Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/01/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Wrong Name -> should be "Köpergewebe" Aaron2403 (talk) 00:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file renamed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
This photo of actor Matt Doyle looks too professional. Also, I doubt the uploader created the photo. George Ho (talk) 09:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 15:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Please can this be deleted if possible, made an error when uploading file Type. Apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hutch3636 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
DashDodge.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Anthere at 18:32, 21 Januar 2021 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7) --Krdbot 03:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Landinglane (2).png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Anthere at 18:30, 21 Januar 2021 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7) --Krdbot 03:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Askback.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:29, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Anthere at 18:28, 21 Januar 2021 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7) --Krdbot 03:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Dashdodge (2).png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Anthere at 18:30, 21 Januar 2021 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7) --Krdbot 03:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Dashdodge (1).png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Anthere at 18:31, 21 Januar 2021 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7) --Krdbot 03:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pablo_Khali/sandbox E4024 (talk) 15:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; OoS and self promo. --Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded this file unintentionally, and wish to have it removed. Squalus442 (talk) 21:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 18:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Перезалив Avelann (talk) 22:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 18:24, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I was not aware of copyright violations when using photos from official sources, in this case the Official Website of the brand (breitling.com). My apologies. David M. 1963 (talk) 14:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme at 13:06, 22 Januar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 09:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- I was not aware of copyright violations when using photos from official sources, in this case the Official Website of the brand (breitling.com). My apologies. - David M. 1963 (talk) 14:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme at 13:07, 22 Januar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 09:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
User with very dubious uploads, no evidence that it is actually licenced this way Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 16:13, 23 Januar 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: advertisement --Krdbot 21:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 02:55, 24 Januar 2021 UTC: spam --Krdbot 10:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 02:55, 24 Januar 2021 UTC: spam --Krdbot 10:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that it is a "work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties". The "transition team" (for a next government) to which this photo supposedly belongs was not the US government then. Plus the file is not exactly the one in the source Frodar (talk) 12:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- The transition team's employees are still employed by the federal government, as the .gov domain would indicate. I did not link the source and in any case the source image is clearly from that picture.Petermzc (talk) 04:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Petermzc (talk) 04:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete I feel like we're nitpicking here, and the transition is funded by the United States federal government, and the dot-gov domain would indicate as much, wouldn't it?You can find the photo on the photographer's website, which very much gives the impression that these photographs are copyrighted. Jeff Mauritzen is a commercial photographer, not a government employee, and seeing that he doesn't seem to have photographed anyone else on the Biden team would indicate that Mauritzen did not take the photograph in an official capacity. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. this is not an official portrait from the federal government. those are not available yet. --Missvain (talk) 23:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Image was taken from the image in this July 2019 article and photoshopped a different background by the Biden Transition Team. Corky 23:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per the nomination. This is not the work of the U.S. federal government.TJMSmith (talk) 22:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:17, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Photo by Washington Post staff photographer. [1] under copyright. Found5dollar (talk) 00:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Missvain at 22:29, 24 Januar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 03:19, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HousseMiladi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Judging by the Flickr page, appears to be a Flickrwashing account: https://www.flickr.com/photos/32497206@N08/with/50859531341/
Ytoyoda (talk) 18:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Support I agree and notify @Dyolf77: multiple images exist online for a long time despite being uploaded just recently in Flickr. Moumou82 (talk) 21:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
bitte löschen, ich finde nicht wo ich das selbst löschen kann. Danke UlrikeCom (talk) 08:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 03:40, 27 Januar 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by UlrikeCom --Krdbot 15:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
bitte löschen, ich finde nicht wo ich das selbst löschen kann. Danke UlrikeCom (talk) 08:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 03:40, 27 Januar 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by UlrikeCom --Krdbot 15:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
bitte löschen, ich finde nicht wo ich das selbst löschen kann. Danke UlrikeCom (talk) 09:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 03:40, 27 Januar 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by UlrikeCom --Krdbot 15:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
This photo is coming from " Kylie Jenner's Personal Instagram Page". I do not have an instagram account and I am not willing to create one but all I do know is, that those images are not published under a license that fit with the Commons licensing rules. I think, this image must be deleted. Mosbatho (talk) 13:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 15:16, 27 Januar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 21:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Not the uploader's own work, the same image can be found here. If the uploader is copyright holder, they must prove this. Mosbatho (talk) 13:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 15:16, 27 Januar 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 21:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Some of these can be found elsewhere online, some have discrepancies between EXIF date and date in file name, and some are lacking EXIF metadata altogether. The user had uploaded one copyvio which has just been deleted following an OTRS complaint, so nominating the rest of the images as well.
- File:MDP exeter 2006.jpg
- File:SEG MDP Protestor 2007.jpg
- File:MOD Plod Ship 2007.jpg
- File:Mod plod.jpg
- File:Mod Police in Afghanistan.jpg
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused text-only image, advertising for external link, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:Action_Shot_against_Alberta_University.jpg
- File:USPORTS_NATIONALS_2015.jpg
- File:USPORTS_Nationals_2015.jpg
- File:Bishop_Gaiters_Athletic_Banquet_(_Garth_Smith_Award_).jpg
- File:Lebanon_Division_1_basketball_game.jpg
- File:Lebanon_Division_1_against_Sagesse.jpg
- File:Lebanon_Division_1_with_Tadamon.jpg
- File:On_set_with_CTV_News.jpg
- File:Lead_Trainer_on_the_Toronto_Raptors_court_with_NBYMP.jpg
- File:Lead_Trainer_at_North_Pole_Hoops_Camp.jpg
- File:Model_shot_for_Under_Armour.jpg
- File:Lead_Trainer_&_Technical_Director_of_Sahel_Basketball.jpg
- File:Model_shot_for_Under_Armour_Canada.jpg
- File:Stephen_Curry_6_Shoe_Launch_with_Under_Armour.jpg
- File:Teaching_kids_in_Chad_at_a_private_school.jpg
- File:Press_Conference_in_Chad_for_Sahel_Basketball.jpg
- File:Team_Believe_Basketball_Tryouts.jpg
- File:Lead_Trainer_at_the_CYBL_Rising_Stars_Camp.jpg
- File:Don_Basco_Invitational_Camp.jpg
- File:Lead_Trainer_at_the_North_Pole_Hoops_camp.jpg
- File:Seed_Project_&_Hoop_Forum_with_NBA_Player_Luol_Deng.jpg
commons is not your personal photo gallery. and most of these are going to be copyright violations. Quakewoody (talk) 07:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TimmyCruz953 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:The GaSeLigShy Studios (2020 OFFICIAL LOGO).png
- File:The GaSeLigShy Channel (Summer 2020 LOGO).png
- File:Gab's AllInOne Shelf Place (2020 LOGO).png
- File:Shelf Place (2020 LOGO).png
- File:The GaSeLigShy Kids (2020 LOGO).png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
no permission for depicted contemporary artwork
- File:Bröckelnde Fassaden - Crumbling Façades.jpg
- File:Lars Arrhenius (1966 Stockholm SE) - The Man Without Qualities, 2001 (partial).jpg
- File:Lars Arrhenius (1966 Stockholm SE) - The Man Without Qualities, 2001 (detail).jpg
- File:Lars Arrhenius (1966 Stockholm SE) - The Man Without Qualities, 2001.jpg
Krd 16:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:40, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope, And above TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:40, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Everything by user is copyvio, low-re images.
