Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/06/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 1st, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP France, there is no freedom of panorama in France. This mosque was completed in 2012. plicit 06:49, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected images uploaded by the user Castrajon https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles?limit=500&user=Castrajon&ilshowall=1 All the photos that this publication are not his own, he is copying them screenshots from YouTube and googlemaps of protected images and other users, I request that you block this user and delete all the photos that he is publishing. © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA - Todos los derechos reservados. These photos are published on GoogleMaps and YouTube with copyright and this user is copying and publishing them in his name without consent, this behavior violates the wikimedia rules, please block this user and delete all the photos that he is publishing © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA (discusión) 21:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC) © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA (talk) 07:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 09:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected images uploaded by the user Castrajon https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles?limit=500&user=Castrajon&ilshowall=1 All the photos that this publication are not his own, he is copying them screenshots from YouTube and googlemaps of protected images and other users, I request that you block this user and delete all the photos that he is publishing. © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA - Todos los derechos reservados. These photos are published on GoogleMaps and YouTube with copyright and this user is copying and publishing them in his name without consent, this behavior violates the wikimedia rules, please block this user and delete all the photos that he is publishing © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA (discusión) 21:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC) © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA (talk) 07:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 09:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected images uploaded by the user Castrajon https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles?limit=500&user=Castrajon&ilshowall=1 All the photos that this publication are not his own, he is copying them screenshots from YouTube and googlemaps of protected images and other users, I request that you block this user and delete all the photos that he is publishing. © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA - Todos los derechos reservados. These photos are published on GoogleMaps and YouTube with copyright and this user is copying and publishing them in his name without consent, this behavior violates the wikimedia rules, please block this user and delete all the photos that he is publishing © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA (discusión) 21:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC) © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA (talk) 07:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 09:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected images uploaded by the user Castrajon https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles?limit=500&user=Castrajon&ilshowall=1 All the photos that this publication are not his own, he is copying them screenshots from YouTube and googlemaps of protected images and other users, I request that you block this user and delete all the photos that he is publishing. © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA - Todos los derechos reservados. These photos are published on GoogleMaps and YouTube with copyright and this user is copying and publishing them in his name without consent, this behavior violates the wikimedia rules, please block this user and delete all the photos that he is publishing © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA (talk) 08:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 09:24, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected images uploaded by the user Castrajon https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles?limit=500&user=Castrajon&ilshowall=1 All the photos that this publication are not his own, he is copying them screenshots from YouTube and googlemaps of protected images and other users, I request that you block this user and delete all the photos that he is publishing. © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA - Todos los derechos reservados. These photos are published on GoogleMaps and YouTube with copyright and this user is copying and publishing them in his name without consent, this behavior violates the wikimedia rules, please block this user and delete all the photos that he is publishing © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA (discusión) 21:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC) © TURISMO RURAL ARLANZA (talk) 07:53, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Cookie at 09:12, 1 Juni 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Castrajon --Krdbot 14:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The editor found out that this file is not free for use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shamrockwikiedit (talk • contribs) 84:56, 1 June 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per nom and COM:CSD#G7.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moved to Category:Relations of Iraq and the People's Mujahedin of Iran. -- Themightyquill (talk) 18:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: accidental nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 18:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio de la photo du compte personnel de François Durovray: http://www.francoisdurovray.fr/mon-parcours/ Poudou99 (talk) 09:30, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo, not free Supertoff (talk) 15:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo at 15:36, 1 June 2021 UTC: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (F2): surpasses threshold of originality --Krdbot 20:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo not free Supertoff (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo at 15:36, 1 June 2021 UTC: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (F2): surpasses threshold of originality --Krdbot 20:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to edit the copyright Holayannie (talk) 09:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete please. there is a problem with copyright Holayannie (talk) 05:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. plicit 03:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from YouTube Tournesol (talk) 13:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 20:16, 1 June 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 02:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Por que es sacada de otro lugar Juanpamx (talk) 16:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola at 18:52, 1 June 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 02:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio|source=https://www.facebook.com/1243319692431937/posts/2636358449794714/ Mauricio C. (talk) 17:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:36, 1 June 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.facebook.com/1243319692431937/posts/2636358449794714/ --Krdbot 02:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio|reason=https://twitter.com/DiarioPasala/status/1399500499263668226 Mauricio C. (talk) 17:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 20:11, 1 June 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 02:31, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Jelican9 (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image failed to upload; has not been corrected in over 2 years Deanlaw (talk) 03:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The PDF file is complete. --De728631 (talk) 17:52, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 23:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 10:47, 4 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 27 May 2021 --Krdbot 14:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 23:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 10:47, 4 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 27 May 2021 --Krdbot 14:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol, cf. Google Images — danyele 14:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All the reasult you listed are published later than i load my picture on Wiki. Anyone can copy and use my picture on the web now, it's not my fault, it's my own Work--Aramis974 (talk) 20:52, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My file was loaded 6 April 2021 on Wikimedia, before i used it on SCD Progresso Calcio Facebook page 21 February 2021. Other pictures found with google image are : 10 Sept 2021 https://bologna.repubblica.it/sport/2021/09/10/news/enrico_raspadori_mio_fratello_giacomo_l_ho_preso_al_fantacalcio_-317183370/ 19 May 2021 https://mobile.twitter.com/marcomaioli1/status/1394774927534866440 23 April 2021 (taken from Wikipedia) https://www.footballandlife.it/2021/04/23/giacomo-raspadori-sassuolo-una-storia-damore-lunga-una-vita/ 03 June 2021 https://new.qq.com/omn/20210603/20210603A018P300.html September 2021 (taken from Wikimedia) https://balizapierrette.blogspot.com/2021/09/giacomo-raspadori-wiki.html?m=1&c=1 May 2021 https://twitter.com/emiratesdagli/status/1396084598334009349 10 September 2021 https://bologna.repubblica.it/sport/2021/09/10/news/enrico_raspadori_mio_fratello_giacomo_l_ho_preso_al_fantacalcio_-317183370/ 10 September 2021 https://artbrennannewpro308.blogspot.com/2021/09/the-best-19-giacomo-raspadori-sassuolo.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aramis974 (talk • contribs) 10:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a valid VRTS ticket for this photo. Ruthven (msg) 11:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear where this is located at the source website, but the website has copyright information. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shoot for the Stars (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These YouTube channels quite clearly take media from celebrities' social media so it is very unlikely that the Creative Commons license is valid.

