Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/04/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Files in Category:Male masturbation
[edit]Bad quality COM:PORN, commons is not an exhibitionist platform.
- File:1 Mann wichst.jpg
- File:Caucasian man masturbating in bed until orgasm.webm
- File:Looped male masturbation orgasm.gif
- File:Post-orgasm photo of a man immediately after masturbating.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 00:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Jagdeepnh (talk) 08:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 08:39, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
SOUHAIT DE NON DIFFUSION Pierre CASAMITJANA (talk) 09:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Keine gute Qualität des Bildes. Bitte um Löschung. 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:A56E:11:664B:8E47 07:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Keep: Do not feed the troll --DALIBRI (talk) 07:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Ich möchte das folgende Bilder aus Wikimedia Commons gelöscht werden. Begründung: Dies sind meine eigenenen Bilder und sind nicht schön und haben keinerlei Bezug auf Weinfelde 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:9D0E:62DE:13AB:D24A 10:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- But who are you? If you are uploader Cityboy91, then log-in and confirm. --Túrelio (talk) 08:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in scope, and doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion (no proof even that requester is uploader!). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:FC67:3FB1:B053:2C7A 14:45, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 15:13, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität Lukas 91 (talk) 08:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Keine gute Qualität des Bildes. Hat auch keinerlei Bezug auf irgend etwas. 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:A56E:11:664B:8E47 06:55, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Do not feed the troll --DALIBRI (talk) 07:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Ich möchte das folgende Bilder aus Wikimedia Commons gelöscht werden. Begründung: Dies sind meine eigenenen Bilder und sind nicht schön und haben keinerlei Bezug auf Weinfelde 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:9D0E:62DE:13AB:D24A 10:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- But who are you? If you are uploader Cityboy91, then log-in and confirm. --Túrelio (talk) 08:28, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in scope, and doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion (no proof even that requester is uploader!). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:FC67:3FB1:B053:2C7A 14:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 15:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität Lukas 91 (talk) 08:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Keine gute Qualität des Bildes. Bitte um Entfernung. 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:A56E:11:664B:8E47 06:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Do not feed the troll --DALIBRI (talk) 07:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:FC67:3FB1:B053:2C7A 14:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 15:26, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität Lukas 91 (talk) 08:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Ich möchte das folgende Bilder aus Wikimedia Commons gelöscht werden. Begründung: Dies sind meine eigenenen Bilder und sind nicht schön und haben keinerlei Bezug auf Weinfelde 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:9D0E:62DE:13AB:D24A 10:22, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- But who are you? If you are uploader Cityboy91, then log-in an confirm. --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in scope, and doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion (no proof even that requester is uploader!). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:FC67:3FB1:B053:2C7A 14:48, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 15:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität Lukas 91 (talk) 08:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
chlechte Qualität auch nicht zeigenswert 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:856D:A01F:18A7:BC87 09:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by known LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 18:39, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität Lukas 91 (talk) 08:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Ich möchte das folgende Bilder aus Wikimedia Commons gelöscht werden. Begründung: Dies sind meine eigenenen Bilder und sind nicht schön und haben keinerlei Bezug auf Weinfelde 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:9D0E:62DE:13AB:D24A 10:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- So far no evidence that this is the uploader, who was User:Lukas 91. --Túrelio (talk) 08:05, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in scope, and doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion (no proof even that requester is uploader!). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:FC67:3FB1:B053:2C7A 14:46, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 15:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität Lukas 91 (talk) 08:35, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Keine gute Qualität des Bildes. 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:A56E:11:664B:8E47 06:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Do not feed the troll --DALIBRI (talk) 07:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität Lukas 91 (talk) 08:35, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Keine gute Qualität des Bildes. Gibt bessere Bilder von der Altstadt. 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:A56E:11:664B:8E47 07:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Do not feed the troll --DALIBRI (talk) 07:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Ich möchte das folgende Bilder aus Wikimedia Commons gelöscht werden. Begründung: Dies sind meine eigenenen Bilder und sind nicht schön und haben keinerlei Bezug auf Weinfelde 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:9D0E:62DE:13AB:D24A 10:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- But who are you? If you are uploader Cityboy91, then log-in and confirm. --Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in scope, and doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion (no proof even that requester is uploader!). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:FC67:3FB1:B053:2C7A 14:48, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 15:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität Lukas 91 (talk) 08:36, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Bild falsch angeschrieben deswegen bitte löschen. 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:A56E:11:664B:8E47 06:52, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Do not feed the troll --DALIBRI (talk) 07:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Mein eigenes Bild und es ist nicht wirklich schön 2A02:1205:5073:FEA0:DC1D:E59B:1B7D:C022 10:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- But who are you? If you are uploader Cityboy91, then log-in and confirm. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in scope, and doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion (no proof even that requester is uploader!). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität Lukas 91 (talk) 08:36, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Schlechte Qualität 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:819C:7D8E:CDF2:D87D 07:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Request by known LTA vandal. --Achim55 (talk) 12:17, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope. See ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/鎌倉時代に書かれた作者不明の肖像画. 新幹線 (talk) 05:37, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:56, 30 April 2022 UTC: Vandalism by w:ja:LTA:SUMOSONG. This figure contains Wanwan, one of character of w:Inai Inai Baa!, so this figure was not drown in w:Kamakura period --Krdbot 13:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Farhan Ahmed Jovan.jpg Priyo Harry (talk) 12:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: ARR @ https://flickr.com/photos/145646262@N05/39126939504, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 14:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:1
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyvio + is that literally a photo of a screen? Dronebogus (talk) 02:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 15:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 12:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope garbage Dronebogus (talk) 21:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope junk
Dronebogus (talk) 00:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope
Dronebogus (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS junk files Dronebogus (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
More OOS junk
Dronebogus (talk) 16:30, 15 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC) Out of scope junk Dronebogus (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS crap junk Dronebogus (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
No copyright info + OOS Dronebogus (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. Yann (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Load of OOS crap This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
More OOS crap Dronebogus (talk) 05:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert me if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Oos garbage Dronebogus (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 20:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC) Deleted --Adamant1 (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
That was fast. More junk as usual Dronebogus (talk) 01:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC) Deleted The images were deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 18:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nom, some apparent copyviols from social media. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope crap Dronebogus (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Garbagé de OOS Dronebogus (talk) 11:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
a.jpg){kind=link}
![94 File:Auszug aus "Moderne Bauformen- Monatshefte für Architektur und Raumkunst".jpg](#File:Auszug_aus_"Moderne_Bauformen-_Monatshefte_für_Architektur_und_Raumkunst".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_posted_on_Instagram_CPvlHbYFa7t(JPG).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:1
[edit]Instagram crap
Dronebogus (talk) 11:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Usual collection of Instagram crap
Dronebogus (talk) 01:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Oos garbage
Dronebogus (talk) 22:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Usual oos crap
Dronebogus (talk) 12:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Delete. Derivative work of logo. Source country is unknown, so we cannot be sure in freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:1
[edit]Personal spam and potential copyright violations
- File:Azmy Ehab21.jpg
- File:BALSA EUCLIDES.webp
- File:JARDIM BALNEARIO EUCLIDES.webp
- File:MAPA EUCLIDES.webp
- File:Moatazelmasry1632004.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 01:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mahir256 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: is this sockpuppeteer; the category of which this image is a part should also be nuked GPSLeo (talk) 07:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- As the file has a VRT permission you should provide a bit more explanation. --GPSLeo (talk) 07:03, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope. WD item deleted. --Yann (talk) 15:24, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:37, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:11, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:38, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:11, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:38, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:11, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:38, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 10:11, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio: http://www.president.kg/files/media/123/123038.jpg 46.251.206.50 04:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:50, 5 May 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: http://www.president.kg/files/media/123/123038.jpg. The user has uploaded this unfree file at least three times --Krdbot 13:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Salvador Dalí (1904-1989) has not been dead for 70 years. Thuresson (talk) 00:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete obviously a copyright violation. Dronebogus (talk) 00:28, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 09:06, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Madexhibitionist (talk · contribs)
[edit]Exhibitionistic COM:PORN
- File:Naked man using an elliptical trainer.jpg
- File:Selfie of a 50 year old male with an erection making the peace sign.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 00:56, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 09:08, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
This picture's title is "15 years old girl's breast". If this title is true, This picture is child pornography. By the way, this user and User:スーパーマサラ(User talk:スーパーマサラ) will be the same person. Because of this fact, this tile is false. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 06:41, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 09:12, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
No proof that it's own work and no logical connection with LeBron James (???) TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as likely copyvio, from the signature it's https://twitter.com/Kalystri, and if the artist uploaded it themselves they would likely have put that name on it. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:56, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely own work, questionable scope. --Strakhov (talk) 09:13, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
very low quality Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 07:56, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- The newer version of the file was of low quality. But now I reverted it and there is no need for deletion. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 07:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Can anyone remove the deletion tag? I don't want to delete anymore. Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 13:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Strakhov (talk) 09:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
this is my photo Ashiq S 13:56, 30 April 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashiq Surendran (talk • contribs) 13:56, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, nominated by uploader, valid CC licenses cannot be withdrawn, no valid reason for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
this is my photo Ashiq S 13:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashiq Surendran (talk • contribs) 13:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, nominated by uploader, valid CC licenses cannot be withdrawn, no valid reason for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:18, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
this is my photo Ashiq S 13:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashiq Surendran (talk • contribs) 13:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, nominated by uploader, valid CC licenses cannot be withdrawn, no valid reason for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:16, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
this is my photo Ashiq S 13:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashiq Surendran (talk • contribs) 13:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, nominated by uploader, valid CC licenses cannot be withdrawn, no valid reason for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
this is my photo Ashiq S 13:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashiq Surendran (talk • contribs) 13:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, nominated by uploader, valid CC licenses cannot be withdrawn, no valid reason for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
this is my photo Ashiq S 13:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashiq Surendran (talk • contribs) 13:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, nominated by uploader, valid CC licenses cannot be withdrawn, no valid reason for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:07, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Mainteance Madsky87 (talk) 14:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. Don't try "my upload is better than this one." --Achim55 (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:21, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Maintenance Madsky87 (talk) 14:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. Don't try "my upload is better than this one." --Achim55 (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 09:21, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Central Saharan Republic
[edit]Out of scope: maps/CoAs and flags of a fictional entity. This nomination includes the enveloping category as well.