- File:Selvagapathi.jpg
- File:Ssp palani.jpg
- File:Kcp palanisamy.jpg
- File:Kannapan.jpg
- File:Arcot v samy.jpg
- File:Vpduraisamy.jpg
- File:Subbu lakshmi jaga.jpg
- File:Periyasamy ip.jpg
- File:Tks.jpg
- File:Rsb.jpg
- File:Nehru kn.jpg
- File:Siva thiruchi.jpg
- File:Duraimurugan.jpg
- File:Karunanidhiflagright.png
- File:M.-K .png
- File:Stalinarrannaduraidoctorate 009.png
- File:Karunanidhilast.png
- File:KARUNANIDHITERM3-JANUARY261989.png
- File:Anna-indira.png
- File:Anna CM.png
- File:Dmkform.png
- File:Mkstalin new.png
- File:Stalinragul.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:19, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Copyvio not own work. - FitIndia Talk Mail 18:17, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:40, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Аджилити бум и спаниель.jpg
- File:IMG collor for dogs.jpg
- File:MyCollages (1).jpg
- File:Spaniel.rozie.jpg
- File:Spaniel.rozie.agility.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:41, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded this by accident BlueAcidball (talk) 05:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Made error in uploading, have since read rules, and understand more clearly, but I do think this is a free image, but will refrain from uploading images Joco179 (talk) 19:47, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete (C)2015 Wendy Barrows all rights reserved --E4024 (talk) 19:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC)- BTW what about File:John William Ward in Johnson Chapel.jpg; not a DW? --E4024 (talk) 13:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, "(C)2015 Wendy Barrows all rights reserved". --Túrelio (talk) 20:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
I erroneously did upload the same subject twice: identical with File:Wappentafel des Kardinals Louis Aleman.jpg. Sorry! -Oporinus (talk) 18:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Only used for promo (m:Special:CentralAuth/Fantasticsat) Gikü (talk) 00:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
unsure what video this is from, but if it's from Tommy's channel as claimed then it's most likely not freely licensed Ionmars10 (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Most likely not freely licensed and certainly not the uploader's own work. IanTEB (talk) 15:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Same image uploaded and deleted multiple times (Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/01/21, Commons:Deletion requests/File:TommyInnit.jpg) DrawWikiped (talk) 19:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Request for deletion as the uploader. No1lovesu2 (talk) 18:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Keep - file in use. --E4024 (talk) 18:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)- @E4024: Not anymore and yes I am the uploader and this is my SOCK#LEGIT.--No1lovesu2 (talk) 03:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
copyvio, uploader is not author Lesless (talk) 19:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF and a "comment" box; dubious original work, most probably taken from social media. E4024 (talk) 19:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Author requested, withdrew permission before email to OTRS. Andrew nyrtalkcontribs 19:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Poor resolution image that doesn't demonstrate 2603:8081:1608:AEB1:6581:91AB:9BAB:C241 20:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Keep Not poor resolution. In heavy use in ar.wikipedia.org نيو هارتفورد (نيويورك), arz.wikipedia.org
نيو هارتفورد, azb.wikipedia.org نیوهارتفورد، نیویورک, ceb.wikipedia.org New Hartford (lungsod sa Tinipong Bansa, New York), cy.wikipedia.org New Hartford, Efrog Newydd, en.wikipedia.org New Hartford, New York, es.wikipedia.org New Hartford (Nueva York), eu.wikipedia.org New Hartford (New York), fa.wikipedia.org نیوهارتفورد، نیویورک, fr.wikipedia.org New Hartford (New York), ht.wikipedia.org New Hartford, New York, it.wikipedia.org New Hartford (New York), pl.wikipedia.org New Hartford (miasto), sh.wikipedia.org New Hartford, New York, simple.wikipedia.org New Hartford, New York, sr.wikipedia.org Њу Хартфорд (Њујорк), uk.wikipedia.org Нью-Гартфорд (Нью-Йорк), ur.wikipedia.org نیو ہارٹفورڈ، نیو یارک and www.wikidata.org Q9049730. Tm (talk) 02:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
A non-notable person in a vanity photo. No educative value. Richard Avery (talk) 21:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Useless images because of extreme low quality.
- File:Škoda 21Tr,-Brno královo pole.jpg
- File:Iveco Urbanway zepředu, Brno, Královo pole.jpg
- File:Škoda Rapid facelift.jpg
Harold (talk) 21:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
3 children of a non-notable person. No educative value Richard Avery (talk) 21:43, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DenisIDDQD (talk · contribs)
[edit]Useless files because of extreme low resolution.
Harold (talk) 21:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete unused, unusable, indistinct. Out of scope. --ŠJů (talk) 00:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused, undescribed logo of no obvious meaning. no educative value Richard Avery (talk) 22:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused blurred photo of some sort of control panel with no indication of importance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Kullanışsız olduğunu düşünüyorum. Huluxsi (talk) 12:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Unnecessary manipulation of the flag. --E4024 (talk) 14:29, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Trade (talk) 13:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. Photos available on different source on-line.
- File:572644-salman-khan-biography-book-being-salman.jpg
- File:Salman-khan-look-smart-635799527402751817-17381.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 13:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
User's uplading past creates suspicion about this "own work" w/o camera EXIF. E4024 (talk) 13:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Non-free corporate logo bezik (talk) 13:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused indifferent photo of sea. Useless description. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 13:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. No EXIF data. Other uploads from same user of same person are deleted as copyright violation. Smooth O (talk) 13:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 14:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Wrong place Trotskists (talk) 14:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- I think you'll have to clarify what you mean by that! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted photo. Suspicious image Photo not suitable for Wikimedia Commons 211.197.54.36 10:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete There is a better quality analogue. 91.122.153.113 18:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use; no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope personal pic of a user with no contribs - m:Special:CentralAuth/Skey Zi Gikü (talk) 14:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of finnish sculptor Hanna Vihriälä (born 1974) Norsuaukio ("Elephant square"), unveiled 2011. No Freedon of Panorama for aculptures in Finland, not in PD. Htm (talk) 14:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- I do not really understand this argument, as in the Finnish legislation it is allowed to photograph public pieces of art if they are permanently on public display ([2]).Ilarius (talk) 15:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Ilarius: Unfortunately, per COM:FOP Finland and Finland's Copyright Act 404/1961, "If the work of art is the leading motive of the picture, the picture may not be used for the purpose of gain." Due to this restriction, photos of unlicensed copyrighted works in Finland cannot be hosted in Commons because files uploaded here must have licenses that permit free reuse for any purpose, including commercial, per COM:SCOPE. This restriction, however, does not include works of architecture thus photos of modern Finnish buildings can be hosted here using the Template:FoP-Finland. Howhontanozaz (talk) 15:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator and Howhontanozaz. ––Apalsola t • c 15:57, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- I do not really understand this argument, as in the Finnish legislation it is allowed to photograph public pieces of art if they are permanently on public display ([2]).Ilarius (talk) 15:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 14:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahsukanulis (talk · contribs)
[edit]News photos with no metadataː unlikely to be own works.
