Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/04/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![11 File:"Empereur Jose before the independence day - Feb 2021.jpg".jpg](#File:"Empereur_Jose_before_the_independence_day_-_Feb_2021.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![59 File:*+* Bucha Massacre in Art – Exemplary Picture - “In the infrared target sight of a soldier of the Russian Federation" - War Crime -"Death of a young desecrated and raped mother from Bucha".”.jpg](#File:*+*_Bucha_Massacre_in_Art_–_Exemplary_Picture_-_“In_the_infrared_target_sight_of_a_soldier_of_the_Russian_Federation"_-_War_Crime_-"Death_of_a_young_desecrated_and_raped_mother_from_Bucha".”.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_2022.07.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
My Hope I made a mistake. めるるる (talk) 00:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 08:42, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Personal image by non contributor, disparaging comment. Yann (talk) 12:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
xbgyimxx ibygxxxxx 2A02:C7E:4E46:4D00:283D:FAB9:2BFE:622E 13:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Karena melanggar Hak Cipta Rei Fell (talk) 19:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & copyvio. --Achim55 (talk) 20:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
The copyright of this file was restored in the US by the URAA because in 1996 the file wasn't in the public domain in the United Kingdom. 79.151.30.172 21:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The image was created in the UK in 1936, so it entered the British Public Domain in 2006, when its copyright expired. Normally, where the image was first created takes precident over other countries.Angelgreat (talk) 01:42, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- The image was created in the UK in 1936, so it entered the British Public Domain in 2007, when its copyright expired. Normally, where the image was first created takes precident over other countries.Angelgreat (talk) 01:42, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- For stay in Commons, it must be in Public Domain in the country of origin and also in the United States.
--79.151.30.172 02:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.151.31.9 (talk) 08:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- To the IP user, I highly recommend creating a Wikimedia account. It will make things easier. Angelgreat (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: URAA can't be the sole reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 79.151.31.9 as Copyvio (copyright) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free image. Previously this file was also uploaded in English Wikipedia by the same user that uploaded it here. In August, it was deleted from Wikipedia, see the link of that discussion. Previously kept at DR, ineligible for speedy. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- At the time, I didn't realize that it was public domain in the UK (where it was originally created), so I uploaded it under US copyright. Had I known that it was public-domain in the UK at the time, I would have uploaded it here. Angelgreat (talk) 20:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 23:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Image shows up on a reverse image search, but I won't link to sources as they all produce content warnings in my browser. Presumably this is not the uploader's own work. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:15, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 11:32, 7 April 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 20:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
low resolution photo, non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 02:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by A.Savin at 23:38, 9 April 2022 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 07:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MichalZeisen123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per usage at https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedysta:MichalZeisen123/brudnopis this is somebody taking screenshots of the Crusader Kings III videogame to document their gameplay of it. These would all be copyrighted.
- File:Albrecht I Przemyslidda.png
- File:Czechy albrechta.png
- File:Jakub I.png
- File:Jerozolima Wojciecha.png
- File:Wratysław.png
- File:Czechy wratysława.png
- File:4 Władysław I.png
- File:Srbia Władysława I.png
- File:3 Dragosz II.png
- File:Serbia Dragosza II.png
- File:2 Michał I.png
- File:Serbia Michała I.png
- File:Serbia Dragosa I.png
- File:1 Dragos I.png
Lord Belbury (talk) 17:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work, uploaded by accident Trade (talk) 00:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
personal photo, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 01:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
![01:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/06#c-Oaktree_b-2022-04-06T01:34:00.000Z-File:"Empereur_Jose_before_the_independence_day_-_Feb_2021.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:57, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
![12:57, 13 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/06#c-IronGargoyle-2022-04-13T12:57:00.000Z-File:"Empereur_Jose_before_the_independence_day_-_Feb_2021.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
non-notable individual, promotional photo Oaktree b (talk) 01:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:57, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 01:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
potential copyvio, sourced from facebook Oaktree b (talk) 01:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
potential copyvio, sourced from facebook, unlikely to be own work. red linked uploader name, unable to confirm Oaktree b (talk) 01:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
non-notable individual, unused photo Oaktree b (talk) 01:46, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
non-notable actress Oaktree b (talk) 01:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:01, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
non-notable individual, draft article was rejected for lack of notability Oaktree b (talk) 01:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:05, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Unfree public art. There is no freedom of panorama for allowance of commercial uses of public art in the Philippines as of now. The artist of one of the nominated artworks is still alive today. Source: [1].
- Filipinas 1986, ©️1987 artist Ben-Hur Villanueva (1938–2020)
- Bust of Senator Benigno "Ninoy" Aquino Jr., ©️ 1989 sculptor Peter Tiamzon de Guzman (1962–)
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:57, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Derivative of the non-free poster Xunks (talk) 03:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- information stand--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 04:09, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Bogdanov-62: unacceptable still, the informational text is well-constructed enough for the author (the writer) to claim copyright.
Delete still, and COM:FOP Russia does not allow commercial exploitations of copyrighted works that are not architecture or land arts. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Bogdanov-62: unacceptable still, the informational text is well-constructed enough for the author (the writer) to claim copyright.
