Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/02/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
error de fotografía ZorroEmprendedor (talk) 05:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7. --Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
TV program Copyright infringement. Gahukuro (talk) 07:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Trade (talk) 10:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy - personal photo by non-contributor (Commons:CSD#F10). --Lymantria (talk) 15:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia Metanetgurban (talk) 11:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violations – As per the footer of the source provided, quote "All materials contained on this site are protected by Korean copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior consent of Joins.com". In addition, as per the copyright policy of the source provided [1], quote "The service users confirm that it will not distort, remake, alter the information and confirms that Joins.com does not take responsibility for any problems that arise. In addition, without documented approval of Joins.com, users cannot use the information for information service or resell it for commercial or non-commercial purposes." Paper9oll (talk) 00:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Explicit at 00:45, 15 Februar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 15:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Mio errore di caricamento Marcomarchetti1234 (talk) 11:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 21:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Advertisment BlinxTheKitty (talk) 15:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Advertising BlinxTheKitty (talk) 15:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, advert BlinxTheKitty (talk) 15:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
I don't see any evidence of the Creative Commons license. Larry Hockett (talk) 06:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 22:00, 15 Februar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: Getty Images photo --Krdbot 03:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Trade (talk) 10:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy: personal picture by non-contributor (F10). --Lymantria (talk) 09:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Potential copyvio. Low image resolution and missing EXIF data. COM:OTRS permission is needed. SCP-2000 03:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Shizhao at 02:41, 16 Februar 2021 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source --Krdbot 09:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Logo Askeuhd (talk) 23:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 10:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
在以下位置有此媒体的更新版本 There is an updated version of the media at: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AWUL-he21_00327_%E8%82%89%E8%92%B2%E5%9C%98_4.pdf Snaketong (talk) 02:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep: They are scans of different copies of the same old book. They could be used to validate each other. --維基小霸王 (talk) 05:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
You are right! : Keep: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snaketong (talk • contribs) 23:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Snaketong (talk) 23:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): User withdrawn. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 10:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
wrong file Navidulhuq (talk) 08:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 10:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
wrong file Navidulhuq (talk) 08:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 10:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Original research, lack of verifiability, POV Hooiwind (talk) 12:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep :
- Français : Je viens ici suite au message du bot sur Wikipédia. Le fichier est utilisé sur wikipédia francophone. Il y a des sources donnée sur ce Wikipédia qui corrobore ces cartes et qui donnent des données similaires à celle sur cette carte. Sources :Belgique: données démolinguistiques , Maintenir une homogénéité culturelle et linguistique : mise en perspective diachronique des stratégies de découpages territoriaux de la périphérie flamande de Bruxelles-Capitale ou l'Atlas d'histoire (isbn=978-2-8041-4390-9) carte sur la Belgique régionalisée. Je ne vois pas pourquoi cette image devrait être supprimée.
- English : I come here after the bot messages on the Wikipedia in French. The file is used on french wikipédia. There are sources on that Wikipédia that gives the same informations than these two maps more or less. See above the three source for the data represented on this map. I don't see why this image have to be deleted ? --Huguespotter (talk) 17:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 10:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Original research, lack of verifiability, POV Hooiwind (talk) 12:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep :
- Français : Je viens ici suite au message du bot sur Wikipédia. Le fichier est utilisé sur wikipédia francophone. Il y a des sources donnée sur ce Wikipédia qui corrobore ces cartes et qui donnent des données similaires à celle sur cette carte. Sources :Belgique: données démolinguistiques , Maintenir une homogénéité culturelle et linguistique : mise en perspective diachronique des stratégies de découpages territoriaux de la périphérie flamande de Bruxelles-Capitale ou l'Atlas d'histoire (isbn=978-2-8041-4390-9) carte sur la Belgique régionalisée. Je ne vois pas pourquoi cette image devrait être supprimée.
- English : I come here after the bot messages on the Wikipedia in French. The file is used on french wikipédia. There are sources on that Wikipédia that gives the same informations than these two maps more or less. See above the three source for the data represented on this map. I don't see why this image have to be deleted ? --Huguespotter (talk) 17:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 11:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Original research, lack of verifiability, POV Hooiwind (talk) 12:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 11:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 15:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- No: © Kelly Pao - http://www.redbubble.com/people/kellypa --E4024 (talk) 16:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Yes sorry I put the wrong © information for the image -- new user here -- should I just have it deleted and reupload it? Jenduki (talk) 16:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC) Jenduki
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by EugeneZelenko. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 11:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
La wiphala no representa al departamento de Tarija, ellos no se representan con banderas, y tampoco representa al sureste ni suroeste de Chuquisaca Elpepefachero (talk) 20:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Elpepefachero Esta no es razón para borrar el mapa pero sí para corregirlo. En la zona que describes que no va la Wiphala se podría poner en blanco como parte de la bandera de la flor de Patujú, saludos.Janitoalevic (talk) 03:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 11:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The map is wrong, given that the Wiphala is an official flag in all of Bolivia, according to Article 6 of the Constitution of Bolivia Ingaviano (talk) 08:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Adding information to the above: we have to read the Article 6 of the Constitution of Bolivia approved in 2009, which clearly states that the wiphala is a national symbol of Bolivia. Nowhere does it say it is only in certain regions of Bolivia, and national means that it is official in all of the country. Not only that, there is no law that states the Patujú flag is official in all of the regions that it shows. This map shows a subjective "gut feeling" of what flag is supposed to go where, but does not reflect the laws and the Constitution of Bolivia. This makes this map invalid and completely incorrect, and should therefore be deleted.--Ingaviano (talk) 08:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- It makes no sense to have fun the country in two poles, when the consitutationally consitutational flag is a national symbol, Asismimo there are more indigenous flags in Bolivia, including all of them would be complex on a map, so it must be eliminated. Bodoque9903 (talk) 20:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the Wiphala being also a national flag makes this map invalid, because it is showing a wrong depiction of where the Wiphala is "official". It is not limited to just some regions, it is a national symbol according to Article 6 of the Constitution. @-akko Do you think you can please weigh in on this issue? Thank you in advance. Ingaviano (talk) 15:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: File is a DW of a flag that was deleted for copyright reasons. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Restored per UDR on my talk page. No prejudice against renomination for reasons stated by Ingaviano. Abzeronow (talk) 20:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of own work Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete in the speediest way possible. This seems to be an attempt to someone, by the WMF-banned Icewhiz. Should be speedied as vandalism/harassment. JavaHurricane 01:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by AntiCompositeNumber. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 11:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
This is a user page image that is no longer in use. Lipsio (talk) 01:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Disputed on Czech Wikipedia, probably not stated person. Gumruch (talk) 00:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Second, false license. No reason/proof for aplying {{PD-CzechGov}} moreover combinated with stated own work. Gumruch (talk) 21:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Nonsense. E4024 (talk) 02:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The mentionned source says : "Published: Dec 17, 2014. Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License". Not for Commons. Kathisma (talk) 16:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Spam (?), no educational use, bad quality. Jcornelius (talk) 02:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope used to host or advertise by a single purpose account Bidgee (talk) 04:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Kotivalo (talk) 05:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Commons is not a personal photo host. JIP (talk) 20:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 05:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata and previous publications.
- File:تمبر.jpg – previously published at http://isna.ir/fa/news/93051808513/%D8%AA%D9%85%D8%A8%D8%B1-%D8%A2%D9%82%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%86%D9%85%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C-%D8%B4%D8%AF. The watermark appears to have been deliberately cropped out to conceal the copyright infringement (and inadvertently shaving off one pixel in width). It seems likely that neither the depicted work nor the derivative are the uploader's own.
- File:مصلی تاریخی سبزوار.jpg – previously published at http://www.negahmedia.ir/media/show_pic/16439. Watermarks attributing the photo to Mosalla Sabzevar appear to have been deliberately cloned and cropped out to conceal the copyright infringement.
- File:مسجد جامع سبزوار.jpg – previously published at http://www.e-sabzevar.ir/fa/view_page.php?v=101&text=%D9%85%D9%86%D9%88%DB%8C%20%DA%AF%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%B4%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C%20%3E%20%D8%A2%D8%AB%D8%A7%D8%B1%20%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C%20%D9%88%20%D8%A8%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C%20%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AE%DB%8C. Prominently watermarked.
- File:آرامگاه کاشفی.jpg – found at http://abolfazlbeyhaghi.persianblog.ir/post/170/ (albeit in lower resolution) published more than a year before the uploader claims it was created and more than 2½ years before it was uploaded here.
- File:آرامگاه حاج ملا هادی سبزواری.jpg – found in higher resolution at http://www.tishineh.com/tour/Pictures/Item/2908/35846.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:50, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- And since the uploader continued to upload multiple copyright violations instead of commenting here, you can add the following to the list:
- File:خانه باغ اسکویی.jpg – obviously a scan or other reproduction of a pre-existing photo (note the lower left-hand corner); previously published (albeit in lower resolution) at http://seeiran.ir/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%BA-%D8%A7%D8%B3%DA%A9%D9%88%DB%8C%DB%8C-620x325.jpg
- —LX (talk, contribs) 10:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:20, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Recent pictures, bogus license, no permission.