- File:Flag of central saharan republic.png
- File:Coat of arms of Central Saharan Republic.png
- File:Fictional flag of Central Saharan Republic.svg
- File:Map of central saharan republic.png
Enyavar (talk) 14:21, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fantasy flags, coat of arms or map, especially the ones likely to be user-made hoaxes, are not educational. Veverve (talk) 17:32, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 09:23, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This film was released in 2022, so the maker of this affiche cannot be dead for at least 70 years and I do not see a VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 14:21, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AndreySetiawan989 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like the uploader has just googled for pictures of these athletes and uploaded them all claiming them as their own work. File:Achmad Hulaefi - 1.jpg = https://www.beritajakarta.id/read/61753/mengenal-lebih-dekat-achmad-hulaefi-asn-dki-peraih-medali-asian-games, File:Aries Susanti Rahayu - 1.jpg = https://olahraga.skor.id/aries-susanti-dan-impian-di-olimpiade-tokyo-2020-01336334, etc.
- File:Liem Swie King - 1.jpg
- File:Karisma Evi Tiarani.jpg
- File:Hariyanto Arbi All England.jpg
- File:Edgar Xavier Marvelo.jpg
- File:Mohammad Ahsan - 2017 World Championships.jpg
- File:Puspa Arumsari.jpg
- File:Hanifan Yudani Kusumah.jpg
- File:Rexy Mainaky.jpg
- File:Ricky Subagja.jpg
- File:Bambang Suprianto.jpg
- File:Achmad Hulaefi - 1.jpg
- File:Hary Susanto.jpg
- File:Achmad Hulaefi.jpg
- File:Diananda Choirunisa.jpg
- File:Veddriq Leonardo.jpg
- File:Aries Susanti Rahayu - 1.jpg
- File:Aries Susanti Rahayu – 1.jpg
- File:Aries Susanti Rahayu (1).jpg
- File:Aries Susanti Rahayu.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 14:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unlikely own work, COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 09:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Self harm
[edit]Commons can illustrate whatever this is (autoerotic sexual masochism I guess?) without grotesquely violent shock images
Dronebogus (talk) 00:06, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, only penis 01 another is in use. --Ezarateesteban 16:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
What even is this and where did you get it? Dronebogus (talk) 00:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use and nomination. --Ezarateesteban 16:43, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Henri Matisse (1869-1954) has not ben dead for 70 years. Thuresson (talk) 00:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete obviously a copyright violation. Dronebogus (talk) 00:28, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 16:44, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Useless low-res image Dronebogus (talk) 00:37, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 16:44, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elie Ghossoub (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising, out of scope.
- File:Back cover of the book - Order of Merit Extraordinary grade - الاستحقاق اللبناني الدرجة الاستثنائية.jpg
- File:Inside the book - Order of the Cedars officer grade - وسام الارز الوطني رتبة ضابط.jpg
- File:Inside the book - Order of the Cedars commander grade - وسام الارز الوطني رتبة كومندور.jpg
- File:Inside the book - order of the Public Instructions type I وسام المعارف النوع الاول.jpg
- File:BOOK SIZE.jpg
- File:Inside the book - Order of Merit Extraordinary grade - الاستحقاق اللبناني الدرجة الاستثنائية.jpg
- File:Inside the book - Order of St. Maron Grand Cordon وشاح مار مارون.jpg
- File:Inside the book - Order of Merit type I, class 1.jpg
- File:THE ORDERS, DECORATIONS AND MEDALS OF THE LEBANON أوسمة وميداليات ونياشين لبنان.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:59, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 16:46, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused photoshopped image of nondescript foliage, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 16:47, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Asma.heydari1365 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-notable, self-promo, unused {{Userpage image}}. See d:Wikidata:Requests for deletions#Q111519068.
- File:Mohammad Mirshahi6.jpg
- File:Mohammad Mirshahi5.jpg
- File:Mohammad Mirshahi4.jpg
- File:Mohammad Mirshahi3.jpg
- File:Mohammad Mirshahi2.jpg
- File:Mohammad Mirshahi.jpg
- File:Mohammad Mirshahi1.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:21, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LilYoung Az (talk · contribs)
[edit]SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 13:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:05, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ColonneDuNord33 (talk · contribs)
[edit]SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors). Unclear why these images should be in Commons.
- File:Logo Wooksart.jpg
- File:Wooksart.jpg
- File:Antoine Godet.jpg
- File:-Dylan Besseau.jpg
- File:Dylan Besseau--.jpg
- File:Dylan--Besseau.jpg
- File:Dylan Besseau-.jpg
- File:Dylan Besseau face.jpg
- File:Dylan-Besseau.jpg
- File:Antoine Godet.png
JopkeB (talk) 14:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Chip-Happy.png
- File:Battery-Full (1).png
- File:Battery-90 (2).png
- File:Battery-80 (1).png
- File:Battery-70 (1).png
- File:Battery-40 (1).png
- File:Battery-60 (1).png
- File:Battery-50 (1).png
- File:Battery-10.png
- File:Battery-30 (1).png
- File:Battery-20 (1).png
- File:Logo edited edited edited (2).webp
- File:Go Chip Studios!.png
- File:Official Website.png
- File:The Sudio Logo 4.0.png
- File:The Studio 3.0.png
- File:The Studio 2.0.png
- File:The Studio.png
- File:Go Chip!.png
- File:Go Chip Logo.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:05, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Low quality chemical structure due to incorrect file format. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 06:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I have uploaded File:Acrylate-ion-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality vector version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 08:34, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Useless low res image Dronebogus (talk) 00:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 12:18, 8 May 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mojahed.cybery --Krdbot 19:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dkorie Terrell
[edit]- File:Rocko_2012.jpg
- File:Rocko_and_his_woman.jpg
- File:Rocko Da Don.jpg
- File:La La La single.jpg
- File:Auburn_-_La_La_La.jpg
- File:Monica_Arnold.jpg
- File:Monica 2004.jpg
- File:Monica July 2004.jpg
- File:Monica Arnold 2.jpg
- File:Monica 3.jpg
- File:Monica Arnold 4.jpg
- File:Monica 5.jpg
- File:Monica Arnold 6.jpg
- File:Monica Arnold 7.jpg
- File:Monica 8.jpg
- File:Monica 9.jpg
- File:Monica 10.jpg
- File:Monica 11.jpg
User:Dkorie Terrell was blocked as a sockpuppet on English Wikipedia, but remains active here. One of his uploads on English Wikipedia was speedily deleted as a hoax.[1]
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Umma_Do_Me_-_Rocko_single_cover.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Twp of the Rocko uploads have watermarks showing they were copied from online sources. The second and third shots have two different extended camera details, uncharacteristic of Dkorie Terrell, showing he got them from somewhere else. The 2008 shot was found by Tineye Reverse Image search in a 2015 Flickr page.[2] Obviously not belonging to Dkorie Terrell.
