Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/07/17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 17th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image should be merged to File:Amelia Sophia of Great Britain.jpg since is lower quality copy of that Ecummenic (talk) 00:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. File deleted and redirect to the better version created. --Raymond 09:49, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio. Found on numerous websites with TinEye (https://tineye.com/search/2f9bf1ec7b777ae34a447a02c1b7772d904fd56c), and while none of these were before the upload on Commons, the fact that this has been used on volkswagen.cz makes this highly unlikely to be own work. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 02:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 04:45, 17 July 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: advertisement --Krdbot 07:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsensical page. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 10:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo, Random photo from internet Avocadoy72 (talk) 00:45, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete as a copyright violation. Copyright is held by Blue Sky Studios or Disney.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:47, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:15, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer need it 73.192.70.168 18:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded mistakenly Imkml (talk) 11:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:26, 17 July 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Promo/press photo --Krdbot 19:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Same painting as File:Bloemen in een vergulde porseleinen vaas onder een glazen stolp.jpg, which has a higher resolution. Not in use on the projects, so can be deleted without harm. Ellywa (talk) 12:16, 17 July 2022 (UTC) Please delete, (the uploader Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 13:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC))[reply]


Deleted: as uploader agrees, no need to prolong this DR. --Ellywa (talk) 20:56, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Uploaded by mistake Farhansnigdho (talk) 12:41, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:35, 17 July 2022 UTC: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (COM:CSD#F2) --Krdbot 19:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image Cjp24 (talk) 13:54, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: in use, but very likely not own work considering other copyvio uploads by this user. --P 1 9 9   15:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The video within the video is a campaign ad which is not the uploader's original work Putitonamap98 (talk) 15:12, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann at 19:57, 17 July 2022 UTC: per COM:SPEEDY --Krdbot 01:33, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No mention of image being pd on website Putitonamap98 (talk) 17:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann at 19:57, 17 July 2022 UTC: per COM:SPEEDY --Krdbot 01:33, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bild ist laut Watermark von Google Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above, clear CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:27, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shashank Rautela as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: deleting image for privacy. That is not a valid speedy deletion rationale per COM:CSD.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{Vk}} as above.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I believe that @Shashank Rautela: wanted to request the deletion of the previous version of the file, which I assume contains his personal image. This version could be deleted per COM:CSD#F10. However, there is also a later version of the file, but it is also eligible for deletion due to a quite obvious copyright violation (simply do a reverse search of the image via Google Images or TinEye). — Pius (talk) 12:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The comments of Pius can only be agreed. --MKBler (talk) 13:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per Pius.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused personal image per uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:31, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Non-free logo of a company. No indication the uploader has the authority to release the image under the stipulated cc-by-sa-4.0 license, and no indication at the source (https://ens.domains/) that the image is available under this license nor any other license compatible with Commons. It is highly unlikely a company would want to release its prime, identifying logo under a license that would allow another company to use it for commercial purposes. Hammersoft (talk) 13:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:32, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Non-free logo of a company. No indication the uploader has the authority to release the image under the stipulated cc-by-sa-4.0 license, and no indication at the source (https://ens.domains/) that the image is available under this license nor any other license compatible with Commons. It is highly unlikely a company would want to release its prime, identifying logo under a license that would allow another company to use it for commercial purposes. See also File:ENS Name.jpg. Hammersoft (talk) 13:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:33, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused poster of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also contained DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:34, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph of a non-notable tattoo artist. So OOS. Adamant1 (talk) 01:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:56, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 高桥洵丐张大腚 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images, which is out of project scope. COM:SPAM

Larryasou (talk) 04:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:56, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal, bot-imported pic without context. Fl.schmitt (talk) 10:42, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:56, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal self promotional image that is outside out scope Herby talk thyme 10:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:56, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Well, I wrongly added this file. I think it might violate personal copyright. Therefore, I think it should be deleted. As of the day I uploaded it, I request it to be deleted Naturalminer (talk) 15:26, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:57, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:MIRUTOKEN

[edit]

Self-promotion of a non-notable token --JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 16:47, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Spam. --Achim55 (talk) 17:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per "F10. Personal photos by non-contributors". MKFI (talk) 12:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:57, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jthapelo060 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Further personal images that seem to have no relevance to the scope of this project. Commons is not intended as cloud storage

Herby talk thyme 14:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jthapelo060 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Further personal images that seem to have no relevance to the scope of this project. Commons is not intended as cloud storage.