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Self promo on wikidata Minoraxtalk 07:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. If the photo is not out of scope, it will need OTRS permission, because it's small, lacks metadata (please see COM:PCP), and can be found elsewhere on the web by using Google search by image/TinEye. --Ahmadtalk 20:15, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
out of scope of the project, see wds Oursana (talk) 04:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:11, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Suspicious own work claime: image watermarked with "Andrew Bastion photography". MKFI (talk) 06:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Taken from https://ginamilesmusic.com/epk/, no free license on page. MKFI (talk) 06:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:29, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per COM:PACKAGING. Larryasou (talk) 08:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:29, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
There is a watermark below the image Rohalamin (talk) 10:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Keep Nonsensical request, there are thousands of images with watermarks (Images with watermarks). --Orijentolog (talk) 06:07, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Watermark matches uploader. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:32, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Copy vio from https://severpost.ru/read/100471/ this site 95.31.188.32 10:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:32, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
copi vio from https://novoshakhtinsk.org/o_sayte/ this site 95.31.188.32 10:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:33, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
copy vio from this https://ramns.ru/glava-ramenskogo-gorodskogo-okruga-viktor-nevolin-stanet-gostem-prjamogo-jefira-na-ramenskom-radio-v-sredu-25-marta/ site 95.31.188.32 10:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:33, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
copy vio from this https://www.ap22.ru/paper/Glavnyy-imam-Sobornoy-mecheti-Barnaula-Fagim-Hazrat-otmechaet-50-letniy-yubiley.html site 95.31.188.32 10:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
copy vio from this site https://chelyabinsk.er.ru/person/6382db63-7bbe-47c4-bcdc-d1936a1bd505 95.31.188.32 10:47, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
copi vio from https://cherkessk09.ru/news/5357-mjerom-cherkesska-izbran-aleksej-baskaev.html this site 95.31.188.32 10:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copi vio from https://volgograd.er.ru/person/16f7fbe5-c576-42bc-8a84-058161753990 this site 95.31.188.32 10:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio. A newspaper poster from 1984 is very likely to be protected by copyright (also considering it features a photograph). Blåmes (talk) 13:07, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Not own work; reverse search gives hundreds of web pages hosting this image Gikü (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: obviously that's not Alexa Demie. I don't know where that image came from but it has been used on English Wiki for image related vandalism once. Iggy the Swan (talk) 15:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded by an image vandal on enwiki who is probably not the copyright holder. Looks like a screenshot of someone who is probably not Sydney Sweeney. Iggy the Swan (talk) 15:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded by the same image vandal as the one who uploaded "File:Sydney 2015" and is probably not the copyright holder. Iggy the Swan (talk) 15:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
I can not think of any possible project use for an ms paint image of a green square containing a badly drawn number 5. No educational value, out of COM:Scope. 192.76.8.70 16:36, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
No educational value, out of project Scope. I can't think of any project where an MS paint quality drawing of a question mark on a dirty white background would be of use. 192.76.8.70 16:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
The picture is copied from another site, as stated in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 00:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of a free license at source. --Strakhov (talk) 16:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Taken from facebook page https://lens.google.com/search?p=ASQ0Rg2bZFJU_rEEwMaCyLflB3nTytm5xuQhEynN44MMWqT9pEGNzf5sU1N9-IiZ5Pp3DFIks-lnb9NSgmMiW8s6r15tGvRRO_O8JcIFHWzGCFpp7bK-Z5Tsg1ucAoh6EAfLDw-TyyAWYj5ktHRd0JVcJPgXvXGDj48QW-TeO-2fmZI4M_8GIWDg11Nh65Bwqvdam4XxBQMaNSIt3NNwGTAP1cF2PW121fmyCr4D0TwR3-aer7BK17MKPe2jQn6JGka4wcCYgiw0899v7s-rHroUV5U4eBOJyS2aP1w2nORI1yyBB6-EIzFcqP15wqWImT3JZed_np0zOJtlJ5g%3D&s&ep=ccm#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsIkVrY0tKRGhtTkRaaU16VXdMV1prWTJRdE5EUXdNeTA0WW1FMkxUbGtNMkZsWXpnellXRTROQklmYzNsellVMUJSakJCWkZGaVJVWkRjWGQ0VEhKTVVEUnhNRzlpWWw5NFl3PT0iXQ Putitonamap98 (talk) 07:15, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely own work. --Strakhov (talk) 16:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't believe this is own work. It is a cropped version of the top image shown here. It is the only contribution of the user and there are no metadata. Wouter (talk) 19:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely own work. --Strakhov (talk) 16:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality and in wrong .jpg format, can be replaced by text. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 12:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 15:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Not used, low quality chemical diagram, many replacements in Category:Oxalyl chloride. Wostr (talk) 16:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 15:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Low quality, not used chemical diagram, replacements are available in Category:Pivaloyl chloride. Wostr (talk) 17:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 15:53, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Нарушение авторских прав. Пользователь декларирует изображение как собственную работу, хотя источником является https://www.kino-teatr.ru/acter/album/189452/1040524.jpg Valmin (talk) 00:09, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:27, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
The boy in the photo is me. I've never given any permission to use my image in any webpage. This violates my rights and I will have to start legal actions against Wikipedia/wikimedia for allowing my image to be used and exposed without my consent through international, informatic and tort law. EzequielFerrari00 (talk) 12:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Wutsje. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
I am the person on this photograph. I never gave permission to anyone to expose my photos. I didn't consent posting my photo. I found my photo on a regular google image search, and it damages my personal and public image. If picture is not remove from this page, I will proceed to start legal actions against Wikipedia/wikimedia for allowing my personal image to be displayed on its page without my consent and permission. Hernán Ezequiel Ferrari - Lawyer. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 04/5/2022. EzequielFerrari00 (talk) 00:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 16:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" Urheber kann aber nur eine natürliche Person sein, nicht aber der Heimat- und Tourismusverein Dassow. Kein Hinweis, dass der Hochlader berechtigt ist, das Foto unter eine CC-Lizenz zu stellen Lutheraner (talk) 00:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Das Werk hat der Account Heimat- und Tourismusverein Dassow hochgeladen und als "Eigenes Werk" lizensiert. Welcher Unterschied besteht zu Bildern, die der Account Global Fish hochgeladen hat und als "Eigenes Werk" lizensiert hat?
Du kannst natürlich sagen, du weißt nicht, ob die Bilder tatsächlich von der Person hinter dem Account Heimat- und Tourismusverband Dassow gemacht worden sind. Weißt du aber bei den ganzen Dateien nicht, die vom Account Global Fish stammen [2]. Damit musst du leben.
Ich sehe ein völlig normales und übliches Vorgehen und keinerlei Löschgrund.--Global Fish (talk) 07:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" Urheber kann aber nur eine natürliche Person sein, nicht aber der Heimat- und Tourismusverein Dassow. Kein Hinweis, dass der Hochlader berechtigt ist, das Foto unter eine CC-Lizenz zu stellen Lutheraner (talk) 00:24, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Das Werk hat der Account Heimat- und Tourismusverein Dassow hochgeladen und als "Eigenes Werk" lizensiert. Welcher Unterschied besteht zu Bildern, die der Account Global Fish hochgeladen hat und als "Eigenes Werk" lizensiert hat?