- The La La La single.jpg image is the artwork from a record company release by the artist Auburn, which is certainly owned by the record company Warner Bros.[3] The related image, Auburn_-_La_La_La.jpg, appears to be a fan-made hoax, unsuitable for any use.
- The group of Monica images are from July 10, 2004, when Monica performed for Weekend Today in New York City. The images have no camera indicated in EXIF data, showing that they are screenshots or otherwise processed photos, not straight from the camera. Professional photographer Derek "Storm" Arnold has shots from this same event at Getty Images.[4] The uploaded images appear to be from a previous version of Derek Storm's website. --Binksternet (talk) 02:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
![[2]](https://farm4.static.flickr.com/3168/2742661343_88a17ba8f7_m.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:59, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dkorie Terrell (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
もう古すぎるから 2001:3B0:22:8F16:2C57:35C3:4C36:D9D3 15:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
It's too old Einokapihateinend (talk) 15:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Small image without metadata, probably copied from social media. Yann (talk) 15:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
I made this for harassment. Excessive animation, roundabout explanations of things that should be obvious. So this image must be erased. Einokapihateinend (talk) 15:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Falsche Zuordnung ClausNe (talk) 16:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Merge into Portsmouth category hierarchy — Preceding unsigned comment added by TimSC (talk • contribs) 18:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, nonsense. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, Southsea is now a a suburb of Portsmouth and this category is/was too small. I'm merging most of the Southsea hierarchy into Portsmouth. --TimSC (talk) 18:36, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
a.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
a.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Pointless. No educational value. 62.216.210.8 19:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
a.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
a.jpg){kind=link}
Commons:NUDE. Low quality naked person picture. In addition, the title, "naked lady" is false because this person is male. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 20:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Commons:NUDE. Low quality naked person picture. In addition, the title, "female buttock" is false because this person is male. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 20:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Grainy. No educational value. 62.216.210.8 21:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Parque El Ejido is a park located along Avenue Patria Quito, Ecuador.taking a walk in the park.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope 62.216.210.8 21:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyvio per these edits. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unless our understanding of the licensing situation changes, it seems like this file is non-free. (Consult the linked edits for further comments of mine regarding this file.) aismallard (talk) 21:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The website at https://victimsofcommunism.org/ has a copyright claim at the bottom of the page. The text is free, but the logo suggests both flame and barbed wire; it is above TOO. This file needs proof of a free license. Glrx (talk) 21:59, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
image uploaded by hoaxer who kept inserting himself (as a "21-year-old four-star general") into other articles. Nothing about the provenance of this photo can be trusted; as such, it can serve no educational purpose and is not within project scope. DS (talk) 22:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE; same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Final Hisham wiki.pdf. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
No release by author Bahnmoeller (talk) 23:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Klare URV, sollte schnellgelöscht werden. Ich hab SLA gestellt. -- Chaddy (talk) 01:59, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Eugene Zelenko. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Published before 1927 & SEPS claims active copyright on all back issues not in public domain PDMagazineCoverUploading (talk) 02:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This issue was renewed. --RAN (talk) 22:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: renewed per [5]. The file can be restored in 2026. --Rosenzweig τ 12:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
unused, useless, no cat, no encyclopedic value, out of scope, etc F (talk) 11:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 15:03, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Project scope, text-only file. --Rosenzweig τ 12:59, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused, unclear which election or town is actcually represented, can easily be generated using the diagram tool if needed Aeroid (talk) 10:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Aeroid: come on, it has Category:Politics of Vogtlandkreis.--RZuo (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
kept.--RZuo (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused, unclear which election or town is represented, can easily be generated if needed Aeroid (talk) 10:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Aeroid: literally in the filename.--RZuo (talk) 19:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: name of a significant newspaper literally in the filename.--RZuo (talk) 19:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
kept.--RZuo (talk) 19:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
What even is this? Dronebogus (talk) 00:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaded to advertize a certain building under construction, the material was deleted from fa.wiki as spam. Out of scope. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
What even is this Dronebogus (talk) 00:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaded to advertize a certain building under construction, the material was deleted from fa.wiki as spam. Out of scope. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
An user-made, unattested flag. Therefore, out of COM:SCOPE "fantasy" and "imaginary" flag; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". Veverve (talk) 08:16, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: does not seem to be really in use. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused and unclear which election or parliment this actually reflects ... looks fictitious. Aeroid (talk) 10:36, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Unusable - out of focus Periegetes (talk) 11:32, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Due to the poor quality this image is totally misleading (compare to File:Parikkala Kagöne.jpg). --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. Likely a personal photo. Hulged (talk) 13:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. Likely a personal photo. Hulged (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Insufficient information about the authorship: name of the portrayed person = name of the uploader. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal photo by non-contributors. Hulged (talk) 13:03, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Insufficient information about the authorship: name of the portrayed person = name of the uploader. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Author Photographer:Jane de Weck Copyright holder Copyright:Do Not Copy Without Prior Authorisation 191.126.155.52 14:03, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: another author according to EXIF. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Advertising. See also the username. The only contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: advertising (and perhaps copyright violation, but that is unclear). JopkeB (talk) 15:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
The file is uploaded 12 years ago, license is never reviewed and now source site is taken down. We must delete the file. In addition, the image itself (third row from bottom) says: images are taken from public sources in Internet. This is not acceptable, probably the file itself consists a lot of copyright violations. Fifth row from bottom says: author is Anna Rudometkina. Taivo (talk) 20:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation, out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 14:32, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: used only for meme-related vandalism. Willondon (talk) 18:38, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Not educational Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not familiar with the Commons deletion process, but someone may want to look at File:Capturedadwadsdwa.png and File:Merrychristmas.jpg too. Certes (talk) 22:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope, likely some kinds of promotion? Stang★ 06:18, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Possibly a spambot upload. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amirabariran (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope files. Personal photos by non contributors. Used only on wikidata where I have requested the deletion of the item.
- File:Amir Abar 7.jpg
- File:Amir Abar 4.jpg
- File:Amir Abar 1.jpg
- File:Amir Abar 3.jpg
- File:Amir Abar 2.jpg
Hulged (talk) 13:07, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:08, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal photo. Hulged (talk) 13:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (cf. Category:Microsoft OneNote logos). --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Netora as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4|2=File:ATLA logo.svg File:A tla logo.svg above TOO, and non free licensed https://www.mod.go.jp/atla/soubi_logo.html. Opposed by uploader in this edit. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:03, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This is the logo of en:Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Agency. According to the agency's webpage, this logo isn't free licensed, and the usage of this is restricted. The uploader frequently changed the license tags. But there are no valid reason of keeping this file legitimately.
- CC-BY-4.0 by Template:GJSTU-2.0 - not applied. From [6], the logo webpage is excluded from CC-BY license.
- under TOO - This logo is intended to show some military equipment(tank, warships, aircrafts) by illustrating. Obviously above TOO.
