Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/04/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
_ground.jpg){kind=link}
_cover.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Logo.gif){kind=link}
![221 File:0002 Vita von Josef Werner Leben aus dem Interview mit Jorge Silva Izazaga in "Norte" 1972 Kopie.jpg](#File:0002_Vita_von_Josef_Werner_Leben_aus_dem_Interview_mit_Jorge_Silva_Izazaga_in_"Norte"_1972_Kopie.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
because i don´t needed anymore. Thanks Laercioribeirorj (talk) 00:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Porque eu não quero mais utilizar e preciso de privacidade. Laercioribeirorj (talk) 00:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as it seems also to be a copyvio ((C) Valeria Fernandez Amallo). --Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
File:At twilight, a cow grazing grass in our college(Jalpaiguri Government Engineering College) ground.jpg
[edit]_ground.jpg){kind=link}
_ground.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Picture of a live animal has been used which is against the rules. Ajaybiswas22 (talk) 05:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 11:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded by me, but meets threshold of originality, Shadowrvn728 (talk) 17:41, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Unencyclopaedic due to low quality Guy 09:58, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: the quality is low, but it's still in use, so kept per COM:INUSE. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Unencyclopaedic. Not only is this unreadably low resolution, it is also unverifiable as what it purports to be: Commons and one non-authoritative site are the only two locations where this appears. As fart as I can ascertain, this is something that someoen made up one day - but you can't tell because the resolution is too low. Guy 17:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as before. --JuTa 00:06, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by محمدباقر المفرجي (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:صورة لمراد علمدار.jpg
- File:مراد علمدار.jpg
- File:زواج مصلحة.jpg
- File:صورة محمد باقر المفرجي.jpg
- File:محمد باقر المفرجي.jpg
- File:رئيس جمهورية البشير شو أحمد البشير.jpg
- File:أحمد البشير.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Alaa :)..! 09:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded by an LTA, only used on their own pages on some other projects (LTA already globally locked)
- File:Category Manage connected applications QRpedia.png
- File:Tiknow.png
- File:All public logs - Outreach Wiki.pdf
- File:User TMenang.pdf
- File:Chrome qrcode.png
- File:Category TMenang QRpedia.png
- File:Terusan Menang.jpg
- File:Status ekstensi - MediaWiki.pdf
- File:Peluncuran Ulang Strategi Sumber Daya Hibah Komunitas 2020-2021 - Meta.pdf
DannyS712 (talk) 06:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & F10. --Minoraxtalk 13:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
This is non-free marketing material that should not have been uploaded to the commons, and it was uploaded for use at an article that already has a poster so this won't even be used at Wikipedia as was intended. Adamstom.97 (talk) 04:20, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Movie poster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Seemingly out of scope per Commons:Project_scope#PDF. The content is essentially self-published raw text and seemingly not in scope of wikisource/wikiquote or similar. Intent of course matters here -- it is possible this document is being uploaded for an educational purpose in scope, and that's just not clear yet given that it is a relatively new upload. As-is, it seems more that the intent is to use Commons as a personal web-host (see COM:HOST). Mathmitch7 (talk) 15:33, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Saya mengunggahnya secara tidak sengaja Yandi Fadjri (talk) 14:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redrected as duplicate. --JuTa 22:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
_cover.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_cover.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio: Non-free book cover. KirkLU (talk) 09:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
_cover.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
_cover.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 08:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 09:24, 19 April 2021 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 14:35, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 09:13, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Gbawden at 09:24, 19 April 2021 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 14:35, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio: Non-free album cover. KirkLU (talk) 09:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Hekerui at 22:02, 19 April 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 08:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Photos of unknown origin. File:HK Skoda 14Tr agregat Kluky.jpg seems to be a low res scan, File:HK Skoda 8Tr CSA.jpg is availible on the internet (e.g. https://www.hradeckralove.cz/fotogalerie/historie-trolejbusove-dopravy-v-hradci-kralove-16392/, credit: DPmHK. The uploader hasn't respond yet to my questions (cs:Diskuse s wikipedistou:Nentvico).
Harold (talk) 17:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:46, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
I have the rights of this image, I'm the person of the photo. I don't give permission for this to be uploaded. I'm the owner of eduardoriverasantamaria.com and social media. you can check how in all official social media sites the website url described is there. I created this temporal section to proove I'm the owner and I'm requesting the deletion of this image eduardoriverasantamaria.com/temp-messageJperez123 (talk) 15:16, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, depicted person has usually no right to demand deletion. Nevertheless I delete the file, because it is small unused photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution. Own work is unlikely, probably real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
not own work 190.231.219.177 03:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
not own work 190.231.219.177 03:31, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
not own work 190.231.219.177 03:31, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Requires OTRS permission from the photographer. E4024 (talk) 05:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:31, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
copyvio. ArnabSaha (talk) 06:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:31, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 07:41, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:32, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Mauvaise licence appliquée ForwardisGroup (talk) 08:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Mauvaise licence appliquée ForwardisGroup (talk) 07:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Added {{PD-textlogo}} --Achim (talk) 11:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 12:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 07:47, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:32, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 08:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:32, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
insufficient source info, missing exif could be copyrighted - IndrajitDas 08:48, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:32, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
uploaded myself - not useful, white on white Shadowrvn728 (talk) 08:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minoraxtalk 12:32, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 08:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Mobile sceenshot, could be copyrighted image - IndrajitDas 08:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Completely out of COM:SCOPE. Low quality image with no perceivable educational use that couldn't be better accomplished with another image. Unused globally. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE. Highly saturated image posted on Flickr a decade ago with no perceivable use that would not be better accomplished by a different, more recent, and higher quality, image. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE. Highly saturated image posted on Flickr a decade ago with no perceivable use that would not be better accomplished by a different, more recent, and higher quality, image. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Self promotional, out of scope - IndrajitDas 09:33, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Insufficient source info, Out of scope - IndrajitDas 09:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Insufficient source info, missing EXIF and could be copyrighted - IndrajitDas 09:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo without description. Probably not own work. Out of scope Malcolma (talk) 09:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Not an own work either. E4024 (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
book cover needs Ticket OTRS permission Caulfield (talk) 10:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
According to the file's metadata, the copyright holder is Shailendra Pandey/Tehelka. Needs permission from them via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:35, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Recent artwork in Paris. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 19:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
If this is the same subject as that of deleted photo, then delete as there is no FOP in France. Missing artist's permission. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Matlin (talk) 13:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:35, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
It's the wrong artist 92.15.105.176 17:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Who is the correct one? Can you give an internet link? --E4024 (talk) 17:22, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
It's by Louis Beroud. There is already an entry on Wikimedia with the correct artist. 92.15.105.176 17:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep and rename for above. --E4024 (talk) 18:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC)- Keep Why delete? Andy Dingley (talk) 19:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Andy Dingley 'Why delete?' Because it's got the wrong artist in the file name and it's got the wrong inscriptions detail. There are TWO other files for this painting, both with the correct artist. Why KEEP this WRONG file? CornishGooner (talk) 13:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- So rename it rather than deleting it. The information on the page is correct, except for some that's coming from Wikidata (That's a problem outside today's scope). We have three copies of images of this painting (I presume there are several photographs of a single painting). But although this isn't the largest one, it's the one with the best colours. So I might delete File:Louis Béroud - First Communion (Paris).jpg, but I'd keep the other two (including this), unless anyone can colour correct the larger version. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep renamed. No reason for deleting. --A1AA1A (talk) 18:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I have processed your request, so now the file has actually been renamed. No need to delete it, please close this odd deletion request – thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 15:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 13:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amirhosein6009 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploaded for self-promotion, see fa:امیر_حسین_ملک
- File:Amir Hossein Malek6.jpg
- File:Amir Hossein Malek5.jpg
- File:Amir Hossein Malek4.jpg
- File:Amir Hossein Malek3.jpg
- File:Amir Hossein Malek2.jpg
- File:Amir Hossein Malek1.jpg
- File:امیر حسین ملک.jpg
- File:Slider Chera namoondi.jpg
Discostu (talk) 13:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:37, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Metadata credits www.pacotwo.com. Permission missing and it was previously published at https://www.boardsportsource.com/2017/11/01/silver-surfers-session-wavegarden-cove/. Please follow the steps described at COM:OTRS to verify the license information. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:37, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Fails COM:SCOPE: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality.
