Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/05/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![11 File:"An Arab From Haifa" proposed Palestine flag (alt 9).gif](#File:"An_Arab_From_Haifa"_proposed_Palestine_flag_(alt_9).gif){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_,1962_год.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_am_27.07.2020_Richtung_Hauptbahnhof.jpg){kind=link}
![224 File:"Maggie Khozam.jpg".jpg](#File:"Maggie_Khozam.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
typo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dude138415 (talk • contribs) 06:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Claimed to be own work but the work is likely just resizing images and adding transparency given that other image uploads of car parts have been claimed to be own work but are just modifications of copyrighted product images. These are all likely derivative of copyrighted works.
Whpq (talk) 13:44, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Advertisement. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Epafassianos (talk) 00:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Talk page deleted, no useful content in history. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:01, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Commons is not a free website for publishing one's own book. Also, the book contains a copyright notice and Commons doesn't host copyrighted books. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:55, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted; also false license, contrary to specific "all rights reserved" copyright notice at source website. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:08, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
watermark instagram.com/mashhadtory Baratiiman (talk) 15:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --4nn1l2 (talk) 22:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
screenshot image Rahat Shahriar BD (talk) 15:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sangeeta111111. --Minoraxtalk 06:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
she uploaded screenshot images Rahat Shahriar BD (talk) 15:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sangeeta111111. --Minoraxtalk 06:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Epafassianos (talk) 00:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. The file has 2 versions, in my opinion both are copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file was uploaded by mistake Sakiv (talk) 14:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
![14:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/05/21#c-Sakiv-2021-05-21T14:20:00.000Z-File:"An_Arab_From_Haifa"_proposed_Palestine_flag_(alt_9).gif){kind=link}
Deleted by Billinghurst at 04:04, 23 Mai 2021 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 08:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
![08:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/05/21#c-Krdbot-2021-05-23T08:58:00.000Z-File:"An_Arab_From_Haifa"_proposed_Palestine_flag_(alt_9).gif){kind=link}
Out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: also copyvio. --Didym (talk) 21:28, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Small and pixelated; have a bunch of raster and vector alternatives in Category:Shikimic acid DMacks (talk) 00:01, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. File:Shikimi.svg might be one of those alternatives. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:33, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused fantasy election maps, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Electoral College 1980 Fear, Loathing and Gumbo.svg
- File:Electoral Map WW.jpg
- File:WWDemPrimaryElection2006.svg
- File:WWElection2002.svg
- File:WWElection2006.svg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:03, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Logo of a website that no longer exists. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image. User's only upload. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:53, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Peymanmajidimoeiniran (talk · contribs)
[edit]Simply personal images - Commons is not a web host
- File:Wing - wallart.jpg
- File:بیست و نهمین جشنواره امتنان از نخبگان جامعه کار وتولید استان تهران اداره کل تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی استان تهران.jpg
- File:Peyman Majidi Moein Kid Toon me.jpg
- File:Peyman Majidi Moein toon me 2.jpg
- File:Peyman Majidi Moein Toon me.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین Clipart.png
- File:Face and mask on face detection.gif
Herby talk thyme 09:05, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Peymanmajidimoeiniran (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal/promotional photos. out of com:PS.
- File:جشن تولد یکی از کارمندان ماهکس - پیمان مجیدی معین.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین - سخنران هکاتوریسم 2020 - 3.png
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین - سخنران هکاتوریسم 2020 - 2.png
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین - سخنران هکاتوریسم 2020.png
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین - پل طبیعت.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین - آتایا.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین در دانشگاه شریف.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین - کتابخانه.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین - نخبه جامعه کار سال استان تهران - 2.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین و جایزه 3000دلازی هکاتوریزم 2020.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین و میلاد احرام پوش - دانشگاه شریف - 1.jpg
- File:Peyman Majidi Moein and Mohammad Fatemeieh at China.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین در چین - ناهار کاری.jpg
- File:Peyman Majidi Moein at China - 2.jpg
- File:Peyman Majidi Moein - 10.jpg
- File:PEYMAN by Peyman Majidi Moein - 2.jpg
- File:PEYMAN by Peyman Majidi Moein.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین در پارک ساعی.jpg
- File:قرار های هفتگی خانه ترانه با حضور روزبه بمانی و پیمان مجیدی - 3.jpg
- File:قرار های هفتگی خانه ترانه با حضور روزبه بمانی و پیمان مجیدی - 2.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین در طبیعت همدان - گنجنامه.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین در کیش - کشتی یونانی.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین - نخبه جامعه کار استان تهران.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین در The Bund.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین در معبد چینی.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین در مرقد مطهر امام رضا.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین در نمایشگاه بین المللی کار.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین و باجه تلفن قرمز.jpg
- File:Technology and Peyman Majidi.jpg
- File:پیمان مجیدی معین در چین و پیرزن چینی.jpg
- File:خانه ترانه تهران.jpg
- File:Peyman Majidi at the Bund.jpg
- File:Sharif University.png
- File:Face Detection.jpg
- File:Peyman Majidi Moein Profile Photo.jpg
Hanooz 13:52, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:41, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. The file was renamed by a request of the uploader. It had been named improperly. Island (talk) 10:00, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WielkoLudOfficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, personal photos, out of scope.
~Cybularny Speak? 11:22, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
fake diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image. User's only upload. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 14:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable performer, no educational value, out of scope. And looks like screengrab. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:13, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:14, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adeel Iftikhar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text images, out of scope.
- File:Urdu Translation from Tazkira-e-Ulamaye-Hind.jpg
- File:Urdu Translation Some Verse of Waseet Nama.jpg
- File:Family Tree خاندانی شجرہ.jpg
- File:Title Aqaid e Azeem.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional photo of a non-notable bar (?), no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:17, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable team, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:17, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Mhmadzedan12
[edit]
Unused, non-notable logos. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 14:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused plain bookcover (?), COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thelourdesfoundation (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo and logo, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res image of nondescript place/building, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:59, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:21, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:21, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:21, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram with little context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:22, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused corporate promotional image, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:22, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal calendar doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:26, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image. User's only upload. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 15:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:27, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Mohamad 444
[edit]- File:جودة.jpg
- File:لحريم.jpg
- File:عبد الرحيم موهوب 1.jpg
- File:عبد الرحيم موهوب 2.jpg
- File:عبد الرحيم موهوب 3.jpg
Unused personal images of a user who was blocked for uploading out of scope content. Johnj1995 (talk) 15:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:28, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:28, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bdtourinfo24 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:28, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kiziridi.ig (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used.
- File:5 задача "Расчет ускорения объекта при спуске и его конечной скорости".png
- File:4 задача "Расчет силы необходимой для вывода домино из положения равновесия".png
- File:1 задача "Расчет минимального расстояния на которое нужно отставить банку с кормом, чтобы теннисный мячик сбил его".png
- File:3 задача "Расчет силы реакции опоры домино на горизонтальную плоскость".png
- File:2 задача "Расчет высоты падения теннисного мячика(2) и его скорости перед приземлением".png
- File:Конечное действие.png
- File:1 и 2 действие.png
- File:3 и 4 действие.png
- File:5 и 6 действие.png
- File:Схема Машины Голдберга.png
_%D0%B8_%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8_%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B4_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%BC%22.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:30, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability.