- File:Faramarz Khan Caravansary.jpg
- File:Sarbedaran SQ.jpg
- File:Shoayb Mosque.jpg
- File:سردر قدیمی بیمارستان حشمتیه.jpg
- File:بیمارستان حشمتیه.jpg
- File:Sabzevar Cement.jpg
- File:مصلی تاریخی سبزوار 1.jpg
- File:Sabzevar Airport.jpg
- File:Iraj Mahdiyan.jpg
- File:کتابخانه ناوی.jpg
- File:شش یخدوها.jpg
- File:مجسمه رستم و سهراب.jpg
- File:خانه تاریخی جعفرزاده.jpg
- File:خانه افچنگی.jpg
- File:ShoaybTomb1.jpg
- File:دکتر سیادتی.jpg
- File:حمید سبزواری.jpg
- File:حسین قندی.jpg
Yann (talk) 17:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- I talked to the user in his native language in Persian Wikipedia fa:بحث کاربر:Ariaamiri#کپیرایت but he seems to have no understanding of copyright issues and even is not willing to learn! 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, per nomination/discussion. Different external sources, no permission.Wdwd (talk) 19:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
The {{PD-Iran}} claim needs evidence. There is no evidence that these are indeed in public domain in Iran. The images do not seem that old. Attempts to obtain permission from the culture office of Sabzevar have failed as far as I know.
- File:Shariatmadar historic house (Ghanbar Siyah alley) 02.jpg
- File:Shariatmadar historic house (Ghanbar Siyah alley) 01.jpg
- File:Oskouie historic house 02.jpg
- File:Shariatmadar Tehrani historic house 01.jpg
- File:Oskouie historic house 01.jpg
- File:Moslem historic house 03.jpg
- File:Cheshomi historic house 01.jpg
- File:Moslem historic house 02.jpg
- File:Moslem historic house 01.jpg
- File:Mohammadiyani historic house 01.jpg
- File:Kazem Cheshomi historic house 01.jpg
- File:Cheshomi historic house 02.jpg
- File:Baghani historic house 01.jpg
- File:Sarpoush Caravanserai of Sabzevar 01.jpg
- File:Sang Keleydar Caravanserai of Sabzevar 01.jpg
- File:Zargarha Hoseinieh of Sabzevar 02.jpg
- File:Zargarha Hoseinieh of Sabzevar 01.jpg
- File:Ghannadha Hosseinieh of Sabzevar 02.jpg
- File:Lotfalikhan Hoseinieh of Sabzevar 01.jpg
- File:Torshizi historic house in Baghan 01.jpg
- File:Oskuie historical house 03.jpg
- File:Torshizi historic house in Baghan 02.jpg
- File:Bildar Bashi tomb 01.jpg
- File:Oskuie historical house 02.jpg
- File:Adib Karrabi tomb 01.jpg
- File:Memarzadeh Caravansary of Sabzevar 02.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 09:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo of unknown person without educational use Kotivalo (talk) 09:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
No useful content / Used in selfpromotion article on sl wiki (was deleted) A09090091 (talk) 09:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Why should Commons care about what someone's social media profile picture looks like? JIP (talk) 20:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- @JIP: Just for knowing, maybe it is linked with latest TikTok challenge in Slovenia (adding yourself to article of your hometown)? IDK --A09090091 (talk) 21:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ragnarok6688 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Mostly photos of photos. Often professional sports photography. Unlikely to be own work.
- File:Doctoral Interview in South Africa.jpg
- File:Williams as a Raider.jpg
- File:Williams as a 49er.tif
- File:Williams interview.jpg
- File:Williams in locker room.jpg
- File:Jamie and Horse.jpg
- File:Williams in High School Sports.jpg
- File:Williams College football.jpg
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Trade (talk) 10:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- has this maybe even been deleted before under a different file name? Quakewoody (talk) 13:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo of a user with no valid contribs; only used for vandalism at ro:Special:Diff/13909626. Gikü (talk) 12:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo of a user with no valid contribs, only used for self-promo at ro:Utilizator:Dr.Pascal Dameh. Gikü (talk) 12:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 14:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 14:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 15:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope, text only. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
I don't see an indication that the uploader has the right to licence these images. We'd need OTRS permission or evidence that this is in the public domain
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 16:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Blurred image, unused, not properly described, no educative value Richard Avery (talk) 16:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, blurry, no educational use, seems to be have been created as a joke. JIP (talk) 20:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 16:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 16:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused WMF project screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmadnejad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own-work claim: small size, user upload history (also no FOP in IRAN).
4nn1l2 (talk) 17:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmadnejad (talk · contribs)
[edit]User blocked 3 times for copyright violations, unlikely to be own works.
- File:زهرا بهروز آذر.jpg
- File:Madanibajestani.jpg
- File:Madanibajestani2.jpg
- File:Hadi mohammadpour1.jpg
- File:Hadi mohammadpour12.jpg
- File:Hadi mohammadpour.jpg
- File:Dibatabatabei.jpg
- File:Dogharoon.jpg
Yann (talk) 12:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 14:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zaragozano Escuer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - lower res, no EXIF, uploaded by sock of serial copyvio LTA, appear stolen from social media (e.g., title of "File:Sara Fernández Instagram.jpg" and File:Intervencion Sara Fernández.jpg is here; File:La vicealcaldesa de Zaragoza.jpg is here; etc.) Duck/COM:PRP issue.
- File:Ana Guerra en 2020.jpg
- File:Ana Alicia Guerra Morales.jpg
- File:Sara Fernández Instagram.jpg
- File:Alberto Pérez Petroch.jpg
- File:Intervencion Sara Fernández.jpg
- File:Carpas Cs Zaragoza.jpg
- File:Acto Cs Aragón.jpg
- File:Aiti Ocaña Morales.jpg
- File:La vicealcaldesa de Zaragoza.jpg
- File:Jorge Azcón Navarro.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 17:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Liltripdagoat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Another famous rapper who doesn't know about our project scope. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:Push ya penz.jpg
- File:Always remember to CHASE YOUR DREAMS.jpg
- File:We made it my nigga.jpg
- File:Yuh already know the deal.jpg
- File:We kan only go up from here.jpg
- File:Trippymaraj.jpg
- File:Heavy on it sleazeeeeee ahahahah.jpg
- File:Happy late valentine’s day.jpg
- File:Imma real one.jpg
- File:Blood gang hoe.jpg
- File:Say cheeseeeee.jpg
- File:Sum serious tingzz.jpg
- File:Trippy trip.jpg
- File:Taking the world by storm.jpg
- File:Right before i released a new song.jpg
- File:Deshawn storms.jpg
- File:Middle finger up to my competition.jpg
- File:Head honcho.jpg
- File:All in seriousness.jpg
- File:Blurry lane.jpg
- File:Baby G.O.A.T.jpg
- File:Liltrip.jpg
- User:Liltripdagoat
Achim (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Christianehlinger (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW of paintings by fr:Maurice Ehlinger, who died 1981. France is pma + 70, so not PD until 01.01.2052 (1981+70+1)
- File:Monique par Maurice Ehlinger.jpg
- File:Michèle par Maurice Ehlinger.jpg
- File:Lucinda par Maurice Ehlinger.jpg
- File:Le peintre Maurice Ehlinger et son modèle.jpg
- File:L'eurasienne par Maurice Ehlinger.jpg
- File:Cathy par Maurice Ehlinger.jpg
- File:Renée par Maurice Ehlinger.jpg
- File:La Skieuse par Maurice Ehlinger.jpg
- File:Jacqueline nue par Maurice Ehlinger.jpg
- File:Jacqueline par Maurice Ehlinger.jpg
- File:Deux autoportaits de l'auteur.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 18:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, self-promotion — Dudek1337 (talk) 18:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
educational value? Veliensis (talk) 19:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope, fake. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Matlin (talk) 19:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Not in-use picture of an unknown person. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 20:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
No useful content / advertisement A09090091 (talk) 21:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
No useful content / advertisement A09090091 (talk) 21:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope / No useful content A09090091 (talk) 21:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
great, please delete User:Catshunter
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
No useful content / Out of scope bei Commons is not a place for personal holiday snaps A09090091 (talk) 21:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
great, please delete User:Catshunter
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Biplab (Rapper) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion of another famous rapper who didn't contribute to our projects. Commons is neither the right place to promote your career nor your free web host.