This file is useless. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:38, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juliocesaravc2007 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Terrible JPG. No plausible educational use. Delete. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Promotional selfie and user has not edited outside of promoting themselves. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:41, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdullahalimran010 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity Wikidata item.
- File:Abdullah Al Imran 007.jpg
- File:Abdullah Al Imran 006.jpg
- File:Abdullah Al Imran 005.jpg
- File:Abdullah Al Imran 004.jpg
- File:Abdullah Al Imran 003.jpg
- File:Abdullah Al Imran 002.jpg
- File:Abdullah Al Imran 001.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:40, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:40, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:40, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal flag, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, COM:EDUSE; No conceivable educational use or value. Marbletan (talk) 15:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-quality selfie with no educational benefit. Anarchyte (work | talk) 15:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Completely out of scope. Anarchyte (work | talk) 16:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
COM:SPAM - Advertising or self-promotion. This is just a gif of the logo of a random Discord server. Anarchyte (work | talk) 16:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
COM:SPAM - Advertising or self-promotion. This is just the logo of a random Discord server. Anarchyte (work | talk) 16:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
COM:SPAM - Advertising or self-promotion. This is just the logo of a random Discord server. Anarchyte (work | talk) 16:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
COM:SPAM - Advertising or self-promotion. This is just the logo of a random Discord server. Anarchyte (work | talk) 16:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Porque sí Logo Ismael Olea (talk) 15:07, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 18:49, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:SPAM - Advertising or self-promotion. These are just the logos of a random Discord server/gaming group. Completely non-notable, unencyclopedic, and out of scope. Anarchyte (work | talk) 16:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused image of uncertain use/meaning, likely out of Commons:SCOPE Mathmitch7 (talk) 16:34, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:43, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Trouble faite (talk · contribs)
[edit]Completely out of scope with no possible reason for keeping them.
Anarchyte (work | talk) 16:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete These could be attack images. E4024 (talk) 19:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:43, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:43, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused (thermal?) images of undefined things, no context, little educational use, unusable and out of scope.
- File:Capa salinidad.png
- File:Pfg.png
- File:Salinidad pfg.png
- File:Salinidad.png
- File:PFG 92c7ac.png
- File:Pfg ovm.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work, unreliable uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:46, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable group, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dalal abumaiz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text diagrams, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope.
- File:توضيح.png
- File:توضيح 2.png
- File:توضيح 3.png
- File:Pi3333333333.png
- File:Pi 55555.png
- File:Pi 44444222224444422222.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:48, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused tiny image of a nondescript computer room, no context, little educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:48, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:48, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:48, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pindotgroup (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional photos of non-notable company, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:49, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:13, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:49, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Torshavn1337 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Suspected COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, appeared elsewhere prior to upload (e.g., File:Kaputaş beach in Turkey.jpg is here ; File:View from Bebek in winter.jpg is here; etc.), user serial copyvio uploader (see talk/deleted contribs), etc. Duck/COM:PRP issue.
- File:Typical plant communities in the Mount Kaçkar National Park is this old-growth Buxus forest.jpg
- File:Safranbolu in winter.jpg
- File:Lycian tombs by the water.jpg
- File:Kaputaş beach in Turkey.jpg
- File:View from Bebek in winter.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 21:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:50, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:15, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:50, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 05:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 18:27, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 05:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 18:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 05:17, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 18:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
This file isn't licensing under CC. Wiki6421 (talk) 06:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has the appropriate license: {{PD-AZ-exempt|type=banknotes}} --TarPas (talk) 07:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. http://www.senatorlarrypressler.com RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 12:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of permission to list under this license. czar 18:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
The source link makes absolutely no mention of the work being creative commons Putitonamap98 (talk) 02:25, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete, no free licence at the declared source. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)- Moreover: Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus, see COM:SPEEDY#G4. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:57, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as this is clearly a violation of copyright. Jon698 (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: G4 - speedily deleted. --rubin16 (talk) 19:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since)... which is perfectly correct. But it would appear to be a mid 18th century image and old enough to be retained with correct license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 18:26, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license. --JuTa 05:16, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity and everybody already knows how it works 36.73.29.216 07:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Although disgusting it is rare to have such close up footage of an anus pooping, to see how the sphincter relaxes and tightens. Giving birth would be similarly graphic and educational. Knowing how it works is not the same as seeing it because we cannot easily view our own anuses as humans. UserTwoSix (talk) 00:41, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --✗plicit 13:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
--Язенин Павел Александрович (talk) 19:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)=== File:IMG-20200816-WA0013.jpg === Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 13:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Not used, no plausible use. If selfie of uploader, possible child protection issues. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 13:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Low quality apparent "creepshot" uploaded by "voyeur project", not in use. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:10, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 13:17, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
obvious OR violation FleurDeOdile (talk) 18:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Oppose – This isn't Wikipedia. We don't delete images here for OR issues. If there is an issue with the title, then it should be renamed to reflect the fact that it is an unofficial track. LightandDark2000 (talk) 01:45, 28 April 2021 (UTC)- Oppose – I don't there's a similar rule like WP:OR in Commons. It should be kept. Beraniladri19🌀🌀 talk 03:06, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion.(non-admin closure)' HurricaneEdgar 09:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Too quick to import this - replaced its usages with higher resolution individual images, unused in project mainspaces Lcawte (talk) 23:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 13:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since). which is absolutely correct. But this is a Roman seal impression, their empire has been gone a long time. Converting to Nomination in hopes of finding a way to keep an interesting historical image (in use). Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since)... image is attached to article which says painter died in 1947. Perhaps uploader could include complete information and we could help with a license? Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dublette, die ich als Anfänger aus Unkenntnis angelegt habe Heusinger~dewiki (talk) 16:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC) {{speedydelete|Doublette}}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Unused screenshots without clear copyright status, and little educational value, out of scope.