- File:10-Fertig - E-Paper in Liste zu sehen.jpg
- File:9-Vorgang-abschliessen.jpg
- File:8-Auf-Absenden-klicken.jpg
- File:7-Oeffnen.jpg
- File:6-Aktuelle-Ausgabe-auswaehlen.jpg
- File:4-PDF-hochladen-Button.jpg
- File:5-Dateipfad-oeffnen.jpg
- File:2-Heft-hochladen-Button.jpg
- File:3-Daten-eingeben.jpg
- File:1-Login.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed Shaheen Mass One (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Low-quality duplication of File:Flag of the Republic of China.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:34, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Duatigajuni (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos for oneself are out of COM:SCOPE. None in use.
- File:Duatigajuni.my.id desktop walpaper.jpg
- File:Kita-Adalah-Monolog.png
- File:Kita adalah monolog.png
- File:Duatigajuni-logo.png
- File:Duatigajuni.png
- File:Duatiga juni.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:35, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Duatigajuni (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope. Previous batch of spam images by user already deleted.
- File:Logo Mawlana.png
- File:Mawlana logo 2024.jpg
- File:Mawlana logo.png
- File:Mawlana new logo 2023.png
- File:Duatigajuni.my.id.png
- File:Duatigajunimy.id.png
- File:Duatigajuni.png
Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason famille La Cropte de Chantérac.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Coat of arms of Mgr Georges d’Aubusson de la Feuillade (Shield).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason Hoeilaart.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:44, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Hoeilaartvlag.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:46, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:13, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Armoiries Navarre Foix.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:13, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason Coucy-le-Chateau.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:13, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason Coucy-le-Chateau.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Keep this seems to be part of a large purge of old files that are in scope. The user even got blocked over this. Just tag them as {{Superseded}}. This is a waste of effort and files and won't save any diskspace. Multichill (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)- Keep This bottom edge is round, so not the same. The vectorized picture (without soul) is sufficient as a sticker on Lego or Duplo. Lidewij (talk) 13:29, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:13, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason Coucy-le-Chateau.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:14, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason ville fr Heilly (80).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:14, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:La Cuarta Logotipo.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:14, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason famille fr Thouars.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:14, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason famille fr Suzanne de Fournel.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Armoiries seigneurs Montfort.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Armoiries seigneurs Montfort.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:14, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason famille fr Ponthieu montgomery.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason famille fr Moreuil.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:16, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason famille fr Souastre.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason famille fr Marie de la Personne.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason ville fr Warluzel (Pas-de-Calais).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason Dreux.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason fr Gironvilliers.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:COA family fr Maistre (Savoy).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason Adolphe Édouard Casimir Joseph Mortier (1768-1835) (Restauration).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:25, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
_(Restauration).svg){kind=link}
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:17, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason Batard Vendôme.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this seems to be part of a large purge of old files that are in scope. The user even got blocked over this. Just tag them as {{Superseded}}. This is a waste of effort and files and won't save any diskspace. Multichill (talk) 16:08, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:17, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Armoiries Montpensier Moderne.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:17, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason duche fr Bourbon (moderne).svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:29, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep this seems to be part of a large purge of old files that are in scope. The user even got blocked over this. Just tag them as {{Superseded}}. This is a waste of effort and files and won't save any diskspace. Multichill (talk) 16:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:17, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Armoiries Louis de Vendôme.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 15:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this seems to be part of a large purge of old files that are in scope. The user even got blocked over this. Just tag them as {{Superseded}}. This is a waste of effort and files and won't save any diskspace. Multichill (talk) 16:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:17, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason Courtenay.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this seems to be part of a large purge of old files that are in scope. The user even got blocked over this. Just tag them as {{Superseded}}. This is a waste of effort and files and won't save any diskspace. Multichill (talk) 16:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason Philippe II de Tarente.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this seems to be part of a large purge of old files that are in scope. The user even got blocked over this. Just tag them as {{Superseded}}. This is a waste of effort and files and won't save any diskspace. Multichill (talk) 16:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Armoiries Anjou Tarente.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this seems to be part of a large purge of old files that are in scope. The user even got blocked over this. Just tag them as {{Superseded}}. This is a waste of effort and files and won't save any diskspace. Multichill (talk) 16:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason comte fr Anjou.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:05, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this seems to be part of a large purge of old files that are in scope. The user even got blocked over this. Just tag them as {{Superseded}}. This is a waste of effort and files and won't save any diskspace. Multichill (talk) 16:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Armoiries Charles Robert Hongrie.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this seems to be part of a large purge of old files that are in scope. The user even got blocked over this. Just tag them as {{Superseded}}. This is a waste of effort and files and won't save any diskspace. Multichill (talk) 16:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Armoiries Charles-Martel Hongrie.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:07, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this seems to be part of a large purge of old files that are in scope. The user even got blocked over this. Just tag them as {{Superseded}}. This is a waste of effort and files and won't save any diskspace. Multichill (talk) 16:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason duche fr Anjou-Sicie-Jérusalem.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep this seems to be part of a large purge of old files that are in scope. The user even got blocked over this. Just tag them as {{Superseded}}. This is a waste of effort and files and won't save any diskspace. Multichill (talk) 16:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Armoiries André Hongrie.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this seems to be part of a large purge of old files that are in scope. The user even got blocked over this. Just tag them as {{Superseded}}. This is a waste of effort and files and won't save any diskspace. Multichill (talk) 16:14, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, just because an SVG version of an image exists doesn't mean that the PNG should automatically be deleted. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:09, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Incorrect coat of arms (see pages 248 and 249 of the cited source) — Preceding unsigned comment added by The White Lion (talk • contribs) 22:31, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: as before. --Krd 20:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Armoiries Jacques II de la Marche.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 16:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete raster images just because there is also a vector version and someone has replaced every last instance of use with the vector image. This has been discussed exhaustively years ago (Commons talk:Superseded images policy), and the outcome still stands. Plus, with the newer feature InstantCommons, Commons can also serve as a file repository for basically any Mediawiki installation anywhere, and that's another reason why files that are in scope and don't have copyright problems should not be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 10:21, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: found at https://bigbrotheruk.fandom.com/wiki/Ramiz_Siddiqui with no appropriate onward use licence
Looking further at this, I see it is uploaded by the subject of the picture, so I am migrating this to a full discussion.
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 18:46, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- For input from the uploader please see the talk page of this discussion. Obviously they wish the image to be kept. Timtrent (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- There is further, substantial, and somewhat conflicting commentary now on the talk page. Please refer to it prior to closing this discussion Timtrent (talk) 15:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
I can provide all necessary copyright proof. this is my image I edited it and my sister took it via a phone. For personal use and I do inherit this image and it is not uploaded here in vain but in correspondence to the MTV tag along with other VJs. I have listed it as a free to use license and sister doesn’t mind either. Now I’ll also forward them a written email from my sister from her email. Please give insight to this correctly because this is my image taken by my family. We own all rights to and can decide what we wish to do with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramizking (talk • contribs) 02:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ramizking Please ensure that you use COM:OTRS and that the copyright holder licences this picture correctly. I am concerned that on this talk page you appear to state by saying THIS BELONGS TO THE MTV INDIA TAG ALONG WITH ALL ARTISTS that the image is owned by MTV India. This conflicts with the statement that your sister (or your family) is the copyright owner by virtue of taking the picture Timtrent (talk) 23:09, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi no sorry what I meant was this belongs here because it fits the category of mtv India along with the other artists of the brand. As you can see in the tag of mtv India you find many faces of MTVs photo. But it doesn’t mean the copyright holder is them. I’ve requested the COM OTRS place and so has sister waiting their decision. 123.208.83.210 08:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Please ignore what I said about the MTV thing I was only trying to imply that this belongs here giving justification on why it’s even uploaded on Wikimedia it’s because I belong to the category of mtv India and brand along other artists but the copyright holder is most definitely the person who took this picture and they have contested it with COM OTRS. What do you want me to do now? 02:03, 28 May 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramizking (talk • contribs) 02:03, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Ramizking It is not that you have contested the deletion. It is, I hope, that the copyright holder has supplied the correct credentials for the picture.