- File:Naya Kalakar official music.jpg
- File:Naya Kalakar song by Biplab.jpg
- File:Biplab raper.jpg
- File:Biplab Rapper.jpg
- File:BiplabRapper.jpg
Achim (talk) 21:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
poor unusable photo with inscriptions, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 23:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:EDUSE. Out of scope photo by non-significant contributor. According to toolforge, this editor has only editor their user page in ar.wiki BriefEdits (talk) 23:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:EDUSE. Out of scope photo by non-significant contributor. According to toolforge, this editor has only editor their user page in ar.wiki BriefEdits (talk) 23:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation from Instagram. Larry Hockett (talk) 06:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope? seems to be a selfie with a filter BlinxTheKitty (talk) 15:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:31, 22 Februar 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Liltripdagoat --Krdbot 09:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Artist only died in 1967. No permission from the estate or rights holder Artmax (talk) 14:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jarekt (talk) 02:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Artist only died in 1967. No permission from the estate or rights holder Artmax (talk) 14:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jarekt (talk) 02:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be from Unsplash, not a Pixabay, and not compatible with Commons since it was uploaded in 2020: https://unsplash.com/photos/Kf07tqhQRJk/info Ytoyoda (talk) 04:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 07:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded to Unsplash after 2017, not compatible with Commons: https://unsplash.com/photos/SZ1ku0VN44g/info Ytoyoda (talk) 04:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 07:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
I want to keep the photo as a personal archive Balkis Anton Nurohman (talk) 01:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload. --Wdwd (talk) 13:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
The administrator requested to remove the photo from publication for copyright reasons Balkis Anton Nurohman (talk) 00:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - very beautiful pic. E4024 (talk) 00:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Question Which administrator? Which copyright reasons? Taivo (talk) 09:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept. No reason for deletion is shown. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
I want to keep the photo as a personal archive Balkis Anton Nurohman (talk) 01:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload. --Wdwd (talk) 13:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
The administrator requested to remove the photo from publication for copyright reasons Balkis Anton Nurohman (talk) 00:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment Which administrator? Which copyright reasons? Taivo (talk) 09:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept. No reason for deletion is shown. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
I want to keep the photo as a personal archive Balkis Anton Nurohman (talk) 01:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload. --Wdwd (talk) 13:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
The administrator requested to remove the photo from publication for copyright reasons Balkis Anton Nurohman (talk) 00:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Question Which administrator? Which copyright problems? Taivo (talk) 10:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept. No reason for deletion is shown. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
users who want it, because of religious issues Balkis Anton Nurohman (talk) 00:20, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason given for deletion. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
I want to keep the photo as a personal archive Balkis Anton Nurohman (talk) 01:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload. --Wdwd (talk) 13:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
The administrator requested to remove the photo from publication for copyright reasons Balkis Anton Nurohman (talk) 00:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep E4024 (talk) 00:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Question Which administrator? Which copyright reasons? Taivo (talk) 09:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept. No reason for deletion is shown. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Is it free to upload files from that source? E4024 (talk) 01:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete non-free source. DMacks (talk) 05:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Dubious o/w by a newcomer that already made a copyvio upload. E4024 (talk) 01:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. It's all over the usual filesharing/wallpaper sites. DMacks (talk) 05:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Very large text document with unclear copyright. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
very blurry and very low resolution many better files Nauener Tor (Potsdam) Oursana (talk) 03:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that this image is released under the described license. The terms for the website, at http://jetwit.com/wordpress/about/, state that commercial use is not allowed without permission, so this license is "not free enough" for Commons. C.Fred (talk) 04:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Cropped version of File:Top 10 - best motorcycle records.jpg, no permission. Cjp24 (talk) 04:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded to Pixabay after January 2019, not compatible with Commons Ytoyoda (talk) 04:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded to Unsplash in 2020, incompatible with Commons: https://unsplash.com/photos/dDdSL2Ix9M0 Ytoyoda (talk) 05:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
It is a low-resolution version of the 5.3 MB image: One of the inaugural trio of South Australian Railways locomotives delivered in 1856 (photographed about 1870).png. Further, some important detail has been cropped off. SCHolar44 (talk) 07:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yilku1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © Eusko Legebiltzarra - Parlamento Vasco Theklan (talk) 07:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- This low res image is part of the public images given by the Basque Parliament. -Theklan (talk) 07:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Reproduction of a public artwork - no sufficient freedom of panorama in Slovenia for sharing such works, no evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 08:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gjorgje Jovanovik
[edit]The person credited as the author of these photos is in the picture itself.
Vera (talk) 08:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 13:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
low quality Luda.slominska (talk) 09:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file in use. --Wdwd (talk) 14:06, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
low quality Luda.slominska (talk) 09:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Some doubt about claimed authorship of uploader, as the same photography is in higher resolution, though cropped from both ends, available her: https://www.corteconti.it/portals/0/presidente-carlino.jpg and (C) attributed to "Corte dei conti" in its metadata. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Extremely poor quality, slide scanned at low res, plenty of better shots in same category Sardaka (talk) 09:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; no alternative filename given. --Wdwd (talk) 16:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
low quality Luda.slominska (talk) 09:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 16:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Considering the user's other uploads are also most likely copyright violations and the lack of useful EXIF data and small size, this is also most likely a copyvio. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 16:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
looks like a professional promo pic, with no info from the uploader to say they took the image Lugnuts (talk) 10:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 16:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Images in collage without sources. Please upload each image individually with correct source & author. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sardar Nadir Ali (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation
Timtrent (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and files also used for spam. IWI (talk) 05:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sardar Nadir Ali (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Junction-pedestrian footbridge (C-3 road-A. Bonifacio Avenue-Sgt. Rivera street - Skyway Stage 3 & NLEx Harbor Link 10.1 constructions - Pag-ibig sa Nayon-San Jose, Quezon City & Caloocan)
[edit]Cleanup: All 31 images here are redundant images of an unremarkable overpass. All best and in scope images that were previously on this category have been moved to Category:Construction of Skyway Stage 3 - Circumferential Road 3 segment, Category:Construction of Skyway Stage 3 - Sergeant Rivera Avenue segment, and Category:Bonifacio Avenue (Quezon City). These remaining images are COM:NOTUSED and are redundant to the content already kept at the aforementioned categories. On top of that the name of the category itself doesn't pass COM:Categories.
- File:2252C-3 road-Sgt. Rivera street Skyway Stage 35 construction.jpg
- File:2252C-3 road-Sgt. Rivera street Skyway Stage 36 construction.jpg
- File:2287Junction pedestrian footbridge 07.jpg
- File:2287Junction pedestrian footbridge 08.jpg
- File:2287Junction pedestrian footbridge 09.jpg
- File:2287Junction pedestrian footbridge 20.jpg
- File:2287Junction pedestrian footbridge 24.jpg
- File:2287Junction pedestrian footbridge 25.jpg
- File:2287Junction pedestrian footbridge 27.jpg
- File:2287Junction pedestrian footbridge 32.jpg
- File:2287Junction pedestrian footbridge 35.jpg
- File:2287Junction pedestrian footbridge 39.jpg
- File:2287Junction pedestrian footbridge 40.jpg
- File:2287Junction pedestrian footbridge 43.jpg
- File:2287Junction pedestrian footbridge 46.jpg
- File:2287Junction pedestrian footbridge 49.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 01.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 06.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 09.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 10.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 15.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 19.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 20.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 23.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 27.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 32.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 45.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 46.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 49.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 52.jpg
- File:2336Junction pedestrian footbridge 53.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Magandang hapon po; I did ponder how I would name the categories by asking the foremen there and looking at the mandatory DPWH Notices; but in TIME after finish product, official simple names are done and made by these DPWH fellows; I tell you it is very very hard to name the streets, the people there mixed up their Build Build Build, but after all these are finished rest assured that we will have simpler categories PROMIS though sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 06:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, no permission. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, no permission. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, no permission. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
I believe the magazines are too prominent to be de minimis thus I am nominating it for deletion. Feel free to discuss. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- I would also like to include File:Walmart merritt island FL (8250826888).jpg. Howhontanozaz (talk) 14:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, no permission. Howhontanozaz (talk) 14:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
File:2020-07-19 12 19 17 A bag of Lay's Kettle Cooked Original potato chips in the Dulles section of Sterling, Loudoun County, Virginia.jpg
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, no permission. Howhontanozaz (talk) 14:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
File:2020-07-22 13 18 19 A bag of Lay's Kettle Cooked Jalapeno flavored potato chips in the Dulles section of Sterling, Loudoun County, Virginia.jpg
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, no permission. Howhontanozaz (talk) 14:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in en:Self-healing hydrogels and en:User:Sgmagill/sandbox with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 14:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Easily replaceable with math notation. JIP (talk) 20:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in en:Self-healing hydrogels and en:User:Sgmagill/sandbox with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 14:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Easily replaceable with math notation. JIP (talk) 20:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
File:2020-09-23 00 58 24 A bag of Lay's Kettle Cooked Jalapeno Flavored Potato Chips in the Dulles section of Sterling, Loudoun County, Virginia.jpg
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, no permission. Howhontanozaz (talk) 14:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
File:2020-07-22 11 12 14 A bag of Lay's Kettle Cooked Mesquite Barbecue Flavored Potato Chips in the Dulles section of Sterling, Loudoun County, Virginia.jpg
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, no permission. Howhontanozaz (talk) 14:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 14:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in pl:wikt:matematika and pl:wikt:ekvacio with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio, screenshot/still. Trijnsteltalk 17:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio, screenshot/still. Trijnsteltalk 17:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:v:Calcolatore serie di Fourier with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:v:Calcolatore serie di Fourier with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:v:Calcolatore serie di Fourier with table equivalent:
Righe> C'1 C'2 C'3 C'4 C'5 C'6 Con il calcolatore 1,0000 0,0012 0,3333 0,0012 0,2000 0,0012 Per via analitica 1,0000 0 0,3333 0 0,2000 0
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:v:Calcolatore serie di Fourier with table equivalent:
Righe> C'1 C'2 C'3 C'4 C'5 C'6 Con il calcolatore 1,0000 0,5001 0,3335 0,2501 0,2001 0,1667 Per via analitica 1,0000 0,5000 0,3333 0,2500 0,2000 0,1666
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:v:Calcolatore serie di Fourier with table equivalent:
periodo ampiezza t0 0,00 t1 0,40 t2 0,64 t3 0,75 t4 0,85 t5 0,99 t6 1,04 t7 0,86 t8 0,53 t9 0,21 t10 0,00 t11 -0,02 t12 -0,17 t13 -0,38 t14 -0,47 t15 -0,40 t16 -0,28 t17 -0,26 t18 -0,29 t19 -0,22 t20 -0,00
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Even if inside the book there is not any information about translator, this is the next release of Zofia Popławska's translation from 1924 (information about this is taken from IPSB and from comparison of this two editions. Popławska died in 1969 so this text is not in PD in Poland. Matlin (talk) 10:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 23:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Possibile violazione copyright Dipralb (talk) 17:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Possibile violazione copyright Dipralb (talk) 17:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Probably COM:DW from copyrighted magazine. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:50, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Public art, there is no freedom of panorama in Japan. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free statue. See COM:FOP. MER-C 20:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This freely-licensed image infringes sculptor's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:29, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of identifiable individuals (mostly minors) with no indication of consent to being photographed or having photograph published - as is required in Japan even in public locations. (See Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Japan) --
- File:Two school girls at Todaiji Temple (7412041218).jpg
- File:High school students at Imperial Palace, Tokyo (7498828580).jpg
- File:High school students at Imperial Palace, Tokyo (7498834212).jpg
- File:A school trip at Kyoto, Japan.jpg
- File:High school students playing with deer of Todaiji Temple (7412044132).jpg
- File:High school students playing with deer of Todaiji Temple (7412044994).jpg
- File:Primary school uniform in Nagasaki, Japan (249987635).jpg
- File:School Children of Nara (7391284414).jpg
- File:Police man at Imperial Palace, Tokyo (7498827628).jpg
- File:School girls in Nara, Japan (7391263316).jpg
- File:Two ladies at Imperial Palace, Tokyo (7498734152).jpg
- File:Kindergartner at Todaiji Temple (7412040618).jpg
DAJF (talk) 04:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy (talk · contribs)
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Japan and public art is copyrighted.