Dylsss (talk) 16:46, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shoot for the Stars (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work. Small file sizes, poor quality, and no one has own work on record albums.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ellin Beltz You have to be kidding me. The Billie Eilish photo belongs to my OWN SISTER! She took the photo and gave me permission to use it! Meaning I can upload wherever the hell I want! The impractical joker photos were uploaded by James Murray (comedian). One of the main four of the show. The Chris Issac one is perfect quality and was uploaded by someone else. And the music ones provide coverage to "primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question". This is so ridiculous. I am taking this to an admin ASAP. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 20:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nom - Clearly copyrighted images. Also the images are so tiny they're effectively useless, Images should be deleted and uploader above should be blocked for this theatrical performance. –Davey2010Talk 21:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
1 image was linked to Ebay, Another was to Flickr with a CC licence (not sure if this is legit but to be safe it should be deleted) and the rest being from the uploader themselves. Bar Flickr the rest are copyrighted it's obvious. –Davey2010Talk 21:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Even by admission File:Iloveyoulive.jpg isn't the uploader's own work, doesn't matter if it was a still from a video that a family member filmed, it doesn't make it your own work. However I have serious doubts that is the case. I also find it interesting that the uploader uses png for photographs, File:Chris Isaak 2017.png for example should've been cropped from the original jpg as a jpg (Commons has a tool for that type of thing). Bidgee (talk) 22:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The description for File:Chris Isaak 2017.png states it's extracted from File:Hall And Oates with Chris Isaak - The O2 - Saturday 28th October 2017 HallOatesO2281017-26 (24446890518).jpg; so, unless this isn't the case or the source image is also a copyvio, a crop can't be a copyvio, can it? If the only problem is the format, then it seems that a new crop could be created in the same format as the original. It doesn't, however, make sense to delete the crop as a copyvio unless the original is also deleted for the same reason. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Um, actually no, we're not kidding you. According to COM:L, the images we host for free have to have certain kinds of licenses. "My sister" and "my friend" is not "own work." If you can get the actual photographer's permission, please have them fill in the really simple email form at COM:OTRS. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC) PS: I am an admin . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Shoot for the Stars' version of "File:Themanwhosoldtheworldbowie.png" was unsourced and missing a status tag, although the image itself would probably have been fine if it had been sourced and tagged. Anyway, it was overwritten by another user with a different image (about the same topic) with a source and status tags. Not sure what to do with that. The usurpation of a filename (instead of uploading under a different filemane) is not a good move. But maybe it can be acceptable if the previous unsourced version is deleted. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:07, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shoot for the Stars (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Originally tagged as "no permission", as the uploader assigned {{PD-USGov}} as the license and the photos were sourced to the Fairfield (CT) Police Department, which is not a part of the federal government. The uploader has since changed the license to File:Stephen Buchanan Mugshot.webp to {{PD-author}} citing https://www.nj.gov/nj/legal.html, which doesn't work, because it's for the state government of New Jersey, not Connecticut.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:59, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It states that in the US state of Connecticut, "mugshots are considered public record, there are no exemptions in the Act that prohibits public access and anyone can retrieve them." Shoot for the Stars (talk) 20:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shoot for the Stars I think you had the correct link that dealt with mugshots in Connecticut (https://connecticut.staterecords.org/criminal.php) but changed to an incorrect link that deals with accident reports. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - A public record is not usually PD -- Everything on the web is public, but very little of it is free of copyright restrictions. Connecticut is not one of the limited number of states that does not claim copyright in its works. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dreadfully small, low quality picture of a Margherita pizza. We have a ton of way better images of this type of pizza that supercede this one. You can find them here. Missvain (talk) 01:15, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:19, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely Flickr washed. Rather poor quality, zoomed in photo of a Margherita pizza. Has a watermark on it for a website doesn't exist. The Flickr account no longer exists. Besides, we have way better photographs of these types of pizzas as seen here. Missvain (talk) 02:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:18, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Works copied from Internet sources that don't have any evidence of the CC-BY-SA license they're tagged with

Prosfilaes (talk) 05:15, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:32, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong category: There is no the Yenisei River in Irbeysky District Мельников (talk) 05:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on wikidata Minoraxtalk 05:39, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:35, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Chismosorepuestos

[edit]

Advertising. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect license for work likely under copyright Deanlaw (talk) 07:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:37, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect license for work likely under copyright Deanlaw (talk) 07:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:37, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect license for work likely under copyright Deanlaw (talk) 07:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely own work. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:36, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect license for work likely under copyright Deanlaw (talk) 07:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:36, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality photo montage joke, outside of scope Kotivalo (talk) 14:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low quality photo of domesticated dog. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:45, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:46, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally uploaded the JPG version of the signature, the vector has now been uploaded Jonadrews (talk) 14:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:46, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Non-notable person. SCP-2000 14:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:46, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from a larger photo, e.g. https://www.lidovky.cz/domov/prymulu-ma-nahradit-blatny-babis-privezl-jeho-zivotopis-zemanovi-do-lan.A201023_175537_ln_domov_sei/foto/HEK86edc3_p202010230734301.jpg (https://www.lidovky.cz/domov/prymulu-ma-nahradit-blatny-babis-privezl-jeho-zivotopis-zemanovi-do-lan.A201023_175537_ln_domov_sei, date: 23 October 2020, credit: en:ČTK) Harold (talk) 14:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:47, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Noblevital (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Non-notable person.

SCP-2000 14:49, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:47, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same content as File:Lake Pukaki & Aoraki Mount Cook 01.jpg I guess double versions are not necessary Du Hugin Skulblaka (talk) 20:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. It's not the same file. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:41, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol Ciaurlec (talk) 21:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:41, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol Ciaurlec (talk) 21:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that contains excessive whitsuspected derivative work of the underlying image: it seems the uploader is not the photographer of the underlying image. Possibly a scan of a photograph. Also leaning to out of COM:SCOPE. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:25, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Category:Travel agencies is wrong: "Solo Travel" is not an agency, it just ... marks travelling solo. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PRCapital (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious joke CzarJobKhaya (talk) 17:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: portraits of non noble people, child, childish painting etc.

Matlin (talk) 17:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't belong here DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 17:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   17:24, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mryahye1 (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

While these book covers may be own creations by the uploader, the purpose of these files is unclear. These are COM:NOTUSED. Possibly out of COM:SCOPE. See also COM:HOST.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mryahye1 (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Unused personal profile pictures. Commons is not a web host, and not a social media site similar to Instagram or Facebook.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:09, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. No usage. Lectrician1 (talk) 17:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project's scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 19:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

+ 1 --Veliensis (talk) 12:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res diagram without context, and should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jimv2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-res diagram without context, little educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SEO spam ("Seo Uzmanı [redacted]'ın banner çalışması" = "Banner work of Seo Expert [redacted]") Ubcule (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal (test) image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:33, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam ("Social Media and SEO Expert") from otherwise non-contributing user. Ubcule (talk) 19:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random image of nondescript shrubbery, little educational value, out of scope. Numerous better alternatives already on Commons. P 1 9 9   19:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random image of nondescript shrubbery, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random image of unidentified place, no description, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:39, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot, no context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yvetterr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused materials about company with questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: One of the company's product has an en.wiki page and so has the company's founder Julian Metcalfe. So, some notability is certainly there. Just a remark. Note to be taken as a vote. Rahul Bott (talk) 08:19, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 23:13, 23 May 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Kept now, because apparently Rahul Bott meant to vote keep. Anyways, closed as kept with no consensus to delete -FASTILY 09:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yvetterr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo and logo, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joker Entertainments (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional photo of non-notable performer, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text doc, out of scope. And unresolved copyright issue since 2012. P 1 9 9   20:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused corporate diagram, out of scope. LIkely copyvio as well judging by watermark, and previously published. P 1 9 9   20:03, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by T-1000i (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal logo/image, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9   20:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality photo of indiscernable item, no context, little educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res diagram without context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable athlete, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmed CaanoGeel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jefizdaman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matoma05 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All Facebook size or smaller. Some have metadata suggesting that they had original transmission data similar to facebook. Others with no metadata, but no likely to be own work either.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:15, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Umberto della porta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal files, out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   20:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sachoz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW - clearly photograph of a screen (see, for example, the w:Moiré pattern) - also COM:SCOPE issue as unused, terrible quality photo with no realistic educational use.

Эlcobbola talk 17:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sachoz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res, no EXIF, serial copyvio uploader, uploaded in batch of blatant COM:NETCOPYVIOs of same subject matter (see File:Greenery pasture.jpg, File:Umbrella trees.jpg, File:Vane yard of wind.jpg). Duck/COM:PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 20:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sachoz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res, no EXIF, serial copyvio uploader, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Lined up bulls.jpg is here; File:Vewers bridge.jpg is here; File:Duck in the soil.jpg is here; File:Birds under the trees around the beautiful natural vegetation of the world.jpg is here; etc.) Duck/COM:PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 21:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 23:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is embarrassing Nick19931993 (talk) 23:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: test upload, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is embarrassing Nick19931993 (talk) 23:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: test upload, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is embarrassing Nick19931993 (talk) 23:49, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is embarrassing Nick19931993 (talk) 23:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VikramVS1208 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The "My city Kurnool" watermark indicates these are likely copright violations originating from https://www.facebook.com/kurnoolcity/.

HyperGaruda (talk) 09:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VikramVS1208 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Watermarks refer to Mana Nandyala, implying copyright violation of https://www.facebook.com/NandyalaTown

HyperGaruda (talk) 09:43, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VikramVS1208 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most of these images have transmission data suggestive of facebook or instagram, some actually have FBMD in metadata... Two have no metadata at all but are facebook sizes. I usually send FBMD to speedy, but in this case I left them together with the rest of the gallery to show the pattern of the uploads.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:16, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vjacheslav3636 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I do not find any indicaiton of own work on any of these images. One looks like an album cover, another like a book, and so on.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:16, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 08:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 01:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theweiner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mediocre generic penis pictures. Offers no educational value beyond what is already on Commons. Additionally the EXIF indicates the files were originally uploaded to Facebook, making their licensing status questionable.