- The rest of this process takes time. If the copyright holder has done everything required then you await the outcome. If they have not then the OTRS team will tell them. This is a formal process which will not be rushed. Timtrent (talk) 07:47, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission received from the photographer per ticket #2021052210000427. JGHowes talk 13:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Poor quality, replacable by File:Cyclopropane-skeletal.png and other files in Category:Cyclopropane. Leyo 14:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I have replaced its uses with the proposed file. The unused redirect File:Cyclopropaneline.png should get deleted as well. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:鄭啟民
[edit]From TransTaipei
- File:棕7路線圖.png
- File:966路線圖.gif
- File:1551路線圖.png
- File:綠1路線圖.png
- File:41路線圖.png
- File:707路線圖.gif
- File:兒樂2號線路線圖.png
- File:兒樂1號線路線圖.png
Obvious copyright violation from TransTaipei bus site, Source of the first copyvio image
From Bus Operators
Copyrighted route map without any open data permission. Source Example The last is from `.doc` attachment in [1]
No camera metadata, possibly from social sites / search engines
- File:大都會客運 20 363-FY.jpg - FBMD
- File:三重客運 811 KKB-1769.jpg - FBMD
- File:欣欣客運EAL-0037 236區間車.jpg
- File:大都會客運 306區間車 357-FY.jpg
- File:新店客運 KKB-1723 基隆路幹線.jpg - Google
- File:大都會客運 262路 320-FY.jpg
- File:大都會客運 612路 257-U3.jpg
- File:臺北客運 藍43 KKA-2739.jpg
- File:臺北客運 201405 DAEWOO 低地板 561-U5.jpg - Google
- File:大都會客運 201405 廈門金龍 低地板 325-U3.jpg - Google
- File:欣欣客運 201405 YUTONG 低地板 287-U3.jpg - Google
- File:大都會客運 201405 DAEWOO 低地板 277-U3.jpg - Google
- File:大都會客運 201401 HINO 雙門普遊車 089-U3.jpg - Google
- File:大都會客運 201405 廈門金龍 低地板 325-U3.jpg - Google
- File:臺北客運 201405 DAEWOO 低地板 561-U5.jpg - Google
- File:大南汽車 201405 YUTONG 低地板 198-U3.jpg - Google
- File:指南客運177-U3 949.jpg - Google
- File:指南客運163-U3 912.jpg - Google
- File:中興巴士2014 KINGLONG KL6120U1 168-U3 950.jpg - Google
Basically all contributions by the user hits copyright violation, except those captured by Sony ILCE-6400, which I still didn't find alternate source yet.
--Littlebtc (talk) 04:25, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. No source and permission. SCP-2000 23:37, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Also as following files can be found in the Internet (by google image search) and the uploader has uploaded multiple copyvio images before, they may copyvio too and should be deleted per COM:PCP cc @Littlebtc :
- File:KKA-0500 小2區.jpg
- File:松江新生幹線路線圖.png
- File:基隆路幹線路線圖.png
- File:新店客運 819-U5 綠15.jpg
- File:新店客運 KKA-3273 849.jpg
- File:新店客運 FAB-723 930.jpg
- File:新店客運 FAB-798 913.jpg
- File:大都會客運-掃墓公車KKA-0969.jpg
- File:光華巴士KKB-0175 20210306.jpg
- File:中興巴士KKB-0173 20210402.jpg
- File:大都會客運KKA-0857 260區間車.jpg
- File:HINO - HS8JRVL - KKA-0581.jpg
- File:欣欣客運 2018 HINO HS8JRVL KKA-0569.jpg
- File:三重客運KKB-1510_927駕駛側.jpg
- File:三重客運 KKB-1528 786.jpg
- File:三重客運成運 Master MB120NS KKA-8299 通勤9.jpg
- File:TwKKB1589200417.jpg
- File:臺北客運BYD K9DA EAA-135 橘5.jpg
- File:臺北客運BYD K9DA EAA-123 橘5.jpg
- File:臺北客運 KKB-1608 796.jpg
- File:首都客運_KKB-1631_99.jpg
- File:KKA-9972 首都客運 1580路 花蓮→經台9蘇花改+蘇澳+國5→板橋 20200125 花蓮車站(新光大樓)發車.jpg
- File:大都會客運KKA-0856 937.jpg
- File:新北客運_KKA-0915_587.jpg
- File:Danan Bus - TOYOTA - XZB70L - KKA-0900 20200321.jpg
- File:KKA-0907 小1區.jpg
- File:Shin-Shin Bus KKA-0909.jpg
- File:Shin-Shin Bus KKA-0967.jpg
- File:KKA-0936 小3.jpg
- File:KKA-0923 小10.jpg
- File:淡水客運EAL-0051 860.jpg
- File:指南客運 EAL-0065 紅26.jpg
- File:新店客運 KKB-1696 909.jpg
- File:新店客運 KKB-1723 906.jpg
- File:Danan Bus - TOYOTA - XZB70L - KKA-0963 20201212.jpg
- File:Danan Bus - TOYOTA - XZB70L - KKA-0865 20200228.jpg
- File:大南汽車 KKA-0930 265(區間車).jpg
- File:大都會客運EAL0026 和平幹線.jpg
- File:大都會客運EAL0016 和平幹線.jpg
- File:欣欣客運2018 RAC RACE150 EAL-0011 66.jpg
- File:大南汽車 2020 HINO HS8JRVL KKA-0955.jpg
- File:大有巴士KKA-7399 257.jpg
- File:欣欣客運EAL-0103 236區間車.jpg
- File:大都會客運37公車.png
- SCP-2000 23:55, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
%E7%99%BC%E8%BB%8A.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- I checked above images, they are from the same camera (SONY ILCE-6000) and also image with intact EXIF data is unlikely to be copyvio except for four images:
- File:大都會客運37公車.png
- File:三重客運成運 Master MB120NS KKA-8299 通勤9.jpg
- File:大都會客運KKA-0857 260區間車.jpg
- File:新店客運 819-U5 綠15.jpg--Kai3952 (talk) 22:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- These images came from [2] this website (e.g. File:Danan Bus - TOYOTA - XZB70L - KKA-0963 20201212.jpg came from there ) SCP-2000 09:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- I checked above images, they are from the same camera (SONY ILCE-6000) and also image with intact EXIF data is unlikely to be copyvio except for four images:
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 01:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Author request Vishwa p gudda (talk) 22:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 01:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
uploaded wrong version AngryGlizzy (talk) 22:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. ✗plicit 01:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
A better image resolution were uploaded with following picture (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wagen_195@Hauptbahnhof-ROB_am_20.03.2021.jpg) OliverZenglein (talk) 23:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 01:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Vickynorum (talk) 17:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Incomplete deletion request by original uploader. Skeezix1000 (talk) 23:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Arquivo: Forcefire ao vivo em Mangaratiba, Brasil.jpg
[edit]
REASON FOR DELETION Vickynorum85 (talk) 19:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 05:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Delete my old photo, i upload in my old account vickynorum. I haven't had an account since 2008 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vickynorum85 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Why should it be deleted? - Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
this photo is mine and was placed by me in 2008, in an account to which i no longer have access to vickynorum. i want to remove the photo because it was for wikipedia in 2008, as my band the text was not approved the photo was abandoned at wikicommons. I want the photo to be removed and deleted because we are not famous musicians and I am in the photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vickynorum85 (talk • contribs) 01:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Low res photo of non-notable band. Minimal if any in-scope usefulness. Support courtesy deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:49, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Whilst licences are irrevocable and whilst it is categorised under Category:Music in 2008 - the file is of low/poor resolution and the guy in the image is non-notable anyway so given the aforementioned issues the file wont ever be used on or off wiki so in this specific case I too support a courtesy deletion.