GeorgHHtalk   20:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cyberkshatriya

[edit]

They appear to be copyrighted. --Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep File:Nargis Dutt.jpg appears to be from the film Tamanna (1942) and is PD-India. All pre 1962 works are awarded 50 years protection, and even if taken in 1962 would have expired in 2012. File:Teg bahadur lahore museum.png is a Mughul period painting.
As the uploader, User:Cyberkshatriya appears not notified about this request, I will relocate this request on the queue of today and I will notify the uploader. Ellywa (talk) 14:24, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: two of the older ones, deleted and redirected to already existing file a third one of these; deleted the rest. The Nargis Dutt image is almost certainly not from 1942 as claimed (she was only 13 then). I wasn't able to properly date it, it could be from 1957 or from 1965 or yet another year, so I could not determine its copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 23:57, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ali khairbek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:45, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nothing to see, out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 03:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission or that uploader is actual creator. Also duplicate. Sumanuil (talk) 04:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also inaccurate colors. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion. No educational usage. Premeditated (talk) 09:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:OOS: intended for the profile of a company and its promotion on Wikipedia Frodar (talk) 10:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 15:24, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 15:26, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, deleted at least twice before JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 15:28, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Bible quote. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:46, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo, no notability JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 16:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:46, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo, no notability JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 16:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image with no educational value – automatically uploaded Albinfo (talk) 20:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, only for selfpromo. Taichi (talk) 23:53, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license for this image at the source Imzadi 1979  04:56, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation by yet another sock puppet of User:Arthur Brum DrKay (talk) 15:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Example of previous publication of the same image: 1, 2, . The editor has not provided indication of permission by the copyright holder or author. Awikimate (talk) 19:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 18:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation by yet another sock puppet of User:Arthur Brum DrKay (talk) 15:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Example of previous publication of the same image: 1. The editor has not provided indication of permission of the copyright holder or author. Awikimate (talk) 19:53, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 18:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License not found at source: uploaded by yet another sock puppet of User:Arthur Brum DrKay (talk) 15:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 18:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In Category:Marathons there are much better photos than this unused one without high resolution and without detailed description. No educational use, unusable and out of scope COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 23:41, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, this is unknown russian newspaper, no author, no date, no copyright. Is derivative, not own original work. Drakosh (talk) 15:05, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drakosh, Hello. The newspaper is quite well-known and authoritative. I have added the source — documentary film that shows archival sources and newspaper publications of the early twentieth century about abrek Sulumbek Corrected the description.--Adam-Yourist (talk) 17:24, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, request can be closed now. I dont know exactly how to do it properly. --Drakosh (talk) 18:31, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, no need to delete the file. --Ellywa (talk) 09:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ernesto Rosales 1103 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these files are certainly not the uploader's "own work" from 2022 as claimed. They need proper sources, authors, dates and rationales why they are either in the public domain or under a free license. If these things are not provided or not satisfactory, the files should all be deleted per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 18:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is not true. Images that have "1946" or "1985" in the file name are almost certainly not prior to 1942. The images with "Alfonso López Echandía" in the file name show a man who was born in 1932 and is certainly older than nine years in the images. Also, even if you don't write it, you treat them all as if they were anonymous. Without any sources, original publication etc. we cannot at all tell if that is actually the case. --Rosenzweig τ 11:51, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry if my words are ambiguous. I am trying to say "Keep all images [that are] prior to 1942 as PD-Colombia" not "Keep all. All images are prior to 1942 as per PD-Colombia". Several have the names of the author on the image, but they are pseudonyms. If they can be traced to a person, we can find a death date. Wiki Commons rules allow us to scan images, if they were pulled from the Internet they should be able to be found using the standard reverse image search and standard image search by name. The are several billion images online to match to. --RAN (talk) 01:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see. So you just volunteered to do these searches and find authors and death dates? --Rosenzweig τ 11:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I already have performed the search and have not been able to match the pseudonym to a known photographer, I even posted at a Facebook group that specializes on photographers. --RAN (talk) 17:05, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete It's hard to tell for all the files, but most of them are certainly from after 1942. So they should all be deleted as copyvio per the precautionary principle. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:03, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Columbia is 80 years pma, so in order to beat the URAA, images must be prior to 1927. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ernesto Rosales 1103 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