- Template:PD-Japan-exempt - I looked up the documents issued by the related government agency. But I couldn't find out the documents including this logo. I also asked the uploader for indicating the documents in File talk:防衛装備庁.svg. But the uploader doesn't answered. In view of the agency declaring the logo policy[7] by official notice, the agency seems not to want to let this logo under free usage. --Netora (talk) 13:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: GJSTU-2.0/CC-BY 4.0 not applicable. --Yasu (talk) 15:22, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted asset of Woolworths Group Limited TAC PlazaMaster (talk) 04:56, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Not any copyrightable elements. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 08:53, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This is a 1966 Italian record cover. I don't think the {{PD-Italy}} tag (for "simple", non-artistic photographs) applies to it, which leaves it protected by Italian copyright with 70 years pma.
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Louiselle for more files from this series of uploads. --Rosenzweig τ 23:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:52, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obvious COM:LL, missing original author, date, source, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obvious COM:LL, missing original author, date, source, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obvious COM:LL, missing original author, date, source, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Farouk Alghamrawi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own works, small files without EXIFs (almost all with Facebook metadata)
- File:قناة اخباري.jpg
- File:Actor .jpg
- File:المخرج فاروق الغمراوي مع النجمة بدريه طلبه.png
- File:مهرجان مسرح رومانس.png
Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:06, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused, actually empty, no election, can easily be generated by the diagram tool with real data. Aeroid (talk) 10:39, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, unused. Can be deleted.
- --Girwidz (talk) 19:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Own work claim is unlikely as it San be found on some Indonesian news website. NFarras (talk) 07:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 03:05, 14 June 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Candy405 --Krdbot 06:56, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
same file: Emblem of Azerbaijan.svg Jelican9 (talk) 00:39, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:57, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
same file: Emblem of Azerbaijan (simmetric).svg Jelican9 (talk) 00:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:57, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
This page is nominated for delete because does not long. End discussion:7 ianuarie 2023 03:04 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marianiftode1 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, nomination makes no sense. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:33, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Hilariously low quality, conveys nothing TenPoundHammer (talk) 03:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- My kid drew it when they were eight years old. It does show the basic idea of trac ball: two people holding baskets on sticks, throwing a ball back and forth. I'll ask my kid if they want to draw an updated version. Meonkeys (talk) 02:26, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, personal artwork, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:32, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Indian police foundation SubrahmanyamPM (talk) 04:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Test document uploaded SubrahmanyamPM (talk) 04:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:34, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
No use, a simple <math> tag is more easy and accesible --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 04:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Image that should not be an image, only used on user pages, can be replaced by following table equivalent
k c(k) 0 1073 1 1133 3 1253 5 1373 10 1673
--WIKImaniac 18:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Cannot be deleted because it is used on a user page. @Wikimaniac: if you can replace this on the user page with their consent, please nominate the image again. --Elly (talk) 20:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Image with no real use. The file is a test edition, and the unique use is a working page that categorizes science images that don't have enough data, and belongs to an user that has not been active since 2013 --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 04:59, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
promotional purpose (see description, nor search for the title) Veracious (talk) 06:05, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Postcard from 1975 with nothing to indicate the photo would be in the public domain or under a free license. 2A02:908:121:9900:0:0:0:C78D 06:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Postcard from 1974 with nothing to indicate the photo would be in the public domain or under a free license. 2A02:908:121:9900:0:0:0:C78D 06:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Repetitious. {{User|POS78}} talk 09:39, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:02, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Repetitious. {{User|POS78}} talk 09:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Merry May, PGD Leadership (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal business essays, out of COM:SCOPE as "Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text".
- File:Ideal Sales Strategies and Relevant Development of Concept To be a jumpstart on your sales strategy, model and plan VOL-0 30 Apr 2022.pdf
- File:The Elements of Business Strategies Associated Methodology Turn Into A Growth Organization VOL-0 18 Mar 2022.pdf
- File:Delecation Menthodology of Cross Functional management in Organization VOL-0 31 Jan 2022.pdf
- File:The concept of Business Development, Regarding the Association of Business Development Vs Marketing, Business Development Vs Sales, Business Development Vs Project Management, Business Development Vs Vendor Management VOL-0 12 Jan 2022.pdf
- File:Methodology of Relationship and Lifestyle VOL-0 08 Jan 2022.pdf
- File:How to Start in Personal Development and How to create a Framework 3 Tips for Beginner VOL-1.pdf
- File:Relation Between Talent Management And Organizational Behavior Regarding Cross Functional Management.pdf
Lord Belbury (talk) 10:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
and
Senator2029 10:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:38, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mina Luna Vincent
[edit]Out of project scope, self-promotion.
Bencemac (talk) 16:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In scope, and one in use, with a valid Wikidata entry. --RAN (talk) 05:15, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- None of them has a Wikidata-item, and the users are here clearly just to promote this person. Bencemac (talk) 07:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- comment ^YOU^ are the person who closed & deleted the wikidata item, on a 2:2 no consensus split discussion @wikid. Lx 121 (talk) 21:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as above; in scope, & actually 2 of them are in-use. extensively, across multiple wikis, in several languages. largely in lists & discussions relating to the 'celebrate women' event, female redlink articles, etc. -projects, it looks like.
- as the nominator should know, in-use files don't get deleted without a really good reason. (& PLEASE do not go around stripping out all the in-uses, that would be deeply inappropriate, really lame, & it just might be a significant rules-violation too)
- the other 2 pictures are also easily in scope. the nominator seems to be applying their understanding of wikipedia notability (, etc.) rules here, & they don't fit @ commons.
Info For context, the Wikidata item was deleted as elaborately constructed spam and promotional by me, then I nominated the files for deletion. The files are in fact not in use, they are just in Wikidata-lists and eventually will get removed in the next updating. Bencemac (talk) 07:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Info For context, the user is mis-applying WP:notability standards from wikipedia, to wikidata, where they do not apply. the user also closed the 2:2 split no-concensus discussion (@wikidata) as "delete"; which is not exactly good form & is certainly not an unbiased close.
AND if the user actually knew commons rules, they would know that "behind the scenes" use on other wiki-projects still counts as "in-use" when it comes to deletion @ commons.
