Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/03/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
mistakenly uploaded Italobrother (talk) 00:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 12:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Signatures are copyright protected. See Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-signature_tag#China,_People's_Republic_of.
Wcam (talk) 16:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:34, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Derivative works of toys which may be copyrighted work itself (COM:TOYS), and of a framed picture of unknown origin. Freedom of Panorama exceptions (if there are any) are irrelevant, because no permanent installment in public place; so each image needs permission by original creator(s).
File:Edward the Booble, Moominworld.jpgFile:Moominmamma and Moominpappa, Moominworld.jpg- File:Sniff's family portrait, Moominworld.jpg
File:The Groke's cave, Moominworld.jpg
A.Savin 18:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep A very obvious retaliation for Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Edit-warring and A.Savin I can only assume this is what he meant by his threat: "I'm sure the day will come and you will have to pay your price."
- Also none of these are toys. If they (i.e. any photographs taken at Moominworld) are to be deleted, then why did A. Savin select my, and only my, photos of the many on Commons? Andy Dingley (talk) 18:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Please answer why should I (and the admin who will close this DR) think that the three puppets and the framed portrait are allowed to be hosted on Commons merely under the CC license by the photographer, and not why it was me who opened the noination. Anything else is childish. --A.Savin 00:58, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment I'm withdrawing this for the three images of toys, as I'm not familiar with how high is COM:TOO in Finland -- maybe those puppets are too simple (normally we have to mind the precautionary principle, but who knows...). If someone is sure they are above the threshold and have to be deleted, please feel free to re-nominate. The "Sniff's family portrait, Moominworld" is definitely above TOO and needs evidence of permission or that it's in Public Domain. --A.Savin 15:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- These are still neither toys, nor puppets, no matter how many times you falsely claim that. If anything they are costumes, see COM:COSTUME Andy Dingley (talk) 11:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete all, photo of photo, and violation of COM:FOP Finland.--RZuo (talk) 15:45, 20 March 2021 (UTC)- Delete Delete all. All apparent derivatives of non-free content. -FASTILY 05:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- So I asume that you're also going to apply that logic to all files in Mascot costumes and in Moominworld. Because otherwise you're simply supporting what is an obvious retaliatory deletion against a single editor. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Retaliatory deletion request by A.Savin - although this has been closed in under a day. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Sniff's family portrait, Moominworld.jpg deleted by JuTa (talk • contribs • blocks • protections • deletions • moves • rights • rights changes); all others withdrawn. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:45, 9 November 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
I was violated and forced to do this Dirkdigg11111 (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 20:33, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I was violated and forced to do this... please take this down Dirkdigg11111 (talk) 18:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 20:33, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://blog.unicef.se/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/asa-lantzblogg.jpg Tournesol (talk) 11:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 12:07, 19 März 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining upload --Krdbot 21:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I do not have the rights for it.. I wanted to upload other photos but that didn't work for several reasons. The photographer didn't gave me the rights for it so it really needs to be taken down again. Sorry and thank you! Mlma100 (talk) 22:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 23:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 16:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unfree game-art. --Túrelio (talk) 09:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely that an official 2009 logo is made and owned by the uploader. Every corporation protects his logos. The Banner (talk) 20:49, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Natuur12 at 23:11, 19 März 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.nicepng.com/maxp/u2e6e6q8q8t4o0q8/ NC --Krdbot 09:45, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Only a redirection, not useful 216.98.9.126 21:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 21:55, 19 März 2021 UTC: Only a redirection not used, not useful --Krdbot 09:45, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation: this is an illustration from this book Laplorfill (talk) 17:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 13:59, 20 März 2021 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 21:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammadmoqaddas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fair use material is not permitted on Commons.
- File:علامه محمدتقي شوشتري.jpg
- File:يعسوب الدين رستگار جويباري.jpg
- File:Gheysaraminpoor.jpg
- File:Eshtehardi.jpg
إسلام (talk) 20:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
This is literally a duplicate file of this original file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Cuba_(1902%E2%80%931959).svg , this is just a file mistake, why do i have to discuss it further, this is so petty. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 15:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- "sky blue" is the original file title. The file was moved to the "1902–1959" title, which broke a bunch of pages at en.WP and elsewhere. As I said in my edit summary, if someone can figure out how to resolve this problem, be my guest. This file should not simply be deleted, however, as it will break many pages. With normal article pages and templates, we use redirects to resolve problems like this. If a redirect will work here, that would be fine with me. Jonesey95 (talk) 16:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: File:Flag of Cuba (1902–1959).svg has been moved back to File:Flag of Cuba (sky blue).svg. --jdx Re: 11:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Clearly a copyright violation - still frame from Thomas and Friends TV show Laplorfill (talk) 13:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused and requested by the photographed person (see ticket:2021031810013425) Mbch331 (talk) 14:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
ONNOZELE TRUT verwijder die foto nu meteen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malik Faroek (talk • contribs) 18:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
zelf upgeload en met die miljoenen knoppen niets kunnen vinden om foto te deleten -asap verwijderen Malik Faroek (talk) 11:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
verwijderen ASAP - ik ben Malik Faroek in zijn blauwe galabyah Malik Faroek (talk) 11:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 11:30, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I decided to cell some of my works. I dont want anyone can access to them anymore. Amir Pashaei (talk) 11:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ceiling of Borujerdi House, Kashan, Iran.jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:26, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I decided to cell some of my works. I dont want anyone can access to them anymore. Amir Pashaei (talk) 11:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ceiling of Borujerdi House, Kashan, Iran.jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I decided to cell some of my works. I dont want anyone can access to them anymore. Amir Pashaei (talk) 11:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ceiling of Borujerdi House, Kashan, Iran.jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I decided to cell some of my works. I dont want anyone can access to them anymore. Amir Pashaei (talk) 11:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ceiling of Borujerdi House, Kashan, Iran.jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I decided to cell some of my works. I dont want anyone can access to them anymore. Amir Pashaei (talk) 11:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ceiling of Borujerdi House, Kashan, Iran.jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Small/low-res. Have a bunch of Category:1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene high-quality alts in this and other layouts. DMacks (talk) 15:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background and in poor TIF-format. Superseded by File:Mesitylen.svg as example. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 14:23, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Nonsense image that has never been used (as far as I can tell). There should be no bond-line between the N and the X. We have a ton of usable Category:Quaternary ammonium compoundss if we need a generic image of this class (per image-description) such as File:C18x2Me2Cl.png. Other specific chemicals could be drawn easily if someone wanted a certain one. DMacks (talk) 16:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 14:27, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Celumusa.Sambo.Youtuber (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:The love of nature by Celumusa Sambo 14.jpg
- File:The love of nature by Celumusa Sambo 13.jpg
- File:The love of nature by Celumusa Sambo 12.jpg
- File:The love of nature by Celumusa Sambo 11.jpg
- File:The love of nature by Celumusa Sambo 10.jpg
- File:The love of nature by Celumusa Sambo 09.jpg
- File:The love of nature by Celumusa Sambo 08.jpg
- File:The love of nature by Celumusa Sambo 07.jpg
- File:The love of nature by Celumusa Sambo 06.jpg
- File:The love of nature by Celumusa Sambo 05.jpg
- File:The love of nature by Celumusa Sambo 04.jpg
- File:The love of nature by Celumusa Sambo 03.jpg
- File:The love of nature by Celumusa Sambo 02.jpg
- File:The love of nature by Celumusa Sambo 01.jpg
Achim (talk) 12:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:04, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prisbaez89 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: transmission code in EXIF data.
- File:Paramedico "B".jpg
- File:Paramedico segundo.jpg
- File:Paramedico segundo "B".jpg
- File:Paramedico segundo Ciclo "B".jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Javierguadalupe2013 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: inconsistent sizes, quality, and styles, missing EXIF data or credit to someone else. All photos of same person, unlikely that uploader was present at all these diverse places and times.
- File:Lanzamiento Lista 88 - 2013.JPG
- File:Junta departamental.jpg
- File:Diego Echeverría - Jorge Larrañaga.jpg
- File:Con el Nobel Vargas Llosa, Madrid 2012.jpg
- File:Diego Echeverría - Larrañaga 2014.jpg
- File:Diego Echeverría, Sídney..jpg
- File:Diego Echeverría 2013.jpg
- File:Parlamenteo Mexicano 2007.jpg
- File:Junta deptal.jpg
- File:Diego Echeverría y Vargas Llosa. Madrid 2012.jpg
- File:Diego Echeverría.jpg
- File:Diego Echeverria 2011.jpg
- File:Diego Echeverría y Rajoy.jpg
- File:Diego Echeverría y Enrique Iglesisas.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dick van Hees (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text tables, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope.
- File:Assembly table.JPG
- File:Connection table.JPG
- File:Part mounting table.JPG
- File:Part defect table 1.jpg
- File:Part defect table.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IMAM QASIM SAQI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits.
- File:Fikr o fun ke phool profile 3.jpg
- File:Imam qasim saqi profile 3.jpg
- File:Imam qasim saqi profile.jpg
- File:Iqbal qusru qadri profile.jpg
- File:Participated in DD urdu mushaira.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused very low-res images of circuit boards, unusable, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own works: inconsistent sizes, quality, and styles, missing EXIF data. All photos of same person, unlikely that uploader was present at all these diverse places and times.
- File:FMG ASTech award 2014.jpg
- File:RF group.jpg
- File:SDR08 111.jpg
- File:FMG IEEE Fellow.jpg
- File:Iradio2 20101109 UofC 02.jpg
- File:FMG ASTech 2014.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused logos and tiny images (likely screengrabs), no meaningful description, no educational value, unusable and out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by حسن احمد المصرى (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Too big collection for user page.
- File:حازم توفيق 5.jpg
- File:حازم توفيق 4.jpg
- File:حازم توفيق2.jpg
- File:حازم توفيق3.jpg
- File:حازم توفيق.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by حسن احمد المصرى (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:حازم توفيق 9999.jpg
- File:حازم الحبشي.jpg
- File:زوز.jpg
- File:زووما.jpg
- File:حازم توفيق 11.jpg
- File:حازم توفيق 9.jpg
- File:حازم توفيق 10.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thetusharml (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
- File:Modeltusharml.jpg
- File:TS887427.jpg
- File:Tushar ML.jpg
- File:TusharML.jpg
- File:TusharML8874.jpg
- File:TS8874.jpg
- File:TusharML88.jpg
- File:Tushar ML Srivastava.jpg
- File:Model TusharML.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:40, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
2016 building by Broadway Malyan archi firm. https://www.emporis.com/buildings/1209872/acqua-private-residences-livingstone-tower-mandaluyong-philippines no freedom of panorama in the phils.
- File:09353jfHulo Acqua Private Residences Coronado Pasig River Ferry Mandaluyong Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:09353jfHulo Acqua Private Residences Coronado Pasig River Ferry Mandaluyong Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:09405jfHulo Acqua Private Residences Coronado Pasig River Mandaluyong Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:09405jfHulo Acqua Private Residences Coronado Pasig River Mandaluyong Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:09405jfHulo Acqua Private Residences Coronado Pasig River Mandaluyong Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:09405jfHulo Acqua Private Residences Coronado Pasig River Mandaluyong Cityfvf 10.jpg
- File:09405jfHulo Acqua Private Residences Coronado Pasig River Mandaluyong Cityfvf 19.jpg
- File:09405jfHulo Acqua Private Residences Coronado Pasig River Mandaluyong Cityfvf 20.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
2015 bldg by Arquitectonica and FSL& Associates, Co. - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BDO_Corporate_Center. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
2015 bldg by Arquitectonica and FSL& Associates, Co. - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BDO_Corporate_Center. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Very recent bldg by Globe Asiatique Realty Holdings Corporation. https://kmcmaggroup.com/building/GA-Twin-Tower no freedom of panorama in the phils Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
1998 completed building cited by https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/paragon-plaza/2590. No freedom of panorama in the phils Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
The agency was born in 1982 - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_Overseas_Employment_Administration. No freedom of panorama in the phils, and the government doesnt own copyright of it only physical possession
- File:09819jfOrtigas Avenue Pedestrian Footbridge Interchange Mandaluyong Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:09819jfOrtigas Avenue Pedestrian Footbridge Interchange Mandaluyong Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:09819jfOrtigas Avenue Pedestrian Footbridge Interchange Mandaluyong Cityfvf 09.jpg
- File:09819jfOrtigas Avenue Pedestrian Footbridge Interchange Mandaluyong Cityfvf 11.jpg
- File:09819jfOrtigas Avenue Pedestrian Footbridge Interchange Mandaluyong Cityfvf 21.jpg
- File:09840jfOrtigas Avenue Streets Landmarks Greenhills Mandaluyong EDSAfvf 03.jpg
- File:09840jfOrtigas Avenue Streets Landmarks Greenhills Mandaluyong EDSAfvf 04.jpg
- File:POEA, Ortigas.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pioneer Pointe
[edit]Building is a work by Villarosa and Associates - https://www.filbuild.com/philippines/real_estate/condominium/mandaluyong_city/filinvest_land/pioneer_pointe/. No freedom of panorama in the phils
- File:02853jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Street Mandaluyong Cityfvf 18.jpg
- File:02853jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Street Mandaluyong Cityfvf 19.jpg
- File:02853jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Street Mandaluyong Cityfvf 20.jpg
- File:02981jfBarangays Highway Hills Buayang Bato EDSA Boni Pioneer Street Mandaluyong Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:02981jfBarangays Highway Hills Buayang Bato EDSA Boni Pioneer Street Mandaluyong Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:02981jfBarangays Highway Hills Buayang Bato EDSA Boni Pioneer Street Mandaluyong Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:02981jfBarangays Highway Hills Buayang Bato EDSA Boni Pioneer Street Mandaluyong Cityfvf 06.jpg
- File:02981jfBarangays Highway Hills Buayang Bato EDSA Boni Pioneer Street Mandaluyong Cityfvf 07.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Robinsons Cybergate
[edit]Two buildings one from 2006 - https://kmcmaggroup.com/building/Robinsons-Cybergate-Tower-1/ and another from 2007 - https://kmcmaggroup.com/building/Robinsons-Cybergate-Tower-2/. No freedom of panorama in the phils.