Please also be aware Vickynorum courtesy deletions are very rare and never ever happen unless there's mitigating reasons so please don't upload files and then change your mind etc, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:49, 30 May 2021 (UTC)- Keep - Well given the user has now go on from personally attacking people to canvassing I'm placing myself here. The file is of non-notable people however it's categorised under "Music in 2008" as it shows an image from that era.
- This might seem spiteful but if the user wants to blatantly personal attack people and then canvas then no I don't see why a courtesy deletion should continue.
- (I've added the file to Category:People with handheld microphones and Category:Topless men in Brazil.) –Davey2010Talk 11:35, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: No reason for courtesy deletion when the uploader makes liberal use of insults and profanity to support his case. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 06:47, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment Vickynorum85 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) has canvassed numerous editors talk pages (e.g. [3]) with the subject line "Vote delete photo" and a link to this DR. If this photo is to be deleted, it shouldn't be a "courtesy deletion" (it would be rewarding them and set a dangerous precedent for future DR cases). Bidgee (talk) 05:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete In my opinion, the photo and all the attitudes of the person responsible for placing the item for removal, all that is happening is only giving more publicity for this person to appear. User talk:jimrogersjames 19:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Publicity is not our problem. We're here to provide useful images to the world, Being blunt and to the point > It's not our problem if the photo uploader wants to make a complete ass out of themselves. –Davey2010Talk 20:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting that jimrogersjames (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) is a new account and the only edit was a vote to delete in this DR. Bidgee (talk) 21:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. small unused personal photo without metadata, the user's only upload. Looks like not own work, but copyright violation. Also I will block Jimrogerjames indefinitely as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 07:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The source cited is an unreliable blog and it does not contain this photograph. The copyright status of this image cannot be verified. Psychologist Guy (talk) 20:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Reggio calabria piazza indipendenza e museo nazionale archeologico della magna grecia.jpg
[edit]
Deleted in 2009 as FOP violation. Personally I think it's a stretch to claim any of this very simple facade is copyrightable. Courtesy ping Á per Special:Undelete/File:Reggio calabria piazza indipendenza e museo nazionale archeologico della magna grecia.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:01, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 09:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Claimed to be an own work; however, the pictured person, an Indian musician Vidwan Anoor Suryanarayana, died in 1989. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete unless accurate information and proof of license can be shown. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Claimed to be an own work created in 2008; however, the portrayed person died in 1977. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete unless accurate information and proof of license can be shown. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Las imágenes de Andrés Martín de Diego son parte del archivo familiar (yo soy su propio nieto), desconocemos el año exacto en el cual esas fotos fueron tomadas, el año 2008 corresponde al año en que dichas imágenes fueron digitalizadas. Creo que con esto la discusión queda cerrada y las fotografías no deben ser eliminadas. Gracias y saludos. Wated Time Boy (talk) 13:09, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Claimed to be an own work created in 2008; however, the portrayed person died in 1977. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Las imágenes de Andrés Martín de Diego son parte del archivo familiar (yo soy su propio nieto), desconocemos el año exacto en el cual esas fotos fueron tomadas, el año 2008 corresponde al año en que dichas imágenes fueron digitalizadas. Creo que con esto la discusión queda cerrada y las fotografías no deben ser eliminadas. Gracias y saludos. Wated Time Boy (talk) 13:09, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Claimed to be an own work created in 2008; however, the portrayed person died in 1977. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Las imágenes de Andrés Martín de Diego son parte del archivo familiar (yo soy su propio nieto), desconocemos el año exacto en el cual esas fotos fueron tomadas, el año 2008 corresponde al año en que dichas imágenes fueron digitalizadas. Creo que con esto la discusión queda cerrada y las fotografías no deben ser eliminadas. Gracias y saludos. Wated Time Boy (talk) 13:09, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused version of File:Bet365 Logo.svg with misleading file name. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
File:UNOSAT A3 Natural Landscape FL20210407IDN DamageAssesstment Alak KotaKupang NE 21042021-1.png
[edit]
Capture of image from a United Nations website (https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/UNOSAT_A3_Natural_Landscape_FL20210407IDN_DamageAssesstment_Alak_KotaKupang_NE_21042021.pdf) probably copyrighted. Pierre cb (talk) 03:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Looks like a photo from the live telecast, not many are authorized to attend this function. Low quality and no meta data. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 03:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Looks like a photo from the live telecast, not many are authorized to attend this function. Low quality and no meta data. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 03:49, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
broken SVG and useless Ankry (talk) 06:53, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
User has only take a photo of a photograph from a museum. Copyright for this photo belongs to the author of the original photo. Аuthor of this photo - Brodskii Alexander Ivanovich, died in 1984. Photo was taken in 1942. Information taken from Central State Archive of Film and Photo Documents of St. Petersburg. Other photo taken with this photo: https://spbarchives.ru/infres/-/archive/cgakffd/photo/ar134991 https://spbarchives.ru/infres/-/archive/cgakffd/photo/ar137806 Kursant504 (talk) 06:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of certificate with no indication of importance. Too small and unclear tob of use. Malcolma (talk) 07:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is not a postcard. No publication information available. One of the possible authors (Sakharov and Orlov's photo studio) died in 1961. Thus, less than 70 years have passed since the day of death. Maxinvestigator (talk) 07:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Vandalism, somewhat humorous text. Nothing to do with the clip. Mason (talk) 07:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism, it's a joke text written in Norwegian Mason (talk) 07:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