New uploads with the same problems. As before: The files need proper sources, authors, dates and rationales why they are either in the public domain or under a free license. If these things are not provided or not satisfactory, the files should all be deleted per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 23:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These images are PD-Colombia as prior to 1942 and should not be deleted

[edit]
These are the ones nominated for deletion that are PD-Colombia because they were created prior to 1942. They should not be deleted. --RAN (talk) 04:15, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see. I think the usual procedure is to put a strikethrough through whichever images in a group should not be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Only anonymous images published before 1942 are in the PD in Colombia. Not just any image created before 1942 as implied above. So we still need sources and first publication to be able to (perhaps) determine that they are anonymous. OR they can be kept with {{PD-old-assumed}} if they are at least 130 years old (template adjusted with the duration=80 parameter to accomodate Colombia's 80 years pma term). --Rosenzweig τ 11:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment For anybody deciding this, please also note that some file descriptions were changed by User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ), claiming that the author is anonymous and changing years without giving any evidence. So please check what was changed before deciding anything. --Rosenzweig τ 13:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Our rules allow you to scan an original image, it doesn't have to be downloaded from the internet. There are 750 billion images are on the internet, if you can't match one of these images with a reverse image search, or a simple name search, to the name of a photographer, you have performed all of the due diligence that can possibly be accomplished. --RAN (talk) 17:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ernesto Rosales 1103 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

And another one. I will warn the uploader one last time; the next time it's a block.

Rosenzweig τ 15:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:55, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ernesto Rosales 1103 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Another batch of files related to politics of Venezuela, taken from various web sites, uploaded with CC licenses. File:Laidy Gómez.png is taken from a site called Poderopedia, which claims to be under a CC 3.0 license [1], but a reverse image search with TinEye and Google Images shows that this image was used on Twitter and various web sites since at least 2019, also in larger versions, so I highly doubt it originated from that Poderopedia site. I also can't find CC licenses for the others, and File:Freddy Bernal Gobernador.jpg I can't find at all at the source page that is named. So all those files should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless convincingly shown to be either under a free license or in the public domain.

Rosenzweig τ 17:25, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:54, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PACKAGING. SHB2000 (talk) 01:52, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, as file is shown here copyrighted in Septmeber 2021, Uploader claims it is public domain a month later: https://culturaenegocios.com.br/conheca-levi-avelino-o-jovem-que-faz-sucesso-como-musico-compositor-e-influencer/ A loose necktie (talk) 02:47, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information provided regarding the copyright status of the statues, but it is likely that the sculptors or artists who designed these sculptures are not yet dead for more than 50 years. The Philippines does not have freedom of panorama that would have allowed free exploitations of works easily found by the public.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of a journal is copyright. Even source is not in commons. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Found it: CC4 licence: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Shkuru Afshar (talk) 12:06, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is the personal website with no copyright/free tag. Needs investigation. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Found it: CC4 licence: Image licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 12:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cc-by-nc-nd Theklan (talk) 13:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: website says "CC BY-SA 3.0". --P 1 9 9   14:48, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The previous deletion discussion resulted in a keep vote by the closer, no other participants or discussion. While the source website includes a boilerplate CC-BY-SA license, this particular image by Manu Ortega has an explicit CC-BY-NC-ND license, indicated in the lower left. A larger image (with clearer view of the NC-ND declaration) can be downloded clicking by "Deskargatu pdf-a hemen klik eginda", and see also here. I think it's clear that the illustrator always intended their work to be CC-NC-ND. --Animalparty (talk) 07:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jordpop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images include book cover art which is not the uploader's own work, and high resolution artwork on spines which I would doubt (since the photo is of these specific books arranged for the camera rather than a general bookshelf) would be considered Commons:De minimis.

Lord Belbury (talk) 09:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also the following in same reason with watermarks:
Nakaret (talk) 03:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:47, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thumbnail-size, contextless bot import from unidentified location Fl.schmitt (talk) 11:43, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is totally blurry and of low quality, probably taken from inside the car. The file is not used on other wikis. The photo was uploaded by user:Panoramio upload bot without paying attention to quality. Nemracc (talk) 13:49, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr-washing: Flickr account has 0 followers, no exif data here or on Flickr. Images can be found elsewhere w/o indication of free license, e.g. at https://ashfaquenabi.wordpress.com/.