- File:02120jfGuadalupe Robinsons Cybergate MRT-3 LRT-14 Bridge Station Pasig River Mandaluyongfvf.jpg
- File:02120jfGuadalupe Robinsons Cybergate MRT-3 LRT-15 Bridge Station Pasig River Mandaluyongfvf.jpg
- File:02120jfGuadalupe Robinsons Cybergate MRT-3 LRT-16 Bridge Station Pasig River Mandaluyongfvf.jpg
- File:02120jfGuadalupe Robinsons Cybergate MRT-3 LRT-19 Bridge Station Pasig River Mandaluyongfvf.jpg
- File:02120jfGuadalupe Robinsons Cybergate MRT-3 LRT-20 Bridge Station Pasig River Mandaluyongfvf.jpg
- File:02120jfGuadalupe Robinsons Cybergate MRT-3 LRT-3 Bridge Station Pasig River Mandaluyongfvf.jpg
- File:02120jfGuadalupe Robinsons Cybergate MRT-3 LRT-4 Bridge Station Pasig River Mandaluyongfvf.jpg
- File:02120jfGuadalupe Robinsons Cybergate MRT-3 LRT-5 Bridge Station Pasig River Mandaluyongfvf.jpg
- File:02120jfGuadalupe Robinsons Cybergate MRT-3 LRT-6 Bridge Station Pasig River Mandaluyongfvf.jpg
- File:02120jfGuadalupe Robinsons Cybergate MRT-3 LRT-8 Bridge Station Pasig River Mandaluyongfvf.jpg
- File:02120jfGuadalupe Robinsons Cybergate MRT-3 LRT-9 Bridge Station Pasig River Mandaluyongfvf.jpg
- File:02138jfGuadalupe MRT Station Pasig River EDSA Barangka Ilaya Mandaluyong Cityfvf 04.jpg
- File:02138jfGuadalupe MRT Station Pasig River EDSA Barangka Ilaya Mandaluyong Cityfvf 05.jpg
- File:02138jfGuadalupe MRT Station Pasig River EDSA Barangka Ilaya Mandaluyong Cityfvf 06.jpg
- File:02138jfGuadalupe MRT Station Pasig River EDSA Barangka Ilaya Mandaluyong Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:02138jfGuadalupe MRT Station Pasig River EDSA Barangka Ilaya Mandaluyong Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:02138jfGuadalupe MRT Station Pasig River EDSA Barangka Ilaya Mandaluyong Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:02138jfGuadalupe MRT Station Pasig River EDSA Barangka Ilaya Mandaluyong Cityfvf 13.jpg
- File:02138jfGuadalupe MRT Station Pasig River EDSA Barangka Ilaya Mandaluyong Cityfvf 14.jpg
- File:02756jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:02756jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 25.jpg
- File:02781jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:02781jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:02853jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Street Mandaluyong Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:02853jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Street Mandaluyong Cityfvf 08.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 06:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Building from 2019 - https://kmcmaggroup.com/building/the-podium-west-tower/. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 06:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
A 2015 building by architect Jose Antonio V. Luces of the United Architects of the Philippines - https://www.dccd.com/project/tv5-media-center/. No freedom of panorama in the phils. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 06:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
not the actual composition of the French national assembly. Fake diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the user indefinitely and will delete all his/her remaining contributions as hoaxes. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mandaluyong City Hall 0
[edit]The artist whom i asked about the hostings of photos of artistic works on wikimedia told me that i shouldnt wait for more days while people can have access to infringe the artists copyright by way of an online database whose licensing is strictly enforced for commercial new media reusers. For these, the NEW city hall is a successor to a 1962 bldg that can be seen at https://m.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=715105655267551&id=645776922200425 so theres no way this is a public domain architecture. No freedom of pano in the phils and no permission from the architect or the archi firm. Also some artistic works like tarpaulins, standees of certain animals, carvings, customised xmas tree and others
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 11.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 12.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 13.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 14.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 15.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 19.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 20.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 21.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 22.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 23.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 25.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 26.jpg
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 01.jpg
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 04.jpg
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 05.jpg
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 09.jpg
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 13.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 08.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 09.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 10.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 11.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 13.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 17.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 18.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 19.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 20.jpg
- File:0271jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Shrine Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 01.jpg
- File:0271jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Shrine Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 02.jpg
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 01.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 02.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 05.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 06.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 11.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 12.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 13.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 14.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 15.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 16.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 17.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 18.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 19.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 25.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 26.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 27.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 28.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 29.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 30.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 32.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 33.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 34.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 35.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7218 13.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7218 14.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7218 17.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7218 18.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7218 19.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 11:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep * Because all the Category:Town halls in Metro Manila including the subject of this deletion Category:Mandaluyong City Hall are owned by the local Government or its agencies; the city hall has no architect or painter but the hired laborers employees workers or even staff who love BAYANIHAN to make the City Hall a Heritage; no copyright exits thereat under Civil law or Copyright law; the new or renovations of the Hall were done for tourist and political purposes and I underscore to Advertise the Paint factories for free; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law;
My classmate Neptali Gonzalez's office and tourist office granted me express and unequivocal permission to take photos
[edit]- for it is for their free Political advantage being hosted in Commons for free; I was even helped by some kind staff in the photography; I finished 2nd highest of 84% in advanced Taxation II in Ateneo in 1979, under Prof. ex Governor Exequiel Javier; the highest is Cesar Villanueva and my grade is even higher than Gonzales; I was lucky since if I took the Reynaldo Geronimo Tax II, I could have been a victim of 75 per cent mass grading; this catapulted me to 2nd Full Honors in 1982 Class;
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deletion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons administrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mandaluyong City Hall 1
[edit]Its clear this bldg is a modern replacement to the 1962 city hall - https://m.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=715105655267551&id=645776922200425 - no freedom of panorama in the phils. Payment of fees for commission to Mandaluyong City doesnt negate copyright. The photographer and former philippines judge - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florentino_Floro - continues to violate poor architects and sculptors copyrights by licensing these derived photos commercially. There is also a christmas installation in some of the pictures and engraving in other photos
- File:0186jfBarangay Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong City Hallfvf 10.jpg
- File:0186jfBarangay Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong City Hallfvf 11.jpg
- File:0186jfBarangay Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong City Hallfvf 12.jpg
- File:0201jfBarangays Boni Avenue Plainview Mandaluyong Cityfvf.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 06.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 11.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 12.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 13.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 14.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 15.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 19.jpg - *see also my note below JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 20.jpg - *
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 21.jpg - *
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 22.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 23.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 25.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 26.jpg - *
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 01.jpg - *
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 04.jpg - *
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 05.jpg - *
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 09.jpg - *
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 13.jpg - *
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 08.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 09.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 10.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 11.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 13.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 17.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 18.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 19.jpg
- File:0251jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 20.jpg
- File:0271jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Shrine Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 01.jpg
- File:0271jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Shrine Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 02.jpg
- File:0271jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Shrine Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 03.jpg
- File:DivineMercyShrineMandaluyongjf7248 06.JPG
- File:DivineMercyShrineMandaluyongjf7248 07.JPG
- File:DivineMercyShrineMandaluyongjf7248 08.JPG
- File:DivineMercyShrineMandaluyongjf7248 11.JPG
- File:DivineMercyShrineMandaluyongjf7248 12.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 01.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 02.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 05.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 06.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 11.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 12.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 13.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 14.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 15.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 16.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 17.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 18.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 19.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 25.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 26.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 27.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 28.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 29.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 30.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 32.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 33.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 34.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityHalljf7173 35.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7218 13.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7218 14.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7218 17.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7218 18.JPG
- File:MandaluyongCityjf7218 19.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete most unfortunately. Current rules apply (see COM:FOP Philippines, section "Recent developments") while the pending bill to amend copyright law is pending in the Congress. While Judgefloro claims that ownership of city halls by the local government mean these are not copyrighted, the copyright rule on commissioned works tell otherwise: COM:Philippines#Commissioned works. These means the "written stipulation" must be presented via COM:OTRS by whoever is the copyright holder (not physical owner). Otherwise, restore when FOP is introduced here officially and formally. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Furthermore, the following images show temporal Christmas décors which may not benefit from future Philippine FOP (which in its current wording based on Australian FOP and requires permanence):
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 19.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 20.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 21.jpg
- File:0204jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 26.jpg
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 01.jpg
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 04.jpg
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 05.jpg
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 09.jpg
- File:0231jfBarangays Maysilo Circle Monuments Plainview Mandaluyong Hallsfvf 13.jpg
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:47, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:One San Miguel Avenue
[edit]Building in 2001 by Philip H. Recto Architects. https://www.emporis.com/buildings/125251/one-san-miguel-avenue-pasig-philippines no freedom of panorama in the phils
- File:0056jfOne San Miguel Avenue Mandaluyong Pasig City Ortigas Center Shawfvf 02.jpg
- File:0056jfOne San Miguel Avenue Mandaluyong Pasig City Ortigas Center Shawfvf 03.jpg
- File:0056jfOne San Miguel Avenue Mandaluyong Pasig City Ortigas Center Shawfvf 04.jpg
- File:0056jfOne San Miguel Avenue Mandaluyong Pasig City Ortigas Center Shawfvf 05.jpg
- File:0056jfOne San Miguel Avenue Mandaluyong Pasig City Ortigas Center Shawfvf 06.jpg
- File:0056jfOne San Miguel Avenue Mandaluyong Pasig City Ortigas Center Shawfvf 07.jpg
- File:0056jfOne San Miguel Avenue Mandaluyong Pasig City Ortigas Center Shawfvf 08.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:One Shangri-La Place Towers
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the phils. 2014 building by Casas + Architects -https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Shangri-La_Place
- File:1241One Shangri-La Place Towers 01.jpg
- File:1241One Shangri-La Place Towers 02.jpg
- File:1241One Shangri-La Place Towers 03.jpg
- File:1241One Shangri-La Place Towers 04.jpg
- File:1241One Shangri-La Place Towers 05.jpg
- File:1241One Shangri-La Place Towers 06.jpg
- File:1241One Shangri-La Place Towers 07.jpg
- File:One Shangri-La Place.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:49, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 09:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files on Melitta Zingler
[edit]copyright violation; living artist; otrs-permission needed.
- File:Anneliese Porträt.jpg
- File:Frauen erotisch.jpg
- File:Hahn (Rohrfederzeichnung).jpg
- File:Herbst-Birkenwald.jpg
- File:Katze mit Blume.jpg
- File:Kloareinischhof im Winter.jpg
- File:Pferdefuhrwerk (Tusche).jpg
- File:Schwanberg.jpg
- File:Sonnenblumenstrauss.jpg
- File:Yak Yama mit Kalb.jpg
- File:Yak Yama putzt sich.jpg
- File:Yakherde.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 11:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS ticket #2021031810007834. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Paige Colleen Noval Rafols (October 26,2005), known professionally as Paige Rafols, is an Filipino model. In September 2013, Rafols started her career in pageantry and modeling. In 2018, she was named Fashion Model of the Year.jpg
[edit]Unused self-promotional photo, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused tiny image of nondescript forest, no educational value, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal family-tree, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Personal logo and low-quality photo of nondescript soccer game, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Allagolovin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional corporate images, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Personal logo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gx2320/Archive and en:User:Conley2013Reunion/sandbox. @P199: In case you have time please take a look at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Fastfoodtrivia. --Index theory (talk) 04:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot snippet, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused diagram without context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused fuzzy image of nondescript relief, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram without context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. Likely DW as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo and text tables, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused diagram, no context, no description, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot snippet, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LightYagami1988 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Downloaded from Facebook, watermarked with league logo and photographer name. Unlikely to be own work.
- File:Jumbo Plastic Linoleum Giants PBA D-League Aspirants Cup 2015 Crossover.jpg
- File:Jumbo Plastic Linoleum Giants PBA D-League Aspirants Cup 2015 intercept.jpg
- File:Jumbo Plastic Linoleum Giants PBA D-League Aspirants Cup 2015 Go for the Win.jpg
- File:Jumbo Plastic Linoleum Giants PBA D-League Aspirants Cup 2015 Drive.jpg
- File:Jumbo Plastic Linoleum Giants PBA D-League Aspirants Cup 2015 Block Shot.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 11:24, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:42, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LightYagami1988 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text docs, out of scope.
- File:PBA D-League Aspirants Cup 2015 Jumbo Plastic Linoleum Giants 743a.jpg
- File:PBA D-League Aspirants Cup 2015 Jumbo Plastic Linoleum Giants 743b.jpg
- File:PBA D-League Aspirants Cup 2015 Jumbo Plastic Linoleum Giants 743c.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal sketch, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 14:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 14:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 14:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 14:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hornacek743 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional logos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 14:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 14:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 14:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 14:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by शिव प्रताप सिंह चौहान (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Smaller version of File:Alpha-D-glucosamine.png with in-image caption. DMacks (talk) 16:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Poor quality chemical structure. The in-image caption impedes reuse on other Wikipedia pages. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:50, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 14:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Probably not OK com:fop in the US. Placed 1981. Work by Mark L. Smith (Q106063728) Vera (talk) 20:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work. The screen shows a Windows start menu being broadcasted with underlying wallpaper. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 10:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Posters are unlikely own work. OTRS-permission from copyright holder (Simon Quendler?) is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 10:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AnVuong1222004 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from software screenshots.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
this is not contemporary potrait and was made 150 years after death of Guru Badshahi009 (talk) 18:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This is apparently the best depiction of Guru Hargobind we have. A portrait not being contemporary is not a reason to delete it. Lennart97 (talk) 11:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, 18th century painting. --Achim (talk) 12:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 17:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 16:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Metadata credits Instagram Ytoyoda (talk) 13:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 14:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Superfaces (talk · contribs)
[edit]Does Commons:Derivative works in source country allow this?
