Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/10/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![117 File:""Should Military Dictatorship Supplant Civil Gov't in Hawaii?"" (debate), May 8, 1932 (NBY 6419).jpg](#File:""Should_Military_Dictatorship_Supplant_Civil_Gov't_in_Hawaii?""_(debate),_May_8,_1932_(NBY_6419).jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_(1).svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![191 File:Логотип компании "Россети Московский регион".png](#File:Логотип_компании_"Россети_Московский_регион".png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Created by cross-wiki locked user, User:Aryashahnaughty. Eostrix (talk) 09:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F1. --CptViraj (talk) 12:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This is an incorrect, duplicate image that contains Exif metadata that identifies an individual that we would like removing. We have since uploaded an alternative and more relevant image that we have used which can be found here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Howden_Broking_Logo.jpg HowdenBrokingGroup (talk) 12:07, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request on 3rd day. --Achim (talk) 12:24, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
{{copyvio|source or reason}} Bardzo proszę o szybkie usunięcie tego pliku gdyż przez pomyłkę przesłałem plik, który może naruszać prawa autorskie. Igo2004 (talk) 09:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
lisence issues NAOFC (talk) 17:26, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 18:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Pornographic content NairobiPapel (talk) 19:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: "Pornographic content," in and of itself, is not a valid reason for deletion. This image, however, is a blatant COM:NETCOPYVIO and is being deleted for that reason. (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 20:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-skol 2804:D4B:54DC:2E00:D880:734A:DC49:6D3A 20:24, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Appears to be the same photo as https://2nd-train.net/topics/article/28261/. If the 2nd-train.net uploader and the Commons uploader are the same person, they should submit a license statement to COM:OTRS. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete Copyvio by terrible plagiarism. --Categorizing (talk) 12:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 06:52, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
I want to delete my account Gypsy cole (talk) 04:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. Accounts cannot be deleted. --Achim (talk) 12:06, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Эта фотография является низкокачественной частью групповой фотографии (артист был снят с группой студентов). Представители артиста потребовали удаления этого файла как низкокачественного снимка. Я когда-то давно и сделал эту фотографию, поэтому прошу к просьбе отнестись серьёзно Zimin.V.G. (обсуждение) 13:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC) Zimin.V.G. (talk) 13:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Можно удалить после того, как представители артиста предложат хорошую замену. Сейчас никакой замены нет, поэтому удаление поставит под удар работу множества сайтов, основанных на свободной лицензии. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Вот эта загрузка сопровождалась текстом Эта фотография утверждена народным артистом РФ Авангардом Леонтьевым в качестве официальной и размещена по его просьбе, но дальнейшего развития не получила. Фото было загружено такое, только в низком разрешении. Sealle (talk) 16:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- То есть теперь участник Zimin.V.G. получил просьбу разместить приведённую вами фотографию? Или служба OTRS обратилась к Авангарду Леонтьеву и получила его разрешение? Прошу прощения, я просто не понял вашей реплики. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Я этого не знаю. Но я вижу удалённые и скрытые правки. Sealle (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Понятно, спасибо. Искренне прошу работников OTRS, в том числе и вас, обратиться к Авангарду Леонтьеву через участника Zimin.V.G. и вытребовать разрешение на его удалённую фотографию, как вы требуете эти разрешения от других артистов. Спасибо! --PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Я этого не знаю. Но я вижу удалённые и скрытые правки. Sealle (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- То есть теперь участник Zimin.V.G. получил просьбу разместить приведённую вами фотографию? Или служба OTRS обратилась к Авангарду Леонтьеву и получила его разрешение? Прошу прощения, я просто не понял вашей реплики. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Вот эта загрузка сопровождалась текстом Эта фотография утверждена народным артистом РФ Авангардом Леонтьевым в качестве официальной и размещена по его просьбе, но дальнейшего развития не получила. Фото было загружено такое, только в низком разрешении. Sealle (talk) 16:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- На меня вышел агент Авангарда Николаевича. Некий Борис из МХТ Чехова. Есть телефонный номер и есть электронная почта. Он планирует загрузить некое качественное фото. У них претензия к низкому качеству фото. Какую фотографию загружал некогда в 2016 году CrazyWhiteHorse я не знаю --Zimin.V.G. (talk) 19:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Отлично, тогда вы легко получите общее согласие. Сначала этот Борис загрузит фотографию, а потом выставите нынешнюю на быстрое удаление из-за low educational quality compared to other one, и без обсуждений всё удалят. Простите, но сейчас-то у нас нет выбора, ваша иллюстрация единственная в категории. Ещё лучше, если Борис заключит со службой OTRS договор и на другие фотографии МХТ. Ух, как славно! --PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Боюсь артисты как всегда идут по накатанной дороге и дадут фото "из архива театра" которое уже явно фигурирует где-то на сайтах и где явно заявлено чьё-то авторское право. Увы, общий подход такой всегда. --Zimin.V.G. (talk) 21:37, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Если какие-то сайты украли у театра фотографию, это не помешает театру заключить договор с вами или с сотрудниками OTRS. Для этого в театре работает юрист, которому вы расскажете этот вопрос, и он легко найдёт ответ. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 05:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Сейчас человек этот вновь звонил, вновь требовал. Я объяснил что ему нужно сделать - самостоятельно загрузить качественную и лицензионно чистую фотографию. Надеюсь он меня понял. --Zimin.V.G. (talk) 07:52, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Если какие-то сайты украли у театра фотографию, это не помешает театру заключить договор с вами или с сотрудниками OTRS. Для этого в театре работает юрист, которому вы расскажете этот вопрос, и он легко найдёт ответ. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 05:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Боюсь артисты как всегда идут по накатанной дороге и дадут фото "из архива театра" которое уже явно фигурирует где-то на сайтах и где явно заявлено чьё-то авторское право. Увы, общий подход такой всегда. --Zimin.V.G. (talk) 21:37, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Отлично, тогда вы легко получите общее согласие. Сначала этот Борис загрузит фотографию, а потом выставите нынешнюю на быстрое удаление из-за low educational quality compared to other one, и без обсуждений всё удалят. Простите, но сейчас-то у нас нет выбора, ваша иллюстрация единственная в категории. Ещё лучше, если Борис заключит со службой OTRS договор и на другие фотографии МХТ. Ух, как славно! --PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- For non-Russian speakers: а courtesy deletion requested, and the uploader doesn't mind, but the file is widely used and it seems to be no / little adequate replacement. Sealle (talk) 17:09, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Also, it looks like the artist have already provided the perfect image to Wikimedia Commons, but it was deleted, possibly because the artist has not published the copyright contract for that perfect image. This means, the artist's representatives may now publish their copyright contract in Wikimedia Commons so to prove that image was completely free. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Думаю дело разрешилось. Загружена фотография File:Авангард Николаевич Леонтьев.jpg Посмотрите всё ли нормально и можно ли удалять теперь. --Zimin.V.G. (talk) 14:04, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Не то чтобы идеально (одноразовая учётка как бы намекает, и если проверить у чекъюзеров её идентичность с автором правки, добавившей изображение в статью, результат достаточно предсказуем), но попробуем остаться в рамках COM:AGF — в конце концов, в таком размере и разрешении фото в сети не находится. Sealle (talk) 16:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Спасибо вам за этот важный поступок. Пожалуйста, расскажите сотрудникам театра, что теперь они могут таким же образом загружать сотни других фотографий. Спасибо ещё раз. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: a courtesy deletion, nominated by the uploader, now unused. --Sealle (talk) 17:01, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Omar_Helwany.jpeg Editor67329652 (talk) 20:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Omar_Helwany.jpeg Editor67329652 (talk) 20:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Hemant Kumar.jpg Hemant 2002 (talk) 07:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:13, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Hangar 13 (2018 Logo).png Gamziko (talk) 06:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Carlos Yáñez del Pino Cyaneztoledo (talk) 16:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Gigi Shibabaw Photo.png Yitbe (talk) 13:38, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Keep Another finger-trouble nomination. I think you need this image File:Gigi Shibabaw Photo.png, which is up for speedy deletion at present, because of sourcing problems. Please discuss that there, not here. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)- Keep, no valid reason for deletion, and all of the above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:08, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:01, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
vandalism (English Wikipedia) Luk (talk) 21:58, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, fake logo. Trivialist (talk) 22:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:16, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Fake logo Trivialist (talk) 22:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll block the uploader. Taivo (talk) 07:14, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Fake logo Trivialist (talk) 22:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. The image is an obvious hoax, for the mere fact that the company went out of business. 23.127.188.95 15:55, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Yes, definitely. In fact, it was uploaded by a sock of User:Jermboy27. 2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:551D:B907:AEEF:28A4 18:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll block the uploader as hoaxmaster. Taivo (talk) 07:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Files created by User:Yitbe
[edit]File:Roman Tesfaye1.pngFile:Gildo_kassa.pngFile:School Feeding - Mothers.pngFile:School Feeding.pngFile:Roman Tesfaye.pngFile:Pilot Kalekidan Girma.pngAnd probably others (see text).