Njd-de (talk) 14:05, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Njd-de Could not find any objection, if reported then do take this work down. kindly remove deletion request Whistleswhite (talk) 14:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's not how copyright works. Anarchyte (talk) 08:01, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

That statue of St Menas in a church in Germany is a work of de:Wilhelm Tophinke, who died in 1961. So it is still protected by copyright until the end of 2031, and the files should be deleted. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany. The files can be restored in 2032.

Rosenzweig τ 14:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eugène-René Arsal died in 1972, no freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:E11D:5CE7:40AD:1E80 14:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eugène-René Arsal died in 1972, no freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:E11D:5CE7:40AD:1E80 14:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eugène-René Arsal died in 1972, no freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:E11D:5CE7:40AD:1E80 14:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privacy issues, this is me Keoqa (talk) 02:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 11:21, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject may be identifiable. Bhphs (talk) 14:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 11:21, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ceejay jah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Flickr-washing: Flickr account has 0 followers, no exif data here or on Flickr. Unlikely that uploader and Flickr user is creator of these images.

Njd-de (talk) 15:36, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to original nomination: The images can be found elsewhere on the web w/o indication of free license: https://twitter.com/hashtag_wilbert/status/1465674923645423616 and https://tribune.net.ph/index.php/2022/04/25/kaia-drops-banger-single-blah-blah/. Njd-de (talk) 16:49, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: both files already deleted by Wdwd and Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 11:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission at the source Imzadi 1979  05:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 14:44, 23 September 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 18:44, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website has no copyright/free tag. Needs investigation. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Found it: CC4 licence: تمام محتوای این سایت تحت مجوز بین‌المللی «کریتیو کامنز ۴» منتشر می‌شود. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:53, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website has no copyright/free tag. Needs investigation. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website has no copyright/free tag. Needs investigation. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Found it: CC4 licence: تمام محتوای این سایت تحت مجوز بین‌المللی «کریتیو کامنز ۴» منتشر می‌شود. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:53, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website has no copyright/free tag. Needs investigation. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:28, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Found it: It is published with CC4 licence: تمام محتوای این سایت تحت مجوز بین‌المللی «کریتیو کامنز ۴» منتشر می‌شود. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website has no copyright/free tag. There is no source that it is published in CC4 licence. Needs investigation. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Found it: It is published with CC4 licence: تمام محتوای این سایت تحت مجوز بین‌المللی «کریتیو کامنز ۴» منتشر می‌شود. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website has no copyright/free tag. There is no source that it is published in CC4 licence. Needs investigation. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Found it: It is published with CC4 licence: تمام محتوای این سایت تحت مجوز بین‌المللی «کریتیو کامنز ۴» منتشر می‌شود. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website has no copyright/free tag. There is no source that it is published in CC4 licence. Needs investigation. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Found it: It is published with CC4 licence: تمام محتوای این سایت تحت مجوز بین‌المللی «کریتیو کامنز ۴» منتشر می‌شود. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website has no copyright/free tag. There is no source that it is published in CC4 licence. Needs investigation. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Found it: CC4 licence: © All content by this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 12:03, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website has no copyright/free tag. There is no source that it is published in CC4 licence. Needs investigation. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:40, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Found it: It is published with CC4 licence: تمام محتوای این سایت تحت مجوز بین‌المللی «کریتیو کامنز ۴» منتشر می‌شود. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website has no copyright/free tag. There is no source that it is published in CC4 licence. Needs investigation. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:40, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Found it: It is published with CC4 licence: تمام محتوای این سایت تحت مجوز بین‌المللی «کریتیو کامنز ۴» منتشر می‌شود. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website has no copyright/free tag. There is no source that it is published in CC4 licence. Needs investigation. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:40, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Found it: It is published with CC4 licence: تمام محتوای این سایت تحت مجوز بین‌المللی «کریتیو کامنز ۴» منتشر می‌شود. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source can't be tracked down; it could be PD, but without a source I can't confirm. Part of a CCI open on the uploader. Sennecaster (talk) 22:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader is locked globally. --Achim55 (talk) 19:12, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thumbnail pic of unidentified location without context, useless for project purposes Fl.schmitt (talk) 16:56, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:10, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thumbnail-size pic of unidentified location Fl.schmitt (talk) 17:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:20, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Model under copyright. No COM:FOP in France. We need a permission from the author. Yann (talk) 16:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hypothetical maps User:Marcello Di Maio

[edit]

More fictional maps uploaded by User:Marcello Di Maio. Delete as misleading and out of scope.