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - it's a photograph of a copyrighted statue, so unless the creator of the statue provided a release to OTRS, these files are in viloation of copyright and should be SPEEDY DELETED. EugeneZelenko, what are you calling a derivative work? Atsme Talk 📧 02:47, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:51, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Clearly a copyright violation - still frame from Thomas and Friends TV show Laplorfill (talk) 13:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- I want this photo for this draft — Preceding unsigned comment added by General electric p30ch (talk • contribs) 13:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- It is an obvious copyright violation, despite your false claim that it is your own work. Laplorfill (talk) 14:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, I admit it that I said lies, but I want this photo for this draft .--General electric p30ch (talk) 15:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- It is an obvious copyright violation, despite your false claim that it is your own work. Laplorfill (talk) 14:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; "I want this photo for this draft" is not a reason to keep. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:24, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Clearly a copyright violation - still frame from Thomas and Friends TV show Laplorfill (talk) 13:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
I am the creator of this and I don't want it here Caferc1534 (talk) 19:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Lack of COM:EDUSE. --Achim (talk) 20:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per Achim. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:29, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Clear copyright violation - still from Thomas & Friends TV series Laplorfill (talk) 19:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Géographie de la mondialisation, Crises et basculements du monde - Laurent Carroué, Armand Colin, 2019.jpg
[edit]obviously copyrighted kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 20:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- it's a scan Bastian Bastien (discussion) 14:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 176.164.36.156 (talk) 13:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be own work according to metadata. Permission seems therefore to be needed. Jonteemil (talk) 14:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 11:28, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused diagram without context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 11:28, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Secretary Blinken Participates in a Virtual Meeting with Women Entrepreneurs (51042150818).jpg
[edit]Violates COM:SS RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 11:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Violates COM:SS RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 11:29, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Violates COM:SS RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 11:29, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 15:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: not realistically useful for an educational purpose. --Tomer T (talk) 11:31, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: above threshold of originality. --Tomer T (talk) 11:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 00:10, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Draft file, no more use / Dessin brouillon création personnelle devenu inutile Ursus (talk) 17:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of nondescript pool at undisclosed location. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 02:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
{speedydelete|reason} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simajuntakagung (talk • contribs) 2021-03-19T07:21:33 (UTC)
- Admins Taivo, Turelio, P199, can one of you please close this, it looks like the uploader is also asking for deletion. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the file for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 13:42, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Création personnelle, version obsolète, remplacée par une image en .png Ursus (talk) 14:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Création personnelle, remplacée par une autre version en .png Ursus (talk) 14:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
seems as rubish; file has no Metadata table so User:LazarSredojevic (Special:Contribs/LazarSredojevic) probably was not person who took the photo Ageuser (talk) 01:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The nominator's rationale is invalid, as the absence of EXIF metadata is not a policy-based reason to delete content.
- However this appears to be a still from the film Joker. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:48, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
seems as rubish; file has no Metadata table so User:LazarSredojevic (Special:Contribs/LazarSredojevic) probably was not person who took the photo Ageuser (talk) 01:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The nominator's rationale is invalid, as the absence of EXIF metadata is not a policy-based reason to delete content.
- However this appears to be a still from the film Joker. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:48, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation, unused on any page, well outside Wikipedia size restrictions for copyrighted images. Recommend Speedy Deletion. Cyberlink420 (talk) 05:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:49, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Built in 2013 - https://kmcmaggroup.com/building/Light-Residences. No freedom of pano in the phils.
- File:02680jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 04.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 05.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 06.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 09.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 11.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 13.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 14.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 15.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 16.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 17.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 18.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 19.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 21.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 22.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 23.jpg
- File:03536jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 24.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 04.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 05.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 06.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 14.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 15.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 16.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 18.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 19.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 20.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 21.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 22.jpg
- File:03566jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 25.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 04.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 05.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 06.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 09.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 10.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 14.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 16.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 17.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 20.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 21.jpg
- File:03591jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Mandaluyong Cityfvf 22.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Three towers built 2014-16 by Pimentel Rodriguez Simbulan & Partners. No freedom of panorama in the phils
- File:02680jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 04.jpg
- File:02680jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 05.jpg
- File:02680jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:02680jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 15.jpg
- File:02680jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 16.jpg
- File:02680jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 24.jpg
- File:02680jfLight Mall Light Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 25.jpg
- File:02730jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 09.jpg
- File:02730jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 10.jpg
- File:02730jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 11.jpg
- File:02730jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:02730jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 13.jpg
- File:02730jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 15.jpg
- File:02730jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 16.jpg
- File:02730jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 17.jpg
- File:02730jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 20.jpg
- File:02730jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 21.jpg
- File:02730jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 22.jpg
- File:02730jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 23.jpg
- File:02730jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 24.jpg
- File:02730jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 25.jpg
- File:02756jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:02756jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 16.jpg
- File:02756jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 17.jpg
- File:02756jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 18.jpg
- File:02756jfLight Mall Residences SMDC EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 19.jpg
- File:02803jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:02803jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:02803jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 04.jpg
- File:02803jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 05.jpg
- File:02803jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 06.jpg
- File:02803jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 13.jpg
- File:02803jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 16.jpg
- File:02803jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 17.jpg
- File:02803jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 18.jpg
- File:02803jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 20.jpg
- File:02803jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Woodlands Mandaluyong Cityfvf 22.jpg
- File:02853jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Street Mandaluyong Cityfvf 05.jpg
- File:02853jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Street Mandaluyong Cityfvf 06.jpg
- File:02853jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Street Mandaluyong Cityfvf 09.jpg
- File:02853jfForum Robinsons Cybergate Malls EDSA Boni Pioneer Street Mandaluyong Cityfvf 10.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:51, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Seems like derivative work but I am not too familiar with Nepalese works. BriefEdits (talk) 08:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:53, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:53, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Unus Photo of what could be exam paper. No description or indication of significance. Possible copy vio and out of scope.. Malcolma (talk) 09:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:54, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright as mentioned in the watermark. This about the book "Standaardwerk universele handleeskunde" of Magda van Dijk-Rijneke. It is not clear whether the user Chirologie is the same as Magda van Dijk. Wouter (talk) 11:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright as mentioned in the watermark. This is probably from the book "Standaardwerk universele handleeskunde" of Magda van Dijk-Rijneke. It is not clear whether the user Chirologie is the same as Magda van Dijk. Wouter (talk) 11:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright as mentioned in the watermark. This is about the book "Standaardwerk universele handleeskunde" of Magda van Dijk-Rijneke. It is not clear whether the user Chirologie is the same as Magda van Dijk. Wouter (talk) 11:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright as mentioned in the watermark. This is probably from the book "Standaardwerk universele handleeskunde" of Magda van Dijk-Rijneke. It is not clear whether the user Chirologie is the same as Magda van Dijk. Wouter (talk) 11:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
We have OTRS-permission, but the file is unused and en:Draft:Kuch Der Aur was deleted due to non-notability, so in my opinion the poster is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: author given as "Solid Jackson" but file EXIF shows "Author Alan Nahigian, Copyright holder © Alan Nahigian". OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 11:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:42, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: author given as "Javon Jackson", but file EXIF shows "Author: Rudolph Lu". OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:42, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Picture includes a large number of copyrighted Disney cartoon characters. A crop might be acceptable, but given the image composition and small resolution I suspect this file is a copyright violation. MKFI (talk) 11:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:43, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 12:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 12:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 12:34, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 12:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 12:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 12:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 12:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
photo missing Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 12:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Bucuresti, Romania. 14 Februarie 2017. Calutul cu trasurica. Pregatiri pentru indragostiti. (2).jpg
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Romania A1Cafel (talk) 12:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Bucuresti, Romania. 14 Februarie 2017. Calutul cu trasurica. Pregatiri pentru indragostiti.jpg
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Romania A1Cafel (talk) 12:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 12:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 12:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 12:49, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 12:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 12:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Krellan456 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appears to be taken from https://www.rovers.co.uk/news/2019/september/ladies-gallery-rovers-v-sheffield-united/. if this is your work, please submit a statement following the instructions at COM:OTRS.
Ytoyoda (talk) 13:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Metadata credits reza feizy Ytoyoda (talk) 13:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:12, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable event, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:12, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
only for the first version of the file Allions (talk) 14:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal family-tree, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from software screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 14:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nikolina Vekić (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per EXIF, author of photos is Marin Speranda, proffesional photographer. No permission from original author. Also, one of photos can be found on official website. https://iuc.hr/about/facilities
Smooth O (talk) 14:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Personality rights Derbrauni (talk) 14:49, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:12, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BriefEdits as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 — billinghurst sDrewth 15:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Random photo of a foot in a category that is pretty well populated. Not sure what kind of COM:EDUSE this offers over other photos as the quality of the image isn't that remarkable. — BriefEdits (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
File:THE CHALLENGE OF TRAINING TRANSLATORS AND INTERPRETERS IN THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF FOREIGN UNACCOMPANIED MINORS.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 16:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:58, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
com:out of scope ads and probably copyvio derivatives of photos and text.
- File:湧気自然塾だより NO.04-03.jpg
- File:湧気自然塾だより NO.04-01.jpg
- File:湧気自然塾だより NO.04-02.jpg
- File:湧気自然塾だより NO.03-06.jpg
- File:湧気自然塾だより NO.03-05.jpg
- File:湧気自然塾だより NO.03-04.jpg
- File:湧気自然塾だより NO.03-03.jpg
- File:湧気自然塾だより NO.03-02.jpg
- File:湧気自然塾だより NO.03-01.jpg
- File:湧気自然塾だより NO.02-02.jpg
- File:湧気自然塾だより NO.02-01.jpg
- File:湧気自然塾だより NO.01-01.jpg
- File:湧気自然塾だより NO.01-02.jpg
RZuo (talk) 18:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jockey Club Play n Gain Project (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:SPAM. They are used in other wikis for the purpose of self-promotion. Also, some files can be found in other websites, thus they may not own work. COM:OTRS is needed.