These images were all uploaded by User:Yitbe who claimed the files as their own work. This appears to be a pattern by this user; after nominating two uploads via CSD I looked through their other contributions and they all seem to be uploaded from elsewhere on the internet. Found via Google Image search: File:Roman Tesfaye1.png [1], File:Gildo_kassa.png [2], File:School Feeding - Mothers.png [3] & [4], File:School Feeding.png [5]. I stopped there as, by this point, it seems evident that I could spend the rest of the day checking this uploader's contributions. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- P.S. These were Cross-wiki uploads from en.wikipedia.org. I am not sure whether they need to be flagged there, as well, or if the Commons process will suffice. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Adding File:Pilot Kalekidan Girma.png. This situation's a little different. It appears to be a derivative work from https://twitter.com/flyethiopian/status/1318880618080575488/photo/1; in this version the depicted subject (an airline pilot) is a mirrored image and, for some reason, superimposed over an ocean pier. (It's also possible that the airline itself created the derivative work, which still makes it theirs.) -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- I've gone through Yitbe's other uploads and tagged them as applicable. A couple did not seem to be used anywhere else (that I could determine) and are presumed to indeed be the uploader's own work. Since I'd already started the deletion request for these others, I assume I should let it run its course. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 21:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Request early closure. As the nominator, and the only editor who has participated thus far, I hereby withdraw the nomination (having read the rest of the main Deletion Requests page). I have gone through and reported the remaining individual files, listed above, as copyright violations. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 00:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per speedy deletion nomination, PCP. --Sealle (talk) 11:47, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
faulty uploaded, correctly uploaded version exists Poliocretes (talk) 17:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, replaced by File:Milan2456.jpg. --Achim (talk) 10:52, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. It is indicated that this is a photograph from a photo shoot. The metadata lists the author Taras Malirevych Venzz (talk) 21:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 12:51, 23 Oktober 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: Author - TARAS MALIAREVYCH. See metadata --Krdbot 20:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Rahulrnath001 (talk) 05:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Podzemnik at 05:48, 27 Oktober 2020 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Kao bun song - all copyvios --Krdbot 09:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bhavdip.1.100 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:32, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 21:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused low-quality image of unidentified child DMacks (talk) 02:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
personal file, french article deleted : no notability Supertoff (talk) 04:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 06:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope image of one word. I'm not really sure what it can be used for. Per COM:NOTUSED BriefEdits (talk) 06:29, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope image of one word. I'm not really sure what it can be used for. Per COM:NOTUSED BriefEdits (talk) 06:29, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 11:05, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as above and COM:SELFIE this is the only upload of a non-contributor. Crep1711 (talk) 11:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Trueknockdigital (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ArteMusicaPoesia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Enrico Maria Camardo - Arcore.jpg
- File:Presentazione Il treno di Leo - Arcore (MB).jpg
- File:Libri di Enrico Maria Camardo.jpg
- File:Enrico Maria Camardo.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:58, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused unofficial logo, out of scope Leonel Sohns 14:29, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo of an non existing Microsoft Windows version, out of scope. Leonel Sohns 14:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument established in 1968. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.
Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:55, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures.
- File:48.Памятник Ивану Тургеневу.Орёл 2015.jpg
- File:Орёл. Памятник И. С. Тургеневу на «Тургеневском бережке».jpg
- File:Памятник И.С.Тургеневу, 17.04.2012 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Памятник Ивану Сергеевичу Тургеневу г. Орёл.jpg
- File:Памятник Тургеневу И.С 1.jpg
- File:Памятник Тургеневу И.С 2.jpg
- File:Памятник Тургеневу И.С 3.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
useless and no usage Hoseina051311 (talk) 15:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - no camera EXIF, lower res, appeared elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Albert playing in mfk zvolen.jpg and File:Albert playing mfk.png are here) COM:PRP issue.
- File:Albert playing zvolen against nitra.jpg
- File:Albert playing mfk.png
- File:Albert playing in mfk zvolen.jpg
- File:Albert playing for MFK Zvolen.jpg
- File:Albert playing in broadbeach fc.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 15:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST - unused logo of non-notable firm Эlcobbola talk 17:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Szilas
[edit]These photos were taken by Béla Brunhuber (1874–1953), see the links in other versions added by me.
Regasterios (talk) 19:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tyrusluke1216 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work on an image illustrating a movie. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:23, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Looks like a movie screenshot. PNG format would support that suspicion. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Incorporates nonfree file https://www.flickr.com/photos/worldeconomicforum/5434139510/ from Flickr. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:28, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawing nomination Sorry, looks like the license changed since it was uploaded as File:Bill & Melinda Gates, David Cameron - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011.jpg. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OK, kept then. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:38, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
“FBMD” in metadata = Facebook download Ytoyoda (talk) 03:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Doesn't look like own work. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover from 2014 (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poder_Judicial_y_Conflictos_Pol%C3%ADticos) Fallaner (talk) 03:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:45, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Diese Weiterleitung ist aus meiner Sicht nicht notwendig, Wunsch des Hochladenden. Mobil-Sockenpuppe (talk) 04:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
signature of a (notable?) person from India, dubious own-work claim. Since Indian law is based on Common law, this may not be eligible for PD-signature. FASTILY 05:33, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Incorrect spelling, should be adellijk Lotje (talk) 05:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- makes no difference on the pronunciation.. just rename it. Thanks GerardM (talk) 06:04, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- @GerardM: File:Nl-adellijk.ogg bestaat reeds, vandaar. :-) Lotje (talk) 13:07, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If you want to rename the file, use Template:Rename. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyright logo, exceeds threshold of originality. Gikü (talk) 07:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