- File:Pasukan elit berkawal di kawasan pejabat pemaju yang telah diserang perusuh.jpg
- File:Sri maha mariamman temple protest burning cars.jpg
- File:Deklarasi-rakyat-Malaysian-People-Declaration.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:53, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Patrick! I made a mistake while specifying the license and author of the file, now I've updated the informations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahsukanulis (talk • contribs) 15:29, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No updates made at all in information/description. Besides, in this edit, uploader claims that the images are fair use, indicating that they are not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahsukanulis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos from 1950 and 1985, not old enough to be PD and missing permission.
- File:Anggota-polis-bukit-kepong-yang-terkorban-692.jpg
- File:Peristiwa Memali 2.jpg
- File:Peristiwa Memali.jpg
- File:MALAYAN UNION PROTEST.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Flickr "robert sullivan"
[edit]Flickrwashed images. These photos are not the work of the Flickr user - they're mostly the works of non-US governments and military contractors.
- File:RIMPAC 2012 - Flickr - aeroman3.jpg
- File:Operation REASSURANCE - Flickr - aeroman3.jpg
- File:Operation Hudson Sentinel, 440 Squadron.jpg
- File:2018-01-28 StratolaunchAircraft 26071200028 6bbee9a16b o (crop).jpg
- File:MP Rob Merrifield.jpg
- File:2018-01-28 Stratolaunch Aircraft.png
- File:2018-01-28 StratolaunchAircraft 26071200028 6bbee9a16b o.png
- File:MP Rob Merrifield (cropped).jpg
- File:Two Cormorant In Flight.jpg
- File:A CH-149 "Cormorant" helicopter flies over Mount-Washington in preparation to land.jpg
- File:A CF-18 en route to Ottawa to celebrate the 60th anniversary of D-Day - 25524715194.jpg
- File:A CF-18 en route to Ottawa to celebrate the 60th anniversary of D-Day.jpg
- File:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon Turkish.jpg
- File:A CF-18 en route to Ottawa to celebrate the 60th anniversary of D-Day. - 25856638320.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Evidence? - The Bushranger (talk) 01:35, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- @The Bushranger: Sure.
- I'd start with the Flickr user's photostream. It's pretty obvious that the photos are mostly, if not entirely, not his work.
- Most of them are U.S. military or NASA photos, so they're copyright-free, but they're misattributed to Robert Sullivan.
- But there were a couple of obvious 3rd party photos that don't belong to the U.S. government, [3], which belongs to DPA, and [4], a Selena Gomez selfie. You can see that the user is less than perfect with assigning the correct license to images.
- When you clicked on the file links, you probably saw that most of the photos had the metadata intact, with credit explicitly given to members of the Canadian armed forces. To my knowledge, the Canadian government does not release images to the public domain.
- So we know that the Flickr user's image credit and licensing are not perfectly reliable, he has labeled copyrighted work as public domain, and that we have images that most likely come from copyrighted sources. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- That's a wrap, yep. Thanks. Delete, sadly. - The Bushranger (talk) 05:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daichiyamada00 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
File:The Yakovlev Yak-38 "Forger" and its crew on the deck of the aircraft carrier "Kiev". - 50102658741.jpg
[edit]Possibly Flickrwashed image, not the work of the Flickr user. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
no indication in the source that it is cc by sa 4.0 웃OO 15:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo not connected to any companies using that name, 7 years old, no educative value. Richard Avery (talk) 15:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unknown person, undescribed place or event, not used for anything. No educative value. Richard Avery (talk) 15:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 16:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private video hosting. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Blurry and unreadable sketch and personal notes, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, but the depicted work of art is copyrighted and as a likely temporary and indoor installation not covered by freedom-of-panorama exception of German copyright law. In addition, as metadata of the image-file state "(C) Shinya", the copyright of the photographer has also to be taken into account, as the photography is not a mere 2-dimensional reproduction of the artwork.-- Túrelio (talk) 16:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Dear Túrelio, i can assure you that i personally am the owner of the copyright of this artwork as well as the photo as i created them both with my own hands. There is no other party except the Bundeskunsthalle Bonn engaged in this project and work of art and i have personally received the allowance to use this photo as a documentary of the artistic work of Tape That collective.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tape That (talk • contribs)
Deleted: Please confirm ownership via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Dashdodgelogo2.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Gamechangers logo.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
EnglishScreenshots 4 png.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by João Sidalino Diogo Peres (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
EnglishScreenshots 2 png.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
EnglishScreenshots 1 png.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, not a selfie, missing original author, source, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
DashDodge (1).png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- What does that mean? What is your rationale? --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Landinglane.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- What does that mean? What is your rationale for deletion? --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Schlittenhardt in der Mercedes-Benz-Arena.jpg
- File:Karl Lagefeld und Andreas Schlittenhardt.jpg
- File:Schlittenhardt präsentiert Döttling Tresor.jpg
- File:Schlittenhardt mit Wolfgang Dietrich.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- No. 1 see here: https://www.bild.de/sport/fussball/fussball/der-stuttgarter-daten-skandal-das-ist-der-mann-der-den-vfb-ins-wanken-bringt-73280978.bild.html#remId=1680334161409163808
- No. 4 see here: https://twitter.com/vfbstr/status/1253262427036225537
- --Opihuck (talk) 17:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
This is a personal photo of mine which was uploaded by someone without my permission. Also a minor. 49.206.2.186 16:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
lolololol Ryanhenrich26 (talk) 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Please delete this photo as soon as possible. Violation of privacy Ryanhenrich26 (talk) 16:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Reverse Mode (1).png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- What does that mean? What is your rationale for deletion? --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chiwit0217 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused hieroglyphs. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Yana (Yang) Surname Character in Simplified Chinese.jpg
- File:Yang Surname Character in Traditional Chinese.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
The owner of this image wants it to be deleted. Enciclopedia1993 (talk) 16:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Keep, INUSE and CC licenses are irrevocable. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7|special:diff/537969423 AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- The uploader said on my TP that "must be deleted because copyright doesn't belong to me. I had exactly the same problem with other images and they were deleted without any problem. The image was not taken by me and I don't have the copyright. It's very simple. The real owner of that image wants it to be deleted (I uploaded it to wikimedia without permission)"
- Please post here in future @Enciclopedia1993: Gbawden (talk) 06:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Per a TinEye search, the oldest use of this photograph was from 2010 in the Oregon House Democrats website, 3 years before its uploading here in Commons. Howhontanozaz (talk) 16:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Personal and promotional image - outside our scope. Commons is not a web hosting service Herby talk thyme 17:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Philipp Kester died in 1958. To be honest, I do not fully understand the licensing situation here. The Munich Municipal Museum has put various of Kester's pictures under CC BY-SA 4.0, but I cannot find this very picture in [5]. Is it ascertained that this picture is under a free license? What is the exact source of information? According to [6] the exact source must be cited. FordPrefect42 (talk) 17:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah I see why that is confusing. Let me try to explain but if there is a better way for me to upload these pictures, let me know. That same problem might come up more than once and I don't really quite know how to manage it properly. I am part of the Münchner Stadtmuseum's digital team, which recently started uploading art works from our collection to wikimedia (and linking them to wikipedia). Some of those pictures are already in our online collection (https://sammlungonline.muenchner-stadtmuseum.de/), others not yet but we already prepared the versions that will be uploaded to that website in the future. The archive of picture by Philipp Kester was bought by the museum in 1986, so we as the institution have the rights to the photos. We still decided to put them out under CC BY-SA 4.0. I am uploading them under my private account since we are in the process of getting our (for many years unused) account back right now. As soon as that happens we will get it verified (you can check my discussion of that matter here, but it's in German, I'm afraid: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administratoren/Anfragen#Benutzerkonto_reaktivieren). Would that make a difference? Or should I mark those pictures with 'own' as source? Thanks for your feedback! -- Sophie 19:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- I see, thank you for your answer. I hope the verified account can be revived soon. In the meantime I suppose it will be helpful to send permissions for the files in question to the OTRS support team. Thank you. --FordPrefect42 (talk) 22:27, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Philipp_Kester,_Anneliese_Halbe.jpg” under ticket:2021012610008625. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 14:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Bad censorship; Request as the uploader. No1lovesu2 (talk) 18:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Are you the uploader? --E4024 (talk) 18:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Request by the uploader No1lovesu (talk) 19:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Still no valid reason. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Protesta y corte de RN40-Eugenio Bustos, San Carlos.jpg
- File:Laguna del Diamante y volcán Maipo.jpg
- File:Desierto de las Huayquerias- San Carlos.jpg
- File:Zona rural de Eugenio Bustos.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:43, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
EnglishScreenshots 3 png.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 09:27, 29 Januar 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:EnglishScreenshots 3 png.png --Krdbot 15:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
bitte löschen, ich finde nicht wo ich das selbst löschen kann. Danke UlrikeCom (talk) 08:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 22:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
bitte löschen UlrikeCom (talk) 08:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 22:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
bitte löschen, ich finde nicht wo ich das selbst löschen kann. Danke UlrikeCom (talk) 09:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 22:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
bitte löschen, ich finde nicht wo ich das selbst löschen kann. Danke UlrikeCom (talk) 09:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 22:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
bitte löschen, ich finde nicht wo ich das selbst löschen kann. Danke UlrikeCom (talk) 09:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 22:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
bitte löschen, ich finde nicht wo ich das selbst löschen kann. Danke UlrikeCom (talk) 09:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 22:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
bitte löschen, ich finde nicht wo ich das selbst löschen kann. Danke UlrikeCom (talk) 09:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 22:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
bitte löschen, ich finde nicht wo ich das selbst löschen kann. Danke UlrikeCom (talk) 09:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 22:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Fehler bei der Anmeldung der Kandidatur, Fehler im Dateinamen. Datei wurde durch korrekte Anmeldung ersetzt. Für die Bemühungen vielen Dank im Voraus ! Mit Gruß Petrus3743 (talk) 09:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 22:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
out of scope. Tomer T (talk) 09:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Privates Foto, das ich im Spiegel gemacht habe. Ich bitte um Löschung mit Rücksicht auf meine Persönlichkeitsrechte. Private photo I took in the mirror. I ask for deletion with respect to my personal rights. Sciencia58 (talk) 10:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 22:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
small size, low quality, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 22:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Quick chats.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:29, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, uploader request. --Amada44 talk to me 21:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Gcblacklogo.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:29, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, uploader request. --Amada44 talk to me 21:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Kickpayments.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, uploader request. --Amada44 talk to me 21:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Dddescriptionimage.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- What does that mean? What is your rationale for deletion? --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, uploader request. --Amada44 talk to me 21:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
SlideArtwork.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- What does that mean? What is your rationale for deletion? --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, uploader request. --Amada44 talk to me 21:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Menuhb.png DannyLWebb (talk) 16:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- What does that mean? What is your rationale for deletion? --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, uploader request. --Amada44 talk to me 21:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
http://www.onlinemexico.com/<script data-ad-client="ca-pub-1417733913119310" async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Duolive.pdf (talk) 03:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, user nominated own userpage for deletion. Taivo (talk) 15:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:39, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- For start it is useless without description Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Self Advertisement in Wikipedia [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 02:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Insufficiently described and unused photo of an uknown boy. Out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 02:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Image is a duplicate of the subject's social media profile pictures. It is the only image uploaded on the Flickr account, which has the same username as the Commons uploader. No demonstration that the user is the original photographer of this image. – Rhain ☔ 03:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
out of scope. Tomer T (talk) 09:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
unlikely own work as it is photograph of print media Joschi71 (talk) 12:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
This image is certainly a screenshot of this YouTube-Video. In addition, this file is not used on any Wiki-project, so it might be possible that this image has no encycl. value? Mosbatho (talk) 13:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable basketball players, out of scope. And likely not own work, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eilia121. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in hu:Kolbe-féle nitrilszintézis, it:Sintesi di Kolbe, zh:氰化钠 and zh:科尔贝腈合成 with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- I agree. Delete. Best regards, --Jue (talk) 18:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 15:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:b:Chimica organica/Ossidazione lipidica with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 15:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:b:Chimica organica/Ossidazione lipidica with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 15:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:b:Chimica organica/Ossidazione lipidica with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 15:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Metadata has FB special instructions "FBMD...". Verification of identity that the uploader is the real copyright holder (the photographer) of this image is required (via COM:OTRS). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Also affected (COM:Derivative work of this file):
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and found elsewhere in the network. --rubin16 (talk) 15:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Error loading, extra file copy: File:Józef Unger, (Podług fotografii Dutkiewicza w Warszawie) (58800).jpg Cyfrowabiblioteka (talk) 08:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 19:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:47, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 23:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 23:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Italy. Subject is a 1954 sculpture by it:Piero Brolis (1920—1978). Won't be public domain in Italy until 2049 (1978+71) and probably 2050 in the US (1954+96). Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: no FoP for artworks. Ruthven (msg) 14:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