- File:190320 Game 厨師起菜.jpg
- File:Game demonstration comic wiki 20210307.jpg
- File:工作區域 1 複本 3.jpg
- File:Kickoff ceremony media section parents teachers 20210307 2.jpg
- File:Kickoff ceremony media section parents teachers 20210307.jpg
- File:190514 Game 我自己會做 齊欣賞.jpg
- File:190401 Game 我自己會做.jpg
- File:19 April 2019 (SAT) “DAY DAY PLAY” (親子遊戲日日玩)@MTR.jpg
- File:“The Way We Are” @881903, The Commercial Radio Hong Kong, 24 November 2019 (雷霆881商業一台「同途有心人」).jpg
- File:Play seminar on a boat.12 January 2019 (SUN) “DAY DAY PLAY” (親子遊戲日日玩)@(For Every Child, -EatPlayLove) UNICEF HK. .jpg
- File:12 January 2019 (SUN) “DAY DAY PLAY” (親子遊戲日日玩)@(For Every Child, -EatPlayLove) UNICEF HK.jpg
- File:29 December 2018 (SAT) “DAY DAY PLAY” (親子遊戲日日玩)@Christmas.jpg
- File:家福會 20191019 04.jpg
- File:Group Photo 家福會 20191019 04.jpg
- File:Sylvia profile photo 5 20190819.jpg
- File:JC PlaynGain Logo Centre CMYK20180910-01.jpg
SCP-2000 18:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in Tr:Louis de Broglie with TeX equivalent:
(Planck bağıntısı) (Einstein bağıntısı) olduğundan veya m: Taneciğin kütlesi (kg)
V: Taneciğin hızı (m·s-1)
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Taken from https://www.facebook.com/makotomaxhirahara/photos/a.472164789885651/501132833655513/ Ytoyoda (talk) 19:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Not for censoring but for the sake of civility, we should also not permit the use of a file name like "Wikishit"... --E4024 (talk) 19:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Noor Takaful (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:Projet:Boîte Utilisateur/Demandes with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
,_known_professionally_as_Paige_Rafols,_is_an_Filipino_model._In_September_2013,_Rafols_started_her_career_in_pageantry_and_modeling._In_2018,_she_was_named_Fashion_Model_of_the_Year.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Class_42_diesel-hydraulic_engine_with_an_added_non-regulation_hydraulic_claw.jpg){kind=link}
![47.187 File:"Jardim", Zélia de Barros.jpg](#File:"Jardim",_Zélia_de_Barros.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&diff=next&oldid=535792518){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_known_professionally_as_Paige_Rafols,_is_an_Filipino_model._In_September_2013,_Rafols_started_her_career_in_pageantry_and_modeling._In_2018,_she_was_named_Fashion_Model_of_the_Year.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_known_professionally_as_Paige_Rafols,_is_an_Filipino_model._In_September_2013,_Rafols_started_her_career_in_pageantry_and_modeling._In_2018,_she_was_named_Fashion_Model_of_the_Year.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_%E2%80%9CDAY_DAY_PLAY%E2%80%9D_(%E8%A6%AA%E5%AD%90%E9%81%8A%E6%88%B2%E6%97%A5%E6%97%A5%E7%8E%A9)@MTR.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%9CDAY_DAY_PLAY%E2%80%9D_(%E8%A6%AA%E5%AD%90%E9%81%8A%E6%88%B2%E6%97%A5%E6%97%A5%E7%8E%A9)@(For_Every_Child,_-EatPlayLove)_UNICEF_HK._.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%9CDAY_DAY_PLAY%E2%80%9D_(%E8%A6%AA%E5%AD%90%E9%81%8A%E6%88%B2%E6%97%A5%E6%97%A5%E7%8E%A9)@(For_Every_Child,_-EatPlayLove)_UNICEF_HK.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%9CDAY_DAY_PLAY%E2%80%9D_(%E8%A6%AA%E5%AD%90%E9%81%8A%E6%88%B2%E6%97%A5%E6%97%A5%E7%8E%A9)@Christmas.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Not an "own work". E4024 (talk) 20:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 20:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 20:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 20:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 20:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing phote Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 20:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
missing photo Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 20:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
duplicated with https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PikiWiki_Israel_66886_scots_mission_hospital,_tiberias.jpg Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 20:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, uploader's only remaining file. Didym (talk) 22:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
This image was used on en:Draft:Orile Blog which was deleted as promotional. No other usage and no educational value, therefore the file is out of scope. mattbr 22:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:37, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Halb nimi Polümeermass (talk) 22:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Halb nimi translates to bad name, kindly file for a rename request. --Minoraxtalk 08:38, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Halb nimi Polümeermass (talk) 22:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Halb nimi translates to bad name, kindly file for a rename request. --Minoraxtalk 08:38, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
File used for vandalism on fr.wikipedia VateGV ◦ taper la discut’ ◦ 22:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation on labels and photos on bottle Ezarateesteban 23:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
wrong license, who is Jamini Roy, is still live? OTRS may be needed Ezarateesteban 23:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
collague without sources Ezarateesteban 23:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Shantanoo
[edit]
Photographs so low-quality that it's impossible to tell what they are a photo of. No descriptions. Unused and unusable. --Apocheir (talk) 23:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Jlincoqueo
[edit]- File:Info micro plásticos.jpg
- File:Estuche.jpg
- File:Monedero.png
- File:Estuche Magico deslizable.jpg
- File:Clawdeen handmade.jpg
- File:Juguetes para gatos.jpg
- File:Clawdeen handmade p2.png
- File:Clawdeen handmade p1.png
- File:Clawdeen handmade.png
- File:Captura de Pantalla 2020-06-04 a la(s) 12.17.33.png
_12.17.33.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Spam promoting the user's textile products. --Apocheir (talk) 23:49, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
word does not exist, see Dorfbach Jeuwre (talk) 23:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Reinhard Kraasch at 10:10, 30 April 2021 UTC: Uploader request, word does not exist --Krdbot 13:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
word does not exist, see Dorfbach Jeuwre (talk) 23:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Reinhard Kraasch at 10:11, 30 April 2021 UTC: Uploader request, word does not exist --Krdbot 13:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
as far as I can tell, this is a screenshot of a film at https://vimeo.com/29085158 and it does not have a Creative Commons license. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
So the image is screenshotted from a non licensed source, but on CC with a usage license? Okay, I will remove it where I used it. Trentjohnson17 (talk) 00:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
file has no Metadata table so User:LazarSredojevic (Special:Contribs/LazarSredojevic) probably was not person who took the photo Ageuser (talk) 01:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The nominator's rationale is invalid, as the absence of EXIF metadata is not a policy-based reason to delete content.
- However this photo is around 20 years old and it's unconvincing that this is the uploader's own work, as claimed, especially given their other uploads. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:05, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
seems as rubish; file has no Metadata table so User:LazarSredojevic (Special:Contribs/LazarSredojevic) probably was not person who took the photo Ageuser (talk) 01:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The nominator's rationale is invalid, as the absence of EXIF metadata is not a policy-based reason to delete content.
- However this appears to be a still from the film Joker. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:05, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
seems as rubish; file has no Metadata table so User:LazarSredojevic (Special:Contribs/LazarSredojevic) probably was not person who took the photo Ageuser (talk) 01:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, falsely claimed own work, copy of File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - The Jokers Dark Knight costume (DC Comics booth) (5985301735).jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:07, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
_(5985301735).jpg){kind=link}
files of new user who has most uploads wrong, so suspicious; file has no Metadata table so User:LazarSredojevic (Special:Contribs/LazarSredojevic) probably was not person who took the photo Ageuser (talk) 01:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
files of new user who has most uploads wrong, so suspicious; file has no Metadata table so User:LazarSredojevic (Special:Contribs/LazarSredojevic) probably was not person who took the photo Ageuser (talk) 01:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wilfredor as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No author information and source. The image is too old AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Very recent bldg by Globe Asiatique Realty Holdings Corporation. https://kmcmaggroup.com/building/GA-Twin-Tower no freedom of panorama in the phils
- File:09024jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:09024jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 05.jpg
- File:09024jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 06.jpg
- File:09024jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:09024jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:09024jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 09.jpg
- File:09024jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 10.jpg
- File:09024jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 11.jpg
- File:09024jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:09024jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 13.jpg
- File:09024jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 14.jpg
- File:09024jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 15.jpg
- File:09024jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 16.jpg
- File:09024jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 17.jpg
- File:09042jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:09042jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:09042jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 06.jpg
- File:09042jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:09042jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 11.jpg
- File:09042jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:09042jfBarangays Malamig Barangka Ibaba Itaas Drive GA Towers Mandaluyong Cityfvf 17.jpg
- File:EDSAjf6975 44.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:13, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
2007 building cited by https://kmcmaggroup.com/building/Lee-Gardens. No freedom of panorama in the phils
- File:05434jfWack-Wack Greenhills East William James Shaw Boulevard Mandaluyong Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:05475jfWack-Wack Greenhills East Highway Hills Mauway Shaw Boulevard Mandaluyong Cityfvf 05.jpg
- File:05475jfWack-Wack Greenhills East Highway Hills Mauway Shaw Boulevard Mandaluyong Cityfvf 06.jpg
- File:05475jfWack-Wack Greenhills East Highway Hills Mauway Shaw Boulevard Mandaluyong Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:05475jfWack-Wack Greenhills East Highway Hills Mauway Shaw Boulevard Mandaluyong Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:05475jfWack-Wack Greenhills East Highway Hills Mauway Shaw Boulevard Mandaluyong Cityfvf 09.jpg
- File:05475jfWack-Wack Greenhills East Highway Hills Mauway Shaw Boulevard Mandaluyong Cityfvf 10.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Really rough screenshot with a CC license that is no longer evident (via Archive.org or Google CachedView) nor was it reviewed by an editor before CC license was supposedly removed. Per COM:NOTUSED. BriefEdits (talk) 05:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Je l'ai téléversé par erreur Alacoolwiki (talk) 09:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:17, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Small, no EXIF -- is it actually own work as claimed. No categories, only description translates to "The school building", therefore useless. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Small, no EXIF is NOT a deletion reason. Useless is. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This picture has too many cropped versions with very similar sizes, so only one version of the cropped version needed. Gag0409 (talk) 09:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This picture has too many cropped versions with very similar sizes, so only one version of the cropped version needed. Gag0409 (talk) 09:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This picture has too many cropped versions with very similar sizes, so only one version of the cropped version needed. Gag0409 (talk) 09:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This picture has too many cropped versions with very similar sizes, so only one version of the cropped version needed. Gag0409 (talk) 09:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
plucked from the internet without authorship or copyright info Joostik (talk) 10:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:20, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification via COM:OTRS correspondence is required so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:20, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
This is an old firm logo that is no longer active.. ThomasKarlsenAdeB (talk) 11:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:21, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
"FBMD" in the EXIF data, taken from Facebook Ytoyoda (talk) 13:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:23, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
"FBMD" in the metadata, from Facebook Ytoyoda (talk) 13:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:23, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Diesel 10 was based on a British Rail (BR) Class 42 diesel-hydraulic engine with an added non-regulation hydraulic claw.jpg
[edit]_Class_42_diesel-hydraulic_engine_with_an_added_non-regulation_hydraulic_claw.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Class_42_diesel-hydraulic_engine_with_an_added_non-regulation_hydraulic_claw.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:D821 at Kidderminster.jpg reuploading breaks attribution Laplorfill (talk) 13:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation of [1] Laplorfill (talk) 13:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
No own work and useless without any context information GerritR (talk) 14:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded this myself and now looking back I do not think it is of any value and would like to have it deleted. It is not used by any pages on Wikipedia etc. and so I do not think deleting it should cause any issues. Elshad (talk) 14:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Perfectly glad to see it deleted, but please, in the future DO NOT UPLOAD MATERIAL THAT YOU DO NOT CONSIDER APPROPRIATE FOR COMMONS AND/OR DO NOT INTEND TO FREE-LICENSE. - Jmabel ! talk 22:40, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
deletion requested by uploader, no more needed Gatto bianco (talk) 14:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:26, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack 78.250.130.173 15:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use (appears valid?). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:30, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Tagged as "own work" by uploader, actually a copyright violation of File:Idrissides22.PNG --Omar-toons (talk) 11:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: fix attribution and license. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 16:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: yes there clearly is a source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:32, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
This is a direct unflattering image of me, as a person. I would like it be removed on it hurting my online professional and job finding prospects. 82.197.207.250 18:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:33, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
White picture. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 20:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Of far too low resolution in order to be of any use. Has been globally replaced by File:STM Metrobus.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Several reasons: 1. The file is not being used. 2. It does not depict the mechanics of the Swap deals accurately. If it's not an FX deal (which it isn't), the notionals themselves aren't being swapped – only payments are, and it's not shown here. Hence, the scheme is erroneous and useless therefore. Niklem (talk) 21:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:35, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Too blurry to be used, sorry. And not categorized Ezarateesteban 23:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
![23:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/03/19#c-Ezarate-2021-03-19T23:07:00.000Z-File:"Jardim",_Zélia_de_Barros.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:35, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
![22:35, 6 May 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/03/19#c-P199-2021-05-06T22:35:00.000Z-File:"Jardim",_Zélia_de_Barros.jpg){kind=link}
"FBMD" in the metadata, from Facebook Ytoyoda (talk) 13:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Eliminar. A mesma conta (KN05Gamer (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) ) publicou vários escudos de clubes esportivos brasileiros como se fosse quem desenhou todos aqueles escudos (de clubes de cidades e fundados em momentos diferentes). Por esse comportamento, parece não entender a necessidade de carregar multimídias sob licenças livres. --Luan (talk) 15:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Corrupted logo, not showing properly. No real use here. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:31, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
fichier que j'ai crée et remplacé par son équivalent en .png Ursus (talk) 13:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Philippes Octogone.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
fichier que j'ai crée et remplacé par son équivalent en .png Ursus (talk) 13:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Philippes Forum.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: source is "own work". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:39, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
no clear sourche Wouter (talk) 15:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:40, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:33, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: this simple COA looks like "own work". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:45, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from FB as per metadata. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 78.250.130.173 15:49, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing original author, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:38, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: very simple map (no propriatary elements), could easily be self made. Provide stronger rationale. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:49, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: very simple image, could easily be self made. Provide stronger rationale. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 16:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: scan of unknown source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:52, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 16:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 16:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-shape}}. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Please remove the original, not the edited version. I have blurred the register plates Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 16:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:59, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation of [2] Laplorfill (talk) 17:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement HaThanhPhuoc (talk) 07:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Roblox HQ is located in the US, so US is the source country. And this Roblox Health Bar is below US TOO. See Commons:Threshold of originality#United States — Preceding unsigned comment added by KMBDENNISTRIDENT (talk • contribs) 01:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
From a non-free video game. (The video game is roblox) Not just simple geometry, also from a non-free game. EVn if headquarters in US, this should still get deleted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:40:c003:9550:254c:972c:a2ef:180a (talk • contribs) 18:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep simple geometry as it's essentially just a green circle on a blue background. it doesn't matter if it came from a non-free game so long as it doesn't contain any copyrightable elements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nintendofan885 (talk • contribs) 11:04, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:25, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
It's a copy of : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stellardrone_-_Comet_Halley.ogg ComputerHotline (talk) 19:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation - taken from a published work, copyright the L&GRP, see: here Laplorfill (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Halb nimi Polümeermass (talk) 21:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Proovige Special:MovePage/File:Marten 2.jpg või Shift-Alt-m --Achim (talk) 22:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
copyvio|1=puudub fotograafi luba Polümeermass (talk) 22:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
copyvio|1=puudub fotograafi luba Polümeermass (talk) 22:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
This "bones" are same thing of File:Ossos de Lebombo.jpg; archeologic object with FALSE author of the image. Please, delete that other file, too. André Koehne TALK TO ME 23:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- And sorry my bad English... Low resolution in this files indicate the fraud in both authorships. The user it's brazilian (like me), and never stay in Africa! Thanks. André Koehne TALK TO ME 23:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:38, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Clearly a copyright image - Marked copyright in bottom left corner Velella (talk) 17:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The existence of a copyright and the release under a CC-BY-SA license by the copyright owner are not incompatible. — Racconish 💬 06:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
BoM images are not allowed FleurDeOdile (talk) 21:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose @FleurDeOdile: needs to chill again with images. There is no such rule that "BoM images are not allowed". However, for sure we will not use this image for the infobox. Typhoon2013 (talk) 23:24, 19 March 2021
- Delete works of the AU government are not public domain, sadly. Elli (talk) 01:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 06:15, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Es ist offensichtlich, dass die Lizenz fehlerhaft ist Angeblich ist der Urheber Ivo Rabanser, einer der Abgebildeten Ivo Rabanser und der Hochlader Ivo Rabanser - es handelt sich aber ganz eindeutig nicht um ein Selfie Lutheraner (talk) 00:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Das Bild stammt aus dem Privatarchiv Ivo Rabanser — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivorabanser (talk • contribs) 10:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Es ist offensichtlich, dass die Lizenz fehlerhaft ist Angeblich ist der Urheber Ivo Rabanser, der Abgebildete Ivo Rabanser und der Hochlader Ivo Rabanser - es handelt sich aber ganz eindeutig nicht um ein Selfie Lutheraner (talk) 00:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Das Bild stammt aus dem Privatarchiv Ivo Rabanser — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivorabanser (talk • contribs) 10:47, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ralf Roletschek (talk · contribs)
[edit]Sie dürfen die Piktogramme in diesem Set vervielfältigen, verbreiten und öffentlich zugänglich machen, solange die Piktogramme selbst nicht verkauft werden und die Bedingungen der entsprechenden Creative Commons Lizenz gewahrt bleiben. [3] -- bolded the non-commercial-restriction.