- File:Schametic.pdf
- File:Schematic.pdf
- File:Representative Structure.pdf
- File:Mechanism at work..pdf
- File:Picc1.pdf
- File:Position of H2O and D2O exchange..pdf
- File:Position of theoretical H2O and D2O exchange..pdf
- File:"Hot-Spot" amino acid facilitating AFGP anti-freeze activity.pdf
- File:Important "Hot-Spot" amino acid facilitating AFGP anti-freeze activity..pdf
- File:Theoretical position of H2O and D2O exchange..pdf
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Unclear if in Commons:SCOPE. Image was uploaded 7 years ago and is not being used by wikimedia projects -- this is user's only uploaded image. Mathmitch7 (talk) 16:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use. --Ezarateesteban 21:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, and no context, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Image not at source (anymore), failed COM:LR. What year did photographer die? And lastly, unused low-res image of unidentified house, no context, little educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dragonslayer3123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: inconsistent sizes, quality, and styles, missing EXIF data or transmission code in EXIF data.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused text image of non-notable event, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 14:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Personal image with copyrighted characters, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 14:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own work: transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 14:59, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 14:59, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused image/icon of a blob, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 15:00, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Picture shows the result from ripple ride model ranked by profitability within a day 2014-05-17 10-25.jpg
[edit]
Unused low-res diagram without context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 15:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Martinponcio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 15:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BogomolovaNatalia10 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nomination --Микола Василечко (talk) 18:45, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. I have marked them as 'ask permission', but user re-uploaded photos. --Kharkivian (talk) 19:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: First image kept: I found similar on ministry web site, two others deleted per nom. --Anatoliy (talk) 22:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Matsievsky as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: файл вырезан из файла с изображением марки СССР File:The Soviet Union 1988 CPA 5986 stamp (Birth centenary of Emanuel Kviring, Soviet politician and statesman).jpg. Выдержка из лицензии на странице файла: "извлечение определенных частей из этого произведения может представлять собой нарушение авторских прав. Например, на почтовых марках должны быть сохранены номинал и название страны" AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Speedy delete Это фрагмент почтовой марки СССР. Изображение этой почтовой марки СССР не охраняется авторским правом только целиком. Фрагмент этого изображения без номинала и названия страны охраняется авторским правом художника марки. По факту нарушение авторских прав. --Matsievsky (talk) 02:20, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Will {{PD-US-alien property}} also apply? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Speedy delete This fragment of the postage stamp was created by the artist V. Nikitin in 1988. Separate independent use of this fragment violates the copyright of this artist. --Matsievsky (talk) 11:43, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Useless photo : no one need a photo of peeling walls. Pierre cb (talk) 03:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Its in use at Moisture. GeorgHH • talk 14:38, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:INUSE. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:42, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Useless photo of disgusting molds Pierre cb (talk) 04:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: In use in English Wikipedia, so COM:INUSE applies. Besides, it's a perfectly in-scope example of mold, disgusting as it may be. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Image was ripped from https://www.ggpm2012.com/2016/12/P16.html. The website doesn't indicate the image is licensed under CC license either. Only their master collection is licensed under CC licensing. Paper9oll (talk) 00:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
since it is the Orthodoxy Beyond Limits or OBL forum's ICON (which apparently is the website http://www.theorthodoxchurch.info), an OTRS is needed Veverve (talk) 00:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status is not clear. Image is of a letter signed by "Richard J. Wolson, Q.C." and page claims "own work" by uploader, User:Mynameis212. If user asserts that they hold copyright to the text of the letter, then they should indicate that more definitively; if author has released the work for publication, user should more clearly indicate proper licensing and/or permission. Mathmitch7 (talk) 00:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Richard J Wolson owns the copyright for this letter, but uploader has permission from owner to post and use this letter at uploader's discretion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mynameis212 (talk • contribs) 12:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Logo. Has sat in Category:Copyright violations for a week, converting to DR. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo from Yahoo Search Engine. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Thienhau2003 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright infringement of VNUHCM University of Technology. PD in the US, COM:Thailand does not provide information on TOO. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- AntiCompositeNumber First, this Logo represents Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology in Vietnam, not Thailand. Second, this reason for deletion for Copyright Infringement is completely correct due to this logo was trademarked by the National Office of Intellectual Property of Vietnam to Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology in 2012 (link https://www.hcmut.edu.vn/vi/welcome/tieudiem/226), so it is copyrighted in Vietnam. Furthermore, although it is a PD in the US, since it is copyrighted in the country of origin it cannot be uploaded to Commons. Thienhau2003 (talk) 05:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Guliolopez as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader has ripped this graphic from a 1930s newspaper (Irish Press) and decided that, because the uploader hasn't sourced (or provided/acknowledged/identified) the author that that makes the image eligible as "anonymous". That the uploader hasn't stated the author/artist doesn't mean that the author/artist is unknown or unknowable. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ochentero as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/AlternativaUCR/photos/a.432500623463381/3936872506359491/. Free in the US, COM:Costa Rica does not provide information on TOO. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File description page blanked by original uploader; assuming to be a request for deletion. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:43, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
File description page blanked by original uploader; assuming to be a request for deletion. Lyndon.otlogetswe (talk) 02:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:41, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Post wwii sculpture (see image description) so the copyright has not expired; no {{FoP-Greece}}. Unfortunately, I cannot find out who made the sculpture. Buidhe (talk) 02:21, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:41, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as Logo Probably free in the US, unsure about COM:TOO Germany AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo. DRing due to age, free in the US, unsure about COM:TOO France. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, published 1980. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Screen capture of likely copyrighted material Pierre cb (talk) 04:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Not for the vague nomination, but although the license was bot-reviewed by FlickrLickr at the time of upload, this flickr account seems unreliable and was apparently taking photos from various sources and there'a a possibility of flickrwashing. N.B.: A review by FlickreviewR 2 is useless when knowing that the file was removed from flickr and it would return "not found". -- Asclepias (talk) 15:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Possible image with promotional purposes. Out of project scope. —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 04:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The license was bot-reviewed by FlickrLickr at the time of upload. Is there any valid reason to doubt it now after it's been on Commons for 14 years? The useless request for review by FlickreviewR 2 when knowing that the file was removed from flickr and it would return "not found" looks like a misuse of the process. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as no source (No source since). A source is already given, and the file has already been kept in a deletion process last year (see above). Andre Engels (talk) 19:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The license was bot-reviewed by FlickrLickr at the time of upload. Is there any valid reason to doubt it now after it's been on Commons for 14 years? The useless request for review by FlickreviewR 2 when knowing that the file was removed from flickr and it would return "not found" looks like a misuse of the process. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:42, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
