a_copyright? on these DRs.--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- What do you mean by “grab back copyright from the company” and “most likely had a right”? Can you couch your !vote comment in legal terms, please, so that I may respond to them likewise? TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 04:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Pros. --Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Photoalbum was made by Institute's worker and all copyrights has an Institute (now - University). So, we need document from University that author of the photo is unidentified or permission from the Institute Kharkivian (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Photoalbum was published without copyright notice in 1950. There is no evidence that the author of the photo worked at the institute. Usually, at that time, institutes did not have staff photographers. Such albums were made by external photographers, members of photo artels. All photo artels in USSR were closed til 1960 and were replaced by photo studios. --Venzz (talk) 15:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Venzz. --Natuur12 (talk) 22:15, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