We have several thousand images of NYC Subway entrances; this close-up without any location information is unlikely to have any use. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- I don't remember uploading it, or why I uploaded it, but this is a strange reason for deletion. Are there any other images that are more or less identical? Deleting it won't save any server space. --ghouston (talk) 01:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- It appears to have been part of a mass upload of photos by this author. See Category:New York City Subway entrances in Manhattan, which has many images like this and this that show the same signage with useful context - and have identified locations. Without location information or useful context, this image is out of scope, as it doesn't have any likely educational or historical value. We delete such images not to save server space, but to make it easier for users to find actually useful images in searches or when browsing through categories. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: acceptable. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, published in news reports dated before upload.[7][8] Verbcatcher (talk) 01:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation, smaller version of file published elsewhere before upload.[9][10][11] Verbcatcher (talk) 01:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No proof of permission of the copyright holder or the portrayed person to publicly transmit or display the photograph. The image has been previously published in other media with no indication of a license that allows use for third parties. Examples of previous publication: 1 2 Awikimate (talk) 01:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete another violation by the same sock master. Deleted multiple times before: e.g. File:Luiz Gastão De Orleans e Bragança.jpg, File:Luiz gastao de orleans e bragança.png, File:Dom Luiz Gastão de Orléans e Bragança.jpg. Uploaded multiple times before by multiple sock puppets. DrKay (talk) 22:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
It appears that a version of this file is on whitehouse.gov (see [12]), but that file is quite different from this one. No reason to think the Columbia photo itself is CC-licensed or PD, especially since the White House licensing page states: "Visitors to this website agree to grant a non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free license to the rest of the world for their submissions to Whitehouse.gov under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License" (emphasis added). AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- The Creative Commons license also allows for adapting the file, which is clearly what they did, so I still believe the file is still CC 3.0. The Image Editor (talk) 03:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment Also note that in the metadata of this file, there is a copyright notice "© Willis Bretz". Howhontanozaz (talk) 12:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)- Delete The CC license is on the WH website, not the Columbia website, so that only allows adaptations from the WH version, which is the smaller of the two files. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed with nomination, and the sleuthing of Howhontanozaz. This is a copyright violation, likely of Columbia University and Willis Bretz. Javert2113 (talk) 14:05, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete agree with the views above. This is likely not PD. TJMSmith (talk) 14:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Photo of a photo. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:11, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
This photo is my own work. And the person who is in the picture (on the right) does not want it to be on the internet. Ma Prem Turiya (talk) 07:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Personal image. used on a userpage, but the author did not contribute any other files that were not stolen from the web. Unless he contributes something usefull I don't see any need for personal images Hangman'sDeath (talk) 08:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Olga Sacharoff
[edit]1954 photo - how can this by CC?
Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation - screenshot of a copyrighted game, which could only be used if uploaded locally under Fair Use. — Yerpo Eh? 09:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. According to this article of the Daily Mail, it was created by a group of artists called The Trump Statue Initiative. Hence this freely-licensed image violates the artists' copyright, and permission from them for a commercially-licensed image of this work via COM:OTRS (email correspondence) is required if keeping this image is desired. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Flickrwashing, account has only this photo, 0 following and 0 followers Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No exif, also found on FB, think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Low quality pornography. COM:PORN 2A02:8108:50BF:C694:C0C1:D097:6B59:B7A8 09:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Achim (talk) 17:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Greece and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Sculptor Memos Makris died in 1993 and the photo can be restored after copyright expiration in 2064 (70+1 years after death). Taivo (talk) 10:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:11, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:11, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 10:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 10:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Request for deletion as the uploader. No1lovesu2 (talk) 18:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Request for deletion as the uploader. No1lovesu2 (talk) 18:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Request for deletion as the uploader. No1lovesu2 (talk) 18:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Request for deletion as the uploader. No1lovesu2 (talk) 18:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Request for deletion as the uploader. No1lovesu2 (talk) 18:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Request for deletion as the uploader. No1lovesu2 (talk) 18:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Request for deletion as the uploader. No1lovesu2 (talk) 18:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Request for deletion as the uploader. No1lovesu2 (talk) 18:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Request by the uploader No1lovesu (talk) 19:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Still no valid reason. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Request for deletion as the uploader. No1lovesu2 (talk) 18:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Request by the uploader No1lovesu (talk) 18:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Still no valid reason. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Azerbaijan. Needs permission from architect via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 07:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in ar:أسيتيليد, it:Acetiluri and sk:Acetylid with TeX equivalent:
![{\displaystyle {\ce {{H-\!{\equiv }\!-H}+BuLi->[{\ce {THF}}][-78^{\circ }{\ce {C}}]{Li-\!{\equiv }\!-H}+BuH}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/2e948ddc41eda544034608783499c1dbe8e93a85 "Formation of lithium acetylide from acetylene + BuLi")
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as a visually poorer replacement. This is a great example of several different flaws in the general use of TeX for chemical equations (screenshot):
- The font doesn't match...neither the surrounding text nor the MOS that multiple Wikipedia sites have adopted based on ACS and other standards bodies.
- The reaction-arrow has lumps in it. This is a problem in every equilibrium arrow, apparently fundamental to our TeX engine. A graphics file instead looks exactly correct.
- Also (presumably fixable) the "^\circ" is semantically wrong (need degrees symbol not a superscript-circle), which might have who-knows-what knock-on effects in other use-cases when copied around, and is also missing the whitespace between it and the "78". But again, it's more reusable and lay-editable to have a graphics file in a standard format directly than to have to hack on these sorts of details to get the correct graphics output.
- These are among the reasons that enwiki (I don't know about dewiki or others) have standardized on .png and .svg for chemical diagrams. Commons is by definition a repository in support of the other wiki sites, not to dictate its own standards to them. DMacks (talk) 19:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @DMacks: most of the problems (font, padding, missing spaces) you mentioned can be fixed exactly as you suspected. Since the degree symbol is not supported, the superscript circle is recommended by en-wiki and de-wiki, among others.
- Please, don't get me wrong, I'm just trying to help in this project to clean up the category that collected such images that should be replaced by TeX. If this specific image is not to be replaced by TeX, although it would be technically possible, then it should not be provided with such a tag. --WIKImaniac 18:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Nice spacing and font fixes. Now it has the appearance of JPG compression or loss-of-resolution (and a good example of uneven triple-bond line-spacing that commonly plagues \equiv rendering) (screenshot). One of User:Cedar101's activities is doing these TeX replacements of chemical images. It's been several times disputed (both specific examples and as a general goal) on enwiki for all these same reasons mentioned here. DMacks (talk) 18:51, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- @DMacks: most of the problems (font, padding, missing spaces) you mentioned can be fixed exactly as you suspected. Since the degree symbol is not supported, the superscript circle is recommended by en-wiki and de-wiki, among others.