Eureka Lott 19:52, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete thanks Eureka for paying attention. --Enyavar (talk) 08:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with a shop sign. Because of the missing description it cannot be categorized locally (Portland: Oregon?/Maine?). No educational use, unusable and out of scope COM:SPAM Feyth (talk) 22:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It would have been the uploader's job to provide a more detailed description. But unfortunately many people who participate here can no longer read and confuse Commons with some social platform where they can show everything. Speaking of the exact reading: this photo was not taken in 2013, but in 2012, exactly on May 30, according to the metadata; so unfortunately the categorization 2013 in Portland, Oregon was wrong. From my point of view, Commons is not the right place to show every random business sign here, the final decision about the further whereabouts of this photo can be made by the administrators responsible for it, Feyth (talk) 22:42, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes, it would have been nice if the uploader had done everything by the book, but the fact that they didn't doesn't make this "every random business" or justify deletion. The categorization can be changed. Why don't you concede the point? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep deletion request was withdrawn by me, the applicant, Feyth (talk) 22:56, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I appreciate it. I won't always take the time to try to salvage a photo, but in this case, I thought it was an interesting image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:55, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MIAJudges (talk · contribs)

[edit]

High number of blurry portrait photos w/o exif data taken in different surroundings are suspect. Uploader claims "Senate judiciary comittee" as source and unknown author. Unlikely that the images are compatibly licensed and that the creators have granted permissions.

Some of the images can be found elsewhere online in higher quality, e.g.

Nominating these images:

Njd-de (talk) 09:22, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:44, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MIAJudges (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Source "Senate JudiciaryCommittee" and author "Unknown author" with incorrect dates (e.g. File:Arianna Freeman.jpg says 7 July 2022, however hearing took place in March 2022: https://www.courthousenews.com/surge-of-public-defenders-heading-to-federal-bench-drives-wedge-at-senate/) are not enough to identify whether these images are compatibly licensed. Some images bear watermarks (e.g. File:Todd Michael Hughes.jpg) suggesting these images/screenshots of videos have been made by a US government entity, which would mean they are in public domain. Much better source information is needed to corroborate that and rule out that these images have been created by a private entity.

Njd-de (talk) 09:58, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
I updated the correct senate judiciary committee hearing dates for all of the names you listed above from Todd Michael Hughes to Margaret Strickland. If there is anything else you need me to update please let me k ow. If not, feel free to withdraw your delete request.
Thank you
MIAJudges (talk) 05:42, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I will be happy to go into each picture I uploaded & put the day of their senate judiciary hearing. I was putting the date I uploaded each picture on the picture but I will be happy to go in & change each one. MIAJudges (talk) 18:21, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If these are screenshots from C-SPAN coverage of hearings, then they're not copyright-compliant for Wikipedia purposes, per the policy here. Per C-SPAN's site, only coverage from the House or Senate floor (not committees) is in the public domain. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 20:51, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
DMacks (talk) 13:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@MIAJudges: Today you uploaded another file with questionable source information: File:Robert Wilkins 1.jpg.
Where do you obtain these screenshots from ? I've been doing some research and it appears that specific hearing did not take place on 31 October 2013 as claimed in the file summary. Unless the same people in same clothes gathered twice, it must've taken place on 11 September 2013 (see video at https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/judicial-nominations-2013-09-11, Robert Wilkins' hearing begins at roughly 0:50h). Njd-de (talk) 21:22, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, No these screenshots are not from C-Span. They are from the senate, none are from C-Span as I know that would violate copyright rules. As for the date for Robert Wilkins, if I put October 2013 then that was just an error. It was taken from September 2013. If there are any errors for any of the above pics that I need to fix please let me know. I’ll be honest, I’m mot a Wikipedia expert so errors are possible but I am more then happy to fix them. I know many people are happy with the pictures on the articles for the federal judges so I can fix whatever is needed so we can keep the pictures up within guidelines. MIAJudges (talk) 22:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all; I feel like most of them are copyvios taken from other websites and don't belong here, and the images that could possibly be from Senate hearings are low quality and can be replaced with better pictures or official portraits. Plus it doesn't help that there's no source except "Senate judiciary committee" and that even after searching I couldn't find them online anywhere, and it can constitute as lacking important information to determine if its genuine. reppoptalk 05:38, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The pictures taken with the nominees sitting at their Senate judiciary committee hearing are not copyvios taken from other websites.