2017 Kelsey Ayres / Nasdaq, Inc. in metadata, unlikely that this Flickr user is able to license this image. Dylsss (talk) 04:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:07, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Requires OTRS permission from the photographer. E4024 (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:07, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 05:17, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This photo shows the moment of people watching the eclipse using the special glasses. I don't think this is out of scope. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: Well I do understand your POV, there are a number of files that actually depict people wearing the special glasses and looking at the sun. Judging by the background of the said image, it seems that the subject is lying on a bed. --Minoraxtalk 11:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom, this is a personal photo with no potential educational use. This does not show the moment of watching the eclipse, just someone wearing the glasses. czar 18:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:07, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Requires OTRS permission from the photographer. E4024 (talk) 05:17, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:07, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Een verkleinde versie van Bestand:入間市上谷ヶ貫八幡神社正面②.jpg. Overtollig, niet in gebruik. トトト (talk) 05:20, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:08, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Een verkleinde versie van Bestand:獅子舞2018.jpg. Overtollig, niet in gebruik. トトト (talk) 05:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:08, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I the uploader just noticed the warning of copyright at Category:Coins of Canada as per COM:CUR Canada Moxy (talk) 05:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Speedy delete. Per nomination. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:43, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:09, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:34, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - file is in widespread use, so removal would be disruptive; and a closely allied image on flickr from the same photographer on the same date at the same location is CC-BY-2.0, so it is reasonable to assume this one was too before [? accidental] removal. Might perhaps be worth someone with a flickr account asking the photographer, for removal of any doubt. - MPF (talk) 14:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The license was bot-reviewed by FlickrLickr at the time of upload. Is there any valid reason to doubt it now after it's been on Commons for 14 years? The useless request for review by FlickreviewR 2 when knowing that the file was removed from flickr and it would return "not found" looks like a misuse of the process. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The license was bot-reviewed by FlickrLickr at the time of upload. Is there any valid reason to doubt it now after it's been on Commons for 14 years? The useless request for review by FlickreviewR 2 when knowing that the file was removed from flickr and it would return "not found" looks like a misuse of the process. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The license was bot-reviewed by FlickrLickr at the time of upload. Is there any valid reason to doubt it now after it's been on Commons for 14 years? The useless request for review by FlickreviewR 2 when knowing that the file was removed from flickr and it would return "not found" looks like a misuse of the process. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 06:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Archdiocesan Seal, Eagle of Jerusalem, Archdiocese of the Goths of True Orthodox Christians.jpg
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by Veverve as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: very likely not own work
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided and no external hits found. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Quite obviously not own work. XenonX3 (talk) 07:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Promotional and source provided, out of scope - IndrajitDas 08:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no COM:FOP in Greece. Although I did not identify the sculpturer it is a recent (after WWII) monument. Unfortunately it is not in its position anymore (stolen, then recovered) but nevertheless it is still copyrighted. Geraki TLG 08:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Insufficient source info, out of scope - IndrajitDas 08:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 09:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Self promotional, out of scope (صورة سلمان العيد, Photo of Salman Al-Eid) - IndrajitDas 09:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
No source defined, missing EXIF info and could be copyrighted - IndrajitDas 09:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 09:48, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 09:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Invalid nomination. There is no policy which states "Images which have ever been near Facebook are somehow contaminated and must never be used". Andy Dingley (talk) 10:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
je to duplicitná fotka Mira Ke (talk) 10:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as a valid redirect left by Túrelio. Not a duplicate photo anymore. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
sculptor Gilbert Frizon, alive, no FOP in France Frédéric (talk) 10:21, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- je pense que vous exagéré l'idée de l'application de la loi... mais si c'est cette exagération qui prévaut, alors... --Jean-Louis Lascoux (talk) 00:56, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept: DM, though this is borderline Jcb (talk) 16:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
I doubt this is de minimis (even by French standard): the image was intentional to include the statue (combined with the file name which indicates the main intent of this image). I doubt this is accessory. A work of art by a still-alive artist, and since France has no commercial FOP, COM:OTRS permission from Gilbert Frizon is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:33, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This magazine was released in 1945 in Bulgaria and was never published in CC-BY-SA-2.5 license. Most of the authors have died less than 70 years ago so their rights are still reserved. StanProg (talk) 11:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original building (or original creation) until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. "Siège social" means Head office in French. What company ? Where ? Civa (talk) 08:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Original building, no freedom of panorama in France. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 23:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
If this is the same building as that of deleted image, then no commercial FOP in France. Missing authorization of the architect over the uploader's application of free license for their image of the architect's work of architecture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This magazine was released in 1947 in Bulgaria and was never published in CC-BY-SA-2.5 license. Most of the authors have died less than 70 years ago so their rights are still reserved. StanProg (talk) 11:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This magazine was released in 1946 in Bulgaria and was never published in CC-BY-SA-2.5 license. Most of the authors have died less than 70 years ago so their rights are still reserved. StanProg (talk) 11:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This magazine was released in 1946 in Bulgaria and was never published in CC-BY-SA-2.5 license. Most of the authors have died less than 70 years ago so their rights are still reserved. StanProg (talk) 11:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This magazine was released in 1946 in Bulgaria and was never published in CC-BY-SA-2.5 license. Most of the authors have died less than 70 years ago so their rights are still reserved. StanProg (talk) 11:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This collection of cherry-picked numbers is near meaningless, it's certainly anti-educational. Not in use and it should never be used as the random selection of sources in order to bias a "scientific" looking summary into an argument the men are worse off than women is based on sources that vary over two decades and have no coherence.