![{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{l}\\{\mathsf {H}}{\ce {-\!{\equiv }\!-}}{\mathsf {H}}+{\mathsf {BuLi}}\ {\ce {->[{\mathsf {THF}}][-78\,^{\circ }{\mathsf {C}}]\ {\mathsf {Li}}{\ce {-\!{\equiv }\!-}}{\mathsf {H}}+{\mathsf {BuH}}}}\\\ \end{array}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/b015dbba0ff3fe88e796fa00fc96e1fdeee885f4)
- Keep In my opinion, we should keep both the PNG and the TeX code for now. Users might use whatever they think is appropriate for the respective use case. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Orla Perc should be moved here, right now it is impossible as existing redirect obstructs move Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: done. --JuTa 23:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
The image is out of scope. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 11:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of licensing, low resolution, unlikely to be useful anyway due to irritating txt layered on it (and not worth time to remove it) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:12, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
This is from the Bizarro comic strip, copyrighted work of cartoonist Dan Piraro 184.99.95.150 11:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Not used. Each logo exists on its own. Nordat (talk) 13:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Business Property 31.4.241.41 14:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: well below TOO, but out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- In this case, the person is quite identifiable and the file is properly named+described, so it can be admitted that in the future the photo could be useful. However, at this time, the person depicted does not appear to aspire to encyclopedic notability. According to this page, his work is copywriting, digital marketing campaigns, social networks, digital marketing strategies for Harfa Sport, formerly for FotoCentrumŠkoda. It is also not a completely insignificant private person, he possibly can become notable. --ŠJů (talk) 18:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in en:User:Paracelsus22/sandbox and fi:E1cB-reaktio with TeX equivalent:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {d[P]}{dt}}&={\frac {(k_{1})(k_{2})[{\text{substrate}}][{\text{base}}]}{(k_{1})[{\text{conjugate acid}}]+k_{2}}}\\{\text{rate}}&=k_{obs}[{\text{substrate}}][{\text{base}}]\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/c3431fd250f244dbb71b271e5b798b82594e5c1b)
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in tr:3-SAT probleminin klik problemine indirgenmesi and tr:3SAT-KLIK indirgemesi with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in tr:3-SAT probleminin klik problemine indirgenmesi and tr:3SAT-KLIK indirgemesi with TeX equivalent:
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![75 File:The Yakovlev Yak-38 "Forger" and its crew on the deck of the aircraft carrier "Kiev". - 50102658741.jpg](#File:The_Yakovlev_Yak-38_"Forger"_and_its_crew_on_the_deck_of_the_aircraft_carrier_"Kiev"._-_50102658741.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![131 File:"IMG20210114143704, jpg".jpg](#File:"IMG20210114143704,_jpg".jpg){kind=link}
![160 File:"City of Ghazipur Skyline from Utter Pradesh.jpg](#File:"City_of_Ghazipur_Skyline_from_Utter_Pradesh.jpg){kind=link}
_(58800).jpg){kind=link}
_busto_di_Bortolo_Belotti_1954.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_The_Man_Without_Qualities,_2001_(partial).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_The_Man_Without_Qualities,_2001_(detail).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_The_Man_Without_Qualities,_2001.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_Surname_Character_in_Simplified_Chinese.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
![09:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/01/21#c-Tomer_T-2021-01-21T09:45:00.000Z-File:"IMG20210114143704,_jpg".jpg){kind=link}
![21:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/01/21#c-Túrelio-2021-01-29T21:31:00.000Z-File:"IMG20210114143704,_jpg".jpg){kind=link}
![09:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/01/21#c-Tomer_T-2021-01-21T09:45:00.000Z-File:"City_of_Ghazipur_Skyline_from_Utter_Pradesh.jpg){kind=link}
![07:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/01/21#c-Explicit-2021-02-03T07:11:00.000Z-File:"City_of_Ghazipur_Skyline_from_Utter_Pradesh.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(58800).jpg){kind=link}
_(58800).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(58800).jpg){kind=link}
_(58800).jpg){kind=link}
_busto_di_Bortolo_Belotti_1954.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_busto_di_Bortolo_Belotti_1954.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_busto_di_Bortolo_Belotti_1954.jpg){kind=link}
_busto_di_Bortolo_Belotti_1954.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[12]](https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Avril_Haines-600x400.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
因為已經有了新版本，而且已經將指向此文檔的鏈接轉指向新版文檔。建議刪除此舊版本。Snaketong (talk) 16:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per uploader request. SCP-2000 15:28, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Question @Snaketong: Which one is the new version? 新版本是哪个？ --Ruthven (msg) 20:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)- @Ruthven: 這是新版本 This is the new version：
東觀閣本 繡像紅樓夢 程甲本 新增批評 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snaketong (talk • contribs) 20:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, fairly speedy request by uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
questa immagine non può essere usata senza licenza ZSherlock221B (talk) 18:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This logo is a fake that has never existed in reality and was only created by some fans trying to copiate inter old logos and even the club confirm this DZwarrior1 (talk) 18:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep Design does not infringe design CP. Beside it is simple geometry and ineligible for copyright and is therefore in the public domain, and common property and does not contain any original literary parenthood. Conserve. --Brgesto (talk) 19:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 11:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader DZwarrior1 (talk) 15:16, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, indeed source should be improved but no reason to delete. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 19:33, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment again? Jeez, this file must really bother you.. --Brgesto (talk) 09:55, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-4){kind=link}
Copyright infringement, no realistic source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 21:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep And again and again and again... this could be a record in years. Source is provided on the description page. And can be found within a quick search as a public domain work. --Brgesto (talk) 21:47, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept for 4th time, no new arguments since previous keeps, no argument why tagged PD-simple does not apply. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:05, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
I made a svg file of this map. TylerKutschbach (talk) 05:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Might help if you told people where it was. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:02, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Here’s the svg file of this map File:Louisiana Presidential Election Results 1980.svg User:TylerKutschbach
- No objection to deletion of redundant version. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The county lines are too dark. TylerKutschbach (talk) 05:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination also newer version in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Some of the counties are wrong. TylerKutschbach (talk) 04:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep till it is corrected or replaced by a better one. "Wrong" is a subjective term till you explain yourself. Lillycottage (talk) 06:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Hi TylerKutschbach - per User:Lillycottage can you explain how some of the counties are wrong? I usually trust your assessments but want to make sure everyone is having their voices heard and so we can learn more about the errors in the map. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 18:21, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
TylerKutschbach The reason why Androscoggin County is wrong on this map is because it looks like it is filled in as b9d7ff which is 40-50% and McGovern won the county by 50-60% and it should be filled in as 86b6f2.