AND the user is apparently mis-representing the current use of the said files. they appear to be included on a large number of discussion lists @ various wikipedias for "women in red", etc., wiki-projects as well as lists for professionals in occupations. that is NOT "just wikidata lists that are going to disappear in the next update". & for good measure, i think i'll just add them to my userpages, because i can. cheers :)
Lx 121 (talk) 20:17, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hello. the person exists and has some jobs as an artist and film director And it is not propaganda. The problem is that I may have put it in the wrong way. Sorry, I'm still learning. I wish you could help me. Thank you. 194.193.175.188 06:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- I leave here some of the things I found about this person. this is a link https://g.co/kgs/h7zxDv
- and here is other one with the music. https://music.apple.com/us/album/mala-dama-single/1565219301
- Also, has some movies. 194.193.175.188 06:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Keep for now. No exif makes them unlikely own work but needs proof of copyvio. 2 deleted as copyvios, 1 found here https://fashion-res.com/fashion-icon-its-mina-luna-vincent/. --Gbawden (talk) 15:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mina Luna Vincent
[edit]Previously DR'd for scope, these are in scope BUT likely copyvio. Tightly cropped with no exif, a number of other photos of her were deleted as copyvio. PCP
Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- question: why have you now added the category to the DR? Lx 121 (talk) 19:12, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Housekeeping - the cat has one image left and when its deleted the cat will be empty Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Support, spam here and on Wikidata. After we get rid of these files, we can finally clean Wikidata again (the subject's previous RfD). Bencemac (talk) 12:18, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- COMMENT and AGAIN you do not understand how things work on commons. (or wikidata for that matter). the reason for the file-deletions has NOTHING TO DO WITH your "spam" complaint. the images were, ^as clearly stated above^, IN SCOPE @wmc, AND they were in-use, all of which which makes your point irrelevant for deletion requests @commons. the images were deleted as suspected copyvio. Lx 121 (talk) 23:15, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete problems with copyright, scope... RZuo (talk) 19:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- comment i see you have taken to stalking my contribs now? (since there doesn't seem to be any other reason for you to sudenly turn up on an obscure & stale dr) - to rebut your points (which have ^already been discussed above^): 1. the copyvio question is in-process of being sorted. IF you have anything to contribute in terms of finding evidence of copyvio for the remaining picture, then please post it here? & 2. please go & actually READ COMMONS' SCOPE, & then come back & explain how you feel this IN-USE picture of this published artist is "out of scope" under COMMONS' RULES? :) with all due respect, Lx 121 (talk) 12:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
I would like ask for deletion of this to avoid multiple file uploaded in this platform. Kuya levi (talk) 11:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:39, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
This foto was uploaded to support content on the Norwegian "Mazda 929" page that I created. It has been taken out of context, and does not make sence anymore Tronerud (talk) 12:24, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
This foto was uploaded to support content on the Norwegian "Mazda 929" page that I created. It has been taken out of context, and does not make sence anymore Tronerud (talk) 12:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
This foto was uploaded to support content on the Norwegian "Mazda 929" page that I created. It has been taken out of context, and does not make sence anymore Tronerud (talk) 12:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
This foto was uploaded to support content on the Norwegian "Mazda 929" page that I created. It has been taken out of context, and does not make sence anymore Tronerud (talk) 12:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Awful quality, superseded by File:Eska Rock TV (2017-.n.v.).webp. Piotr Bart (talk) 12:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
.webp){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Pixelated and blurred. There's a remastered version already uploaded here. Kuya levi (talk) 12:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
test file; has been deleted a few times before (note that it's "INUSE" comes from 2008 and 2012, years before this 2018 iteration was created) Enyavar (talk) 12:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- In fact, I used the file in 2021 for SVG testing purposes; it is useful, for example, if you want to directly compare the rendering of two SVG graphics. Rossel44 (talk) 22:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Why not use File:Test.svg, which is a space specifically reserved for such testing? (PS, I see now what you did then; but so far you have been the only one. I'd say "Keep" if others agree with your assessment.) --Enyavar (talk) 16:43, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not used meaningfully. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:41, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
test file, no context, unused Enyavar (talk) 12:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:41, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alberto.bonanno (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Totò bonanno - studio 1993.jpg
- File:Totò bonanno - pippo rizzo 1951.jpg
- File:Totò bonanno - costanza quatriglio.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:42, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Castoria
[edit]Out of scope: stamp/CoA and flag of a fictional entity. This nomination includes the enveloping category as well. (Has also caused confusion with Category:Kastoria)
Enyavar (talk) 14:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:46, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: flag of a fictional entity Enyavar (talk) 14:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:48, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Non-free according to w:File:Logo-certina.png. Leaning delete as icon appears to be above COM:TOO/per COM:PCP. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:48, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This map is from https://www.catharinavanmijdrecht.eu/sailing-area/sailing-the-ijsselmeer/ and it says: © 2022 - Catharina van Mijdrecht. AND I do not see a VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 13:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Found identical images online, appears to be from shutterstock שוקו מוקה (talk) 13:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- I should have probably put this for speedy deletion, as this is an very clear copyright violation. שוקו מוקה (talk) 07:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This map is from https://www.sporcle.com/games/mucciniale/netherlands-physical-geography. No licence on the website for reuse of images ("Copyright © 2007-2022 Sporcle, Inc.") AND no VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 13:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The website uses licence CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (see https://watersnoodmuseum.nl/en/colofon/), so no commercial use is allowed. This is not compatible with Commons licences. JopkeB (talk) 14:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. There is no licence mentioned on the website, only © 2003-2022. So images may not be uploaded on Commons. JopkeB (talk) 14:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
wrong date, probably wrong author and source Xocolatl (talk) 14:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
the source page has a copyright different from the license claimed here Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hello. I hope you're doing well.
- I'm Mohamed Nahli the founder of Bioloige-Maroc.com and I'm the creator of this file. there is no copyright on it. and want to share it on wikimedia.
- you can check the about page ( https://biologie-maroc.com/about-us/ ) and scroll down and you will find my name as founder.
- thanks for understanding.
- regards Nahli Mohamed (talk) 00:47, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- the images used are free to use. they are offered by Canva (free tool)
- you can check my template and my designs here: https://www.canva.com/design/DAE6ZGm51BM/cuWrdmNhQqwOwIAKvKDaJQ/view?utm_content=DAE6ZGm51BM&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link&utm_source=publishsharelink
- please feel free to respond me.
- wish you the best Nahli Mohamed (talk) 00:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for the explanations, I hadn't noticed that. Under these circumstances, I withdraw my deletion request. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: advertising, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 15:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong source, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 15:03, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Christopher Khaemba (talk · contribs)
[edit]SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) AND the logo might be copyright violation as well
JopkeB (talk) 15:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Flickr uploader "dannychoo" has no copyright to screenshots (and paper brochures) of video game "DRACU-RIOT!".
File:Dracu-riot!- Mirai-chan 6946789142.jpg- File:Dracu-riot! - 6946789048.jpg
- File:Dracu-riot! - Mirai-chan Solar Marine Uniform 7092859773.jpg
- File:Dracu-riot! - Mirai-chan Solar Marine Uniform 6946788774.jpg
- File:DRACU-RIOT - Mirai-chan Winter Uniform 6946788606.jpg
- File:Dracu-riot! - Mirai-chan Bikini 6946788676.jpg
- File:Dracu-riot! - poster 6946788502.jpg
- File:Dracu-riot! - 7092859239.jpg
- File:Dracu-riot! - Desk Diary, 6946788314.jpg
- File:Dracu-riot! - 7092859025.jpg
- File:Dracu-riot! - Elina 7092858941.jpg
- File:Dracu-riot! - Rio Inamura 6946787964.jpg
- File:Dracu-riot! - Azusa Mera 7092858739.jpg
- File:Dracu-riot! front.jpg
- File:Dracu-riot! - Miu Yarai 6946787804.jpg
- File:Dracu-riot! - 7092858567.jpg