Delete per COM:NOTHOST. Fæ (talk) 12:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Recent street art. No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 21:51, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: {{Non-free graffiti}}. --Yann (talk) 14:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This is not a graffiti. This street art is signed by its artist: Jae Ray Mie. The artist is named, and this is not a graffiti. No commercial FOP in France, and missing Jae Ray Mie's authorization. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann: , the man made keep decision above, what do you think? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:25, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Since the artist is identified, I am OK with deletion. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:31, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Per the file's metadata, the author is someone named Heather Leong Xiuming which could be this person working at the Singapore Ministry of Education as a multimedia specialist. If that's the case then permission would be needed from the Ministry of Education via COM:OTRS. There is also no evidence of license at the ministry's website. Howhontanozaz (talk) 12:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of unidentified football player with no EXIF data uploaded by user with no other contributions to Commons. Howhontanozaz (talk) 12:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
The EXIF has a very clear copyright claim, contradicting the release chosen. The site no longer is live, however http://web.archive.org/web/20170813171537/https://silverscreen.in/tamil/media/eetti-success-meet-photos/ exists, but it's not been possible to verify the release from that site, in fact it seems to repeat the copyright claim "© Copyright 2013 - 2016, Silverscreen Media Solutions Inc." is at the bottom of the webpage. Fæ (talk) 12:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Live Link https://silverscreenindia.com/photos/eetti-success-meet-photos/#&gallery=1&slide=6 Perumalism (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for tracking that down. Withdrawn. --Fæ (talk) 19:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Without precise description about the place that the map ilustrate is unuseful, lack of categories Ezarateesteban 13:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
_Logo.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Logo.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not used. SVG exists. Not an official logo with the stripes in TSV and 04. Nordat (talk) 13:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
_Logo.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
_Logo.gif){kind=link}
not own work, not authorship provided Ezarateesteban 13:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Trivial sketch of an hugely speculative rocket motor design. Outside COM:SCOPE. This would be a clear fail for WP:OR, and although that's not an issue here on Commons, it is when it's an incomplete sketch, rather than a fuller description. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Metadata indicates this is a Facebook photo Ytoyoda (talk) 13:34, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Uploads by User:Yolairy familia
[edit]- File:Yolairy Nicole Familia Espinal.jpg
- File:Yolairy Nicole.jpg
- File:Yolairy Familia.jpg
- File:Yolairy Nicole Familia.jpg
COM:SELFIE - self-uploaded images with no perceivable educational use and the uploader has not edited any other projects. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:23, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, maybe a copyvio. Random owner of one of the millions of Discord servers. — Berrely • T∕C 13:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Uhrfuvf here, and suprised someone not from the discord server found this, but as the owner of this file image I'd like to keep it here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uhrfuvf (talk • contribs) 00:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:23, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot containing copyrighted software (and text), not released under a free license (see en:Discord.) — Berrely • T∕C 13:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:23, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Random image that is completely out of scope. — Berrely • T∕C 13:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:23, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused image, just a color swap of the UN logo, not seeing how it is in-scope since the page it was used on has been deleted. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Misleading unofficial map Siirski (talk) 14:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from song. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Misleading unofficial map Siirski (talk) 14:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Misleading unofficial map Siirski (talk) 14:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EinavHenenson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:פיתוח בר-קיימה - עמודי התווך והחיבור ביניהם.pdf
- File:חלופה לגישה הרווחת של מיקום עמודי התווך של פיתוח בר-קיימה.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
While the photo is freely licensed, the logo pictured in the image is copyrighted. See COM:DW. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:31, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ShekibGhawsi1997 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in vanity draft.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
DW work, missing original author, source, date, and permission. And text only, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File:0002 Vita von Josef Werner Leben aus dem Interview mit Jorge Silva Izazaga in "Norte" 1972 Kopie.jpg
[edit]
DW work, missing original author, source, date, and permission. And text only, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
From Flickr where it is noted that the photographer is Katy Grannan and that the photo is from the New York Times Magazine. Jorge Cisne (talk) 15:48, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. While this video is not the original source, it shows that this is from a photoshoot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV5BgPHOURk Anarchyte (work | talk) 15:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. This is an image from Air Arabia 2020 marketing material. See [1]. MarioGom (talk) 15:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Historical photos, the uploader cannot be the author (eg. Pierre Bonnier died in 1918). Proper authorship and/or creation and publication date is needed to determine the copyright status.
Ankry (talk) 16:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nikornpayreekul (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Didym (talk) 21:22, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nikornpayreekul (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images are drastically higher quality than their other surviving upload (File:Solo Performance.jpg) with a complete different photographic style. Based on their talk page I'm not sure I trust that these are proper self-published CC BY-SA 4.0 photos. I'm not CSDing these because I hope that I can be proved wrong and that these are indeed own-work.
Anarchyte (work | talk) 16:15, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Proposed coat of arms of Serbia, 1992.jpg Shumokuzame33 (talk) 22:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no reason given. --Krd 12:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
This design wasn't proposed in 1992 DarkoRatic (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I don't know if it has or not been proposed but it wasn't adopted => not actual, not in use => not useful. Kathisma (talk) 17:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Fails COM:SCOPE - Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality.
We have better photographs that aren't watermarked and covered in dust located in Category:Babul Supriyo. Anarchyte (work | talk) 16:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Anarchyte as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: From description: "this photo belongs [to] baliklar" E4024 (talk) 16:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- "baliklar" is a nickname of the uploader, it was so simple to see by clicking on it. --E4024 (talk) 16:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as a copyright violation (F1) or strong delete. This user has uploaded the cover-art of an album by Baliklar alongside this, with the description for this being "belongs baliklar". There's no doubt in my mind that this is not own work, especially when a week later a music blog uploads a much higher quality image, as well as this, this, this, and this, among other various social media posts. Granted, they're all from after January 3, but Istanbul is faster than UTC (though not by much). Note that the album cover image was uploaded two days after its release. It's either F1, which is the quickest route, or we tag it with permission needed (or use this as a proxy for that) and see where we're at in seven days time. Anarchyte (work | talk) 17:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Wow, what an energy and patience to do all that search in such a short time. I even suspect now that you are the copyright owner. :) E4024 (talk) 19:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Wow, what a brilliant display of the culture at Commons! My apologies for trying to rid the site of copyvios. Regardless, the cover art file was deleted as a copyright violation. @Túrelio: as the admin that deleted it, do you think we need to leave this discussion open for seven days or does the original F1 apply? Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- 1. The original speedy rationale was <<From description: "this photo belongs [to] baliklar">> in case you have forgotten. 2. If you will not be able to sleep tonight of course we can delete this and 764 other copyvios that neither of us marked as F1 this single day. 3.Túrelio knows well and appreciates people who try to get rid the site of copyvios, so be sure to receive a kitten or something like that from the admin. Good-bye. E4024 (talk) 04:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Wow, what a brilliant display of the culture at Commons! My apologies for trying to rid the site of copyvios. Regardless, the cover art file was deleted as a copyright violation. @Túrelio: as the admin that deleted it, do you think we need to leave this discussion open for seven days or does the original F1 apply? Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Wow, what an energy and patience to do all that search in such a short time. I even suspect now that you are the copyright owner. :) E4024 (talk) 19:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Wrong license, certainly not own work. Uploader not responding. See COM:VPC#"Own_work"_that_isn't for the discussion. Yann (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Regretful agreement with Yann. -- Hoary (talk) 00:49, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Wrong license, certainly not own work. Uploader not responding. See COM:VPC#"Own_work"_that_isn't for the discussion. Yann (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Regretful agreement with Yann. -- Hoary (talk) 00:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not own work, wrong licence. Maybe old enough, but needs original author, source, and date. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