Spicy (talk) 19:15, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 01:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work of the uploader and not created in May 2021 as stated. The real source and origin is not stated. ŠJů (talk) 00:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped from another image File:Haruki Nanmei A portrait of Lu Yu 春木南溟筆 陸羽像.jpg (PD). Corrected. Speedy close. Gumruch (talk) 09:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, fixed. Taivo (talk) 07:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Chad, and this freely-licensed image does not have authorization from the architect of the Central Bank of Chad building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:35, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image can be found on the Baton Rogue Mayor website https://www.brla.gov/588/Mayor-President and many other places, clearly not the uploader's work Putitonamap98 (talk) 02:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zero proof this is the uploader's work like the obviously copyrighted portrait of Sharon Weston Broome also uploaded by the same person, this was taken from another website: https://www.facebook.com/stevecarterforbr/ Putitonamap98 (talk) 02:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 07:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mauvaise qualité, personnalité non-notoire. Caux9 (talk) 08:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 06:35, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You can delete, I put it on Wikicommons. This character is not known and the family's permission has not been given for the file to be put online. Caux9 (talk) 16:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 06:36, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Média utilisé nulle part, sans intérêt encyclopédique 2A01:CB05:8915:D300:C07D:1416:154E:6727 12:41, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Still no valid reason, we have at least one other version of the same image, it appears multiple places on the internet with the family history, and is public domain. --RAN (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 13:13, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This portrait is private BBC440 (talk) 12:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 13:14, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mauvaise qualité et reflets (je remettrai une meilleure photo). Merci de bien vouloir la supprimer. Caux9 (talk) 08:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 06:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This person is unknown and the family has not given their consent for the publication of this photo. I am the author of this photo and therefore ask you to delete it. Caux9 (talk) 18:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 06:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This portrait is private BBC440 (talk) 12:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 13:11, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mauvaise version du fichier + personnalité non notoire. Je vous remercie par avance. Caux9 (talk) 08:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 06:29, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Média utilisé nulle part, sans intérêt encyclopédique et de caractère privé 2A01:CB05:8915:D300:C07D:1416:154E:6727 12:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep PD-France. Still no valid reason for deletion, we have at least one other version of the image, it appears multiple places on the internet. "It is an anonymous or pseudonymous work (the identity of the author has never been disclosed) or a collective work and more than 70 years have passed since its publication" See: Commons:Publication for the Berne convention definition of publication. --RAN (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I cropped out the frame, no longer 3d. The source mentioned is not wrong, the nominator is removing it from every place on the Internet where he can ask for deletion. He has 6 SPA accounts both adding info and deleting info, all now blocked. --RAN (talk) 18:10, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. This is now very clearly a faithful reproduction of a two-dimensional work, so there is no valid copyright on that photo (see: {{PD-Art}}). Since the original piece of artwork has clearly had its copyright expire given its date, this file is perfectly fine to include on commons. (For the former version, I would argue that the inclusion of the frame was de minimus, so I don't see a reason to delete older versions of this file.) Mhawk10 (talk) 21:17, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. The photo of frame is considered copyrighted (many photos of 3D objects have been deleted, even photos of coins due to the small 3d details), so the version with frame must be deleted. To prevent problems for other users of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 07:47, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The English Wikipedia article states that this hotel was incepted in 2004. As there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Chad, architects' authorization via COM:OTRS is still required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Public art (sculpture) of unknown date or authorship (sculptor). There is no commercial FOP in Chad, and Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle may roll in. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Public art (sculpture) of unknown date or authorship (sculptor). There is no commercial FOP in Chad, and Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle may roll in. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject here is a hominin sculpture. Chad has no commercial freedom of panorama, and the uploader didn't have permission from the artist of this hominin sculpture. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Hominin photos violating FoP (part 2). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:15, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't sure if it was OK or not but I did a search and was guided by images already on Commons, including for instance this one which has been around since 2011 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Power_Cabinet_With_Nice_Art_On_It.jpg There are many other examples that should also be deleted if you search for "street art new zealand". DrThneed (talk) 03:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:45, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image did not upload Deanlaw (talk) 02:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Deanlaw: Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, 0×0 pixels. Taivo (talk) 08:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image failed to upload Deanlaw (talk) 02:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Taivo (talk) 08:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image failed to upload Deanlaw (talk) 02:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, 0×0 pixels. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image failed to upload Deanlaw (talk) 02:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, 0×0 pixels. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image failed to upload Deanlaw (talk) 03:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, for me the file loaded well. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image failed to upload Deanlaw (talk) 03:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, 0×0 pixels. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image failed to upload; has not been corrected in 2 years Deanlaw (talk) 03:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, 0×0 pixels. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image failed to upload; has not been corrected in over 2 years Deanlaw (talk) 03:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, 0×0 pixels. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image failed to upload; has not been corrected in over 2 years Deanlaw (talk) 03:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, 0×0 pixels. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image failed to upload; has not been corrected in over 2 years Deanlaw (talk) 03:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, 0×0 pixels. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image failed to upload; has not been corrected in over 2 years Deanlaw (talk) 03:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, for me the file loads well. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image failed to upload; has not been corrected in over 2 years Deanlaw (talk) 03:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, 0×0 pixels. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image failed to upload; has not been corrected in over 2 years Deanlaw (talk) 03:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, 0×0 pixels. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image failed to upload; has not been corrected in over 2 years Deanlaw (talk) 03:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deanlaw: The thumbnail didn't upload, but the file is OK. That is not a reason to delete the file! Just trying to upload the same file (which failed because no alteration was made in it) seems to resolve the problem. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, 0×0 pixels. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTUSED: Small, blurred and unused image, can be replaced A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Slightly blurred, but I can replace it.🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 14:53, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It was removed by an IP editor.🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 14:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But the image is still very small and blurred, I cannot see the eclipsed moon clearly. I doubt it has any COM:EDUSE. Could you provide the place where you take this image and upload a better version of this file to see if it is distinct enough to have some educational value. TBH this image's quality is terrible. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:29, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have some less blurry shots, but I need to find them first.🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 15:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, only 256×192 pixels and blurry, but the file is still used. Quite strangely Commons has only 8 images about the eclipse. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional personal file, in pdf form. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:40, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Australia, "Australia Post claims copyright ownership of Australian stamps for 50 years from publication", meaning only stamps published before 1971 are currently exempt from copyright. This one is from 1994 and therefore copyrighted. Calistemon (talk) 08:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note, as this image is part of a large group of potentially copyrighted images uploaded by the same user, I have now nominated this image for speedy deletion as a copyright violation. Calistemon (talk) 09:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Ellin Beltz. --Minoraxtalk 02:40, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Australia, "Australia Post claims copyright ownership of Australian stamps for 50 years from publication", meaning only stamps published before 1971 are currently exempt from copyright. This one is from between 1984 and 1987 and therefore copyrighted. Calistemon (talk) 08:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note, as this image is part of a large group of potentially copyrighted images uploaded by the same user, I have now nominated this image for speedy deletion as a copyright violation. Calistemon (talk) 09:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Ellin Beltz. --Minoraxtalk 02:40, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Toscanini_LCCN2014719391.jpg FMSky (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. No, it is a crop. Materialscientist (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 02:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request Not in use I uploaded this picture by mistake. It should not be here - Jeffersonkendric 12:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as a courtesy to the uploader and due to potential copyright concerns about the sculpture and banner.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 10:17, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 14:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 14:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist's rendering, unlikely to be own work Ytoyoda (talk) 19:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarking indicates this is not the uploader's work Ytoyoda (talk) 19:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata indicates this is a web download. Please specify the image source. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 04:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicts sculpture not made by uploader. More information is needed. Other photos from this series were found on the internet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 2003 U.S. commemorative coins designed by AIP artists or as part of a competition

[edit]

Each of the nominated files was either designed by an Artist Infusion Program (AIP) artist or designed as part of a competition. For reasons explained at Commons:Determining if U.S. coins are free to use, these works are not freely usable and should be deleted. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Apollo 11 Commemorative Coin Contest images and Commons:Deletion requests/US Mint Registered Copyrights.