原典のページで著作者がSS.8氏であることを確認できず、産経デジタルの著作物である可能性が極めて高いため。 Ariga (talk) 07:33, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + unused personal file. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
wrong name Douglas SD Kim (talk) 08:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:58, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
File:A woman walks past a house damaged by recent shelling during a military conflict over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh, in the city of Ganja, Azerbaijan, Oct. 6, 2020.png
[edit]
Reuters is not in the public domain. Copyright violation. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 08:46, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Keep - This media is provided by Voice of America. Valid permission {{PD-USGov-VOA}}. --Interfase (talk) 08:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- It clearly says that VoA copies publications from AP, Reuters and etc. which are not free for use. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 12:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Nope. It is free for use under {{PD-USGov-VOA}} as it was provided by Voice of America. --Interfase (talk) 05:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Third Party Content: VOA has individual licenses from Agence France Presse (AFP), the Associated Press (AP) and Reuters to use their text, video, audio, photos and graphics on our website. All three agencies’ material is copyrighted and the property of AFP, AP and Reuters respectively, and may not be copied, published or redistributed without the written permission of each agency. AFP, AP and Reuters text, video, audio photo, and/or graphic material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 19:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Nope. It is free for use under {{PD-USGov-VOA}} as it was provided by Voice of America. --Interfase (talk) 05:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Túrelio. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
File:People look at the destroyed houses a day after shelling by Armenian's missle attack during fighting over the separatist region of Nagorno-Karabakh, in Ganja, Azerbaijan, Oct. 12, 2020.png
[edit]
Associated Press is not in the public domain. Copyright violation. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 08:47, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Keep - This media is provided by Voice of America. Valid permission {{PD-USGov-VOA}}. --Interfase (talk) 08:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- It clearly says that VoA copies publications from AP, Reuters and etc. which are not free for use. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 12:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Nope. It is free for use under {{PD-USGov-VOA}} as it was provided by Voice of America. --Interfase (talk) 05:12, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Third Party Content: VOA has individual licenses from Agence France Presse (AFP), the Associated Press (AP) and Reuters to use their text, video, audio, photos and graphics on our website. All three agencies’ material is copyrighted and the property of AFP, AP and Reuters respectively, and may not be copied, published or redistributed without the written permission of each agency. AFP, AP and Reuters text, video, audio photo, and/or graphic material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 19:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Nope. It is free for use under {{PD-USGov-VOA}} as it was provided by Voice of America. --Interfase (talk) 05:12, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: User:Túrelio deleted the file. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:58, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
obvious non-free image, stolen promo pic Lugnuts (talk) 09:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:58, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Laut Metadaten handelt es sich um ein geschütztes Werk des Fotografen Ernst Merkhofer Solomon Dandy (talk) 09:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Metadata don't match the user's name. OTRS permission needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
уже использован 90.189.251.152 09:38, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Obviously not my own work. A photograph is not like a self-portrait. No metadata. Venzz (talk) 09:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Small file, fackes EXIF, possible copyvio (see a less cropped version here from 2016). C messier (talk) 10:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio, certainly not "own work", no "Schöpfungshöhe" of its own right, no freedom of panorama. 217.239.14.159 10:28, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Hot28 (talk) 09:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal file of non-contributor. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:05, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Hotaunty.jpg Hot28 (talk) 09:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Hotaunty.jpg Hot28 (talk) 10:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
file:Hotaunty.jpg Hot28 (talk) 10:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of an ad or poster containing a photo. Possibility of copyrighted "photo within a photo" derivative work, plus the poster ad is a form of visual art. Also there is no freedom of panorama for such cases. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:26, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Nostalgia
[edit]
- Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; I would say NOSTALGIA : since 1972 - 1984 I was never absent in the School called Santa Ana Racing Park since I did dream 3x to be a horserace jockey but I failed; but I bet from Race 1 to 16 and also at San Lazaro Hippodrome Saturdays and Sundays; hence, I was about to take Category:Circuit Makati where my Santa Ana school was located, when I bumped upon this Ad Category:The Stratford Residences and asked the Guard about the name of the being built tower and he pointed me to the Ad The Stratford Residences; in all my photography I usually take photos of the Ad or like packaging of Cheese Curls to make sure I put the pics in the correct category since when I travel I would have 2,000 photos to upload and sometimes it is a mess; respectfully submitted to the sound discretion of Commons and I have no objection to the deletion if it may be so; very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 05:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This clearly fails COM:FOP Philippines because the copyrighted advertisements are the prominent object in the photo. I was asked to comment here because I have previously commented on FOP Philippines cases. @Judgefloro: while it is a good practice to take such photos in order to keep track of where your own photos were taken, photos like this one should not be uploaded when they originate in jurisdictions that do not have the necessary freedom of panorama. Finnusertop (talk) 13:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - OoS. --E4024 (talk) 03:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Fitindia. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina for posters and the photo violates poster author's (the theatre?) copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Not sure that kind of fan art can be accepted... TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Found lesewhere on internet. OTRS permission from the original author is needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Scan of an old photo; unlikely to be the uploader's own work as stated. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:309_Court_Street_next_to_917_Plum_Street.jpg” under ticket:2020102110015405. --janbery (talk) 20:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:13, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Watermark indicates Tarra Layne, the Flickr uploader, does not own this image Ytoyoda (talk) 13:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:13, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Seems to be a unused crude parody/personal flag with the only use being by User:OgreBot, better SVG/PNG Files exist BlinxTheKitty (talk) 13:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Looks like hoax. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