I see no further educational value in this quasi duplicate in a wrong file format. Ras67 (talk) 17:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Appears to be a still from "The Voice" television show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CgqHi9K35k Ytoyoda (talk) 17:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Logo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing original author, source, date, and permission. And who is this family? Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This photo was never approved for publication by me, Gianluca Buccellati. Please remove this photo 2603:8000:E004:312F:9179:3657:5136:75F8 18:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Facebook photo, please submit permission statement at COM:OTRS. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
No indication of own use and no educational purpose Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism: used on the es:wiki article "Iván arroyo Caldera", that is a vandal article (deleted or to be deleted soon). Identifiable people, not clear any consent to appear here. PedroAcero76 (talk) 18:47, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:48, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Funny, but no educational value. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Obviously fake filter of snowfall; no educational value Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uselessly blurry photo of an unidentified leaf Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Not based in rules of deletion request. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 20:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment The photo is not bad at all, it just needs to have the species properly identified. —capmo (talk) 03:27, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry photo with no educational value Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Request not based in rules of deletion. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 20:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Not hosting. Used only on the talk page. Possible copyright issues (GUI). — Redboston 19:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Not hosting. Used only on the talk page. Possible copyright issues (GUI). — Redboston 19:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Taken from Facebook. E4024 (talk) 20:03, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Taken from Facebook. E4024 (talk) 20:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
It is claimed as "Own work" by the up-loader, but in the "permission" field is a newspaper and date ColinFine (talk) 20:47, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright Hyméros-(talk) 21:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Contains the logo of Gyldendal, which is non-free. TherasTaneel (talk) 21:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Not own work Askeuhd (talk) 21:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Please remove this, I uploaded a better version Gustavo La Pizza (talk) 21:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded for vandalism purposes on tr.wiki by the very same user who claims to be a hacker and to have acquired some of our account information, so on and so forth. Definitely out of project's scope and has no possible use in the future. Dr. Coal (talk) 22:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was a try to upload another big wav file, however, a server side problem about the size dont let me upload it. A server side upload will be asked Wilfredor (talk) 22:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of copyrighted works. Video game screen and promotional tools are copyrighted. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Black frame, no useful purpose Askeuhd (talk) 22:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Japan Expo 2016
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2016-07-07 15-41-51 ILCE-6300 DSC02893 (27671631313).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-41-57 ILCE-6300 DSC02895 (28208764491).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-42-53 ILCE-6300 2904 DxO (29712034425).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-42-53 ILCE-6300 DSC02904 (27671309464).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-44-25 ILCE-6300 DSC02920 (28183360302).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-44-30 ILCE-6300 DSC02922 (28183370872).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep:
File:2016-07-07 15-41-51 ILCE-6300 DSC02893 (27671631313).jpgFile:2016-07-07 15-41-57 ILCE-6300 DSC02895 (28208764491).jpg- File:2016-07-07 15-44-25 ILCE-6300 DSC02920 (28183360302).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-44-30 ILCE-6300 DSC02922 (28183370872).jpg
- as these have been blurred out,
- Delete the other 2 as non-savable. –Davey2010Talk 11:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's not worth to keep photos which are blurred main subjects. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- People browsing through these may want to know what the building sort of looked like..... The blurred images still have some scope and value to them, You nominated these due to characters being present however I have obviously resolved that so at this point there's currently no valid reason to delete them. –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's not worth to keep photos which are blurred main subjects. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, waste of time blurring them, no use now.--BevinKacon (talk) 20:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- BevinKacon as explained above users may want to know what the building inside looks like inside so as such IMHO there's atleast still some value to them, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- Well, the question whether there is still sufficient educational value in images where integral parts have been blurred is likely neither a clear yes or no, but to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Personally, I agree with BevinKacon and Yuraily Lic that the blurred images are no longer useful and should be deleted, but in the end this is of course up to the the closing admin to decide. GFJ (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- I've struck 2 images since both of those sort of have the same view in other images, The 2 remaining images don't have that area in it and so for that reason imho those 2 should be kept,
- These images IMHO still have some value to them and regardless of usage readers will want to know what the building inside looks like and the area in both images hasn't been taken in any other images in the main category. –Davey2010Talk 15:02, 13 February 2020
- One image is currently not blurred due to WMF constantly bringing up server errors, Until the WMF get that fixed unfortunately for the time being the image will have to remain unblurred as there's no possible way new versions can be uploaded, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 18:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Well, the question whether there is still sufficient educational value in images where integral parts have been blurred is likely neither a clear yes or no, but to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Personally, I agree with BevinKacon and Yuraily Lic that the blurred images are no longer useful and should be deleted, but in the end this is of course up to the the closing admin to decide. GFJ (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- BevinKacon as explained above users may want to know what the building inside looks like inside so as such IMHO there's atleast still some value to them, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Japan Expo 2016
[edit]- File:2016-07-08 10-08-21 ILCE-6300 DSC03667 (27674992474).jpg
- File:2016-07-08 10-08-27 ILCE-6300 DSC03668 (28187139292).jpg
- File:2016-07-08 11-46-09 ILCE-6300 DSC04171 (27677750624).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. –Davey2010Talk 11:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Close again, page not archiving properly. --Minoraxtalk 08:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Japan Expo 2016
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2016-07-08 09-52-55 ILCE-6300 DSC03628 (28186902252).jpg
- File:2016-07-08 09-52-56 ILCE-6300 DSC03629 (28186909032).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Fails DW and Out of scope anyway. (Not that it needs reiterating but these were all uploaded as part of an album and limitations at Flickr2Commons meant they all had to be uploaded IE couldn't pick and choose). –Davey2010Talk 00:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Misleading unofficial design Siirski (talk) 14:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Siirski - Same with this flag. It's being used in a lot of project pages. Can you please replace it with the appropriate flag? Missvain (talk) 20:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Missvain: , I can make a SVG flag, but it has no sources and that's why should to be deleted. This is misleading flag there no state or place used in de facto or de jure. --Siirski (talk) 02:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Got it. Just back me up if I get some backlash about it ;-)
Done Missvain (talk) 02:30, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Got it. Just back me up if I get some backlash about it ;-)
- @Missvain: , I can make a SVG flag, but it has no sources and that's why should to be deleted. This is misleading flag there no state or place used in de facto or de jure. --Siirski (talk) 02:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Siirski - Same with this flag. It's being used in a lot of project pages. Can you please replace it with the appropriate flag? Missvain (talk) 20:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:30, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