Du kannst natürlich sagen, du weißt nicht, ob die Bilder tatsächlich von der Person hinter dem Account Heimat- und Tourismusverband Dassow gemacht worden sind. Weißt du aber bei den ganzen Dateien nicht, die vom Account Global Fish stammen [3]. Damit musst du leben. Als Urheber einen Account anzugeben, reicht völlig aus.
Ich sehe ein völlig normales und übliches Vorgehen und keinerlei Löschgrund--Global Fish (talk) 07:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Uploading of a new file Chino Sator (talk) 00:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 11:02, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hasley as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3|2=photograph of a photograph, which does not appear to be free. Trustworthy uploader, converting to DR to give them a chance to explain. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:03, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Osps7 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: unlicensed logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Unused (apart from a talk page warning about itself) and out of scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Sure looks like a copyvio to me - official Bollinger photo mr.choppers (talk)-en- 01:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Personal image by non contributor. Yann (talk) 12:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 14:29, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Trade (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:43, 20 April 2022 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 19:35, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
File:*+* Bucha Massacre in Art - Exemplary Picture - “The fatal shooting of a young Ukrainian mother” - View through the infrared riflescope of a soldier of the Russian Federation in Bucha.jpg
[edit]
Vorschlag Admin Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 16:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Löschen: Nach Commons:Deletion_policy/de#Außerhalb_des_Projektumfangs: Selbst erstellte Kunstwerke ohne offensichtlichen pädagogischen Nutzen. --sk (talk) 22:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete unlicensed and out of scope. Dronebogus (talk) 21:06, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
File:*+* Bucha Massacre in Art – Exemplary Picture - “In the infrared target sight of a soldier of the Russian Federation" - War Crime -"Death of a young desecrated and raped mother from Bucha".”.jpg
[edit]
Vorschlag von einem Admin Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 16:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
:Es sind meine Bilder ....es ist meine Frau ...es ist mein Werk! Nichts "geklaut oder gestohlen"! Ich will den "Weltfrieden"! - Gerade bei so einem Bild mit Bedeutung! - Bitte entscheidet Weise! - Liebe Grüße vom--Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 16:47, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Löschen: Nach Commons:Deletion_policy/de#Außerhalb_des_Projektumfangs: Selbst erstellte Kunstwerke ohne offensichtlichen pädagogischen Nutzen. --sk (talk) 22:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Wir sind hier nicht auf Facebook. --Watchduck (quack) 18:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete unlicensed and out of scope. Dronebogus (talk) 21:06, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
File:*+* Bucha Massacre in Art - Russian Star of Death - Exemplary Picture - Death of a young desecrated and raped mother from Bucha - Hoping for the conviction of all war criminals.jpg
[edit]
Vorschlag von einem Admin Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 16:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Löschen: Nach Commons:Deletion_policy/de#Außerhalb_des_Projektumfangs: Selbst erstellte Kunstwerke ohne offensichtlichen pädagogischen Nutzen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefan Kühn (talk • contribs)
- Delete Wir sind hier nicht auf Facebook. --Watchduck (quack) 18:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete unlicensed and out of scope. Dronebogus (talk) 21:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
File:*+* Bucha Massacre in Art - Exemplary Picture - Death of a young desecrated and raped mother from Bucha - Hoping for the conviction of all war criminals.jpg
[edit]
Vorschlag von einem Admin Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 16:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Löschen: Nach Commons:Deletion_policy/de#Außerhalb_des_Projektumfangs: Selbst erstellte Kunstwerke ohne offensichtlichen pädagogischen Nutzen. --sk (talk) 22:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete unlicensed and out of scope. Dronebogus (talk) 21:06, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE pic of a user with not valid contribs; self-promo attempt @ ro:Farcaș Mihai-Dan. Gikü (talk) 13:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of (educational) scope: Trivia map, unused. Enyavar (talk) 16:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unusable. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:37, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ionela Vasile (Alive Capital) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted logo, no proof for the 'own work' statement
Gikü (talk) 11:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 12:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asociația Wild Bucovina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted logo; promo attempt in the image description.
Gikü (talk) 13:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 12:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
nonsense Xocolatl (talk) 19:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 12:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. This is an Associated Press photo. The user's only other upload is also a copyvio. Denniscabrams (talk) 17:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 07:32, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 09:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. This was taken by a photographer for TGSportstv1. The uploader's only other upload is also a copyvio. Denniscabrams (talk) 17:55, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 07:21, 3 May 2022 UTC: No license/copyright since 25 April 2022 --Krdbot 09:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palais de la culture (Abidjan)
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Côte d'Ivoire, and the architectural work is not incidental in the nominated images. Per w:fr:Palais de la culture Bernard Binlin-Dadié d'Abidjan, it was completed in 1999 and authored by architect Francis Sossah. One of the images show the distinct interior.
- File:Espace Anoumabo - Palais de la culture d'Abidjan.jpg
- File:Palais de la Culture (PCA) vu du Plateau.JPG
- File:Palais de la Culture (PCA).JPG
- File:PalaisDeLaCultureAbidjanAvril2016 edited.jpg
- File:PalaisDeLaCultureAbidjanFromBADBuildingAout2016.jpg
_vu_du_Plateau.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:42, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
"Photo Credit Sanjeev Singhal": VRT permission from Sanjeev Singhal needed. MKFI (talk) 06:54, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Citrus cross aurantium
[edit]- File:Worshipful Brother Rev. Ron Johnstone Grand Chaplain.gif
- File:Worshipful Brother Rev. Alistair Smyth Grand Chaplain.gif
- File:Dr Martyn Cowan addressing the Cross of Saint Patrick Loyal Orange Lodge.gif
- File:Slide montage.gif
- File:Montage.gif
These images were all uploaded by User:Citrus cross aurantium. I believe they should be deleted because:
- the first two gifs have been created using stills from a video that the user is not the copyright holder for: [4].