violation de copyright de https://www.ilgiornale.it/news/primi-nel-mondo-pi-30-anni-lalbo-dei-maestri-1891467.html Vincent P. (talk) 14:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused logo of an non existing Microsoft Windows version, out of scope. Leonel Sohns 14:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: Hoax / misinformative file. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
violation de copyright de https://www.facebook.com/MonturesFanielEyewear/ (post du 11 septembre) Vincent P. (talk) 14:37, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
N'a plus raison d'être Tmpxcc (talk) 14:46, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Bonjour Tmpxcc, laissez vous du temps. Wikipédia est un projet collectif, il faut savoir être patient et ne pas se vexer. Bien à vous. ----Abalg (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Tmpxcc: Re. Votre peinture est effectivement bien utile pour illustrer le sujet. Elle est remise en place. Merci et bien à vous. It's usefull, don't delete it. ----Abalg (talk) 20:22, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Abalg je suis l'auteur de l'Amante religieuse et j'aimerais beaucoup que mon nom 'tmpx' sans majuscule et si possible avec '2020' (peinture crée en 2020) apparaissent dans le cartouche sous cette image, sinon tant pis pour moi ;o)... bonne journée @Abalg tmpx --Tmpxcc (talk) 06:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Voir fr:Discussion:Mante religieuse#Peinture Amante religieuse pour la suite de la discussion. ----Abalg (talk) 08:48, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Abalg je suis l'auteur de l'Amante religieuse et j'aimerais beaucoup que mon nom 'tmpx' sans majuscule et si possible avec '2020' (peinture crée en 2020) apparaissent dans le cartouche sous cette image, sinon tant pis pour moi ;o)... bonne journée @Abalg tmpx --Tmpxcc (talk) 06:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Tmpxcc: Re. Votre peinture est effectivement bien utile pour illustrer le sujet. Elle est remise en place. Merci et bien à vous. It's usefull, don't delete it. ----Abalg (talk) 20:22, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No valid reason for deletion but this is an artwork of an established author. We need OTRS permission for this file. WHen we get it (which seems to be unlikely based on the fact that the author wants to delete it...), I'm happy to restore the file. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
n'a plus raison d'être Tmpxcc (talk) 14:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No valid reason for deletion but this is an artwork of an established author. We need OTRS permission for this file. WHen we get it (which seems to be unlikely based on the fact that the author wants to delete it...), I'm happy to restore the file. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:21, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
n'a plus raison d'être Tmpxcc (talk) 14:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No valid reason for deletion but this is an artwork of an established author. We need OTRS permission for this file. WHen we get it (which seems to be unlikely based on the fact that the author wants to delete it...), I'm happy to restore the file. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:21, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
n'a plus raison d'être Tmpxcc (talk) 14:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No valid reason for deletion but this is an artwork of an established author. We need OTRS permission for this file. WHen we get it (which seems to be unlikely based on the fact that the author wants to delete it...), I'm happy to restore the file. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:21, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
n'a plus raison d'être Tmpxcc (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No valid reason for deletion but this is an artwork of an established author. We need OTRS permission for this file. WHen we get it (which seems to be unlikely based on the fact that the author wants to delete it...), I'm happy to restore the file. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
n'a plus raison d'être Tmpxcc (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No valid reason for deletion but this is an artwork of an established author. We need OTRS permission for this file. WHen we get it (which seems to be unlikely based on the fact that the author wants to delete it...), I'm happy to restore the file. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hanooz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Poster or book/album cover Sealle (talk) 19:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- All seem simple enough (COM:TOO/COM:DM). Sealle (talk) 19:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- If these are book by fa:حمید بهرامی احمدی (former Iranian MP), then in scope and Keep, otherwisse Delete as some random book covers. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- It appears that he is the writer, but I'm still concerned about COM:TOO Iran which, theoretically, can even protect a simple circle, let alone these covers (and the logo of the publisher). Ahmadtalk 03:39, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- useless and no usage Hoseina051311 (talk) 14:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Proper source + subject description needed so we can determine the right licence and if it's in our scope. Deleted per COM:PCP. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
useless and no usage Hoseina051311 (talk) 15:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Personal file, out of scope 17jiangz1 (talk) 15:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
this is not own work Luckie Luke (talk) 15:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: It trully doesn't look like own work. Likely copyvio. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
useless and no usage Hoseina051311 (talk) 15:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: It trully doesn't look like own work. Likely copyvio. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of a packaged chichirya or snack food. As a brand still being distributed here (and plus the packaging is current), it is certainly 100% copyrighted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; in all my photography I usually take photos of the Ad or like packaging of Cheese Curls to make sure I put the pics in the correct category since when I travel I would have 2,000 photos to upload and sometimes it is a mess; but now, I discovered and learned from you that I would now take photos of the packaging from afar, or I will upload a New Version to overrun the Packaging; respectfully submitted to the sound discretion of Commons and I have no objection to the deletion if it may be so; very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 06:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of a packaged chichirya or snack food. As a brand still being distributed here (and plus the packaging is current), it is certainly 100% copyrighted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; in all my photography I usually take photos of the Ad or like packaging of Cheese Curls to make sure I put the pics in the correct category since when I travel I would have 2,000 photos to upload and sometimes it is a mess; but now, I discovered and learned from you that I would now take photos of the packaging from afar, or I will upload a New Version to overrun the Packaging; respectfully submitted to the sound discretion of Commons and I have no objection to the deletion if it may be so; very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 06:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:32, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Wrong license 37.237.148.42 16:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Looks like a TV screenshot. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:32, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Wrong license 37.237.148.42 16:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Looks like a TV s. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:32, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Wrong license 37.237.148.42 16:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Looks like a TV s. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Wahrscheinliche Urheberrechtsverletzung: Uploader ist offensichtl. Sohn der beiden Abgebildeten, der war zum Zeitpunkt der Fotografie erst ca. 5 Jahre alt, Fotograf ist sicher jemand anderer. Digitalisierung als Repro mit IPhone durch den Uploader (dadurch auch falsche Location-Angabe). 194.166.145.48 16:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Proper resource and author needed so we can determine the licence. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Wrong license 37.237.148.42 16:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Looks like a TV s. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Source mentions that the picture is copyrighted 37.237.148.42 16:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Looks like a TV s. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Depicted person didn't agree on posting - violation of §22 KUG (German Law). Dr.Waldzorn (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Per metadata authorship and license is to be doubted. --Achim (talk) 18:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