Stang★ 16:36, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Stang: Do you have any reason to suspect that he doesn't have the right to license files under CC-BY? Danny Choo was hosting Yuzusoft's (publisher of the DRACU-RIOT!) web pages [8] and afaik was also the creator of the web pages and Dracu-Riots iPhone app too.[9] Mirai Suenaga's character which was in the game is Danny Choo's property and the images are labeled with Culture Japan which is Danny Choo's TV program. So, there is at least some reasonable level of trust that Danny Choo is done it professionally and he has cleared the copyrights before he has put the content on the Flickr. -- Zache (talk) 16:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Zache: This is the official webpage of Yuzu Soft, I don't know why you thought the URL you provided as a "hosting"; It is correct that "Mirai Suenaga" is created by Danny Choo, and I am happy to withdraw deletion request for the first file (only depict character Mirai Suenaga and has no connection with video game Dracu-riot!), but it failed to indicate four main characters in Dracu-riot! were Danny Choo's own work. Anyway, an authorization letter directly from Yuzu Soft is need in such cases. Stang★ 17:16, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- It was written on the web page that I linked. Anyway, if you need technical proof: Danny Choo's web pages and Yuzysoft's web pages at 2012 when the blogpost was written were using same underlying implementation and visual look. -- Zache (talk) 17:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- I sincerely do not think so. The copyright of DRACU-RIOT! is undoubtedly owned by Yuzusoft. Maybe Yuzusoft licensed him for limited use (due to collaboration), but I will not believe that the screenshot of the game itself would be available under an open license. Just think of the main heroines themselves. They are designed by Kobuichi and Muririn, not Danny. MilkyDefer 17:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- I meant that the Dracu-Riot! images which are Danny Choo's Flickr account are published under CC-BY basically as promotional material for the game. Also, images under CC-BY don't mean that the game is under an open license. -- Zache (talk) 17:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- In any case, Danny Choo made collaboration with Yuzysoft also with Amairo Islenauts and most likely with other games too. I would say that it is likely that he/his company and Yuzysoft have a solid collaboration. Yuzysoft has published other promotional content under CC-BY too (for example Sabbath of the Witch trailer in YouTube) and experimenting with open licenses is something that they did do. --Zache (talk) 17:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- This doesn't matter in the context of deletion, but just to note that I fixed the credit lines in the files which were directly from Flickr upload's defaults. Now they tell that the creators for the artwork are Kobuichi and Muririn except one file where creator likely is Komowata Haruka based on the look of the drawings. --Zache (talk) 08:34, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Zache: This is the official webpage of Yuzu Soft, I don't know why you thought the URL you provided as a "hosting"; It is correct that "Mirai Suenaga" is created by Danny Choo, and I am happy to withdraw deletion request for the first file (only depict character Mirai Suenaga and has no connection with video game Dracu-riot!), but it failed to indicate four main characters in Dracu-riot! were Danny Choo's own work. Anyway, an authorization letter directly from Yuzu Soft is need in such cases. Stang★ 17:16, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete unless OTRS is definitively provided. It's difficult to believe that the screencaps in particular have been released under a free license. Also: I note from your global contributions that you propose replacing certain eroge and hentai images with these screencaps, yet none of them can be described as sexually explicit. Is this an attempt to censor Commons with SFW images? That would go completely against existing policy. See COM:CENSORSHIP for more details. JasonGlennHuntly (talk) 08:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- For the context you could also link to the relevant discussions, but yes. I think that images from Midnight68 and his aliases are rarely a good choice to use in articles. In some cases, they are blatant vandalism and in other cases, they are just bad. Generally, I think that if we can replace images of users' own fake companies/comic books, etc with something which actually exists is a good idea. Generally, I am not against NSFW imaginary in the topics where it is relevant. --Zache (talk) 08:59, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Just to note, this is a clear case for Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle, and if people are thinking that there is reasonable doubt then images would need an VTRS permission. Ie, there is no need for keeping this open and we can wrap this up as delete now and restore the files if copyrights can be cleared via VTRS. --Zache (talk) 18:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- I agree completely: all of these files should deleted as soon as possible and the images that they displaced restored to their respective articles. JasonGlennHuntly (talk) 08:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Afaik, only image in the list which needs to be replaced is File:Dracu-riot! - Mirai-chan Bikini 6946788676.jpg and afaik there no need for restoring original images which were artificial screenshots of software that doesn't exist as illustrations to articles. For hentai, there are a lot of images and for eroge, there are least SPNATI which is an adult game with manga-style graphics. -- Zache (talk) 09:11, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- I agree completely: all of these files should deleted as soon as possible and the images that they displaced restored to their respective articles. JasonGlennHuntly (talk) 08:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, sufficient doubt, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Washington Mutual Savings Bank’s main office at 1101 Second Avenue during remodel, 1939 (MOHAI 4316).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I believe the 1939 date in the title & description is correct, so the 1914 date is wrong. As a result, this probably is not PD and needs to be deleted. Jmabel ! talk 17:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
superseded by File:Cerimonia Militare al Vittoriano.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 17:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-free image. გიო ოქრო (talk) 18:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- ბოდიში, რაღაც შეგეშალათ. https://www.artstation.com/artwork/14lDJZ აღწერას ბოლომდე თუ წაიკითხავთ, პოსტ სკრიპტუმში მითითებულია: "I now release this work under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)". ხომლელი (talk) 12:31, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- I clarify, the image is released under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) which is accepted on wikimedia. This is stated at the end of the description (on right side of the image) of the original upload, in P.S section: https://www.artstation.com/artwork/14lDJZ You may be viewing a shortened description by default and need to expand it. Thank you. ხომლელი (talk) 06:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: now free (uploader is likely the artist and license was changed at source). Not sure about scope though. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
The subject's ire seems to suggest that the uploader is not the copyright owner of the photo. See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ram%C3%B3n_Nomar&diff=1080212928&oldid=1079101285 Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Mismatch between the date of the image and the alleged date of the photograph causes me to have grave doubts that it's the uploader's own work. C.Fred (talk) 03:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Hmmm Reverse Google image search doesn't turn up anything useful. Cosmic6811 (talk) 04:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, scanned photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:02, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
il seguenti ritratto non sarebbe la regina Maria Anna vittoria di spagna, ma bensì la principessa Angela Chigi della rovere principessa di Piombino, ed il suddetto ritratto attualemente è conservato presso il casino dell'aurora di Roma ed inoltre è gia stato caricato su commons Kambalini96 (talk) 11:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I think they are asking for deletion because the image is misidentified by the museum, that may require a conversation on the discussion page, but not deletion. --RAN (talk) 22:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Please point out some reference displaying such a person depicted on the portrait is not Mariana Victoria of Spain. --User:Píteas (talk) 16:15, 03 July 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.255.54.57 (talk) 19:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No evidence for the claim & no valid reason for deletion as file can be renamed. --Achim55 (talk) 19:28, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Wahrscheinlich kein eigenes Werk, Gemeinfreiheit der Quelle nicht erwiesen GerritR (talk) 16:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP, photograph of what looks like a modern source (which is not named), so the drawing is probably still copyrighted. --Rosenzweig τ 14:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Kein eigenes Werk, Gemeinfreiheit der Quelle zwar wahrscheinlich, aber nicht sicher GerritR (talk) 15:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep German COA are not copyrightable, and this copy is more than 70 years old. --RAN (talk) 22:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: While this presumably German (because of the subject matter) drawing dated 2012-04-15 looks older (see the fox marks of the paper), there is no source, and I couldn't find it using reverse image search and text search on the Internet. That the uploader is actually also the artist who drew this is rather unlikely and should at least be noted somewhere (by the uploader), or ideally we would have a COM:VRT permission. {{PD-Coa-Germany}} is only applicable for coats of arms of municipalities, districts and similar, not for family coats of arms like this one, the drawings of which are copyrightable. The claim that this work is over 70 years old is pure speculation, and even if it were, that still would not be enough because we don't know if the author died over 70 years ago. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Anonymous and pseudonymous works, “the copyright term of works like oil paintings, sculptures, or buildings created before July 1 1995 is, effectively, always life + 70 years, irrespective of whether they would otherwise qualify as anonymous/pseudonymous.” Also for a drawing like this. This is because the old German law specifically declared that such works of art could not be anonymous works. Without any concrete and believable date (before the previous 2018 upload of this drawing as File:Das Wappen der Familie Weitzel von Mudersbach..jpg) setting any year for the undeletion of this file seems rather pointless, I couldn't come up with an earlier year than 2139 as of right now. --Rosenzweig τ 15:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted images from the National Churches Trust Flickr account
[edit]There was a discussion back in 2020 (VP) (Deletion request) about CC-BY Flickr uploads from the National Churches Trust, which turned out to include several Crown Copyright images and others under copyright from other creators. I have not done an exhaustive search but there are probably others with issues given the prevalence of images uploaded with copyright labels. Note: two of these were flagged the first time round and not deleted; I can’t figure out whether this is because they were OK or whether they were overlooked.