- File:Shinjuku (37882854314).jpg
- File:Shinjuku (24727876928).jpg
- File:Shinjuku (37882846814).jpg
- File:Shinjuku (24727910538).jpg
- File:Shinjuku (24727926538).jpg
- File:Shinjuku (37882782994).jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:59, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
The Congreso del Estado de Yucatán only has 25 seats, and there are several parties having representatives. Fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
I am a little uncertain whether this might pass over Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/France#Threshold_of_originality Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uk:Резонанс (хімія) and en:User:Wickey-nl/reso with TeX equivalent:
![{\displaystyle {\ce {[S=C=N^{\ominus }<->\ ^{\ominus }\!S-C\!\equiv \!N]}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/c17afeea6f4d9ade72c079cda93666ad29706a18)
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep IMHO it's not a disadvantage to have both the PNG and the TeX version since on some Wikipedia projects (like German) we don't use TeX for infobox structures. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:20, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as per Chem Sim 2001. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, based on previous uploads and the sentence: "Rangana Premaratne in a set from Punchi Rala" Trijnsteltalk 17:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP and nomination. --Ezarateesteban 20:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
This image does is not. Your previously deleted she again. No fair-use in Commons. Thanks. 2804:D4B:5437:2B00:900B:F706:24A8:57CB 04:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 23:56, 19 June 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Non-free logo above threshold of originality (F1) --Krdbot 07:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:v:Calcolatore serie di Fourier with table equivalent:
periodo ampiezza t0 0,00 t1 0,62 t2 0,78 t3 0,61 t4 0,63 t5 0,99 t6 1,26 t7 1,00 t8 0,39 t9 -0,00 t10 -0,00 t11 0,00 t12 -0,38 t13 -1,00 t14 -1,26 t15 -1,00 t16 -0,63 t17 -0,61 t18 -0,78 t19 -0,63 t20 -0,00
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ti ringrazio per il pesante lavoro che svolgi correggendo i miei errori, dall'inizio dei lavori ad oggi ho imparato diverse cose e spero, seguendo le tue nuove compilazioni, di non commetterne altri.
- --Funzioni di correlazione (talk) 09:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Nessun problema, prego, il piacere è tutto mio. --WIKImaniac 16:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:09, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in en:GNU TeXmacs and it:GNU Texmacs with TeX equivalent:
- Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- It should be kept, because it is not made with en:TeX but with en:GNU TeXmacs and the point of the page is to show what TeXmacs (which, despite the name, is not based on TeX) does. It *seems* made with TeX, because TeXmacs has good typography and uses the same fonts. I will think about how to make that clear in the text. (edit): I have edited the text in en:GNU TeXmacs with the aim of making that clear.
- --Pireddag (talk) 23:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Pireddag: I understand your point. That's why I added a parameter to keep this pixel graphic. This discussion about deletion can be stopped, please Keep the image. Sorry for the nomination. --WIKImaniac 17:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Pireddag: I understand your point. That's why I added a parameter to keep this pixel graphic. This discussion about deletion can be stopped, please
Kept – Request withdrawn because the picture is to demonstrate typesetting, not to represent the formula itself. --bjh21 (talk) 21:16, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
No FOP (Freedom of Panorama) in Italy. This buldings was designed by architect Angelo Invernizzi (dead in 1958), so this image will be in PD only in 2028 (70 years after the death of author) Holapaco77 (talk) 10:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- La rivista da cui è tratta l'immagine è del 1936 e come avrai notato dalla pagina da cui è tratta, è libera di diritti d'autore; i diritti d'autore sono regolati dalla rivista non dall'edificio.--Eddy Lizia (talk) 13:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- L'immagine si riferisce ad un oggetto materiale, quindi non di applica il PD-Italy. --Holapaco77 (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per 1st exception at the updated COM:FOP Italy: work of a deceased author. @Holapaco77 and Eddy Lizia: The architect, as evidence here states, died in 1958. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: in the note it's clearly written: "Copyright protection expires 70 years after the death of the original author (who is defined as the creator or designer) here. On January 1st of the following year (ie. January 1 of the 71st Year), freely licensed images of the author's 3D works such as sculptures, buildings, bridges or monuments are now free and can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons"
Kept: per {{FoP-Italy}}. Ruthven (msg) 07:54, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
The threshold of originality in Italy is high but I don't think it's so high that this logo wouldn't receive protection Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Logo not simple --Sreejith K (talk) 23:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 14:22, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image.
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}{}\\{\ce {{LnCl3}+ 3NaC5H5 ->[{\ce {THF}}] {(C5H5)3Ln}+ 3NaCl}}\\{}\end{matrix}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/9524d2b315bd271e9bf820182c18f1eeda691ccb)
--WIKImaniac 19:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete In this case it's the best to use the TeX version for this equation. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
low quality Luda.slominska (talk) 20:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- I would like to cancel this nomination. There is no better free picture of this fortress and people want to use it for illustration--Luda.slominska (talk) 07:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Nomination withdrawn. Poor photo quality but compensating in scope usefulness as Commons lacks other free licensed images of specific subject. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 20:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
You may delete this file, as it was taken of a screen. DestinationFearFan (talk) 00:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom and with consent of uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:54, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted CV. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:58, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:58, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Non sourced map. The uploader states: "I created this, mate...I am the source." Not educationally useful. Ixocactus (talk) 21:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Do not delete. The user requested to know what the source of the image was and he got his answer. He does not explain why he thinks it's "not educationally useful" and arbitrarily decided it needed to be deleted, and furthermore if he had bothered to read the article in which the image is used he would see that it corresponds with the information provided there. A source has been provided. Wareno (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Unsourced materials are not useful. Since you put a source on file I think we can keep it. Ixocactus (talk) 19:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept. In use in multiple projects, therefore clearly in scope -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:00, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Personal artwork by unreknowned artist. Richard Avery (talk) 19:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution Image. Cropped from orignial photograph. So clear copyright violation of original photographer. Also good chances to get a full resolution image with clear camera metadata. So to avoid conflicts delete this photograph. Ranjithsiji (talk) 07:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Low Resolution image. No metadata. No camera data. This may be a screenshot or resized picture of an original image. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Suggest to delete this image. Also there is good chance to get a good photograph of these living persons. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image without any kind of metadata. Looks like a resized version of original image or a screenshot of another photo or video. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Also there is good chance to get a good photograph of this living person. Suggest to delete this to avoid conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image without any kind of metadata. Looks like a resized version of original image or a screenshot of another photo or video. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Suggest to delete this to avoid conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image without any kind of metadata. Looks like a resized version of original image or a screenshot of another photo or video. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Suggest to delete this to avoid conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image without any kind of metadata. Looks like a resized version of original image or a screenshot of another photo or video. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Suggest to delete this to avoid conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image without any kind of metadata. Looks like a resized version of original image or a screenshot of another photo or video. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Suggest to delete this to avoid conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image without any kind of metadata. Looks like a resized version of original image. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Suggest to delete this to avoid conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:50, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image without any kind of metadata. Looks like a resized version of original image. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Suggest to delete this to avoid conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image without any kind of metadata. Looks like a resized version of original image. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Suggest to delete this to avoid conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image without any kind of metadata. Looks like a resized version of original image. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Suggest to delete this to avoid conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image without any kind of metadata. Looks like a resized version of original image. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Suggest to delete this to avoid conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image without any kind of metadata. Looks like a resized version of original image. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Suggest to delete this to avoid conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image without any kind of metadata. Looks like a resized version of original image. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Suggest to delete this to avoid conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image without any kind of metadata. Looks like a resized version of original image. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Suggest to delete this to avoid conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image without any kind of metadata. Looks like a resized version of original image. Clear copyright violation of original creator or photographer. Suggest to delete this to avoid conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
No Metadata. Very Low resolution image. Not used in any of wikis. Suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of computer graphics. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of computer graphics. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of computer graphics. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
This is essentially a duplicate of File:Kimchi at restaurant Korean Kitchen.jpg. I don't think Commons needs two almost identical versions of the same dish. I uploaded this file by mistake. JIP (talk) 20:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:56, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Uploader suggests he is the person in the photo, the name of the author is in the metadata; need their permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 10:05, 31 October 2021 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 13:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Original research, lack of verifiability, POV Hooiwind (talk) 12:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as the map 2. I copy the message I put on the delete page of this map :
- Français : Je viens ici suite au message du bot sur Wikipédia. Le fichier est utilisé sur wikipédia francophone. Il y a des sources donnée sur ce Wikipédia qui corrobore ces cartes et qui donnent des données similaires à celle sur cette carte. Sources :Belgique: données démolinguistiques , Maintenir une homogénéité culturelle et linguistique : mise en perspective diachronique des stratégies de découpages territoriaux de la périphérie flamande de Bruxelles-Capitale ou l'Atlas d'histoire (isbn=978-2-8041-4390-9) carte sur la Belgique régionalisée. Je ne vois pas pourquoi cette image devrait être supprimée.