faulty upload Poliocretes (talk) 17:26, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:36, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
same with File:Imam Husayn Shrine 1850.jpg Ruwaym (talk) 17:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
If it's a 1986 poster, then it won't go out of copyright for another 36 years. Sorry. GRuban (talk) 18:07, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- There's also File:Jeanne d'Arc poster.jpg. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 23:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Appears above TOO. This is not mere simple geometric shapes or text. Эlcobbola talk 18:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Too complex to be COM:TOO. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Updated and .png version uploaded Raju Babu (talk) 04:52, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Heavily in use - please process as a duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
this is duplicate copy of File:Achham Sudurpashchim locator.png Raju Babu (talk) 18:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Not the same file. JPg version is actually sharper than the PNG. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Delete Logo belongs to the company it represents, and is not the personal property of the uploader. Uploader has not indicated they are a copyright agent for the company, nor has proof of same been provided such that the company has declared their logo to be available under cc-by-sa-4.0. It is unlikely a for-profit company would declare their logo to be usable for any purposes, including commercial, without their consent. Hammersoft (talk) 18:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation (portrait as well as cover) Martin Sg. (talk) 18:29, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Als Geschäftsführer der Stiftung Fotodokumentation Kanton Luzern bin ich autorisiert Biler aus unseren Beständen hochzuladen. Ich sehe überhaupt keine Logik in deinem Löschantrag.--Nienetwiler (talk) 06:20, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: We need to have COM:OTRS permission in order to keep the file, sorry. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michael Saponara (talk · contribs)
[edit]It's not totally clear who this person is supposed to be or why these should be in scope.
GMGtalk 19:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:48, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work of a billboard/advertisement/poster. While it can be argued as coming from the La Union provincial government, it might be sponsored by private companies (as evidenced by the Smart logo on the top-left). There is also the case of "photo within the billboard" which might the creators of this graphics have obtained from source unknown to us. Another thing is that we can't be sure if the creators worked on this poster under their capacity as government employees or just hired by the La Union LGU (Commons:PCP). There is also no freedom of panorama in the Philippines for most works, including 2D-category artworks (murals, paintings, billboards, and posters) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; I was shocked that the Philippines has a Fruit Basket Capital as Villasis claims to be the Vegetable Capital of this or that; and then, they claimed themselves to be Beach Capital of the North: who crowned them? this Ad is tourism and business purpose - they would demand huge Hotel fees and beach resorts packages for the gullibles; I do not like their beaches; I like that in Marinduque; hence, I took picture of this so that Commons and future readers would be educated as to the Truth of Consequences of their claims; maybe Its A Frank Bro; I remember the Sunday Homily of Fr. Franz about Franks; oh this comment is just to ease our Stress from the Mass Deletions; I spent 2 days writing Comments and still cannot write an intelligent Legal Treatise to put inputs but it's Gone since October 9, maybe Lost in the Woods respectfully submitted to the sound discretion of Commons and I have no objection to the deletion if it may be so; very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 06:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:48, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Info I removed Category:Philippine FOP cases/pending since posters (even those used for advertising) are not bound to FOP reliance in most cases, per Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Posters. Still, images of copyrighted posters are derivative works of those posters. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:48, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
copyright violations Викиенот (talk) 20:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Nexus 5X stock wallpaper is copyright Google, unlike AOSP stock wallpapers. 17jiangz1 (talk) 20:09, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work of a billboard or advertisement that is clearly modern and involving complex (not simple) visual features and/or layout. Although there is no freedom of panorama for such works, since there are two billboards, do these pass Commons:De minimis? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; I thought that ads like Category:Advertisements in the United States or by country are allowed being Not so important; I love the sun hence, the ad is beautiful for daily I pass by Onesimus store in a mall, respectfully submitted to the sound discretion of Commons and I have no objection to the deletion if it may be so; very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 06:15, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This clearly fails COM:FOP Philippines because the copyrighted advertisments are the prominent object in the photo. I was asked to comment here because I have previously commented on FOP Philippines cases. Finnusertop (talk) 13:12, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
File:""Should Military Dictatorship Supplant Civil Gov't in Hawaii?"" (debate), May 8, 1932 (NBY 6419).jpg
[edit],_May_8,_1932_(NBY_6419).jpg){kind=link}
,_May_8,_1932_(NBY_6419).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
kan innehålla våldbejakande extremism dålig kvinnosyn 81.170.253.188 20:23, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Ridiculous reason for deletion in any language. Inoffensive on the face of it and even if not, valuable as a historic document. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:29, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep File is in clear scope and , per Rodhullandemu, "valuable as a historic document". Tm (talk) 21:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio as construction designs and models also expressly fall under the protection of Chinese copyright. 17jiangz1 (talk) 20:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per COM:FOP China as well as COM:TOO China. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Withdraw My bad, didn't realise FOP China applied to 3D reproductions as well, confused with FOP US which only permits 2D reproductions of architectural works.--17jiangz1 (talk) 22:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:41, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, my fault. Please do not consider. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Image is likely photoshopped (see head) and thereby unencyclopedic Túrelio (talk) 20:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:56, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:56, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused snapshot w/o meanigful description, showing likely non-notable persons.-- Túrelio (talk) 21:07, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:07, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:09, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