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Androscoggin County is not right on this map TylerKutschbach (talk) 05:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per previous request. Apperently it is just a color? @TylerKutschbach: can you please replace with a corrected version?. --Elly (talk) 07:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gourami Watcher as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Requesting courtesy deletion. I am not a certified forensic artist and feel this work is not of adequate quality.
Converted to regular DR as image does not qualify for speedy deletion. However, courtesy-deletion should be considered per uploader's wish. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:Courtesy. Unused image. --Elly (talk) 07:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Subject and uploader seem to be the same individual however the image is not a selfie thus unlikely to be "own work". Also, small file with no metadata. Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 07:37, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wow as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: author requesting unused file for deletion; inferior to File:A. Schwarzenegger.jpg
Converted to regular DR as file does not qualify for speedy. IMO, a b/w version of this shot is usable and might be retained. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. a derivative of another image which may be edication useful, for instance in books. --Elly (talk) 07:38, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per The Riksdag's Terms of Use, "Pictures of the members of the Riksdag can be found on the API for the Members. The images are free to use in contexts where the Riksdag and the Riksdag's work are described. The source is Photo: Riksdagsförvaltningen. Reproduction in advertising and marketing is not permitted. Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Photos of RIKSDAG are not available in PD or CC-BY-SA, per https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/global/om-webbplatsen/rattigheter-for-bild-film-och-webb-tv/. --Elly (talk) 07:41, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Logo of something not notable. The other images were already deleted. Hangman'sDeath (talk) 08:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per today the logo is in use on bengali WP. --Elly (talk) 07:43, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for indoor works in Sweden A1Cafel (talk) 10:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- This is a long-live foggy area about COM:FOP Sweden section, wondering if @Esquilo, LPfi, and Mardus: can tell us if this particular case is problemic or not. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:39, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I have forgotten why this bust might be free. Can somebody refresh my memory? Anyway, here is again an example of the bad definition of "author" in the upload wizard and perhaps elsewhere: it asks who has made "this file". We should ask who has made the work in question – which is certainly not the photographer in cases like this – and separately who has taken the photo, made the derivative work or made the file. –LPfi (talk) 11:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Interesting, the author might be long unknown. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Upload wizzard only uses the very generic template {{Information}} that should not be used at all for artworks. Instead {{Artwork}} should be used. /ℇsquilo 15:15,Liuxinyu970226 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: This is not a period work, but a computer assisted reconstruction based on his scull and perhaps other input, if memory serves. –LPfi (talk) 11:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- Upload wizzard only uses the very generic template {{Information}} that should not be used at all for artworks. Instead {{Artwork}} should be used. /ℇsquilo 15:15,Liuxinyu970226 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Interesting, the author might be long unknown. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I have forgotten why this bust might be free. Can somebody refresh my memory? Anyway, here is again an example of the bad definition of "author" in the upload wizard and perhaps elsewhere: it asks who has made "this file". We should ask who has made the work in question – which is certainly not the photographer in cases like this – and separately who has taken the photo, made the derivative work or made the file. –LPfi (talk) 11:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Drop any FOP-related problems, this looks rather like someone's Photoshop filter works than from photograph, any againsts? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP, as FoP Sweden states "unsure". --Elly (talk) 16:58, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
no OTRS confirmation + advertising, spam https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZitoGowvF4RXdMTT7E8UTYbdYripmcv7-bCnG_10yLPhCD1-oCCwcaYUOacFbxGG4ixVfxt4aHp4e0KWoLZvCU9NbStWyzqplPwDONy2ZbHP1VJrCscMFDahbLubPLwkKMcbow9X1a-qa0-XNeYwJSYyqRBqhgAF434tT9VE1LCayID6whTJRgateTgy5nNhTLLvvO8N4FmtLQnVygshDRQ4-8CBSJdz57kGP8k9hVzz6rEnqjjL40L6dATOHE7vTkBxqhEmZIgqM_1QwqEQkCJWvrHNG9YWQRTB46rLLLONBBp-18KvtlARmtqLYGC1OJ5maKs9pB8uWTSgdHQ-PaMNJ1QI7zkw Lesless (talk) 11:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment. --Elly (talk) 16:59, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Photo of photo, needs permission Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- This is my grand father. The photo is is from the family archive. There are only three known photos of Atanas Pashkov.
Could I know what is the reason for deletion request? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pursie68 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Old photos are copyrighted, just like newer ones, please note Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bulgaria. @Pursie68: , if you know who made the photo in your family archive, please follow the procedure of VRT. If successful the photo can be undeleted. Now deleted because the photo is copyrighted. The photo is from before 1946, but this Is too recent to be sure the photo is in Public Domain. Copyright is in effect until 70 years after the death of the photographer. --Elly (talk) 17:05, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, no exif, found on the web incl https://alexanderdegrote.com/over-de-auteurs/, PCP Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment. --Elly (talk) 17:06, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
excerpt is supposedly of five bars of trio, which should include E-flat two octaves above middle C, but only has four bars Mathsci (talk) 12:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep That is no reason for deletion. Source is given, license is OK. --Migebert (talk) 17:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Elly (talk) 17:08, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; artist died in 1961; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 12:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Can be undeleted in 2032 [[Category:Undelete in 2032]]. --Elly (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 17:10, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
A version found online https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2019/03/21/Police-launch-probe-into-Samsung-heiress-alleged-drug-use/3201553159150/ before upload date. No exif - I think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment. --Elly (talk) 17:11, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Sadly a sketch being "copied from a photograph", as described here, makes it a COM:DERIV. Lord Belbury (talk) 13:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Derivative work from a photo from somewhere before 1953 (death of the subject). --Elly (talk) 17:13, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