- English : I come here after the bot messages on the Wikipedia in French. The file is used on french wikipédia. There are sources on that Wikipédia that gives the same informations than these two maps more or less. See above the three source for the data represented on this map. I don't see why this image have to be deleted ? --Huguespotter (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 11:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Artist only died in 1967. No permission from the estate or rights holder. 95.223.238.102 14:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File can be restored in 2038. --Rosenzweig τ 17:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Artist only died in 1967. No permission from the estate or rights holder. 95.223.238.102 14:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File can be restored in 2038. --Rosenzweig τ 17:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Artist only died in 1967. No permission from the estate or rights holder. Artmax (talk) 14:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File can be restored in 2038. --Rosenzweig τ 17:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Artist only died in 1967. No permission from the estate or rights holder Artmax (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File can be restored in 2038. --Rosenzweig τ 17:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Artist only died in 1967. No permission from the estate or rights holder Artmax (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File can be restored in 2038. --Rosenzweig τ 17:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Artist only died in 1967. No permission from the estate or rights holder Artmax (talk) 14:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File can be restored in 2038. --Rosenzweig τ 17:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
I don't see the CC BY-SA 4.0 license on vecernji.hr Timk70 (talk) 12:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete Copyrighted by stated photographers of Croatian TV as stated at source. --Smooth O (talk) 13:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:46, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
it is a duplicate of File:Home of John J. French.jpg . . . I am the author of both Jim Evans (talk) 18:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:16, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Haida Gwaii (Queen Charlotte Islands) - Graham Island - on the trail to the Golden Spruce (deceased) - Haida signage - (21372803350).jpg
[edit]No COM:FOP for text & artwork in Canada MPF (talk) 00:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep not as 2D as it gets. Plus, engraving could qualify as craftsmanship. --Webfil (talk) 14:38, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
the source links to itself. The claim that it was created in 1917 and photographed in 1947 by "an unknown photographer" is most likely bogus. Yinweiaiqing (talk) 01:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:55, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
the source links to itself. The claim that it was photographed in 1951 by "an unknown photographer" is most likely bogus. (in no way does this look like a 1951 photograph from China) Yinweiaiqing (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:55, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
the source links to itself. The claim that it was photographed in 1952 by "an unknown photographer" is most likely bogus. Yinweiaiqing (talk) 01:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:55, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
по запросу автора Леонид Макаров (talk) 04:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:55, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
The metadata of the image indicates that the photograph has a copyright dating from 2009, a different date than the one indicated by the user, so is presumed that he was not the one who took the photo. Taichi (talk) 05:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:57, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Low resolution shot with no higher resolution available suggests this has been culled frm elsewhere. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 07:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Low resolution shot with no higher resolution available suggests this has been culled from elsewhere. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 07:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 07:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
From a wiki with no verifiable source or license. Need information about the original source or photographer and permission to license it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
From a wiki with no verifiable source or license. Need information about the original source or photographer and permission to license it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
From a wiki with no verifiable source or license. Need information about the original source or photographer and permission to license it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
low quality Luda.slominska (talk) 09:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo does not represent tne natural monument/ Luda.slominska (talk) 09:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo does not represent tne natural monument Luda.slominska (talk) 09:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
low quality Luda.slominska (talk) 09:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Invitation (statue)
[edit]There's no freedom of panorama in Monaco for public artworks still in copyright. The artist, w:Kees Verkade, died just recently in December 2020.
- File:Invitation - Monaco (2).jpg
- File:Invitation - Monaco.jpg
- File:Jardins Saint-Martin, Monaco - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:Montecarlo - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:SaintMartinStatue.jpeg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Just heartbreaking. We should be reactively deleting images rather than removing them from our noble project. Have we ever received a complaint regarding FOP from artists associated with this territory? The Instagramability of modern tourism shows us to be hopelessly passe in our attitudes. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- @No Swan So Fine: it's so sad indeed, but we have to respect the copyright law of Monaco and Verkade's posthumous copyright over the artwork. COM:CARES says that Commons respects the copyright of the authors, even if most people do not. While we indeed post such infringing photos on social media and the social media companies do not care that, Commons doesn't want a repeat of the 2012 takedown notice initiated by Claes Oldenburg against Wikimedia Foundation, which removed hundreds of photos of his public sculptures situated in the United States (U.S. doesn't have FOP for such works). And take note, Instagram was one of the "special mentions" of copyright-protectionist EU legislators who proposed the total abolition of FOP in the EU during 2015 (others included Facebook, Flickr, and yes Wikimedia itself). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for such a detailed response! Its something I think of a lot, and I consider myself fortunate to have contributed images from the UK that lacks such restrictions. Hopefully the EU will see the light. Do remind me to add the image to Verkade's article just before my 100th birthday! No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Info 2078 is the undeletion year since it is the expiration of the U.S. copyright (COM:URAA), which is 95+1 years from the "publication" (the unveiling date), even if the statue will fall PD in Monaco in 2071 (50+1 years after the sculptor's death). As there is no FOP in Monaco, the work's status is at mercy of the Monégasque and even U.S. copyrights. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, COM:FOP Monaco. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:04, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Photograph of a painting. Clear copyright violation of original painter. Suggest to delete this picture to avoid further conflicts and violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues of Mollusca in Monaco
[edit]The sculpture La Pieure was erected in 1981 and created by w:Emma de Sigaldi, who died in 2010. There is no freedom of panorama in Monaco for copyrighted sculptures like this.
- File:Jardins Saint-Martin, La Pieure, Emma de Sigaldi 1981, Monaco - panoramio.jpg
- File:Monaco - panoramio (46).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:12, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution scanned image of a pencil drawing. Not used in any of the wikis. Clear copyright violation of original creator. Suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:12, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution image. Metadata says it is photograph of another photograph by Jishnu Rajan. Clear copyright violation of the original photographer. Suggest to delete to avoid violation of law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Very low resolution image. Metadata says it is created with photoshop elements. Clear copyright violation of original photographer. Suggest to delete this file to avoid violation of applicable law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Low Resolution. No metadata. Resized picture of original picture. Clear copyright violation of original photographer. Suggest to delete to avoid violation of applicable law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image. Metadata says a Camera name. So may be a photograph of another photograph created by another photographer. clear Copyright violation. Suggest to delete to avoid violation of applicable law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image. Metadata says a Camera name. So may be a photograph of another photograph created by another photographer. clear Copyright violation. Suggest to delete to avoid violation of applicable law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image. Metadata says a Camera name. So may be a photograph of another photograph created by another photographer. clear Copyright violation. Suggest to delete to avoid violation of applicable law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
A Low resolution image. Metadata says a Camera name. So may be a photograph of another photograph created by another photographer. clear Copyright violation. Suggest to delete to avoid violation of applicable law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution image. Resized photo of an original photo by Valath. Clear copyright Violation. Suggest to delete to avoid violation of applicable law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution image. Resized photo of an original photo by Abhimanyu. Clear copyright Violation. Suggest to delete to avoid violation of applicable law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution image. Resized photo of an original photo. Clear copyright Violation. Suggest to delete to avoid violation of applicable law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution image. Resized photo of an original photo. Clear copyright Violation. Suggest to delete to avoid violation of applicable law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution image. Resized photo of an original photo. Clear copyright Violation. Suggest to delete to avoid violation of applicable law. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
low quality Luda.slominska (talk) 11:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Personal essay, plain text, out of scope. Achim (talk) 12:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Poor composition and dark. Unusable. Also COM:NOTUSED JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- At that time, I need to know the street so Famous and notorious Tagaytay Street corner A. Bonifacio Ave, but it was dark though sincerely ....Judgefloro (talk) 06:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete concur with nomination. Markoolio97 (talk) 17:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in uz:Tezlanish with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 15:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Advertising possibly? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 15:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KHAKZAR MUDASSAR (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is neither your personal free web host nor the right place to promote your career.