I recall that there were FOP issues with "drawings with light" in France. This one seems a derived work (the projection) of some artwork. Ruthven (msg) 08:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Work from 1976 isn't public domain. Alkmaar Archive should know better. Vera (talk) 09:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright infringement Kotofey2016 (talk) 10:16, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia, and image lacks permission from the artwork's sculptors. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Genghis Khan Equestrian Statue, Tsonjin Boldog. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:09, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP that covers this. Abzeronow (talk) 17:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Used prior to upload in an article, where it's credited to a "Ole Nielsen". Could be the uploader, but usually isn't. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:22, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Pinco pallino rosso
[edit]literally just a bunch of files that are often recycled online and the uploader is claiming these to be own work
- File:1613571196700.t.jpg - 33 results on tineye
- File:1613506429448.g.jpg - a bunch of results on google images
- File:1612852252072.c.jpg - 5 results on tineye
- File:1612734291714.t.jpg - can't find anything but alot of missing EXIF info
- File:Minturno-1024x683.jpg - 56 results on tineye
- File:Formia0002.jpg - 8 results on tineye
- File:Teverola foto aerea.jpg - can't find anything but alot of missing EXIF info
- File:Foto aerea 2.jpg - can't find anything but alot of missing EXIF info
- File:Foto aerea 1.jpg - a lot of results on google images
- File:Teverola dal Alto 2.jpg - can't find anything but alot of missing EXIF info
- File:Teverola dal Alto.jpg - can't find anything but alot of missing EXIF info
- File:Monumento strage di Teverola.jpg - a lot of results on google images
- File:Maxresdefault-1.jpg - refer to filename, complete lack of EXIF info and results on google images
- File:Comune-san-cipriano-daversa.jpg - 5 results on tineye
- File:1504951231-1504951072-img-1445.jpg
- File:Succivo chiesa.jpg
- File:Liceo scientifico.jpg
- File:InCollage 20200920 160932677.jpg
- File:Via garibaldi10.jpg
- File:Palazzo carafa.jpg
- File:Casa di luigi colella.jpg
- File:Strage.jpg
- File:Cappella suore.jpg
- File:Via garibaldi1.jpg
- File:Piazza cavour45.jpg
- File:Piazza teverola.jpg
- File:Via roma87.jpg
- File:Memoriale.jpg
- File:Municipio diaversa.jpg
- File:Comune teverola.jpg
- File:Via roma Teverola.jpg - straight up from https://www.radiocorriere.tv/campania/Teverola_ce.html
I check more but at this point I believe it's safe to assume none of them are own work (basing myself off the size resolution and Exif data) --Nutshinou Talk! 11:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Same photo available on her instagram profile (https://www.instagram.com/jelenamedic.photographer/?hl=en). Commons:OTRS permission is needed. Smooth O (talk) 12:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Website states: 2021 Wayne County, Michigan, All Rights Reserved. Privacy Statement, Legal Notices and Terms of Use and no evidence providing flag or seal is in PD Viiticus (talk) 12:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Website states: 2021 Wayne County, Michigan, All Rights Reserved. Privacy Statement, Legal Notices and Terms of Use and no evidence providing flag or seal is in PD Viiticus (talk) 12:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- SUPPORT** WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 15:07, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Although this image appears on the NEA website, it was not created by an NEA employee or any other US government employee, but instead by Tom Pich (http://tompich.com), as can be seen from the uncropped version on the page https://www.arts.gov/honors/jazz/ray-barretto Rrburke (talk) 12:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Vanity promo selfie apparently by جاسر بسكري (Jasser Baskeri), although no EXIF or description detail to prove that the uploader has the rights to this image / Acabashi (talk) 12:49, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
"Copyright 2001-2021 by City of Detroit For information about the City of Detroit's Web site, email the Web Editor. All material is the property of the City of Detroit and may only be used with permission." logo seems too complex to be PD, also no evidence it was make during that time or that it is PD. Viiticus (talk) 12:55, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Rodney Araujo as Speedy (selfie). It is however of a music band (according to Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Facebook - Is FBMD*** metadata reason for speedy deletion?), and I find this kind of publicity photos something we should document. We do not need every one, but I did not easily find similar ones in Category:Musical groups from Spain (I suppose they are from there) Rock music groups from Argentina. LPfi (talk) 12:59, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep None of the reasons put forward for deleting this (or File:Desembarco2021.jpg) have any validity. It is COM:INUSE, it's not a selfie, and embedded metadata is no reason to delete it. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- The INUSE argument may be moot now: the article was deleted as self-promotion. But the self-promotion argument is irrelevant over here. –LPfi (talk) 13:22, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
protected logo, no permission Krd 13:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Also
- File:План земли по карте Менде. Вид со спутника. .jpg
- File:Запавловская Стрелища.jpg
- File:Запавловская Стрелища. Вид со спутника. .jpg
All: Copyrighted sat image, Yandex watermark. Retired electrician (talk) 14:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Apart from the fact that there is no NOP in Greece, the building was complete 1957, so the photo is less than 70 years old, and thus still protected by copyright. C messier (talk) 14:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep a teacher at w:en:Miami-Jacobs Career College and a judo instructor.[5] Verbcatcher (talk) 23:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Well, that actually confirms he is not notable... --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:13, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Low quality image, so if the subject is not notable, not really valuable for illustrating anything I can think of. We have better quality pictures of similar males in similar clothing/position. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:25, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Likely copyvio: credit in EXIF data (Copyright holder Rob Haywood) not matching uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, photo of a notable person: Professor Emeritus - Dean, College of Business of the American University of Iraq Baghdad.[6] Verbcatcher (talk) 22:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- He is a notable person, he was a leader of a minor political party who was jailed for electoral fraud in 2017.[ BBC News report ] However, Delete as a probable copyright violation because this is a crop of a larger image that is available online.[7] Verbcatcher (talk) 22:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- FWIW, I even checked Wikidata: no item there. And that sets the bar at notability rather low... --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Steven Fox is notable, see the English Wikipedia article on him at w:en:Steven Fox. However, the authorship details are unclear with "Kim Fox, photographer" in the description field. Probably needs license verification through COM:OTRS. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:38, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. Only used in dormant sandbox of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
personal details Snachimuthu (talk) 14:49, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted satellite photos, Yandex watermarks. Retired electrician (talk) 14:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lluismorillas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Works by artist who died in 1983, still under copyright. And 3 historical photos missing original author, source, date, and permission.