- Crown copyright (mainly through RCAHMW):
- File:Ceredigion,_LLANFIHANGEL_Y_CREUDDYN,_St_Michael_(2020)_-1_-_credit_to_RCAHMW_Crown_Copyright_(50248653527).jpg
- File:Nanhoron,_Capel_Newydd_(35833210076)_(cropped).jpg
- File:Maesteg,_Bethania_Chapel_(cropped).jpg
- File:Llanrwst,_Capel_Seion_(35873784895).jpg
- File:Yr_Hen_Gapel,_Llwynrhydowen.jpg
- File:Pentre_Llifior_Methodist_Church_(35833209646).jpg
- File:Llandegley,_The_Pales_Meeting_House_(35873785055).jpg
- File:Maesteg,_Bethania_Chapel_(35833210326).jpg
- File:Nanhoron,_Capel_Newydd_(35833210076).jpg
- (c) APEC Architects:
- (c) Cornwall Historic Churches Trust:
- (c) Friends of Friendless Churches:
- (c) St Catherine’s Church:
- (c) Alex Ramsey:
- (c) Baz Richardson:
- File:St_Peter_and_St_Paul,_Knapton_NR28_0SB_(copyright_Baz_Richardson)_(1)_(18705285030).jpg
- File:St_Peter_and_St_Paul,_Knapton_NR28_0SB_(copyright_Baz_Richardson)_(2)_(18895810511).jpg
- File:St_Peter_and_St_Paul,_Knapton_NR28_0SB_(copyright_Baz_Richardson)_(3)_(18270391824).jpg
- File:St_Peter_and_St_Paul,_Knapton_NR28_0SB_(copyright_Baz_Richardson)_(4)_(18272260653).jpg
- (c) Dan Farrar:
- (c) Danny Murphy:
- (c) Edward Nicholl:
- John Blakeston (note: page has duplicate redirect with copyright "c" in the title):
(c) John Sutton:File:Hertfordshire_REED_St_Mary_(48496043946).jpg(comment by @Bjh21: below)
- (c) Malcom Osman:
- (c) Martin Crampin:
- (c) Peter Wood:
- (c) Richard Peat:
- (c) Richard White:
- (c) Robert McDonald:
- File:St_Andrew,_Stoke_Newington,_London_N16_5DU_(c)_Robert_McDonald_(18866804736).jpg
- File:St_Andrew,_Stoke_Newington,_London_N16_5DU_(c)_Robert_McDonald_(18893093585).jpg
- File:St_Andrew,_Stoke_Newington,_London_N16_5DU_(c)_Robert_McDonald_(2)_(18270548054).jpg
- File:St_Andrew,_Stoke_Newington,_London_N16_5DU_(c)_Robert_McDonald_(3)_(18272435153).jpg
- File:Jesus_before_Pilate_St_Andrew,_Stoke_Newington,_London_N16_5DU_(c)_Robert_McDonald_(18272426053).jpg
- (c) Steve MT:
- (c) Stuart Chalmers:
(c) Terry Robinson:File:Lancashire_WARTON_St_Paul_(48496177677).jpg(comment by @Bjh21: below)
- (c) Tudor Barlow:
_-1_-_credit_to_RCAHMW_Crown_Copyright_(50248653527).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(31156796850).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(31528225485).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cornwall_Historic_Churches_Trust_(38699420341).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Friends_of_Friendless_Churches_(48878889658).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(50247609668).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(50248452702).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Alex_Ramsey_(48879614977).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1)_(18705285030).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2)_(18895810511).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3)_(18270391824).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4)_(18272260653).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Dan_Farrar_(23610372626).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Dan_Farrar_(23554078001).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Dan_Farrar_(23009465713).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_MUST_CREDIT_DANNY_MURPHY_(44468589070).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Edward_Nicholl_(46285413351).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(35835440502).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Malcom_Osman_(46235139222).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Martin_Crampin_(48879418316).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Martin_Crampin_JPG_(48879419796).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(31562475616).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3)_(18866688916).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2)_(18895785781).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Robert_McDonald_(18866804736).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Robert_McDonald_(18893093585).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Robert_McDonald_(2)_(18270548054).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Robert_McDonald_(3)_(18272435153).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Robert_McDonald_(18272426053).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(31528343375).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
)_(1)_(18270422544).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
I think this Flickr account should also be flagged as a problematic source. Dogfennydd (talk) 19:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep these two, which came from Geograph Britain and Ireland. I've corrected their licences.
- --bjh21 (talk) 21:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed, thanks for the research. Dogfennydd (talk) 21:06, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete File:St Michael and All Angels, Upper Sapey, WR6 6XR (copyright TudorBarlow (Flickr)) (1) (18270422544).jpg, which came from https://www.flickr.com/photos/tudorbarlow/9688422168 and is non-free. --bjh21 (talk) 21:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete the Crown Copyright images, but
- Keep the other images. 'Copyright' or '(c)' in the file name or EXIF or decription does not indicate a copyright violation and is compatible with a Creative Commons license. The issue here is whether the National Churches Trust should be trusted to have obtained the consent of the copyright holder to the license. The NCT is a highly reputable organisation and we should trust their licenses unless there is a clear reason not to, in the same way that we would trust licenses applied by a major museum or a university library. User:Fæ commented in the Village Pump discussion "Where the named photographer seems to have agreed the CC license, presumably because they were supporting/work for the NCT, this seems a reasonable rationale to accept the license as verified, regardless of what may persist in the EXIF data."[10] Verbcatcher (talk) 22:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all except the struck-through photos from Geograph. I don't think the NCT has taken much care over the licensing of its uploads to Flickr. If it's licensed Crown Copyright photos as CC-BY it seems unlikely that it's got the licensing right for its other photos – at least, its other photos of churches; its photos of people are another matter because they usually seem to have been taken at NCT events or are publicity photos of its most notable members. I've created Category:Files from The National Churches Trust Flickr stream to get a sense of the situation; so far it's got 400 images. This (Flickr version) and this (Flickr version) are CC-BY-SA photos it's republished as CC-BY. "FROM WEB" in this filename (Flickr version) doesn't inspire much confidence. I'm inclined to agree that the account should be flagged as a problematic source, except for photos taken at NCT events and perhaps for its photos of people associated with the organisation. Ham II (talk) 08:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
_(50727058421).jpg){kind=link}
_(50727153737).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: most, per nomination and Ham II, kept only the two from Geograph UK. --Rosenzweig τ 10:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama for statues in Japan. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:42, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
An updated flag already uploaded. May I asked for deletion to avoid multiple file. Kuya levi (talk) 12:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: file is in use. --Rosenzweig τ 21:31, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
No idea if this building design is under copyright Dronebogus (talk) 00:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: According to the description, this is a CGI image. I didn't directly find it on the web, but I have my doubts if the uploader owns rights to it and was authorized to upload it, so I've deleted it per the precautionary principle. To host this, we should have a COM:VRT permission. --Rosenzweig τ 22:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Same rationale as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:%D9%86%D9%85%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C_%D8%B4%D8%A8%DB%8C%D9%87%E2%80%8C%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B2%DB%8C_%D8%B4%D8%AF%D9%87_%D8%A7%D8%B2_%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%AA%D9%85%D8%B9_%D9%85%D8%B3%DA%A9%D9%88%D9%86%DB%8C_%D9%BE%D8%B1%D9%88%DA%98%D9%87_%D8%BA%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%B1_0.jpg Dronebogus (talk) 00:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: According to the description, this is a CGI image. I didn't directly find it on the web, but I have my doubts if the uploader owns rights to it and was authorized to upload it, so I've deleted it per the precautionary principle. To host this, we should have a COM:VRT permission. --Rosenzweig τ 22:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Same rationale as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:%D9%86%D9%85%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C_%D8%B4%D8%A8%DB%8C%D9%87%E2%80%8C%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B2%DB%8C_%D8%B4%D8%AF%D9%87_%D8%A7%D8%B2_%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%AA%D9%85%D8%B9_%D9%85%D8%B3%DA%A9%D9%88%D9%86%DB%8C_%D9%BE%D8%B1%D9%88%DA%98%D9%87_%D8%BA%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%B1_0.jpg Dronebogus (talk) 00:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: According to the description, this is a CGI image. I didn't directly find it on the web, but I have my doubts if the uploader owns rights to it and was authorized to upload it, so I've deleted it per the precautionary principle. To host this, we should have a COM:VRT permission. --Rosenzweig τ 22:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation, the public domain claim is unreliable. Template:PD-Nigeria specifies "It is a cinematographic or photographic work and 50 years have passed since its publication", and this photo is probably not 50 years old. The uniform suggests a very senior military officer, and Sani Abacha was promoted to General in 1990. Likely to date from Abacha's term as President of Nigeria in 1993-1998. Not safely public domain until 2049, 50 years after Abacha's death. A Nigerian newspaper credits this as "Photo: AllAfrica", and has a version with a watermark reading "NIGERIAN GOVERRNM[...]".[11] English Wikipedia has a version of the photo as a non-free file: w:en:File:Sani Abacha (UN).jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 09:06, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Ovinus (talk) 21:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2049 with {{PD-Nigeria}}. --Rosenzweig τ 19:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
I tagged this file for permission but some new user keeps removing tag. The file was uploaded under "India (GODL)", the GODL template says "The user must acknowledge the provider, source, and license of data by explicitly publishing the attribution statement, including the DOI (Digital Object Identifier), or the URL (Uniform Resource Locator), or the URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) of the data concerned". On https://www.india.gov.in/my-government/indian-parliament/shri-syed-imtiaz-jaleel i'm not seeing it was published under such licence. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:39, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
আফতাবুজ্জামান is a biased editor who has nominated the page for deletation. The GODL template doesn't says "The user must acknowledge the provider, source, and license of data by explicitly publishing the attribution statement, including the DOI (Digital Object Identifier), or the URL (Uniform Resource Locator), or the URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) of the data concerned".There are many images like File:Gautam Gambhir - LS MP.jpg. Only {{Personal rights}} can be used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElonRathee (talk • contribs) 05:10, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- The template does say that. Please just unfolt it.