The determination of which files should be deleted was made by visiting the mint's webpage for each of the post-2003 commemorative coins and reviewing the artist information. Coin sides designed by AIP artists or as part of a competition were marked non-free. Coin sides designed by U.S. mint employees were marked PD. If a determination could not be made, the coin side was marked unclear. You can see a table of my findings below. While I have been careful to only choose files and coins that are non-free, please let me know if I have made a mistake.

Name Year Obverse status Reverse status Obverse reasoning Reverse reasoning Reference
National Law Enforcement Memorial and Museum $5 Gold Coin 2021 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [1]
National Law Enforcement Memorial and Museum Silver Dollar 2021 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [2]
National Law Enforcement Memorial and Museum Clad Half Dollar 2021 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [3]
Christa McAuliffe Silver Dollar 2021 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [4]
Women’s Suffrage Centennial Silver Dollar 2020 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [5]
Basketball Hall of Fame $5 Gold Coin 2020 Non-free Non-free Competition AIP [6]
Basketball Hall of Fame Silver Dollar Coin 2020 Non-free Non-free Competition AIP [7]
Basketball Hall of Fame Half Dollar Clad Coin 2020 Non-free Non-free Competition AIP [8]
Apollo 11 50th Anniversary $5 Gold Coin 2019 Non-free PD Competition Mint employee [9]
Apollo 11 50th Anniversary Five Ounce Proof Silver Coin 2019 Non-free PD Competition Mint employee [10]
Apollo 11 50th Anniversary Silver Dollar Coin 2019 Non-free PD Competition Mint employee [11]
Apollo 11 50th Anniversary Clad Half Dollar Coin 2019 Non-free PD Competition Mint employee [12]
American Legion 100th Anniversary $5 Gold Coin 2019 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [13]
American Legion 100th Anniversary Silver Dollar Coin 2019 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [14]
American Legion 100th Anniversary Clad Half Dollar Coin 2019 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [15]
Breast Cancer Awareness $5 Gold Coin 2018 Non-free Non-free Competition Competition [16]
Breast Cancer Awareness Silver Dollar 2018 Non-free Non-free Competition Competition [17]
Breast Cancer Awareness Clad Half Dollar 2018 Non-free Non-free Competition Competition [18]
World War I Centennial Silver Dollar 2018 Non-free Non-free Competition Competition [19]
Boys Town Centennial Five Dollar Gold Coin 2017 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [20]
Boys Town Centennial Silver Dollar Coin 2017 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [21]
Boys Town Centennial Clad Half Dollar Coin 2017 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [22]
Lions Clubs International Centennial Silver Dollar 2017 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [23]
Mark Twain Commemorative $5 Gold Coin 2016 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [24]
Mark Twain Commemorative $1 Silver Coin 2016 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [25]
National Park Service 100th Anniversary Commemorative $5 Gold Coin 2016 PD PD Mint employee Mint employee [26]
National Park Service 100th Anniversary Commemorative $1 Silver Coin 2016 PD Non-free Mint employee AIP [27]
National Park Service 100th Anniversary Commemorative Half Dollar Clad Coin 2016 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [28]
U.S. Marshals 225th Anniversary $5 Gold Commemorative Coin 2015 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [29]
U.S. Marshals 225th Anniversary $1 Silver Commemorative Coin 2015 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [30]
U.S. Marshals 225th Anniversary Half-Dollar Clad Commemorative Coin 2015 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [31]
March of Dimes Silver Dollar 2015 Non-free PD AIP Mint employee [32]
Civil Rights Act of 1964 Silver Dollar 2014 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [33]
National Baseball Hall of Fame $5 Gold Commemorative Coin 2014 Non-free PD Competition Mint employee [34]
National Baseball Hall of Fame $1 Silver Commemorative Coin 2014 Non-free PD Competition Mint employee [35]
National Baseball Hall of Fame Half Dollar Clad Commemorative Coin 2014 Non-free PD Competition Mint employee [36]
5-Star Generals Commemorative $5 Gold Coin 2013 Non-free PD AIP Mint employee [37]
5-Star Generals Commemorative $1 Silver Coin 2013 Non-free PD AIP Mint employee [38]
5-Star Generals Commemorative Half Dollar Clad Coin 2013 PD PD Mint employee Mint employee [39]
Girl Scouts of the USA Centennial Silver Dollar 2013 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [40]
Star-Spangled Banner Commemorative $5 Gold Coin 2012 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [41]
Star-Spangled Banner Commemorative $1 Silver Coin 2012 Unclear PD Mint employee [42]
Infantry Soldier Silver Dollar 2012 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [43]
Medal of Honor Commemorative $5 Gold Coin 2011 PD Non-free Mint employee AIP [44]
Medal of Honor Commemorative $1 Silver Coin 2011 PD Non-free Mint employee AIP [45]
United States Army Commemorative Five Dollar Gold Coin 2011 Non-free PD AIP Mint employee [46]
United States Army Commemorative Silver Dollar Coin 2011 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [47]
United States Army Commemorative Clad Half-Dollar Coin 2011 Non-free Unclear AIP [48]
Boy Scouts of America Centennial Silver Dollar 2010 Non-free PD AIP Mint employee [49]
American Veterans Disabled for Life Silver Dollar 2010 PD PD Mint employee Mint employee [50]
Abraham Lincoln Commemorative Silver Dollar 2009 Non-free PD AIP Mint employee [51]
Louis Braille Bicentennial Silver Dollar 2009 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [52]
Bald Eagle Commemorative Gold Five Dollar Coin 2008 Non-free PD AIP Mint employee [53]
Bald Eagle Commemorative Silver Dollar Coin 2008 Non-free PD AIP Mint employee [54]
Bald Eagle Commemorative Clad Half-Dollar Coin 2008 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [55]
Little Rock Central High School Desegregation Silver Dollar 2007 Non-free PD AIP Mint employee [56]
Jamestown 400th Anniversary Commemorative Gold Five Dollar Coin 2007 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [57]
Jamestown 400th Anniversary Commemorative Silver Dollar Coin 2007 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [58]
San Francisco Old Mint Commemorative Five Dollar Gold Coin 2006 PD PD Old design Old design [59]
San Francisco Old Mint Commemorative Silver Dollar Coin 2006 PD PD Mint employee Old design [60]
Benjamin Franklin Commemorative “Scientist” Silver Dollar Coin 2006 Unclear PD Mint employee [61]
Benjamin Franklin Commemorative “Founding Father” Silver Dollar Coin 2006 PD Unclear Mint employee [62]
Chief Justice John Marshall Silver Dollar 2005 Unclear Unclear [63]
Marine Corps 230th Anniversary Silver Dollar 2005 Unclear Unclear [64]
Lewis & Clark Bicentennial Silver Dollar 2004 Non-free Non-free AIP AIP [65]
Thomas Alva Edison Commemorative Coin 2004 Non-free PD AIP Mint employee [66]