- File:Diseño de vallas publicitarias, Carteles en la vía pública, Conozca España en Barcelona.jpg
- File:Nico-Hepatocyn, medicamento. Laboratorios Biohorm Uriach & Cía S.A. (1964).jpg
- File:Binomil hipnótico, medicamento. Laboratorios Biohorm Uriach & Cía S.A. (1965) 2.jpg
- File:Antoni Morillas fotografía Principal.jpg
- File:Sin título. Pintura (1980).jpg
- File:Sin título. Serie caras. Dibujo (1973).jpg
- File:Tarjeta postal (1980).jpg
- File:Identidad Roura. Cadena de boutiques de Josep Roura (1970) 4.jpg
- File:Identidad Roura. Cadena de boutiques de Josep Roura (1970) 3.jpg
- File:Tipografía Diagonal. Autoencargo (1973).jpg
- File:Arte hispánico de la época visigoda. Ediciones Polígrafa, Barcelona (1968).jpg
- File:Identidad Roura. Cadena de boutiques de Josep Roura (1970) 1.jpg
- File:Identidad Roura. Cadena de boutiques de Josep Roura (1970) 2.jpg
- File:Óptica Arruga. Tienda de óptica (1965).jpg
- File:Campaña benéfica.jpg
- File:Valla publicitaria.jpg
- File:Antoni Morillas frente a una de sus vallas publicitarias.tif
- File:Antoni Morillas Verdura 1967.jpg
- File:Ilustración para felicitación navideña (1961).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement Нарушение авторского права 94.45.0.106 12:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement Нарушение авторского права 94.45.0.106 12:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement Нарушение авторского права 94.45.0.106 12:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement Нарушение авторского права 94.45.0.106 12:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement Нарушение авторского права 94.45.0.106 12:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement Нарушение авторского права 94.45.0.106 12:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement Нарушение авторского права 94.45.0.106 12:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
_,1962_%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,1962_%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright infringement Нарушение авторского права 94.45.0.106 12:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
_,1962_год.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
_,1962_год.jpg){kind=link}
copyright infringement Нарушение авторского права 94.45.0.106 12:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement Нарушение авторского права 94.45.0.106 12:29, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Photo of existing picture, missing original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep the source is indicated as 'Hadi e Haryana' by Prof. Manzoor ul Haq Siddiqui. This is a book which is available at archive.org,[8] and this image is on the second page of that book. The book was published in 1963, but this looks like a much older image and it is reasonable to assume that it is out of copyright. The book is tagged as "Public Domain Mark 1.0" on archive.org. The file is a picture of Muhammad Ramzan (preacher) (1769-1825). The caption on the image may clarify its origin but I don't read the language (possibly Urdu). Verbcatcher (talk) 23:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused random photo of a nondescript bush, no context, little educational use, unusable and out of scope. Superseded by numerous better ones already on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep unless you can point out a picture that is clearly superior. Just one of zillions forgetabble botany-themed media we have, in theory they are in scope - different plants, different seasons, places, whatever. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- "Just one of zillions forgetabble botany-themed media we have..." Exactly the reason why we don't need to keep everything. Please get familiar with COM:REDUNDANT. This poor image of an unidentified shrub is indeed forgettable and totally redundant to any of the hundreds of images already in Category:Leaves in autumn or its subcategories. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image. User's only upload. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 15:05, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, that's me, Karl Kratz. I do online marketing since 1996. This is my official avatar which I use everywhere. It is also used in all social media and as conference / keynote speaker / Fachbeirat image, e.g.:
https://www.omk.live/speaker/karl-kratz/ https://www.campixx.de/speaker/karl-kratz/ https://exzellent-praesentieren.de/ep074-karl-kratz-1 https://conference.allfacebook.de/speaker/karl-kratz/ https://www.onlineexpertdays.com/omx/
It is also set as "default PR picture" within my imprint:
"Avatar-Bild (Standard-Bild für Online-Kommunikation, Interviews, Sprecher-Beschreibungen usw.) (PNG)" https://karlkratz.de/onlinemarketing-blog/impressum/
Best regards,
Karl Kratz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kratzkarl (talk • contribs) 14:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, your image was uploaded in August 2019 and is not being used on any pages. Please be aware that unused personal files can be deleted as out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 19:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Likely copyvio: credit in EXIF data (Copyright of Arron and Liam Storey) doesn't match uploader. And non-notable band, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:05, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as likely copyvio per above. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Low res illegible screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on stale userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
LIkely not own work judging by the watermark. And non-notable persons, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as likely copyvio due to the watermark. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
I can't find it's free to use Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of Pélerins de Pons.jpg (mistake made while learning the DigiKam interface) SashiRolls (talk) 15:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:08.Brigataes.Les amants.immagine dal set.2004.ph.Salvatore Petrilli.jpg
- File:No lives were lost. .jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Not a good photo Peter Erhardy (talk) 22:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - No valid reason for deletion. The photo is in use. Ahmadtalk 10:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 04:04, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Because it is not a good professional picture of Joseph Erhardy. Other photos of the artist, including from famous photographers, Cartier Bresson, are presented on his Wikipedia web page Peter Erhardy (talk) 15:36, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 00:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
...Actually I wrongly posted this page Peter Erhardy (talk) 15:37, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 00:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Redandvidya (talk · contribs)
[edit]License laundering - vimeo uploader is not the copyright holder of the commercial
Эlcobbola talk 16:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oh ok. 18:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redandvidya (talk • contribs) 18:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
The photo is heavily devaluated by the "artisict" effects, and insufficiently described - out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 16:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete --Gampe (talk) 14:04, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect title and no description, seems to be a mistake upload C1MM (talk) 16:14, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Personal document about the user themselves, outside COM:SCOPE. Also the first sentence says "Please do not reproduce or sell this content", which contradicts the Creative Commons 4.0 licence the user has published this file on Commons. The page 2 contains screenshot of non-free software. Stylez995 (talk) 16:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of trophy (See User:Elcobbola/Awards#Trophies,_statuettes,_and_figurines, for example) and photo itself is likely a COM:NETCOPYVIO (see uploader talk/deleted contribs - all trophy copyvios, many with bogus self claims) Эlcobbola talk 16:31, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be COM:DERIV, assembled from at least one copyrighted photo. The plane is a stock photo credited to Haider Azim on various sites (eg. https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-airplane-traveling-very-fast-39832535.html). Lord Belbury (talk) 16:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of Costa Rica (state).svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:00, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Delete Not worth keeping the duplicate PNG one, as the original SVG one is already higher quality, which be scaled without loss of quality. --Stylez995 (talk) 17:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
the picture of the building must be updated Nadinasol (talk) 17:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No clear reason to delete. The building may have been replaced (see File:Tanger med gare maritime.jpg), but a picture of the previous building is a potentially-useful historical record. Depending on the date of the building there might be a freedom of panorama issue, see COM:FOP Morocco. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 00:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
No more picture Navigator84 (talk) 17:59, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 00:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Catedral Metropolitana y Plaza de la Constitución de Zocalo DF en una postal de C.B 1940s.jpg
[edit]
Dubious claim of "own work". Scan or copy of a postcard (clearly misdated about 20 years too early from visible automobiles), no info to show original is free licensed or PD. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Scan or copy of postcard, tagged as "own work" & dubious license. No indication original would be PD or free licensed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:07, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation, the picture is not available under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported -ink&fables (talk) 18:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete no free license at the declared source. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:49, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
I doubt the uploader took the photo in 1923 as claimed. Not yet old enough to be assumed PD Mexico without additional info. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:16, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:58, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mantobount.emp
[edit]
Apart from the fact that there is no FOP in Greece (the architech who designed the building died in 1975), the photos are of small size and lack EXIF - expect from the last that notes that is a work by PHOTO© NIKOS DANIILIDIS, and thus possibly a copyright violation. --C messier (talk) 19:14, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Not own work; logo of an organisation. On en.wiki as a non-free image (here). Number 57 (talk) 19:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Fan edits of Syd Barrett
[edit]The images are fan edits made by Flickr users, so they are derivative works of likely copyrighted images. The face image is found in many places, such as here.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
kyykaarme (talk) 20:07, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
it looks like a TV screen shot, may be a dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 20:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
it looks like a TV screen shot, may be a dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 20:25, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Arosio Stefano as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: In the lower right corner there is a copyright symbol: Sergei Frolov, 2014 Arosio Stefano (talk) 20:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete in an archive of a webpage that was archived before the file was uploaded to Commons.[9] Verbcatcher (talk) 00:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