- However, that's not the problem, because the source has already been acknowledged. The problem is that the legal notice for the source https://www.india.gov.in/website-policy doesn't mention the GODL license, and the question is whether according to Indian law this content is published under the GODL even if the page says otherwise.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:15, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Brother, for your kind information, the images upload in https://www.india.gov.in/ are click by same author and published under {{GODL-India}} . You can see that the background and quality of images upload in https://www.india.gov.in/ are more or less same and are licensed to {{GODL-India}}.For example:File:Gautam Gambhir - LS MP.jpg , File:Bhagwant Mann Lok Sabha.jpg. Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atamaji (talk • contribs) 05:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC) Atamaji (talk) 10:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- We cannot assume. Please provide a source where it said it was published under GODL. I will withdraw my request. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This is content from the Lok Sabha, one of the two chambers of India's parliament. As far as I could find out, {{GODL-India}} does not apply to the Lok Sabha. Compare [12]. --Rosenzweig τ 22:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ianrpenman (talk · contribs)
[edit]The problem with each of these is that they are patently not the "own work" of the uploader. though are declared as such. Depending upon copyright legislation at source there may be copyright violations, or they may be out of copyright period, but we have insufficient information from the uploader. They need to address the licencing, where necessary address the permissioning. Information to support the licencing needs to follow the process for submittal to COM:VRT. Without that COM:PCP applies
- File:Jean Pirie.jpg
- File:Society News.jpg
- File:The Hostest With The Mostest.jpg
- File:Jean's Factory Party.jpg
- File:List of directors of t The Factory.jpg
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep the following: --RAN (talk) 22:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- File:Jean Pirie.jpg I cannot find a renewal for this image.
- File:List of directors of t The Factory.jpg no visible copyright notice.
Deleted: four, kept one. File:Jean Pirie.jpg seems to be a high resolution scan of an original photographic print. Without any further context, information about this print, the photographer etc. I can't really tell if this photo was published, had a notice or not, was renewed or not, and as it's said to be from 1942, it's not that old that it simply has to be in the PD. So I've deleted that one per the precautionary principle. The three 1969 newspaper clippings are from various Chicago papers, all of which renewed issues or contributions per [13], so they are possibly still copyrighted until the end of 2064. So I've deleted those per the precautionary principle as well. File:List of directors of The Factory (1969).jpg was apparently a letter sent to people interested in this Factory club, which should count as publication, there is no notice, and I don't think the reverse side of the letter had anything on it, so kept that one with {{PD-US-no notice}}. --Rosenzweig τ 12:14, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
May be COM:COPYVIO: Photo taken pre-1923 but earliest easily-found publication was 2007 on a JCPenney website Closeapple (talk) 00:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I’m going to assume it was probably from a very old, forgotten publication until more convincingly proven otherwise. This is a very old picture. If there is a current copyright holder who actually cares and has proof of copyright they can just tell us. Dronebogus (talk) 00:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: On various web sites, the photo is said to be from ca. 1904 or 1908, so in a few years, it'll be old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}} or {{PD-US-unpublished}} if it really was not published before 2003. Per [14] (a photo apparently taken in 2008 in the then headquarters of JC Penney), the original is large enough to have a large print made from it and put it on the wall in a frame. So I reckon, given the time frame, it must have been made by a professional photographer, probably commissioned, and it's hard to imagine it was not published at the time. Per US court decisions, publication in those days could be the sale of a print or perhaps the sale of the glass negative. So it if was published before 1927, any copyright (if one existed) has expired, and if it was published later, there's a good chance there was no notice or it was not renewed. --Rosenzweig τ 13:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
it isn't official emblem or insigna Jelican9 (talk) 00:41, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Jelican9: what do you mean? What is the official coat of arms of Azerbaijan then? Veverve (talk) 08:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- There is no Azerbaijan coat of arms used only in circular form. The original usage is as in the link: File:Emblem of Azerbaijan.svg Jelican9 (talk) 15:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and explanations. Fantasy coat of arms, especially the ones likely to be user-made hoaxes, are not educational. Veverve (talk) 17:32, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete , out of scope.--Kadı Message 20:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and redirected. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Probable personal rights violation 2001:A61:104A:E901:FD9A:2FC:EDDD:E29B 12:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Canada, consent is required for commercial use of the photo, which is incompatible with the licencing on Commons. In addition, being inside an airplane cannot be considered as a public place, so perhaps all publishing will require consent. Therefore the photo must be deleted imho. --Ellywa (talk) 17:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I am not sure wether the licence for reuse is compatable with Commons policy, see https://www.freeworldmaps.net/about.html: (1) The exact URL where the original map comes from must be mentioned (with a clickable and visible link in case of web based use) (2) The number of used maps is limited to 5 (five) for a publication (Web, DVD, book…) JopkeB (talk) 14:07, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- It's indeed not compatible with Commons policy (copyright by Daniel Feher, not that there is much difference to our very similar look-and-feel). Note to self: Create SVG with this File:Netherlands location map.svg --Enyavar (talk) 08:06, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:25, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
VTRS esperando desde 2019 191.126.155.52 14:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, permission is listed here: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/30766301/65823896-15e14000-e22d-11e9-8bc1-e653c2997890.jpg. --Ellywa (talk) 17:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/beeld* heilig landstichting
[edit]Copyright violation. These sculptures are in an open air museum in the Netherlands, so no "public place" because there is no free admission, and therefor FOP is not applicable. And there are no VRT tickets. The photos by RCE are only licensed for the photos, not for the works of art.
- File:Beeldengroep op de binnenplaats van het Sanhedrin - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531458 - RCE.jpg
- File:Beeldengroep op de binnenplaats van het Sanhedrin - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531460 - RCE.jpg
- File:Beeldengroep op de binnenplaats van het Sanhedrin - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531459 - RCE.jpg
- File:In het dorp Nazareth - beeld van een bedelaar - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531371 - RCE.jpg
File:Beeld van de goede zaaier, bij de begraafplaats - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531483 - RCE.jpgIs not within the museum --JopkeB (talk) 05:39, 30 April 2022 (UTC)- File:Detail van de beeldengroep, nabij het dorp Nazareth, voorstellende "herdersveld en wachttoren met loofhut" - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531389 - RCE.jpg
- File:Beeld van een slapende vrouw op een uit kalksteen opgetrokken stoep in het Oosters Straatje - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531444 - RCE.jpg
- File:Overzicht van het Hof van Olijven, met in het midden beeldengroep van drie slapende apostelen - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531519 - RCE.jpg
- File:Beeldengroep van de leden van de Hoge Raad in het grote vertrek van het Sanhedrin - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531461 - RCE.jpg
- File:Beeld van een slapende vrouw op een uit kalksteen opgetrokken stoep in het Oosters Straatje - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531443 - RCE.jpg
- File:Beeld in het dorp Nazareth (Beth Juda)- vrouw met kruik en kind bij de waterbron - Heilig Land-stichting - 20531365 - RCE.jpg
-_vrouw_met_kruik_en_kind_bij_de_waterbron_-_Heilig_Land-stichting_-_20531365_-_RCE.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JopkeB (talk) 04:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 18:04, 6 October 2022 (UTC)