This files were initially tagged by LexICon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Doubtful licence, because Uploader = shown person; so for cannot be photographer the same, as it is clearly not a selfie. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Habertix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Comme le droit français ne reconnaît pas la liberté de panorama, la fr:Cité radieuse de Marseille de Le Corbusier est un "bâtiment récent" et la licence libre est impossible jusqu'à fin 2035. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, no freedom of panorama in France. Taivo (talk) 15:15, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Art. 87 Legge sulla protezione del diritto d'autore:"Non sono comprese le fotografie di scritti, documenti, carte di affari, oggetti materiali, disegni tecnici e prodotti simili." Essendo a tutti gli effetti un disegno tecnico, non si applica il temine di 20 anni per la scadenza del copyright. Antemoro (talk) 02:33, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, author en:Mario Castoldi died in 1968 and the file can be restored after copyright expiration in 2039. Taivo (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Art. 87 Legge sulla protezione del diritto d'autore:"Non sono comprese le fotografie di scritti, documenti, carte di affari, oggetti materiali, disegni tecnici e prodotti simili." Essendo a tutti gli effetti un disegno tecnico, non si applica il temine di 20 anni per la scadenza del copyright. Antemoro (talk) 02:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, author en:Mario Castoldi died in 1968 and the file can be restored after copyright expiration in 2039. Taivo (talk) 15:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
There is no such "rank" colour in the Turkish military. Green is the colour of "Infantery" and is valid for any rank from the "rankless" private to Senior Infantery Colonel. (Generals do not have "class".) The use in Italian WP is wrong. If a private was not infantery but artillery or tank class, then he would have another colour, say, dark blue or black or whatever else, but not green. BTW "private" is not a "rank", it means " a soldier without rank". (Another BTW: The green of Infantery class in the Turkish Armed forces is not this green.) E4024 (talk) 04:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Dear friend, the green in the image is not intended to be the green of the infantry, but the color of the uniforms cloth: as such, the image is intended to be a visual equivalent of "no rank insigna over the uniform cloth". And BTW private *is* a military rank, classified by NATO as OR-01 ("Other rank, level 1"): the only difference from any other rank is that in most armies privates does not have a rank *insigna* (i.e. private *is* a "rank", but often without a "rank insigna". I say "often", because some armies do have specific insigna for privates too, like Denmark, Lithiania, Spain etc). That said, if you prefer to substitute the image with "no rank insigna" in writing ("nessun distintivo", in italian), or change the green colour to one more correct for the turkish uniforms, both will be perfectly OK too. Your choice. All the best. --Arturolorioli (talk) 08:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Then you should use those things for the privates of Denmark, Spain and the other one, not Turkey. Nessun dorma. E4024 (talk) 14:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept, per COM:INUSE. Taivo (talk) 16:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
" The word "PETRONAS" and the PETRONAS oil-drop device ( the "PETRONAS House Marks") are registered trademarks and service marks of Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS). You are not permitted to display or use in any manner the PETRONAS House Marks or the other trade marks and service marks appearing on this website without specific prior written permission. " Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:59, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep See Commons:Trademarks. darkweasel94 17:56, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Trademarks are not Commons-incompatible, and you know that Sfan00. Another stupid DR. Fry1989 eh? 17:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Kept: should be ok FASTILY 20:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Due to discussions in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hcc.png, it seems that, as Malaysia is also a common law country, it's likely that how the COM:TOO UK is very low, how their TOO is also very low, the previous keep reason is hence no longer valid. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Sfan00 IMG, Darkweasel94, Fry1989, and Fastily: ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept. In my opinion this is still simple logo. Taivo (talk) 16:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: While the software may be open source that does not mean that the screenshot is not a copyright violation. The web site https://www.truenas.com states © iXsystems, Inc. 2021 All rights reserved, potentially for the site, but there is no obvious licence for the ability to take and publish screenshots
Looking with more time at this, I think this warrants a fuller discussion than a simple copyright SD Timtrent (talk) 07:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I must agree. Software may be free, but things depicted using the software may be copyrighted. I'll delete very similar file:Freenas-interface.png due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 16:35, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Veverve as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: very likely not own work
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as symbol is likely very old and in the PD. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, at moment I delete the logo. If you know, how old the logo is, then you can create undeletion request. Taivo (talk) 16:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Proof of license? No metadata Ariam (talk) 08:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 09:48, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Yet another invalid nomination on no policy-based grounds. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment see previous DRs like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lũ lụt Huế 2020, hỗ trực thực phẩm ngày 15.jpg--A1Cafel (talk) 06:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- That's a precedent, not a policy-based reason. What is the policy-based reason to delete this?
- The previous DR is also wrong (and should be overturned on that basis). Whatever the FB licence, and the uploader's implicit acceptance of it by uploading there, that cannot remove a licence that they grant by other means, such as uploading content that is still their IP, here. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:15, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:50, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 09:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Photo previously published at https://elakari.com/cases/westsurf-park-resort. Such files require COM:OTRS verification Ytoyoda (talk) 13:41, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be from https://elakari.com/cases/westsurf-park-resort Ytoyoda (talk) 13:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stephanie Mathonet (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images are previously published at https://as.com/deportes_accion/2021/03/20/surf/1616229251_690090.html and credited to Wavegarden. Please provide evidence of permission through COM:OTRS.
Ytoyoda (talk) 13:47, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
These appear to be promotional photographs for Wavegarden. One of the photographs appears at https://wavegarden.com/locations/ and at least one is an outtake of a photo that appears on the site. If the user has permission from Wavegarden and/or the photographer, they should submit the license statement to COM:OTRS.
- File:GX010207.MP4.10 33 55 44.Imagen fija001.jpg
- File:019 Kids Bay credit Wavegarden Wavepark.jpg
- File:012 Jacob Szekely credit Wavegarden Wavepark.jpg
- File:038 Hans Odriozola credit Wavegarden Wavepark.jpg
- File:Wavegarden Cove WavePark 3.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 13:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, not a trusted user. Taivo (talk) 17:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Misleading unofficial design Siirski (talk) 14:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Siirski - This "misleading unofficial" flag is being used in a few different project pages. Can you please replace the image with the appropriate flag, if available and then let me know and I'll delete. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 20:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept, per COM:INUSE. No replacement file is shown. Taivo (talk) 17:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
False flag Zeila city has no flag Siirski (talk) 22:04, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept, the file cannot be deleted on that reason, because it is used. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
The image is not in the public domain. Stalin990 (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete similar file:Jorge Serrano Elias 1.jpg as well. Small photos without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 17:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, in the footer of the source (MiBACT) you can see the link to "Note legali", where is explained that the licence is CC-BY-SA 3.0 but "Le immagini, i loghi (compreso il logo del MiC), i marchi registrati e gli altri contenuti di proprietà di terzi appartengono ai rispettivi proprietari e non possono essere riprodotti senza il loro consenso." (The images, logos (including the MiC logo), trademarks and other content owned by third parties belong to their respective owners and cannot be reproduced without their consent.), so I thik that this image is not under CC-BY-SA, but I'm not sure. - Pạtạfisik 14:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Since nothing else is specified, it is assumed that the owner of the photo is the Ministry of Culture itself, which published the image with CC-BY-SA licence.--Holapaco77 (talk) 20:41, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept, per Holapace. Taivo (talk) 17:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Itsquietuptown (talk · contribs)
[edit]I think I shouldn't had move these 5 renderings of PNR NSCR railway stations from enwiki via FileEx/Importer. These appear to be renderings from a third party design and engineering firm, and not from a Philippine government agency (DOTr). See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by FelixPCanas.