- the third gif has been created using stills from a video that the user is not the copyright holder for: [5]
- the fourth and fifth gifs have been created using photos that the user is not the copyright holder for, on this Facebook page: [6]
User was queried on talk pages and has claimed to have their own undisclosed sources, but the images perfectly match the sources in the links so it looks like the user is lying. Ardenssedvirens (talk) 06:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Taken from facebook page https://lens.google.com/search?p=ASQ0Rg2bZFJU_rEEwMaCyLflB3nTytm5xuQhEynN44MMWqT9pEGNzf5sU1N9-IiZ5Pp3DFIks-lnb9NSgmMiW8s6r15tGvRRO_O8JcIFHWzGCFpp7bK-Z5Tsg1ucAoh6EAfLDw-TyyAWYj5ktHRd0JVcJPgXvXGDj48QW-TeO-2fmZI4M_8GIWDg11Nh65Bwqvdam4XxBQMaNSIt3NNwGTAP1cF2PW121fmyCr4D0TwR3-aer7BK17MKPe2jQn6JGka4wcCYgiw0899v7s-rHroUV5U4eBOJyS2aP1w2nORI1yyBB6-EIzFcqP15wqWImT3JZed_np0zOJtlJ5g%3D&s&ep=ccm#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsIkVrY0tKRGhtTkRaaU16VXdMV1prWTJRdE5EUXdNeTA0WW1FMkxUbGtNMkZsWXpnellXRTROQklmYzNsellVMUJSakJCWkZGaVJVWkRjWGQ0VEhKTVVEUnhNRzlpWWw5NFl3PT0iXQ== Putitonamap98 (talk) 07:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs OTRS from Eric Wuestenberg. --Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Taken from facebook page https://lens.google.com/search?p=ASQ0Rg2bZFJU_rEEwMaCyLflB3nTytm5xuQhEynN44MMWqT9pEGNzf5sU1N9-IiZ5Pp3DFIks-lnb9NSgmMiW8s6r15tGvRRO_O8JcIFHWzGCFpp7bK-Z5Tsg1ucAoh6EAfLDw-TyyAWYj5ktHRd0JVcJPgXvXGDj48QW-TeO-2fmZI4M_8GIWDg11Nh65Bwqvdam4XxBQMaNSIt3NNwGTAP1cF2PW121fmyCr4D0TwR3-aer7BK17MKPe2jQn6JGka4wcCYgiw0899v7s-rHroUV5U4eBOJyS2aP1w2nORI1yyBB6-EIzFcqP15wqWImT3JZed_np0zOJtlJ5g%3D&s&ep=ccm#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsIkVrY0tKRGhtTkRaaU16VXdMV1prWTJRdE5EUXdNeTA0WW1FMkxUbGtNMkZsWXpnellXRTROQklmYzNsellVMUJSakJCWkZGaVJVWkRjWGQ0VEhKTVVEUnhNRzlpWWw5NFl3PT0iXQ Putitonamap98 (talk) 07:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Taken from another website https://lens.google.com/search?p=ASQ0Rg1QXTJCt-A05dN58zoS-HQTf3-uT3CuXQBDzKvUzrfm3t4e4-weyIsJ3x6rymxc9lxeTAmlrHBg86Q9-j-qSKRbg73yvIkvKAslTdFY34Km54lpRiwud2IMsy56R7nYe2a3MVslwxk8xM0kMh3NIz4InoPW1Q9EK7XM0KhDycd5D3Md69jHS4m2CxkUTVSLcwk7h_peUFShGedYYhlYUio7aO5jJHna8iJKXetoORsrIzrluB_cYH3--cSaKK9E8B3DgmZ-Tw04olvNbBTD8e4i9kC-vqJZpsvrVh-CmXa6aX8hTjuKRl7v6_vV-QYprFciTCuco9JuZg%3D%3D&s&ep=ccm#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsIkVrY0tKRFExWmpGbE56Y3pMVEV4T1RRdE5EbGlNeTFoWWpFMExUVTNOemM1WWpsalpHRXlNaElmYnpsdlpVaHJTa2w2U2tWaFJVWkRjWGQ0VEhKTVVEWmhNbUZZWWw5NFl3PT0iXQ== Putitonamap98 (talk) 07:15, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio, no fop in benin Dronebogus (talk) 08:36, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. This source (referenced on enwiki article w:en:Door of No Return, Ouidah) reads: "Several artists collaborated with the architect, Yves Ahouen-Gnimon, on this project. The columns and façade's bas-relief figures were conceived and realized by Fortuné Bandeira; the dorsal terra-cotta bas-reliefs and freestanding Egunegun are by Yves Kpede, and finally the oxidized bronzes were commissioned of the artist Dominque Kouas Gnonnou." In addition to that, the source states the monument had multiple incarnations in 1992–95. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per description, the photo is not own work. Real photographer, creation year and first publication data are needed to determine copyright status of the file. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
not in use, incorrect licensing —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 09:55, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
_in_2022.07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_2022.07.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author's request. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:16, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
_in_2022.07.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
_in_2022.07.jpg){kind=link}
There is a watermark in the image Rohalamin (talk) 10:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
not in scope of the project XRay 💬 11:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Uploader Request Jordis DASComm22 (talk) 15:08, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Not under a free license. Secretlondon (talk) 23:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, no free license at source. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Uploader Request Jordis DASComm22 (talk) 15:09, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Not under a free license. Secretlondon (talk) 23:42, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Uploader Request Jordis DASComm22 (talk) 15:09, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Not under a free license. Secretlondon (talk) 23:42, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FunnyCommons95 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal "artwork" lacking COM:EDUSE.