- File:Icon-menschen-und-behinderung-9.gif
- File:Icon-menschen-und-behinderung-8.gif
- File:Icon-menschen-und-behinderung-7.gif
- File:Icon-menschen-und-behinderung-6.gif
- File:Icon-menschen-und-behinderung-5.gif
- File:Icon-menschen-und-behinderung-4.gif
- File:Icon-menschen-und-behinderung-3.gif
- File:Icon-menschen-und-behinderung-2.gif
- File:Icon-menschen-und-behinderung-1.gif
Rillke(q?) 10:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. Discussion merged at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Piktogramm-Serie- Menschen & Behinderung.pdf. --McZusatz (talk) 10:47, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Ich hatte das auch gelesen und war irritiert. Aber der Löschantrag ist wohl korrekt, der Urheber kennt die CC wohl nicht richtig. Schade. --Ralf Roleček 10:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Unter AGF, ja. Andererseits habe ich schon viele Seiten gesehen, die sich Lizenzanwälte leisten können sollten und es trotzdem mit freien Lizenzen nicht richtig hinbekommen. -- Rillke(q?) 12:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Ich hatte das auch gelesen und war irritiert. Aber der Löschantrag ist wohl korrekt, der Urheber kennt die CC wohl nicht richtig. Schade. --Ralf Roleček 10:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. We have the vector data and could create PNGs in case those are needed. In any case there is no need for GIFs per com:FT. --McZusatz (talk) 08:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Kein Grund, den Nachnutzern die Bilder vorzuenthalten. Was du schreibst, ist kein Löschgrund. --Ralf Roleček 20:42, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Natürlich ist das ein Löschgrund, wie man hier nachlesen kann. Wir haben schon jetzt zu wenige Leute, die sich um die vorhandenen Dateien kümmern. Wozu brauchen wir dann von jedem Icon eine SVG, PNG und redundante GIF Version? Selbst wenn die Dateibeschreibungsseiten zentral und gleichzeitig (z.B. auf Wikidata) gepflegt werden würden, hätte ich diese GIFs zur Löschung vorgeschlagen. --McZusatz (talk) 11:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Mit gleichem Argument kann man also einen LA auf die PNG stellen? Wir haben kein Speicherproblem. --Ralf Roleček 12:56, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Ja, kann man (Wie der LA ausgeht haengt aber immer von den Umstaenden ab...). Und: Ich habe nie von einem Speicherproblem geredet. Ganz nebenbei bemerkt wird kein Speicher frei wenn man Dateien loescht. --McZusatz (talk) 14:27, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Mit gleichem Argument kann man also einen LA auf die PNG stellen? Wir haben kein Speicherproblem. --Ralf Roleček 12:56, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Könnten wir diese Diskussion anderswo führen [z.B. Forum] und uns hier stattdessen auf das urheberrechtliche Problem beschränken? Die Positionen sind klar; weder Repetio noch Repetitio bringen uns weiter. Die Vektor-Versionen könnten dann unter
other_versionsverlinkt/gezeigt werden. -- Rillke(q?) 21:08, 17 May 2014 (UTC)- COM:Dupe sagt mir, dass das case-by-case diskutiert werden muss. --McZusatz (talk) 11:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Dann werde ich die GIF bei positiver Antwort des Urhebers nach Wikiversity, Wikibooks und in die deutsche WP retten. --Ralf Roleček 12:56, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Falls du es als sinnvoll erachtest Dateileichen zu erstellen... --McZusatz (talk) 14:27, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Dann werde ich die GIF bei positiver Antwort des Urhebers nach Wikiversity, Wikibooks und in die deutsche WP retten. --Ralf Roleček 12:56, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- COM:Dupe sagt mir, dass das case-by-case diskutiert werden muss. --McZusatz (talk) 11:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Natürlich ist das ein Löschgrund, wie man hier nachlesen kann. Wir haben schon jetzt zu wenige Leute, die sich um die vorhandenen Dateien kümmern. Wozu brauchen wir dann von jedem Icon eine SVG, PNG und redundante GIF Version? Selbst wenn die Dateibeschreibungsseiten zentral und gleichzeitig (z.B. auf Wikidata) gepflegt werden würden, hätte ich diese GIFs zur Löschung vorgeschlagen. --McZusatz (talk) 11:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Kein Grund, den Nachnutzern die Bilder vorzuenthalten. Was du schreibst, ist kein Löschgrund. --Ralf Roleček 20:42, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Ich kann den oben zitierten Satz so unter http://icons.anatom5.de/ nicht mehr lesen. Ich sehe dort ein doppelgleisiges Lizenzmodell: einmal die CC-Lizenz, mit der Bedingung den Urheber zu nennen und ein zusätzliches "kommerzielle Lizenz" genanntes Modell, was es ermöglicht die Piktogramme auch ohne die Namensnennung zu nutzen.
- "Besonders interessant ist die Piktogramm-Serie durch das zweigleisige Lizenzmodell: Kostenlos mit Nennung der Rechte-Inhaber oder kommerziell ohne Namensnennung." [4]
- Genau diesen Zusatz finde ich hier in unserem Archiv aber auch zu hauf. Der Nutzer muss sich also entscheiden a) will er es kostenfrei nutzen? Dann hat der die CC-Lizenz-Bestimmungen einzuhalten, die u.a. auch die Namensnennung der Urheber vorsieht, oder er möchte b) die Piktogramme ohne Namensnennung verwenden, dann er hat er bitte in seinen Geldbeutel zu greifen. Habe ich etwas missverstanden?
- "Die Weitergabe der Piktogramm-Serie an Dritte sowie das Bereitstellen in Downloadarchiven ist nur mit deutlichem Hinweis auf die Lizenzbedingungen erlaubt."
- dürfte hier ja auch deutlich eingehalten sein. Vielleicht sollte noch der Zusatz, dass sollen die Piktogramme ohne die Namensnennung genutzt werden, dies mit Hilfe einer finanziellen Aufwendung auch möglich sei, ergänzen.
- Ich tendiere also zu: Keep Anika (talk) 08:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- "solange die Piktogramme selbst nicht verkauft werden und die Bedingungen der entsprechenden Creative Commons Lizenz gewahrt bleiben" steht so immer noch dort. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 11:14, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hat jemand den Herrn Mosbach mal angeschrieben? CC-A ist ja auch nicht wirklich klar: meint er nun cc-by (nur Attribution) oder cc-by-sa? --Anika (talk) 12:56, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Ja: [5]. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 13:04, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hat jemand den Herrn Mosbach mal angeschrieben? CC-A ist ja auch nicht wirklich klar: meint er nun cc-by (nur Attribution) oder cc-by-sa? --Anika (talk) 12:56, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- "solange die Piktogramme selbst nicht verkauft werden und die Bedingungen der entsprechenden Creative Commons Lizenz gewahrt bleiben" steht so immer noch dort. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 11:14, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. SVG files are linked here File:Piktogramm-Serie- Menschen & Behinderung.pdf. There is no need to keep those GIFs. --McZusatz (talk) 16:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Bloß daß die SVG mal wieder völlig kaputte Alphakanäle haben, das ist ja nichts Neues. Und darum gehts hier auch nicht im Geringsten sondern darum, ob die Grafiken in einer freien Lizenz vorliegen. Wenn ja, dann darf jeder nach Lust und Laune daraus auch andere Bilder oder Formate basteln, wenn nicht, ist alles zu löschen. --Ralf Roleček 00:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Huch, da hat jemand '0' und '1' in den SVGs vertauscht. Ich habe das mal rueckgaengig gemacht. Jetzt sollte alles passen. --McZusatz (talk) 08:59, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Bloß daß die SVG mal wieder völlig kaputte Alphakanäle haben, das ist ja nichts Neues. Und darum gehts hier auch nicht im Geringsten sondern darum, ob die Grafiken in einer freien Lizenz vorliegen. Wenn ja, dann darf jeder nach Lust und Laune daraus auch andere Bilder oder Formate basteln, wenn nicht, ist alles zu löschen. --Ralf Roleček 00:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, see also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Piktogramm-Serie- Menschen & Behinderung.pdf Krd 16:57, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ralf Roletschek (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:L: The license components -nc- (noncommercial) and -nd- (no derivatives) are not usable for Wikimedia Commons.
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR- DSF6692.jpg
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR- DSF6677.jpg
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR- DSF6665.jpg
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR- DSF6657.jpg
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR- DSF6647.jpg
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR- DSF6597.jpg
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR-DSCF6705.jpg
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR-DSCF6661.jpg
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR-DSCF6637.jpg
- File:18-01-16-Oder-Havel-Kanal-RalfR RR80527.jpg
- File:18-01-16-Oder-Havel-Kanal-RalfR RR80510.jpg
- File:19-08-10-Burg-Penzlin-RalfR.jpg
- File:19-08-28-Ra2-im-Kon-Tiki-Museum-Oslo-RalfR.jpg
- File:19-04-28-Seurasaari 0582.jpg
- File:20-02-25-Tesla-Wald-RalfR-101 0367-50p.jpg
Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 17:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Template:Resolution restricted-by-sa ist eine gültige Lizenz. --Ralf Roletschek 17:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Resolution restricted-by-sa. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Das ist mal wieder bezeichnend. Nicht nur Lizenzen werden auf Commons gegen den Willen der Urheber nachträglich geändert, existierende gültige Lizenzen sollen auch noch nachträglich gelöscht werden. Wer löscht nun die über 100.000 Dateien von Fotothek und Bundesarchiv? Die sind ja auch Resolution restricted-by-sa --Ralf Roletschek 18:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Ralf Roletschek: Restricted-by-SA is fine. The problem is with restricted-by-NC and restricted-by-ND. Commons has never accepted NC or ND licenses, and only accepted GFDL 1.2-only until 15 October 2018. Kaldari (talk) 18:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm en-0. See Template:Multi-license. Ich habe immer sehr viele Nachfragen von Schülern, Studenten, Lehrern usw. bekommen. Seit ich NC hinzugefügt habe, bekomme ich diese vielen Mails nicht mehr. Das ist zwar inhaltlich Unsinn, es ist aber so. Offenbar denken Studenten usw. "aha, NC, das darf ich also benutzen". --Ralf Roletschek 19:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ich entschuldige mich. Leider können wir aufgrund der Regeln von Commons kein NC annehmen. Kaldari (talk) 19:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Als zusätzliche Lizenz ist sie zulässig. --Ralf Roletschek 19:38, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ich entschuldige mich. Leider können wir aufgrund der Regeln von Commons kein NC annehmen. Kaldari (talk) 19:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm en-0. See Template:Multi-license. Ich habe immer sehr viele Nachfragen von Schülern, Studenten, Lehrern usw. bekommen. Seit ich NC hinzugefügt habe, bekomme ich diese vielen Mails nicht mehr. Das ist zwar inhaltlich Unsinn, es ist aber so. Offenbar denken Studenten usw. "aha, NC, das darf ich also benutzen". --Ralf Roletschek 19:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Ralf Roletschek: Restricted-by-SA is fine. The problem is with restricted-by-NC and restricted-by-ND. Commons has never accepted NC or ND licenses, and only accepted GFDL 1.2-only until 15 October 2018. Kaldari (talk) 18:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Das ist mal wieder bezeichnend. Nicht nur Lizenzen werden auf Commons gegen den Willen der Urheber nachträglich geändert, existierende gültige Lizenzen sollen auch noch nachträglich gelöscht werden. Wer löscht nun die über 100.000 Dateien von Fotothek und Bundesarchiv? Die sind ja auch Resolution restricted-by-sa --Ralf Roletschek 18:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Resolution restricted-by-sa. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Resolution restricted-by-sa ist eine akzeptable Lizenz. Bis heute, heute soll das nachträglich geändert werden. Bis dann irgendwann hier nur noch CC-0 übrigbleibt. Knapp 1‰ der Dateien auf Commons sind von mir. Meine Fotos werden mehr als 30.000 mal in Projekten benutzt. Die paar Dateien hier sind sowas von unwichtig, werden aber auch fast 100 mal verwendet. Mit solchen Aktionen vertreibt man erfolgreich Fotografen. Bis 2018 habe ich noch jährlich tausende Fotos hochgeladen, seit dem nur noch weniger als hundert. Ich füge den Bildern nun die FAL hinzu, damit ist der Löschantrag vom Tisch. Und meine Uploads auch. --Ralf Roletschek 20:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Now that they use the Free Art License, I don't see any reason to delete. Kaldari (talk) 00:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Resolution restricted-by-sa ist eine akzeptable Lizenz. Bis heute, heute soll das nachträglich geändert werden. Bis dann irgendwann hier nur noch CC-0 übrigbleibt. Knapp 1‰ der Dateien auf Commons sind von mir. Meine Fotos werden mehr als 30.000 mal in Projekten benutzt. Die paar Dateien hier sind sowas von unwichtig, werden aber auch fast 100 mal verwendet. Mit solchen Aktionen vertreibt man erfolgreich Fotografen. Bis 2018 habe ich noch jährlich tausende Fotos hochgeladen, seit dem nur noch weniger als hundert. Ich füge den Bildern nun die FAL hinzu, damit ist der Löschantrag vom Tisch. Und meine Uploads auch. --Ralf Roletschek 20:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The files now seem to be under FAL, which as far as I know is an acceptable licence.