MIAJudges (talk) 13:45, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MIAJudges (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Similar to recent nomination for deletion of files uploaded by this user, the images are lacking information to determine copyright status. Images are extremely unlikely to be CC-BY-SA licensed, and the question is whether they are in public domain. However, no author and source given as "Senate judiciary comittee" is not helpful. Some images have been uploaded with incorrect dates, e.g. File:Robert Wilkins 1.jpg (hearing took place 11 September 2013, not 31 October 2013) or File:Matthew Leitman.jpg (hearing took place 30 October 2013, not 16 January 2014). For some of the screenshots the source is undeniably C-SPAN, e.g. File:Kimberly Mueller.jpg seems to have been taken from https://www.c-span.org/video/?293041-104/us-district-court-nominations (at approx. 4:30 min) or File:Catherine Eagles.jpg from https://www.c-span.org/video/?293041-104/us-district-court-nominations (scene at approx. 14:50 min).

Njd-de (talk) 13:15, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all,

The File:Kimberly Mueller.jpg picture can be deleted. All other pictures listed here has been updated with the correct licesne info per the advise I was given by admins. We used the File:Arianna Freeman.jpg as a template & I updated all of thee pics using that. If these are good, later this week I will go ahead & re-do the pictures that were deleted already with the correct info from the template mentioned above. Some of them I did not get from the SJC hearing so I will leave those out.

MIAJudges (talk) 22:19, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per MIAJudges. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MIAJudges (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Georgia copyrights their government created works: https://copyright.lib.harvard.edu/states/georgia/ Also the website source explicitly says "all rights reserved".

Abzeronow (talk) 16:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I put licensing Template in the licensing section. Could you give me some advice as to how to obtain what you’re asking for?