مسح الخط الفاصل للصحراء 160.179.0.143 20:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- KEEP: Babel translates your remark as "Clear the line of desert". If there is something wrong with the map's content, you don't just delete it. You edit it instead — or ask somebody else to do so. I would like to help (I am the editor who put that map together), but the remark is rather unclear. What do you mean by that? Kelisi (talk) 20:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep There is nothing wrong with the map. Furthermore, since it's used in other projects and has been stable for years, you cannot change the borders to suit your POV. M.Bitton (talk) 21:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Source and license appear incorrect although the engraving may be old enough. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I have identified the engraving and changed the license. We don't need an immediate source as {{PD-Art}} applies. The engraving is identified in an academic paper.[[10] page 87] Verbcatcher (talk) 01:03, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- We need some kind of a source, the entire source field is empty. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
@Ellin Beltz: I misidentified the engraving as another made from the same viewpoint. I have changed the identification based on what looks like a reasonably reliable source, althought I don't understand Turkish.[11] While an accurate source is highly desirable, is it obligatory for public domain images? Can you point me to policy that confirms this? Can the source be the engraving itself? The image is available on several websites, including the one I have just linked (although the file there is not an identical binary file). Should we change the source to this website, or does it need to be where the uploader obtained the file? Should we re-upload another copy from a known source? I have since found a higher-resolution copy,[12] but the colours are different and it should probably be uploaded as a new file. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:42, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Verbcatcher: Sources are mandatory, please see COM:LI. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
I have uploaded an essentially identical copy from a known source and have set the source to its URL. This seemed rather pointless. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Verbcatcher: I am sure some people regard speed limits and stop signs as pointless but common culture proceeds best with common rules. Thank you for the source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Appears a source has been found. --Missvain (talk) 01:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely claim of own work on black and white portrait. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep duplicate of w:en:File:Portrait of Charles Drew.jpg, which is credibly attributed is and identified as 'PD US not renewed'. We should change the information on this file to match the enwiki file. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- "We should" but until that is finished, this file should not be kept as is. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:46, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Dated 1938 on the Document, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep, this is used at w:tr:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk'ün ölümü ve devlet cenaze töreni with the caption "Atatürk'ün sağlık durumu hakkında 18 Ekim 1938 tarihinde Başbakanlığa ulaştırılan rapor." which Google Translate gives as "Report delivered to the Prime Ministry on the state of health of Atatürk on 18 October 1938." It is reasonable to assume that he report was produced by a Turkish government ministry. COM:Turkey states that "If the first author is a legal person, the term of protection shall be 70 years from the date on which the work was made public." If this was made public before 1950 then it is public domain in Turkey. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:28, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Keeping - see User_talk:Missvain#Commons:Deletion_requests/File:AtaturkSaglikRaporu.png. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other admins to review it. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 20:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Photo size, quality and ID in metadata suggest this is from Facebook or other social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, this is my photo. İ take. This is photo archived in google photos. İ take with Gm 4g, İf yours dont believe me, i can show the my google archive thanks.AkatosH (talk) 10:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Assuming good faith. --Missvain (talk) 01:04, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded this photo of a politician, when there was no other. Now, it is of no use. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfredo_Castillo_Cervantes Opus88888 (talk) 21:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, unless the uploader is now indicating that they did not take this photograph. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:47, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:04, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work: small size, user upload history 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:04, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 21:54, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 207 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per Tuvalkin. --Green Giant (talk) 10:12, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
A better image resolution were uploaded with following picture (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wagen_207@Hauptbahnhof-ROB_am_05.11.2020.jpg) OliverZenglein (talk) 23:31, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Both photos are useful and they are not absolutely equivalent: Same bus, yes, but on different locations, rotes, dates et c.. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:44, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
_am_27.07.2020_Richtung_Hauptbahnhof.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_am_27.07.2020_Richtung_Hauptbahnhof.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 21:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
_am_27.07.2020_Richtung_Hauptbahnhof.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
_am_27.07.2020_Richtung_Hauptbahnhof.jpg){kind=link}
_am_27.07.2020_Richtung_Hauptbahnhof.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
A better image resolution were uploaded with following picture (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wagen_207@Hauptbahnhof-ROB_am_13.11.2020.jpg) OliverZenglein (talk) 23:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
_am_27.07.2020_Richtung_Hauptbahnhof.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
_am_27.07.2020_Richtung_Hauptbahnhof.jpg){kind=link}
Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 21:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded a better picture quality of the bus on 2020-12-04 OliverZenglein (talk) 00:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Good enough. Warn the user not to open DRs one after the other. --E4024 (talk) 01:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per E4024. --Green Giant (talk) 10:14, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
A better image resolution were uploaded with following picture (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wagen_205@Hauptbahnhof-ROB_am_04.12.2020_1.jpg) OliverZenglein (talk) 23:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep Identical reason as the previous requests above. No need to waste time on repeated requests. Protect the file page, and warn the user not to repeatedly open more DRs for the same reason. Remember, once published under a Creative Commons licence, it cannot be revoked (even by deleting it). --Stylez995 (talk) 14:39, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 21:59, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded a better picture quality of the bus on 2020-12-04 OliverZenglein (talk) 00:06, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per Tuvalkin Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wagen 207@Stadthalle am 02.07.2020 Richtung Nilkheim.jpg. --Green Giant (talk) 10:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
A better image resolution were uploaded with following picture (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wagen_205@Hauptbahnhof-ROB_am_04.12.2020_3.jpg) OliverZenglein (talk) 23:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 22:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 199 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
A better image resolution were uploaded with following picture (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wagen_199@Hauptbahnhof-ROB_am_20.11.2020.jpg) OliverZenglein (talk) 23:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Both photos are useful and they are not absolutely equivalent: Same bus, yes, but on different locations, rotes, dates et c.. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 22:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 197 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
A better image resolution were uploaded with following picture (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wagen_197@Stadthalle_am_05.12.2020.jpg) OliverZenglein (talk) 23:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Both photos are useful and they are not absolutely equivalent: Same bus, yes, but on different locations, rotes, dates et c.. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
A better image resolution were uploaded with following picture (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wagen_196@Stadthalle_am_10.04.2021.jpg) OliverZenglein (talk) 23:45, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Added a better photoquality of the bus OliverZenglein (talk) 22:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Checking Category:Wagen 196 (bad cat name, btw) this photo seems to be pretty unique. Nominator shouls always indicate the name of the better photo which would replace this one, too, and all these related DRs should have been bundled in a single one. (And my vote is the same for them all, too.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Tuválkin. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
A better image resolution were uploaded with following picture (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wagen_196@Hauptbahnhof-ROB_am_14.11.2020.jpg) OliverZenglein (talk) 23:46, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Both photos are useful and they are not absolutely equivalent: Same bus, yes, but on different locations, rotes, dates et c.. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:42, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:06, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
A better image resolution were uploaded with following picture (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wagen_195@Hauptbahnhof-ROB_am_13.03.2021.jpg) OliverZenglein (talk) 23:53, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 01:06, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paolo Peace (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art and promo photo. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:1-H-DeerAboveand Below-s-wiki.jpg
- File:1-H-DeerAboveand Below-cs.jpg
- File:1-H-DeerAboveand Below-s.tif
- File:70paulre (2000x1268).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Il semblerait que la licence de ce fichier n'est pas compatible pour être publié sur WikiCommons MyriamColina (talk) 10:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - source gives CC-BY-SA 3.0. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Mongolia: non-free (2008) monument / architecture.