- I am confused by a statement on the file information pages: This file is only available in the local resolution under CC-BY-SA. The full resolution is here on Flickr and can be used under the GFDL 1.2 or CC-BY-NC-ND. There is no CC-BY-SA copyright tag, but is the file nevertheless licensed under some unspecified version of CC-BY-SA?
- The template User:Ralf Roletschek/Autor4 bothers me. Is this a "disclaimer" which several GNU and CC licences require you to include with all copies of the work? If so, this makes the files less usable. I'm not sure if we should allow users to include disclaimers. There is some information about disclaimers problems at w:WP:FIXGFDL.
- I think that the wording This file has been released under a license which is incompatible with Facebook's licensing terms. It is not permitted to upload this file to Facebook. is problematic. It sounds as if the author prohibits the use on Facebook even if Facebook at some point updates the terms of use. Also, I suspect that a user who uploads a file to Facebook doesn't violate the licence but only Facebook's terms of use. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- As the author has place them under FAL, there is now an acceptable licence (although the question is always, can FAL be revoked?). However, the hodgepodge of tags is completely unhelpful. Some are problematic. Clean up is certainly needed, and there needs to be clarity. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 22:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- The template {{Multi-license}} may help. {{Self}} also has language for multiple license choices, but only for a maximum of two. clpo13(talk) 22:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Regarding the notice about not uploading the file to Facebook, it is certainly possible for the terms of use for Facebook (or another site) to change over time. Perhaps it would be better to say "which may be incompatible" instead of "is incompatible". If a user was to upload a CC-licensed work to a social media site, one possible license concern that could arise is if the social media site has terms of use that, for example, prohibit downloading any content from the site except for personal noncommercial use. From what I understand, with a CC-licensed work, it is not permissible for licensees to add additional legal restrictions and/or technological measures that would restrict the ability of reusers to exercise the rights granted under the CC license. There is a Creative Commons FAQ entry about the possibility of a work's licensor adding additional contractual restrictions to a CC-licensed work, but that may be different from a licensee or reuser adding additional restrictions. --Gazebo (talk) 08:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal/CC_BY-SA_on_Facebook/es und User:Ralf_Roletschek/No_Facebook --Ralf Roletschek 10:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Regarding the notice about not uploading the file to Facebook, it is certainly possible for the terms of use for Facebook (or another site) to change over time. Perhaps it would be better to say "which may be incompatible" instead of "is incompatible". If a user was to upload a CC-licensed work to a social media site, one possible license concern that could arise is if the social media site has terms of use that, for example, prohibit downloading any content from the site except for personal noncommercial use. From what I understand, with a CC-licensed work, it is not permissible for licensees to add additional legal restrictions and/or technological measures that would restrict the ability of reusers to exercise the rights granted under the CC license. There is a Creative Commons FAQ entry about the possibility of a work's licensor adding additional contractual restrictions to a CC-licensed work, but that may be different from a licensee or reuser adding additional restrictions. --Gazebo (talk) 08:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- The template {{Multi-license}} may help. {{Self}} also has language for multiple license choices, but only for a maximum of two. clpo13(talk) 22:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- As the author has place them under FAL, there is now an acceptable licence (although the question is always, can FAL be revoked?). However, the hodgepodge of tags is completely unhelpful. Some are problematic. Clean up is certainly needed, and there needs to be clarity. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 22:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- All the -nc- -nd- licences on the templates User:Ralf_Roletschek/Lizenz,User:Ralf_Roletschek/Lizenz2,User:Ralf_Roletschek/Lizenz3,User:Ralf_Roletschek/Lizenz4, and others I may have missed, should be reworked to use the {{Cc-non-compliant}} template. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 20:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ich ändere überhaupt nichts, meine Vorlage ist eindeutig. Und erst Recht nicht, wenn dort "veraltet" drinsteht. --Ralf Roletschek 10:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- All the -nc- -nd- licences on the templates User:Ralf_Roletschek/Lizenz,User:Ralf_Roletschek/Lizenz2,User:Ralf_Roletschek/Lizenz3,User:Ralf_Roletschek/Lizenz4, and others I may have missed, should be reworked to use the {{Cc-non-compliant}} template. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 20:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: The deletion request was created because it was disputed if the files have any valid primary licence. The author added the {{FAL}} to all images listed in this deletion request which is (as of 2020-05) considered to be a valid primary licence. Therefore all images meet the base requirement for at least one free licence.
This deletion request is not a decision for:
- Is the FAL a valid licence - Over 140'000 images are listed in Category:FAL. Since this would effect much more images, this discussion can't be held here.
- Are you allowed to co-licence your files under a non-free/non-commercial licence - So far there seems to be no general consensus in the community. As of now (2020-05) it is not forbidden.
- Can you require a different licence for a higher resolution ("The full resolution is here on Flickr and can be used under the GFDL 1.2 or CC-BY-NC-ND") - Again there seems to be no general consensus in the community even it is leaning towards a deprecation of this practise. Depending on the applying copyright law, the author might just add additional licences to the image.
If you think that one or more images meet different reasons for deletion or that one or more of the points listed above are a valid reason for deletion feel free to open up a new deletion request --D-Kuru (talk) 16:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ralf Roletschek (talk · contribs) (2021)
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Ralf Roletschek as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: einer nachträglichen Lizenzänderung durch Dritte widerspreche ich seit 15 Jahren, das ist außerdem nach kontinentaleuropäischem Recht sittenwidrig. Eine Umlizenzierung kommt nicht in Frage. --Ralf Roletschek 15:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC). Converting to DR due to past DRs.
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR- DSF6692.jpg
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR- DSF6677.jpg
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR- DSF6657.jpg
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR- DSF6647.jpg
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR- DSF6597.jpg
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR-DSCF6705.jpg
- File:20-04-23-Fotoflug-Ostbrandenburg-RalfR-DSCF6661.jpg
- File:20-03-22-Berlin Potsdamer Pl-DSCF6441.jpg
- File:20-03-14-Hamsterkaufe Deutschland.jpg
- File:18-01-16-Oder-Havel-Kanal-RalfR RR80527.jpg
- File:18-01-16-Oder-Havel-Kanal-RalfR RR80510.jpg
- File:19-08-10-Burg-Penzlin-RalfR.jpg
- File:19-11-01-Kulturforum-Berlin-RalfR DSF3889.jpg
- File:19-11-01-Gemaeldegalerie-Berlin-RalfR DSF3932.jpg
- File:19-06-14-Graz-Murinsel-Schloßberg-RalfR.jpg
- File:19-06-14-Schloß-Stainz-DJI 0105.jpg
- File:19-09-04-Cottbuser-Ostsee-DJI 0614.jpg
- File:19-09-04-Cottbuser-Ostsee-DJI 0579.jpg
- File:19-09-04-Cottbuser-Ostsee-DJI 0541.jpg
- File:19-09-04-Cottbuser-Ostsee-DJIpano 0535.jpg
- File:19-08-17-Stadion-an-der-alten-Foersterei-DJI 0275.jpg
- File:19-08-17-Stadion-an-der-alten-Foersterei-DJI 0272.jpg
- File:19-01-27-Schloß-Eggenberg-Graz-RalfR-DJI 0363.jpg
- File:19-01-25-Mariatrost-RalfR-DJI 0324.jpg
- File:18-12-31-Elchbraten-RalfR-GFDL-1.2-RRK9791.jpg
- File:18-11-30-Palma de Mallorca-RalfR2-100 0316.jpg
- File:18-11-01-Valldemossa-DJI 0728-ß730-HDR.jpg
- File:18-11-01-Mallorca-Port-d-Alcudia-PANO0001-0009-Panorama.jpg
- File:18-11-01-Mallorca-Lluc-DJI 0556-0558-HDR.jpg
- File:18-10-30-Santa-Ponsa-RalfR-DJI 0345.jpg
- File:18-10-29-Mallorca-Ses-Salines-RalfR-DJI 0279.jpg
- File:18-10-29-Mallorca-Manacor-RalfR-DJI 0268.jpg
- File:18-10-21-Juchte-RalfR-DJI 0633-0630.jpg
- File:18-10-21-Juchte-RalfR-DJI 0195-0198.jpg
- File:2011-05-18-landtagsprojekt-erfurt-071.jpg
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Kept The licenses used maybe old and crappy, but still at least valid for the time these photos were uploaded so I don't see any reason to delete these files. Multichill (talk) 20:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 16:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
No source Catalunia1995 (talk) 18:54, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Museo ni Jesse Robredo
[edit]Building was designed by architect Gian Paolo Priela and the sculptures by Jun Vicaldo - https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/923645/museum-for-naga-citys-beloved-son-rises-on-playground/amp. No freedom of panorama in the phils, commissioning doesnt negate copyright of the architect and sculptor
- File:A loner Jesse Robredo.jpg
- File:Facade jmrobredo g.jpg
- File:Facade jmrobredo.jpg
- File:Facade of jmr museum.jpg
- File:Facade of jmr.jpg
- File:JESSE ROBREDO MONUMENT AND MUSEUM.jpg
- File:JESSE ROBREDO MONUMENT.jpg
- File:JESSE ROBREDO SMILES.jpg
- File:JESSE ROBREDO SRES.jpg
- File:JMR MUSEUM.jpg
- File:Statue jmr.jpg
- File:The Museo ni Jesse Robredo 01.jpg
- File:The Museo ni Jesse Robredo 02.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 06:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 04:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Potentially Flickr washed photos of Offline TV at Twitch Con 2018
[edit]- File:OfflineTV Members.jpg
- File:Offline TV - TwitchCon 2018.jpg
- File:Imane twitch cropped~2.jpg
- File:FED twitch cropped.jpg
Extracted images
[edit]- File:Pokimane.jpg
- File:FEDMYSTER.jpg
- File:Toast cropped.png
- File:Scarra (cropped).jpg
- File:Lilypichu 2018.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Seems like screencaps from the live Pokimane Podcast at TwitchCon 2018. A duplicate fan upload could be seen here. If others agree, all these images, and there derivative photos, would be copyrighted. — BriefEdits (talk) 09:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Which includes en:File:Imane twitch cropped.jpg. — BriefEdits (talk) 09:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- File:FED twitch cropped.jpg specifically was uploaded by Delta fiver and is claimed to be original work. However, the size of the photo along with the context of the photo would suggest that it was derived from the same source as the others. — BriefEdits (talk) 02:54, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- It is sad we always loose photos that are dificult to replace but in this case i tend to agree with the investigation -Wvdp (talk) 09:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Same opinion as Wvdp. Luckily most of the extracted photos have replacements but we'll be missing out on the group photo + fed. Troutfarm27 (talk) 03:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- I made those edits when I didn't really know how all the image licencing on the Wikipedia worked, I just went on a cropping and uploading spree because articles had no images at the time, but now I know and have learnt. What I'd say is, go ahead and do what needs to be done, you have my support. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 05:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - I extracted images based on the flickr licensing of the uploaded image which is now not valid. I concur with the nominator's assessment that these are screen grabs. Referencing the video in the nomination statement, the camera position is the same for the flickr photo and the video. The specific frame grab is from the end of the video clip. Start viewing at about 1:01:33 and you will see where the image came from. -- Whpq (talk) 12:47, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative works of a non-free video stream. —RP88 (talk) 21:47, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Paul Schmidtbauer
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 1974.
- File:Der Künstler Igo Klemencic.jpg
- File:In der Gschirrmauer.jpg
- File:Milieuzeichnung.jpg
- File:Paul Schmidtbauer Selbstbildnis (Öl auf Hartfaserplatte).jpg
- File:Selbstbildnis Paul Schmidtbauer.jpg
- File:Verfolger.jpg
- File:Verlangen.jpg
- File:Ölgemälde (ohne Titel).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 11:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
________________________
Der Künstler Paul Schmidtbauer ist 1974 gestorben und es ist bei bestem Bemühen nicht möglich, eventuelle Erben von Veröffentlichungsrechten von Fotos seiner Kunstwerken ausfindig zu machen. Ich konnte und kann allerdings Fotos von seinen Kunstwerken, die sich in Privatbesitz befinden (z.B. "In der Gschirrmauer" gehört mir) anfertigen und wäre froh, wenn diese zur Veröffentlichung freigegeben werden. Es wäre sehr schade, wenn dieser Künstler keine entsprechende Würdigung - und dazu gehören Abbildungen seiner Werke - durch Wikipedia, bzw. Wikimedia erfahren würde.