MIAJudges (talk) 16:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all files already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 17:36, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission or that uploader is actual creator. Sumanuil (talk) 04:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gradients usually exceed the threshold of originality. Even if it was a solid color, the logo still possibly exceeds the TOO. 24.12.3.153 21:17, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission or that uploader is actual creator. Sumanuil (talk) 04:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission or that uploader is actual creator. Sumanuil (talk) 04:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It would help if the uploader hadn't uploaded dozens of logos and claimed to have created them all.Sumanuil (talk) 06:00, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission or that uploader is actual creator. Sumanuil (talk) 04:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission or that uploader is actual creator. Sumanuil (talk) 04:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep PD-logo, simple geometric shape, although this one is slightly more complex than the others. What evidence are you expecting from an svg file that someone created it other than their license statement? --RAN (talk) 05:20, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission or that uploader is actual creator. Sumanuil (talk) 04:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep What evidence are you expecting from an svg file that someone created it other than their license statement? Also text and simple geometric shapes are not eligible for copyright. --RAN (talk) 05:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission or that uploader is actual creator. Sumanuil (talk) 04:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO, either own work and DW or not own work. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission or that uploader is actual creator. Sumanuil (talk) 04:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO, either own work and DW or not own work. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission or that uploader is actual creator. Sumanuil (talk) 04:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO, either own work and DW or not own work. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission or that uploader is actual creator. Also duplicates existing file. Sumanuil (talk) 04:34, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • If we already host copies of it, why would we need permission for another copy? What evidence are you expecting from an svg file that someone created it other than their license statement? --RAN (talk) 05:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:51, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brigban (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts, diagrams, logos. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Although I didn't do an in-depth analysis of every image, some of them appear to be educational. Plus, the whole "they should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful" argument is clearly nonsensical. Plenty of logos aren't in SVG format and are still useful. Also, split the nomination up into a smaller amount of files next time. 317 files is way to many for anyone to reasonably look through. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question: Why have some of these files been deleted with the rationale "Out of Commons:Project scope" while this discussion is still ongoing? Isn't the purpose of this discussion to determine whether or not they should be deleted as out of scope? Marbletan (talk) 16:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedurally per Adamant, take the deleted files to COM:UNDEL. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brigban (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts and diagrams. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment. As files covering various concepts in geometry, mathematics, and graphing I think a majority of these depict topics that fall well within the scope of educational media that is appropriate for Commons. Some are clearly lower quality (low resolution, non-ideal file format, etc.) and may never be used because there are plenty of higher quality alternatives. But while spot checking, I find that some appear to be potentially useful files of decent quality (the PNG files related to local minima and local maxima, for example). With over one hundred diverse files nominated, it is really too much to categorize each into keep/delete. Marbletan (talk) 16:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: kept all remaining files procedurally per Marbletan; deleted files can be taken to COM:UNDEL. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brigban (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts and diagrams. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above closes. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Watermark: Hamed Elmiyeh for City Council of Tehran HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:24, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source can't be tracked down; it could be PD, but without a source I can't confirm. Part of a CCI open on the uploader. Sennecaster (talk) 22:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:53, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is inaccessible to verify date, no author besides the website domain (highly unlikely), and there is an extremely high chance that this is misidentified and not even the subject it claims to be. Only use is on Enwiki, where there are plenty of other images. Uploader is blocked sock with a CCI. Sennecaster (talk) 22:29, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CSS Webb had two (2) walking beam engines. The boat shown in this sketch appears to have only one (1). — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 174.246.135.102 (talk) 18:11, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another probably copyvio image marked as "Own work". Probably an image from Facebook taken by an account with only one upload D-Kuru (talk) 14:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:55, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Albinfo (talk) 20:34, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; source stated to be "google.com". --Rosenzweig τ 08:46, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work – grabbed from the web Albinfo (talk) 20:36, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:46, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission or that uploader is actual creator. Sumanuil (talk) 04:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I should have checked closer; this was published initially in 1967 by Erik Heyl with notice, so expiration is in 2062 Sennecaster (talk) 22:53, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicado Alexrof (talk) 23:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexrof of what? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mdaniels5757: found it. Bencemac (talk) 21:46, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bencemac Thanks. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure if a mural inside a museum in Albania can be under a free license. Definitely no freedom of panorama. Albinfo (talk) 21:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no fop inside buildings accd. to COM:FOP Albania. --Rosenzweig τ 16:03, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Content that is posted with the intention of mocking another person or user. Zoohhdf319 (talk) 04:25, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also likely copyvio and out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-res photo, seems to belong to the same photoset as https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/photos/e.-elias-merhige (though no exact match) Blacklake (talk) 08:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyvio. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:22, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission Dronebogus (talk) 11:36, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:20, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derived file of multiple stamps that are still under copyright (published in the 1950s-2000s) Skimel (talk) 18:24, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