- File:Khakzar Mudassar as khaki bai.jpg
- File:Khakzar Mudassar.jpg
- File:KHAKZAR MUDASSAR.jpg
- File:Khakzar Mudassar 03.jpg
- File:Khakzar Mudassar 01.jpg
- File:Khakzar Mudassar 02.jpg
- File:Khakzar Mudassar in a smart look.jpg
Achim (talk) 16:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Achim55: really? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Kidding? COM:FOP Pakistan isn't applicable as the depicted artist doesn't look like a sculpture. --Achim (talk) 08:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
"Mythological New Zealand garden dwarf"? Rather a haphazard shot from a computer classroom. Out of scope. Kotivalo (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Washington DC in front of the White House November 7th 2020 Joe Biden announced the winner of the election 20 minutes prior 6.jpg
[edit]Uploaded by accident - my image please delete Kurtkaiser (talk) 16:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:20, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:20, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
old image Techleader1984 (talk) 17:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:v:Calcolatore serie di Fourier and it:v:Utente:Funzioni di correlazione/SandboxAnalisi with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:v:Calcolatore serie di Fourier with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:v:Calcolatore serie di Fourier with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Matlin (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:v:Calcolatore serie di Fourier with TeX equivalent:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&A'_{0}={\frac {1}{2\pi }}\left[0,5a(1)+a(2)+a(3)+\dots +a(19)+0,5a(20)\right]{\frac {2\pi }{19}}\\&A'_{n}={\frac {1}{\pi }}\left[0,5a(1)\cos(nwt_{1})+a(2)\cos(nwt_{2})+\dots +0,5a(20)\cos(nwt_{20})\right]{\frac {2\pi }{19}}\\&B'_{n}={\frac {1}{\pi }}\left[0,5a(1)\sin(nwt_{1})+a(2)\sin(nwt_{2})+\dots +0,5a(20)\sin(nwt_{20})\right]{\frac {2\pi }{19}}\\&C'_{n}=\left({A'_{n}}^{2}+{B'_{n}}^{2}\right)^{\frac {1}{2}}\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/b88a7ef592f259587fa693a0a8e69e19cc654a41)
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused crop. I do not understand why we felt the need to crop her from an earthquake picture. Is she a notable soldier? Or just one other soldier deployed in a help operation? E4024 (talk) 19:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Luda.slominska (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Luda.slominska (talk) 19:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Photo of a photo. Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Not own work LuCKY 💬 ✒️ 📂 11:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Original research, lack of verifiability Hooiwind (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use, Use {{Factual accuracy}} instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
This file is not a photograph by Alexander Binder (1888–1929) and is NOT a donation by Bundesarchiv Mutter Erde (talk) 15:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- oops, now i have seen, that Bundesarchiv has donated another version of this file, sorry. Mutter Erde (talk) 15:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image fits other uploads in this series by this user. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely a free logo [2] Marcus Cyron (talk) 18:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Someone already made this image Wikihelp7586 (talk) 20:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Disagree, does not seem to be a duplicate. -- Gauss (talk) 11:42, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- I disagree, although the image has an incorrect license, it is a free domain and even though it looks like a duplicate, it was actually taken a few minutes apart from the one that seemed duplicated. → --Levi bernardo (talk) 05:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- I disagree, although the image has an incorrect license, it is a free domain and even though it looks like a duplicate, it was actually taken a few minutes apart from the one that seemed duplicated. → --Levi bernardo (talk) 05:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of computer graphics. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots of a Team session. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots of a Team session. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots of a Team session. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots of a Team session. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots of a Team session. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots of a Team session. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots of a Teams session. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots of a Teams session. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots of a Teams session. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots of a Teams session. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots of a Teams session. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots of a Teams session. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Screenshots of a Teams session. No educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 20:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by McChizzle as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Honda Ridgeline Rear Seat.jpg
Converted to regular DR, per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (PNG -> JPEG).-- Túrelio (talk) 21:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Honda Ridgeline Rear Seat.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Upload by an SPA that has its exif data missing. Seems a screenshot from a video? Vera (talk) 21:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 11Anonymous1122 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Probably, copyrighted newspaper.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as derivative work and copyright violation. mattbr 05:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unnecessary duplicate of File:Arkadia-teatteri, Läntinen Heikinkatu.jpg. Mlang.Finn (talk) 22:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Image is two screenshots of actor Björn Andrésen in two films: "Midsommar" (left) and "Death in Venice" (right). Images are both attributed to "Visconti" by the uploader, which I assume is the film director Luchino Visconti, who directed Andrésen in the 1971 film "Death in Venice" but not the 2019 film "Midsommar" (directed by Ari Aster). Visconti most likely didn't take the picture, however. Uploader used the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, which doesn't apply to film stills, as the copyright most likely lies with the film studios for each film. Image uses are copyright violations. ExRat (talk) 22:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- It's now 2 April 2021. Some feedback would be appreciated. ExRat (talk) 07:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unclear authorship and license. GeorgHH • talk 16:20, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Clearely copyright violation for the picture of Björn Andrésen aged, but the other picture can be conserved. - Siren-Com (talk) 11:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Image is a screenshot of actor Björn Andrésen in the 1971 film "Death in Venice". Image is attributed to "Visconti" by the uploader, which I assume is the film director Luchino Visconti, who directed Andrésen in the 1971 film. Visconti most likely didn't take the picture, however. Uploader used the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, which doesn't apply to film stills, as the copyright most likely lies with the film studios for each film. Image uses are copyright violations. ExRat (talk) 22:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- It's now 2 April 2021. Some feedback would be appreciated. ExRat (talk) 07:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete GeorgHH • talk 16:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
pejorative description, unidentified, not notable people Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
copyright Fina Rifa, see commons:Derivative work . HombreDHojalata.talk 22:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
copyright Carme Solé, see commons:Derivative work . HombreDHojalata.talk 22:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
copyright José Ramón Sánchez, see commons:Derivative work . HombreDHojalata.talk 22:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
copyright Karin Schubert, see commons:Derivative work . HombreDHojalata.talk 22:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lucian Mircea Stoenac (talk · contribs)
[edit]Both cases are photos of physical photos. Actual sources and proof of permission must be provided.
Gikü (talk) 12:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
There is only a release by the scanner, the release of the photographer is missing. Tohma (talk) 18:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader appears to be a serial copyright violator. --Rosenzweig τ 15:55, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
There is only a release by the scanner, the release of the photographer is missing. Tohma (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader appears to be a serial copyright violator. --Rosenzweig τ 15:53, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
There is only a release by the scanner, the release of the photographer is missing. Tohma (talk) 18:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader appears to be a serial copyright violator. --Rosenzweig τ 15:53, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
There is only a release by the scanner, the release of the photographer is missing. Tohma (talk) 19:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader appears to be a serial copyright violator. --Rosenzweig τ 15:55, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
There is only a release by the scanner, the release of the photographer is missing. Tohma (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader appears to be a serial copyright violator. --Rosenzweig τ 15:55, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
There is no release to commons: www.deutschefotothek.de/documents/obj/70600283 Tohma (talk) 19:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:48, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
zdjęcie niskiej jakości Napioorex (talk) 13:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Agree , the photo uploaded originally is very poor quality and tabloid style. The second photo has of course another author and it exists on wiki already (File:Krzysztof_Napiórkowski_portrait.jpg) Maestro (talk) 12:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: exif says it was taken from Facebook. --rubin16 (talk) 14:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
The main element in this image is Tour Odeon, which was designed by architect Alexandre Giraldi and inaugurated in April 2015. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Monaco. Permission from the copyright holder, Mr. Giraldi (preferably via COM:OTRS) is a must to have this freely-licensed image of his copyrighted work retained here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP Monaco. --Ellywa (talk) 03:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Renata Litvinova
[edit]Might this be a case of Flickr-washing? The picture from 2015 has many of the traits that would be suspect had it been directly uploaded to Commons: no EXIF, low resolution, the subject credited as its author. The photo from 84 of course has no EXIF, for it would have been an analog photo. There is no link between the official website and this Flickr account, though that might be because Flickr is a dying platform. Should these be deleted based on PCP?
Vera (talk) 09:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. As an author the subject itself is named, while these are clearly no selfies. So copyright violations are highly probable. Therefore deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 03:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Monaco. The sculpture was unveiled in 1984, and its artist w:Arman died in 2005, still within the 50 years posthumous copyright duration of the artwork. Also, take note of COM:URAA issue. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: er nomination and COM:FOP Monaco. --Ellywa (talk) 03:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Monaco for copyrighted public art like this 1990 statue. The artist, fr:Cyril de La Patellière, is still alive.
- File:Garden statuary (3696957727).jpg
- File:Jardins Saint-Martin, Monaco - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Monaco (7584699830).jpg
- File:Monaco (8252714722).jpg
- File:Sculpture "Maryse au miroir ou le temps inalterable" de Cyril de la Patellière.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: er nomination and COM:FOP Monaco. --Ellywa (talk) 03:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
The artist of Servi Muti, w:Roberto Barni from Italy, is still alive as of this writing. No FOP in Monaco. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: er nomination and COM:FOP Monaco. --Ellywa (talk) 03:30, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Monaco. The artist of this 1994 work, w:Jean-Michel Folon, died in 2005.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted:Per nomination and COM:FOP Monaco. Can be undeleted in 2076. . --Ellywa (talk) 03:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
There is no FOP in Monaco. The author of this 2000 sculpture, artist Kristian Dahlgard, appears to be alive per sources provided by Google searches. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and COM:FOP Monaco. --Ellywa (talk) 03:36, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
The plaque at the bottom isn't legible, but the top seems to show the words w:Fernando Botero (a still-living sculptor) and the year is probably 2003. There is no freedom of panorama in Monaco for such copyrighted public art. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and COM:FOP Monaco. --Ellywa (talk) 03:37, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlike the two other images of Category:2008 statues in Monaco bearing permission from the work's artist Matéo Mornar, this one has no permission from him. A 2008 work of Mornar, and there's no freedom of panorama in Monaco. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and COM:FOP Monaco. --Ellywa (talk) 03:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
The sculpture was completed in 2009 (as per its category). There is no FOP in Monaco for any cooyrighted public art. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and COM:FOP Monaco. --Ellywa (talk) 03:40, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
This is a type of "personal research", and such things do not belong to Wiki. Conty (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, Wikimedia Commons does not have a "no original research" policy as such. If the image is blatantly factually incorrect, that would be another thing... AnonMoos (talk) 07:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 23:29, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
I would like to have this file removed. Some of the details given are not correct (for instance, I now know that Tyrannosaururs were not alone in having the 3rd metacarpal separate from the 2nd metacarpal) Conty (talk) 16:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. I am also not seeing what part of the image contradicts your statement. If there are errors, replacing the current file (which still has much educational utility) with a corrected version seems preferable. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The use of this image can be discussed on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 03:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Es un recorte de un retrato hecho por Humberto Garavito, que murió en 1970. Error (talk) 12:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Como File:Alvarado.jpeg, (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alvarado.jpeg), puede ser un retrato hecho por Humberto Garavito, que murió en 1970. Desde luego no es un trabajo propio de user:Georgewikip. Los metadatos dicen:
| Autor: | Gianni Dagli Orti/REX/Shutterstock |
| Titular de los derechos de autor: | Copyright (c) 1970 Shutterstock. No use without permission. |
Tiene pinta de que Georgewikip tomó https://www.gettyimages.es/detail/fotograf%C3%ADa-de-noticias/portrait-of-pedro-de-alvarado-y-contreras-fotograf%C3%ADa-de-noticias/164084612 o algo parecido, recortó la parte de abajo para que no se viera la marca de agua y lo subió a Commons. Puede que sea una foto del cuadro de Garavito http://www.humbertogaravito.org/uploads/6/9/5/1/69512253/500929_orig.jpg Prensa Libre dice de Garavito:
- Pintó en forma idealizada el retrato de Pedro de Alvarado, del cual hizo algunas copias y también el de doña Leonor de Alvarado.