- File:Chinggis Khan Statue.jpg
- File:Chingis Khan Statue.jpg
- File:Dschingis Khan in Zonjin Boldog 01.JPG
- File:Dschingis Khan in Zonjin Boldog 02.JPG
- File:Dschingis Khan in Zonjin Boldog 03.JPG
- File:Dschingis Khan in Zonjin Boldog 04.JPG
- File:Dschingis Khan in Zonjin Boldog 05.JPG
- File:Dschingis Khan in Zonjin Boldog 06.JPG
- File:Dschingis Khan in Zonjin Boldog 07.JPG
- File:Dschingis Khan in Zonjin Boldog 08.JPG
- File:Dschingis Khan in Zonjin Boldog 09.JPG
- File:Dschingis Khan in Zonjin Boldog 11.JPG
- File:Dschingis Khan in Zonjin Boldog.JPG
- File:Genghis Khan Equestrian Statue.JPG
- File:Genghis Khan monument 01.jpg
- File:Genghis Khan monument 02.jpg
- File:Genghis Khan monument 03.jpg
- File:Genghis Khan monument 04.jpg
- File:Genghis Khan monument 05.jpg
- File:Genghis Khan Monument.jpg
- File:Mongolia Genghis Khan.jpg
- File:Steel-Genghis Khan.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 09:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for buildings and 3D artworks. Abzeronow (talk) 20:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This is a still-copyrighted Mongolian landmark created by It was designed by sculptor D. Erdenebileg and architect J. Enkhjargal, and unveiled in 2008, in effect this file infringes their copyright. There is no Commons-acceptable freedom of panorama in Mongolia; their FOP only covers reproductions for "noncommercial purposes", conflicting with Commons:Licensing which states all media files (even the underlying works) should be freely usable in any purpose, including commercial exploits of these files.
- File:2017. Massive statue of Chinggis Khan at Tsonjin Boldog, North of Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Tsonjin Boldog is the place Chinggis found a golden whip, which led him to becoming the leader of Mongolia. (39581791771).jpg
- File:Arkhust, Mongolia - panoramio (10).jpg
- File:Arkhust, Mongolia - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Arkhust, Mongolia - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Arkhust, Mongolia - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Arkhust, Mongolia - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:Chinggis Khan (Genghis Khan) (2540203203).jpg
- File:Chinggis Khan (Genghis) (6228087785).jpg
- File:Chinggis Khan Statue Complex (22310657094).jpg
- File:Chinggis Khan Statue Complex (22310875634).jpg
- File:Chinggis Khan Statue Complex (22312249083).jpg
- File:ChinggisStatue.jpg
- File:Dzsingisz kán monumentális lovasszobra (Monumental statue of Chinggis khaan) - panoramio.jpg
- File:Genghis Khan - panoramio.jpg
- File:Genghis Khan Equestrian Statue.jpg
- File:Genghis Khan on horse monument.jpg
- File:Genghis Khan Statue Detail.JPG
- File:GenghisKhanEquestrianMonument (1).jpg
- File:GenghisKhanEquestrianStatue.jpg
- File:GK (2540206993).jpg
- File:The largest equestrian statue of the world - panoramio.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2540203203).jpg){kind=link}
_(6228087785).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:02, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 20:25, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for 3D art and buildings. Abzeronow (talk) 21:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. Images show the statue's details.
- File:Arkhust, Mongolia - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Arkhust, Mongolia - panoramio (14).jpg
- File:Arkhust, Mongolia - panoramio.jpg
- File:Chinggis Khan Statue Complex (22515011827).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:07, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. See above threads for details.
- Indoor sculpture of a life-sized boot
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Indoor wax sculptures
- File:ChagataiGenghisKhanEquestrianMonument.jpg
- File:GenghisKhan&BörteGenghisKhanEquestrianMonument.jpg
- File:JamukhaGenghisKhanEquestrianMonument.jpg
- File:JochiGenghisKhanEquestrianMonument.jpg
- File:ToluiGenghisKhanEquestrianMonument.jpg
- File:ÖgedeiGenghisKhanEquestrianMonument.jpg
- Genghis Khan is a major part on this image, missing OTRS authorization from sculptor D. Erdenebileg and architect J. Enkhjargal
_%D0%91%D1%8D%D1%81%D2%AF%D0%B4_%D0%94%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F%D0%BC%D1%8B%D0%BD_%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%82%D3%A9%D0%B3%D1%81.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Undeleted the outdoors works. I'll wait for guidance on whether Mongolia's FOP covers the indoor works. Abzeronow (talk) 21:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Mongolia. See also COM:FOP Mongolia and {{NoFoP-Mongolia}}.
- File:Arkhust, Mongolia - panoramio (11).jpg
- File:Чингис хааны морьт хөшөө-1.jpg
- File:Чингис хааны морьт хөшөө-3.jpg
- File:Чингис хааны морьт хөшөө.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Ox1997cow (talk) 16:35, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for buildings and 3D art. Abzeronow (talk) 22:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Unused poor photo of nondescript table and chairs, no educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:01, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Illustrates this range of chair design and is one of the Nordic collection photographs, which are unlikely to ever be added to. --Fæ (talk) 15:29, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per fae. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
"THE IMAGE OF SCP-173, BASED ON THE SCULPTURE Untitled 2004 SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES." This not is CC BY-SA 3.0. 組曲師 (talk) 16:36, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Fan art. The original sculpture is copyrighted, but this particular piece of fan art is CC BY-SA 3.0. Di (they-them) (talk) 17:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - infringes on copyright of original. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
The name has a mistake and the model is not properly oriented. Is there a way to change the name and the orientation without deleting it? Sorry if this is not the right place to ask, I have just started to collaborate in wikipedia. GabrielLucas (talk) 18:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - see Template:Rename. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own work, taken from FB as per EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep insufficient reason for deletion. The user has uploaded a large number of photographs of buildings in Naples which have a similar style and are probably all by the same photographer. Facebook metadata is insufficient reason for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - we do not keep images taken from Facebook. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 18:54, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
![18:54, 21 May 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/05/21#c-Didym-2021-05-21T18:54:00.000Z-File:"Maggie_Khozam.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
- Sorry. I will try very quickly to add a new picture, thanks for understanding — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord's Church (talk • contribs) 19:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I suspect this is a selfie, taken in a mirror (the writing on the balloons in reversed). It is reasonable to accept the the uploader is the photographer and is the subject of the photo. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:21, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Why? The uploader has uploaded 2 copyvios, and I do not see any reason to assume own work on this small image without Exif data. --Didym (talk) 21:32, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Fitindia. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
![20:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/05/21#c-Jameslwoodward-2021-06-21T20:08:00.000Z-File:"Maggie_Khozam.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
Dubious if really own work, mainly due to low resolution and absence of metadata. Actually, except the original uploader's statement about the date on which this photo was taken there is nothing else that could be taken into consideration as a proof of any sorts. 😕 Glorious 93 (talk) 19:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The low resolution may indicate that this was taken with a mobile phone in 2006, when mobile phone cameras usually had low resolution, and / or it may be a crop from a larger image. It does not look like a professional photograph, and the viewpoint is consistent with the crowd at a football match. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
This picture left me confused about if it's a copyvio or not, so I'm opening this nomination. This pic can be found on this actress' official Instagram account (see here), but the metadata on it indicates it's a "legit photo" in the sense that you can find all the data (such as exposure time, f-number, ISO speed rating, etc.) you are expected to find in a photo that was not a copyvio. In pictures taken directly from internet you, normally, don't find this data. I'm think that the author of this picture is somehow linked to the actress. The author produced the pic used on the actress Instagram and, then, someone (linked to the actress) uploaded the "original pic" directly here. I don't know if I'm clear. Anyway, I don't know what exactly do to in this case. Is this a copyvio or not? SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 22:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