Achim55 (talk) 15:16, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Why do you feel the need to delete this images? I could understand deleting the Average Wikinews editor picture but why delete the munkey nft picture? In my description I say that I make funny images for the use of other wiki users. To deny this would be to deny artistic freedom and for wiki users to have a little more humor in their lives. Sure, delete the wikinews picture, it is definitely created out of spite, but the monkey nft picture was created for the joy of other wiki users to share and use. I feel that nominating it for deletion is like nominating a comedian to die. Please do not delete the munkey nft picture. It would make me very happy if you did not do that. Sincerely, Funny Commons 95. P.S. Technically the munkey nft is educationally because it does show that NFT's can be very expensive. FunnyCommons95 (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons is not your personal webhost. If you can show a possible scope I will undelete. --Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
not appropriate Maloroso (talk) 15:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP, professional photo with no exif, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 13:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: uploaded by a user who has changed a correct image to this one on a Charli XCX article and on the left of the photo implies the photo has come from TikTok which is most likely a copyvio. Iggy the Swan (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
creator request ItzSelenux (talk) 17:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
creator request ItzSelenux (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
creator request 189.217.67.41 21:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
creator request 189.217.67.41 21:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
copyvio from https://likeness.ru/blog/topic/118678/ruslan_aushev_pokhozh_na_nikolaya_odoevskogo-maslova.php this site 95.31.188.32 19:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Source website does not indicate a Creative Commons license.
Ixfd64 (talk) 20:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
screenshot (see symbol in the upper right), certainly not own work (fotot from the 1950s or 1960s) Polarlys (talk) 21:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. The uploader marked as CC-BY-SA but I see no mention of Creative Commons licensing on the claimed source page.
This image was added to the enwiki article around the same time as another image which was later deleted as a copyvio: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TP-Link&diff=1067566906&oldid=1067565853 73.223.72.104 21:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Not useful Darrelljon (talk) 21:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Suspected flickrwashing. Source is no more available less than one hour after upload, no files remaining. Didym (talk) 22:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
FALTO DESCRIBIR MariaMartinezObregon (talk) 22:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Self-portrait MexTDT (talk) 22:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
"Own work" is very doubtful - this is one of a handful of widely republished photos of the first virtual reality display from 1968, by Ivan Sutherland's group at the University of Utah dave pape (talk) 23:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; clearly a scan of a photo. --Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Previously published as https://www.myjoyonline.com/educated-fools-and-disappointed-graduates-saying-fixthecountry-should-fix-themselves-shatta-wale/ and it was uploaded to the Nigerian Daily Post in May 2021... https://dailypost.ng/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/shatta-wale-2-2-1000x600.jpg Binksternet (talk) 23:44, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- it is an image of shatta wale andd not any other person.so it should allowed to use Richard Oppong Ansong (talk) 00:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Picture appears to be a non-free commercial PR photo that is displayed on many websites. This version appears on the Journal of Court Reporting website. A quick Google search displays this image. There might be variations of the same image floating on the web. I serious doubt the uploader is the true author for copyright purposes. 68.50.12.230 00:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The full version was deleted, the cropped one should be too. Photo is prepared by the state not the US government. Oklahoma does not release their portraits under public domain Putitonamap98 (talk) 10:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Lower-quality version of File:Freeport Area of Bataan June 30, 2010-2011 Logo.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
copy vio 95.31.188.32 10:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Unclear resolution 2600:100C:A212:9AA7:60EF:EFAE:48C6:A6DB 12:47, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; heavily INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 13:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Images with varying type, resolution, quality and date of photography; no way any of these is uploader's own work.
- File:Poli-rapid.jpg
- File:Rapid-petrolul.jpg
- File:Nicolae Manea.webp
- File:Ion Ionescu golghetarul istoric al Rapidului avand 107 de golurii tricoul visiniu.png
- File:Coregrafia facuta de suporteri pentru meciul cu CSA Steaua din Liga a 4.jpg
- File:Suporterii Rapidului.jpg
- File:Silviu Ploeșteanu.png
- File:Lotul Jiul Petroșani înaintea unui meci cu Politehnica Iași din ultimul sezon al clubului din prima ligă..jpg
- File:Grafic arătând evoluția ligii Jiulului din 1934 până în prezent..png
- File:Coregrafia fanilor craioveni.jpg
- File:FC-ARGES-1953-GALERIE.jpg
- File:Fc Arges a câștigat campionatul pentru a doua oară în 1978-1979 ..jpg
- File:FC Arges a fost campioana romaniei in sezonul 1971-1972.jpg
- File:Sorin vlaicu.jpg
- File:Poli Timisoara in 1923.jpg
- File:Poli-timisoara-1980.jpg
- File:Poli in 2010-2011.png
- File:Logo Steagu Rosu.gif
- File:Steme Brasov.png
- File:Insigna ICIM brasov.webp
- File:1966-tabela-cu-buonsucceso.jpg
- File:Stadionul-tractorul-anii-1980-delcampe-net-e1588847265921.jpg
Gikü (talk) 13:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- No, most of them probably aren't. I used Google Images to find the original source of some of them. This one was probably taken from here, this one from here, this one from here and this one could be a crop of this picture. I wonder though if some of them can't be kept with the right license and a link to their correct source. Maybe at least these three: 1), 2) and 3). --Nenea hartia (talk) 19:58, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Apparent Flickrwashing - here November 2016, well before January 2017 Flickr upload, upper-left watermark crediting kimjennie.com (i.e., YG Entertainment), Flickrstream replete with works not belonging to uploader (e.g., [7]), etc. Эlcobbola talk 13:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Эlcobbola it is already there on commons [8] Shaiksuhana2 (talk) 13:59, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Why do you think that is responsive to the concern? That image, less complete (cropped) and from a blog, is also license laundered. Эlcobbola talk 20:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
![[8]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20161119_%EB%B8%94%EB%9E%99%ED%95%91%ED%81%AC_%EB%A9%9C%EB%A1%A0%EB%AE%A4%EC%A7%81%EC%96%B4%EC%9B%8C%EB%93%9C_(1).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Doubtful own work. See en:User_talk:Mardilucia --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyright violation. No evidence of being uploader's own work. Has already uploaded before an image deleted for the same copyright issue. Film Enthusiast (talk) 17:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi,
- I'm the photographer of this picture
- You can read the EXIF, it's my company : "ILLUSION STORY", check the official registry from INSEE.
- Plus, I'm Vincent Zafra, the Grand REX photographer.
- There is no right issue about my own work.