- File:PNR NSCR Marilao station.jpg
- File:PNR NSCR Solis station.jpg
- File:PNR NSCR Malolos station.jpg
- File:PNR NSCR Balagtas Station.jpg
- File:PNR NSCR New Tutuban.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Uploader claims it as "own work", but is taken from band's own copyrighted promotional materials. (Twitter, Facebook, etc.) --Finngall talk 16:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete all his/her uploads as copyvios. Taivo (talk) 17:36, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
I originally tagged this as a copyvio, but changing to a regular deletion request, as the uploader appears to be the subject of the photograph and may own the rights to press photos.
Vogue credits the photo to the photographer, and generally, image copyright generally belongs to the photographer, not the subject. If the uploader owns the rights, they should contact COM:OTRS with the evidence, and I would also suggest uploading the original high-res image instead of the low-res, web-quality image here. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:39, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Knownroads (talk · contribs)
[edit]This series of images appears to have been uploaded to create an article about a school. There is no indication that these are user's own work. Sizes vary, one has camera metadata, the others don't. I think these have been culled from the school website, facebook and other sources. Note: I kept one previously in deletion before seeing the entire series together. I am renominating one image I previously kept - which I now think was an error.
- File:Springvale-CBD-2013.jpg
- File:Annual awards night 2008.jpg
- File:Interiorgym.png
- File:Buildingplans.png
- File:Gymnasium1.jpeg
- File:Wellington Secondary College,Playing Fields, 2009.png
- File:Wellington Secondary College, M Block, 2009.png
- File:Wellington Secondary College, M Block 2, 2009.png
- File:Wellington Secondary College, R Block, 2009.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Licence and creator only apply to the creator of the file, but there is no information about the creator of the original photograph. Discostu (talk) 18:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep the original photo is in the public domain, see Commons:Hirtle chart. Multichill (talk) 19:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- There is no information about when the photograph was first published. --Discostu (talk) 19:15, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment It is correct that there is no information about first publication. But do we have any reason to believe that it was not published before 1926 (it is from 1919)? It seems to be put on display at a museum so I would expect that the museum have checked the copyright status. --MGA73 (talk) 21:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- The image might be in private ownership, never published before and the museum could have an agreement with the owner to display it. As long as we don't know all that COM:PCP applies and we should assume that the image is copyrighted until 120 years from creation. -- Discostu (talk) 08:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Discostu: Yes i know that it may be copyrightet. But according to PCP: "The precautionary principle is that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." So is there significant doubt? --MGA73 (talk) 14:00, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- The image might be in private ownership, never published before and the museum could have an agreement with the owner to display it. As long as we don't know all that COM:PCP applies and we should assume that the image is copyrighted until 120 years from creation. -- Discostu (talk) 08:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
I forgot to notify the original creator of the file. Maybe User:Chris_Light has more information. -- Discostu (talk) 08:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'd like to see publication data. Publication before 1926 is not obvious. Taivo (talk) 17:49, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
--What I know-- With the image already deleted, it took awhile to locate another copy. After extensive checking. The following is what I can provide at this time.
- In the text below the image is a statement 'as it looked in 1919'. The presumes that the photograph must have been taken in 1919. It's not a sketch, which could be at some later date.
- Based on the 1919 date, I checked several on-line sources and have have identified a report by H.E. Cole and H.A. Smythe in The Wisconsin Archeologist; V.18 no 4, November 1919, Archeological Society of Wisconsin 1919 containing the words Devils Lake and Lynx. As I did not purchase access, I did not find the articles title, nor the specifics contained in the article.
- From that reference, further reviews of The Wisconsin Archeologist sources found a second article by H.E. Cole; The markings of the Lynx mound of Devils Lake; Wisconsin Archeologist, XX, July' An Indian Effigy Mound in the Devils Lake State Park, 1924.
- Further reading of The Wisconsin Archeologist from years before and after 1924, a few were available on-line lead to the information that Henry Cole was a director of the Wisconsin Archeological Society during these the late teens and early 20's of that century. He was also the President of the Baraboo Historical Society and owner of a newspaper in Baraboo, Wisconsin.
Therefore, I have concluded that the 1919 date in the museum text of the exhibit is a reference to an image made that year and used in one or both of the articles discovered in the Wisconsin Archeologist, making the the image now public domain. Chris Light (talk) 02:30, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
obviously not "own work" but scan of a commercial map Joschi71 (talk) 23:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Widerspruch: Es handelt sich nicht um eine "commercial map". Der zugrundeliegende Plan wurde seinerzeit vom Bürgermeister sowie vom Gemeindedirektor Jüchens an die Einwohner mit dem Hinweis kostenlos ausgegeben:
- "Wir hoffen, daß dieser Plan dazu beiträgt, Interesse an der Gemeinde Jüchen zu wecken und deren Einrichtungen bekanntzumachen".
- Entsprechend gibt es weder ein Impressum noch einen Hinweis auf Urheberrechte. Gleiches gilt auch für andere Ortsteile der Gemeinde Jüchen.--Fibe101 (talk) 07:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ich habe aufgrund deiner Einlassung den Eintrag bei "Quelle" geändert in "Scan des Originals". --Fibe101 (talk) 05:54, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ich beantrage Freigabe bei Permission - Support-Team. --Fibe101 (talk) 17:11, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Das dargestellte Dorf wurde abgebaggert. Der Straßenplan hat nur noch historischen Wert. Der neue gemeindliche Straßenplan wurde 1975 kostenlos an die Bürger verteilt, nachdem infolge der Zusammenlegung diverser Gemeinden "neue" Straßenbezeichnungen eingeführt werden mussten. --Fibe101 (talk) 15:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ich beantrage Freigabe bei Permission - Support-Team. --Fibe101 (talk) 17:11, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021042310010283 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 22:00, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, if the ticket is ever processed and find to be suitable, then the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 17:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Cover of a book published by this organization, which has a copyright notice, not clear where the CC license is indicated, and a copyrighted book (and cover image) unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, the copyright is owned by my institute, since this book is so old and out of date now we have decided to CC BY 4.0 licence it. I'll try to get the web guys to put up a page --Onco p53 (talk) 02:16, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Great, thank you Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:24, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Onco p53 and Ruff tuff cream puff - I am not seeing any proof of licensing for this that merits it remaining on Commons. Onco p53 - You have one week to provide appropriate WP:OTRS or this will be deleted. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 20:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- Great, thank you Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:24, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. Ruthven (msg) 12:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Royal Monogram of incategory:Copyright_violations
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Miwako Sato as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Template:PD-TH-exempt does not apply, as this is not part of the news, constitution, judgment, etc, at all; and no clear source about the original is provided. It is unclear if these images were drawn from a free blazon (and acceptable on Commons) or not.
- File:Royal Monogram of King Mongkut.svg
- File:Royal Monogram of Queen Saovabha.svg
- File:Royal Monogram of King Vajiralongkorn and Sineenart.svg
- File:Royal Monogram of Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn and Suthida.svg
- File:Royal Monogram of Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn and Sineenart.svg
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:48, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. At cannot be licensed PD-TH-exempt, and at the same time CC-BY-SA4.0. Uploader did not comment or explain. --Ellywa (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)