en français : il s'agit d'une oeuvre dérivée composée de plusieurs timbres publiés dans les années 1950 à 2000, et qui sont encore sous droit d'auteur parce que leurs créateurs ne sont pas décédés depuis plus de 70 ans. Skimel (talk) 18:43, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment for instance Jean Pheulpin (1907–1991), so hsi work is copyright until 2062. Ww2censor (talk) 10:49, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Bilorv as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Per description, taken from https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/519678-most-playing-cards-consecutively-thrown-into-a-target without valid license
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as rationale is not convincing because the external hit has far lower resolution and is cropped compared to our version. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,I'm helper of his photographer, my sir gave me permission to use this photo on Wikipedia in card throwing article where world's records catagory is mentioned and we used Wikipedia commons to upload it and used in card throwing section where record photos are being uploaded with record! And Aditya Kodmur holds rights on this picture and Guinness World Records doesn't completely! Thank you and please do not delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edit wiki233 (talk • contribs) 11:11, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. Obviously this should be kept. I'll let people more knowledgeable than I about the requirements for documentation on Commons address what further actions need to be taken. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yea! We own personal rights on this picture and please do not delete our picture as we have own right and been taken from our won camara! Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edit wiki233 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Edit wiki233: you say that the photographer has given "permission to use this photo on Wikipedia in card throwing article". However, that's not what you've done. You've released the photo under a Creative Commons license, so that anybody can reuse the photo with attribution for any purpose they desire. Is this what the photographer has agreed to? Bilorv (talk) 10:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - "permission to use this photo on Wikipedia in card throwing article " is far too limited to be acceptable here. We require that images must be free for use anywhere by anybody for any purpose. It's also not clear that the actual photographer has given any written permission at all. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo marked as self work created in 2010 but the person depicted died in 1993. {{PD-Serbia}} does not cover post-1973 works WindEwriX (talk) 20:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 21:51, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Included in Early American Steamers volume 4, originally published in 1965. Out of copyright in 2060 Sennecaster (talk) 22:47, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (copyright registration here). The file can be restored in 2061. --Rosenzweig τ 00:11, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a version of very poor quality and in black and white, there are already better versions like File:Dorothea Sophie of Neuburg, formerly identified with Margherita Maria Farnese.jpg and File:Dorothea Sophia of Neuburg, formerly identified as Margherita Maria Farnese.jpg Ecummenic (talk) 08:24, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:15, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO Sweden for me. Jonteemil (talk) 09:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:14, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Finncle (talk) 12:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:14, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:HOAX cats and pages by chronic sockpuppeteer and impersonator (Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Wildhorse3, extensive copyvio by sockpuppeteer). No region is such defined, tried to create the same articles on enwiki which were promptly deleted (1, 2, 3). Gotitbro (talk) 14:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:16, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work (wrong date, no medatada, low size) HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:15, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we know if there is FOP or other PD exception in Lebanon? DMacks (talk) 14:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Just found COM:FOP Lebanon mentions there is no FOP ("non-commercial only"). That leaves the question of who actually owns the license for this, and if it's the government whether that is intrinsically commons-compliant. DMacks (talk) 14:40, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks more like a photo taken from the internet of the premiere night of the movie Journal 64 than own work. 80.62.117.69 14:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:54, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per favore qualcuno può correggermi il titolo di questa pagina? Ero senza occhiali!1 Chiedo venia Manuela Musco (talk) 16:02, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Question A quale nome Lei vuole cambiare il titolo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:13, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Buongiorno Ikan Kekek, scusami tanto, solo adesso ho visto questo messaggio. Ieri ho visto che potevo correggere il nome del file da sola, l'ho fatto, ora è a posto, si è creato un redirect. Ora si potrebbe togliere l'avviso di cancellazione, credo!! Scusami ma non sono tanto pratica. Grazie. Buona giornata. Manuela Musco (talk) 07:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:55, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright : empire studios - voir aussi clip : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzLGJyAwhCI Bédévore (talk) 19:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mediocre photo of very common subject Dronebogus (talk) 19:34, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason. --Krd 13:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright : empire studios - voir aussi clip : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzLGJyAwhCI Kirham (talk) 21:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should be processed in coordination with the treatment of File:Ziak et Maes dans les studios Empire en novembre 2021..jpg Kirham (talk) 21:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:57, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a screenshot of my contributions on en.wikipedia.org and accuses me of being a nationalist. This shouldn't be on Commons. Semsûrî (talk) 23:53, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:57, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence from the program author that this software is released under a free license; source code isn't available either. For legal reasons, the specific individual/group creating the program or the source of such authorship will not be mentioned in this DR. Ntx61 (talk) 18:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep seems below COM:TOO to me. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    That's to be seen, maybe we'll wait for another month or more until an administrator decides on it; for comparison on the length, this DR that I opened in early July was open for over 6 months. What concerns more, however, is when Microsoft spots this -- since this screenshot contains something illegal, they could (in theory, I think) send DMCA notices to have it taken down to prevent users from looking up its name. I have also opted not to mention the name of the tool or its author here to avoid having this DR getting DMCA'd or otherwise censored by WMF staff due to potentially assisting readers to commit piracy by hinting at it. For the same reason, if this gets taken down, I am planning to replace the screenshot with a generic mock screenshot, which can be below COM:TOO, and also "linked" to a fictitious or generically named software so that readers can see how it may look like without pointing it to a real software. It is too risky to hint at anything. Ntx61 (talk) 04:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:PCP. --Krd 16:29, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

لأنها كلام فارغ Mohammedslama (talk) 22:12, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this photo is part of article which I've preparing. Was took few years ago by myself. Lukasz.Felcenloben (talk) 01:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who couldn't resist. --Achim55 (talk) 11:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]