_(1).svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:09, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
_(1).svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
_(1).svg){kind=link}
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:09, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:09, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Obviously not my own work. A photograph is not like a self-portrait. No metadata. Venzz (talk) 21:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
probably copyviol - low format — danyele 23:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: IMO this can be considered de minimis. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Didn't knew that. Thanks. --Trade (talk) 10:48, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:05, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
copyright infringement Baratiiman (talk) 07:58, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:08, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Small size, lacks EXIF, possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 10:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Murals and 2-d art are not allowed by COM:FOP US. Buidhe (talk) 18:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep The main subject is a graffiti. They can be kept per {{Non-free graffiti}}. The posters nearby should be in de minimis. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:20, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I agree that {{Non-free graffiti}} can be used. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Non free in Russian Wikipedia w:ru:Файл:Rosseti Logo vert Ru.jpg. 176.59.40.233 11:06, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Okey, deleted per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Russia#Simple_creative_works. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:26, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LifetimeWiki as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: Metadata is missing. Uploader's previous history of copyrighted images. Hence, own work is doubted.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as evidence is too weak.-- Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I did some digging online but I couldn't find a backup for the claim that it's a copyvio. The author also uploaded some useful images here and this one looks quite genuine to me. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:11, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
doubtful to be own work given low quality, no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Proper source needed so we can determine the licence. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:08, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Author request Di (they-them) (talk) 20:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
-2020-10-21T20:01:00.000Z-File:Aurochs_bull_and_cow.svg){kind=link}
Kept: Sorry Di (they-them) but you didn't provide any relevant reason for deletion. The file is useful to the project. CC is non-revocable so there should be a good reason backing up your request. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:07, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Marked "All rights reserved" in metadata Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:23, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Okey, deleted. I've checked some other photos of the uploader and they all seem to be taken with Canon EOS 70D, only this photo is an exception. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:58, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Although US gov works are PD, the Peanuts designs/drawings are copyrighted. 17jiangz1 (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Do you know that these drawings weren't produced by the feds as part of the design process? As I recall, these drawings are publicly released to promote the actual object itself. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter as long as the work is derivative of the Peanuts charachters, which are copyrighted.--17jiangz1 (talk) 22:24, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- File:Charles Schulz Congressional Gold Medal reverse.jpg. You can't copyright a character: are you thinking of a trademark? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Uh yes you can: Copyright protection for fictional characters. Characters are significantly above even the high standards of COM:TOO US.--17jiangz1 (talk) 04:39, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- File:Charles Schulz Congressional Gold Medal reverse.jpg. You can't copyright a character: are you thinking of a trademark? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter as long as the work is derivative of the Peanuts charachters, which are copyrighted.--17jiangz1 (talk) 22:24, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:56, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
This is a painting created between 1945 and 1951, and as such should be under copyright for many years more. The Library of Congress lists Davis's works as being under copyright, so it's unclear why this one, which is 69 years old, should not be. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:32, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:32, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Pornographic Content NairobiPapel (talk) 15:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope file. AshFriday (talk) 01:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- AshFriday, maybe you’re used to better quality porn (more and better camera angles, better lighting and sound, the guy a bit more groomed and athletic, longer footage, and some story plot, maybe?), but the goal here is educational, not recreational. There are other websites for good quality porn people can find when needed (so I heard!); in Commons we rather have this kind of media — unscripted, short, single-topic — as it is better suited to illustrate sexology topics in the context of encyclopedic reuse. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per Tuválkin. We have only a few videos in the relevant category. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:28, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
sexual content 97.83.164.180 20:57, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid reason for deletion.Just Some Wikipedian (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism, IP blocked. --Achim (talk) 21:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
sexual content 97.83.164.180 19:46, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep and block this IP again, per previous DR. Every time they discover their block has expired, they spam "sexual content" DRs on every human sexuality image they can find until someone blocks them again. Just Some Wikipedian (talk) 22:39, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
[Non-admin closure, Speedy Kept] Mass closure DR added by 97.83.164.180 because of accidental create. StayC, Bae173 and music fans [ talk to me ] 04:42, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
This is porn 194.233.96.65 06:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept. The fact that it is porn is not a reason to delete it. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
it is very unlikely that this is an own work, the source and the photographer should be given Goesseln (talk) 22:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. We need to know the source so we can determine the licence. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 02:11, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Not artwork, illegal graffiti. As I understand it, thus photos of it allowed. Keep -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:40, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: {{Non-free graffiti}} has long been allowed to stay on Commons. --Majora (talk) 00:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in USA. Please note that the two objects are stickers, not graffiti. They cannot benefit from {{Non-free graffiti}} A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:46, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hotel Saljut (Kyiv)
[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine, erected in 1984.