Anmerkung: Zahlreiche seiner Bilder etc. befinden sich im Besitz von Galerien, Auktionshäusern, Museen etc., von denen sie auch laufend auf ihren Webseiten, oder in Broschüren, oder in Werbematerial veröffentlich werden (siehe Weblinks in https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Schmidtbauer). Auch in Google Bilder finden sich sehr viele seiner Werke. Wenn diese Institutionen Fotos veröffentlichen dürfen, müsste es ja wohl auch mir als Privatperson erlaubt sein - oder? Beste Grüße! --Gerfried Pongratz (Diskussion) 15:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerfried Pongratz (talk • contribs) 15:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Category:Paul Schmidtbauer Category:Painters from Austria by name
Kept: all but some per ticket permission. --Krd 06:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PieroGibson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete agree, in addition, a google search shows that the images are all over the internet. --Andel (talk) 16:26, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:08, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, logo above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Comes from roblox.com, and when you are logged in, this thing appears. 2601:40:C003:9550:254C:972C:A2EF:180A 18:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 12:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
The logo at the top does not meet the "simple geometric shape" threshold. FDW777 (talk) 07:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Text-only table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without any other meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 78.250.130.173 15:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights. Ταπυροι (گپ) 19:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- I designed it and this is an original file. Clubs logo was very different with this! --Ταπυροι (گپ) 19:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:21, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights. Ταπυροι (گپ) 19:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- I designed it and this is an original file. Clubs logo was very different with this! You can compare them. --Ταπυροι (گپ) 19:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:21, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Highly unlikely to be own work (mainly) due to absence of metadata.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as rationale is rather weak. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:19, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
The logo of the Swedish company Tarsier Studios, as the result above COM: TOO Sweden, which is quite low. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 03:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment See also other problem files:
- File:Little Nightmares II Logo 3.svg
- File:Little Nightmares 2 Logo.svg
- File:Little Nightmares Logo.svg
- File:Very Little Nightmares Logo.svg. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 03:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. False license, false claims -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:11, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The logo of the Swedish company Tarsier Studios, as the result above COM: TOO Sweden, which is quite low. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 03:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment See also other problem files:
- File:Little Nightmares II Logo 3.svg
- File:Little Nightmares 2 Logo.svg
- File:Little Nightmares II Logo 2.svg
- File:Little Nightmares Logo.svg
- File:Very Little Nightmares Logo.svg. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 03:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:58, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
The logo of the Swedish company Tarsier Studios, as the result above COM: TOO Sweden, which is quite low. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 03:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment See also other problem files:
- File:Little Nightmares II Logo.svg
- File:Little Nightmares 2 Logo.svg
- File:Little Nightmares II Logo 2.svg
- File:Little Nightmares Logo.svg
- File:Very Little Nightmares Logo.svg. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 03:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:58, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
The logo of the Swedish company Tarsier Studios, as the result above COM: TOO Sweden, which is quite low. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 03:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment See also other problem files:
- File:Little Nightmares II Logo.svg
- File:Little Nightmares 2 Logo.svg
- File:Little Nightmares II Logo 3.svg
- File:Little Nightmares Logo.svg
- File:Very Little Nightmares Logo.svg Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 03:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
The logo of the Swedish company Tarsier Studios, as the result above COM: TOO Sweden, which is quite low. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 03:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment See also other problem files:
- File:Little Nightmares II Logo.svg
- File:Little Nightmares II Logo 2.svg
- File:Little Nightmares II Logo 3.svg
- File:Little Nightmares II Logo 2.svg
- File:Little Nightmares Logo.svg. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 03:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep on File:Little Nightmares II Logo.svg and File:Little Nightmares II Logo 2.svg, however this version should be revdeled. This and earlier versions should also be revdeled. A court might deem the small figures as PD-simple but I'm not sure and then maybe deletion is the best. Delete on all other files.Jonteemil (talk) 21:27, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Infrog. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
The logo of the Swedish company Tarsier Studios, as the result above COM: TOO Sweden, which is quite low. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 03:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment See also other problem files:
- File:Little Nightmares II Logo 3.svg
- File:Little Nightmares 2 Logo.svg
- File:Little Nightmares Logo.svg
- File:Very Little Nightmares Logo.svg. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 03:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete—Agreed, these are above the Swedish TOO. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 06:53, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Infrog. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No source 78.250.130.173 15:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
No source 78.250.130.173 16:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 16:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 16:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 16:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 16:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
No own work GerritR (talk) 22:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
no own work. GerritR (talk) 23:34, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These files have not been uploaded to FlickR by the copyright owner (see EXIF), nor with a CC0 license. The conditions for {{PDMark-owner}} to apply are not met. Same situation as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Media without a license as of 25 March 2021
- File:18.02.2020 Declarație de presă a deputaților Dumitru Alaiba si Stela Macari despre concursul pentru funcția de Director al Consiliului de Administrație al ANRE (49551712493).jpg
- File:18.02.2020 Declarație de presă a deputaților Dumitru Alaiba si Stela Macari despre concursul pentru funcția de Director al Consiliului de Administrație al ANRE (49551712548).jpg
- File:18.02.2020 Declarație de presă a deputaților Dumitru Alaiba si Stela Macari despre concursul pentru funcția de Director al Consiliului de Administrație al ANRE (49552446852).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gikü (talk) 01:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
These files have not been uploaded to FlickR by the copyright owner (see EXIF), nor with a CC0 license. The conditions for {{PDMark-owner}} to apply are not met. Same situation as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Media without a license as of 25 March 2021
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gikü (talk) 01:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by P199. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Compromised montage/collage: one of the files is File:Samarinda Islamic Center Mosque.jpg, deleted due to no FoP violation at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Samarinda Islamic Center. Unless replacement image is found, the entire collage must be deleted as a copyvio to the copyright of the architect of the mosque (built in 2008). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Contains deleted copyrighted photo File:Samarinda Islamic Center Mosque.jpg per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Samarinda Islamic Center. -M.nelson (talk) 11:21, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:50, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Imperial Household Agency of Japan/Handout via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS PICTURE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. Previously undeleted after same rationale. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emperor Naruhito and Empress Masako 02.jpg: Government of Japan Standard Terms and Use (Version 2.0) does not apply to images of the Imperial family". Also, the Agency says "images of the Imperial family are not free images". --A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:41, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Author is KVF, not own work AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Violates COM:SS RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:43, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:44, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
see Commons:Currency#Sierra Leone - images of Banknotes of this country are not free. JuTa 15:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: COM:CUR Sierra Leone. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No source 78.250.130.173 15:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No sources 86.212.243.110 22:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 16:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 16:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
There's no commercial FOP in Indonesia, and licensing permission from the architect is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Ford Mustang GT Bleu 5.0-litre V8 - Free Car Picture - Give Credit Via Link (cropped).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per file name and Flickr page, this image requires credit to comply with Creative Commons license BY2.0 and none will be given. General Ization (talk) 05:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- It's a free image. It's a very high quality photographic image so perceptively it may appear to be copyrighted. The flickr user has an entire array of other high quality vehicle images. Also, this is a cropped version that has only been recently uploaded so there hasn't been time for the image to be verified from the original yet. Sourced from here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/154073030@N05/42451961142/ - Cement4802 (talk) 05:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @General Ization: Instead of deleting, could we simply rename the photographer's images with "give credit via link" in the titles? As long as they're credited, properly licensed and linked back to the Flickr pages, I don't see the issue. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:01, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- FYI, here are the images with "give credit" in the title: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22give+credit+via+link%22+intitle%3A%22give+credit+via+link%22&title=Special%3ASearch&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&advancedSearch-current=%7B%22fields%22%3A%7B%22intitle%22%3A%22%5C%22give+credit+via+link%5C%22%22%7D%7D&ns0=1&ns6=1&ns9=1&ns12=1&ns14=1&ns100=1&ns106=1 Ytoyoda (talk) 15:04, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'll leave it to your interpretation of the policy. It still doesn't seem to me to comply with the expectation of the expectations of the publisher of the image, and my opinion is that renaming the image doesn't change those expectations or the terms of the CC-BY license. General Ization (talk) 16:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Based on CC-BY-SA image of Commons and the request that credit should be given/and linkback is clearly indicated on the file page. Reusers should read this carefully. --Ellywa (talk) 18:43, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Die Steirische Tourismus GmbH ist Inhaberin der beim HABM (Harmonisierungsamt für den Binnenmarkt) EU Patentamt registrierten Wortbildmarke „Steiermark Das Grüne Herz Österreichs“ (AT 220.067/CMT 010900091). Das Logo wurde von Dritten ohne Zustimmung durch die Steirische Tourismus GmbH hochgeladen und der Öffentlichkeit zur Verfügung gestellt. Steirische Tourismus GmbH (talk) 09:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Dann soll also der Artikel de:Das grüne Herz Österreichs ohne Bild bleiben? --Achim (talk) 13:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ja, wir würden dann das Logo gegen ein Bild ersetzen, welches für die Veröffentlichung auf Wikipedia freigegeben wurde. --Steirische Tourismus GmbH (talk) 08:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. In addition, per COM:TOO Austria Austria has a low threshold of originality and therefore this logo will be copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 18:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
The poster includes an artist's signature: "M. G.". see museoreinasofia.es. Since it dates back to 1935 it's not OK to presume this author has been dead long enough (before 1941 to comply with Spain's 80 p. m. a.) Strakhov (talk) 10:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and can be undeleted safely 120 years after the image was made, which will be 1935+120=2055.. --Ellywa (talk) 18:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Is is covered by North Korea's FoP? Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 06:49, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Yes, FoP law in North Korea states that "A copyrighted work may be used without the permission of the copyright owner [...] When a copyrighted work in public places is copied." See COM:FOP. And since this is obviously installed on the northern side of the demarcation line, we don't have to consider the non-commercial FoP in South Korea. De728631 (talk) 17:06, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, maybe I didn't explained very well. The issue is not FoP in itself, but whether this picture was taken in a public place or not. It seems to be clearly indoors, so that, without a clear statement of where it was taken, I don't think FoP can be argued in a straightforward way. --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 17:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment North Korean law seems to require that the object is at a public place whereas the camera can be anywhere. You are confusing COM:FOP#Korea (North) with COM:FOP#Germany which instead requires that the camera is at a public place whereas the object can be anywhere. I have no idea if this is a public place or not. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:06, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
I took this in a place especially prepared for tourists. These pictures are hanging in this room, where visitors first get some information about the border and have the opportunity afterwards to buy some souveniers in the same public room. --Nicor (talk) 19:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC) by the way, there is actually no single room in hole north korea where these pictures are not hanging inside. --Nicor (talk) 19:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Is that room only open to tourists or also to ordinary Koreans? I'm not sure if it is a public place if ordinary Koreans can't enter the room. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Does that makes any difference for this deletion request? --Nicor (talk) 12:20, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- You can only take a photo of the photos if the photos are in a public place, and if the room isn't open for ordinary Koreans but only for foreign tourists, then it might not be a public place. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:43, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- Does that makes any difference for this deletion request? --Nicor (talk) 12:20, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- The german Wikipedia says a public institution is a facility that ist provided to a certain group for public use. Besides North Korean people are not at all allowed to go or move where they want to. Not even to other cities. But that does not mean that cities in North Korea aren't public places. It's a lack of freedom, not a lack of public sphere. --Nicor (talk) 16:30, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- The question is not how German law defines a public institution (Öffentliche Einrichtung) but how North Korean law defines a public place (공공장소, konggong changso). To that question I have no answer, and presumably no one here knows how it is defined. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:24, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- So then there is no need for action. --Nicor (talk) 10:02, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- The question is not how German law defines a public institution (Öffentliche Einrichtung) but how North Korean law defines a public place (공공장소, konggong changso). To that question I have no answer, and presumably no one here knows how it is defined. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:24, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- The german Wikipedia says a public institution is a facility that ist provided to a certain group for public use. Besides North Korean people are not at all allowed to go or move where they want to. Not even to other cities. But that does not mean that cities in North Korea aren't public places. It's a lack of freedom, not a lack of public sphere. --Nicor (talk) 16:30, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Appears that this is compatible with NK law James F. (talk) 02:43, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
No FoP for indoor works in North Korea A1Cafel (talk) 12:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- @MGA73: Some years ago, you said that these files from DMZ are generally ok, by "they are not eligible for copyright", would you please explain your rationale is still valid here or not? Probably {{PD-North Korea}}? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: I don't remember and I can't find the discussion where I should have said that files from DMZ are okay. But looking at the discussion I see no reason why FOP should not apply.