 Mysterymanblue  03:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/national-law-enforcement-memorial-and-museum-gold
  2. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/national-law-enforcement-memorial-and-museum-silver
  3. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/national-law-enforcement-memorial-and-museum-clad
  4. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/christa-mcauliffe
  5. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/womens-suffrage-centennial
  6. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/basketball-hall-of-fame-gold
  7. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/basketball-hall-of-fame-silver
  8. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/basketball-hall-of-fame-clad
  9. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/apollo-11-50th-anniversary-gold
  10. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/apollo-11-50th-anniversary-silver
  11. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/apollo-11-50th-anniversary-clad
  12. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/apollo-11-50th-anniversary-five-ounce-silver
  13. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/american-legion-100th-anniversary-gold
  14. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/american-legion-100th-anniversary-silver
  15. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/american-legion-100th-anniversary-clad
  16. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/breast-cancer-awareness-gold
  17. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/breast-cancer-awareness-silver
  18. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/breast-cancer-awareness-clad
  19. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/world-war-i-centennial
  20. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/boys-town-centennial-gold
  21. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/boys-town-centennial-silver
  22. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/boys-town-centennial-clad
  23. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/lions-clubs-international
  24. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/mark-twain-gold
  25. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/mark-twain-silver
  26. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/national-park-service-100th-anniversary-gold
  27. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/national-park-service-100th-anniversary-silver
  28. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/national-park-service-100th-anniversary-clad
  29. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/us-marshals-225th-anniversary-gold
  30. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/us-marshals-225th-anniversary-silver
  31. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/us-marshals-225th-anniversary-clad
  32. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/march-of-dimes
  33. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/march-of-dimes
  34. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/national-baseball-hall-of-fame-gold
  35. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/national-baseball-hall-of-fame-silver
  36. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/national-baseball-hall-of-fame-clad
  37. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/5-star-generals-gold
  38. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/5-star-generals-silver
  39. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/5-star-generals-clad
  40. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/girl-scouts-of-the-usa-centennial
  41. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/star-spangled-banner-gold
  42. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/star-spangled-banner-silver
  43. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/infantry-soldier
  44. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/medal-of-honor-gold
  45. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/medal-of-honor-silver
  46. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/united-states-army-gold
  47. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/united-states-army-silver
  48. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/united-states-army-clad
  49. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/boy-scouts-of-america-centennial
  50. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/american-veterans-disabled-for-life
  51. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/abraham-lincoln-silver
  52. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/louis-braille-bicentennial
  53. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/bald-eagle-gold
  54. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/bald-eagle-silver
  55. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/bald-eagle-clad
  56. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/little-rock-central-high-school-desegregation
  57. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/jamestown-400th-anniversary-gold
  58. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/jamestown-400th-anniversary-silver
  59. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/san-francisco-old-mint-gold
  60. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/san-francisco-old-mint-silver
  61. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/benjamin-franklin-scientist
  62. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/benjamin-franklin-founding-father
  63. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/chief-justice-john-marshall
  64. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/marine-corps-230th-anniversary
  65. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/lewis-clark-bicentennial
  66. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/commemorative-coins/thomas-alva-edison

Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 14:11, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 2003 U.S. commemorative coins designed by AIP artists or as part of a competition 2

[edit]

New information has come to light on the designs of several commemorative coins. Notably:

  • The reverse of the 2010 American Veterans Disabled for Life Silver Dollar was designed by Thomas Cleveland of the Artistic Infusion Program, not a mint employee, as previously thought.[1]
  • The reverses of the 5-Star Generals Commemorative $5 Gold Coin and the 5-Star Generals Commemorative $1 Silver Coin were designed by Barbara Fox of the Artistic Infusion Program, not a mint employee, as previously thought.[2]
  • The obverse and reverse of the Star-Spangled Banner Commemorative $1 Silver Coin were designed by Joel Iskowitz and William Burgard, respectively, of the Artistic Infusion Program, not by mint employee or by an unknown designer, as previously thought.[3]

The second part of this deletion request (files listed after File:2012 Star Spangled Banner Dollar Reverse.jpg) is various files that would have been deleted as part of the previous DR.

For reasons explained at Commons:Determining if U.S. coins are free to use, coins designed by Artistic Infusion Program contractors are not freely usable. For more detailed information on how the determination was made, please see User:Mysterymanblue/U.S. Coins with known copyright statuses#Commemorative coins.  Mysterymanblue  21:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, previous section.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:46, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nomination including the essay Commons:Determining if U.S. coins are free to use. The terms of use on the website of the US Mint state ‘’Coin and medal designs may be based on sources that are copyrighted and licensed to the United States Mint or otherwise used with permission. In some cases, such designs may themselves be covered by third-party copyrights assigned to the United States Mint. Numismatic designs may also contain third parties’ other proprietary material, trademarks, or logos licensed or provided to the United States Mint for limited purposes. Reuse of such designs may require permission of the rights owner.’’ There is a possibility these coins are copyrighted. Consequently, the uploader – or any other Commons user - has to show per COM:EVID that the image can be used with an acceptable licence. This has imho not been done in this case. So therefore these images must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 16:14, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio https://especiales.elcomercio.com/2013/05/especial_roldos/timeline.php Esprit Fugace (talk) 04:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination, no proof that the file is own work or is available under an acceptable license. -- CptViraj (talk) 10:03, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: needs OTRS permission. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Adventuroustiger

[edit]

The metadata of the 3 files contains the names of the photographers: Killian Pham, Andrew Burn, and Brent Winstone copyright Qantas Airways Limited; the uploader won't be all of these people. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete all per nomination. Dubious own work claims. Should have qualified F1 of Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion#File. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: needs OTRS permission. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a derivative work of a 3D object that is uploaded with no permission of the original artwork author. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per {{PD-RU-exempt|type=orders, decorations and medals}}. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:00, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Logo originates in the US and qualifies for PD-textlogo. I have applied the appropriate license. Fry1989 eh? 16:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It clearly doesn't meet the threshold of originality. In the future maybe just add the appropriate license instead of doing a deletion request. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per comments. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work this file is owned by Televisa. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 19:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This clearly doesn't meet the threshold of originality. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per comment. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has copyright information embedded copyright statement with "All Rights Reserved". This Youtube video appears to be the source, and has no suitable licence mentioned. Smirkybec (talk) 10:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted screenshot. Educational value is unclear as well. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.69.156 15:40, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: needs OTRS permission. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error in the stereo-descriptor used Valliappan Kannappan (talk) 15:53, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error in the stereo-descriptor used Valliappan Kannappan (talk) 15:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post WWII monument in Greece, where there's no FOP. Buidhe (talk) 16:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ununsed near-duplicate of File:Demolition of All Saints, Brightside, Sheffield (geograph 3824154).jpg. The only difference is that this file has a watermark, but all the information in the watermark is duplicated in the file description. bjh21 (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Thank you for spotting this. Yes, delete it. Storye book (talk) 19:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sébastien Langloÿs is born in 1971. No freedom of panorama in France, no OTRS. Rehabmamet (talk) 19:49, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour, j'ai mis en ligne ce fichier pour illustrer la branche cadette de l'article "Famille de Perier". Or cet article va être supprimé car l'histoire de cette famille n'est pas encyclopédique, de même que le personne montrée ici. Savary34 (talk) 08:39, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Média utilisé nulle part, sans intérêt encyclopédique 2A01:CB05:8915:D300:C07D:1416:154E:6727 12:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Still no valid reason, and the image is in use, and in the public domain both in France and in the USA. The same image appears multiple times online in articles on the family history. It appears in Ancestry, Geni, and other genealogy websites. --RAN (talk) 19:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 16:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour j'ai mis en ligne ce média pour illustrer l'article "Famille de Perier". Or ce dernier va être supprimé car son son histoire n'est pas encyclopédique. Je préfère donc enlever ce fichier. Savary34 (talk) 08:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 14:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --plicit 09:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons n'est pas Instagram - user bloqué sur fr.wiki Hyméros-(talk) 16:03, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 10:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commons n'est pas un blog - User bloqué sur fr.wp Hyméros-(talk) 16:03, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 10:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a screen capture from an episode of Black Butler, which is still under copyright in both its country of origin (Japan) and the USA. Robkelk (talk) 17:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 09:50, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for 2D art, meaning photographs that prominently feature copyrighted imagery are also considered copyrighted. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 10:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Biographical articles should be posted to Wikipedia, provided that the subject is notable per guidelines. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:15, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ezarateesteban 20:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTUSED: Small and unused image, can be replaced A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not in use, low quality. --Ezarateesteban 20:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata contains the name of the author and copyright holder. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: possible copyvio. --Ezarateesteban 20:33, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[1]: © Rene Riisalu, absolutely no indication of a free license. 188.123.231.20 06:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also: File:Allar Levandi ja Anna Levandi (cropped).jpg --188.123.231.20 06:49, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: VTRS is vallid, invalid DR. --Ezarateesteban 20:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ezarate, pretending to be a valid sysop, don't be lazy to look at the file history: there wasn't any permission at the moment of DR creation. --188.123.231.14 21:57, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source website has no licensing information. There is a photo credit in the pdf link marked "press release", need permission from the photographer to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FoP in Latvia, unfortunately; this is a recent monument Materialscientist (talk) 07:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a UK government image. Clearly labeled PA image at the source. Copyrighted in the UK until 1 January 2024, and potentially in the US until 2048. DrKay (talk) 08:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How can a picture created in 1937 be published before 1926 (as claimed in the license)? DrKay (talk) 08:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is clearly wrong, but the painter died more than 70 years ago, so it is clearly in PD in the source country UK. I'm not sure how these URAA things for US copyright work and whether that's relevant in this case, though. --PaterMcFly (talk) 09:53, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - PD-UK in 2014, therefore missed the URAA cutoff. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How can a picture created in 1937 be published before 1926 (as claimed in the license)? DrKay (talk) 08:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination PD-UK in 2014, therefore missed the URAA cutoff. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a "JIGRI" watermark on the photo and no META data proving the uploader is the copyright holder. Pierre cb (talk) 14:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a "JIGRI" watermark on the photo and no META data proving the uploader is the copyright holder. Pierre cb (talk) 14:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a "JIGRI" watermark on the photo and no META data proving the uploader is the copyright holder. Pierre cb (talk) 14:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a "JIGRI" watermark on the photo and no META data proving the uploader is the copyright holder. Pierre cb (talk) 14:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a "JIGRI" watermark on the photo and no META data proving the uploader is the copyright holder. Pierre cb (talk) 14:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a "JIGRI" watermark on the photo and no META data proving the uploader is the copyright holder. Pierre cb (talk) 14:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a "JIGRI" watermark on the photo and no META data proving the uploader is the copyright holder. Pierre cb (talk) 14:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly cropped headless shot Kotivalo (talk) 14:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request - (Don't want my own work on wikimedia commons anymore.) Greater-Amin (talk) 15:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is himself depicted and the photo does not look like selfie. Probably real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: very low resolution and lack of location information make this unidentifiable, no realistic use MPF (talk) 15:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its in use; and of an owl, so what's the problem. Ceoil (talk) 16:08, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I dont really care though, so grand with deleting. Ceoil (talk) 20:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ceoil: - there are 250 different species of owls around the world ;-) I'd be happy to withdraw the DR if you can add location information that will help identify it (the location doesn't need to be exact if you're concerned about privacy; country/region of country and nearest town/city will still be a big help) - MPF (talk) 22:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MPF: - I have no idea! But don't worry it was only ever on my en wikipage, and was thinking to taking it off there now anyway. Thanks all the same. Ceoil (talk) 19:52, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Canada A1Cafel (talk) 16:50, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The given source page is not for free use. GeorgHHtalk   17:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination © 2021 Léman Bleu Télévision - Tous droits réservés. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper sourcing, 10-year-old unused file CzarJobKhaya (talk) 17:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure if this is CC-BY-SA. 1) It's a logo; 2) source ([2]) have a copyright note for entire site content. This file should be fixed or deleted. stanglavine msg 18:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Would you really take a photo of someone just to describe them as "Mizkif sister"? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 2017; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This sculpture is from the 1970s and therefore copyrighted and cannot be hosted on Commons without Commons:OTRS permissions from the creator or copyright holder.