- File:Kiev - Hotel Salute.jpg
- File:Kiev Mazepy Str (Salut Hotel).JPG
- File:Kyiv victory day sign.JPG
- File:Salut Hotel in Kiev.JPG
- File:Unusual round building supported by a central column (8600765761).jpg
- File:Victory Day in Kyiv, 2019 (79).jpg
- File:Victory Day in Kyiv, 2019 (82).jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
VLu (talk) 06:04, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
No FOP for artworks and sculptures in US 17jiangz1 (talk) 20:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note, if kept, please move to "... garb.jpg". Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo TVR Internațional (2004).svg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SVG logos of television channels and networks of Romania. Even though Televiziunea Română (TVR) is Romania's public television network, it seems that the logos of their TV channels do not fall under the exemptions listed at Chapter 3 Article 9 of the law invoked in license.
.svg){kind=link}
- File:Logo of TVR (2004-).png
- File:TVR1 Logo.png
- File:TVR2 Logo.png
- File:TVRHD logo 00.jpg
- File:TvrCluj.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gikü (talk) 07:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:52, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Photographed by Béla Halmi (1892–1962), see here. Regasterios (talk) 16:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. --Missvain (talk) 21:03, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No FOP for art in US. Review only verifies that it was uploaded to Flicker with the same license. 17jiangz1 (talk) 20:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Irrelevant as this is not a sculpture kept in a permanent place. "The copyright in an architectural work that has been constructed does not include the right to prevent the making, distributing, or public display of pictures, paintings, photographs, or other pictorial representations of the work, if the building in which the work is embodied is located in or ordinarily visible from a public place." and the definition of an "architectural work" is a building such as "humanly habitable structures that are intended to be both permanent and stationary, such as houses and office buildings, and other permanent and stationary structures designed for human occupancy, including but not limited to churches, museums, gazebos, and garden pavilions". How is this car a building? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:04, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Koavf: I think you're confusing the wording. In COM:FOP US, the "Note that copyright applies only to "buildings"" is in the context of "architectural works", meaning that "Bridges, cloverleafs, dams, highways or walkways are not ‘buildings’ under the definition of architectural works." and thus not copyrightable, which is not relevant in this case. The section "OK for buildings only" is irrelevant for this photo, and I am not referring to that. See the subsequent section "Artworks and sculptures" which states "For artworks, even if permanently installed in public places, the U.S. copyright law has no similar exception, and any publication of an image of a copyrighted artwork thus is subject to the approval of the copyright holder of the artwork." Note "even if", meaning even if not also applies. --17jiangz1 (talk) 22:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Enthält personenbezogene Daten, Datenquelle nicht plausibel Snoopy1964 (talk) 13:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Description says it's sourced to a newspaper, presumably copyrighted -M.nelson (talk) 13:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion and not sure whether it is in scope at all. --rubin16 (talk) 05:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BlauerBaum as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Der enthaltene Text ist CC-BY-4.0, jedoch nicht das Werk selbst. siehe [6] Jordi (talk) 16:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, there is no copyvio in this document: text has a free license, graphics are not protectable (lack of creativity).--Jordi (talk) 16:06, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Weak delete, Die Vermeidung einer möglichen Urheberrechtsverletzung wiegt für mich schwerer als der Wunsch die Datei zu behalten --Molgreen (talk) 04:19, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Verweis auf Diskussion weitere Diskussion im Bereich Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen
[edit]Hinweis: Im Bereich Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen gab es auch eine – aus meiner Sicht – nicht abgeschlossene Diskussion zu dieser Datei. --Molgreen (talk) 05:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Question What's the claim to a restrictive copyright? Is it credible? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: text is under a free license, other logos/pictures could be considered DM. --rubin16 (talk) 05:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 17jiangz1 as Dw no source since (dw no source since) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:05, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Koavf: I tagged the file as "DW no source" since the Indiana Tea Party logo was included and not sourced, and am unsure of the relevant copyright status/if above US:TOO, not with the intent to trigger deletion.--17jiangz1 (talk) 20:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- It's not clear to me that this is even copyright-able. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Koavf: Just to clarify, a "DW No source" tag is not a speedy deletion tag, just a request for the sourcing to be rectified to include any parent works.--17jiangz1 (talk) 20:38, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- It's not clear to me that this is even copyright-able. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete No indication that the creator released it under a free license - email proof should be verified through COM:OTRS. The Indiana Tea Party logo is likely copyrighted. -M.nelson (talk) 13:38, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and unfree logo included. --rubin16 (talk) 05:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