--Error (talk) 13:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Can be undeleted in 2041. . --Ellywa (talk) 03:54, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
本媒體文檔有如下新版本 There is a new version of this media document: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WUL-he21_02677_%E8%82%89%E8%92%B2%E5%9C%98_1.pdf Snaketong (talk) 12:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: They are scans of different copies of the same old book. They could be used to validate each other.--維基小霸王 (talk) 14:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark, no need to delete this file. --Ellywa (talk) 03:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
本媒體文檔有如下新版本 There is a new version of this media document: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WUL-he21_02677_%E8%82%89%E8%92%B2%E5%9C%98_2.pdf Snaketong (talk) 12:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: They are scans of different copies of the same old book. They could be used to validate each other.--維基小霸王 (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark, no need to delete this file. --Ellywa (talk) 03:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
本媒體文檔有如下新版本 There is a new version of this media document: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WUL-he21_02677_%E8%82%89%E8%92%B2%E5%9C%98_3.pdf Snaketong (talk) 12:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: They are scans of different copies of the same old book. They could be used to validate each other.--維基小霸王 (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark, no need to delete this file. --Ellywa (talk) 03:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
本媒體文檔有如下新版本 There is a new version of this media document: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WUL-he21_02677_%E8%82%89%E8%92%B2%E5%9C%98_4.pdf Snaketong (talk) 12:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: They are scans of different copies of the same old book. They could be used to validate each other.--維基小霸王 (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark, no need to delete this file. --Ellywa (talk) 03:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
2.2 Out of scope (2.2.1 Not educationally useful and 2.2.2 Vandalism): A fragment of a souvenir cloth purposefully clipped to imply there was an attempt to create an Ottoman colony during the Occupation of Constantinople (note that it has been inserted into the Wikipedia article on this topics in multiple languages by a single editor). Here is a copy of my comment on the file page: File name and description describe this is as a flag prepared for a planned colony based in Istanbul, which is used as a caption for this image on Wikipedia articles in several different languages. The origin of the flag is a souvenir cloth map to commemorate Gallipoli. See: [3] [4]. Jr8825 (talk) 06:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Just a curiosity: Why did the Brits occupy Istanbul? 1. Because they heard that it would be nice to eat a grilled fish with Turkish rakı looking at the Bosphorus? 2. They knew Turkey would raise great footballers and they wanted to take share of them for their national teams. 3. Find yourself please.
- Another curiosity: Why did the Brits, before anything else, closed the Ottoman Parliament in Istanbul? 1. Because they loved democracy so much that they were jealous of democracy blossoming in other countries. 2. They did not want their colonies to take example from the Ottoman Empire and make steps towards democracy (because of the first reason above). 3. They wanted to improve Turkish democracy.
- Last curiosity: Why do "you" think the Brits occupied Istanbul? (Could it be because they knew the Greeks would illegally invade Turkey and the Brits occupied Istanbul in order to help the Turks out from that disaster that came with massacres?)
- Note: Notice that I am not "voting", only asking questions for the moment. --E4024 (talk) 16:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Let's look at the source given in the deletion request: This is handkerchiefs distributed by the British military administration (mean official) to the soldiers participating in the Gallipoli Landing. Australian flag is seen on the top left, top right is seen naval ensign, flag of New Zealand is seen bottom right. Aand, there is a not educationally useful and vandalised icon at the bottom left. Thank you, it was funny. --𐰇𐱅𐰚𐰤 (talk) 17:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- The document at the above source by "Gov Au", commits barbarism, and of course not vandalism, by saying "[Gallipoli, Turkey in Asia]". AFAIK Gallipoli is not in Asia, is it the name of an Asian turkey breed? --E4024 (talk) 17:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- The comments below insisting it was part of an attempt to establish a British colony are original research unsupported by any serious sources, stemming from unsubstantiated claims published in a Turkish language article in 2015 [5], which is listed as the source for the image on the file page. Jr8825 (talk) 19:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Note: I took down here the talk just above mine from where it was placed so you may read "below" as "above" for better understanding. E4024 (talk) 19:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- For some reason "Turkish language article" sounds like "Abdul" to me. When will we learn to treat as equals to countries, nations, cultures, languages etc? Another curiosity. E4024 (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is nothing to do with respect for different cultures. The only source for this far-fetched claim, which is directly contradicted by the National Library of Australia and Australian War Memorial website entries for the item (both linked above), is a retired Turkish businessman turned amateur historian quoted by the private TV channel w:A Haber (linked above). Jr8825 (talk) 20:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- For some reason "Turkish language article" sounds like "Abdul" to me. When will we learn to treat as equals to countries, nations, cultures, languages etc? Another curiosity. E4024 (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per discussion. IMHO let alone a historic piece of cloth or an excellent map (with the name of Erenköy that we changed in 1947) like this one, even a paper napkin or toilet paper from the First World War years is in scope. BTW no vandalism around. (If you see any vandalism go after it, not after a valid and valuable image. BTW please someone upload also the complete image in the source. Thx.) E4024 (talk) 21:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Note for readers: This discussion has been manipulated by the OP. E4024 (talk) 17:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? Jr8825 (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep but the caption needs to be re-written and the file re-named ("Crest on the corner of a Gallipoli souvenir handkerchief" or some such).' The souvenir handkerchiefs had to have been produced after the British failure at Gallipoli, since it shows that French troops took 500 prisoners - this happened in July 1915 (center bottom of the kerchief, near Troy). On the far left of the kerchief it shows the position and activities of the HMS Queen Elizabeth and the landing places on the Gallipoli Peninsula of various forces. Link to the complete souvenir. Therefore these handkerchiefs were made after the Gallipoli Campaign had already taken place. The campaign was a disastrous failure on the part of the British. So it's highly unlikely that the British had any illusions that Turkey would become a British asset or colony. Therefore it's unlikely they were proposing any colonial flags at that point; to do so would be silly— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the keep vote. The source already says it was made between 1915 and 1920. Therefore it is PD. OTOH, although the allied forces lost the naval and sea battles there in 1915, the Ottoman Empire lost the Grand War (WWI); as a result of which all the areas shown in the mapchief, including Istanbul, the capital were occupied by the enemy. If you are not familiar with this part of world history, watch the 2014 film Water Diviner where you will see how the area was under the military authority of the Brits (and other people serving them). Therefore the claims still may be valid, but that is another issue. We can only discuss here keeping or deleting a file. E4024 (talk) 20:51, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- I respectfully disagree, Diannaa, I don't believe the crest in itself has any educational value. Obviously it would be an entirely different case if we were talking about the entire cloth, or even an extract of the cloth connected to its subject (Gallipoli), but I fail to see how this narrow crop (originating, as I've outlined, in a conspiracy theory/hoax claim) has any educational purpose. In fact, I think it does the opposite of educating as it's designed to misinform. I'm also wondering whether the image may have been digitally altered to remove the border lines visible in the archive images, so as to remove any contextual information. Jr8825 (talk) 21:57, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Striking my keep vote; Jr8825 is correct - the surrounding material has been removed to make this look like a standalone image, and the intent appears to be to deceive. E4024, I am a lot more likely to get my info from history books than from movies, which are often not historically accurate.— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- The British were one of four countries that occupied Constantinople at the end of the First World War. The occupation started in 1918, two and a half years after Gallipoli. Regardless of the timing, I doubt the British at any point thought they were in a position to colonize the country.— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Which country? Are we not talking about the Ottoman Empire? What happened to Irak, Palestine, Jordan, etc etc etc? E4024 (talk) 00:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- The country where Gallipoli and Constantinople are located. Iraq, Palestine etc are not displayed on the souvenir handkerchief/map, so I don't see how they are related to this particular image. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Which country? Are we not talking about the Ottoman Empire? What happened to Irak, Palestine, Jordan, etc etc etc? E4024 (talk) 00:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: I've thought about it for a few days and I am now or the opinion that the file should be deleted. The image is being used on several different Wikis with captions such as "The coat of arms of the Istanbul-based colony that the UK planned to establish" (from tr:İstanbul'un İşgali); "The proposed flag for the proposed British colony in Istanbul" (from de:Besetzung von Istanbul). That's unsourced original research as best and a falsehood at worst.— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Here in Commons we do not design Wikipedias, we just provide them with images, and not only them but whoever needs free images. You have all the liberty to oppose whatever you wish in Wikipedias, I am sure they are as free-minded as us Commoners. I know you work in EN:WP, one day I can tell you some of my observations about that version of the encyclopedia. E4024 (talk) 00:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Since it is not what it claims to be and is being used to insert fictional content across wikipedia projects, it is out-of-scope and is being used solely for vandalism. If editors wish to keep it, it should be renamed and used appropriately. DrKay (talk) 09:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: if it is decided to delete this image, please consider to delete File:Eclipse of the Star and Crescent.svg as well, which is similar. Ellywa (talk) 03:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: that is a piece of some historical cloth, the image potentially has an educational value. How it is used in Wikipedias, the description and the file name is a different question that could be solved separately. --rubin16 (talk) 06:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Matsievsky as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Это изображение вырезано из изображения целой почтовой марки СССР File:The Soviet Union 1990 CPA 6248 stamp (Georgian chang, gudastviri, salamuri, chonguri, dayereh and larchemi).jpg, что нарушает авторские права Melberg (talk) 13:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Honestly, I don't understand how File:The Soviet Union 1990 CPA 6248 stamp (Georgian chang, gudastviri, salamuri, chonguri, dayereh and larchemi).jpg is not Copyvio and this file - is. Further clarifications required. --Melberg (talk) 13:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- "Внимание: этот официальный российский документ, государственный символ или знак (в основном, почтовые марки, монеты и банкноты) может включать одно или несколько произведений, которые могут быть защищены авторским правом, если они отделены от этого документа, символа или знака. В таком случае данное произведение не является объектом авторского права, если его повторно использовать полностью, но в то же время извлечение определенных частей из этого произведения может представлять собой нарушение авторских прав. Например, на почтовых марках должны быть сохранены номинал и название страны." --Matsievsky (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- 'Warning – This Russian official document, state symbol or sign (postage stamps, coins and banknotes mainly) may incorporate one or more works that can be copyrightable if separated from this document, symbol or sign. In such a case, this work is not an object of copyright if reused in its entirety but, at the same time, extracting specific portions from this work could constitute copyright infringement. For example, the denomination and country name must be preserved on postage stamps.' --Matsievsky (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Это фрагмент почтовой марки СССР. Изображение этой почтовой марки СССР не охраняется авторским правом только целиком. Фрагмент этого изображения без номинала и названия страны охраняется авторским правом художника марки. По факту нарушение авторских прав. Не понимаю, что здесь можно обсуждать. --Matsievsky (talk) 08:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- 'Warning – This Russian official document, state symbol or sign (postage stamps, coins and banknotes mainly) may incorporate one or more works that can be copyrightable if separated from this document, symbol or sign. In such a case, this work is not an object of copyright if reused in its entirety but, at the same time, extracting specific portions from this work could constitute copyright infringement. For example, the denomination and country name must be preserved on postage stamps.' --Matsievsky (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- "Внимание: этот официальный российский документ, государственный символ или знак (в основном, почтовые марки, монеты и банкноты) может включать одно или несколько произведений, которые могут быть защищены авторским правом, если они отделены от этого документа, символа или знака. В таком случае данное произведение не является объектом авторского права, если его повторно использовать полностью, но в то же время извлечение определенных частей из этого произведения может представлять собой нарушение авторских прав. Например, на почтовых марках должны быть сохранены номинал и название страны." --Matsievsky (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: stamps are exempt from copyright per Russian (and Soviet) legislature but only as a whole stamp. --rubin16 (talk) 06:31, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Henle-Logo Claim Schwarz.jpg. While this may technically be a SVG file, this is not a vector file as you can notice by simply zooming in or by looking at the source: it is a PNG embedded inside SVG markup. It was likely created using one of those dubious JPG-to-SVG converter websites and provides zero value in addition to the already existing JPG file and the (actual) SVG file File:Henle Verlag Logo.svg. On the contrary, it might be mistaken for a true vector file. intforce (talk) 14:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Die Datei File:Henle Verlag Logo.svg enthält nicht die unten abschließende Linie, die zum Logo gehört. Außerhalb der Verlagsprodukte und auf verlagseigenem Informationsmaterial wird es daher immer mit Linie und Claim verwendet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orosb (talk • contribs) 12:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Irrelevanter Kommentar. File:Henle-Logo Claim Schwarz.jpg wurde nicht zum Löschen vorgeschlagen. Es geht hier um die technische Umsetzung einer SVG-Datei. intforce (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 06:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Halyna Haiko (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images are from Wikia, a fan wiki where they were uploaded by someone with a username (mentioned in the file info as the author). It seems that the images are no longer portrayed on Wikia, and the links show no license, but it's doubtful that they were licensed with CC license.
kyykaarme (talk) 16:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 06:34, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Credited to Domingo Postiglione at https://www.bluemountainsgazette.com.au/story/3684294/plants-mans-lifetime-interest/, unlikely that the subject owns the rights to this image, as claimed on the Flickr source page. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 06:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Алексей Никитенков (talk · contribs)
[edit]The metadatas show these images are screenshots. Probably not own works.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 06:36, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author Azim Ilyasov is needed. Taivo (talk) 20:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 06:36, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope / low resolution / unclear motive A09090091 (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: could be better recreated by wiki templates. --rubin16 (talk) 06:37, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krisgabwoosh as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: 39 - Gualberto Villarroel (CROPPED).jpg
Converted to regular DR, per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (PNG -> JPEG). -- Túrelio (talk) 21:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - It is a smaller resolution image cropped identically to the newer one Krisgabwoosh (talk) 21:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 06:39, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
MasterChef logos
[edit]- File:Celebrity MasterChef Australia logo and wordmark.gif
- File:Junior MasterChef Chile Logo & Wordmark.png
- File:MasterChef Algeria logo and wordmark.svg
- File:MasterChef Australia Logo & Wordmark.svg
- File:MasterChef Chile Logo & Wordmark.png
- File:MasterChef China Logo & Wordmark.png
- File:MasterChef Colombia.jpg (subsequently deleted due to missing source, listing retained for completeness)
- File:MasterChef Greece logo and wordmark.png
- File:MasterChef Israel Logo & Wordmark.png
- File:MasterChef Logo & Wordmark.svg
- File:Masterchef logos.JPG
- File:MasterChef The Professionals.jpg
- File:Masterchef-junior-logo.jpg
- File:TE SMCJUN7.logo.png
- File:Original-8cbddff4971b93927350e53d67ee9229.jpg (added by mattbr 05:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC))
- File:Masterchefcel.png (added by mattbr 10:44, 29 August 2021 (UTC))
- File:Masterchef-logo.png (added by mattbr 06:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC))
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:MasterChef Logo.svg and COM:TOO UK, other MasterChef logos (Category:MasterChef logos) are subject to UK copyright and "sweat of the brow" doctrine. They should be deleted. --George Ho (talk) 23:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. Use of the logo appears to satisfy this. WWGB (talk) 05:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- @WWGB: That's for local enwiki rules; we're discussing usage at Commons. These logos still qualify for British copyright protection, even when they may be below American originality standards for copyright. In other words, the logos still fail to satisfy COM:TOO UK. George Ho (talk) 19:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- @George Ho and WWGB:
Move Could you not re-upload all logos to enwiki (or elwiki//frwiki/zhwiki/etc.) (like File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg did) to satisfy this? Happily888 (talk) 23:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- @George Ho and WWGB:
- @WWGB: That's for local enwiki rules; we're discussing usage at Commons. These logos still qualify for British copyright protection, even when they may be below American originality standards for copyright. In other words, the logos still fail to satisfy COM:TOO UK. George Ho (talk) 19:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(4).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Graham_Island_-_on_the_trail_to_the_Golden_Spruce_(deceased)_-_Haida_signage_-_(21372803350).jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_am_2._Oktober_1990_in_Erfurt.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(4).jpg){kind=link}
_(4).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Graham_Island_-_on_the_trail_to_the_Golden_Spruce_(deceased)_-_Haida_signage_-_(21372803350).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Graham_Island_-_on_the_trail_to_the_Golden_Spruce_(deceased)_-_Haida_signage_-_(21372803350).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_am_2._Oktober_1990_in_Erfurt.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_am_2._Oktober_1990_in_Erfurt.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(17995756052).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Oppose Keep Per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:MasterChef_Logo.svg speedy closed by @Jameslwoodward: with response "The UK copyrights typography, while the USA does not. Since MasterChef originated in the UK, this has a UK copyright." - SanAnMan (talk) 14:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- SanAnMan and WWGB, in a DR it is better to use Delete and Keep rather than
Oppose. The two of you both "oppose", but in opposite directions. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Can you elaborate your "keep" vote? Do you mean to vote for "move" ({{Vm}}) back to local wikis or to remain on Commons? George Ho (talk) 00:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- @George Ho: Keep for me means remain on Commons. I support the stance that these logos are simple geometry and thus do not meet the threshold of originality. There does not appear to be any copyright mark on any logo graphic, even the originals hosted by Fox. - SanAnMan (talk) 15:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- What about COM:TOO UK saying that the UK's originality standards are very low? Furthermore, do you think deleting File:MasterChef Logo.svg was a mistake? George Ho (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Almost forgot: the logo was originally made by a British company (either Shine TV or Ziji Productions), not an American one. More likely, the logo is subject to British jurisdictions and is of British origins. George Ho (talk) 18:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- @George Ho:
- SanAnMan and WWGB, in a DR it is better to use
- Delete per nomination, on the basis that the original logo is British-made. COM:TOO UK sets a very low bar. File:Original-8cbddff4971b93927350e53d67ee9229.jpg also added. mattbr 05:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Additionally, the letter 'm' has been specifically modified for this logo with the addition of the spiral connected to the letter. This appears to have been done to purposefully create similarities with a trivet, given this is a logo for a cooking TV series. This suggests a level of creative skill and effort to create an original and distinctive work exceeding the very low threshold of originality bar for UK works. Therefore it is very likely the logo has copyright protection in the UK, making the files ineligible to be hosted on Commons (using {{PD-textlogo}}) as the logo must in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work (see Commons:Licensing). Without very definative guidance, the precautionary principle should be applied and the files deleted. mattbr 06:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per George Ho, Mattbr et al. Unless we have specific good reasons to show this is allowed in copyright laws of relevant countries, precautionary principle should assume it is not. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per TOO UK. --rubin16 (talk) 06:47, 18 November 2021 (UTC)