- I know, its not all days you can take pictures with movie stars... VincentZafra (talk) 18:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- @VincentZafra: Please send confirmation via COM:OTRS and we can undelete it Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
The image has been previously published under copyright TELDEACTUALIDAD PRESS SL ([9]) and it does not seem that uploader and author are the same person. Macucal (talk) 17:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Not the best picture, I would like to replace it. Newsfittoprint22 (talk) 17:42, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep OK, so upload a better one and we'll thank you, and probably replace it in our articles. That's not a reason to delete this one, especially until you have replaced it. We aren't limited to just one picture of a person. We are limited to only free images, though, which is why we often don't have the best images available on the Internet. --GRuban (talk) 17:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- A new one has been uploaded, would love it if you could replace it in the article. Much appreciation. :) Newsfittoprint22 (talk) 19:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Did I upload it to the right place, if not, just need to know how and I can do right away. Newsfittoprint22 (talk) 19:07, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Newsfittoprint22: Wow - File:Alanna 050413 0024.jpg? That's a beautiful image, much better than this one! However, I'm afraid it's also clearly marked "©2013 Glen Wexler Studio • Reproduction right granted only by written licensing aggreement • 323.465.0268" in the EXIF, so we clearly need that written licensing agreement (if not an aggreement).Would you please be so good as to get Glen Wexler, or his or official agent, to write to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org from his or her official email address and say - "Yes, I am Glen Wexler, and I do license the image at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alanna_050413_0024.jpg under the license at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en"? Especially if you are Glen Wexler. Then we'll be glad to replace the image in the article. I'm guessing that's the Glen Wexler at https://www.glenwexler.com/, and I'll also send an email that way. Presumably you can get a faster response from the phone number in the EXIF, but I won't presume to call myself. Thank you! --GRuban (talk) 14:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Alanna paid for the shoot and owns the image, but if that is what you need I can do my best to get that from him or I will look for another one that I can get that for. Newsfittoprint22 (talk) 16:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Nice! I got a response to my email from Glen Wexler that should have also gone to permissions-commons, I'll put a few tags and categories on the image and will put it on the Alanna Ubach page. Thanks again. --GRuban (talk) 13:12, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Newsfittoprint22: One question - on the image page, you write it was from 15 May 2019. However, the "copyright 2013" in the EXIF, and the 050413 in the title implies strongly that it's actually from May 4, 2013. Are you sure about the date? Should I ask Glen Wexler? It's not critical, but nice to get the date correct as well. --GRuban (talk) 13:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Nice! I got a response to my email from Glen Wexler that should have also gone to permissions-commons, I'll put a few tags and categories on the image and will put it on the Alanna Ubach page. Thanks again. --GRuban (talk) 13:12, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Ticket:2022040810000258 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 04:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Saint Mary Church (Abidjan)
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Côte d'Ivoire. According to w:fr:Sanctuaire Notre-Dame-d'Afrique d'Abidjan, the church was completed in 1987 and authored by w:fr:Aldo Spirito, who is apparently still alive today. The architectural work will fall public domain in the 99th 70th anniversary of the author's death (9970+1 years, consistent with Ivorian posthumous copyright term).
- File:Sanctuaire Marial d'Abidjan - Eglise principale-1.JPG
- File:Sanctuaire Marial d'Abidjan - Eglise principale-2.JPG
- File:Sanctuaire Marial d'Abidjan - Vitrail du calvaire.JPG — stained glass artwork
- File:Sanctuaire Marial d'Abidjan.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:28, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Paul Siaka
[edit]These sculptures are all in Côte d'Ivoire, which does not have freedom of panorama. The author, Paul Siaka, is apparently still living. (his website).
- File:Sanctuaire Marial d'Abidjan - Calvaire Paul-Siaka.JPG
- File:Sanctuaire Marial d'Abidjan Notre-Dame-d'Afrique-Mere-de-toute-grace.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Low quality image, duplicate from File:Florida in United States.svg. Maanshen (talk) 03:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
"Photograph by Husne Afsar": VRT permission from Husne Afsar needed. MKFI (talk) 06:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
no source given Hoyanova (talk) 07:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 12:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
The state representative photos are not public domain, also not a work of the US government, this is from the state Putitonamap98 (talk) 07:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Unknown Author; no link to license on "placeit.net" mentioned in upload comment. Potential copyright violation. Malyacko (talk) 09:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Unknown Author; no link to license on "placeit.net" mentioned in upload comment. Potential copyright violation. Malyacko (talk) 09:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Building dates to 2019 as per [10]. Needs license permission from the architect/designer. The building style slightly exceeds COM:TOO that would have made it eligible for {{PD-structure|PHL}}.