- @A1Cafel: You say that FOP does not apply indoor. Could you tell more about why you think that? Have you found something in the laws of North Corea? Have you read a verdict from a North Korean court? --MGA73 (talk) 07:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Not everyone can go to the Demilitarized Zone freely. IMO it cannot be regarded as "public space". --A1Cafel (talk) 07:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- This is the reason I wonder if PD-North Korea tag applies here or not, since it mentions "It is a "work whose publication, issuance, performance, broadcasting, show and exhibition is prohibited" in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea". --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Not everyone can go to the Demilitarized Zone freely. IMO it cannot be regarded as "public space". --A1Cafel (talk) 07:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: according to Nicor, in the previous request, this image was made in a public space. In North Korean law as described on Commons no difference is made between indoor our outdoor. So this image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 18:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bjmullan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights. Sreejith K (talk) 13:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The license seems fine. Images made up of letters and basic geometric shapes/colors don't meet the threshold of originality. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Belgium does not recognize a file below threshold of originality, per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Belgium. Therefore this image is copyrighted and has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 19:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing original author, source, date, and permission. Maybe old enough, but in scope? P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:58, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete User:ConleyFamilyAssociation, User:ConleyHistorical, User:EmeryvilleReminder, User:Fastfoodtrivia, User:MoADfactcheck and User:Qguardian are sock puppets, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gx2320/Archive. They gave false and misleading information. Most of their questionable articles have been deleted in Wikipedia. en:User:Drawnareas/sandbox shows a version of the main article. --Index theory (talk) 17:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Per nomination. The photo was made prior to 1919 as the subject died in that year per en:Paschal Conley. Can be undeleted safely 120 years after that year, which will be 1919+120=2039.. Is in scope because an article about the subject exists. --Ellywa (talk) 19:14, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Sources are in the page about Banu Hilal 5.182.26.126 17:27, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep — Mouh2jijel [Talk] 09:24, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- I'm a bit sceptical about some areas, but generally agree it's okay to keep it. Still, this is apparently an anachronous map, supposed to show all areas where Banu Hilal were active within that time. It does not postulate some kind of "they ruled all that as an Empire". --Enyavar (talk) 16:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:EVIDENCE. Uploader did not comment or explain the authorship of this map. And uploader User:Idriss265/User:Elsouf has a long list of deleted images on their user page. --Ellywa (talk) 19:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Please rule according to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carte présentant la Tribu Arabe des Banu Hilal.jpg, same arguments apply. --Enyavar (talk) 16:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:EVIDENCE. Uploader did not comment or explain the authorship of this map. And uploader User:Idriss265/User:Elsouf has a long list of deleted images on their user page. --Ellywa (talk) 19:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
No source 78.250.130.173 15:58, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: this is the same argument as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carte présentant la Tribu Arabe des Banu Hilal.jpg, and I actually find this map closer to realism than the other. --Enyavar (talk) 16:30, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:EVIDENCE. Uploader did not comment or explain the authorship of this map. And uploader User:Idriss265/User:Elsouf has a long list of deleted images on their user page. --Ellywa (talk) 19:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
There were a false creator and a false date - and I can't belive, the license is correct. The image must be Public Domain, or is not free. An Institute can't publish under a free license without knowking the photographer. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The Upload Wizard, which I used to upload this, asks the date field to be filled in with "Date work was created or first published". If following those instructions produces a "false" date, then perhaps it should be amended? In any case, the source of these images clearly marks them as released under a CC-BY license and states the copyright holder as the UCL Institute of Archaeology. I don't see any reason to second guess the licensing information provided by a reputable academic publisher. The fact that the photographer wasn't named in that particular article doesn't mean that the Institute of Archaeology doesn't know it or that they are lying when they say they are the copyright holder. Joe Roe (talk) 16:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- We don't talk about the IoA, we talk about this umpoad. Nothing in your statement is convincing. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 13:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The copyright of the website now listed as source is not free. It is user generated content, the copyright situation is explained here. Therefore the photo has to be deleted per nomination. The photo of an unknown author can be undeleted safely 120 years after the image was made, which will be ultimately 1936+120=2056.. --Ellywa (talk) 18:36, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a crop from a photo present in a tweet. The uploader likely misunderstood how public domain applies in this case. This is clearly a copyrighted photo, with no evidence of it being taken by anyone or in a way that would make it public domain. BeŻet (talk) 16:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- This photo - including thousands I have been uploading over the past year - are public domain as they were uploaded and published by a member of the US House of Representatives as part of her official duty. There is no reason for the to be nominated for deletion. I've been through this before - you can find the rationale as to why this image should be kept at the deletion discussion here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Missvain. Thanks. A lot of folks don't understand how federal works and social media operates. I've spent a vast amount of time doing my research around it, and that includes during my tenure as Wikipedia in Residence at the Library of Congress, which is owned and operated by the US Federal Government. Missvain (talk) 16:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Missvain: But there's no evidence it was taken by a member of the US House of Representatives. If there is no evidence, we can't assume it's the case. It should be deleted. BeŻet (talk) 10:44, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- Again, assuming good faith - there is no evidence that it wasn't taken by an employee of the federal government. It's rare that an actual representative takes these public domain photographs that they publish on their own Twitter. It's often taken by aids and employees. Again, whoever reviews this can read my argument linked to above which has resulted in the keep of hundreds of files nominated for the rationale you're presenting. Missvain (talk) 16:23, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Missvain: But there's no evidence it was taken by a member of the US House of Representatives. If there is no evidence, we can't assume it's the case. It should be deleted. BeŻet (talk) 10:44, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- This photo - including thousands I have been uploading over the past year - are public domain as they were uploaded and published by a member of the US House of Representatives as part of her official duty. There is no reason for the to be nominated for deletion. I've been through this before - you can find the rationale as to why this image should be kept at the deletion discussion here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Missvain. Thanks. A lot of folks don't understand how federal works and social media operates. I've spent a vast amount of time doing my research around it, and that includes during my tenure as Wikipedia in Residence at the Library of Congress, which is owned and operated by the US Federal Government. Missvain (talk) 16:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete We have no evidence who the photographer is. It certainly isn't the uploader, the member of congress who is in the photo - it could have been a federal worker, it could have been a campaign or party worker, or it could have been an employee of the TV station. Given this doubt, per the COM:PRP, the file should be deleted. -M.nelson (talk) 10:58, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark M.Nelson. As the congress member / owner of the twitter account is present on the photo, it is not clear who made this photo. It therefore has to be deleted on the basis of COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 18:40, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm unsure whether COM:DM applies. I see a copyrighted slide containing a bunch of flags and the "Democracy Dignity Rights" banner, which predominates this photo and puts the speaker at the backburner. I'm torn between the presentation slide and the speaker as the predominant subject of the photo. Per recently closed DR discussion, which resulted in most other similar photos deleted, deletion of this photo may be likely unless I stand corrected. George Ho (talk) 17:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Lean towards Delete, as the photo behind the subject is a major element of the photo, not simply a background, and is significant to the framing of the photo. The photo could be cropped to focus just on the individual. -M.nelson (talk) 11:24, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Photo cropped to only the individual. George Ho (talk) 17:18, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: cropped version of the photo can be kept, uncropped version has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 18:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Howard is the owner of his signature image and he did not approve the public release of this image SnapDragon2021 (talk) 17:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This person is a public figure in the United States. The United States copyright office does not recognize copyright for signatures. More documentation is at Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-signature_tag#United_States. I hear the claim that this signature has an owner and that the owner did not approve the release, but typical review here checks copyright protection and it seems that the law of the country does not recognize copyright claims for signatures. If anyone would like to propose another rationale for review, escalation, or higher scrutiny then they may. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:42, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:SIG, since U.S. copyright law applies. JGHowes talk 17:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 18:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Indulexco appears to be the entity behind the architecture of this contemporary building. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Indonesia, and COM:OTRS permission from the architect is required to legally host this image under free/commerciall license. Discussion at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/01#Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque should be focused by professors in this grey area concluded with maintaining the no Indonesian FOP status quo. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP Indonesia. --Ellywa (talk) 18:46, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
The main motif of this image is the mosque. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Samarinda Islamic Center for the rationale of this DR. No commercial FOP in Indonesia, missing architect's permission. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No COM:FOP Indonesia. While the photo is low resolution and somewhat blurry, there's no indication in COM:INDONESIA that this isn't copyrighted. Applying enough blur to protect the architect's copyright would make the file useless. -M.nelson (talk) 11:27, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The mosque is the main subject of this phoot and cannot take advantage of de minimis. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP Indonesia. --Ellywa (talk) 18:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
One of the images is now nominated at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Islamic Centre - panoramio.jpg. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Samarinda Islamic Center for the rationale. No commercial freedom of panorama in Indonesia, and no indication of permission from the architect. Unless the erring image is changed/replaced. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- If and when File:Islamic Centre - panoramio.jpg is deleted (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Islamic Centre - panoramio.jpg), this file should be cropped to remove it and the history deleted. -M.nelson (talk) 11:29, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: cropped and deleted version with copyrighted image, per remark M.nelson. --Ellywa (talk) 18:49, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
No se ha especificado la fuente // the source has not been given. --Malvinero10 (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyrighted logo, Argentina appears to have a low TOO, per COM:TOO Argentina. --Ellywa (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Gonzo fist
[edit]This file was initially tagged by SheridanRoss1560 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <This logo is not in the public domain and is owned by The Anita H Thompson Owl Farm Trust. It may not be used without permission from the Trust.>. DRing due to age, previous DRs, and to allow better investigation of PD claim. Also adding the files this was derived from.
- File:Gonzo.svg
- File:Thompson for Sheriff, 1970 (Aspen Wall Poster No. 5).jpg
- File:Thompson for 1970 Aspen, Colorado Sheriff poster.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It's described as PD in the file description (File:Thompson for Sheriff, 1970 (Aspen Wall Poster No. 5).jpg at least), for reasons based on US copyright law and that being a system requiring notices at the time, rather than applying by default. Post facto claims by the owl farm don't change this. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- See https://www.aspentimes.com/entertainment/whats-next-for-hunter-s-thompsons-owl-farm/
- Seems that there's a change of ownership, and some increased commercial interest in, the gonzo logo itself. The article doesn't make it clear if the logo has been registered as any form of trademark. Nor (IANAL) would that change the status of posters (which we're assuming to be PD, as above) which pre-date it. Andy Dingley (talk) 03:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- 78705372 & 90432436 seem to be live Gonzo trademarks held by the owl farm. There are also simpler wordmarks that have lapsed. However these do not refer to the logo here File:Gonzo.svg, but rather a more complex version of it (presumably later) with the cross-shaped word and dagger additions.
- In which case, I would keep all of these. They pre-date the trademarks belonging to the owl farm and they are significantly different. Andy Dingley (talk) 04:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Trademarked logos are also allowed on Commons and are independent of copyright status. Kingofthedead (talk) 05:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Although we do need the copyright to be clear, and I don't think we could claim that for the later (dagger) version of this, as has been trademarked. It's also unusual (albeit possible) for a trdemark to not be based on something copyrighted. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Trademarked logos are also allowed on Commons and are independent of copyright status. Kingofthedead (talk) 05:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- I maintain my original analysis of the notice-free publications of the posters and copyright status. In any case, the rationale for deletion provided by SheridanRoss1560 does not contain enough information to assess whether copyright is at stake here, let alone any new information contradicting the publication/public domain analysis. I would be open to hearing them out if there is any conflicting information on the copyright status analysis, but I don't see that yet. I tend to agree with Andy Dingley's assessment on the trademark issues raised. As far as trademark goes, the blade and the word "Gonzo" are incorporated in both 78705372 (registering the image in 2007 for commercial uses on clothing, after a 2005 application) & 90432436 (applying in January 2021 for a registration of the image for commercial uses related to liquor; final registration appears to be pending but I don't know what difference that may make, if any, in the meantime). Even if the fist-and-flower alone (sans dagger) is protected as a trademark, Commons allows trademarked content provided it is otherwise free-license per Commons:Trademarks and other site policies. That said, I would not object at all to adding {{Trademarked}} to any of the images to caution others about the possibility of infringing commercial use. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 23:06, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- We should add {{Trademarked}} to things that we know aren't trademarks? Andy Dingley (talk) 23:09, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Potentially; I don't know. I would note the broad wording of {{Trademarked}}: "This work includes material that may be protected as a trademark in some jurisdictions." That's pretty broad and doesn't concede much, and besides the images would still be acceptable to host on Commons with that label anyway. In general, I don't know how similar an image would have to be for it to be potentially protected by the same trademark, though I know it's somewhat of a case-by-case determination. I also know it has something to do with the intended use; I imagine that if someone started printing File:Gonzo.svg on bottles of liquor to be sold at market, that could be potentially problematic for them even without the word "gonzo" or the element of a dagger.But I take your point that it's certainly not the same image. We don't want to be skittish when trademark holders making encroaching claims of ownership over images that aren't truly theirs. In this case the images and the trademarked imagery are clearly different, even if they incorporate some of the same elements. It's a judgment call when it would be worth placing a general warning to others about the need to be mindful of similar trademarked images. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 05:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- I see {{Trademarked}} as being intended for use on products, where a de minimis trademark might be visible, rather than for use on trademarks and their representations themselves. The point is to highlight that there is a recognisable trademark present and although that's acceptable for that image, it's not carte blanche to treat the image (i.e. by cropping) as a source for an image of that trademark which would no longer be de minimis, thus no longer justifiable as freely licensed content to our standard here.
- If I were HST's attorney (a chap can dream), then I would have advised him that the image here was no longer a good subject for a trademark, as it had escaped into the PD. Like images which aren't clearly above TOO, you're welcome to trademark these, but they're no longer strongly defensible. I presume he heard similar advice and then developed the dagger form of the logo as a result, so that that could be better protected. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Potentially; I don't know. I would note the broad wording of {{Trademarked}}: "This work includes material that may be protected as a trademark in some jurisdictions." That's pretty broad and doesn't concede much, and besides the images would still be acceptable to host on Commons with that label anyway. In general, I don't know how similar an image would have to be for it to be potentially protected by the same trademark, though I know it's somewhat of a case-by-case determination. I also know it has something to do with the intended use; I imagine that if someone started printing File:Gonzo.svg on bottles of liquor to be sold at market, that could be potentially problematic for them even without the word "gonzo" or the element of a dagger.But I take your point that it's certainly not the same image. We don't want to be skittish when trademark holders making encroaching claims of ownership over images that aren't truly theirs. In this case the images and the trademarked imagery are clearly different, even if they incorporate some of the same elements. It's a judgment call when it would be worth placing a general warning to others about the need to be mindful of similar trademarked images. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 05:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- We should add {{Trademarked}} to things that we know aren't trademarks? Andy Dingley (talk) 23:09, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
here.
- Andy Dingley: That makes sense to me. At this point I'm 100% in your corner. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 00:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep all are PUBLIC DOMAIN. --Ooligan (talk) 20:52, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The party claiming copyright must demonstrate that they – or Hunter Thompson – have acquired such rights from the artist who made the original poster.--Kernpanik (talk) 07:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per majority of contributors to this discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 19:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be an invalid license. It is claimed to be be a public domain image created by Justin Arnold in 2013. It's not old enough to be out of copyright. It was not uploaded by Justin Arnold as own work, so where's the proof this is a public domain image? Meters (talk) 20:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Igren: you can follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the designer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 19:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Track map incorporates OR analysis that has resulted in confusion from outside users mistaking it for official data. While this map does not violate any policies on Commons, it's repeated inclusion in Wikipedia articles is disruptive and violates no original research policy there. Supportstorm (talk) 21:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, image is in use on the projects. If it is incorrect, this should be discussed on the projects to remove it from the articles. --Ellywa (talk) 19:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