Missvain (talk) 19:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    • This sculpture was created in response to a call for projects in 2015 and installed in 2019. The theme for the call arose from "Barre's first Ethnic Heritage Festival, dating back to the 1970s." SEE: "New Sculpture by Sean Williams Honors Stone-Cutting Community" by SUSAN LARSON; OCTOBER 30, 2019.[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artaxerxes (talk • contribs) 2020-06-01 20:47 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination - If it were from the 70s, it might be PD-no-notice, but from 2015 it is definetely under copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sébastien Langloÿs is born in 1971. No freedom of panorama in France, no OTRS.

Rehabmamet (talk) 19:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AGAINST THE DELETION
FRANÇAIS / ENGLISH
Langloys EST le créateur de ces sculptures et a placé les photographies de ses propres sculptures sous une licence CC BY-SA 4.0, abandonnant de ce fait tout droit d'auteur. Par conséquent, il n'y a absolument aucune raison de supprimer ses photos.
ENGLISH
Langloys IS the creator of these sculptures and placed the photographs of his own sculptures under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license, abandoning all copyrights. Therefore, there is absolutely no reason at all to delete his pictures. Tatvam (talk) 08:09, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Je confirme être l'auteur de ces photos, libres de droits, représentant mes œuvres. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exuvie (talk • contribs) 08:52, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Exuvie,
J’ai contacté personnellement Sébastien Langloÿs samedi dernier pour lui exposer la situation des photos dont il est l’auteur sur Wikimedia Commons. Je m’étonne donc de lire votre récent message dans lequel vous affirmez en être vous-même l’auteur. Pourriez-vous me donner plus de détails car cette seule phrase ne suffit pas. Un certain processus d’information est à enclencher pour que ces photos ne soient pas supprimées du site. Merci d’avance de votre réponse: Tatvam (talk) 09:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Tatvam, merci pour votre retour, c'est parce que je me suis connecté avec le profil utilisé par l'assistante de ma SARL. Exuvie et Langloys identiques. Langloys. Merci d'ailleurs de m'avoir contacté je n'ai plus mon assistante, et je vais devoir me pencher sérieusement sur les procédure à suivre pour faire les choses en bonne et due forme. Sébastien Langloÿs - Exuvie (exuvie (talk) 11:25, 7 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Je vous réponds par mail pour la suite: Tatvam (talk) 13:56, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sébastien Langloÿs is born in 1971. No freedom of panorama in France, no OTRS.

Rehabmamet (talk) 19:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AGAINST THE DELETION
FRANÇAIS / ENGLISH
Langloys EST le créateur de cette sculpture et a placé la photographie de sa propre sculpture sous une licence CC BY-SA 4.0, abandonnant de ce fait tout droit d'auteur. Par conséquent, il n'y a absolument aucune raison de supprimer cette photo.
ENGLISH
Langloys IS the creator of this sculpture and placed the photograph of his own sculpture under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license, abandoning all copyrights. Therefore, there is absolutely no reason at all to delete this picture. Tatvam (talk) 08:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be own work, needs source & proper license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Escudo de Calahorra actual.png. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sébastien Langloÿs is born in 1971. No freedom of panorama in France, no OTRS.

Rehabmamet (talk) 19:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AGAINST THE DELETION — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatvam (talk • contribs) 08:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FRANÇAIS / ENGLISH
Langloys EST le créateur de ces sculptures et a placé les photographies de ses propres sculptures sous une licence CC BY-SA 4.0, abandonnant de ce fait tout droit d'auteur. Par conséquent, il n'y a absolument aucune raison de supprimer ses photos.
ENGLISH
Langloys IS the creator of these sculptures and placed the photographs of his own sculptures under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license, abandoning all copyrights. Therefore, there is absolutely no reason at all to delete his pictures. Tatvam (talk) 08:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tatvam: where is the evidence? The sculptor should have instead sent an email to Wikimedia Commons via COM:OTRS process. A blanket statment from him is not enough. Physical proof is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I sent him a notice about it today. All the best: Tatvam (talk) 11:43, 13 June 2021

(UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly published, see caption. Not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-res image of nondescript tree, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9   19:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGEing Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published on January 8, 2021 at https://www.healtheuropa.eu/baltic-cbd-lithuanian-expertise-in-hemp-cultivation-in-the-klaipeda-district/96236/, uploaded here 19 January, unlikely own work, more likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"https://scontent-sjc3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/49895979_1851688928291907_4148461782530260992_n.jpg?_nc_cat=102&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=8024bb&_nc_ohc=sT8Z6b_2GPcAX-MzuJi&_nc_ht=scontent-sjc3-1.xx&tp=14&oh=f66ee5ce5d5d7bec389c0d1d11f27b9a&oe=60DD0D66" at facebook. Same people on the stairs. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be a screenshot, judging by the metadata Ytoyoda (talk) 20:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture four in slideshow (dots under main photo) https://peakinfra.com/assetz/repl/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indarjeet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: disparate/inconsistent sizes, quality, and styles, missing EXIF data or credit to someone else.