- File:0401City of San Jose del Monte 34.jpg
- File:0401City of San Jose del Monte 35.jpg
- File:San Jose del Monte in Bulacan 02.jpg
- File:San Jose del Monte in Bulacan 03.jpg
- File:San Jose del Monte in Bulacan 04.jpg
- File:San Jose del Monte in Bulacan 05.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
COM:DERIV of a flag at File:Samata Party Flag.jpg that's been deleted as lacking permission a few times, superimposed with File:Uday Mandal Samata Party.jpg which similarly lacks permission. Lord Belbury (talk) 11:44, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete since this is a COM:DW as explained by Lord Belbury. Since both of the elements have at least questionable licensing at best, this file can't be kept unless both of the individual elements can be verified as being PD or released under a free license that Commons accepts. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
not own work – almost identical to en:File:Coat of Arms of Guelph, Ontario.svg, which is hosted under fair use TFerenczy (talk) 14:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete – Copyvio due to false claim of authorship (unless the claim applies solely to the vectorization, which seems unlikely). In either case, the original artwork is still copyrighted. Senator2029 22:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
It looks like the source website credits the US Coast Guard by mistake. The actual source appears to be the Canadian Coast Guard (which makes sense since the fire was off the Canadian coast) and the CCGS does not allow commercial use of its content: https://twitter.com/CoastGuardCAN/status/1452150618467016713 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; reuters credit it to canada here https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/canadian-coast-guard-says-monitoring-container-ship-fire-2021-10-24/. --Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
possible copyright infringement, the date is not a photo, but a scanner MisterXS (talk) 14:42, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image is not from a party or an event. Fails Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama -- DaxServer (talk) 15:36, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete - BH license requires the photo to be from a party, set or event. Those images would come from the Parties & Events section of the website, not from the celebs section where this image is from. Ravensfire (talk) 16:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image is not from a party or an event. Fails Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama -- DaxServer (talk) 15:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete - BH license requires the photo to be from a party, set or event. Those images would come from the Parties & Events section of the website, not from the celebs section where this image is from. Ravensfire (talk) 16:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It doesn't seem that uploader and author are the same person and the image appears to be scanned from some printed publication Macucal (talk) 17:10, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
I question the own work. See here. It is the only contribution of the user and there are no meta data. Wouter (talk) 18:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:NOTSOCIAL. This child is clearly non-notable and has absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 18:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Unsubstantiated assertion. A child plants a tree for the first time in his life at an environmental action. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:16, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Keep - could be used and on commons since 2012. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Foto wurde vom Hochlader als "Eigenes Werk" lizenziert. Laut Metadaten ist Fotograf Christian Jungwirth, Urheberrechte www.christianjungwirth.com. Identität zwischen Urheber und Hochlader nicht ersichtlich Lutheraner (talk) 18:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Newspapers are usually protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 19:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
think this file was already deleted, if I remember correctly: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Torjubeeeeeel.jpg Albinfo (talk) 19:59, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; needs OTRS from JuhaniJarvenpaa. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
claims CC own work – but according to meta data, another photographer is tagged as in other pics uploaded by the same user with the same license Albinfo (talk) 20:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- grabbed from the web: [11] --Albinfo (talk) 20:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
another pci grabbed from the web: [12] Albinfo (talk) 20:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
most probably like all the other pics uploaded by this user not "own work" Albinfo (talk) 20:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anna znaenok (talk · contribs)
[edit]Strong doubts about these pictures. The uploader states that they are "Art journalist and art historian (MA)." on their user page, but appears to be passing work by Zoya Volkova and by Lisa Shtormit off as their own work. COM:PCP applies/. COM:VRT shoudl be used if there url;oadimg of these files is legitimate. We appear to have a permissions or a copyright violation.
- File:Andrey Berger.jpg
- File:Ольфакторный перфоманс “Диффузио”.png
- File:Интерактивный и ольфакторный проект “Фамильные ценности” при поддержке гранта CAF Москва и JUF of New York (2018, Москва).png
- File:Скульптура для ольфакторного проекта “nOsense” арт-резиденции АСМЕ Лондон, при поддержке фонда MOST.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:24, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Published in 2001 is obviously not old enough to be in PD 220.246.230.92 03:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Published in 1989 is not old enough to be in PD 220.246.230.92 03:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Published in 1989 is not old enough to be in PD 220.246.230.92 03:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Published in 1984 is not old enough to be in PD 220.246.230.92 03:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Danish police press photos. {{Attribution}} claimed, but I can't find any indication of such on the source website. The source allows use, but makes no mention of derivatives etc. required of a free license.
- File:Rigspolitichef Thorkild Fogde I Uniform.jpg
- File:Politibil Volkswagen Touran.jpg
- File:Aftenpatrulje foto af Kim Matthai Leland.jpg
MKFI (talk) 06:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hello. I contacted the Danish Rigspoliti press division via email requesting permission to use the photographs on wikipedia and related sites. I was granted this permission due to the images being public and for press use Fishie000 (talk) 11:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Fishie000: "permission to use the photographs on wikipedia and related sites" is rather vague and may not be enough. Our licensing policy requires that image are free to use and modify, and they can't be restricted to only Wikimedia sites. Can you please ask if they are willing to grant an explicit and specific license like CC-BY-SA? MKFI (talk) 14:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- They are public images according to the police... They are listed as "Press Photos". Fishie000 (talk) 14:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Fishie000: Sadly press photos, while free to use, still often have some restrictions. See "Press photos" under Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Internet_images. MKFI (talk) 16:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- @MKFI
- So even with written permission from the people publishing the image. I need to get a insanely COVID-19 busy Police Commissioner to issue me a license to use the image... If so... just take down the god damn images. I have a life and things to do. I'm not gonna sit here and write out 9000 emails and wait 6 months until I finally get my "license". It takes the Danish Police ~MONTHS~ to issue most common licenses due to their insane understaffing
- -
- Now. Do you even understand Danish? How do you understand the "source website"? Have you spoken to the Rigs Police? Do you have a background in European copyright law? Do you understand the fact that the copyright owners permitted me in an email to use those images here? The Chief-Clerk of the Danish Police's Press division gave me written permission.
- -
- Here is a screenshot of the email https://imgur.com/a/yE33Vx8. You are welcome to take a peek and translate it using whatever you undoubtedly used to translate the "source website" Fishie000 (talk) 21:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Fishie000: Sadly press photos, while free to use, still often have some restrictions. See "Press photos" under Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Internet_images. MKFI (talk) 16:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- They are public images according to the police... They are listed as "Press Photos". Fishie000 (talk) 14:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Fishie000: "permission to use the photographs on wikipedia and related sites" is rather vague and may not be enough. Our licensing policy requires that image are free to use and modify, and they can't be restricted to only Wikimedia sites. Can you please ask if they are willing to grant an explicit and specific license like CC-BY-SA? MKFI (talk) 14:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Fishie000: I apologize if I sound unnecessarily harsh or difficult. These are good images and it would be good if we can keep them.
- However, "permission to use the photographs on wikipedia and related sites" may simply not be sufficient to include them here (although it certainly would be for most websites); Commons:Licensing requires images to be usable by anyone, anytime, for any purpose, including someone taking the images and trying to sell them for profit.