{{PD-PRC-exempt}} applies only for text, not for images. See also the simliar case. SCP-2000 13:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 17:13, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, see it:File:Logo Poste Vaticane.jpg WindEwriX (talk) 14:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, although a similar logo File:Radio Vaticana - Logo 2017.svg is available on Commons. --Elly (talk) 17:41, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Street near Hsinchu railway station.jpg
Converted to regular DR, per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (png -> jpg). -- Túrelio (talk) 14:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: not an exact dupe, because the other image shows a number plate. In this version it is blurred. I wil nominate the other image for deletion. --Elly (talk) 17:43, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
The depicted signpost is "Bildrechte © masastarus envato.com"! This special derived work is not allowed per {{De minimis}} or Freedom of panorama. (Only during the pandemic, therefore no permanence in the public). Ras67 (talk) 15:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Den Copyrighthinweis hatte ich tatsächlich übersehen. Dennoch: Dies ist kein Papierplakat für den temporären sondern eine für den längerfristigen Einsatz vorgesehene Kunststofftafel, welche über die letzte Spielplatzsaison hinausstehen geblieben ist und auch in der nächsten Saison dort stehen wird. Granpar (talk) 09:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Diese „Kunststofftafel“ entspricht meines Erachtens weder der Rechtfertigung der Panoramafreiheit noch dem Kriterium bleibend, wie vom Gesetz gefordert. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 13:36, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Ich würde die Datei Behalten. Das ist eine Tafel im öffentlichen Raum, dahinter Wiese und Wald. Das ist meines Erachtens Panoramafreiheit. Triplec85 (talk) 18:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Per COM:FOP Germany ‘’works located permanently in public streets, ways, or public open spaces’’ are free to share. However, this sign is not permanent. It is intended for use during the Covid pandemic and will be removed when the pandemic is subdued. Therefore it has to be deleted. --Elly (talk) 20:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
This special derived work is not allowed per freedom of panorama, since lacking permanence in the public and furthermore advertisement! Ras67 (talk) 15:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Diese auf einer dauerhaft an einer ehemaligen Scheune der Beuchertsmühle angbrachte LKW-Plane mit dem dauerhaft aufgebrachten Werbedruck belegt, dass der Wohnplatz "Fünfte und Sechste Mühle" im Marsbachtal ist landläufig eher unter dem inoffiziellen Namem "Beuchertsmühle bekannt ist. (Hinweis: Die 5. und 6. Mühle wurden schon in den 1860er Jahren vereinigt). Granpar (talk) 05:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Das hab ich auch nicht angezweifelt, auch wollte ich damit nicht implizieren, dass Du damit Werbung machst, dennoch bin ich der Meinung, dass das vorliegende Bild hier auf Commons unzulässig ist. Dieses Plakat ist der Panoramafreiheit schlicht nicht zugänglich. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 15:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Granpar: Falls du die Plane von ein bisschen weiter weg fotografierst und noch einiges an Gelände/Bäume/Wiese mit dabei ist, die Plane also nicht Hauptbestandteil des Bildes sondern zufällig Nebenbestandteil des Panoramas ist, sollte es wohl unter die Panoramafreiheit fallen. ;-)
- P.S. by the way... falls du vor Ort ein paar Osterbrunnen bei deinen Touren siehst, kannst du Bilder in Category:Easter in Baden-Württemberg bzw. Category:Easter in Main-Tauber-Kreis hochladen. Bilder zu diesen Bräuchen gibt es leider bisher nur sehr wenige und die Kategorien sind nur spärlich angelegt, häufig noch nicht vorhanden. Aktuell steht ja die passende Osterzeit vor der Tür und vielleicht wurden trotz Corona die ein oder anderen Osterbrunnen geschmückt. Viele Grüße Triplec85 (talk) 08:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Elly (talk) 19:56, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP i Denmark. Scupltor is Robert Lund Jensen (1915-2003) |EPO| da: 15:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nomination. Peter Alberti (talk) 18:14, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No freedom of panoroma for artwork per COM:FOP Denmark. Can be undeleted in 2074. [[Category:Undelete in 2074]]. --Elly (talk) 20:05, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The picture is taken in Russia and Russian laws apply Victuallers (talk) 17:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The law in Russia will be applicable for persons if they are in Russia. This photo is made by personnel from the Indian navy. They were allowed to make the photo and to publish the photo as they wish. As far as I know this is not prohibited by Russian law. The Indian navy decided to publish the photo with a free licence in India. This does not appear against Russian law. --Elly (talk) 20:11, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Merci pour votre notification mais, et c’est humiliant, pourquoi avez-vous supprimé ma discussion sur la Loi de Koide sans m’en avertir ? Quelle est la cause précise de cette censure ?
- Vous devriez supprimer l’onglet discussion des pages Wikipedia puisqu’elles ne servent à rien.
- J’ai trouvé ces deux relations en rapport avec la formule qu’a énoncée Yoshio Koide. Cela ne fait de mal à personne, prend peu de place et donne une information étonnante quant au tour de magie qu’y fait le hasard absolu.
- Le rapport des résultats de deux formules en système d’unités (SI) présente une incroyable coïncidence sur des valeurs aussi faibles : le 2/3 de koide y est trivial !
- Le rapport de ces deux formules est en effet évident
- (mt2 + mμ2 + mε2 ) / (mt1/2 + mμ1/2 + mε1/2 )2 = 1,99960x10-27 ≈ 2x10-27 kg
- (mt2 + mμ2 + mε2 ) / (mt + mμ + mε) = 2,99945x10-27 ≈ 3x10-27 kg
- Alors que sur la formule de Koide il ne l’est qu’après calcul.
- (mt + mμ + mε) / (mt1/2 + mμ1/2 + mε1/2 )2 = (3.3567340858x10-27)/(7.0958892734x10-14)2 ≈ 2/3
- À propos de la formule de Yoshio Koide que vous ne censurez pas, je n’ai trouvé sur le web aucune théorie acceptée par la communauté scientifique permettant de justifier son rôle en mécanique quantique. On peut alors douter que ce soit une relation certaine entre la masse des trois leptons chargés tant qu’elle n’est pas démontrée : https://motls.blogspot.com/2012/01/could-koide-formula-be-real.html.
- Tiens, une autre tour de magie !!
- (mt + mμ + mε) / (mt1/2mμ1/2+mt1/2mε1/2+mμ1/2mε1/2) = 3,99985 ≈ 4
- Convaincus ?
- J’en fais d’autres ici, toujours avec la masse des leptons chargés, en bas de page :
- https://sites.google.com/site/cotecouretcotejardin/autheatredeletrange
- Les calculs en 2012 avec les valeurs de codata 2010 sont là :
- Vous comprenez ainsi que les approximations étonnantes (relatives à des entiers ici par exemple) ne font pas forcément loi. Un mathématicien pourrait vous le confirmer et vous expliquer que l'esprit de contradiction est nécessaire pour appréhender la réalité et aviser votre public.
- Recevez mes salutations distinguées. Francis Maleval — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francis Maleval (talk • contribs) 12:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Francis Maleval: Merci pour votre message. J'ai peur qu'il y ait eu un malentendu. Je n'ai rien supprimé. L'image File:Koide avec unités SI.gif n'est pas utilisée. Les images qui représentent des formules doivent être remplacées par du TeX. Par conséquent, l'image inutilisée doit être supprimée. J'espère avoir pu vous aider un peu. --WIKImaniac 16:24, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Can be replaced by formula's in TeX. Unused image on the projects. --Elly (talk) 20:23, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
此掃描文檔缺兩頁。現在已經有了不缺頁的新文檔，而且已經將指向此文檔的鏈接轉指向新版文檔，請將本文檔刪除。 Snaketong (talk) 00:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per uploader request. SCP-2000 15:28, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:COURTESY. --Elly (talk) 20:25, 3 October 2021 (UTC)