P 1 9 9   20:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, looks like a screenshot of a black and white movie. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tin Eye found two prior hits. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From 2015 at https://www.rediff.com/news/report/woman-raped-on-infosys-campus-in-pune-2-held/20151229.htm Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chubtor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pretty clear none of this is own work, old photo, old collage, city police badge.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, Facebook sized image which is unlikely own work. Derived images also nominated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It belongs to James Murray dipshit. He is one of the main four of Impractical Jokers. It's his own work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoot for the Stars (talk • contribs) 21:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest that you remove he uncivil personal attack. How would Commons know if Jamessmurray~commonswiki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) is James Murray? Anyone can create an account and claim to be someone who they are not. Bidgee (talk) 22:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, this is the Admin/Bureaucrat you called "dipshit", Shoot for the Stars. Please act in COM:AGF and work in a spirit of cooperation on the project. Cheers, Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:43, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, it's some kind of crest. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License laundering case, the photograph was taken before 1955 (Cantera was assassinated in that year), so the author of the photograph cannot be the one who uploaded the image on Flickr. Therefore, the license of the image cannot be what they have indicated. Taichi (talk) 20:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The author would have need to die on 1944 (under the former law) or 1950. Not impossible, as we don't know the exact date of the work, but w don't have evidence of that, either. Also note this is not an anonymous work, since a signature (the photography studio) is shown in the picture. I don't think the flickr author intended license laundering, but the licensing of the flickr account appears unreliable, and we must not rely on that. Platonides (talk) 22:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Solicito que se elimine por no tener ninguna dirección David Ll L (talk) 20:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - 1964 work -- no evidence of permission from artist. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe a copyright violation, look like an banner from a site, and the name of the photo is userd like code test for photo Reda Kerbouche (talk) 21:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an own work, no source provided Ezarateesteban 21:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le modèle de cette décoration a été créé en 1955 par Raymond Subes. Raymond Subes est mort en 1970. Cela ne fait que 51 ans, et donc la reproduction en image de ce bijou est encore protégée. Jebulon (talk) 21:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

filename is suspect, since it states "screenshot" and "facebook" Mannivu · 22:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

filename is suspect, since it states "screenshot" and "facebook" Mannivu · 22:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

À mon grand regret. Cet insigne a été créé par le ferronnier d’Art Raymond Subes, qui est mort en 1970. La représentation de cet objet ne peut être placée sous licence libre avant 75 ans après la mort de l’auteur. Jebulon (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found online, hard to believe it may be his own work or free license. His files have already had to be erased several times Lost in subtitles (talk) 23:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A user on IRC (and File talk:Crazy 4K drone video of Hong Kong, China.webm) brought to my attention that some or all of this video appears to have been copied from commercial drone video. The YouTube channel with this video now also contains tutorials on pirating software, which brings into question that user's diligence regarding copyright. I doubt that someone with a $3,000 camera on a $3,000 drone would need to pirate Premier or After Effects. There is also no source for the music. Some of the drone footage previously appeared in two videos [3] [4] by Timelab Pro, a production company that sells drone footage. I do not think that this video came from the YouTube videos directly, as they are watermarked and have heavy visual effects. However, I think that there is enough doubt raised that this video should be deleted under COM:PCP. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Video sequence Previous use
0:00-0:07 0:52-0:53 At original speed

Artgrid

0:07-0:15 Artgrid
0:15-0:22 Artgrid
0:22-0:30 Artgrid
0:30-0:37 2:09 - 2:11, slower, rotated 180°, desaturated

Artgrid

0:38-0:45 Artgrid
0:45-0:52 Artgrid, 0:38
0:52-1:00 Artgrid, 0:49
1:00-1:07 0:51-0:52, at original speed, without VFX

Artgrid

1:07-1:15 Artgrid
1:15-1:22 Artgrid
1:22-1:30 Artgrid
1:30-1:37 Artgrid
1:37-1:45 Artgrid, 0:25
1:45-1:52 Artgrid
1:52-2:00 Artgrid
2:00-2:07 Artgrid, 1:44
2:07-2:15 Artgrid
2:15-2:22 Artgrid
2:22-2:30 Artgrid
2:30-2:37 0:31-0:32, slower, reversed, brightness increased

Artgrid

2:37-2:45 Artgrid
2:45-2:52 Artgrid
2:52-3:00 Artgrid, 0:16
3:00-3:07 Artgrid
3:07-3:15 around 1:35

Artgrid, 0:07

3:15-3:22 Artgrid
3:22-3:30 Artgrid
3:30-3:44 Artgrid
I've added what are probably the actual sources from Timelab's Artgrid page which I somehow missed the first time round Ms7821 (talk) 14:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • DeleteMultiple bits of Timelab Pro footage (and given the style I suspect the whole thing is) and its unlikely that they would allow third parties to CC license their stuff. I've been seeing a lot of suspiciously high quality drone footage on youtube under a CC license so its something to be aware of.Geni (talk) 03:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Per above. SCP-2000 06:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

identical image as https://photo.xuite.net/next.media/20219437/10.jpg but flipped horizontally. The uploader is almost certainly the same person as the IP 37.111.11.236 who uploaded this image on the same day they created the en.wp articles that link to this image. However this image being from Taiwan (and not from Myanmar like the IP), plus the fact that the uploader uploaded nothing else, lead me to believe that the uploader found the image on xuite.net, flipped it (which renders the Chinese characters unreadable), then claimed "own work" Yinweiaiqing (talk) 23:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 14:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Logo originates in the United States and qualifies for PD-textlogo. I have applied the appropriate license. Fry1989 eh? 16:25, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 16:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Amos Gilad, Naftali Bennett (8904866625).jpg Triggerhippie4 (talk) 17:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: redirected. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:02, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier en doublon Olga Rithme (talk) 15:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Redirected to File:Portrait d'Ana Orantes 2.jpg (30. Juni 2021, 20:54 Uhr von Túrelio (A)) GeorgHHtalk   21:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyrights of the image from Öcalan's trial don't belong to VOA. Nanahuatl (talk) 00:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nanahuatl: who holds the copyright? Can you elaborate? Enjoyer of World (talk) 00:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Enjoyer of World: , the picture has been taken during his trial on 1999. VOA is definetely not the original creator of the file.--Nanahuatl (talk) 02:51, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Who was the original creator? Enjoyer of World (talk) 03:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I cant find older upload with image search from Google. Shadow4dark (talk) 17:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:08, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2607:FC50:0:15:0:0:0:193 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: -spam  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown author for free image Caulfield (talk) 13:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've introduced the author's name forgotten by FTCG program----Mcapdevila (talk) 15:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:11, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error in the name of the drug enantiomers Valliappan Kannappan (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion; issue fixed. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error in the name of the drug enantiomers Valliappan Kannappan (talk) 15:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. There is no need to delete this file as the version loaded on 1 June corrects the error in the name originally shown in the image. The file is in current use in Main Space articles. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 12:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep GeorgHHtalk   21:28, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:13, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is low graphical quality (pixelated), has typographical misakes ("R" and "S" should be italicized and in parentheses), and has in-image text that interferes in re-use (I replaced it with image-multiple composite of the two structures, each at high quality, and with caption in wikitext to allow translation in a few wikis, akin to this). DMacks (talk) 03:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 09:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 16:33, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just updated the licence with the original source being Logopedia. Seems that the original uploader just wanted to get the file straight on Commons. --Bankster (talk) 19:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 16:36, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:15, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It feels to be above the fairly low TOO for Israel. The "v" letter is anything but simple text or shape. — kashmīrī 16:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I must disagree with you. It is just a simple pd-logo. Tal (רונאלדיניו המלך, talk) 18:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To me, the four-colour motif in "v" is fairly original and unique. Do you have any examples of similar design publicly available? — kashmīrī 18:31, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:15, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Versão Antiga DavidRaniel (talk) 18:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concerned about the copyright violations regarding these posters. I'm not sure about Brazilian government funded artwork re: public domain. However, the other images appear unlikely to be PD. Missvain (talk) 19:30, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paz e bem!

Quer dizer que você solicita apagar por suspeitar.
Se um pocicial matar um favelado por suspeitar que ele vai cometer um assalto, isso é correto?

Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk)


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-old (and PD-art after removing the frame) may apply. This may be useful. Strakhov (talk) 20:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see the title/author as APPROACH TO THE IMAGE OF LOS SANTOS EMETERIO AND CELEDONIO IN LA RIOJA AND NAVARRA by Javier Fernandez Cascante, but I don't see any dates for the painting. I can't find a larger or better image on the internet and would agree with Complementos6 that this is the one from the cathedral's website. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is a work in the Cathedral of Calahorra. There is a section in that paper (p. 126) dedicated to works depictings this pair of saints in that cathedral and it cites several dates ranging from the 16th century to 1902. I don't have time now to find out what one is this file. (I see now it it may be only about sculptures though). If this painting were in the public (it looks indeed old), it's not very significant whether it's taken from the cathedral's web or not. Strakhov (talk) 06:28, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Here (pp. 794-795, footnote) there is a mention about a painting of the "Santos Emeterio y Celedonio" in the Cathedral of Calahorra (from Rome) from the first half of the 17th century. Strakhov (talk) 06:36, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe the photo was taken from here? https://catedralcalahorra.org/capillaBautismal.html--MateoSag (talk) 14:46, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ~AntanO4task as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work, and it seems re-photograph image Image dates from 1905 and is in use. Please provide additional information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:20, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Brazilian Democratic Movement got 89 seats, not 191. Does not match with the real composition seen herre : c:File:Camara dos Deputados do Brasil 2006.svg. Fake diagram, to delete Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GlobeRotter:  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:12, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:23, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 16:36, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File licensing is fine, no indication to doubt given source and authorship. GeorgHHtalk   21:52, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, own work is not sure due to missing metadata. I'll delete file:Pueblo de Santa Maria de Nativitas Bachiniva, Chihuahua, Mexico.jpg and file:Bachiniva Evergreen Valley.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 17:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to a concern at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/03#Blacked out versions of images relying on FoP in the Philippines and other, images that show exact outlines/silhouettes of unfree works from no-FOP countries are not OK too. See also the closing admin's (Jameslwoodward's) input at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hand of Coexistence.jpg.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Keep ich sehe keinen Löschgrund. Nur vorauseilender Gehorsam, weil irgendwas vielleicht eventuell unter Umständen am Rande der Legalität sein könnte. Irgendwann gibts auf Commons nur noch Blümchen und die werden dann gelöscht, weil jemand eine Klage wegen Persönlichkeitsrecht befürchtet. Ralf Roletschek 07:40, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Literal Google translation of Ralf Roletschek's input

I see no reason for deletion. Just hasty obedience because something might possibly be on the edge of legality under certain circumstances. At some point there will only be flowers on Commons and they will be deleted because someone fears a lawsuit over personal rights

Ox1997cow (talk) 15:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ox1997cow (talk) 16:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Those pictures are usefull, I think, to help illustrate the problem of no FOP in France when talking with people who are not knowledgeable of the subject. I think I made the black part fuzzy enough so it is not possible to know what the sculpture really looks like. But if you think it is not enough, I can provide a version with more black. Regards. Lionel Allorge (talk) 08:55, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep - You can't claim copyright on images that are so simple that they fall under PD-shape. Like:

Also the claim that all the images are "exact outlines/silhouettes" is not right.

Further, the nominating user refers to an extremely short discussion in the Village pump archive, which does not show a ground for removal. As example File:Atomium 010-censored.png is given. This image was nominated for deletion, but kept because of PD-shape. And so were many others.

The claim that "DM requires that the average viewer would not notice if the copyrighted item is removed from the image." is just nonsense. Copyrights are in place when a creator's creative output is visible. If nothing is visible, one can't claim something he did not create. A black rectangle, circle, triangle, cloudy, etc are not created by architects and are PD-shape. Romaine (talk) 13:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS: It is time to look up all the falsely deleted images and restore them again. Anyone having an overview of which should be restored? Romaine (talk) 13:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Romaine: Let's talk about blacked out images which were made by me. I think these below images are clearly deleted. (They are not clearly PD-shape.)
However, I think these below images are clearly PD-shape. (63 Building blacked out image is just rectangular, Lotte World Tower blacked out image is just trapezoid.)
Ox1997cow (talk) 17:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is ludicrous. To qualify as a derivative work, you need to create a work. A solid black shape is not a work. There is hardly any creative/artistic process involved in creating that. Even if you claim it was a work, to be derived there still must be recognizable features, discernible clues of the original work present. Without any copyrightable traces of the source work, no violation. The surroundings, the panorama, are not part of the [blacked out] work, but works that are assessed in IPR independently. Otherwise I claim everything was a derivation of the Monolith, specifically 1000’s of little copies of them (= pixels). -- Kays (T | C) 08:00, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Die Bilder vom Europaparlament sind außerdem nicht in Frankreich entstanden sondern auf dem exterretorialen Gebiet des Europaparlamentes. --Ralf Roletschek 08:35, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I have now decided: to withdraw this DR. I am now convinced that blacked out versions are not copyright infringements because there is no copyright concern over the outlines. Only do if the actual features or appearances of the buildings and public art do cause derivative concerns. See the comment by Kai Burghardt.  I withdraw my nomination, and I may also request restorations/undeletions of blacked out versions of those from here (the Philippines), Luxembourg, and UAE. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:36, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: DR was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 20:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Al ser una fotografía suelta, después de que borraran el artículo, no aporta información Vpg80 (talk) 11:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As it is a loose photograph, after the article was deleted, it does not provide information
translator: Google Translate -M.nelson (talk) 20:26, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (of uploader), thanks. --Ellywa (talk) 00:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has missing license. And there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 16:35, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This probably doesn't meet the threshold of originality. As it's just the sun/basic circles. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I would disagree. It's a striking logo. I think it does meet the threshold of originality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's a chopped up sun. There's nothing original about that. Off the top of my head I can think of a ton similar logos and images from the mid 80's and early 90's. It was a pretty common image motif during that time. For instance, do a Google image search for "80s sun logos." There's hundreds of examples that this one clearly copied. The only way to prove originality is by providing evidence that they were the first ones that created the image. Which I'm about 100% sure has zero chance of happening. Especially since there were extremely similar images going back to the 70s and 60s, long before this logo was even created. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:38, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you can show this logo is unoriginal, either the logo is itself in violation of copyright or it's indeed deemed to be below the threshold of originality under relevant law. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
How would the logo be in violation of copyright if it's generic and unoriginal? I don't think you understand how the threshold of originality laws work. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:49, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, the obvious point is that if it's stolen and above the threshold of originality, it violates the copyright of a preexisting logo, though they may not have sued to test that out. It's not clear to me that this is below the threshold of originality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:24, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
99% of the content on here has never been tested in court to see if it actually meets the threshold of originality. That's not really the point though. Us making our best guess that it does or doesn't based on the information we have access to, in this case that there's thousands of extremely similar logos, is. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Owned by Grupo Televisa. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 01:07, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't mean anything. We are allowed to upload logos that come from companies. The question is if they can be used as part of fair use or not meeting the threshold of originality. Neither of those have to do with who supposedly "owns" the logo though. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The alleged copyright infringement and the deletion request is complete nonsense
  • First of all, this simple logo is not a copyrightable work anyway, because it does not have the required threshold of originality. There are tens of thousands of them at Commons (e.g. over 77,000 here or over 45,000 here) that only require the license building block [[Template:PD-logo|{{PD-logo}}].
    • So it doesn't really matter who created this work, because there is no copyright infringement here and so there is no reason to delete the file.
    • There were only errors in the description, but even these are no reason to delete the file.
  • Second, it was not the user @Lucho249: , but the bot @BotMultichillT: that entered the wrong claims in the description. This bot error can also not be a reason for deleting the file.
  • The false claims in the description and about the license have already been corrected in the meantime. Thus, the alleged copyright infringement or the deletion request is just warm air and nonsensical.
--Bestoernesto (talk) 03:32, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and remarks of several persons. Imho the combination of ellips and circle with striking lines is an original creation and per m.nelson above COM:TOO Mexico. --Ellywa (talk) 00:45, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  1. https://www.sevendaysvt.com/vermont/new-sculpture-by-sean-williams-honors-stone-cutting-community/Content?oid=28807589