- No, I do not speak Danish. You could ask for other Danish speakers to comment on this by asking in Commons:Landsbybrønden or da:Wikipedia:Landsbybrønden. MKFI (talk) 13:07, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- You could also ask for help in Commons:Village pump/Copyright; it is certainly possible that my understanding of the copyright issue is incorrect. MKFI (talk) 13:11, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The only acceptable way to provide permission is via COM:VRT. We can undelete if this is done. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Duplicaat van キハ110形(小淵沢駅~甲斐小泉駅).jpg トトト (talk) 07:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected as (very close) duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of a poster. The image may not be from a government employee but a private computer graphic artist. Missing COM:VRTS permission from him/her. There is also no FOP in the Philippines for commercial exploitations of such artworks without artists' licensing permissions. The poster may not qualify if FOP to be introduced here after the elections is for permanent artworks only. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The year indicated on the plaque is MMXXI (2021). This means the plaque is recent and a large part of the text (except a small passage from the Book of Psalms at the top) is eligible for copyright as a literary work of an author still alive. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster – fair use is allowed at rowiki, image should be transferred there if needed. Gikü (talk) 13:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- I do not understand what is the issue. Can you make it more clear? Plesa Dragos Florian (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><img alt="Licenţa Creative Commons" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png" /></a>
Această operă este pusă la dispoziţie sub <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Licenţa Creative Commons Atribuire-Necomercial-FărăDerivate 4.0 Internațional </a>. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plesa Dragos Florian (talk • contribs) 19:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- NC ND nu este permis aici pe Commons. --Achim55 (talk) 20:57, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Old Unused Image 59.153.19.226 16:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
creator request ItzSelenux (talk) 17:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
se creo sin permiso del autor original 190.157.102.247 02:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
se creo sin permisos del autor original 189.217.67.41 21:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused logo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Wrong date, probably wron author. Could be copyright violation. Xocolatl (talk) 19:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong author, no source... Xocolatl (talk) 19:15, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
I don't think this file should be deleted, but I do object to a recently added speedy deletion tag. Per COM:D I'm converting to a regular deletion discussion. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- I can agree with you on objecting to deletion as well. Historyday01 (talk) 20:08, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This file is a copyright violation as it was taken from Wikia (https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/steven-universe/images/7/7b/IAN.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20150821191929&path-prefix=ru) (backup). While the file uploaded here is from 2016, the earliest source is from August 2015. 2603:301D:22B2:4000:4851:B842:E7C9:21FC 20:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the backup link. Your original link was dead for me (now working, bizarre!).
- Delete. This diff from the Russian Fandom page shows someone adding the image on August 21, 2015. Between that and the Commons uploader's other copyright violations, I think there's a reasonable case that this was an improper upload. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 20:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Created a replacement image from a public domain image I found today. Trying to add it where I can. Historyday01 (talk) 22:40, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Update: I changed all the images over on en.wikipedia to the replacement image, so all that is left is for those in foreign-language wiki pages to be changed over to the new image.--Historyday01 (talk) 22:47, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
An identical image already exists in svg format Kougelhof (talk) 23:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant to File:French party SFIO.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
An identical image already exists in svg format Kougelhof (talk) 23:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant to File:French party Rad.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
An identical image already exists in svg format Kougelhof (talk) 23:42, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant to File:French party PRRRS.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
No FoP in Taiwan for indoor artworks - this board is placed inside a building per description. Taiwan has a relatively low TOO, and IMO the design of this wooden board is above TOO standard. Stang★ 16:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 07:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
non-notable, used for an article that hasn't been accepted in wiki for lack of notability Oaktree b (talk) 01:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
There is no acceptable freedom of panorama in Côte d'Ivoire, and this work of architecture is not incidentally included but intentionally included. The author of this 1973 work is architect Rinaldo Olivieri (source: [13]). Needs commercial license permission from him. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" Urheber kann aber nur eine natürliche Person sein, nicht aber der Heimat- und Tourismusverein Dassow. Kein Hinweis, dass der Hochlader berechtigt ist, das Foto unter eine CC-Lizenz zu stellen Lutheraner (talk) 00:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Das Werk hat der Account Heimat- und Tourismusverein Dassow hochgeladen und als "Eigenes Werk" lizensiert. Welcher Unterschied sollte zu Bildern, die der Account Global Fish hochgeladen hat und als "Eigenes Werk" lizensiert hat?
Du kannst natürlich sagen, du weißt nicht, ob die Bilder tatsächlich von der Person hinter dem Account Heimat- und Tourismusverband Dassow gemacht worden sind. Weißt du aber bei den ganzen Dateien nicht, die vom Account Global Fish stammen [14]. Damit musst du leben. Als Urheber einen Account anzugeben, reicht völlig aus.
Ich sehe ein völlig normales und übliches Vorgehen und keinerlei Löschgrund- --Global Fish (talk) 07:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: AGF. Claim of own work is believable. Has exif from mobile phone. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Abecedare as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copied from https://www.facebook.com/419272474900533/posts/1107574796070294/ without any indication that image is in public domain or properly licensed. Apparently old image, check for possible PD. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:44, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: We need more info to determine PD. He died in 1987, so not sure how old this is. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Someone's Moving Castle (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence to show the government department' s logo is in PD. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shenzhou 5 insignia.PNG
Larryasou (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" Urheber kann aber nur eine natürliche Person sein, nicht aber der Heimat- und Tourismusverein Dassow. Kein Hinweis, dass der Hochlader berechtigt ist, das Foto unter eine CC-Lizenz zu stellen Lutheraner (talk) 00:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Das Werk hat der Account Heimat- und Tourismusverein Dassow hochgeladen und als "Eigenes Werk" lizensiert. Welcher Unterschied besteht zu Bildern, die der Account Global Fish hochgeladen hat und als "Eigenes Werk" lizensiert hat?
Du kannst natürlich sagen, du weißt nicht, ob die Bilder tatsächlich von der Person hinter dem Account Heimat- und Tourismusverband Dassow gemacht worden sind. Weißt du aber bei den ganzen Dateien nicht, die vom Account Global Fish stammen [15]. Damit musst du leben. Als Urheber einen Account anzugeben, reicht völlig aus.
Ich sehe ein völlig normales und übliches Vorgehen und keinerlei Löschgrund- --Global Fish (talk) 07:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Ich sehe keinen Löschgrund, der Urheber tritt hier unter einem Pseudonym auf. Das darf er. --Rosenzweig τ 11:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Imagem não existe na web. Possivelmente não representa o partido. Link de origem quebrado. Pode conter direitos autorais. Partido mostra outro logo em seu mais novo estatuto. Não tem respaldo de existir. Sr. Freak (talk) 01:57, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --MB-one (talk) 18:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
من آن را به اشتباه آپلود کردم Ebrahimesmaili43 (talk) 06:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
